Except that these days, saying, "fuck" doesn't imply anything whatsoever about the speakers emotions. "Fuck" is just a gratuitous bad word now, said for no reason other than to say it, for the most part.
> "Infotainment" is what it comes out to--part propaganda, > part sensationalism and yellow journalism, part > celebrity namedropping, with a smidge of actual > fact in there for taste.
But that's what we Americans want on our TVs. Who the hell cares about real news? Except for the pretentious among us, who watch the "news" on PBS and such.
My guess is it'll be owned by whoever occupies it, which will be fine until the environmentalist fringe starts complaining about how the Moon is being trashed by humans...
...is it the place of the Federal Government to regulate here?
Should this not be the jurisdiction of each State? I know that the Feds regulate against harassment in the workplace, but are there other examples of federal law concerning harassment in general? What makes "cyber" harassment special?
I'm not saying cyber-bullying should be allowed. But I am questioning whether it's within the federal government's jurisdiction.
Slashdot Mirror
STF. (sigh...)
Took deceased's gold dental fillings and wedding ring, left dirty old golf ball, SL.
TFTC!
I guess they'll keep all their interns at least 15 meters away from any interments .
[x] DeWitt.
Hey buddy, wanna buy some...air?
I'm not selling the bottle, just what's in it!
Except that these days, saying, "fuck" doesn't imply anything whatsoever about the speakers emotions. "Fuck" is just a gratuitous bad word now, said for no reason other than to say it, for the most part.
> FTFA
Oh my!
... especially when you have 4 hungry children and a crop in the field.
Oh, wait...
There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
Moral of the story: If you're afraid of driving, don't!
I've found it to be a cheap knockoff masquerading as something useful to wile away my valuable time.
DON'T CLICK ON THAT LINK!
It might be a phishing scam!
I admit it, I couldn't really tell the difference.
They both looked pretty good to me, unlike most of the videos that are all artifacty.
Ah yes, thank you. Much better defined difference.
> Why must people be so greedy that they have to use every
> unethical and immoral tactic there is to sustain their greedy growth?
Ah, that's easy.
Because their shareholders want their 401K's to be worth as much as possible by the time they retire.
Greed is the sole point of being in business (um.., usually).
Doh!
Maybe he meant:
1: Outlook cannot accept any incoming connection requests.
I couldn't see any difference in quality between the regular version and the "fmt=6" version of the skating dog.
Isn't the purpose of "shared folders" to allow access to the host file system from the VM?
Web filter at work says:
ACCESS DENIED!
Internet access to the requested website
has been denied.
URL: http://www.shareaza.com/
CAT: PR2PR
If you feel this website is blocked incorrectly,
you can submit a request for review.
Kind of sad, isn't it, that the United States Military Forces have to depend on Afghani cell phone service for tactical communications.
Or is that just what the Taliban thinks?
> "Infotainment" is what it comes out to--part propaganda,
> part sensationalism and yellow journalism, part
> celebrity namedropping, with a smidge of actual
> fact in there for taste.
But that's what we Americans want on our TVs. Who the hell cares about real news?
Except for the pretentious among us, who watch the "news" on PBS and such.
My guess is it'll be owned by whoever occupies it, which will be fine until the environmentalist fringe starts complaining about how the Moon is being trashed by humans...
...is it the place of the Federal Government to regulate here?
Should this not be the jurisdiction of each State?
I know that the Feds regulate against harassment in the workplace, but are there other examples of federal law concerning harassment in general? What makes "cyber" harassment special?
I'm not saying cyber-bullying should be allowed. But I am questioning whether it's within the federal government's jurisdiction.
Insightful, my ass.
It's a complete non-sequiter.
We hold people responsible for what they do (yes, even when done in response to someone else's actions) all the time.
> Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are in the Constitution.
Really familiar with The Constitution, are you?
Was that post a joke, or are you really as stupid as your sig makes you sound?
:-)
Yes, and (most likely, just ask my wife) Yes.