Slashdot Mirror


'Death Star' Aimed at Earth

An anonymous reader writes "A spectacular, rotating binary star system is a ticking time bomb, ready to throw out a searing beam of high-energy gamma rays that could lead to a major extinction event — and Earth may be right in the line of fire. Australian science magazine Cosmos Magazine reports: 'Though the risk may be remote, there is evidence that gamma ray bursts have swept over the planet at various points in Earth's history with a devastating effect on life. A 2005 study showed that a gamma-ray burst originating within 6,500 light years of Earth could be enough to strip away the ozone layer and cause a mass extinction. Researchers led by Adrian Melott at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, U.S., suggest that such an event may have been responsible for a mass extinction 443 million years ago, in the late Ordovician period, which wiped out 60 per cent of life and cooled the planet.'"

400 comments

  1. lies, Lies, LIES!!! by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    443 million years ago

    How do these fancy-pants "scientists" know what happened 442,994,000 years before Earth was created?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Easy, they asked me.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only that, but the event is "6,500 light years" away; that's far, far in the future. According to my Kansas Board of Education approved science book, Judgment will come upon us before that time.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by shafty023 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Time dilation is a strange thing. To the photons the travel is instantaneous. Yet for all other objects we have to "catch" up with them which in this case would be 6,500 yrs in the future. Of course for us to visit that location 6,500 light yrs away at our barbaric speeds it'd be 5 x 10^18 yrs till we got there. If photons have no understanding of time, and if the photons have already reached every point in space as soon as they are discharged, then why does it still take time for us to see them far away? Some things will never make sense.

    4. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Unless of course the event occurred 6499 years ago, in which case Judgment will be coming soon after all!!!!!11!!!

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    5. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by BoomerSooner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well at least we've figured out how to stop global warming :)

    6. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      And after this we'll all turn into Incredible Hulks when we get very very angry.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    7. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by mattcoz · · Score: 1

      How little do you mortals understand time.

    8. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't think I have ever read that photons travel instantaneously. Care to cite?

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    9. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by catbertz · · Score: 1

      does that mean we're dead already, and just don't know it yet? *cries*

    10. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Alyred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if I'm missing a joke in that your post is modded funny, but I think he was talking about perceived time from the reference of the photon. As they travel the speed of light, time dilation should slow down perceived time infinitely, if my memory of physics serves me.

      Subtle point, but interesting, thinking about it.

    11. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to the AOL message board, troll.

    12. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by asterix404 · · Score: 1

      Nono, thanks to evolution in about 6500 years we will all be immune to gamma radiation. Or at the very least those of us luckly enough to survive the nuclear winter.

    13. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're in an indeterminate state until someone opens the box.

    14. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1, Informative

      While it is 6,500 light years away, you also have to remember that what we are seeing now is an image from 6,500 years ago. For all we know, it could have already cone supernova 6,499 years ago, and we wouldn't know until next year.

    15. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      Proton torpedoes?

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    16. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Bloodfyre · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly...!

    17. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Well, does the box have airholes?

    18. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      How do these fancy-pants "scientists" know what happened 442,994,000 years before Earth was created?

      For that matter, how do they know it was 443 million years ago and not some other time in the past? Carbon-dating? Sure, if you can trust that it is going to be accurate. What do they have to prove their dating mechanism is even correct? Oh, they don't have proof that it is correct. I guess we have to take their word for it that carbon breaks down *all* the time at the *same* rate. Of course, we weren't around back then to actually measure it's half-life so we don't have a measuring stick to make sure the measuring stick is accurate.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    19. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      But we can never observe what actually happens at the speed of light, only what goes on as we pass infinitesimally close to it. Yes, time slows down to a dead crawl, but it's impossible for any observer to ever reach the speed of light. It's in effect a logical fallacy to attempt to apply our understanding of what goes on before the speed of light to what goes on at the speed of light.

      Einstein made a similar mistake in that he often wondered what an observer traveling at the speed of light would see. But he realised when he was older that the fundamental flaw in his thoughts was that no observer can ever travel at the speed of light, and so all speculation is impossible to confirm or dispute. What you're doing when you say that photons experience an infinite amount of time is misusing Calculus. To put it simply, you've effectively taken the limit of a function as we approach what could be a discontinuity, but you're now misrepresenting the limit's value as the value of the function at that point instead of the value that the function approaches.

      --
      SRSLY.
    20. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      No... no it is not carbon dating, which can only get us a few tens of thousands of years back. In stuff from 400 mya, all the radiocarbon has long since decayed.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    21. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Easy... they asked MacGuyver to build one with a microwave, a toothpick, and duct tape.

    22. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Would have helped if I said "A time machine using a microwave, a toothpick, and duct tape"...

    23. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by mikael · · Score: 1

      There is evidence that our planet has been hit by gamma ray bursts before - the radiation leaves microscopic trails in chert.

      Paleo-indian Catastrophe

      America got nuked in 12,500BC

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    24. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by aqk · · Score: 1

      WTF???

      What's with this "photons travel instantaneously"?

      What High school or "college" did you learn THAT in?
      Garner Ted Armstrong U?
      Or The LRH school of tin-can communication?

      Anyhow I HAVE a secret line to that death star!
      And I can attest that it put out a really bitchin' burst of gamma rays 3500 years ago! Hooo-eeee! Yowsa!

      So they should be hitting us pretty soon - in about 3000 years or so!
      Better have your tinfoil hats ready by then, Mr. Instant-Photonman!! Mine's all ready!


    25. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posts like this are why slashdotters have the perception that most Christians believe in young earth creationism (they don't - at least not outside of the USA)
      You're not funny, and you're not helping - the only way to make the young earthers go away, is to stop bringing it up before they do.

    26. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Yeff · · Score: 1

      I blame George Bush and global warming.

      --
      "Freedom Through Vigilance"
    27. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by msromike · · Score: 3, Funny

      The good news is that it will take 6500 years to arrive. The bad news is that it went Supernova 6499 years ago.

    28. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      No, just a Gieger counter, a particle of strontium 90 and a flask of hydrocyanic acid.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    29. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by multiferroic · · Score: 1

      Your ID here is way too high for this.

    30. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2, Funny

      But no everyone knows mass-extinctions are the result of Bush's refusal to sign ... what was the name of the accord signed by all those thousands of private jets that descended upon Bali again ?

    31. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      Duh! They carbon-dated washed-up Ark fragments.

    32. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      No, I think you'll find that it's only that SCIENTIFIC type of radiocarbon which has gone. There's bound to be a Carbon-481 theotope left out there for us REAL believers to find. Anyhow, I just spoke to the guy that tried to flog me a new 2-terabyte drive the other week and he tells me that in binary a few tens of thousands of years is much more.

    33. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      I'm going out on a limb here and assuming that you're talking about a 2008 ballot box. In that case, you're wrong: you're in 50 VERY deterministic states.

    34. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      We won't be immune to gamma radiation. It's a vector for evolution: it causes genetic mutations. As long as we can stay alive long enough to reproduce after being irradiated, we'll be something else BECAUSE of it. Not so much gamma radiation as delta population, if you will.

    35. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I used to have a three digit ID IIRC under the name "mcgrew", but lost /. passwords and changed email addresses took care of that.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    36. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reread the parent and sibling posts.

    37. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Aaron5367 · · Score: 1

      443 million years ago How do these fancy-pants "scientists" know what happened 442,994,000 years before Earth was created?
    38. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      No... no it is not carbon dating, which can only get us a few tens of thousands of years back. In stuff from 400 mya, all the radiocarbon has long since decayed.

      Sooooooo...are they just pulling 400 mya out of their ass? If not, care to offer up the way they would date this stuff if no carbon is left to date it?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    39. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger's_cat

      On weekends I explain Far Side comics.

    40. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I had realised that Schrodinger was being discussed here. I was attempting a pun, and something politically funny.

    41. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Someone modded me a TROLL!?!?!?! I was asking a freakin' question, not telling the guy he was an insensitive clod for chrissake. I was legitimately curious where he heard that.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    42. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I don't know why the post was then modded as a troll. Thanks for the info, I couldn't figure out what in the world he might be talking about.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    43. Re:lies, Lies, LIES!!! by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      They are almost certainly not. But no, I would not care to speculate on their methods, since I don't work in that field, and don't have the time to search out the relevant papers. There are other methods of estimating dates, you know.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  2. Thanks guys by NIckGorton · · Score: 5, Informative

    Further research would be required to determine if we are exactly in line with the axis of the system - but even if we are, we probably still have hundreds of thousands of years to come up with a solution, said Tuthill. Thanks for putting that at the end of TFA. Now I need to go change my shorts.
    1. Re:Thanks guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! If all these damn scientists would stop wasting precious resources (time, money, etc...) on discovering what could possibly occur in "hundreds of thousands of years" and instead started focusing on what could possibly occur in 1000 years, we'd likely be better off. Hell, for all we know, in under "hundreds of thousands of years" some massive force could shift Earth's orbit so much so that we plummet into the sun or fly off into space, and our planet and species may not even be around for these supposed gamma rays to do any harm in the first place...

    2. Re:Thanks guys by polar+red · · Score: 4, Funny

      errr ... "informative" ???

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    3. Re:Thanks guys by LOTHAR,+of+the+Hill · · Score: 1

      Was the article accompanied by a grant application?

      Sounds like one of those three steps to profit schemes...

    4. Re:Thanks guys by KwKSilver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not only that, but the star is 8000 light years distant, and the danger-zone was cited as 6500 light years. Even allowing for a 10% error in both figures...

      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    5. Re:Thanks guys by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

      Ok, so why is the above post marked 'interesting'?

      Oh! It must be because someone actually RTFA! :P

      --
      Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    6. Re:Thanks guys by Shinmizu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I, for one, wanted to know whether he was wearing shorts, something else, or nothing at all.

    7. Re:Thanks guys by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Further research would be required to determine if we are exactly in line with the axis of the system - but even if we are, we probably still have hundreds of thousands of years to come up with a solution, said Tuthill.
      Thanks for putting that at the end of TFA. Now I need to go change my shorts.
      No problem, after a few hundreds of thousands of years, we'll have moved out of the path of that death star.

      Or, maybe we'll get lucky, and the gamma rays will hit the giant space goat just as it arrives. Two problems solved at once...
    8. Re:Thanks guys by tattood · · Score: 1

      discovering what could possibly occur in "hundreds of thousands of years" and instead started focusing on what could possibly occur in 1000 years
      They're not talking about what could happen in a few hundred thousand years. The stars are 8000 light years away, which means that we are looking at the stars as they were 8000 years ago. This means that the stars could have gone supernova 7999 years ago, and it's 1 year until that radiation hits Earth.

      Another interesting thing: If the stars are 8000 light years away, and a gamma burst from 6500 light years is enough to damage the ozone layer, is that extra 1500 light years of distance enough of a buffer that we would be safe?
      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    9. Re:Thanks guys by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      I am no scientist - but I get from your post, and I wondered about this:

      If this star shoots out a gamma ray WMD directly at the Earth RIGHT NOW - won't it take at least 8000years to get here? Nothing travels faster than the speed of light, yes?

    10. Re:Thanks guys by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are correct, but as the light we are seeing from the star right now also traveled the same distance. It could have shot out a gamma ray 7,999 years ago and we could be toast within the year. I am no scientist either, but I figure both light waves would travel at the same speed.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    11. Re:Thanks guys by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      But going by that logic we wouldn't know until it got here. It could have shot a gamma ray 7990 years ago and in 10 years we'd have a nice surprise.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    12. Re:Thanks guys by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we wouldn't know until the wave hit us. For all intents and purposes, the star exists in our current reference frame in the state that we observe it in. It's not like you can see the star explode and then say, "Ok, we've got 8,000 years to get our act together.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    13. Re:Thanks guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mind me I'm just quoting the article, you know, the one that ends with "Further research would be required to determine if we are exactly in line with the axis of the system - but even if we are, we probably still have hundreds of thousands of years to come up with a solution, said Tuthill.", Tuthill being the "lead researcher". IANAS, but I imagine that he is implying that it takes "hundreds of thousands of years" for the whole exploding supernova process to complete...

    14. Re:Thanks guys by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      Funny that all three posts say exactly the same thing.

      You guys must've posted at exactly the same time!

      Thanks for the clarification...

    15. Re:Thanks guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is science the only profession where if you're not curing cancer or feeding the poor, you're wasting your time? What have you done to save the Earth today, asshole?

    16. Re:Thanks guys by kryliss · · Score: 0

      If that were so then wouldn't see some sort of "Gamma Ray Disturbance" much closer to us than the actual binary star source due to the "Death Ray" traveling towards us at the speed of light as well? Take for instance this thing shot out a ray about 4000 years ago, we would see a "Gamma Ray Disturbance" 4000 light years away.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    17. Re:Thanks guys by Intron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "we probably still have hundreds of thousands of years to come up with a solution, said Tuthill."

      Which leads us to the interesting question: If we knew we were in danger and had 100,000 years to do something about it, what would be the simplest solution?

      1) Move everybody somewhere else
      2) Put up shields
      3) Move the Solar system out of the way
      4) Point the Supernova at the Arcturans instead

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    18. Re:Thanks guys by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The first rule of research is that more research is always needed. You don't see too many papers that end with "Yep, that's everything" :)

    19. Re:Thanks guys by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 1

      Or it could already be on it's way...

      Or not.

    20. Re:Thanks guys by flosofl · · Score: 2, Funny

      If that were so then wouldn't see some sort of "Gamma Ray Disturbance" much closer to us than the actual binary star source due to the "Death Ray" traveling towards us at the speed of light as well? Take for instance this thing shot out a ray about 4000 years ago, we would see a "Gamma Ray Disturbance" 4000 light years away.
      Uh, no, we can not see events 4000 light light years away instantaneously. We would have to wait 4,000 years before the image of that Gamma Ray Disturbance reached Earth. At which time I believe we would be far to busy to notice. You know, with the actual Gamma Ray arriving at the same time.
      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    21. Re:Thanks guys by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the star is 8000 light years distant, and the danger-zone was cited as 6500 light years. Even allowing for a 10% error in both figures... ... and besides, who needs gamma ray bursts anyway? We humans already are already doing an excellent job of driving everything to extinction that gets in our way.
      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    22. Re:Thanks guys by kalirion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he meant a "Disturbance in the Force" as planets four thousand light years away from us are wiped out. Force Disturbances, as I understand it, travel at subspace speeds at least.

    23. Re:Thanks guys by James+McGuigan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      5) The political answer, it would cost too much, so lets forget about it and allow future generations figure something out

    24. Re:Thanks guys by Follis · · Score: 1

      Why?

    25. Re:Thanks guys by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      Why? That's a very good question. I was asking that pretty much all the way through the article and the comments that followed.
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    26. Re:Thanks guys by JordanH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You guys must've posted at exactly the same time!

      You don't know that. Some of the posters might have been relatively further away and it just took the message longer to get to you, but they might have posted at earlier.

      Or, maybe that's the point...

    27. Re:Thanks guys by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      If this star shoots out a gamma ray WMD directly at the Earth RIGHT NOW - won't it take at least 8000years to get here? Nothing travels faster than the speed of light, yes? But it might have happened 7999.9 years ago and we've got no way of knowing until the gamma rays get here.
    28. Re:Thanks guys by rmerry72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only that, but the star is 8000 light years distant, and the danger-zone was cited as 6500 light years.

      Gamma rays don't suddenly stop dead in their tracks at 6500 light years, nor do they dissipate that fast. Gamma rays are light and the fact that we can see this star (and those thousands of times further away) indicates that if a large burst of gammas was flung in our direction we'd be well in the path. There was a recent episode of The Universe that covered this possibility. Nothing we can do about it however.

      --
      We do not inherit the Earth from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
    29. Re:Thanks guys by rmerry72 · · Score: 1

      If this star shoots out a gamma ray WMD directly at the Earth RIGHT NOW - won't it take at least 8000years to get here?

      As I'm sure others have/will point out, sure, but what if the star shot it out around 6,000 BC our time. All light travels at the speed of light on a vacuum (and gamma rays are light and space is almost a vacuum most of the time) so we are viewing the star 8000 years ago. We won't know what's happened to the star RIGHT NOW for another 8000 years - assuming it doesn't burp before then and we're still here.

      --
      We do not inherit the Earth from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
    30. Re:Thanks guys by rmerry72 · · Score: 1

      You don't see too many papers that end with "Yep, that's everything" :)

      Except String theory :-> More like "That's everything, you just can't observe, measure or test it. Now give us grant money anyway!"

      --
      We do not inherit the Earth from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
    31. Re:Thanks guys by TekPolitik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny that all three posts say exactly the same thing... You guys must've posted at exactly the same time!

      Only from your frame of reference.

    32. Re:Thanks guys by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      It would seem to be quite unlikely for any object to be directly in line with the axis of they system, even the Earth. Given the distance that would be, what, a couple milli-arcs off being a clean miss?

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    33. Re:Thanks guys by Cecil · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope. The light, radiowaves, whatever we might use to detect this disturbance would also travel at the speed of light. Put simply, information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Outside of science fiction, and pending further discoveries in physics, there is absolutely no way to realistically know anything beyond the speed of light, everything we see or detect has already happened. The speed of light is a harsh mistress indeed.

      The only thing we can do is rely on predictions based on our existing knowledge of physics that a light-speed event will soon begin, or continue. But we will never be able to know for certain that it's happened until it's upon us. By analogy, we know the sun will continue shining its light at us because we know that even in the worst case scenario, a collapse of its internal fusion reactions would take millions of years and we could see signs that such an event was happening, such as seeing that its hydrogen fuel supplies were about to run out. However, if there is some previously unknown method of collapse that is instantaneous and the sun looked entirely normal until it happened, then it would be entirely possible that the sun has already shut down and in 1 to 8 minutes we are about to realize that today is definitely not a good day.

    34. Re:Thanks guys by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      Don't complain. It's not like someone here expected you to read it here... :P

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    35. Re:Thanks guys by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      Every philosopher up to the postmodernists ended up with that phrase. And most of the postmodernists did when they hit the chat show circuit.

    36. Re:Thanks guys by PJ+The+Womble · · Score: 1

      I'm not a scientist, I'm a software engineer (or that's what they told me when I left college anyway). But isn't the nature of science that we can only BELIEVE in ideas until they're disproven? Don't we BELIEVE that the sun will continue shining because we BELIEVE that in the worst case scenario [...] we MIGHT BE ABLE TO see signs that such an event was happening[?] Mind you, I'm reassured in my unwavering belief in metanarratives before paradigm shifts by my elders and betters here... http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm

    37. Re:Thanks guys by torgis · · Score: 1

      the second rule of research is that you do NOT talk about research!

  3. Thanks Global Warming by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If these rays cool the planet, and Global Warming warms the planet, we should stay a nice luke-warm and be fine, right?

    If not, can't we just count on that layer of lead-based space debris to block the gamma rays? No? well then, feets don't fail me now!

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Thanks Global Warming by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      If these rays cool the planet, and Global Warming warms the planet, we should stay a nice luke-warm and be fine, right?

      Except for the searing ultraviolet from a lack of ozone, I would say you are about spot on.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Thanks Global Warming by ajs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If these rays cool the planet, and Global Warming warms the planet, we should stay a nice luke-warm and be fine, right? You're mis-reading the quote. The event cooled the planet, not the rays. Likely that was a result of secondary effects. For example, killing 60% of living things would result in lots of barren land which would produce large amounts of dust. That may have been what produced the cooling effect.

    3. Re:Thanks Global Warming by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's plenty of time to buy stock in companies which make suntan lotion, sunblock, sunglasses, etc.

    4. Re:Thanks Global Warming by Vexor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everybody know that's Nuclear Winter will cancel out Global Warming.

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
    5. Re:Thanks Global Warming by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      Since Ozone is a greenhouse gas, being stripped of the ozone layer would seem to act as a brake on global warming.

    6. Re:Thanks Global Warming by piemcfly · · Score: 1

      Extra long term investors are rejoicing.

      Now, when the babyboom of 443002008 (four hundred forty-three million two thousand eight) hits, they'll be ready!
      Our future galactic overlords shall be pleased to know that thanks to this discovery, they won't have to go through pension-fund and healthcare reforms!

    7. Re:Thanks Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try again Sherlock. The ozone layer is a very high layer of oxygen that is exposed sun's full UV output and acts as a filter against it. It is only a problem when close to the ground. Its UV shielding effect is far greater than any small greenhouse affect it can have.

    8. Re:Thanks Global Warming by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 1

      What will my mutual funds be worth then?

      Lessee, assuming a 1% rate of return (assuming a GWB economic growth curve), 1.1^443002008 = Invalid input for function.

      Sweet!

    9. Re:Thanks Global Warming by zienth · · Score: 1

      Unless the enemy has studied his Agrippa... which I have.

    10. Re:Thanks Global Warming by irtza · · Score: 1

      http://www.ucsusa.org/ssi/archive/ozone-climate-connection.html seems like a decent read on this. I don't think the GP was too far off base. perhaps not the most significant thing, but still the GP was correct.

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    11. Re:Thanks Global Warming by JLF65 · · Score: 1

      The pollution around cities compensates for the lack of ozone. In fact, ozone is usually a common component of pollution. Funny how ozone way up high is good, but ozone down near the ground is "pollution". :D

    12. Re:Thanks Global Warming by arodland · · Score: 1

      the math gets a lot easier when you factor in the GWB inflation curve as well...

    13. Re:Thanks Global Warming by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. How many /. readers actually go outside?

      Nobody would notice.

    14. Re:Thanks Global Warming by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      Wow that's an excellent comeback. Too bad it's missing the entire point by injecting an orthogonal concern and a value judgment where none existed before.

  4. Oh come on! by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean I've been driving a Prius and spending my beer money on renewable energy only to have this happen!??!

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Oh come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I blame that bitch princess that wouldn't tell the beings from Omicron Persei Eight where the rebel base is.

    2. Re:Oh come on! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least you have learned to love the smell of your own farts.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Oh come on! by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Enough smug in the atmosphere might just be able to shield us from the gamma ray burst.

    4. Re:Oh come on! by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Enough smug in the atmosphere might just be able to shield us from the gamma ray burst.
      So the Apple Store is the safest place to be?
  5. Uhhhh by jag7720 · · Score: 1

    This is so completely stupid... next we will find out that the sun will burn out in 6 million years.... crap, there goes my retirement.

    1. Re:Uhhhh by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

      That's alright, the sun should be good for another 10 billion, give or take a few.

      O'course, the earth will be uninhabitable in about 7 billion, so...

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Uhhhh by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're forgetting about the photino birds.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  6. Episode of Sliders by celnick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Didn't I see this when it was an episode of Sliders. For once, my watching an obscure science fiction show comes in handy. There was a parallel earth where a pulsar was heading towards earth and was gonna irradiate it and cause a mass extinction event.

    Good show, had some hot geeky chicks on it for awhile.

    --
    "Write the bad things that are done to you in sand, but write the good things that happen to you on a piece of marble."
    1. Re:Episode of Sliders by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The science on that episode (and most later episodes) was like the computer terminology thrown around in Hackers-- if you knew how wrong it was, it was almost painful to watch/hear. IIRC, the pulsars looked like empty toilet paper rolls with light coming out of the ends. And they didn't just irradiate Earth and leave it physically intact but lifeless, they made it blow up. Ugh, I'm shaking my head in disgust at the mere memory of it.

      That show started off great and is 100% responsible for me getting interested in the alternate-history genre. Unfortunately, after the creator left they just resorted to stealing movie plots and it got downright ridiculous and pathetic.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:Episode of Sliders by hardburn · · Score: 1

      In fact, I think it was that exact set of episodes where the professor gets killed and the show officially jumped the shark.

      --
      Not a typewriter
  7. OH NOES by snarfies · · Score: 1

    We're doomed.

    Oh, wait, HOW long will it take this radiation to reach Earth from 6,500 light years away?

    1. Re:OH NOES by NIckGorton · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, wait, HOW long will it take this radiation to reach Earth from 6,500 light years away? Next Thursday if it went Supernova 6,499.99 years ago.
    2. Re:OH NOES by kemenaran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that we see the star as it was 6500 years ago. As far as we know, it could have already exploded, and a good bunch of gamma rays be coming to us right now. So you were right, we're doomed ^^

    3. Re:OH NOES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would happen instantaneously from our POV.

    4. Re:OH NOES by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      I dunno, did it look like it was about to go nova any time in the near future 6500 years ago?

    5. Re:OH NOES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that we see the star as it was 6500 years ago. As far as we know, it could have already exploded, and a good bunch of gamma rays be coming to us right now.

      So you were right, we're doomed ^^ Well hey, quite obviously we need to have some interstellar outpost that could alert us to this this potential disaster.
    6. Re:OH NOES by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's not like we're going to see it much longer before we also feel it.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:OH NOES by hardburn · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for a smarty-pants (but wrong) astrophysicist to flame you for not recognizing that unless an event's light cone hits you, it hasn't actually happened yet.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    8. Re:OH NOES by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      And don't forget that we have closer neighbors that can cause us a lot more trouble.

      For example Betelgeuse is a read supergiant about 527 lightyears away. (the distance seems to be very unclear, one source says 586, another says 310, Google says 427, but one thing is at least clear IT'S THERE)

      Anyway if that star decides to go supernova (or any other in our neighborhood) we will get a slight tan at least... And according to some experts Betelgeuse is ripe for blowing.

      So it's likely that we are going to experience a supernova or any other stellar event that affects our world in a much more severe manner than we can do ourselves. The only question is when - and it is no idea to worry about it since we can do very little about it.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:OH NOES by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And faster than light communications, otherwise the message will reach us at eh same time as the radiation.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    10. Re:OH NOES by berashith · · Score: 1

      What exactly would I do with a message that says "you have about 3 seconds to live" ?

      Im not sure we would get the shields up on time.

    11. Re:OH NOES by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      message: Ha Ha

      Then the gamma ray hits.

    12. Re:OH NOES by SleptThroughClass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next Thursday if it went Supernova 6,499.99 years ago.
      Oh, good. I have plans this Thursday but not next Thursday.
    13. Re:OH NOES by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      While we may not have all of the information regarding a star exploding into a supernova, I'd expect that there is at least some sort of indication that the star is nearing the end of its life. In a stars lifetime, the collapse and supernova event may be nearly 'instant', but 10,000 years is nothing when compared to the overall lifetime of a star.

      Given our short lifetimes when compared to that of the universe, we are a bit like the highspeed cameras that are used to capture explosions. In our frame of reference, a popping balloon is a near instantaneous event, but to the camera it is a long, drawn out affair.

      I would imagine that a supernova is similar. Instantaneous from the 'point-of-view' of a star, but aeons to a human.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    14. Re:OH NOES by stjobe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd expect that there is at least some sort of indication that the star is nearing the end of its life.
      We can try to figure out what it's burning. The star can burn hydrogen and helium happily for millions and millions of years, but when it runs out of that it's gonna start on carbon, which might last it a thousand years or so, and then it's on to neon for a couple of years, and then oxygen for a few months before finally burning silicon for a few hours before the big show.

      In a stars lifetime, the collapse and supernova event may be nearly 'instant', but 10,000 years is nothing when compared to the overall lifetime of a star.
      I fear that you are mistaken. The collapse and supernova event is for all intents and purposes instant even in our timeframe. The core collapses in as little as a quarter of a second, the core bounce is over in a millisecond and the explosion lasts for about ten seconds. Quote Wikipedia (emphasis mine):

      When the core's size exceeds the Chandrasekhar limit, degeneracy pressure can no longer support it, and catastrophic collapse ensues. The outer part of the core reaches velocities of up to 70,000 km/s (23% of the speed of light) as it collapses toward the center of the star. The rapidly shrinking core heats up, producing high-energy gamma rays that decompose iron nuclei into helium nuclei and free neutrons (via photodisintegration). As the core's density increases, it becomes energetically favorable for electrons and protons to merge (via inverse beta decay), producing neutrons and elementary particles called neutrinos. Because neutrinos rarely interact with normal matter they can escape from the core, carrying away energy and further accelerating the collapse, which proceeds over a timescale of milliseconds. As the core detaches from the outer layers of the star, some of these neutrinos are absorbed by the star's outer layers, beginning the supernova explosion.
      So no, a star doesn't just randomly explode, but when it's time to go it goes. And if it's not too small, it's going to go with a really interesting lightshow.

      I would imagine that a supernova is similar. Instantaneous from the 'point-of-view' of a star, but aeons to a human.
      No, a supernova is most certainly a very brief event. The remnants of that event might linger on for "aeons", but the event itself is surprisingly quick even for a distant observer. Wikipedia again: "A supernova causes a burst of radiation that may briefly outshine its entire host galaxy before fading from view over several weeks or months."
      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    15. Re:OH NOES by stjobe · · Score: 1

      Betelgeuse is a big star, yes, and close (relatively speaking). But just to keep things in perspective: There are much bigger stars out there.

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    16. Re:OH NOES by sco08y · · Score: 1

      As far as we know, it could have already exploded

      We do know one thing for sure. It's not a goddamned "ticking time bomb."

    17. Re:OH NOES by the_bard17 · · Score: 1

      Suddenly, I feel much much smaller.

    18. Re:OH NOES by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a bit sloppy with my post, thank you for clarifying the process.

      The point I was trying to make was that a star just doesn't go supernova from a normal star with no 'warning' Of course, the last phase just before it reaches the Chandrasekhar limit is very short, and the subsequent collapse IS effectively instantaneous.

      But it shows that the star does go through a 'series' of collapses. It was those collapses that I was clumsily referring to as giving off indicators.

      For example, if the star did go nova '7999' years ago, then we would see that it was already burning carbon which would be a pretty good indicator that we were set for a light show.

      The real question I have is why the astronomers seem to think that the supernova event is so near, yet outside of the normal timeline by which they should be able to determine that it is so near. If it was burning Helium, you could expect it to last one to one million years. But if it was already on Carbon, then you could be fairly certain that it would only be a few thousand at most.

      This is just guessing on my part, but I wonder if they are only detecting that it is burning Helium, but that the combination of the second star in the system is 'feeding' the WR star, causing its 'life' to accelerate.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  8. Don't tase me, bro ... by BenBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Had to be said ...

    1. Re:Don't tase me, bro ... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      no..no it didn't.. I'm almost certain no one had a gun to your head, even then it would have been worth it for you to take the bullet rather than repeat that tired joke.

    2. Re:Don't tase me, bro ... by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean: "Don't irradiate me, bro!"

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  9. Well guys.. by ben0207 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was nice knowing you.

    --
    cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    1. Re:Well guys.. by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must've been new here.

    2. Re:Well guys.. by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Informative

      It was nice knowing you.

      It's OK! Barack Obama will know what to do! If this thing can just... hold... off... until... next... year.

      Maybe if we just planned an unconditional sit-down with the people running that star, they'd like us again.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Well guys.. by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      Nah, It's probably better to ignore them. That will make them see things our way better then talking to them :-)

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    4. Re:Well guys.. by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, It's probably better to ignore them. That will make them see things our way better then talking to them :-)

      I suppose it's possible you haven't seen the fine documentary, Mars Attacks. Well you should, mister.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Well guys.. by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Well, he wioll haven been new here.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  10. lead paint by spikenerd · · Score: 4, Funny

    I own a very old house with lead paint all over the ceiling. Since your survival depends on renting my basement, I think I'll start the bidding at $100,000/mo+utils, no pets.

    1. Re:lead paint by berashith · · Score: 1

      no no no ...
      you should rent it out for 1$ a month starting now. Since there is little likelihood of someone getting there in time, you can rent it to A LOT of people, and use is first come first served. Now, you can rake in from a huge population segment for a few million years while waiting. The renters pay so low that they wont think of the insurance you are offering as expensive, and you will be rich as hell.

      BTW, this is not the business model of the company I work for , nope, no way.

    2. Re:lead paint by HeavensBlade23 · · Score: 1

      No self respecting slashdotter would ever live in a basement!

    3. Re:lead paint by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      >No self respecting slashdotter would ever admit to living in a basement!

      Fixed that for you. You're welcome

    4. Re:lead paint by emilper · · Score: 1

      In fact, lead would not help, since gamma rays would create more radiation, and even more dangerous radiation, when crossing lead, if I remember well my physics classes from long ago.

      I would suggest water. A couple of hundred meters.

    5. Re:lead paint by rmerry72 · · Score: 1

      No self respecting slashdotter would ever live in a basement!

      Why should I leave my basement? Do you know of the vile, evil, stupid creatures that infect this planet? Maybe this gamma ray burst can sterilise the surface then I might come upstairs. I can hunker down for a few thousand years if that's what it takes.

      --
      We do not inherit the Earth from our parents. We borrow it from our children.
    6. Re:lead paint by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I don't have $100k. Would an unused shotgun shell do? If not, maybe you'd accept a (recently) used shotgun shell, instead?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:lead paint by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      If not, maybe you'd accept a (recently) used shotgun shell, instead?
      Actualy the deal's even better. You get to keep the shell, he receives the little metal balls.
      spikenerd, you intrested in renting a kevlar pants? I'll start the bidding at 100,000 euro/mo.
  11. No Fear by zgregoryg · · Score: 0

    8,000 light years away? Well if we make it another 8,000 years then we can worry about it.

    1. Re:No Fear by sm62704 · · Score: 2

      You don't know that it didn't already go nova 8000 years ago.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:No Fear by Amouth · · Score: 1

      except we are looking at it from our point of view.. which is what it looked like 8,000 light years away.. which means it is posiable to that ithas gone off.. just .. the light and gama ray's havn't gotten here yet..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:No Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not how it works. If it's 8000 light years away and it exploded 7999 years ago, the burst would hit us next year. Oops.

  12. Not my problem by dasbush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Further research would be required to determine if we are exactly in line with the axis of the system - but even if we are, we probably still have hundreds of thousands of years to come up with a solution, said Tuthill. I'll just leave this little problem to my great(x1428) grandchildren to deal with.
    1. Re:Not my problem by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Slashdot readers don't have girlfriends and therefore don't have children.

    2. Re:Not my problem by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      Wait a second... minimum 100000 years, 1428 generations... That's at least 70 years a generation! You'll be lucky if no one breaks a hip during childbirth!

    3. Re:Not my problem by EMeta · · Score: 1

      Hacking sperm banks FTW!

  13. 30 minutes until we're in range. by Aegis+Runestone · · Score: 1

    "30 minutes until we're in range of the Earth."
    "No, I say we're in range now."
    *Jupiter, and Mars are destroyed, and on earth*
    "... Oh crap."

    --
    -Aegis Runestone-
    1. Re:30 minutes until we're in range. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      So obscure.

      But it was funny as hell.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  14. Gamma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    So if 60% of us are wiped out, what kinds of superpowers can the rest of us expect?

    1. Re:Gamma? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      If happens close enough, the remaining 40% will be superpowder.

  15. No problem by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is really no problem at all. I'm sure we'll find a critical flaw in the star that will allow us to destroy it in the nick of time. Possibly an exhaust port or something like that.

    1. Re:No problem by explosivejared · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we can just take the routine "nuke it from orbit... it's the only way to be sure" actions. Whew!!! Problem solved!!

      Wait! What do you mean stars are basically just big long continuous nuclear reactions and nuking it only makes it worse?!

      I agree with that guy earlier... we're doomed.

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    2. Re:No problem by Arimus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, exhaust port is out. I put some chicken mesh over the exhaust port and held it place with blutack and duck tape - nothing will dislodge the combined powers of the dark forces holding the mesh in place.

      I've also trained the gunners as to what the rebel ships look like and what the empire ships look like together with electro therapy they now know what to shoot at.

      The major commander on the death star will not be on board one of the fighters defending it.

      And anyway when the heroes first arrive on the station they will be taken, under armed guard, placed against the nearest wall and shot. Following being shot they will have their heads chopped off while I watch giving no chance for them to stage a stunning escape and disrupt my evil plans. This death will lack drama will be simple, won't go wrong, will make a mess - but hey, I've got an army of evil underlings who can clean up.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    3. Re:No problem by ozbird · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, exhaust port is out. I put some chicken mesh over the exhaust port and held it place with blutack and duck tape - nothing will dislodge the combined powers of the dark forces holding the mesh in place.

      No problem, we'll just use a frozen chicken.

    4. Re:No problem by Arimus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Argh.... foiled.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    5. Re:No problem by Ironlenny · · Score: 1

      I see that you have read Peter's Evil Overlord List http://www.eviloverlord.com/lists/overlord.html

      --
      There is a system for subverting the system and you should use that system!
    6. Re:No problem by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you are going to worry about absurdity, you should start with someone capable of interstellar travel waging wars of control, and the other guy, who is also capable of interstellar travel, doing something other than running away.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:No problem by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Excellent. We'll just steal some of the empire's ships (thanks a lot for conditioning your gunners not to attack them), and equip them with missiles loaded with a combination of Febreeze and WD-40.

  16. Please God, no... by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Funny

    if years > 6000 and state == Kansas: Bad_Evolution_Jokes()

    1. Re:Please God, no... by andphi · · Score: 1

      I think that function name is malformed. You forgot the verb. :) Should it have been getBadEvolutionJokes, putBadEvolutionJokes, listBadEvolutionJokes or modDownBadEvolutionJokes?

    2. Re:Please God, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while(1){ doBadEvolutionJokes(Nerd news); {

  17. From TFA by pedropolis · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A 2005 study showed that a gamma-ray burst originating within 6,500 light years of Earth could be enough to strip away the ozone layer and cause a mass extinction." The system in question is 8,000 light years away. So it's all good. Besides, we all know Uranus gets hit first...

    1. Re:From TFA by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      Besides, we all know Uranus gets hit first... Only if you remember to duck and cover.
    2. Re:From TFA by ziggy00001 · · Score: 1

      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.
      Fry: Oh. What's it called now?
      Professor Hubert Farnsworth: Urrectum. Here, let me locate it for you.

  18. Finally.. by snehoej · · Score: 1

    Bring out your tin foil hats people!

    1. Re:Finally.. by Torn8-R · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't we put paper bags over our heads and lay down or something?

    2. Re:Finally.. by David+Gould · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't we put paper bags over our heads and lay down or something? Sure, if it makes you feel better.
      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  19. Yeah, I'm really gonna worry about this by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    With time lags between events of 400-plus million years, I really have to worry about this happening in my lifetime.

    Nitwits.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Yeah, I'm really gonna worry about this by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      This start might have exploded 399 million years, 11 months, 30 days and 23 hours ago. So you'll its gamma ray burst will reach the Earth in an hour.

    2. Re:Yeah, I'm really gonna worry about this by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      You sir, are absolutely correct. Science that may not be directly applicable in your lifetime is utterly worthless. Here's to hoping you were only being sarcastic and my sarcasmometer is just having a faulty moment.

    3. Re:Yeah, I'm really gonna worry about this by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no.

      The star is 8000 lightyears from earth, not 400M LY. So assuming gamma rays travel at light speed, the star could've exploded a while back, and we'll be figuring it out pretty soon.

      The reason why it's unlikely is that the state of the star, as we see it now (8000 years ago), doesn't appear to be ready to go Real Soon Now.

      If the star was 400 million light years away, the gamma ray burst seems unlikely to do anything but make an orbiting sensor wake up and go "huh?"

    4. Re:Yeah, I'm really gonna worry about this by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Never said anything about the science. I just said I'm not gonna worry about an event whose last recorded incidence was 400 million years ago.

      That was the focus of the stupid Slashdot headline - that Earth was in the path of a gamma ray burst that might happen nobody knows when. Since the last one that might have affected Earth was 400 million years ago, I allow that it might not happen before I can be transmogrified into a Transhuman in the next 50 years and blow this joint anyway.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  20. Cool ! by kemenaran · · Score: 1

    The first thought I had reading this was "hey, this is coool !" Honestly, what is better than to be destroyed by a huge cosmic gamma-ray beam ? It's even better than to be wiped out by huge vogons spaceships to make room for a galactic highway !

    1. Re:Cool ! by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, at least we don't have to listen to their damned poetry!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Cool ! by masticina · · Score: 1

      Well if that coincides with this Vogon Poetry Contest I got invited to, you know you may go in my place!

      --
      Codefile Defected to another Hexadimal Range refresh your CHAOSTACK.NLM file with a new copy
  21. heh... by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

    Well, at least is cooled the planet...

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Impossible by wumpus188 · · Score: 4, Funny

    John Titor would have warned us.

    1. Re:Impossible by __aailob1448 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google John Titor for the funny.

  24. Hmm let's think about this a sec... by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

    At a distance of 8,000 light years from Earth, the pair of stars are a short hop away in galactic terms

    And we are looking back 8000 years from today, since light took us 8,000 years to get to us. It will take another 8,000 years for a gamma blast to get to us. Something tells me were out of harms way.

    1. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      And we are looking back 8000 years from today, since light took us 8,000 years to get to us. It will take another 8,000 years for a gamma blast to get to us. Something tells me were out of harms way.


      My god, man, think of the children! Someone please think of the children!
      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      If it did then we would know about it, real soon. But, for every day it doesn't the more and more we move away from being lined up. If it happened 7000 years ago, it will be another 1000 years before we see anything.

    3. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 1

      Unless the GRB was 8000 years less an hour ago.

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    4. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by neil-ngc · · Score: 1

      Your not that bright, are you? Whatever causes the beam to go off could have happenned 7999 years, 364 days ago, and we wouldn't have any idea until we see and experience it at the same time - tomorrow.

      But realistically - I think the mass extinction scenario that's more likely is a Yellowstone eruption...seems like one's overdue, plus or minus perhaps tens of thousands of years. That's a lot less zeroes than this star thing.

      I'm not going to lose any sleep over something some distance star does every trillion years or so.

    5. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      I guess not, physics degree aside. I have no doubt that if it were to happen that relatively soon, from the article they don't mention the probabilities, I'm sure it would be plastered all over the news if it was a risk to us anytime soon. From what I've seen in regards to astronomical occurrences we have a far higher probability of being hit by an asteroid than this thing, and only if it's a 100% certain a GRB would happen. Then again nature can be cruel.

    6. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your not that bright.

      The behavior of the object changes as it approaches the super nova event. We don't see any of the changes happening. Probably won't for millions of years.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by neil-ngc · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it would be plastered all over the news if it was a risk to us anytime soon

      That's kind of my point. Based on TFA, this is something which could conceivably happen, though the timespans mentioned seem to indicate that the odds of it happenning in our lifetimes are ridiculously low.

      But if it were to go off, we'd have no warning. Yes, we wouldn't experience the event until 8000 years after it happenned, but since radiation travels at the speed of light, it would arrive at the same time as any visible indications. Your initial post seemed to indicate that we would see something, and then it would be another 8000 years before the radiation hits.

    8. Re:Hmm let's think about this a sec... by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1
      After re-reading what I wrote, I see what you mean. My bad, based on the author stating at the end of the article

      hundreds of thousands of years We should be out of the path "of destruction" before then.
  25. Cosmos Magazine reports by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> Cosmos Magazine reports

    Other articles include:

    10 Fabulous Handbags for the Apocalypse
    Is Your Man Cheating? Find Out With A Quantum Telescope.
    Lose Weight Fast - New Dark Matter Diet.

    1. Re:Cosmos Magazine reports by iamajs · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you aren't talking about cnn?

    2. Re:Cosmos Magazine reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is Your Man Cheating? Find Out With A Quantum Telescope. Careful. You might change the outcome by observing it.
  26. Mass Extinction by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only roaches, rats, and Steve Ballmer will live...

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Mass Extinction by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      ... or we could all develop super powers.

    2. Re:Mass Extinction by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, your superpower is the ability to grow your nails really fast.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Mass Extinction by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Why would the rats survive?

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    4. Re:Mass Extinction by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      I know; cockroaches and Balmer are a given... but rats?

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    5. Re:Mass Extinction by jalsk · · Score: 1

      I think you're being redundant there...

    6. Re:Mass Extinction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it worked for that hairy X-Man dude, didn't it?

  27. We can hope ... by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The problem is that we see the star as it was 6500 years ago. As far as we know, it could have already exploded, and a good bunch of gamma rays be coming to us right now. So you were right, we're doomed ^^

    It'll at least spare us any more Chillary.

    Oh, wait - we're doomed either way. F$ck! I knew I should have stayed in bed!

  28. I asked GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    God, a ./'er asked"

    How do these fancy-pants "scientists" know what happened 442,994,000 years before Earth was created?

    God: Don't bug me, it is still the 7th day.

    Human: Can't be!

    God: You think 1 day to me is like one day to you? You arrogant twit, 1 billion of your years is one day to me.

    1. Re:I asked GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would explain why his ping sucks in TF2.

    2. Re:I asked GOD by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whip out your concordance. The Hebrew word for "day" used in Genesis isn't meant to be metaphorical; it's a literal, 24-hour period of time.

      If you assume that everything in the Bible is no deeper than a convoluted historical document, you're missing a lot.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    3. Re:I asked GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      If you believe that everything contradicting a literal interpretation of the Bible is a lie, you're missing even more.

    4. Re:I asked GOD by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of an old joke:

      A man has gained an audience with God.

      Man: Oh Lord, what is a million years like to you?

      God: To me, my son, a million years is but a day.

      Man: Oh Lord, what is a million dollars like to you?

      God: To me, my son, a million dollars is but a penny.

      Man: Oh Lord, would you give me a penny?

      God: Tomorrow.

    5. Re:I asked GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whip out your concordance. The Hebrew word for "day" used in Genesis isn't meant to be metaphorical; it's a literal, 24-hour period of time.



      If you assume that everything in the Bible is no deeper than a convoluted historical document, you're missing a lot.

      The Bible needs this warning sticker.
    6. Re:I asked GOD by lowededwookie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually you're wrong. The word day is used in many contexts in the Bible. The creative days mentioned in the Bible are not literal 24 hour days. In context they refer to periods. There are also scriptures in both Old and New Testaments that say "a thousand years are but as a day in God's eyes" so at bare minimum the creative days would be 6000 years. But what people fail to realise is that there are two creative periods. Genesis 1:1 says "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" but from Genesis 1:2 onwards it talks about creative days on Earth and in the original Hebrew the language indicated it was from the perspective of someone standing on the earth looking up so the creation of the sun, moon, and stars would have seemed to have just happened as a dark cloud was removed thus unveiling the luminaries. The problem with those decrying the Bible is that most of them have never read it so they know stuff all about it. For all the mocking if people read it they'd realise it is a fascinating book with prophecies which have been so accurate that in many cases it's been accused of being written after the fact which is wrong considering that Daniel had the book of Isaiah before the fall of Babylon and Isaiah had written not only that Babylon will fall but who and how (Isaiah 45:1-25) which is the only prophecy to mention a person by name and was written 200 years before the event. Archeology backs up most of the Bible so it's not just a book to be taken on faith.

    7. Re:I asked GOD by Vexar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh no. The day-age theorist argument again. If you use that concordance properly, you will note that the usage is not "Back in Caesar's day..." for the Hebrew word 'Yom.' It is used hundreds of times throughout the Bible. The only time it appears to mean more than a single cycle of light and dark (or the period of light only) is when it is applied with a modifier. Even Strong's Exhaustive Concordance (are there others?) states that for the word to mean anything other than a single revolution of the earth (or just the sunlight portion), requires a modifier, such as an enumeration, or something meaning several, or a period of days. So, some day, the gamma rays may wipe out our ozone layer, but is that the Judgement Day, where a third of the world's waters boil up, and a third of the lands are consumed with fire? Holy death star, indeed!

    8. Re:I asked GOD by BungaDunga · · Score: 0, Troll

      Mod "-1 no paragraphs, run-on sentences".
      Here, have a comma. And a period.
      ,.
      May they serve you well.

    9. Re:I asked GOD by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you believe that everything contradicting a literal interpretation of the Bible is a lie, you're missing even more.

      That's exactly the point I was trying to make. They're creation stories, not docu-dramas. Ask, "what insight is the author of this text trying to convey?" not "How can I rationalize a story to fit a literal history I want to believe in."

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    10. Re:I asked GOD by eosp · · Score: 1

      "And it was evening, and it was morning."

    11. Re:I asked GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is just so fucked up.

      Some people will believe the weirdest things. No wonder you voted for Bush.

    12. Re:I asked GOD by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I truly believe that time is not linear. The bible I think makes this point with the "a thousand years is as a day" statement. Lot's of other interesting things in the bible. I think it's in Job where it states that "he hangeth the earth upon nothing." I know most people here don't believe in the bible or God...at least not the biblical one. Even if you don't believe it though...it's still an interesting read.

    13. Re:I asked GOD by Slur · · Score: 1

      Well why get complicated? It is a story aimed primarily at children after all.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    14. Re:I asked GOD by Aegis+Runestone · · Score: 1

      You're fairly incorrect. The Hebrew translation of the word that comes out as "day" can also be translated as "time" or "period." My speculations are that the reason why the Lord and Moses had it be "days" instead of "times" or "periods" they used "day" to emphasize the fact that God rested on the 7th day to the Israelites.

      The number 7 also has a symbolic meaning: "Whole, complete." So it's either 7 "times" or "periods," each of unknown length (it's obvious that "days" wouldn't be accurate in calculating the Earth's age unless you went by the Lord's definition of "days."), or it is wholly symbolic.

      --
      -Aegis Runestone-
    15. Re:I asked GOD by Vexar · · Score: 1

      Yes, because compared to Moses, the average Slashdot user, spiritually is what, now? Moses wrote Genesis, although I don't know if he penned it or had a scribe.

    16. Re:I asked GOD by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 1

      Archeology backs up most of the Bible so it's not just a book to be taken on faith. Shame about palentology, geology, astronomy, chemistry, biology, physics and mathematics then, isn't it?
      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    17. Re:I asked GOD by computechnica · · Score: 0, Troll

      My Favorite passage is in Deuteronomy were you can Rape a virgin and then Buy her for 50 Sheckels

      22:28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;

      22:29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

    18. Re:I asked GOD by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      Moses wrote Genesis, although I don't know if he penned it or had a scribe. Actually nine different people wrote Genesis and it was pasted together very crudely. Moses was most likely a mythical character that never existed as was Jesus.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    19. Re:I asked GOD by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

      prophecies which have been so accurate that in many cases it's been accused of being written after the fact which is wrong considering that Daniel had the book of Isaiah before the fall of Babylon

      The Book of Daniel is a fiction, written hundreds of years after the events it claims to portray. It's easy to make prophecies come out correctly in fiction.

      Archeology backs up most of the Bible

      Uh, no. For starters, remember the whole captivity in Egypt thing? Big part of the Old Testiment? Archaeological evidence - none. Herod's slaughter of young boys around Bethlehem? No evidence outside the Gospels.

      As literature and myth, some parts of the Bible have some merit. As history or as a sensible guide to ethics or philosophy, it's badly wanting.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    20. Re:I asked GOD by jwo7777777 · · Score: 1

      Crawl, nay, slither back into your dark hole you abomination of anonymous-ness!

    21. Re:I asked GOD by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      Wow, gets modded troll 4 days later. Those christians are ruthless, not ones to turn the other cheek I guess.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  29. Never fear! by caywen · · Score: 1

    Google will save us! We just need to drive its stock price to $1000/share and they will solve this problem.

  30. Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I saw a show a year or two ago that said scientists believe the earth could soon lose its atmosphere in same the way that they think Mars once did due to the flipping or loss of its magnetic field as the core continues to flow and cool. I can't recall the name of the show but a quick Google show that Nova covered this in 2003.

    1. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What the fuck is with the recent trend of indiscriminately modding down ACs? Parent did NOTHING to detract from the discussion.

    2. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nah, polarity flips have been happening for a long time; if we lost our atmosphere every time, this planet would LOOK like mars...Anyway, Mars has no atmosphere because it's too small, not because it doesn't have a liquid core with the attendant magnetic field. Losing the magnetic field (which may or may not happen during a flip...Geologic data isn't precise enough to tell) could cause some problems with regards to the solar wind, but complete loss of atmosphere is extremely unlikely.

      The average period between pole flips is about 250,000 years, so that will give you a pretty good idea of how often it happens, and how unlikely it is that atmospheric loss follows. For the curious, it's been about 800,000 years since the last flip, so we're due one.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      What is talking about a different kind of potential disaster called? It certainly is adding to the discussion. Would you go to AA to get over your coke addiction?

    4. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-read my post.

    5. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Which one?

    6. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Mars has no atmosphere because it's too small"

      more properly, not enough mass.

      We should just start smacking space debris into it until it has enough mass to hold an atmosphere.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, I was imprecise. Mars has an atmosphere, and even some pretty wild storms occasionally which we've gotten pictures of from the rovers.

      What it really lacks is a dense atmosphere...It's only about 1/100th as dense as ours. It would be interesting if it were a little denser, because the atmosphere is almost completely CO2. In composition, it is much heavier than our primarily nitrogen atmosphere, and it does lend weight to the idea that the bulk of the "light" elements in the atmosphere have been stripped away, though it's equally likely, especially in the case of things like H2, that they just "escaped"...It doesn't take much to accelerate hydrogen to escape velocity when the gravity is that low. Even on earth we lose a measurable amount.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    8. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      One thing I was wondering about the magnetic pole flipping...

      Since many birds can navigate by the earths magnetic field, when the flips occur is there a shift in migration patterns?

      That is, will all the penguins swim/waddle to the new 'South' pole?

    9. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by weaselanator · · Score: 1

      Won't we be protected if we invert the polarity of the ozone layer?

    10. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by odohvare · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. Mars has an atmosphere. A very thin one, but it does have one.. A Gamma Ray burst doesn't necessarily happen during a nova/supernova. This is a binary system, and just the odd gravitational forces acting on both stars can cause a build up of energy that is released in a burst. This burst, if timed just right could pass through the earths orbital plane. If this were to happen, The radiation(Gamma) would kill much of the life on the planet. At the same time, the atmosphere would be severely damaged as well. Like the article says, the Ozone layer could be stripped off. If that happened, even more radiation(Ultra Violet) would make it through the atmosphere. This would kill even more life, including much of the plant life leaving a lot of dead decaying matter, and the significant heat increase that would occur would cause winds and other catastrophic weather anomalies. This would cloud the remaining atmosphere causing a very significant cool down.

    11. Re:Atmosphere? What atmosphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth could eventually lose its atmosphere. When the core heat dies enough and plate tectonics stop.

      The warming sun will cook everything long before that, though.

  31. Slashdot has fallen behind by syousef · · Score: 0, Troll

    It use to be that I'd first read this sort of news on slashdot, but either slashdot has fallen behind, or my local paper's improved greatly. I think the former. These days I read about it in the local paper first and a day or two later I read about it on slashdot. Then it gets duped a few days/weeks/months/years later.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  32. Ob. Simpsons Quote by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean I've been driving a Prius and spending my beer money on renewable energy only to have this happen!??!

    Bart: Aw, recycling's useless, Lis. Once the Sun burns out, this planet is doomed. You're just making sure we spend our last days using inferior products.

    ~Philly

  33. Gamma Ray bursts in fiction by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Used in Stephen Baxter's excellent Sci-Fi novel Manifold: Space.

    One of the best hard-science Sci-Fi books I've ever read.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Gamma Ray bursts in fiction by mdenham · · Score: 1

      Also used in Greg Egan's Diaspora, which might be of more interest to everyone here since we all spend 90% of our time in computers anyway.

  34. Isn't it obvious? by PingXao · · Score: 4, Funny

    To Americans, at least, it's obvious. It hates our freedom.

    1. Re:Isn't it obvious? by badman99 · · Score: 0

      Hmmm what freedom is that exactly ?

      The freedom to pay income taxes ?
      The freedom to invade other countries for oil ?
      The freedom to have your government spy on you incessantly in the name of 'national security' ?
      The freedom to live on the street and go hungry ?

      Hmmmm kinda like Homer Simpsons land of chocolate aint it ;-)

  35. Not to nitpick by techpawn · · Score: 1

    but is it per cent or percent? Are we paying for this too?

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:Not to nitpick by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Nitpick answer: it's either "percent" or "per centum". Percent is an abbreviation. The meaning is "per hundred".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Not to nitpick by techpawn · · Score: 1

      Oh! Well, learn something everyday, don't we? Danke!

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  36. "Paging Dr. Banner" by Mr+Z · · Score: 3, Funny

    If this happens, don't make anyone angry. You wouldn't like them when they're angry.

    --Joe
    1. Re:"Paging Dr. Banner" by Samgilljoy · · Score: 1

      If this happens, don't make anyone angry. You wouldn't like them when they're angry.

      Finally! I've had to scroll through the entire list of comments to get to a Hulk reference. Must be my age, I don't know.

      At least once the startling metamorphosis occurs, we can just leap up to the star and smash it in revenge.

    2. Re:"Paging Dr. Banner" by h3llfish · · Score: 1

      Curse you for beating me to the obligatory gamma ray joke! I think life will be fun with 6 billion green Hulksters running around... although there won't be anything to destroy within a matter of hours. We'll just have to amuse ourselves by having hot angry gamma irradiated sex. I can't wait to try out my two foot long green member!

    3. Re:"Paging Dr. Banner" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If its proportional, you'll be putting it in a 4 foot wide green hole.

  37. In other news by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 1

    After Earth is pummeled with gamma rays, Hulks and Spider-Men become the norm, even passé. Marvel Comics sadly goes out of business.

  38. more importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it hit America first or the rest of the world?

  39. Since the gamma rays move at the speed of light.. by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    How do we know that it hasn't already gone off, and the burst is due to hit us in say, 10 minutes?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  40. Whew, thank goodness by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    I was worried about global warming, now I know this event will cool the earth off, for the next dominate species.

  41. The Bad Astronomer has covered this on his blog. by jdoss · · Score: 5, Informative

    Right here.

  42. Death Star? Head to the Hills by oceaniv · · Score: 1

    Although the hills have eyes. Death Star II: This is a crappy movie isn't it?

  43. Thank Goodness!! by boneglorious · · Score: 1

    ...that it's at least 8000 years away and thus, no matter what, we will have a chance to open the crypt of civilization up!!!

    --
    Can I mod something +1 Scary if it's true but I wish it weren't?
  44. That's no moon... by Ikcor · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a rotating binary star system.

  45. ObSimpsons by sharkey · · Score: 1

    This is ACTION NEWS, I'm Kent Brockman!!!! First off, let's go to Scott for a report on the killer rotating binary star system!!

    Thank you Kent! The death toll is still at zero, but it is getting ready to shoot right up!!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  46. Out of range? by Chysn · · Score: 1

    TFA says

    > A 2005 study showed that a gamma-ray burst originating within 6,500 light years of Earth could be enough to strip away the ozone
    > layer and cause a mass extinction

    TFA also says

    > At a distance of 8,000 light years from Earth, the pair of stars are a short hop away in galactic terms

    So what they're actually telling us, in a roundabout way, is that there's nothing to worry about.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
  47. Damn by sconeu · · Score: 1

    That was supposed to be in response to KublaiKhan's post.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  48. Re:Out of range? and did you catch by Babu+'God'+Hoover · · Score: 1

    The google ads link for gamma ray credits!

  49. ObTrek by jdigriz · · Score: 1

    Shields! SHIELDS!

  50. Re:Since the gamma rays move at the speed of light by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do we know that it hasn't already gone off, and the burst is due to hit us in say, 10 minutes? Well, it's 20 minutes later, so I guess that theory is shot to hell. :D
    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  51. Re:Not so by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    We don't know if a gamma burst didn't happen eon's ago and is on its way and might arrive sometime next month. Better to understand what possible risks might be. Also gives a interesting theory to start looking for evidence of gamma burst extinctions. If it turns out to have been a cause then we see we are even more fragile than we thought, with meteor strikes and methane releases from the oceans and lets not forget man's influences as potential earth busters. But if we find that it is one of the dangers then we can start thinking about strategies for coming out on the other side of the next one.

  52. Global Warming... by Kev647 · · Score: 1

    So, should something like this really happen, we can easily claim that "the creator" of this universe could care less how we pollute the world, since this would inevitably have happened, as it has in the past. lol.

  53. Alright, I'll talk! by Mercano · · Score: 1

    Alright, I'll talk! The rebels are based on Dantooine. Just spare Earth, please.

    --
    #include <signature.h>
    1. Re:Alright, I'll talk! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that information. Fire when ready!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  54. Finally a solution by andy19 · · Score: 1

    To global warming!

  55. Earth cooked, news at 11... by southpolesammy · · Score: 4, Informative

    So let me see if I've got this right...

    If a GRB hits us in the next 10 years, the Earth is cooked and we're screwed. Game over.

    If a GRB hits us in the next 100 years, the Earth is cooked, and although I'm gone, life on Earth is still screwed. Game over.

    If a GRB hits us in the next 1000 years, the Earth is still cooked, I'm long gone as are the vast majority of my descendants, but maybe mankind (assuming we live that long) will have found the means to leave the planet and preserve itself. However, life on Earth is still screwed. Game over.

    Ditto for 10k years, 100k, etc. Basically, there's very little we can do to save the Earth, and next to nothing we can do collectively to save ourselves, except for a few lucky individuals. Thus, the long term goal shouldn't be figuring out how to protect the Earth, but rather we should be figuring out how to preserve our legacy. Fighting against Mother Nature has proven time and time again to be futile.

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    1. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by Astadar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you're absolutely right. We narrowly survived the GWB that occurred in 2000 and will have lasted for 8 yea.... oh..

      GRB...

      Never mind.

      --
      --Coming up with something clever... please wait...
    2. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to do extrapolations like that, you need to consider the other side. Human civilization has only existed for ~10K years, so it's not likely to last another 10K. So, no biggy if the years until the event is beyond 10K which is the case here.

    3. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      It ain' over yet. And then there are the after affects.

    4. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by FritzSolms · · Score: 1

      Aahh -- but then there is religion ....

    5. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      And in hundreds of billions of years, the universe gets sucked into black holes (if it hasn't suffered energy death by then). Game over.

      All good things must come to an end.

    6. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      You fool! In 10k years, humanity will have long transcended into an indestructible Godmind in hyperspace and could make that "deathstar" vanish with a (virtual) flick of its tentacles.

      MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

      Of course, by then I'll be dead :(

    7. Re:Earth cooked, news at 11... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      but maybe [future] mankind ... will have found the means to leave the planet and preserve itself.

      Earth has a thick atmosphere to protect us to a large degree, at least in the shorter term. Assuming future colonies are in the neighborhood of Earth (say 200 light years), they will receive about the same blast of radiation if this star does a core dump. It is tough to protect oneself from such a blast unless you prepare for it up front, and that may not be practical if you don't know when its coming. Thus, space colonies may be in the same boat. It's just a hell of a lot of radiation that requires the mother of all shields to hide from. Either you do everything with fat bulky expensive shields for thousands of years, or dance with lady luck and hope for the best.

      Actually if we colonize the moon, the radiation would zap only half of it; the side facing the blast. Inhabitants on the hidden side may not feel much effect. This is also true on Earth as far as direct radiation exposure, but a large part of the danger being on Earth is environmental damage that kills farm plants and creates a kind of nuclear winter. Still, having half of all moon colonies wiped out is not a pleasant thing. But it does suggest that colonies should be placed on both sides as a hedge.

  56. Not to worry... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    If we get hit with gamma rays then all that will happen is we'll all bulk up, get green skin, and be able to complete our morning commute to work with mile long leaps. Purple pants, for some odd reason, will also become the latest fashion craze. Of course, we might all need some anger management courses to prevent mass-smashing of infrastructure.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  57. Re:Wouldn't killing 60% of life result in lots of by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah well the remaining 40% can always buy a carbon offset.

  58. 12-21-12 by AcidTag · · Score: 1

    How long before the doomsday (12-21-12) nut jobs connect the dots?

    1. Re:12-21-12 by sjames · · Score: 1

      How long before the doomsday (12-21-12) nut jobs connect the dots?

      Perhaps it's time to corner the market in lead foil? It should be amusing watching people stagger around in their 200 pound lead foil suits.

    2. Re:12-21-12 by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      How long before the doomsday (12-21-12) nut jobs connect the dots?

      Perhaps it's time to corner the market in lead foil? It should be amusing watching people stagger around in their 200 pound lead foil suits.
      200 lbs for a lead foil suit.
      That's be just over 90kg.
      Which means 0.008 m^3 of lead.
      Wikipedia gives the skin area of a human as 1.5 to 2 m^2 ; I'll take the lower figure, as some areas will need less protection than others - do the soles of your feet need as much protection as any working gonads you have?
      So that 0.08 m^3 of lead would spread over 1.5 m^2 to a thickness of 0.0053 m.

      Your customer's lead foil suits aren't going to give much protection from 5mm thickness of lead. A little less than the atmosphere itself does. I take it that you'll be selling them from a good deep concrete bunker, and (by definition) selling them to the stupid dead-but-not-yet-stationary members of the population.

      I'm generally underwhelmed by the "Ordovician mass extinction from a GRB" hypothesis. There were *very* few land plants and animals at that time, and the marine organisms would have got about as much protection from each 10m of water as they would from the atmosphere. So marine organisms would have had half the exposure at 10m depth (compares to surface organisms), one quarter at 20m depth, one nineth at 30m which is the approximate base of the photic zone. That'd have effects, but probably not devastating.

      Hell - we could survive that without too much difficulty. Live at 20~30m by "day" (when the GRB is in the sky, regardless of Sun position), and do your out-of-doors stuff by GRB night. Would be a PITA, but survivable on the several months scale that's implied.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    3. Re:12-21-12 by sjames · · Score: 1

      I expect the market for lead foil suits to be exactly the same people who use tinfoil to stop the government/alien mind rays. I expect the lead suits to provide just as much real benefit to the wearer as the tinfoil hats.

      The rest of us will have to get by with the knowledge that if the beam is focused enough to do that kind of damage from 8000 light years away, it will be tightly focused enough that it's more likely to miss us entirely.

    4. Re:12-21-12 by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The rest of us will have to get by with the knowledge that if the beam is focused enough to do that kind of damage from 8000 light years away, it will be tightly focused enough that it's more likely to miss us entirely.

      Besides, unless the GRB hit's less than a couple of centuries in the future, there aren't likely to be many humans to worry about it.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  59. My guess is... by Berserker76 · · Score: 1
    ....that it went super nova on December 21st, 5989 B.C.

    /hoping I did the math right

    //probably not, but I think you get the point

    ///thinks a 60% extinction level event might just be enough

  60. How does that follow? by argent · · Score: 1

    But, for every day it doesn't the more and more we move away from being lined up.

    How do you know? We might be drifting into alignment. There's several degrees of uncertainty as to how precisely the system is aligned.

  61. Re:Not so by huckamania · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's start by putting some detectors out in space that ping us every second. When the burst hits the sensors out there in space and destroys them we'll know here on Earth because the pings will stop. Put them out about a light year away and we'll have a whole year to prepare.

    See, problem solved.

  62. Re:Not so by huckamania · · Score: 1

    Time is an illusion perpetrated by the manufacturers of space.

    - quote at the bottom of the page when I posted the above.

  63. Re:Not so by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    Well a light year out.. hmmm assuming that the gamma rays are traveling as fast or as any signal from the satelites, we might probably will become aware of the gamma rays shortly before we become aware that the warning system has detected the rays.

    Well unless we can get a good subspace link going. hmmm we will have to work on that one.

  64. yes but... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but whether it's 250,000 years from now or next week, my first reaction to a giant space death ray made of binary supernovas emitting a telltale spiral that shows you are looking down the barrel of the thing is still,

    "OMFG! THAT'S AWESOME!" :D

    Come on, be honest, even if we're doomed, giant space death rays are STILL awesome... somewhere, E.E. "Doc' Smith is smiling...

  65. 6 Billion Incredible Hulks by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

    Don't make ANYONE angry.. You wouldn't like ANYONE when their angry.

  66. math word problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a gamma ray leaves Philadelphia at 2:00pm headed West toward San Francisco....

  67. With the risk of sounding stupid... by TheRagingTowel · · Score: 1

    gamma rays travel in the speed of light right? If the event happened X light years from us, X years in the past, aren't we cooked before we know it happened? Only when the burst energy reaches earth - that's the moment we know it happens.

    --
    4Z5TX
    1. Re:With the risk of sounding stupid... by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      gamma rays travel in the speed of light right? If the event happened X light years from us, X years in the past, aren't we cooked before we know it happened? Only when the burst energy reaches earth - that's the moment we know it happens.

      Yep.

      However, we might be able to spot changes in a star leading up to the actual burst. If we knew what to look for.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  68. Atmospheric Shield by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    And here all along I've been feeling that a hundred miles of atmosphere is a pretty good shield against bad things from many many lightyears away.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  69. Other information by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    Somebody else on slashdot posted this link http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2008/03/03/wr-104-a-nearby-gamma-ray-burst/ Read it if you are going to read the slashdot article. I am not sure how reliable the information is, but it seems to have a lot more data than the slashdot article has. The slashdot article is just you typical sensationalized crap saying "we are looking down the barrel of a gun." We don't know if it is pointed directly at us or not. We do not know how much matter is between the star and earth. If there is a lot of matter, then a lot of energy will be absorbed by it. We aren't even certain how far away it is (even though the article says 8000 light years). This is a binary star.... what happens if the other star goes super nova before this one creates a gamma ray burst? Will it change WR 104's aim? There are too many unknowns this article is just news media trying to promote itself by predicting doomsday.

  70. (Looking up and squinting) by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    That's no death star....

  71. Obligatory by master_p · · Score: 0

    I hope we can play DNF before the mass extinction event...

  72. Strangely Optimistic by db32 · · Score: 1

    You all realize that we have to survive for a long long time before this is a threat to us. I am reasonably confident that we will kill ourselves off one way or another LONG before this happens to us. Being worried about this seems very optimistic.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  73. Al Gore by Bizzeh · · Score: 1

    i wonder if al gore will make a movie out of this, and how he will blame it on everyone else.

  74. Back on this death star thing by renegadesx · · Score: 3, Funny

    God: Dantoonie is to remote for an effective demonstration

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
    1. Re:Back on this death star thing by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      Maybe if it was spelt correctly it would've been funnier.

      (and I'm not even a star wars nerd!)

    2. Re:Back on this death star thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, renegadesx. I should have recognized your foul stench when I logged into Slashdot today.

  75. Re:the political answer by weighn · · Score: 1
    Mitigating climate change is too expensive. Saving us from death-rays is not required until far beyond our lives and the lives of many generations to follow. No need to resort to money as an excuse.

    But you do make a good point - we can't even save ourselves from ourselves, let alone an external threat :(

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  76. Re:This calls for a... by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

    But how do you know that this Gamma Ray Burst is not in itself a pre-emptive strike against possible future human aggression towards our interstellar neighbours.

  77. Relevant post by Kyokushi · · Score: 1

    from xkcd blag: http://blag.xkcd.com/2008/02/15/the-laser-elevator/#comment-12937 Now if we can create that kind of cannon... probably asking those CERN dudes for a little help...

  78. I wouldn't worry overmuch by secPM_MS · · Score: 4, Informative

    While such Wolf-Rayet doubles, or the LBV in Eta Carniae are definitely pre-supernovae, it is unlikely that they are likely gamma ray burst sources. GRB's have a very strong preference for low metallicity environments, almost certainly because higher metal levels cause them to loose too much mass angular momentum. In this region of the galaxy, the metal levels is too high to have a high unlikelihood of GRB's. Also note that for the GRB to propagate into space, the star must first have blown off its envelope, or the GRB is absorbed in the stellar atmosphere and simply adds to the explosion energy (this is probably quite common).

  79. Not correct by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Let say , for example, we see things happening to this star that indicate super nova will be happening in 1000 years.
    That mean we would have 1000 years. Stars undergo changes before going super nova.

    With 1000 year time line, we might be able to save the earth. Anything from a giant sheet of lead in space, to some sort of global magnetic repulsion scheme. who knows, but it WOULD be possible.

    Hell, it might even be good for us as a race.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. Apocalypse Later! by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 1

    So, assuming we don't kill ourselves some other way, or have aliens or other intergalactic happenings wipe us out, in >6500 years, we're all going to die... maybe. Guess we'd better get to work on that solution. Cancel all the research into diseases like cancer, this needs top priority, just in case.

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  81. Where is the Kaboom? by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

    There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

  82. I know what's to blame for this... by Sly+Raskal · · Score: 1

    I blame this on Global Warming. lol

  83. Re:Not so by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    and THAT is why his comment is modded funny :)

    also, woosh.

  84. Re:Not so by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    That sound is the joke going over your head at the speed of light.

  85. Have you forgotten? by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    There's always an Earth-crossing asteroid or a searing beam of high-energy gamma rays...
    or an mass extiction event about to wipe out life on this planet.
    The only way people get on with their happy lives...
    is they do not know about it!

    --
    Sig this!
  86. grand vacation by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    well, *if* it goes up (or already has) and we are square on in its sights,
    this will be the best show we've ever seen, and the last show we'll ever see.

    proudhawk raises a toast to all he knows "Salude!"

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  87. Global Warmer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    It always blows my mind that some people will fear this astronomically (pun intended) low risk threat, but insist we ignore the huger, if still <100%, risk of Global Warming and Climate Change.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Global Warmer by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Why should we fear the changing climate? Is our goal to lock down the weather/temp of the planet from now until the end of time?

      I for one, would like to make the Sahara bloom with plantlife again.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Global Warmer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're not going to live to see the Sahara bloom again. You're going to die as the civilization you depend on crashes around you.

      Ask the dead people in the Gulf Coast why to fear the changing climate. Or ask the people a little inland who feared the incoming waves of refugees. Then multiply that by ten thousand.

      But of course that's not what I said. So I'd like to know how much you fear this "Death Star" the story discusses. Or are you looking forward to the Earth's atmosphere returned to a primitive condition wherein only exotic primeval plantlife can bloom again?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Global Warmer by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      If the climate was that unstable, we wouldn't be here.

      I don't fear the "Death Star", I would like to use the fear to get us back into space development, instead of endless "Green" programs.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    4. Re:Global Warmer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The Sahara was green 5000 years ago. It's been desert for several thousand years. The climate is most certainly that unstable. The current instability as we move towards a new stability band is now well documented.

      It's ironic that you want to exploit irrational fear to bilk people who wouldn't otherwise want it into investing in space development, but will irrationally ignore the documented threat of Climate Change because it doesn't suit your narrow agenda. And beyond ironic, it's self-limiting to ignore the Climate Change that will undercut all the space development you prefer.

      How perfectly Republican of you. Oh, I meant "libertarian".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Global Warmer by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      The Greens are exploiting non-existent global warming to push their programs, why can't I use the "Death star" to push mine?

      So, because the Sahara turned into desert, the climate is unstable? By "unstable" I meant like a system breaking down to worthlessness. Not "changes".

      It's guys like you that make it impossible to take enviromentalists seriously. It's interesting that you paint me a Republican because I don't echo your beliefs back at you.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    6. Re:Global Warmer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If you don't think "Sahara" = "worthless", I'm not interested in ever seeing any of your "programs" come to pass.

      If you don't think going from "bloom" to "desert" is "unstable", but just "changes", then I'm not interested in hearing why you're pretending I didn't say you're really "libertarian".

      It's guys like me that are saving fools like you from your obviously suicidal commitment to ignorance. Guys like you don't contribute anything to space research, you just thrive on something fake to fear while you ignore the real threats. You can't even echo my "belief" in the dictionary back at me.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:Global Warmer by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Really, like the program to make the Sahara bloom again, like I mentioned in the very first post? Feel free to stop acting like an attack dog and try listening to what I'm saying.

      Making the Sahara bloom again would require changing the climate. Period.

      Now, imagine all the government programs have come to pass. The earth now has terraforming stations all over it to maintain specific temp ranges, atmospheric quality, etc. How in the WORLD are you going to make any improvements to the Sahara when you've make any climate change "wrong" and brings the forces of all our laws and technology to fight it? At best, all you've done is taken the dynamic system of nature and locked it up.

      It seems to me that you're full of good intentions, but have no idea what you're really implementing as long as it has a blanket of "Saving the world!" covering it. Even if you're not saving the world.

      Also, imagine this. I'm an intelligent human being who's also studied the issue and came to my own conclusions. Labeling me a "Fool" might make you feel better when you discount me and move on. But I'm still here and I'll still be living my life countering your beliefs.

      Or you can point and laugh at a spelling mistake I've made, deride every point I make without adding anything constructive to the conversation, and go on with your life imagining that I don't really matter.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:Global Warmer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything about "making the Sahara bloom again". I just pointed out that the Sahara was in bloom and then it crashed, turned into a desert. Demonstrating just how unstable the climate can be. And how its changes wipe out civilizations.

      There's no serious effort to "terraform" the Earth and maintain specific temp ranges etc like you describe. There are only efforts to stop human industrial processes from forcing climate parameters, which is what is threatening the natural systems we depend on.

      Your "blooming Sahara" is not only a straw man, it's science fiction. If in fact there is some harebrained scheme to "bloom the Sahara", it just shows that "the environmentalists" aren't the monolithic boogeyman you fear. You seem to like straw man arguments: I never mentioned any spelling mistake.

      But I will of course deride your foolish points, like "climate change" != "climate instability", or "Sahara" != "worthless". Or "let's make people afraid of some negligible aberration while ignoring the real threat we have only a short time to rectify". Or the basic attitude of stoking fear in some nonthreat in space to build a space industry, when what you're really getting is a boondoggle Star Wars "missile defense" system that just distracts from everything, incluiding space research.

      You haven't added anything constructive to the conversation. You've added straw man arguments, a treacherous fear motivation strategy to get deeper into space, some typical know-nothing chatter denying Climate Change, and some passive-aggressive complaints when I treat your arguments as the quality they present.

      You matter, or I wouldn't reply to you. You matter as a demonstration of a dwindling, but still clinging minority who thinks we can play games like you're trying. So I'm willing to counter your arguments and your attitudes. If not for you to change, then for others to read and see just what is real and what is a derivative of a 1950s "space invasion" movie used as Space Age propaganda.

      The Martians aren't coming to steal Earth. We, instead, are turning Earth closer to Mars.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  88. (Looking up and retching) by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    1. Re:(Looking up and retching) by kylehase · · Score: 1

      That's impossible, even for a computer.

      --
      You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  89. Good to be near the edge of a galaxy by Jeff1946 · · Score: 1

    This points out why it is a good thing we are near the edge of our galaxy. One factor I don't recall seeing in estimates of the odds of other planets in the universe sustaining life is fraction of the stars near the edge of the galaxy. Lots of bad things can happen if you are too close to other stars or worse black holes.

  90. Re:Not so by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "Time is an illusion...." ... Lunch time doubly-so.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  91. don't forget that by overcaffein8d · · Score: 1

    it could have already emitted all this gamma radiation like 6499 years ago, and we wouldn't know it.

    --
    Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
  92. Branch Prediction and Goaltending by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    prepare

    The problem with not having much time to prepare, is the need to take action now rather than having more evidence which eventuality will occur. Even if the burst will miss from the source in question, there is always a chance another source will fry us if we're not doing anything.

    Put them out about a light year away

    Reflectors and deflectors, not detectors, should be placed in line with earth and the gamma ray source. If what they is true about goaltending being the difference between winning and losing the Stanley Cup, let's award the Stanley Cup to whoever places a deflector that stops the burst from reaching us.

    One of the big problems is distance - the deflector has to be far away from us in order to cover the earth. A deflector can be launched to make a beeline for the star system, but the deflector wouldn't be any use in this case until it's far enough to cover the solar system in it's path across the galaxy. A deflector that works earlier would have to track the line between us and the Death Star, assuming the gamma rays can't be curved by some unknown gravitation source. Perhaps it would work to fire a series of deflectors that overlap in coverage as the earth orbits, with redundancy in case of a space collision with some fast moving thing.

    May I also suggest we start building underground and ozone plants, with drone balloons to replenish the atmosphere?

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    1. Re:Branch Prediction and Goaltending by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Los Angeles is already way ahead of you on the ozone production issue.

  93. Re:Not so by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    putting some detectors out ... about a light year away and we'll have a whole year to prepare.

    Dude, you are so ready for management

  94. I'm confused by shiftless · · Score: 1

    ... it is unlikely that they are likely gamma ray burst sources ... ... the metal levels is too high to have a high unlikelihood of GRB's ...

    Hello, I'm Leonard Nimoy. This tale of alien encounters is true. And by true, I mean false. They're all lies. But they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that what matters? The answer is: no.

  95. Re: Not my problem - ... or is it? by Rickus+Dickus · · Score: 1

    To dangerous, we can't rely on your offspring continuously reproducing for the next 1500 generations. Much better idea: we all contribute a dollar to help you put into hibernation for some hundred thousand years, by which time humanity will have reverted to cannibalistic cave-dwelling monsters... And then you try...
    ...
    ... Ah, forget about it.

  96. Opportunity! by sanky · · Score: 1

    I can finally be a millionaire selling Gamma Proof Umbrellas! Yooohoooo!!!! I knew my day would come! :-P

  97. How is this "news"? by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    This story was featured on the BBC's "Horizon" science programme about 7 or 8 years ago!

  98. Can the Sun's mass block the rays? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    This might be a stupid question, but I wonder how long will the gamma ray blast last, and 2) is it possible for a sufficiently large mass -e.g. Jupiter or the Sun to be interposed between we humans and said blast, and block most of the gamma rays.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  99. Solar flares will get us first by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

    Surely there is a greater risk of a high energy flare on the nearest star getting us first?

  100. New Species? by Karmaholic · · Score: 1

    So gamma rays? Earth Population: Billions of Hulks? Ya, just put a big intergalactic sign for any alien invaders at the time saying: Don't piss us off!

  101. "Women and Minorities to Be Hardest Hit" by bigH2O · · Score: 1

    ...they forgot to add that tag line

    --
    missing sig
  102. Re:Not so by Tim+MacDonald · · Score: 1

    Large problem with this, as it's already been discussed. Information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. We would get the information from the sensors at the same time as we would be hit by the gamma ray. Even accounting for any discrepancy in the travel rate of either, we would have either no warning whatsoever or round about a minute to prepare.

  103. Earth saved, news at 11:15 by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 1

    Basically, there's very little we can do to save the Earth

    There's plenty.

    Conceptually, a gamma ray burst is akin to a laser beam; shade the target, and you prevent the damage. Moreover, the effects of the GRB are relatively low-energy -- it's described as splitting ozone and N2 molecules, not blasting away the whole atmosphere -- so the beam would be able to ablate only a small amount of a protective shield. Finally, the effects -- splitting molecules, creating muons, etc. -- are already happening anyway, so the protection doesn't need to be perfect, simply good enough to leave the results within the same ballpark as the level of bombardment the earth sees all the time.

    Accordingly, it seems likely that manufacturing an earth-sized dust cloud between us and the GRB would be sufficient protection; essentially, corral some rocks from the asteriod belt, move them into position, and pulverize them. While that's not something we could effectively do now, it's not so outlandish for 1,000 years in the future.

    Fighting against Mother Nature has proven time and time again to be futile.

    Only with careful definitions.

    Most of the Netherlands has been wrested from the stormy North Sea over the course of centuries, a process that would fall under most definitions of "fighting against Mother Nature". Given the state of the Netherlands today, though, it would also fall under few definitions of "futile".

    A great deal of what modern civilization does and is could be considered as fighting against nature, and I would disagree that civilization is futile. Natural forces are not something that can be dismissed as irrelevant, but neither are they something that should be fawned over as omnipotent; as is almost always the case, the truth lies between the extremes.
  104. The problem by jgoemat · · Score: 2

    The problem with those decrying the Bible is that most of them have never read it so they know stuff all about it.

    The problem with those embracing the Bible is that most of them have never read it either. It is an amalgam of different stories that contradict each other. Any serious theologian that has studied the Bible does not believe in the literalness of the text. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence that does the same will immediately see the contradictory and ridiculous nature of it. So we are left with the stories that people can pick points of truth from to suit their own needs. It is much like astrology, people only see the parts that could be true and ignore the rest (talking snakes, dancing swords, Adam would be like God if he had eaten one more piece of fruit, etc.). There is actually no credible evidence for the miracles in the Bible or any prophecies coming true after they were written. Most scholars believe that the book of Isaiah had several authors and minor editors, with a noted change in authorship at chapter 40 (based on his name not being used, the situation changing and style).

    Archeology backs up most of the Bible so it's not just a book to be taken on faith.

    I would agree with this to the extent that archeology can back up the movie 'Spiderman' in that I'm pretty sure New York city actually exists. Anything supernatural in the bible is not backed up by archaeological evidence, for instance the great flood.