This is stupid. Its basicly saying that if someone knows your wireless key they can decrypt your wireless traffic. Any web based email should use another layer of encryption via https anyway. I'm too lazy to read the article, but is there mention of if it is for WPA2 personal or enterprise?
There was a recent school shooting (in Germany I think it was) where there were 9 people killed, with nine shots fired, and 9 headshots. This kid had never used a gun before in his life, but his parents had built him a gaming cave for CS. Think playing Counter Strike with a Wii-like custom controller. Even SWAT dont go for that kind of accuracy. FPS gamers just train and expect headshots everytime where the professionals go for the 2+1 rule. 2 bodyshots with one follow up headshot.
That has nothing to do with what we are talking about. That is concerning authority. We are talking about property. Those are two different things. "ALL things belong to the People" only in a communist system, in which case NO authority derives from the people (they claim it will, but history proves otherwise). Those are two mutually exclusive political theories. Its easy to quote lots of material when it has no bearing on the topic at hand. Roads are public land, at least most of them. Air is not owned by anyone. The landlord are those THAT PAID FOR IT. You have NO right to their property that for the time being they have CHOSEN to give you for free.
Actually its those in the depths of poverty who are the most likely to dedicate part of their income to TV (and cigarettes and beer). I'll get marked flamebait for it, but having grown up in a poor part of a poor town, I have no doubt but that its largely their own choices and actions that A) put them there and/or B) keep them there.
And how much do they really want it? I know those rural people too. They love nature and their farm. They aren't the urbanites who live glued to the TV.
Yes I am. The electromagnetic spectrum belongs to me and the People in general. The FCC has zero right to take-away OUR common property and lock it up behind a ~$100/month cellphone paywall.
Whoah there. Common property? Who says you own diddly-squat of the spectrum? Did I miss that in the Constitution or in the UN list of human rights? Just because you breathe you "own" something that other people discovered and are using for your free use? They designed the hardware. They produced the content. They maintain the infrastructure. You have no right to require that they continue to do so. Common property and belonging to the "People in general" are communist buzzphrases. We have public land, but thats it. There is no other common property, and there shouldn't be. If you want to argue that you have the right to build your own hardware and broadcast on licensed spectrum, go ahead. You might have a point there. Arguing that you have a right to receive free stuff on those spectrums is way out there.
One question that is always missed in attacks on a capitalist system (not that you are over the top, yours is actually one of the more rational rants I've seen in a while). What is the point of raking in profits if you dont use them? What do you use them on if not for investing back into the company? Even considering that the CEO makes several hundred million annually, most of that "profit" of which you speak is put back into the company in some form, meaning its not really profit. I don't think many of these people are the Mr. Scrooge who makes money just for the sake of having it rot under their bed. It's put back in the system at some point.
"The irony is that if the Bush FCC had dared to push something like this, it would have been attacked by progressives -- and rightly so -- because there's absolutely nothing progressive about this particular proposal.
...
In other words:
- it hurts the poor
- it hurts rural residents
- it add another expensive $1000-2000 annual bill
- it serves to further consolidate the industry away from private local station, and into the hands of megacorps
- stifles competition by monopolizing entertainment in even fewer hands (ATT, Verizon) than previously
I do not think progressive means what you think it means...
Hmmm, you bring up a good point. The Russians should have just hired a bunch of Mexicans. Then, even after we find out they are illegal, we still couldn't touch them!
A few years ago I did a write up about a company in Missouri that was converting waste from a turkey plant into crude oil. I don't remember details, but it seems that operations like that, even if not strictly cost effective on oil production, could have a major role to play once you factor in the elimination of a large portion of what now goes to a land fill.
If he’s a boy, he could have been born any day except Tuesday. (Otherwise this case would already have been counted in the first scenario: the older child a boy born on Tuesday). This second scenario generates just six, rather than seven, more possibilities.
Some environmental groups have warned these cables could be used instead to import non-renewable electricity from coal- and gas-fired power stations in north Africa.'
Even when you are doing what they want they find a way to complain.
How is it a redesign? It is the exact same form factor that has been tried before. There is no breakthrough. The only difference is that instead of an open market (including opensource) you have apple spoon feeding you what you can and cannot run. Apple is the worlds greatest advertising firm, but as a computer company their products are worse knock offs than anything Microsoft has done.
Anything I've run works fine with the touchscreen. The iPad is selling like hotcakes because Apple redesigned an old concept and is selling it like it is a revolutionary breakthrough, just like the ipod. I've had an netbook ever since the original asus eee and have always had people ask what it is. Now they just ask if it is an ipad. Apple does a great job marketing their crap so that in the public mind anything even similar, even if it came first, is a knock off of apple.
Windows 7 words great with a touchscreen. -signed Someone who uses it on a regular basis.
PS, if you have a touch screen and use the built in flicks at all, you really really should try out this app. http://forum.eeeuser.com/viewtopic.php?id=84092 It takes the default flicks and blows them away.
Slashdot Mirror
> ...if this user has your password...
Where does it say that?
whereby an internal, authorized Wi-Fi user
This is stupid. Its basicly saying that if someone knows your wireless key they can decrypt your wireless traffic. Any web based email should use another layer of encryption via https anyway. I'm too lazy to read the article, but is there mention of if it is for WPA2 personal or enterprise?
There was a recent school shooting (in Germany I think it was) where there were 9 people killed, with nine shots fired, and 9 headshots. This kid had never used a gun before in his life, but his parents had built him a gaming cave for CS. Think playing Counter Strike with a Wii-like custom controller. Even SWAT dont go for that kind of accuracy. FPS gamers just train and expect headshots everytime where the professionals go for the 2+1 rule. 2 bodyshots with one follow up headshot.
Pay them a buck per page and they learn some family history along the way. Problem solved.
That has nothing to do with what we are talking about. That is concerning authority. We are talking about property. Those are two different things.
"ALL things belong to the People" only in a communist system, in which case NO authority derives from the people (they claim it will, but history proves otherwise). Those are two mutually exclusive political theories. Its easy to quote lots of material when it has no bearing on the topic at hand.
Roads are public land, at least most of them. Air is not owned by anyone.
The landlord are those THAT PAID FOR IT. You have NO right to their property that for the time being they have CHOSEN to give you for free.
Actually its those in the depths of poverty who are the most likely to dedicate part of their income to TV (and cigarettes and beer).
I'll get marked flamebait for it, but having grown up in a poor part of a poor town, I have no doubt but that its largely their own choices and actions that A) put them there and/or B) keep them there.
And how much do they really want it? I know those rural people too. They love nature and their farm. They aren't the urbanites who live glued to the TV.
>>>you're entitled that the number of things
Yes I am. The electromagnetic spectrum belongs to me and the People in general. The FCC has zero right to take-away OUR common property and lock it up behind a ~$100/month cellphone paywall.
Whoah there. Common property? Who says you own diddly-squat of the spectrum? Did I miss that in the Constitution or in the UN list of human rights? Just because you breathe you "own" something that other people discovered and are using for your free use? They designed the hardware. They produced the content. They maintain the infrastructure. You have no right to require that they continue to do so. Common property and belonging to the "People in general" are communist buzzphrases. We have public land, but thats it. There is no other common property, and there shouldn't be.
If you want to argue that you have the right to build your own hardware and broadcast on licensed spectrum, go ahead. You might have a point there. Arguing that you have a right to receive free stuff on those spectrums is way out there.
One question that is always missed in attacks on a capitalist system (not that you are over the top, yours is actually one of the more rational rants I've seen in a while).
What is the point of raking in profits if you dont use them? What do you use them on if not for investing back into the company? Even considering that the CEO makes several hundred million annually, most of that "profit" of which you speak is put back into the company in some form, meaning its not really profit. I don't think many of these people are the Mr. Scrooge who makes money just for the sake of having it rot under their bed. It's put back in the system at some point.
"The irony is that if the Bush FCC had dared to push something like this, it would have been attacked by progressives -- and rightly so -- because there's absolutely nothing progressive about this particular proposal.
...
In other words: - it hurts the poor - it hurts rural residents - it add another expensive $1000-2000 annual bill - it serves to further consolidate the industry away from private local station, and into the hands of megacorps - stifles competition by monopolizing entertainment in even fewer hands (ATT, Verizon) than previously
I do not think progressive means what you think it means...
Ya, Google sure proves that information has no value
Hmmm, you bring up a good point. The Russians should have just hired a bunch of Mexicans. Then, even after we find out they are illegal, we still couldn't touch them!
A few years ago I did a write up about a company in Missouri that was converting waste from a turkey plant into crude oil. I don't remember details, but it seems that operations like that, even if not strictly cost effective on oil production, could have a major role to play once you factor in the elimination of a large portion of what now goes to a land fill.
If he’s a boy, he could have been born any day except Tuesday. (Otherwise this case would already have been counted in the first scenario: the older child a boy born on Tuesday). This second scenario generates just six, rather than seven, more possibilities.
He makes the assumption that only one was a boy born on Tuesday. The question would be much different if it said "Only one was a boy born on tuesday."
Seconded
science discovers adrenaline. Story at 5
n/m
This is exactly true.
The Constitution is no longer law around here. Get with the times bro!
What you didn't know is that Google is the botnets...
Some environmental groups have warned these cables could be used instead to import non-renewable electricity from coal- and gas-fired power stations in north Africa.'
Even when you are doing what they want they find a way to complain.
How is it a redesign? It is the exact same form factor that has been tried before. There is no breakthrough. The only difference is that instead of an open market (including opensource) you have apple spoon feeding you what you can and cannot run. Apple is the worlds greatest advertising firm, but as a computer company their products are worse knock offs than anything Microsoft has done.
I find it humorous that this post begins with a decry of another posters maturity and arrogance that itself ends with the phrase, "go fuck yourself."
Anything I've run works fine with the touchscreen. The iPad is selling like hotcakes because Apple redesigned an old concept and is selling it like it is a revolutionary breakthrough, just like the ipod. I've had an netbook ever since the original asus eee and have always had people ask what it is. Now they just ask if it is an ipad. Apple does a great job marketing their crap so that in the public mind anything even similar, even if it came first, is a knock off of apple.
T91MT
Battery: 5-6 hours
Weight: 2 pounds
Heat: None
Rotating fan: None
Windows 7 words great with a touchscreen.
-signed
Someone who uses it on a regular basis.
PS, if you have a touch screen and use the built in flicks at all, you really really should try out this app. http://forum.eeeuser.com/viewtopic.php?id=84092 It takes the default flicks and blows them away.