You see, they exclude them selves from science... That's OK... they will only rise to the potential they allow them selves. Its a matter of time, but the truth is on it's way
I would say that is a brilliant name for a party !!! Can you imagine a member take the stand and talk on some mundane issue in a full purple polka dot clowns outfit !!
Very simple... Google develops driverless cloud printing and releases code and API into public domain. Apple develops driverless cloud printing and somehow gets a patent and respective clamping down.
There is one single change that will have an immediate affect on all this business.
KPIs on financial advisers.
If you go to a financial adviser, and pay him money to advise you where to put your money. You should be able to choose the financial adviser that has made the most profit for his customers. Well that information is only known to banks. Why is that ? Because even though you pay financial advisers, they actually work for banks and not for you !
Most financial advisers are actually crap, and don't make money for their customers. When you walk in their office, they show you amazing trend graphs, What they don't tell you is that they started with 1000 funds 20 years ago, and slowly retire the bad performing funds, and introduce new ones as time advances. So amazingly... all the funds in their collection are making money !!! They tell you... had you invested your pocket money in 1980... you would have been a millionaire.
Now be careful how they word it. They say... had you invested in those funds that started 20 years ago, you would have been a millionaire. That is like saying had you bought the lottery... because that chart behind them is made up with the winning funds. The loosing funds have been removed from the collection that makes the trend, as they are no longer available to invest in today, so why include them in the trend of the funds they are offering that you invest in !! Off course they keep saying past performance is not indicative of future trends:-)...
Where do they make their money you ask... selling insurance my friend as well as fees and charges on their advice (PS: Fees and charges is the same word, they just invented two words to charge more:-)
One last detail... if your investment starts turning south, somebody that works for you might advise you to move your money into a safer investment. Somebody that works for the bank might rather keep the money there to protect the fund.
Guess who the financial adviser protects ?
I love this stuff... you couldn't make up such a scam (at least I couldn't):-) even though I am being burnt by it as we speak:-)
So if I disclose all your bank password, would that make me immune ? I agree in part, but it is a problem.
If as a delivery dude, I find your key under the front door mat, can I make a 1000 copies and drop them off all over the city with your address to teach you to be safer ?
I am genuinely asking, I don't have the answer.
If I simply return your key, and you keep putting it under the mat, then what do I do.
In fact they are quite common. One of te big problem with rare earths is that if you extract them, you generally find them in company with thorium. Now even though it is naturally there, one you took it out of the ground you are obligated to treat it as a radioactive waste. You are not aloud to mix it back into the ground at the same consistency you found it. The result is that one of the few places on earth you can get rare earths is... China. Who by the way is storing the thorium, and is moving ahead into building Gen IV reactors.
In fact there is a dude that is petitioning to be allowed to extract "rare" earth metal and be allowed to store the thorium. This one mine will be able to produce all the energy the US needs as a... byproduct. Now that is handy
If you are given a rate of increase you also need a sample size and a proportion of a sample to make use of it. Even if the rate of psychopaths is higher in CEOs s-why just jumps to the point as if that is the reason companies are run that way. It doesn't follow unless you want me to say it in Latin to give it extra weight.
I made a suggestion that was just as ridiculous, but effectively think of it like this. People with red hair might make better CEOs. People with red hair might be more likely psychopaths. It does not mean that CEOs are by and large psychopaths.
Amm... the chance of you dieing a violent death is a one way graph of continuous reduction. Hunter gathers where most likely than all to be killed be man of beast or nature. I think there is one book I would recommend, Mat Ridley's Rational optimist. Most warm and fuzzy recollections of the long past are dramatically misplaced and the references are all a click away.
More importantly, can you go up... most poor places are also high density. Where it is low density, it is probably because of the elements which this house might have problems with.
Simply put, if they spam you and you click them as so, then even their legitimate emails will end up in other peoples spam folder. If they are a little agresive in sending you emails without a easy way to opt out... SPAM
Junk... this is an example of statistical manipulation for emphasis. If it is four times more likely to be psychopaths , and the ratio is 1 in a million. Then all you have is 4 in a million.
Simply put, these groups suffer from group think. Happens to every group, and we likley suffer from it as well (e.g. in any group of like thinking people say organized religions, sport clubs, political followers). They can walk down a one way dead and each will pat each other on the back all the way.
PS: Do not forget, it may take a marginal psychopath to run those companies. Your statistics did not say if these psychopaths are the successful CEOs or not.
So in fact if we combine this Wall street computer with the way Google algorithms are developing we may have Skynet almost here. If a billion people contribute in decisions that an algorithm makes, is it still human intelligence or emerging intelligence from this "Internet computer" ?
Slashdot Mirror
Tell that to the sun
You see, they exclude them selves from science ... ... they will only rise to the potential they allow them selves.
That's OK
Its a matter of time, but the truth is on it's way
People on average have less than two feet.
Well that is based on an Intel platform, so they do have some experience
I would say that is a brilliant name for a party !!! Can you imagine a member take the stand and talk on some mundane issue in a full purple polka dot clowns outfit !!
You're saying it like it is a bad thing ?
...
I can fork a device and have other companies adds or no adds at all
Very simple ... Google develops driverless cloud printing and releases code and API into public domain.
Apple develops driverless cloud printing and somehow gets a patent and respective clamping down.
Very different mindsets
Well you could build a prototype that consumes more energy than produces but is still a reactor *cough* fusion *cough* ... sniffle ...
So does an abacus ... you could even unearth one and it might still be functional ...
There is one single change that will have an immediate affect on all this business.
... all the funds in their collection are making money !!! They tell you ... had you invested your pocket money in 1980 ... you would have been a millionaire.
... had you invested in those funds that started 20 years ago, you would have been a millionaire. That is like saying had you bought the lottery ... because that chart behind them is made up with the winning funds. The loosing funds have been removed from the collection that makes the trend, as they are no longer available to invest in today, so why include them in the trend of the funds they are offering that you invest in !! Off course they keep saying past performance is not indicative of future trends :-) ...
... selling insurance my friend as well as fees and charges on their advice (PS: Fees and charges is the same word, they just invented two words to charge more :-)
... if your investment starts turning south, somebody that works for you might advise you to move your money into a safer investment.
... you couldn't make up such a scam (at least I couldn't) :-) even though I am being burnt by it as we speak :-)
KPIs on financial advisers.
If you go to a financial adviser, and pay him money to advise you where to put your money.
You should be able to choose the financial adviser that has made the most profit for his customers.
Well that information is only known to banks. Why is that ? Because even though you pay financial advisers, they actually work for banks and not for you !
Most financial advisers are actually crap, and don't make money for their customers. When you walk in their office, they show you amazing trend graphs, What they don't tell you is that they started with 1000 funds 20 years ago, and slowly retire the bad performing funds, and introduce new ones as time advances. So amazingly
Now be careful how they word it. They say
Where do they make their money you ask
One last detail
Somebody that works for the bank might rather keep the money there to protect the fund.
Guess who the financial adviser protects ?
I love this stuff
Well many features started cropping up in jailbroken iOS before they where implemented. Others still wait there ...
tethering, large file download on 3G, facetime on 3G, notifications and so on
Announced 1Q, 2005
...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj-KS2kfIr0
Go to 4:00 to see the slide to unlock in action
Now Apple requested the patent on December 2005, I am guessing some form of prior art should kill that.
So if I disclose all your bank password, would that make me immune ?
I agree in part, but it is a problem.
If as a delivery dude, I find your key under the front door mat, can I make a 1000 copies and drop them off all over the city with your address to teach you to be safer ?
I am genuinely asking, I don't have the answer.
If I simply return your key, and you keep putting it under the mat, then what do I do.
Same goes with an Ipad and a digital photo frame. This should be in favor of Samsung, not against.
Looks interesting, but isn't lego a faster means to express their imagination
with less mess ?
In fact they are quite common. One of te big problem with rare earths is that if you extract them, you generally find them in company with thorium. Now even though it is naturally there, one you took it out of the ground you are obligated to treat it as a radioactive waste. You are not aloud to mix it back into the ground at the same consistency you found it. The result is that one of the few places on earth you can get rare earths is ... China. Who by the way is storing the thorium, and is moving ahead into building Gen IV reactors.
... byproduct. Now that is handy
In fact there is a dude that is petitioning to be allowed to extract "rare" earth metal and be allowed to store the thorium. This one mine will be able to produce all the energy the US needs as a
http://energyfromthorium.com/2011/03/10/free-thorium/
I think my pointy went over your head.
If you are given a rate of increase you also need a sample size and a proportion of a sample to make use of it. Even if the rate of psychopaths is higher in CEOs s-why just jumps to the point as if that is the reason companies are run that way. It doesn't follow unless you want me to say it in Latin to give it extra weight.
I made a suggestion that was just as ridiculous, but effectively think of it like this. People with red hair might make better CEOs. People with red hair might be more likely psychopaths. It does not mean that CEOs are by and large psychopaths.
Amm ... the chance of you dieing a violent death is a one way graph of continuous reduction. Hunter gathers where most likely than all to be killed be man of beast or nature. I think there is one book I would recommend, Mat Ridley's Rational optimist. Most warm and fuzzy recollections of the long past are dramatically misplaced and the references are all a click away.
A favorite way of hunting was to burn the forest and wait for the animals to run out in fear.
More importantly, can you go up ... most poor places are also high density. Where it is low density, it is probably because of the elements which this house might have problems with.
Simply put, if they spam you and you click them as so, then even their legitimate emails will end up in other peoples spam folder. ... SPAM
If they are a little agresive in sending you emails without a easy way to opt out
Junk ... this is an example of statistical manipulation for emphasis. If it is four times more likely to be psychopaths , and the ratio is 1 in a million. Then all you have is 4 in a million.
Simply put, these groups suffer from group think. Happens to every group, and we likley suffer from it as well (e.g. in any group of like thinking people say organized religions, sport clubs, political followers). They can walk down a one way dead and each will pat each other on the back all the way.
PS: Do not forget, it may take a marginal psychopath to run those companies. Your statistics did not say if these psychopaths are the successful CEOs or not.
Well ... 500,000 Android activations a day, that should "count" for something ... or is that Gnu/Android ?
Very very good point ?!
So in fact if we combine this Wall street computer with the way Google algorithms are developing we may have Skynet almost here. If a billion people contribute in decisions that an algorithm makes, is it still human intelligence or emerging intelligence from this "Internet computer" ?