Can you tell me more about why you think Microsoft isn't allowed to use Google's results in their results, or to use data gathered from Google searches to improve their engine?
It makes no difference either way. Bing is a search engine. I don't care if all it did was run your query over to Google and search on it and return the results with its own front.
Welcome to the internet, whiners. Anyone ever use aggregate search engines before? Chill out.
Do you seriously think you are making a point here?
The idea that morality can only come from some higher power is absurd. As you can see from this very discussion, ideas of right and wrong are different in different societies. Obviously, morality is collectively determined by the society.
Take the bucket off your head, coward.
I am no longer a pirate of anything, but I used to be.
My position was that if I can't afford something, but I can benefit enormously from acquiring it while no one is hurt by the "theft", I should certainly do so. Many software tools fell into this category.
Now that I am a productive member of society, I do not pirate anything since I have the means to pay for it. However, to have lost that experience and learning made possible by the pirating could have drastically changed my status today.
I think it's sarcasm. It used to be people would reply with how "XKCD is not 'obligatory'". I think this is just the next step of escalation. Take cover now.
What isn't balanced? I've played many matches and I haven't found any balance problems. Personally, I was extremely impressed with how balanced the game was at release.
This isn't my first account either. My last account was a single digit, but that wasn't my first account either. My first account was actually before they had invented numbers, and it was actually a Sanskrit phrase. Unfortunately, the rock I chiseled my passwords into was destroyed in the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event, so I can't log in with them anymore.
Bluefin just catchin the blow-by.
No immediate consequences for destroying species.. maybe we'll learn to enforce preservation of life soon, or maybe we'll just capitalize ourselves out of the water too.
It is unfortunate you failed comprehension (even in what you quoted), but I enjoyed your post and so I wish you well in your ambition of arguing against points that weren't made. I assume you meant to do that, so I won't insult your intelligence by explaining the obvious.
Slashdot Mirror
Are they making it retroactive then?
Can you tell me more about why you think Microsoft isn't allowed to use Google's results in their results, or to use data gathered from Google searches to improve their engine?
Are you implying that Google owns a copyright on their search results?
yeah, so then you go use google when you notice it's faster and don't use bing anymore. I don't see where the outrage comes from. Just cuz M$ ?
It makes no difference either way. Bing is a search engine. I don't care if all it did was run your query over to Google and search on it and return the results with its own front.
Welcome to the internet, whiners. Anyone ever use aggregate search engines before? Chill out.
Because if they leave it up they can gather data to incriminate more individuals. Honeypot?
Do you seriously think you are making a point here?
The idea that morality can only come from some higher power is absurd. As you can see from this very discussion, ideas of right and wrong are different in different societies. Obviously, morality is collectively determined by the society.
Take the bucket off your head, coward.
I am no longer a pirate of anything, but I used to be. My position was that if I can't afford something, but I can benefit enormously from acquiring it while no one is hurt by the "theft", I should certainly do so. Many software tools fell into this category. Now that I am a productive member of society, I do not pirate anything since I have the means to pay for it. However, to have lost that experience and learning made possible by the pirating could have drastically changed my status today.
I think it's sarcasm. It used to be people would reply with how "XKCD is not 'obligatory'". I think this is just the next step of escalation. Take cover now.
At least Catholic girls are easy.
Not if they only spend the interest. There are investment options available that earn decent percentages. It is feasible.
Though it is not feasible for paycheck-to-paycheck dude.
And even more to rivals and enemies
you're just supposed to assume that because there are links to sources that whatever you think will be backed up by those sources.
Fixed.
You should people with a like-a-like before you joke people as it just fools you like a learn
Thanks for clarifying that, AC.
What isn't balanced? I've played many matches and I haven't found any balance problems. Personally, I was extremely impressed with how balanced the game was at release.
Agreed on the voice acting and storyline.
Like shit.
This isn't my first account either. My last account was a single digit, but that wasn't my first account either. My first account was actually before they had invented numbers, and it was actually a Sanskrit phrase. Unfortunately, the rock I chiseled my passwords into was destroyed in the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event, so I can't log in with them anymore.
Bluefin just catchin the blow-by. No immediate consequences for destroying species.. maybe we'll learn to enforce preservation of life soon, or maybe we'll just capitalize ourselves out of the water too.
Killing for dogma.
So now the US can launch missiles that buzz the Kremlin before going on to hit targets in Iraq. Bitchin
I'll only say that at the least you're not wrong.
mod parent up: insightful
It is unfortunate you failed comprehension (even in what you quoted), but I enjoyed your post and so I wish you well in your ambition of arguing against points that weren't made. I assume you meant to do that, so I won't insult your intelligence by explaining the obvious.
The fact that there is this kind of money to be spent is rather dependent on the overwhelming power of the US military at this point.
As long as the US is The Superpower, their money will hold value no matter how much debt they go into.
Divert the funds into what you describe sure, but if it doesn't yield marketable results quickly, the US would end up in trouble.