Slashdot Mirror


User: nanostuff

nanostuff's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
34
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 34

  1. Re:Are most programmes multi-processor? on Intel Details Upcoming Gulftown Six-Core Processor · · Score: 1

    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/GTA-IV-1.0.3,1402.html

    One frame more for a quad core processor over the closest dual core.

    Not exactly a "requirement"

  2. Inspirational monkey on Neural Implant To Give Control of Paralyzed Arms · · Score: 1

    Kudos to the monkey. If I found myself in a tiny box and without feeling in my arm, the last thing on my mind would be earning rewards.

    Achievement points, maybe.

  3. Re:Small Jump to Telepathy on Electrode Implant Gives Mute Man a (Synthesized) Voice · · Score: 1

    The limitation here is interpreted accentuations and generally being restricted to having words come out, but having no control over how they come out. Don't even think about singing. Interfacing with the vagus nerve through a laryngeal simulator would translate muscle intentions into sound rather than words into sound. I saw a fairly impressive simulator of the human vocal tract a while back, and a demonstration of EEG devices on the neck. This is the holy grail of voice restoration/synthesis.

  4. Re:Unless... on Major Advances In Knot Theory · · Score: 1

    The ONLY real hard part is the flash of insight that computers can never do

    My insight algorithm would disagree.

  5. Re:A little slow? on $208 Million Petascale Computer Gets Green Light · · Score: 1

    What is a real application in this case? Seems to me like performance could vary wildly from one "real world" application to another, so it may not be as simple as to say 1 Petaflop real performance. Peak in this case would indicate a much larger performance difference, but again, not a particularly meaningful number. But if it runs Crysis, that's all I need to know.

  6. A little slow? on $208 Million Petascale Computer Gets Green Light · · Score: 1

    Didn't Blue Gene/L do nearly 500 TFlops sustained in 2007? Doubling that by 2011 seems a little... slow. Perhaps the architectural difference will have more substantial benefits in real world performance, but by the given numbers alone, it seems like a disappointing upgrade.

  7. Re:Meanwhile... on Nearly 50,000 IT Jobs Lost In Past Year · · Score: 1

    and what companies are doing will result in this country's ultimate demise as a superpower.

    You say this as if it's a bad thing. Jobs going to poorer regions of the world is a natural and wonderful balancing. Jobs being lost to automation, that's even greater.

  8. Re:28 Qubits ought to be enough for everybody on Opening Quantum Computing To the Public · · Score: 1

    You're been reading quantum-brain hogwash again haven't you?

  9. Re:Futurama on The Future of Mind Control of Physical Objects · · Score: 1

    That's fiendishly crude and sloppy. If you have the technology to do this plus receive and send all necessary neural data, you will surely have the technology to replicate the biological network in a more durable medium and forego such a haphazard implementation in the first place.

  10. Re:It's about frigging time! on The Fight To End Aging Gains Legitimacy, Funding · · Score: 1

    Watch for the government to try to restrict this research, or use of its results, to "save social security".

    If the theory is that the government will restrict what is not in their favor, I find it hard to believe they would, of all things, prevent the development of technology that could extend their reign indefinitely.

  11. Re:Not Bloody Likely on Supercomputer Simulates Human Visual System · · Score: 1

    It is all automated processing. Is there any kind of processing? Jesus processing? Jesus Insideâ
  12. Re:go brain go on Supercomputer Simulates Human Visual System · · Score: 1

    How large a part of the Roadrunner supercomputer can your brain simulate? If you're going to make a direct comparison, let's make it fair.

  13. Re:Singularity is naive on Douglas Hofstadter Looks At the Future · · Score: 1

    hardware wears out, and without infrastructure to support it, the 'singularity' will die through disk/memory/processor/whatever failure in fairly short order. I don't think you've thought this through. The internet, computers, anything electronic should have been long gone by now if it subscribed to your "wearing out" policy.
  14. Re:Balls of crystal on Kurzweil on the Future · · Score: 1

    So then you see that diet and exercise only goes so far in making people healthier and smarter. At some point a bit of modern marvel is just the thing. Vitrectomy for you, a better hippocampus for Jimmy. Let's not define some arbitrary boundary to what level of technology is sane.

    BTW, I love how you instantly get +1 Score, that's wonderful :)

  15. Re:hmmm. on IEEE Special Report On the Singularity · · Score: 1

    Ultimately, unless you can explain how a exact copy of a certain physical system is not the physical system in question despite being identical in every point that can be measured or debated over, yes it is.

  16. Re:Balls of crystal on Kurzweil on the Future · · Score: 1

    What does liposuction have to do with sanity? People like to improve themselves. To suggest doing so is insanity is insanity.

  17. Re:Balls of crystal on Kurzweil on the Future · · Score: 1

    I don't see any sane person adding a computer to his brain for non-medical uses. Never thought I'd see any sane person carrying a computer in their pocket. It's a wonderful thing how narrow-minded objections obsolete so quickly.
  18. Re:mid-age life crisis on Kurzweil on the Future · · Score: 1

    It takes 15 years, sometimes, for a useful drug with no proven side effects to make it to market. How long does it take a new transistor manufacturing technology to make it to market? Technology won't sit idle during the period the drug is being brought to market. The transition phase is not the same length it takes to release the product. It may take 10 years for a drug to come to market, but one year later another drug is discovered which will also take 10 years. When the first drug comes out, the next one will be available one year later.

    It's equally ridiculous to assume that the rate of increase will remain the same with no compelling evidence to support the assertion. You have unrealistically high expectations of compelling evidence. Kurzweil has used numerous examples going from medical imaging resolutions, both temporal and spacial, DNA sequencing costs, DNA synthesis costs, the exponential growth of available gene therapies.
  19. Re:hmmm. on IEEE Special Report On the Singularity · · Score: 1

    Either you misinterpreted that part of the movie or I have. My understanding was that it makes no difference who falls into the tank because it is illogical to presume a uniqueness between two identical copies.

  20. Re:hmmm. on IEEE Special Report On the Singularity · · Score: 1

    If you want a transfer, you copy and delete the original. Now you've transferred the consciousness. Problem solved.

  21. Re:First, do no harm (to another's marketplace) on Large Web Host Urges Customers to Use Gmail · · Score: 1

    You're making me feel guilty for breathing without having someone charge me for it. Think of the capital that can be created by monetizing oxygen consumption.

  22. Re: on NASA Will Man Destruct Switch Just In Case · · Score: 1

    Looks like slamming into Newfoundland is acceptable.

  23. Re: on MADD Targets GTA IV Over Drunk Driving Scene · · Score: 1

    MADD also is asking car and alcohol manufacturers to consider removing cars and alcohol from distribution
  24. Re:Except a good bit of the base research on Bill Gates On the GPL — "We Disagree" · · Score: 1

    I'd like American Idol banned from the TV/web, and myspace. All those shitty car commercials, ban them too. Fortunately for the free world, we won't get what we want.

  25. Conscious AI on Next-Generation CAPTCHA Exploits the Semantic Gap · · Score: 1

    The first conscious AI will without a doubt be created by a spammer. Forget cures for diseases, there are cats behind letters to be found.