Funny (read: hypocritical) of the left to pump up the completely fabricated myth of Russia interfering in the U.S. election, but openly loves the Canadian government interfering in U.S. politics.
Yet the U.S. wants to interfere in Canadas internal business regulations in many fields. Copyright. Agriculture. Lumber. To name 3. Are you fine with that?
Wow. so much misinformation, where shall I begin? Allah is not "god" in Arabic. It is the name of the head god in the Arabic pantheon which was the Moon god. Why do you think there are crescent moon symbols everywhere? Mohammed's people, the Arabs where likely not related to the people of Ishmael. His tribe was likely the nomadic tribes on the Mount Sinai area. Judaism did not even exist at the time of Abraham. It grew out of Abraham but Arabic people had nothing to do with that lineage. Mohammed wanted to make his people monotheistic so he adopted some ideas that he learned from travelling traders of Jewish and Christian background and chose the Moon god to be their only god in his new religion. They still kept all of the traditions from the old Arabic religion. Mecca was the center for worship of the pantheon. The Hajji Pilgrimage to Mecca, the Kaaba, the stoning of the Devil (pillar) , circling the Kaaba, are all from the Arabic religion the preceded Islam. Where are the laws of Moses in Islam? Where are the teachings of Jesus in Islam? Nowhere because they were incompatible with it.
Calling Islam an Abrahamic religion is pure nonsense. There is no direct lineage. He just copied some ideas and tried to create a new backstory to support it.
Let's correct your misinformation
Al-Lah = The Lord. Just like the Abrahamic god is The Lord. Same God same "name" just in a different language. Moslems originally prayed to Jerusalem (some still do). Mohammad tried to unify his followers with the Jews in Jerusalem with him as their new prophet. When the news came to him during prayer that the Jewish leaders had rejected him THEN he turned and prayed towards Mecca.
Mohammad was a native of Mecca and not once but 3 times his followers were expelled because the worshipers of the "old gods" thought they were too numerous and dangerous to the old ways. When the first group went to a nearby Christian country the King questioned them on their beliefs and accepted them as Christian Subjects.
Tell you what. how about you look for some books on the history of Islam and the life of Mohammad that were written neither by Moslems or by people who hate Moslems and get some honest facts rather than your nonsense.
Not religious but when I read up on Islamic history it reminded me so much of Christian history in the things they did and believed.
Be fair: One child. Very much a child when they married, but it was a political thing to tie families together. In accordance with custom he didn't consummate the marriage until she was menstruating, and thus considered an adult by the standards of the time. Today, he would be considered guilty of statutory rape - but those were very different times, and what he did was not really out of the ordinary for a man of some wealth and political importance.
Be even more fair and recognize that for that "child" there are two ages. The younger age comes from her as an old lady. Is it any surprise she knocked 6 years off her age? If you accept that young age then at the age of 2 she converted to Islam and by her eloquence converted her parents. The other age puts those events when she was 8. By the higher age in most of the U.S. she could marry with parental or judicial consent. It just isn't good for the anti-Islam narrative for her to not be a small child and Mohammad to not be a pedophile under modern law.
I'm non religious and when reading up on the life of Mohammad could never decide if he believed his preaching or was just a world class "used camel salesman".
Nonsense, as usual from the far left wing. Maybe you should examine the facts instead of the rag you read that espouses those collectivist views you adore so much.
But who cares. We are in charge now. Maybe it's now time to shut down all left wing press, thought, websites, groups, since you're so completely off the rails and unreasonable.
Just a thought.
While throwing out the 1st Amendment or maybe the whole Constitution.
The problem with this is that just because you may have liked the old game you may not like the new one and so won't buy it and may not buy the next one either because they took away the one you actually liked.
I could regale you with stories about how debian refused to take input from a PS/2 keyboard after a dist-upgrade
How about a USB keyboard that would work for seconds at a time after you unplugged and reinstalled it due to a Win 10 update? Or terminal software that didn't work for a month until another update fixed it? Had both of those. The keyboard I fixed after IT failed to and the other I had to use an alternate computer for the terminal for that month. Never did find out why the terminal program didn't work right. The terminal program also had an update of Win10 remove the terminal programs config. Such fun constantly debugging stupid shit like this instead of actually working.
It can't help that modern Linux distros have become such a shitshow. By that I mean the Linux and open source software ecosystem undergoes totally unnecessary change very rapidly. Often this has made the user experience worse, and it makes it harder to use and support Linux.
Funny stuff. Didn't MS just roll out an update that removes Mediaplayer from your system? You get a forced reboot, go to use mediaplayer and it's magically gone no notice or warning. You can (for now at least) reinstall it without paying, but why remove it where it is already installed without at LEAST asking? Rapid unnecessary change is all through Windows 10. With Linux at least updates are your choice and spyware is not part of the OS.
Presumably the researchers who created the papers own the copyright. So what standing do the PUBLISHERS of these journals to sue over copyrights they don't own?
Usually Microsoft is championing how they're "Making it Simple(TM)" to develop and deploy millions of plugins with little regard to privacy, security, upgradability, or robustness. Just get the latest Visual Studio which will give you a wizard that will spew out reams of boilerplate code, and you insert your application in the white spaces.
Not always. At one time their promotion of add ons for IE amounted to "It is harder to make add ons so you will have less competition.
Controls need to be changed to match Windows or Apple.
As does appearence. Of course it can still be changable.
Being open/free might actually make it harder to be desktopable.
Does it also need to be changed to being prehacked and loaded with Corporate Spyware like Win 10?
Mine was 1998. I installed Redhat 5.2 and Linux has been on my desktop ever since.
2007 and it wasn't until I had a Linux problem (of a type that could show up on any OS) and had to switch to my Windows machine to look up the solution (simple once you knew it, fixed without the CLI) that I realized I hadn't used the Windows machine for over a month and found it frustrating without the little shortcuts I was used to in Linux that didn't exist in the Windows DE. Since then Linux has been my primary OS.
Same thing happened with the Year of the Network. Till suddenly networks were everywhere because of the slow constant growth not by an explosion. Of course Linux is all over as Android is built on Linux and dominates tablets and phones.
A public school in Toronto had this forced on them. It didn't last the first year because it wasn't the black people but a few black LOUDMOUTHS who wanted it. Funny that their reason was that the black kids needed to be taught the black way because they don't learn the same way as the whites.
Slashdot Mirror
Funny (read: hypocritical) of the left to pump up the completely fabricated myth of Russia interfering in the U.S. election, but openly loves the Canadian government interfering in U.S. politics.
Yet the U.S. wants to interfere in Canadas internal business regulations in many fields. Copyright. Agriculture. Lumber. To name 3. Are you fine with that?
Agnostics are more like "I know there is no evidence, but just maybe there still is something"..
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. That is the agnostic thinking.
Wow. so much misinformation, where shall I begin? Allah is not "god" in Arabic. It is the name of the head god in the Arabic pantheon which was the Moon god. Why do you think there are crescent moon symbols everywhere? Mohammed's people, the Arabs where likely not related to the people of Ishmael. His tribe was likely the nomadic tribes on the Mount Sinai area. Judaism did not even exist at the time of Abraham. It grew out of Abraham but Arabic people had nothing to do with that lineage. Mohammed wanted to make his people monotheistic so he adopted some ideas that he learned from travelling traders of Jewish and Christian background and chose the Moon god to be their only god in his new religion. They still kept all of the traditions from the old Arabic religion. Mecca was the center for worship of the pantheon. The Hajji Pilgrimage to Mecca, the Kaaba, the stoning of the Devil (pillar) , circling the Kaaba, are all from the Arabic religion the preceded Islam. Where are the laws of Moses in Islam? Where are the teachings of Jesus in Islam? Nowhere because they were incompatible with it.
Calling Islam an Abrahamic religion is pure nonsense. There is no direct lineage. He just copied some ideas and tried to create a new backstory to support it.
Let's correct your misinformation
Al-Lah = The Lord. Just like the Abrahamic god is The Lord. Same God same "name" just in a different language. Moslems originally prayed to Jerusalem (some still do). Mohammad tried to unify his followers with the Jews in Jerusalem with him as their new prophet. When the news came to him during prayer that the Jewish leaders had rejected him THEN he turned and prayed towards Mecca.
Mohammad was a native of Mecca and not once but 3 times his followers were expelled because the worshipers of the "old gods" thought they were too numerous and dangerous to the old ways. When the first group went to a nearby Christian country the King questioned them on their beliefs and accepted them as Christian Subjects.
Tell you what. how about you look for some books on the history of Islam and the life of Mohammad that were written neither by Moslems or by people who hate Moslems and get some honest facts rather than your nonsense.
Not religious but when I read up on Islamic history it reminded me so much of Christian history in the things they did and believed.
Be fair: One child. Very much a child when they married, but it was a political thing to tie families together. In accordance with custom he didn't consummate the marriage until she was menstruating, and thus considered an adult by the standards of the time. Today, he would be considered guilty of statutory rape - but those were very different times, and what he did was not really out of the ordinary for a man of some wealth and political importance.
Be even more fair and recognize that for that "child" there are two ages. The younger age comes from her as an old lady. Is it any surprise she knocked 6 years off her age? If you accept that young age then at the age of 2 she converted to Islam and by her eloquence converted her parents. The other age puts those events when she was 8. By the higher age in most of the U.S. she could marry with parental or judicial consent. It just isn't good for the anti-Islam narrative for her to not be a small child and Mohammad to not be a pedophile under modern law.
I'm non religious and when reading up on the life of Mohammad could never decide if he believed his preaching or was just a world class "used camel salesman".
Nonsense, as usual from the far left wing. Maybe you should examine the facts instead of the rag you read that espouses those collectivist views you adore so much.
But who cares. We are in charge now. Maybe it's now time to shut down all left wing press, thought, websites, groups, since you're so completely off the rails and unreasonable.
Just a thought.
While throwing out the 1st Amendment or maybe the whole Constitution.
Government by the Corporation for the Corporation. The Corporation is Mother, the Corporation if Father.
The problem with this is that just because you may have liked the old game you may not like the new one and so won't buy it and may not buy the next one either because they took away the one you actually liked.
Let's shut down butt fucking
If you hadn't begun doing it you wouldn't need to stop.
You could always try ACE
So how much of this money will be to keep MS the dominant OS provider to schools and therefore keep filling the Gates pockets?
I could regale you with stories about how debian refused to take input from a PS/2 keyboard after a dist-upgrade
How about a USB keyboard that would work for seconds at a time after you unplugged and reinstalled it due to a Win 10 update? Or terminal software that didn't work for a month until another update fixed it? Had both of those. The keyboard I fixed after IT failed to and the other I had to use an alternate computer for the terminal for that month. Never did find out why the terminal program didn't work right. The terminal program also had an update of Win10 remove the terminal programs config. Such fun constantly debugging stupid shit like this instead of actually working.
It can't help that modern Linux distros have become such a shitshow. By that I mean the Linux and open source software ecosystem undergoes totally unnecessary change very rapidly. Often this has made the user experience worse, and it makes it harder to use and support Linux.
Funny stuff. Didn't MS just roll out an update that removes Mediaplayer from your system? You get a forced reboot, go to use mediaplayer and it's magically gone no notice or warning. You can (for now at least) reinstall it without paying, but why remove it where it is already installed without at LEAST asking? Rapid unnecessary change is all through Windows 10. With Linux at least updates are your choice and spyware is not part of the OS.
If you didn't want it, then why would it obey it? Or are you supposing that what you want isn't part of your mindset?
You've never watched Forbidden Planet?
Presumably the researchers who created the papers own the copyright. So what standing do the PUBLISHERS of these journals to sue over copyrights they don't own?
Records when people are on the scene not random animals. Capable of recognizing you and not recording your comings and goings.
Usually Microsoft is championing how they're "Making it Simple(TM)" to develop and deploy millions of plugins with little regard to privacy, security, upgradability, or robustness. Just get the latest Visual Studio which will give you a wizard that will spew out reams of boilerplate code, and you insert your application in the white spaces.
Not always. At one time their promotion of add ons for IE amounted to "It is harder to make add ons so you will have less competition.
What the fuck is cortana? Sounds like some sort of butthole disorder.
Seems like an accurate description
Controls need to be changed to match Windows or Apple.
As does appearence. Of course it can still be changable.
Being open/free might actually make it harder to be desktopable.
Does it also need to be changed to being prehacked and loaded with Corporate Spyware like Win 10?
If I install Windows there is one version of it, Win 10; same with Apple..
That must be a shock to MS when they think they have Home, Pro and Enterprise just for 3 of the top of the head of a non Windows user.
When was YOUR year of the Linux desktop?
Mine was 1998. I installed Redhat 5.2 and Linux has been on my desktop ever since.
2007 and it wasn't until I had a Linux problem (of a type that could show up on any OS) and had to switch to my Windows machine to look up the solution (simple once you knew it, fixed without the CLI) that I realized I hadn't used the Windows machine for over a month and found it frustrating without the little shortcuts I was used to in Linux that didn't exist in the Windows DE. Since then Linux has been my primary OS.
So which Windows or Mac OS when you point to the task bar allows you to scroll through open windows with the scroll wheel on your mouse?
Same thing happened with the Year of the Network. Till suddenly networks were everywhere because of the slow constant growth not by an explosion. Of course Linux is all over as Android is built on Linux and dominates tablets and phones.
What part of the Constitution says that?
A public school in Toronto had this forced on them. It didn't last the first year because it wasn't the black people but a few black LOUDMOUTHS who wanted it. Funny that their reason was that the black kids needed to be taught the black way because they don't learn the same way as the whites.
Why would she do that when the kiss was forced on BOTH of them without eithers consent?