Slashdot Mirror


Department of Justice Demands Facebook Information From 'Anti-Administration Activists' (cnn.com)

PopeRatzo shares a report from CNN: Trump administration lawyers are demanding the private account information of potentially thousands of Facebook users in three separate search warrants served on the social media giant, according to court documents obtained by CNN. The warrants specifically target the accounts of three Facebook users who are described by their attorneys as "anti-administration activists who have spoken out at organized events, and who are generally very critical of this administration's policies." One of those users, Emmelia Talarico, operated the disruptj20 page where Inauguration Day protests were organized and discussed; the page was visited by an estimated 6,000 users whose identities the government would have access to if Facebook hands over the information sought in the search warrants. In court filings, Talarico says if her account information was given to the government, officials would have access to her "personal passwords, security questions and answers, and credit card information," plus "the private lists of invitees and attendees to multiple political events sponsored by the page."

253 comments

  1. And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful, I think I saw a mouse.

    1. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trump must have watched the Catalan news reports and said... Can I do that?

    2. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he can, he's the most POWERFUL MAN in the world.

    3. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Underlying meaning: Don't use Facebook!

    4. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasted his power. He's a soon-bankrupt-again prisoner headed for the firing squad.

    5. Re:And so it begins... by Humbubba · · Score: 2

      In the halls of justice, the only justice is in the halls - Lenny Bruce (1923 - 1966)

    6. Re:And so it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  2. Fuck Donald Drumpf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkZ5e94QnWk

        IMPEACH DA BITCH TRUMPIES

    1. Re: Fuck Donald Drumpf by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Such persuasive eloquence!

  3. Not right by markdavis · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This just isn't right. If they are seeking the ID of people who posed actual physical threats, or were involved in UNLAWFUL activity (such as genuine libel, inciting riots, participating in violence or riots, etc), that might be justified.

    Being caught up in an ID disclosure just because one visited a web site or Facebook page goes well beyond what could possibly necessary.

    More info needed, especially when it is a CNN article.

    1. Re:Not right by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      More info needed, especially when it is a CNN article.

      http://fortune.com/2017/09/29/...

      https://lawnewz.com/crazy/doj-...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This just isn't right. If they are seeking the ID of people who posed actual physical threats, or were involved in UNLAWFUL activity (such as genuine libel, inciting riots, participating in violence or riots, etc), that might be justified.

      Being caught up in an ID disclosure just because one visited a web site or Facebook page goes well beyond what could possibly necessary.

      More info needed, especially when it is a CNN article.

      To take one example, Antifa has gained the distinction of being labeled a 'domestic terrorist organisation' in a very short time for throwing urnine bombs and punching a few Nazis while the Ku Klux Klan is still not considered worthy of that title even though it has been waging a campaign of lynchings, murder, rape and terrorist bombings for 150 years. From the Trump administration's point of view there is nothing wrong with that picture so what makes you think they don't consider themselves to have ample justification for cracking down on people who committed the unpardonable crime of visiting Trump critical Facebook pages? After all, Antifa and other organisations like it are a clear threat to Trump's 'base'. From the point of view of the likes of Sessions, Trump, Bannon, Miller, Gorka, and the rest of that ilk nothing is more natural than a president using his authority to persecute his political opponents.

    3. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because EVERYBODY who got destroyed by the House Un-American Activities Committee was trying to overthrow the government... oh that's right they weren't

      Those who refuse to learn from History are doomed to repeat it

    4. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how that is even a point of contention. The Trump campaign platform was fascism. Literally, I remember looking up the dictionary definition of the term and comparing it to his speeches back then. He hasn't given any indication he's changed his mind after taking office.

    5. Re: Not right by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you don't want to get caught up in an investigation of people who incited riots and conspired to violate others' civil liberties, don't "like" the pages those people use to plan riots and conspire to violate civil liberties.

      Don't worry, I'd never "like" trumpist pages anywhere.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally. I take nothing any of the news networks say at face value. I would be very surprised if this were the complete truth.

    7. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rioting. Smashing store windows. Burning cars. This is just in the US.

      Antifa ARE fucking terrorists.

      Fuck you Boris.

    8. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go look up the Venona files. McCarthy was right, and there was an infestation of commies in the midst. The problem is that they didn't get them all, and they've resurfaced.

    9. Re:Not right by Nostalgia4Infinity · · Score: 1

      Antifa committed violence. The government has the right to investigate, including issuing warrants for information. I can imagine that people would be concerned with being charged with conspiracy, they should be.

    10. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot really needs to end the ability of unverified ACs to post here. I am beginning to suspect that too many comments like the one above are coming from the other side of the planet.

    11. Re:Not right by ravenshrike · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking moron. Antifa was labeled by the Obama administration as a domestic terrorist organization in 2016.

    12. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hurrrr durrrr it's da ruuuushans!

      kys

    13. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes , fake news out of fox is much more useful than an article that does not have all the information. Idiot.

    14. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem was that he incited fear of outsiders to gain political power, and because there were vanishingly few actual bad guys to find, he started trying to make villains out of people who disagreed with him.

      There were a few actual Russian spies. He was still a shithead.

    15. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understand that antifa is like Anonymous, right? It's just a bunch of people who independently declare themselves to be antifa.

      Which means that it has no character -- neither peaceful nor terrorist. It's just people. It's a goal, not a group.

    16. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed. look at all the bitcoinerz. repeat after me: eighteen-forty-nine. 1849.

    17. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aussies and new zealanders post here, yes.

    18. Re:Not right by mariox19 · · Score: 1

      If you go to the DisruptJ20 website and look around a bit, you'll see that they distribute publications that include how to fight with riot police and armored vehicles—I suppose in case enthusiasts want research to write a screenplay or something. For example, the "Egyptian Tactical Pamphlet." https://www.indybay.org/newsit...

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    19. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling everyone who disagrees with you a Nazi won't make you any friends and is just another reason why this page won't be defended.

    20. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it make the post any less true?

    21. Re: Not right by markdavis · · Score: 0

      >"Yes , fake news out of fox is much more useful than an article that does not have all the information. Idiot."

      CNN has far more "fake news" than even Fox. They just disguise it better. And if you think CNN is going to fairly report on anything Trump related, you are the "idiot."

    22. Re: Not right by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      ^^^^^^Found one for you, Sessions!!!^^^^^^

      Just joking . . . maybe.

    23. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All news channels make a whole lot out of nothing.
      Where the hell have you people been for the last 40 years.

    24. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gaslighting people that a fascist isn't a fascist won't make you any friends is just another reason why trumpists will be put up against the wall when the revolution comes.

    25. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh I call bullshit. ONE black guy went on a sniping rampage at white police officers because he agreed with BLM and took it to an extreme. That doesn't equate BLM to the KKK. There are a few decades of lynching, murders, intimidation, etc of a difference.

    26. Re:Not right by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "If you go to the DisruptJ20 website and look around a bit, you'll see that they distribute publications that include how to fight with riot police and armored vehicles"

      I'm no expert on USA Constitution, but wasn't that at least on its spirit? Isn't the ultimate reason for a "well regulated militia" to be able to overcome government when need arises? Or is fighting riot police and armored vehicles the exclusive privilege of the government? On top of that, isn't this kind of things what free speech is all about?

    27. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like they're asking for information on people who 'liked' the pages of the organizers of the violent anti-trump riots.

      That doesn't seem like *that* big of an overreach to me.

      Given how extremely primed the media -- especially CNN -- has been to overly hype the "republicans = nazis" rhetoric lately, I'm going to need more evidence of foul play before I worry.

    28. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're free to say these things. But if you hang around in a group of people who routinely commit terrorist acts, and you make public claims of support for the terrorists, you should be unsurprised when the authorities ask you a bunch of questions and start looking closely at you to see whether you're just a terrorist sympathizer or actually a terrorist.

      Now, if they started to try and bring charges against people for doing nothing more than hanging around terrorists publicly claiming to love and support them... that would be problematic. 'Cause, as you say... free speech...

    29. Re: Not right by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      You're right - those people have really terrifying wrists.

    30. Re:Not right by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      She also says Facebook will give officials access to her "personal passwords, security questions and answers, and credit card information,"

      Now, I can't be sure about the last two, but her "personal passwords"? Really? Facebook shouldn't even know her plain text personal passwords. At this point, and as much as I hate Trump and Jeff Sessions, I think this is just speculation on her part and she doesn't know what she's talking about.

    31. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Trump!

    32. Re:Not right by thsths · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I fail to see how the government could use the credit card information or the password for any legitimate reason.

    33. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the revolution"

      That's so special. Hey look guys, this one believes a revolution is coming!!!

    34. Re: Not right by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

      "everyone who disagrees with you" IS a NAZI, if they hold Nazi ideals, spout NAZI rhetoric and salute people who serve the Confederate Flag instead of the Constitution.
      If you happen to be one, you SHOULD be offended, often, and pointedly

    35. Re:Not right by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      This just isn't right. If they are seeking the ID of people who posed actual physical threats, or were involved in UNLAWFUL activity (such as genuine libel, inciting riots, participating in violence or riots, etc), that might be justified.

      Being caught up in an ID disclosure just because one visited a web site or Facebook page goes well beyond what could possibly necessary.

      More info needed, especially when it is a CNN article.

      Did they say only those accounts. If not, give them three for one, better, 5 for 1.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    36. Re:Not right by ebvwfbw · · Score: 0

      Nope. Hillary's was on the other hand. Remember, fascists are on the left, not the right. Can't say Nazi without saying socialist. Socialists are leftists, and lie, a LOT. Otherwise you'd take them to the curb with the rest of the trash.

      Look up what fascists really are. Compare it to the Democratic party. It's all there - race divisions, free health care, dumbing down schools, etc. Problem is, fascists eventually run out of other people's money. Then they crash, hard. Want to live in a Hillary world? Just move to venezuela, cubs, etc. If not, don't tell us what to do. Look into the Democratic parties very racist past. Don't believe that crap the all of their racists switched to the Republican party in the 1960s. I know some people that are still fooled on that one.

    37. Re:Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first incarnation of the KKK was wiped out by the Federal Government in 1871. Most members that could be identified were either arrested or killed, and everyone else dropped out to avoid that fate. You can't get much more "persecuted" than that.

      In comparison, this was a criminal conspiracy to commit rioting, arson, looting, assault, and various other violent felonies. The police got a warrant to get the names of those that read the conspiracy's Facebook page in order to further investigate.

      There is no "persecution" of anyone here. There is a warrant, there is an investigation, and if anyone is believed to have committed a crime, there will be an arrest and trial in public court.

    38. Re: Not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, another brave AC calling for "revolution" so some idiot with the brilliance of Pelosi and the sincerity of a Clinton can bring about the workers paradise of bread lines and uninhibited thought policing. I'm surprised the little turd had time between ANTIFA marches to post on /.

    39. Re: Not right by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      sounds exactly like the democrats today. everyone is a racist or a nazi to them just like everyone was a commie to mccarthy

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    40. Re: Not right by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

      I remind you that wages were at their peak as a percentage of GDP under Clinton (so much for bread lines) and the only thought policing I've seen is Trump demanding that black men shut up about the murder of unarmed black men or else be fired
      Even for a rightwing buffoon, that was a stupid line

    41. Re:Not right by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

      Nazis weren't socialists dolt
      Using the word in their name NDSP no more proves them socialist than People's Republic makes NK a Republic.
      Believe all that truth about the racist republicans, like White Power Conference headline speakers Tom DeLay, Trent Lott and Dick Armey in 1992-1997

    42. Re:Not right by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Nazis weren't socialists dolt
      Using the word in their name NDSP no more proves them socialist than People's Republic makes NK a Republic.
      Believe all that truth about the racist republicans, like White Power Conference headline speakers Tom DeLay, Trent Lott and Dick Armey in 1992-1997

      Wow, so much wrong in such a little amount of space. Name calling to boot. A sure sign you're clueless, otherwise you'd set forth an intelligent argument.

      NK - had to look it up. I never wondered about their government. NK is a Republic. It's certainly not a Democracy. There is a people's assembly, a premier and three vice premiers. Their internal structure is based on representatives - that's a Republic. Did you realize that the USA is a Republic as well? Probably not. This is not to say that anyone other than the supreme leader has any say in the country.

      Back to the Nazis - the Nazis were Socialists. In fact the official party platform was socialist. Here is a funny article - funny because the wiki people writing it still think Nazi's are to the right (due to the left's propaganda), then look at the part on the position in the political spectrum - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... . After reading that, you should have a good understanding and why you're wrong. How you've been lied to by the left. They want to escape their history because it's so bad.

      White Power Republicans? Can you show me one? If you say Trump, that shows me how out of touch you are. All I have to do is show you some videos from just a few years ago when the Democrats were giving him awards and talking nice about him. One Democrat even said that if he didn't like how things are, become President and fix it. He said - be careful what you wish for. I'm sure the Dem laughed thinking that was so funny. All until he's a Republican candidate, then of course he's the new GW Bush (and Devil incarnate). Break out the nasty name calling bag and bag of dirty tricks/lies. The only racists I know of are in the Democratic party. Largest hate group in the Country is the Democratic party. I'm not talking about assholes, like Sharpton or David Duke. Actual party members. Like Waters, like Franken to name a couple. If Republicans wanted to show white superiority, it's not hard. Just google IQ by country. 'Nuff said. If you're not convinced just respond. I can hit you with a much larger facts. Not that it will do any good I suspect. You're showing signs of deep denial of reality. Republicans try to help the other races, Democrats want everyone on the government plantation. Think about it. Black leaders that I know will tell you that as well. They want to change it. Just look at all the black people in Philly that voted for Trump. You probably don't even know that black people have benefited a lot from Trump already. I'm sure the "news" your listening to won't tell you. Still reading? I'm amazed if you are. I'll admit I was wrong. I figured you would have stopped long ago.

    43. Re:Not right by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      NK is not a republic, for the PUBLIC has no control.
      Kind of Like Trump
      You Lose

  4. A witch hunt. by fredrated · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Trump Administration is evil. I suppose I am now a target.

    1. Re:A witch hunt. by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The gov't should investigate people based on their threat risk and NOT their political leanings. If The Right only investigates The Left, and/or the The Left only investigates The Right, then our "law" is no better than Nazi law.

    2. Re:A witch hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When federal marshals raid your home in service of an IRS audit, your suspicions will confirmed. Until then, you're just another whiner.

    3. Re:A witch hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what this is.
      Did someone like, or comment positively on pages of groups known to engage in violence?

      Well, guess what? That person is now fucked.

    4. Re: A witch hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad news man.

      Your political allegience is but one of many variables in the potential " Domestic Terrorist " equation.

      Veteran status, education level, skin color, known affiliations, criminal history, personal beliefs, religion and where you live are a few others.

      Basically, everyone is potentially a Domestic Terrorist, just some score higher on the scale than others.

      You should fight for what you believe is the right path and to hell with their labels.

    5. Re:A witch hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When all you have is Left and Right polarities, where feelings trump facts, where people clump together on an internet site that stalks the entire internet. Then maybe Nazi law is what we deserve.

    6. Re: A witch hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How so? How are they 'fucked- any more than somebody in a store at the time of a robbery, who the police want to question, is 'fucked?' If they did nothing wrong they will be quickly cleared.

    7. Re:A witch hunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when the Obama (and Clinton) administration used the IRS to target conservative groups (a form of investigation) he was a Nazi?

  5. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If what you're resisting is respect for people of other races, that makes you racist.

    If what you're resisting is racism, that makes you not racist.

    What you appear to be doing is playing word games, because it's easier to be right when you control all the words. But resisting bad things is good, and resisting good things can be bad.

    Step away from the words and start working on the concepts.

  6. Credit card information? by ASCIIxTended · · Score: 2

    Why exactly would FB have Talarico's credit card information in the first place? Is FB not free anymore?

    --
    I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
    1. Re:Credit card information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably wealth transfers.

  7. CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh noes, CNN sees boogeymen. So much fake news.

    When real news picks it up, you'll learn it was a standard court issued warrant against rioters.

  8. Re: Hypocrisy by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"What you appear to be doing is playing word games, because it's easier to be right when you control all the words. But resisting bad things is good, and resisting good things can be bad."

    "Bad" and "Good" are very relative, subjective, and even flexible. Apparently the mode du jur is to do bad things in the [often wrong] belief that it is for good. I was taught that two wrongs don't make a right.

  9. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some of us deplored government overreach under the previous administration, and still deplore it under the current administration.

  10. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

    What part of the Constitution says that?

  11. Patriot act - the obvious unavoidable conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who could have foreseen such a surprising turn of events? A politician abusing the system like this? I mean, There weren't any signs. No lessons in history. Nothing that could have possibly warned against letting fear make people give up their power to a government that may at some point be controlled by a talking anus. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again.

  12. Yet another Constitutional Travsity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This president not only hasn't read the constitution, but wouldn't care even if had, and he's made that clear. Show me where the is a violent crime or public threat to people's physical safety, and perhaps I'll consider, But this is simply a witch hunt for anyone who speaks out openly against the Trump administration. American was supposed to be a place where people political opinion and protests were supposed to be allowed without government intimidation. A government elected by the people (which the electoral college vote is not I might add). This is as bad as the McCarthy days. Every time this president does something that is in violation to the constitution, there should be a vote in congress to impeach him. But of course that won't happen, until this president embarrasses this country and his party so badly that we are in danger of being cut off from the world. (Which given his UN performance, I wouldn't rule out). I suspect Facebook and other IT organizations will resist this. Perhaps Twitter should consider censoring his statements. Technically a constitutional violation as well, but ...this "twit" can do far more damage than anyone posting on Twitter of Facebook single handed.

    1. Re:Yet another Constitutional Travsity by hey! · · Score: 1

      There is nothing in the Constitution which says the executive branch can't demand this information as part of its normal law enforcement activities. That doesn't mean that Facebook is legally compelled to give them that information without a warrant, even though you may feel that is similarly intrusive.

      Here's the cold, hard truth: the Constitution cannot protect anyone's freedom if most people develop the habit of mindless compliance or expediency.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Yet another Constitutional Travsity by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      This is a test

    3. Re:Yet another Constitutional Travsity by Billary+Blinton · · Score: 0

      If you had voted correctly we could have arrested the entire right with our backdoor encryption initiatives and this would have never been a problem. My plan for America was to keep you safe. Had I won Obama's second term, national ID tied to the internet would have insured that no such requests would ever be made and Donald Trump would have never posted a thing to twitter.

    4. Re:Yet another Constitutional Travsity by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3

      constitution lists the rights of the government.

      if its not listed, they don't have that right.

      the people, otoh, are the opposite. all rights are assumed unless listed as a 'you dont get this right'.

      so, your statement is null. the constitution does not say the administration can't go door to door and demand us all sing his some song; but this is absurd to follow this line of reasoning.

      whatever is not listed as a power - the gov goes NOT get it, by default.

      not sure where you learned civics...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Yet another Constitutional Travsity by hey! · · Score: 1

      It lists the functions of government, in a very broad way that allows government quite a bit of leeway. For example the framers clearly intended for Treasury functions to be exercised by Congress, but in the very first year the Constitution was in effect Congress realized this was unworkable and created the Treasury Department in the executive branch -- this by the way is why we have this whole "Debt Ceiling" nonsense that other countries don't. That was Congress exercising its Treasury powers in ways the framers didn't specifically anticipate.

      The framers didn't anticipate having standing armies either; but Congress has wide latitude to "raise" armies as long as appropriations didn't last more than two years. This allowed them to in effect create a standing army by appropriating its budget annually, which it did starting in 1791. This is much like copyright extension; the Constitution specifically grants Congress copyright granting powers for limited terms; however since there is no specific upper limit on the term Congress has for practical purposes the power of granting indefinite copyright terms.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re: Yet another Constitutional Travsity by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      In America you have all the civil rights for which you can afford to sue in federal kangaroo court. That means I personally have no rights at all. How many rights do you have?

  13. Do you trust unelected facebook or twitter more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, there are activist groups inside facebook and twitter scouring people's profiles and messaging data, looking for people to scapegoat as "Russian" and actively hampering their capability to exist in society (at least were a large people congregate).

    There is no oversight on this, and people have gone as far as state the people in control of the larger recognizable internet have an agenda to destroy groups of people based on who they might identify with.

    These internet companies can do what they will, but people here are going to say they don't have to even respond to a legal warrant, on activity during inauguration day that is out in the openly criminal? Our we a government by the people, or by Mark Zuckerberg?

  14. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't think that there are liberals in the military?

  15. What are the charges ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the authorities have a warrant, the suspected crime should be mentionned on that warrant.

    So is that it ? Is she suspected of being an "anti-administration activist who has spoken out at organized events, and who is generally very critical of this administration's policies" ? In what fucking alternate universe has this become a crime in the U.S.

    But it's okay. Trump apologists will just say that Obama was worse, or that Clinton would have started a war with Russia.

    1. Re: What are the charges ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy. Using Facebook to conspire to commit crimes. Tacking 'online' on the end of the description of an act does not magically change it and make it legal or immune from investigation. Anoymnity on the Internet has always been a facade.

  16. FUCK YOU HITLER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean Trump. Seriously, fuck off you stupid son of a bitch. This has got to be a fucking joke right? What a fucking uneducated, unimportant, piece of shit 5 year old baby. Every person who voted for Trump should be kicked out of this country, they have no idea what this country was founded on or stands for, not one fucking clue.

    I can't wait until the US has a President again. Having a child run this country is absolutely fucking retarded. But I guess when a bunch of retards vote for a fellow retard this is what you get....

    How many months before we are ordered to water our crops with Gatorade?

    1. Re: FUCK YOU HITLER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it. #CrookedHillary lost.

    2. Re: FUCK YOU HITLER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes she wasn't a lot better, but she's not a child. Trump, his family, friends (he doesn't have any true friends), associates or acquaintances have no business running or being part of any form of government.

  17. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll fucking beat your punk nazi ass if you compare white supremacy to free speech again, bitch

  18. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want names of the Fascist Anti-Fascists... Who can't seem to stop committing VIOLENCE to prevent peoples SPEECH... Liberals and millennials are fucking lazy TRASH. You have fought no wars, shed no blood, and sacrificed NOTHING for this nation. Therefore, you deserve NOTHING!

    wow... so that's why they keep trying to start wars! it all makes sense now, they were trying to save the millenials all along, of course! humans are nothing but filthy scum without wars and human sacrifice.

  19. Re:Hypocrisy by sgtsquid · · Score: 2

    Some of us deplored government overreach under the previous administration, and still deplore it under the current administration.

    The difference is that now you're willing to speak about it publicly.

  20. Re:Hypocrisy by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When we used to hold the Soviet Union up to the light, we'd point to their jailing and beating and disappearances of dissidents and say "The USSR is a police state!"

    Nothing's changed here except the geography. These tactics are still police state tactics, no matter which dictator-wannabe is practicing them.

    --
    John
  21. CCFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually really like the Christian Conservatives for Trump page. It's pretty awesome.

  22. Seems like they don't like the target by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    There seems to be no problem with tech disclosures as long as it hits conservatives.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
    1. Re:Seems like they don't like the target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There seems to be no problem with tech disclosures as long as it hits Russians.

      FTFY

    2. Re:Seems like they don't like the target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that "republican" and "conservative" are now synonymous with "Neo-nazi racist xenophobic cunt", with offender-in-chief being POTUS, that actually seems fair.

      I'm sure there are some republicans that aren't racist cunts, but they're few and far between.

  23. Re:Hypocrisy by hord · · Score: 1

    Some of us have been complaining loudly for years and have been told to "shut up" because we have roads, education, and everything's fine.

  24. Re:Hypocrisy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a difference between resisting taxation because you don't like Obama and resisting the government trying to deport your family or take away the healthcare that is keeping you alive.

    This kind of false equivalence argument is the new favourite of the far right. "Yes we are bad, but they are the same and you are a hypocrite for not acknowledging that".

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  25. Is anyone surprised? by quonset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The con artist has repeatedly praised his buddy Putin at every opportunity, even going so far as to apologize for Putin's military deliberately bombing hospitals and civilians in Syria, and Russia's support for the dictator Assad.

    It is well known Putin doesn't like or tolerate dissent. In Crimea, which Russia stole from the Ukraine, Russia troops went door to door in the Tartar community and rounded up anyone who spoke out against the takeover. They shut down Tartar schools and the only Tartar radio station, and forbid the teaching of the Tartar language. Just recently, Russia jailed a Tartar leader because he led protests against the Russian invasion of Crimea.

    Witness now in the U.S. what the con artist is trying to do. His fragile ego can't stand anyone saying a single bad word about him and so he does this. He's only following the lead of his buddy Putin.

    That using the power of the government to go after people who exercise their First Amendment rights should even be an issue speaks volumes about this administration.

    1. Re:Is anyone surprised? by CustomBuild · · Score: 1

      The con artist has repeatedly praised his buddy Putin at every opportunity, even going so far as to apologize for Putin's military deliberately bombing hospitals and civilians in Syria, and Russia's support for the dictator Assad.

      It is well known Putin doesn't like or tolerate dissent. In Crimea, which Russia stole from the Ukraine, Russia troops went door to door in the Tartar community and rounded up anyone who spoke out against the takeover. They shut down Tartar schools and the only Tartar radio station, and forbid the teaching of the Tartar language. Just recently, Russia jailed a Tartar leader because he led protests against the Russian invasion of Crimea.

      Witness now in the U.S. what the con artist is trying to do. His fragile ego can't stand anyone saying a single bad word about him and so he does this. He's only following the lead of his buddy Putin.

      That using the power of the government to go after people who exercise their First Amendment rights should even be an issue speaks volumes about this administration.

      / Are you retarded? The US government is going after violent thugs. How rosy must your glasses be to overlook every other act, but the speech.

    2. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antifa is a government agency?

    3. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life Protip: Antifa are NOT leftists. You need a civics class, a remedial one at that along with a historical one. Point out (and we'll use the last administration) where under that administration where the government went after people who exercise their First Amendment rights. I'll wait, for a long time while you give me a valid answer.

    4. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Funny

      One thing I love about Tartars is the delicious sauce.. The *Tatars*on the other hand share the same facts as you posted.

    5. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Department_of_Justice_investigations_of_reporters

    6. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That using the power of the government to go after people who exercise their First Amendment rights should even be an issue speaks volumes about this administration.

      Trump is a small man with a fetish for the symbols of democracy and a bottomless hostility for the actual practice of it.

    7. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antifa proudly wave the black and red flags symbolizing communism and anarchy. They are as left as left gets.

    8. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government is going after violent thugs.

      Are you retarted?
      The US government is using the excuse of "violent thugs" to go against anyone who took a peek.

      If we were to follow your delusion, we'd need eyebleach to protect us from cooties and "a rotten apple spoils the barrel" would instantly affects anything passing within a 100 feet.

    9. Re:Is anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And NASCAR proudly show the confederate flag. But despite "liking" the terrorist treasonous reprobates of the past, the POTUS is ignoring these anti-american scum, as are you.

      Because you're both idiots.

  26. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I try not to get too political.

    You mean to say, that you try to cover yourself with a pretense of being "not too political" in order to give a false air of legitimacy to your faux grievances?

    However, I can't help but notice how it's now "your civic duty" to "resist" and generally disparage the government.

    Ah, picking up the messaging of the right-wing that carried over from Reagan, huh?

    Questioning their authority has long been a problem of the right-wing conservative branch. They were even worse when beating the anti-Communist drum. There's a reason why McCarthy ran rampant.

    Prior to January 20, 2017, that meant you were a racist deplorable scumbag.

    When you embrace Cliven Bundy, Phil Robertson, Joe Arpaio and the birther-in-chief himself, Donald Trump, does that not make you one of their racist brotherhood? I mean, it isn't like you are giving them like the love to a leper victim, you were shouting your devotion in chorus.

    Still are. You can't even let NFL players kneel in protest without having a fit. You'd probably explode if they used the Black Power Salute.

    Journalists were being tossed in the pokey, phones were being tapped to find "leakers", etc. Apparently, now that's all just police state tactics.

    Yeah, sorry, Fox News tried that already.

    The real question is, why are you so suddenly supportive of the "police" state you allegedly deplored, why do you demand everybody march to the orders of your glorious leader, why do you insist so vehemently that everything is going well and that you should get all the credit for it?

  27. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve is probably just disappointed he's still going to have to pay for the Wall, not the Mexicans. Sucks being lied to, doesn't it, Steve?

  28. Re:Good by Scutter · · Score: 1

    Either the First Amendment applies to all of us or it applies to none of us. If you can pick and choose who gets to voice their opinion, then we've all already lost.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  29. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta hand it to Trump: he got his clueless supporters to believe that the news is all fake unless it comes from the State News Service, er I mean Fox News. Pretty impressive, really. Why worry about breaking the law when you can hide behind "fake news" like a coward?

  30. Re:Good by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Bashing random peoples heads in is not protected speech. I knew very well I would get modded down for my post, because of blind people like you. It wasn't long ago a bunch of Antifa thugs beat some up for having a genetic defect that prevented him from growing hair.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  31. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    Considering Liberals and ANTIFA would NEVER allow it to be built without Blowing it up, or some other act of TERRORISM, I'm not worried...

  32. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 0

    Not enough to outweigh the Gun Advocates and Conservatives who join... As most of the millennials are all still in Liberal arts and Gender Studies for 4 more years! :-P

  33. Does no one remember #disruptj20? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The organizers of #disruptj20 were caught, on camera, planning various attacks on people attending the inaugural ball, including the part where they wanted to use butyric acid in the A/C systems to cause everyone to panic and evacuate into the crowd of protesters outside.

    So they're investigating a crime here, not searching randomly for people "critical" of the administration.

    1. Re: Does no one remember #disruptj20? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it should be FBI, not Trump's admin, that is doing this. And that is NOT the case.

    2. Re: Does no one remember #disruptj20? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the FBI was created to do that kind of thing doesn't mean the White House gave up its authority to do the same. The Secret Service still exists and also investigates these things. And the White House can still make more organizations and committees to do the same investigations if they choose to.

  34. Re:Good by Scutter · · Score: 1

    Are they investigating "bashing random peoples heads in" or are they "demanding the private account information of potentially thousands of Facebook users in three separate search warrants"? Those are two very different conversations and you really need to make up your mind which one you want to talk about.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  35. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    None, because my statement didn't quote it... Violence against Free Speech is Pathetic. I don't need the constitution to tell me that. If YOU do... YOU are whats wrong with America.

  36. Re:Good by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Nope same difference.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  37. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    Those who defend those who attack one of the most Valued Freedoms in the Known world.... Are The enemies of Everything America Stands for.

  38. Re:Hypocrisy by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1, Troll

    Look up purity ponies. Plenty idiots on the left think Obama/Clinton are as bad as Trump.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  39. Re:Good by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    That fact that a CNN article is on the front page of Slashdot says a lot. Eating it up without question just shows people here have no clue what's going down in this country.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  40. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't think liberals have guns?
    And who says one needs to outweigh the other?
    You're just full of BS, aren't you?

  41. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 0

    You seriously underestimate the 200 million Legal Gun Owners of America... Excellent!

  42. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 2

    The ONLY reason you aren't living in the Reich TODAY, is because of Men Like MY Grandfather, who has a purple heart AND medal of honor for his service in World War 2... My Family Killed Nazis BEFORE YOU WERE BORN ... Punk!

  43. Re:Hypocrisy by beer_maker · · Score: 0

    See, that is the kind of lazy use of English that makes people not listen to you, Ami. ... your "resisting the government trying to deport your family" can also be written as "legally deporting people who are in the country illegally, many of whom have made no effort to become citizens"" and your "take away the healthcare that is keeping you alive" can be written as "I just want to make up false stories about what might be in a healthcare bill I never read". Please try to stick to facts if you intend to malign large groups of people, some of whom are more than tired of your slant on things.

    --
    Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  44. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that your argument is based on a false premise: that Donald Trump is racist. There is no evidence of that, yet the left just keeps repeating it over and over. Protip: repeating a falsehood does not make it true.

  45. Wait a sec... by TheZeitgeist · · Score: 1

    Article Quote:

    Trump administration lawyers are demanding the private account information of potentially thousands of Facebook users in three separate search warrants served on the social media giant, according to court documents obtained by CNN.

    "Trump Administration Lawyers?" Can legal counsel to the President obtain search warrants? DoJ lawyers maybe, but not Trump Admin flacks I don't think. CNN and their weasel-wordy ways!

    1. Re:Wait a sec... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Next, you'll be suggesting that they can't do this without a warrant!

      Wait, there are warrants which a judge signed off on? oh, ok... wonder if maybe there is more to the story than CNN is letting on. You know, like probable cause related to a crime...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  46. Re: They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know,no matter how much those precious "gun owners" shout it, they've never fought for liberty or justice.

  47. Exactly by Billary+Blinton · · Score: 0

    Antifa are the real patriots. Just like the Soviets branded the mujaheddin as terrorists, so will Trump's government. While these days I can no longer provide stinger missiles through the mail, you citizen can do your part and send your local Antifa a bike lock or two to an activist in need.

  48. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Protip: repeating a falsehood does not make it true.

    Unless your name is Trump, I suppose...

  49. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I do that? I'm one of them. You seriously underestimate me. I reject every part of your OP as BS, and now you're getting OT trying to start some kind of war between parties. Not all speech is protected as "free speech", Not all liberals are lazy trash (though there are plenty on both sides who are), liberals have fought wars, shed blood, etc., and the constitution says everyone deserves certain things (i.e. not "nothing"). So go take your BS russian troll self and buzz off!

  50. Re:Good by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    They're demanding all the information of people who had direct participation in an account integral in setting up riots during the inauguration. They will then cross reference this information with all the people they arrested and charge any successful hits with conspiracy as well as the other charges they're up on.

  51. He's still here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't you impeached this orange clown yet? The GOP wrap themselves in the flag whilst enabling a foreign adversary to manipulate what you call democracy, solely because it gets their snouts in the trough.

  52. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's enormous evidence for it. His positions on Muslims, Mexicans, black football protestors, and refusal to denounce white power marches are all strong evidence that he's a racist.

    What you mean is that there's no proof. And you're right. It is 100% impossible to prove someone is a racist. Even if they say, "I'm a racist," they could be lying.

    I think the word racist is used too often when describing his supporters. But that doesn't mean there's not strong evidence that he, himself, is a racist.

  53. Re: They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    Except for the fact that about 1/3 of them are Veterans... do you think Before or After you babble Bullshit?

  54. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    I'm as IRISH as they come fukstik... And ANTIFA Threatening everyone CERTAINLY isn't protected speech. But you all seem to want to give them a PASS on that. When they crack open a camera-mans Skull with a bike lock for not agreeing with them, or Attacking 60 year old women, and the THOUSANDS of other examples I could give. ANTIFA and Their TROLLS, display some of the MOST unpatriotic, Pathetic, UNAMERICAN behavior I have seen in my 40 years on the planet. They have you drinking the kool-aid. Clearly. FYI, millennials have never SEEN a war. So how, pray-tell could they have fought in one? LOL (A Few Liberal Maybe, but typically they are the conscientious objectors... At least as far as history is concerned.)

  55. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The constitution doesn't say that "everyone deserves certain things" - the constitution lays out a blueprint for a limited form of government. You're confusing that with the Declaration of Independence.

    I think you overestimate your opinion of yourself.

    So go take your BS antiFa troll self and buzz off!

  56. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cite some instances of dissident disappearances in the US. Real cites, not just hearsay.

  57. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Clinton bombed a country to change the headlines during his BJ scandal. It didn't work. His crazy wife believed he didn't get a BJ and defended him before it was proven then she just started acting like it didn't mean anything anyways when it was. Bat shit crazy lady WTF...
    Bill Clinton brought us the DMCA. Never forget that.

    The only reason people in Houston ever even heard of or voted for Obama is the word "Obamamoney" and they literally thought they would get paid if he won...

  58. Demanding facebook info from terrorist leaders by WaffleMonster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Most of these fools are engaged in terrorism. They are unwilling to tolerate people they disagree with so they challenge states monopoly on violence to achieve their political objectives. Of course this or any government is going to go after them.

    1. Re:Demanding facebook info from terrorist leaders by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Most of these fools are engaged in terrorism. They are unwilling to tolerate people they disagree with so they challenge states monopoly on violence to achieve their political objectives. Of course this or any government is going to go after them.

      Would those of you who modded this down care to explain yourselves? Are you condoning violence as a means to an end? Do you disagree with my definition of terrorism? Do you think there is insufficient evidence to support violence? YouTube video exist of these same people in their own words plotting to use violence to shut down metro system and "throat punching" others.

  59. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bad" and "Good" are very relative, subjective, and even flexible.

    Are they? They usually boil down to Me=Good and Opposing Me=Bad.

    Apparently the mode du jur is to do bad things in the [often wrong] belief that it is for good.

    You mean the ancient and eternal standard.

    I was taught that two wrongs don't make a right.

    But were you taught that what's right, and what's wrong, can change places in the span of making toast for breakfast?

  60. Re: They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So again, you demonstrate how they have never fought for liberty or justice, at most, they were deceived into thinking they were.

    And sadly, not even then for many.

    Strange, a world where you hope a man is a victim of deceit just to save his soul.

  61. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your Grandfather has a Medal of Honor? Not many of those were awarded. You need to back that one up, just who was he?

  62. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not because I don't like obama, it's Obamacare which is an unfair tax, that I don't like.
    Taking away healthcare is a BS argument because I'm financing your BS heathcare by resisting the tax. And I don't know you, if you die I don't care. You won't care when I die so that's how that goes. Death is the biggest part of anyone's existence.

    Sickly Lives Do Not Matter Enough To Justify A Tax That Just Bails Out Irresponsible Insurance Companies.

  63. Is it ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in your world, as a White man, to resist deportation in mexico or some other turd world country? I'll just answer the question for you. It would be wrong of me to resist it because that would be Colonialism. Regular White working class men (and an increasing amount of White women as well) are getting sick and fucking tired of the leftist judeo-bolshevik bullshit. You fucking people are traitors of the worst kind.

  64. God bless President Trump by daftdada · · Score: 0

    And leave my karma alone you filthy SJW morons!

     

  65. "Nazis", oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    National Socialism is the only true way of life for real White Men so fuck off with your idiocy.

  66. at last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Das ist "Papiere, Bitte!" ... in the good ol' US of A.

    LOL home of the free LMAO home of the brave

  67. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest, from a familial perspective: Ethnically German. Blond hair, blue eyes. Living in the Reich wouldn't have changed the lives of people fitting that description very much. Maybe the beer and sausage would be better.

    So many deserve nothing, in your opinion, being so proud of your grandfather that served for nothing. Maybe we should have let them win. We would not have any of the current social or political problems that we argue about. Our engineering would be better too. Maybe even a vacation home on Mars by now. Service medals stopping that from happening ring hollow.

  68. Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was busted? by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Informative

    I note that you conveniently leave out the part where #disruptj20 was caught on camera plotting to attack people at the inaugural ball? Or how they planned to chain trains and otherwise shut down DC? Have we forgotten about violent assaults like the woman whose hair was lit on fire?

    They're investigating all of the people who were plotting violent attacks, including the planned release of butyric acid into the ventilation systems of the ball. Oh, that's just a "stink bomb" you say, but c'mon, really? You expect people to identify which acid they're breathing in and not be forced to evacuate the building into a pile of police and protesters on a freezing cold day?

    Sorry, but this is a criminal act that they're investigating. They're allowed to find out who was involved in it and given that #disruptj20 was criminal, they have reasonable suspicion to look at anyone involved. You don't get to plot crimes and then complain because the police are investigating. They're going after #disruptj20 because the leaders of it were caught planning criminal activity, not because they criticized the president.

    The people who tried to attack others at the inauguration knew or should've known what they were getting into.

  69. Where's the ironic mod again? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    Anyone who disagrees with me is Russian, so I don't have to answer their points. Time to lament how we live in a post-fact world, that's another good way to avoid dealing with inconvenient facts.

  70. #disruptj20 tried to light this "witch" on fire by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Informative

    > The gov't should investigate people based on their threat risk

    Why do you think they aren't?

    Here's video evidence of some of the crimes #disruptj20 was plotting:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHZSfhd1X_8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIjbkYLI1nY

    And here is one of those 'peaceful protesters' at the inauguration lighting a lady's hair on fire:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY5WTDgV4ik

    There's no reason for society to pick & choose, they should arrest ALL people plotting or performing violent acts.

    1. Re:#disruptj20 tried to light this "witch" on fire by fafalone · · Score: 2

      'Liking' a page is not actively participating in the planning of a crime. That you continue to say so makes you the exact same kind of scum as the people demanding the info, leaving out the critical distinction that makes it abusive instead of legitimate, because that interferes with the ultimate goal of attacking critical speech to quell such dissent in the future..

    2. Re:#disruptj20 tried to light this "witch" on fire by Xenographic · · Score: 2

      That depends on how far the DA wants to push the conspiracy charges and exactly how much they knew about the riot plans, actually. I tend to agree that actually charging them with a crime for merely that is unreasonable. I don't agree that they're automatically immune from further investigation.

    3. Re:#disruptj20 tried to light this "witch" on fire by RedK · · Score: 1

      No, but having liked a page and then participated in the events can show premeditation and probably conspiracy. The DOJ probably wants the info to bolster charges or increase current charges against suspects.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  71. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have like 3mil more people with insurance, but everyone now has a product that only gives them about one third of the value it once did for the money.

  72. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less racist than Black Lives Matter, whose name is an explicit statement of racism and black supremacism.

  73. At least they're getting warrants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the Trump administration is getting warrants to have a closer look at people who might have non-peaceful or non-democratic opposition to the Trump administration, which he is within his right to do. The Obama regime on the other hand, performed warrantless mass surveillence on everyone, including Trump himself.

  74. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Left state news = CNN and NPR

    Right state news =Fox

  75. Details matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Trump is NOT going after everybody who opposed him. The DoJ is going after the violent thugs who were beating up people and damaging property back around the inauguration. Those antifa-type thugs were not just innocent people who disliked/disagreed with the election of Donald Trump - they were engaging in political violence, assaulting people who had taken a different political position ---- an action which is, by definition, terrorism. This investigation is like any organized crime or RICO investigation; it's looking for accomplices to the criminal violence.

    Incidentally, just how many Mitt Romney or John McCain supporters marched in mobs through the streets beating people up, smashing windows and lighting stuff on fire after Obama's 2008 and 2012 victories???

    Political violence ALWAYS comes from the left. Every assain in US history was to the left of his target. Even the brown-shirted thugs on 1930s Germany were from the National Socialist German Workers' Party. It's ALWAYS from the left. Before some ignoramus pops off about Tim McVeigh (a nearly lone example in the US from the apparent political right) let me point out that we was lashing out at a specific field office of a specific government agency in revenge for its torching of a bunch of civilians at Waco (an evil act by McVeigh, but NOT supported by ANYBODY on the right, and NOT the intentional targeting of random civilians to make a political point). McVeigh was a vile person doing an evil mass-murder and ended up being very rightfully put down like a rabid dog, but his action was not actually terrorism by classical definition, nor an explicitly partisan political act like an assasination. Plenty of his target FBI people were on the political right themselves and nobody of any note on the right opposed his prosecution and execution.

  76. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but this is a criminal act that they're investigating. They're allowed to find out who was involved in it and given that #disruptj20 was criminal, they have reasonable suspicion to look at anyone involved.

    And by "involved", you mean everyone who ever looked at their Facebook page?

    [youtube.com]

    You're citing Project Veritas videos as evidence, dude. How many times do you need James O'Keefe to be exposed as a fraudster before you'll learn?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  77. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not supremacy, you ignoramus. Matter, as in the opposite of 'not matter', as in it's not okay to arrest or shoot or do anything else random to them.

    By use of your failing logic, then Blue Lives Matter is police supremacist.

    Idiot.

    Black people have had enough of police and institutionalized racism and they are trying to let people know they are tired of it. But if a black person gets 'uppity', as a moron like you might say, and tries to defend their value as a human, you get all twisted up about that.

  78. Re: Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bus by firewrought · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, fuck that dude. I tried watching Project Veritas back before the election (in the spirit of seeking multiple viewpoints), only to find it very choppy and... long on insinuations, short on substance. Very manipulative.

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  79. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were investigating a criminal act they wouldn't be asking Facebook for the information, they would be asking a judge for a warrant

  80. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there with you

  81. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do you need #disruptj20 and AntiFa exposed for the terrorists they are before YOU learn Ratzo?

    I note you don't even attempt to deny what the video SAYS or who's saying it... just attacking the messenger of the video.

    But no surprise there - you've already pivoted away from the Facebook Russian ads story.

  82. Department of Justice by easyTree · · Score: 1

    A product of the 'department for generating ironic department names?'

  83. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  84. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who doesn't see DJT's blatant racism is a literal fucked in the head retard. Sorry to break it to you. You need some mental health help and an education.

  85. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol. Stick to the facts.... coming from a Trump supporter.

    It's too bad you can't fathom irony. Or hypocrisy. Your mind would break if you tried to resolve your double think.

  86. Re: Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the second line of the summary said "search warrant" ... Oh wait, it does

  87. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they are investigating a criminal act and have evidence for several plots, why don't they just get a warrant? Why ask Facebook for something that a judge can compel them to provide? Maybe the Justice Department doesn't know how warrants work?

  88. I'll laugh if you were one of them... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    > And by "involved", you mean everyone who ever looked at their Facebook page?

    No, everyone who decided to "like" it. That's literally the first line of the first link you posted, telling us that 6,000 people apparently like endangering lots of people by putting acid into ventilation systems and whatnot.

    > You're citing Project Veritas videos as evidence, dude.

    And you're leaving out the full story, once again. They have people on video, that's enough for police to investigate. It'll be pretty damned clear whether they were actually preparing or not once they investigate.

    1. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by fafalone · · Score: 2

      But liking the page isn't a crime. It doesn't mean you're planning to commit a crime. Approving of people planning a crime is not illegal. Had they confined their information demand to people who posted something indicating participation, I'd agree with you. They did not, instead opting to make the demand as broad as possible in a clear bid to chill speech.

    2. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, everyone who decided to "like" it. That's literally the first line of the first link you posted, telling us that 6,000 people apparently like endangering lots of people by putting acid into ventilation systems and whatnot.

      Why, you stupid sonofabitch. You actually believe that "liking" something should make you a suspect in a criminal investigation. No wonder you would support a wannabe fascist as president.

      Do you also believe that liking a post about putting people in ovens should make you a suspect? Because I suspect you just might become a suspect.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They have people on video? You mean like the video about Acorn and Planned Parenthood, both of which were edited to frame the narrative? There is really no other way to say this, you are a dumb cunt.

    4. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You actually believe that "liking" something should make you a suspect in a criminal investigation.

      What about marching in a public rally with a Nazi flag, in a demonstration in which people are run over by a Nazi in a car?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emmelia Talarico sounds like another disgruntled Mexican piece of shit.

      Maybe you could be Compooter Adminster on her taco truck.

    6. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you mean the guy in the car who had his windows smashed and someone hitting the rear of his car with a bat before he stepped on it?

      not to defend nazis, but lets be real here for a second. if his car wasnt assaulted, he most likely wouldnt have stepped on the gas in a panic and hit someone

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    7. Re:I'll laugh if you were one of them... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

      No, we mean the guy who attacked a crowd intending to kill people AND THEN had his windows smashed.

  89. Re: Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bus by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    > If only the second line of the summary said "search warrant" ... Oh wait, it does

    This is Slashdot. A few posts up, you'll find that even the submitter didn't bother read any of this stuff.

  90. Re:Good by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

    Why do you hate freedom? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  91. Re: Hypocrisy by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2

    Less racist than Black Lives Matter, whose name is an explicit statement of racism and black supremacism.

    Some here seem to miss the very important point that the simple words "Black Lives Matter" does nothing to indicate that any other color of life does not matter equally. Yes there are certainly those who take up the banner and misuse the concept. But the concept is fundamentally correct. To argue against the words Black Lives Matter is the same as agreeing with the prejudiced assholes in Newfoundland where the popular theme is that they dealt with their uppity native Indians long ago and they were nothing but a useless bunch of trouble makers anyway as many who live there are still lead to believe. Same thing in British Columbia where many belittle the Carrier Indians to this day and call them nothing but a "useless bunch of horse and cattle thieves". Yes prejudice is rampant and the US is not alone but it can be exposed for what it is and eventually become socially unacceptable the same way eventually misogyny will.

    The truth is the lives of all races of people matter and the fact is that there are still a huge number of closet racists in the US that believe as Wallace did in "segregation now and segregation forever!" This fact creates the need for greater awareness of how fucked up the US is especially each time some racist dick head like Zimmerman in Florida gets away with murdering an innocent black.

    No it is plain and simple the US is screwed by prejudice and the fact that a simple conceptual truth using the words "Black Lives Matter" can be twisted by racists to mean something other than what the words say speaks volumes about how twisted these KKK wanta bee assholes really are including a quite a few who wield power. Notice how quiet David Duke is right now, there is a reason. There are enough idiots hard at work putting forth the racist agenda that he can sit back and work on his political base in the shadows. Yes there are those within BLM who disgrace the memory of Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks, but the concept of Black Lives Matter is a truth and to a great many in the US a truth that burns very deeply indeed.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  92. You're one of the 6,000, right? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    I am not now a supporter of National Socialism, nor have I ever been, Mr. Mcarthy. And I don't have a Facebook account, either. I also detest the brownshirt types, like the terrorist group Antifa, who go around preemptively physically assaulting anyone who has a differing opinion. Not to mention the idiot racists often found on Slashdot.

    I also know the various elements of conspiracy. It's reasonable to say that liking the Facebook page itself shouldn't be illegal, even if there might be a technical argument about trying to recruit people to an attempt to cause a violent riot. But it's not unreasonable to say that the police can't even investigate the people who publicly expressed support for an attempt at causing a riot. That's cause enough to investigate and see just what they were plotting and what steps they actually took to move forward with the conspiracy.

    So in the end, I merely believe that we shouldn't prevent the police from investigating people who conspired to commit violent crimes. It's funny how agitated you get at the idea of that.

    1. Re:You're one of the 6,000, right? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Except that a lot of the supposed "AntiFa" stuff was actually a false flag op. You do understand what "false flag" means, don't you?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:You're one of the 6,000, right? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that Prof. Bike Lock was merely pretending to be a liberal professor for their entire life?

      Sorry, no, that doesn't really make any sense.

    3. Re:You're one of the 6,000, right? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      I had to do a double take because that was too similar to the original.

    4. Re:You're one of the 6,000, right? by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Antifa are not terrorists
      Take your spanking and go shut up!

    5. Re:You're one of the 6,000, right? by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Beating those who bring steel pipes to attack a black man, 7 on one, is not breaking laws.
      It is enforcing the law cops refuse to enforce.

  93. The Congressional investigation never made news by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    I guess that means you never saw the congressional investigation into Planned Parenthood that vindicated them, or the fact that full, unedited videos were received and reviewed by all committee members?

    In the videos, Planned Parenthood representatives discuss the demand for certain body parts, the manner in which patient consent is solicited, pricing considerations, and the methods by which doctors manipulate procedures to ensure that tissue and organs of fetuses remain intact.

    In one video, a Planned Parenthood official discusses how doctors modify procedures to preserve intact fetal specimens that can be provided to research firms in exchange for money. The Planned Parenthood official also discusses how reimbursement amounts can be manipulated.

    Clearly debunked! Nothing to see here, Citizen! Move along now. You'll have to ask CNN's Chris Cuomo for permission to look at real news. The media is special, they have more rights than you do. He's an attorney, he should know!

  94. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us spit on this mix of sense with nonsense, but most especially the DMCA.

  95. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your smugly sneering tone is most commendable, Boris. Those vernacular English classes are really paying off!

  96. Re: Hypocrisy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Do you suppose the Soviets publicized their abuses in Pravda?

  97. Reminder from history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a common bit of propaganda that HUAC blacklisted everybody in Hollywood and destroyed lots of careers... but that's not actually historically correct. Study-up on what really happened with the blacklists:

    When the HUAC people were banging their drum, the people in Hollywood panicked that the public would become aware of how many self-identified commies would come to the attention of the ticket-buying public - and all the bosses in Hollywood decided to create their blacklists and not hire IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE INVESTMENTS OF THE HOLLYWOOD ELITES. There were, at that time, plenty of people in Hollywood who were well-known to be communists - some were dedicated to the cause and others turned to communism in response to the Depression. Everybody in Hollywood knew this and they also all knew the general public did not know and would not approve. Joe McCarthy never banned ANYBODY from acting in a film - he had no power to do that. Hollywood became a huge pile of dogs fighting eachother for box office dollars and all the "blacklisted" writers, musicians, actors, etc were thrown under the bus by their fellow Hollywood people (directors, writers, producers, studio bosses, etc) desperate to protect their own money. In fact, the system started to collapse thanks to one of the bravest men in the place: Kirk Douglas (of Spartacus fame). As soon as he insisted on using "blacklisted" people in his films (and those films made money), the whole scheme began to fall apart, just like the child pointing to the naked emperor.

  98. Re: Hypocrisy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 0

    Under Obamacare I was twice, for financial reasons, turned away from a hospital while in pain. The fake-progressive establishment told me to go die in the street like a dog. That's why smug Obamacare apologists disgust me.

  99. lol the turn in language inside 10 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 year ago the commenter's line would have instead began with: "Department of Justice" and not "Trumps lawyers".

    The submitter should chill out and submit the news without immediately casting judgement.

    The silly brown shirts plan to fill our televisions with entertainment on 4th of November. The police are looking forward to overtime that weekend and so are eager for it to come . Trump's DOJ is trying to prevent live Ad free TV entertainment. To lecture these kids and talk them from ending up in jail.

    Trump's got more heart and integrity than most people on TV these days. If you can achieve anything, vote out the war hawks next election.

  100. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a difference between resisting taxation because you don't like Obama and resisting the government trying to deport your family or take away the healthcare that is keeping you alive.

    This kind of false equivalence argument is the new favourite of the far right. "Yes we are bad, but they are the same and you are a hypocrite for not acknowledging that".

    While I'm not without compassion for the children of illegal immigrants, or even some illegal immigrants themselves (the ones that work), they still committed crimes, and putting our collective heads in the sand isn't going to make it go away. From what I hear, ICE is currently focusing on criminal illegals and ignoring the others for the most part.

    The ACA is bankrupting the country and the people that can afford it, premiums have doubled since its beginning and they're only getting higher. People that used to be able to afford health insurance are being priced out of the market, and insurance companies are folding/abandoning markets because they're losing money. It was the government creation of a monopoly and it's already abusing its power.

  101. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your insurance was still shit. How is that Obamacare's fault?

  102. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    That video by the discredited "Veritas Project" has been debunked. It was misleadingly edited.

    In any case, it's it reasonable to then go after everyone who read anything associated with this person?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  103. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before Obamacare, the same thing would have happened. Pain is relative. Most likely you were asking for opiates of some sort.

    No hospital in America will turn away a patient in extreme medical need. A 'pain' is nothing and they WILL turn you away for that unless you have insurance to pay for your drug addiction.

    That doesn't mean you won't get a huge fucking bill at the end.

    So, did you die like a dog? Still whining like one I see...

  104. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by RedK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "it has been debunked". Sure. Convenient you leave no source to said debunking. So thoroughly debunked, Robert Creamer had to resign after Project Veritas exposed him : http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/18/...

    Even CNN had to report on it. "Debunked" means "It was factual, but I hate it" to some of you people.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  105. Re:Hypocrisy by RedK · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to be deported, there's an easy way : Don't enter the country illegally and while if in said country illegally, don't commit a felony.

    Otherwise, you absolutely should be deported, and resisting being deported after committing a crime should be ridiculed, not lauded and praised.

    Or are you actually just resisting Law and Order ? Would you prefer to live in anarchy ? I don't think you'd like actual anarchy.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  106. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Where is the original, unedited video? If they have nothing to hide then there is no problem posting it for us to examine.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  107. Re: They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    That response made no sense... Smoke more crack. It seems to be working.

  108. Consequences by pakenhaminq · · Score: 1

    Didn't Social Justice Warriors tell us that "Just because speech is free does not mean that it should be free of consequences". Now this chick is bitching about potential consequences of her own speech. Cry me a river!

  109. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it must not have been that serious since you didn't go to an Emergency Room because the ER legally can't refuse to treat you regardless of how much it costs and then you just have to deal with the bill later. Obamacare has saved my life and countless others, thanks for your contributions to it.

  110. Re:Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Disclaimer: Non American.

    See, that is the kind of lazy use of English that makes people not listen to you, Ami. ... your "resisting the government trying to deport your family" can also be written as "legally deporting people who are in the country illegally, many of whom have made no effort to become citizens"" (...)

    Language have power.

    When people wilfully left out the most important context in the discussion they usually are consciously (occasionally subconsciously) trying to misdirect and reduce the whole discussion to simple emotional-buttons that they can push on less-informed readers, because they already know their argument hold no substance and have no way of coming ahead by facts.

    By the way, unless you count refugees (another discussion), America is pretty much the only country in the world where there are significant % of the population that pretend that deporting people that came in illegally is wrong. Tell us again - how on Earth can a country protect itself if anyone can come and pretty much bring anything along?

  111. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if some of the contents discussed have contexts among people in the know that will oute their information source / mole and has a good likelihood of causing personal endangerment?

    You don't seem to have a good grasp of the risks the sources and all parties involved has taken. Even benign information (like the model of a car) can lead to fatal repercussions when they are outing obviously violence-inciting groups.

  112. Re: Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget he pardoned a sheriff who was convicted of criminal contempt after continuing racial profiling.

  113. Re: Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congress seems to have all the video:

    âoeThe Committee has received all unedited video footage from the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) as required by our subpoena. A viewing room is set up in the Committee office where all Committee members and staffâ"majority and minorityâ"have equal access to view the footage. With nearly 800GB of data to review, it will take significant time to evaluate all of the footage. Out of an abundance of caution to ensure the safety and security of all individuals recorded, the footage will not be released to the public at this time.â

    Nice try though.

  114. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't help but observe that instead of talking about what convinced you that the video was debunked, you are now asking for a source which you clearly do not have and of which you assume without any proof that will demonstrate the opposite of what the edited video shows.

    And yet, you never do this when the edited content is in support of your beliefs, when you blindly build large assumptions on top of feeble foundations instead.

  115. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we forgotten about violent assaults like the woman whose hair was lit on fire [youtube.com]?

    Took a look at that video. Clearly not something planned in any way by organizers of the protest. Also, it looks like the guy who put it out was also one of the protestors. So, basically, not sure what your point is with that one.

  116. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your source is one that always disagrees with me, therefore the message carried by the messenger MUST be invalid!" - Typical PopeRatz/AmiMojo level feminazi shitcunt retardation. GTFO.

  117. Like Nixon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nixon was pretty paranoid about opposition and protesters too. Trump is learning from the best!

  118. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by RedK · · Score: 1

    Where is the original, unedited video? If they have nothing to hide then there is no problem posting it for us to examine.

    From reading your reply, I am now still unconvinced the Veritas stuff is debunked, as you have provided no debunking yet. Also, do you ask CNN for unedited material too ? Or do you just take their stuff at face value.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  119. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Involved" == paid progressive agitprop snot-lickers. Might break-that-out into DemoRat sluts, Rawlsian metahoes and Trotsky snibberbooz. Need more details or have I cleverly exhausted deplorables ? Kinda suxx being a /. thought-crimr eh pad're ?

  120. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt liberals and antifa will ever work together. And liberals commiting terrorism is also not a very common occurence. I am not aware of a single time when that happened.

  121. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how this is in other countries, but here in The Netherlands, the liberal party is the most popular party among military personnel. Liberal parties are often more friendly to the military budget than left-of-centre parties.

  122. Re: Hypocrisy by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    because it's easier to be right when you control all the words.

    funny you bring that up because that is EXACTLY what the left is doing with words like "racism" in todays climate. racism has a pretty simple definition, however today you wouldnt know it, because anything they dont like = racism today

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  123. Re: Hypocrisy by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    His positions on Muslims,

    muslim isnt a racie.

    Mexicans,

    context matters. has he called out all mexicans? no, he didnt. he even sent aid after the earthquakes

    black football protestors,

    did he call them out by race? or are YOU applying race to the equation? Pretty sure he never said a word about race

    and refusal to denounce white power marches are all strong evidence that he's a racist.

    he has denounced them 1000 times over so far, if you didnt hear that, blame your prefered media company for neglecting to give you the truth

    in short, the man who was awarded the NAACP award and loved by the black community until 2015 is not in fact racist like you people keep claiming

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  124. Re:Hypocrisy by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    exactly. taxes are theft, thats a legit reason to resit.

    if you are here illegally, you have no legit reason to resit deportation because those are the rules, you broke them, and now you live with the consequences of your actions.

    if i have something i shouldnt have on me (look at my name) and get stopped by the cops, i dont argue that it shouldnt matter because its wrong, i pay the fine, i knew it might happen and i made the decision on my own, therefore i live with the consequences if i get caught.

    same goes with people here illegally

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  125. Re: Hypocrisy by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    you have all your talking points down so ill simply tackle one.

    it wasnt trump who started with the birther movement, it was hillary when she was trying to beat obama for the dem nomination in 08.

    if the left didnt lie all the time, they wouldnt have anything to say ever

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  126. Re:They mean ANTIFA Traitors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What have YOU fought for, shed blood for, sacrificed?

  127. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

    Since no one has "exposed" Antifa for terrorists, given that they have never initiated violence and have never murdered anyone, (Which your friends have done)
    Seriously chump, you make yourself look the liar this way.

  128. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Project Veritas has been prosecuted in civil court and paid a$100,000 Judgement.
    This ever happen to their victims?
    Completely debunked

  129. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, project Veritas is so clean their "documentarians" were indicted for criminal forgery and are waiting civil trial for fraud and libel

  130. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    His point is to lie, to make a false equivalence to save his nazi loving friends from real law enforcement.

  131. Re: Hypocrisy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Actually, no, nothing like that ever happened to me before Obamacare. And now that I live abroad, I have gold-plated health insurance for a fraction of the cost of my former worthless Obamacare coverage.

    But thank you for your concern and compassion. Fake-progressives really do care about their fellow man.

  132. Re: Hypocrisy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Because before Obamacare, my coverage through Kaiser was way, way better and also somewhat cheaper.

    But hey, cling to the patently false narrative you were fed by the capitalist news media. It's makes you look smart!

  133. Re: Hypocrisy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, one of the medigreed professionals did give me the option of going $10,000 into debt - i.e. instant bankruptcy - just to get diagnosed. Glad I didn't do that.

    Here in HCMC, a doc at the best most super expensive hospital in town was able to diagnose the issue for $158, including tests.

    But hey, thanks for your concern and compassion. Fake-progressive running dogs really are the best people!

  134. Re: Hypocrisy by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    BTW... My issues were a bicycle crash and complications thereof. What's needed was an x-ray and physical therapy, not painkillers.

    Otoh, for my pill-popping opiate-addled hypochondriac former colleague in San Francisco, Obamacare has been a dream come true.

    But hey man, keep on lying to yourself and others.

  135. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1
  136. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Thanks. I forgot you can debunk 90% of this stuff just but googling "thing + snopes".

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  137. Re:Why don't you tell them why disruptj20 was bust by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    AND, don't forget to cross check.
    Factcheck.org
    Politifact.org
    NYtimes Ombudsman
    Washington Post fact check