Seriously, this is vastly more important. This is about the people's right to own their government versus the government's attempt to own the people. VASTLY more important.
You're mistaking efficiency for that weird Slashdottian desire to have RAM sitting there doing nothing - which still consumes power and so is actually the opposite of efficient.
It's pretty straightforward, really. There's this "progressive" tendency to try to paint companies as faceless, soulless lifesuckers draining all that is meaningful from existence when in reality, it's just people trying to get things done to make a living.
I like poking holes in the "progressive" attempts at class welfare.
Yeah, who are they to think that just because they invest literally billions of dollars in making the technologies work they should expect any kind of return?
Are you getting a charge that I respond? I mean you seem almost too thrilled to think since you keep repeating yourself. I'm not sure who you're convincing, it's pretty damned likely no one is paying attention to this. Certainly no one cares about your accusations.
The Constitution reserves all rights not explicitly mentioned to the people or the various states in Amendment 10. In any case, the Supreme Court noted that the right to travel is a virtually unconditional personal right.
People like you, who don't understand how this country was designed to work and who gladly abrogate your own rights, are the biggest problem we face.
The diplomatic system is a self-sustaining game designed to keep the powerful in power, and as such, there is no purpose to sustaining it outside the halls of power. I don't have to help these people continue down the path they believe is best when I don't agree with them.
It's not the fault of those who benefit most from the economic system that there are large numbers of mediocre people who bring nothing to the system and therefore draw little. No one forces anyone to remain unskilled.
They have the Big Mac, mine is the Big Mick. They both contain two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onions. But they use a sesame seed bun. My buns have no seeds.
So like the GP said, stop paying the property taxes and see how long you have the property. You took a longer road to make the same point and claim you disagree, which is a seriously strange way of making an argument.
It doesn't open up "debate" it opens up philosophical wankery. The real way to answer these questions isn't with a bunch of stoner farting around and whoa-man questions, it's to man up and actually do it, then measure the result. I'd volunteer in a heartbeat.
Seriously, this is vastly more important. This is about the people's right to own their government versus the government's attempt to own the people. VASTLY more important.
No, it's not the case that only the people who find your preferred solution compelling are smart. Sorry.
You're mistaking efficiency for that weird Slashdottian desire to have RAM sitting there doing nothing - which still consumes power and so is actually the opposite of efficient.
If you're pretending that you're somehow typical of the market, you're disillusioned. Sorry.
Why because he wants it, and his greed trumps the greed of the creator.
It's the mindset of a child.
It's pretty straightforward, really. There's this "progressive" tendency to try to paint companies as faceless, soulless lifesuckers draining all that is meaningful from existence when in reality, it's just people trying to get things done to make a living.
I like poking holes in the "progressive" attempts at class welfare.
Yeah, who are they to think that just because they invest literally billions of dollars in making the technologies work they should expect any kind of return?
Do people who own companies have rights?
Are you getting a charge that I respond? I mean you seem almost too thrilled to think since you keep repeating yourself. I'm not sure who you're convincing, it's pretty damned likely no one is paying attention to this. Certainly no one cares about your accusations.
The Constitution reserves all rights not explicitly mentioned to the people or the various states in Amendment 10. In any case, the Supreme Court noted that the right to travel is a virtually unconditional personal right.
People like you, who don't understand how this country was designed to work and who gladly abrogate your own rights, are the biggest problem we face.
I guess we should all accede our right to privacy to the government since you're okay with it.
The diplomatic system is a self-sustaining game designed to keep the powerful in power, and as such, there is no purpose to sustaining it outside the halls of power. I don't have to help these people continue down the path they believe is best when I don't agree with them.
It's not the fault of those who benefit most from the economic system that there are large numbers of mediocre people who bring nothing to the system and therefore draw little. No one forces anyone to remain unskilled.
Well sure, the *good but simple* people will lose out, but what about the *mediocre and retarded* people?
I don't see how my middle class job is going to be eliminated because a robot performs repetitive tasks. I don't perform a job that can be automated.
Aside from that, if everything is automated, what exactly would the subservient be subservient to? Just slaving away for kicks?
I do like it! I really do! When I get reactions like this, it's all worthwhile.
Now you can link to this post as proof as you continue to stalk me. I look forward to spoonfeeding you even more in the future.
People use to rip, mix, and burn a few hundred years ago? That's perhaps the best anti-copyright stance I've ever seen.
Do you have anything more meaningful than "we should dismantle a working system so people can have free stuff, and that might be better?"
They have the Big Mac, mine is the Big Mick. They both contain two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onions. But they use a sesame seed bun. My buns have no seeds.
And Zeus said "behold, I am as a bull. Now fuck me and make a Demigod."
Those divine folk are weird.
Not if you believe in a merciful loving god who will subject you to an eternity of torture because you ate meat on the wrong day.
Call it "free entertainment" and try to be the littlest bit honest.
LOL homebrew. LOL backups.
So like the GP said, stop paying the property taxes and see how long you have the property. You took a longer road to make the same point and claim you disagree, which is a seriously strange way of making an argument.
Why, is your bare assertion somehow more meaningful than mine?
Hmmm, I thought it was slightly darker black on black. I should get my eyes checked.
That second "questions" should have been statements.
It doesn't open up "debate" it opens up philosophical wankery. The real way to answer these questions isn't with a bunch of stoner farting around and whoa-man questions, it's to man up and actually do it, then measure the result. I'd volunteer in a heartbeat.