"Columbia requires all students to study the important books of the western cannon. "
Do they include Rommel's "Gefechts-Aufgaben für Zug und Kompanie : Ein Handbuch für den Offizierunterricht" (Combat tasks for platoon and company: A manual for the officer instruction)?
I know it's not cannon-centred, but surely such a classic must have been on the list somewhere?
And what about his "Infanterie greift an" (Infantry Attacks)?
A good idea, of course.
But what happens to the ship's rotation as its centre of gravity continually changes with the movements of its passengers? Should the ship have some sort of compensatory device?
How could this be dealt with?
While in theory, I greatly admire the strictness you have described, according to NationMaster figures, Germany's road death toll is just slight of Australia's, which has a pretty easy driving test.
Putting death toll aside, are there any other benefits of this test? More considerate driving? Less road rage? Death toll is not the ultimate measure of road usability, so it would be interesting to hear about whether the strict testing has any effect on road culture.
This is assuming that NationMasters' figures are more-or-less accurate.
How about sending up a Stinger on another balloon with some remote control built in? Surely it wouldn't cost that much to stabilise and fit with video for capturing the target.
Could you capture the target from the ground and send up the initial coordinates?
Does this make any sense at all?
Just for your information (unless you were joking), "kudos" is not a plural, so there is no single "kudo". Sort of like there is no "octopu" as a singular octopus. OK octopuses are countable, while kudos is not, but you get the drift.
Maybe a better example would be you can put hommos on your pita bread with your falafel, but not one hommo.
Actually, Yahoo POP is free of charge in some other countries. If I understand correctly, for some reason it was illegal not to have the option in the UK. I've got it working fine in Mail on a MacBook.
You can always set up a UK account and have it display a US (if that's your base) homepage.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I always understood that the more odious autocratic regimes tended toward presidential systems where the head of state and executive are one person - with the United States being an exception.
I passed through Sydney Airport yesterday and all of the free internet terminals were using Ubuntu.
Unfortunately, on the screens I saw, there were no desktop icons for Opera, so if someone closed the browser window, people though the computer had crashed. You get the picture.
In short, while some tech people are trying to make open-source available to the public, many short-sighted mistakes are still being made.
One of the benefits of the station is the symbol and fact of international co-operation. Words like "extort" and "hamstrung" are right off target. It's not like Russia is spoiling a US party. If anything, the party is only happening because of Russia.
Slashdot Mirror
FB could cave in to vk.com, which is basically a clone of FB, but with completely unregulated up- and downloads of music and videos.
Default interface is English.
There's even a logout button in the main menu.
And a quarter of the number of people that the US has in jail.
Here are two links to articles about children who use echolocation to compensate for their blindness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1QaCeosUmw
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1218291/Blind-boy-7-Briton-able-ears.html
The Australian Financial review charges about $100/month for news and seems to be doing OK: https://subscribe.afr.com/afr/default.aspx?referrer=1
"Columbia requires all students to study the important books of the western cannon. "
Do they include Rommel's "Gefechts-Aufgaben für Zug und Kompanie : Ein Handbuch für den Offizierunterricht" (Combat tasks for platoon and company: A manual for the officer instruction)?
I know it's not cannon-centred, but surely such a classic must have been on the list somewhere?
And what about his "Infanterie greift an" (Infantry Attacks)?
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, although they had to grind it anyway after it had cooled down (three months later).
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13606-giant-telescope-project-begins-with-a-spin.html/
in 1987 by North Korean agents, so liquid explosives do actually present a potential threat.
Some more information about liquid explosives:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-149180.html/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Flight_858/
A good idea, of course. But what happens to the ship's rotation as its centre of gravity continually changes with the movements of its passengers? Should the ship have some sort of compensatory device? How could this be dealt with?
And ended with a "Big Bang"!
While in theory, I greatly admire the strictness you have described, according to NationMaster figures, Germany's road death toll is just slight of Australia's, which has a pretty easy driving test.
Putting death toll aside, are there any other benefits of this test? More considerate driving? Less road rage? Death toll is not the ultimate measure of road usability, so it would be interesting to hear about whether the strict testing has any effect on road culture.
This is assuming that NationMasters' figures are more-or-less accurate.
How about sending up a Stinger on another balloon with some remote control built in? Surely it wouldn't cost that much to stabilise and fit with video for capturing the target. Could you capture the target from the ground and send up the initial coordinates? Does this make any sense at all?
Just for your information (unless you were joking), "kudos" is not a plural, so there is no single "kudo". Sort of like there is no "octopu" as a singular octopus. OK octopuses are countable, while kudos is not, but you get the drift.
Maybe a better example would be you can put hommos on your pita bread with your falafel, but not one hommo.
Fair enough point about the lack of buttons, but what if Apple added some voice control via the iPhone or whatever?
That could be fun!
No-one deserves abuse while in custody. Especially abuse so petty, childish, and vindictive as that described.
If you have principles, you should stick to them--especially with someone like SH. Show him that your values actually have some substance. Pathetic.
Goodness--only 9% of people might want to buy an iPhone when Apple is looking for 1% of the market.
What a disaster!
Actually, Yahoo POP is free of charge in some other countries. If I understand correctly, for some reason it was illegal not to have the option in the UK. I've got it working fine in Mail on a MacBook.
You can always set up a UK account and have it display a US (if that's your base) homepage.
http://help.yahoo.com/l/uk/yahoo/mail/original/manage/manage-281222.html
Perhaps they should make the contributors pay, as is done for some scientific journals.
It might help to keep the noise down and force writers to be a little more thoughtful about their contributions and editing.
What would be more effective--paying per edit or per word?
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I always understood that the more odious autocratic regimes tended toward presidential systems where the head of state and executive are one person - with the United States being an exception.
Have I misread something?
Bitwise is pretty decent: Windows, Linux, Mac; encrypted, whiteboard, voice, peer-to-peer, basic version free. http://www.bitwiseim.com/index.php/
I passed through Sydney Airport yesterday and all of the free internet terminals were using Ubuntu. Unfortunately, on the screens I saw, there were no desktop icons for Opera, so if someone closed the browser window, people though the computer had crashed. You get the picture. In short, while some tech people are trying to make open-source available to the public, many short-sighted mistakes are still being made.
That's "Soviets", not "Russians". There is a difference.
One of the benefits of the station is the symbol and fact of international co-operation. Words like "extort" and "hamstrung" are right off target. It's not like Russia is spoiling a US party. If anything, the party is only happening because of Russia.
Have another look at both pages. Yahoo is cluttered and about three screens deep.
Yandex's home page is just one simple screen and easy to look at. Much closer to Google than Yahoo's unreadable mess.
So what is the answer to the article's question: "What percentage of the world's airports are in the USA?" ? Anyone? Hive-mind?
I think you mean iRony.