Slashdot Mirror


Why Japan Hates the iPhone

Ponca City, We love you writes "With a high level of technical sophistication, critical customers, and high innovation rate, Japan is the toughest cell phone market in the world. So it's not surprising that although Apple is the third-largest mobile supplier in the world, selling 10 million units in 2008, in Japan the iPhone is selling so poorly it's being offered for free. The country is famous for being ahead of its time when it comes to technology, and the iPhone just doesn't cut it. For example, Japanese handset users are into video and photos — and the iPhone has neither a video camera, multimedia text messaging, nor a TV tuner. Pricing plans in Japan are also very competitive, and the iPhone's $60-and-up monthly plan is too high compared to competitors; a survey lat year showed that among Japanese consumers, 91% didn't want to buy an iPhone. The cellular weapon of choice in Japan would be the Panasonic P905i, a fancy cellphone that doubles as a 3-inch TV and features 3-G, GPS, a 5.1-megapixel camera, and motion sensors for Wii-style games. 'When I show this to visitors from the US, they're amazed,' according to journalist Nobi Hayashi, who adds, 'Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.'"

884 comments

  1. Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Japan, only old people use iPhones?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not trolling, making a joke. I guess you forgot "In Korea, only old people use email..."

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Japan, only old people use iPhones?

      No, the fact is that the iphone is a piece of crap that doesn't do anything special. It's a triumph of marketing.

      The only reason the iphone is popular in the US is that other US cell phone options are so crappy, but that's a reflection of what the US carriers are selling.

    3. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank God someone else feels this way. I'm so sick of people getting iPhones and then insisting on whipping them out and showing them off every three seconds. It's not that impressive, every douche already owns one. I've seen it a million times. No, I don't wish I had one. If I wanted one, I'd already have it. I just don't think it's worth the money. The summary alone says it all - no video? no MMS? My friend's free POS phone has that. It's a mediocre phone in a sexy package with a touchscreen. No surprise the Japanese aren't interested.

      PS - can we avoid turning this into a fanboy flamewar - just this once? I called it sexy...

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all relative and relative to the US market the iPhone is not a piece of crap. It's great to talk about the Japanese market, the cool gadgets, and how much better they are. But guess what? If we can't get/use them here it's irrelevant. No one seems the least bit interested in marketing them here. Does it suck? Sure it sucks but it's been this way for the last 10 years.

    5. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I reckon that the iPhone is actually a good phone (if you disregard how expensive it is when considering the contract fees), but IMHO, it is indeed, first and foremost a triumph of marketing over all else.

      There are a bazillion of things that the phone lacks, specially if you consider its price. But then there is this group-think thing where people will convince themselves that they don't actually need whatever is lacking, and that they absolutely need whatever is there.

      People buy this phone for the same reason that other people buy luxury clothes: the promise of higher social status, and self-esteem through brand name identification.

    6. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were offered here in English, running on the retarded US cell phone frequency, we'd buy them by the millions. Japan has always been years ahead in cell phone technology. You can pay vending machines with your cell phone. Meanwhile, you still have people in the US that have to use dial up. Yes, jav1231, it's all about market, not choice.

    7. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by bytethese · · Score: 0

      no MMS? My friend's free POS phone has that.

      Exactly. That's like saying, "No parallel or serial ports? My POS 4yr old PC has that stuff."

      I also do not wish to turn this in a fanboi post, however MMS is not as robust as email, which the iPhone seems to do very nicely.

    8. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stupid comment. The truth is that in Japan the people likes big features list and nothing else. I don't understand why is the people complaining about "America is behind Japan"...

      So, when you buy a over-engineered hardware from a USA company you're stupid, but when you buy a over-engineered hardware from Japan you are being smart, and of course you're not buying hardware just because of marketing.

    9. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "You can pay vending machines with your cell phone. "

      I for one, am NOT anxious to have a cell phone that spends my money on vending or anything else.

      I prefer most of my purchases to be with good, old fashioned cash. I can keep up with my spending better that way...it isn't abstracting money from value, say like how casino chips make you forget you're really playing for real money.

      I like to keep any credit as low as possible....once out of CC debt hell, I intend to say out of CC debt hell. I wouldn't want to pay by cell phone, just another possible way to ruin yourself by spending without thinking.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I reckon that the iPhone is actually a good phone (if you disregard how expensive it is when considering the contract fees), but IMHO, it is indeed, first and foremost a triumph of marketing over all else."

      Considering that 'contract fees' and the prices of data plans are all about the same in the US...that they are a 'given'.

      You can easily disregard them in consideration of the price of the iPhone to any other smart phone in the US. In that light...they're pretty much ALL the same price here.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by jbezorg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anybody else but me think that if we bust on the iPhone some more, this guy's head will explode?

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    12. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by babyrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I prefer most of my purchases to be with good, old fashioned cash. I can keep up with my spending better that way...it isn't abstracting money from value, say like how casino chips make you forget you're really playing for real money.

      I feel exactly opposite to this - I use my credit card or debit card for absolutely everything I can (within reason) in order to keep track of my money. At the end of the month I can import my bill electronically into Quicken and see where all my money went. Even without Quicken at least there is a record. Contrast this with - crap, I just took $200 out of the ATM Monday and now I have 12 cents left in my pocket - where did it go?

      I always pay my credit card off at the end of the month so there is no CC debt hell.

      Now to get back on topic, sort of ...

      Paying with my iPhone would likely have similar advantages.

    13. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by molarmass192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree, the iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI, a solid internet browser, a usable mobile calendar, and a viable iPod replacement. Is it the end all be all of cell phones, no. However, what made the iPhone so good was the software stack more than the hardware stack. The iPhone software stack is still by far the best on the market. The hardware is just slightly above average, but I (personally) think Apple did this to create an upgrade path. For example. want GPS? Upgrade from V1 to V2. Next will be, want video? Upgrade from V2 to V3 ... etc.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    14. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I don't need to exactly know 'what' my money was spent on....just how much is going out.

      Lately I generally take out about $300 a week...I buy groceries with that (I cook for the whole week usually on Sundays, take lunch, leftovers for dinners so I can hit the gym...etc).

      I take what is left....and that is my spending money that week in general.

      I pay for gas with a CC, but, that's about it. I can see daily how much I have left and keeps me honest about what I spend. If I'm paying all in cash it means more to me...I actually think twice about spending 'real' money...much more so, than if I just swipe a card. Swiping a card doesn't translate into spending real hard money...till EOM.

      But hey..to each his own.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as robust as email? They aren't really the same technology, you might compare SMS and MMS, but email is a different animal.

      MMS is newer than SMS and supports more. Lack of support is very poor in comparison to the rest of the market

    16. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...every douche already owns one.

      I don't.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    17. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's pretty popular globally, except in Japan.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "...every douche already owns one. "
      then "No, I don't wish I had one."

      Clearly every douche doesn't have one~

      It's Japan. I don't care what you offer, it's going to be damn difficult for a 'Western' company to crack that nut.
      Doable, just difficult.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How long ago did you live in Japan ... 10 ... 15 years ago?

      The P905i is already outdated. I've had mine for over a year now. Lots of the phones they have now make the P905i look like ancient tech. Motion sensors which rotate the clock display so it stays upright as you turn the phone 10Mpx cameras with touch screens for selecting your photo subject. 4 inch tv screens with multimedia capability that would make your head spin. You can record your favorite TV show while you're at work, bring your phone home, plug it into your TV and watch the show on the big screen. Complete webkit stack (Yes, that means you can become a walking web server).

      Seriously, you're iPhone sucks compared to what's out now.

    20. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Some might. I almost bought one because it does have the features I need, and it looks great;however I wanted a little ore control, so I went with the G1... Something I regret more and more every day..piece of crap.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      I don't need Quicken to know where my money goes, I have a brain!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    22. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yoe're not a douche, you're an asshole.

    23. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced by your argument. Like you said, it is relative. However, using the argument "you can't get that in the US so it doesn't matter" is just a cop-out and only justifies the low standards many of our industries hold. This is supposedly and increasingly global economy, so making stuff 'good enough for the US market because they won't know any better' doesn't cut it.

      By no means am I inferring that the iPhone holds low standards, however.

    24. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny

      "PS - can we avoid turning this into a fanboy flamewar - just this once?"

      No, not when you start out the conversation like this:
      "It's not that impressive, every douche already owns one."

      So, no, apparently we can't. And you started it.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    25. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by magisterx · · Score: 1

      You have some good points. Relative to the US market, the Iphone is quite nice. Personally, I have a G1 with Android, but I looked very seriously at the Iphone before making my decision.

    26. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dwarg · · Score: 1

      No, the fact is that the iphone is a piece of crap that doesn't do anything special. It's a triumph of marketing.

      The only reason the iphone is popular in the US is that other US cell phone options are so crappy, but that's a reflection of what the US carriers are selling.

      So which is it; A piece of crap, or better than all the other cellphones in the US? I don't think you can really have it both ways.

      I understand being sick of all the hype surrounding the iPhone, it's gone past the point of absurd. But it's funny you would focus your anger on Apple for selling a better phone rather than at the cell phone companies for not letting us buy something better. Or more importantly, for not offering better calling and data plans.

      The biggest problem I have with the iPhone is AT&T. I paid my $200 dollar fine to get away from them a few years ago so I don't care how "cool" their phones are I won't be going back.

    27. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      In Japan, there were already touch screen phones, and phones with full web browsers built in long before the iPhone was even announced. What you have on the iPhone now is about where Japan was around 4 or 5 years ago. The P905i mentioned in TFA was on the market in 2007 when Steve was making his iPhone keynote.

    28. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the fact is that the iphone is a piece of crap that doesn't do anything special.

      Wrong: there's that one app that displays a zippo lighter, and you can open up the zippo and light it, and then if you tilt the phone the flame ACTUALLY MOVES!

      Yeah. Put THAT in your pipe and then use that app to smoke it.

    29. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Gilmoure · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, that explains the spherical white helmet.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    30. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by immcintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I reckon that the iPhone is actually a good phone

      In my experience with mine, "phone" is one of the things it is definitively NOT good at.

    31. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 1

      It's all relative and relative to the US market the iPhone is not a piece of crap. It's great to talk about the Japanese market, the cool gadgets, and how much better they are. But guess what? If we can't get/use them here it's irrelevant.

      It's perfectly relevant to TFA, which is discussing why the iPhone can't make it in Japan.

    32. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by BlackCreek · · Score: 1
      The iphone is completely out of bounds for me for the fact that I can't upload music or videos to it without itunes (which now sign cryptographically the files, ruling out reverse engineering), and itunes does not run on Linux (which I use everywhere).

      Not that this is its only weak spot, it's just that this is enough for me not to even consider as a valid offering.

    33. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that you really understand what 'cash' is. It has been many years since 'cash' has been anything more than casino chips. Heck, one could resonably argue that since the inception of 'cash', it hasn't been anything more than casino chips, but certainly since we left the gold standard.

    34. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI (etc...)

      More accurate to say it was the first phone to receive any major marketing in the United States that does all that. It is most assuredly not the first cell phone to do all that, which I think is kinda the point of this article.

    35. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by pkphy39 · · Score: 1

      You're not a douche, you're an asshole. Also, fuck you. ;)

      Fixed that for you.

    36. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Gromius · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I take out 100 euros and 200 CHF a week and its much easier to stick to a budget than doing it by cards. I probably spend less this way, if somebody says lets head out for meal, I can just look at my wallet and see if I can afford it. Although maybe I do spend more because on friday nights it can be, hey I've got 150 CHFs left, lets hit Pickwicks in Geneve and taxi back home to France :)

    37. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary alone says it all - no video? no MMS?

      To be fair, both are merely limitations of the included apps; iPhone hardware is more than capable of either. There are a dozen MMS apps on the app store. Similarly, there are several video recorder apps for iPhone, though there are none on the app store.

      If anything, this says more about Apple's closed, paternalistic development environment than about the iPhone itself. When jailbreak apps can provide substantial, useful functionality that official apps can't, something is very, very wrong, and Apple really needs to step back and reevaluate things.

    38. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by supersocialist · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need to do more research. I can wirelessly sync music to my current-firmware iphone through Amarok over SSH with keyed authentication, and I'm definitely on the low end of technical knowledge when it comes to linux. There are clear, easy-to-follow wiki how-tos. To trick the iphone into reading unsigned database entries, you only have to edit a single entry in a .plist file on the phone.

    39. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      "But hey..to each his own."

      Exactly, the good thing is you're both following a budget and not going in debt heh.

      Personally, I also use only my debit card because it's simple and easy for me to track.

      I very much wish I could just use my cell phone or debit card for a vending machine. I would have even less reason to carry around cash then, I fucking hate cash.

    40. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Personally, I also use only my debit card because it's simple and easy for me to track."

      I've always refused to have a debit card. I've actually had to return new ATM cards...'cause they were also debit cards.

      At least with a credit card, if someone steals and uses it, you report it and your only liable for like $50....you can contest the money.

      With a debit card...if stolen and used...that money is gone then....and you don't get it back till YOU can prove it wasn't you. I don't like the idea of that latter situation, kinda like being guilty till proven innocent.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    41. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I'm not sure that you really understand what 'cash' is. It has been many years since 'cash' has been anything more than casino chips. Heck, one could resonably argue that since the inception of 'cash', it hasn't been anything more than casino chips, but certainly since we left the gold standard."

      Semantically...I understand what you're saying.

      But realistically..today's 'cash' is what gold was in previous days. And..unlike casino chips, everyone takes them as real money.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    42. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, only old people use iPhones?

      No, the fact is that the iphone is a piece of crap that doesn't do anything special. It's a triumph of marketing.

      The only reason the iphone is popular in the US is that other US cell phone options are so crappy, but that's a reflection of what the US carriers are selling.

      But it has an app store. I can go out and get closed source programs, which often cost money, to do all sorts of simple specialized tasks that really should just be built into the phone.

    43. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

      Could somebody explain what the point of a 10 MP CCD is with a typical cell phone lens being only 1.25 mm in diameter with a 3.5 mm focal length? That's like putting a Ferrari engine in a Pinto, but slightly less useful.

      By my math, the resolving power of the lens provides for a horizontal resolution (at the red end of the spectrum) of just shy of 4,000 pixels in the long direction on a cell-phone-sized CCD, and that's if the lens is ground perfectly and if the alignment between lens and CCD is also perfect. Chances are, at 3600 pixels, a 10 MP photo is probably significantly exceeding the real-world resolving power of any real-world cell camera lens unless the lens costs $10,000 to grind and is glued to the sensor....

      Not to mention that the light gathering capabilities of such a small lens are terrible and that the low light SNR of a CCD is inversely proportional to the number of pixels. Can a 10 MP cell phone camera take pictures of usable quality in anything less than the light of the sun going nova?

      Seriously, I just don't get it. It's like they're adding pixel count because they can without stopping to consider whether they should.... Above about 3 MP, a cell camera makes no sense given the lens size, quality, and mounting tolerances. Maybe 5 MP. Maybe.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    44. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Khyber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "I disagree, the iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI, a solid internet browser, a usable mobile calendar, and a viable iPod replacement."

      Not even remotely true. Before the iPhone there was the LG Touchscreen. It also had a solid internet browser, Openwave IIRC. No calendar but it did play MP3 files.

      See, where you think the iPod is something new, it's not. It's a well-marketed rip-off.

      Consider this - In the USA We have Hi-Def, 1920x1080. Japan is about to release SHV, 7680 x 4320 pixels.

      And we're just now catching on. Japan is killing us technology wise, in part because they aren't as encumbered by patents as we are, in part because while we're the melting pot of the world we're really quite secular, and then to top it all off our entire rate of progress is hindered by our legal system.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    45. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by relguj9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh, for me it was cheaper to get an iPhone, both phone wise and plan wise than a Blackberry or any other 3g capable device.

      I couldn't care less about MMS, I can upload photos to facebook or get stuff off of my e-mail.

      I also have no desire to watch videos, if I'm going to watch TV or a movie, it's going to be off of my DVR or computer on my 52" TV and 7.1 surround system on my comfortable couch with a beer, not on my tiny ass cell phone. Youtube, the internet and the app store provide more than enough instant entertainment if I'm stuck somewhere or bored.

      I have no need for turn by turn directions either, I actually prefer google maps + GPS.

      My biggest complaint about the iPhone is that you have to crack it to do certain things, like copy over ringtones.

      The iPhone doesn't suck, you're just being anti-trendy and generally pissed. I'm not a fan of trendy shit or Apple in general, but the iPhone is a pretty good device.

    46. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      No, you generally have the same protections on debit card from the bank. The difference is you are without money while they investigate, so credit cards are far better for this.

      And I guess with a CC if they find against you, you can sink your credit and refuse to pay, but with debit they have your money.

    47. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...every douche already owns one.

      I don't.

      Everyone knows blackberry users are the biggest douchebags:

      http://www.theonion.com/content/news/new_mobile_device_purchase_makes

    48. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's really only the cellphone market that enjoys such a disparity. Computers, digital cameras, and other technology is virtually international, even in price/performance. Akhiabara and Hong Kong have a LOT of shit, but really nothing more, and at no better prices than, what you could find in NY or LA, let alone online. Sure, there's probably more knockoff electronics, and they're probably easier to obtain in Asia, but there's no better *quality*, and definitely not better quality at lower prices. Except for mobile phones.

      When you consider that, you (or I, at least) have to wonder if there's not some serious market manipulation going on in the west to prevent Asian competitors from gaining ground in the mobile market.

    49. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apple has historically been different, one of the few companies welcomed, even enthusiastically embraced by the Japanese.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TyR3fyLO_I

      They love gadgets over their. The way Apple does things, and the typical build quality is what the Japanese market is all about. Cool technology packaged in an easy-to-use, stylish package. It's not like North America, where it's more or less a race to the bottom to see who can build the cheapest widget with the biggest numbers, to hell with quality. They *care* about (perceived) build quality. That's why the expensive Sony Trinitron that never had significant market share here, dominated over there during the years of tube based Televisions. It wasn't just a "buy domestic" mentality. Because much of Sony's competition was Japanese as well.

      The iPod and the Mac mesh *perfectly* with what the Japanese love about technology. In fact, I'd even go so far to say the iPhone gets it nearly right, but fails with several, easily corrected critical flaws that Apple just seems unwilling to correct. MMS, Video, App Store issues - that's all software, the build quality of the hardware seems perfectly respectable to me. It feels quick and responsive most of the time, and I'd never own one because of lack of openness (my definition of "open" may differ as I'm a Windows Mobile fan) and because of those few fatal flaws mentioned in TFA.

      (This is my second post today defending Sony. I need to go take a shower.)

    50. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I get better phone calls using Skype on my PSP. That's sad that a portable game console can beat out a supposed phone in it's own main function.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    51. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by nekura · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not necessary to crack the iPhone to copy over ringtones, but it's not super simple, either. It's been a while since I've done, but if I remember correctly you just cut out the piece of song you want in your favorite audio editing program, encode that to m4a in iTunes, change the extension to .m4r, then reimport that to the Ringtones section of iTunes.

      --

      "Programming is like sex - one mistake and you'll have to support it for the rest of your life."
    52. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I disagree, the iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI, a solid internet browser, a usable mobile calendar, and a viable iPod replacement.

      What? I had a phone that had all those things back in 2005 (name escapes me at the moment.) I traded up for a phone with real buttons.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    53. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by eap · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...The summary alone says it all - no video?

      I don't care to take up for the iPhone, but they can do video. It requires jailbreaking (not the same as unlocking), which is fairly easy to do.

      The fact that it is hardware capable of video but restricted by Apple will probably not win any fans, but just sayin', if you want to record video on the iPhone you can.

    54. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      I am in Singapore.

      I got a buddy with an iphone, whose brother + friend's GF also uses an iphone.

      Guess who has to jailbreak the iphones everytime some new firmware comes out?

      And this is with unlocked iphones (as sold in Singapore).

      I? I prefer something with linux, but not being able to get a decent linux / other opensource phone, have been using a Samsung Omnia 16GB version for the pass 6 months or so.

      Did you know that we got it months ahead of the the rest of you in EU/US?

      PS: When the Sharp Zaurus was introduced to the world, I was willing to pay about 1400 SGD (900 USD?) for it, and contacted Sharp / other Sharp resellers / distributors and nobody was willing to sell it to me. Where is Sharp now anyway?

    55. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which is it; A piece of crap, or better than all the other cellphones in the US? I don't think you can really have it both ways.

      Uhm, sure you can. In this case it is not only a piece of crap, and better than many other phones on the US market. What this implies is that the other phones on the US market are also crap. There's no reason that those can't all be true statements.

      The problems with the iPhone are many, and AT&T is just one of the most annoying.

      No cut/paste. So you can't take content you need from one app to another (think notes for contacts). You either need to go back and forth between apps (slow) and type what you can remember or write it down and retype it.

      The only hard edge on the entire thing is the metal bezel around the screen. That's also the one place you are going to hold the phone up against your head making it probably the most uncomfortable phone to use for extended periods of time that I've ever owned.

      Lock screen notifications are limited to phone functionality. If you want email notifications or other app notifications on the lock screen you have to jailbreak your phone.

      No landscape mode for email/sms. This is probably my second biggest gripe next to no cut/paste. I'm really just an average sized guy, but my fingers are kinda long and the iPhone is pretty narrow. It doesn't fit comfortably in my hands in portrait orientation as it's too narrow. If I try to hold it like this and type with both thumbs it drops out of my hands due to the smooth back or my hands cramp up. This isn't the case with my blackberry which is barely a quarter inch wider. The reason this is a stupid problem is that the phone supports a landscape keyboard, but Apple has chosen not to allow it's use in the mail or sms apps.

      No push, push doesn't work. Up until just a few days ago Apple had pretty much stopped talking about push, even from their MobileMe service (non free) where it was supposed to work. They stopped calling it push because it didn't work. They also said that devs would have push access to the phones through Apple, and that has never materialized. With the lack of push for email for example you are stuck polling. On non jailbroken phones you are stuck polling once every fifteen minutes, or longer. You are forced to pay for an unlimited data plan, so there's no real reason other than battery life to have this limit on fetching data. Well, maybe that and it would be a selling point for the crap that is MobileMe, if it actually worked.

      I own the iPhone for exactly one reason, and not because it's a good phone. I bought it because people are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on stupid crap applications, and it's a pretty easy target to hit.

    56. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      It's great to talk about the Japanese market, the cool gadgets, and how much better they are. But guess what? If we can't get/use them here it's irrelevant.

      But do we want all those Japanese gadgets? I've wondered for some time where the notion of watching TV on your phone came from...I thought maybe it was Mars. But now I know: Japan.

      I went to Tokyo once, and was overwhelmed with the feeling that the place was at once alien and eerily familiar. Then I realized where I'd seen Tokyo before: a lot of the science fiction books I've read have alien societies and cities in them that look and feel just like Tokyo. I figure that when Western science fiction authors visit Japan, they acquire a definitive conception of alieness that is reflected in all their subsequent writing. I can just imagine the thought process: "Hmm. I need some really weird aliens in my story. I've got it...a warrior-society of infallibly deadly—but always smiling—fighters who watch TV on their phones, and use toilets that have more controls than a 747."

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    57. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by badasscat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's Japan. I don't care what you offer, it's going to be damn difficult for a 'Western' company to crack that nut.
      Doable, just difficult.

      It's not really all that difficult. In fact, the iPod does just fine there. (The Walkman digital players are neck and neck, but that's to be expected - there is *some* home court advantage, just in the marketing and language if nothing else.)

      In fact, there are not many categories of anything there over which we (meaning western companies) have not had at least some influence, and in many cases are market leaders. It's a total myth that the Japanese only like Japanese products. Well ok, then how do you explain Levi's, Starbucks, McDonald's, Apple (other than the iPhone), Microsoft, Chanel, Coach, hollywood movies, Mariah Carey, etc. etc.?

      The fact is they love our stuff. They just don't love all of it equally, and why should they? We don't love all of our stuff equally either. They just happen to have slightly different priorities in what they're looking for, but they have no bias whatsoever in terms of where the products they use come from.

      The companies that do best there are the ones that tweak their stuff to Japanese tastes and/or expectations. That should be obvious, but apparently it was not obvious to Apple with the iPhone, which is clearly on the low end of phones in Japan on specs... and uglier than most too. So it's no surprise that it would be unpopular.

      But if it had an 8mp camera, a TV tuner, a cheaper rate plan, a higher-res screen, a clamshell design and proper buttons? It wouldn't matter who made it, people there would buy it.

    58. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      So which is it; A piece of crap, or better than all the other cellphones in the US? I don't think you can really have it both ways.

      -1 is a negative number, but it's still higher than -2, -3, -4, etc.

    59. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, apart from having a great UI, great features, iTunes, the app store, and so on... I guess this just reflects different priorities. I don't give a flying fuck how many megapixels the camera has, but the user interface is incredibly important. I suppose Japanese consumers see it as the opposite, which might explain why pretty much every Japanese product has tons of useless features and an incredibly poor UI. The fact remains, it's a lot harder to make something that is pretty, well-made, and has a good UI than it is to just cram it with useless features. That's really what Apple, Bose, Bang & Olufsen, and similar companies are good at.

      I guess the best analogy is a Swiss watch. A Swiss watch costs at least 100 times more than a cheap digital sports watch, has lower accuracy, is more fragile, and doesn't really have any features. Yet, I'm pretty sure most people would choose a Rolex over a Timex, even if they were the same price.

    60. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Box specs. Higher numbers sound good and give a "reason" for upgrading. Its pretty common. When I did scanner firmware, we were implementing a 1200 dpi mode so we could put 1200 dpi on the box. TO actually use it, you had to go through 3 or 4 submenus and find the magic function to turn it on- because it took double the time to scan with no improvement in scan quality. 600 dpi was the limit which the rest of the hardware could accurately produce. Not to mention most people couldn't see more than that, unless they zoomed in on it in photoshop. But 1200 dpi on the box meant that it was "better" than the old 600 dpi model, even if they were functionally equivalent in every real world sense.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    61. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all fine and good Mr. Bigshot-credit-card-user but it has been empirically proven time and again that people spend more money when they use plastic versus cash whether they pay it off at the end of the month or not. And it is very likely that you are no exception. So, you are getting ass raped whether you like it or not. But, hey, at least you can keep track of your overspending right?

    62. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I said "Heck, one could reasonably argue that since the inception of 'cash'"

    63. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by joggle · · Score: 1

      The answer is obvious. It's the same as the old Intel vs AMD clock wars. People don't know the details and assume more is better and like being able to use a single number to come up with a decision.

      Most don't go to dpreview.com and look at comparisons of actual photos taken by different cameras and detailed reviews to decide which is superior.

    64. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Japan . . . they aren't as encumbered by patents as we

      You're kidding, right? In Japan, patent infringement is a crime punishable by five years in prison. I'll even provide a source (the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry -- in Japanese). It says at the end of the page (translated quickly)

      ". . . persons who infringe patents are subject to up to 5 years in prison or a 5 million yen fine . . ."

    65. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dave562 · · Score: 1
      With a debit card...if stolen and used...that money is gone then....and you don't get it back till YOU can prove it wasn't you. I don't like the idea of that latter situation, kinda like being guilty till proven innocent.

      That isn't true. I had my debit card account compromised the other day. Wells Fargo gave me a credit for all of the contested charges as soon as I told them what was going on.

    66. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which is it; A piece of crap, or better than all the other cellphones in the US? I don't think you can really have it both ways.

      The reason you don't think you can really have it both ways is most likely because you don't think.

      I don't know if this will help clear it up, but I'll try anyway. We will assume you ride the short bus to school. Lets say there are 5 people already on the bus. They have I.Q.'s that range from 23 to 33. You get on the bus with your 48 I.Q. You are smartest passenger on the bus, but you're still a fucking tard.

    67. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > the iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI

      Huh?? Handspring Treo 180, released Feb 2002. Available with or without keyboard. The 180G was entirely touch based, including dialing the phone and entering text. There may be earlier examples.

      I think you mean "the iPhone was the first to offer a phone with the look and feel of the iPhone". That's what people usually mean when they make statements like this.

      > a solid internet browser, a usable mobile calendar, and a viable iPod replacement

      "solid" is relative... The browser's limitations have been widely reported.

      Both Blackberry and Palm (and I believe Symbian) were all over the usable mobile calendar years before.

      As far as an iPod replacement... you can put a 16 gig memory card in a Blackberry for about $50, try that with your 8 gig iPhone. And -- listen, this is important -- Blackberry supports stereo bluetooth, (as did Palm with a third party app) an area where Apple is *way* behind. When I get into my truck, the phone automatically pairs with the radio and I can play music on the stereo directly from the phone wirelessly, *and* control the phone from the stereo console. No fumbling in the glove compartment for the proprietary adapter cable, no putting up with fiddly, low-fidelity FM transmitters.

      But what you say is technically correct, -- a viable iPod replacement -- as no iPod has this feature natively.

      What *I* want in an iPhone is something at least as good as I can get in a competing phone. What you actually get is a somewhat innovative GUI on a substandard platform.

      I'm not anti-Apple. We own a Mac and three iPods -- (two -- a 3rd gen and Classic -- have been retired) including a Touch. The Touch is a lot of fun. But the iPhone just isn't that special. I'm sorry. Cellular phones just aren't Apple's core competency. I mean, yes, it beats the hell out of Windows Mobile, but what doesn't?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    68. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I had a phone that had all those things back in 2005

      What phone was that? My Treo sure as hell didn't, and if my father's work phone is any indication, CrackBerries still don't either. I hope you're not referring to something running Windows Mobile; IE on the desktop is bad enough.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    69. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      Bad day?

      (Written from my iPhone).

    70. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "iPhone was the first to offer a touch screen based UI"

      I thought that was Palm--Tungsten W or even the handspring Visor deleuxe+gsm module.

      "a solid internet browser"

      Palm had a decent one, but Opera mobile (on various platforms) was the 1st solid browser.

      "mobile calendar"

      Again, Palm had it and MS active sync on older PPC devices were good. And then there's blackberry before the iPhone.

      "iPod replacement"

      ok, Apple can take that one considering they created the iPod, but then again Sony phones always had excellent sound reproduction on their phones...better than any iPod.

      "The iPhone software stack is still by far the best on the market"

      Uh, that's OSX. And the Android stack is actually just as good and easier.

    71. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by XLR8DST8 · · Score: 0

      and, also, one thing at a time. it can't all be done at once. they chose what they wanted to develop first. i think they made good decisions.

    72. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by fjanss · · Score: 1

      usable digital zoom perhaps ?

    73. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      Actually, the Pinto makes a dandy drag car with a V8. It's an easy conversion and people have gotten into the 7's with them. Not that it would be practical for much else.

      I too seriously question the rationale for high MP CCD's in a camera. As you say, the optical lens isn't big enough to begin with, and the smaller these sensor elements are the worse their low light performance tends to be. I'm not even sure 10 MP CCD's make sense in a small point and shoot, but they seem to sell pretty well, so there you go.

      Something I haven't seen addressed here is application support. I'm no iPhone fanboy, but apple seems like the only company that's been able to create a viable platform for 3rd party apps.

      Sure, you can run 3rd party apps on a P905i (linux core), or any of the multitude of windows CE phones, but there's no storefront to automate the installs so how do we get paid?

      Could somebody explain what the point of a 10 MP CCD is with a typical cell phone lens being only 1.25 mm in diameter with a 3.5 mm focal length? That's like putting a Ferrari engine in a Pinto, but slightly less useful.

    74. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by master_p · · Score: 1

      I see a new Slashdot meme coming along:

      In Japan, things are better bla bla bla...

    75. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll check this out when I get home from work.

    76. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      I don't watch tv.

      But I sure like Bloom, Synthpond, Noise.io, Bebot, Beatmaker, GigBaby (for recoding at Gigs), iTM DJ for doing quick live performances in Virtual DJ, and when I'm not being a musician, X-Plane, Fastlane, and Lightbike.

      Oh wait. Your phone can't run OS X applications? Oh well. Have fun in Japan watching your TV shows off your mobile. Because my iPhone can't do that. Oh wait, I just have to buy an adapter and yes it can!

      Sounds like I win this one. Lol.

      -=g

    77. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wow. Those Japanese phones with their TV antennae. Isn't that the service that we're quickly cutting off here in the US? Yeah, let me rush out and buy something expensive to take advantage of that while it lasts.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    78. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by alexbox404 · · Score: 0

      LOL! yeah i know watching TV in ur phone is pretty sweet but if u want to update ur phone u will have to replace it with a new one! get new apps on those phones ITS IMPOSIBLE!! I left japan in Oct 14/08 but seriously! those phones are outdated everymonth so its like using toilet paper for 300bucks. tell me the best cellphone its out there and put it vs the iphone. will do hardware and software fight. i can control my fucking pc by using my IPHONE vnc from the other side of the earth!!! IM SORRRRY that U dont own a iphone u would now what im talking about.

    79. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      They know how to respect patents, and their system is far better than ours. They are STILL not nearly as encumbered as we are.

      Oh, and 5 million yen? That's like a slap on the wrist. That's, what, about 50,000 USD? Microsoft and other companies would LAUGH at that.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    80. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by yenne · · Score: 1

      My biggest complaint about the iPhone is that you have to crack it to do certain things, like copy over ringtones.

      I've used iToner for over a year now and it continues to work flawlessly.

    81. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by yenne · · Score: 2, Funny

      But... 10 is better than five. I just don't see how you don't Get It.

      I've heard that next month they're releasing one that goes to 11.

    82. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Targon · · Score: 1

      Strange that a Treo 680 has a touch screen, has a SD slot for MP3s, pictures, or whatever, and has a useful calendar. Yes, it may have a very outdated operating system, and it doesn't REQUIRE the use of the touch screen, and yes, I know it isn't as powerful overall. But to say that the iPhone was the first to have these features is incorrect.

      Really, the iPhone has a better package than the older Palm phones, but it is more about polish than about being the first to have all of those features. With that said, the Palm Pre looks like it may blow many people away, with a new OS, UI, and also more business-friendly features like cut and paste.

      The thing about the iPhone is that it makes for a nice toy, but it just doesn't feel like a great phone for my needs.

    83. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Five years in prison. You conveniently forgot that part.

      If I were an independent inventor and could get five years in prison for accidentally infringing on a patent, I'd move the hell out of that country. Five years in prison, man.

    84. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by iocat · · Score: 1
      It's not like this anymore, at least with Bank of America. I had someone fraudulently used my debit card to buy like $2000K worth of stuff at an Apple Store and I freaked the fuck out, because I though my $$ was going to be gone for months, but in fact they put the cash back in my checking account IMMEDIATELY (within 10 hours of me calling them), with the provision that they would take it back later if it turned out not to be fraud. About six months later, I got a letter saying "it's all good."

      I was stunned by the high quality of the customer service I got, actually.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    85. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by irae · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did it take you like 15 minutes to write it?

    86. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the clock rotate thing, i think that would be the gyroscope device typically used in digital cameras such as most Canons. This would be in addition or besides the sensors used in the wii controllers.

      The TV tuner needs the Japanese Digital TV Standard (ISDB), as it has an mpeg4 low bandwidth channel (1seg) meant for these mobile devices. I think the Europeans are now adding such a low bandwidth channel to their DVB standard. Of course once you get the stream, saving for later playback is a non issue as long as you have the space.

      USA has the worse of the digital systems, so they won't have this mobile TV thing at all, ever. Unless they admit defeat and switch everyone (again) to one of the properly designed systems.

      10MP, recording while you walk (Image Stabilization is applied to video), etc, nothing you can't get in a typical Japanese p&s camera, many Canons do all that and cost less than 200$.

      The rest would be the phone itself, again America sporting outdated systems, they barely have the European (GSM) in addition to theirs.

      I don't think the reason for the iPhone failure are nationalistic, otherwise the xbox360 would have had the same fate. Its simply they have better and cheaper options, developed at home as a bonus.

      I know the iPhone and i don't consider it that interesting as a phone. As a mobile computing platform, it has a mild interest, but so does the Nintendo DS and others.

    87. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I noticed a lot of while in Japan was that people used their camera phones as replacements for lugging around another camera and there are a lot of printing stations all over the place where you can print the photos from your camera. I dunno about 10MP, that seems a bit high end-ish, but I did see a lot of 5-7MP stuff and it looked really, really nice, more so when you consider it's coming from a phone. Shots at night, of fireworks, street stuff, flowers/plants. The only thing I didn't see was any macro photography work, but I guess at that point maybe you just whip out the camera... still, just taking whipping out your phone on the fly at a 7-11 and doing prints? That's something I wish the US had more of.

      Japanese use their cellphones for everything, from paying bills to getting onto the metro, to texting/communicating efficiently, to taking pictures and videos of cool stuff they see. Just looking at a basic list, nothing terribly specific, will show that the iPhone is lacking many features that would be standard for a Japanese user, not even taking into consideration all the other 'features' (gimmicks, whatever) that it's still missing.

    88. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      My Nokia N95 has Opera - and its a full web browser, a usable calendar (works with Outlook/Exhange), GPS (real GPS, not fake), lasts a week or so on its battery and I can install anything I like on it - the only thing it doesn't have is a touch screen.

      Oh and it can playback and record video (really decent quality too)

    89. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I agree. A friend came back from Japan and she showed me her phone. Its got a lot more bells and whistles than most other consumer-marketed phones (e.g. I have a BB). The Japanese phones have a wow really cool gadget! factor.

      I don't know the technical aspects but the 5+ MP cell phone cams certainly look better than the 3 MP the GP mentions.

    90. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      But it's not a feature if you have to make modifications for example my car can fly, if given the correct modifications.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    91. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by wombert · · Score: 1

      Yep, I did that using the instructions here: Making your own iPhone ringtones

      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    92. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Garganus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nop stupif. And nonody likws a smattass.

    93. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the patents in question were detailed and useful descriptions of devices instead of "like, what if a computer could, like, do clicky stuff, I mean stuff when you clicked it, I mean clicked the mouse, like buy stuff, man?", you mightn't be so worried.

    94. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      In Japan, there were already touch screen phones, and phones with full web browsers built in long before the iPhone was even announced.

      But they weren't any good. That's the difference.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    95. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      You missed the real "killer app" on the iPhone; the micro-payment application delivery system. Er yeah it runs on iTunes which kinda blows, but you can use it directly from your phone without iTunes so personally I never notice that problem.

      I discovered the true power of this a while back in the following way:
      - While stuck on the M4 motorway heading home to London (England) I was wondering why *this time* I had to wait 2 hours to drive 5 miles, so I went onto the App store, downloaded and paid £3 for a traffic info application, which then showed me the live CCTV pictures of the motorway in front of me!

      Could I do anything with that information? Well no, it's London traffic so of course not, but did it make me feel informed to be able to see miles ahead of me on the road while waiting patiently? YES.

      This is just one example of a simple but very helpful application that takes advantage of all those location aware features that this platform provides.

      Can you do this with a Nokia / LG / Sony? Yes, minus the search / purchase / install bit (oh and perhaps minus the *insert useful app bit*). Could it be done with just a web browser, yes probably if you can stand browsing standard web pages on a 3 inch screen, and assuming said pages dont need flash, java, etc..

    96. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by SilentTristero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about folded optics? Minolta had a camera like this with a 45 degree mirror behind the lens and the sensor down one side a few years ago. Gives longer focal length in a slim body. Don't know if any of the camphone companies are doing this though, there's probably not enough empty space in the case.

    97. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      The usable mobile calendar is the killer app for me. Couldn't find anything else that would sync iCal and Addressbook properly. I also don't want a hinge or slider that'll break in a few months.

    98. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Phist · · Score: 1

      "But if it had an 8mp camera, a TV tuner, a cheaper rate plan, a higher-res screen, a clamshell design and proper buttons? It wouldn't matter who made it, people there would buy it." (badasscat, Feb. 27)

      People would buy it over here too but here suppliers rule demand so we end up with whatever suppliers want demand to have. That's not the only reason but it's the biggest reason.

      What? You thought over here was a free market? Don't be silly. That's only a myth.

    99. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Could somebody explain what the point of a 10 MP CCD is with a typical cell phone lens being only 1.25 mm in diameter with a 3.5 mm focal length?

      The purpose is to prevent the sensor resolution from being the limiting factor as the lens is now.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    100. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      AC there basically says what I'm saying - their patent system is better than ours. In almost every way, it is superior to ours, which is held down by all kinds of bullshit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    101. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You lose speed with the smaller pixels though. Cutting it down from 10 to 5MP would double the pixel size if the rest of the physical dimensions remained the same, and would give you an extra stop worth of light gathering capability with the same amount of noise. Probably something you'll want, especially if it lacks a flash.

    102. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Wyvern2005 · · Score: 1

      Um-that would have been the Motorola Ming, i think?

      --
      Oops..was I supposed to push that button?
    103. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Draek · · Score: 1

      Apparently they were, otherwise they wouldn't be buying them now that the iPhone is there.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    104. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You do realize that most people have bad taste, right? And multitouch is a little different to a simple touch screen. I wonder how many of the people who are buying the other phones have actually used an iPhone for a non-trivial amount of time.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    105. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm so sick of people getting iPhones and then insisting on whipping them out and showing them off every three seconds.

      you're sick of people making use of their phone and you're so egotistical you honestly believe they're just doing it to impress you? are you aware that the world does not revolve around you?

    106. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats anyway better than >>The iPhone features a built in 2.0 megapixel camera located on the back for still digital photos. It has no optical zoom, flash or autofocus, and does not support video recording.

    107. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It fails to make sense to you because you don't know enough about the subject... liquid lenses have been around for almost five years.

    108. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by uhmmmm · · Score: 1

      The inclusion of a real web browser isn't really that important in the Japanese market. In Japan, probably more people browse the web on their cellphone than on a computer. This means that my and large, Japanese websites are made with the limited browsers in mind in the first place, though many sites will check the user agent of similar to allow separate versions for computers and cellphones. Because there was demand for it, the mobile web already worked rather well in Japan, and throwing Safari onto a cellphone there doesn't really change things much.

    109. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      and I'd never own one because of lack of openness (my definition of "open" may differ as I'm a Windows Mobile fan)

      By "open" you mean you want malware pop-ups on your phone too?

    110. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      If you're above the real-world resolving power of the lens, it's not going to make any difference in terms of digital zoom, either. The resolving power of the lens defines the maximum useful resolution of the resulting image. Using an image sensor with greater resolution than the resolving power of the lens is a bit like taking Photoshop and having it scale up an image to a larger size by interpolation. You aren't getting any additional picture information that way because the information isn't there to get.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    111. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      You're right that liquid lenses improve resolving power over cheap plastic lenses. The resolving power of liquid lenses, according to Varioptic, is about the same as that of glass lenses. Therefore, their real-world resolution will probably max out short of 10 MP, assuming a traditional cell phone lens diameter. They certainly can't go beyond that level, as 10 MP was right up against the resolving limit for a theoretically ideal lens; no lens, no matter how amazing, can change the laws of physics.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    112. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      And my gas hob at home is better at cooking food than the camping stove I have.

      Shame I actually have to be connected to a mains gas supply to use the home cooker, yet I can go anywhere I can buy gas bottles with my camping stove....

      I assume your psp with skype requires a wifi connection to use. I find it hard to believe you're using it over GPRS/3G with better call quality than standard celluar calls. If this is the case, return your iPhone for a non-defective model - it's broken somehow.

      If you're comparing the VoIP call quality over wifi with cellular, then no shit it's better. What did you expect?

    113. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 1

      LOL! yeah i know watching TV in ur phone is pretty sweet but if u want to update ur phone u will have to replace it with a new one! get new apps on those phones ITS IMPOSIBLE!! I left japan in Oct 14/08 but seriously! those phones are outdated everymonth so its like using toilet paper for 300bucks. tell me the best cellphone its out there and put it vs the iphone. will do hardware and software fight. i can control my fucking pc by using my IPHONE vnc from the other side of the earth!!! IM SORRRRY that U dont own a iphone u would now what im talking about.

      I have plenty of addon apps for my phone. Including an ssh shell where I can indeed get CLI access to my home server, I can also pull up my music server, and play my music. I don't use it often, because it's a pain to enter commands, but in emergencies, it's been handy. There's even a java development kit available for it, which means that if I knew Java (I don't), I could write, and upload, whatever program I wanted.

      I suppose you could call it "IMPOSSIBLE!!" if you can't read Japanese, so perhaps you didn't know about addon apps for your phone because you couldn't navigate the docomo imode site and find them? I only ask because you're making claims that are just false.

    114. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by dmizer · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I just don't get it. It's like they're adding pixel count because they can without stopping to consider whether they should.... Above about 3 MP, a cell camera makes no sense given the lens size, quality, and mounting tolerances. Maybe 5 MP. Maybe.

      Actually, the phone I was referencing was mostly a camera, and only partly a phone. It had great optical zoom, and a good sized lens. It was as good if not better than many dedicated pocket digital cameras. A bit bulky, but worth it because you don't have to carry around a phone AND a camera.

    115. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      MMS, Video, App Store issues - that's all software, the build quality of the hardware seems perfectly respectable to me. It feels quick and responsive most of the time

      You are totally correct. The problems with the Iphone (and I do have one, through my work) is mostly software-related.
      The hardware is ok, though it is a bit slow, lacks physical buttons and a usb-port and has short battery time.

      The software lack mostly in the communications area, which is a bit ironic in a communications-device.
      You can't send anything to anyone.
      You can't even share contact-information with your friends or business relations. This "We can not let our users communicate or use media in any way that don't bring us money!"-mentality that Apple has is really, truly annoying.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    116. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Could somebody explain what the point of a 10 MP CCD

      Bragging-rights for the gadget-crazy, that's the point. =)
      If you like high-tech gadgets, higher tech is better no matter if it usable or not.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    117. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      No. Tone of your comment aside, what I mean by "open" is a platform that anyone can reasonably develop and publish for.

      To me a "closed" system like Windows Mobile is much more open than a system like Apple's iPhone platform because anybody can download .Net and get coding, then publish by uploading .cab files to their web host.

      Not so much with the iPhone.

      You can argue the merits of open source, "free as in speech", "free as in beer", etc. But to me, being able to have anyone develop for your platform is much more important in a practical sense. That's why Windows is a dominant desktop OS. It's why Valve is a successful game developer / publisher, it's the reason behind the success of an awful lot of products.

      Because this is Slashdot, I'll convolute the matter with a terrible car analogy: You don't have to have access to the blueprints for a car to design a better intake manifold, or exhaust, or even ECM chip.

      Likewise, "openness" the way it's typically been defined (access to source code), is only slightly more useful than just having open access to development tools for a platform. I've never looked at the source of Firefox, or PHP, or Perl. I haven't needed to. All these products are well documented, and fairly well supported.

      To directly address your smart-ass comment about malware, I would contend that this problem exists because Windows is the dominant platform, and for no other reason. If Linux or OSX or BeOS, or any other platform were dominant, than malware writers would be incented to write malware for those platforms as well. Any system that is "open" by my definition (open to develop for) is vulnerable to such a threat.

      In defense of your point, only a locked down system, where most folks can't publish or run their own code like the iPhone is well protected. So your iPhone is safer than your BSD box. Funny how that works.

      I wish I had a better term to use than "open" for what I mean, since it already has a connotation to "source available". But coining a new term would be just as confusing.

    118. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. In fact, In most places there were already touch screen phones, and phones with full web browsers built in long before the iPhone was even announced. HTC have been doing them for ages.

    119. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like this anymore, at least with Bank of America. I had someone fraudulently used my debit card to buy like $2000K worth of stuff at an Apple Store and I freaked the fuck out...

      Wow, I didn't know it was possible to buy $2 million worth of stuff at the Apple Store.

    120. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzz

        NintendoDS beat iPhone by at least 2 years.

        Touch based browser.
        Touch based applications
        Touch based mp3 player
        Touch based game system.

        please enter 50 cents to try again,

    121. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Grail · · Score: 1

      Or get a drag-and-drop application that will convert to the m4a format, change the extension and import it to the Ringtones section of iTunes automagically?

      See? Computers are good for automating tedious and repetitive operations :)

    122. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      I wasn't being a smart ass at all. Is there any reason why one should assume Windows Mobile is any more secure than Microsoft's desktop or server OS offerings, which have abysmal security track records?

    123. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Yes skype requires wifi on the PSP. Here's the kicker - the wifi on the PSP is notoriously WEAK. I can't get any further than 20 feet from any WAP or I lose connection, has been with every PSP model and revision I've owned. The fact that it can still give me a better call on an absolutely shit wireless signal than a cell phone with a full set of bars tells me that the iPhone is a piece of crap.

      Basically my PSP does everything iPhone does (and more with a little homebrew) PLUS it can actually play some serious games.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    124. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Your call quality over Wifi is not dependent on how weak the signal is - either you have a usable wifi signal or you don't. It's not like a snowy picture on a TV set or an analogue telephone.

    125. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by nekura · · Score: 1

      Ha, that works too. :) When I did it I didn't find any free apps and I only wanted to transfer one ringtone, so. :b

      --

      "Programming is like sex - one mistake and you'll have to support it for the rest of your life."
    126. Re:Using an iPhone makes you look pretty lame? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I can tell you don't have a PSP, otherwise you'd immediately know what I'm talking about.

      With 10-30% signal, Skype is unusable. It will instantly drop even while you're connected to other services without issue.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  2. Japan hates the iPhone by Bromskloss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh no, it has become self-aware!

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Japan hates the iPhone by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      Oh no, it has become self-aware!

      Gestalt, mein Herr!

      gestalt (plural gestalts)
            1. A collection of physical, biological, psychological or symbolic entities that creates a unified concept, configuration or pattern which is greater than the sum of its parts (of a character, personality, or being)

    2. Re:Japan hates the iPhone by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that some animated movie that was big back in the early 90's? The dubbing was kinda' bad but cool animation.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:Japan hates the iPhone by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Thank you for explaining that. I was trying to figure out what joke was being referenced by GPs statement that, because Japan hates the iPhone, the iPhone had become self-aware.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  3. maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by petes_PoV · · Score: 1, Redundant

    After all, what's japanese for "but it's shiny and pretty and I WANT ONE NOW

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by abigsmurf · · Score: 5, Funny

      *in your best schoolgirl voice*

      Kawaii~~~

      or alternatively
      *breathing heavily and drooling*

      Moe~~~

    2. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, what's japanese for "but it's shiny and pretty and I WANT ONE NOW

      Konichiwa?

    3. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ã--ãã--ããããSå...æã®ãäSã®ãOEãã

      That's Google language tools for you...

    4. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Depending on whether it's set to vibrate?

    5. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that reminds me of the iBrator. I don't remember the website number :(

    6. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Chrono11901 · · Score: 0, Troll

      There phones don't get sold here because they think the average American is to stupid to know how to use it.

      Considering shiny and limited but tard friendly iphone is a hit here, they are right.

    7. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that first sentence made no sense...

    8. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Chrisq · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There phones don't get sold here because they think the average American is to stupid to know how to use it.

      And to know the difference between their and there.

    9. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a survey lat year showed..."

    10. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Their phones don't get sold here because they think the average American is too stupid to know how to use it."

      Good thing you are not an average American.

    11. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vibrator

    12. Re:maybe the reviews just don't translate well. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      127 USB connected iBrators ought to be enough for everyone!

  4. What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Japanese products have been so over-the-top and over-engineered for the past 25 years, this hardly comes as any surprise. I mean, just take a look at the current Honda Civic dashboard and compare it to a German car's dashboard. The Honda is all gadget-y and digital-y and the German car is just, well, Teutonic-ly svelte. Maybe the saying "there's no accounting for bad taste" doesn't ring true in Japan.

    1. Re:What's new? by rshol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or maybe good taste is relative and not an absolute.

    2. Re:What's new? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Japanese seem to have a talent for doing everything to excess. Sometimes that's a good thing, such as when they decide to make something sleek and efficient. Then you get, say, the 1989 Nissan 240SX, with a .26 CD, 30 MPG freeway on 87 octane (the Japanese version probably does better, but on more expensive fuel) and some of the best handling ever seen in a sports car of its class. Other times they decide to gewgaw it up to the max, and you get any Sony Vaio product with buttons that fall off and shit. Er, do I have a bone to pick? Anyway the point is that you can find ample examples of both, but I think you're right about the electronics these days. Not that I can load the page that shows their favorite phone. Personally I just want a fucking eyetap built into some Oakley M-frames with photo-gray tint, and a discreet wearable computer so I don't look like a total tard at all times, and I want it to replace all of my computers or at least their current interfaces. What's better than a monitor with a privacy filter? No monitor, and no keyboard either. Then I can jerk around with my own virtual interfaces all I want.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:What's new? by Moryath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obligatory:

      What about my electronic lavvy? It comes when you call, takes your trousers down, does everything - it's just so stylish.

      Due to hit the Japanese market in... what, three years?

    4. Re:What's new? by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      http://z.about.com/d/cars/1/0/W/u/ag_07e63_dash.jpg

      vs

      http://z.about.com/d/cars/1/0/W/u/ag_07e63_dash.jpg

      of course, we're comparing a cheap family car with an upmarket one, but quite honestly, neither seems to be designed with a great deal of taste. If anything, the Honda looks a little more stylish without all the 1970s faux-walnut trim. ;-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    5. Re:What's new? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a one-word rebuttal:
      iDrive

      To be fair, it's much better now... but WOW, what a price to pay for a spartan dashboard!

      Also, you have to consider that the market for the Honda Civic in no way overlaps with any German car. Even the Volkswagen marketing doesn't really overlap too much. The street racing crowd is not going to be showing off too many Rabbits or Jettas.

      But I agree with you and think the VW Rabbit dash looks better than the Civic dash. Mostly I object to the silvery trim, but most of what I see is that VW cost-cuts by using a symmetric dash where they can just plop the driver's side gear for left or right-hand drive. The Honda is clearly designed for left-hand only. I can certainly see how people who desire a bit more bling would like the Honda.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Well, the saying didn't come from me, but I do find lots of truth in it. Been to a Wal-mart lately? I suppose "kitsch" isn't a real word either?

    7. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Ok, I love car talk so here goes. First, the iDrive is optional, whereas Japanese glitz usually isn't. The iDrive knob is hardly a high-techy eye sore either, even if the whole notion of the iDrive is pretty stupid.

      Second, I was thinking more along the lines of a Euro-spec'd Civic SI compared to a VW GTI. Thirdly, if you think the street racing crowd has no room for GTIs, then you haven't been paying attention. You should really check out the Euro-Civic SI hatchback dash...completely different car than the US market.

      Ok, time to be truthful. I drive a Japanese car. It's a Mazdaspeed3 and I most certainly didn't buy it for it's Japanese-styled interior. Besides, it could be worse, I could be driving a Chevy Cobalt!!!

    8. Re:What's new? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I think you linked twice to the same image...

      My 2 cents on dashes? I've owned all three and found Japanese car dashes hard to use, the Mercedes dash (and the entire car) was way too plain, and the Cadillac to be perfect -- a thousand engineers creating the perfect car for an engineer. So how about an American car's dash as the best balance of features, comfort, ease-of-use and luxury?

      --
      I come here for the love
    9. Re:What's new? by Bake · · Score: 1

      err... you're linking twice to the same pic.

    10. Re:What's new? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Bloody brilliant. You compared Dash #1 versus Dash #1. What an idiot. "Er, it's hard for me to say which I prefer. The German and Japanese dashes look identical to my eyes."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    11. Re:What's new? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You've got me beat... I don't currently have a car! :)

      I see VERY few modified VWs compared to Civics. In fact, Civics outnumber everything else that I see kids racing around in. True, I don't stand by the side of the road and watch the kids race at 2AM, but when you drive around New York and New Jersey it's not too hard to pick out the drag racers.

      check out the Euro-Civic SI hatchback dash

      Ewww, just Googled it... PLEASE tell me that thing is marketed towards kids.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:What's new? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I like the car that gets 250 miles per gallon: http://www.motorauthority.com/vw-boss-confirms-1-liter-car-for-2010.html

      Even 90 mpg is okay with me: http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/publish/printer_319.shtml

      The Japanese and Americans need to start producing high-mileage cars. And I don't mean 50. That's pathetic. We need to start saving fuel, especially with gas prices hovering-around 3-4 dollars this summer, and most people drive by themselves so all they need is a basic car. They don't need a Ford Living Room SUV except for a few very-rare occasions.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Ok, here's the deal on the Euro Civic SI....they love it (at least the auto journalists and tv shows do)! But man, is that car not every Japanese electronic stereotype ever rolled into one?

      I suppose you are right on the "kiddies". I haven't been a kiddie for a long time (39 now) and can only judge the "hot hatch" market based on perusing the auto-rags at the bookstore (and my research before buying my MS3). It seems the VW GTI is definitely waaaaaaaay out of the average kiddie's league. I actually narrowed my choices down to the GTI and the MS3 and went with the "more bang for the buck" over the supposed refinement of the GTI.

    14. Re:What's new? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I like the car that gets 250 miles per gallon

      You'll never make back the money in gas savings. Never. The MINIMUM price for that thing is going to be over $30,000... carbon fiber, magnesium frame, hybrid, etc. EXPENSIVE. Compare that car to a regular Jetta getting 30MPG at $18,000. It costs 16.67 cents/mile to run. This new 235MPG car costs just 2.13 cents/mile to run. So you save 14.54 cents/mile. That means you need to drive 82,536 miles to recoup your initial investment. Bring gas to $4/gallon and the price of that thing to a more-realistic $40,000 and you have yourself 189,146 miles to break-even. And notice that I'm being very generous by comparing to a pretty big car. Buy a lowly Chevy Cobalt with it's 37MPG and $16,000 sticker price and the comparison just gets worse.

      Even 90 mpg is okay with me

      The article says 78. And that's diesel, so while it is impressive it isn't gonna blow anyone out of the water. To make it a fair comparison with gasoline, it is more like 66 MPG, not 78. Diesel has more energy per unit volume, but also uses more crude in it's production. By the time you add all the crash safety stuff in for the US market you are back in the 60s with a diesel, and (suprise) the 50s with a gasoline engine. Which is exactly what the small hybrids are getting.

      They don't need a Ford Living Room SUV except for a few very-rare occasions.

      You may have noticed that people don't buy those anymore, even in the US :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Civic dash was designed to do one thing - provide information to the driver in the most streamlined way possible in a racing environment. There is a LOT of HID into the dash. Of course, we don't get the proper version of this dash with the graduated shift indicator in North America. The JDM version (Euro as well?) is better in this regard.

      The Honda dash makes "normal" cars seem retro/antiquated once you get used to it. Between my S2000 and Civic Si I'm not charmed by the dash in the BMW 135i that I test drove recently.

    16. Re:What's new? by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

      "A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire.

      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    17. Re:What's new? by 2short · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Well, the saying didn't come from me, but I do find lots of truth in it."

      But you're misquoting it. It's "there's no accounting for taste"; You stuck the "bad" in there. The more common saying has a lot of truth in it, and expresses exactly what rshol said.

    18. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EU is the largest economy in the world (2008): $18.9Tn. Second comes US with $14.3Tn, then Japan $4.8Tn. Source: CIA Factbook

    19. Re:What's new? by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      From my point of view, it's the Americans who do everything in excess. Bigger is better. SUVs. In case of electronic, consider the bloated Logitech keyboards with wild curves and more multi-media keys than the last version, versus the Happy Hacking Pro 2. Sure there's bloated Japanese design, but there's also a big market for stuff designed with great grace, simplicity and elegance, aimed at functionality.

    20. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Above comment should be modded down for vagueness and general stupidity. Japanese products (such as the Honda Civic) are NOT over-engineered relative to German cars, point in case: have you ever tried to service a BMW yourself? Not only do you need non-standard tools, you need to be sure you apply ridiculously exact amounts of torque, pressure etc when performing any maintenance action. Have you ever tried to to add transmission fluid to BMW 3 series (E46 or E92)? You have to get *underneath* the engine and use a **pump** because the those idiots in Bayern decided to put the fluid valve on the bottom thus turning gravity from your friend to your enemy, and forcing you to acquire yet another tool for something that should be simple (and is on EVERY Honda Civic in existence). Draining the fluid requires you to use a different port on the side of the engine (another brilliant idea).

      The Germans do this sort of overengineering to justify MSRP and maintenance costs that are considered grand larceny in other retail sector. Cadillac engines are another perfect example, since they are actually made by OPEL (another German firm, I believe now owned on some level by GM).

      If your criticism against the Honda Civic dash display is the best you've got against Japanese cars (or products in general), then you need to drive a Bimmer for a while and realize why people always unload them to some poor wannabe yuppie right before the free maintenance period ends. As a mechanic who gets rich on people's desire for "Ultimate Driving Machine", I should know.

    21. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, in my field, the saying goes, "no accounting for BAD taste", because no matter how well designed something is, the common guy will choose the Rebel-Flag/velvet-Elvis every time. Elite much? Sure. Doesn't make it any less true.

    22. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that is what i like to see Apple getting stuffed
      at last they are just as bad as German cars all bullshite and cobblers
      Apple most over stated overrated goods around

      German cars most over rated claptraps on the road the only good thing about german cars now is that at least BMW have seen sense and are using proper PSA Diesel engines the only good part of the entire range as for VW yea well bollox waggon Mercs Jercades

       

    23. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced I misquoted anything, since I can't find a definitive quote either way (with or without the BAD). It's just a saying. I will give you my take on the "taste is relative" argument however: people with bad taste don't know they have bad taste. You can quote me on that one, since it is mine, although borrowed heavily from "stupid people don't know they are stupid, or they'd stop being stupid" quote.

      If the statement "good taste is relative" were an absolute, then there'd not be an entire industry and entire higher-education programs devoted to design.

    24. Re:What's new? by euxneks · · Score: 1

      [...]I mean, just take a look at the current Honda Civic dashboard and compare it to a German car's dashboard. The Honda is all gadget-y and digital-y and the German car is just, well, Teutonic-ly svelte. Maybe the saying "there's no accounting for bad taste" doesn't ring true in Japan.

      I didn't know Jeremy Clarkson browsed Slashdot.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    25. Re:What's new? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Personally I just want a fucking eyetap built into some Oakley M-frames with photo-gray tint, and a discreet wearable computer so I don't look like a total tard at all times

      I'm sorry but designer sunglasses don't make you look like less of a tard, they make you look like more of a tard. Especially if they have some kind of monitor built into them.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    26. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1
      OK my bad. I did misquote it:

      De gustibus non est disputandum: Latin for âoeThereâ(TM)s no disputing about taste.â Another version of this saying is âoeThereâ(TM)s no accounting for taste.â

      So adding "Bad" in there makes my version indeed a cutesy, wannabe-clever spin on the original. That makes me wrong twice this morning. Bad day for me.

    27. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      made by OPEL (another German firm, I believe now owned on some level by GM)

      Owned 80% by GM since 1929, owned 100% by GM since 1931. Opel is just trying to figure out how to become independent again...

    28. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Actually, Clarkson et. al. love the Euro-civic. I can't remember for sure, since I moved back to the US two years ago, but I think it won their car of the year. But as a huge Clarkson fan myself, I would have half-expected my comment to have come from him too--just surprising that he actually loves the Civic and hates the BMW M5 (role-reversal)

    29. Re:What's new? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      It's better to be talked about than not talked about.

      â"Oscar Wilde character in a Monty Python sketch

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    30. Re:What's new? by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Isn't diesel cheaper than gasoline in the U.S., as is the case here in Brazil (and perhaps the reason why diesel engines for non-utilitary vehicles are forbidden here)? If that's the case, even if it made 50 mpg with diesel, it would still be cheaper to run.

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    31. Re:What's new? by Kharny · · Score: 1

      Logitech is swiss, not american.

      Microsoft keyboards are us-designed.

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    32. Re:What's new? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Isn't diesel cheaper than gasoline in the U.S., as is the case here in Brazil

      Diesel is almost always more expensive than regular gasoline in my area. It goes up even more during heating season (since diesel and home heating oil are pretty much the same thing).

    33. Re:What's new? by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      Relative to me of course.

      A sort of "prime mover" of good taste if you will.

    34. Re:What's new? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      More expensive, actually. I think it's a combination of our "clean" (low-sulfur) diesel laws and the cost associated with converting the refineries over from gasoline... the refiners don't want to do it because it is expensive and it would drop the cost of diesel.

      I suspect that if all of our gas/diesel came from light sweet crude diesel would be cheaper since the refining process would be cheaper... you'd have to "crack" the crude to make less diesel and more gasoline. But a lot of our refineries process crap from places like Venezuela... once you have to "crack" the crude, diesel is not really any cheaper than gasoline to produce.

      In Brazil I bet you have higher quality crude and less complex refineries.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:What's new? by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Actually, even though I disagree with the original poster, his addition of the word 'bad' actually improved upon the old saying. Sorry, just like the saying 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' and other (hardline) relativist crap, such sayings express little and are probably more misleading than true.

      Maybe, just maybe we can have the best of both worlds. That would be lots of functionality, where the UI takes less than 5 seconds to navigate, *and* where the most commonly used functions take fewer clicks than less used ones. Definable hotkeys too - that sort of thing. It can still look nice too.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    36. Re:What's new? by clickety6 · · Score: 1
      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    37. Re:What's new? by 2short · · Score: 1

      Um, of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder, how could you possibly argue otherwise?

      Are you really suggesting beauty and good taste are objective standards independent of individual human opinions? Let me guess: You have good taste and are an excellent judge of beauty; people who disagree with you don't just have a different opinion, they are objectively wrong.

    38. Re:What's new? by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Even though I may not agree with what you initially said, I preferred your 'wrong' version of the saying :) Very true also about how people with less sophisticated taste (in design, music, art) don't know it. Though as you might guess, the situation is complicated somewhat since a person can have worse taste in one way (say a music's harmony or placement of gadgets in a window) than someone else, but better in another (say melody/rhythm, or striking that balance between feature creep and versatility in a program) etc.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    39. Re:What's new? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      "The street racing crowd is not going to be showing off too many Rabbits or Jettas."

      How was Mars these last 10-15 years? It is evident you just got back to planet Earth.

    40. Re:What's new? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Oh definitely. We all have our strengths and weaknesses, and even those of us in the design field can have strong design skills in one area, and horrific skills in others. I absolutely suck with illustration and bezier tools. The difference, however, is that I know I suck and I can deconstruct WHY something sucks. I don't fall back on the usual slashdot mantra of "good taste is relative", because frankly, it really isn't as relative as most would like to think. When you don't understand something, you are more apt to not realize how bad you are at it, so you can blow it off by saying, "oh, it's all relative". You may LIKE something that is in bad taste, but you aren't going to convince anybody with good taste that it isn't anything but bad taste. We all like things in bad taste...they are called guilty pleasures. The difference is, some of us realize just how bad our guilty pleasures really are ;-)

    41. Re:What's new? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Are you really going to argue that there are nearly as many VWs out there as there are Hondas? I'm not saying that there aren't any out there, but they certainly aren't as numerous as Civics. The GTI is kinda pricey for those guys. Much cheaper to grab a shitty old Civic, strip it down, and pop a hot engine in it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re:What's new? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that most of the boy racers I have seen who are willing to spend a bit more money on a car get themselves a Subaru. Not to say that there aren't tricked out VW's out there, but they aren't common.

    43. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 240sx wasn't a 240 at all in Japan and never came with the KA boat anchor sold in America. 30mpg out of car made in '89 isn't as out of ordinary as you think. That being said, your SOHC KA24 isn't getting you 30mpg on any highway at any time.

      Aww, someone else on Slashdot knows about cars. You have been caught.

    44. Re:What's new? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      EU is the largest economy in the world (2008): $18.9Tn. Second comes US with $14.3Tn, then Japan $4.8Tn. Source: CIA Factbook

      Actually the world economy is larger than the EU economy, so there!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    45. Re:What's new? by wirefarm · · Score: 1

      "Personally I just want a fucking eyetap built into some Oakley M-frames with photo-gray tint, and a discreet wearable computer so I don't look like a total tard at all times..."

      Actually, wearing M-Frames all the time will make you look like a "tard," even if there's no computer attached.

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    46. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Japanese seem to have a talent for doing everything to excess.

      Yeah, right. As opposed to Americans who are well known for their restraint and quiet understatement. Mr Pot please say hello to Mr Kettle....

  5. Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For one, the Japanese are well ahead of the West in terms of cellphone technology, as witnessed by the description of the P905i. For the Japanese, the 3G iPhone is old hat.

    In addition, unlike in the U.S., where we love Japanese products, the Japanese hate our products. They're very biased towards home-grown stuff. They typically steer clear of imports. Imports are generally more expensive in Japan due to tariffs and such, too.

    1. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's more than that. In Japan, space is very constrained and most of the phones I saw there were flip phones. This gave the user a modicum of privacy, even on crowded transport. iPhones simply aren't made with that type of concern in mind.

    2. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Moryath · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed.

      The Japanese make a mockery of WTO "free trade" regulations on a daily basis, but they get away with because they're a relatively small market compared to the US. By contrast, when some of us in the US suggest that maybe we should switch to "fair trade" that imposes tariffs on goods imported from places that have zero environmental protection laws and pay out slave-labor wages (to even the playing field), we get shouted at about "protectionism."

      The Japanese also have a major cultural complex about what is "true japanese." If you have one grandparent who wasn't born in Japan (or worse yet, isn't ethnically asian), it doesn't matter that your family may have been there for 75 years, as far as they are concerned you're still a gaijin. If you're there for tourism, grand, but trying to live there and get employment, or even someday fit into Japanese society as a gaijin? Might as well forget it unless you're going to be an Engrish teacher (and even then, the "natives" will get promoted above you every time).

      American and European products? Well, that's gaijin stuff.

    3. Re:Don't be so surprised. by SilverJets · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While your argument does hold some merit to the "discrimination" against foreign products the most likely reason for the iPhone hate is that it does not function the way most Japanese people need it to. When I was in Tokyo last year, for every 10 people I saw using a cell phone 9 of them were texting and most of them had a flip phone. In fact I found the size of the phones to be quite funny because they looked like the early flip phones...very large.

      Having seen and played around with an iPhone I can see why it would not appeal to people who just text with their phone. Especially when riding on a train so that you are holding on to the railing with one hand and texting with the other. Also, the keyboard on the iPhone takes up screen space. Why would you want to lose a lot of the screen to a touch keybpad when you can get a phone that has a separate screen and keypad?

    4. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Don't be so surprised. by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, although also in Europe, whilst perhaps not as advanced as Japan, we've still had things like 3G and Internet access in even non-"smart" phones for years, and we wonder what all the fuss is about.

    6. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Alinabi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're very biased towards home-grown stuff.

      ...the iPod sells well in Japan...

      --
      "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
    7. Re:Don't be so surprised. by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      In addition, unlike in the U.S., where we love Japanese products, the Japanese hate our products.

      Except for our rice. They LOOOOVE California rice. I thought that this was odd until it was explained to me that the Japanese had brought the rice to California, and thus it was actually just Japanese rice grown in a better climate. LOL, how do I roll my eyes on the internet?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Ninnle+Labs,+LLC · · Score: 5, Informative

      but they get away with because they're a relatively small market compared to the US.

      What?! They are the second largest economy in the world... That's hardly what I'd call a "small market".

    9. Re:Don't be so surprised. by kno3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would you want to lose a lot of the screen to a touch keybpad when you can get a phone that has a separate screen and keypad?

      Is this not obvious? So that you can fill the surface of the phone with screen, therefore having a bigger screen. You use the keypad when you need it, but then if you wana watch something for example, the keypad goes and you have a nice large screen to watch stuff on.

    10. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Get over yourself. My mother's caucasian American, my Father's Japanese. I don't get treated like a Gaijin even though I definitely don't have the pure-Japanese look. All it takes is a good understanding of the culture (and living it), and speaking Japanese like a native. I've never had anyone promoted over me simply because they were more Japanese than I was, although I have been accused of the opposite, in that my "American" background put me at an advantage. (Partially true, since both Japanese and English are a native language to me, and speaking both is a massive plus in my field, but that has nothing to do with my genetic makeup.) The "he got promoted because he was xxxx" is, 90% of the time, the sound of a loser whining.

      One thing I see with "Engrish Teachers" getting passed up for promotion is that their English is good, but the Teaching part is not. (Which is to be expected... how many gaijin English teachers in Japan do you know that have had adequate training to become a teacher? A number very close to ZERO would be the answer.) That may not be the teacher's fault considering the way these teachers are recruited, but it is certainly a valid reason why the promotions may not be moving in their favor.

      As far as the iPhone is concerned, I have one, and I know what the complaining is all about. I'd say that 50% of the problem is that the iPhone doesn't offer any of the proprietary "keitai" functions that everyone has come to expect from ANY phone these days in Japan. Offer a product that doesn't have the functions you want, and it's no surprise that people don't want it. However, another 50% of the problem is that it's locked into the SoftBank carrier. Piss poor customer service, terrible reception unless you're in the middle of one of the big cities, and bad pricing plans upon launch.

      But when the summary quotes Nobi Hayashi (who the hell is this guy!?) as saying that carrying an iPhone is "lame", well... sounds like he's either sour because he doesn't have one, or else he only hangs around keitai geeks. Having an iPhone is a GREAT conversation starter with girls. Carrying a Panasonic P905i isn't gonna generate the same kind of enthusiasm.

    11. Re:Don't be so surprised. by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      its not only europe and japan. even here in india we've had 3g twin video camera phones for atleast like three years. iphone just cant keep up when you compare its features with another phone. but its ui is something that can't be objectively compared, its so ahead of any thing else.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    12. Re:Don't be so surprised. by munch117 · · Score: 1

      By contrast, when some of us in the US suggest that maybe we should switch to "fair trade" that imposes tariffs on goods imported from places that have zero environmental protection laws and pay out slave-labor wages (to even the playing field), we get shouted at about "protectionism."

      So, in your fantasy world, tariffs increase the wages in said places? In the real world it's the other way around: your tariffs would be paid for partly by increased prices in your country, and partly by lowered wages in the country you are "helping".

    13. Re:Don't be so surprised. by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the iphone lack of success is little (nothing?) to do with all that.

      Using "protectionism" as an excuse for the iPhone's failure, is like using "protectionism" as an excuse for your car not selling well in Japan, when the real reason is you don't make right hand drive cars.

      The iPhone is an inferior product compared to the competing products in Japan. The iPhone doesn't even have built-in, reliable (non-fiddly) and well-integrated QR code (a type of 2D "barcode") reader app.

      There are QR codes everywhere in Japan - business cards, ads, signs, magazines, etc.

      Example usage: bus stops

      See: http://2d-code.co.uk/bus-stop-qr-code/

      "Each bus has a GPS which continuously updates the bus company server with its position. The QR Code at the bus stop takes you to a mobilised page for that stop which shows a list of approaching buses, their location, whether they are on time or delayed (if delayed by how many minutes), estimated arrival time at the stop and if there are any alternative buses going in the same direction."

      The Japanese do buy foreign stuff, it just has to meet their standards. The Chinese need specially regulated farms for their farm produce to sell in Japan, you can call that protectionism, but I call it a good idea given the dubious stuff the Chinese tend to get up to ;).

      Lastly with regards to forever being a "gaijin" and never being promoted.

      If a real Japanese CEO screws up big time in Japan, they're almost expected to commit suicide (it's one of the traditional and honourable options left for you).

      Whereas a US CEO gets 20 million dollars to "go away and stop hurting the company, please".

      So yah, that's a big cultural divide there. Think you can really be one of them?

      Even many of the Japanese can't be "japanese enough", and those suffer for it, because "a nail that sticks up/out must be hammered down". You think those will get promoted as well? Of course as a gaijin, you will forever stick out. So best you work for the few companies that are fine with that.

      My friends didn't seem to have any complaints about working in Japan.

      --
    14. Re:Don't be so surprised. by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      Is this not obvious? So that you can fill the surface of the phone with screen, therefore having a bigger screen. You use the keypad when you need it, but then if you wana watch something for example, the keypad goes and you have a nice large screen to watch stuff on.

      You really need to see Japanese people texting on their phones to understand.

    15. Re:Don't be so surprised. by kno3 · · Score: 1

      I realise that texting on the iPhone is impossible, I am certainly not a fan of the product. I was just explaining their reasoning behind the decision.

    16. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who has studied the country from afar but never been here. Not everyone is open-minded, but it's not nearly as severe as it is presented in college anthropology classes. Foreigners do find plenty of work in non-English teaching jobs IF they can speak Japanese fluently. Japanese, well, Tokyo Japanese people, are largely apathetic to many things. They are not passionate about racial purity, nor have a political axe to grind against "foreigners". The burden is on the "foreigner" to learn the language and prove they want to fit in and not go back home after a few years. This is true anywhere in the world.

      Imagine the common situation in reverse. Life will be difficult for a Japanese immigrant to the US if they can only say basic phrases, cannot read or write English, and are working in a job field known for short contracts and high-turnover rates. An American family may not be too keen about their daughter wanting to marry someone in such a position either. That said, given the state of the global economy, teaching English (at schools) is actually a fairly safe, and reasonable starting position for someone who cannot speak the native language and has little other professional job skills.

    17. Re:Don't be so surprised. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to lose a lot of the screen to a touch keybpad when you can get a phone that has a separate screen and keypad?

      Is this not obvious? So that you can fill the surface of the phone with screen, therefore having a bigger screen. You use the keypad when you need it, but then if you wana watch something for example, the keypad goes and you have a nice large screen to watch stuff on.

      If 95% of what you do on the phone is send texts then a proper keypad is an advantage.

    18. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's gaijinsan to you :)

    19. Re:Don't be so surprised. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      How is a flip phone more private? Perhaps if you leave your cellphone out on the table, the iPhone is a bit less private.

    20. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Uhh, since this devolved into something about the US cell phone market and Japanese cell phone market into this dribble, I'll bite.

      'The Japanese also have a major cultural complex about what is "true japanese."'

      So does the US. You just may not be as aware of it. Look at the comments made by fans of NASCAR when Toyota entered the field here a couple of years ago. Many/most were pissed. For a frame of reference, compare Toyotas entry with Dodge's a few years prior still. Plenty of people dislike Japanese products. (The current rage nowadays is China.)

      My father is a US citizen, ancestors came over around 1783, what we would call German descent. He met my mother as he worked as a ships engineer during his career. I came to the US as a 2yo. I grew up and lived in same house until college. I now live 5 miles over.

      I still get "looks" (dirty looks, looks of disdain, disgust, looking aways) in the area for being (half) different. Most of it from younger folk working at the supermarket and teenagers who yell off the street while I work in the yard. The rest are from people who moved into the area, usually from nearby cities, as the housing market was booming and see someone "different" as being "new."

      Now, not everyone does this and most leave you alone or don't care or go about their lives, but that's is what is readily apparant to me. One who takes action on their feelings every so often usually amounts to 3-4 mailbox knockovers and dozens of trash on your yard a year, as opposed to, say, the majority folk who don't deal with this at all (my parents still make their living in real estate wo we have many properties to compare to, since we don't care of the lawn care for the them).

      Indeed, what you say is accurate from all I've read about Japanese culture. But the opinion put forward it in, as Japanese centric, is hardly isolated to them. The Japanese have a word for outsider. At least they are upfront about it.

      The reality is, no matter how long you live in an area, if you look different, you often are considered different. Neighbors, police, passerbys. Sort of like the black gang member in the Gangs of New York movie.

      My parents live in a very upscale neighborhood. Nearly every time my mother answers the door to a sales person, person looking for directions, etc., she gets questioned "may I speak to the owner", "oh, you speak English very good" (my favorite), or is thought of as the housekeeper or servant. The other sentiment often encountered, particularly at new banks or with new bank hires, is jealousy.

      Where I am is something like 96% white per the 2000 US census. Rather well-educated county, and the top or top 2 of the municipalities/school districts in the area, bordered by 2-3 of the rest of the top in the county.

      This sort of behavior and thought is not relegated to the US, Japan, or white districts. I got similar treatment sometimes when I went to college in Chicago and was in a black neighborhood. It's just the way things are, and there's very little you or anyone can do about it.

      Japanese like Japanese things. So do many US people, who try to buy American, etc. Japan has a general word for outsider? The US just maybe doesn't need language to indicate what is readily displayed in body language and social ties.

    21. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the single key reason I chose to get a Voyager instead of an iPhone. I text way too much to have to deal with an on-screen keyboard.

      I'll buy an iPhone the day it has a real keyboard.

    22. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      but trying to live there and get employment, or even someday fit into Japanese society as a gaijin?

      Wow. So you mean hot, young, blond, American girls can't find work in Japan???? Whoda thunk it?

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    23. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter what you call it it is indeed a small market.

    24. Re:Don't be so surprised. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      LOL, how do I roll my eyes on the internet?

      :rolleyes:

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    25. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Ninnle+Labs,+LLC · · Score: 1

      No matter what you call it it is indeed a small market.

      In comparison to what? If the second largest economy in the world is a "small market" wouldn't that make every other country a small market too? And if so is there even really any kind of distinction between small and large if everyone is small?

    26. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means, it's small in that there's not many people in it, compared to China or the US or the EU or whatever

    27. Re:Don't be so surprised. by 5of0 · · Score: 1

      the Japanese hate our products. They're very biased towards home-grown stuff. They typically steer clear of imports. Imports are generally more expensive in Japan due to tariffs and such, too.

      The Japanese language has a whole different alphabet for Western stuff - anything tainted with Western-ness uses the Katakana alphabet, which is very sharp and angly and, to the Japanese, ugly - you can even tell in the name itself. Japanese things are written in Hiragana, which is smooth and curvy and beautiful. The two alphabets are the same aside from appearance - they have the same letters, and you can write anything in Katakana that you can in Hiragana (and vice versa) - but things like "television" (and presumably "iPhone") are written in Katakana. It's a very cultural thing, to the point of being embedded in their language.

      --
      You all have Oo.o and Firefox, so get World Wind.
    28. Re:Don't be so surprised. by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      It's the appearance of privacy.

      I pretend that you cannot see what I'm reading on my phone. You pretend not to see the absolute gory smut on my phone's display.

      The flip phone pretends to a bit more private. That's all.

    29. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they get away with because they're a relatively small market compared to the US.

      What?! They are the second largest economy in the world... That's hardly what I'd call a "small market".

      Someone doesn't know what *relative* means.

    30. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be because 'fair trade' isn't about taxing the shit out of countries you politically disagree with. It's about making sure the little guys are ensured a place in the market without having to sell their stuff at a substantial loss to compete with the bigger boys.

      The difference between the two situations being that tariffs that include entire countries hurt the little guys in those countries too - essentially resulting in bigger business in the 'good' countries coming out on top.

    31. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Trollll. Don't talk about places you haven't been to. There is some anti-gaijin feelings but there are pro-gaijin feelings as well. A lot of japanese style/music emulates the west. Often parents will feel weird about their japanese daughters dating a gaijin. But they like hanging out w/ us being friends. And they have no problem using our products if they are better. iPod is one example. Japanese products are often better for electronics. DS > PSP in japan, hotspots free games better selection and better suport for japan. PS3 >>> xbox in japan the ps3 is cheaper and has many more games, and games are more targeted towards japanese people. And japanese people are fussy about food (though that mentality is changing). So i call BS.

    32. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Knara · · Score: 1

      One thing I see with "Engrish Teachers" getting passed up for promotion is that their English is good, but the Teaching part is not. (Which is to be expected... how many gaijin English teachers in Japan do you know that have had adequate training to become a teacher? A number very close to ZERO would be the answer.) That may not be the teacher's fault considering the way these teachers are recruited, but it is certainly a valid reason why the promotions may not be moving in their favor.

      Well, seeing as programs like JET seem to prefer little Japanese language training in their applications (AFAIK), that'd be a good place to start the search. No requirement that they have any teaching experience or credentials doesn't help, either.

    33. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why does that make you roll your eyes? If the Japanese have a preferred strain of rice, and it's grown in California, genetically it's still the Japanese rice. If Californian farm land is better than Japanese (probably so), the Japanese rice grown in California could easily be a superior product.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Moron.

      DS > PSP in japan

      Nintendo and Sony are both Japanese companies.

      PS3 >>> xbox in japan

      Sony is Japanese, Xbox is American.

      And you're a clueless idiot.

    35. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No tuner and no emoticons (for texting) were also a deal breaker over here.
      So now you can buy a bulky wireless TV tuner looking like your iPhone but fatter and you can download an app for texting with emoticons.
      And yes the flip form factor being the norm here for texting ease, the iPhone will never be cool for youngsters and females.

    36. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitter troll ain't ya

      Being of arab descent is fun in the US now I suppose?

    37. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down; they don't know what they're talking about.

      Perhaps I'm just lucky and happen to live in a very tolerant area or something, but while there is some anti-gaijin sentiment among radical right-wingers (not as much as there is racism rampant in the U.S. though, so...), most people really don't care, and some think it's cool.

      From the way the parent talks, I suspect they're an eikaiwa loser (a lazy person who came to Japan to try to make money without working by pretending to be an English teacher without actually knowing anything about teaching). They might just be some idiot though.

    38. Re:Don't be so surprised. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      but its ui is something that can't be objectively compared, its so ahead of any thing else.

      How does that follow? If they can't be objectively compared, then it's not meaningful to say that any phone is ahead. You can assert that the Iphone is ahead, but equally, one could assert that any phone is ahead. (And I disagree anyway - it's perfectly possible to objectively state how a UI is better, that's why we have things like UI guidelines and so on; whether you're capable of arguing your case of why you think the Iphone is better is another matter.)

    39. Re:Don't be so surprised. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      For privacy, they have stickers you put on your screen that only permit light to exit straight out of the phone, and you cannot view the screen except for about a 20 or 30 degree viewing angle.

      When I lived in Japan, I had one that from the side was Mario jumping on the flagpole from Mario Bros. But looking from the front was a slightly-tinted phone screen.

    40. Re:Don't be so surprised. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      If a real Japanese CEO screws up big time in Japan, they're almost expected to commit suicide (it's one of the traditional and honourable options left for you).

      Ahahahahhha. What a ridiculously provincial, offensive, and outdated view of Japan.

    41. Re:Don't be so surprised. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      By contrast, when some of us in the US suggest that maybe we should switch to "fair trade" that imposes tariffs on goods imported from places

      You misunderstand your own situation. You have a protected steel market, which produced the unintended consequence of a lot of manufacturing moving to where steel is cheaper. You have a protected sugar market, which means you have a lot foodstuffs full of corn syrup instead of cheaper imported sugar - so higher manufacturing costs and fatter people. Then there is beef, wheat and all the other bits that are considered exceptions to any free trade deal the USA has with other countries. If you want beef from Australia which has no chance at all of giving you mad cow disease you have to wait until 2020 - while in Japan people can buy that now (even if it is at highly inflated prices due to tarriffs). This sort of protectionism was going on before 1200AD (Byzantine Romans) and had some pretty bad unintended consequences even back then.

    42. Re:Don't be so surprised. by wrook · · Score: 1

      Actually, this isn't true. Japanese people generally like the rice from the area they grow up in. You can't even buy Californian rice here (it's illegal to import unless Japan has a surplus).

      Having tasted both, though, IMHO most Japanese rice is much better than Californian rice. For instance the CalRose rice that you can buy in North America is acceptable, but at the lower end of what you can buy here. Texture is everything.

      I'm sure that Japanese people who visit California heap praise on the rice. But I suspect it's partly because they are just so happy that they don't have to eat long grain rice (or worse, bread), and partly to be polite.

    43. Re:Don't be so surprised. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The Japanese - almost without exception - claim that their domestic version of something is "the best". Now, tastes are tastes and national pride is not in any way unique to the Japanese... so that's not why I roll my eyes. I roll my eyes because they need this convoluted story to show why something from outside the country that they prefer is still Japanese.

      It would be as if I told you that American products are all superior, with the exception of wine. French wine is clearly better, but that's because all of the French grapes died and they had to replace them with California cuttings.

      This story is true, but you should be rolling your eyes. :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    44. Re:Don't be so surprised. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm not referring to Japanese people in California. I'm just repeating what I was told when I was in Japan. Maybe it differs by region, I really have no idea. I was in Beppu at the time. It's a resort town in the south, known for its hot springs.

      Googling around shows that California's biggest export market for rice is Japan, so I'm not sure where you learned that it can't be imported. Maybe you were there in the 80s when it was still a protected market? It makes sense that they would have only started "justifying" the eating of California rice after the market opened up.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    45. Re:Don't be so surprised. by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      According to the article Nobi Hayashi is "a journalist and author of Steve Jobs: The Greatest Creative Director." He also doesn't say the iPhone is lame in the article.

      From his recent blog post he's upset about this quote since it is out of date and he is a big iPhone fan, but has mentions problems with both Apple and Softbank.

      In my experience, most Japanese people I've shown the iPhone to are impressed by the user interface, but I believe Apple and Softbank should to more to meet the needs of the local market. Also the data pricing plan is crazy and the recent price change doesn't affect it.

    46. Re:Don't be so surprised. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, the first post that adequately describes the problem. There seems to be a lot of iphone hate around today.

    47. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally know Nobi Hayashi. He is an avid Apple fan and only uses an iPhone all the time. Nobi is one the most famous Apple journalists in Japan. The article in a complete farce.

      Here is Nobi's own blog about this issue:
      http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html

    48. Re:Don't be so surprised. by nobihaya · · Score: 1

      Hi there anonymous coward ;-) I am not afraid to disclose my real identity. I am that Nobi Hayashi, that guy in person. And I DO have iPhone; actually, I even have the first generation iPhone and now I have three of them (excluding the one that was stolen in San Francisco on the show floor of MACWORLD EXPO in January). And I totally agree with you that carrying P905i isn't going to generate the same kind of enthusiasm. As a matter of fact, to me, those people who has P905i in that ugly champagne gold color look more 'lame' than carrying any other Japanese phones. And that phone is not my weapon of choice. My weapon of choice is iPhone. (And second weapon of choice is INFOBAR 2. I didn't even charge P905i and search for it for hours ). You might ask what's wrong. Well, what's wrong is the article quoted here. This author Brian Chen based the article from two years old interview and he added a few words I have never said to support the conclusion he wanted to write; he seem to hate Japan. http://torley.com/how-not-to-handle-blog-comments When I twitter about how I was misquoted, he modified the article and attributed the "iPhone =lame" quote to Daiji Hirata who also never said it; his filing another complaint to the article. Anyway, to read the full story, you have to come to my blog: http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html

    49. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobi,

      I'm the AC that posted earlier. (I'm simply too lazy to get an account, not very keen on the karma thing and all.) I stand corrected on the comment in the summary as being inaccurate. (Thank you all for pointing that out.) While I do agree that the iPhone falls short in many ways, and is not a "main stream" keitai in any way, simply calling it "lame" sounded odd. (And reminded me on Cmdr Taco's initial comments on the iPhone. I always get a chuckle at that.) Sorry, no ill intentions, and again, I stand corrected.

    50. Re:Don't be so surprised. by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      ... Because then the keyboard takes up a lot of screen space. The difference is, on the iPhone, it only does this when you're typing. All that area with a physical keyboard? That could be screen, and is on the iPhone.

    51. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      yeah, I hear it sells on par with those sony mp3 players... you know, the ones that are a complete failure everywhere else?

      the ipod selling in japan proves only that it's a good product. sony's piece of shit mp3 players selling as well as it proves that the japanese buy japanese

    52. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Yuuki+Dasu · · Score: 1

      A close friend's mother is Swiss. I've been hanging out with him many times when we meet people, and most immediately compliment him on being fluent in Japanese. His immediate response is always, "But of course... I am Japanese." He grew up here. He lives here. He works here. But it's a permanent existence on the borders of society for him, as a hafu (half-Japanese).

      So YMMV.

    53. Re:Don't be so surprised. by wrook · · Score: 1

      I live in Japan right now.

      Actually, I checked the importation rules and you are correct. There is some importation because the WTO forced Japan into a quota of rice imports (on the request of the US). As of 2008 the imposed importation of rice (all from the US) was 770,000 tons (and actually Japan didn't import all of it's quota, falling 70,000 tons short). However, the *surplus* of rice in 2008 was 1.3 million tons. So, I was also correct that Japan does not import rice unless it has a surplus (the one exception was 1992, where there was a shortage of rice).

      But anyway, I live in Shizuoka and I have never seen American rice for sale. I admit that I live in the countryside, though. Possibly it's available in bigger cities.

      Japanese people are very, very nice people for the most part. If you are a visitor, they will compliment you. But, unless Ooita is radically different than Shizuoka, I don't think *anybody* is going to go out of their way to find Californian rice.

    54. Re:Don't be so surprised. by wrook · · Score: 1

      Arrghhh... replying to my own post. But I did some more digging, and discovered why I never see any American rice for sale here. This article should shed some light on it:

      http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/consumer_goods/article3948493.ece

      Long story short: the Japanese stockpile all of the rice that they buy from the US. Now they've been given the OK to resell it on the world market to help with growing food prices in Asia (article is dated a year ago, so I'm not sure if it went through or not).

      The thing is, people here remember the famine that happened after WWII. Because the country was not self sufficient in food and was blockaded, many many people died. In fact, after the war it took a long time to get the supply chains up an running. The law on the restriction of imports of rice was put in place to make sure this never happened again. Even though I am against protectionist market policies, in this case it makes total sense. A free market is one thing. Food security is something else altogether, and I think they have their priorities right.

    55. Re:Don't be so surprised. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree with you regarding food security... it's actually one thing that I think should be excluded from free trade agreements. I'd much rather have food security than cheap mean prices of food, at least in the developed world where starvation is rare. Things like paying farmers to idle fields don't really outrage me as much as they do some people.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    56. Re:Don't be so surprised. by wirefarm · · Score: 1

      It's because the Japanese hate your freedom. ;-)

      More likely, it's because the West too often fails to design products specifically for Japan, rather than try to retrofit existing products or even worse, merely "market" Western products in Japan.

      Japanese companies are designing products for Japanese people who live in Japan.

      For example, written Japanese is a lot more "dense" than English. One character can convey a meaning that it would take many letters to express. For that reason, they are not bothered by screens so small as to be considered unusable by most Westerners. The iPhone's bigger screen becomes less important. Japanese input on a Japanese phone has a steeper learning curve, but everyone learned it years ago. The iPhone requires learning a new one, I suspect. (Haven't really tried it.)

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    57. Re:Don't be so surprised. by wirefarm · · Score: 1

      A proper "English" keyboard? For Japanese text?
      Because Japanese input is complex, the predictive input on a Japanese numerical keyboard is quite sophisticated. Typing texts all in romaji is far less efficient, actually.

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    58. Re:Don't be so surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in Tokyo last year, for every 10 people I saw using a cell phone 9 of them were texting and most of them had a flip phone. [...] Especially when riding on a train so that you are holding on to the railing with one hand and texting with the other.

      What you saw, most probably, is them *emailing*. SMS are bloody expensive in .jp, and all phones come with a (ridiculously complex) email address. Emailing is free, texting (as in the Western understanding of texting, aka SMS) is not.

  6. This is because Japanese people are smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you ever noticed that they speak some strange version of the Mexican language and look unlike us? Also their food is expensive because we eat cows which are large, plentiful and docile animals, while Japanise people only eat fearsome and rare SHARKS to boast of their manliness. In conclusion, Japan is a far away place somewhere in Mexico where smart people do not eat cows. Thank you will you marry me.

    1. Re:This is because Japanese people are smart by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Bah! Their swords are small and curved. Our swords are long, straight, and manly!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:This is because Japanese people are smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had me at Mexican! *sniff*

    3. Re:This is because Japanese people are smart by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Have you ever noticed that they speak some strange version of the Mexican language and look unlike us? Also their food is expensive because we eat cows which are large, plentiful and docile animals, while Japanise people only eat fearsome and rare SHARKS to boast of their manliness. In conclusion, Japan is a far away place somewhere in Mexico where smart people do not eat cows. Thank you will you marry me.

      Now tell me about the ninja.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:This is because Japanese people are smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    5. Re:This is because Japanese people are smart by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Chale carnal, o sea que todo este tiempo he estado viviendo en Japon??? Pinches gringos estÃn locos!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    6. Re:This is because Japanese people are smart by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Hah!

      Monkeys!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  7. How come it's only in Japan by guruevi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Why don't we get these type of phones in Europe or the US? I think we have a large market as well and some of these phones would be welcomed. Instead we're stuck with crappy phones and the iPhone is nearly the best well known product we can get. Where is our 3G? Where is our full speed internet and cable tv on a phone?

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      At least here in Finland 3G with GPS and cameras are nothing new. TV would be useless because we too have our MPAA/RIAA equivalent organizations that make sure that nothing innovative can happen with the content that they control.

    2. Re:How come it's only in Japan by fictionpuss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because we're at the behest of the phone companies, not the other way around. They can comfortably sit on technology, and decide when to release/market it for the most $$$.

      Then not only are you stuck with older technology, you're locked out of exploiting that technology to its fullest extent, by the same companies who have a secondary market peddling crappy closed source software.

      Roll on OpenMoko.

    3. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The japanese phones have an actual antenna you fold out when you want tv. It's not coming via the turbo-3g or whatever.

    4. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two things.

      First, they have a completely locked down, proprietary phone network, where it is absolutely impossible to do anything without express permission from the network operator.

      Second, have you tried using a piece of Japanese consumer electronics? They're absolutely terrible. While the Japanese can handle electronics pretty well, they have no clue at all about user interface design, and their culture values having fifty million features crammed onto a device with none of them being slightly useful over having a device that does a few things very well.

    5. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We don't get these kinds of telephones in Europe or the US because the... Wait for it... They...

      SUCK!

      No, seriously, they absolutely suck. I've been using the phones here for a few years, and one of the main features they have is that they're an implementation of a checklist of features you'll never use more than one or twice, all crammed into the least user-friendly UI you could imagine.

      They have absolutely no sense of UI design, and being so used to dealing with crappy interfaces they're not even aware of the possibility nor the advantages of a well designed one. Seriously, have you ever looked at one of their webpages?

      Call it taste, or what ever. But the reality is that the iPhone and phones from e.g. Nokia just don't do it well here in Japan, and neither of the two companies should try to change or they'll lose what gives them customers in the west.

      Oh, and BTW... Softbank's (particulary their iPhone's) subscription plan sucks.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    6. Re:How come it's only in Japan by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      You have to give them credit for stuffing their written language onto a keypad like they do, though.

    7. Re:How come it's only in Japan by NinjaCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Nokia N96 has a tv decoder built-in (for the new DVB-H standard). However, in all the countries I have travelled to in Europe since I got it, only in Finland (in Turku) could I actually get channels.

    8. Re:How come it's only in Japan by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Because we're at the behest of the phone companies, not the other way around.

      The situation in Japan is as bad, if not worse. Until recently, foreign phones wouldn't work at all in Japan. And the whole market is run by 3 companies, who just like in the US, pretty tightly control the network. At least in the US you can sign up with T-Mobile or AT&T and use any GSM phone (though that won't necessarily get you 3G).

      The fact is that in Japan the consumers want these crazy gadget phones, even if they don't really work 100% of the time. The US does not have that kind of demand... the closest thing to gadget crazed masses that we have are teenagers, and they seem to be placated by things like the Sidekick... and of course the iPhone.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because all these articles are talking rubbish. Japan is not ahead of us here, they just don't want the same thing as us. I explicitly don't want a phone that's a 3" TV, I don't want a phone that's a 5 megapixel camera with a shit lens, I don't want a phone that's a video camera, I don't want a phone that can send MMSes (especially when it can send email).

      I want a phone that's simple to use, beautiful, and gets on with being a phone, which the iPhone is absolutely ideal for.

      p.s. I *definitely* don't want a phone shaped like hello kitty.

    10. Re:How come it's only in Japan by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK, ordinary phones have been able to do things like web browsing, 3G, video recording/phoning/downloading, maps, copy and paste for years, and higher end phones have been offering things like wireless and GPS on top of that for ages.

    11. Re:How come it's only in Japan by alantus · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, I can't stand my Japanese cellphone!

      Sure, they have cute emoticons, hdtv, and whetever you can think of, but the UI is completely unbearable!

      And I think SMS are artificially limited to less characters than the standard (don't remember the number). Maybe this limit is so that you use emails instead, which would be more expensive? Not sure.

      I'm already looking into buying a Nokia E71-1 next time I go to Europe.

    12. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's because of macfags. Japanese people have advanced technology and that has immunised them against macfaggotry. In America macfaggotry rules and technology has been retarded. Like you and your mother.

      You can change though. When you see a phone, don't look at how shiny it is or how elegant the user interface, ask how many megapixels the camera has, what CPU speed, ram/flash size it has and if it has a built in wine guide, tv receiver, 3G, Wifi, Japanese to English dictionary, sandwich maker etc. Count the features and buy the phone with the most, even if it is a bit ugly, the fan is a bit noisy when it warms up and you need to learn EMACSish key sequences to send a text message. Then you will be purged of the SIN of macfaggotry and so will your country.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:How come it's only in Japan by defenestr8 · · Score: 1

      p.s. I *definitely* don't want a phone shaped like hello kitty.

      why not? at least then you wouldn't have to worry about anyone trying to steal it.

    14. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 1

      Roll on OpenMoko.

      Roll onto what, the hype? The OpenMoko ("Hello Moto") is a software platform. That's it. Not even a very good one at that. It's intended for someone like you to polish this turd into something really cool.

      Problem is, the only hardware that supports OpenMoko is a limp dick compared to the iPhone, and can't hold a candle to phones like the ones mentioned in the article.

      --
      "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
    15. Re:How come it's only in Japan by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Users and their expectations differ widely, as the article mentions. One set of users want a device to do a few things very well, and another set wants it to do everything even if that makes it more complicated. Being a hardware developer, I am of the latter mindset.

      Management is always on your ass to get the product out the door, generally as soon as it works. User interface considerations add greatly to the product latency, and if you have competitors you might not have the luxury of designing a good interface.

      Not all interfaces can easily be abstracted for human interaction. For instance, we like for one design component to have one purpose, but sometimes this isn't really tractable because we require more buttons than space permits, so we use "soft buttons". That is to say nothing of the desire for knobs, switches, jog wheels, and so on.

      There's also the 80/20 rule. Just because no one uses all of the features on a single phone doesn't mean that the all of the features aren't used regularly across all of the phones.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    16. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They should design their UI using the dumbest common denominator like the rest of the civilized world.

      It is were Apple shines and why their RDF was so effective.

      I'm reminded of why the drive selection was taken out of Vista's defragmenter application.

    17. Re:How come it's only in Japan by socsoc · · Score: 1

      p.s. I *definitely* don't want a phone shaped like hello kitty.

      What if it had ponies?

    18. Re:How come it's only in Japan by bhagwad · · Score: 1
      Because in the US, or any country with large corporates who don't care about what customers want, you're stuck with what they decide to shell out to you and call the "greatest".

      For example, the RIAA trying to stop progress by opposing any technology that actually makes life easier.

      This post tries to put it in words.

    19. Re:How come it's only in Japan by jambox · · Score: 2, Funny

      They can comfortably sit on technology

      Yeah I seen the videos too. Dirty bastards!

      --
      You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
    20. Re:How come it's only in Japan by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Actually from what little I've seen Japan actually gets some camera phones with non-shit lenses. Something utterly unheard of in the US.

    21. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you want a phone with a 3 megapixel camera with a shit lens...

    22. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan is not ahead of us here, they just don't want the same thing as us. I explicitly don't want a phone that's a 3" TV, I don't want a phone that's a 5 megapixel camera with a shit lens

      Great, because we can't do that.

      People seem to have a funny definition of "ahead". The fact that you weren't trying to win the stupid old marathon anyway doesn't change the fact that you crossed the finish line hours after the marathon crew packed up and went home.

    23. Re:How come it's only in Japan by fictionpuss · · Score: 1

      The OpenMoko project refers not only to the bundled kernel/user layer software, but the open hardware aspect also. One without the other would be an entirely pointless prospect, and neither is a trivial undertaking.

      You miss entirely the point about open systems. We need at least the first viable open mobile system, before we can build upon that foundation. The OpenMoko team have made great strides on that front.

      I agree with you that it isn't finished or end-user friendly yet, but what's your point?

      I'd rather have an open system a few years behind cutting edge, because it will still be upgradable a few years after the cutting edge product becomes artificially obsolete due to its pre-designed marketing lifecycle.

    24. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other reasons why the iPhone is not popular Japanese that are failed to be mentioned, the biggest ones would be payment and ticketing. For example, the vast majority of cell phones in Japan can make payments at things like vending machines just by holding the phone up to it. Also, you can pay your train fare by just using phone proximity through the turnstiles. Add to it with other things that are mentioned, and it becomes quite clear that it is not very appealing at all in the Japanese market because it is so different, and Apple has not really sufficiently met the needs of the Japanese market.

    25. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Having suffered with a Japanese phone (and playing around a lot with other friend's phones) I'd have to say that they spend 95% of their time with the technology and design of the physical phone and the rest on the UI.

      The UI on those phones are the least user-friendly.

      We can't really complain tho as US-based Motorola's UI is complete crap.

    26. Re:How come it's only in Japan by MSXFireHawk · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with you. The UI is just terrible. And the webpages... A complete MESS... And why do they need TV's on their phones if the TV REALLY SUCKS here... People often think about japanese people as being intelligent... I really have to disagree completely about that... And if you live here you'll see the true reality... Lots of them hate foreigners and they keep themselves closed in their own world... Closed-minded people... That's why no foreigner product will ever work here...

    27. Re:How come it's only in Japan by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I think you hit the nail on the head here. Phone companies haven't been keeping the super advanced Japanese phones out of our market because they think we're plebeians who couldn't possibly handle the power of such a device. They aren't brought over to the US because they are expensive and have features that just don't sell over here. I mean who actually wants a 3" TV crammed into their cellphone? Especially one that drains the battery in 30 minutes and is saddled with a crappy control UI?

      I swear there is a weird form of cultural bigotry though, where the very concept that you don't want a phone with a crap UI means you're just an unsophisticated Yankee that can't figure out a simple 17 layer menu system and aren't good enough to handle having a slow and constrained JVM on your phone. For some reason "Ergonomically designed interface" just doesn't seem to be as important a bullet point on the packaging as "5 Megapixel Full Motion Video Capture".

      This extends beyond phones too. Even simple home appliances show a similar design aesthetic. In the US, a washing machine has basically 4 settings, you turn the knob to the correct one and press go. The European ones I've worked with have about 40 different modes, menu systems, and complex error conditions that can occur if you program it incorrectly. It also required that you hit the buttons in a particular order and didn't give you an indication of what the next selection you needed to make was. I'm hoping it did a better job of washing with all of the extra information I had to program into it, but I really couldn't tell the difference.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    28. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's eerie that what you DON'T want in a phone coincides exactly with the iPhone's shortcomings. Funny how that works.

    29. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      And I think SMS are artificially limited to less characters than the standard (don't remember the number). Maybe this limit is so that you use emails instead, which would be more expensive? Not sure.

      Maybe this is because all Japanese texts would be in UTF-8, which would use 2 bytes per Japanese character, so the total number of characters would be halved.

    30. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *definitely* don't want a phone shaped like hello kitty.

      Redneck yank.

      captcha: reoccur (reoccur reoccur reoccur, wtf. is wrong with this captcha system)

    31. Re:How come it's only in Japan by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

      They have absolutely no sense of UI design, and being so used to dealing with crappy interfaces they're not even aware of the possibility nor the advantages of a well designed one. Seriously, have you ever looked at one of their webpages?

      Maybe the design of the user interface is less important to the overall functionality/desirability of a device than Apple would have you believe.

    32. Re:How come it's only in Japan by noewun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      . . .they just don't want the same thing as us.

      True, and there are things about Japanese culture which make their cel phone market very different from ours. One of the biggest things is the way in which the Japanese commute to and from work: Japan has a much higher use of public transportation than does the U.S., and the Japanese are heavy users of rail travel. This means, according to the last figures I checked, the average Japanese working person has an hour commute to and from work which is, essentially, free time. Contrast this to the U.S., in which the majority of people drive to work.

      To me, this explains a lot of the Japanese demand for the use of video and TV on the cel phones, and from the cel phone networks: they have the time and inclination to use those services. Contrast this to the U.S., in which people have to (supposedly) concentrate on their driving; we have lots of talk radio here, something to listen to during that commute which requires no hands.

      Add to this all of the other commuting the Japanese do via rail and you have a market which just doesn't exist in the U.S. I think this holds true in Europe as well, which also has a higher incidence of public transportation use than the U.S. We drive here, a lot, and that niche just doesn't exist. Most Americans get their online TV and video either at work or at home. Which is to say that population and work patterns influence technology adoption and use as much as, or more than, GUI design and technical achievement.

      At least that's my theory.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    33. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Unpossible! Good optics do not fit in small spaces. period.

    34. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't care if it's 640x480 with a shit lens. The kinds of lenses you get in phones mean that they're worthless for taking more than a quick snap, which means any more than VGA is a waste.

    35. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      I don't get you â" for me, as a european (someone with taste), the iPhone is a better phone than any of these supposedly better phones. It's simpler, smaller, more beautiful, and does more of what I want and less of what I don't. That's ahead in my book.

    36. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Or possibly â" apple designed a very good phone, and realised that the perceived shortcomings are not actual shortcomings. Why would I send an MMS when I can send an email? Why would I take a 5MP photo when the crap optics you can get into 0.5cm can't deal with that much detail?

      etc.

    37. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      It's a good theory, I like it â" but I've seen japanese trains, with the way they cram them in like sardines, could you honestly watch one of these devices :P

    38. Re:How come it's only in Japan by krakround · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need to go back home. You have too-long-time-expat-itis.

    39. Re:How come it's only in Japan by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

      if you'd ever been in japan for a while you'd realise how wrong you are... japan had email when we were moving to digital (from analog) and that gap has existed ever since. Its not about having a TV on the phone, its about many other factors. SMS (mms) was never all that used in japan because they already had superior tech (i.e. email).

      Most of the factors are about tech thats a generation or two ahead of everyone else - because both the tech market (phone makers) and the comm's (mobile providers) can move very fast - its a small island with a big market, throwing up new towers is easy. Pushing out a new phone tech is also quiet easy - if you know how to market to the japanese.

      If you want to talk about computing, then yeah, they are behind - but not when it comes to gadgetry (in fact, anything build in japan tends to be ahead, anything built elsewhere tends to be behind).

    40. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Spatial · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of why the drive selection was taken out of Vista's defragmenter application.

      Man I hate that.

      Back in Windows 98 you even had a block visualisation where you could see everything being moved around as it happened.

      In XP you had a crappy visualisation but at least it was something. You could see some progress.

      Now in Vista you have... nothing. I don't think there's even a progress bar.

      The whole principle of it annoys me. It's the same concept with useless error messages that won't tell you where the error happened or even a vague description. Completely useless, a total user interface failure.

    41. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a european, I say rubbish. The iphone is fairly pretty, but younger europeans, at least in northern parts (I'm in ireland but do travel to the uk and other bits of northern europe), like the japanese, do in fact use and expect actual phone features too. The iphone is basically the sort of phone a fashion-conscious older woman (your mum, say) would use. But even my mum, an executive, doesn't bother with the iphone, she depends on more sensible levels of functionality available from blackberry/nokia/lg/samsung/sony/sharp/panasonic/lg/basically-everyone-but-apple.

    42. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      And yet, if I look around my work (developers, 3D artists and managers) I see that about 70% of people here have... wait for it... an iPhone. Of the iPhone using masses, no one seems displeased with it. There's one guy with a windows mobile device, he's sworn his next will be an iPhone. There's a few of the older people with an ancient battered nokia, they seem happy with them and expect to carry on using them for another 20 years.

      Conclusion: you're talking rubbish - people here actually like the iPhone, it's a very functional phone, that's very easy to use and happens to have a really excellent selection of applications to use on it.

    43. Re:How come it's only in Japan by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      I do part time consulting for a little company here that has a Japanese sister company that sells a martial arts magazine. (Cliche, I know.) And when I read, "Seriously, have you ever looked at one of their webpages?" I laughed. Yep, I have. Watch Japanese news (at least the few I've see) and there's stuff moving around everywhere and colors that make me ill. (It's like FOX News + psychedelics.) I can't read Japanese and yet their general design in marketing and broadcast always "feels" like it's screaming at me from all over the place.

      It doesn't appeal to me. I'm not saying it's bad or wrong or whatever because I'd probably feel differently if I grew up there, but from the culture I've grown up in everything seems so crammed and "busy."

      Maybe my puny gaijin just can't handle all that information.

    44. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want a phone that can send MMSes (especially when it can send email).

      All Japanese phone can send email since ages...

    45. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because all these articles are talking rubbish. Japan is not ahead of us here, they just don't want the same thing as us. I explicitly don't want a phone that's a 3" TV, I don't want a phone that's a 5 megapixel camera... I don't want a phone that's a video camera,

      Sure, but "ahead of us" isn't defined by your personal preferences. Some of us do want these features. But none of us can have them. And therefore Japan is ahead of us.

    46. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Rutefoot · · Score: 1

      If what you listed were the only things important to you, it doesn't make sense that you'd shell out the extra money for an iPhone when many other phones meet that criteria or exceed it.

      If media functions were not important to you, you'd most definitely pick something smaller, less fragile and cheaper.

      "But then there is this group-think thing where people will convince themselves that they don't actually need whatever is lacking, and that they absolutely need whatever is there."
      -Blackcreek, someplace higher up the page.

    47. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have an open system a few years behind cutting edge

      That's why you don't see the problem. You are happy obsolete hardware. A large majority of customers don't agree. That was the point in the article, and why projects like OpenMoko are a dud. It's striving to satisfy a market that isn't there.

      --
      "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
    48. Re:How come it's only in Japan by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      If that's all you want a phone for, then the iPhone is seriously overkill for you. There are a lot of attractive, simple phones that make much better ACTUAL PHONES than the iPhone (actual phone quality and reliability being, in my experience with mine, probably the thing the iPhone is worst at).

      The thing is, the iPhone is trying to be that kind of fancy do-it-all phone with everything but the kitchen sink. And compared to markets in other countries, it just comes up short. To put it another way, if all you want is a phone, you don't have to spend several hundred dollars on an iPhone to get an attractive one that works well. If you want something with all the bells and whistles that justifies that kind of price, the iPhone is not and never was state of the art.

    49. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like it's acting as a status symbol in your local peer group. Got an iphone? You're "in", you can afford one, etc., you can gush about how wonderful they are together with the alpha male.

      But try walking down the street in dublin or london or something.(UK has loads of phones and Ireland has more mobile phones than people, you'll see phones...). Sure, you'll see some iphones , they're not the complete dismal failure some people are making them out to be, but they're sure as hell not at 70% of the market for pete's sake!

    50. Re:How come it's only in Japan by fictionpuss · · Score: 1

      You seem to be arguing that no open system can be a success unless it comes into existence shiny and new.

      It could only come into existence shiny and new if it had an extended initial period of closed development (like the iPhone), which is entirely against the point of having an open system.

      I mean, do you see the point I'm making, or am I playing with a troll here?

      In addition, I am not happy with obsolete anything, my quote which you truncated was making the point that an open system can stay close to cutting edge, long after closed systems such as the iPhone are obsolete.

      It requires a bit of patience is all - while Linux might not have been an advanced OS when you were using your 386, you can now pull that box out of the cupboard and load the very latest kernel on that if you wanted.

      So yeah - roll on OpenMoko, because until there is a healthy open mobile communications ecosystem, we're all gonna be stuck to the teats of whichever large telecom companies hold joint monopoly in our local areas.

    51. Re:How come it's only in Japan by knickerbocker · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. The iphone is heads and tails better than the Japanese offering. Note: I use the singular there as EVERY JAPANESE CELLPHONE IS EXACTLY THE SAME. Japanese phones are nothing special. A few of them have some neat features, but none of them near the software sophistication of the iphone. If you want to talk in terms of the cellular networks themselves the high speeds offered you would have a pretty solid case for a Japanese lead, but in the case of handsets I haven't seen anything that approaches the iphone here. A ridiculous fallacy. Runaway imaginations with an (un)healthy dose of cynicism.

    52. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I am currently living in New Zealand and our first rental place had some Fisher and Paykel piece of crap washer, which is I believe a New Zealand brand but takes after European brands (everything in New Zealand is either European (mainly UK)-inspired, or American-inspired, NZ taste seems to be a mix between the USA and UK). It was constantly beeping and had flashing LEDs and many settings and was just as you described, it felt overly complicated and yet also didn't wash clothes all that well. And then the stupid thing broke and all it would do was beep incomprehensible tones and flash incomprehensible lights.

      So when we moved into our house, we took the time and extra money necessary to find a used American-made Whirlpool washer. Big, solid, and sturdy. No electronics, just a couple of mechanical dials. The thing feels bulletproof, and I don't worry about fragile and pointless electronics breaking. It washes clothes in less than half to time that the F&P piece of crap did, and does a better job of it to boot. I am sure that it uses more water and electricity too, which is unfortunate ...

      First time in a looong time I've responded to a sub-1000 id BTW.

    53. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds a bit strange to me. In Ireland at least, SMSes while individually limited are auto-split anyway by typical phone OSes, can't quite imagine the japanese being less capable of that than us. If you write a long SMS text message to someone, you get a length warning, an old phone you send to sees, say, three consecutive text messages, a new phone also sees three consecutive text messages but probably presents them on the one page anyway.

      Of course maybe in japan they just use switch to MMS or email transport, or there's some insane patent in force on the idea there.

    54. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Motorola RZR is pretty simple to use and gets on with being a phone, is several hundred dollars less than the iPhone, and has a subscription that is $50/month less. If all you want is a phone, then the iPhone is a rather piss poor choice.

    55. Re:How come it's only in Japan by achurch · · Score: 1

      I've seen japanese trains, with the way they cram them in like sardines, could you honestly watch one of these devices :P

      I live in Japan, I ride those trains, and yes, people can and do watch TV on their cell phones no matter how crowded it is. The trick is getting your phone (and arm) into position before you get packed into the crowd.

    56. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, I've had many pervious phones that were "just phones". The problem is, their UI is invariably shit. I don't care if it's a nokia (my second favorite phone was), a Sony Ericsson or something else, they all have shit UIs. They are all controlled in a painful slow way using 2 to 4 little buttons on the front that just simply aren't enough to select things fast. They all use teeny tiny fonts that you can't read on low quality screens with poor antialiasing. They all randomly swap around the affermative/negative actions at the bottom of the screen, they invariably have bowed to phone company preasure and done moronic things like making MMS more prominent in the menus than SMS, they never sync properly with my computer's address book without having to buy proprietry extra cables, and they have never thought of all the things I might want to do in their shitty menu systems. How was it again that I added this guy's secondary phone number to an SMS to send to someone again? Oh yes, it's not in the menu!

      This is why the iPhone is awesome â" because it has none of the shortcomings of a "normal" phone's shitty UI.

    57. Re:How come it's only in Japan by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, they're not at 70% market share. What I was attempting to imply was that you had identified their target market incorrectly. It is not teenagers who want something shiny, and it's not 45 year old mothers who thinks it looks cute. It's computer users and developers who have disposable income to spend of a shiny computing gadget and have got over their "apple is evil/failing/make computers with only one mouse" thing.

    58. Re:How come it's only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want a phone that can send MMS there is exactly one model that is still made: the iPhone.

    59. Re:How come it's only in Japan by davolfman · · Score: 1

      That's why they've got the lenses mounted sideways in a 3/4in barrel that doubles as the hinge. It's not like the lenses need to be much bigger for the tiny sensors non-DSLR cameras use.

  8. of course by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPhone is inferior in lots of ways. It has NO stereo bluetooth support! It also lacks bluetooth IP networking for tethering to your laptop, and it doesn't use the standard USB mini-B cable.

    The iPhone needs a lot of improvement before I would consider it.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:of course by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has NO stereo bluetooth support! It also lacks bluetooth IP networking for tethering to your laptop, and it doesn't use the standard USB mini-B cable.

      *shrug*, when I look for a phone none of these things are even a consideration for me. I don't use bluetooth for anything and I really don't care about what USB cable is used as long as I can transfer what I need to the device quickly.

      Personally there are plenty of choices out there in phones because people have different needs and tastes. The iPhone isn't anywhere near the perfect mobile device (actually far from it) but it does what it does very well. I am a mass transit rider and I love the video/music player and the web browser. I used to own a T-mobile Sidekick and I really miss the keyboard on that device as well as the background application running. It's been difficult for me to get used to the fact that I am not available on AIM 24/7 wherever I am.

      You take the good with the bad and you weigh your options before choosing your device. I decided that the media component of the iPhone was far superior to other devices I tried and that was more important to me on my commutes, especially after a 5.5" of snow falls after 12 PM in Minneapolis crushing the roadways during rush hour.

      YMMV.

    2. Re:of course by Flaggday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The USB mini-B cable may be "standard", but the iPod dock connector is plentiful. Check households, office desks, backpacks, and I bet you'll find it much easier to locate a dock connector than a USB mini-B to anything.

    3. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also lacks bluetooth IP networking for tethering to your laptop, and it doesn't use the standard USB mini-B cable.

      No, it has neither of those for teathering. It uses the much faster WiFi teathering method.
      You create an ad-hoc wireless network on one device (IE your laptop) then join the iPhone to it and run your netshare app on the iPhone. Much better range than bluetooth. It's technically faster, but 3G is your bottle neck so it doesn't matter much.

      Your point about the bluetooth stereo is right on (as well as every other bluetooth service they did not include, such as all of them)

      Personally I see the lack of mini-b usb a Good thing, as I personally make more use of the other non-data related signals off the iPhone dock jack, far more than the usb functionality, which I mainly only use to charge the phone at home. My car dock charges it via the firewire power in (As it's 12v instead of 5v) and use the audio in/out, video, and serial port features heavily.

      But for just charging and syncing with a mac, I can still see your side of that too.

    4. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, jailbreak with backgrounder can run things in the background

      or without jailbreak, several of the im apps in the store offer offline email notification, combined with push and you're good. beejiveim works fairly well for this.

    5. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I'm guessing the number of cameras and non-apple mp3 players sold in recent times somewhat outnumber the number of ipods sold. Even my parents could probably find several USB mini-B leads in their house.

    6. Re:of course by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it always goes back to the original iPod review on /.
      "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

      There is a schism between the features crowd and the functions well crowd. Apple bridges that well enough for the American market to come up with products people really want. But the problem has always been the solely American-centric focus. Japanese and many other markets don't have the same tastes. Perhaps the Japanese are more toward the features side and are techy enough not to worry about seamless integration (I have no idea).

      Let's face it: the killer app on the iPhone are two things: seamless integration among components (hardware/software) and now the App Store - giving you thousands of capabilities that competitors don't have now (but easily can). (Balmer: Developers, developers, developers!!!)

      But you can't go into foreign markets with the exact same thing, prices, etc and expect not to be completely beaten up. Just like most domestic US cars are unsellable almost everywhere else: they are simply too big in both exterior and motor size.

      Apple is a design house. It's problem is that it is so centralized and secretive, it's hard for it to compete in other markets. It needs design houses in other countries to start competing elsewhere. And be willing to individualize their approach to regions/countries.

    7. Re:of course by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can "design" until you are blue in the face but in the end of the day a 2 pound bag of shit with a pink bow tie is still a 2 pound bag of shit.

      People's feelings will not change just because you changed your name from Diebold to Premier Election services or whatever they're called now.

    8. Re:of course by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's face it: the killer app on the iPhone are two things: seamless integration among components (hardware/software) and now the App Store

      No, the killer apps are the tolerable music player that syncs with iTunes and the first decent small-screen web browser.

      (And why do you keep repeating this term "seamless integration"? If it were seamless, you wouldn't have to exit every application to run another, as if it were Palm OS, or DOS. That's a very big seam.)

    9. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's shiny and made by Apple. That's enough for the sheeple

    10. Re:of course by garcia · · Score: 1

      1. Push doesn't work very well.

      2. Jailbreak has never really worked very well for me (or several others I know that have done it -- some people have no issues). As I have mentioned many times before, when I have my phone jailbroken, applications will randomly stop working (immediately return to the main screen after you start them). Once one starts doing that, the others quickly follow suit and requires you to reinstall the applications to get them to stop. So while I love the availability of the extra applications, I really would prefer that my applications continue working properly.

      3. Backgrounder "worked". AIM would run and I would get IMs. Unfortunately sometimes it wouldn't work and would hang the entire device. If I am continuously restarting the device to gain control of runaway backgrounded processes, it's really not doing me much good is it?

    11. Re:of course by avalys · · Score: 0

      That's not a problem, that's a feature. What, you want a window manager or something? Most people don't want to worry about process management on their freaking phone.

      If a developer wants to build an application that remembers where the user was when it last closed and returns to that spot when it launches again, that's certainly doable on the iPhone.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    12. Re:of course by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      I've only seen an iPod dock connector once so far, on an iPod owned by a coworker who complained he hated the thing *shrug*

      I have no clue by what you mean "check backpacks" either. My backpack has a USB mini-B cable in it and a short length of Cat5e.

    13. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Savvy? You mean obcessed with gimmicks.

    14. Re:of course by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      So the six to ten USB connectors on each PC in the house don't count? How many iDock connectors on your TV or laptop? How about your DVD player?

      Those all have USB connections in my home.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    15. Re:of course by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I want the Apple that made the Newton which didn't have this problem.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    16. Re:of course by nasor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the real issue is much simpler; Japanese people text like crazy, and the iPhone is pretty bad for texting. Simple as that.

    17. Re:of course by Flaggday · · Score: 1

      I have no clue by what you mean "check backpacks" either. My backpack has a USB mini-B cable in it and a short length of Cat5e.

      I think a survey of backpacks, shoulder bags, etc., in just about any demographic in the United States is likely to turn up more dock connectors than mini-B. Doesn't mean that's the best choice, just that saying the iPhone uses a non-standard connector is misleading.

    18. Re:of course by putaro · · Score: 1

      You mean those USB ports that the iPod dock connector connects to?

    19. Re:of course by Flaggday · · Score: 1

      But you don't jam your phone directly into the PC, laptop, TV, or DVD player, do you? You use a cable to connect the two, and both ends matter- saying there are more full size USB A things to plug into doesn't say anything about what's on the other end of that cable, and the debate is about whether that other end is a USB mini-B, a micro-B, a dock connector, or anything else.

    20. Re:of course by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Where have you seen an iPod dock connector on a device that doesn't plug into an Apple product?

      For instance, my mini-B cable both fits my Cowon D2 music player, and my Canon photo camera. My Nokia phone unfortunately does have its own weird charging connector, but standarization should take care of that in a few years. And since it has full Bluetooth support, it's not really a problem as for anything other than charging I don't need a cable anyway.

    21. Re:of course by SLi · · Score: 1

      Also it doesn't have a keyboard.

      Seriously. A phone without keyboard? I have no doubt that iPhone is very good for a phone without a keyboard, but still it's a ridiculous idea.

    22. Re:of course by Flaggday · · Score: 1

      Where have you seen an iPod dock connector on a device that doesn't plug into an Apple product?

      Never. I'm just saying that iPods are *everywhere*, whether they're perfect or not.

      My Nokia phone unfortunately does have its own weird charging connector, but standarization should take care of that in a few years.

      Standardization on mini-B? Or micro-B? Or the thing that's on most LG's right now? Or the thing that's on most Motorola's right now? I'm just saying that, if I wanted to bet on availability of a given cable in any random place, I'd bet on being able to find the thing that plugs into the ubiquitous iPod.

    23. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are a child. I don't care how old you are, you have the mind and attitude of a child.

    24. Re:of course by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Standardization on mini-B? Or micro-B? Or the thing that's on most LG's right now? Or the thing that's on most Motorola's right now?

      Wikipedia says: "The Micro-USB connector was announced by the USB-IF on January 4, 2007 and the Mini-USB connectors were withdrawn". So Micro-B then.

      Though standarization on USB would be a great start. A mini to micro adapter can be made easily, and wouldn't require another cable that'd add to the tangled cabling mess in the backpack.

      I'm just saying that, if I wanted to bet on availability of a given cable in any random place, I'd bet on being able to find the thing that plugs into the ubiquitous iPod.

      In America maybe, but not in Europe. In Spain the only person I know who had an iPhone was a coworker, who complained it was a fancy looking piece of junk. My mother recently asked me what an iPhone *was* and she works in tourism. And I've seen them offered for 0 Euros, though I'm sure a high priced contract of some sort is attached. Considering her current contract is 10 Euros a month, and I vaguely remembered iPhones coming with $60/month contracts, she instantly lost interest.

    25. Re:of course by Flaggday · · Score: 1

      In America maybe, but not in Europe.

      Fair point, especially considering TFA's topic. All my observations come with the "in the US" caveat.

      In Spain the only person I know who had an iPhone was a coworker, who complained it was a fancy looking piece of junk.

      Are iPods common but not iPhones? Or are iPods a rarity also?

    26. Re:of course by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      iPods seem a great deal more common than iPhones, but I see a pretty large variety of players on the underground. And pretty much any recent phone will make an acceptable MP3 player. My phone for instance accepts 8GB cards, which would make it quite acceptable. I still prefer my dedicated player though.

    27. Re:of course by Lord+Ender · · Score: 0, Troll

      Better a child than a Coward.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    28. Re:of course by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the US. Not outside, in the real world.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    29. Re:of course by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

      Boole-sheet.

    30. Re:of course by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You confusing "gimmicks" and useful, practical features. All the examples I give are useful and practical, Mr. Coward.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    31. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has NO stereo bluetooth support! It also lacks bluetooth IP networking for tethering to your laptop, and it doesn't use the standard USB mini-B cable.

      Blackberry Storm. :)

      Not the best device in the world and it does require a contract with the super evil Verizon (though, compaired to AT&T, VZ aint that bad).
      But it does everything I need of it.

      Just about any blackberry has the features your listing in fact.

    32. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no clue by what you mean "check backpacks" either. My backpack has a USB mini-B cable in it and a short length of Cat5e.

      So you don't know what he means by checking backpacks, and then in the very next sentence you check you backpack?

    33. Re:of course by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Let's see, my office/home/car: iPod connectors, for iPod nano, and wife's iPhone. Mini USB connectors in open use: CF reader, graphics tablet, Nokia N95 cellphone, digital photo frame, Canon DSLR, Canon P&S, USB hub, USB hub, digital audio recorder (dictation device), label writer/printer, GPS.

      Sorry, you were saying?

    34. Re:of course by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      and run your netshare app on the iPhone

      Because netshare ships with the iPhone, right? Oh, no.

      I guess I could get it on the App Store, then? Oh, no.

      Much better range than bluetooth.

      I'm confused. Every laptop I've had over the last three years has Bluetooth 2.0, Class 1. As does my N95. As does the iPhone - well, apparently not. If you're getting 300' range from your iPhone's ad hoc wireless, color me impressed.

      My N95 can create a wireless hotspot, fully functional, WPA, MAC filtering, infrastructure mode, and share the network, out of the box. As soon as I link it to my laptop by Bluetooth, I get a Nokia N95 over Bluetooth modem device, I create a dialup connection to dial AT&T at *99# and all is good, out of the box.

      It is nice that there is the ability to control more functionality via the dock connector, but let's be honest, that's a chosen limitation at Apple's end, not an inability of USB to connect to and control a device.

    35. Re:of course by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      Geez give it up! Only iPod owners have iPod dock connectors. Apple is using a proprietary connector so they can license peripherals. And then they want me to pay extra for the priveledge? No, thanks. Here's my list of mini-B gadgets:

      Digital Camera
      Digital camcorder
      Sony PSP
      Logitech remote control
      USB Flash card drive

      Companies that don't use it are up to no good!

    36. Re:of course by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh! The Japanese do enjoy those things, as well as much more. Other multimedia phones do it just better than the iPhone. Most Americans are simpler than the Japanese in their techy needs.

    37. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you download the newest version of AIM for the iPhone(If you haven't already), it now offers the ability to keep you online even when the app is not open. If someone IM's you, you will receive a text message and then you can open AIM and start chatting again. I know this is nowhere near the "right" solution to the problem (background processes are)but it is about as graceful as we are going to see until that area is addressed properly.

    38. Re:of course by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      You can "design" until you are blue in the face but in the end of the day a 2 pound bag of shit with a pink bow tie is still a 2 pound bag of shit.

      I'm not sure what your point is. One would hope that "step 1" of "make good product" is "select material other than shit to make phone out of."

    39. Re:of course by Draek · · Score: 1

      In the US maybe, but I don't think I've ever seen an iPod dock connector here in South America, whereas since both my digital camera and my scanner use standard USB connectors, I'd already have plenty of spares for the cellphone even before buying it.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    40. Re:of course by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I have three mini-USB cables in my living room that I can see, two attached to my PS3, one to my PC for the camera.

      I have no iDock connectors, because I have a PSP and a Walkman (mp3 / FM / video player).

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  9. iPhone by JailTheHouse · · Score: 1

    The iPhone is not currently able to compete with the Japanese technology!
    ---
    http://google.blogozz.com/2009/02/27/blogger-connects-to-google-friend-connect/

  10. Proof by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I love the iPhone and think it's damn cool, things like this are (to me) just another piece of proof that the North American (and western society, in general) cell phone markets are set up to discourage innovation and advancement and are, instead, designed to ensure lock-in with particular vendors and suppliers. We _NEED_ regulators to step in and start putting companies in their places. That will open up innovation and encourage manufacturers to make better products to compete for consumer dollars. Also, regulators need to force carriers to provide better plans at reasonable rates. But, since a lot of people are getting rich off of the current stifling system, I won't be holding my breath for that sort of change to happen... We will continue to remain behind the times.

    1. Re:Proof by thedonger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe we just need stop believing that we all must have a cell phone and stop buying the crap about which you are complaining? Or we all buy stripped down, inexpensive models with basic plans.

      What you may not be factoring in is that the vast majority of the American cell phone-buying public thinks the iPhone is the greatest thing since sliced bread. They don't care about Linux, and they don't know what Japan is doing outside of their anecdotal awareness that the Japanese are very tech-savvy.

      If you want the government to force cell phone companies and carriers to do anything it will cost you tax dollars - probably a greater amount relative to the time you will have to wait for the cell phone companies/carriers to come to your awareness in their own time.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:Proof by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Pfft... Are you an imbecile or something?

      I grew up in Norway, probably one of the few countries with higher cost of living than Japan. Yet my mobile phone subscription back home was _much_ cheaper than the one I got here in Japan now.

      Not only are they damn expensive (everyone is hooked already), but the only regulations that ever get made here are those that benefit the bureaucrats. Consumer protections is a concept they might have heard of, once long ago, and promptly forgotten.

      The question we really should ask us isn't 'why is Japan so far ahead of us technologically', but rather 'why is Japan so far behind us in soft technologies?' You know, things like UI design, quality of life, etc?

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    3. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have regulators for cellphones; it's called the FCC.

    4. Re:Proof by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You know, it's really funny, these pleas for the government to step in and make your life better.

      Modern governments are, at their core, democratic (don't give me that Republic spiel, that's less true today than it ever was and the base of all republics is democracy anyway) and require at least plurality action to get a certain thing done.

      Whereas, stuff like the cell phone market being stuffy is directly the result of lazy consumers--the same people that are also the only ones that can really enable change by electing politicians that will change things.

      Politicians are also beholden to special interests, and in any case, whenever a politician does anything it is setting a normative value for other people and--maybe I'm too conservative-I don't see that as all a good thing.

      If consumers want to change the market, they should stop ENABLING the market. Nobody is making you buy a shitty cell phone. You want it, you think you need it, so like a heroin addict needing a fix you keep on taking your poison, enabling the same thing you rally against. The modern citizen, the modern consumer, is perhaps one of the stupidest organisms on Earth. Spending resources on things they recognize as being shit, all the while hoping some karmic force sets about righteousness in the world, is not my idea of an intelligent, effective way to use your resources.

      Of course, it's far too easy to just want God or Government to descend down from above and make everything better and force everyone to do exactly what you personally feel should be done.

      Apple is often an offender of this. They heavily market the hell out of their above-average-but-overpriced products, and people buy them, unaware and apathetic that better things exist for cheaper.

      Quit blaming the fucking "CORPORATIONS!!!" and stare into the fucking mirror for a change. It's easy to blame the drug dealer for the addict's habits but ultimately it's the addict that keeps coming back for more and is the one that can stop the self-destructive cycle.

    5. Re:Proof by steelfood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cell phones in asia are less tools, and more fashion statements. They're like your designer handbags or fancy shoes, except priced at a point even teenagers would be able to and do afford multiple phones. And because the major networks are GSM, people can easily switch phones to match their current attire with a swap of a SIM card. This means there's insane competition in Japan, and it means there's a huge drive for continuous innovation to stay ahead of the fashion curve (it's fashionable to be tech-competent over there). To even begin to do that here, the government needs to do a few relatively minor, but important things:

      1) Encourage open infrastructure. Basically, undo everything the FCC has been doing for the past 8 years. If a government grant was used to build a network, then the operator should be forced to lease the network to a third party for wholesale prices. Or, put network operators in the same class as gas and electric companies, and heavily regulate them.

      2) Encourage open standards within the government. The government should encourage standardization based on open standards. It should give grants to organizations that work towards such ends, and stipulate that by taking government money, the result is public domain. That eliminates a lot of barriers to entry to a market.

      3) Return the rights to the people. That means outlawing anti-competitive exclusivity clauses and the likes. Forcing phone carriers to make their numbers portable was a great move. That trend of forcing interoperability has to continue. For example, France requires unlocked versions of phones to be sold alongside their locked version.

      4) Remove the teeth of patent trolls. The patent system needs to be significantly overhauled. As the system exists currently, patents stifle innovation, not encourage it.

      Doing this won't change the culture overnight. But I'm certain we'll start to see improvements within 5 years.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:Proof by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      You get it, and you deserve a gold star. Consumers want to blame business for their own stupidity. Well, duh! You let someone get the, relatively speaking, better end of the deal by your own consistent action! Wake up and start shopping around and doing comparison shopping instead of buying what you saw on the TV commercial or because your friend bought it!

    7. Re:Proof by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      So the federal government should step in and make sure all Americans have the same taste of hyperactive Japanese teens fully doped on energy drinks? Now *that's* a stimulus package. :-)

      Dude, this stuff just isn't that important. So the Japanese have some more advanced (and very buggy from what I've seen) phones. Who cares? WIll one of those phones make me happier? Help me retire earlier?

      Actually, if it means I can get a phone that transforms into a talking cat and a giant mecha armor suit, I might advocate this. Bonus points if it transforms into a sexy android or a cat girl.

    8. Re:Proof by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      What you may not be factoring in is that the vast majority of the American cell phone-buying public thinks the iPhone is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

      Citation needed?

      And if that is the case, surely that does show how much the US phone market is behind other countries, I'm afraid.

      They don't care about Linux

      Who mentioned Linux? Similarly, they don't care about Iphone OS. People like to use just whatever phone, all of which can access the Internet and play their music - they don't care about which OS it runs. It's the pro-Iphone people who seem to think that this does matter.

    9. Re:Proof by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The question we really should ask us isn't 'why is Japan so far ahead of us technologically', but rather 'why is Japan so far behind us in soft technologies?' You know, things like UI design, quality of life, etc?

      No, the question we should ask us is precisely "why is Japan so far ahead of us technologically". I want to know why they can have all that fancy stuff on their phones, and I can't. The question "why is Japan so far behind us in soft technologies?" is not for us, but for Japan. It's their problem, so it's them who should think about it. Why waste time on thinking why somebody else has a problem you don't?

    10. Re:Proof by kid_oliva · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I am not mistaken, it is the way the regulations are that cause the problems and not a lack of them. It is similar but not the same as the regulations why you either AT&T or Verizon available for your land line and not both. I know we have antiquated regulation that make updating "the last mile" a pain because you have to get approval in each municipality. Just part of the problem with old models that promote large companies with resources.

      --
      I eat Karma for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. That's why I don't have any.
    11. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The root cause of the problem is that there is limited spectrum space, and it is all licensed to the highest bidder. This huge barrier to entry causes a lack of competitors, which in turn causes higher prices and less innovation.

      Solutions:

      1. Require providers to allow resale of existing service (this has many issues and may not be technically feasible in many areas.)
      2. Open up a lot more spectrum for other providers, with a model that doesn't allow existing (large) cellular or landline providers (or any other company that has over X percent ownership by those existing providers) to purchase more than X percentage of the total new spectrum. This is in my opinion the best solution, although there are likely issues that would need to be worked through to allow it.

    12. Re:Proof by biggerboy · · Score: 1

      This is marked as interesting? Regulations benefit those who have lobbying power. And since when do consumers of technology have any lobbying power?

    13. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Why waste time on thinking why somebody else has a problem you don't?

      ummm... so you can know why you don't have that problem and then can take steps to ensure that you never do?

    14. Re:Proof by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why waste time on thinking why somebody else has a problem you don't?

      If you don't think the two are connected, you've got another think coming. Why are the Japanese masters of efficiency? They fucking have to be. There's not a lot of land to work with. I hope to go see it this summer, before the oceans rise overmuch :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Proof by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Having a cell phone makes sense for a ton of reasons. That you seem to think they are unnecessary is ridiculous to the point of ludicrous. If they weren't so useful there wouldn't be so many of them.

      And good luck getting a basic plan. I have the most basic non-prepaid plan AT&T offers with the single addition 200 txt messages a month ($3) and it somehow works out to $52 a month instead of the advertised $39.99. Think about that for just a second. Why isn't my $39.99 plan exactly $42.99 (plan + texting)? False advertising! You can attempt to justify it by saying they're regulatory fees or some hogwash, but the fact is the plan is advertised at $39.99 and it's completely impossible to actually pay just that amount and not get sent to collections.

      And good look finding a cheaper plan of any kind on any carrier. It's effectively price fixing. $40+ a month is about the minimum you can get on any carrier for any plan that isn't prepaid.

      Companies are increasing the cost of text messages even though their costs didn't change. They do this on a plan where you're locked into a 2 year agreement due to a subsidized phone. You can potentially get out of your agreement as a result, but it's not easy and it's horribly inconvenient. So you generally just eat the cost and their profits go up.

      Cell phone companies have been pretty customer abusive for a very long time now, and no single customer has sufficient power to force them to change their ways. Hence the government should step in. They actually do have that kind of power. Which IMHO is what the government is for - and no other purpose - standing up to entities that individual citizens cannot.

      --

      Question everything

    16. Re:Proof by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "What you may not be factoring in is that the vast majority of the American cell phone-buying public thinks the iPhone is the greatest thing since sliced bread."
      I just don't think so.
      You have the Blackberry folks that are completely addicted.
      Then you have the Palm Fans that are waiting for their Palm Pre to replace their Treo.
      I don't know if anybody is really addicted to any of the Windows Mobil phones but I am sure they exist.
      There is a small fan base for Android but I hope will expand as more phones are available. I am not sure that the Vast majority of cell phone users want an iPhone.
      Now I do have an iPod touch and I really can see the desire to have an iPhone.
      When I have wifi I love the browser. The screen is great.
      The things I don't like about the iPhone is lack of Bluetooth stero support. "I am guessing battery life is the reason". Lack of tethering and the lack of video recording.
      I have heard that the G1 has a compass. If it does I will be really interested in getting one. I have an idea for an app that would really work better with a compass as well as a GPS.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why waste time on thinking why somebody else has a problem you don't?

      Because there's money to be had in selling solutions to both problems?

    18. Re:Proof by Nursie · · Score: 1

      So I'm allowed to hate other people?

      I don't enable these activities and I sure as hell don't buy crappy products like some sort of addict. Masses of other people seem to though.

      HERE is the problem with democracy - most human beings are stupid, lazy and violent.

    19. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you don't develop that problem in the future.

    20. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we just need stop believing that we all must have a cell phone and stop buying the crap about which you are complaining? Or we all buy stripped down, inexpensive models with basic plans.

      You, thedonger, are right on the money. Until we get over our materialistic selves, we will be exploited.

      Who gives a rat's ass about the iPhone? I mean really. I can text. I can call. That's all *I* feel that *I* 'need'. In truth, I don't *need* either of those things when I'm walking down the street.

      The iPhone is an overpriced POS, with a crappy interface.

      Maddox says it best:

      http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone

      It's no wonder the iPhone isn't selling on merit in a target sector that has far better and cheaper products.

    21. Re:Proof by thedonger · · Score: 1

      I am not sure that the Vast majority of cell phone users want an iPhone.

      That's not what I said. I said the vast majority of Americans think the iPhone is really neat-o. A slick design. You may only know a handful of people who voted for the other candidate, but either way there were tens of millions. No, I don't have a citation, but I'm pretty sure a very, very large number of people think the iPhone is cool, and most of them probably do not know about all the great tech gadgets in Japan. If they know what Bluetooth is I bet they only know about mono hands-free cell phone earpieces. And the only thing they tether is their dog to a tree.

      Slashdotters may have the numbers to take down a major web site, but they are not an accurate cross-section of life in America. Especially the ones not in America.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    22. Re:Proof by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Japan doesn't use GSM.

      --
      Q.
    23. Re:Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > they don't know what Japan is doing outside of their anecdotal awareness that

      they helped out after the German's bombed Pearl Harbor.

                - Bluto

    24. Re:Proof by Quikah · · Score: 1

      T-mobile's lowest plan is $29.99. With taxes/fees I pay $32-$33 / month. I don't txt. I don't know what you are doing to get ~$10 extra tacked on to your bill.

      --
      Q.
    25. Re:Proof by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I know that RIM makes and sells a lot of phones. Blackberries are very popular.
      I will give you that a lot of people want I phones but when it comes to the people that have the money for them a lot seem to be going for other options as well.
      As I said I am looking at the new G phone and the new Palm myself.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    26. Re:Proof by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Hmm I don't think Japan is going to be overwhelmed by rising ocean levels very soon. It's mostly mountainous.

      I suppose the coastal cities (most of the big ones) are in trouble. But Japan as an island itself? Not going anywhere.

  11. Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the Japanese are smarter than Americans.

  12. Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by TyrainDreams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone still drools over the iPhone as if it has every feature of every phone and more! When it's just an on par smart device. Sure it has a lot of great features and the app store from apple, but there are far better phones in existence and its sure not going to get people who are being described as the peak of technological civilization(true or not).

    I am happy with my HTC Vogue, it plays music...and has internet...I think it even makes calls...oh wait its the sprint network...so no, no calls...

    1. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      an iphone with a sliding keyboard, now that would be useful.

      A smartphone without a keyboard is a bust for me. :-/

    2. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by TyrainDreams · · Score: 0

      I agree, that's one thing I wish my phone had, but i make do without. Android was ported to my phone, the on screen keyboard is actually usable. I was shocked at how well it does.

    3. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you are just another dumb linux-using slashdot robot. The iPhone is better than ANY other phone out there, and makes even most desktop computers look lame in comparison (except Apple ones).

      Instead of slamming it, like a typical ignorant linux user, why don't you TRY it and understand why the revolution has come.

    4. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, strawman.

      The iPhone doesn't even do MMS, so clearly people aren't drooling over it because it has an impressive feature checklist. People are enamored with the iPhone because it does what it does -well-.

      I've had phones that could play music before. But they sucked so bad at it that I never used the feature.
      I've had phones that could browse the web before.
      But they sucked so bad at it that I never used the feature.
      I've had phones that could play games before.
      But it all sucked so bad that I never used the feature.

      and on. and on.

    5. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by chrispugh · · Score: 1

      You just essentially described a T-Mobile G1.

    6. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The iPhones claim to fame was never the feature list. You could buy phones with a much more impressive feature list well before it came out. The claim to fame was that it did away with the horrible terrible symbian based interfaces that most smartphones are saddled with.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by TyrainDreams · · Score: 1

      Steve? Steve is that you?

      http://www.apple.com/iphone/features/

      My phone has all those features sans branding(so Opera instead of Safari and WMP instead of iPod).

      It does these things that my phone does only mine isn't locked into some sort of proprietary app store...

      I'm not saying the iPhone isn't a good phone, its a good phone...but its just a good phone...It isn't some sort of trendy revolution or some sort of demi-god its a fucking phone made by apple. It has flaws and although i suspect some sort of shallow sarcasm in your statement, I could easily assume you are not being funny and are in fact serious. Thats the sad thing, there are people who suck off the iPhone because its trendy. So is it really that awesome or is it just apples new cool?

    8. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      It's not all about features.

    9. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by ak_9jsz · · Score: 1

      I'd say par is pretty poor then. The iPhone is (..Aborting: 'witty' mode failed. Initiating 'street' mode...) so half-a** (i'm talking about the Browser, email, contacts, iPod)! I'm a greatly disappointed owner so, it's great to see it get sh***ed on (given away for free -- ha! I love it!). The only reason i bought the iPhone was because it is the only "smart" phone that comes out the box the ready for [my] international/multilingual use. (superfluous rant: G1 was second, nothing else to speak of after that. Can't believe that in the NY metro area, we don't get phones that can display even Chinese! That' doesn't sound smart to me.) But now it's time to say good bye to it. "Flush!!!!"

    10. Re:Well...The iPhone isnt that special... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Except I don't want to give up my top-notch phone service with Verizon for subpar performance on another carrier. Ooo, flamebait? Sorry. :-)

  13. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple makes cell phones now?

  14. Want to know what Linux can do? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    The Panasonic phone runs Linux.

    It's also buggy as hell (as all Japanese phones are), but I suppose if 3 inches of Japanese TV gives you a woody, get a plane ticket, man.

    1. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's totally true... their gadgets are indeed bleeding edge, but American consumers wouldn't put up with the buggy nature of their gadgetry. We eventually get much of the same stuff, after the Japanese public has been kind enough to beta test it for us :)

      By the way, even by slashdot standards... this is REALLY old news. Forbes was claiming the iPhone was doomed in Japan over a year ago. If it succeeded despite all of that, well THAT would be some news.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by NinjaCoder · · Score: 1

      But does the Panasonic phone do cut-n-paste? I am flabbergasted that this is not possible on an iphone as standard. Or has there been an update?

    3. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'll channel the average Apple fanboy and just say that copy-and-paste is an unnecessary feature that only makes things more difficult to use. You should be glad there's no cumbersome copy-and-paste feature! Apple knows best.

    4. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >>>American consumers wouldn't put up with the buggy nature of Japanese gadgetry.

      Or the incessant obsolescence. Buy a MUSE analog HDTV in 1990, and have it obsoleted ten years later (broadcasts discontinued). Buy an Enhanced Definition Betamax around the same timeframe, and watch it go belly-up in 2003. Invest heavily in karaoke laserdiscs, and watch them be discontinued so you can no longer play your huge library.

      There are advantages to waiting - like saving money not investing in doomed products.

      Also I think obsessing about shiny new toys is not healthy - but that's just my own personal opinion. While it's true the Japanese had access to ED Betamax, and American consumers did not, I think we survived just fine. It was no great loss.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would be a good theory were it true, but the fact is the US cell phone market has always been even further behind than just skipping the beta phase. Every time I'd visit and go into a shop selling mobiles I'd have to chuckle to myself at the stuff they were selling which was years behind what we had even in Europe, let alone Japan.

      This is why the original iPhone was a flop everywhere but the US (yes it was even a flop in Europe), people were looking at it and thinking what's the big deal when it's camera, it's memory, it's lack of custom apps, lack of MMS, lack of 3G, lack of GPS and so on made it a laughably poor device, whilst in the US it was pretty state of the art.

      Move forward to the iPhone 3G and Apple have realise their mistakes and have moved forward a bit, but as stated in the summary, the iPhone still lacks features that many in Europe and Japan have come to expect.

      The US is a world leader on most things, but cell phones are one of the few products the US was simply years behind on, often never even getting some of the high end Nokia models we enjoyed in Europe For example, did the US ever even get the Nokia 7650 in the end? a phone that in 2001 had a camera, could play Doom, browse the web, run Java apps- in fact, everything the original iPhone had minus touch screen but plus a whole bunch of other features (MMS, custom apps).

      Apple realised the mobile gap was in the US and took advantage of that, they couldn't compete immediately with the companies like Nokia that had been doing it years and the US gave them a place to get started without ever needing to do so. Once their foot was in the door they could fairly quickly move on with their technology to produce a phone that was a little more attractive in Europe/Japan, if they keep it up and keep going they'll do well.

      At the end of the day though, the summary comes as no suprise as it really is quite similar to the story here in Europe. It's not to slag Apple off, because if the US was as uptodate on mobile technology as Europe it's questionable whether Apple could've got it's foot in the door as easily as it did and more fool Nokia et. al. for not taking the opportunity to exploit the rather backwards US cell phone market themselves. I think this is also why the iPhone has the following it does, not necessarily because it's any better than other phones outside North America- it still lacks a lot of features European and Japanese phones have, but because it's a decent mid-range phone in Europe/Japan and more importantly, because it is light years ahead of much of what the US ever really had before it.

    6. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by NinjaCoder · · Score: 1
      :)

      It's been a long time, but I seem to remember Apple crowing about how easy it was to cut-and-paste from different apps back in the original version of Mac OS. I was impressed with it at the time, so must have been innovative!

    7. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by iocat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The biggest problem with the iPhone in Japan (or so I was told by everyone I asked in Japan) is that it requires 2 hands to use effectively. Therefore, you can't use it to text one handed on a crowded subway where you need one hand to hold on to the overhead strap.

      ALso, for whatever reason, people seemed less impressed by its fancy pants touch scrolling UI, and more interested in simple lists they could click through, and being able to pull down over the air TV versus d/l videos.

      Personally, I agree with my Japanese friends; I'm not a huge fan (I like a keyboard).

      But, it's interesting to note that almost every expat American I saw on my last trip had an iPhone, though -- so there might be just more appeal, culturally, to Amercians and westerners for some reason. There's certainly no shortage of cult-of-Mac people in Japan, but it didn't seem to translate to the phone.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    8. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah except Apple invented copy-n-paste on their first Mac (1984), and others quickly added the feature to their own OSes (1985 - Atari ST, Microsoft Windows, Commodore GEOS, Amiga Workbench). It seems odd they would not include one of their best inventions in the Iphone.

      -

      8-bit Mac OS clone - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e2/GeOS_Commodore_64.gif

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      The other thing Americans won't put up with is the cost. Japanese electronics and other things are hideously expensive compared to the hunks of cheap-ass Wal-Mart special tech that consumers here want. Just look at all the comments on Slashdot bragging about how cheap their computers are.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    10. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah F%^k you /. you f%6king a$$. You give me an old story again and I'm going to punch you IN THE HEAD!

    11. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's totally true... their gadgets are indeed bleeding edge, but American consumers wouldn't put up with the buggy nature of their gadgetry.

      Umm. American consumers flock in droves to upgrade to the latest versions of Microsoft products. They're not exactly the most discerning technology users.

    12. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wake up man, any phone today, even those free with contract ones, have copy and paste.
      well every phone except the iphone.

    13. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is why the original iPhone was a flop everywhere but the US (yes it was even a flop in Europe), people were looking at it and thinking what's the big deal when it's camera, it's memory, it's lack of custom apps, lack of MMS, lack of 3G, lack of GPS and so on made it a laughably poor device, whilst in the US it was pretty state of the art.

      I was traveling overseas when the original iPhone came out and people were going crazy for it.
      Not because it had good features, but because it was a status symbol.

      Mobile shops were hawking it for 2x retail and selling out every time they got a new box of iPhones.
      The mobile stores all had waiting lists, even those kiosks in the mall.
      Having one meant either someone hand carried it from America or you paid >$1000 US
      /But that's just my anecdotal experience.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    14. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      People are "flocking" to Vista? Non-geek, non-corporate types have Windows Mobile phones AT ALL? The XBox 360 is second place to the refreshed GameCube that is the Wii? What Americans are you talking about? What droves?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Being an original iPhone adopter from the U.S. I'd say it's strength isn't in its features, but in its usability. As stated 1000 times, the iPhone interface, much like the MacOS interface, is beyond any of its competitors, at least in the U.S. Intuitive, smooth, with good feedback (though not tactile -- and I've taken to sighing when I hear the tappity-tap of a blackberry user in a theater or classroom compared to the silent keyboard of the iPhone).

      Dodging the easy car analogy, the iPhone is a partner who knows what you want, instead of someone who can offer anything you want.

    16. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus dude, it's means IT IS. Seriously it's (IT IS) like getting an icepick in both eyes every time!

    17. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple didn't "invent" copy/paste for god's sake, though they did popularise it. What fanboyism, sheesh, though you were inaccurate even in apple terms - the Lisa (1981) had it before the Mac.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy_&_paste

      Emacs had kill/save/yank functionality equivalent to or better than most cut/copy/paste until recently (since it kept a history on the "kill ring", though in the modern era such functionality exists as clipboard history daemons on linux/X11 ) basically forever.

      The Amiga had 256 independent clipboards that were also represented in the virtual filesystem layer, which was handy (though there are command line clipboard access tools under linux nowadays which are pretty much equivalently handy).

    18. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by forand · · Score: 1

      The original iPhone was not sold outside of UK, France, Germany , Ireland and Austria according to Wikipedia. Your statement: "the original iPhone was a flop everywhere but the US (yes it was even a flop in Europe)" makes it clear you do not have as firm a grasp on the iPhone rollout as the tone of you post implies. Do you have numbers that indicate the orginal iPhone was actually a "flop" in Europe (the ONLY placed outside the US it was sold)?

    19. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by aclarke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To each their own, I guess. I just got back from Switzerland, and had one person comment on how fancy my phone was. She had heard of iPhones but I guess had never seen one, or an iPod Touch either. This is from a family with 5 iPods.

      Maybe, as others have stated, Apple designed a product which would sell well in its primary market, the US. There's a "duh" moment for you. Yes, other markets have better mobile phones and coverage, but as a Canadian I don't feel bad for you Americans :-( Things here are even worse.

      I have to say though that given what little I've seen of the Panasonic P905i, I'd take the iPhone any day. A phone with a giant antenna and TV access? No thanks. It goes back to cultural preferences once again.

    20. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by cthellis · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm always quite mystified by comments like that. In what way, other than perhaps a slightly wider form factor, does the iPhone "require" a second hand to use effectively? It's certainly speedier to have two thumbs available for typing, the ability to use multi-finger gestures like pinching... But if you're just quickly using it, in what way is it difficult?

      Certainly anyone pining for a full QWERTY you can use in portrait is talking about a phone that's effectively as wide, and just as much "better to type on with two hands, but usable with one" and would see no real change. And a lot of people seem to love full-length landscape keyboards; now THERE you need two hands! Certainly the specific one mentioned in the article isn't a dream of one-handed operation... This does not happen often, and for any phone with a 3" or larger screen, you'll always have that problem in ONE corner or another when trying to operate it with one hand.

      For the most part, the only time I have to stretch inconveniently is if I want to use the "back one screen" button, which is normally positioned in the far upper left. Backing out with the Home button is easy, but if I'm going into and out of song menus or podcast menus looking for something specific, going "back" frequently can get annoying, because it's the farthest key away from my right thumb.


      ...and is it just me, or does anyone else find it weird that the Japanese consider it "high tech" and desirable to have an irritating antenna sticking out of your phone to pick up regular TV signals instead of using all that glorious data bandwidth they have out there to stream content, like... you know... makes more sense?

      Complaining about poor quality camera and lack of video is one thing, but thinking TV is keen while you could toss a dozen streaming video clients on your phone? o_O

    21. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by cthellis · · Score: 1

      People don't really "flock" to Microsoft products, and certainly not to the latest stuff. Some people keep on top of their software, but by FAR most people do not, upgrading only when they have to.

      Which for Windows means "when they buy a new computer," and for Office tends to mean "if it comes with their new computer" or "whenever one of the kids says they need it for school."

      Gamers and technophiles flock to upgrade, not "American consumers." And certainly not to Microsoft since the Vista PR nightmare.

    22. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You're saying the original iPhone was a flop in Europe? Certainly that wouldn't have anything to do with not being officially sold there...

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    23. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by cthellis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You'd be hard-pressed to find ANY Apple fanboy saying "it's not necessary." Most are still "what the crap?" themselves, and go so far as to say "I guess they're working on a new system that will change expectations as to what 'cutting' and 'pasting' means to mobile devices and to the 'cloud,' and aren't going to bring it out until they're ready.

      Not to mention Apple's been pretty hard-line as to the 'sandbox' concept for apps, and dramatic clipboard alterations would start giving people access to all sorts of potential monkey-business.

      So while they may "understand" on a "logistical for Apple" level, effectively NO ONE says it's unnecessary, or doesn't find themselves missing it.

    24. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I'm always quite mystified by comments like that. In what way, other than perhaps a slightly wider form factor, does the iPhone "require" a second hand to use effectively? It's certainly speedier to have two thumbs available for typing, the ability to use multi-finger gestures like pinching... But if you're just quickly using it, in what way is it difficult?

      The ability to touch-text is common here in the UK and I'd expect even more-so in Japan. I'd never buy a phone without a proper input pad for that very reason - touch-texting whilst pissed in a club and having a conversation is essential!

      --
      Nick
    25. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the iPhone is a partner who knows what you want, instead of someone who can offer anything you want.

      So you're saying the iPhone is the wife you've had for years, knowing what you like but it may not be that hot anymore or even let you play too much. Whereas all the fancy phones are the hot mistress you like to try new things with along with streaming video cameras or one handed wiimote style play?

    26. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Japanese seem to enjoy crappy UI as well. Consider nearly any Japanese TV remote control. I'm looking forward to an Apple designed universal.

    27. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The phone isn't sold in Switzerland (according to the post above yours).

      I've seen lots of people in the UK play with an iPhone, once someone gets theirs out to show how much money they spent on it, but very few seem to have actually bought one. I've seen many more iPod Touch's than iPhones.

      Most people I know who wanted a more-than-just-calls phone already have one, and are waiting, either for the touch thing to be more common on normal phones, or for the iPhone to get the features the rest have and be a comparable price.

    28. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by SoupGuru · · Score: 4, Funny

      I heard iPhones get angry if you anthropomorphize them.

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    29. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      it's camera, it's memory, it's lack of custom apps, lack of MMS, lack of 3G, lack of GPS and so on made it a laughably poor device, whilst in the US it was pretty state of the art.

      No, it was substandard in the US even when it came out. I was already walking around with an AT&T Tilt/HTC TYTN II (3G, MMS, GPS, etc) when the iPhone was released to its adoring fans.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    30. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "The ability to touch-text is common here in the UK and I'd expect even more-so in Japan. I'd never buy a phone without a proper input pad for that very reason - touch-texting whilst pissed in a club and having a conversation is essential!"

      I think it also may have something to do with txt messaging starting out earlier and still probably more popular in Europe and other far away lands than in the US.

      I think early on, it had to do with how ya'll are billed for voice and txt...it was cheaper over there to txt than to voice. Over here...pretty much the opposite. Heck...still is really...you have to pay extra to txt or get a txt plan for your phone.

      I actually never tried it till just after Katrina, when we found it was about the only way to contact anyone with a 504 area code on their phone. You simply could not call anyone for almost a month or more, but you could txt them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>>What fanboyism.

      I've never owned an Apple in my entire life. Swing-and-a-miss. Maybe you should just correct people when they make mistakes, with adult-style tact, rather than call them childish names.

      Ass. ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    32. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

      All I saw in that sentence was:

      "3 inches of Japanese woody, get a plane ticket, man."

    33. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by babyrat · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is from a year ago...but it seems to contradict the 'flop'...

      http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/13104/14128/iphone-o2-sales-figures-success.phtml

      O2 has confirmed that the iPhone is the company's fastest selling device it has ever had in the UK, however stopped short of saying actually how many it sold in the first month and half on sale.

    34. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by city · · Score: 1

      I've enjoyed the Extreme Elimination Challenge show as much as the next guy, but what else are they watching where they want tv on their phones? I dont even get cable at home anymore, let alone do I want tv on my phone. Different strokes I guess.

      --
      I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
    35. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have much in the way numbers. I doubt it actually "flopped" in absolute terms, it's got a chunk of the market and I somehow doubt it's lossmaking for apple, but even with very heavy advertising atypical for a mobile phone in Ireland, it's considered just another phone here - and one that doesn't (or didn't, haven't checked recently) even play java and flash games. It wasn't wildly successful like in the USA, IMO that really was mainly because the USA had quite such incredibly crap mobile phones for the most part until its introduction for a variety of dumb reasons (USA using different standards to the rest of the world, USA having endless truly idiotic patents granted to sue-happy US businesses).

      http://www.insideview.ie/irisheyes/2007/06/bets-on-iphone-.html
      (old, but as you can see, it could hardly be said to have repeated its US performance on launch no matter what PR Apple and its partners spew).

    36. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by dmizer · · Score: 1

      It's also buggy as hell (as all Japanese phones are), but I suppose if 3 inches of Japanese TV gives you a woody, get a plane ticket, man.

      Don't know where you get that information from. I haven't had a single problem with mine. Early firmware was buggy, but that was two years ago for the P905i. Mine is rock solid, takes great pictures, and has a great music player.

      Really, the only thing that got me was that the thing couldn't play mp3's. Only plays wma. Everything else was a slam dunk. It even interfaces tolerably well with my Linux machines.

    37. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Really? I guess O2, Orange and so on just stole the handsets they were selling and hacked the Apple store to allow Europeans to activate then?

      Here, it's always nice to have evidence to backup a claim:

      http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/04/19/iphone-european-fire-sales-spreading-to-france/

    38. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the antenna? It looks like just about every other japanese phone I've seen (that is, large, with a strap, and tons of features). Looking at some pictures, it looks like the antenna just pops out of somewhere, thus staying out of the way while not in use. I wish we even had something like 1seg in the US for mobile devices...

    39. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Xest · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing this but again it seems to be an argument not applicable outside the US at least. People in Europe from the age of 1 to 100 have been happily using mobile phones since they were more god awful to use than every phone on the market today in both Japan and Europe.

      Usability has never been a problem for phone users here because they're so widespread it's like a TV remote or a microwave, people just know how to use them. Ironically though the lack of a proper keypad is actually a usability issue for a lot of Japanese/European users where texting is far more prominent than it is in the US too. People can text much faster and much more mindlessly with standard number pads than they can with the iPhones touch screen interface.

      I know where you're coming from don't get me wrong, it is easier to use, but for many outside the US we've not been so hard done by that the difference in usability is positive enough to make it worth losing features or form over (the iPhone is quite big compared to some on the market, small phones are a big thing to a lot of Europeans/Japanese too).

      Apple's brought some cool stuff to the interface for sure and many other companies are producing models that have similar features, but I think you'll struggle to ever do away with full keypad based phones, they'll always have a place for many people over the touch screen interface. It'll be interesting to see how Apple pursues mobile technology in this manner- whether they just stick to their niche market as they effectively do with their computing hardware or if they start producing multiple models like they have with the iPod nano, touch and classic. An Apple phone with a keypad could be quite interesting and certainly open them up to a much larger marketshare but I get the impression that a device like that would be hard to maintain a "wow" factor with in the way Apple tends to achieve with most of it's products.

    40. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      That indeed seems to be anecdotal experience. Apparently after the initial burst of curiosity, no one bought them

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    41. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Being an original iPhone adopter from the U.S. I'd say it's strength isn't in its features, but in its usability. As stated 1000 times, the iPhone interface, much like the MacOS interface, is beyond any of its competitors, at least in the U.S. Intuitive, smooth, with good feedback (though not tactile -- and I've taken to sighing when I hear the tappity-tap of a blackberry user in a theater or classroom compared to the silent keyboard of the iPhone).

      Its likely because prior to the iPhone, smart phones in the US were a niche product used by business folk and tech heads. Also the "walled garden" ecosystem is pretty well established in the cell phone industry here (BREW & Verizon Wireless) and generally accepted as the norm. Outside of the US, folks were already accustomed to open devices being able to load custom software, multitask, send and receive MMS messages and *gasp* cut and paste text between applications. Try finding a "crippled" phone like the infamous Verizon version of the Motorola v710 in Europe and Japan. They likely view the iPhone in a similar light.

    42. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Google have the same problem in Korea. The less is more design philosophy which works so well for google and apple in the west just doesn't work in Korea and Japan. Consumers there want more more more.

    43. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going post anonymously for this one...

      When iphone 1 came out, I bought 4 from the Apple store without contract before my trip to Taiwan and in 48hr turned a 30% profit (prearranged with eager reseller over BBS post). I didn't find the iphone any more technologically advanced than many of the phone in the shop of the dude to whom I sold the phones. Since then, I have always have a bias against the iphone.

    44. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're an idiot. You keep harping on about your "features" like they are actually worth a shit. Maybe people in the United States realize that the vast majority of the bullshit that these phones do are just that, bullshit. What the fuck am I going to do with a 5+ MP camera on a fucking cellphone? It's going to take the worst pictures you ever saw in your life just really big ones. Whoop de fucking do.

      And watching TV on your phone? What? Why the fuck would I want to do that? It's fucking stupid.

      Nobody wants these dubious features on lackluster designed phones with overly complicated and buggy interfaces that you Euros and Japanese are so keen to gush on about. Ever heard of usability? The iPhone is a veritable joy to use compared to almost anything else. I don't have one but my girlfriend does and it's great. If you want to record video, send MMS or what have you, it's just a jailbreak and an application download away.

      I happen to have a G1. It is fucking great. It has accelerometers, GPS, video, multi-touch (yeah, I rooted it), the best keyboard this side of a blackberry, an awesomely bright and clear albeit medium res screen. The market is great for downloading cool apps. It's a little thin, admittedly for real business and productivity stuff but it'll get there. Other than that, the only thing I don't like is the lack of a front mounted camera for video conferencing, the sub-VGA screen resolution, lack of video codecs, and maybe the battery life could be a little better.

      The problem with you people is you tolerate absurdly ridiculous interfaces with your stupidly complex devices. Look at the typical European car. Yeah, they're fast, and comfortable. But, goddamn, you actually have to think about it to unlock the fucking door. That's just stupid. I shouldn't have to learn where they hide the fucking latch. I should find it in its natural place just under my hand when I reach for it. Anyway, end of rant.

    45. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      The iphone is a small laptop, whereas nokia (and japanese companies) are providing big phones.

    46. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by wfolta · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of people mentioning features, but what about how they are tied together? I am not familiar with the Nokia 7650, but if it has the typical Nokia interface who cares if it has a built-in microwave oven, a hot tub, and ultra-high-definition 120 fps video recording?

      The iPhone does not have the latest and greatest HW specs nor necessarily every software feature known to Linus, but it looks good, is extremely well though out, and it hangs together in a very nice, intuitive way.

    47. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Knara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, perhaps, maybe you should just know what you're talking about before hitting "submit"?

    48. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and who doesn't you fucking dipshit? Microsoft has a worldwide unassailable monopoly on the desktop. Everybody buys their shit including you you piece of shit bigot.

    49. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the fact you struggle to unlock a car door is an awesome example of why your post is completely irrelevant to anyone with an IQ over about 20.

      But then, you're American, so idiocy comes as standard which is presumably why thinking about something such as unlocking the door is such a strain for you worth sacrificing performance and comfort for.

    50. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by lordtoran · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany, sending SMS is plainly the "normal" means of using a mobile phone. That's probably because there is nothing like a talk flatrate on offer and call prices are obscene, especially if your mobile is of the prepaid kind. If you want to chat for longer than two or three minutes, you better have a good ole landline phone nearby.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    51. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by lordtoran · · Score: 1

      Was that in the UK? In my experience, they tend to share trends with the US (the language may be the connecting factor). The actual Europe remained rather unimpressed by Apple's hype. It could be purchased here in Germany as part of a T-Mobile contract, but that offer was apparently pulled quickly as it couldn't stand a chance against 100 EUR non-simlocked phones with more features.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    52. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And that's your problem. Typical Euro idiocy. Too fucking dumb to realize that you can have comfort, performance, and ergonomics. Oh, sorry, that's probably too big of a word for you.

      I always wondered why European tourists walk around with those stupid ass looks on their faces. You have been very enlightening. No wonder half of your Union is still stuck in the third world.

    53. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by novakyu · · Score: 1

      I heard iPhones get angry if you anthropomorphize them.

      Better than deifying them. At least they can't smite you down ...

    54. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big words...hey there buddy, don't forget your 'culture' originates in Europe, including your (vile) version of the English language.

      As for third world, America is a disgusting racist and foul country, but even taking that into account, do you think katrina would've wrought the same devastation in Europe...?

    55. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Uh, antenna? When was the last time you saw a phone with an external antenna?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    56. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by breeze95 · · Score: 1

      Dodging the easy car analogy, the iPhone is a partner who knows what you want, instead of someone who can offer anything you want.

      A better way of putting it is.

      Dodging the easy car analogy, the iPhone is a partner who knows what you want, instead of someone who can offer anything you MIGHT want.

    57. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Fuck off, how do you know why people were getting it? Can you read peoples mind.

      The fact, it is the first usable mobile phone ever. Even in the simpler days, when all they could do was call, they were hampered by a limited screen.

    58. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As for third world, America is a disgusting racist and foul country

      Yeah, real fucking racist. So racist, we just elected a black president, you ignorant hick. Keep swallowing that swill your state controlled media -BBC or whatever it's called- keeps feeding you and believing that shit. Turn off the America hating talking heads on your "telly" and actually pay us a visit (while they'll still let you out of your country, but more on that later) and I'll bet you'd be pleasantly surprised. That is if you aren't a freedom hater like so many of your Euro brethren obviously are.

      You people are too much, especially you Anglos. Pointing the finger at us all the while the insidious creep of the Orwellian police state with the fucking cameras and shit tightens its grip all around you. You're pathetic.

    59. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by daver00 · · Score: 1

      Let me correct that for you:

      "the iPhone is a partner who tells you what you want, instead of someone who can offer anything you want."

      Just like the macOS interface, as you say. You see the thing about apple UI methods is that they don't make sense to me and they don't make sense many other people, but anyone who finds they do make sense, and indeed Apple themselves, will vehemently deny this and defend their UI even though there is clear evidence here that it is not as clear as they would like to think. It puts me off. For example, the universal menu bar thing in OS(whatever), makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to me, so apple is saying that a bar across the top of the screen, completely abstracted away from the app with focus, holds all that apps menus? and changes what is contained in it as focus changes? And that is supposed to be clear and intuitive?

      The thing about UI design is that there is absolutely no way to design an interface that 'makes sense' to everyone. Everyone perceives and interprets things in a totally different way and therefore as far as I am concerned I would prefer to have multiple, configurable ways to do any one thing, since then I can make my UI work the way I think. Making this possible in a not so confusing manner to me, THAT is the essence of good interface design.

      Computers are complex and powerful tools, you can't hide this by dumbing down an interface.

    60. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I have a friend in Japan who carries two mobiles - the iPhone, which he wears where people can see it, and a Japanese phone that he actually uses for his day-to-day communications. He claims most Japanese iPhone users do the same. Apparently you can buy things with your phone in Japan (like train tickets), and not having this capability is a show-stopper for Japanese consumers.

    61. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm too old. If I were in a club with a friend who was texting at a table, I'd tell him to freaking go home. What's the point of being in a club if you're texting?

    62. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      people were looking at it and thinking what's the big deal when it's camera, it's memory, it's lack of custom apps, lack of MMS, lack of 3G, lack of GPS and so on made it a laughably poor device, whilst in the US it was pretty state of the art

      So, you're basically stating that Europeans and Japanese are stupid, and value pointless "features" over something that's actually usable. Thanks for clearing that up.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    63. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Being a European myself, I would say that the selling point for the iPhone must be the speed and the interface. Plus with appstore it is also a toy that you can play with for hours.

      I could have used video recording more than once and MMS. It's not just teenagers that use these functions(although they use it 400 times more often with their 100s of SMS messages every day)

      But when you have had many painfully slow Nokia phones and unstable phones with that Microsoft thing on it(had 2, even nokia was better), it is just so great to have a phone without lag in the interface, that does not have to be restarted every other day to make sure that it really is running properly. To me that makes up for the shortcomings of the phone.

      If I had bought the standard phone from my provider(hi3g), I would have been able to send MMS, record video, make video calls, watch TV etc on the Nokia N96.

    64. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have owned a couple of Nokia phones, I loved them in the early 90's. But my next phone won't be a Nokia. Since perhaps ten years or so, the clocks in their phones loose time. Their phones won't work as reliable pocket watches, they won't work as reliable alarm clocks, they won't work as reliable "anything that has time involved".

      To me a mobile phone has two main purposes: as a phone and as a timepiece. The lack of a fully functional clock limits both uses. I like having a camera (but I would like it even more if the time stamp of the photos where reliable) , I like having a music player, but I don't NEED either.

      All of their newer phones are rather useless.

    65. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 0

      For example, the universal menu bar thing in OS(whatever), makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to me, so apple is saying that a bar across the top of the screen, completely abstracted away from the app with focus, holds all that apps menus? and changes what is contained in it as focus changes? And that is supposed to be clear and intuitive?

      I don't know what your definition of "makes sense" is, but understanding the reasoning behind usability design has nothing to do with usability aside from the study of it. You probably don't have a clue why the doors in your house open the direction they do either, and it doesn't matter to you, but it does to police and firemen.

      How about this, how would you design a radon or carbon monoxide detector? Quick, what makes sense? Would it look and sound sort of like a smoke detector? Makes sense, right? We all know what they are, what a high pitch screeching means, etc.
      OK, now what if someone wakes up, checks for a fire and silences it? I hope you designed it ugly as fuck, with giant lettering: BLAH detector, WARNING, invisible gas.
      What about when the battery is low? Beep occasionally? What people expect from such a device right? Except, do most people know what a carbon monoxide detector alarm sounds like? OOPS. You have to treat false alarms ENTIRELY differently because you're dealing with something people can't detect themselves. Better have a description of the various alarm states printed right on that sucker!

      I hope you get my point. Even though these devices are conceptually similar, detect FOO -> sound alarm, they have to be designed completely differently, and it's not just a matter of what was built first, although that is a factor. Overloading the meaning of something we are already familiar with might be bad in general, but it's not obvious to the average person who will expect something familiar.

      Back to your example...
      It's a fixed, universal context menu and the application is the context. Yes, it IS just as evil as any context dependent menu is, and you hit on that. It is however, fixed, universal, and the context name is always the leftmost entry. You know all those context menus in Windows, KDE and Gnome? Are THOSE intuitive? Now, I have an universal application-context menu, why would I put a redundant one on each application? Why move it from it's fixed position? Do you need to see a menu bar for more than one application at a time? You can't manipulate more than one at a time, with keystrokes or mouse gestures, so what would the point be? Neither Windows, Gnome or KDE will even show the contents of more than one menu bar at a time AFAIK. Do you forget where it is when it doesn't move? Making menus m®ove doesn't make sense to me, what's the advantage of having it collocated with each window instance? What's the expected behavior when more than one document from the same app is opened? Can you point me to some multi-document standards from other systems? What's the advantage of having content in context menus that is unavailable in the main menu? To solve menu clutter, check the GIMP out. You can probably guess the UI design was inherited from a platform with *ahem* sane application menu standards. Who knows, maybe simply hiding least frequently used menu items is a better approach. MakesSense(tm)

      Computers are complex and powerful tools, you can't hide this by dumbing down an interface.

      A computer is just as complex as the interface you give it. I would love for you to prove a relationship between interface complexity and application capability. Complex UI == no idea/consideration how this device will be used. That would be a fine excuse for computers in general, a decade or two ago.

      A car is complex and powerful tool...
      Shit, so is a human body, and here we are with only four limbs and crude interpersonal communication.

      Look, it's just harder to make something simple and powerful. You have to think about how it's used. A complex interface doesn't solve anything besides letting the UI designer be lazy while pushing the mental burden onto the user.

    66. Re:Want to know what Linux can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying the original iPhone was a flop in Europe? Certainly that wouldn't have anything to do with not being officially sold there...

      Yes it was. It was on sale in the UK, Ireland, Germany and France amongst others.

      Last time I checked they were all in still in Europe.

  15. That phone description sounds familiar by GooberToo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and features 3-G, GPS, a 5.1-megapixel camera, and motion sensors for Wii-style games. 'When I show this to visitors from the US, they're amazed,'

    Android G1 owners wouldn't be "amazed". After all, it they are describing a G1.

    1. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by ribuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Take a look at this video of the Panasonic P905i. At first it looks like it has a similar form factor to the Android G1, until they morph it from a slider to a flip-phone and pull out the digital TV aerial. Seriously cool!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6J5EtiQ1ps

    2. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the Android G1 is the phone copying the japanese ones, not the other way, like you're disingeniously implying.

    3. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      While the G1 is nice, don't give it all the credit, HTC makes a lot of other nice phones too. I have the Touch Pro, which has 3G, GPS, a 3 megapixel camera, and an accelerometer just like the G1. It has a capacitive scroll wheel (like the iPod) instead of a scroll nub, though.

    4. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but does it have dual SIM slots?

    5. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that imply they Android G1 is better than iPhone? (and the iPhone has neither a video camera, multimedia text messaging, nor a TV tuner)?

    6. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Take a look at this video of the Panasonic P905i. At first it looks like it has a similar form factor to the Android G1, until they morph it from a slider to a flip-phone and pull out the digital TV aerial. Seriously cool!

      It's not a slider, it's a flip phone that can open two ways. The phone really isn't all that impressive, the only thing it has that the G1 doesn't is the TV antenna, which doesn't seem like it would be all that useful.

    7. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

      HTC makes the G1 dude.....

      --
      Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
    8. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by prelelat · · Score: 1

      I think at 1:08 into the video you can here the guy with the phone say something about the iphone and then everyone laugh. I love that flip concept I would get that phone instead of the iphone just to have real keyboard and a real phone in one. Then again I have no need for a smart phone.

    9. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      HTC makes a lot of other nice phones too

    10. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is really cool and it definitely destroys the iPhone. I wish they sold those here.

    11. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      I could watch TV on my Game Gear back in '89 or whatever... but I never did.

    12. Re:That phone description sounds familiar by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously, what are you going to watch, Maury Povich? Oprah?

  16. so, where's the surprise by unity100 · · Score: 0, Troll

    apple wasnt able to sell a product on the premise of being 'hip' and 'cool' for once. japanese preferred function over cool factor. hipster ads didnt cut it. to the extent that apple didnt see any issues with offering the phone almost free with various subscriptions. all the while customers in u.s. being locked in, tortured, and belittled if they wanted to do more with their phone by unlocking it, after paying exorbitant amounts. there's nothing to defend about apple - only way one can do this in this thread and subject, would be probably due to sheer fanboyism. bad. fanboyism is little different from religious fundamentalism.

    1. Re:so, where's the surprise by fermion · · Score: 1
      I think maybe it is a matter or culture and expectations. For instance, if I was away from my computer with a wifi connection for long periods to time, then maybe something like watching tv on my phone would a major deal. However, I mostly have access to a computer and wifi. For traveling, when I am not driving, I am used to reading and listening to my music player. I know for others watching a movie is of more interest, so they would want this feature.

      Likewise triangulation of cell towers have always been more than good enough for my applications. I am used to pretty much knowing where I am going before hand, so I don't really need turn by turn directions. I any case, such directions often are inefficient, and i have been burned when I have relied on google or mapquest to tell my where I am going rather than studying the map myself.

      as far as the phone service, the cell phone companies certainly do cause problems for customers. However, in the US the culture is generally not to change phones often. To me this is the key. If one is a culture where a product is replaced every year or even more often, then one can have very frequent and innovative product cycles, with the primary goal being adding features, no matter how lame, to drive the sales of the product. In a country where people keep phones for two or three years, the impetus to do such things are not as great. Outside of the teenage market, where there is expendable income and they do not understand that are being locking until they are 25, or those that lose the phone often, there is just not the incentive to add gee golly whiz features.

      It is true that features like TV and the like are probably limitied by the cell phone companies. Other features may be limited by technology. I like my 1G iPhone and see little reason to give it up, other than ATT may be doing stuff to make it less useful. Certainly for my applications, 3G or GPS is not a huge plus. It is the same with computers. Some may need or want the absolutely latest in computers, so maybe want to buy a PC because it is expandable or cheap enough to replace every six months. But for doing actual work, such an aggressive upgrade cycle seems counter productive. Much better to get a couple years use out of a working machine, then invest time and money into a new machine that will give another couple years of use.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  17. Makes you look pretty lame here too... by Assmasher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...seriously, why don't people just either burn their money or donate it directly to Apple? No flash? No Java? Apple decides whether or not someone can sell/distribute an application? Have to buy a Crapintosh to develop for it?

    Why do people accept this kind of behavior from Apple, but not other companies? Weird...

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Makes you look pretty lame here too... by loutr · · Score: 1

      No other companies ?

      How about MS, Sony, RIAA/MPAA members, ... ?

      People don't care about what they buy/use, they just get what they're used to, or what is considered hip by their TV programs or magazines.

    2. Re:Makes you look pretty lame here too... by socsoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I do not want flash or java on my mobile. I don't even want them on my computer and my userbase doesn't have java until they request it. I don't have a business reason to support java (unfortunately some sales reps sell flash banner ads), and both have continual app updates which bothers my helpdesk because we have tried to instill into them not to install stuff without our permission. But a java or flash update every 2 weeks? It gets annoying.

    3. Re:Makes you look pretty lame here too... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You do realize that mobile Java has very, very little to do with Java on the desktop - especially when it comes to implementations, and not just the spec.

    4. Re:Makes you look pretty lame here too... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Why would you want a smart phone if you don't want flash or java on it? You must like the idea of being locked into some ridiculous environment like Objective C... If you're arguing that you don't need a smart phone, I agree, I don't either, but if your phone is supposed to run software to help you do things other than receive/send calls, you would obviously be better served with technologies that are not locked in or have small developer bases. Right?

      --
      Loading...
  18. No tentacles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    They don't like the iPhone because it doesn't have 100 tentacles that spring out of it and rape every school girl within a hundred feet. Also, there's no Bukake Cartridge so you can squirt your friends. Isn't it obvious how far we are behind the Japanese in innovation? If I want to violate a girl with my iPhone I have to put it on vibrate, stick it into her nether region, and keep calling myself.

  19. Only in Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.

    Correct me if I'm wrong but carrying around an iphone anywhere is going to make you look pretty lame.

  20. Re:That's not nice. by Camann · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I could be wrong but I thought AC was making an attempt at a South Park reference. Apparently mod(s) agrees with you.

    --
    I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
  21. Pretty lame? by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "'Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.'"

    God, how I wish I could get that Japanese cellphone with built-in 3" TV (Panasonic P905i) because I've always chosen cellphones out of regard of what Japanese teenagers might think of me! :-p

    Sorry, I'll just stick with the iPhone, and upgrade to a phone based on Android when it matures. I would have love to have gone with an openmoko phone but that platform was pretty much stillborn. :(

    Japanese cellphones are way way ahead of ours? Next thing you know, you'll be telling us that third-world countries have faster interweb access than we do - without bandwidth caps. This is old news.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Pretty lame? by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, I'll just stick with the iPhone, and upgrade to a phone based on Android when it matures.

      Similarly, I'm sticking with my Motorola V980 phone, and will upgrade to a new phone when it matures. A necessary condition for "maturity" is having basic functionality that even my years old bog standard phone has, such as copy/paste, and MMS. (Cue the "But I don't need that, so why would anyone else!" posts.)

      Japanese cellphones are way way ahead of ours? Next thing you know, you'll be telling us that third-world countries have faster interweb access than we do

      Indeed. I'm in the UK, which perhaps explains why the supposedly "new" Iphone offerings have been done here in ordinary phones for years. And people have the cheek to claim that other manufacturers are copying the Iphone!

    2. Re:Pretty lame? by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1, Informative

      Indeed. I'm in the UK, which perhaps explains why the supposedly "new" Iphone offerings have been done here in ordinary phones for years. And people have the cheek to claim that other manufacturers are copying the Iphone!

      I'm genuinely curious about this. I know everyone says that non-US phones are way ahead of us, but what UK phone had amazing integration with Google maps (or any online map provider) years ago? Which UK phone had multitouch? Which UK phone had a great app store? Which UK phone had visual voice mail? Which UK phone had a full blown browser years ago? Which UK phone integrated perfectly with your music collection on your computer?

      For that matter did any non-US phone have all these features (and more) *years* ago? I accept that for the vast majority of phones available in the US vs. other countries, the US phones are generally behind the times (I'm guessing due to vendor lock-in and US cell providers trying to wring out every last penny they can from consumers for any semi-advanced features). But honestly, from my point of view the iPhone is really advanced, not just for the US market, but for every market. But I guess it's cool to hate the iPhone on slashdot and instead favor some obscure Korean phone that supposedly had all its features 10 years ago.

      For the record, no I don't own an iPhone, but I know many who do and I've used it quite a bit, and I've never seen a phone (or PDA type thing) so well put together. Every component feels so well integrated, whereas other devices feel very cobbled together to me.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    3. Re:Pretty lame? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --Next thing you know, you'll be telling us that third-world countries have faster interweb access than we do - without bandwidth caps. This is old news.--

      Damn it's payday and this old news just put me in a bad mood again. Same with cellphone bandwidth. Oh yes Verizon promises 4G everywhere soon. Yeah right.

    4. Re:Pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what UK phone had amazing integration with Google maps

      Google maps has long had a java client - remember standard phones support mobile java apps in the UK, and for a long time have had web-browsers powerful enough for the web-interface your desktop uses too (but smart people use the java client as it's cheaper and faster, the UK often still suffers from charging for mobile bandwidth).

      Which UK phone had multitouch?

      No one really cares all that much about multitouch, they grew up using keypads for texting anyway.

      Which UK phone had a great app store?

      That's not the model in the UK - people get java apps from an online store of their choice (most usually their mobile provider's captive home page) if they want that sort of thing.

      Which UK phone had a full blown browser years ago

      Most any of them with a screen big enough to make it worthwhile? Sheesh.

      Which UK phone integrated perfectly with your music collection on your computer?

      Any of the zillions that play mp3s?

      But honestly, from my point of view the iPhone is really advanced, not just for the US market, but for every market

      It's not somehow "terrible", but your point of view is presumably limited and parochial to the USA, by the sounds of it.

      I don't think you appreciate how the mobile market works in the UK and other parts of Europe. You have large walk-in stores that sell a vast range of phones like Carphone Warehouse.
      http://www.carphonewarehouse.com/mobiles

      You pick and choose a phone with the features you want, stick your SIM in. iphone has some features, in other ways it sucks - and most people are NOT enamoured of the provider locking thing.

    5. Re:Pretty lame? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Which UK phone had a great app store?

      I like how you spun the fact that one vendor fully controls the distribution of software on to iphone in to a feature. I would say that's a considerable drawback.

    6. Re:Pretty lame? by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      The Japanese have had "Navitime" (phone with built in GPS plus maps) for several years (I think I first saw ads on japanese trains around 04/05). They have also had other map clients that integrate map functions alone with trains for quite some time as well (used one on a sony erricson around 05/06).

      I haven't seen an app store, or visual voice mail before, but all of the other features have been around years prior in other Japanese phones.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    7. Re:Pretty lame? by Foochee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a video of the P905i in action. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6J5EtiQ1ps

    8. Re:Pretty lame? by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know everyone says that non-US phones are way ahead of us, but what UK phone had amazing integration with Google maps (or any online map provider) years ago?

      Um, just about all of them except the really cheap ones that don't do Java? As the other commenter pointed out, Google have a Java client. Oh I'm sorry, I forget that the Iphone can't even support Java either, so I mean "really cheap ones, and the expensive Iphone".

      For years I've seen friends with various smartphones that have GPS and mapping software (some of them choose to store the map on the phone, so they don't even need an Internet connection). I'm afraid I don't know the model of phone - you see, unlike Iphone users, when anyone else gets out their phone and uses it, they don't make a big fuss of "Hey, I'm doing this on my IpHoNe [or whatever model it is], isn't this cool!" They just get on and use it.

      Which UK phone had multitouch?

      Multitouch is a recent phone development, and not unique to the Iphone AIUI. I'll admit that multitouch is one neat thing that the Iphone has helped develop - all phone companies have introduced new things when they release new phones, and there's no reason for Apple to be different. I never said that the Iphone had nothing neat or new in it - but that doesn't mean that Apple invented all the things that people falsely claim were new in the Iphone.

      Which UK phone had a great app store?

      App store? If I see an App, I download it, and it just works. Why would I tie myself to one store? The phone providers (Vodafone, etc) provide online stores for people who don't want to go looking for it, it's been this way for years.

      Which UK phone had visual voice mail?

      No idea, what is this?

      Which UK phone had a full blown browser years ago?

      Any phone (except the cheap non-Java ones) can run Opera Mini (most have built in browsers too, albeit often not as good). Smartphones have had full blown browsers for years. Are you seriously suggesting that the Iphone is the first phone with a decent browser? I think that proves my point about just how limited the technology must be in some countries. We've been able to browse the web for years. I remember it being impressive when I saw people doing it about, oh, 2003, but for heaven's sake, it's 2009.

      Which UK phone integrated perfectly with your music collection on your computer?

      I can't think of a phone these days that doesn't play mp3s from your computer, and this has been around for years too.

      Of course, you'll probably claim some magical significance in terms of your use of "amazing", "great", "full blown", "perfectly" - which smells like a No True Scotsman fallacy (oh, it doesn't count that it had a browser, it wasn't "full blown"). You'll have to objectively define what these terms mean, and show why the Iphone's offering was a significant and important change, and explain how it is better than everything else on the market.

      For that matter did any non-US phone have all these features (and more) *years* ago?

      Well, it didn't include all features, because you've listed multitouch which is a recent development in the phone industry. But it's a fallacy to claim that therefore the Iphone is the first to do all of these features! I could just as easily claim that since the Iphone can't do all the features that my years old cheap phone can do (e.g., Java, copy/paste, video recording/phoning, MMS), that therefore my phone is better in other respects too.

      I didn't claim that everything on the Iphone was done years ago - that's a straw man you're attacking. But a large number of things that people do think the Iphone did first (most notably, web browsing) or are cool when the Iphone finally gets it (3G) are ancient history in the rest of the phone industry.

      But honestly, from my point of view the iPhone is really advanced, not just for the US market, but for every market. But I guess it's cool to hate the iPhone on slashdot and ins

    9. Re:Pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think their cell phones are that far ahead of ours, just the network support (small countries will always have the advantage here).

      The phone I have (N95-3) has been available in the US for almost two years with all of these features minus the TV tuner and a smaller screen.

      The larger screen's are a side effect of having a complex written language that benefits from a larger screen and although nice isn't really ahead, just a nice feature.

      Now the 1seg tuner is a fairly advanced feature that would be nice to have in the US but is limited to watching broadcast TV. I'm going to stick to streaming satellite TV from my slingbox.

      For the other features. 3G: Check. GPS: Check. 5MP Camera: Check. Accelerometers: Check.

      The phone is also capable of a many of the cool features Japanese phones have (it has a second camera on the front for video calling) but US carriers choose not to support them.

      Also Japanese phones (at least the two phones branded phones from softbank I've gotten to play with) were just as crippled as a branded phone you would buy in the States, and from what I've heard are fairly difficult to unlock.

      America doesn't need better phones, because they're out there, people just care more about whatever gimmicky phone Verizon is selling this month for 50 dollars. The providers have been subsidizing the phones for so long, nobody wants to pay what the phones are actually worth (America seems to be one of the only countries with this problem). If the providers started selling phones at a profit and then spent this money on improving their network, the gap between US and Japan would shrink pretty fast.

    10. Re:Pretty lame? by kisrael · · Score: 1

      You're kind of right but mostly wrong.

      A single browsable market is a HUGE benefit. I had some WinCE device, I put maybe 1 3rd party app on it. I've done a lot more w/ the iPhone because of the single stop w/ great desktop integration.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    11. Re:Pretty lame? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      The convenience of it doesn't really outweigh the danger of it.

    12. Re:Pretty lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article was designed to counter smug iPhone users such as yourself. It obviously failed, you're as smug as ever.

  22. A better title would have been by Exitar · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Japan is immune to Reality Distortion Field"

    1. Re:A better title would have been by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Japan has its own Reality Distortion Field.

      One that makes Jobs' RDF look like that worn-out magician at the street corner that never manages to get any of his lame tricks right.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:A better title would have been by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      I think it's just that theirs strong enough to prevent ours from interfering.

    3. Re:A better title would have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emperor Hirohito, anyone, anyone, Bueller?

    4. Re:A better title would have been by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      That theirs is

      I can't type today. Must be using the iPhone keyboard. *ducks*

    5. Re:A better title would have been by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Immune to Apple's, maybe... But I'm sure they've got plenty of their own.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    6. Re:A better title would have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't mock Tommy Cooper!

    7. Re:A better title would have been by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      Japan INVENTED the reality distortion field.

    8. Re:A better title would have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan has its own Reality Distortion Field.

      One that makes Jobs' RDF look like that worn-out magician at the street corner that never manages to get any of his lame tricks right.

      Illusionist, Pop. A worn-out Illusionist.

  23. Different products for different markets. by Jacques+Chester · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Japanese are buying a list of features: screen size, TV, radio, motion sensors, pedometer, email, circle of protection etc etc. A lot of tech-heads in the West like that approach and also make their decision based on the number of ticked boxes on the back of the display container.

    The rest of us just want a phone that makes phone calls without having to click through 50 damn menus. And that looks kind of nice. That's the iPhone.

    --

    Classical Liberalism: All your base are belong to you.

    1. Re:Different products for different markets. by GooberToo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The rest of us just want a phone that makes phone calls without having to click through 50 damn menus. And that looks kind of nice. That's the iPhone.

      Great way to rationalize an inferior product.

    2. Re:Different products for different markets. by Alistair+Hutton · · Score: 1
      I assume you are taking the piss, the iPhone has been marketed to death on it's functionality and extra features. I'm looking at a full page add on the back of the Guardian where it's pointing out the dozens of options and features it has. I don't even think making calls is mentioned.

      A "phone that makes phone calls" is a £25 Pay-As-You-Go Nokia 1200, not a £240,000,000 240,000,000 month contract iPhone.

      --
      Puzzle Daze is now my job
    3. Re:Different products for different markets. by GooberToo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow, flaimebait for statement of an obvious observation? Pretty obvious the moderators have both an iPhone and penis envy.

      Face it, the iPhone is inferior to most phones commonly available in Japan. Most phones available in the west are inferior to what is commonly available in Japan. But, the iPhone is even inferior to most phones competing against it in Western and US markets. You bought an iPhone because it was "hip", not because it was utilitarian. A touch screen for its sole input device is contrary to utilitarian. Which is exactly the point of my original post. If you want a phone "that [just] makes phone calls", you wouldn't be in the market for an iPhone in the first place.

      In the end, the post is nothing but an illogical attempt to rationalize owning an iPhone when every layman can easily see the phone being discussed easily makes the iPhone out to be inferior.

    4. Re:Different products for different markets. by Chrono11901 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So they base there decisions on the features and ability's while Americans base theirs on how tard friendly the phone is?

      Considering how many people payed 5$ for the ifart app, you might be on to something.

    5. Re:Different products for different markets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of us just want a phone that makes phone calls [...] that's the iPhone.

      Err, wait, what? Say whatever you want about the iPhone, but if you REALLY want a phone that "just makes phone calls", the iPhone's a ridiculously-overbloated expensive monstrosity.

    6. Re:Different products for different markets. by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      That's the iPhone.

      And pretty much every other cell phone in existence. By those qualifications a $50 phone from Radio Shack should be great.

    7. Re:Different products for different markets. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The Japanese are buying a list of features: screen size, TV, radio, motion sensors, pedometer, email, circle of protection etc etc. A lot of tech-heads in the West like that approach and also make their decision based on the number of ticked boxes on the back of the display container.

      The rest of us just want a phone that makes phone calls without having to click through 50 damn menus. And that looks kind of nice. That's the iPhone.

      The iPhone lacks basic functionality such as mms that even bargain-bucket phones have, as well as a poor interface that doesn't even have a keypad for text messaging, but sells based on box-ticking of gimmicky features like multi-touch, the app store, and all that shit you see on the misleading adverts that no-one actually uses.

      Personally I'd rather have a phone where I wasn't prevented from using basic features because it conflicted with Steve Jobs' ego.

  24. warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The user "twitter" is a twitter sockpuppet.

    1. Re:warning by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Funny

      The user "twitter" is a twitter sockpuppet.

      Isn't that an infinite loop? If he is his own sock puppet, what is inside the sock? I now have this vision of an endless sock puppet with nothing but sock puppets inside, puppet as puppeteer...
      And now my brain hurts...
      Thanks

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:warning by wick3t · · Score: 2, Funny

      I once wrote an infinite loop in a Comp Science exam paper. 6 years on and I'm still waiting for the results.

    3. Re:warning by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I once wrote a program to find out whether there was an infinite loop in my program and I'm still waiting for it to tell me.

      Got so bored that I decided to write a program to...

      NO CARRIER

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:warning by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Isn't that an infinite loop? If he is his own sock puppet, what is inside the sock?

      Well, obviously, the sock is a Klein bottle.

    5. Re:warning by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      That or it's a Mobius sock.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    6. Re:warning by Meski · · Score: 1

      A recursive Pierson's sockpuppetry of the penis. ngaaa!
      http://www.puppetryofthepenis.com/

  25. It's not really a Japan thing by m0RpHeus · · Score: 1

    Outside of North America, the iPhone and other popular phones in North America (like Black Berry, G1, Windows Mobile phones, etc) are just another phone. People prefer other phones. In countries that use GSM, Nokia is still the king. In places, like countries like Japan and South Korea, the reason why the iPhone is not popular there is that the dominant cellphone network standard in use is not compatible with the iPhone (which uses GSM).

    --
    Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
    1. Re:It's not really a Japan thing by reiisi · · Score: 1

      Not compatible?

      Somehow, it still works.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  26. Text messaging? by Goaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

    multimedia text messaging

    Japan has never even used "text messaging" as in the horribly lame and limited SMS - they use normal email for that. I don't think anybody is missing some kludgy extension to a protocol they never used in the first place, either.

    1. Re:Text messaging? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out how you can have multimedia text messaging. Isn't a text message by definition a single medium? That's like saying you want a cheese pizza with everything on it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Text messaging? by Bushcat · · Score: 1

      Softbank uses SMS.

    3. Re:Text messaging? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      SMS allows sending a few bytes of text. MMS allows sending images, sound, video and rich text.

      Generally not very useful IMO, but can ocassionally come handy. For instance with my phone I could open the GPS app, make it calculate a route, save an image of the GPS display, and send that by MMS to somebody who is trying to find a place, but has no GPS on their phone.

    4. Re:Text messaging? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      My point was that once you add images, sound, and video, it's not so much a "text" message anymore.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Text messaging? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      Back when the term "multimedia" started to be heavily used in relation to computers, the meaning was roughly "The same stuff as usual, except with mostly pointless sound and video attached". This seems to have mostly started with the common availability of sound cards and CD drives.

      So for instance a "multimedia encyclopedia" would come on a CD, and the revolutionary feature would be that you could listen to a MIDI of Beethoven's 5th from the article.

      In the same way, a MMS is a text message with a photo or video attached. An email about how you spent your vacation doesn't stop containing text because you attach a few photos, right?

    6. Re:Text messaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is parent moded as interesting, it should be informative. All Japanese phones sends and receives emails, not SMS.

    7. Re:Text messaging? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What makes it a text message with a video attached instead of a video message with text attached?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Text messaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because what works for you must work for everyone else also, right?

      I have email on my phone. Many of my friends do also. I have never used my phone to send an email, other than to respond to things sent to me by email that I want to address before I get home (as opposed to just communicating with friends).

      When I communicate with my friends and family I use SMS. That's all that's needed, the vast majority of my messages to friends easily fit within 160 bytes. It's also much quicker than email, and all of my friends can receive it (as opposed to only the set who can receive email and have it configured).

      Calling MMS a "kludgy extension to a protocol they never used in the first place" sort of makes yourself sound like a douchebag, considering the vast majority of cell phone users use exactly that.

      I only send pictures through email with my phone in a single circumstance - when I need to send a picture to the single person I know who owns an iphone. Everyone else gets MMS, and it works perfectly well.

    9. Re:Text messaging? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I am talking specifically about Japan, you know. You don't live in Japan, and "the vast majority of cell phone users" don't either. And the vast majority of JAPANESE cell phone users certainly don't use SMS, which was the whole point.

    10. Re:Text messaging? by Garabito · · Score: 1

      Because a MMS isn't really a SMS, it's treated differently by the network. A SMS is a short text string piggybacking in the control messages between the cell phone and the network. A MMS is more like an e-mail with attachments, it gets sent through the data network (the same data network that gets used for mobile web and data plans).

  27. free iphones from softbank by davejenkins · · Score: 2, Informative

    Softbank is now offering the 8GB iPhone for free (with two year data plan). I saw this yesterday, and translated a quick summary on my site for the Japanese language-challenged: http://www.davejenkins.com/

    1. Re:free iphones from softbank by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's 1 Euro less than what T-Mobile offers it for in Germany. Or the G1 for that matter.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  28. Japan is unlike any other place in the world.... by blackchiney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Japan is unique in the fact that it's a sizeable market. Most western companies have attempted to market products there and failed. The only market that does well is American and European fashion.

    I think this has to do with a little bit of NIH (not invented here) and poor understanding of the country. Hell even Microsoft with billions of dollars sunk into the XBox marketing can't make a dent there and there is only 2 competitors. On the other hand Sony did so poorly in the international mobile market they had to team up with Ericcson to bail them out. Product marketing in Japan is like the LOST bubble. We can't seem to get in and they can't seem to get out.

  29. Konata's cellphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://omoshiroi.info/omoblog/index.php/2007/08/04/konata_s_cell_phone

    From the link:

    Rundown of the basic specs:

    Width: 50mm
    Length: 111mm
    Weight: 143g
    Displays: 3.0" Main LCD, 0.8" Sub LCD
    Cameras: 2.0MP main camera, 0.1MP secondary camera (video conferencing)

    It also has a built in FM transmitter (for the car), a DVR mode for recording broadcasts, and a whole list of neat features that are pretty much standard on Japanese phones these days. Meanwhile, my phone is 4 years old and was obsolete when I got it. It can hardly make calls these days. I need a new one...

    Oh, by the way, this phone was from 2 years ago. In Japan, it's already obsolete. Eat your heart out, Steve Jobs! X-3

  30. Features =/ Good Phone by Oceanplexian · · Score: 1

    I'll be honest, I own an iPhone so I'm a bit biased here, but this Japanese P905-whatever may have every feature under the sun, but it doesn't change the fact that it looks clumsy and (I'm assuming), like all Japanese phones it has a buggy non-intuitive mess of an OS.

    Sure, I wish my iPhone had A2DP/HDTV/Satellite Whatever, but sometimes I just want to
    get things done without being flashed by a bunch of LEDs

    1. Re:Features =/ Good Phone by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      I'll be honest, I own an iPhone so I'm a bit biased here, but this Japanese P905-whatever may have every feature under the sun, but it doesn't change the fact that it looks clumsy and (I'm assuming), like all Japanese phones it has a buggy non-intuitive mess of an OS.

      You have the choice of using an easy to use phone like the iPhone, or using a buggy non-intuitive mess like a Japanese phone. Your choice. One of these two choices clearly demonstrates that you are highly intelligent, the other choice demonstrates just as clearly that you are beyond stupid.

      It seems that Americans and Japanese disagree which of the two choices shows that you're clever, and which one shows that you are stupid.

      Japanese teen says: "I am a rocket scientist because I can use this complicated phone".
      American rocket scientist says: "I am a rocket scientist, I don't have the time to waste on this complicated phone".

  31. It's the Kanji support stupid by putaro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones. Given that text messaging is a major use for cell phones, this is a big problem.

    The UI on the iPhone blows away Japanese cell phones (I live in Japan and I use them all the time). The reason the iPhone isn't taking off as well in Japan is the kanji support and Softbank's piss poor marketing support. They have not done a good job of differentiating the iPhone from the other touch screen phones and, in fact, SoftBank carries several other touch screen phones which is confusing.

    1. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Virak · · Score: 2

      The reason the iPhone isn't taking off as well in Japan is the kanji support

      Well that'd make sen-

      Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones.

      Wait, what? Did you mean to say it isn't as good as with other phones? Because that'd make a lot more sense. (And if so, I'm curious as to what exactly is wrong with it; I don't even have an iPhone, let alone input Japanese with one)

    2. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was because Kogal's have no place for a Keitai charm.

    3. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't proper nouns, so why did you capitalize them?

    4. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally-
      If Apple hadn't taken bids for who gets to distribute their phone here in Japan and given marketing rights to Docomo (the largest mobile phone company in Japan) then I'm willing to bet that it would have sold like hotcakes. I'd have to agree- poor marketing and a way way way too expensive range of data plans are what has fumbled the iPhone here. Even a free phone with an expensive monthly plan isn't going to fly at all...

    5. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, there is no predictive text input. On regular Japanese cell phones you can write a sentence very very quickly. Sometimes faster than with a QWERTY keyboard. In fact, most of the time the cell phone's predictive text input is faster. For this reason I hate using my friend's iPhone. Sure it's pretty, but who the fuck cares if I can't remember what the reading of one of the 3000 kanji I must know is.

    6. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones. Given that text messaging is a major use for cell phones, this is a big problem.

      If Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones, then how is it a problem for the iPhone specifically?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Japanese input is NOT as good as other phones. Touch-screen only also sucks for lots of text entry, which is more of a major use (vs. calling) in Japan.

      AND iPhone lacks the TV tuner that all of the even lower end Japanese phones have. AND it lacks the ability to record video out of the box AND it lacks Mobile Suica (Micro payment/train pass), etc., etc. It can't show standard decoration mails every other japanese phone can, it doesn't show mobile-phone pages well (iMode) like every other Japanese phone, etc.

      In other words, although it does some things better, it's also lacking in many areas, and "strange". One Japanese guy I know mentioned "It's more like a computer", meaning it doesn't work with "phone stuff" in Japan, but it can, for example, view PC web pages better than other phones.

      And... for example, my phone.. it has a touch-screen, etc., it just doesn't run apps for the iPhone... which.. nobody cares. Which app did you need exactly? iPhone is missing the standard phone stuff here, but supports un-needed apps? no thanks.

    8. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by putaro · · Score: 1

      Kanji input on the iPhone is as good as the other cell phones.

      Sorry, that should have been isn't, not is.

      Typing in Japanese is damn weird and requires a lot of software support to be anywhere near usable.

      As you may know, Japanese has four different symbol sets that are mixed together. There are hiragana and katakana which are syllable based. One character represents a syllable, for example "ku". Hiragana covers all of the syllables needed for Japanese words. Katakana is used for "foreign words" and emphasis and could be looked at like capital letters in English except that it has some extra syllables that foreign words use but Japanese never does. Also, the English alphabet is used and is called "Romaji". Then, there's Kanji which are ideographs and are basically Chinese characters, but used with Japanese words and I'm sure there are some that are only used in Japanese.

      In constructing a sentence it's quite common to mix all four of these together. Generally any Japanese sentence will mix hiragana and kanji unless it's very simple.

      When inputting kanji you can't just push a key for the character since there are thousands of them. The common solution is to enter the word as it is pronounced, in either English characters or hiragana. I have seen English characters used the most but I may be prejudiced since the people I work with are very used to using computers and English text. As you enter the word, the computer starts looking up possible matches and shows you a popup list you can choose from if you like. To additionally confuse things, Japanese has a *lot* of homonyms. So, you typically get quite a few possible characters.

      So, if you watch someone typing Japanese on a Mac (Windows is similar but uses some different keys I think) you'll see them typing English letters which are not echoed on the screen, reading back hiragana characters initially, whacking the space bar every now and then to have the computer show a list of possible kanjis, and then the enter key to accept the kanji and move to the next one. In addition you'll see them switching character sets since they may want to enter something in Roman characters, etc.

      So, especially on something where you're typing with your thumbs, the ability of the computer to track what you're writing about and present you with the right kanji as the first pick in the list can make your typing a lot more pleasant. Unfortunately, even full-blown Mac OS does not have the best dictionary - it's available as an after-market add-on. I don't think anything similar has surfaced for the iPhone yet.

      Also, as some other people mentioned, Japanese cell phones have an array of cutesy characters that people here love to insert into their text messages. My wife exchanges emails with all of the other moms at our kids' kindergarten. My wife learned to use email as part of her job in a US corporation and refrains from smiley faces, hearts, etc. The other moms said that her email was "too harsh" and she really needed to include those. I'm pretty sure the iPhone was missing those cutesy characters initially and I'm not sure if they've been added yet.

      And, of course, there's still the problem that the iPhone can be a sucky phone. One of my friends has an iPhone here in Tokyo but he has kept his DoCoMo phone because it works a lot better as a phone.

    9. Re:It's the Kanji support stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, UI (and Jobs' RDF) is known is the only merit whatsoever iPhone has. But the part I like the most is about other touch screen phones - now I see that iPhone indeed is not to blame - it doesn't sell just because it has fair competition!
      I see.

  32. im really looking forward to that by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    with the switch to digital tv signals in the usa this month, putting a receiver in cellphones for that signal is a no brainer

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:im really looking forward to that by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      If they put ATSC tuners in our cell phones, how else would they be able to push their overpriced TV over data services?

  33. Makes me wonder by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although the Japanese and a number of Asian countries are "ahead of us" (read USA) when it comes to technology, most Americans I know of still regard the USA to be the most technologically advanced country in the world. It baffles me.

    Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

    When I rode the subway in New York on return to USA, you could not blame me for thinking I am in a country of the fifties. What's happened to the USA?

    1. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the NYC subway dates to 1904, thinking you were in the 50s meant it's doing pretty well.

    2. Re:Makes me wonder by Totenglocke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's happened? Our culture decided sometime in the 50's-60's that doing well in school was for losers. We've also developed a sense of entitlement and think everything should be low cost or free, regardless of how much it costs to manufacture or develop (a co-worker who complained about the "high gas prices" when gas was $1.50 a few weeks back comes to mind.......I think if gas was free she'd complain that we weren't being paid to take the gas!). The main reason behind people thinking we're the most technologically advanced country is the idiotic "God Bless America" / "We're #1" crap that tells people being born in the US somehow makes you special and you don't have to work as hard.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

      Than the Europeans are ahead as well. The Shanghai Maglev is a german design.

    4. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer: eisenhower Kennedy Johnson Nixon carter Reagan bush Clinton bush mixed with crap govenors and a lame ass public. Even if Obama wannted to buck the trend getting people out of their god damn cars is practically impossible due to 50 years of bad planning

    5. Re:Makes me wonder by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

      Like anything there is probably a variety of causes. Lawyers & lawsuits. Regulations. Lack of political and public will. Cost due to distances and size of country. Expectations.

      --
      Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    6. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's happened to the USA?

      Offshoring. Duh.

      The Japanese are very proud of their products - so much so that they have a large manufacturing base where they manufacture their own products still. It's a point of national pride for them.

    7. Re:Makes me wonder by Eil · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have no mod points for this excellent comment so instead I'll pay you in Cheetos.

    8. Re:Makes me wonder by fallen1 · · Score: 1

      I can give you a one word answer as to what has happened to the good ole' US of A: GREED.

      Plain and simple. What we used to do as both national pride and to flex American technological muscles now gets bogged down in "Holy shit, it is going to cost _what_ to build that mag-lev train? We'll never be able to pull that off. It will take 15 years for it to pay for itself!" We have fallen by the wayside when it comes to grand feats that will pay for themselves in the LONG TERM. We have become a country and that wants it all but we want it NOW and it damn well better pay for itself within 2 years, while it is at it.

      I know of no easy fix for this condition. It may take a technical and thought process revolution to bring about change so that America can move again to the forefront of technological, science, engineering and many other fields we excelled at. Perhaps we need a grand plan, akin to getting to the moon, to get behind once more and refocus the will of the people onto? Even if we must tap into the greed that seems to have overridden the majority of the people and say "By doing this, we can bring about more prosperity!" Maybe "By setting foot on Mars, we will have shown that America is not beset by the issues of today; we will have shown that financial burdens can be overcome and conquered; that mankind can work towards a common goal and that space is no limitation to us!"

      Eh, /shrug.. who knows?

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    9. Re:Makes me wonder by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One thing to consider: Is that new technology there for showing off, or is it actually useful? Maglev trains have been tried a few times in the US, but they've always been considered too impractical for mass production. One thing you have to remember is that just because a technology looks cool and futuristic doesn't mean that it's necessarily better.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    10. Re:Makes me wonder by asv108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      US taxpayers, most of which do not ride trains, do not want to pay for fancy trains they will never ride. Its a lot easier to spend trillions on public works projects in a totalitarian regime like China.

    11. Re:Makes me wonder by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Well there is one installation of this (German-designed) maglev train in China. There are no plans to add another one in China or any other country. There isn't a single installation of it in Germany either. I'm not sure whether having maglev trains in the US would be a good idea. The idea of replacing air travel with something really convenient (city-center to city-center) like a maglev train is intriguing. It could potentially provide a nicer and faster way to travel on certain routes. It might also be a good way to save fuel. However whatever is getting in the way of adopting it in the US - other countries seem to have the same problem. Maybe the this maglev system isn't as suitable for the job as it seems, maybe it's just too expensive to make sense, maybe it just can't compete with conventional rail systems. There are lots of high-speed train systems (e.g. ICE, TGV, bullet train) which offer very similar advantages and which have been proven in many installations all over the world. Maybe it would make sense for the US to look into that, too.

    12. Re:Makes me wonder by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The main reason behind people thinking we're the most technologically advanced country is the idiotic "God Bless America" / "We're #1" crap that tells people being born in the US somehow makes you special and you don't have to work as hard.

      Well, that's true so long as you're willing to support war. And so long as there's wars out there to be won which will provide economic benefit. The USA never really recovered from the Great Depression until after we did some ass-kicking and gained a bunch of economic concessions as a result. Add to that the fact that we've never been invaded (acts of terrorism aside, it's not like we've been occupied) and we've got this immense cloud of hubris surrounding us that we can't seem to stop breathing.

      Remember, we "conquered" this nation and then have run around bombing the shit out of everything since. We think we're hot shit and have yet to be proven wrong. At least, in our minds :/

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA is the Christian equivalent to Iran. That happened.

      When a country invest his resources in war, and their population turns to a religious madness like creationism all the scientists blow apart.

    14. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

      Than the Europeans are ahead as well. The Shanghai Maglev is a german design.

      And one from the 70-80ies no less.

    15. Re:Makes me wonder by Rheaghal · · Score: 1

      Actually, the only thing that really "happened" was that in America we built stuff first, had a huge investment in infrastructure that still works, and therefore there is little economic incentive to change or upgrade it (using the subway/maglev comparison, for example). As other countries build their infrastructures, of course they will use newer technologies to do so. As we in America have need to build new infrastructure, we use new technology too. But if the old still works sufficiently well, there is little point in tossing it out in the face of trillion dollar deficits. As for education, I think the point is slightly off the mark there, too. As education becomes increasingly expensive, it won't be long before it will be too expensive to get a teaching degree, because on a teacher's salary you could never pay off the loans for your education.

    16. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or.... maybe the number of insanely over-engineered gadgets in your life (auto-asswiping toilet! TV Phones for all!) aren't an indication of a technological culture, just a gadget obsessed culture?

    17. Re:Makes me wonder by rca66 · · Score: 1

      Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

      Just for the record: that train is made in Germany. The technology which is used there is roughly 30 years old. It is not used elsewhere because for must cases it is simply too epxensive.

    18. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason we're not the MOST technologically advanced country is that thanks to the Internet making knowledge-transfer easy and fast, virtually all large civilizations are now roughly equivalent in terms of technological ability and knowledge.

      Technology, these days, is something you either have or don't have. Advancements percolate out into the world and spread to all civilizations that can use them.

      A more interesting question is, "do the CITIZENS of a given civilization have access to the full level of technology available in it? And if so, how MANY citizens use (and know about) it?"

      Here in the U.S, our university system, government labs, and corporate labs are among the best in the world. There's a reason most countries send their kids here to attend universities. I work for my state government, and believe me when I say my data center is extremely high tech. Furthermore, I and many of my fellow technologists enjoy building our OWN gear. I'm currently working on some "wearable computing" kit, and a transexual I used to work with (swear to God -- "she" had the worst case of "man hands" I've ever seen, used to be a bodybuilder if you can believe that) was trying to invent a modernized data glove, and asked me about video game interfaces.

      But we're an extreme minority in the 'States. Maybe five percent, if that. The best technology in the WORLD is available to us, but it frequently requires "some assembly" (i.e. you have to know a little about electronics, you have to know how to source weird gear, etc). The companies doing business for the consumer market around here don't CARE about supplying us with cutting edge gear. We have to build it for ourselves. And our fellow Americans don't respect us for knowing how to do this, they think we're a bunch of dorks. It's literally a form of birth control; if you're into electronics, you WON'T be getting laid.

      I think it's a combination of three trends:

      1) "Bubba thinks them pointy-headed kids and their stupid books are faggy Morans -- REAL men shoot things and watch football"

      2) The government is trying to dumb everyone down and make them easier to control.

      3) It's a side effect of all the ridiculous DMCA-like laws we're suffering under (corporations don't sell us good shit because they think we'll do something "unauthorized" with it -- and of course, we WOULD, ha ha).

      Meh, I don't care. I've got some serious gear at MY house. And I know how to get stuff the Japanese can't buy at retail. Like my pet project, the "instant darknet": Altoids tin sized units that you nail to telephone poles and get a P2P local area network, complete with webcams, only viewable by people who know how to connect to it. I'm DYING to finish THAT one... Sadly, I'm broke until October thanks to unexpected home and car repairs (dammit!).

      Anyway, don't ask why Americans think they're "number 1" and aren't.

      Ask why SOME Americans have access to stuff that's as cool as anything in Japan, but MOST Americans not only don't care about it, but don't even know about it, and would be hostile towards it if they DID know about it.

    19. Re:Makes me wonder by rho · · Score: 1

      You may not be all that wrong about the '50s and '60s, but it's not because we collectively thought that school was for losers. Remember that the '50s and '60s were a time of great prosperity and innovation in this country, largely because we had escaped serious damage in WWII. This gave the US a tremendous advantage over Europe and many parts of Asia.

      As in most things there are tradeoffs. That the US was basically undamaged meant we had a head start. But as the Europeans and Japanese were rebuilding they were also updating. Over the long term this has brought them many advantages compared to our older technology. Example: our high-speed train system basically stopped improving itself around this period, whereas the Europeans were innovating in this field.

      Another tradeoff is that being on top makes you soft. We're #1, why should we work any harder? We have always had the greatest steel industry in the world, why should that ever change?

      Of course, this state of affairs doesn't have to be permanent. It only becomes permanent when we enshrine mediocrity into unchangeable law in order to prop up one special interest or another.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    20. Re:Makes me wonder by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Can you give me some reasons that the maglev they had was better than the NYC subway?

      I mean this as a nice way of saying "Get beyond your sci-fi channel dreams of what should be and give me a valid ROI study that justifies it beyond the Wow! factor."

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    21. Re:Makes me wonder by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Because it covers the 18mi between the airport and city subway system in seven minutes.

      How about being able to go from Houston to Dallas in about 45 minutes? Or for those of you in the NE, that's a bit longer than the distance between Washington and New York or New York and Boston. Seattle to Portland or Vancouver, BC could be done in half an hour. Los Angeles to San Diego would take about twenty minutes.

    22. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nail on the head. When "we" decided that being smart wasn't "cool"... well, we know where that led us. We ended up with a President who was "folksy" instead of the "egghead". I'll give you two guesses as to who won a Nobel prize... the "folksy guy" or the "egghead"... I think you'll only need one.

    23. Re:Makes me wonder by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Because it covers the 18mi between the airport and city subway system in seven minutes.

      How long does this take by the current system? I'm seriously interested in the savings here. Knowing one part of this and not another doesn't help.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    24. Re:Makes me wonder by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      One thing you have to remember is that just because a technology looks cool and futuristic doesn't mean that it's necessarily better.

      I agree with you on this. By the way who said that because something looks cool and futuristic...it is better? I didn't.

      Your statement would carry more wright if we in these United States had something better than anything anywhere in the world. We do not! I personally, would rather ride that Shanghai train than the New York subway with all the filth and noise.

      The sad thing is that we do not realize that we are falling behind fast.

    25. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, you used the magnetic levitation train they bought from Germany as an example of the technological superiority of the Chinese. This is probably an example of careful planning/urbanism/ political will to create infrastructures with public funds. But in no way can you construe buying a foreign product as an example of technological superiority. You should find another example.

    26. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main reason behind people thinking we're the most technologically advanced country is the idiotic "God Bless America" / "We're #1" crap that tells people being born in the US somehow makes you special and you don't have to work as hard.

      I disagree, the entire reason the US considers itself superior is because we're the only ones to send a human to the moon. The masses of people don't have any imagination, and only remember that they saw some guy in the past that walked on the moon, and that's the extent that they remember history, thus the US must be the greatest.
       

    27. Re:Makes me wonder by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Since the comparison was between the Shanghai maglev and the NYC subway system, I'll use the 55mph max speed of the subway trains and guess maybe half an hour give or take five minutes.

    28. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maglev is the name for the Japanese train. The german designed train installed in Shangai is called Transrapid.

    29. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no plans to add another one in China or any other country.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuo_Shinkansen

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai-Hangzhou_Maglev_Train

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maglev_(transport)#Proposed_systems

    30. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really doesn't have much to do with the maglev specifically, the US infrastructure is in shambles pretty much accross the board. I'm from Sweden, I lived in the US (New York) a few years ago, and I have lived in a few other places across Europe. Compared to pretty much any European or Asian country, subways are extremely dirty, underfunded and constantly late, the rail system is worse than many third world countries (even the northeast is in a pretty crappy state, yes, there are a few signs of improvement with thing like the California HSR, but what's needed for the US to catch up is across the board far better maintenance, electrification, signalling, more frequent service, etc, etc, etc). Broadband is generally quite pathetic compared to other countries, the cell phone system is years behind and the reception is generally pretty poor (probably skimped on the number of towers).
      I don't drive much so I can't really speak for the state of the highway system, but considering that Americans often don't have any other means of transportation, it ought to be pretty damned good.

      The US is a great country, but somewhere along the way it lost its will to do anything properly and decided to just put up with whatever is cheapest in the short term.

    31. Re:Makes me wonder by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Ok. Now tell me where the return on investment is at in getting someone to the airport a potential of 20 minutes earlier so said traveler can just stand around the airport security lines?

      BTW, what about stops? Are there still stops?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    32. Re:Makes me wonder by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geography:

      US is huge compared to Japan. So in Japan it's significantly easier to implement a high speed wireless network. This makes Japan the perfect test bed for new wireless technologies. Teenagers (regardless of the country) will buy anything trendy or gives the appearance that they are more advanced than their peers. Japanese teenagers in urban areas appear to have a large disposable income and the willingness to purchase the new "in" thing en masse. If I wanted to thoroughly test something wireless and high-tech I would introduce it in Japan first.

      The US has it's technological hotspots too. But it is only a small percentage of the US continent. So cool devices don't normally find it's way in the US market for mass consumption. However if you know where to look, you will find pretty nifty uses of technology but it's mostly in the business technologies instead of consumer tech.

      Age:

      The New York subway is considerably older than the Shanghai MagLev, and it would be costly and produce too much downtime to replace it with something that only gave a marginal ROI.

      Image:

      Don't forget some countries put a lot of money into "showcase technologies" (eg. very small bullet train lines, world's tallest skyscraper, etc.) to give the appearance that somehow their country is more "advance" than its neighbors. Unfortunately some of the countries that build these "showcases" have very oppressive governments.

      Perspective:

      When you live in the US, you are able to see the "warts". Bad news sells more papers. Teacher unions make it a point to always show need for more money. blah.. blah.. So you compare what you see while vacationing in other countries (which is always just the tip of the iceberg) with what you live in at home.

      Reality:

      We live in a global society. One day soon, political boundaries will become nothing more than regulation zones. I think this happened already, but for political reasons no one wants to admit this. I work and live with friends of different nationalities. I'll travel and work at locations outside the US. I chat and play with people from around the world thanks to the internet.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    33. Re:Makes me wonder by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The main reason behind people thinking we're the most technologically advanced country is the idiotic "God Bless America" / "We're #1" crap"

      Religion is a key reason for the intellectual backwardness of the majority of the US population. Science is the enemy of their imaginary celestial friend, and all intellectuals are just a bunch of scheming atheist Commie liberals.

      The stereotypical American is the typical American. We have some very bright people. but the mob is the enemy of social progress. There is a huge disconnect between "leading edge" Americans and the mass of ignorant slaves to theism. I find it interesting that we fight the Taliban not because they are backward and toxic, but because they are not Bible Thumpers.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    34. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ain't easy bein' cheesy.

    35. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehm, that maglev is german technology, not chinese...

    36. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has the best university system in the world, both in breadth and quality. Many countries (notably Japan) have mediocre college systems. More Americans go to college than in any other country, and the number of years of schooling is highest here. This makes up for the failings of the secondary school system. "School is not cool" is a silly notion a small number of people believe in. However, being a long-suffering SlashDot social geek may give you different ideas about this.

      In most countries they seem to think that medical care should "just be free", whereas many Americans think you should shoulder your own medical costs. Your "point" about entitlement is extremely off-base; this affects people worldwide, and in socialist countries more so, not less.

      Americans take fewer vacations and holiday time than any other country in the world (even Japan). We are hard-working, and there is a strong "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps" ethic here. There is less of a nanny-government to protect you than in socialist countries. How on earth you think this implies Americans are lazy is beyond me.

      Of course people are going to make inane, factually inaccurate hot air comments on the net all the time. What amazes me is some moderator giving "Insightful" to this mess of a comment. I guess it closely follows the anti-American simplistic mindset of much of this site, so it must be brilliant!

    37. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      US is huge compared to Japan. So in Japan it's significantly easier to implement a high speed wireless network.

      That explains why you can't get good net access in Jerkwater, Wyoming. It does not explain why you can't get good access in San Francisco or Manhattan.

      The New York subway is considerably older than the Shanghai MagLev, and it would be costly and produce too much downtime to replace it with something that only gave a marginal ROI.

      Sure, but that doesn't explain why we can't have high speed rail service from NYC to D.C.

      Teacher unions make it a point to always show need for more money. blah.. blah..

      Because we do need more money for schools: higher salaries for higher teacher standards, smaller classrooms, replace school books held together with duck tape since 1974, and replace old buildings in need of repair.

      One day soon, political boundaries will become nothing more than regulation zones. I think this happened already, but for political reasons no one wants to admit this. I work and live with friends of different nationalities. I'll travel and work at locations outside the US. I chat and play with people from around the world thanks to the internet.

      Would be nice.

    38. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with all the filth and noise

      That's a rather rude way to refer to New Yorkers.

    39. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I know of no easy fix for this condition.

      Actually, the fix is quite easy: bring back the 91% marginal tax rate while slashing defense spending to a quarter of what it is now. Pay for that high speed rail, pay for public health care, pay for public education, and pay off our national debt.

    40. Re:Makes me wonder by registrar · · Score: 1

      A lot of it is that you are very quick to reject the successes of other cultures if you perceive them as being the result of socialism, protectionism, "not the American way", etc..

      For example, universal health care. Practically every other civilised country has better average health (than USA) for a substantially smaller cost (like, 70%). But you argue against that using killer arguments like "it's socialist!"

      For example, your weird understanding of freedom. I understand that freedom is a particularly important notion in the history of the USA, but as soon as someone mentions the f-word, you guys go all silly. "Attack on New York"? No! "Attack on freedom itself"! Basically if you weren't so obsessed with freedom, your dear leader couldn't have used it as a buzzword to persuade the nation to go and do some very silly and expensive things in Iraq.

      And so on, and so on. In the case of high tech, it's probably because seriously expensive high tech projects require a fair bit of government intervention and that would upset all your libertarian tendencies.

      Basically, you all need to learn to be a bit more utilitarian when you make collective decisions about the role of government. Occasionally, a society needs to have the option of changing itself by the action of a well-informed government.

    41. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      What's happened? Our culture decided sometime in the 50's-60's that doing well in school was for losers.

      No, the problem is that Republicans and supply side economics took over our economy. Tax cuts didn't pay for the Interstate Highway System. Tax cuts didn't put us on the moon. And the rich, with all their tax cuts, haven't come close to even thinking about picking up that slack.

      Instead, we now flush trillions of dollars down the Pentagon toilet - and most of that has gone on the national credit card.

      You want stuff like this to start happening again, you need to bring back the 91% marginal tax rate - the same one that built the Interstate Highway System and started the Apollo program.

    42. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You may not be all that wrong about the '50s and '60s, but it's not because we collectively thought that school was for losers. Remember that the '50s and '60s were a time of great prosperity and innovation in this country, largely because we had escaped serious damage in WWII. This gave the US a tremendous advantage over Europe and many parts of Asia.

      We also had a 91% marginal tax rate, the real reason we were able to do stuff in the 50's and 60's. But that's all been trickled down the drain.

    43. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if Obama wannted to buck the trend getting people out of their god damn cars is practically impossible

      Racist.

    44. Re:Makes me wonder by djp928 · · Score: 1

      All a higher marginal tax rate does is kill the incentive for people to earn more money. Why bother to work hard and earn more if your tax burden will just take all that away anyway?

      Kennedy started the tax cuts. Don't blame it all on those nasty Republicans.

    45. Re:Makes me wonder by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if the old still works sufficiently well, there is little point in tossing it out in the face of trillion dollar deficits.

      We take this too far. This only leads to roads falling apart, major freeways that are potholed, bridges that collapse, viaducts that are cracking, the general rundown of our infrastructure, til we get to the point where there is nothing but to have massive injections of capital in order to make things safe, let alone state of the art.

      Everyone wants everything clean fresh and new. Then they're told they have to sacrifice something. Or that they might (shock) have to pay for it, and the "DONT YOU RAISE MY TAXES!" crowd starts chanting, and proposals get shot down, bridges collapse, people scream for blood, and the cycle repeats.

    46. Re:Makes me wonder by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      The return on the investment is in cutting traffic congestion (thereby reducing commute time for those still driving, reducing road wear, and reducing emissions) and reducing the need for parking at the airport. Are you going to get your friend to drive you to the airport and take an hour or more out of their day when you can just get onto the city mass transit system and take the maglev to the airport in half the time?

      As for stops on a long distance line like a Houston-Dallas run, I can't really see why you'd need them. They'd really just make the trip take longer for little to no benefit. Naturally in more densely populated areas it would be a good idea to have an express train that doesn't stop and a local train that stops at the smaller stations.

    47. Re:Makes me wonder by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      What's happened? Our culture decided sometime in the 50's-60's that doing well in school was for losers. We've also developed a sense of entitlement and think everything should be low cost or free, regardless of how much it costs to manufacture or develop (a co-worker who complained about the "high gas prices" when gas was $1.50 a few weeks back comes to mind.......I think if gas was free she'd complain that we weren't being paid to take the gas!). The main reason behind people thinking we're the most technologically advanced country is the idiotic "God Bless America" / "We're #1" crap that tells people being born in the US somehow makes you special and you don't have to work as hard.

      We also decided never to stand up for anything at some point. Watch this video, and see how people who think they're accomplishing something manage to royally fuck themselves through "consensus processes", nonviolence, and insistence on having everyone follow rules.

    48. Re:Makes me wonder by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Wow, so many problems I don't know where to start:

      More Americans go to college than in any other country

      No. They don't. The US is #5, behind Greece, Belgium, France and Spain.

      the number of years of schooling is highest here

      No. It's not. That honor goes to Germany.

      "School is not cool" is a silly notion a small number of people believe in

      And yet high school drop out rates are at their highest ever, approaching 50% in some major cities.

      In most countries they seem to think that medical care should "just be free"

      Please point to a single country that thinks that medical care should be free. Most countries think that it is better for the good of their society, and more cheap/efficient to aggregate medical services, and pay for it as a function of their taxes rather than anything else.

      Americans take fewer vacations and holiday time than any other country in the world (even Japan).

      No. they don't. They actually rank #4 in the world for days taken off work. Both Australians and Japanese work longer hours than Americans. On the other hand, the US is notable amongst developed nations for not mandating that employers allow employees a single day of vacation.

      You were, however, correct about this:

      Of course people are going to make inane, factually inaccurate hot air comments on the net all the time.

    49. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      All a higher marginal tax rate does is kill the incentive for people to earn more money.

      Do you really think that Americans were completely uninterested in making more money in the 50's, the 50's that the Republicans supposedly want to return to, when we had that miserable socialist in the White House, Dwight Eisenhower?

      Under a 91% tax rate, you wouldn't practically be able to have a fleet of private jets, yachts, and a dozen homes, like the Maddoff's who are facing indictment. Does that mean you wouldn't have any interest in making enough money for a private jet, a yacht, and three homes? Methinks not.

      So spare us this "but but but Americans wont want to work" nonsense.

      Kennedy started the tax cuts.

      But he didn't slash them like Reagan did. The top marginal rate stood at 70%, a fine rate in peace time with a health economy, until the Gipper started destroying it with Voodoo Economics. But now we're stuck in two wars, will have a debt over $10 trillion, and income disparity as at the highest rate since the late 1920's. The Democrats should force the 91% tax rates down the throats of the supply siders, and leave it there until our debt is paid off, our bridges are fixed, and we have nationalized health care.

    50. Re:Makes me wonder by Milowerx · · Score: 1

      Oh please but the rest of the world doesn't feel this way? Japan doesn't think they are #1? Please! What about Korea? Germany? France? Britain? No that's not our problem. Our problem is the government and the way they let companies rape themselves, each other and us and are immune to the repercussions. THAT'S what's wrong with the USA.

    51. Re:Makes me wonder by djp928 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you seriously want all the jobs to go overseas? Ok then. At least at that point there wouldn't be any need for fixing roads, since they'd be empty.

      Your posts just make you sound like you're jealous of what other people have and want daddy gubmint to take it all from them so you can feel better about yourself.

    52. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I don't recall Sun or Apple or Google or Yahoo or Facebook as being Japanese or Chinese inventions. And I don't recall their founders being called "losers."

      We've built a country where super-expensive public transit projects don't make sense, since we're not all living in skyscrapers. That doesn't make us "less advanced," unless you feel that level of advancement is inversely proportional to carbon dioxide emissions. And we're less gadget-obsessed than the Japanese. That doesn't make them "ahead of us."

      When people think this way, I wonder what's wrong with them. You know the large countries with the highest rate of college graduation among adults aged 26- to 35-years-old? Russia and Canada. Two countries dependent more than most developed nations on their natural resources, and two which aren't known for technological innovation.

    53. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a lot easier to spend trillions on public works projects in a totalitarian regime like China.

      You mean as opposed to the great, er, difficulty in spending trillions on bailout and pork projects in the US? And that is when the country is most heavily indebted in its entire history too!

    54. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

      I live in China and hate to disappoint you, but the train you rode is unfortunately designed by Germans and bought to China. Not to say USA wouldn't be falling behind in technology though, no comment on that, but try to remember us Europeans as well. :P

    55. Re:Makes me wonder by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      Our culture decided sometime in the 50's-60's that doing well in school was for losers.

      I am thinking that Hollywood decided that for us.

      But more to the point, R&D and reinvestment developed an inverse relationship to CEO pay and the ROI expectations of "private investor groups" et al.

      In short, good old self-centered greed did us in.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    56. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you ARE REALLY IMMENSELY STUPID I don't even know where to start. That silly magnetic levitation train in China was built by Siemens, which is a German company in case you did not know. America is the most technologically advanced nation on earth like it or not (I do not even live there). Chinese "technology" is 99% copied from technology developed in the States or somewhere else and almost always poorly implemented with dubious standards. Stop whining about like a hippie puppy and go live somewhere else if you do not like your own country. I bet you are dressed up right now in cheap Chinese made clothes because you rather pay less than support your own economy by buying better quality wardrobe stuff.

    57. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welcome to third world

    58. Re:Makes me wonder by radicalskeptic · · Score: 1

      China may have a few "ooh aaah" projects, better cell phonse and more flat screen TVs, but after living here for 8 months, I don't agree with your conclusion. It isn't fair to cherry pick one or two examples, when they are unique and not characteristic of the average. You mentioned the maglev train. Well that is nice and fancy, but how many Chinese cities have even regular metro systems? Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Xiang Gang and Chongqing, IIRC. How many US cities have metro systems? New York, Boston, DC, Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Cleveland, Chicago, Philadelphia and Miami. Possibly more I'm forgetting. So maybe the shiniest tech in Shanghai is impressive, but if you average it out with what the lack of technology in most places, I still think the US comes out ahead.

      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    59. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know the Magnetic Levitation Train in Shanghai was built by Germans?

    60. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just last week, I was in Shanghai and I can say that from the Magnetic Levitation train to the technology that runs and manages public transit, those folks are way ahead of us.

      FYI, that maglev train was designed in Germany. It was just too expensive so there are no such trains in Germany. The Chinese in Shanghai could afford it though.

    61. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I rode the subway in New York on return to USA, you could not blame me for thinking I am in a country of the fifties. What's happened to the USA?

      Just because it isn't the latest doesn't mean we should tear up all our track, discard perfectly good subway cars. Let's not be stupid. It would also be VERY disruptive. NYC subway works, works well and has worked well for over a centry. I put the NYC transit against any in the world, including those in Japan. Cost wise they can't compete. Just imagine what it takes to lift a car by electric. They have also had problems including accidents. I'm a scientists and I go over there because we are ahead of them, still. So I get a bit pissed when they try to tell me we are behind. Then I ask them why I'm there and they shut up.

      Long and the short of it is we are behind because of special interests. Hollywood kept HDTV out of here for at least a decade. Even now our options suck. Monsanto has keep stevia sweetners out of the US for a couple of decades, actually more like 30 years now so they could sell their substitutes that are in reality chemicals of questionable health safety. I could go on and on. It would make you really mad if you knew.

      Don't assume it is only corporations that do this. Minority groups do it as well. Something Obama and comedian Bill Cosby are trying to stop. However we still have fools like Sharpton to deal with. Then there are unions, like the teachers union that keep us back. Then all the energy that we waste on getting upset over things like pornography, taboo words on the TV, things like that. Lastly all the energy going to the drug "war". I hope Obama/Congress gets around to changing the laws to make more sense.

      Now, to get back to clubbing seals.... just kidding.

    62. Re:Makes me wonder by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Maglev trains have been tried a few times in the US

      [citation needed]

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    63. Re:Makes me wonder by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You can't get from JFK to Manhattan on the subway. There is no line.

      Take a cab.

      (In my experience less than two hours).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    64. Re:Makes me wonder by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever said that you could.

    65. Re:Makes me wonder by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      ...see how people who think they're accomplishing something manage to royally fuck themselves through "consensus processes", nonviolence, and insistence on having everyone follow rules.

      As opposed to Japan, where — oh, wait.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    66. Re:Makes me wonder by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maglev_train, near the end where it talks about maglev systems.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    67. Re:Makes me wonder by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      test, technology demo, test, prototype, abandoned, test, prototype, tes, test test...

      Ok, for very small values of "tried out".

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    68. Re:Makes me wonder by eluusive · · Score: 1

      As an American Physicist, I have to say you have your head squarely up your ass.

      Most of those countries didn't have anything in place when they put in those "technologically advanced" public works. Current projects in America are the best in the world.

      It takes a lot of money, and requires a lot of political justification to rip out a metro system that's working just fine to replace it with some fancy sparkly new POS.

      The fact that we're don't choose to spend our tax funds on such projects says nothing about our ABILITY to apply technology, or the quality of the scientific papers being produced here.

      I keep hearing this tired "Asian is so much better and more amazing" crap over and over. By the way people talk about laptops available in Japan you'd think Japanese Laptops were designed by space aliens and powered themselves through fusion crystals or some BS -- when in reality they run the same American MADE OS and have the same AMERICAN MADE CPUs as every other fucking laptop in the world.

      THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

    69. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Wow, you seriously want all the jobs to go overseas?

      Then why didn't they seriously go overseas when we had a 91% tax rate? And you really think there will be a shortage of job applicants for jobs with multimillion dollar salaries?

      Your posts just make you sound like you're jealous of what other people have and blah blah blather blather

      If American CEO's are worth what they've been paid, then where's our awesome economy?

      The facts just don't support your story line. At all.

    70. Re:Makes me wonder by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      That explains why you can't get good net access in Jerkwater, Wyoming. It does not explain why you can't get good access in San Francisco or Manhattan.

      I was under the impression that there WAS good access in San Francisco and Manhattan. You have WiFi in most coffee shops, and restaurants. You have the first roll out of G3 wireless.

      In fact, when a major telecommunication company wants to introduce the next best thing to the national market, they start with San Francisco and Manhattan first.

      Sure, but that doesn't explain why we can't have high speed rail service from NYC to D.C.

      The rest of the country considers that pork barrel spending. So politics is a factor. Remember point #1 (Geography)?

      Because we do need more money for schools: higher salaries for higher teacher standards, smaller classrooms, replace school books held together with duck tape since 1974, and replace old buildings in need of repair.

      My point was that the US isn't the only one with these issues. In fact, I've seen great students come out of countries with WORSE facilities available to them. The dirty little secret that the teachers union don't want everyone to know is that TEACHERS provide the quality education, not the buildings.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    71. Re:Makes me wonder by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that there WAS good access in San Francisco and Manhattan. You have WiFi in most coffee shops, and restaurants. You have the first roll out of G3 wireless.

      By "good access" I meant "access like some European and Asian countries have", not "lots of availability". So yeah, you can find plenty of Wi-Fi spots around town. 100 Mbps duplex connections to your apartment for 30 USD per month? Not so much.

      The rest of the country considers that pork barrel spending.

      So? That's why senators from New England give support to projects from western states. Despite all the hay being made over "pork barrel spending" and earmarks, the budget bill is going to have 9,000+ earmarks in it.

      My point was that the US isn't the only one with these issues. In fact, I've seen great students come out of countries with WORSE facilities available to them.

      Which does nothing to dismiss the fact that our schools need more money. That some dedicated souls do a great job for $25k a year doesn't mean we should keep paying all teachers peanuts.

      The dirty little secret that the teachers union don't want everyone to know is that TEACHERS provide the quality education, not the buildings.

      Simplistic platitudes. The fact is that the quality of the facilities have a great impact on the quality of education: the classroom sizes, the availability of athletic/computer/shop classes, and the ability of the students to study while warm in winter, cool in summer, without a leaky roof over their heads.

    72. Re:Makes me wonder by mookiemu · · Score: 1

      This one strikes a nerve. Why do Americans persist with the notion that being smart and doing well in school makes you a freak? Why do Americans hate intellectuals? Look at our presidential elections, anytime someone show any bit intelligence, everyone starts crying, "elitist!". That's partly how they killed Al gore's campaign. The Republican party made intelligence uncool and we ended up with Bush.

      My nephew is now having to endure being called names like, "egghead!", and "professor!", because he does well in school and because he speak really well.

      It's sad!

    73. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shanghai's MagLev is German technology. Not Chinese.

  34. The question is... by EricX2 · · Score: 1

    Why do others (America especially) put up with old technology? It didn't take me a week to realize the iPhone was nothing more than a gateway to the iTunes store with a touch screen an accelerometer and some basic phone features.

    1. Re:The question is... by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does you phone sync your contacts, calendars and email OTA? Does it let you control your Media Center? Does it play 3D games?

      Can you take a photo of something and load it into an app where you can annotate it and then email it off?

      It's not about old/new technology.. it's about a platform that can be extended with a truly good interface that let's you do things... the iPhone isn't perfect but it is certainly one of the best mobile platforms ever created.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:The question is... by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      It didn't take me a week to realize the iPhone was nothing more than a gateway to the iTunes store with a touch screen an accelerometer and some basic phone features.

      "Nothing more"?

      Oh, c'mon. Have you actually used an iPhone or iPod Touch?

      The interface blows away everything else on the planet. It's seriously nice.

      I don't care that it doesn't have a television built in; just like a don't care that my riding lawnmower or stapler doesn't have a built-in television.

    3. Re:The question is... by Rheaghal · · Score: 1

      Actually I got one for my wife for Christmas. She uses it for watching movies (the display is seriously cool) listening to audiobooks, and playing Bejeweled. Certain that it must be useful for more than that, I used it for some considerable time. You're partially right about the interface: It blows. Multitouch sounds nice, but it is the most frustrating interface I've ever used. It was bad in Safari, but I assumed it had to be good in other places. Nope. It's even worse in Google Earth. The Keyboard? It's ok, but not seriously better than soft keyboards on other devices. On the other hand, my HTC Vogue does, in fact, let me sync contacts, calendars and email OTA (wifi & bluetooth). It does let me control my Media Center. It play 3D games (not that I want to). It does let me take a photo of something and load it into an app where I can annotate it and then email it off. All without the use of a stylus, and all with, if necessary, just one hand. It lets me use the browser and music/movie player I prefer. It lets me create and install any apps I care to have, without restriction, downloaded from any source. It doesn't tell me I can't have a South Park theme or emoji, or a $1000 wallpaper app if I'm stupid enough to buy it. I'm no great fan of Microsoft in general, but they did get it right with WinMo, even though you need to put some effort into configuring it to get it to be usable. The iPhone doesn't give users much of an option to make it usable.

    4. Re:The question is... by Nursie · · Score: 1

      With the exception of controlling a media center, I had a phone that could do all that in 2005, that the network gave me for free on ~$50 contract. Plus it had a second camera and 3G.

      And I could load whatever I wanted onto it. I had it running MAME, because I'm a terrible geek. It also had an FM receiver and some sort of tv function I never used.

      The iPhone *does* have a good interface. But it's behind the times in terms of what it can do. And no, IMHO these things don't actually cancel each other out. You might think differently, good for you. Me, if I'm paying that much I want something spectacular to use that also has all the latest comms technology in.

    5. Re:The question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes yes yes, yes, yes, and yes.
      Oh, and it has a keyboard too.

    6. Re:The question is... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Does it play 3D games?

      Doom?

      Quake?

      Duke Nukem?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  35. An indictment of Japan, really by malice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Panasonic P905i wouldn't appeal to me at all. I really don't think of a cell phone that doubles as a portable TV is particularly innovative; I think it's rather sad.

    I saw this all over Japan, people watching TV on the subway... and meanwhile the Internet access and web capabilities of this phone, and others in Japan, are quite poor relative to what the iPhone or G1 can do.

    I'm sorry, but being able to watch live TV on a cell phone is not "OMG, it's so advanced, I want it" in my book.

    1. Re:An indictment of Japan, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is interesting that they have taken a OTA digital channel, packed all the other channels into it, and broadcast it specifically for phones. While here in the US we sit and wait to get OTA digital and continue to put it off...

    2. Re:An indictment of Japan, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but being able to watch live TV on a cell phone is not "OMG, it's so advanced, I want it" in my book.

      You are right. It is SO much better to pay to download the TV shows from iTunes, and then pay AGAIN for the 3G bandwidth that you used to download them.

    3. Re:An indictment of Japan, really by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be able to build a phone for TV reception in North America anyhow. ATSC is not suitable for moving receivers (and as I understand it, neither is DVB-T).

    4. Re:An indictment of Japan, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but being able to watch live TV on a cell phone is not "OMG, it's so advanced, I want it" in my book.

      You are right. It is SO much better to pay to download the TV shows from iTunes, and then pay AGAIN for the 3G bandwidth that you used to download them.

      Also the iPhone is obviously the better platform for the internet. Not having a keyboard makes it really easy to send emails, chat on IRC, and control your server over SSH.

    5. Re:An indictment of Japan, really by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      well.. here we have underground. and I mean - Under Ground. Go figure.
      (then again I am currently reading Underground by Murakami. Just a detail, thou.)

    6. Re:An indictment of Japan, really by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

      That's why there is DVB-H

  36. I agree by 2names · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Carrying around an iPhone in Japan would make you look pretty lame.'

    It doesn't do much for your reputation in the U.S. either...

    I like to use the old Bluetooth headset analogy.

    Old Techie: "You know how lumberjacks will sometimes put a big red X on trees?"
    Young Techie (who is wearing a bluetooth headset): "Like, yeah."
    O.T.: "That big red X is a sign to other lumberjacks that the tree bearing it needs to be culled from the population."
    Y.T.: "Culled. That's not really a word, is it?"
    O.T.: "The bluetooth headset is the human equivalent."

    /s/bluetooth\ headset/iPhone/g

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this "Old Techie" the same guy who goes off on rants about how his VT100 terminal is the best display device ever and you don't really need anything faster than a 300 baud modem?

      Heaven forbid people don't want to have to constantly hold their phone in their hand or have long wires going everywhere. Yeah, that's a sure mark of stupidity, there.

    2. Re:I agree by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      I don't get what's not to like about a BT headset.

      I've got a stereo one. It looks like a pair of headphones, except with no cable, and a little microphone that can be pulled out. It's got good sound quality, there's no way to get the wire get tangled with anything, I can simply remove it from my head and put it somewhere without again messing with the cable, and if I get a call I can hit a button and switch from the music to the cell phone.

      That last part seemed unnecessary (I bought it for music), but it came really handy when I had to mess with the wiring in the rack. Phone rings, just one button press, and I can put the phone in my pocket and have both hands free to mess with the cabling, while continuing talking to the other tech. What's not to like?

    3. Re:I agree by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth headphones that look like headphones are somewhat exempt, curmudgeons are usually complaining about people wearing their bluetooth phone headsets to look important, when all it does is make them look stupid.
      I have a bluetooth headset and love it, but it usually stays in my pocket or on my desk.
      Unless you are recieveing phone calls every 3 minutes or so, you just look like an idiot wearing your bluetooth headset everywhere you go..
      See http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bluetool http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bluetard&defid=874163 and http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bluetooth%20douche .

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    4. Re:I agree by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unless you are recieveing phone calls every 3 minutes or so, you just look like an idiot wearing your bluetooth headset everywhere you go..

      I often kept it on in the car, until I got a stereo with bluetooth. I didn't want to have to go hunting for the fucking thing. I usually hang the headset on my shirt collar when I take it into a store or something.

      People who wear their bluetooth headset everywhere think they are a secret agent. Your mission, if you choose to accept it, is to look like a total choad.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I agree by adolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could be.

      Off-topic, young techie story: I was on IRC once, a decade or so ago, and a friend there was opining that it'd be so much more fun to write code if he could just do it on a real VT100, or at least on a monitor that had a VT100 logo on it. A year or so later, I found a DEC VT100 in good condition at the Dayton Hamvention fleemarket for $1.

      He said it worked fine. I said I didn't care if it worked, and that I was only interested in the logo. I offered him $5, if he'd just let me pry off the logo. He refused, and was insistent that I take the entire terminal for $1 or nothing at all. So I gave him a dollar, and took the whole thing.

      But it was heavy, and I wasn't about to carry it around all day. So I walked over to the nearest trash can, pried the logo off with my knife, and announced to the crowd my intention: Take this genuine DEC VT100, for free, or it goes into the trash. People looked. They listened. But here's the thing: Nobody wanted the free gear. I pleaded with folks to PLEASE take this free historic artifact, but they wouldn't do it.

      So, I tossed it into the trash barrel. It landed with a dull thud on top of a mountain of discarded plastic bottles and small electronics. And then, everything changed: In mere seconds, Old Techies swarmed upon it like flies on shit to rescue it from its grave.

      As long as it was merely free, the item had no value. But once it was trash, it was worth having.

      Totally bizarre.

    6. Re:I agree by 2names · · Score: 1

      Using a bluetooth headset is not a problem. WEARING one constantly like you think you are on the Enterprise is a sure sign that you need some special attention from a lumberjack.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    7. Re:I agree by joNDoty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as it was merely free, the item had no value. But once it was trash, it was worth having.

      I think that's because even if you claim you're offering something for free, there's still a feeling that they owe you. Whereas they owe a trash can nothing.

    8. Re:I agree by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, I tossed it into the trash barrel. It landed with a dull thud on top of a mountain of discarded plastic bottles and small electronics.

      *shudders* Do you realize how many cute, little, innocent kittens died on that horrible day?

    9. Re:I agree by jabelli · · Score: 1

      Because it bothers you, I should take it out of my ear and jam it into my pocket, where the arm snaps off the first time I sit down?

    10. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      %s/bluetooth\ headset/iPhone/g

      And you think you deserve to be on /.? You should be ashamed of yourself!

    11. Re:I agree by kindbud · · Score: 1

      But the iPhone lacks A2DP support. You can't listen to music over a stereo bluetooth headset with it. That's incredibly lame for a wireless device designed around a music player.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    12. Re:I agree by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      What's the make and model of your stereo headset?

    13. Re:I agree by vadim_t · · Score: 1
    14. Re:I agree by adolf · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      It was Sunday -- the last day of the hamfest. Nobody wanted that terminal for a dollar. Had I not bought it and loudly thrown it away, it would've been dropped quietly into a dumpster somewhere to die alone. But, alas, I did rescue it from its sure fate, and lo, by trashing it in front of a crowd, I gave it new life.

      I did that terminal a favor. The kittens are fine.

    15. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they did not want to lug the heavy thing around all day either.. until they saw it's fate when you dropped it into the trash for real.
      It's not like they're gonna be able to resell it for any money... you ripped the logo off of it.
      But Maybe those folks who saved it from the trash bin decided it was worth it for them to lug that heavy thing around, even sans Logo - than to try to sleep at night knowing that a piece of history was just thrown in a trash can in front of them.

      Maybe, In their eyes, they watched some one disrespect a piece of history it by ripping the logo off and dropping it into the trash bin right in front of their eyes.
      Maybe they thought it was part of the show. Some shock value vendor vying for their attention. Maybe they could not believe that anyone would actually do something like that to a Genuine DEC VT100.
      But once you dropped in the trash and walked away, then they knew it wasn't a game. They realized that someone was actually going to deface and discard a Genuine DEC VT100. Hell yeah, someone's gonna grab it now ! NOT because it is suddenly worth more as trash. But Maybe because no one believed that you could be for real, till you dropped it and walked away.
      Maybe it wasn't that they might have thought that it was worth less when you offered it for free.

      Maybe you could look at what you did that day through their eyes ?

    16. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, only dorks and old men carry around knives.

      Second, you should have been killed on the spot for destroying a VT100 for the stupid badge.

  37. wise nation by whtvr · · Score: 1

    well... they may be selling panties in vending machines but there's still some wisdom left in Japan... iphone is after all just a toy in comparison to many phones out there and only people using it are either too stupid to use anything more sophisticated or simply do not need any more than iphone has to offer; that is fair enough but there's no point calling iphone high-end imnsho; and don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that it's not a good (for some) product or it's not innovative, it's simply not as awesome as many people may seem to believe

  38. Why Japan Hates the iPhone by rob1980 · · Score: 1

    Coulda fooled me. I'm pretty active with the Japanese community on campus where I go to school (including having a Japanese roommate) and a lot of them are going to Softbank as soon as they go back home to take advantage of the free iPhone deal.

    1. Re: Why Japan Hates the iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they intend to come BACK to the US, a free iPhone is pretty sweet.

      If they intend on staying in Japan, they could do better I'm sure.

  39. Japanese "usability" by zerofoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Japan's culture of usability is "different" from ours to say the least.

    Having worked in the electronics industry, I can tell you that Japanese users place high value on features and technical complexity. Mastering a technically complex device is viewed as an accomplishment.

    Look at some of the electronics designed for the Japanese market - rows and rows of tiny buttons, incomprehensible menus, difficult to read displays; then look at electronics designed for the US market - touch screens, big legible fonts and buttons, simple - easy to navigate menus.

    (Most of) western society places a high value on ease of use over functionality. Apple does very well in those markets. Japanese culture is very detail oriented and places value on technical complexity and function.

    It's a culture thing, and Apple needs to understand that if they want to succeed in the Japanese market.

    -ted

    1. Re:Japanese "usability" by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      (Most of) western society places a high value on ease of use over functionality. Apple does very well in those markets. Japanese culture is very detail oriented and places value on technical complexity and function

      Other than the cellphone thing, can you give any examples?
      Otherwise, I would it consider the above explanation to be an Apple Apologist's explanation.

    2. Re:Japanese "usability" by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two words: Japanese toilet

    3. Re:Japanese "usability" by jandrese · · Score: 1

      So the problem was that the interface was too user friendly for the Japanese? Apple needs to fix it by adding layers of incomprehensible menus like most of the other smartphones on the market? Ouch.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Japanese "usability" by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      two words - American Toilet

    5. Re:Japanese "usability" by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Other than the cellphone thing, can you give any examples?
      Otherwise, I would it consider the above explanation to be an Apple Apologist's explanation.

      How about this? http://gizmodo.com/5069366/why-zen-software-design-does-not-come-from-japan

      It's a photo of a Japanese cellphone, complete with a ton of photos showing the UI. I think the homescreen says it all - 20 icons (and more if that thing on the edge is a scroll bar), but nothing other than an icon showing what function that icon will invoke.

    6. Re:Japanese "usability" by Spatial · · Score: 1

      So in other words, we're retarded and they aren't?

      Bummer.

    7. Re:Japanese "usability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that explains Sony's reputation.

    8. Re:Japanese "usability" by Yhippa · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that's why I sometimes prefer WinMo to the iPhone. Even though I know I'd be happy with the simplicity and the "It Just Works (TM)" of the iPhone there is something that I like about installing programs to do very specialized tasks that delight me on WinMo. Then again the battery life and constant crashing kind of counteract that so I probably do not know what I'm talking about.

    9. Re:Japanese "usability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mastering a technically complex device is viewed as an accomplishment.

      Tell me about it. Last year, I was issued a new cellphone. I'd just spent a year trying to figure out how to work the old one, but now I have a new one with a mostly different keypad layout and it gave me a brainache. You should have seen the look of disappoinment and shame on my Japanese wife's face when I had a tantrum and threw the new cellphone under my desk, after failing to make it send a txt message.

    10. Re:Japanese "usability" by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Is it just me... All I got from that was "Japanese users are way more pro than American users, we clearly aren't 1337 enough to use their phones, so we have to use noob iPhones"

    11. Re:Japanese "usability" by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      I must be missing something - those phones UI look extremely similar to iPhone and many of the screens look pretty straightforward, with text menus.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    12. Re:Japanese "usability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Trade having kids for techiness.

    13. Re:Japanese "usability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Apple computers AND iPods are extremely successful in Japan, precisely because they're easy to use.

      The reason iPhone fails is:

      1) because it IS actually inferior to many Japanese products in terms of accessories (but note that "complication" has nothing to do with it)
      2) the kanji input is fucking rubbish

    14. Re:Japanese "usability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, do you know Nintendo DS or Wii? Do you know BlackBerry Bold with nice small keyboard?
      I agree with you in general Japanese characteristic, but an excessive generalization doesn't bring a significant conclusion.

      - The Input method with iPhone OS 2.0 (first iPhone in Japanese) was a simply junk (it took 3 MINUTES to operate 3 characters).
      - Emoji, icon characters, could not be used in iPhone till iPhone OS 2.2.
      - iPhone lacks Felica, MMS, Push mail, copy/paste support.

      In spite of those issues, many Mac users in Japan, like me, is happy with iPhone. A friend of mine (windows user) also. iPhone is not so perfect, but it's getting well.

  40. N95 by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

    Android phones? Johnny-come-latelies. The Nokia N95 was massively superior in many regards at European iPhone launch (even compared to its later 3G re-launch), but Europe doesn't really consider technical capabilities in what's 'cool'. Nor price (the N95 deals were also much better).

  41. Apple is not third!! by jfanning · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple is in absolutely no way the "third-largest mobile supplier in the world".

    Not even close.

    The top are: Nokia (40%), Samsung (14%), Motorola (14%), Sony Ericsson (9%) and LG (7%). Apple is well down in the single digits.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone

    On the other hand they have captured a surprisingly large share of the revenue, but only because the iPhone is a high margin product and they don't compete in the high volume area.

    1. Re:Apple is not third!! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Apple is in absolutely no way the "third-largest mobile supplier in the world".

      Not even close.

      The top are: Nokia (40%), Samsung (14%), Motorola (14%), Sony Ericsson (9%) and LG (7%). Apple is well down in the single digits.

      Yes, but for very high values of those digits.

    2. Re:Apple is not third!! by jfanning · · Score: 1

      Yes, but for very high values of those digits.

      If you think 1% is high.

      http://theappleblog.com/2009/01/30/apple-achieves-11-percent-market-share-what-next/

    3. Re:Apple is not third!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is #3 in terms of revenue. Which is extremely remarkable considering they achieved this in 15 months.

      The "high margin" status of the iPhone is over stated. An 8G iPhone compared to a comparable HTC is $100 CHEAPER here in AU. The iPhone has slightly lower specs, but has better materials (yes, I have tried HTC phone, I prefer that my phone does not feel cheap). So maybe it evens out.

    4. Re:Apple is not third!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good effort, poor followthrough. The reference article for the numbers you provided was from January of 2008, and so doesn't reflect things like Motorola's drop to 8% market share and such. Apple was still only 1.1% in Jan of 09, but third highest by revenue.

    5. Re:Apple is not third!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there were about 1.1bn mobile phones shipped in 2008, so Apples 10M gives it less than 1% market share.

    6. Re:Apple is not third!! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      whoooosh

  42. I'm An Apple fanboi And I Have Mod Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do I mod the entire nation of Japan down as trolls?

  43. Hardly innovative... by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

    The tailgate on my 89 Ford LTD Wagon does the same thing. I don't know about the TV tuner, though...

  44. apple is not the 3rd largest mobile supplier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is not even top 5, although they did make the top 10. Last time i checked, USA was not the whole world...

  45. Carrying around an iPhone by proxy318 · · Score: 1

    'Carrying around an iPhone would make you look pretty lame.'

    There, fixed that for you.

    --
    Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  46. Poor kamikazes by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They gave their lives only to become a nation of dudes with man purses. If they only knew before. Or maybe they saw it coming and decided death was better.

    1. Re:Poor kamikazes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have summed up an ancient and beautiful culture with tragic accuracy.

    2. Re:Poor kamikazes by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

      a nation of dudes with man purses

      Don't forget the man bras.

    3. Re:Poor kamikazes by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I almost did, but now you've reminded me again. aw crap.

  47. iPhone is popular, but it's in a small pond by Bushcat · · Score: 1

    iPhone is popular in Japan, but the market works against it: It's carried by Softbank, the #3 player in the market after Docomo and au. Softbank's market share means that the #1-selling phone on the Softbank network for any particular month is around #25 among all phones in Japan. For most new phones, the peak sales period is the first 6 weeks after release. After that, the numbers plummet. In contrast, iPhone has been Softbank's best-selling phone month after month. The only product I've identified with a similar sales profile is Softbank's 815T, a Toshiba product with replaceable covers that has been selling in reasonable numbers for around a year. Therefore, in terms of the market available to it (i.e. Softbank subscribers), the iPhone is a very successful product. It does miss many features Japanese take for granted, such as 1seg, but it succeeds despite that. In Japan, form over function can win through.

  48. thats a real concern by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i have a blackberry with built in gps

    the gps is disabled. why? because verizon wants me to buy their retarded cell phone tower triangulation location service for $10/ month. the gps chip is sitting right on my phone. free. locked. i downloaded the free gmail app (amazing they let me do that, huh?), and all i can do is a get a rough approximation of my location. i've got the hardware, on the phone, to get the free signal. and verizon won't let me

    fucking evil, fucking retarded. it does nothing, dear verizon, except fill me with a burning hatred for you

    now i can understand a cell company competing with the services of another cell company, and blocking this or that signal that is a PAID service

    but when they go out and start squashing well-established FREE signal services, WHEN THE HARDWARE TO GET IT IS ALREADY ON THE FUCKING PHONE, i begin to channel my inner communist. that is the most evil retarded bullshit there is. free market business practices at their most evil

    so i agree with you, i can see them blocking the free hdtv digital signals. 100% possible

    the only redoubt i can consider is that, being a free market, t-mobile, sprint, etc., should unlock free gps and unlock free tv signals, if they aren't already, and make a marketing bonanza on that fact

    you'd see verizon quickly lose customers, and quietly reverse their fucking evil shit sucking behavior

    they already lost me, i totally hate them for that, and have told them in no uncertain terms

    evil motherfuckers. blocking free gps in order to sell me their half assed triangulation service. the hardware is already built into THE DAMN PHONE you fucking asswipes

    die you sleazy shitsucking verizon, die

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:thats a real concern by EXrider · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya man, I HATE Verizon for that shit. Also hate how they truncate SMS messages to 160 characters outbound to other carriers, but inbound they split it into two separate texts; makes it easier for them to eat through my limited number of text messages. Hmm what else... I also hate how they call my cell, my work phone, text me, email me, AND FUCKING SNAIL MAIL ME shit about how I can get a new phone with another 2yr contract. Oh, and suddenly my cheap 35/mo plan isn't available anymore either? Nope, I'll stick with my current plan and keep getting free hand me down phones from friends and family. NO MEANS NO VERIZON, FUCK OFF! I also hate their cock block version of the internet where you can barely get out to the real internet, then when you get there you can't load HTTPS pages because that particular root CA isn't in the phone's store and there's no way to say IGNORE. Oh I could go on and on...

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    2. Re:thats a real concern by knarf · · Score: 1

      If I may ask... why did you give Verizon your business in the first place? You do realise that in a capitalist economy your wallet is your weapon? Give your business to some of the other bottomfeeders instead of Verizon. Or if you feel you have to bend over for some reason at least hack that phone to take away those restrictions. Just sitting here venting on /. does nothing good.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    3. Re:thats a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I moved from Verizon to Sprint.

      Sprint allows me to use the GPS on my blackberry with Google maps for free!

    4. Re:thats a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, you wouldn't recommend that I switch to Verizon ?

    5. Re:thats a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its awesome how you put up with that crap. you stupid tool. you deserve it. It makes me happy when people make shitty choices and then get shit on. Especially when its this notorious know-it-all I-have-a-vapid-opinion-of-everything wetback.

    6. Re:thats a real concern by loshwomp · · Score: 1

      i've got the hardware, on the phone, to get the free signal. and verizon won't let me

      So stop giving them your money, already.

    7. Re:thats a real concern by PipianJ · · Score: 1

      That's nothing new with Verizon. Heck, they've been crippling Bluetooth for ages.

    8. Re:thats a real concern by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that since Verizon bought Alltel that's your only choice period. I wish someone else would come in here because Alltel didn't used to lock things up. Now with the takeover, it is slowly happening. Verizon Wireless is partially owned by Vodafone which I don't think would do this, but controlling interest is with Verizon Communications which has to be one of the most evil corps around.

    9. Re:thats a real concern by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      In the eastern US some people don't have a choice. It's Verizon or nothing. That's how they get by with this crap. They should just be selling bandwidth. How it's used shouldn't be taxed by them or anybody else. Oh wait their dsl is the same even where there is competition. People need to complain loud to the lawmakers. Oh wait both sides are in their pockets as well. There is nothing anyone can do because of no competition and corruption.

    10. Re:thats a real concern by djbentle · · Score: 1

      As a Verizon customer I agree completely. What you mention at the end may be happening though. Most of the smaller companies don't block stuff like that intentionally, and I think Verizon is having to respond somewhat. I have a Blackberry Storm and the GPS is unlocked. I can also connect it directly to the computer to copy on and off files (or download from the internet) music, video, photos, I can even use the music as free ringtones, all of which Verizon has disallowed on some phones in the past. It doesn't have a slower processor, or less memory than other carriers' versions either, which they have also done. Several other recent phones are similarly unlimited as well. They have relied on their network quality to get and maintain customers despite their inferior, often intentionally hobbled hardware and I hope they will be forced by the marketplace to change those practices.

    11. Re:thats a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, Comrade!

    12. Re:thats a real concern by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Steady, anyone would think you were trying to advertise for verizon ;)

      Do you recommend I purchase the verizon service myself? I'm salivating, and almost falling over myself in a desperate bid to register with them. I hope they offer their services in the UK soon - well one can dream eh?

      By the way, your post probably does serve a useful purpose in the sense Verizon would lose customers as a result.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    13. Re:thats a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put a different version of the Blackberry OS on your phone. Flashing a different carrier's OS onto a Blackberry is easier than with any other brand cellphone in existence.

    14. Re:thats a real concern by dargaud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suggest you don't purchase an HP digital multimeter/signal analyzer... When you later call them to purchase a 1Gb memory upgrade (for about 1000$) they just give you a code to type in on the device... to activate the extra memory that is already installed inside the device. Now I'm only a lowly engineer with no decision/purchase power, but I told them in no uncertain terms to go fuck themselves, and if I had any power the device would be on its way back in the mail with a money-back request. All this because their marketing practices would make a maggot gag.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    15. Re:thats a real concern by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Extended SMS's (greater than 160 characters) are always separate text messages, it's typically up to the phone software to aggregate them into one message. Earlier versions of firmware for this functionality on Nokia phones, and the manual would warn that although they would appear as a single message, you may be billed for multiple messages.

      SMS's are 160 characters. But if you know the recipient can get MMS and it works fine on your phone, etc, use that - you can do "effectively unlimited" length messages.

      Verizon suck ass, but on this they are not guilty.

    16. Re:thats a real concern by EXrider · · Score: 1

      I figured it was some bullshit Verizon limitation, but I've never used text messaging from any other carrier.

      It would be nice if it was actually consistent though, inbound messages >160 get split into two.

      Outbound messages >160 get truncated and verizon sends me an obnoxious automated response saying they truncated my >160 char message.

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    17. Re:thats a real concern by Pyroja · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are a troll. Verizon does a lot of backhanded evil shit, and there are many reasons to hate on them. Don't make shit up. The GPS on all VZW BlackBerries has been unlocked for months. I've got my BlackBerry Storm right here in front of me. Not only did it come with a free mapping app, BB Maps, I also went and installed Google Maps. Funny that, it accesses the GPS just fine. So does Nav4All. And SignalLoc. And Poynt. A year ago you could've slung this claim. Not today. Better luck next time.

      --
      [Trojan.]
    18. Re:thats a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      i begin to channel my inner communist.

      Here in China, there is ONE major cell phone provider, and only one other minor one that I know of. I'm not sure why the minor one exists, because it sucks and no one I've ever met uses it.

      The Major one (China Mobile) is _awesome_. It works everywhere, I never have any signal problems no matter what city in the country I go to. You buy a SIM card for about 20 USD, and recharge it whenever you use up your minutes. To use it in Hong Kong and Macau I just send a text message to China Mobile letting them know I want my phone to work there, the service costs less than 1 USD per day, when I come back to China I text them to turn it off.

      Cheers to "communism" for making good use of a natural monopoly. Apparently US policy makers skipped the part of their econ textbooks that teaches about that.

  49. No MMS. LOL. by inotocracy · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I found out that the iPhone lacked MMS I couldn't help but laugh. No MMS? Seriously? How can a mobile phone be released and not support that oh so basic functionality. Every single phone released has MMS but not the iPhone. Why exactly?

    1. Re:No MMS. LOL. by mini+me · · Score: 1

      Because Mail does the exact same thing, only better? There are email to MMS gateways if you really feel the need to send an MMS message to someone.

    2. Re:No MMS. LOL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be true, but why not make it easy for people to communicate with phones using MMS (ie pretty much all of them) while still providing email as an option.
      It's the same kind of deal with not having J2ME on the iPhone, it has, for better or worse, become a standard for mobile applications, and for some reason, Apple decided that iPhone users shouldn't be able to take advantage of that huge base of applications.

    3. Re:No MMS. LOL. by inotocracy · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean you completely ignore a standard way of sending photos mobile-to-mobile. Everyone else does it yet Apple chooses not to. Great, what next.. no copy & paste? Oh wait..

    4. Re:No MMS. LOL. by mini+me · · Score: 1

      We know Apple were under tight time constraints with the iPhone. If it was between MMS or email, I think they made the right call. I believe MMS will come to the iPhone eventually, but they need to implement much, much more important features to implement first (i.e. Push).

      And yes, the iPhone does need some way to share data between applications. But I think we will eventually see something more like the Services menu in OS X as opposed to copy and paste.

  50. Why America Hates the Iphone too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why America hates the iphone? Simple answer AT&T!

    I wanted an iphone but refused to do business with AT&T. Recently I was comparing rates between my provider Tmobile and AT&T because Tmobile does not yet have the Blackberry Bold.

    My current rate plan is $60 a month and the equivalent rate plan with AT&T is over $160 because they nickle and dime you do death. AT&T's business model is to get exclusive deals on handsets in the hope that consumers will be so obsessed with the handsets they will forget all about their overpriced service. I will be keeping my Blackberry Curve.

    This is the main reason why our Cellular market is so uncompetitive. In Europe you buy a handset and then shop for a provider. The handset lock in allows providers to sell their overpriced services and force you to buy one of "their" crippled handsets because of the customized firmware.

    And of course since America has the best government system money can buy the Telco's have politicians bought out so that this monopolistic anti competitive behavior will continue forever keeping us behind the curve so that our "cutting edge" phones like the iphone get laughed at by the world market.

  51. Learn what free means. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    FFS, the iPhone isn't "free" in Japan, and probably close to no phone is anywhere in the world. The cost is just spread by the subscription fee over a number of months.

    I'm sure they would pick one up if it was actually free, I for sure would.

    I hate all the morons which says "omg the G1 / iPhone / Nokia N82 / whatever" isn't expensive, I only paid bla bla... Idiots, please go kill yourself.

    I also hate all the fucking ads which mentions the price you pay when you receiver the phone and not the total price.

    I'm sure you could get a Hummer for $1 to if you accept to pay $2.000.000 / year for the next five years. Omg! Free car! Take one! ...

    Not weird your economy is fucked up if you can't even understand the freaking phone isn't free.

  52. Amazing by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    Even the phone which I got for free from T-Mobile, has a built in camera. With the iphone supposed to be an advanced device I do find it quite pathetic it lacks such a common feature. I never really like iphone because its closed platform nature and fisher price design.

  53. American Fashion by Jdogatl · · Score: 1

    Not trying to troll but I think it is not just phone's or technology. Americans are less fashion oriented in my experience (I am an american). This does not suprise me. I find the iphone nice but also a bit lacking.

  54. Language note for the curious by querist · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Japanese word transliterated "kawaii" is usually translated "cute" in dictionaries, and is composed of two kanji (borrowed Chinese characters), the first meaning "to be able to, to be allowed to" and the second meaning "to love" or "love". The Chinese word written the same way (ke3 ai4) is also translated as "cute" and the implied meaning from the order of the characters/words is "loveable".

    Yes, that would most likely be the word used by Japanese tweenies and teenaged (and even older) ladies. Just remember, this is the nation and culture that brought us "Hello Kitty".

    1. Re:Language note for the curious by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bet the iPhone - Hello Kitty Edition would sell millions... Features pink bezel and adorable hello kitty stylized back plate.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Language note for the curious by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Just remember, this is the nation and culture that brought us "Hello Kitty"."

      I prefer to remember the good old days....when they put out something a bit more manly.

      I miss the old Speed Racer.

      Now that was a japanese export that was worthwhile.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Language note for the curious by redxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great, now explain Moe without sounding like a pedophile.

    4. Re:Language note for the curious by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet the iPhone - Hello Kitty Edition would sell millions

      Go and wash your head out with Clorox, please. Don't do that again.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Language note for the curious by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      I live in Taiwan and bought my girlfriend a Hello Kitty cellphone for Valentines day, it is white with pink highlights; her friend has the black edition and they both love them.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  55. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Actually, and surprisingly, the Xbox 360 has outsold the Wii and the PS3 for the past 4 weeks. That could simply be explained away by every gamer in Japan already owning a Wii, and nobody anywhere being particularly excited for the PS3, but it's still a pretty interesting development.

  56. Software competition anyone? by meist3r · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert in the Japanese cell market but as far as I am informed they have a huge competitive market for mobile applications ranging from astrology calendars to serious navigation apps or multimedia functionality. Stepping onto that turf in a software NaziTunes/AppSStore uniform is probably not the very best argument to sell devices.

  57. What Makes a Good UI by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Japanese cell market sounds a lot like the Korean market, which makes me think that it's not just "features instead of UI" that makes the Japanese dislike the iPhone, but instead the UI itself. In Korea, when someone wants to get a specific feature of his cell phone, which may be through several "ugly" list menus, he flips open the phone, takes about a quarter second to hit the memorized sequence of hotkeys for menu choices on his hardware keypad without looking at the phone, and by the time he gets it out of his pocket and up to his head the feature is waiting for him. An American with an iPhone will take five more seconds to navigate through pretty menus to get to the same thing. The iPhone looks more friendly and advanced, but the guy with the archaic lists navigates his UI 10x faster. Even Americans, at least the more techy ones, can get used to their phones to the extent that the UI which looks clunky to us at first actually _works_ much better for them than an iPhone's can.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    1. Re:What Makes a Good UI by quarterbuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Nokia was the original champion for this.
      Each menu on the phone is associated with a number 1= Call 2= Messages etc. and the same applies to the submenus. Most of my friends had these sequences memorized, so they could pick up a phone and type 1-2-1 and get into their received text messages menu etc. without looking at their phone.
      The cool thing was that this sequence of menu's was the same in ALL the Nokia phones, so most of the users stuck with Nokia when they upgraded.
      Later on Nokia changed their menu layout and their phone chargers causing a lot of the users to defect.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    2. Re:What Makes a Good UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, it's a bit like with software. People look at things like vi, and think, that is one ugly and unfriendly piece of software, but once you're used to it and learned all it's quirky features and shortcuts, you're going to be 10x more efficient with text editing than with your standard gui text editor, which looks great in terms of first imperssions.

  58. No surprise really.... by BetterSense · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that a particular American product isn't cutting it in the land of the rising sun. These days, there's only four things America does better than the rest of the world: music, movies, microcode, and high-speed pizza delivery.

    1. Re:No surprise really.... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You might have a point about the pizza, but the other three? Not so much.

    2. Re:No surprise really.... by BetterSense · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

  59. Well, I'm not in Japan, but by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    AT&T is the problem with the iPhone. If I could get an iPhone with Verizon service I would have bought every generation so far.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  60. moving back from Japan by navtal · · Score: 1

    I knew the American consumer was being screwed when I got a 5 year old model cellphone at 4 times the price plus an exorbident 2 year contract after coming back from Japan. It's a scam and one that is hurting us as a nation.

  61. interestingly, by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    The reasons cited (aside from the TV tuner -- who needs that?) were the same reasons I passed on the iphone. I keep hearing about coolness and "the experience" on the "jesus phone" but beyond the GUI -- seriously, now -- it's a mediocre phone, even by American standards, let alone what they have over there. I suspect the difference between their consumers and ours is that ours are more likely to buy into mindshare. Hmm. Maybe that's why in so many cases they're the producers, and we're the consumers.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  62. Different market , different needs by Kiarra · · Score: 1

    I guess it's all marketing strategy failure. Each different countries have different needs, habits and interest. The marketer should now their market first. There's no point, for instance, selling woolen sweater in tropical countries.Or just targetting to sell IPhone to a certain market niche. Btw, i wonder if they really sell it for free.. I could fly there lolz

  63. Mobile Web by vaxt · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is all wrong. In Japan they have two distinct internets, which are not compatible with eachother: the regular internet, which we are used to, and the "keitai" (mobile) web. It's my understanding that the Japanese public mostly cares about the Keitai web, which is packed full of proprietary technologies. The iPhone, following global standards is completely incompatible with the Keitai web, and thus is why people don't want it.

  64. only foreigners, perhaps by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are a lot of American things that seem to be chic in Japan, but technology has never really been one of them. It's like trying to impress a German with your precision-engineered American luxury car or something.

    1. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be the case now, but back in the day Admiral Perry did manage to impress the Japanese with American technology.

    2. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by eamonman · · Score: 1

      Up until the mid 70's, people used to look upon 'Made in Japan' the same way that we look upon 'Made in China' nowadays. Things can change a lot in a generation.

      --
      0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    3. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by StikyPad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The Corvette is actually one of the best values in the sports car market, and the hand made Z6 outperforms many of its competitors in ANY price range, let alone the sub-$100k bracket. Unfortunately, that's pretty much the only one. It's not like you can actually use a sports car/sedan to its full potential on any public roads in the US, so there's not quite the market here as there is elsewhere.

    4. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by lordtoran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or like impressing a Frenchman with your tasty British cuisine.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    5. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by shiftless · · Score: 1

      It's like trying to impress a German with your precision-engineered American luxury car or something.

      Old Cadillacs and Lincolns (and other classic American cars) have huge followings in Europe. For decades, Cadillac was the "standard of the world" in luxury cars. It is only recently (within the past 20 years) that they have fallen from that pedestal. The US is certainly capable of being the best of the best in any field we choose to compete in. The only problem is our collective willingness to do so is somewhat lacking.

    6. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's true, but the Z6 Corvette is still unlikely to impress the Germans - it's just the way it is. Even with the trash they're willing to slap a VW badge on nowadays.

    7. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by bipbop · · Score: 1

      I don't understand--can you turn this car discussion into some kind of metaphor?

    8. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Does it still have leaf spring suspension? As current in the 1800's on all those horse and carriages?

    9. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      No, it's just the way they are.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    10. Re:only foreigners, perhaps by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yes. I believe it also has wheels, as current in the stone age on all those carts. Just because a technology is old doesn't mean it's bad, or that it hasn't improved.

  65. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple Explanation: Star Ocean 4

    You'll probably see a similar phenomenon when Dragon Quest 10 (eventually) comes out for the Wii.

  66. Nissan GT-R by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Check out the dash of the Nissan GT-R:

    http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cars/nissans-gt+r-data+dense-dashboard-explained-324672.php

    Compare the GT-R dash with the dash of the Corvette ZR-1:

    http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/chevrolet/0802_2009_chevrolet_corvette_zr1/photo_03.html

    Or this radio made and sold in Japan (its a bit older, but it illustrates the point):

    http://japan-auto-sound.com/images/206-0606_IMG.jpg

    I was not apologizing for Apple - I was faulting them for their lack of understanding Japanese culture and what the Japanese value in usability and functionality. They may need to design different phones for different markets if they wish to succeed in those markets.

    -ted

    1. Re:Nissan GT-R by rho · · Score: 1

      That radio explains the high accident rate in Japan.

      This idea that the Japanese love complexity is weird to me. When I think of Japanese design I think of minimalism--quality over quantity. Maybe this is a generational thing? Or is there an exemption for electronics?

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  67. OK THIS IS WHAT IT IS!!! IPHONE by alexbox404 · · Score: 1

    I lived in Japan for about 4 years so i own like 5 different cellphones. these Cellphones are sold like GUM in the U.S. But now that i compare any of my old cellphones to my iphone they are not even close to my new apple device. My IPHONE does have a videorecorder! it can send MMS messeges !!!! The resoulution is amazing IT IS NOT A fake 10mega pixels!!!! YES! JAPAnese has some good ideas that our cellphones companies do not have! like TV , Using ur Cellphone as ur debit card. and live news broadcasting right into your palm/ BUT THE IPHONE COULD DO ALL THIS AND MORE IF ATT or VERIZON had this kind of broadcasting. now the true about cellphones in japan is that .. yeah they are cool cellphones but they feel sooo cheap becuase they come up with a newone every month. they are not as easy to use and as powerfull as the iphone. Japanese people are just pissed cuz the iphone could be named the best cellphone ever the start of a new generation of cellphones! GET OVER IT JAPANASE PEOPLE!!!! APPLE MADE A FCkIN KICK ASS PHONE!

  68. BDSM and iphone users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever I see an iphone user, I see somebody who is into Femdom, BDSM - somebody who gets pleasure from being tortured. And so far, not a single iphone user I know have been able to give me a good enough reason why they so much love their phone to prove me wrong.

  69. celebrity appearance by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    I loved that part in Sixteen Candles where you go, "No more yankeee my wankee. The Donger needs food!"

    If anyone is qualified to comment on the contrast between American and Japanese cultures, it's this famous exchange student.

    Seth

  70. Says who? by youcantwin · · Score: 1

    I happen to live n Japan and I also own an iPhone.
    Sure Japanese phones have a lot of features that the iPhone doesn't have: better camera, mobile payment system, video calls...
    However regarding MMS for instance, Japan is a civilized country and as such they've been using using emails on phones for years.
    What's dumb on the iPhone for Japan is not the lack of MMS but the presence of SMS!

    Regarding the iPhone being lame in Japan, it is the exact opposite of my experience. Almost all the Japanese who have seen my iPhone were impressed by it, even compared to local standards.
    The reasons not to buy it in Japan: no mobile payment, the carrier who offers it (Softbank) doesn't have the best reputation, emoji (pictural characters) are mostly incompatible with other phones/carriers.

    Again, one last time, to me the reason the iPhone blew away everybody when it came out is ONLY because it had the first mobile useable full web browser. I've seen a lot of crazy features on Japanese phones, but never that simple one.

  71. what? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    1. like i knew they did that beforehand
    2. uh yeah, i'm a l33t hardware hacker extraordinaire, like everyone else, and have the 50 hours a week to tinker
    3. who said i was venting to make a difference? i was respinding to a guy's point in an ongoing internet thread, like hanging out in a bar. why do my words have to have some sort of utility expected of them? to turn your question on yourself: why the hell are you venting?

    in short, fuck off

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  72. Maddox Summarized the iPhone the Best by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    From his post (warning: Strong Language):

    "There you have it: the most objective comparison of two cellphones ever made. I think I'll take the rest of the afternoon off and copy and paste text on my cellphone because I can"

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone

    1. Re:Maddox Summarized the iPhone the Best by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Who the hell copies and pastes text on their phone anyway? Most people can barely write text on their phones because they have a number pad only.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Maddox Summarized the iPhone the Best by Targon · · Score: 1

      Note the mention of the iPhone, which means this isn't a comparison to EVERY phone out there. If you are using your phone as an Internet communications device, then writing e-mail and responding to posts on a web site may very well call for cut/copy and paste.

      A real issue is that the iPhone may be a nice toy, but when some really basic features are missing, it means people will look for a device which DOES do what they want or need it to do.

      Blackberry is really about e-mail while out of the office, but is NOT all that great for anything else.

      The iPhone is for those who want an electronic toy that can do a lot of things, but who don't need a great phone, organizer, or anything else that is business-like. It may do the job, but it isn't great.

      The Palm Pre when it becomes available is supposed to fit between these two, where you get a lot of the electronics features you see in the iPhone, but with the business type features that will make it better for those who use their phones for work/business purposes. The big question now is when it will be available for a carrier that people would want(AT&T, Verizon, or any European or Asian carrier).

      Just because a device currently has a "cool" factor associated with it does not mean it is a great device for the primary purpose. For a cell phone, what good is it if call quality is horrible? And since the battery in a cell phone tends to go bad after only a year, being able to replace it without sending the phone away is CRITICAL.

  73. Its all to much! by patiodragon · · Score: 1

    Wow. All you're english anal-agies are getting way to much for me!

  74. iPhone is free in the UK too... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

    ...on 45+ GBP per-month plans.

    Not quite the same as "giving it away", but the plans are decent and the hardware is free.

  75. as soon as this contract is up, i'm doing the same by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    fuck you verizon

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  76. having lived and worked in Japan... by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    While I dont anymore, I used to live and work in japan (first went there around 2000), and im really not that supprised.

    As someone else said, there is a certain amount of nationalism (buy Japanese!), but its really not as bad in the corporate work culture as people make out, they promote the best people for the job (gaijin or not), but its hard to be the best person for the job when your competing against the japanese who are willing to do 18hrs a day to get ahead.

    Now the japanese are ahead of the rest of the world in electronic gadgets - true, but computing wise, they're quite a bit behind (because of nationalism mostly).

    However, when it comes to mobile phones, the japanese were doing email and had data connections to their phones (in the hdspa range) when the rest of the world were doing WAP, SMS and that first data technology (GPRS?). For me when i first arrived it was techno-culture shock because they had these amazing gadgets we only dreamed of, while computers were slow and felt like antiques.

    But the defining characteristic of any japanese phones is the ability to input text (japanese) well - not something i imagine the iphone does. They also are able to install anything they want on their phones - again, not something you can do on an iphone. But it doesn't end there. There are so many things about the iphone that make it useless to the japanese compared to the competition. Coming from a non-japanese manufacturer, you really have to be a step ahead in order to get any market share and the iphone just isn't, its also expensive (in an on-going sense).

    Now the last 4 phones i've had have been the HTC TYNT II, the Dopod D810, the Sony Erricson 810 and a nokia (who's model i cant remember). The HTC has been one of the worst phones i've had, its slow and has many problems (my boss chooses to reboot his every morning just to make sure) so when the iphone 3g (we didnt get 2g in AU) came out (and i had an ipod touch), i was KEEN, the interface is fast (dont care intuitive or easy to use - these often hinder rather then help). My iPod can pull down all my email (3 different accounts, exchange, imap and google) while my htc has barely made a connection to the local exchange server (even when plugged up via usb to a machine on the network). But when apple started charging for firmware updates and locked out the ability to code my own apps (or download anyone else's) i was disgusted. "oh, but its not firmware update, its a software update" - believe this if you will but your an idiot if you do.

    Surfice it to say, the iphone just wont stack up against the local japanese models in terms of what the japanese want and its too "locked out" for a tech-savy (almost all of them) Japanese - did apple really think they were going to get the japanese to pay for "apple tv" - shear stupidity.?

  77. A disaster--91% didn't want to buy an iPhone by Zero+return · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Goodness--only 9% of people might want to buy an iPhone when Apple is looking for 1% of the market.

    What a disaster!

  78. Hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did not liking something equate to hating it?

  79. A good old-fashioned future... by argent · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a story by Bruce Sterling in the collection "A Good Old-Fashioned Future", where a US government agent with her builky PDA is harassed and overcome by Japanese coordinating their efforts through "Pokecon" smartphones.

  80. Mod parent up by Ohrion · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with you about the TV thing. Low tech compared to the high tech their phone COULD be using.

  81. Not enough buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd have to add 20 or 30 buttons on the iPhone before even thinking about making it popular in Japan.

  82. OMG, it's Huge! by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

    One of the things that I looked for this most recent time around was a phone that didn't feel like a brick in my pocket, and make my keys smash into my leg. That phone does some cool stuff, but it's darn near a laptop. No thank you.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  83. WHAT ARE THE NUMBERS? by homejapan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe this - yet another "the iPhone failed in Japan" article with NO SALES DATA to support the claim. Maybe it is selling slowly here in Japan. Maybe flopping miserably. But why make that claim with no numbers to back it up? Get the numbers first!

    There are other reasons why Softbank might cut the price. End-of-season (that'd be now) goals. Inventory clearance for a new model. Or the biggest reason of all: a lousy economy. If the iPhone is sluggish in Japan, it's not the only thing; everyone from Toyota on down is bleeding money and laying off workers as sales slump for just about everything.

    Even in a good economy, maybe the iPhone wouldn't succeed here. Maybe it would. Sadly, without any data upon which to base intelligent comments, we're still going to get non-stop uninformed punditry about market potential and breathless unproven claims of "cultural differences".

  84. Marketing over substance by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... first .... solid ... usable ... viable ... end all be all ... good ... the best ... slightly above average, .. (personally) ....

    With exception of the "first" adjective, all the rest of adjectives that you use to describe this marvel phone are completely subjective judgements.

    In other words you drank the KoolAid and instead to look at hard objective facts you are just using the same market speech used to promote this gadget.

    The marketing people at Apple should really give themselves a pat in the back.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  85. Japanese are very conservative, really by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They've gotten used to doing things in a certain way on there keyboard cell-phone (ike very painful ways of entering kanji) and dont want to change. It the same as getting people off of qwerty keyboards in the US.

  86. But gold is just chips too by professorguy · · Score: 1

    The gold standard isn't some magic that makes currency have 'real' value. Gold itself has very little intrinsic value. Its rarity doesn't justify its price--that's due to speculators who know there are people like you around and can keep the price high.

    Gold's only got a high value because there are a lot of people who hold (not use) it because of its high value. If it had to be valued on its use (like most other commodities), it'd be valued by rarity and would be worth a couple of bucks a brick.

    In short, gold is just like poker chips--it has value because someone else said it does.

    1. Re:But gold is just chips too by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Hence the statement "Heck, one could reasonably argue that since the inception of 'cash'"

    2. Re:But gold is just chips too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually gold is pretty vital to a range of high tech industries. It'd still be about valuable as copper without human's unreasonable fascination with it even if it was as common as copper, and have you checked the price of copper lately?

  87. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Umm, PS3 has shifted several million units now, just FYI.

    No, not as many as Xbox, but it has shifted a lot. And we're seeing some really interesting stuff (e.g. Flower) come out on it.

    (Also it's a lot shinier and quieter...)

    Anyway, I have all three so I'm not going to say "OMG!!! Ur so wrong xbox suxx!!!", but the PS3 is not a failed product by any means.

  88. Too much head-nodding here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm beginning to think that a lot of stuff coming from Wired is crap reporting.

  89. Um, I think you're talking about the Fujitsu 905i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure it's the Fujitsu 905i, a joint venture between Fujitsu and NTT Docomo:
    http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/english/product/foma/905i/f905i/index.html

    And it's going to be introduced in Taiwan soon, with Taiwanese language localizations.

  90. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Who are you replying to? I never said the PS3 was a failed product. (I did say it's an unexciting product.)

  91. iPhone is not bad for texting by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Most people complain about it at first, but I think it's just the learning curve. Both my wife and I have iPhones, and we text as fast on these as we did on phones that had full keyboards.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:iPhone is not bad for texting by FrostDust · · Score: 1

      As mentioned in the article, most Japanese use their phones heavily while on the train, using a hand to hold onto the overhead strap. Can you text on the iPhone, just as easily, with only one hand?

    2. Re:iPhone is not bad for texting by spineboy · · Score: 1

      yes, actually that's how I text usually - with one hand.

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
  92. Different mindset by webagogue · · Score: 1

    The imode fans will be disappointed by the advanced elegance of the iPhone... but almost EVERY gaijin I know (and Japanese who work closely with gaijin) has or is seriously considering an iPhone. 1-seg.. BAH!

    --

    Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
  93. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Nursie · · Score: 1

    "That could simply be explained away by every gamer in Japan already owning a Wii, and nobody anywhere being particularly excited for the PS3"

    You implied nobody was buying it. Not quite the case.

    Also, as I say, there are some exciting developments. Noby Noby Boy for instance. Though personally I don't care for it.

  94. ãããã(TM)ã by BladeDaughter · · Score: 1

    æé話-ãããã(TM)

  95. Panasonic P905i?!? by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

    If you name a product "Panasonic P905i", you should be shot. At least a little in the foot. Everyone remembers "iPhone" or "Eee", but I've already forgotten what that PQW9592391IE-phone was called...

  96. Third time lucky by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    The iPhone needs a lot of improvement before I would consider it.

    Certainly, but in its second generation form it is already got many things right. Heck, I would have been surprised if they had managed to create the perfect phone. Even with what it has got wrong, it is offers a better experience than some of the other smart phones in the North American and European markets. Chances are there will be another iPhone come September, given Apple's release schedule and their approach that makes competitors feel like they need to play catch up. Apple is a newcomer to the market, so it is in many ways amazing that they have managed to pull off what they did. Motorola, Nokia et al. can say what they want, but they were meant to be the experts in that market, but they did not play the cards to their advantage, though there is still a chance for them to do so.

    The truth is if batteries were better than they are now, then I am sure Apple and many other cell phone companies would being offering different products, since anything you put on a phone is going to have a negative effect on the battery charge. Then again, even with a better battery life companies want to offer a product that appeases half the market, while giving them a reason to buy the next version when they release it down the road.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  97. almost as bad as sayiing cheese pizza by spineboy · · Score: 1

    To people living around New York, saying cheese pizza is redundant, and is like saying a meat steak or a wooden tree. Pizza is understood to have cheese on the surface.
    Often people just say pie, as in pizza pie. "Give me a large plain pie"

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:almost as bad as sayiing cheese pizza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, tell us more tidbits about New Yorkers. We're dying to hear, and it's all so new, we've never heard any of it before.

  98. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should stick to reading what I actually type instead of things I "imply." ("Imply" in this case meaning, apparently, "stuff I made up then attributed to you.")

    I never said the PS3 is a failed product. I never implied it was a failed product. Stop replying to things I never said, please.

  99. Talking to phone in public is rude. by Pushpabon · · Score: 0

    It also has to do with the fact that in Japan it's somewhat rude and inconsiderate to talk to phone in public transport or so I've understood. Wish people here understood that aswell and didn't have their ringtones set to max and yell in the bus. I've had my phone on vibrate/silent for as long as I've owned it.

  100. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should stick to reading what I actually type instead of things I "imply."

    "Actually, and surprisingly, the Xbox 360 has outsold the Wii and the PS3 for the past 4 weeks. That could simply be explained away by every gamer in Japan already owning a Wii, and nobody anywhere being particularly excited for the PS3, but it's still a pretty interesting development."

    Hmm, we're talking about sales figures and you're postulating the reason for the xbox being ahead is that everyone owns a wii and nobody is interested in owning a PS3. It's pretty clear.

    "("Imply" in this case meaning, apparently, "stuff I made up then attributed to you.")

    Fucking pompous git.

  101. Sigh - USA population density different than Europ by spineboy · · Score: 1

    America is a BIG country, and not that densely populated. Trains will never catch on for MOST of the country ,because the passenger density is too low. On the coasts it has made grounds because the population density makes it profitable.

    Europe (Western from England to say Poland) would comfortably fit in the USA in about half the space of east of the Mississippi.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  102. Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like my telephones wired to a wall... so I can get away from them!

  103. Not true at all IMHO by Nicky+G · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was in Japan a few months ago, I got a hell of a lot of "iPhone? Sugoi!" (cool!) in response to using my iPhone in public. The Japanese public may reject it for technical reasons (original lack of emoji support, tv, video, etc.) or pricing reasons, but "lack of cool" is not one of them, I don't think.

  104. It's Not All Japan by juancnuno · · Score: 1

    Tigarah is Japanese and she loves her iPhone.

  105. Yeah, but as a gaming platform... by Kuukai · · Score: 1

    The iPhone's getting much more love from Japanese developers than from Japanese consumers, it seems. Microsoft set unbelievable piles of money on fire to get a handful of Japanese developers, but without any particular plan on their part to be a gaming system Apple already has a Final Fantasy game (I guess CD isn't nominally FF but it has all the Moogles and fixins of an FF) and a Metal Gear Solid game lined up. It's a really weird contrast, perhaps th iPod touch will take off as a gaming platform there...

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
  106. Deja Vu -- /.'d a Long Time Ago by knapper_tech · · Score: 1

    I So Called This.

    This pretty much confirms the cause of my frustrations with US Phones.

    To follow up on my tribulations with the US phone situation, I'm opting not to overpay for crap and still use a Virgin Mobile phone with a $6 plan finally breaks even with the $30 plan at about 300min or so. I was using a Kyocera for the longest time, but finally upgraded to a much newer Kyocera that cost $20. The old one's battery died. I still don't have nearly as many features as my free W41CA had. In fact, I still use my Casio for taking pictures occasionally and as an alarm because of the really nostalgic ring tone. I like my current Kyocera because it's very simple and seems durable...and has a new battery.

    --
    "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
  107. Lame by kalel666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems Chen used an old article to quote Hayashi thusly, "Hayashi's cellular weapon of choice? A Panasonic P905i, a fancy cellphone that doubles as a 3-inch TV. It also features 3-G, GPS, a 5.1-megapixel camera and motion sensors for Wii-style games."

    The none-too-happy Hayashi reports, "My cellular weapon of choice, of course is an iPhone... I can't agree with what Brian's article had to say and here is how I view the iPhone market in Japan."
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html/

    iPhone Mattters today also has a related report, "The Japanese hate the iPhone so much they start four iPhone magazines."
    http://www.iphonematters.com/article/the_japanese_hate_the_iphone_so_much_they_start_four_iphone_magazines_173/#When:12:42:00Z/

    --
    I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
  108. Where are these advanced phones? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    If they are supposedly so far ahead, where is the fanciful technology? Why are they unable to compete outside of Japan? The simple answer is that more features do not make a device more advanced and that the hallmark of truly advanced technology is that it is powerful yet easy to use and would appear as magic to more primitive cultures.

    I'm tired of this myth about technology being more advanced in Japan. This is simply not true.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  109. Correction by Shin-LaC · · Score: 4, Informative

    That kanji spelling of kawaii is ateji (= employing kanji that sort of match the sound and meaning of a word, but have no grounds in its etymology). The word "kawaii" comes from "kahohayusi", which then evolved into "kahahayusi", "kahayusi", "kawayusi", and finally into "kawaii". "Kahohayusi" is a compound of "kaho" , meaning "face" (kao in modern Japanese), and "hayusi", meaning "bright".

    Much like "mabayusi" (=> modern "mabusii") indicates a brightness so strong that you have to avert your eyes, "kahohayusi" literally describes a sight that you can't face. By metaphor, the original meaning of the word was "pitiable", "a sorry sight". This meaning is retained in the modern word "kawaisou", while the meaning of "kawaii" changed into "lovely, cute".

    As for how that happened, we can conjecture something like this: small, weak things are pitiful, but they can also elicit a feeling of wanting to help them; the reaction changes from "turning your face away" to "extending your hand", so to speak, and thus the feeling becomes one of attraction.

    (if you don't believe me, check the Gogen Yurai Jiten)

    Who knows, maybe someday Japanese buyers will be moved by the pitiful, weak iPhone, and grant it a place inside their hearts. ;)

    1. Re:Correction by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      The only thing I would object to is your roumaji. Although there are many wacky systems, a more sensible phonetic representations would be Hepburn-nish "kahohayushi", "kahahayushi" etc. At least the "shi" makes more sense then "si" phonetically.

    2. Re:correction by Pyroja · · Score: 1

      It is not locked. It has been unlocked for months.

      I am not a troll. I am not the one spouting lies.

      You have an 8830. The update is for the 8830.

      Keep telling yourself you're right. Fine by me. Everyone else is enjoying unlocked GPS. You're not. Oh well. Your choice.

      The OS is as supported as any from RIM. But hey, you can keep telling yourself you made the right choice.

      As for me, I'll go back to enjoying Google Maps and Nav4All.

      Have fun! =D

      --
      [Trojan.]
    3. Re:correction by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Let's assume he's not a troll for one moment. Can you prove to him and me that the update isn't for the 8830?

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  110. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another fanboy is talking without any clue...

  111. garbage - look at the coasts, not the midwest by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    The "Amerika is roooral" argument does explain why we don't have high speed trains or high speed internet access between Bumfuck, North Dakota, and Jerkwater, Wyoming. It does not, however, explain why we don't have those services on the highly populated coasts.

    No, the real reason is that movement conservatism has turned us into a cheap nation. Tax cuts didn't pay for the Tennessee Valley Authority. Private companies did not build the Interstate Highway System, the U.S. government did - with tax dollars.

    When we stop putting the ability of the top 1% of 1% to make more money than the bottom 100 million Americans combined, you might start seeing things like 1 Gpbs duplex connections to your house and be able to take a high speed train from Boston to Miami.

  112. Wait a sec, 91% of what market??? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It looks like someone is playing with statistics again to try and make things look worse than they are...

    91% sounds pretty bad. But that's of the whole cell phone market. What is the percentage among people wanting to have a smartphone?

    If you looked at the total US cell phone market you may well see a similar figure, where 70-80% of people just want a phone and not a smart phone. But as is, we have no way to compare the percentage given with the relation to the U.S. market. (which would be inetresting).

    I'm not saying the iPhone has actually been a giant success there, but it's done better than that number would make it appear and I would imagine Apple has done better than any other non-Japanese phone maker in that market.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  113. Re:Sigh - USA population density different than Eu by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

    People tend to exaggerate just how sparsely populated the US is. While it's true that the US as a whole is much less densely populated than Europe as a whole, it's not like the US population is spread evenly across the country, just like it's not in Europe. The state of Ohio is about as densely populated as France. How much rail service does Ohio have? Little to none. France? One of the largest high speed rail networks with speeds up to 320 kph, and at least hourly service between major cities.
    And Ohio only comes in at no. 9 in terms of population density...

  114. Slimy Hit Piece by reversible+physicist · · Score: 1

    This poster is absolutely right: the article is a hit piece that misquotes and completely contradicts what the Japanese journalist Hayashi has actually been writing! Mod kalel666 up! Take a look also at http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/20290/ on why the Japanese don't hate the iPhone.

  115. But it's a Sony! by tknd · · Score: 1
  116. article got it wrong by ctk76 · · Score: 1

    this has been covered before. iphone's not popular in japan for three reasons: 1. no video phone 2. can't pay for stuff with it. (critically important. credit cards are sooo yesterday.) 3. no TV tuner (it's not a bad feature to have) also, it doesn't help that iphone cost as much as other phones that better cater to the japanese lifestyle.

  117. Hijacking by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html/

    My cellular weapon of choice, of course is an iPhone and my cellular weapon of choice to the foreigners is INFOBAR2 and I don't even dare to charge my P905i these days.

    This from the guy misquoted in both the article and summary. The author actually asked for his opinion, but then took something from an old interview.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:Hijacking by nobihaya · · Score: 1

      and added something I never said. I have shown iPhones to vast number of people and none of them ever told me iPhone looked lame. All of them 'Wowed'. Do you know where I am lecturing? I am lecturing at some Japanese phone manufacturers saying if they don't change their mindset and take a serious look at iPhone, they will be ten years behind; they already are. The real price of Japanese advanced looking is $700 - 800 + You can buy a few iPhones with it or with that cost Apple can put as much (or even more) unnecessary and hard to use craps but because Apple understands what users want, they have a vision about how the future of communication should be, they chose not to.

  118. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  119. 2 words: *Awesome* by docbrody · · Score: 1

    Its just kind of cool to know that there is an advanced civilization out there where people actually scoff at the iPhone.

  120. So, about the Japanese... by Tokyo_Otaku · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some of the stuff that comes up on this website just kills me some days. Every time a story comes up about Japan, and why something isn't selling there, a bunch of posters go on about what a bunch of xenophobic dicks Japanese are and how no western companies can do well there.

    To those people: You obviously don't live here, and you should consider the merits of spouting off on things with which you have no direct experience.

    I live in Tokyo. I've been here for about 6 years and have worked helping to restructure a well-known Japanese company.

    So, on to some random points:

    1) Do Japanese have a water-tight sense of national identity?

    Yes.

    But they are not the only ones with nationalistic issues. See also "We're #1 motherfuckers" in the US and the vague but pervasive smugness of Europeans.

    2) Are some Japanese people arrogant, screaming racists?

    Yes.

    And like there aren't arrogant and screaming racists in the US or Europe... No siree...

    This is often thought to be more widespread than it is, partly because foreigners are not always welcome in a number of establishments in Japan. In some cases this is indeed because they are racist.

    This is way more often the case because Japanese are not good culturally with dealing with the unfamiliar or strangers, even other Japanese. Letting the foreigner in who doesn't know the right way to behave and will freak out all the patrons is not good business.

    They are not totally unjustified in thinking that foreigners will not behave themselves, given the massive number of westerners who come here and act like total dicks, in the same way people are known to act like total dicks when visiting the Amish. I don't know how many times I have had to cringe when reading the news or standing on the train because of the obnoxious behaviour of other gaijin.

    All that said, I've seen a little old Japanese guy body-check my friend, for no other apparent reason than he was a Gaijin.

    3) Are domestic Japanese businesses insular and hard to do business with?

    Yes.

    Domestic Japanese companies tend to cluster together in groups, solidified with cross shareholdings. It's often times difficult for Japanese companies to work with other Japanese companies, so don't feel so picked on.

    Granted things were waaaaaay worse in the 80's. They used to rebuff ski equipment makes with bullshit excuses like, and I'm not kidding, "Japanese snow is different". It seems that Japan has collectively grown up a little since then.

    4) Japanese hate foreign brands. They only want to buy Japanese things.

    No.

    Here are a list of things that are insanely popular in Japan:

    - Starbucks
    - Louis Vuitton
    - Virtually any European fashion brand
    - Krispy Kreme (2 hours lineups just to get one)
    - iPod
    - McDonalds (there is a word for meeting there)
    - Apple products (amongst designers)
    - Hollywood movies
    - Microsoft software
    - Dell hardware
    - Cisco routers
    - etc etc etc

    Do I really need to say anything more?

    5) The XBox 360 failed in Japan because of X.

    No.

    Unless X happens to be the fact that MS massively screwed up the launch in Japan by not having a single game Japanese people wanted to play in the initial line-up. JRPGs, fighting games and simulators of all kinds. That's what they like.

    In Microsoft's defence, they have done their best to recover like champs. They obviously went right out and commissioned a bunched of JRPGs, which have all hit in the last 6 months, taking XBox 360 to the top of the hardware charts three times, including this week.

    6) Japanese don't buy the iPhone because their phones are super wicked.

    Yes and No.

    Japanese phones have been waaaaaay ahead for a long time. The phones in the US, until the iPhone and Android have been pretty much a total joke.

    That said, the

  121. Whole premise of article is false;misquoted source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the journalist Nobi Hayashi was misquoted. The entire premise of the article is false. From his own web site:

    "Anyway, I can't agree with what Brian's article had to say and here is how I view the iPhone market in Japan."

    Read his response to the article here:
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html

    http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/japanese-iphone-hate-disputed-by-wired-tokyo-based-source/

    Wired's journalistic standards seem to be getting worse and worse. It is too bad this gets posted on Slashdot.

  122. have any of you even seen a japanese phone? by stefoid6 · · Score: 1

    I work developing software for a japanese company that sells Japanese domestic phones. They cant compete in the world market because nobody wants to buy their shitty phones. If you like a phone that has a laundry list of features that youll never use -- not the least because you wont be able to work out how to find and operate them - then get a japanese phone. then go bang your head against a wall because youll probably enjoy that too. They have NO IDEA about useability. Japanese consumers havent been exposed to any other type of mobile phone in their little walled garden, so they dont know any better. If the iPhone isnt selling well - yet - its because it doesnt support the langauge properly and it hasnt been marketed properly. The head of of my comapnies mobile division owns and uses - an iPhone.

  123. Korea by crossmr · · Score: 1

    Korea will be more or less the same. Koreans love taking pictures with their cell phones and if you've ever taken a trip on the Seoul Metro subway you'll notice something like 80%+ people watching TV on something. Not all of them are using their phones, some of them carry other portable devices and watch pre-recorded TV or movies. PSPs are far more popular here than I saw in Canada, but more for movie watching than gaming. Even the elderly are doing that (which is a direct contrast from the mass technology phobia the elderly seem to have in NA). I can't imagine the iphone being a big hit here. I believe its scheduled to come out here in 2 or 3 months.

    1. Re:Korea by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Crossmr the homosexual Wiki Nazi.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  124. What did Nobu really say about the iPhone? by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What did Nobuyuki Hayashi really say before he was so badly misquoted by Brian Chen?
    Read his blog: (hint his real cellphone of choice is . . . an iPhone!?!!):
    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html

    --
    -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --
  125. Nonsense by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    It isn't a piece of crap. That's just ridiculous. The data plans are what suck. I simply can't afford > $1K/year to use a phone.

    The iphone is a nice piece of engineering. It doesn't do much more than what some of the other touch screens do, but it does have one advantage over any other handheld device: The applications. Of course, this has little to do with the iPhone's hardware as with its ubiquity. But the iTunes store is what sets it apart.

    The iPhone isn't revolutionary. But to say it sucks is just flamebait.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  126. Chigaimasu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been in Japan for about 6 months now, and all I see are useless extensions and small screens. It's a bit comical saying that watching Japanese TV is a boost since Japanese tv is so vapid it makes American tv look absolutely philosophical. I can't think of anyone actually ever playing games on their phone either, outside of tetris-style games.

    The Japanese may love random useless features, but I have yet to see them use them. Further, if they are using the internet really at all, they will be paying well in excess of $60 a month. In Japan there is no such thing as a cheap cell-phone package. I cost $18 a month, and all I can do is send text messages, since actual calls are a buck every 30 seconds on top of that.

    My brit expat friend has an iPhone and is loving it. From what I've seen, it's still clearly the best phone on the market for usability and slickness.

    Japanese mobile phone industry is over-hyped.

  127. keypad by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Yeah. They've become addicted to the keypad.

    I got my first cell last year (an old model p903itv that was cheap) and I hate the keypad. Too much of the interface guessing too much and too much of the interface erasing back too far when you tell it it guessed too much.

    But the Japanese are used to having the input device buffered by an input method. They just don't _get_ that the guessing ahead limits what they are typing.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  128. nokia still suck by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    1. not one unified OS, but series 60 80 90, or whatever junk...

    2. some of the 07 phones had utter crap GUI defects.

    3. cheap plastic feel.

    4. top end nokias - too pricey.

    5. i dont see a menu called Nokia Store on my nokia.... Sure there are telco specific crap, but thats just means most telcos wont bother making anything decent.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  129. hey, asshole by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    my blackberry world edition

    gps locked

    purchased oct 07

    replaced jul 08

    locked, locked, locked

    locked you arrogant assumptive motherfucker. understand?

    you want me to fucking bring it over to you and show you you fucking twatstain?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hey, asshole by Pyroja · · Score: 1

      If by that, you mean you want me to help you update the firmware on the phone to 4.5 so that you, too, can enjoy the unlocked GPS that every other Verizon customer with a BlackBerry is currently enjoying, then... Yea, ok. I'm glad to help.

      http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/12/gps-now-unlock-for-verizon-blackberry-8130-and-8330-blackberry-bytes/ - That's from nearly 3 months ago. And Google Maps works now too.

      --
      [Trojan.]
  130. visit an ipod factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you will understand who is really 'living in the 50s'.. more like the 1850s.

  131. bugs by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Well, some people consider the lack of a delete-left function a bug.

    So to speak.

    I hate my P903itv for a variety of reasons. I'll easily lose ten minutes of painstaking typing if my concentration wanders, and I'm unwilling to pattern the thumb-torture people call one-handed-texting into my brain, so, for me, the interface itself will remain a bug, not a feature.

    I've thought about the P905i for the linux, but only if it gives me a shell, and only if there is either some way to hook up a keyboard or some way to use it tethered so I can send e-mail from my notebook through it.

    (No way to get a shell on the p903, as far as I know.)

    I really don't plan on buying another Japanese phone.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  132. What is this thing with TV? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    I never use it.

    I've thought about watching the NHK language programs during my commute, but my commute takes me from one area to another, so I'd have to reset the receiving area. (Lock-in strategy like the area codes on DVDs, I guess.)

    Besides, the train companies keep telling us how impolite it is to use phones on the trains, and how using the phone in the lead or tail car might mess up their controls systems somehow, so we should completely shut the phone off (and log back in later) on the front and back cars.

    wansegu (one-segment) is a bust. Serious silliness.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  133. Re:Japan is unlike any other place in the world... by reiisi · · Score: 1

    I think, less than the not understanding the country, is the country not understanding.

    Can you get a PC pre-loaded with a Linux OS in Japan? No.

    Can you get a phone pre-loaded with a Linux OS in Japan? Yes, but, until recently, the GPL was completely ignored. (And you couldn't get access to the shell, either.)

    Do you want the text from your mail on your P90x? Here's what you do.

    You save it to your SD via the extension menus in the phone. Then you mount the SD on your PC and go hunting through directories with numeric names and files with numeric names until you find a few files that look the right size and have the right date. Scan through those files with hexdump -C and eventually you start seeing mail text instead of tags in some tagging format that you don't have docs for.

    Then you have to decide how much you want the text in its original form, because you're going to have to write a filter to get it out.

    Yes. Pathological NIH.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  134. I will handle this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note to our American-speaking American readers: the parent comment appears to be from one of those wiley shark eating Japanese people from Japan (Mexico). It may look like gibberish to people who speak American, but I learned a little Mexican back in high school and the Japanese dialect, while difficult, is decipherable with some effort. This gentleman seems to be telling us, "You have offended my ancestors. Prepare to cleave to the fighting hive of bees." Well, sir, I respectfully tel you that here in America, we do not cleve to bee-hives and we respect the cultural diversity of our neighbors, even the Japanese who live in the semi-tropical jungles across the Rio Grandi. Good day!

  135. It's the software ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the software IMO ... http://tinyurl.com/d5n928

  136. i have an 8830 by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    its locked

    gps hardware, locked out by the software

    its 4.2

    no 4.5 available

    thanks for playing

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i have an 8830 by Pyroja · · Score: 1
      --
      [Trojan.]
  137. darling by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    its an 8830 world edition, not a curve

    i have 4.2

    you go to the website, you ask to download the latest software, verizon says 4.2

    why do you somehow think you know my own business better than i do?

    you want me to download something from sprint onto my verizon phone?

    you tell me what happens, you're the expert

    zzz

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:darling by Pyroja · · Score: 1

      Um, it'll work just fine.

      And you'll have an unlocked GPS.

      "Just did the 135 upgrade and everything looks fine on my VZW 8830." - As posted in that very same thread.

      Hell, I have the 9530, and Verizon's official OS is .75, yet I'm running .109. Not only do I have no issues, the phone is leaps and bounds better than before.

      If you're fine with the locked GPS and old firmware, stick with what you have. I pointed out that the GPS is unlocked. I am correct in that statement. Your trepidation in updating the software on your phone has nothing to do with the facts. Enjoy your locked GPS.

      --
      [Trojan.]
  138. so you're telling me by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    an os, for a different model phone, unapproved by verizon, from sprint, i download to my different model, different cell provider phone... i'll have no problems

    you're going to warranty that?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:so you're telling me by Pyroja · · Score: 1

      Ok, for one thing, it is for your phone. You have an 8830? This is for the 8830.

      On top of that, RIM makes the OS. Just because Verizon doesn't release it to you doesn't mean much of anything.

      Go on, update. Enjoy improved functionality.

      Or, y'know, don't.

      But don't claim that Verizon's evil for locking the GPS when, um... It's not locked.

      --
      [Trojan.]
  139. Where your wrong by bogie · · Score: 1

    "tells people being born in the US somehow makes you special and you don't have to work as hard."

    You think we don't work hard in the US? We work harder and longer hours with less vacation that any other civilized country. Americans are killing themselves working hard just like their parents did. Maybe now they take a bit longer to reach maturity but once they do, think 30 instead of early 20's, everyone I know pretty much works their asses off trying to get ahead. Then again I don't live where school boards fight Evolution, so maybe it's a Regional thing.

    Anyway there is for sure a sense of entitlement out there but most adults I know work plenty hard and are very much concerned about the state of this country and where its going. Neocons who constantly push for their own entitlements to the exclusion of all others obviously excluded.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  140. Nobi by nobihaya · · Score: 1

    HI I am Nobuyuki Hayashi (aka Nobi) referred in this article. I have to point out you are using the quote I have never mentioned. Perhaps, Brian, the author of Wired article thought I would never read his article but I did. After I blamed him for this, he redirected that "iPhone = lame" quote to Daiji Hirata which made him upset because he never said that either. :-( Anyway, to see how I really think iPhone is doing, read the post on my blog: http://blog.nobi.cc/ If you want to keep arguing the delusion about Japan, you can stay here. If you want to do a serious discussion, please come to my blog or quote from my blog and forget about that "iPhone look lame in Japan"; it's not just me and Daiji but I haven't seen one person in Japan who would say iPhone looks lame. And I have been lecturing how big a threat iPhone is to the Japanese handset manufacturers almost 4-5 times a month since Jan. 2008; I have shown the device to 12 months x 4 lectures x 150 or so people + many parties (I had one big iPhone party yesterday celebrating the launch of Evangelion application for iPhone and I will have another one tonight with 100+ people in Mita, Tokyo ).

    1. Re:Nobi by nobihaya · · Score: 1

      I saw a discussion about the size of manufactures in the comment; I have been so busy and tired since that Wired article came out and I don't feel like reading all the comments here. Let me tell you an interesting thing. Some of you may think Japan has advanced phones. Do you know how much worldwide market share they have? 5% is the share of all the Japanese handset manufacturers combined. SHARP is by far the largest in Japan and they have about 20% share here in Japan, which means SHARP'S worldwide share is about 1% = about the same (or less) than Apple. Do you still think they are serious competitor of iPhone?

  141. Alas, iPhone is not so hot by gevantry · · Score: 1

    Compared to most inexpensive cell phones in Japan, the iPhone is a few steps backwards in terms of its feature set. I have a better feature set with my Toshiba W45T. The only advantages to the iPhone are the touch screen and its built-in Wifi, but that is not enough to make it seriously competitive here in Japan. Even more problematic it its price tag: the phone itself is over-priced, and the service plans are likewise a joke.

  142. The proper retort to iPhone users... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    When confronted by an iPhone-brandishing evangelist, smile while pulling out your Android-running HTC Touch and tell them, "At least MY phone didn't have to be jailbroken to run whatever software I want"...

  143. correction by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    it is locked

    and has been locked

    by verizon

    for over a year

    but i know some troll on a message board who says it can be unlocked, by installing an unsupported os for a different phone model (oh no wait, sorry, same phone model, he says, even though its fucking NOT) from a competing cell company

    he guarantees its kosher and painless

    i think this is an iq test that i'm going to pass with flying colors, by passing on your glowing back alley offer

    how's that rub you?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  144. FYI, Some facts about the Japanese & the iPhon by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

    So there are a few crucial Japanese features that the iPhone totally lacks:

    1) Real time email: SMS is over in Japan. All phones send and receive EMAIL in REAL TIME for FREE.
    2) Phone wallet: Riding a train? Just cast your phone over the sensor. You can even buy drinks, or use it at some combini's. Your phone is an ATM. the iphone does not have this feature.
    3) Camera: The iPhone has a web cam that can only take stills in comparison.
    4) Bars: It is true, the AT&T equivalent of Japan has the sole distribution license. The reception... sucks. If Docomo sold the iphone, more would have bought it.

    The iphone has everything else, and then some. The iphone isn't really a phone. Everyone I know who owns one, keeps their regular phone. So they have two phones. So it's for those who can afford it as a second phone. And that makes not so many.

    In reality, the iPhone is thought of as a great new gadget/toy, but many simply question Apple and Softbank (the provider) their seriousness when it comes to competing with other mobile companies. Maybe Softbank though the iPhone had enough to make others give up features they depended on, but alas that was not the case. So many look at the situation as a huge screw up by Softbank for paying Apple so much for so many, when the product was insufficient to even replace existing phones.

    You can't really blame Apple for accepting a lucrative deal with little downside.

    The major discounts are due to the overstock that can't be returned or sold anywhere else for being SIM locked. At this point Softbank is just cutting their losses.

  145. My opinion about the origila article by hiratadaiji · · Score: 1

    Hi all,
    I'm Daiji Hirata, quoted in the WIRED article. I DO have a iPhone and I don't feel most Japanese hates the iPhone.
    When I read the article, iPhone = lame was as my words. I have NEVER said so. I have not have any contacts with the author by NOW. The author seems to have modified again after my comment in the article.
    I have written my opinion: http://daijihirata.com/aboutwiredarticle.html
    Thanks,
    Daiji Hirata.

  146. Think about nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't like phones made by NOKIA too. I don't Why. Just hate Japanese.

  147. The P905i is NOT CHEAP by mattr · · Score: 1

    Just to keep the record straight, I have a Panasonic P905i (carrier is NTT DoCoMo) which is great but it is easy to rack up serious monthly bills, I pay well over US$100 for mine (and forget roaming.. I spent $500 in a week in Europe). Of course with that I get everything the poster said, plus unlimited internet. There are some expensive streaming media channels too I don't subscribe too. The iPhone is quite nice looking, in particular the ability to get all your email on it is great. The P905I has a neat large screen that can fold out horizontally but still the email client only lets you see the top 15 lines or so of an email, which is silly. Anyway, the iPhone looks neat in other people's hands but not sure it is more compelling for me personally than if I had say a full keyboard. The things that have kept me getting anything besides the P905i are not wanting to have to use an onscreen keyboard to dial, wanting a good size screen, needing to roam overseas, etc. Also I got $100 off the list price from having a docomo phone for a couple years. But most women are buying KDDI's au brand which is cheaper and cuter. Businessmen are mostly docomo, I believe.

  148. Flamebait non-researched wrong data nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets start with Apple being third largest phone supplier with 20M phones. Have a look at the Gartner research here.

    I've got a lot more to say but got to cook lunch now. No matter how much you tell people to check their facts, they won't, and I've got a kid to feed.

  149. Wow! This is true! by Sits · · Score: 1

    My phone is an old monochrome Nokia and I've just tried what you explained after I went to the main menu. I can't get 1-2-1 to work (after the first 1 it seems to be waiting for more numbers e.g. to form 11) but the fact that there exists number shortcuts is spot on! I always wondered what those numbers at the top right of the screen meant...

    Thanks!

  150. Bingo! by primordial+ooze · · Score: 1

    Yeah AC, that was my (old techie) reaction as well. Along with - "What an irresponsible asshat, to drop a CRT into a regular trash bin". Around here (and I think in most of the US nowadays), that's a huge non-no - CRTs contain wicked amounts of heavy metals that are verboten in regular landfills, and the implosion risk aka a face full of glass shards to a trash collector (the professional, paid-to-do-it kind) is non-zero enough to warrant the proscription.

    If you'd tried to pull that stunt at the MIT Electronics flea mkt (third Sunday every month april-oct Albany st garage - best of its kind in North America), you'd been thrown out on your ass - for good.

  151. Is that you HAL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this a turing test? Is that you HAL?

  152. Feature rich Toilets by krischik · · Score: 1

    Oh, you can get them here in Europe as well. The important sentence here is

    as of 2004, are installed in more than half of Japanese households.

    I think that is pretty impressive.

  153. Even Obama things the US invented the car ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Obama's speech in both houses last week...

  154. Phones are for talking by bryan2008 · · Score: 1

    I realize there are many reasons why a person would need or want to do all the great things that are being discussed here and that's fantastic. But can I really be the only one who just uses his cell phone for making and receiving phone calls? I know this is /. and the discussion is about advanced phones, but I'm getting the vibe that everyone here thinks a phone without apps or touch screens or internet or feature #9 is somehow inferior. Is there anybody else here that still uses a plain Jane featureless phone?

  155. Brian Chen misquoted jp sources & silently edi by havill · · Score: 1

    Both Japanese sources quoted in the article were misrepresented.

    See

    http://blog.nobi.cc/2009/02/my-view-of-how-iphone-is-doing-in-japan-by-nobi-nobuyuki-hayashi.html

    and

    http://daijihirata.com/aboutwiredarticle.html

    for their rebuttals of Brian Chen's Wired blog entry.

    Nobi owns and uses an iPhone. I've seen him use it in person. The reason he was using a DoCoMo P905 in June 2008 is because the iPhone wasn't sold in Japan until July 2008.

  156. dont buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, they buy things like sony products which have had a history of being user friendly as dirt.

    much of the technology is poorly implemented. features that you don't use are useless.

  157. Well of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when you focus on the stupid logo for years ignoring the product, the product turns out as crap. Fortunatly you have the cult to buy it and make you feel good.

  158. Improve it!! by yotka · · Score: 1

    May be you feel rejectec by japanesses, but one thing is true, compared to japan you are in the third world. So do not feel offended if one of your tech products is rejectec. Improve it!!!

    --
    Lenny rules!
  159. Re: PreShifting & Debit by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I have never had anyone really steal my debit card, and I think I only lost it once.

    But when I visit bigger cities, I use a "trick card". It only has about $100 live on it, basically to cover monthly fees and some silly little munchie purchase.

    When I want to buy anything serious, the bank has a really good phone-transfer system that the petty thief won't know about, and couldn't crack in a day if he did. I simply transfer the big balance into the "Trick Card" as a one shot.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  160. Troll by French31 · · Score: 1
    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. --Ben Franklin
  161. he said, she said by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Who cares what a bunch of random talking heads say? The degree to which the Japanese like or hate is measured by market share.

  162. maddox said it best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone

      It is not only the Japanese who dont like iPhone.

      ~_~v

  163. Lets reTHink this by alexbox404 · · Score: 0

    well that sounds way to hard to do to only upload and download some files. I dont need to know any kind of Java skills or japanese language to be able to do that in my iphone. All its the program that you can dowload for Free . Put my computer IP address on the program of my device and i can control my fucking PC from the other side of the world! Im not saying that there is not cool Cellphones in Japan. im just saying that I know how to apreciate an amazing cellphone when i see it.

  164. Actually, the biggest problem by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    I think most critical fatal mistake Apple made when releasing this thing in Japan is that they didn't add a hole for attaching a wrist strap.

    Without that, if you want to hang dozens of little charms on your phone, you need a third-party case of some sort.

    Other than that, people here don't keep a phone very long or use many of the features. Lately I've been seeing a phone advertised on the basis of having some little piano keyboard app that looks suspiciously like the "Band" app for the iPhone. Who is really going to use that for more than a few minutes?

    Other than the TV tuners, I doubt many people actually use the clever features that are so touted when they bring out a phone here.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  165. Mod Parent Up, Please by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

    --
    -- My Weblog.