Both of you are wrong. AT&T is no more. The company named AT&T today is actually Southwestern Bell, which purchased the remnants of AT&T and then re-branded themselves in 2005.
The reality is that you are not a programmer, or at least not an experienced one, and that you are talking out your ass making statements that are absurdly untrue.
Yet here you are, acting like an expert. Fuck off you dishonest fuck.
Now I am reminded of a News Radio episode. The owner of the radio station, billionaire Jimmy James, wrote a book that sold poorly in America but the Japanese translation was a best seller in Japan. So he had the Japanese version translated back into English, which was now titled "Jimmy James Macho Business Donkey Wrester"
Given that the diameter of a silicon atom is around 0.2nm, that means they are now building transistors out of something like 30-35 atoms across.
Thats not how it works and it hasnt been that way for many generations.
The pitch of Intels latest "14nm" process is 42nm and the gate lengths are 20nm. These are the key values that indicate the transistors performance. The latest have a width of 8nm, which effects density but not so much performance.
Contrast that with Intels latest "10nm" process, which has a superior pitch of 34nm, but an unknown/unreported gate lengths. These test chips are slower than Intels latest 14nm so it is probably safe to assume that the gate lengths are actually terrible.
Intel loves the fact that their in-house math library is used in many benchmarks, that cripples performance on anything that doesnt report "GenuineIntel" via the PCUID instruction.
Not only is this a known fact, Intel lost a god damned lawsuit on this very issue.
Also, Intel 7nm chips will be superior to other "7nm" chips out there, since companies kind of just make up the numbers now. Intel 10nm = TMSC 7nm basically.
Any other Intel P.R. you want to spew?
Intel doesnt really have what Intel would call 10nm yet. There is no mass production, only test runs continually proving that mass production aint possible yet. If mass production aint possible, its just a showpiece. There is no way to know what transistor densities Intels 10nm would have because they dont have 10nm.
TSMC on the other hand is ramping up 7nm mass production as we speak. Intel now has a target and if that target is what they would call 10nm then they are fucked, because they still have to relax 10nm until its actually feasible. You have no idea what densities that will bring, but Intel marketing pretends to know and you are repeating the fantasy.
We are dealing with a specific persons specific comparison. Their comparison was that there was only one broadband provider, and it was slower than what most people are subscribed to.
Now, we can assume then that most of the people in the area have BETTER than the only broadband in the area, or the dishonest fuck is intentionally misleading on purpose because thats what dishonest fucks do.
I'd lay odds that the folks at facebook had posters and memos up telling employees to make them look good to glassdoor. I have worked for several companies that have asked their employees to "vote for us" for one industry bullshit award or another.
Most get a better connection / price via a smartphone / hotspot. ( assuming a tower is in the general vicinity )
You said there is only one provider...
...but then, only at the end, you say most people use another provider that is even faster. Make up your mind. Be honest, or continue getting called out as a dishonest fuck.
Slashdot Mirror
Both of you are wrong. AT&T is no more. The company named AT&T today is actually Southwestern Bell, which purchased the remnants of AT&T and then re-branded themselves in 2005.
Hope, the very worst thing to base support upon.
This is nothing more than another instance of a millennial having an old idea but thinking its new. They do it in every domain.
Are you sure this is always desirable? Coming up with instances in which it isn't should be a trivial exercise.
Thats why we got universal healthcare as promised by Obama.... oh... wait...
The future is nonworking links, but at least its open source? Is that what you are saying (your page dont load bro)?
What are you talking about? There were plenty of websites approved by Bobby!
uhhh... what?
Lets bring reality to this table of yours.
The reality is that you are not a programmer, or at least not an experienced one, and that you are talking out your ass making statements that are absurdly untrue.
Yet here you are, acting like an expert. Fuck off you dishonest fuck.
Do you even have the capacity to step back and look at yourself?
I've stepped back and looked at both of you.
To be very clear. You are on the ugly side of this, supporting, defending, and propagating malevolence.
Maybe it's because they made a mistake, or because they inventory items from 3rd party sellers who are less scrupulous, and you got that one.
1) Customer (A) returned item (X) as "broken."
2) Send (X) to customer (B) for confirmation that the item is broken.
3) Profit.
The Nazi's and Pedos are always #1 on the hit list. The people that support these hit lists dont realize that they are #2.
Hah my first thought was that Google is doing A/B testing.
Now I am reminded of a News Radio episode. The owner of the radio station, billionaire Jimmy James, wrote a book that sold poorly in America but the Japanese translation was a best seller in Japan. So he had the Japanese version translated back into English, which was now titled "Jimmy James Macho Business Donkey Wrester"
newsradio macho business donkey wrestler
This show was excellent. They had this idea before these translators existed.
Given that the diameter of a silicon atom is around 0.2nm, that means they are now building transistors out of something like 30-35 atoms across.
Thats not how it works and it hasnt been that way for many generations.
The pitch of Intels latest "14nm" process is 42nm and the gate lengths are 20nm. These are the key values that indicate the transistors performance. The latest have a width of 8nm, which effects density but not so much performance.
Contrast that with Intels latest "10nm" process, which has a superior pitch of 34nm, but an unknown/unreported gate lengths. These test chips are slower than Intels latest 14nm so it is probably safe to assume that the gate lengths are actually terrible.
Intel loves the fact that their in-house math library is used in many benchmarks, that cripples performance on anything that doesnt report "GenuineIntel" via the PCUID instruction.
Not only is this a known fact, Intel lost a god damned lawsuit on this very issue.
Also, Intel 7nm chips will be superior to other "7nm" chips out there, since companies kind of just make up the numbers now. Intel 10nm = TMSC 7nm basically.
Any other Intel P.R. you want to spew?
Intel doesnt really have what Intel would call 10nm yet. There is no mass production, only test runs continually proving that mass production aint possible yet. If mass production aint possible, its just a showpiece. There is no way to know what transistor densities Intels 10nm would have because they dont have 10nm.
TSMC on the other hand is ramping up 7nm mass production as we speak. Intel now has a target and if that target is what they would call 10nm then they are fucked, because they still have to relax 10nm until its actually feasible. You have no idea what densities that will bring, but Intel marketing pretends to know and you are repeating the fantasy.
Intel will now re-label their 10nm as 7nm.
And before you go there, Intel was the first company to lie about node size.
he thinks suburban is rural
When I compare them?
We are dealing with a specific persons specific comparison. Their comparison was that there was only one broadband provider, and it was slower than what most people are subscribed to.
Now, we can assume then that most of the people in the area have BETTER than the only broadband in the area, or the dishonest fuck is intentionally misleading on purpose because thats what dishonest fucks do.
These arent tax breaks targeted at the rich. These are taxes targeted at the rural and suburban populations.
The media is being unfair to Facebook.
According to a certain political party, facebook IS the media now.
I'd lay odds that the folks at facebook had posters and memos up telling employees to make them look good to glassdoor. I have worked for several companies that have asked their employees to "vote for us" for one industry bullshit award or another.
Most get a better connection / price via a smartphone / hotspot. ( assuming a tower is in the general vicinity )
You said there is only one provider...
...but then, only at the end, you say most people use another provider that is even faster. Make up your mind. Be honest, or continue getting called out as a dishonest fuck.
I suspect slashdotters wont be happy until broadband means being able to stream 4Kx4Kx4K voxel video to each member of the family.
The numbers say that most likely you are from a south east asian country. They are all shit-holes in comparison. Even the best of them.