So you have eloquently described the real problem, not the symptoms. Why don't you direct your energy and outrage at fixing the cause, instead of complaining about the symptom?
Is that because it would take less government intrusion and regulation? The FDA controlled by the drug companies - never forsaw that outcome! Gut the FDA.
What I mean is, that Americans that speak English at home, almost always cannot speak another language. Your interpretation of my phrasing proves my point, I think.
English is famously accretive. That does not change anything.
Inviting a person to make a sexual departure in another language does not count.
It struck me that Americans speak English as if it were their second language. Of course, it is their only language, but their fluency, vocabulary, cultural references, idioms and figures of speech are those of a non-native speaker.
The whole ethos of the IETF and the internet has always been for net neutrality.
The whole point of finesse is that the government does not tell people how to run their networks. So you have (deliberately?) misunderstood - they can do what the hell they want with the networks they built.
But at the same time, if they are providing some parody of the internet, then it is proper that they not mislead their customers. And if the state is protecting, supporting or subsidizing the provision of internet, they do not qualify.
The Internet is a set of agreed protocols and standards. If these protocols are not adhered to, then the service provided is not "Internet". It becomes something like the late, unlamented AOL.
So if an ISP violates net neutrality, like deep packet inspection, blocking ports, injecting data, prioritizing or blocking specific traffic, it is violating one or more of the protocols or standards.
In such a case, the ISP should lose all Safe Harbor protection, government subsidies and assistance, such as peering, right-of-way access, tax breaks and the like. Of course, under truth-in-advertising regulations, they may not use the word "internet" in advertising or describing their product.
"It lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it. While it lies there, it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it." - Learned Hand
On the contrary, there is no flaw. This is frustrating the NSA, which has asked eBay to be more Patriotic. Would be a shame if something were to happen to their nice website.
Slashdot Mirror
Let's start with the government, just to show good faith.
The solution already exists, and is already in use.
"Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the predator party?"
Use your vote to remove the rules, and the gold becomes useless because there is nothing to buy.
So you have eloquently described the real problem, not the symptoms. Why don't you direct your energy and outrage at fixing the cause, instead of complaining about the symptom?
Is that because it would take less government intrusion and regulation? The FDA controlled by the drug companies - never forsaw that outcome! Gut the FDA.
What I mean is, that Americans that speak English at home, almost always cannot speak another language. Your interpretation of my phrasing proves my point, I think.
English is famously accretive. That does not change anything.
Inviting a person to make a sexual departure in another language does not count.
It struck me that Americans speak English as if it were their second language. Of course, it is their only language, but their fluency, vocabulary, cultural references, idioms and figures of speech are those of a non-native speaker.
And Germans are using 10X as much as natives hiding in the Amazon rain forest. Shame on Germany!
The US has attempted to regulate cryptography as a "munition".
I therefore assert my Second Amendment right to use strong encryption.
The monorail of our time.
What do the other 224 do?
Buggy whips are gone, but the need for horsehoe nails remains.
Wake me up when women have to register for the draft, and their life expectancy is the same as that of men.
The whole ethos of the IETF and the internet has always been for net neutrality.
The whole point of finesse is that the government does not tell people how to run their networks. So you have (deliberately?) misunderstood - they can do what the hell they want with the networks they built.
But at the same time, if they are providing some parody of the internet, then it is proper that they not mislead their customers. And if the state is protecting, supporting or subsidizing the provision of internet, they do not qualify.
The Internet is a set of agreed protocols and standards. If these protocols are not adhered to, then the service provided is not "Internet". It becomes something like the late, unlamented AOL.
So if an ISP violates net neutrality, like deep packet inspection, blocking ports, injecting data, prioritizing or blocking specific traffic, it is violating one or more of the protocols or standards.
In such a case, the ISP should lose all Safe Harbor protection, government subsidies and assistance, such as peering, right-of-way access, tax breaks and the like. Of course, under truth-in-advertising regulations, they may not use the word "internet" in advertising or describing their product.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Remember two hours of groping, humiliation and 4th Amendment violation.
100 hundred years of US garbage will need a landfill 100 ft high, and 18 miles on each side.
People lose their minds over the landfill "problem", so it seems Mr. Musk is going to have a hard time convincing them to switch to solar.
If the President has to submit to this before boarding Air Force 1, then we are living in a Republic. If not, we are living in a feudal kingdom.
And nothing of value was lost.
You don't only get paid for what you do, you also get paid for your future potential and value to the company.
"It lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it. While it lies there, it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it." - Learned Hand
"I am worth what they pay me."
"I am an engineer."
"Users wish they knew who created this wonderful software."
When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.
On the contrary, there is no flaw. This is frustrating the NSA, which has asked eBay to be more Patriotic. Would be a shame if something were to happen to their nice website.
Does eBay/PayPay have a warrant canary?