Here's one informative site. However, be aware.. theres a whole lot of content on that subject, meditation, etc. Since I'm interested in that subject, it took me some time to read it and understand it all.
Sorry for not giving you more specific link, but meditation requires some more indepth knowledge.. so you don't actually waste your time. A lot of people just waste their time, because they aren't doing it right, and then they quit.
Re:More than scientific learning
on
LHC Success!
·
· Score: 1
Mistakes can happen...
Im not a 'doomsdayer', however, it's different experimenting with... I don't know, say stem cells, etc... and this.
Im not exactly sure what this thing does, Im a computer geek, so I won't talk about it, but I realized scientist, more often then not, are playing with dangerous stuff. They don't understand it, yet they play with it. They are arrogant. Nature and all that stuff are dangerous things, and if you poke it like this every so often it can come back bouncing on your head. More to the point... the heads of people that didn't do anything.
I understand this will (probably?) offer insight of how universe works, big bang... black hole, blabla... but if the risk is totally destroying everything ever existed, I think it's not worth it.
Maybe we will destroy ourselfs tomorrow, maybe never. As doomsdayers can't say the dooms day will occur, so you can't say it will not, unless you have the ability to see in the future.
My buddy few days ago, told me his flash/firefox is crashing all the time, however.. my firefox(iceweasel)/flash isn't crashing at all. I sometimes watch youtube for hours, opening 5-10 videos at the same time, everything works like a charm.
It only crashes when I open specific porno tube site, but I think it's not related to Flash, since in opera, it works ok.
Depends with what software they have been 'sniffing'.
SSID is broadcasted in 802.11 beacon frame, along with some other stuff.
So if you turn off the SSID broadcasting, you'r removing the SSID info from the body of beacon packet, so regardless you have traffic or no, your AP is gonna show up (without ssid so you will not know the name of ap) in something more advanced then netstubmler. Kismet for example.
I don't have anything against Amarok. There are cool features, and adding music and stuff is imho, better then in xmms..
What users want ? Well, if im not mistaken, users (and I mean joe average) want simplicity, effectivnes, and all that to look pretty.
Amarok is ugly for a music player.. This is maybe matter of opinion, however, I know quite a few people not wanting to use amarok just because of those reasons i mentioned.
It looks like a email client, its not really that simple (at first, but enough if theres a choice), its hogging down the computer (some are aware of this some are not, but most of Linux users are aware). Assuming of course, they are 'using' Linux and Amarok, not trying to see whats the hype with all this linux stuff, then after three days googling for how to remove it.
I noticed amarok have a lot of popularity, IMHO, that's only because there's no normal music player for Linux. You mentioned that ncurses music player and stuff.. Im not a zealot, what I want is music player that plays music, and have decent song/playlist management features. Looks nice and stuff... if I already use these fancy desktop enviroments like kde, gnome,...
Winamp 3 (i think.. the old simple one) was a success, and everyone used it... when they overbloated it with all that they have now, no one is using it anymore (at least not the people I know used it before). Or they install some light version that looks normal and acts as a music player. If they have a choice.
"I'm not saying you're wrong to want what you want, but you are wrong if you expect Amarok to give you that. That's not what it's there for."
That's fair enough. Im only speaking in the word of few people I know. So, why not address the issues, if the people who develop it are aware that they will probably do better, if they 'fix' it.
That will gain more popularity for their project and more support, and make everyone happier.
"I see this a lot on Slashdot, and I wonder... where do you keep your money? Banks are companies, as are brokerages. If you bought a house, there is a stunning amount of personal data stored with your realtor and title agency. Schools contain your entire academic record. Hell, the big 3 credit agencies have records that are very easy to access.
Why a mistrust for Google, but not these other services that people use so regularly? Or is everyone here just universally paranoid?:)"
Banks can do with my money whatever they like, I for one don't give a f, If they give me the money when I want that money. (Of course, its not 'moral' or whatever that they do with my money whatever they like, but... there you go)
With personal data, it's not the same... They can't find out anything about me with dealing with my money, they know only how much I have money. But they don't know what kind of porn I watch, or what im reading, or what someone is writing to me, or something.
Im not a national threat, so i have nothing to hide, but anyway, you wouldn't like to get your mail without envelope, stacked on a pile, where anyone can read it (especially if they WANT to read it), do you ?
Offtopic, however... I need to say this.. so mod me however you like.
1. Amarok looks like an e-mail client, not an music player (Yea, I know about Show player window but the option is barely usable). 2. It uses around 100 mb of RAM.
So if you'r a developer of amarok, instead of bloating it with uneccesary features and whatnot, you guys should work on minimizing RAM usage and speeding it up a bit. - If your already working on that, good.
Xmms was a way to go, but xmms lacked playlist management features, and it was not maintained properly, so it failed.
For the record, I use Amarok too, since Linux lacks better player now.
A lot of people think just the same about all this, so.. I think it needs to be said.
Try to accept the critic in a positive way, and please, stay away of 'ram is cheap' philosophy. People really don't want to waste 100 MB of ram, to listen music, but most of them aren't aware it uses that much ram. Its a music player for god sake..
In a few years, Linux will be slower then windows with all these apps eating ram, and not caring. Hell.. it already is.
IMHO, rhel should have tested this. If they announce offical new version of some app, and it turns out to brake stuff, then that's theirs fault.
Maybe admins should stop being lazy, and start installing 'network' services which are crucial server components, by hand, from source, which gives them more flexibility and control then rpm -i..
No ? Ok then, chrooting ?
I chroot my bind's, so, if I update, the rpm package can only mess up files like/etc/named.conf which I don't use, since all of config files are in/chroot/named/ and redhat isnt aware of that.
Binary file has a switch to start from chroot... you edit/etc/sysconfig/bind or something like that, and do/etc/init.d/named start - Thats it.
If you can easyli chroot some service (like named), then do it. You can only gain something from it.
Debian.
See:
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
And, if you'r interested after reading above, see:
http://www.debian.org/donations
Im not in anyway affiliated with Debian project, except I use it for every day work.
You asked to whom you might donate, so this is my opinion.. they contributed "much" to the Open Source community.
I know you'r not using Debian, but thats not the point. The point (imho) is in helping the Open Source and OS projects.
Right. I'll bet the Serbs said the same thing about Kosovo - and now look at them. Post WW2 the population of Kosovo was about half Serbian and half Albanian Muslim. Amazing, isn't it, given the ethnic cleansing of the native Albanian population by the Serbs under Milosevic. Interesting thing about Kosovo -- it was created as a province of Yugoslavia in 1945 to protect its ethnic Albanian majority. If it was ever half Serbian, it was so because native Kosovans were rounded up and executed. Or maybe you missed that? At any rate, the notion that it was half Serbian at the end of WW2 is poppycock. Albanians are a majority on Kosovo because, the Serbs where selling their land for unussualy high prices to Albanians, and moving to Belgrade, etc.
And because their typical family has 5 and more children and then those children have 5 and more of their own children.
Yeah, the illyrian people where on Kosovo first, and then Slavic people came and assimiliated them to what we know today as: Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro.
Albania didnt even exist.
It is almost the same as your country did to Indians, and is doing right now. Taking over by force and war land of other people.
Cleansing of Albanians on Kosovo ? Ok, true.
But when you say something like that, don't forget that Albanians also did some scary and messed up shit, and they are protected by your(American) government while doing that.
And we all know what's you government like, if you don't, then move to europe and watch the injustice your "country" commits to the rest of the planet for their own economical interest.
If you find yourself offended, so be it.
Im fucking sick of your false democracy, and of using "democracy" word as an excuse to attack other country's.
Whats wrong with asking question ? No matter how you'r good, or maybe you have some solutions and plans already, but asking a "slashdot" where majority of users are some kind of admins/programmers is not a bad thing, since you can learn something every day...
Almost every admin has its own style/way of doing stuff. Some are better, some are not that good, but they are all productive, so nothing wrong with asking.
Two heads are always smarter then one, no matter what your ego thinks about that.
.. believing is.. the same as not believing.
Since, you still believe. You believe that there's God or you believe that there isnt a God.
Anyway, objectivization of God is not good (but some people like that), and I think Einstein said that he don't believe in "the man on the sky with a beard", but he hasn't been specific about it.
Anyway, IMHO, the only true path is to doubt/question everything, but it's easyer to believe that someone is watching us, and that we will "live" after death, since it gives us a meaning and security.
... someone who knows how to do what I need.
Someone who is intelligent and bright, and someone who knows how to behave.
But, having thats not the case with other employers(from my experience).. I would suggest 'if you want to be in CS business' to go to tech school.
No man, you are talking about something I didnt write.
You talking about video and high bandwidth needs, but if you need high bandwidth need you don't take a 'cheap' package... you ask for more, you ask for best quality... money is no issue there. You are mentioning your customers, the people you sell something too.
You CANT expect for that to pay $15 USD.
Again, I don't mention exactly http vs p2p, im thinking http,ssh,voip,irc,im and others vs p2p.
The truth is again, 99 % of users dont download linux over torrent, they are downloading porn..
And, you can get reasonable speed using http get, at least I do whatever I download. On 'rare' occasions I cant download full speed.
Yes, but the majority of users don't understand that.
Don't forget we are not talking about slashdot users, we'r talking about joe average, who even don't know what 128kbps mean... they know what $15 usd mean, and what $50 usd mean, and they are not in hurry to download a movie since they have a monthly flat, they got a life besides computers and internet.
Having said that, Im doin' them a favor, not damaging them.
And if you say, yeah.. but what about one of them who knows ?
- Get used to it. Thats what democracy is. The majority are right, and the minority.. needs to adjust. Im a minority myself, in lots of stuff, and thats how world function, so If you want anything to do in a world yourself, you need to act the same, but of course, not to step on people and do really bad things, just to succed. And I don't mean succed in capitalistic context, but succed in making people generally happy, and helping them.
Those who want more, contact me, and I'll give you unlimited, but you will pay for it a little bit more, so you not affect the quality i try to provide for other users. Not a commercial, im long way from you guys, just trying to prove a point.
You are (partly) right. Basicly.. if I sell x mbps to you, you should be able to get it. In my case, I sell only 128kbps (p-t-mp, wifi) because my current infrastructure cant support more then that.
But, is p2p a priority or wikipedia (for example) ?
Aren't the point of 'internet' supposed to be a source of information and education, instead of 'fast' movie leeching ? I quoted fast, since I don't block p2p, only slow it down, since movie downloading is not a priority, nor it should be.
Im not excusing those actions, im talking about real world situations, where everything is not perfect.
Would you like better to have a 'decent' internet connection, or you want isps to delete firewall rules and not prioritize traffic, so in a year you get crappy internet connection which takes forever to download a clip from youtube ? or whatever.
You CAN get 'dedicated' internet link, where no one will shape your traffic, but it costs money, so if you want speed, you pay for it.
You cant drive a car with 1600ccm and expect it to go from 0-100kmh in a 5 seconds.
In my case, if I stoped shaping p2p, i would not be able to continue working, and 90 % of my users will lost a ISP that is providing them with cheap (and reliable, for that money) internet.
So you think about which is more important.
I suppose its the same with verizon or other isps, but different figures.
Maybe a little offtopic, but still relevant in some degree.
First of all.. Im tired of reading posts that bash isps. Of course, 99 % of isps suck, but not because they throttle bandwidth for p2p, youtube and rest, but for other reasons.
(Please try to be objective, while reading this...)
I own a little isp in my (suck ass) country. I give internet to the people for cheap prices, 128/128 kbps flat for $15/month (this is the cheapest net possible here).
It is really a problem when many users use p2p, since I need to pay to MY isp and im responsible to other users, who don't use p2p.
So, what I do.. I shape p2p using L7 filters to 64kbps (half od full user link) - in effort to provide the best quality to majority of users.
Ok.. if you want a non shaped full speed link for every protocol, let's say 512kbps.. no problem. I'll charge $400 usd (thats the standard here), but you cant expect to have the same 'position' as those users who don't use p2p, and need responsive http/ssh or other protocols.
Imagine isp with 100K users.. 70 % of them bashing the link with p2p leaving all day long active, and the rest of them bashing the link with youtube... thats unacceptable, not because of materialism, because of common sense. You all got high speeds for little money, and complain all the time... for god sake. You want quality, pay for it, and if you pay and your isp doesn't provide you with quality, sue them.
90 % of p2p traffic is illegal content sharing anyway (not saying agains it, im downloading often movies and other stuff, mainly because I cant buy it here).
Im giving net in good spirit, while everybody selled 128 kbps for 50 usd, i sold it for 15.. so if i shape p2p, you shouldnt bash me or other people because of it.
Be objective, and keep an open mind. Everyone got problems, including isps.
Of course.. I don't support sending RST packets to bitorrent ports.
Slashdot Mirror
.. your business doesn't depend on it.
Seriously .. powering down failover boxes or something like that is not wise thing to do.
Imagine in some fucked up situation, when your main systems goes down... you can't boot failover servers for some reason ... long fsck, or whatever.
You can power off the servers that aren't critical .. Why question on slashdot for that ?
Logic anyone ?
There is. I searched for that too.
Here's one informative site. However, be aware .. theres a whole lot of content on that subject, meditation, etc. Since I'm interested in that subject, it took me some time to read it and understand it all.
Here's the site: http://swamij.com/
Sorry for not giving you more specific link, but meditation requires some more indepth knowledge .. so you don't actually waste your time. A lot of people just waste their time, because they aren't doing it right, and then they quit.
Mistakes can happen...
Im not a 'doomsdayer', however, it's different experimenting with... I don't know, say stem cells, etc... and this.
Im not exactly sure what this thing does, Im a computer geek, so I won't talk about it, but I realized scientist, more often then not, are playing with dangerous stuff. They don't understand it, yet they play with it. They are arrogant.
Nature and all that stuff are dangerous things, and if you poke it like this every so often it can come back bouncing on your head. More to the point... the heads of people that didn't do anything.
I understand this will (probably?) offer insight of how universe works, big bang... black hole, blabla ... but if the risk is totally destroying everything ever existed, I think it's not worth it.
Maybe we will destroy ourselfs tomorrow, maybe never.
As doomsdayers can't say the dooms day will occur, so you can't say it will not, unless you have the ability to see in the future.
Yeah, I wanted to say almost the same thing.
My buddy few days ago, told me his flash/firefox is crashing all the time, however.. my firefox(iceweasel)/flash isn't crashing at all.
I sometimes watch youtube for hours, opening 5-10 videos at the same time, everything works like a charm.
It only crashes when I open specific porno tube site, but I think it's not related to Flash, since in opera, it works ok.
Iceweasel ver: 2.0.0.14
Flash ver: 9,0,31,0
According to:
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_15507
It's not the latest, but it works... so try that.
Depends with what software they have been 'sniffing'.
SSID is broadcasted in 802.11 beacon frame, along with some other stuff.
So if you turn off the SSID broadcasting, you'r removing the SSID info from the body of beacon packet, so regardless you have traffic or no, your AP is gonna show up (without ssid so you will not know the name of ap) in something more advanced then netstubmler. Kismet for example.
This has nothing to do with traffic amount.
I don't have anything against Amarok.
There are cool features, and adding music and stuff is imho, better then in xmms..
What users want ? Well, if im not mistaken, users (and I mean joe average) want simplicity, effectivnes, and all that to look pretty.
Amarok is ugly for a music player .. This is maybe matter of opinion, however, I know quite a few people not wanting to use amarok just because of those reasons i mentioned.
It looks like a email client, its not really that simple (at first, but enough if theres a choice), its hogging down the computer (some are aware of this some are not, but most of Linux users are aware). Assuming of course, they are 'using' Linux and Amarok, not trying to see whats the hype with all this linux stuff, then after three days googling for how to remove it.
I noticed amarok have a lot of popularity, IMHO, that's only because there's no normal music player for Linux.
You mentioned that ncurses music player and stuff.. Im not a zealot, what I want is music player that plays music, and have decent song/playlist management features.
Looks nice and stuff... if I already use these fancy desktop enviroments like kde, gnome,...
Winamp 3 (i think.. the old simple one) was a success, and everyone used it... when they overbloated it with all that they have now, no one is using it anymore (at least not the people I know used it before). Or they install some light version that looks normal and acts as a music player. If they have a choice.
"I'm not saying you're wrong to want what you want, but you are wrong if you expect Amarok to give you that. That's not what it's there for."
That's fair enough. Im only speaking in the word of few people I know. So, why not address the issues, if the people who develop it are aware that they will probably do better, if they 'fix' it.
That will gain more popularity for their project and more support, and make everyone happier.
"I see this a lot on Slashdot, and I wonder... where do you keep your money? Banks are companies, as are brokerages. If you bought a house, there is a stunning amount of personal data stored with your realtor and title agency. Schools contain your entire academic record. Hell, the big 3 credit agencies have records that are very easy to access.
Why a mistrust for Google, but not these other services that people use so regularly? Or is everyone here just universally paranoid? :)"
Banks can do with my money whatever they like, I for one don't give a f, If they give me the money when I want that money. (Of course, its not 'moral' or whatever that they do with my money whatever they like, but... there you go)
With personal data, it's not the same... They can't find out anything about me with dealing with my money, they know only how much I have money. But they don't know what kind of porn I watch, or what im reading, or what someone is writing to me, or something.
Im not a national threat, so i have nothing to hide, but anyway, you wouldn't like to get your mail without envelope, stacked on a pile, where anyone can read it (especially if they WANT to read it), do you ?
My data, my business...
Offtopic, however ... I need to say this .. so mod me however you like.
1. Amarok looks like an e-mail client, not an music player (Yea, I know about Show player window but the option is barely usable).
2. It uses around 100 mb of RAM.
So if you'r a developer of amarok, instead of bloating it with uneccesary features and whatnot, you guys should work on minimizing RAM usage and speeding it up a bit. - If your already working on that, good.
Xmms was a way to go, but xmms lacked playlist management features, and it was not maintained properly, so it failed.
For the record, I use Amarok too, since Linux lacks better player now.
A lot of people think just the same about all this, so.. I think it needs to be said.
Try to accept the critic in a positive way, and please, stay away of 'ram is cheap' philosophy.
People really don't want to waste 100 MB of ram, to listen music, but most of them aren't aware it uses that much ram. Its a music player for god sake..
In a few years, Linux will be slower then windows with all these apps eating ram, and not caring. .. it already is.
Hell
"I found at least one instance where they drove well unto private property, past a gate and no trespassing sign, and took photographs."
This is "breaking the law" too in america, am I right ?
Trespassing at the private property, taking pictures, and putting it on the web for whole world to see without permission.
IMHO, rhel should have tested this. If they announce offical new version of some app, and it turns out to brake stuff, then that's theirs fault. Maybe admins should stop being lazy, and start installing 'network' services which are crucial server components, by hand, from source, which gives them more flexibility and control then rpm -i.. No ? Ok then, chrooting ? I chroot my bind's, so, if I update, the rpm package can only mess up files like /etc/named.conf which I don't use, since all of config files are in /chroot/named/ and redhat isnt aware of that.
Binary file has a switch to start from chroot... you edit /etc/sysconfig/bind or something like that, and do /etc/init.d/named start - Thats it.
If you can easyli chroot some service (like named), then do it. You can only gain something from it.
Debian. See: http://www.debian.org/social_contract And, if you'r interested after reading above, see: http://www.debian.org/donations Im not in anyway affiliated with Debian project, except I use it for every day work. You asked to whom you might donate, so this is my opinion.. they contributed "much" to the Open Source community. I know you'r not using Debian, but thats not the point. The point (imho) is in helping the Open Source and OS projects.
Install your own smtp on your home adsl, or something. Put it on port .. lets say, 7856.
Tunnel that via SSH, or something else.
Problem solved. l;)
Whats wrong with asking question ? No matter how you'r good, or maybe you have some solutions and plans already, but asking a "slashdot" where majority of users are some kind of admins/programmers is not a bad thing, since you can learn something every day... Almost every admin has its own style/way of doing stuff. Some are better, some are not that good, but they are all productive, so nothing wrong with asking. Two heads are always smarter then one, no matter what your ego thinks about that.
.. believing is .. the same as not believing.
Since, you still believe. You believe that there's God or you believe that there isnt a God.
Anyway, objectivization of God is not good (but some people like that), and I think Einstein said that he don't believe in "the man on the sky with a beard", but he hasn't been specific about it.
Anyway, IMHO, the only true path is to doubt/question everything, but it's easyer to believe that someone is watching us, and that we will "live" after death, since it gives us a meaning and security.
I think RSBAC (linux kernel patch) covers that, and much more. http://www.rsbac.org/
Wasted 1 Billion. Never mind cpu time.
... someone who knows how to do what I need. Someone who is intelligent and bright, and someone who knows how to behave. But, having thats not the case with other employers(from my experience).. I would suggest 'if you want to be in CS business' to go to tech school.
Or.. they will reinstall windows, and fix the problem.. as usual. l:) /me hides
No man, you are talking about something I didnt write. You talking about video and high bandwidth needs, but if you need high bandwidth need you don't take a 'cheap' package... you ask for more, you ask for best quality... money is no issue there. You are mentioning your customers, the people you sell something too. You CANT expect for that to pay $15 USD. Again, I don't mention exactly http vs p2p, im thinking http,ssh,voip,irc,im and others vs p2p. The truth is again, 99 % of users dont download linux over torrent, they are downloading porn.. And, you can get reasonable speed using http get, at least I do whatever I download. On 'rare' occasions I cant download full speed.
Yes, but the majority of users don't understand that.
... they know what $15 usd mean, and what $50 usd mean, and they are not in hurry to download a movie since they have a monthly flat, they got a life besides computers and internet.
.. but what about one of them who knows ?
Don't forget we are not talking about slashdot users, we'r talking about joe average, who even don't know what 128kbps mean
Having said that, Im doin' them a favor, not damaging them.
And if you say, yeah
- Get used to it. Thats what democracy is. The majority are right, and the minority.. needs to adjust. Im a minority myself, in lots of stuff, and thats how world function, so If you want anything to do in a world yourself, you need to act the same, but of course, not to step on people and do really bad things, just to succed.
And I don't mean succed in capitalistic context, but succed in making people generally happy, and helping them.
Those who want more, contact me, and I'll give you unlimited, but you will pay for it a little bit more, so you not affect the quality i try to provide for other users.
Not a commercial, im long way from you guys, just trying to prove a point.
You are (partly) right. Basicly .. if I sell x mbps to you, you should be able to get it. In my case, I sell only 128kbps (p-t-mp, wifi) because my current infrastructure cant support more then that.
But, is p2p a priority or wikipedia (for example) ?
Aren't the point of 'internet' supposed to be a source of information and education, instead of 'fast' movie leeching ? I quoted fast, since I don't block p2p, only slow it down, since movie downloading is not a priority, nor it should be.
Im not excusing those actions, im talking about real world situations, where everything is not perfect.
Would you like better to have a 'decent' internet connection, or you want isps to delete firewall rules and not prioritize traffic, so in a year you get crappy internet connection which takes forever to download a clip from youtube ? or whatever.
You CAN get 'dedicated' internet link, where no one will shape your traffic, but it costs money, so if you want speed, you pay for it.
You cant drive a car with 1600ccm and expect it to go from 0-100kmh in a 5 seconds.
In my case, if I stoped shaping p2p, i would not be able to continue working, and 90 % of my users will lost a ISP that is providing them with cheap (and reliable, for that money) internet.
So you think about which is more important.
I suppose its the same with verizon or other isps, but different figures.
Maybe a little offtopic, but still relevant in some degree. First of all .. Im tired of reading posts that bash isps. Of course, 99 % of isps suck, but not because they throttle bandwidth for p2p, youtube and rest, but for other reasons.
(Please try to be objective, while reading this...)
I own a little isp in my (suck ass) country. I give internet to the people for cheap prices, 128/128 kbps flat for $15/month (this is the cheapest net possible here).
It is really a problem when many users use p2p, since I need to pay to MY isp and im responsible to other users, who don't use p2p.
So, what I do .. I shape p2p using L7 filters to 64kbps (half od full user link) - in effort to provide the best quality to majority of users.
Ok .. if you want a non shaped full speed link for every protocol, let's say 512kbps .. no problem. I'll charge $400 usd (thats the standard here), but you cant expect to have the same 'position' as those users who don't use p2p, and need responsive http/ssh or other protocols.
Imagine isp with 100K users .. 70 % of them bashing the link with p2p leaving all day long active, and the rest of them bashing the link with youtube... thats unacceptable, not because of materialism, because of common sense. You all got high speeds for little money, and complain all the time ... for god sake. You want quality, pay for it, and if you pay and your isp doesn't provide you with quality, sue them.
90 % of p2p traffic is illegal content sharing anyway (not saying agains it, im downloading often movies and other stuff, mainly because I cant buy it here).
Im giving net in good spirit, while everybody selled 128 kbps for 50 usd, i sold it for 15 .. so if i shape p2p, you shouldnt bash me or other people because of it.
Be objective, and keep an open mind. Everyone got problems, including isps.
Of course.. I don't support sending RST packets to bitorrent ports.