Why would he drop exception management? It's real pain to figure out when something goes wrong without it. By default most python funcs throw an exception that can only be ignored explicitly, and if it ends up unhandled a useful error message with backtrace will be printed.
The security practice is about not telling whether you got username or password wrong, to avoid revealing existing account names to possible attackers. However if username/password combo is correct then there is no security reason for the system to hide the fact that account was disabled. Telling the real reason of login failure would save the now known authentic user possible futile attempts to reenter password thinking that he made a typo.
I still don't see what makes Putin tyrannical. Like to be tyrannical you need to be unpopular among actual people, and drive extremely unpopular policies. And he's pretty moderate in that respect. Nothing that he didn't do that wasn't copied from EU or US. In fact that's my problem with him: dumb copying of foreign laws, even those that don't work. Like the right to be forgotten. And I don't consider Ukraine situation to be genuine expansionism. Both countries are artificial formations on territory of Rus. They're like partitioned Germany. If Germany re-merged then I don't see why Rus won't.
They can do deep packet inspection and detect protocols, but it can be stopped by tunneling via some other protocol that can't be disabled, such as ssh or https. They can go for vpn services, but it's relatively easy to make new one after previous were shut down.
Well, but my point is that Japan was basically a paper tiger compared to european powers. It would serve as a good distraction to destroy USSR if they didn't do a dumb thing and go for US instead. And if not for Perl Harbor US would be content to watch USSR burn. US basically engaged the weakest enemy and helped in other theaters mostly with material aid until the outcome was clear. Their contribution shows them as masters of intrigue and deception who have their ass always covered. Not that there's anything wrong with that.. But that doesn't mean I should help them to maintain their spin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... - not something I could call briefest interaction. As far as scale is concerned this is comparable to european theaters. Germany and Japan could definitely wipe out USSR by working together, but Japanese alone were nothing more than training dummies for Zhukov to practice his military command skills on.
They ignored it because they believe that Russians are Untermenschen and have no right of initiative in such matters and silly Putin doesn't deserve anything more than scorn for thinking otherwise or trying to act like it.
Can there even be a hard evidence? The word "interfere" can have many connotations, especially in context of global politics. Like strictly speaking one nation can't even do actions like that because a nation is not a single individual but rather a set of individuals all with distinct agendas.
We should get used to always using genderless pronouns (singular "them") to refer to people because soon people will be changing genders so often that notion of gender will be obsolete. I admire the bravery of mr(s) Manning and hope all will work out well for them.
Actual Russians wouldn't ever care about who POTOS is. Maybe a couple Russian nationals contributed to it for the lulz but real troll has no nationality. They act in multi-national teams.
To say there was a designated outcome is facile. There was a leave campaign for Brexit (as well as a remain one) run by a bunch of the people in power. They called it the official campaign and lied egregiously.
But it was said many times(even you confirm it) that people in power who contributed to "leave" campaign didn't expect it to succeed and participated in it as part of a political game. This is exactly what makes me think that that vote was fake. Both "remain" and "leave" were created by competing parts of the Establishment as part of a political game and even leavers didn't really want it. You can consider the outcome to be vote of non-confidence for both of those factions. Same applies to Trump. In course of their political games reps and dems decided that Hilary becomes the Queen next, so they pruned the candidates accordingly. Kicked out Bernie and chose Trump as second candidate as he was considered too politically incorrect to be elected. And other parties weren't considered because the public is conditioned to never vote for them to avoid "wasting" their votes. They could as well not exist.
Both Brexit and Trump are examples of votes where there were designated "right" solution and designated "wrong" solution. If the "wrong" decision is objectively wrong then there's no need to put it into the ballots in the first place. So any vote that have only one designated right option is not vote at all, and shouldn't have happened in the first place. So you may consider that people chose "wrong" option as protest against this false democracy. If people's votes don't matter then there's no way they could make a stupid vote, or any meaningful vote at all beside a vote of non-confidence.
I disagree that it detracts. In fact I wouldn't notice anything like this. Most people have quirks like this and any adult person wouldn't notice, unless pointed to it on the purpose to find stupid and childish excuse for abuse.
Russian writing is a lot more phonetic than English. Rules are a lot more logical, to the point you actually have a chance to pronounce a word properly based only on how it's written without knowing it. While English is full of silly rules like 'i' for some reason reading like 'ay' in some context and like 'i' in others.
One could simply modify a HDCP TV to extract deobfuscated image. From what I can tell that spec treats playback devices as black boxes expecting device manufacturers to implement such details with mere contractual obligations compelling them so. And newer tvs have full featured OSes on them that could be attacked with exploits and controlled. Not to mention it's always possible to modify the hardware if you have physical access.. Also HDCP was repeatedly broken in different ways. It's possible to even make an HDMI adapter that strips HDCP obfuscation.
What's so hard about it? Such a disk is basically "a locked box with key supplied along with it". Otherwise nobody would be able to play those disks. To torrent it is basically a matter of deploying a tap somewhere in playback chain. It's utterly impossible to prevent this without making the disk unplayable. Though cracking of the scheme is a distinct possibility too. It's basically an overcomplicated layer of obfuscation, and the more complex the scheme is the more likely it would contain some mishap that would compromise entire scheme.
No idea why anyone would ever suggest 1AU. Obviously you'd make it as small as possible while not getting trashed by destructive power of solar wind, probably a lot smaller than Mercury's orbit.
How would throwing money at this problem solve anything? There's absolutely no guarantee that money will actually make it to people capable and willing to accomplish this. Not to mention it takes forever for a rocket to make it to Mars, and those trips are kinda useless anyway. Which is kinda heart of the issue. Why attempt this in the first place? Not a lot of useful and/or fun stuff you can do there. Even communications with Earth will be subject to several minutes of delay due to speed of light being finite. Like you send a tcp/ip packet to Earth and can ever get reply to it only in 4 minutes or so. That for sure would make accessing Earth based networks REALLY annoying.
Slashdot Mirror
9% a lot lower that can be expected for a muslim country given that ISIS is the kalifate reborn.
Why would he drop exception management? It's real pain to figure out when something goes wrong without it. By default most python funcs throw an exception that can only be ignored explicitly, and if it ends up unhandled a useful error message with backtrace will be printed.
The security practice is about not telling whether you got username or password wrong, to avoid revealing existing account names to possible attackers. However if username/password combo is correct then there is no security reason for the system to hide the fact that account was disabled. Telling the real reason of login failure would save the now known authentic user possible futile attempts to reenter password thinking that he made a typo.
I still don't see what makes Putin tyrannical. Like to be tyrannical you need to be unpopular among actual people, and drive extremely unpopular policies. And he's pretty moderate in that respect. Nothing that he didn't do that wasn't copied from EU or US. In fact that's my problem with him: dumb copying of foreign laws, even those that don't work. Like the right to be forgotten. And I don't consider Ukraine situation to be genuine expansionism. Both countries are artificial formations on territory of Rus. They're like partitioned Germany. If Germany re-merged then I don't see why Rus won't.
They can do deep packet inspection and detect protocols, but it can be stopped by tunneling via some other protocol that can't be disabled, such as ssh or https. They can go for vpn services, but it's relatively easy to make new one after previous were shut down.
NATO won't bother invading Kazakhstan because there is not enough oil there.
Well, but my point is that Japan was basically a paper tiger compared to european powers. It would serve as a good distraction to destroy USSR if they didn't do a dumb thing and go for US instead. And if not for Perl Harbor US would be content to watch USSR burn. US basically engaged the weakest enemy and helped in other theaters mostly with material aid until the outcome was clear. Their contribution shows them as masters of intrigue and deception who have their ass always covered. Not that there's anything wrong with that.. But that doesn't mean I should help them to maintain their spin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... - not something I could call briefest interaction. As far as scale is concerned this is comparable to european theaters. Germany and Japan could definitely wipe out USSR by working together, but Japanese alone were nothing more than training dummies for Zhukov to practice his military command skills on.
They ignored it because they believe that Russians are Untermenschen and have no right of initiative in such matters and silly Putin doesn't deserve anything more than scorn for thinking otherwise or trying to act like it.
I'm pretty sure there's an app for prostitution too..
Also don't forget quantum mechanics. Everything that is below electrons and protons isn't even directly observable.
Can there even be a hard evidence? The word "interfere" can have many connotations, especially in context of global politics. Like strictly speaking one nation can't even do actions like that because a nation is not a single individual but rather a set of individuals all with distinct agendas.
We should get used to always using genderless pronouns (singular "them") to refer to people because soon people will be changing genders so often that notion of gender will be obsolete. I admire the bravery of mr(s) Manning and hope all will work out well for them.
Isn't it easier to just apply anti-monopoly laws/RICO to organizations and government structures engaged in such exclusive agreements?
Actual Russians wouldn't ever care about who POTOS is. Maybe a couple Russian nationals contributed to it for the lulz but real troll has no nationality. They act in multi-national teams.
It would be as wasteful as voting for non dem-rep party
To say there was a designated outcome is facile. There was a leave campaign for Brexit (as well as a remain one) run by a bunch of the people in power. They called it the official campaign and lied egregiously.
But it was said many times(even you confirm it) that people in power who contributed to "leave" campaign didn't expect it to succeed and participated in it as part of a political game. This is exactly what makes me think that that vote was fake. Both "remain" and "leave" were created by competing parts of the Establishment as part of a political game and even leavers didn't really want it. You can consider the outcome to be vote of non-confidence for both of those factions. Same applies to Trump. In course of their political games reps and dems decided that Hilary becomes the Queen next, so they pruned the candidates accordingly. Kicked out Bernie and chose Trump as second candidate as he was considered too politically incorrect to be elected. And other parties weren't considered because the public is conditioned to never vote for them to avoid "wasting" their votes. They could as well not exist.
Both Brexit and Trump are examples of votes where there were designated "right" solution and designated "wrong" solution. If the "wrong" decision is objectively wrong then there's no need to put it into the ballots in the first place. So any vote that have only one designated right option is not vote at all, and shouldn't have happened in the first place. So you may consider that people chose "wrong" option as protest against this false democracy. If people's votes don't matter then there's no way they could make a stupid vote, or any meaningful vote at all beside a vote of non-confidence.
I disagree that it detracts. In fact I wouldn't notice anything like this. Most people have quirks like this and any adult person wouldn't notice, unless pointed to it on the purpose to find stupid and childish excuse for abuse.
Russian writing is a lot more phonetic than English. Rules are a lot more logical, to the point you actually have a chance to pronounce a word properly based only on how it's written without knowing it. While English is full of silly rules like 'i' for some reason reading like 'ay' in some context and like 'i' in others.
One could simply modify a HDCP TV to extract deobfuscated image. From what I can tell that spec treats playback devices as black boxes expecting device manufacturers to implement such details with mere contractual obligations compelling them so. And newer tvs have full featured OSes on them that could be attacked with exploits and controlled. Not to mention it's always possible to modify the hardware if you have physical access.. Also HDCP was repeatedly broken in different ways. It's possible to even make an HDMI adapter that strips HDCP obfuscation.
What's so hard about it? Such a disk is basically "a locked box with key supplied along with it". Otherwise nobody would be able to play those disks. To torrent it is basically a matter of deploying a tap somewhere in playback chain. It's utterly impossible to prevent this without making the disk unplayable. Though cracking of the scheme is a distinct possibility too. It's basically an overcomplicated layer of obfuscation, and the more complex the scheme is the more likely it would contain some mishap that would compromise entire scheme.
No idea why anyone would ever suggest 1AU. Obviously you'd make it as small as possible while not getting trashed by destructive power of solar wind, probably a lot smaller than Mercury's orbit.
How would throwing money at this problem solve anything? There's absolutely no guarantee that money will actually make it to people capable and willing to accomplish this. Not to mention it takes forever for a rocket to make it to Mars, and those trips are kinda useless anyway. Which is kinda heart of the issue. Why attempt this in the first place? Not a lot of useful and/or fun stuff you can do there. Even communications with Earth will be subject to several minutes of delay due to speed of light being finite. Like you send a tcp/ip packet to Earth and can ever get reply to it only in 4 minutes or so. That for sure would make accessing Earth based networks REALLY annoying.
Can you also make LEDs and power button?