A human could easily misinterpret your first question as asking for an explanation of what windchill factors are about or fail to understand your second question. Try asking for the current wind chill or heat index, and what your monthly payment would be if that's what you want.
their stores are effectively closed to people who can't get a credit card
Take $25, deposit it to open a free checking account at your local credit union, and they'll give you a visa or mastercard debit card you can use as credit. We need to figure out who these people are who can't do that, and address their problems. Maybe it's difficult for illegal immigrants to open an account? Not sure who else.
One option is a state or national credit union, with post offices serving as banks.
This is Microsoft's play to take control of the browser people use. They offer an Edge that works just like Chrome, so lazy Windows users go ahead and use their default Edge instead of installing Chrome. Once they've got 80% market share back, they can fork Chromium to add Windows-only components and get websites to implement those, and ta-da they've got lock-in again like in the good old ActiveX days.
The news is that it's not news: that is, the news is that the fire had nothing to do with Tesla batteries. In other news, SpaceX isn't responsible for the recent Soyuz failures and Elon Musk didn't eat a baby.
The genius of it is you only have to heat the sidewalks for the first few years. After that, the emissions from doing so make Toronto too warm for ice.
It's 1.66% of China's population. Pointing out that 23 million is a large percentage of the USA population is an absurd attempt at disinformation.
For an equivalent group in the USA, we might look at people whose right to vote (and to hold a lot of jobs) has been revoked due to a previous felony conviction. As of 2016, 2.5% of the USA's voting age population was barred from voting due to a felony -- if you spread that out over the full population, it'd be just a little more than than China's socially discredited group. Considering China imprisons far fewer people, social credit may be seen as an alternative punishment for that population.
(Of course, the entire Chinese population lacks the right to meaningful voting.)
Yea but the revolutionary breakthrough here is that Google found a way to patent it so now nobody else can do it anymore without paying them royalties.
That's not Google's business model, never has been. Since it's going into Chromium, Google is open sourcing it.
It does cost a lot of money to patent something, so it's not something one does on a whim. It may be something a scammer feels will pay off in lending a seeming endorsement to the scam, though.
One can obviously be against the planet's biggest unnecessary war production machine without being against all possible wars. I'm all for wars of defense, and even wars to defend friendly NATO countries which have been invaded. Decades of isolation and a firm anti-war commitment even after close allies were invaded did not lead to the USA being conquered when the Japanese attacked in 1941... or even losing an inch of valuable land for a day. Even if the USA completely disarmed (which it shouldn't), invading it would be suicide for any nation. So spare me any utterly ridiculous claims that the USA had to bomb Iraq because it was scared of Hussein, or the like.
Sanctions are usually simply a means to produce war, or soften the enemy for invasion. Sometimes that's bad, other times it may be acceptable to make an aggressive power tip their hand -- like how American oil sanctions forced Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.
Microsoft employees didn't know they were signing up for a "defense" contractor. If they'd been informed of that, they may not have taken the job. They've every right to object or quit now that they've found out.
You know the Kurds hate the US, right? Because in the first Gulf war they were strongly encouraged to rise up against Saddam by the US when the US invaded. Then the US just kinda fucked off and let Saddam slaughter them.
You must have completely confused Kurds with Shia, because the USA did a hell of a lot to protect the Kurds from Hussein: a no-fly zone that allowed them to become a de-facto independent nation after the first gulf war (and immediately start slaughtering each other in a civil war, but that wasn't the fault of the USA).
The first gulf war itself would've been unnecessary if the USA hadn't encouraged Iraqi aggression for the previous decade, but get your facts straight.
Being a pretty young woman has always been a great marketing tactic. If people start invested in companies run by hideous 70 year old women, then it'll either be progress or political correctness.
The Earth is rotating at about 1000 miles per hour toward the east. Launching against that rotation naturally requires more thrust to reach orbital velocity than launching with it.
Private company SpaceIL which happens to be Israeli launches spacecraft to the moon from SpaceX Falcon 9. The country of Israel didn't do it, and SpaceX only launched them to Earth orbit with the private vehicle performing the lunar orbit and landing in the coming months.
If an immigration crisis that peaked 20 years ago is a national emergency too urgent to wait for congress, the next president can declare the origin of the universe a 14 billion year national emergency too urgent to wait for congress.
Taxes on profits are passed on to shareholders... but never to employees or customers, obviously. If there was more money to be made from charging customers more or paying employees less, they'd be doing it already for more profit. Corporations do not ever leave profit on the table and decide to be philanthropic just because they've hit a particular profit target already.
A 100% tax on corporate profits would be ideal if it weren't for the need to encourage capital investment by shareholders for growth. Corporations are legal constructs designed by government, required by their charters required to theoretically serve the public interest. Shareholders have not earned money in the way in the way employees (and most customers) have, so they should only be allowed to keep it to the extent that proves beneficial to society as a whole (via a growing economy).
Israel has plenty of experience murdering people (nuclear scientists) in Iran. No drones required -- they used magnetic bombs, bullets and poison. Probably with the help of the MEK terrorist cult the USA supports and funds.
Safer and cheaper for sure, but in no way are they faster or better. Opportunity took 15 years to travel 28 miles, a human runner can do it in under 3 hours. The rate of science that can be done by a rover is also quite glacial compared to a human who can set up a laboratory and innovate new tools and make much more complex decisions in real time without a 20 minute speed of light lag.
With the current state of rockets, I'd rather spend the money on lots of robotic missions. But if for example the BFR works out and gives us an economical way to get large masses to Mars, it will make sense to send a few people -- assuming they're happy to accept the unsafeness.
Slashdot Mirror
A human could easily misinterpret your first question as asking for an explanation of what windchill factors are about or fail to understand your second question. Try asking for the current wind chill or heat index, and what your monthly payment would be if that's what you want.
If I choose to have Amazon donate to the charitable wing of Islamic State (which kills fewer Americans than anti-vaxxers), then they should?
Take $25, deposit it to open a free checking account at your local credit union, and they'll give you a visa or mastercard debit card you can use as credit. We need to figure out who these people are who can't do that, and address their problems. Maybe it's difficult for illegal immigrants to open an account? Not sure who else.
One option is a state or national credit union, with post offices serving as banks.
This is Microsoft's play to take control of the browser people use. They offer an Edge that works just like Chrome, so lazy Windows users go ahead and use their default Edge instead of installing Chrome. Once they've got 80% market share back, they can fork Chromium to add Windows-only components and get websites to implement those, and ta-da they've got lock-in again like in the good old ActiveX days.
Solar and wind both lead to a lot of excess capacity at certain times of day.
The problem is making the process pay for itself, because otherwise no company will bother just to save their grandkids' money/lives.
The news is that it's not news: that is, the news is that the fire had nothing to do with Tesla batteries. In other news, SpaceX isn't responsible for the recent Soyuz failures and Elon Musk didn't eat a baby.
The genius of it is you only have to heat the sidewalks for the first few years. After that, the emissions from doing so make Toronto too warm for ice.
It's 1.66% of China's population. Pointing out that 23 million is a large percentage of the USA population is an absurd attempt at disinformation.
For an equivalent group in the USA, we might look at people whose right to vote (and to hold a lot of jobs) has been revoked due to a previous felony conviction. As of 2016, 2.5% of the USA's voting age population was barred from voting due to a felony -- if you spread that out over the full population, it'd be just a little more than than China's socially discredited group. Considering China imprisons far fewer people, social credit may be seen as an alternative punishment for that population.
(Of course, the entire Chinese population lacks the right to meaningful voting.)
That's not Google's business model, never has been. Since it's going into Chromium, Google is open sourcing it.
The effect is the same -- but the government can only order you to shut up, it can't order you actively tell lies to people. For now.
It does cost a lot of money to patent something, so it's not something one does on a whim. It may be something a scammer feels will pay off in lending a seeming endorsement to the scam, though.
So what you're saying is you think there's a chance of space monsters lurking under the surface in the center of asteroids?
One can obviously be against the planet's biggest unnecessary war production machine without being against all possible wars. I'm all for wars of defense, and even wars to defend friendly NATO countries which have been invaded. Decades of isolation and a firm anti-war commitment even after close allies were invaded did not lead to the USA being conquered when the Japanese attacked in 1941... or even losing an inch of valuable land for a day. Even if the USA completely disarmed (which it shouldn't), invading it would be suicide for any nation. So spare me any utterly ridiculous claims that the USA had to bomb Iraq because it was scared of Hussein, or the like.
Sanctions are usually simply a means to produce war, or soften the enemy for invasion. Sometimes that's bad, other times it may be acceptable to make an aggressive power tip their hand -- like how American oil sanctions forced Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.
Microsoft employees didn't know they were signing up for a "defense" contractor. If they'd been informed of that, they may not have taken the job. They've every right to object or quit now that they've found out.
You must have completely confused Kurds with Shia, because the USA did a hell of a lot to protect the Kurds from Hussein: a no-fly zone that allowed them to become a de-facto independent nation after the first gulf war (and immediately start slaughtering each other in a civil war, but that wasn't the fault of the USA).
The first gulf war itself would've been unnecessary if the USA hadn't encouraged Iraqi aggression for the previous decade, but get your facts straight.
Being a pretty young woman has always been a great marketing tactic. If people start invested in companies run by hideous 70 year old women, then it'll either be progress or political correctness.
The Earth is rotating at about 1000 miles per hour toward the east. Launching against that rotation naturally requires more thrust to reach orbital velocity than launching with it.
Private company SpaceIL which happens to be Israeli launches spacecraft to the moon from SpaceX Falcon 9. The country of Israel didn't do it, and SpaceX only launched them to Earth orbit with the private vehicle performing the lunar orbit and landing in the coming months.
Humans can't tell if a crossing guard is legitimate or is just impersonating a crossing guard. Oh no!
https://xkcd.com/1958/
The hell do you do to destroy your jeans in 6 weeks? I buy $15 jeans off amazon and they always last years.
If an immigration crisis that peaked 20 years ago is a national emergency too urgent to wait for congress, the next president can declare the origin of the universe a 14 billion year national emergency too urgent to wait for congress.
Taxes on profits are passed on to shareholders... but never to employees or customers, obviously. If there was more money to be made from charging customers more or paying employees less, they'd be doing it already for more profit. Corporations do not ever leave profit on the table and decide to be philanthropic just because they've hit a particular profit target already.
A 100% tax on corporate profits would be ideal if it weren't for the need to encourage capital investment by shareholders for growth. Corporations are legal constructs designed by government, required by their charters required to theoretically serve the public interest. Shareholders have not earned money in the way in the way employees (and most customers) have, so they should only be allowed to keep it to the extent that proves beneficial to society as a whole (via a growing economy).
Israel has plenty of experience murdering people (nuclear scientists) in Iran. No drones required -- they used magnetic bombs, bullets and poison. Probably with the help of the MEK terrorist cult the USA supports and funds.
Safer and cheaper for sure, but in no way are they faster or better. Opportunity took 15 years to travel 28 miles, a human runner can do it in under 3 hours. The rate of science that can be done by a rover is also quite glacial compared to a human who can set up a laboratory and innovate new tools and make much more complex decisions in real time without a 20 minute speed of light lag.
With the current state of rockets, I'd rather spend the money on lots of robotic missions. But if for example the BFR works out and gives us an economical way to get large masses to Mars, it will make sense to send a few people -- assuming they're happy to accept the unsafeness.
Dolphins aren't fish.