I have a daughter as well, and I want you to keep your bullshit laws off my children. Just because you're a lazy parent doesn't mean you get to tell me how to do my job.
Perhaps, but find someone who actually uses in that context rather than simply a bastardization of the word 'orientation' instead of using 'orient' as they should.
Then why did you even bother to bring the educational value of material into the argument? You stated that Pirates of the Carribean is not educational, and therefore not protected. I simply stated that thousands of fiction books are not educational either, yet still seem to be loaned out by libraries without being sued by publishers for infringement. If that's not part of your argument, why did you bring it up in the first place?
As for making a copy, every time you view a page of a book, you've made a copy of that book on the back of your retina. It's only temporary, but it is a copy. If someone only downloaded shared files to a RAM drive, would that be protected? It's as temporary as that copy in your mind is.
So those shelves filled with thousands upon thousands of fiction books are educational? If the test is "Is this materials educational" then almost every public library is committing copyright violations daily.
Yes, plays aren't spliced together afterwards. But I'll warn you up front, those little kids on state aren't really English ragamuffins. They're only pretending. I know, I was as shocked as you are, but plays aren't really real either.
Read the whole quote: "one on one personalized service"
Perhaps you're looking for the word "personable" not "personal". Hearing a voice on the radio could be considered personable, but there's definitely nothing "one on one" or "personal" about it.
There doesn't necessarily have to be a master file with instructions on how to rebuild it from the pieces. Some format similar to a doubly linked list where each piece knew which one went before and after it would be enough to rebuild a file from many small pieces.
Where'd you get the notion that libertarians care about nothing but themselves? Libertarians simply believe that maximum individual freedom is how you care for people. Not authoritarian edicts.
You're just making up shit now, you're not even attempting to discuss anything resembling reality.
Do you honestly think that government agencies continue to exist beyond their usefulness because the hordes of paper shufflers are scared of being poor? Let's get real. Those agencies don't self perpetuate due to the nameless masses employed by them, they do it because of the people at the top of those pyramids love the power they wield.
Yeah, because, ya know, poor college kids never plaster advertisements around big cities. I've never seen thousands of concert flyers for some little indie band glued to buildings and poles. Doesn't happen. It's just the evil corporations that litter and advertise.
The free market does take care of itself. The problem is that we haven't had a truly free market since the government started choosing economic winners and losers through tax laws and business subsidies.
Then maybe you should see about getting a referendum started to raise taxes for your local schools. I learned about Japanese internment camps in high school. There was no sinister cover-up.
As long as we're treating real life like Hollywood, why can't we just ask McBain to fly through the air like Neo and catch the fleeing criminals in the act. No GPS required.
I have it on good authority that MtViewGuy is a terrorist planning to blow something up. Now, I'm not 100% positive on that, in fact I could be completely wrong. But we can't take any chances can we?
You're exactly the kind of idiot that terrorists love.
Total cost of ownership? What the fuck are babbling about? Does a hybrid somehow go through fewer wiper blades and tires? The only way a hybrid will save you $14,000 over five years is if the damn thing uses NO FUEL OR OIL.
This is my last response, and I only replied this time just in case anybody happens to read your bullshit and think it's any way factual. I feel compelled to expose bullshit when I see it. But arguing about this further with someone of your stunted intelligence is just an exercise in futility.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly. See how I simply upload this audio file to a server which then decodes it and sends it back to my speakers...
I have a daughter as well, and I want you to keep your bullshit laws off my children. Just because you're a lazy parent doesn't mean you get to tell me how to do my job.
Yet...
Perhaps, but find someone who actually uses in that context rather than simply a bastardization of the word 'orientation' instead of using 'orient' as they should.
I happen to agree, but the person arguing with me seems to find Pirates of the Caribbean to have no educational value.
Then why did you even bother to bring the educational value of material into the argument? You stated that Pirates of the Carribean is not educational, and therefore not protected. I simply stated that thousands of fiction books are not educational either, yet still seem to be loaned out by libraries without being sued by publishers for infringement. If that's not part of your argument, why did you bring it up in the first place?
As for making a copy, every time you view a page of a book, you've made a copy of that book on the back of your retina. It's only temporary, but it is a copy. If someone only downloaded shared files to a RAM drive, would that be protected? It's as temporary as that copy in your mind is.
So those shelves filled with thousands upon thousands of fiction books are educational? If the test is "Is this materials educational" then almost every public library is committing copyright violations daily.
Yes, plays aren't spliced together afterwards. But I'll warn you up front, those little kids on state aren't really English ragamuffins. They're only pretending. I know, I was as shocked as you are, but plays aren't really real either.
Yeah, Suge Knight is pretty white.
Read the whole quote: "one on one personalized service"
Perhaps you're looking for the word "personable" not "personal". Hearing a voice on the radio could be considered personable, but there's definitely nothing "one on one" or "personal" about it.
That was the first thing I thought as well. I had to read it a couple of times to be sure I was reading it correctly. It is backwards.
Actually we'd be better off if congress would all do what Sonny Bono did.
Yeah, yeah, tasteless. Mod me down if you must.
There doesn't necessarily have to be a master file with instructions on how to rebuild it from the pieces. Some format similar to a doubly linked list where each piece knew which one went before and after it would be enough to rebuild a file from many small pieces.
Where'd you get the notion that libertarians care about nothing but themselves? Libertarians simply believe that maximum individual freedom is how you care for people. Not authoritarian edicts.
You're just making up shit now, you're not even attempting to discuss anything resembling reality.
Yes, liberals and conservatives care so much. They're so caring that rather than get drug users help for their problem, they throw them in prison.
Liberals and conservatives care alright. They care about money. They care about power. They care about being re-elected.
Peddle your bullshit elsewhere, I'm not buying.
Sorry, that's all I've got.
Do you honestly think that government agencies continue to exist beyond their usefulness because the hordes of paper shufflers are scared of being poor? Let's get real. Those agencies don't self perpetuate due to the nameless masses employed by them, they do it because of the people at the top of those pyramids love the power they wield.
Yeah, because, ya know, poor college kids never plaster advertisements around big cities. I've never seen thousands of concert flyers for some little indie band glued to buildings and poles. Doesn't happen. It's just the evil corporations that litter and advertise.
The free market does take care of itself. The problem is that we haven't had a truly free market since the government started choosing economic winners and losers through tax laws and business subsidies.
Then maybe you should see about getting a referendum started to raise taxes for your local schools. I learned about Japanese internment camps in high school. There was no sinister cover-up.
Jesus fucking christ on a pogo stick, some fucking people's kids.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_socialism
Go back to school junior. The big people are talking.
As long as we're treating real life like Hollywood, why can't we just ask McBain to fly through the air like Neo and catch the fleeing criminals in the act. No GPS required.
I have it on good authority that MtViewGuy is a terrorist planning to blow something up. Now, I'm not 100% positive on that, in fact I could be completely wrong. But we can't take any chances can we?
You're exactly the kind of idiot that terrorists love.
Total cost of ownership? What the fuck are babbling about? Does a hybrid somehow go through fewer wiper blades and tires? The only way a hybrid will save you $14,000 over five years is if the damn thing uses NO FUEL OR OIL.
This is my last response, and I only replied this time just in case anybody happens to read your bullshit and think it's any way factual. I feel compelled to expose bullshit when I see it. But arguing about this further with someone of your stunted intelligence is just an exercise in futility.
Enjoy your "savings" on your hybrid, dipshit.
For what it's worth, my wife and I both have our computers in the same room. :P