Slashdot Mirror


65% of Americans Spend More Time With Their PC Than SO

Ant writes "PR Newswire reports that 65 percent of consumers are spending more time with a computer than with their significant other (SO). The "Cyber Stress" study confirmed consumers' growing relationship with technology in their everyday lives. In fact, more than 8 out of 10 Americans (84%) say they are more dependent on their home computer now than they were just three years ago."

291 comments

  1. Techno-Dystopia by P(0)(!P(k)+P(k+1)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    “We empathize with consumers about the emotional nature of dealing with computer problems. As the leader in computer problem resolution for nearly 10 years, we have a distinct advantage in helping consumers quickly and conveniently solve their frustrating computer problems,” said Josh Pickus, CEO of SupportSoft.

    SupportSoft sells support; so they're interested in a dystopian state of affairs. (For my part, I'm still not convinced we're not dealing with a slashvertisement.)

    That said, computers play some yet-to-be-determined role in the splintering of society; as the space-time-continuum is warped, and proximity becomes irrelevant: neighbours become irrelevant.

    A real dystopia, therefore, might be the flattening of human relationships into one indifferent, indistinguishable mass.

    But since Europeans and European-Americans aren't breeding anymore, it doesn't matter: you'll all be dead within a generation.

    1. Re:Techno-Dystopia by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But since Europeans and European-Americans aren't breeding anymore, it doesn't matter: you'll all be dead within a generation.

      Several European countries have birthrates acceptably above the replacement rate (hello from Finland). The real problem with Europe's birthrate is not that they may lead to extinction of ethnic majorities (a possibility in some countries, not all), but that government services cannot be adequately maintained without enough of a growth in population.

    2. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      proximity becomes irrelevant: neighbours become irrelevant.

      Right, I will make sure to email you when I'm sick and need groceries, or to look after my kid when I need to go out a bit.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    3. Re:Techno-Dystopia by inviolet · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Several European countries have birthrates acceptably above the replacement rate (hello from Finland). The real problem with Europe's birthrate is not that they may lead to extinction of ethnic majorities (a possibility in some countries, not all), but that government services cannot be adequately maintained without enough of a growth in population.

      Interesting... because in an earlier slashdot article we read this:

      Roughly speaking, a Ponzi scheme is one in which the perpetrators make false claims in order to lure investors. Once they have some investors coming in, they begin to pay back the earliest investors in order to create hype and garner more investors. People make money in ponzi schemes, but only by being at the top of the pyramid. What separates a Ponzi scheme from an actual market is that in an actual market, the items being traded have value outside of the system itself, and that access to liquidity is therefore available at levels other than the top. The article claims that because cash exchanges and the corresponding exchange rates are controlled by the people at the 'top', they are the only people with the ability to achieve substantial liquidity, and therefore, to make any money. This is why they say it resembles a Ponzi scheme more than an actual market.

      How very amusing.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    4. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > > proximity becomes irrelevant: neighbours become irrelevant.
      >
      > Right, I will make sure to email you when I'm sick and need groceries, or to look after my kid when I need to go out a bit.

      And if you'd spent more time with your computer instead of your SO, you wouldn't have a kid who needs looking after when you need to go out a bit. More importantly, you'd have finished that "nifty robot who'd be able to go out and get your groceries for you when you're sick" project that's been sitting in your basement since you left college.

      "I look at you all, see the love there that's sleeping,
      Robo-guitar gently weeps.
      I look at the floor, and I at least Roomba's sweeping,
      Robo-guitar gently weeps."

    5. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1

      Mmm, Techno-Dystopia. Is that some new sub-sub-genre of electronic music?

      Anyway, I'd like to think that I'll last more than one generation. I mean, a generation is only, what, 25 years or so?

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    6. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Funny

      But since Europeans and European-Americans aren't breeding anymore, it doesn't matter: you'll all be dead within a generation.

      Why do you think we fund cloning research?

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    7. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1

      Wow, your neighbors will get you groceries? I have to try that some day. ;-)

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    8. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you're joking, but just to make it clear, cloning does not mean you get a fully grown clone of yourself. You still have to raise it as a child. Why bother with cloning? Just create baby factories where they take donated eggs and sperm and make babies in test tubes. Duh!

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    9. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dr00g911 · · Score: 4, Informative

      (For my part, I'm still not convinced we're not dealing with a slashvertisement.) Um, the PR Newswire credit was all I needed to know it was a slashvertisement.

      Yeah, I work with Ad/PR agencies. Anything on Newswire is bought, paid for then copied & pasted as "news" around the globe. That's the point.
    10. Re:Techno-Dystopia by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Right, I will make sure to email you when I'm sick and need groceries, or to look after my kid when I need to go out a bit.

      To be fair, I wouldn't trust my current neighbors with either task (although I don't have a kid).

      Of course when you live in the ghetto, you learn to not bother each other.

      As in... I don't answer the door unless I'm expecting someone and even then we don't open the door until we have confirmed who it is.

      But I think the point of the matter is that in 20 years, having personal relationships will be a moot point. Or even having kids...

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    11. Re:Techno-Dystopia by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What, you're surprised government is a Ponzi scheme?

      Try, "All of Western society." Basing large organizations on finance resembles nothing more than using a just in time compiler to me. The amusing thing is that it appears there's no way people are smart enough as a whole to either design or accept a more intelligent solution.

      Reading the Wikipedia article on Ponzi shows something quite interesting - he gave people exactly what they wanted, and the only ones to get advantageous results were those who cashed out right before it all fell apart. Just another story of catastrophic market failure; I love how everyone sees these things coming and noone says, "Wait. How do we stop this before it gets too big?"

    12. Re:Techno-Dystopia by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      US is ranked 137 in birth rate. If you don't count immigration, we're pretty screwed, since every person needs to have at least 3 kids. But still, we're not as fucked as Japan if you ever read that "vanishing Japanese" article or Hong Kong which is dead last according to wikipedia. Is a fact, any place with rising real estate price is proportional to the death of its citizens. It's got nothing to do with World of Warcraft.

    13. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Joebert · · Score: 0, Troll

      Has everyone seen it before ?
      No.
      That makes it news to someone.
      Quit being jealous & STFU.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    14. Re:Techno-Dystopia by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I find "in the ghetto," the community is more tightly knit than in the suburbs.

    15. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dr00g911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a difference between journalism and press releases that are copied and pasted as news, or polished by a "writer" and published in local newspapers or websites like this one to fill space.

      They're what are referred to in the industry as advertorials, and they run the gamut from sleazy to benign, but don't be fooled for a moment that you're not looking at full on advertising. Client pays agency, agency writes article, agency broadcasts to PR newswire, Slashdot picks it up (among others).

      Not sure what jealousy has to do with anything, it's an issue of trust in the media and making the distinction between journalism and paid flack.

      Your eyes were bought by Supportsoft. If you don't have issues with that being framed as news, then please do us all a favor the next time there's an election and stay home.

    16. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Joebert · · Score: 1

      The only difference I see is one group is trying to bring people up, entertain them while the other group is trying to put them down.

      Quit being jealous & STFU.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    17. Re:Techno-Dystopia by bberens · · Score: 1

      That depends on whether or not you're the only [insert race] person in the [insert alternative race] ghetto. For instance, I'm acquaintances with a white couple in a part of Venezuela. They have massive castle like locks (2x4 sized thing you slide over to stop the door opening) on both interior and exterior doors as well as bars on every window. The idea being that the 'bad guys' may break through the first set of barriers before help arrives but are unlikely to get through yet another set of barriers. Insane really...

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    18. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to ask my elderly neighbor (before she had to go to an assisted living home) if I could pick her up anything during my trips to the market. She couldn't drive anymore and her knees were shot from arthritis.

      "I have to try that some day."

      You should, some people really need the help.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    19. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Henneshoe · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the figure everyone needs to have at least 3 kids? I would think to maintain a population in which the average age of death is not changing the average person needs to have 1 child (2 per couple). Apparently I am wrong because the CIA https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos /us.html says in the US today the fertility rate is 2.09/woman and the population growth rate is at .91% including immigration.

      Just trying to figure out where my math is wrong.

    20. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You + Your wife = 2 people.

      1 kid = minus 1 in population
      2 kids = same population
      3 kids = plus 1 in population

    21. Re:Techno-Dystopia by hachete · · Score: 1

      I think the French are actually *ahead (2.5 kids average) for the first time in a while. A combination of benefits and child-care. Be afraid, be very afraid.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    22. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try, "All of Western society." Basing large organizations on finance resembles nothing more than using a just in time compiler to me. The amusing thing is that it appears there's no way people are smart enough as a whole to either design or accept a more intelligent solution.

      Reading the Wikipedia article on Ponzi shows something quite interesting - he gave people exactly what they wanted, and the only ones to get advantageous results were those who cashed out right before it all fell apart. Just another story of catastrophic market failure; I love how everyone sees these things coming and noone says, "Wait. How do we stop this before it gets too big?"


      You're missing a key difference between ponzi schemes and "all of western society"

      The participants in a ponzi scheme contribute nothing beyond their initial deposit. The orchestrators of the scheme generate nothing. The participants of capilitalistic western societies create new wealth every single day they go to work.

      Now, if you said "socialistic western societies who operate extensive welfare states" you'd be exactly correct. If you avoid large scale wealth transfer between participants that decreases the motivation to work or the necessity thereof, then there's no reason it would ever implode.

      Any which way, in terms of western societies collapsing like a ponzi scheme.... I bet France is first. Check out their economy. I might be wrong but I don't think so.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    23. Re:Techno-Dystopia by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      In coming into the original Ponzi scheme, you invested. You made the bank worth marginally more. Then, over time, the overall value of the money you had originally invested was increased. (doubled every month, as I remember) This led to the total value of the bank being much less than its total debits.

      This is the way I understand modern economics as working. The pie is 10 slices big, but 1000 of them exist on paper.

    24. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1
      US is ranked 137 in birth rate. If you don't count immigration, we're pretty screwed, since every person needs to have at least 3 kids.


      Every person does not "need" to have any number of kids.

      Why not count immigration? I don't see how we're screwed. It would take some time for a slight negative popualtion growth to reduce 275 million to a terribly low number. And there is no reason to believe that population would continue to decrease forever.

      Personally, I'd like to see fewer people. More open spaces.. less crowed parks/recreation areas, etc. But I guess the REAL problem is the proportion of elderly. I mean, so what if the US has a population of 200 million vs. 275 (or whatever is now)?

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    25. Re:Techno-Dystopia by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      This is the way I understand modern economics as working. The pie is 10 slices big, but 1000 of them exist on paper.
      That last part describes fractional reserve banking, where depositor's money is lent while it sits in the bank, and the borrower puts their money in a bank while they use it, that bank then lends it to someone else, etc. A common activity and a dubious practice, though it has had a decent track record here. It's certainly a large part of our economy but one can imagine an economy without debt. An economy without debt is an economy without fractional reserve banking.

      Past that, you're essentially saying modern economics is a zero-sum game, and it's pretty easy to demonstrate this is not the case.

      The most direct way is to consider material wealth, and as the population of the world has grown, so has the food supply and the goods enjoyed in a person's daily life. Air Conditioning, cars, houses, apartment buildings, raw materials at home depot, etc, etc. These are all material examples of wealth that are created by every day efforts.

      If wealth was strictly limited then the human population and the benefits they enjoy would have never grown past the caveman era, let alone provide historically unheard of advantages at an ever-increasing rate.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    26. Re:Techno-Dystopia by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      infant/child mortality maybe?

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    27. Re:Techno-Dystopia by loki_tiwaz · · Score: 0

      not only is this a slashvertisement, it is playing on the new media fear campaign that the copyright defenders and violent game horror criers are using.

      it's amazing how history repeats itself. television used to be something that 'made people spend less time with their significant others', so was radio, so was the printing press. in parallel to this the other issues came up, the monk-scribes were out of work for copying latin bibles, latin was under attack, people were persecuted by the inquisition for owning writings of the new protestant movement. controversial movies being banned, book burnings, etc etc.

      times are changing. nothing's changed.

    28. Re:Techno-Dystopia by mfrank · · Score: 1

      It's more likely because of Muslim immigrants. When they lost Algeria as a colony back in the 50's (?), they magnanimously gave everyone there French citizenship.

    29. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... there's no bad guys in Venezuela? What's insane about wanting to feel secure in your own home???

    30. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Poll:

      You are at home and the doorbell rings. You open and see your neighbor from across the hall whom you know only by sight. He is in a robe, looks terrible and sneezes a lot. He says that he is very sick, cannot leave the house, and would like to ask you to bring him groceries the next time you go shopping. He hands you a list and some money. What do you do?

      [ ] You tell him to fuck off and die. How dare he interrupt your Halo session!
      [ ] You reluctantly agree although you just came back from Walmart and won't have to go again for a week
      [ ] You say "sure, dude" and ask if he needs anything else
      [ ] You offer to change your shopping plans, drive out right now, and get him anything he needs

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    31. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Insane is the state of a society that makes such measures a requirement for safety. In a society that isn't completely fucked you don't even actually need to lock the doors. Don't laugh, this was the normal state of affairs as recent as 20-30 years ago in Vienna, Austria, a normal middle-european city with a population of 2 million.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    32. Re:Techno-Dystopia by pluther · · Score: 1
      ...your neighbor from across the hall whom you know only by sight.

      And this is where the problem lies.

      Some people actually know their neighbors, not just by sight. When I was in St. Louis, I could have asked half the people in the building if they'd pick something up for me and they would have. We knew each other's names, would sometimes drink or dine together, and watched each others cats while out of town.

      Moved to California about six months ago, and talk daily with friends in Missouri and Oregon, but probably couldn't pick more than a few of my neighbors out of a lineup.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    33. Re:Techno-Dystopia by geekoid · · Score: 1

      D, unless I can't get away right then, then C.
      And C will be as soon as I can. If I can't, I may call a friened to do it.

      Been there done that. Gladly do it again...like most people I know in real life.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    34. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it depends on our relationship. For example, does he talk to me when he doesn't need something? But most likely C, "sure, dude." I am assuming that the list is fairly short. You know, the essentials. I mean, I'm not going to do the guy's week worth of shopping just because he's laid up for a couple days.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    35. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1

      Right, so 2, or maybe slightly more to account for early death, would seem to be the optimal birth rate. 3 would be a significant increase.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    36. Re:Techno-Dystopia by misleb · · Score: 1

      I understand that a lot of Canadians don't bother to lock their doors. The rate of violent crime there is very low. I think it also has to do with fear.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    37. Re:Techno-Dystopia by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      You're right, I'm saying it's a zero sum game. This is not completely true, nor what I had meant to say. What I had meant to say is that currently economics - while not being a zero sum system - is not growing 'pie' fast enough to keep up with the imaginary pie. This is leading to extremely disproportionate distribution of wealth; the rich are working on projected pie, while the poor and soon-to-be-poor are working with whatever real stuff they can get their hands on. The real stuff is getting less and less available to the overall population because of the way money moves to try and change the fact that growth does not happen as fast as people with capital want it to. This means that only the people connected with the movement of the money are completely capable of defending themselves - and even them not forever.

      You mentioned continually increasing quality of life, but I do not believe that this will be the case over the next few decades. Perhaps. One can hope. But I see quality of life in a broad downhill trend internationally.

    38. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it seems to be getting worse. When I was growing up, I knew all my neighbors, and often chatted with them on the front porch. Currently, I don't know anyone by name, a few neighbors by sight, and quite a few who I'd expect to be IN a lineup that I don't want to know.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    39. Re:Techno-Dystopia by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It seems to vary. Where I live, people tend to keep to themselves. Nobody really says anything to me, so I don't say anything either. At my previous house, I knew several neighbors quite well, and at a different house, I was on a first-name basis with most of the block. All 3 houses were in "bad" areas.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    40. Re:Techno-Dystopia by hachete · · Score: 1
      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  2. Does that include work-related computer use? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And does it include time spent by all the stereotypical geeks who don't have significant others?

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Does that include work-related computer use? by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That, and does it consider time spent sleeping with your SO (and yes, I actually mean sleeping, not other "activities") as time together? My guess is that it doesn't. So, this is a very believable statistic. I spend all day at work with a computer, and some time at home. I only spend about 5 - 6 hours of waking time with my wife a day. It really doesn't say anything about how our lives are spent, just acknowledges that computers are becoming a bigger part of our lives, but they are not necessarily intruding upon our time with our families.

    2. Re:Does that include work-related computer use? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised more than half of Americans spend more time with their PCs. A lot of us work computer jobs, so we're in front of a computer all day. My dad worked at a potash mine when I was growing up; he worked 9 to 5, so he spent more time with the potash mine than my mom. Call me crazy, but I'm guessing people spend time with lots of work-related things more than their significant others. It's called having a day job.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    3. Re:Does that include work-related computer use? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I only spend about 5 - 6 hours of waking time with my wife a day. It really doesn't say anything about how our lives are spent, just acknowledges that computers are becoming a bigger part of our lives, but they are not necessarily intruding upon our time with our families.

      Good point. Twenty or thirty years ago, you could have written a similar piece, talking about how people are spending more time with their desk chair, slide rule, or mechanical pencil (depending on occupation) than with their significant other.

      It's really nothing new. When you spend more time at the office than you do at home (of your waking hours), it's to be expected.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Does that include work-related computer use? by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, my wife and I both have our computers in the same room. :P

    5. Re:Does that include work-related computer use? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd seriously hope that this only includes non-work use at home, and only considers people living with an SO - the report implies that, but who knows.

      Even if it does though, this still doesn't surprise me - long term couples living together do not tend to spend all their time doing activities *together* (other than simply being in the same room). You have things like watching TV together, which a lot of people probably spend most of their free time doing - how does that count? And if that counts as time with your SO, why doesn't both using their computers counts? Or one using a computer and one reading a book?

  3. I Would Comment On This... by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... but I have to go have sex with my wife.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    1. Re:I Would Comment On This... by mockchoi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you at least wait until I'm done?

    2. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No worries. I got it covered.

    3. Re:I Would Comment On This... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I thought when you upgrade Girlfriend 2.0 to Wife 1.0, there were issues with that function. Namely, for some reason, Wife 1.0 would randomly not perform that function.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:I Would Comment On This... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      ... but I have to go have sex with my wife.

      Dare I ask, what port are you using? DVI, Ethernet, USB, Firewire, ps2, they all look like they would be pretty painful....

    5. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not have cybersex? Then you can do both!

      (Just don't forget your robe and wizard hat.)

    6. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Joebert · · Score: 1

      The OP is using a bootleg version called "wife", not the official "Wife", note the missing capitalization.

      A similar thing to look out for is "Wine" instead of "wine", "Wine" is actually a virus that will cause "Wife" to complain about a bunch of random settings.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    7. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't know that some states allowed marriages with blow-up dolls.

    8. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its always about her isn't it?

      What about the computers feelings in all of this?

    9. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just buy those sex gadgets Wired is writing about... then neither of you have to leave your respective computers and still have sex with eachother even over the Net. When I find a girl who want to marry me I surely will buy those.

    10. Re:I Would Comment On This... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused, are you his wife?

      Give the guy some credit--he may be fast, but do realize he probably needed to get back to his computer.

    11. Re:I Would Comment On This... by the_wishbone · · Score: 1

      You just made my co-workers think I'm crazy because of how loud I laughed there...Thanks.

    12. Re:I Would Comment On This... by jimbojw · · Score: 1

      That's what she said.

    13. Re:I Would Comment On This... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Wiife, more likely.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. My PC is my SO by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    You insensitive clod!

    1. Re:My PC is my SO by bartyboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Once upon a time, my SO was a PC, too. Until I discovered that her beige box was full of viruses, that she was rooted by strangers and that neighbours would piggyback on her fat pipe.

    2. Re:My PC is my SO by dopelogik · · Score: 1

      I just watched Weird Science the other day - still a great movie!

    3. Re:My PC is my SO by grungebox · · Score: 1

      So I guess on 2/14 you'll be spending the night mounting your hard drive? Inserting your floppy disk? ?

    4. Re:My PC is my SO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And my laptop is my mistress!

    5. Re:My PC is my SO by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Your SO is a "her" with a "fat pipe"? EWWWWWWW

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:My PC is my SO by partowel · · Score: 0

      me too!!!!

    7. Re:My PC is my SO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmm... a pipe do have an inside too...

    8. Re:My PC is my SO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and ? and what did you do about that ? did you replace her ? or are you now a necrofiliac ?
      or did you just upgrade her to something a little more fishy than Windows ?

    9. Re:My PC is my SO by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      So now your SO is a Mac right? Her box might be a little more pale but she definately has a more friendly interface to her insides.

    10. Re:My PC is my SO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I swapped my old PC for my Mac.

      The PC did not take kindly to being replaced by a younger, thinner model. I tried to explain it to her... you know: besides the appearance factor, and the newness of the relationship-- all the things that my new Mac would allow me to do now that PC either could not or would not do...

      The explanation didn't work. Ended up taking the power cord out of PC. Then she was quiet again. ;-)

  5. Even More Shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10% of Slashdot readers have SO's to spend time with in the first place.

  6. In other news by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdotters, known to not have SOs, are believed to have caused a great innacuracy/bias in this report.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  7. Coincidence.. by zyl0x · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also, on a completely different topic, World of Warcraft subscriptions have exceeded 8 million.

    --
    Blerg.
    1. Re:Coincidence.. by vimh42 · · Score: 1

      Hardly. I spend a great deal of time playing WOW with my wife and have met a significant number of couples who also play together.

    2. Re:Coincidence.. by zyl0x · · Score: 1

      So do a few other people. However, I would be quick to accept that less than a third of the playing population is even old enough to marry.

      --
      Blerg.
    3. Re:Coincidence.. by Jacer · · Score: 1

      In my experience, grouping with couples always leads to some sort of weird drama.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    4. Re:Coincidence.. by spyder913 · · Score: 1

      You'd most likely be wrong. MMOs have a higher average age than their chat interfaces might lead people to believe.

      Here is a link with more info: http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/archives/000194.ph p and unfortunately it's not WoW specific, but you can find some interesting stuff on that website.

  8. Sounds right by WinterSolstice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my family, my wife is a writer. I'm an IT guy. At night, we play WoW together.

    Added together, our total time at home together (including sleep) is about 11 hours. That means 13 hours is spent with a computer seperately right off the bat.

    Considering our nights are often spent playing 3-4 hours of WoW, that puts it at 17 hours on the computer per day. Even at best, we would spend probably 3-4 hours a day together, which wouldn't even put a dent in the usual 8-10 hours at work with a computer.

    -WS

    --
    An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  9. SO's provide the same services as computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If my SO would sit on my desk at work for 8 hours a day and solve differential equations for me, maybe I would be spending more time with her than with my computer.

    1. Re:SO's provide the same services as computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you need to import one of those Chinese wives. They are all great with math aren't they?

    2. Re:SO's provide the same services as computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my SO would sit on my desk at work...

      If my wife tried that, I'd have a mainframe on my desk.

      Mij

  10. who are these people?! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who the hell comes out with studies like this? Whos idea is it to waste money studying and interviewing people to come up with useless stats like this and what are they trying to do? Since almost everyone uses computers, almost everyone knows that they're usefull for just about everything, and almost everyone knows that there's rarely something wrong with people who spend "too much" time on them, I guess we're left with the logical assumption that it's either the Amish or really old politicians sponsering these stupid studies. I bet they presented the stat in the way they did disregarding that like 90% of that time occurred at work. Ugh, why don't they just stop living in the 90's and give up their ridiculous notions that everyone who uses a computer is an antisocial loser and shouldn't.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:who are these people?! by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Apparently you have not noticed the huge rise in obesity in the United States.

      I luv ramen more than life itself!

      Perhaps you have much to learn about proper diet and exercise. Sitting on one's ass in front of the computer for most of the day means that one has no opportunity to adequately get up and about. After I began limiting myself to only a few hours of computer use a day, and stopped taking it on trips, I've lost fat, gained more muscle mass, and I feel absolutely amazing compared to my years of the average man's sedentary existence. There is a real problem there that a number of health experts have identified.

      Ugh, why don't they just stop living in the 90's and give up their ridiculous notions that everyone who uses a computer is an antisocial loser and shouldn't.

      If one spends more time with the PC than socializing with one's wife, then that means that one, wait for it, isn't socializing much with one's wife. And probably not with neighbours or extended family as well. Or perhaps you think the best way of socializing with people is to ignore them completely?

    2. Re:who are these people?! by lonechicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently you have not noticed the huge rise in obesity in the United States. It seems like there's a rise in anorexia in the U.S. as well. Everytime I see a bunch of teenagers around, the group is made up of some fat kids and some bony kids. Barely any in the middle. Now that I think about it, adults are like this too. Where is the middle ground???
    3. Re:who are these people?! by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      All the normal ones have been eaten; the bony ones are next.

    4. Re:who are these people?! by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Apparently you have not noticed the huge rise in obesity in the United States. It seems like there's a rise in anorexia in the U.S. as well.

      Sounds like we have already solved the problem. Next! (this should be taken as a joke)

    5. Re:who are these people?! by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

      Obesity peaked in 2004 in the United States and has been in pretty good descent for the past 2 years. You should go to the cdc website and read up on this. Rates of obesity in European and even East Asian countries are starting to compete with American rates of obesity.

    6. Re:who are these people?! by EtherealStrife · · Score: 1
      Actually, I eat the amount I do primarily because of my rather noisy stomach. I don't get hungry, but the gurgle and growl lets me know when my body desires more sacrifices. While at home it's no big deal and I can go a day or so without actually feeling hungry (and since I don't move around much while at home, the sounds are almost null -- nothing is being burned), but in public it's rather embarrassing.

      Back in hs I was consuming an average of 4000 calories a day of fast food and other garbage while taking weight training (for pe req), and I maintained my weight (135lbs @ 5'8"). Since then I pretty much stopped exercising entirely, and my calorie intake went down to the 2000-2500 range. Net result: I now classify as "overweight" (26 bmi). Exercise makes a hell of a difference.

    7. Re:who are these people?! by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I eat because I'm hungry. Despite a relatively healthy choice of foods to eat, that ends up making me fat. Suppress my appetite and I wouldn't be fat. Eat 100 extra calories a day (~%4 over what you burn), and you'll gain nearly a pound a month, more than 10 pounds a year, 100 pounds a decade. So for me to be 6', 250 lbs at ~40, that means ~45 extra calories a day over the last twenty years. That's ~1/5 of a "single serving" packet of Chips Ahoy.

      I expect obesity to largely disappear in the next thirty years as effective appetite suppressants are developed.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    8. Re:who are these people?! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

      you forgot the calculation for the energy in calories it takes carrying around more weight during the day which makes a huge difference and evens it out at some point.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  11. Is this a surprise? by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What percentage of people spend more time at work than with their significant other?
    The vast majority.

    What percentage of people who have a PC with broadband at home (the demographic targeted by this study) use a PC at work?
    65% doesn't sound far off.

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  12. It's all about prioritization by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife was getting pretty upset about my gaming time (especially on WoW), so now we came to an agreement. I only spend 1 hour a day on gaming (2 on Sat & Sun), and we've created a date night once a week that I don't even use the computer at all. It's made for a lot smoother relationship, and in reality I've found it much more satisfying than simply just playing games.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:It's all about prioritization by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      Good for you. I recovered from an Everquest addiction by taking up flying R/C airplanes. Now, on the weekends I spend time with friends, outside and doing something more fun than a computer game ever could be.

      It's sad to think back on all of the time wasted for 3+ years sitting in front of the computer on gorgeous weekend days for 12 hours or more.

      Games are fun, but real life is so much better.

    2. Re:It's all about prioritization by masdog · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend usually gets upset with me for being on my computer, but she doesn't realize that half the time I am on the computer, she's on her computer scanning pictures, doing lesson plans, or scrapbooking. So it's not like I would be spending time with her anyway if I wasn't on my computer.

    3. Re:It's all about prioritization by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      You are obviously playing the wrong games.

      Try moving the mouse slowly to the right, then quickly to the left. And repeat.

      This game is playable on all OS's with pointing device support.

      Have fun.!]#

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    4. Re:It's all about prioritization by jfodale · · Score: 1

      Cue the 'aftermath' documentary music.

      --
      Waiting for Warhammer Online.
    5. Re:It's all about prioritization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No joke, Al Gore is nominated for an Oscar. Hollywood truly has lost all credibility.

    6. Re:It's all about prioritization by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      I'm considering taking up skydiving to overcome my BF2 addition. Of course, in real life I don't get to re-spawn if my main and secondary fail.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    7. Re:It's all about prioritization by spun · · Score: 1

      Date night is a great idea, regardless of how much time you spend on a computer. Here's a little tip for married guys: just because you think you have her doesn't mean you don't need to persue her. Women need to feel desireable. If you treat sex as something you are due just for being married, you aren't going to get much. Take her out, give her a massage, fix her a fancy dinner, do whatever it is she likes. If you show her that she is sexy and desireable enough to work for, she will feel sexy and desireable and she will act sexy and desireable.

      Yes, I did have to go through a bit of a dry spell before I learned this.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    8. Re:It's all about prioritization by corbaguy · · Score: 1

      My wife and I were both into gaming before we had kids, but since then our priorities have changed. I do some stuff on computers in the morning while absorbing caffeine, then go to work (with a computer all day). Once I come home, and I make a very concerted effort to get home for dinner with the family, it's no more computers for the day for me (except now that the kids are older they're complaining about their computers, so I get called upon to straighten them out).

      Perhaps I've used up my allotment of getting excited about computers, but really, spending evenings with my family is much better ...

      Nevertheless, if you added up the hours, I certainly spend more waking hours with computers than with my wife.

    9. Re:It's all about prioritization by IflyRC · · Score: 1

      Have you thought about R/C sky diving?

    10. Re:It's all about prioritization by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      heh, I used to play BF1942 back in college, ya those were the days. Skydiving in that ment one thing.

      "E99999999999999"

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    11. Re:It's all about prioritization by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing. I work very hard during the day (typically 9 hours) and when things get crazy I do 12 hours on and 12 hours off. I have Sunday dedicated as a date day for my wife. So we both do our own thing during the week and spend the day together on Sunday. Works out very well.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    12. Re:It's all about prioritization by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm not married, and I don't live with my GF, but I certainly make her the priority. When she's at my house, we're not on the computer. I figure I can always conquer more regions AFTER my date.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  13. Only 65%!!!? by revlayle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Either way, I believe it. Personally, I have no idea why I live with other people anymore, less have any actual serious relationships. However, while I use a computer a LOT (over 65% easily... part of the job), even at times when I am not on the PC much, I still have the same attitude, so it may be that I'm just an asshole. :)

    1. Re:Only 65%!!!? by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      I had assumed you were trying to be "Funny," and not "Interesting," but either way, I find myself thinking the same thing. A computer is a source of endless intellectual stimulation. I can see why some people might find it more satisfying than sitting around, regurgitating what we did at work all day. As much as I have a distant biological urge to get a girlfriend, married, etc, I don't ever think I've ever seen a couple have a conversation that wouldn't bore me to tears if I had to endure it personally. I guess I never saw that as something to strive for. Then again, I'm probably an asshole too so...

    2. Re:Only 65%!!!? by revlayle · · Score: 1

      You see I have been married twice (still married, but that is in a legal sense). While my first wife an I had a nasty divorce, I get along fabulously (for the most part) with my current wife. However, when I want to be left alone, I want to be left along, as in, I want the whole place to myself, I don't want to share it with anyone, nor do I want to worry about other people messing with my stuff (which kids, and other adults do. i don't have a LOT of stuff, but what I do have, I don't want it messed with). Unfortunately, computer or not, this urge to be left alone happens more often than not.

      I was kind of trying to be funny, but, in reality, it more of a true statement of myself that people could take in a funny way.

  14. Color me suprised! by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wow, a study commissioned by support.com says people need support! From a PR newsire, nonetheless. And we're not even people, but "consumers". Come on, if you're going to write fake news reports on fake studies, at give the appearnace of trying by not using marketroid speak.

    Tag this one as "shill".

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    1. Re:Color me suprised! by Alcibaides · · Score: 1

      I'm really getting tired of this "shill" tagging crap. The article is either good or it is not. Blame the editor if it is bad. Blaming the submitter is nothing but cowardly and naive.

    2. Re:Color me suprised! by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not blaming the submitter, or even the editor. The tag is on the story itself. It's an ad. It's paid for. It's not news. What better use for a tag to mark this as such? Certainly better than "yes".

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    3. Re:Color me suprised! by Alcibaides · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like "ad" or "spam" to me than "shill". The former are articles, the latter is a person.

    4. Re:Color me suprised! by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1
      Good point. "Spam" tags are usually about spam and not spam themselves, and spam is really email, so this doesn't fit. "Ad" is better, but this isn't an obviously ad, it's an ad dressed up as news.

      Shill, while probably technically wrong, gives a better impression that someone's getting paid to advertise and then pretend it's not. Like all that mail you get hawking mortgage payment insurance labeled "FINAL NOTICE: REPLY IMMEDIATELY" with fake stamps on it, or ads with fake post-it notes on it to make me think a friend is sending it to you ("Thought you might be interested -J.") even though the post-it note has has no pen depressions in it and obvious was just printed.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  15. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for National Mandatory Sex and Cuddling Day.

    (Verify word was "nearby"? Must be a sign....)

    1. Re:I can't wait by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      BB Proud, Comrade! intercourse wife plusgood. uncuddle daytitle. cuddle doubleplusungood. make Party member plusgood. show at hateweek.

      Seriously though? That would just remind some of us of how much we need a wife.

      --
      SRSLY.
    2. Re:I can't wait by MonolithicX · · Score: 1

      You mean Valentine's Day?

    3. Re:I can't wait by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Would be the only day I get laid !

    4. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. That's Nation Fight with Your SO and/or Get Sad and Drunk and Masturbate in Front of Your Computer Day. Clearly, NFYSOGSDMFYC Day isn't quite as catchy....

    5. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just in time, prostitution will be legalized so Hallmark can expand their commercial holiday dominance.

    6. Re:I can't wait by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0

      National Mandatory Sex and Cuddling Day.......... You mean Valentines Day... yeah its comming up bud there might be something to this article

      --

      Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    7. Re:I can't wait by Sartak · · Score: 1

      For me, Read Dante's Inferno Again Day

  16. Seasons? by rwven · · Score: 1

    you need to look at what time of year it is. Suring the spring, summer, and fall, you go outside with your SO and do things outside the house. During the winter, you end up with people staying at home. There is only so much you can do at home, so people sit at the computer.

    I bet if they waited until summer and ran this survey again, there would be different results.

  17. Grow closer apart. by w33t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People spend more time with lots of things than with their SO. I would argue that this can be healthy.

    After all, if you want to get sick of someone there is no better way than spending every waking moment with them.

    I know it's all down to personal preference, but I find that time apart is every bit as important as time together.

    The trick is to balance the two - too much of one or the other is bad, you need just the right amount of together and seperate time.

  18. Love Robot... by SeaSolder · · Score: 1

    So, does spending time with my lady robot count?

  19. cough*nerd*cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a SO but, if I did, I'd find joy in conversation, watching movies and not playing an Orc attempting to find her.

    1. Re:cough*nerd*cough by WinterSolstice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've been married for 10 years, and my wife an I are both hardcore gamers. We have conversation, we watch some movies... but the main thing we do is play games together. Incidentally, we both play on the same team nearly all the time.

      I may be a nerd, but I know what works for my relationship :)

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:cough*nerd*cough by profplump · · Score: 1

      We all know that sitting in the same room as someone else doing exactly the same thing you are could never lead to a conversation, and that watching movies generally does. There's no reason to point out the obvious you nerd.

    3. Re:cough*nerd*cough by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I don't have a SO but, if I did, I'd find joy in conversation, watching movies and not playing an Orc attempting to find her."

      Geez, what's the matter, doesn't anyone want to fuck any more?

      :-P

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:cough*nerd*cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been married for 10 years, and my wife an I are both hardcore gamers. We have conversation, we watch some movies... but the main thing we do is play games together.

      Damn.. I salute you.

      I can't even get my wife to read a single Dilbert comic, much less games. And we don't have conversation; we only watch movies she picks out.

      Truthfully, it is starting to make sense to me why her nickname for me is "stupid". I've lost all illusions of self-worth.

  20. I used to- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 5, Insightful

    spend nearly all my time outside of work on my PC. Then I got a job in the PC world, and then I quit being on it outside of my normal job.

    Then I met a girl, and got married. Since she turned out to be a complete psycho bitch (I should have known...should have known) and now spend all my free time *back* on the PC, and away from her as much as possible.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:I used to- by dave562 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Everybody has to have the psycho bitch experience so that we know what to look out for next time. Just like spending years and years in front of a computer enables you to deal with the most off the wall random errors, spending years and years dealing with women enables you to quickly put their psycho bitch behaviors in check and/or kick their asses to the curb at the appropriate time.

    2. Re:I used to- by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      spend nearly all my time outside of work on my PC. Then I got a job in the PC world, and then I quit being on it outside of my normal job.
      Then I met a girl, and got married. Since she turned out to be a complete psycho bitch (I should have known...should have known) and now spend all my free time *back* on the PC, and away from her as much as possible.


      Hey, I spend most of my after work time either playing video games or sitting infront of the computer. My wife and parents complain that I'm anti-social because I don't get out to go to church, or take the kids to boy scouts and/or girl scouts or attend all the PTA meetings. What's freaking ironic is that I'd be considered "social" by just freaking showing up standing around and not saying anything for 30 min - 1 hour half. How is that social? That I meet five strangers and might have picked up their names? Am I odd that the only humans that I care about or my existing family and friends? I don't want to run out and form a vast social network. Being social is being in a setting with a few others and discussing a few topics. I can do that through many mediums why is it socially accepted to be social to be physical lurker but when you are a non lurker on the on-line world you are seen as anti-social?

    3. Re:I used to- by apt142 · · Score: 1

      ...why is it socially accepted to be social to be physical lurker but when you are a non lurker on the on-line world you are seen as anti-social?

      It's because physical contact gives the appearance that you're interested in the world around you. Note the word "appearance." People need to see indicators that you care about your environment. Computers are good at hiding that because all your physical motions are the same when retrieving information. So, zoning out to a video game looks the same as keeping up with what's going on.

      That being said, I'm all for introversion and not going out. But, if going meant showing that I cared to the people around me, then I'd go. You don't have to do it every time.

    4. Re:I used to- by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      There are these things called real life, fresh air, exercise, well-being, and real-world experience. Some people equate the value of life to how much experience one has gained throughout its course. Here, in case you're new to these concepts:

      If you need help coping, just remember: Take it easy. One day at a time.

      CAPTCHA: ejected, as in what you should be, from your seat.

      Not trying to troll or flame, just a bit perplexed about people's apparent inability to comprehend the differences between life (having one, that is) and living. Computers exist to augment our lives, not to replace them. I'm not saying I'm perfect, either. Computers are my career and a hobby of mine. It's easy to become assimilated. However, every once in a while, you just have to take a step back and enjoy life, otherwise you might just end up missing it. I've personally found the aspects of Taoism that concentrate on dualism and balance to be especially helpful when trying to keep everything in my life together. See also Thelema and, to a lesser extent, Satanism.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    5. Re:I used to- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that social? That I meet five strangers and might have picked up their names?

      Yes, participating in your children's school and scout activities is more social than chatting on IRC or playing CS:S. By being a "lurker," you are not fully participating in the lives of those around you. You may not have any desire for a huge social network -- that's normal. You make it sound, however, as if you have absolutely no interest at all in being familiar, on some level, with the community that your family have made themselves a part of. That's probably why your spouse is irked. Your kids may not care now, but they might later. My dad was always very involved with my sports, scouts, and musical activities, and while it didn't mean much at the time I sure as hell appreciate it now.

    6. Re:I used to- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, sounds like you married my wife's sister or something. I'm right with you on this one. My wife is a PHYYYYYYYCO. I think the only time we get along is when we're not even near each other. Should of stayed single.

    7. Re:I used to- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And gee, you don't think that YOU might be part of the reason she turned into a psycho b****? Just because you weren't spending all your time on the computer, doesn't mean you weren't doing the same kind of behaviors, avoiding reality, with the emotional maturity and emotional expressive capabilities of a woodchuck. You paid attention to her when you were wooing her, and then when you got her safely in your back pocket, you went back to your normal routines. And she was like, WHAT just happened here?!? I want a real human being! -It takes two to ruin a marriage, bucko. You better wake up and recognize what you have, and treat her with some respect or you'll be on the fast track to a divorce. You probably already are. --Speaking from experience, having married a Software engineer, with the emotional maturity and emotional expressive capabilities of a woodchuck.

    8. Re:I used to- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Am I odd that the only humans that I care about or my existing family and friends? I don't want to run out and form a vast social network.

      Yeah, but it's cool. There are lots of us.

    9. Re:I used to- by kabocox · · Score: 1

      There are these things called real life, fresh air, exercise, well-being, and real-world experience. Some people equate the value of life to how much experience one has gained throughout its course. Here, in case you're new to these concepts:

              * real life (aka meatspace)
              * fresh air
              * exercise
              * well-being
              * experience (no, not experience)


      I had that life style choice forced on me growing up. I didn't like it. That's why I've adjusted to a life style that I like. My only problem is that I don't like to control others or their actions, which includes my kids. My wife has no problem telling my kids to go to church or scouts. Her social mindset is being passed on. I tend to think that the example that I'm setting to my kids is that you aren't allowed to do anything fun after school except on the weekend unless you are an adult. Being an adult magically allows you the ability to do what you want once you get home as long as you are "working." I do my chores and then play. O.k. I tell my kids that I had to do alot of things like going to church when I was their age, but its a choice that I don't now. They like church or atleast the church social set more than I ever did. Fun wasn't associated with church or that peer group. Church was just a waste of time for me and trying to force a fear of death or unkown mindset on me. I live perfectly well by minimizing my church contacts as much as possible.

    10. Re:I used to- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Church was just a waste of time for me and trying to force a fear of death or unkown mindset on me. I live perfectly well by minimizing my church contacts as much as possible.

      Man, I wish I grew up with a dad like you. Kudos to you.

    11. Re:I used to- by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Ya but most software errors can be fixed with a patch or software upgrade.....Ohhh wait, I see where you are going with this, and I like the way you think!

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    12. Re:I used to- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking to myself: "OH SHIT...WHEN DID I POST THIS?!?!?!" then I noticed it wasn't me. *whew!! I'm safe for a little while longer.

    13. Re:I used to- by jafac · · Score: 1

      Then I met a girl, and got married. Since she turned out to be a complete psycho bitch (I should have known...should have known)

      Of course you should have known. They're ALL psycho bitches.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:I used to- by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? What stick up his/her ... with mod points decided to moderate that flamebait? Not that I don't have karma to burn, even if this gets modded troll. But come on. That was a good, humorous analogy. =)

    15. Re:I used to- by khchung · · Score: 1

      What's freaking ironic is that I'd be considered "social" by just freaking showing up standing around and not saying anything for 30 min - 1 hour half. How is that social? What I have now learned is women value the appearances of doing something more than actually doing the said thing! When you wife tells you "I want you to do more X", you should translate that to "I want you to be seen as do more X". For example, when she tells you she wants you to "be more social", she actually means (in menspeak) she wants you to appear to be more social, regardless of whether you are actually being social or not. Thus showing up (thus being seen) and standing silent for 1 hour is exactly what she wants, but going around chatting with your neighbors without other people see you doing it is not.
      --
      Oliver.
  21. And They're Probably Less Dependent On by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In fact, more than 8 out of 10 Americans (84%) say they are more dependent on their home computer now than they were just three years ago.
    Shocking 'facts' aren't they? But they failed to mention that these people who find themselves more dependent on computers probably find themselves less dependent on other things. For instance, transportation. You don't have to go down to the mall and hoof around looking for a CD or even books for that matter. You don't have to go out to rent videos--just use Netflix or Blockbuster. Why are malls becoming predominantly clothing stores? Because you can't try clothes on online. You can do your banking online now and I'm sure the things you can do online instead of driving your vehicle to the office to make the payment are numerous.

    And I'll bet these people are a little less glued to their televisions than they were three years ago. And instead of going to the movies or getting hammered at a bar, they might find an online game to be a bit more entertaining.

    The obvious downside is that I'm sure that some people are probably less active than they were before, but not all of them. If you percieve this to be a growing threat or strain on relationships, market software/hardware that makes the PC experience something shared between two people. I know tons of couples (and families) that have two or more computers and they simply play games like WoW together.

    Honestly, I don't see anything unhealthy with this trend so long as the people excersize or go out walking/running once a week or more.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  22. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...people who keep in contact with their SO's via computer? At least 50% of my computer-time is actually spent 'with' my girlfriend, just chatting or playing WoW together. Face-to-face social interaction is the best kind, but interaction via comoputers/the web is not irrelevant.

  23. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My computer's not a total bitch!

  24. And in pre-information-age societies.... by ciaohound · · Score: 3, Insightful

    65% spend more time with their plow horse/tractor/butter churn/machine tool/slide rule/whatever than they spend with their spouse. The division of labor has always taken spouses away from each other to some extent. Of the discretionary time that spouses could choose to either be together or apart, well, has that changed significantly?

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:And in pre-information-age societies.... by dreddnott · · Score: 1

      I spent more of my time off of work with my wife than on the computer, counting what little we did together on our PCs, but she divorced me anyways. Anorexia is a bitch.

      --
      I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
  25. Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just ICQ'ed this story to my wife in the other room and we both agree that it is just BS.

    1. Re:Ridiculous! by jonoid · · Score: 1

      1999 called, it wants it's instant messaging client back.

  26. Um, I have a job... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Which could easily explain why I spend more time with a computer than with my SO.

    But, get this: (FTA)

    1. The average consumer has experienced computer troubles eight times - about every four months - over the last three years.
    2. The average American is wasting 12 hours per month - the equivalent of half a weekend - due to problems with their home computer.
    3. A majority of Americans (52%) describe their most recent experience with a computer problem as one of anger, sadness or alienation.

    I can relate - there are computer things which simply don't get done around my house because I don't have the time to mess with them. For example, I'm not using my home PC as a media server because: 1.) There's a problem with my Samba configuration that I don't have time to troubleshoot, and 2.) For some reason, Windows98 shares don't play well with the rest of the network. I really don't have the time to troubleshoot either problem, but if I had to fix one of them, I'd fix Samba because, generally speaking, you only have to fix a Linux problem once.

    And don't get me started on how awful it was setting up a wireless router with Windows XP... I spent $200 worth of my time to configure a $15 piece of hardware.

    And that is the "plug and play" friendly OS. I wonder how much time I would have wasted had I tried to set it up from Linux...

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Um, I have a job... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      And don't get me started on how awful it was setting up a wireless router with Windows XP... I spent $200 worth of my time to configure a $15 piece of hardware. It took you three days to configure a wireless router with Wondows XP?!? It should've taken you 15 minutes tops. On a slow day, I get it done in 10...
      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    2. Re:Um, I have a job... by silentounce · · Score: 1

      Psssssshhhhaw. That's nothing.
       
      1. The average husband has experienced wife troubles for an average of three consecutive days - about every month - over the course of his marriage. This is in addition to random outbursts throughout the month.
      2. The average husband is wasting 96 hours per month - the equivalent of every weekend - due to "honey-do" lists.
      3. The majority of husbands (100%) describe their most recent experience with a spousal problem as one of anger, indifference, or confusion.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    3. Re:Um, I have a job... by gillbates · · Score: 1

      Um, yes, it should have taken me no more than 15 minutes. But something insided me thought, "I wonder what would happen if I used the installation CD..." Well, I found out. I had to go back and fix what the install CD had broken. Come to think of it, I probably could have done it in Linux in about 5 minutes.

      Incidentally, $200 of my time is a lot less than three days. Maybe you should consider asking for a raise...

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    4. Re:Um, I have a job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      $200

      three days

      Your job at burger king must really conflict with your robber baron schedule.

    5. Re:Um, I have a job... by Darby · · Score: 1

      1. The average husband has experienced wife troubles for an average of three consecutive days - about every month - over the course of his marriage. This is in addition to random outbursts throughout the month.

      Well, I'm better than average on this one. I have a wife who realsied that if you skip the green pills and go right to a new pack you can reduce this a lot. Say three consecutive days about every year :-)

    6. Re:Um, I have a job... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      "I wonder what would happen if I used the installation CD..." Well that'll learn you to let curiousity get the better of you! That Damn CD is the first thing to get tossed.

      $200 of my time is a lot less than three days. Mine too...I was being obnoxious.
      Geek Squad wants $130 to do a WiFi setup...bandits! I just charge a one hour minimum.
      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

  27. Obligatory? by masdog · · Score: 1

    Hick Child: Dang it, Buck. It's my turn to use the sex box!
    Buck: It's my sex box! And her name is "Sony".

    1. Re:Obligatory? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I don't want to live in a world where that Family Guy quote is an obligatory response to ANYTHING.

      Finkployd

  28. Study sponsors... by lonechicken · · Score: 1

    When interviewed, they said, "We're just cavemen. We do not understand these shiny so-called 'mice'. When we randomly bang on these 'keyboards', glyphs appear magically on what you people refer to as 'monitors'. We spend more time with our wives because we cower in fear of the grinding and wind-like noises that emminate from these miniature 'towers'." ...(in a stern voice) "But what we do know is that computer problems can sometimes cause significant emotional distress, similar to what happens when a problem occurs between spouses."

  29. My PC isn't teaching English 7250 miles from me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *sniffle*

  30. One of us. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    PR Newswire reports that 65 percent of consumers are spending more time with a computer than with their significant other (SO).

    One of us. One of us. One of us. One of us.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:One of us. by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to say thank you for a good laugh. It did take me the title and three of the four of them before I got it. It's quite refreshing to get something else than "I for one..." references. Again, thank you.

    2. Re:One of us. by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

      I still don't get it. I'm sure it's funny, but I'm dumb. Help me out.

    3. Re:One of us. by Jotii · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new not-I-for-one joke overlords.

      --
      [sig]
    4. Re:One of us. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The original quote was from Freaks (1932), "Gooble gobble, gooble gobble, we accept her, we accept her, one of us, one of us!"

      It is a famous quote from the movie Freaks (1932), though you may be more familiar with the other references made to it. (I know I am; I haven't seen the movie, but am now looking to buy it on DVD to get the full context.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:One of us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:One of us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FAIL FAIL FAIL

  31. Well timed... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    Just last night the wife made just this objection as I pulled out the Tablet while cooking dinner so I could check email. I shrugged, conceded the point in general, and then she grabbed the damned thing and went into the bedroom to catch up on stuff related to Heroes and Jericho!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  32. Usians, not Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usians, not Americans

    1. Re:Usians, not Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist!

  33. Furthermore... by sterno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do the following get counted:

    * Time spent chatting with your SO online
    * Time spent with your SO in a room together both using computers where you're talking with eachother, etc

    Seems like those would be time on computer as well as time with SO. Then the question becomes how quality that time is considered to be.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Furthermore... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      And what about the time spent with your SO in a room both using computers while chatting with each othe....

      Oh, gods, I am a geek, aren't it?

    2. Re:Furthermore... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "And what about the time spent with your SO in a room both using computers while chatting with each other...."

      And what about the majority of those on Slashdot where the computer IS their significant other?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be me. *sigh*

      But at least I can't get it pregnant. And it won't cheat on me. Or nag me. Or run off with some other operator.

    4. Re:Furthermore... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      And what about the majority of those on Slashdot where the computer IS their significant other?

      They should count their blessings.

    5. Re:Furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about the time spent with your SO in a room both using computers while chatting with each othe.... .. I put on my robe and wizard hat...
  34. The reason is simple by Snarfangel · · Score: 5, Funny

    The PC does what you tell it to.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    1. Re:The reason is simple by riffzifnab · · Score: 1

      You must be new and have missed out about this whole DRM thing. Yeah... enjoy it while it lasts.

    2. Re:The reason is simple by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      Yes Microsoft did a good job at improving Windows' listening skills with XP.

      Everytime me and M.E. got into a fight, she'd fire a BSOD at me and look away, damn bitch.

    3. Re:The reason is simple by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      I gather you don't run Windows.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    4. Re:The reason is simple by Aardvarki · · Score: 1

      And most people use Windows, so their box goes down on them more often than their wife.

    5. Re:The reason is simple by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The PC does what you tell it to.

      Except when it doesn't, and gives you a completely incomprehensible error message. Then again, that's the same when you ask "Honey, what did I do wrong?" "You should know!". It doesn't get any better when you add DRM, then it'll just be like "No, you can't go to the pub for beers!". But most of all, it exactly and only exactly what you ask it for. If you asked "Honey, should we have lice for dessert?" instead of "ice for dessert", she'd probably raise an eyebrow or two while the computer would happily serve them up. And if you said "let's have beef for dinner", and just a raw beef showed up on your plate, you'd probably ask: "Uhh.. medium done please, and could I have some potatoes and salad with that?" And that doesn't include the infamous "do what I intended you to do, not what I asked you to do". A classic example: "Aaaaaaaaaah the computer just deleted my thesis, because I accidentally hit the delete button". No, you did (and you probably checked the "don't ask me again" on the delete dialog and turned off the recycle bin to save space too).

      Computers tend to do what you want (barring bugs) only if you spoonfeed it accurate commands - it's not incredibly difficult but there's certainly a technique to it, that many can't seem to master. It's notoriously bad at reasoning out what it is you're trying to do otherwise.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  35. Obvious why by hardcode57 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have much more sex when you're with your computer.

    1. Re:Obvious why by Joebert · · Score: 1

      My wife gets soo mad when she walks in on me jerkin off to some chick on webcam & I tell that chick I'll be right back after I kick my sister out of my room.
      But she goes absolutely insane when she finds that date on our creditcard statements.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  36. Do the math by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

    I have 168 hours in a week. I work in front of a computer 40+ hours a week. I do graduate school online, so add about 20 hours. I sleep 8 hours a night, so subtract 56 hours. That leaves us 52 hours. 1 hour per week is spent in church, with my wife in the choir. She spends all of saturday at the farm with the hourses, so 14 hours spent there. I have a potential 38 hours, minus any time using the restroom. I believe it.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

    1. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1 hour per week is spent in church, with my wife in the choir. She spends all of saturday at the farm with the hourses, so 14 hours spent there."

      I think I'd check to see what is taking 14 hours on the farm with the horses. Remember to bring a camera but chek to see if that can get you arrested for filming that first.

  37. I'd spend more time with my wife... by Afecks · · Score: 1

    ..but can she run Linux?

    1. Re:I'd spend more time with my wife... by powerlord · · Score: 1
      [I'd spend more time with my wife ...] ..but can she run Linux?


      Yes ... you just have to leave her a pre-built hardware platform, install media, detailed instructions, and a contact number for support in case she hits an unforeseen snag.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:I'd spend more time with my wife... by Kelson · · Score: 1
      ..but can she run Linux?

      Mine can, but she prefers to run a BSD variant.

  38. Futurama by thebdj · · Score: 1

    How long until this is shown in our junior high and high schools?

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
  39. Social interaction is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to look hard here to read between the lines, folks. After a few years of marriage, I think most of us would agree that spending time with a computer is far more enjoyable than spending it with your SO.

    I can't change what my wife's droning on about by typing a different website into an address bar. And 6mbps DSL is far more affordable than diamond jewelry every anniversary and Xmas.

  40. I'm not american, but... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    Of course I spend twice as much with computer as with my wife... when I get home she doesn't allow me to stay with it!!!

    --
    So say we all
  41. Out of curiousity... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The American divorce rate has been 50% or higher years before PCs were ever around. So what people doing before PCs came around that got them divorce from their significant? Play Dungeons & Dragons all the time?

  42. Hmmmm... Significant Other... by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Funny

    I seem to remember having one of those... Someone nagged me when I was upgrading our router... but the memory is dim... Anyway, the food miraculously appears and somehow the children get to bed, so I suspect someone is in the house doing these things...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  43. 50% Divorce Rate by MBCook · · Score: 1

    This country has over a 50% divorce rate. People don't treat marriages like they used to. That's why there are books like Dr. Laura's last two, The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands, and The Proper Care and Feeding of Marriage. Ignoring what people think of Dr. Laura, there are tons of other similar books on the market. Look at the influences most people have for how a good marriage is and you find divorced parents, sitcoms with snotty wives and husbands who act like 12 year olds, and movies and other popular culture that say similar things ("Men don't have feelings" and such).

    I wonder what the percentage time is of happily married couples?

    And does this spend include time at work? Because I work at a computer all day, so without staying up at night there would be no way for my wife to compete on a time basis (if I was married).

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:50% Divorce Rate by geekoid · · Score: 1

      it's 40%.
      Mostly because people either:
      A)Get married as soon as they can because they feel pressured.
      B) Dont communicate about every thing. Like a certian kind of sex? tell your SO. Don't like something, tell you SO.

      For the record, I have been married twice, the first time for less then a year, and my current wonderfull, and beautifull wife for almost 17 year.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  44. Big Deal by cat_jesus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I spend more time with my underwear than I do with my SO and she doesn't seem to mind it. It has the added benefit of keeping my dangly bits from rubbing all over the inside of my pants.

    1. Re:Big Deal by LoveGoblin · · Score: 3, Funny
      It has the added benefit of keeping my dangly bits from rubbing all over the inside of my pants.
      Unfortunately, they also keep your dangly bits from rubbing all over the inside of her pants.
  45. Well, Duh... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    Have you seen my SO?!

  46. Both? by Tom · · Score: 1

    What about time spent with both? Mine lives in a different city right now, and we play Guild Wars as a way to have something to do together in addition to mail and phone.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  47. That's GEEK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's an IT guy who has the social skills to get a wife. Geek.

    You, however, do not have an SO and you used the term "find joy in". Nerd!

  48. Which Explains Why: +1, Incendiary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    the SUV-driving, mortgage-strangled, corporation-loving proletariat continue to support the
    world's most dangerous "leader".

    Join the conversation to help democracy and freedom reign in the United States.

    Thanks for your support.

    Patriotically,
    K. Trout

  49. ASA is the new FUD by jomama717 · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    A majority of Americans (52%) describe their most recent experience with a computer problem as one of anger, sadness or alienation. (emphasis mine) This seemed a little extreme to me at first, but I realized my perception of computer problems as a professional software developer may be much different than that of the majority of Americans. I suppose if I think back to car problems I've had (as someone with zero knowledge of cars) "anger, sadness, and alienation" (ASA) is a fair description of my experience.
    --
    while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
  50. Open Mouth, Insert Foot by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

    I listen to quite a few podcasts. I listen to them mostly when I'm doing housework. One day, I had just finished the dishes and had about ten minutes left on part one of MacCast's podcaster roundtable, so I sat down on the couch and took a quick break. My wife took that as the signal for "cuddle." Then she asked me "Why do you like listening to your people on your podcasts talk and not me?"

    I said "Because they talk about interesting things."

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    1. Re:Open Mouth, Insert Foot by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      This brings up a very interesting point --

      We're not interested in computers, but rather, we're interested in the people on the other side of the computers.

      "Internet addiction" is "interesting people addiction."

    2. Re:Open Mouth, Insert Foot by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "We're not interested in computers, but rather, we're interested in the people on the other side of the computers."

      The internet. Travel to distant servers. Meet new and interesting people. And when I meet them in Battlefield 1942 I end up shooting them. ;)

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Open Mouth, Insert Foot by obzidian · · Score: 0

      Heh, and on the couch you slept for the next week...

      --
      Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  51. Not relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the relation between your SO and your computer?

    Most people spend more time at work than with their SO anyway. It's mandatory for the average civilian if he wants to survive financially.

    It's normal to have "only" about 25% of your time spent with your love. That's called life balance.

    Computers are tools, if they are present in multiple facets of your life, there's no problem. I use mine for work, hobbies, part of my social interactions, personal growth, and more.

    OH NOZ! He spends more time with clothes than with his significant other!!

  52. bad sign? by mackil · · Score: 1

    This is probably a bad sign, but when I first glanced at this /. entry and saw SO, I thought they were talking about Search optimization.

  53. It's in a Press Release.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... it must be true.

    Consider the source.

  54. For 99% of geeks, PC == SO by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    So what's the big deal?

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:For 99% of geeks, PC == SO by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

      I agree, so how accurate is this statistic?

  55. nOSeX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Mac user, my PC is more attractive than my wife.

    (posted anonymously dear)

  56. Enough?! by thegreatbob · · Score: 0

    Enough of the "My PC is my significant other!" your making the rest of us look bad. (but i wonder how many people defy this self imposed stereotype) I wonder how i would hold up to this if i had a significant other Also, do they by some strange circumstance do they count those who admit to not having a significant other?

    --
    There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
  57. Watching TV by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    Shockingly, spending time with my SO means I have to watch Gilmore Girls, Desperate Housewives, CSI, Law and Order, Missing, Monk, House, 2 1/2 Men, and 24. I like some of them and can tolerate most of the others. But Gilmore Girls, that's torture.

    I tried to time the pauses between conversations on Gilmore Girls and couldn't find a stopwatch that could record time in that small of increments.

    I do spend time with her on the couch with the Powerbook. I have earphones plugged in and have watched Office Space, Heavy Metal, Blues Brothers, Gone in 60 Seconds, and Con Air recently. Does that count?

    --
    Shit better not happen!
    1. Re:Watching TV by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Being in the presence of someone else while you're both ignoring each other to stare at the TV does not count as "spending time with them" in my book.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Watching TV by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      Pah you're lucky. My SO makes me watch shows such as "The OC" and "One Tree Hill" *shudder*

  58. What about overlap? by Kelson · · Score: 1

    I know married couples who both play World of Warcraft. For them, time on WoW *is* time with their SO.

    While my wife and I don't share any online games, our computers are in the same room. If both of us are on the computer, we're still talking to each other.

  59. Work time counts? by microTodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure. In a 168-hour week, I spend 56 hours sleeping, 50 hours at work on a PC, 8 hours at home on a PC, and maybe 36 hours quality time with my SO (4 hours per day during week, 8 hours per day on weekends).

    Does this mean I'm "ignoring" her for my PC? No, it means that I work.

    Back in the 1800s men on the farm probably spent more time with their horses than their wives...hmmm, that didn't sound so good...

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    1. Re:Work time counts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Och laddy, y'be raht abaht th'hahrses! Reeel men wir spendin' thar time wit sheeep!

    2. Re:Work time counts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the oddest Welsh accent I've ever heard.

  60. Another B.S. Study by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After doing the RTFA stuff, I noticed something, umm, interesting? It doesn't bother to distinguish between using the computer at home, and using the computer at work. Considering the fact that MOST people spend more of their time WORKING then being AT HOME, 65% seems rather low now, doesn't it? I mean, is it REALLY true that 35% of Americans don't have to deal with a computer, constantly, at work? Good for them! Stupid B.S. sensationalist studies give scientific studies a bad name.

  61. Joys of WoW minus the headaches by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Listen... I am unfortunately one of the ones playing WoW that hasnt yet been able to
    get the SO involved. I do know that time spent on my computer to play is time spent apart....
    what I do like to know is...if I did have her online with me, would that be considered time
    spent with her....

    As well, is there a possibility that the article fails to mention the time spent
    sleeping (wink,wink) in bed with the SO is calculated into the % brought forth.
    I also tend to think that anyone who wants calculate time fixing the computer software
    or hardware instead of calculating the time it takes to figure something out in 1 hour instead of reading the manual, included with every box of software you buy to better understand using it, would shave off time on this report.

    Last but not least, if time spent on the computer is BAD, but the time it saves you by
    doing your taxes in 2 minutes instead of 20 hours...(quicktax)....then is that calculated as a minus towards the total, as it actually gives you back time ...no???

    There will always be abuse over use for the addictive persons needing that connection
    in their lives, but I find this report highly inconclusive and highly erroneous
    I would like to see these formulas used to come up with this percentage.

  62. More time eh by vision864 · · Score: 0

    Cant say i blame them, People Male female etc all suck socialization is way the fuck overrated.

  63. Re:You forgot by Bastian · · Score: 4, Funny

    *My SO is another avatar in Second Life

  64. Perfect solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found that I can increase SO/PC ratio by getting SO under the table and performing BJ while I use PC.

  65. Here's a hint by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Don't buy cheap-ass $15 wireless routers, for Pete's sakes. You get what you pay for.

  66. and? by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    Geez, you say that like it is a BAD thing.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  67. Best of both worlds by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend and I, both huge computer nerds, just moved into a new apartment. We put our computers side-by-side on a big table right in front of our huge living room window overlooking the city. We geek it up with our single player games but we're always poking eachother to come look at something cool in our games. It's quite romantic, actually.

  68. That's because... by BigRiff · · Score: 1

    ...she's SCSI and I'm IDE.

  69. Multi-purpose device by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    My personal computer is my home entertainment system and my main communication device; using it for movies (rentals and downloads), television series (I don't own a TV), music, gaming, email, passive blogging, news, chatting, online ego massaging (dating site), social entertainment (youtube and random stuff), photography, educational materials (pr0n), banking and purchases.

    It occurred to me that I was practically always in front of the darn thing, using it or at least always interacting with it, yet could not find any of the activities specifically wasteful.

    I made two changes however, for one I stopped playing Wow, but that's simply because I lost interest, as I found it to be cyclical, but this didn't affect or reduce my computer use by much.

    The other thing I did was setup all my email from various domains to get forwarded to my cell phone. It turned out that I would often go to the unit just to see if I had new mail, only to end up sorting non-essential arrivals, that could have waited to be processed at another time.

    Now I get the first 140 characters of each email on my phone, live, and can even reply to it directly (using the phone) if the message requires some urgent response. Since I've made this change, the only time I actually sit in front of the computer to handle email is once in the morning, and once at night.

    I used to just sit there, sort if like I might be waiting in front of a television, waiting for something else to come on, but now whenever I use the computer, I'm actually doing something with it. I used to see myself as dependent and didn't like that feeling and thought I ought to do something about it. Now I'm only dependent on my computer in the same sense that I'm dependent on electricity.

  70. Politically correct garbage! by botlrokit · · Score: 1

    When did my FU become a SO? I must have missed a memo.

  71. modparentup - Re:Techno-Dystopia by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    if you ran your own private business the way govts run countries, you'd be in jail for fraud and racketeering within months.

    as another reply says, a lot of gov't finance is like a ponzi scheme, signup and pay now for future gains, but the gains are only paid for by future signups... e.g. pensions:
    the USA is hitting the wall at the moment, as are many other countries, in that there's no bit pot of invested money, tax received today pay's other people's pensions, so if the population shrinks it places a big burden on the current working citizens. Worse, the gov't often promised generous pensions to many public sector workers in lieue of good pay at present, and this is compounding the issue.
    some countries are now making private pension schemes obligatory. the snag is that people are still having to pay quite high taxes, and for decreasing services! They are realising the money is going to pay pensions of retired public sector workers rather than actually buying service. In the UK, local "council tax" rises a lot each year and yet each year we're threatened with service cuts - as civil servants retire and live longer, the pension "black hole" gets bigger.

    sadly, there's little you can do except off-shore as much money as possible to avoid paying tax.

    1. Re:modparentup - Re:Techno-Dystopia by Calinous · · Score: 1

      The even sadder thing is that, when the gov't will be out of money for paying pensions, it will take money from somewhere else - your private pension fund might be taxed even more, in order to support the gov't pension funds

    2. Re:modparentup - Re:Techno-Dystopia by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      in the UK, the gov't have indicated that they are thinking about making pension funds prop each other up, so if one fails (there was a case a few years ago), even if the gov't are partly to blame, then the others must compensate.... this could lead to a domino effect of collapse.

      no wonder the UK property marker has gone through such a boom, it's become almost the only "safe" investment there is (at least in terms of the gov't not being able to take it away). You might gain or lose in value, but it's still yours!

  72. Regarding your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you realize it's that attitude that keeps the world from improving.

    1. Re:Regarding your sig by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      what attitude? Your inability to detect sarcasm and humor?

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Regarding your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no... "Na na na na naaaa naaaa, I made you eat your parents!" is humor. Your sig is bad enough if it's serious, but are you actually claiming it's funny??

  73. What does this mean? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    On the face of it, it's true for me. I'm with my laptop probably 14 hours a day on a workday, give or take, and with my wife for maybe 4 waking hours on a workday. But I'm not sure that tells the whole tale. First, obviously, when I'm at work, I'm with the laptop, not the wife...but that's hardly a choice. Second, in the evenings, I'm usually sitting in the living room with the laptop on my lap while my wife sits in the same living room with her Powerbook on her lap. What does that count as?

    On the weekends, when my time is mine to do with as I will, I nearly always spend more time with my wife than with any of my computers, though of course there is some overlap where I am with both. Whereas people used to sit at the breakfast table Sunday morning reading the paper, something that is often labeled a communal exercise, we spend the morning at the breakfast table in newsreaders on our laptops. Is that time "with the computer" or "with our SO"?

    --
    The cake is a pie
  74. I don't have an SO... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    ...probably because I spend so much time on my PC.

    --
    This sig is false.
  75. What if.. by JFlex · · Score: 1

    My computer IS my SO?

  76. Duh? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Are we counting waking hours only?

    I work for 8 hours a day (if I'm lucky - 9-10 is probably the more common case). Since I work in IT, close to all of that time is spent on a computer. Often, several.

    If I get home around 5:30, then I have another five to seven hours before I'm likely to go to sleep. If I don't bother to check Slashdot, my personal e-mail, or my friends' blogs, or post-process any photos I've taken, or play any games, or chat up any friends online, that still leaves less total time to be with my spouse than I've already spent online.

    So who cares?

  77. Where's the Fries? by mmalove · · Score: 1

    Ok, the article titles around 65% figure, which is what I'm interested in. 65% of what? Of people with a SO and a decent comp? Of all Americans? A more population?

    RTFA, and it's got absolutely nothing to do with the 65% figure, except for one little aside stating that people sometimes spend more time with the computer than their spouse - used to promote their support services.

    I may not be able to officially mod the OP, but consider this a lengthy (-1 Tool) towards Ant.

    As to discussion on the 65% figure, which is in itself kind of interesting - I'm sure I'm one of them. Not because I don't want to spend time with the wife per say, but when she's got college, I've got work, she's got work, we both have 3 kids that need full time watching, and you gotta sleep sometime - there's no way I could match the 40 waking hours I'm on the computer at work each week in quality time with the wife, let alone any gaming at home I do. I think a lot of people fall into this category - when you both have a lot of responsibilities there's just not much time left to spend with one another. Computers have just become that tied to everything we do - we've learned how to use their automation to enhance daily tasks, access information effeciently, and meet up with friends for entertainment.

    --
    You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  78. Great so do I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I'm looking for a replacement for mig wife btw., I'm quite sure I can find that woman somewhere here on /.

  79. 99% Americans Spend More Time With PAPER than SO by Vitriolix · · Score: 1

    I fail to see the point.

  80. Well, a part of our lives... by Kopretinka · · Score: 1

    I, for one, spend more time with my clothes than with my SO, or with my computer, for that matter. This is, however, meaningless, what matters is what I do when I'm inside my clothes or at the computer - I can work, I can communicate, play games, read stuff, shop etc.

    Some people say that within 10 years, computers will disappear. I concur, I think within 10 years, computers will be everywhere, so they will disappear from the focus, and we will talk about what we do (with or without computers).

    --
    Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
  81. This sums it up!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    WIFE: Babbbyyyyy, why don't you pay attention to me??

    HUSBAND: I'm busy on the computer!!

    WIFE: Well...I want to do some EXPLORING...(giggles)

    HUSBAND: (click) (click) (click) huh?

    WIFE: mmmmmm.....I wanna explore new sexual positions...

    HUSBAND: ehhh wouldn't it be quicker to just GOOGLE it! (click) (click) (click)

  82. Utility value - amount of use by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    I ask girlfriend and Google: Is the line "those are pearls which were his eyes" Shakespeare? Google says 'nope.'
    I ask girlfriend and Google: Is there more crime in the neighborhood where we're looking to buy a house than in the one where we're currently living? Google says 'nope.'
    I ask girlfriend and Google: Hey, want to go in the other room and make a bunch of loud, immoral sounds? Google says 'nope.'
    Google's so negative.
    Girlfriend for the win!

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  83. Consumers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am appalled by the corporatism rife here.

    We empathize with consumers about the emotional nature of dealing with computer problems

    What, pray tell, are these consumers consuming? Computers? You can consume a computer? Or computer support?

    If I pay you, I am not a "consumer". I am a customer. I might buy a six pack and give it away; am I the "consumer" or is the person who drinks the brew?

    Customer #6: I am not a consumer, I am a free man!
    Corporation #2: Mwahahahaha!

  84. I don't think this is anything new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is directly analogous to any such statement as "75 percent of wives spend more time in their kitchen than with their husbands" back in the days when women were expected to stay at home and cook. The PC is a central focus point for a large number of different activities. I do not think any suggestion that PCs are dividing spouses can be inferred from such a simple statistic.

  85. Activity in itself or time using a tool? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    This would only be somewhat alarming if they were spending time with the computer, as in tinkering with its hardware or making a case mod, something for the sake of the computer itself. On the other hand, if this is time spent using the computer as a tool, then it's a stupid thing to report because by the same logic most people spend more time "with" their eyes, ears, hands, mouth, pen/pencil, book, etc., because these are tools and humans spend most time using tools.

  86. Sumitter has a point... by robophobe · · Score: 1

    It's true. Since BC came out, my SO and I haven't been raiding. We haven't done Onyxia since the update. But it's only temporary until we level up to the point where we CAN raid again. And we do the occasional instance together...

    --
    There was a time when movies had plots. So you knew who's ass it was, and why it was farting.
    -Not Sure
  87. Ambiguous headline! by dkoulomzin · · Score: 1

    The first time I read that headline, I parsed it as:

    65% of Americans Spend More Time With Their PC Than Their SO's do.

    And thought "duh!"

    --
    Thou shalt not begin a subject line or post with the word "Umm".
  88. Captian Obvious Strikes Again!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    80% of people spend more time with their computers rather than their SO's because most of the users tweaking the curve are lifeless dorks, that have no SO to spend time with. I would say that 100% computer time vs 0% SO time will stiffly affect the overall number scheme.

    If our dorks of the world would find a life outside porn, IM and WoW we'd see a drastic drop in that number.

  89. Workworkwork by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    How many Americans spend more time at work than with their SO?

    That's it! Jobs are bad!

    1. Re:Workworkwork by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Thats my problem.. I wake up at 1pm, take an hour break from 4pm-5pm, take another break from 10pm through 12pm, and then work until 6am. Speaking of which, its about 5:50am now, time to head to bed.

      Thats life, more-or-less every day.

      Calculating in the breaks and weekend work, its upto 86hrs as week on the computer. This compares to approximately 33 hours a week with the wife and 49 hours of sleep. (usually not with the wife, because I'm on the computer)

  90. No-brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People can't feed their families putting clothes on their backs by just doing their SO like they can doing their job. Some things are worth NOT doing 24/7.

    1. Re:No-brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not everybody has my stamina......

  91. Er, I'm not so sure... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I think your numbers are off, or you're only counting white people, or something.

    The fertility rate in the U.S. is definitely above replacement rate right now. It's not in all areas -- there are parts of the country becoming depopulated via migrations and "greying out" of the remaining population -- but overall the population is basically stable from births, and increasing due to immigration.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  92. Excellent Point! by corbaguy · · Score: 1

    This really is an important factor in the equation.

    Of course, I'm not sure how to analogously segregate time "with" vs "using" my wife, and I ain't going down that rathole here ;)

    1. Re:Excellent Point! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      That's simple: if the wife enjoys the time spent with you, you were with her, otherwise you were merely using her. Oh, and this is always open to retroactive invalidation, so years from now she may inform you that you were merely using here the whole time.

  93. What about using the PC to spend time with SO? by AusIV · · Score: 1

    I'm in a long distance relationship, so I only get to see my girlfriend for a weekend every two or three weeks. I certainly spend more time with my computer than physically with her, but most of the time I spend on my computer I have a chat window up and I'm talking to her. We play some online games, talk to each other quite a bit, and frankly I'd hate to imagine a long distance relationship without a computer to help keep us connected.

  94. Relevant Comic by subwarm · · Score: 1

    http://www.geeklikeme.net/dotcomic/ Posted this comic this morning - felt it was relevant to the topic at hand. My apologies in advance for the shameful self promotion.

  95. Isn't i obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows boot time is longer than the average male needs having sex...

  96. SIgnificant Other Vs. PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, you mean that cute little Blood Elf Warlock I met in Kalimdor isn't my significant other?

      Korgath Realm - When your significant other isn't anymore, there's always a monkey online.

  97. and 95% spend more time with their TV than SO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you count time off work, I bet TV will takes bigger slice of people's time than computers. I mean regular people, not slashdotters (for whom PC is their SO).

  98. SO? by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    SO? What SO? Should we have one? We're nerds, for Flying Spaghetti Monster's sake!

  99. Um... duh? by djSpinMonkey · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    65 percent of consumers are spending more time with a computer than with their significant other

    With a computer? Gee, how many of them work with computers at their day job? How many don't have SOs?

    The average consumer has experienced computer troubles eight times - about every four months - over the last three years.

    They only have computer trouble once every four months? That seems pretty low, if anything, though I suppose it depends on how you define "trouble." If they mean, "this website won't load," I bet it happens on a weekly freakin' basis for most people (especially if they read Slashdot). If they mean, "do you smell something burning?" then probably less often.

    The average American is wasting 12 hours per month - the equivalent of half a weekend - due to problems with their home computer.

    Huh? What happened to "once every four months?"

    A majority of Americans (52%) describe their most recent experience with a computer problem as one of anger, sadness or alienation.

    Um... as opposed to what? Are they seriously suggesting that 48% of Americans don't get grumpy when Lappy won't work? This statistic really makes me wonder what they're counting as "trouble."

    "We empathize with consumers [blah blah give us money]," said Josh Pickus, CEO of SupportSoft.

    Ah, right.

    Come on, this is a marketing pitch for their computer support service, and it's not even a subtle one.

  100. Which Leads To... by reallocate · · Score: 1

    ...not having an SO.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  101. Seriously, you guys... by foamrotreturns · · Score: 1

    Who is really surprised by this? Let's be honest. Most people that work in any sort of white collar (and even a good chunk of those in blue collar) jobs sit in front of some sort of terminal all day while they are at work. That's 8 hours every day. If you sleep 8 hours and spend 8 in front of the PC, that only leaves 8 more hours. Factor in meal times, taking kids to soccer practice, commute to and from work, and that probably only leaves 5-6 hours (at best) of free time each day to do whatever you want to do, including spending time with your SO. This story is sensationalist hogwash that is trying to stir up reactions like "OMG look at us! Society is degenerating blah blah blah!" We've heard it all before. Nothing to see here - move along.

  102. more time with computer than SO by dididothat · · Score: 1

    i am intensifying my search for a SO, as my computer just asked me via instant messaging if it looked fat next to a laptop....

    --
    "you may disagree with me, but i would lay down my life to defend your right to do so..."
  103. When my wife left me recently by woodycat · · Score: 0

    after 24 years of marriage I only had my closest companion for comfort and support. My PC.

  104. I agree by phorm · · Score: 1

    Sometimes my SO is uncomfortably pushy in regards to my personal space. Yes, I like spending time together, cuddling, sex, etc. I also sometimes like to stop and read a book or play a video game.

    Part of the reason is that it lets me distract/disable/derail my normal thought pattern. This means that when I've spent the day being bitched at by users, working late, and missing breaks/food, I get to distract my mind from what has gone on (and/or what I still need to do). Sexual distraction works sometimes, but as it's generally more physical than mental (and stress is not really conducive to a healthy sexual response anyhow) it doesn't always do the trick. Having a woman poking at my bits or hoving in front of my face really doesn't do much for me (although backrubs are great in general).

    However, give me some time with a book or video game, and my troubled thought pattern is derailed. After that, I'm happy to engage in some more personal activities. If I happen to spend part of the down-time playing a game with my SO it's even better since nobody is feeling neglected at that point.

    Without games or books etc, my busy life would intrude way too much on my personal life. They're a welcome break from reality.

  105. hmm u think? by fury88 · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to spend time with my wife? When I hang out with her all she does is bitch that I am spending too much time on my PC!

  106. You mean people don't spend time with SO's? by ShadowCloset · · Score: 1

    Well, I never. So, it's computers now. Huh.

    Used to be bars. Or the garage. Or anything other than together. And now we have computers.

    Computer's are ruining our lives! Run for the hills!

    News at 11...

  107. Ooops! You Mispelled... by skeeterbug · · Score: 1

    ...girlfriend.

  108. What about the "SO" for groceries? by patiodragon · · Score: 1


    I was trying to figure out what kind of Shared Object they were referring to...I never would have guessed.

  109. Well. Duh. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    My SO
    • Takes care of the bills
    • Will occasionally clean the cat box.
    • Fixes me a meal a couple times a year.
    • Encourages me to try new things.
    My SO doesn't
    • Bluescreen at the mention of Novell
    • Ask "What should I do?" when I plug in my (memory) stick.

    ..On the other hand...

    My PC:

    • Can suggest new things to try.
    • Is always ready to go somewhere, and can usually suggest some interesting places.
    • Doesn't complain if I want to play computer games all weekend.
    • Will remind me of appointments without complaining that it shouldn't have to remind me of any gawddamn thing.
    • Doesn't bitch if the temperature is below 65 or above 75.
    • Doesn't go psycho if it sees a spider, wasp or mosquito.
    • Thinks the color of the room is just fine.
    • Lets me watch "American Chopper"
    • Doesn't complain that my hands are cold.
    • Probably knows the optimum arrangement for loading the dishwasher.
    • Is almost always "in the mood"
    My PC doesn't:
    • Tell me on a weekly basis how f**ked up I am, and how I need therapy.
    • Tell me how screwy my family is, and how it's family is just wonderful.
    • Insist I get a 1 $Mil life insurance policy.
    • Stop running self-diagnostics when it discovers that it might have a problem.
    • Spend all day watching TV, then whine about how lonely and depressed it is.
    • Complain that it'll never meet anyone unless I introduce it to friends or co-workers, then say "I can't handle it" when I offer to arrange get-togethers with friends or co-workers.
    • Reformat it's disk because I lied to it.
    • Kick me out of the house for 3 months and accuse me of abuse because I didn't want to have anything to do with it for a while.
    • Drain the joint checking and savings accounts into it's own secret, private account.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  110. The Real Deal... by skeeterbug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    most folks aren't prepared for marriage. i sure wasn't, and neither was my wife. looking at the dazed and confused looks of nearly everyone i know, neither were they. here are some notable facts you need to consider:

    1. the vast majority of women consider sex a tool to use to get what they want. that's their excitement. for example, most women will be sexually available during dating, but will all of a suden get annoyed at sex once the marriage is over. in my case, 100% availability and sexy turned into 90% unavailability and sex was mostly annoying within months of marriage. we dated 5 years, so 5 years went one way, got married and everything changed almost immediately.
    2. women tend to see absolutely nothign wrong with #1, above. they did what they had to had to do to get what they wanted - and what else is there? this is quite narcissistic, but, well... it is what it is...
    3. women don't want to be "sex slaves" (what a freaking bad attitude!) to their husbands... but neither to do husbands want to be celibate slaves to their wife. you've never heard the latter b/c, well, that concept probably has never entered into the mind of a woman b/c they don't really think about anything other themselves when it comes to sexuality.
    4. the average woman *really* wants a eunuch to 1. make her look good in front of her friends, 2. isnpire others to be jealous of her, 3. buy her lots of crap, 4. if you don't buy her crap, at least pay for the mortgage and all expenses so she can direct all her money to buy herself crap, oh, and did mention make others jalous of her?
    5. the average woman is very emotional, but not very intimate, while the guy is very intimate, but not so emotional.
    6. all that sexual energy she used to trick you to marry her - it now all goes into eating. well, not always, just 90% of the time.

    now, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman not too interested in sex (and 90% are not interested in sex beyond using it to get what they want - and when they get married, they already have what they want, monetary security (a mule to pull their cart, so to speak)).

    but there is something *really* immoral, wrong, dishonest and downright EVIL about pretending to be some kind of sexy when one is really the ice queen. make no mistake, 90% will freeze out their husbands and shed no tears about the all but celibate life they trick their provider to enter.

    so, do i sound a bit cynical? want to know something scary? i married a pretty good woman and she pulled this crap on me too. i don't think it is b/c she's evil, rather, i think it is b/c the wiring is different. just like guys can't help their sexual desire, neither do women have to think about manipulating guys with sex and then freezing them out FOR LIFE.

    most guys would much prefer to be in bed with their sexy, hot wife who is into them... but that person only existed PRIOR TO MARRIAGE. she's long gone, now.

    anyway, i recommend that every single guy read the "proper care and feeding of marriage" and make sure their fiance reads it. then toss in the "proper care and feeding of husbands." if she can't make a commitment - assume at you own peril, b/c there is a 90%+ chance you end up devastated FOR LIFE - to the precepts in that book, run away as fast as you can.

    i also recommend listening to her radio show. hearing women call up and complain about their husbands wanting sex and men complain about their woan throwing them under the bus will give you some perspective beyond the LIE that is a woman dating.

    fortunately, my the message of how CRUEL my wife has slowly sunk into her and now she makes more of an effort to not just suck me dry (in every way but the way i want, right) and she is beginning to realize that marriage wasn't just a "free security (money, protection, guidance, etc...)" kind of deal, rather, she had some responsibilities, too. it wasn't just get, get, get, but she has to give some back.

    my guess is not more than 10% of the women who deceive their boyfri

  111. Girlfriends that get mad... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Girlfriends that get mad because your on your computer need to be dealt with when you first start dating them. The first time they complain, you simply need to remind them that if you keep the computer time, you can always get more girlfriends. If you keep the girlfriend, you don't get more computer time. It will drive off a lot of women, but when you find one that gets it, you've solved a major headache that could follow you for the rest of your life. If you think there won't be other women, just keep in mind that I am fat, ugly, and just plain creepy (not in the good way). If I can find a good woman, so can you.

  112. SO? by Dabido · · Score: 1

    My PC IS My SO!!!!!

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  113. Least or most? by unix_core · · Score: 1

    To a computer-science student like myself, this doesn't make any sense! Do they mean the most or the least significant other?

  114. Computer love by billcopc · · Score: 1

    I guess that would make them an INsignificant other. sorry, had to be done :)

    The problem is that computers do offer a form of limited, "safe" social interaction, plus you don't have to worry about your hair, your breath, or what you're wearing (or not wearing). Some people use computers the way others use phones.. if I added up the time my S.O. spends on the phone every day, the number would come close to my non-work computer time. While she entertains her friends and family with the day's joys and woes, I post flame-worthy banter on /. to push peoples' buttons and stimulate intellectual debate. Really it's the same thing, only she uses her voice whereas I use my keyboard.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  115. Time spent on a PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife used to complain about the amount of time I spent in front of the PC... Since I've started skydiving, she's realised that the PC hardly took up any time at all :(