I apologise for including the flippant 'get to it' comment. Presumably that get me the troll moderation. Perhaps it was warranted.
I don't care which scenario occurs more frequently. I was merely pointing out that the PP wasn't presenting an accurate comparsion, and attempting to provide the correct one.
I apologise for including the flippant 'get to it' comment, which presumably got me the troll moderation. Perhaps it was deserved.
I don't really care which situation has more examples. I was only pointing out that the PP wasn't presenting an equal comparison, and attempting to present the correct one.
That's not the correct counterfactual though. You need to provide us with 2 examples where the pilot decided to manually override the flight computer and crashed. Also, you need to show that had the pilots not manually overridden the computer the crash wouldn't have happened.
This method is proof that creationist ideas can evolve, which I find deliciously ironic - when subjected to selection pressure, they develop new mechanisms of denial to cope.
Much like the current crop of religions have managed to out-compete older, less fit religions.
"The cat was released nearby, but was hit and killed by a taxi almost immediately. Shortly thereafter the project was considered a failure and declared to be a total loss."
I know it's wrong, but this made me laugh so much.
In a previous life I was training for the olympics, and was ranked 10th in the world at some point. I also played a hell of a lot of WoW. 4 hours training a day leaves a lot of free time.
Actually, I'd say that playing WoW while my competitors were out getting drunk probably gave me an advantage.
Now, I work 45 hour weeks in front of a computer and play a lot less WoW, and I'm also nowhere near as fit.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then why is their evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God
You're under the impression that it's a black and white thing.
Disliking a company's actions on issues such as these doesn't have to result in a boycott. But it could certainly make a difference when comparing similar products from different companies.
Slashdot Mirror
Presumably China will implement a DMCA style anti-circumvention law.
Indeed, but would they even requirement payment?
I had no idea what a BOFH was, so here's some google entries.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/odds/bofh/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastard_Operator_From_Hell
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/BOFH
I apologise for including the flippant 'get to it' comment. Presumably that get me the troll moderation. Perhaps it was warranted.
I don't care which scenario occurs more frequently. I was merely pointing out that the PP wasn't presenting an accurate comparsion, and attempting to provide the correct one.
I apologise for including the flippant 'get to it' comment, which presumably got me the troll moderation. Perhaps it was deserved.
I don't really care which situation has more examples. I was only pointing out that the PP wasn't presenting an equal comparison, and attempting to present the correct one.
and you're talking about a second car
Where does this phrase come from?
That's not the correct counterfactual though. You need to provide us with 2 examples where the pilot decided to manually override the flight computer and crashed. Also, you need to show that had the pilots not manually overridden the computer the crash wouldn't have happened.
Well? Get to it.
You're thinking about it the wrong way 'round.
The price of Photoshop, when compared to a similar product, is $0. Likewise, the market value of Windows is also $0.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
Yes, I realize you were trying to be funny.
I don't think so.
It's watts*hours. Not watts per hour.
So you're saying WoW wasn't addictive before the achievement system was introduced?
This method is proof that creationist ideas can evolve, which I find deliciously ironic - when subjected to selection pressure, they develop new mechanisms of denial to cope.
Much like the current crop of religions have managed to out-compete older, less fit religions.
"The cat was released nearby, but was hit and killed by a taxi almost immediately. Shortly thereafter the project was considered a failure and declared to be a total loss."
I know it's wrong, but this made me laugh so much.
In a previous life I was training for the olympics, and was ranked 10th in the world at some point. I also played a hell of a lot of WoW. 4 hours training a day leaves a lot of free time.
Actually, I'd say that playing WoW while my competitors were out getting drunk probably gave me an advantage.
Now, I work 45 hour weeks in front of a computer and play a lot less WoW, and I'm also nowhere near as fit.
This proposal makes no sense.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then why is their evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God
~Epicurus
How on earth is this "troll"?
I dunno, reaching into my bag, pulling out something and throwing it at some guy holding a gun at me doesn't seem like a good idea.
You're under the impression that it's a black and white thing.
Disliking a company's actions on issues such as these doesn't have to result in a boycott. But it could certainly make a difference when comparing similar products from different companies.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott
I don't boycott Nestle products, but given a choice between their products and a competitor's I normally go with the competitor's.
You actually read the quest text? I just madly click through it all and follow the arrows on my screen.
You're confusing monopolies with patents.
There was a billboard from the last campaign that read "More teachers, less bureaucrats". Someone spray-painted "fewer grammar" underneath it.
I took this as a sign that the New Zealand education system was in fine shape. Even our taggers are grammar nazis.
If they actually found any they'd have committed a serious crime.
You didn't?
10 million teenagers can't be too far wrong...
Wait, so you're saying the Jonas Brothers are the best band ever?