You beat me. I replied up there before reading down here.
Your example doesn't show, however, that they are really equal, which they aren't judging from the output.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 123204 27 May 16:13/usr/bin/less
The 1 shows that only 1 file system entry points to the contents of that file. So you have 2 files which happen to have the same date and the same size. They are not truly equal, meaning they use double the space.
See here and note the equal inode numbers as well as the 3 showing that besides less and more, a third entry points to the contents of that file.
Re:Here's a good example of 'lean and mean'
on
Less Might Be More
·
· Score: 5, Funny
subscribe to the less is more principle
$ ls -li/usr/bin [...]
69687 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 96720 Dec 6 2003 less
69687 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 96720 Dec 6 2003 more [...] $ _
Wait a second. Isn't the reason we are going through DLL hell the one that we have one piece of code for decoding JPEG being reused as often as possible? So patching this bug should be as simple as replacing one DLL, right?
That said, I have to add that I can't understand people using it anyway. I looked at it, found it lacking and turned away. So if someone uses it, he should pay of course or use something else.
Yep, and reading the "features" list and looking at the screenshot this project looks a lot like make-money-out-of-crap. Sorry to be harsh.
It just looks like a hobbyist programming example from a learning book. Maybe the interface is so ingeniously designed that it hides a vastly more complex editor engine. But said features list seems to say "Sorry, that's really all there is, can I have your $20 now?"
They will use it to intrude on our lives. But remember, ultimately you have a choice (until the law states otherwise) about whether or not they get your dollars.
"What? You say our ads are not leading to increased sales? We need even more and better directed ads!"
Link to D.S.L. upgraded to a form that doesn't make some browsers choke.
Am I the only one asking: WTF? http://www.damnsmalllinux/ makes "some browsers choke"? It's missing the TLD. It's invalid. Plain and simple. Are Slashdot editors so brainwashed by browsers that magically slap various TLDs onto some gibberish that they refer to correct behaviour as "choking"? The implication seems to be, that it was no error in the first place but the correction was merely to satisfy those picky choking browers.
The link you followed to create a Gmail account has already been used to create an account for gina.allison@gmail.com. Now, its account creating powers are all gone. To create another Gmail account, you'll need a shiny new account creation link. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Actually, it's bearable and almost usable on a 2.6GHz P4. Booting to desktop takes 2m15s. "About this Mac" claims 1GHz G3 processor although this fluctuates (sometimes 700-900MHz depending on the load of the host) and doesn't correlate with the "felt speed".
I admit, you can't really work with it and the coolness factor overlays the lack of speed.
Slashdot Mirror
You beat me. I replied up there before reading down here.
/usr/bin/less
Your example doesn't show, however, that they are really equal, which they aren't judging from the output.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 123204 27 May 16:13
The 1 shows that only 1 file system entry points to the contents of that file. So you have 2 files which happen to have the same date and the same size. They are not truly equal, meaning they use double the space.
See here and note the equal inode numbers as well as the 3 showing that besides less and more, a third entry points to the contents of that file.
subscribe to the less is more principle
/usr/bin
$ ls -li
[...]
69687 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 96720 Dec 6 2003 less
69687 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 96720 Dec 6 2003 more
[...]
$ _
Correctamundo!
Wait a second. Isn't the reason we are going through DLL hell the one that we have one piece of code for decoding JPEG being reused as often as possible? So patching this bug should be as simple as replacing one DLL, right?
Not right? Damn me and my ideal views.
That link is for 3.1. Stupid AC must have been confused 3.5 with 2.5.
That AC is not me.
*runs*
$ telnet 61.218.79.53 22
Trying 61.218.79.53...
Connected to 61-218-79-53.HINET-IP.hinet.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.5p1
Hmm.. Isn't 3.5p1 vulnerable to some exploit? Not that I'm implying anything!
Hope it helps. Coral link.
One example that blew me away was doing openssl speed md5 vs. openssl speed md5 -multi 2 on an HT-enabled NetBSD box (2.6C P4).
The throughput went from under 300M/s to 480M/s (can't remember and can't be bothered to reboot now to check).
That's just one counter-example. The general increase in responsiveness under load is a plus, too.
For real workloads a real SMP box is obviously better, though.
That said, I have to add that I can't understand people using it anyway. I looked at it, found it lacking and turned away. So if someone uses it, he should pay of course or use something else.
As it turns out, I am charging 20$.
Yep, and reading the "features" list and looking at the screenshot this project looks a lot like make-money-out-of-crap. Sorry to be harsh.
It just looks like a hobbyist programming example from a learning book. Maybe the interface is so ingeniously designed that it hides a vastly more complex editor engine. But said features list seems to say "Sorry, that's really all there is, can I have your $20 now?"
Amen.
When the manual said that "Congratulations on your purchase. This will give you a lifetime of enjoyment" they were actually talking about doggy years.
:)
No, you have to see "lifetime" as in "lifetime of the product", then it makes sense.
Coralized link.
They will use it to intrude on our lives. But remember, ultimately you have a choice (until the law states otherwise) about whether or not they get your dollars.
"What? You say our ads are not leading to increased sales? We need even more and better directed ads!"
On the subject of sound and visibility of it I am reminded of the music video "Gantz Graf" by Autechre. Go check it out, it's an experience.
Argh. It ate my link :(
:(
This I meant. Yes, I preview from now on
Thanks. Now this also works and hopefully reduces the load a bit.
Link to D.S.L. upgraded to a form that doesn't make some browsers choke.
Am I the only one asking: WTF? http://www.damnsmalllinux/ makes "some browsers choke"? It's missing the TLD. It's invalid. Plain and simple. Are Slashdot editors so brainwashed by browsers that magically slap various TLDs onto some gibberish that they refer to correct behaviour as "choking"? The implication seems to be, that it was no error in the first place but the correction was merely to satisfy those picky choking browers.
Get a clue FFS.
since it even got its own story, why not use it?
try here.
an MP3 is Kb/s so MP3s/s is Kb/s^2?
And that's just how we measure bandwith. But how do we measure bandwithout??
The link you followed to create a Gmail account has already been used to create an account for gina.allison@gmail.com. Now, its account creating powers are all gone. To create another Gmail account, you'll need a shiny new account creation link. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Congratulations, gina.allison@gmail.com!
Actually, it's bearable and almost usable on a 2.6GHz P4. Booting to desktop takes 2m15s. "About this Mac" claims 1GHz G3 processor although this fluctuates (sometimes 700-900MHz depending on the load of the host) and doesn't correlate with the "felt speed".
I admit, you can't really work with it and the coolness factor overlays the lack of speed.
Why is it modded funny? Check PearPC. I installed MacOS X 10.3 aka Panther in it just fine. Yes, on x86.
More like an idiot slashdot poster who even wonders what kind of unit a petabyte is.
I really appreciate this!
My root password is: ************
Thank you, random anonymous slashdot individual aka.. umm.. "AppHack". Thanks again!
Alright, I was really thinking it was "1-exe no-registry"-crap instead of 1-exe no-"registry-crap". The "wonderful" seemed sarcastic there.