Slashdot Mirror


Rio Carbon MP3 Has A 5G CF To Be Cannibalized

GlucoPilot writes "This guy bought a Rio Carbon Mp3 player because he figured he could rip the 5GB CF Card out of it. He did, and put it in his prosumer 6MP digital camera. Now he can take 1,500 six-megapixel pics in one sitting. Oy." The card is apparently a 5GB Microdrive, note, not 5GB of Flash memory.

256 comments

  1. Wow, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    that's a lot of porn

    1. Re:Wow, by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      "that's a lot of porn"

      Not all porn are good ya know.. there is plenty of home made porn featuring people like "beastly" girls and "phat boy slim"

  2. Be nice to Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They've always been nice to us, supporting open standards like Ogg Vorbis and FLAC.

    1. Re:Be nice to Rio by MarkByers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He bought there product and now he is helping advertising it by encouraging others to do the same. That's being pretty nice, I would say.

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
    2. Re:Be nice to Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Retarded!

    3. Re:Be nice to Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their

    4. Re:Be nice to Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're

    5. Re:Be nice to Rio by Nichotin · · Score: 1

      In theory, this is being nice to them. If this means increased sales that is..

    6. Re:Be nice to Rio by timts · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of this kind of action with rio stuff. probably because rio stuff is not cheap at all?

      people have been doing this to the 4G creative muvo stuff and some already did this to the not-officially-released 5G version. the 2nd gen of 4G version has been lock to IDE interface only so they cant use it as CF.

  3. Speaking of cameras... by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?

    Also, I'm glad they didn't copy Apple in this respect -- after all, if I were Rio I wouldn't care what my customers did after I bought it, since I would have already been paid.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Speaking of cameras... by CdBee · · Score: 5, Informative

      " I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?"

      Not suitable for continuous r/w operations! Mp3 player/Camera use is a single file being written then the drive is stopped again....

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Speaking of cameras... by selderrr · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?

      A full miniDV tape is 30GB worth. Microdrives are still stuck at 6GB. Additionally, an mp3 player has a very low disk access frequency, which reduces the risks of physical damage while reading/writing. A camcorder on the other hand, is CONSTANTLY accessing the disk.

    3. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm surprised we haven't seen those microdrives in camcorders yet. I wonder why?

      Why? DV tape is so much cheaper, with much bigger capacity.

      While a microdrive may be faster, with random access, DV tapes are fast enough for almost all camcorder applications, and far more robust than a microdrive.

    4. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, a MiniDV tape is more in the 13 gig neighborhood. But yeah, other than that, you're spot on.

    5. Re:Speaking of cameras... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      it depends. 13 gigs at normal and about 18-20 on extended.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Refrag · · Score: 1

      How does Apple figure into this? I have no idea what you meant by being "glad they didn't copy Apple in this respect."

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    7. Re:Speaking of cameras... by selderrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      weird : after importing as Full DV with iMovie, i have about 30GB worth of clips.... how come ?

    8. Re:Speaking of cameras... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm glad they didn't copy Apple in the sense of making the hard drive interface proprietary so the cannibalized drive would be useless, like Apple did with the iPod Mini.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Speaking of cameras... by hernyo · · Score: 1

      Most digital cameras are able to shot 600x400-like 30 fps movies. You mean this is impossible with this microdrive thing?

      --yeah, i know, my english sucks

    10. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but don't expect great battery life.

    11. Re:Speaking of cameras... by GoRK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple ipod drives are 'dumber' than your normal 1" microdrive or 1.6" mini-drive. They lack a lot of the logic IC's and firmware that allows them to be used with standard IDE interfaces. Instead, the ipod controlls the drive electronics directly. This essentially does a few things: 1) it makes the drives cheaper for apple, 2) it makes refurbishing/upgrading/recycling/repairing faulty iPods a lot cheaper since you dont have to replace the drive's control electronics when you replace the drive, and 3) it makes the drives unusable in anything other than an ipod.

      While reason #3 is often cited by conspiracy theorists to be some kind of plot to prevent people from canibalizing drives out of the ipod to prevent potential loss of iTunes revenue, it is really only a side effect of reasona #1 and #2. If running full-fledged drives in the iPod were actually cheaper or the same price as running drives with reduced integrated electronics, rest assured Apple would do it. It's got to be a fairly difficult/expensive/unnecessary engineering process to integrate drive electronics into your design simply to keep people from buying your product to take it apart.

    12. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Who said we had to use MPEG2 (miniDV/DV) to record to the CF disk? Using an MPEG-4 codec that 6GB would allow at least the same capacity as the miniDV tape.

      Yes, the cost would be higher, as a 6GB Microdrive is expensive, and you'd also need an MPEG-4 encoder chip, but the size/weight of the camcorder would be significantly reduced, I'd think.

      Also, Microdrives are often used in such constant-access situations. For example, anybody who owns a PDA and plays video files off a Microdrive (Or any other type of streaming media).

    13. Re:Speaking of cameras... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      different file formats with different compression ratio's?

    14. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DV doesn't use MPEG2. If it did, the quality would be absolutely fabulous - DV runs at 25Mbit/sec and has uncompressed PCM audio. If one was to implement a nice, closed GOP MPEG2, progressive 1280x720@24fps, at around 15Mbit/sec with stereo AC3 at 256kbit/sec recording onto CF, you can see that we would be able to get around an hour onto maybe a 6GB card - and we'd be enjoying considerably better picture quality and convenience. And no TV standards crap to worry about, either.

      A digital camera maker with no interest in camcorders like Olympus could do this if they wanted, but have they got the balls?

    15. Re:Speaking of cameras... by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Hitachi, the makers of the drives in the Apple and Muvo MP3
      players makes two types of drives. One type has both a IDE interface
      and a CF (compact flash) interface. These will work in the MP3 players,
      cameras, and as a hard drive on a computer. The other type only has
      the IDE interface. These will work in the MP3 players and as a hard
      drive on a computer, but will not work on the cameras. The Apple uses
      the IDE only drive. The Muvo used the IDE and CF compatible version
      until Hitachi made them switch to the IDE only version, because it was
      hurting sales of their stand alone product at much higher margins. The
      Rio player uses a Seagate drive so the issues may be different.

      BTW Creative has a new Muvo with the Seagate drive, that is easier to take apart.

      http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=1249&s=1

      http://www.photo.net/equipment/hitachi/mp3microdri ve/

    16. Re:Speaking of cameras... by jacobdp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, no. The drive in the 3rd-gen iPod is plain old ATA; the connector is smaller and it requires a 3.3-volt power supply, but other than that it's pinout-compatible with the one in your computer.

    17. Re:Speaking of cameras... by martinX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is weird ...

      What do you mean by "importing as full DV with iMovie"? iMovie can only import as full DV - there are no choices. Are you importing it with something else as full DV and THEN importing those clips into iMovie? Because that would double your disk space used - iMovie makes a duplicate of whatever you import.

      If not that, are you using an 80 minute tape in LP mode?

      I use iMovie quite a bit and 1 tape = ~13 GB for me.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    18. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Not suitable for continuous r/w operations!
      You have no idea what you are talking about. My Archos AV480 has an 80 gig hard drive inside the unit and it records at 512x384 @ 30fps just fine. Since when is a microdrive (basically a harddrive) not suitable for continuous operations?

    19. Re:Speaking of cameras... by scottj · · Score: 1

      I would pay more for a camcorder with these features. I think you're on to something. :)

      --
      .-.--
    20. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      My bad, I had assume DV was simply very high bitrate MPEG-2.

      However, my point stands. With a high bitrate MPEG-4 encoder (And 256kbit is a bit overkill for stereo, but sure, throw that in too) and you're still WAY under MPEG-2 or DV.

      In fact, assuming a 7.5mbit MPEG-4 stream, which seems reasonable as WMVHD is only 6.5mbit all told, twice as much as the situation you outlined.

      And of course regular DV res (720x480, is it?) would require an even lower bitrate.

    21. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Since Apple buys the hard drive for the Mini from from Hitachi, wouldn't it be Hitachi's decision about the interface? Is there documentation that Apple forced Hitachi to provide the drive without a CompactFlash interface?

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    22. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the truly insightful reply. I'm glad to see it moderated as such.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    23. Re:Speaking of cameras... by pslam · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the truly insightful reply. I'm glad to see it moderated as such.

      It's a shame it's almost completely wrong. Cornice drives (1.5GB) have most of the controlling logic on the main board rather than in the drive, but all of the 4GB and 5GB one inch drives I've seen (including the Seagate) are plain old ATA interface.

      Some of the 4GB Hitachi drives don't work in some devices but that's just due to the ATA command set not being fully implemented by those drives.

    24. Re:Speaking of cameras... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There's documentation (in the form of anecdotes from Slashdotters) that the hard drive from the iPod Mini doesn't work in anything but the iPod Mini. I haven't tried it, I don't know why, all I know is there's something different about it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    25. Re:Speaking of cameras... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Camcorders have a bigger battery than a whole MP3 player. I think the issue of the thing being obliterated if you smack it just the right way while it's spinning with the heads swung out just so is more important. When you use tape with a fixed head there's not much to go wrong.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      You'd still need to solve the disk access problem. Imagine having your camera die because you moved it too quickly?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    27. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Refrag · · Score: 1

      There's documentation of a guy getting it to work in his camera after formatting it as FAT.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    28. Re:Speaking of cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have pointed out, you are wrong in your assertion, but I can't decide if you're stupid, and truly believe what you wrote, or very clever, and are trying to see how many people you can fool.

      For the sake of the moderators you took in with your post, I'll respond to the obvious flaws in your logic.

      1) it makes the drives cheaper for apple

      No, it would make the drives *MORE EXPENSIVE* for apple, because Apple wouldn't be able to use standard off-the-shelf drives. Having custom made drives would increase, not decrease costs.

      2) it makes refurbishing/upgrading/recycling/repairing faulty iPods a lot cheaper since you dont have to replace the drive's control electronics when you replace the drive

      Again flawed logic. It would be *more expensive* to replace, because you'd have to pay more in labour costs to replace the drive, because it takes more time. going from "swapping an IDE drive" to "removing the drive, removing the IC board from the drive, putting a new IC board on the drive, testing the drive to make sure it works properly, putting the new drive in place." (yes, you *do* need to test it - with a plain old drive-swap, the drives would be pre-tested.)

      And what happens if the IC board is what's at fault? You've just lost any imagined cost-savings, because you have to get another (again non-standard, so more expensive) IC board.

  4. Why didn't apple use these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of the only 4gb in the iPod mini why not use these drives? the RIO manages to come in under the iPods price but yet still has a bigger drive.

    Maybee there is a new ipod mini on the horizon......

  5. Time for a redesign by ramk13 · · Score: 0

    Sound like Rio might have to reengineer their Carbon, like Creative did with the Muvo.

    It's always great when you get a product at wholesale prices by taking advantage of a company's buying power.

    1. Re:Time for a redesign by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But I don't get it. Why would they want to redesign it? Won't they sell more the way it is now, since both the people that want to play music and the people who want the hard drive are buying?

      Also, there's the other side of it: what if somebody wanted the shell? The thing that upsets me about the iPod Mini is that I want an iPod (to sync with my iBook), but I want a flash-based player. I would have loved to buy an iPod Mini shell off Ebay after somebody else took the hard drive, but NOOOO, Apple had to go screw it up!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Time for a redesign by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      I was going to ask something related to what you said. Is it possible to replace the 'canabalized' microdrive with a stardard compactflash card? I would love to get a cheap cheap cheap shell.electronic from one of these people and sla in a gig CF card. Battery would last for ages longer I am sure, and a gig is plenty for me.

      Better yet, mod it up so that a CF card reader slot was put in there, so you could swao out CF cards. So does anyone know if you can do that, and if so, anyone have an mp3 player shell to sell (or better yet donate so I can try and mod it for the saake of the community at large)? :)

    3. Re:Time for a redesign by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because more expensive and lower capacity flash memory is better...somehow...

      I'm totally baffled.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Time for a redesign by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, in the article the guy said he cracked some of the plastic on his, so it would have to be glued back together, but that if you were careful you could avoid that. So I'm sure if you looked you could get a shell of one of these, or of the Creative Muvo thingy (without the 4GB drive) off Ebay.

      However, if you'd want an MP3 player that's designed to use CF cards, there's exactly one(!) company out there that makes them, called Frontier Labs. They make a CF-based player called the NexIA. I've thought about buying one, but I wish it would sync with iTunes...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Time for a redesign by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Longer battery life, better shock resistance...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Time for a redesign by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      Well one of my main reasons for wanting to get the shell from one of these is the much vaunted intefaces of the Rio's or even an iPod Mini... Plus, doesn't the Rio play OGG files? BTW, someone mentioned that Apple "screwed that up" with the mini... did they change the way the drive is installed or somesuch

      Anyways, seems like a cheap way to get a very nice mp3 player, that you can scale with larger cards as you a) get more money and b) they get cheaper.

    7. Re:Time for a redesign by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      But... aren't CF memory cards anywhere from 3 to 5 times slower?

      So even though power consumption of a memory card is about 4 times less than a microdrive (305mA write vs 80mA write, but possibly worse since it will only be reading and the flash is still 80mA read), it will be spending about 4 times as long actually reading from the device, too.

      And I'm fairly certain that the iPod shuts down the hard drive entirely, rather than having it sit idle, to conserve power. If it doesn't, it could, and considering the new 4G iPod got a 50% power boost over the 3G iPod, with no change in battery, I suspect that's what happened.

      So you'd get, I am willing to wager, no increase in battery life, better shock resistance, lower lifetime since they have limited read/write cycles, more expense, and maybe lower weight.

      4gb microdrive specs
      1gb CF specs

    8. Re:Time for a redesign by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      BTW, someone mentioned that Apple "screwed that up" with the mini... did they change the way the drive is installed or somesuch
      That was me. There was an article a while back about how people tried to do this with the iPod Mini, but found that the drive wouldn't work in anything else. I don't know exactly what they did, but it's something with (the software part of) the interface.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Time for a redesign by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      simple, bceause the manufacture of the microdrive makes money off selling the 5gb md at full retail price so they don't want people buying the player and takeing the drive out instead of buying the full priced version. So they will force rio to change if they still want their microdrives.

      thou it depends on who suppiles them.

    10. Re:Time for a redesign by malfunct · · Score: 1

      They would want to redesign it if they were hurting thier hard drive suppliers sales. The reason for this is if buying a rio for the hd is cheaper than buying the hd itself then the hd supplier would rethink its discount to rio on the basis that they are losing thier cream of the crop profits on raw hd sales.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    11. Re:Time for a redesign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ding ding ding, we have a winner.

      In normal operation, the iPod's drive is almost never spun up. The music is cached to 32MB of RAM and played directly from there. When the cache runs out, the hard drive spins back up for a few seconds and copies the next 32MB of songs. At the speed of either of these devices, it takes almost no time (which can't be said for CF).

      My brain melts at even considering the amount of time it would take to write 5GB of music to a Compact Flash card in the first place. No amount of FireWire or USB 2.0 bandwith is going to help you there.

      The iPod is using a notebook hard drive while the iPod mini uses a Microdrive -- both of which are designed specifically for applications of this variety. Further, the iPods are specifically designed to further insulate the drives from damage. Pretty much anything you're going to do that would toast the iPod's drive would toast the whole iPod.

      Replacing it with CF is really pointless and a gigantic waste of money.

    12. Re:Time for a redesign by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But... aren't CF memory cards anywhere from 3 to 5 times slower?

      In a word, No
      High end CF memory cards are 2 to 3 times faster than microdrives.
      Of course they can cost up to fourteen thousand dollars for the really big ones

  6. 1500? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Funny

    1,500 pictures in one sitting? I hope he cannibalized the battery too!

    1. Re:1500? by arose · · Score: 5, Funny

      From a car...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:1500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital SLRS are rated to take about that. My nikon d70 battery can shoot easily 1500 frames with no flash.

    3. Re:1500? by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative
      I hope he cannibalized the battery too!

      Not really. The Digital Rebel and 10D both get about 500-600 shots out of the battery if you don't use the flash, AF in servo mode(ie continuous refocusing) or use a lens with image stabilization a lot. Canon and Nikon both make vertical grips for their cameras which hold two standard battery packs.

      I've gone to motorsport events and taken 2-3GB of RAW photos on one battery pack, and I use both image stabilization and AI servo focus mode. I have two packs, and I've almost never needed the second one in my year of ownership thus far.

      I have an older 330MB microdrive. It's slow as shit. CF cards used to be slower, now it's completely the opposite. Compared to my Sandisk Extreme and Ultra II cards, the microdrive takes 4x longer to offload photos from the buffer.

      When you've been shooting pictures of every 4th car going by you and then one of them locks up the rear and starts to spin, you want as many shots out of the 9-shot camera buffer as possible. Shoot continuous at 3fps for 3 seconds and sort the good from the bad on the laptop later.

      Most pros don't use anything over 1GB. Why? Because 1GB is almost 120 photos for a 10D- a shitload. So you're not swapping that often. By using 4 1GB cards- if one gets erased, stepped on, lost, or dies on you- you're only out 1/4 of your photos, instead of ALL of them. Furthermore- 1 can be in your 'digital wallet' widget or laptop, while the other is in your camera. Oh, and it's hideously expensive for a 4GB card versus a 1GB card or a bunch of 512's, just like those super-huge memory dimms cost much more per MB than a 512 or 1GB stick.

    4. Re:1500? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I have the same camera he has, the Nikon D70, and I can say it is a sweet camera. I have a couple of the high capacity cards and a microdrive card and they do hold a lot of pictures but I question this drive people have to get big and fatter cards.

      Sure, you can get 1500 pictures on this card but I ask you is this a wise thing? I know CF card falure is rare but it does happen and the microdrives are more prone to fail than the memory cards are. It seems to me more logical instead of carrying a couple of fat cards to carry the same amount of space in smaller cards. Say 256 or 512 cards.

      You can get 256 cards for under 50 bucks now. Seems to me it would be smarter to carry a few of these cards instead of the big ones and rotate them out. Change one a day if you have to. On the D70 you can get 70 or so pictures on a 256 card. That way if you do suffer from card falure you lose at most one day's worth of pictures. I suppose you could lose more than one card but at least you wouldn't walk away with nothing.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    5. Re:1500? by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Informative
      The D70 has a hell of a battery life. I've shot over 800 pictures in one sitting and my battery only dropped 1 tick on the meter. There are 5 ticks on the meter. I've read reports where people have shot over 2000 pictures on one charge.

      I'm about to take mine out to do some shotting and I've been shooting on the same battery for 2 weeks now.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    6. Re:1500? by tktk · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's slow as shit.

      You just need more fiber in your diet.

    7. Re:1500? by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Set your camera to RAW mode, I dare say you'll be lucky to get 15 shots out of your 256M card. At that size, 5G is around 300 shots; not even enough to drain the battery of a D70, and the amount of information from CCD's is only going to go up, not just in resolution, but in dynamic range.

      You're right generally, of course, but plenty of even portable applications can use this kind of storage (and more).

    8. Re:1500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Oh, and it's hideously expensive for a 4GB card versus a 1GB card or a bunch of 512's, just like those super-huge memory dimms cost much more per MB than a 512 or 1GB stick.
      After the latest round of price cuts, the best CF cards by $/MB appear to be the 1GB and 2GB cards. With 1GB being a little less than the cost of two 512MB cards and 2GB being at or slightly less than the cost of two 1GB cards.
    9. Re:1500? by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      As with RAM, the only reason to use the HUGE sizes of CF cards is if you a) need to carry a single huge file (movies, anyone?) on one card, or b) have simply run out of space for cards.

      To actually explain this, only the second point applies to RAM. If you only have 3 or 4 RAM slots, and you want an insane amount of RAM, you'll have to use the bigger chips, as opposed to the 512s or 1024s.

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    10. Re:1500? by I7D · · Score: 1
      You just need more fiber in your diet.

      Or Taco Bell

      --
      Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
    11. Re:1500? by sejanus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'm a photographer and I take 4 x 4gb cards with me wherever I go. I rarely use them all, my record on one day is filling up 3 and a half cards, but theres no way in hell I'd use 1gb cards.

      I use 2 x Fuji S2's which outputs a RAW file that is 12mb in size - thats a fair bit of storage. I've never had a problem losing photos, though I am very careful and as soon as I get home I start dumping them to my fileserver. I only relax after that is done :)

      As the next batch of cameras come out, these 4gb and 5gb cards will become more common. The Fuji S3 (a nikon based DSLR body with a Fuji sensor) outputs a raw file that is 24mb on the microdrive, and other upcoming cameras such as Canon's 1Ds II and Nikon's D2x probably won't be far off that kind of file size.

      "Most pros don't use anything over 1GB. Why? Because 1GB is almost 120 photos for a 10D- a shitload. "

    12. Re:1500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or Taco Bell

      Fast as diarrhea?

  7. No News Here by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't see why this is making news now. Those of us with the high end digital SLR and such have been doing this since we first found out you could get these CF cards in these players. It's cheaper to buy the player and canblize it for the CF than to buy the CF.

    Waste of a good player if you ask me.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:No News Here by Kyosuke77 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it's a waste. I've heard tell that once the microdrive is removed, it can be replaced with a simple 512MB CF card and the player can still be used, albeit with lower storage capacity.

      --
      GET THEM INSIDE THE VAULT!
    2. Re:No News Here by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      I did this with a Creative Muvo2 that had its 4GB Micro drive removed and have been quite pleased with it.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  8. Cannibalized? by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was the guy himself a microdrive? Has the microdrive robot takeover begun?

    --
    Arbitrary sig
    1. Re:Cannibalized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has the microdrive robot takeover begun?

      Begun the microdrive robot takeover has.

      (Someone had to do it...)

    2. Re:Cannibalized? by TrevX · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new microdrive robot overlords.

      --
      I support the right to arm bears.
    3. Re:Cannibalized? by daVinci1980 · · Score: 0

      Bwahahahahah. Great Futurama reference. Wish I had mod points today.

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  9. Er, Duplicate Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't the 'Rio Carbon Mp3 player' get hacked a long, long time ago?

    More importantly, newer models of this device have the microdrive soldered to the circuit board to avoid just this.

    1. Re:Er, Duplicate Article by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that was the Creative Muvo something-or-other, and it was a 4GB drive, not 5.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Er, Duplicate Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the creative muvo 2... It now has a 5gb drive, which i've read reports are 'extractable.' still.

      Check it out.

    3. Re:Er, Duplicate Article by bhny · · Score: 1

      pretty soon there will be an article about a 6MB drive!

  10. 5GB Microdrive on eBay: $96 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you search completed items on eBay, a 5GB microdrive went for $96 recently. So this guy wasted $150. The days of buying MP3 players and selling them for their parts are over.

    1. Re:5GB Microdrive on eBay: $96 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's true. it's been confirmed by netcraft.

    2. Re:5GB Microdrive on eBay: $96 by sigma · · Score: 4, Informative
      I would assume you were looking at this auction: here.

      This drive is PC Card sized, which is not usable in any modern consumer digital camera. The seller was simply keyword spamming. "Microdrive" is actually a marketing name created by IBM (and then sold to Hitachi) for a hard drive with a CompactFlash interface, so neither this auction nor the Seagate drive can be legally called a Microdrive.

    3. Re:5GB Microdrive on eBay: $96 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Microdrive" is actually a marketing name created by IBM (and then sold to Hitachi)
      > for a hard drive with a CompactFlash interface,

      Well, going back about 17 years, the Sinclair QL and ZX Spectrum before it via an interface had "microdrives" which were cartridge based tape loops.

  11. Article Text - Server Super Slow by Lord+Haha · · Score: 5, Informative

    Carbon Cannibal: Breaking it down for the hard drive

    As I described yesterday, I bought a very nice MP3 player, the new Rio Carbon 5GB model. It's awesome, and I already like it a lot. My original intent, though, was not to buy an MP3 player to listen to music, but instead to rip apart for its 5GB hard drive, for use in my Nikon D70 digital camera. But once I saw the Carbon, I decided it was time to own an MP3 player, so I got two.

    Rather than eating lunch today, I decided I would share my story of destruction. In part two of our saga, I tear into the second of the two Carbons I bought, pictures included.

    Note: If you decide to spend $249 on one of these things and tear it apart yourself, you do so at your own risk. It's value to Rio and the store you bought it at will instantly become $0, and your warranty will be a thing of the past. At your own risk, your mileage may vary, do not pass go, please tip your waitress. Oh, and whatever you do, don't come yelling at me. It's your own damn fault. In fact, you will probably end up with $249 worth of useless junk. You have been warned.

    Okay, so first of all let me tell you right up front that I broke the thing to the point where I will have to use a little glue to put it back together. The Carbon has a metal back plate, and a plastic front plate, with a rubber surround. What I did not realize is that the front plate is in sections, as well. Not realizing this, I didn't remove the front plastic facing (the silver plastic with the LCD window and the Rio logo) from the body of the MP3 player. It is held in place with some adhesive. Just be careful while you remove it and it will come right off. Once off, it may be that there is a better way to get this thing apart than the method I used. If I will have to use some glue inside where it used to have screws holding things together, because I broke a few plastic threads on the plastic case where the screws were attached as I pried it apart.

    While it looks from the outside like the rubber portion is a section all on it's own, it in fact is not. The rubber part is just glued to the plastic front plate, which is under the silver plastic front cover just mentioned.

    How I got it apart (your mileage may vary, be careful): I started by working a small screwdriver around the case, prying very gently between the metal back plate and the rubberized section. There are a number of metal tabs that you will see inside as you go. Those hod the drive in place. Be careful and don't go too deep or apply too much pressure inside with your screwdriver, you will break things if you do, or you might crack the case. If you don't care about reusing the Carbon, you can afford to be a little more indiscriminate, but things are packed together pretty tight in the small case, so caution and taking one's time is warranted.

    Once I worked all the way around with the small screwdrivers (I used 2, it helped keep things working along), I peeked inside to become a little bit familiar (there's a lot you just cannot see, though). Then I used a screwdriver inserted from the bottom of the case to get good leverage as pictured below, and worked the case looser.

    In the end, I used my fingers, after loosening with the screwdriver, to take the case apart. Again, note that I broke the plastic threaded screw posts in the process. The end result was a front plate, a loose power button (just insert it back in place later), the top chrome-like trim plate (that has the holes in it for USB, earphones, etc), and the back plate with all the electronics attached. The front panel navigation button is loose when you disassemble it - it's held in place by the front plate.

    There are two screws that you will need to remove from the face of the circuit board (the side with the LCD screen), and then you can start to swing the circuit board away from the hard drive. Below is the view from the side, pulling the circuit board up and away from the battery (lower left) and hard drive (in the lower center of the picture under t

    1. Re:Article Text - Server Super Slow by TCM · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    2. Re:Article Text - Server Super Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More people should post this type of link, far more helpfull than copy-pasting.

  12. Nit picking by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't really buy that 1,500 picture number, but it is in the right range. I have a 2.2GB Microdrive in my 5 Megapixel camera and can only shoot 550-600 pics. But really, how often do you need that many pics? I have shot a couple hundred when using the autodrive a lot, but I could cull those down in the field if I started running short on space. The problem with CF hard drives is they are a LOT slower than flash on playback, so wading through the contents is not fun.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Nit picking by Xshare · · Score: 1

      Let's see. 5/2.2=2.2727* 2.2727*x600 = 1363. Seems bout right to me.

    2. Re:Nit picking by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      2200MB/600pic=3.66MB/pic*1500=5.5GB.
      So his camera makes 10% smaller jpegs/raws(didnt rtfa) then yours, which is more then possible given the different compression strategies used.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Nit picking by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well, I assume they are 6 Megapixles with very strong Jpeg compression. do you use Tiff for yours or RAW? now everyone does.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Nit picking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 2.2GB Microdrive in my 5 Megapixel camera and can only shoot 550-600 pics. But really, how often do you need that many pics?

      You've never worked a wedding or other professional photography, have you?

      Pro photographers take a lot of pictures. Being able to take 1,000 photos without changing memory cards is very handy.

      There's a saying: amateur photographers want every photo they take to come out very nice. Pro photographers are happy if they get one good shot per roll of film.

      When you look at the cost of everything else (hiring a photographer, lenses, cameras), film or memory cards are very cheap, so you take a lot of photos. You are much more likely to get a really good shot.

    5. Re:Nit picking by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      don't for get, on the speed side, that the recycle time is way longer unless you have a huge cache to buffer the writes which means continuous mode is out of the question as is getting a quick shot right after the first.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Nit picking by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      he's close. My pics off my 6.3mp Canon Rebel are in the 2-3mb file size range with the quality and size set to max (Jpeg), Double that if I'm shooting RAW. That would be about 1400 on average.

    7. Re:Nit picking by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      But really, how often do you need that many pics?

      All the time if you are doing astrophotography and stack images. If you are shooting 10-15 raw photos at a time, you can only get 12 series of exposures on a 1 GB card.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    8. Re:Nit picking by dhalgren99 · · Score: 1

      The 1500 picture number is in the right range. I have a Nikon D70 with a Hitachi 4GB microdrive (from a Muvo2) and I get ~1100 pictures at the highest setting (6mpixel, jpg fine, each photo around 2-2.5mb). It really depends on what compression he uses, I can get 2.2K pictures if I go down to Jpg Normal.

      And yes, having 1.1k pictures does come in handly. Whenever I go shooting I usually take anywhere from 500-600 photos for a full day. It's not always easy to get insects and animals (not to mention people) to pose the right way. They tend to keep on moving on their own, so I just hold the shutter down, and sort through the photos later. The 9 frame buffer on the D70 is a life saver here.

      As for power, the Nikon D70 is great on that! I get anywhere from 1100-1200+ photos, depending on whether I used how much flash, and that includes alot of focusing, and menu operations, and reviewing of pictures. So, power consumption has a lot more to do with the camera and it's batery. If designed properly you can get a long life from it. I haven't even gotten a second battery yet. I just charge it after two days (1200+ pics) worth of shooting.

    9. Re:Nit picking by m.dillon · · Score: 1
      Mmmm. ok, I *HAVE* worked several weddings and I take a lot of shots, and 1 Gig CF cards work just fine thank you very much! In fact, I prefer using 1G or 2G cards over higher capacity microdrives just from a safety standpoint, if something were to go wrong I wouldn't lose the *entire* wedding.

      Batteries are more of an issue, anyway, but even so it only takes a few seconds to changeout a CF card or a battery, so it just isn't worth the potential loss of data to use cards with ridiculously large capacities. You simply change the card out in an off moment, while you still have a hundred or so shots left so you aren't caught flat footed. No big deal.

      -Matt

    10. Re:Nit picking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      than

      you shitkicking redneck moron

    11. Re:Nit picking by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that the size of the JPEG file the camera produces depends a lot on (1) How well the camera implements the JPEG algorithm and (2) The amount of sensor noise. Little point-and-shoots have a lot more sensor noise then higher-end DSLR's and thus tend to produce much larger JPEG output files pixel-for-pixel. The Canon 10D series (including the 300D 'Digital Rebel') DSLRs have very good low-noise sensors and one of the best JPEG compressors in the business, with the highest quality JPEG mode producing 2-3 MByte JPEG output (6 Mpixel camera) and lower quality JPEG modes at full resolution produce much, much smaller files ( Your contrast and sharpness settings also have an effect. In-camera sharped photos generally produce larger JPEGs (because any noise is attenuated by the sharpening algorithm).

  13. this is kind of cool but ... by mAIsE · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=5gb+microdrive &btnG=Search+Froogle

    its about $180 for a 5G drive with some sort of warranty

    1. Re:this is kind of cool but ... by JawzX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Kingston drive is cool kit and nicely priced, but its PCMCIA not CFII.

  14. Energy consumption by hernyo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's nice to get a 5G 'memory card' for just $250. But does this microdrive suck the battery faster than regular flash memory card? This is quite an important issue because - as far as I know - digicams and batteries 'hate each other'.

    -- yeah, i know, my english sucks

    1. Re:Energy consumption by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Informative

      DSLR's tend to have pretty beefy batteries (and even beefier battery packs), in addition to generally using less power than standard digicams. Used in RAW mode, you can probably fill 5G and still have plenty of battery to spare.

  15. With this you can store the movie named... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... Blame it on Rio!

  16. Anyone who's tried, please post this find... by adzoox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish anyone that has tried this with a Rio Carbon or more specifically the iPod mini - do you get better battery life with a compact flash card in these things?

    And to note... I recently spoke with someone at Hitachi. They said the MAIN reason the iPod mini is a closed device where you can't just remove the drive easily is solely to protect it's market for the drives otherwise.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Anyone who's tried, please post this find... by legirons · · Score: 1

      "I wish anyone that has tried this with a Rio Carbon or more specifically the iPod mini"

      Can you not "upload" data from a digital camera to the iPod over firewire? I thought that that was one of the features of an iPod, although I'd be interested if anyone actually knows how well it works.

    2. Re:Anyone who's tried, please post this find... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you have to buy a separate add-on - something like $60.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Anyone who's tried, please post this find... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point was battery life not data storage size.

  17. my wish list... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Interesting
    i wonder why digital camera's don't come with internal hard drives, and better battery packs. size could be an issue, but if they can make 512 meg usb keychain drives (imagine it without the plastic casing and it is even smaller), i am sure they can put a gigabyte on a camera and still leave a slot for a memory card. also, why not have better batteries? if my laptop can get 4 hours, with a 14.1 screen, then on scale a camera should be able to do better with a much smaller battery. even if they expand the battery pack on camera's by 50%, that would be that many more pictures i could take. and one last thing, add on a better optical zoom, and get rid of the digital zoom.

    since we are talking cameras, i might as well ask. i have a 2mp camera which takes good pictures, but i am thinking about getting a 3 or 4mp as prices have fallen (paid over $250 for my 2mp 18 months ago). what digi camera's do people have, and how do they like them? my 2mp is fuji, and i have been happy with them. the 2mp takes nice pictures, but a guy at the photohut told me that for anything larger than 4x6, i should get a better camera.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:my wish list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In serious Canon DSLRs the batteries are comparable in size to a laptop battery and even with IS lenses and AF can last more than 1500 shots on a single charge. And they haven't been updated in *ages*.

    2. Re:my wish list... by Neophytus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get a Canon PowerShot A80 (not to be confused with the A85). It's the best camera you can buy for the money. Just be sure to use quality (2000 or 2300mAh) rechargables with it, otherwise you'll get about 10 minutes of usage rather than hours.

    3. Re:my wish list... by Refrag · · Score: 1

      My Canon Digital Rebel can take pictures for days before I need to recharge the battery.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    4. Re:my wish list... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      why in gods name are you promoting that spam site in your sig?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:my wish list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's because you have a shitty camera or you don't know how to use it. Probably both.

      First thing, you don't leave it on more than needed. If your camera has a sleep mode, use it. Most batteries can't power a camera more than 4 or 5 hours. That's why you use power management.

      Second thing, most good cameras (i.e. not bottom of the barrel) have much better life than these dinky little cameras that use 2 AA's or a tiny Li battery. Owing a lot to better power management. Cameras like the Canon G5, Sony 828, Olympus C5060, or SLR's can take up to 500 or more shots on a single charge provided that you don't leave the LCD running for long periods of time or take every picture with a full flash.

    6. Re:my wish list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      one last thing, add on a better optical zoom, and get rid of the digital zoom
      You think good zoom lenses are cheap to design and make? The bigger the zoom range, the bigger the compromise and the more complex the design is, more expensive too. You're expecting simply way too much for a $250 camera. If you want more, spend more. At least $1000 for something that might satisfy your criteria. Oh did you know that no currently available digital SLR camera has digital zoom?
    7. Re:my wish list... by bwalling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, they could have internal storage, but you pay for the camera without that, so why should they increase their costs? Sure, they could have a better battery, but then you would buy the $70 secondary battery. Sure, they could improve the optical zoom, but it's cheaper for them to add digital zoom and fool most consumers with it.

      They're trying to make money, not help you.

    8. Re:my wish list... by YE · · Score: 1

      I second the recommendation for Canon's A80; I think they very recently released a successor, I think it's A95. Believe me, the swivel LCD makes a HUGE difference, it's not a gimmick.

    9. Re:my wish list... by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      The reason they don't do it is the mark up on accessories. Why include something and make 2% on it when they are turning 33% profit on the accessory sales. They know you are going to buy spare batteries, another memory card, and a bag, tripod, etc, etc, etc. Everything they include is one more thing they can't bend you over on.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    10. Re:my wish list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a referer number, duh.

    11. Re:my wish list... by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      I'd like to second (or third) the recommendation on the Canon A80 (or newer model). I got the [2Mpx] A40 back when it was new and have loved it, and that product line has just gotten better. I've recommended it to family and friends, 5 of which have gotten newer A-series cameras over the past 2 years. The newer models have a flip-out screens and nicer controls than the A40, but they all have manual aperture and shutter-speed control, making them the closest thing to an SLR (exposure-control-wise) in point-and-shoot body. Additionally, the A-series cameras take 4 AA batteries, a God-send in my opinion. With NiMH rechargebles, the batteries seem to last a long time; and emergency alkiline replacement are availible anywhere in the world for reasonable prices as AA seems to be the most common size everywhere.

      As for camera resolution and printing, I just tried printing some 2Mpx images from my A40 on a Canon i9900 photo printer, the first that I've tried that prints higher res than the camera does.
      The results:
      - 4x6 prints looked flawless
      - 8x10 prints looked flawless if your nose isn't pressed up to the picture. (in my opinion, good enough for framing and hanging on the wall)
      - I haven't yet found 13x19 paper, but I imagine the results will be similar to the 8x10s, grainy close up, but not bad on the wall above the couch.

      All this said, I'm hankering for a Canon Digital Rebel. As much as the aperture control of the A-series fits my creative needs, I am eager to return to the composition control provided by multiple lenses. I plan on keeping the A40 though, for remaining on belt in easy reach while the SLR is safely stowed in the backpack while skiing, etc.

      Hope this helps!
      Adam

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    12. Re:my wish list... by Bam359 · · Score: 1
      I second the recommendation for Canon's A80; I think they very recently released a successor, I think it's A95. Believe me, the swivel LCD makes a HUGE difference, it's not a gimmick.

      As you have to be looking directly at an LCD to be able to see the picture clearly, a swivel lets you put the camera on a ledge or something (tripod), and still see what kind of picture you are going to get. You can also close it to protect the screen from scratching, etc.

      Also checkout the S1iS , which retails for ~ 700.00 up here in Canada.

    13. Re:my wish list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's got a referer ID in it, you stupid ass. You should click it and buy into the pyramid scheme!

    14. Re:my wish list... by RedBear · · Score: 1

      i wonder why digital camera's don't come with internal hard drives, and better battery packs. size could be an issue, but if they can make 512 meg usb keychain drives (imagine it without the plastic casing and it is even smaller), i am sure they can put a gigabyte on a camera and still leave a slot for a memory card.

      One reason is cost. People would be confronted with a camera price that in some cases would be as much as double the base price of the camera. Another reason is the fast moving pace of technology, and consumer choice. All memory is not created equal. As consumers we have a choice about which brand of memory to put in and how much. If I only take 10 photos any given day and don't care about how fast they get written to the card, then I can pay $20 for a 32-64MB average-speed card.

      But if I'm into action photography and like to take loads of pics I can take the same camera and pour $300 into a bunch of the latest, fastest memory cards. This time next year I have the option of upgrading to a new generation of even faster memory cards, and/or larger cards. If the camera manufacturer built-in a memory card it would probably end up being much slower and smaller than anything available on the market within just a few months, thus making the cost of that internal card a waste of money from the perspective of many people. It can't be upgraded, and can't be taken out and resold to help finance a new card. It just doesn't make enough sense. That's why they include a small card for you to play with and then let you make a choice about how much more to put in. Many of the higher-end models don't even include a starter card.

      Another thing is, it would make the camera bigger. Compact cameras are already using stamp-size, credit-card-thin new memory cards like the SD card and xD Picture card. They don't have room for both an internal and an external card. Even on larger cameras making the camera bigger is usually not desirable unless there is some real benefit. And I don't really see any.

      The following is mainly OFFTOPIC:

      what digi camera's do people have, and how do they like them?

      Like you, I also bought a 2MP camera about 18 months ago. It was Canon PowerShot A40 which took decent pics and was easy to use. Upgraded to a PowerShot A70 when it came out last year (3.2MP). Again, easy to use and great colors. Pics can be printed out at least 8x10 and still look very nice. Possibly even larger with proper processing. In general I can recommend any Canon PowerShot digital for being easy to use, quick and generally taking well-exposed pictures with accurate colors.

      Gave the A70 to a friend and bought into the "ultra-zoom" craze with an Olympus Camedia C-750 last year (4MP). Again the resolution is good for 8x10 prints or even a bit larger, 13x19 would be stretching the limits of the resolution however. All this is assuming you want film-quality resolution in your printed photos. The Olympus C-750 is a great camera with lots of nice features and 10x optical zoom. I like it but it is slow to focus and it's often difficult to get to many options because you have to navigate through layers of menus instead of using a dedicated button.

      That is one of the reasons I've been looking at the new Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2 recently (8MP). It's got a lot of external controls that make it easy to modify a dozen or more different settings quickly. The A2 is one of 5 new cameras with an 8MP chip (the others are from Nikon, Olympus, Canon, and Sony). This is enough resolution for 16x20 prints at 150dpi (near enough to photographic quality to not really matter).

      For a casual camera I just bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ3 (3MP) for my wife's birthday. Good enough for 8x10 prints at least. 12x optical zoom, image stabilization (it works) all in a compact package. Very nice camera. Pretty much any 3-4MP camera will make good 8x10 prints these days.

      These new sensors are getting into the realm of the ridiculous for the casual snapshooter. There are simpl

    15. Re:my wish list... by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      They also make money by constantly improving the features. Digital cameras are improving at an insanely fast rate in fact at the moment. If there was market demand for internal storage, you can be sure someone would add it.

      However personally I wouldn't want it - I'd rather just have a memory-card slot and then buy whatever size/speed memory I prefer, than have to work with some inbuild thing coming with the camera. Sure the camera can have both, but thats just needlessly adding to its size+cost.

      Re. optical zoom, the companies work have worked hard on this over the last few decades. Unless you're buying real low end cameras (where all the consumers tend to care about are 'megapixels' etc), the companies pay real care to improving everything.

      However, note that increasing the zoom is never a win-win situation - to increase the optical zoom, you either have to increase the size+cost of a camera or decrease the image quality (either by decreasing the sensor size - losing resolution or adding noise - or increasing image distortion) or both.

      Thats why even SLR lenses are typically no higher zoom-range that your typical compact cameras, and most SLR owners buy multiple lenses (i.e. a tele-lense plus a wide-range lens plus a macro lense etc rather than some 'super-zoom one-size-fits-all'). If you really need high zoom, you have to sacrifice in terms of money/size/quality, and for the market the optimum zoom size is around 3-4x, however the market also supplies 10x and 12x optical zoom cameras for those who really need them (or for those that think the bigger the zoom number the better, and don't realise that a 6mp DSLR with a 3x zoom will take far better pictures in most situations than an 8mp 8x zoom 'prosumer' camera with lots of other fancy features and which actually costs virtually the same as a far-superior DSLR).

      Sure the megapixel numbers and digital zoom numbers are are stupid as the megapixel myth, but thats no reason for you to fall for them.

    16. Re:my wish list... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      Like you, I also bought a 2MP camera about 18 months ago.... easy to use and great colors

      My 2mp camera was good. Any pics I took for the web were great, and HUGE. I had to open up photoshop and crop the image size down when posting, because the picture was wider than the width of my monitor (1024*768). I was happy with my fuji 2mp camera. But then I had a cousin come and visit from Europe, and while shopping she wanted to purchase some disposable camera's. I told her I had a 2mp camera, and she said that did not sound like a high resolution. I talked with the guy working in the store, and he said the disposable camera's were of the same image quality as a 3mp digi camera. So far I have not printed out pictures, just kept them on the PC. But I do know that eventually I will want to start printing pictures, and I don't want grainy pictures.

      For a casual camera I just bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ3 (3MP) for my wife's birthday. Good enough for 8x10 prints at least. 12x optical zoom, image stabilization (it works) all in a compact package. Very nice camera. Pretty much any 3-4MP camera will make good 8x10 prints these days.

      I checked out this camera at amazon, and it looks like what I want. If I could get this camera as a 4mp, it would be perfect. Right now if I printed pics, I think I would want 5 by 7 pictures. But in the future, I would want to print pictures paper sized.

      In case you're wondering how I'm estimating the print sizes, the rule of thumb (I've read) is that an image only needs to be printed at 150dpi to give near-photographic resolution (at least to the human eye) and anything more than 300dpi is just more information than necessary. So take the largest print size you'd like to be able to make from your images (say 13x19) and multiply each side by 150, then multiply the two resulting numbers and the end result will be the MINIMUM megapixels you need to print with decent quality. Do that again with 300 and you'll get a much larger number that will be the number of megapixels you'll want in order to get the best possible quality at that print size.

      This is the info I needed most. Thank you. I have heard many rules of thumb, that 2mp makes good 4 by 6 pics, that 3mp make good 5 by 7, and so on. But I never thought about how many pixels it takes to make a photo of x inches. Are you sure that 150 dpi is good enough for a crystal clear picture? I remember back in the early 90's when people stared measuring laser printers, that less than 300 dpi would leave letters with unsmooth corners.

      Once again, thanks for you info. It helps!

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    17. Re:my wish list... by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Having used camera equipment in the field, I can tell you that being limited to 512mb or even 1gb of space when on an extended shoot is horrible for anything other than just snapshots. With RAW pictures coming out to something like 20mb each, your drive would only hold 24-60 pictures, and it's much easier to lug around four 1gb microdrives or real flash drives than the laptop and extra batteries you'd need to remove the images from a fixed-memory camera.

      Plus, the first time you run out of space in the middle of something interesting, you're going to curse ... pretty much everything. Being able to swap cards in 20 seconds with gloves on can be a life-saver.

      As for digital camera sizes, a 4mp camera will give you maybe a 9x13 picture before everything becomes pixelated. A good 6mp or 8mp should get you up to something in the neighborhood of 11x17.

      Personally, I have a Canon Powershot S45. It's a digicam rather than an SLR, but unless I'm night-shooting, it does rather well.

      But I still always carry extra cards and batteries, even though I generally don't take more than two cards or two batteries worth of pictures. I know some people who snap 1000+ frames over three days.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
  18. So microdrives are dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What should we get then. Sugar cube based drives?

    1. Re:So microdrives are dying? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That would be SWEET!!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  19. How is this not nice? by k98sven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok.. maybe I'm missing something here.. Are these things sold with a mandatory music-download-service subscription or something like that, in order to subsidize the price of the hardware? Or what?

    Because if they make their money off selling the things.. that doesn't make sense. Why should they care what you do with their product once they've sold it? This could leads to them selling more units.

    (Besides which.. The idea of being 'nice' to a business is just ridiculous. It's a friggin' business venture, not a person! They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.)

    1. Re:How is this not nice? by EvilFrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, ignoring the fact that a corporation is legally a person, businesses do not run themselves. Behind every business there are people making the decisions, and a business is as "nice", "ethical", or "trustworthy" as the people who run it.

      The fact of the matter is that there are some companies I prefer supporting over others, because I know what sort of people are behind them.

    2. Re:How is this not nice? by deacon · · Score: 5, Funny
      (Besides which.. The idea of being 'nice' to a business is just ridiculous. It's a friggin' business venture, not a person! They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.)

      AOOOGHAAA!

      AOOOGHAAA!

      ATTENTION!

      ATTENTION!

      An Apple Reality Distortion Engineering team has been dispatched to re-educate you in proper company loyalty pavlovian responses.

      Please Stand By!

      In a hurry?

      Shaving your scalp for the electrodes will save time and fuss later.

      That is all.

      Yeah, yeah, I dissed apple, mod me down, whatever...

    3. Re:How is this not nice? by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Probably, the parts other than the hard drive are really cheap and counting bulk pricing the whole thing comes out really really cheap, so they can make money selling the whole thing at less than the retail price of the hard drive.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    4. Re:How is this not nice? by Reverant · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why should they care what you do with their product once they've sold it?
      Because they actually prefer that you walk around listening to music with their player. Why? Because in this way, you advertise their player and their brand, and you will most propably tell all your friends how nice this 5G MP3 player is. But if you just pry it open, remove the microdrive, and then throw it in the trash, all this free advertising goes to, well, the trash.
    5. Re:How is this not nice? by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      he bought two of 'em, read the damn article.

    6. Re:How is this not nice? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok.. maybe I'm missing something here.. Are these things sold with a mandatory music-download-service subscription or something like that, in order to subsidize the price of the hardware? Or what?

      A quick google search reveals that a professional camera shop/mail order company sells a 4 GByte microdrive for $370-$500, while the MP3 player is expected to retail for $250. The difference is due to market pricing, as professional photographers are used to paying thousands for a professional camera, while the average consumer is used to paying hundreds for a portable digital product. The casing of the product hides the fact that both products used the same core component. Eventually the market will realize this and take action- perhaps choosing MP3 players with removable microdrives

      This isn't any different from Amazon's price discrimination for books.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:How is this not nice? by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      (Besides which.. The idea of being 'nice' to a business is just ridiculous. It's a friggin' business venture, not a person! They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.)

      This is BS man/woman.

      Any business out there is intended to make money or why the hell are they there? Even farmers are out there to make a buck so should we treat them the same? And being nice to customers is freaking Bus 101. Any how no matter if it's a Corp or Joe's strip joint; if they are nice why not treat them nice? I understand the whole capitalism thing but damn don't try to kill every business.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    8. Re:How is this not nice? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 4, Insightful
      all this free advertising goes to, well, the trash

      What? After having given Rio roughly two hundred and fifty bucks, I'm ALSO supposed to advertise for them at no charge? I don't think so. It's like the dealership sticker on the back of cars. My buddy used to tell them that either they knock off, say, a thousand bucks off the cost of the car in exchange for advertising, or lose the sticker before the deal closed (properly... no razor blades). Stunningly, he never drove cars with dealership stickers.

      Sure, he was being petty, but I completely agree with the point he made. Why would I advertise for Rio or their ilk? It's not as though they've done me any unilateral favours.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    9. Re:How is this not nice? by Surur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its called recognising the second order effects of one's actions. Sure cannibalising the micro-drives are good for you in the short term, but the Seagate makes a big profit margin selling these at a premium to photographers, and probably sells them to Rio at a steep discount. They dont want to lose that premium to the buyers of the Rio unit. They will therefore either stop selling to Rio (to protect their larger profit from photographers) or change the spec in some way to make that unintended use of the drive impossible.

      Either way it will drive up the costs for Rio, and damage them as a company. They will be forced to become less hacker friendly, and everyone will end up hating them.

      Its called thinking more than one step ahead, and this exact same scenario has already occurred to other HDD music player makers.

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    10. Re:How is this not nice? by loyalsonofrutgers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's just not true. Bureaucracies are much more than the sum of the people that combine to form them. This is the "I was just following orders" phenomenon. There's a lot of sociological literature about how bureaucracies and corporations are not merely the culmination of the personalities of its constituent parts. Fact of the matter is that fairly good people, when part of such an organizational structure, can do very bad things. And, furthermore, the organization in this case exists to make money, so fairly good people can do very bad things in order to make money. The organization becomes a creature unto itself.

    11. Re:How is this not nice? by jhoffoss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hello, how is paying the set $250 price for merchandise, then canabilizing YOUR property, not nice? I fail to see the point of this entire thread.

      I buy a product from Rio, that's that. If they're selling these at a loss, (which I guarantee you they're not) then they're losing money whether I use it, advertise, etc. or not.

      If this were not the case, and they are selling it at a loss to increase sales, as someone suggested, then wouldn't their losses increase due to additional sales? What fruity business consultant would come up with that idea?

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    12. Re:How is this not nice? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your clear, well thought out explaination. Editors, please archive the thread now.

    13. Re:How is this not nice? by Reverant · · Score: 1
      Why would I advertise for Rio or their ilk?


      Nobody said that you should or that you must, for that matter. I just said that Rio would prefer that their player is in circulation, practically advertising itself, rather than it being in the trashcan. And yes, the guy did buy two of them, but then again, Rio would prefer that two different individuals bought one, and actually used it. That goes for every other company in the world, including (surprise!) Apple.

      As for the car analogy, it's not the dealership sticker we're talking about here ("Joe's Ford Deals"), but rather the car's make and model (ie "Ford" and "Maverick").
    14. Re:How is this not nice? by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      (Besides which.. The idea of being 'nice' to a business is just ridiculous. It's a friggin' business venture, not a person! They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.)

      Yeah, but the reason they choose that as a strategy is that they anticipate customers favoring their company for its niceness. If niceness is actually important, then lots of people will gravitate towards the nice companies. If not, then the ruthless companies will outperform the nice ones.

      If you want more companies to do what Rio does, then throw a little more of your business Rio's way. If not, then just go with whatever company you want. This is still market economics, you're just choosing whether or not their behavior is something of value to you.

    15. Re:How is this not nice? by Sexy+Commando · · Score: 1

      I'll assume large corporations somewhat implemented Protocol 7 and created an evil entity that rules over the whole company.

    16. Re:How is this not nice? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      give me a break - they are interested in selling units and making money. True that there might be a bit of advertising involved in that, but if they were given the equivalent of a buying slashdotting with millions of units being sold (and then ripped apart), they'd take the cash from selling units in that fashion just the same.

    17. Re:How is this not nice? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      hey are selling it at a loss to increase sales, as someone suggested, then wouldn't their losses increase due to additional sales?

      Economy of scale. Say making 100 units costs $300/unit but making 1000 of them costs $200/unit. If you sell them for $350 you're too expensive to be competitive. At $250 your sales pick up enough that you start to see a tidy profit.

      What fruity business consultant would come up with that idea?
      Don't be so quick to be that smug. Computer geeks aren't the only people in the world with a brain.

    18. Re:How is this not nice? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Well, ignoring the fact that a corporation is legally a person"

      But a person that can be owned, interestingly.

      I wonder how far a campaign to emancipate corporations would get?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    19. Re:How is this not nice? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      > I fail to see the point of this entire thread.

      And yet you feel compelled to contribute to it.
      Puzzling, that.

      Actually threads don't have points. Posters (heads) do.
      It's similar to the allusion made previously in
      this thread, that it's silly to treat a business
      as a person, since businesses are amoral.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    20. Re:How is this not nice? by belroth · · Score: 1
      And how would Seagate know why anyone bought a Rio Carbon?

      This should boost Rio sales - people who want a MP3 player (and choose that model) and those who want a cheap microdrive are now the market.
      I read the article (I'm sorry, I can't break the habit) and the guy bought a Carbon to canibalize and liked it so much he bought another to use for music, I really don't see the harm to Rio.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    21. Re:How is this not nice? by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      If you actually do the math, you will find that there is, for a given product, a perfect price. This is where the economy of scales is most effective with the given manufacturing capacity and where supply meets demand. It would be more than stupid for seagate to demand different prices from different manufacturers because somewhere down the chain, different kinds of end users are targeted. Seagate doesn't care for the customers customers curstomers. It cares for its customers. True, prices might be different, but this can only be due to contracts that limit the risk for seagate or provides it with more planning security (ie.: you agree to order at least 10000 units over the next 6 month).

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    22. Re:How is this not nice? by 10scjed · · Score: 1

      as you can see from my sig, i am not a lawyer, but i did once read this article on straight dope regarding personhood for corporations- for what its worth...

      --
      --10scjed IANAL,AFAIK
    23. Re:How is this not nice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they should have no problems with people buying them for the drives. If it costs less for each unit when they sell more of them, then people who buy a unit for the drive are driving down the cost per unit, which means more profit.

    24. Re:How is this not nice? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      that is true, but besides the point. I was talking about the parent sneering about how they wouldn't be selling it at a loss because more sales would mean more loss

    25. Re:How is this not nice? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      partly true, but they sell at a discount to Rio because Rio will thousands at a time and probably sign deals involving guarantees of future purchases as well.

      Try buying other elextronic components bulk - it's not unusual to get a 50% or more discount per unit if you buy 1000 at a time.

    26. Re:How is this not nice? by sixteenraisins · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, ignoring the fact that a corporation is legally a person,...

      A corporation is not a person; legally, figuratively, literally, or in any other fashion. A corporation is a model of ownership, just like "sole proprietorship" or "partnership."

      Two of the most obvious differences between a "corporation" and either of the other two ownership models I mentioned are (1) a corporation uses allocation of stock to shareholders, whether publicly traded or not, and (2) the separate entity clause, which says very clearly that the assets, debts, etc. of the corporation are separate from the assets, debts, etc. of the owners (shareholders) - meaning if a company gets sued, litigants generally can't make a claim against the shareholders' assets.

      By definition, a corporation is necessarily not a person, even in the instance of a corporation with a single shareholder.

      --
      When you're not looking, this sig is in Latin.
    27. Re:How is this not nice? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      But the inverse works, too. Some very bad people can do some very good things in committee. Some companies can do nice things in the interest of making money (such as AOL subsidizing the cost to produce Winamp and Mozilla).

      Hating an organization JUST because it's an organize is stupid. If a corporation does things you like, it is in your interest to try and go with them wherever you can. I deal with this all the time...we have a supplier that has really high managed hosting rates, and despite OWNING a managed hosting business myself, we went with that supplier -- because they really helped us out last year.

      Back on topic, Rio makes money on these things. Buying up a ton of them, Rio makes a ton of money. Who loses? CompactFlash manufacturers, is who....and not, I'm sure, by a whole lot since no company (the real market for compactflash micro drives) would ever okay the purchase and destruction of a ton of mp3 players.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    28. Re:How is this not nice? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Well, the label is an identifier, not an advertisement. If your car is a piece of shit and says "Bill's Used Cars," Bill's not making any money. Same with ratty old Nikes.

      When I bought my car, it came with a sticker on it. They gave me shitty service. I put a "Sucks!" sticker after their logo. I felt better.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    29. Re:How is this not nice? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Good people make evil decisions to make money because they know they will not be held responsible for them. The corporation is the greatest intrument for shirking personal responsibility ever invented.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    30. Re:How is this not nice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if someone wants to get the same Rio you got. but you put stickers over all the logos. so instead they get a cheap knock-off that just doesnt do the job. they tell all their friends the horror story. and they all decide that these cool gagdets are just too much trouble. sony ends up making all the walkman sales and rio goes down the drain. i hope you can see that.

    31. Re:How is this not nice? by Pooua · · Score: 1
      A quick google search reveals that a professional camera shop/mail order company sells a 4 GByte microdrive for $370-$500, while the MP3 player is expected to retail for $250.

      Actually, a quick Google search led me to Steve's DigiCams, in which Steve mentions that Seagate plans to start selling 5 GB CompactFlash II drives (just like the one pictured in the article) in the third quarter of 2004 at an expected price under $150. Also, "Microdrive" is the trademarked name of IBM's and Hiatachi's device.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    32. Re:How is this not nice? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's funny... I just bought a used car and it had no sticker on it. Now I wonder!

    33. Re:How is this not nice? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Because they actually prefer that you walk around listening to music with their player. Why? Because in this way, you advertise their player and their brand, and you will most propably tell all your friends how nice this 5G MP3 player is. But if you just pry it open, remove the microdrive, and then throw it in the trash, all this free advertising goes to, well, the trash.

      If you pry it open, make a web page about how to do it, and post it to Slashdot, how much free advertising is that? Worth some thousands of times more than wearing the player as you walk around I think.

      And why on earth do you think a company you have paid for a product has the right or even the expectation that you will be a walking billboard for them?

    34. Re:How is this not nice? by instarx · · Score: 1

      A corporation is not a person; legally, figuratively, literally, or in any other fashion. A corporation is a model of ownership, just like "sole proprietorship" or "partnership."

      I guess you think if you sound positive enough people will believe you. However, in reality, a corporation IS often considered to be a person. Corpor..., Corpus..., Body..., Person... get it?

      As proof of your statement, you offered...

      (1) a corporation uses allocation of stock to shareholders, whether publicly traded or not

      And just what does that have to do with the price of eggs? There is no reason to think that issueing stock prevents anyone from being a person. In fact it is common. People often incorporate themselves and often have investors who own a share of their earnings (prizefighters come to mind). No one would ever state that these people are not real persons. Your statement simply has no bearing on the topic.

      (2) the separate entity clause, which says very clearly that the assets, debts, etc. of the corporation are separate from the assets, debts, etc. of the owners (shareholders) - meaning if a company gets sued, litigants generally can't make a claim against the shareholders' assets.

      Although I don't know what "clause" you are talking about, this is a generally true statement. However once again your argument has no bearing on whether a corporation is a person or not. No one contends that the corporate entity and the stockholders are the same.

    35. Re:How is this not nice? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Actually, a quick Google search led me to Steve's DigiCams, in which Steve mentions that Seagate plans to start selling 5 GB CompactFlash II drives (just like the one pictured in the article) in the third quarter of 2004 at an expected price under $150.

      Yes, but the component in question is the microdrive. It is the pricing difference between the MP3 player and the retailer store than has forced the guy to dismantle his MP3 player.

      Undoubtably, you can buy economically priced CompactFlash cards,but it is also the transfer rates (3.2 Megabytes/second for CompactFlash, 80 Megabytes for Microdrives) that makes a big difference. A JPEG compressed home photograph isn't going to take more than a couple of seconds to save. For a professional photographer, waiting 10 seconds to save a 32 Megabyte image is going to be an eternity.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    36. Re:How is this not nice? by Pooua · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the component in question is the microdrive.

      Have another look at the photograph of the drive in the original article. Here is a link to it: Seagate 5GB ST1 Drive

      Notice that it is a Seagate drive. As I said, "Microdrive" is a trademarked name of IBM and Hitachi. Therefore, the Rio is not using a Microdrive, and the lead article is incorrect to have identified it as a Microdrive.

      Seagate uses the same hard drive internals, but with different interfaces, for either CF Cards or ST1 (competing with Microdrive). Here is the Register article explaining things: Seagate unveils 'tiny to terabyte' hard drives

      But, feel free to pay $250 for a Rio, so you can tear it apart and get the $150 hard drive out of it. The drive is an OEM product right now, so you might have trouble getting it any other way.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  20. Are Slashdotters retarded by be-fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why else would they always put the link in the most useless part of the text? To keep me on my toes? The link does not point to 1,500 six-megapixel pics, so the link text should not be "1,500 six-megapixel pics." The link text should be the "rip the 5GB CF Card out of it."

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Are Slashdotters retarded by cookiepus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you expect the link to go to a gallery of 1500 six-megapixel pics the guy tool?

    2. Re:Are Slashdotters retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you expect the link to go to a gallery of 1500 six-megapixel pics the guy tool?

      I'm sure some fraction of slashdot's audience wouldn't mind 1500 6MP pics of the guy's tool.

    3. Re:Are Slashdotters retarded by glenstar · · Score: 1
      Did you expect the link to go to a gallery of 1500 six-megapixel pics the guy tool?

      I would *hope* he wouldn't post 1500 pictures of his tool.

    4. Re:Are Slashdotters retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      More to the point why doesn't Slashdot just put links to the actual article at the top, under the heading... I remember this was one of the most confusing things when I first started reading slashdot - which of the links buried in the text is the point of the item?

  21. In other Digital Camera Storage News.. by cflorio · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The price of Compact Flash really took a nose dive in the last month. You can now get a Sandisk Ultra II 1 GB solid state card for under $100.

    1. Re:In other Digital Camera Storage News.. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Yet the ling your pointing to offers it for 120 now....Hmmm....anyway, I will agree....BOTH SD and CF have been plummeting. I am wondering what Walmart will run for their Black Friday special?? Last year it was a 128 MB card for 30 which was really good at the time....this year could be 4 times that size for 30.

      --

      Gorkman

  22. With the ability to take so many 6MP pictures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You think he might have put some larger images on the site so that people could follow along with his mod...

  23. Batteries? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What kind of camera can take 1,500 6 mega pixel pictures without a change of batteries? If you can change batteries, you can change media as well.

    I've got a Sony DSC-V1, and I love it. But getting a > 256mb memory stick won't do me too much good without extra batteries.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Batteries? by QuasiDon · · Score: 1

      With My Canon Rebel Digital, I can take about 500 pictures on a charge. If I do Raw format, they are between 6 and 8MB per picture. So with two batteries (I keep a spare with my camera), I could come close to filling up that card. Plus, If I am traveling, it is not much of a hassle to bring along my battery charger, but much more of a hassle to bring along my computer do unload my CF card. For people who travel and take lots of pictures, this is great news.

    2. Re:Batteries? by mangu · · Score: 1
      If you can change batteries, you can change media as well.


      But you can buy batteries anywhere. For memory sticks you have to go to a specialized store. If you are on a trip to some distant place, it's nice to know you will not run out of media for your pictures.

    3. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memory Stick?

      If you can afford extra batteries and memory cards then you can afford to buy a camera that uses standard technology.

      Please turn in your geek card

    4. Re:Batteries? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      most DSLRs can take upwards of 500 or even 600 pictures with a single battery. More if you aren't using the lcd. So if they are now 8 megapixel pics (ie Canon 20D) you are approacing 5GB on a single battery.

      Plus having to carry extra batteries AND extra media is one more thing to carry (and thus forget to bring)

      Also according to dpreview, the dsc-v1 has 'average battery life' (they'd "recommend a second battery") so your needs with the V1 would certainly vary from others.

    5. Re:Batteries? by Forbman · · Score: 1

      ...also, the flash will eat up your batteries like mad, also.

      No LCD, no flash. Battery should last for a few more pics.

  24. Lifespan by dioxide · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know much about how long these drives are supposed to last? Is there a maximum number of writes, like flash memory, or is it equivalent to a 2.5" hard drive?

    I've got a few i-openers and I also want to build a small router type machine out of a soekris board, these drives would be ideal, as long as they aren't going to stop working after a month of writing logs.
    Read and write speed is not an issue with what I have in mind.

    1. Re:Lifespan by quintessent · · Score: 1

      Juding from my experience with one of these, the lifespan, under light use, is about 3 weeks.

  25. I hate to tell you this, but... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although they're similar, this isn't an iPod. Apple has nothing to do with it!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  26. You can't see? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.

    If a company A is more successful than company B because it acts nicer, that will reinforce company A's nice behavior.

    If that is what you value in a company AND it's products, since no product exists in a vacuum, then it SHOULD inspire loyalty from you because that is what you pay for. If you DON'T value niceness, then of course it shouldn't inspire loyalty from you.

    Some of us happen to like nicer companies than unnice, or even evil, companies, and choose our 'loyalty' accordingly.

    Loyalty may be too strong a word, but our proclivities if that seems better to you.

  27. Seagate Drive Will Soon Be Released As Standalone by Techie2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.seagate.com/cda/newsinfo/newsroom/cover age/article/1,1113,2320,00.html Soon you won't have to buy the MP3 player to get the drive.

    --
    "And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am." - Linus Torvalds
  28. Prosumer...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prosumer: It's a revolting, horrible stupid word which sounds nasty, isn't real and is just plain ugly. I really wish people wouldn't use it.

  29. But this is 5, not 4! by quintessent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You see, every time the spec for something goes up a notch, Slashdot needs to post an article about it, esepcially CPU speeds, as measure in megahertz.

    The interesting thing is, I was under the impression that both Creative and Apple have now protected their Microdrives so they're not readable in a camera.

    For those who are thinking of doing this, beware, though. I bought a cannibalized microdrive, which worked for about weeks, then died without warning. Now I have no idea how to get the thing fixed.

    1. Re:But this is 5, not 4! by Pooua · · Score: 1
      The interesting thing is, I was under the impression that both Creative and Apple have now protected their Microdrives so they're not readable in a camera.

      It depends on the camera and the drive. Some combinations will work, and others won't.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    2. Re:But this is 5, not 4! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it work for several weeks then quit?

    3. Re:But this is 5, not 4! by quintessent · · Score: 1

      AC wrote:

      Why would it work for several weeks then quit?

      I wish I knew. I can hear it spinning in there, but nothing--my computer or my camera can access it. I'm guessing it's one of those fluke failures that hard drives are prone to.

  30. I hate to tell you this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as my laughing has nothing to do with the grandparent post.

  31. Seagate says drives will ship in September by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    Seagate is backlogged a bit, but they're increasing capacity and these drives should be available shortly. "We're a bit oversubscribed. We're looking at ways of increasing capacity." -- Rob Pait, Seagate's director of global consumer electronics marketing. Pulling these things from consumer products will be unnecessary very shortly. After all, the version they put in the Rio Carbon was packaged for retail sale. A USB-keychain format is coming. There's also an ATA version for OEMs.

    The drive was designed in Singapore and manufactured in China. Seagate, once a California company, is now so multinational they barely have US operations. They've closed plants in Ireland, Mexico, Mayalasia, and Singapore because those places weren't low-cost enough.

    Here's the ST1 drive manual. Expect a glut of these things in January, once the holiday season business has been fulfilled and the production lines are running at full speed.

  32. Varying DV formats by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Raw DV has the video and audio streams interleaved.

    Some of the DV "container" formats used on PCs (such as one of the two DV-AVI types) duplicate the audio stream, with the "video" stream actually being the original raw DV (which has both video and audio)

    Also, longer tapes might exist now. The typical 60-minute-standard-play tapes are 13 GB. I think that tapes exist that are 75 and even 90 minutes in standard mode now though, although last time I went miniDV shopping they were hard to find and VERY expensive. (Compared to 6-packs of 60s relatively cheap at Costco.)

    See above regarding extended play tapes, which I think are 18-20 GB or so (but with a MUCH higher risk of errors) on a 60 minute tape.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  33. Priceless ! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cost of Rio MP3 player: $249
    Cost of trip to buy Rio: $5
    Value of your time to disassemble Rio: $50
    Having your hack featured on Slashdot: PRICELESS!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  34. Re:Rio Return Scam? by cflorio · · Score: 1

    I don't know, maybe Morals?

  35. Re:Compare: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You spend more than $3,971 per year on computers, games, and other such geek crap. For shame.

    Go live in Indonesia.

  36. But by Bruha · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Does it run Linux?

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Yawn...]

  37. The Next DIY Project by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Your next project is to do something useful with the remaining Rio parts. W.A.S.T.E. not, want not.

    After all, if people are cannibalizing OnStar systems after the subscription runs out just to get the GPS components, someone ought to be able to suggest a use for the rest of your Rio.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:The Next DIY Project by twitter · · Score: 1
      People typically put in smaller CF devices and sell the result on ebay. What do 512MB media payers go for these days? You may have to copy system files using a laptop. I don't have a Carbon so I don't know.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  38. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  39. Low cost mp3 players without drm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From what I previously knew, the Rio lost the battle to the entertainment cartel, so it was encumbered with digital restrictions management. I've been holding off buying a portable mp3 player because of the fear of buying one, and then finding out it was useless to play mp3s from my own music collection.

    I know that I can take a cd with mp3s on it to a electronics outlet to check if car stereos work or not with non-drm'd mp3s, but the few places I've been to (including circuit city, best buy, and a few other large stores) don't make it possible to check this on portable players, everything is boxed up when you buy it, and the samples are a mess (and I doubt they'd let me make the transfers to the device to see if it worked, though I must admit I haven't tried, haven't been to one of the stores lately).

    An ipod is far too expensive for my budget. Can someone name some lower priced mp3 players (ogg is ok too) that can hold a decent amount of songs (at least a hundred), and can play them, and transfer others in and out for variety, without drm restrictions? I'm looking for something hopefully under $100, the lower the better. I'm interested in two types, one that plays a cd of mp3 recorded songs, and one that isn't a cd player. If the second one can use usb drives as the medium for storing music, that would be even better, so I can mix up the music from time to time for my disabled relative who lives 3000 miles away, and doesn't own a computer.

    Any ideas, recommendations, suggestions would be deeply appreciated. Thanks!

    1. Re:Low cost mp3 players without drm? by kagaku · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any mp3 players that won't play a non-drm file. Almost any mp3 player will play DRM-WMA files, but they still play plain old mp3 as well. There are a few that only allow one way transfers (to the player only, not back to your pc), but most allow two-way transfers (including Rio).

      As far as I know, the only mp3 player to natively support Ogg Vorbis at the moment is the Rio Karma. Some iRiver players have the ability to play Vorbis as well, but afaik the firmware that allows this is still beta.

      If you're looking for a decent CD based mp3 player, I'd highly recommend looking into the Rio SP250. Before I bought my Rio Karma, I had one of these for a few years and absolutely loved it. I don't think you can find 'em new anymore, but you should be able to find it on eBay. It'll play mp3's or wma files off a CD, as well as normal audio cds. Great battery life too.

      --
      everyday is another shooter.
    2. Re:Low cost mp3 players without drm? by AlphaPB · · Score: 1
      Removable USB stick players from Lexar and Sandisk.

      Both of them should cost about $100 with a 256MB stick.

  40. Re:Rio Return Scam? by FLEB · · Score: 1

    That and screwdriver claw marks, I'd imagine.

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  41. Re:Anyone who's tried, please post this find...Huh by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    is solely to protect it's market for the drives otherwise.

    If that was the case, why doesn't Hitachi just swap a couple pins for their embedded customers. That way it would not be interchangable with the consumer version.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  42. Defending Slashdot's repost policy by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    Imagine if Slashdot only posted news once. If I was away for a few weeks, and slashdot posted a really cool article about some obscure subject that's rarely covered by anyone, I would most likely miss out.

    Not everyone reads the first article. Quite frankly, I'm glad Slashdot reposts nearly identical articles.

    Providing they're not posted the same day.

  43. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but i didn't know 9-11 was a holiday now. are we going to make columbine a holiday too? what about the time george w. choked on a pretzel? what about the time the alamo got pissed on by ozzy ozbourne? what about the day there was an outbreak of food poisoning at jack in the box?or is it only a "tragedy" if jews die?

  44. yes by twitter · · Score: 1
    Does it run Linux?

    Of course it does. Just drop it into a Zaurus or other handheld running Debian. I can imagine using partitions as /usr and /var.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  45. Re:Rio Return Scam? by nolife · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nothing can prevent that but, that has been happening for years as you could attempt this with anything and obviously people do.
    I am going into rant mode here but everytime I think about this, I get frustrated.
    I bought a 8X DVD drive from CompUSA a few years ago. Got home opened it up and wham! It was a used and broken 32x cdrom drive. I took it back within hours and explained exactly what happened. The assistant manager came to the desk and proceded to make strange faces looking at the device and commenting to herself out loud "wow, we don't even carry this model cdrom, I wonder how this happened" etc.. but never actually said anything directly to me or even asked me a single question. In fact, she never even looked directly at me. Then it came... In front of my kids and a bunch of other customers in line at the service desk. She flat out accused me for attempting to defraud them and she stated she was going to call the police and have my thrown in jail if I did not leave the store. A very heated agrument started but I eventually left with my credit card being charged back the full amount and I have not gone to a CompUSA since.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  46. Re:Rio Return Scam? by Juggle · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I had a friend who worked at a Best Buy....he noticed one customer was buying a returning 2-3 hard drives a week complaining about them not working.

    Being a tech guy (he worked in their "upgrade department") he popped one of the returned drives into a system and checked it out...worked fine...but was WAY lower capacity than what it was labled.

    Turned out the guy was buying the largest drives on the market....then pulling the labels off and putting them back on small drives which he'd return.

    Next time he came in the "yellow shirts" where waiting for him and gave a ring to the local police pretty quick.

    Now if you paid cash and didn't leave any personal info, only did it once and never returned to the store again....you could probably get away with it...but whether or not you should try that is between you and your deity.

    The problem is the kind of greed that makes someone try that kind of scam in the first place almost always assures they won't do it just once - and that's when they get caught.

    --
    --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
  47. Re:Rio Return Scam? by Sancho · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, you really can't blame them for assuming that you were trying to defraud them. I bet they get this sort of thing a lot, and it's a damn shame that they don't check the returns more carefully.
    Of course, that's why I like tamper-proof seals on things. That way you can be relatively sure that no one has had the device before you. I never by "open box" electronics for this very reason--the stores just can't test everything and often are so swamped that they overlook little things, and it's very easy to get screwed.

  48. Re:Rio Return Scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing that stops you from just fucking stealing one, I'd imagine.

  49. Re:With the ability to take so many 6MP pictures.. by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    That's what I was thinking, too, but with a potential for being slashdotted, maybe he was wise to not put bigger images on the page. His site has held up remarkably well.

  50. not asking for much are you? by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    They dont put those things in because it would drive the cost beyond what the average consumer wants to pay for a basic digital camera.

    Want really good zoom? Get a DSLR and a nice lens. The nikon D70's 18-70mm kit lens is worth $500 but only costs a bargain $250 in the kit.

    More battery power = bigger battery = bigger camera. Size is a purchase factor for many people.

    Most DSLR's can shoot well over 1000 shots between charges and theres no need to turn the camera off. Heck, my D70 *never* turns off completely, even with the switch on Off. It always at least displays the shots remaining on the card.

    --

    -

  51. Good v Bad by siskbc · · Score: 1
    They're in it to make money. If they act 'nice' it's because they believe it's a good strategy to make money. I completely fail to see how that should inspire any loyalties from me.

    As long as you find nothing wrong with them treating you (the consumer) the same way, then fine. Personally I like to reward companies who see benefit in supporting customers with my business.

    If you teach companies that they won't be rewarded for playing nice, they won't. If you send the message (with your $$$) that actually caring might be profitable, they might take that option, even if it's less obvious as a mechanism for making money.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  52. Re:Rio Return Scam? by jwcorder · · Score: 1

    Dude I think your friend is full of bull. The paper the labels are printed on is almost IMPOSSIBLE to get off without tearing it and if you did, that crap rolls up like crazy. Now I can believe that maybe he was taking the face off the hard drive and putting it on the smaller capacity one, but even that would be hard with the screw locations. Just a thought...

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
  53. Re:Rio Return Scam? by BlacKat · · Score: 1

    Really, then explain why I have a nice western digital drive here that I've just successfully been able to peel the entire top label from without /any/ damage.

    Even the other little stickers seem to come off just fine... the only ones that have severe issues are the "protection" ones that leave behind bits of themselves spelling out "VOID" or somesuch.

    We once bought a nice 80gb drive from Future Shop as an "open box" drive... whoever had the drive prior had low-level formatted it to 2gb... and we couldn't find any way to get the other 78gb back... so we returned it, but also told them exactly why we were.

  54. Re:Speaking of cameras... It works by krito · · Score: 1

    "Apple ipod drives are 'dumber' than your normal 1" microdrive or 1.6" mini-drive. They lack a lot of the logic IC's and firmware that allows them to be used with standard IDE interfaces."

    Well, that's not what mr Tony D says. Read on for more information about how to get your iPod Mini's microdrive up and running in your digital camera.
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1 023&message=10224662

  55. Re:With the ability to take so many 6MP pictures.. by oniqPL · · Score: 0

    From his main site, "Wow, the hits just went through the roof. My article with pics on breaking down the Rio Carbon got posted on slashdot.org. I have changed the pics to make them smaller, as the bandwidth was challenging the NIC in the server."

    Quick thinking!

  56. Not exclusive by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    If they make money by helping you, then of course they will help you.

    Competition helps. If Canon isn't selling a camera with integrated storage and battery, and it really is a strong selling point, then eventually someone else will and take those sales away from Canon.

    As an analogy, look at the iPod, and then the iPod mini, as examples of exactly this formula.

    Market is flooded with removable storage, removable battery mp3 players. Apple releases an integrated storage, integrated battery mp3 player which happens to become a big hit. In fact, I do believe the CF hd market was languishing until Apple stepped in.

    So yes, if you believe that you make the most money when you help the consumer more than your competitors do, a corporation is out to do BOTH.

  57. Hmm by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I guess a lot of cameras use stanard AA batteires, mine has a special 'infolithium' doohicky.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  58. Yep, word on the street is.... by Otto · · Score: 1

    Word on the street is that the 5 gig versions of the Seagate ST1 CF drives will be available for under $200 in a month or two. The 2.5 gig versions should be just under $100.

    I guess this is cool if you want one early, as the drives have only been made available for OEM uses, but the consumer versions will be cheaper than these devices so it's not a great deal unless you're impatient.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  59. how about... lower price for photogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plan B, lower the price to photographers since it's obviously bearing a huge markup and is related more to "industry standard" price fixing than actual production cost, would not occur to you/them I suppose.

  60. Buffer write time by ehack · · Score: 1

    If you are shooting a show, you end up with a lot of images in the buffer (1DII can do 8images/sec). You cannot change card until they are all spooled out. So either you have a big card and shoot your bursts, or you have small cards and need to wait till you have spooled (1-2 mins) until you can change cards. Waiting is not a thing which a professional photographer likes to do, although Java users are a patient lot (glad I got that in:)

    --
    This is not a signature.
  61. Come on... by Archimonde · · Score: 1

    Ask yourself this: about what this article is? That guy who disassembled that player is actually (probably not intentionaly) advertising Rio brand. Anyone who wants 5GB compact flash will want one. I'm sure there is someone in the /. crowd who will buy it. Heck, even I am interested in it.

    Its free advertising, and the positive one.

    --
    Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
  62. Carbon Shells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone tried these with a regular solid-state CF card? How long before we start seeing Carbon shells on eBay?

    The Muvo2 was alright, but I much prefer the UI and design of the Carbon. A gig of CF usually goes for $60 now, so around $100 or so for a decent 1GB flash player isn't bad at all.

    1. Re:Carbon Shells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put an IPOD mini 4GB (from a failed experiment) in the Carbon reflashed the device and it works great. So I guess I have a RIpOd Carbon Mini

  63. I am a Fuji user too by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I currently use a Fuji too. It is 2 MP as well. Probably the same as yours, the FinePix 2400 Zoom.

    It is an OK camera, given that I purchased it 3.5 years ago, and it is still ticking. It has a good lens. The Megapixel thing is not an issue. Its pictures are nice and sharp. It also has great macro capability.

    The problem I have with it is low light performance. It can't focus and the pictures are grainy. Flash pictures are really crappy too.

    I found that this is a common problem with consumer digital cameras. A relative of mine has bought a high end prosumer camera, the Nikon 5700. It suffers from the same problems of low light performance as well. He also made a mistake of using a microdrive Compact Flash card, and writing to it is very slow.

    I have been thinking of my next camera, and find the following choices to be suitable for my need:

    • Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20. Here is a overview of it, and here is the info from the Panasonic web site. This camera has the greatest optical zoom you can find, 12X. The lens is made by Leica, known to be great always. It has an optical image stabilizers. The drawbacks are a proprietary battery (need to buy a spare for more $$$$), and the LCD does not swivel. The price has come down dramatically since they introduced the 2 Megapixel model. This one is 599$ MSRP.
    • Canon S1 IS. This one has it all, a good lens, a swivel LCD, image stabilizer, Canon quality, AA batteries (cheap rechargables), ...etc. The problem is that it is only a 3 megapixel camera, and for this day and age, this is a bit low. It takes great pictures for sure. Check the gallery in the above link.

    Of course, you can take the removable lens DSLR route, but that is too expensive for a general user like me.

  64. Re:With the ability to take so many 6MP pictures.. by thegoogler · · Score: 1

    Also from the main page "click the pictures to see larger versions"

  65. it isn't interchangeable with the consumer version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why swap pins?

    If you take the hard drive out of a mini, it won't work in most cameras, card readers, etc.

    Also note that minis won't work if you put a flash CF card in them.

  66. Re:Rio Return Scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like your friend is BS-ing you. Every Best Buy I have returned a product to has required name, address, and phone number to do returns. Also to buy refurbished or open-box products. So you can be pretty certain BB is tracking this on its own.

    Best Buy is a shitty store btw.

  67. Cool! by wldkos · · Score: 0

    That is definately cool to see some nice hardware hacking. Even though that Rio MP3 did look cool, I'd rather use that than the IPOD HDD since 20gb for pictures is just too much.

  68. Re:Rio Return Scam? by wldkos · · Score: 0

    That's very logical and a very human thing to do. Great idea though, There's always a loophole in every system, and this guy found one.

  69. Re:USB Mass Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He probably means mp3 players that act like a standard USB mass storage device. Many mp3 players actually convert the mp3 into a propriatery format. An example of this is the RCA Lyra, which uses it's own mpx format (some kind of encrypted mp3).

  70. I see it in small engines by zogger · · Score: 1

    Being an outside maintenance dude, I see this sort of weird pricing with small engines. Say you got a small riding mower needs a new engine. You can get mowers on sale for as little as 600 clams. Want just the engine? 599$. Guess what most guys do....

    I say go for it before RIO won't care, they sell more gadgets, they are happy, you get a microdrive and the leftovers for your junk hardware box (or storage unit or whatever), and that's a geek +1 cool factor, because you can never have enough hardware junk. Evah. That's the rules and stuff.

    1. Re:I see it in small engines by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Nah, I bought a gas-powered trimmer at one of the two big US home centers, but it had been returned. OK, no problem.

      Tried to use it twice. Engine would rev up, but cut out after about 10-15 seconds on throttle, plus was leaking gas, but it would idle or run at low speeds fine.

      I thought perhaps there was a fuel flow problem related to the gas leak (sort of like sucking soda through a cracked straw).

      Engine guy at the store agreed, and said it would probably be a warranty fix for the carb.

      Cool beans.

      The store calls back, saying that it was determined to need a "piston replacement", at $260.00 (probably not including labor). I paid $220 for it on the rack [at the time retail was $270, but now they're $200!]! No way will I pay that, I said, when a new one was only $200!

      Was getting ready to go complain to the store, but then got a phone call, after learning a bit more about the particular unit's history from the store, they agreed that it would be best to just exchange with a new unit. Good enough for me, because I do want to/need to use it.

  71. Re:Speaking of cameras... It works by Refrag · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the camera doesn't recognize the HFS format on the Ipod Mini's drive. So, he reformatted it as FAT using the Carbon (he could have also formatted the Ipod's with FAT with Itunes for Windows -- if the Ipod hadn't been driven over).

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  72. this item not out yet according to amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to amazon..this hasnt been release yet....

  73. Re:it isn't interchangeable with the consumer vers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Also note that minis won't work if you put a flash CF card in them."

    Where'd you get that information?

    All you have to do is clone the information from the mini HD - it works fine. Several websites have done it, none report on the battery life though.

  74. Re:USB Mass Storage by kagaku · · Score: 1

    Actually I'd say that those type of mp3 players are in the minority. The only ones I can think of offhand that convert to their own formats are the RCA Lyra and pretty much any 'mp3' player Sony makes (they all convert music to ATRAC3 format).

    --
    everyday is another shooter.
  75. I have lots of Microdrives lying around by ksp · · Score: 1

    I have several boxes of Microdrives that I never use any more. The main reason is that they only fit in this computer!
    ;-)

    --
    What is the sound of one hand clapping?
    cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
  76. How about 100,000 0.25 megapixel pictures by phr1 · · Score: 1

    That 5 GB drive is equivalent to a DVD. So you could have a camcorder that stores a full hour of high quality MPEG-2 video, or a half an hour of DV-25 (i.e. MiniDV compression) video.

  77. Why destroy it when you can use a PCMCIA drive? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    You can use an adaptor

    http://www.glasslantern.com/articles/PocketPCDri ve s/

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:Why destroy it when you can use a PCMCIA drive? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Damn slashdots handling of text! Here's the link

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  78. Re:Rio Return Scam? by Juggle · · Score: 1

    This was around 95 or so...the labels on the drives being returned were those metalized silver ones. No they didn't pull off completely cleanly and if you looked closely you could tell where they had been pulled up and glued back down (he showed me on that was sitting there.)

    No, it wouldn't work with just any drive on the market. But the particular brand and packaging that this guy was scamming on did make it possible.

    --
    --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
  79. Re:Rio Return Scam? by jwcorder · · Score: 1

    You may be able to get that label off with some care and some time without tearing it. But try sticking it back down. It looks like crap. Even with glue, most of the paper they use to print the labels with are made of similar paper like you get on a bottle of soda and that really shows damage.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
  80. MuVo2 FM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The upcoming MuVo2 FM also has the 5GB Microdrive. Check this site to be notified when the MuVo is available:

    http://www.urlyadopter.com/