It can be true with mutators like positive or negative bias applied.
This is reported by an environment journalist. And while it may be entirely true that the money is explicitly used to attack global warming. There's no mention whatsoever of the money used to attack global warming skepticism that is channeled to the other side of the pond from sources like Al Gore and other people that are investors in greentech.
This is why I hate the climate debate. It ceased to be science a long time ago, it's all about politics nowdays. Trying to objectively categorise it is the same as being as being a presidential candidate that claims to be 45% democrat and 55% republican: You'll get flakk from both sides and votes from none.
What do they mean would happen if the earth moved 1% closer to the sun then? Everything burst into flames, the oceans evaporate and the moon falls down unto our head?
It seems to me that they are trying to form fit the equations to put earth on the extreme border.
Or they're playing buzzword bingo and decide to use the worst apocalyptic CO2 forcing knife-edge-balanced runaway GW scenarios which sets the world on fire if solar influx is just slightly elevated.
Do you not feel a need to refine the singularity concept and flesh it out a bit?
The idea that I feel you convey is that we have an accelerated progress rate(which I find nothing wrong with), but that this would lead to a lightning-strike like event like a singularity, is lowering a religious rapture-like veil over it.
Whereas, to use the fundamental view: a exponential curve climbing to a singularity, we'd find nothing instantaneous and rapture like about the singularity moment at all. Because the curve is smoothly climbing. So what's interesting is not the singularity event at all, that's just some endpoint where theoretical mapping of progress may break down. What's interesting is the Rapid Climb for the short period before we get to that point.
There will be no sharp transition, we'll transition from crippled, to walking(I guess we're here right now), to running, to dashing forward at highway speeds. That's a lot more appealing concept, because I can go out there and join the runners and accelerate with them, as opposed to lie in my sofa, waiting for the divine finger-snap transition.
DENIERS, BUUUUUUUURN THEM! Wait wait. How do we know they are deniers? Because they look like it! Yes, but, we have to prove it. Uuuh... they're made of oil... so they float? Yes, and what else floats? Ducks? Yes, so fetch me a duck and I get my scales out....
They'll just put politicians as apex predators and key to preserving biodiversity, then claim they've filled in all the important spots and only have to add some minor details to finalize it.
Being the original grandparent or whatever poster; this is virtually a knife in my own back, but anyway, for neural networks, things will be slow as shit, end of story.
But; things can be simplified, trained separately or bypassed by other creative processes, in this case, the end justifies the means, so unnatural and 'inhuman' practices are totally fair play in this case. That said, I hope that dear Ray have a strongly opinioned council of google engineers, becaue, well, I do think they have a very much better clue about how to do thinks better than him: he's a visionary, not a practical implementer.
The chinese room is the dumbest fucking thought experiment in the history of the universy. Also, Penrose is a fucking retard when it comes to consciousness.
Now, having put the abrasive comments aside(without bothering about the critique of the aforementioned atrocities: the internet and googles provides a much better job of the fine details regarding that than any post here will ever make)
SOooooo, back to the topic at hand: Boris Katz forgets a very important detail: A lifetime of experience to a computer cluster with several thousand cores, and several billion Hz of operational frequency, per core, can be passed in a very short time. Now I'm not saying it is guaranteed to work, or to provide any viable resource but I'm saying it's not unfeasible.
I'm however also not particularly excited about Kurrzweil; he's a good introduction, but the presentation he gives is a bit too shallow and oriented towards laymen(a good method to spread the idea, but a bad one to refine it or get good critique)
Converting to mechanized agriculture had its casualties too. Converting to steam power had its casualties too. Converting to digital IC computers had casualties too. Invading Nazi germany had its casualties too.
I dont' think opressive scientology ads are important to the livelihood of the atlantic. I think it's important to the expanded profit margins of the upper echelons.
Of course its just coincidence. We should free these poor, innocent and, more importantly, rich men and pay them $450 million each of taxpayer money to compensate for the terrible suffering and stain of reputation that the legal system have wrought upon them.
Elderly and children do not respond with classic symptoms always, along with possible co-infections and whatnot else it's pretty hard to tell if it's actually flu, some passing other infection, or other natural causes.
The mayans predicted the disaster that is Apple maps. The end of the era is due to Santa using his iPhone to navigate and strays into NK airspace, being mistaken for a US spyplane and swiftly shot down.
Slashdot Mirror
Multi display gaming and 4K monitors right around the corner may also give it a run for its money.
It can be true with mutators like positive or negative bias applied.
This is reported by an environment journalist. And while it may be entirely true that the money is explicitly used to attack global warming. There's no mention whatsoever of the money used to attack global warming skepticism that is channeled to the other side of the pond from sources like Al Gore and other people that are investors in greentech.
This is why I hate the climate debate. It ceased to be science a long time ago, it's all about politics nowdays. Trying to objectively categorise it is the same as being as being a presidential candidate that claims to be 45% democrat and 55% republican: You'll get flakk from both sides and votes from none.
A once a century event. And it hit no one that deserved it? Such a shame.
Though I guess Steve Jobs and Hitler weren't availible as targets.
Assault crossbows on youtube? Time to call the think of the children brigade!
What do they mean would happen if the earth moved 1% closer to the sun then? Everything burst into flames, the oceans evaporate and the moon falls down unto our head?
It seems to me that they are trying to form fit the equations to put earth on the extreme border.
Or they're playing buzzword bingo and decide to use the worst apocalyptic CO2 forcing knife-edge-balanced runaway GW scenarios which sets the world on fire if solar influx is just slightly elevated.
Do you not feel a need to refine the singularity concept and flesh it out a bit?
The idea that I feel you convey is that we have an accelerated progress rate(which I find nothing wrong with), but that this would lead to a lightning-strike like event like a singularity, is lowering a religious rapture-like veil over it.
Whereas, to use the fundamental view: a exponential curve climbing to a singularity, we'd find nothing instantaneous and rapture like about the singularity moment at all. Because the curve is smoothly climbing. So what's interesting is not the singularity event at all, that's just some endpoint where theoretical mapping of progress may break down. What's interesting is the Rapid Climb for the short period before we get to that point.
There will be no sharp transition, we'll transition from crippled, to walking(I guess we're here right now), to running, to dashing forward at highway speeds. That's a lot more appealing concept, because I can go out there and join the runners and accelerate with them, as opposed to lie in my sofa, waiting for the divine finger-snap transition.
Just tell them to make sure that the head mesh is attached to the rest before clicking submit.
DENIERS, BUUUUUUUURN THEM!
Wait wait. How do we know they are deniers?
Because they look like it!
Yes, but, we have to prove it.
Uuuh... they're made of oil... so they float?
Yes, and what else floats?
Ducks?
Yes, so fetch me a duck and I get my scales out....
They'll just put politicians as apex predators and key to preserving biodiversity, then claim they've filled in all the important spots and only have to add some minor details to finalize it.
It was also before he invaded poland.
Being the original grandparent or whatever poster; this is virtually a knife in my own back, but anyway, for neural networks, things will be slow as shit, end of story.
But; things can be simplified, trained separately or bypassed by other creative processes, in this case, the end justifies the means, so unnatural and 'inhuman' practices are totally fair play in this case. That said, I hope that dear Ray have a strongly opinioned council of google engineers, becaue, well, I do think they have a very much better clue about how to do thinks better than him: he's a visionary, not a practical implementer.
The chinese room is the dumbest fucking thought experiment in the history of the universy. Also, Penrose is a fucking retard when it comes to consciousness.
Now, having put the abrasive comments aside(without bothering about the critique of the aforementioned atrocities: the internet and googles provides a much better job of the fine details regarding that than any post here will ever make)
SOooooo, back to the topic at hand: Boris Katz forgets a very important detail: A lifetime of experience to a computer cluster with several thousand cores, and several billion Hz of operational frequency, per core, can be passed in a very short time. Now I'm not saying it is guaranteed to work, or to provide any viable resource but I'm saying it's not unfeasible.
I'm however also not particularly excited about Kurrzweil; he's a good introduction, but the presentation he gives is a bit too shallow and oriented towards laymen(a good method to spread the idea, but a bad one to refine it or get good critique)
Crime?
If I see a bank vault missing a wall, am I criminal for pointing out this obvious and stupid flaw?
Converting to mechanized agriculture had its casualties too.
Converting to steam power had its casualties too.
Converting to digital IC computers had casualties too.
Invading Nazi germany had its casualties too.
I dont' think opressive scientology ads are important to the livelihood of the atlantic. I think it's important to the expanded profit margins of the upper echelons.
Of course its just coincidence.
We should free these poor, innocent and, more importantly, rich men and pay them $450 million each of taxpayer money to compensate for the terrible suffering and stain of reputation that the legal system have wrought upon them.
You'll loose ions in the voimit pumpout, so excess use will either need supplementing or monitoring to prevent various complications.
I disagree.
We are actually big clothed apes.
Follow the money and you probably find that various three letter agencies are his main customers.
Elderly and children do not respond with classic symptoms always, along with possible co-infections and whatnot else it's pretty hard to tell if it's actually flu, some passing other infection, or other natural causes.
Where should the treshhold to sick be drawn? A light cough and running nose would mean me staying at home ~1 month per year.
The amount of stupidity will exceed the swarzchild limit, luckily nothing will escape from here after that.
Maybe he don't have a face?
>Based on the above, who am I?
Anonymous
The mayans predicted the disaster that is Apple maps. The end of the era is due to Santa using his iPhone to navigate and strays into NK airspace, being mistaken for a US spyplane and swiftly shot down.