Slashdot Mirror


NASA On Full Court Press To Deflate Doomsday Prophecies

coondoggie writes "Insidious unknown planets lurking behind the sun ready to slam into Earth, supernova set to engulf the planet and giant, unseen asteroids screaming toward our globe are all theories espoused across the Internet as to how we will meet our demise on 12/21/2012. Do any of these theories even remotely hold out a scintilla of evidence they could happen? Not even remotely if you look at the material NASA has put out which pretty much debunks any and all of the notions being floated in across the cybersphere."

286 comments

  1. Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...we have NASA. I was really beginning to think it was The End.

    1. Re:Thank God... by durrr · · Score: 4, Funny

      The amount of stupidity will exceed the swarzchild limit, luckily nothing will escape from here after that.

    2. Re:Thank God... by meglon · · Score: 2

      That is indeed the probably cause of our destruction.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    3. Re:Thank God... by meglon · · Score: 4, Funny

      That, and misspellings with no edti button....

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    4. Re:Thank God... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      The rate of accretion of the stupidity unfortunately causes some of that stupidity to radiate outwards due to conservation of angular momentum. Luckily we have the likes of NASA to try to prod it back into place.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    5. Re:Thank God... by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So crazy. This whole Mayan doomsday prophecy stuff all amounts to nothing more than an ancient form of the y2k bug.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    6. Re:Thank God... by meglon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep. But yah know, if you listen to the wind you hear the same nonsense every year, often multiple times a year, usually from religious nutcases that just have to have a screw loose (or several). Where i grew up we had a large Jehovah Witness church not too far down the road, and several times a summer a couple little old ladies would come by preaching the end of the world was coming in the next couple months.

      It seems there are a small number of people in the world who's only interest is to have the world end... i just don't get it.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    7. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the secret hidden scrolls found only yesterday predict worldwide flattulosis will overtake us. This is entirely the will of Bob and will only find fatalities in particular high offices and targeted cultures. Prepare to gas up like balloons, fly like rockets and stink like a senator gaped by a gorilla.

    8. Re:Thank God... by LifesABeach · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Mayan's I've talked to think this is funny; they equate the calendar ending like December 31st. The cycle then repeats itself.

    9. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better .. it signifies the first (and possible only) time an employer contractor overrunning budget and cut it off :

      -What are you doing there?
      Making Calenders.
      -I asked you to make calendars a week ago, how long does it take??
      Well, we're up to the year 2012. How far do you want us to go?
      -WTF. Really? Knock that off and go kill a mammoth.

    10. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, the 13th baktun ends and the 14th one begins. no problem. the calendar doesn't "end"

    11. Re:Thank God... by jythie · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is frightening is how many apocalyptics hold public office....

    12. Re:Thank God... by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "So crazy. This whole Mayan doomsday prophecy stuff all amounts to nothing more than an ancient form of the y2k bug."

      Not even that. It amounts to looking at your wristwatch at five to twelve and saying "oh, my god, the world ends in five minutes".

    13. Re:Thank God... by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. It's like seeing 999999 on the car odometer and thinking that the car will self destruct if you drive it one more kilometre (or mile, depending).

      Mind you... if your car has that much mileage, it might just self destruct at that.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    14. Re:Thank God... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      What is frightening is how many apocalyptics hold public office....

      What is more frightening is that despite all the budget cuts, NASA still can't find a good use for the tax dollars that they get. It is unbelievable that they are wasting it on this garbage. Do they really not have anything better to do?

    15. Re:Thank God... by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      Yep. But yah know, if you listen to the wind you hear the same nonsense every year, often multiple times a year, usually from religious nutcases that just have to have a screw loose (or several). Where i grew up we had a large Jehovah Witness church not too far down the road, and several times a summer a couple little old ladies would come by preaching the end of the world was coming in the next couple months. It seems there are a small number of people in the world who's only interest is to have the world end... i just don't get it.

      Atheists (somewhere) wittily offered to look after the pets of those 'raptured' with a non-refundable deposit. And return the animals should the rapture not happen. I think they coined a mint. I don't know if they kept it.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    16. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Mayan's I've talked to think this is funny; they equate the calendar ending like December 31st. The cycle then repeats itself.

      I suspect everyone else thinks it's funny too.

      Man, this is great, we can get an official response from NASA for anything... "Dear NASA, I'm terribly worried about the rumours that the world is about to be eaten by a giant mutant star-donkey. Can you please indicate whether any silly asses have been spotted by the space telescope?" Post that... next one... "Dear NASA, I'm shocked that you don't seem to have dispelled the rumours that the world is about to be destroyed by a critical mass of thermo-nuclear tabasco sauce when the supermall opens with too many Mexican food outlets. Please hurry to dispel the rumours of this terrible catastrophe." Next one... "Dear NASA, the radio just told me the world is going to implode because so many clocks are now co-ordinated by NTP that when they chime midnight at exactly the same time, the resonance from all those hourly chimes will shatter the earth's inner core. Please set my mind at ease."

    17. Re:Thank God... by meglon · · Score: 1

      Hehehe. I'd be more than happy to give someone (read: nutcase) around where i live a couple hundred bucks for some land with a nice house on it, with the caveat that i only take possession of it on the 22nd.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    18. Re:Thank God... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. There's not even the slightest hint of evidence to suggest all these nutjob prophecies are real. Everyone can see through the bullshit. It's not like they're something with a lot of valid evidence that is obviously real, like religion.

    19. Re:Thank God... by j-beda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I personally think that it is convenient to have a fairly authoritative website to point people to who have concerns due to the woo-woos raising a fuss. Nothing is ever going to change the minds of the "true believers" but it is useful for those not yet completely bamboozled to have the opportunity to see a more reasonable world-view. I doubt very much that this cost NASA much in terms of resources.

    20. Re:Thank God... by msauve · · Score: 1

      +1

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    21. Re:Thank God... by jythie · · Score: 2

      Hrm.... political figures who have a religious interest in bringing about the end of the world... vs what is probably a few people in NASA doing a bit of entertaining outreach regarding the misuse of science. Not really the same, much less 'worse'.

    22. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what - NASA has, and will likely continue to have budgets for education and community outreach.
      This falls under both categories, though I really wish it didn't.

    23. Re:Thank God... by robot5x · · Score: 1

      Yeah BUT doesn't Mayan mythology also talk about different 'ages of the sun'? At the end of each such age their myths said that a terrible calamity happened, lots of people died, but the earth kept rolling and life gradually renewed.

      The difference this time around is that - according to the Mayan calendar - we are currently in the fifth and final 'age of the sun'. The implication being that - after this particular calendar cycle finishes (next week) - the whole place is going to evaporate and there won't be any more.

      Well that's what I read in some book or other anyway. Yes, that's my citation.

      --
      Hej! Nasi tu byli!
    24. Re:Thank God... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's like seeing 999999 on the car odometer and thinking that the car will self destruct if you drive it one more kilometre (or mile, depending).

      For sale.
      1988 Toyota Camry, 999999K's, excellent cond. one lady owner.
      $4000 o.n.o.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    25. Re:Thank God... by drkim · · Score: 1

      "So crazy. This whole Mayan doomsday prophecy stuff all amounts to nothing more than an ancient form of the y2k bug."

      Yeah - and we all know how good the Mayans were at predicting impending disaster.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_conquest_of_Yucat%C3%A1n

    26. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what will change their minds. The happy realization that everything's "Ok" when they wake up on the 22nd, 23rd, 24th ...and so on. (Typical exceptions admitted, sadly)

    27. Re:Thank God... by rwiggers · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, not even that. They'll find an error in calculations, another doomsday theory or whatever....

    28. Re:Thank God... by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Determining the fate of the world is outside of Nasa's pay grade, we should be asking the airforce.

    29. Re:Thank God... by craigminah · · Score: 1

      I predict on 12/22/2012 a "researcher" will reveal errors in the original interpretation of the Mayan calendar and will present a new end of the world doomsday prediction. T-shirts will go on sale shortly afterwards...

      "It's the end of the world and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt", etc.

    30. Re:Thank God... by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

      Even better, it's like seeing 079999 on and odometer and thinking that. We are heading into the 13'th b'ak'tun out of 20 (b'ak'tuns last a little less than 400 years), and after ending the 20th, we move onto the 1st bak'tun of the 2nd piktun. Oh, and after 20 piktuns are done, it's onto the 2nd kalabtun, 20 of those is a K'inchiltun and 20 of those is a Alautun. But there's nothing for 20 Alautuns, so in ~460 billion years, we might see some trouble according to the Mayan calendar.

    31. Re:Thank God... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The Mayan's I've talked to think this is funny; they equate the calendar ending like December 31st. The cycle then repeats itself.

      A few years ago I dug into this Mayan prophesy/end-of-the-world/Nibiru stuff on the Internet. That was the conclusion I came to; that the Mayans had a very long calendar, and it ended in 2012. But like all calendars, you just start over at the beginning.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    32. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Dennis Ritchie predicted that the world would end on January 19, 2038, and I believe him a lot more than a bunch of dead Mayans.

      (Well, the 32-bit world, anyway; the 64-bit world has an extra couple billion years to go).

    33. Re:Thank God... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      I contemplated advertising that for those who were/are truly serious in their belief that the world will end on the 21st, I would have them sign a legal contract which gives me all of the assets in all their bank accounts.

      This would be signed and executed on the 20th so there would be time for the money to transfer that day. Once the money had been transferred, I would give them $100 to spend during their last hours. Can't be that coldhearted.

      Since the contract was not signed under duress and they were truly serious in their belief that there would be nothing after the 21st, there wouldn't be any excuse for them to come back to me on the 22nd asking for their money back.

      After all, if you're truly of the opinion that nothing will be here on the 22nd, there shouldn't be a problem with you giving your money away.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    34. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So crazy. This whole Mayan doomsday prophecy stuff all amounts to nothing more than an ancient form of the y2k bug.

      There is a big difference, though. The Y2K bug was a real problem, which was all but wiped out due to preventive measures. With this Mayan calendar bullshit there is no preventive action and no threat.

    35. Re:Thank God... by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      More irony in your title than the actual post.
      Since it's only Christians that believe in a Mayan doomsday. Actual Mayans don't give a shit.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    36. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing is ever going to change the minds of the "true believers"

      Call it a hunch, but I think December 22nd will probably do that quite well.

      Course, I think I read somewhere that the placement of Dec. 21st is horribly off, and it's actually a number of years earlier, but I could be mistaken.

    37. Re:Thank God... by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

      My church just handed out (free!) 2013 calendars to parishoners. I was starting to worry about that Dec. 31st thing, but now I know we're good for another 12 months.

      Besides, who with any business sense publishes a calendar that lasts 5000 years, and distributes it carved in stone?

    38. Re:Thank God... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      wrong. the Y2K was a real problem that was solved* This isn't even a problem. It's just the last day on a calendar.

      *not planes falling out of the sky problem,.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:Thank God... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Not a s firghtening as clueless people like you.

      This is a huge problem. Kids contact NASA scientist becasue they are afraid. People kill them selves and others over these issues. The create a huge misunderstanding of astronomy.

      Cutting it off now is the correct and forward thinking thing to do.

      Yes, it would be nice if this money* was used towards something else, but don't underestimate the impact of these doomsayers and prepper idiots are having on out society. Spreading their ignorance like a plague.

      *it's really not a lot

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    40. Re:Thank God... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      if you see 999999 on the odometer, it is reasonable to assume the car is going to fall apart, soon.

      This is like December 31st. The next day you need a new calendar.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    41. Re:Thank God... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      The rate of accretion of the stupidity ....

      I presume that's supposed to acceleration? and autocorrect run amok?

    42. Re:Thank God... by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      ...we have NASA. I was really beginning to think it was The End.

      It is the end. I'm positive. Even Slashdot knows it's the end; my current inventory of moderator points ends on... the 21st.

    43. Re:Thank God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . there's always a salesman who has an interest in having a sucker believe that there is no tomorrow to save for.

    44. Re:Thank God... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I see it more like some future civilization looking at the way we handle dates several thousand years from now, and concluding that the world is going to end on December 31st, 9999 (on our calender) because we practically never give any consideration to the possibility of 5 digit years.

    45. Re:Thank God... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think NASA being right about this will make the general public take more of an interest in them and space exploration in general. Wishful thinking, I know, but it'd be one hell of a Christmas present.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    46. Re:Thank God... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      You should keep in mind that a lot of stories are repeated just because they seem to be good stories.

      It was only recently (in historical terms), that people realized that news and history should actually be accurate! And many don't believe that even now. Just look at TV news.

  2. What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by Dr_Ish · · Score: 2

    This is all disinformation. I read on the Internet that it was going to be a zombie apocalypse. Hell, even the government has plans preparing for it!

    1. Re:What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you haven't been to a mall for a few weeks...

    2. Re:What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be the end of the world, right? Most of us /.ers have extensive training in keeping zombies at bay, so we'll be fine.

    3. Re:What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      We're doomed, doomed I tell you.

      Sure enough, I will survive the dooming by dooming the doomed. Doomed be you all!

      (saved my ass)

    4. Re:What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by Cryacin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember, only 4 shopping days until the apocalypse.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I am spending my time and money buying peoples houses. Spent every penny I have, but on Jan 1/2013 I take possession of 4 houses.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    6. Re:What About The Zombie Apocalypse though? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be the end of the world, right? Most of us /.ers have extensive training in hiding in our parents' basement jerking off to manga.

      FTFY

  3. Additional Sources by Krazy+Kanuck · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the event the world ends or the source is /.'ed here's additional linkage Article links to a NASA video via YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QY_Gc1bF8ds And NASA.gov has much the same information. http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/yoemans20091110.html

  4. Why? by datsa · · Score: 2

    NASA already released a statement saying that they don't know of any significant astronomical events on Friday, and as far as they know, there's nothing to worry about. Beyond that, people are going to believe what they want to believe, and a "full court press" is not going to change that. Either that or they're in cahoots with Quetzlcoatl.

    1. Re:Why? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      Either that or they're in cahoots with Quetzlcoatl.

      Sneaky bastard. Snakes his way into everything.

  5. Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by SpankyDaMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's 2 options here:

    1. Everything is fine, no gobal apocalypse

    2. There's something on the way that's going to kill us all, but if we tell you about it the whole world will panic and riots will stop the government getting itself to safety along with a handpicked few 'key' people

    Either way - they'll say it's safe

    And on that note, I'm going to hang up my tin foil hat

    1. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by plover · · Score: 1

      3. The 'Pockyclipse is really on the way, but the NASA engineers are lying because they don't want to give up any precious engineer slots to save some useless politicians. Remember, NASA has all the keys to the escape rockets.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      Actually, in some ways, we do that all the time.

      If one of the active volcanoes go (e.g. Portland, Seattle), most people would die anyway, so no sense freaking them out.

      Most people would just get on the highways, gridlock, and never have a chance to escape. Hot mud flows faster than you can drive, so you can't outrace it, or the ash scurf that would cover all the former flood plains, only way would be to drive on side streets up to the top of a ridge, and virtually nobody will do that, so what's the point? We don't even have enough helicopter lift capacity to rescue the schoolkids we're supposed to rescue when that happens.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by lennier · · Score: 0

      3. The 'Pockyclipse is really on the way

      It is? I'm not surprised. I knew that stuff was scary when I first tasted it.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    4. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proper instructions in the event of the end of the world, have been around for a while. It's a 3 step process that consists of the following:

      Step 1 : Don't Panic
      Step 2 : Drink Beer
      Step 3 : GOTO Step 1

    5. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by MLBs · · Score: 2

      3. The 'Pockyclipse is really on the way, but the NASA engineers are lying because they don't want to give up any precious engineer slots to save some useless politicians. Remember, NASA has all the keys to the escape rockets.

      Escape rockets to where? To die in space?

    6. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by StormUP · · Score: 2

      You don't think the military really spends that much money on wars and hammers do you? All that funding has been going into NASA to build an arcology on the far side of the moon. It'd look suspicious if they put that much money into the NASA budget so they're just leaving it in the military budget where there's been bloat for years and people assume it's being spent on earth based projects. You really think that "secret" space plane is the only thing the military has been spending money on in space? If Obama were honest when he responds to the construct a Death Star by 2016 petition he would just say: "We already have one. And it's cloaked." But he can't. National security and all that. It will be interesting to see what fiction he makes up instead.

    7. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by StormUP · · Score: 1

      What? Where do you live? Do you know anything about volcanoes or how far a pyroclastic flow will typically travel. If Mt. Hood (I imagine this is what you meant by Portland) blew it's top Portland would get covered in ash, but nobody would die instantly. Mt. St. Helens is 53 miles NE of Portland as the crow flies. It blew up fairly recently. 1980 in fact. We're still here. Now Mt. Hood is a bit closer at 40 miles, but still far enough away that it is unlikely that much in the way of real damage would occur. However, if Mt. Tabor were to suddenly become active there might be a problem. It's smaller, OK, it is more like a big hill....but it's technically an active volcano and it's within city limits. In fact there's parks on it and water reservoirs...and roads....and houses. It's smaller though, so it's not like the whole city would disappear. I'd be quite safe at my house in the burbs.

    8. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do apologize, but I'm going to need a citation on that speed of lava thing. Of the number of documentaries that I've watched that involve scientists trying to get samples of lava, and thus walking amongst and between the lava flows, I'd swear it looks slow enough to just about walk faster.

      Keep in mind that I have no clue how far that location was from the volcano itself, but if the lava is still red, glowing, and molten I can't imagine it being miles away.

    9. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by geekoid · · Score: 1

      now now, don't give that self absorbed idiot actual facts. He won't know what to do with them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by cusco · · Score: 1

      Not lava, mud flows and pyroclastic ash flows, both of which can travel at well over 150 kilometers/hour. The last time Mount Rainer was active, about 10,000 years ago, the boiling 120 kph mud flow from the melted glacier traveled all the way to Lake Washington, which is why Renton and Tukwila are flat (look them up on Google Earth) 100 kilometers away. Won't get much if any lava out of volcanoes in the Pacific Northwest, they're cinder cones.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    11. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      Just to be sure (slashcode not allowing colors and all) -- "Don't Panic" is supposed to be in red letters, yes?

    12. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I live in Seattle. The last time Mount Rainier went it pushed boulders the size of mansions down the river flood plains where now 250,000 people live.

      They'll still die if it goes off today.

      And the people of Pompei could tell you what hot ash from a nearby volcano will do to you, as your lungs burn out. It's full of hot cinders and rocks too.

      But live in your fantasy world if you wish. You still can't drive fast enough to escape it, because everyone else will try to do the same thing, and a bicycle will go faster than you will. Of course, the bicycle won't get far.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    13. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      the mud flow turned into hot ash scurf that flowed over Lake Washington and into Puget Sound, literally burning half of Mercer Island.

      Horribly burned, choked with ash, unable to move, unable to see, and hot rocks falling on your head. Even if you got on a boat, it would likely capsize from the weight of the ash, if you didn't die before you got out of range.

      Look, we have disaster plans at King County for this. I'm just telling you what will happen, at some point. Your failure to take it seriously is part of why you would never survive.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    14. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! These underground bunkers are so much bigger then I expected.

    15. Re:Of course they'd say that to avoid global panic by MLBs · · Score: 1

      Jokes aside, I find it interesting that people think that the majority of defense budgets go into acquiring hardware like aircraft and missiles, when in fact, the majority of funds go into payroll. In some places, a large chunk of that goes into funding retirement of officers.

  6. Happy Doomsday!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A new international holiday.

  7. Interesting propaganda campaign by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This hardly seems like it's worth NASA's effort. You already know that the loons won't be convinced by it. A press release consisting of the single word "NO" is all it should really take.

    But it's also a great opportunity. Not on the 20th, but on the 22nd. When everybody wakes up, they say, "Wow, NASA got it right, and the kooks were kooks. Score one for science." It's nice to see science be able to just slam-dunk something without it getting balled up in revisionism, hedging, and accusations of malfeasance.

    And if people learn just a little bit more about gravity, seasons, the solar system, and the galaxy, so much the better.

    So kudos to NASA for seizing the day. "Proving that the world isn't ending" isn't really one of NASA's missions, but if it results in better support for NASA's real missions (both financially and in terms of having their results taken seriously), then I want to say "Good job" to their PR department. (Cheap, too!)

    1. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      What's really sad about all of this is that on Dec 22 all of those kooks will just scream about how they misinterpreted the information and they date is actually X years off or something about how their prayers to [insert deity here] were answered and the fact we are all alive is proof of his/her/its existence. Science might shine for a bit but it won't take long before everyone starts up with a new nutjob inspired notion of doom and gloom that science is again going to have to spend time showing wont actually happen.

    2. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, never discount the ability of humans to run ahead of a tidal wave claiming to be leading it.

    3. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      This hardly seems like it's worth NASA's effort. You already know that the loons won't be convinced by it.

      Stupid question: how many of these loons actually exist? Maybe I'm an out-of-touch elitist or don't visit the right websites, but the only discussion of the apocalypse that I recall seeing is in news articles about the phenomenon and/or debunking it. Which leads me to believe that it's at least 90% a media-created phenomenon, with only a mere handful of nutjobs actually believing this stuff. (A more intriguing possibility is that the entire thing really is bullshit, just someone's social engineering experiment, or perhaps a viral marketing campaign.)

    4. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by jfengel · · Score: 2

      I can tell you that I encountered a fair number of them online, about a year ago. I expected it to ramp up, but at least in my experience, it actually largely evaporated.

    5. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by jfengel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'll never fix the kooks, but it's nice to score points with people who aren't yet kooks but seem more willing to give them the benefit of the doubt than you or I would.

      In this case, I'm sure the kooks will find something to move on to, but with luck they'll move on to different things rather than all to the same thing. That's what's giving them so much media play.

    6. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      I've got my fingers crossed they do all move around to different things so they can spend more time trying to drown each other out with who's "This is how the world will end" scenario they each discover next.

    7. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By some accounts, 60%+ of the American population believes (or say they believe) in a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis - this is far wackier, in my view, than believing that some [inexplicably tied somehow to arbitrary points on two unrelated Calendar systems but otherwise] natural event is going to kill us all next week. So I wouldn't be surprised at all if a majority of the population is at least partially convinced that 'something will happen' when the Mayan calendar cycles (again), even if they do absolutely nothing concrete as a result.

    8. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that there are no Mayans in the Bible, right?

      Sure, there are some whack-jobs out there who will merge all sorts of weird shit together like the Bible, Mayan calendars, Nostradamus, etc, but most actual Christians wouldn't actually believe that a bunch of pagan idol-worshiping natives are going to receive some prophecies about the end of the world. Part of believing the literalness of Genesis would also be the part where they think everyone else is wrong and they are right.

      Honestly, I think most people just consider the possibilities because their lives are boring and they want to be part of some big story, even if the story is the end of the world. Most of them would probably go into shelters and hoard supplies and ammo for just about any reason.

    9. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      This hardly seems like it's worth NASA's effort. You already know that the loons won't be convinced by it. A press release consisting of the single word "NO" is all it should really take.

      Where were you on 12/12/12? I'm not a "loon", but you're fucking retarded if you don't think we're practically blind to space. We get really detailed images of very small pieces of the sky, or very low res images of the big picture, but no where near the resolution we need to be able to say nothing's going to hit us within the next few weeks. NASA and the US Armed Forces need to swap budgets before I even consider your statements as partially knowledgeable. Back to 12/12/12... This is actually what happened:

      FTFA: Earth Avoids Collisions With Pair of Asteroids

      "According to NASA, a pair of asteroids — one just over three miles wide — passed Earth Tuesday and early Wednesday, avoiding a potentially cataclysmic impact with our home planet. 2012 XE5, estimated at 50-165 feet across, was discovered just days earlier, missing our planet by only 139,500 miles, or slightly more than half the distance to the moon. ..."

      Granted the larger 3 mile wide one was well known to exist, but really, something 150ft across shouldn't be popping up on our radar just a few days before it would hit us -- ESPECIALLY not something that's passing twice as close as our moon. That doesn't bode well for assertions that we're sure no big rock is hurling towards us, indeed, I'd say it casts a plausible shadow of doubt well within the realm of possibility.

      I'm no end of the world in 2012 nutter, but I do think our #1 prime directive should be getting some of our eggs out of this one basket -- self sustaining colonies off-world. Unlike you, I think the propaganda campaign by NASA is actually shooting themselves in the foot. I'd be drumming up the fact that we're practically blind, and that we really don't know for sure if a big ass rock really could hit us, maybe not tomorrow or next week, but in a few years, a decade? No one can say for sure, but we do know IT WILL HAPPEN, and when it does if we're not ready already then we are doomed. That's the angle I'd be pushing to get more space funding -- It's far more ethical than downplaying end of the Earth scenarios (occurring ~1wk away) when you think about it: It's the survival of our species and/or all life on Earth I'm talking about.

      For fuck's sake, man! Learn you some basic Astronomy! There's a proto-planet ~the mass of Pluto called Eris that's been whirling around our Sun for eons at an odd orbit and it was only just discovered in 2005. THAT'S why Pluto's not a planet anymore... We'd have to admit that we DIDN'T SEE A PLANET SIZED ROCK right in our back-yard...

      FTWA:

      Eris, is the most massive body known to orbit the Sun after the eight planets:[i] It's the most massive orbiting beyond the planet Neptune, and the most massive known dwarf planet. It is estimated to be 2326 (±12) km in diameter, and 27% more massive than Pluto, or about 0.27% of the Earth's mass.

      Eris was discovered in January 2005 by a Palomar Observatory-based team ...

      Pretty fucking huge to have not seen it until just 7 years ago, eh smart guy?

      What if Eris would have been on a collision course with Earth? We'd have been kicking ourselves for the over 30 years we've wasted NOT trying to colonize space. Funding man, this 2012 thing was a great opportunity to harvest some good ol' panic for cash! We may not be able to stop a proto-planet, but if we get us some asteroids

    10. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where were you on 12/12/12? I'm not a "loon", [...]
        [spittle-flecked descent into raving lunacy]

      You, dear sir, are a loon.

    11. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by able1234au · · Score: 2

      A 20 metre meteor hits the earth on average every 100 years. A 2 km meteor every couple of million years. So 50-165ft meteor is approx 15 - 50 metres.

      A 75 metre iron meteorite would make a crater like Meteor Crater. A stone meteorite would produce airbursts like Tunguska with land impacts destroying the area size of city. None of this pleasant but none of it a world-killer.

      According to NASA there are roughly 4,700 PHAs, plus or minus 1,500, with diameters larger than 330 feet (about 100 meters). So far, an estimated 20 to 30 percent of these objects have been found.

      Half the distance to moon is close, but that is still a low odds hit and yes, we need more funding to find more of these asteroids. We haven't been looking long and on the other hand, nothing too bad has happened in the past couple of million years so while a killer could be around the corner, the odds remain low. Still, i too would be happy if we knew where everything was.

      Eris is large but a long way away. Anything closer than Saturn would be known fairly well in advance. Feel free to hit the panic button but there is a higher risk you will be hit by a bus in the next day. Worry about that more.

    12. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but boy isn't NASA going to look stupid if the end DOES come. Ha Ha!

    13. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      I think they've got it backwards. Better to feed the doomsday hysteria. Could Earth/civilisation end? Oh let Aunty NASA tell you a story so terrifying that you'll never sleep again. Of asteroid/comet impacts, solar flares/CME's, nearby super-nova explosions, nearby gamma-ray bursts, the galactic core going active, or Earth's magnetic field reversing, or super-volcanoes, or...

      And treat the doomsday scenarios created by the non-scientific idiots seriously, actually work out what would be required for specific events, along the lines of Randall Munroe's What-If series, sneaking in a bit of science and historical context (and maybe some fucking perspective).

      For example, Nibiru: Any planet-sized body would be visible to telescopes before it passed the orbit of Neptunet. Naked eye visible for a decade before it crossed Saturn's orbit. And orbital mechanics means it can't "hide behind the sun".

      Aaaand that's where debunkers stop. Wouldn't it be better to show what you have to add to move the "detection" date to later than today for an impact/gravitational disturbance on 21 Dec 2012. How far out would a moon-size/Earth-size/Jupiter-size body be seen by someone not in The Conspiracy To Hide The Truth, for varying levels of conspiracy (the final one being naked eye observation by untrained observers.) And what extra properties would be required to hide it up 'til now, for each scenario. And the ways such an event could actually affect Earth (from impact, to changing Earth's orbit, to ejecting the moon, to ejecting Earth from the solar system, to Jovian/Martian/Venusian impact, to crashing straight into the sun...), with sly digs at how worthless your silly little bomb shelter is in each of those cases.

      When kids & dumb people get interested in dinosaurs, it's the biggest and fiercest that attract them. People interested in science watch David Attenborough's Life On Earth. People not interested in science watch Shark Week on Discovery Channel. People actually opposed to science watch Ancient Astronauts on History Channel. You want to spread a pro-NASA, pro-Science message, you start by introducing them to the universes actual monsters on Apocalypse Week on NASA TV every time these stupid scares pop up.

      Hell, it's not as if you're going to calm the nutters down, so why no use their stupidity against them. Jiu Jitsu baby. Bait'n'switch. Con the conmen.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    14. Re:Interesting propaganda campaign by flayzernax · · Score: 0

      Eris is a badass planet dood and by gods some times you need spit flecked raving lunacy to get your point across to people who just dont give a shit like you. Enjoy your life.

  8. Idiots by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm postponing my doomsday-device test until December 22, just so I can laugh at those idiots who believe all that nonsense.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Idiots by Macrat · · Score: 1

      They are hiding in their apocolypse shelters watching The 12 Disasters of Christmas.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2325993/

    2. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't do it on December 23, because there's some uncertainty interpreting the Mayan Calendar, and it could turn out that The End is on that date.

    3. Re:Idiots by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      what, and ruin Festivus?

  9. Reverse Psychology? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    I guess they think that if they don't try to debunk something that is important to only a very small percentage of the public, that that group will then assume NASA's silence is "proof" that Nibiru is on its way to smash into us.

    Hey, I'm all for a good conspiracy theory but this is utter horseshit.

    Humanity has so many things on its plate that coming up with a contrived pseudo-history doomsday event is just ridiculous. Hey, Nibiru nuts,I've got some brand new black-and-white Nike Decades athletic shoes for you to try on.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  10. We've got them now! by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They wouldn't deny it unless it were true!

  11. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and we should trust NASA over everyone else because?

    1. Re:Really? by Sperbels · · Score: 3, Informative

      Smart people know things that dumb people don't?

    2. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Smart people know things that dumb people don't?

      I hate you arrogant liberals.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting to undo troll mod.. meant to mark funny and missed.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. We love you instead. And will keep loving you until you DIE! Did you hear me? This is a PROMISE.

    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard tolerate arrogant neocons!

  12. Or... by sconeu · · Score: 2

    <PARANOID-CONSPIRACY-THEORY>
    It's the supernova, because there's no way that NASA could know about it in advance!
    </PARANOID-CONSPIRACY-THEORY>

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Or... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a way to know courtesy of Neutrino spikes caught via the detectors in the SNEWS. Only gives a few hours warning though.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:Or... by Immerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that they could. Obviously they wouldn't have any warning before the energy front hit, but assuming they correctly understand the physics behind supernovae they can make a pretty solid prediction as to which stars are capable of going supernovae, as well as how close the resulting explosion would have to be to cause damage to the Earth. And none of the stars close enough to cause damage if they exploded is capable of doing so.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. Whoosh.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:Or... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      There's no danger of a supernova either.

      To pose even the slightest threat, a star would have to go supernova within about 50 light years of our star system. All the stars that close to ours are known and cataloged, and not one of them is massive enough to be capable of going supernova in its lifetime. The nearest star capable of going supernova is IK Pegasi, which is about 150 ly away.

    4. Re:Or... by dido · · Score: 1

      To cause significant danger to earth's biosphere, a supernova would have to occur within about 100 light years in order to cause any kind of significant harm to the biosphere, and there isn't any supernova progenitor object within that distance at this time. Supernova progenitors are not that hard to find: you'd need either a very heavy white dwarf orbiting a more massive companion star that is gaining a lot of mass from accretion (to produce a Type Ia supernova), or a massive star nearing the end of its life cycle (Type Ib/Ic or Type II supernova). Of Type Ia progenitors, IK Pegasi is the closest, at 150 light years, but at the rate it's going, it probably won't go off for another several million years, but it's also moving away from us, and by then it'll be a lot further away than it is today. Alpha Lupi is the closest Type II supernova candidate, at 550 light years, followed by Antares at 600, and those are all much too far away to cause any significant harm. Geminga was only 550 light years away and it went supernova 300,000 years ago, and that wasn't associated with a major mass extinction. A hypernova from a really big star would of course have longer destructive range (perhaps 50 times more), but there aren't any stars capable of exploding like that which are near enough to cause any significant damage. The really big stars like VY Canis Majoris and Eta Carinae that could become hypernovae are all more than 4000 light years away, far too distant to cause any real harm given the kind of explosions they could conceivably produce.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    5. Re:Or... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Obviously, everyone in this subthread missed the PARANOID-CONSPIRACY-THEORY tags.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including the bloke who gave you +1 Interesting instead of +1 Funny.

    7. Re:Or... by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We may not have to worry about supernovae, but a gamma ray burst is quite another thing.

      As Phil Plait points out, we're practically staring down the barrel of WR-104!

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    8. Re:Or... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      To cause significant danger to earth's biosphere, a supernova would have to occur within about 100 light years in order to cause any kind of significant harm to the biosphere, and there isn't any supernova progenitor object within that distance at this time. Supernova progenitors are not that hard to find: you'd need either a very heavy white dwarf orbiting a more massive companion star that is gaining a lot of mass from accretion (to produce a Type Ia supernova), or a massive star nearing the end of its life cycle (Type Ib/Ic or Type II supernova).

      ... or an alien species capable of connecting the stars together via wormholes.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Or... by flayzernax · · Score: 0

      Or according to cern it doesnt require much to change the climate on earth, say for example enhance the greenhouse effect by creating more cloud cover.

      See http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/research/CLOUD-en.html

      Fun stuff, though not past the hypothetical and experimental stages.

  13. We know the real story.. by MaerD · · Score: 2

    The truth is that Desmond Miles saved us all at the last minute. Otherwise it would have been much worse. However, he let out some sort of demi-god thing that's going to make ubisoft lots of money for the next few years.

    --
    I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    1. Re:We know the real story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was the Doctor...

    2. Re:We know the real story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look for the gigantic aurora borealis and news broadcasters eating their hat.

      Lots of money..

  14. 21th month? by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Good thing there are only 12 months in a year then!

    1. Re:21th month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MM/DD/YYYY, it's a format that irrational people use. I see it frequently from my fellow Americans. Personally, I've always liked YYYY/MM/DD, because it can't get confused for the other two common formats, and because it sorts nicely in ls.

    2. Re:21th month? by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      MM/DD/YYYY, it's a format that irrational people use. I see it frequently from my fellow Americans. Personally, I've always liked YYYY/MM/DD, because it can't get confused for the other two common formats, and because it sorts nicely in ls.

      Not an American by the way, but it's hardly irrational. It's the numeric representation of the way dates are usually spoken. "February 14th, 2003 was notable because while an exceptional number of normal people were busy getting laid, most Slashdotters weren't." The closest similar format adds a superfluous word. "The 14th of February 2004 was no different with regards to the carnal delights not enjoyed by Slashdotters." Nobody except voice-overs in movies use your preferred format in speech. "2005... February 14th... all over the world human beings are overcome by erotic satisfaction... except one man. That man is... Anonymous Coward."

      The best way is to stop being moronic and insist every date needs to be expressed numerically. I prefer to never write months numerically. I use "Feb 14/2006". If your hard drive is too full of porn to fit those extra bytes, well, you're beyond help.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    3. Re:21th month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper format is YYYY-MM-DD, not YYYY/MM/DD.

    4. Re:21th month? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Its the 18th of December, as usually spoken in Britain. Most - maybe all - European languages follow the same pattern.

    5. Re:21th month? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I prefer MM/DD/YYYY because it seems to be easiest to sort. Year is so broad it often doesn't eliminate anything, so you want it on the end so that the year bits are the last you have to sort. Day is too specific and doesn't sort related possibilities together. Month gives a balance and is also used as the key for many real world systems that care about date like many legal and financial instruments. So you lead with month, fall back to day, then finally year. Best balance of search-ability and sort-ability.

    6. Re:21th month? by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      If only I'd thought of that and had a whole example outlining it - and it's superfluous word; "of".

      When's the Doctor Who Christmas special broadcasting?

      The Twen Ty Fifth Of De Cem Ber (8 syllables)
      De Cem Ber Twen Ty Fifth (6 syllables)

      Conversationally here in Canada I find the shorter version (much) more common. But that's the discussion... it's regional. I posted my comment with regards to the use of the word "irrational". Too many people seem to think things done differently from the way they are taught to do them are stupid or worse. It's a civilization (or civilisation, depending) thing to get it that Other does not automatically mean Wrong.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    7. Re:21th month? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      MM/DD/YYYY, it's a format that irrational people use. I see it frequently from my fellow Americans. Personally, I've always liked YYYY/MM/DD, because it can't get confused for the other two common formats, and because it sorts nicely in ls.

      Not an American by the way, but it's hardly irrational. It's the numeric representation of the way dates are usually spoken.

      Except... perhaps it is said "February 14th" because of the stupid MM/DD/YY format.

      What ticks me off in addition to that is that there are still places that use two digit years. Did we learn nothing from Y2K?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:21th month? by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      Except... perhaps it is said "February 14th" because of the stupid MM/DD/YY format. What ticks me off in addition to that is that there are still places that use two digit years. Did we learn nothing from Y2K?

      Or it could be that some people know how to be verbally efficient. Y'know, instead of slavishly trying to adhere to an attempt to placate one's OCD by listing the date components in a nice growth-pattern? This is sort of like insisting that toilet-paper needs to be hung with the paper away from the wall - it's the One True Enlightened Way - because... oh... that keeps dirty knuckles away from the wallpaper. Really? The difference between "makes sense" and "is arbitrary" is so marginal it's almost immeasurable. This isn't like "metric versus Yankee". This is like "colour versus color". Yeah, the bonus "u" assists suggestion of pronunciation but really on the grand scale of things it's irrelevant.

      No, we learned nothing from Y2K. The masses think they learned that computer people are alarmists - as opposed to learning that we know how to react to a technical problem and address it. Computer people think we learned to not place limits anywhere attainable values, but we really haven't.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    9. Re:21th month? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I prefer MM/DD/YYYY because it seems to be easiest to sort. Year is so broad it often doesn't eliminate anything, so you want it on the end so that the year bits are the last you have to sort. Day is too specific and doesn't sort related possibilities together. Month gives a balance and is also used as the key for many real world systems that care about date like many legal and financial instruments. So you lead with month, fall back to day, then finally year. Best balance of search-ability and sort-ability.

      When do you ever want all of your February things from multiple years grouped together? More often than you want things from the same year grouped together? If you for example through all of your charitable receipts together, would you ever be interested in them being sorted by month-day-year? It seems much more common to want things with dates close to each other *in a single year* to be sorted close to each other. I can maybe think up some rare reasons when it might be convenient, but many many many more when it would be less useful than sorting by year-month-day.

    10. Re:21th month? by sublayer · · Score: 1

      The proper format is YYYY-MM-DD, not YYYY/MM/DD.

      By "proper", of course, you mean international standard ISO 8601.

    11. Re:21th month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you write ten dollars as $10 or 10$? There's no reason that the written form and the spoken form have to synch up. When speaking, there is an advantage in the shorter format, not so much so when writing.

    12. Re:21th month? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twenty-fifth December. There. FTFY. See how easy it is to debunk your wishful thinking?

    13. Re:21th month? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "When do you ever want all of your February things from multiple years grouped together?"

      "More often than you want things from the same year grouped together?"

      I agree but that is just it you don't merely want them grouped you generally don't want other years besides the current to be displayed at all. Other years are normally filtered out (in some solid way such as put away in a closet for paper or moved to an archive for digital). It should be safe to say that if I'm looking at something from February on a day to day basis it is THIS February. The year shouldn't typically be relevant to my mental process so it is the last piece of data I want to see in the date. For current information, the piece of data I am usually concerned with is the month with the day and time as drill down data. The year gets tacked on to the end almost as an error check.

      I think working with the current year is a typical usage scenario and for everyone working this way it is most efficient to mentally parse mm/dd/yyyy and see this reflected in the often used shorthand of mm/dd.

      For someone who is typically parsing multiple years of data on a daily basis yyyy/mm/dd definitely does make the most sense and while I think this is less common there are certainly no shortage of people who have this work flow. I can't think there are many work cases where dd/mm/yyyy would be all that beneficial. Even if you are hyper sensitive to the day time frame months wrap around so often that you are going to be concerned with the starts and ends of other months too often to be looking at day before month.

    14. Re:21th month? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I posted my comment in response to "the way dates are usually spoken", which you didn't qualify with a region.

      If the problem is the extra "the" and "of" I suggest adopting a Yorkshire accent/dialect, where "the" has no syllables: "I'm working down t'pit". "T'eighteenth 'f December".

      Also, I think "Nobody except voice-overs in movies use your preferred format in speech. "2005... February 14th" is wrong -- in Chinese and Japanese dates are spoken and written year-month-day.

    15. Re:21th month? by j-beda · · Score: 1

      I guess I find the year info useful, and have no problem ignoring it at the front of the string when visually parsing things, while at the end of the string it serves no useful sorting purposes, so I stick it at the front. mm-dd-yyyy seems to have no real advantage over yyyy-mm-dd, and a number of disadvantages in all of my usages.

  15. NASA did not mention... by flayzernax · · Score: 0

    Alien invasion
    Stargates
    Wormholes
    Radiation (cosmic or otherwise)
    Thermonuclear war
    Dinosaurs
    Or atlanteans.

    My vote for likely events on friday are : wormholes and or aliens.

    1. Re:NASA did not mention... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Alien invasion: Mars Attacks!
      Stargates: Stargate
      Wormholes: see "Stargate"
      Radiation (cosmic or otherwise): Hulk
      Thermonuclear war: Terminator
      Dinosaurs: Jurassic Park
      Or atlanteans: Why do you hate people from Atlanta?

    2. Re:NASA did not mention... by flayzernax · · Score: 0

      I never said I hated them =/

      Its all pure speculation anyway. And my post was ment to be humorous.

    3. Re:NASA did not mention... by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

      Yeah come on, even this famous French Psychic with 85% prediction accuracy confirmed for us we'd have an Alien Invasion before 2013. With over 1 million views (when you add up all the copy cat videos), it must be true! Nobody has been able to credibly debunk this guy... yet.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAIQJmE75vg

      PS. Try not to lose too much sleep over this, you can sleep as much as you want after the aliens get you.

      --
      No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    4. Re:NASA did not mention... by flayzernax · · Score: 0

      Oh don't worry about me I'm totally crazy already. My favorite is Giorgio Tsoukalos

      While it's highly unlikely (according to NASA), I would be giddy with joy if Thor thought 12.21.2012 was an epic day to troll us all.

  16. Re:21..? by interval1066 · · Score: 0

    This and our complete inability to embrace the metric system are one of the few things I'll accept that Europeans are right about.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  17. A day as any other by gweihir · · Score: 1

    These crackpots do have some entertainment value though, my employer is throwing a party as a result on that day. But other than that, the usual: Stupidity, self-aggrandizement,... . Human scum at work. I think if the right 5% died, this planet could be a peaceful paradise.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:A day as any other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These crackpots do have some entertainment value though, my employer is throwing a party as a result on that day. But other than that, the usual: Stupidity, self-aggrandizement,... . Human scum at work. I think if the right 5% died, this planet could be a peaceful paradise.

      No doubt an enlightened person such as yourself should be the one deciding who the 'right' 5% are, eh? If only you could get rid of 'those' people.

    2. Re:A day as any other by Nyder · · Score: 1

      These crackpots do have some entertainment value though, my employer is throwing a party as a result on that day. But other than that, the usual: Stupidity, self-aggrandizement,... . Human scum at work. I think if the right 5% died, this planet could be a peaceful paradise.

      ya, if the top 1% was in the 5%.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    3. Re:A day as any other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually 1/3 of them.
      We should come up with a contrived story about a global disaster. Build three giant spaceships, and separate everybody onto the ships to go to another planet. Then midway through, the useful 2/3 of us can turn around an head back, and leave the useless 1/3 to float off into oblivion. That should solve just about all of our problems.

  18. Complete waste of time... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    ...you can't fix stupid.

    At least, not yet. Science, genetics specifically, still offers us a little hope of finally leaving superstition behind us.

    But it sure is difficult to watch the deluded go about their hand waving, crystal gazing, and ancient calendar worshiping.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Complete waste of time... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Science, genetics specifically, still offers us a little hope of finally leaving superstition behind us.

      Have you not seen idiocracy?
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/
      It seems much more likely, to me, that the future depicted in that film is our future.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Complete waste of time... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      Yes, I've seen Idiocracy. In fact, I keep the intro on my iPad. :)

      But I rather expect that when you can specify you want a smart child, you're going to want to, and then you're going to get one with critical thinking abilities, a decent grasp on reality, and superstition will die out within a few generations.

      I think the way it'll most likely go is that if you don't see to it that your child is well gifted intellectually, society will treat you (and probably your kid) as a pariah.

      Just as those who don't see to it that their kids get decent nutrition are looked down upon today. Only more so -- because the competitive advantage for everything from mates to jobs will be enormous.

      It's just speculation, of course, but I'm pretty comfortable with it.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:Complete waste of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can fix stupid, all it takes is recycling a plastic bag...over their head.

    4. Re:Complete waste of time... by waynemcdougall · · Score: 2

      ...you can't fix stupid.

      At least, not yet. Science, genetics specifically, still offers us a little hope of finally leaving superstition behind us.

      But it sure is difficult to watch the deluded go about their hand waving, crystal gazing, and ancient calendar worshiping.

      That's just the sort of thing a Capricorn would say!

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    5. Re:Complete waste of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because YOU'RE the fucking idiot the movie is about.

    6. Re:Complete waste of time... by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...you can't fix stupid.

      At least, not yet.

      Unforgettably, NASA is wasting our tax dollars trying. If 6 to 12 years of public school education couldn't give them enough reasoning power, why would they believe anything NASA had to say? We've spent enough money on these idiots.

      Personally I have no problem with the incredibly gullible running for the hills, committing suicide, or what ever it is that one does in preparation for the end of the world. As long as they do it to themselves. I see no upside of trying to convince them of their folly.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Complete waste of time... by shaitand · · Score: 2

      "But I rather expect that when you can specify you want a smart child"

      Since this is almost entirely dictated by the result of experience and self programming rather than nature I doubt there ever will be such a button. Not that we are anywhere near far enough along in our understanding of genetics to screen embryos. The result is essentially genocide and we don't know what other things could be affected by the removal of "unwanted" genes.

    8. Re:Complete waste of time... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      There were some pretty smart people who believed in all sorts of superstitions in the past. Just because someone has intelligence, doesn't mean that they are going to apply it to things that you perceive as being desirable.

      On the other hand, we got to where we are with people who maintain those superstitions, so perhaps it is not as big a deal as you might think at first glance. The biggest problem that arises from people like that is that they may retard, but they never completely stop progress.

    9. Re:Complete waste of time... by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Intelligence doesn't help if you don't use it. It still only takes one mistake to turn anyone into a Darwin Award nominee. Even geniuses can screw up fatally. Then there's bad luck.

      I have a relative who is comfortably above average intelligence, judging from her ability to write good English, organize and plan, manage money, not be suckered by con artists, and in general navigate the complexities of modern life. But she believes in cultish branches of Christianity and associated nonsense such as Creationism, faith healing, prophecy, and that D&D is evil. When confronted, she simply turns her brain off. In 1991, during the fall of the Soviet Union, she predicted that Gorby, whose birth mark was the mark of evil, would take over as absolute dictator of Russia, and then would invade Israel, thus kicking off the End of the World. When events didn't unfold as she prophesied, she conveniently dropped the whole thing. Some years later, her pet conspiracy theory was this notion that there was a mysterious 6 story building in Belgium in which vital data about every person in the world was being stored, and once it was all collected then bad stuff would happen. I quickly shredded that one by pointing out that no 6 story building was needed, a stack of CDs one person could carry around could hold enough data to do that. She was in shock while the implications of that revelation sank in. Recently, she nearly died from a ruptured appendix. Wouldn't go to a real doctor until it was nearly too late.

      Part of the problem is that she stays away from other smart people. There's no one in her circle who can reason better than she can. She spews out nonsense, and no one around her can argue about it.

      Some would say no one who believes nonsense like that can be intelligent. She is an exhibit to the contrary. One should remember that education and accumulated knowledge counts for much. Archimedes was one of the greatest scientists of antiquity, but there is much we know today that he never figured out, never had a chance to figure out, hobbled as he was by the knowledge of his time and the lack of tools for exploring the world. A crucial tool lacking in antiquity was a decent numbering system. Doing math with Roman numbers is painful.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    10. Re:Complete waste of time... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Since this is almost entirely dictated by the result of experience and self programming rather than nature

      Since you have no idea what you're talking about, we'll just agree to disagree.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    11. Re:Complete waste of time... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not stupid.
      It's lack of critical thinking; which can be fixed.
      I's ignorance; which can be fixed.
      It's assuming every opinion has equal weight; which can be fixed.

      Educating kids that there isn't a planets going to crash into us, there is no reason to think the Mayans were even attempting to predict the EotW.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Complete waste of time... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's horrible movie, and we would all be dead before we came close to what they are doing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Complete waste of time... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No. agree to disagree just allows ignorance to flourish. Stop it. Explain why he is wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Complete waste of time... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      SO small minded. In a lot of ways you are worse then those people, and a far poorer thinker.

      "As long as they do it to themselves. "
      they never do. They drag their kids, the spread there ignorance like a plague. Having an official agency explain the science side is a good thing. This isn't one generation of people, it's a continuing and growing.

      "I see no upside of trying to convince them of their folly."
      this is about giving people data so they don't get sucked into the folly. Knowledge isn't some magical think that everyone has equally and some people do use it.

      It's about stopping ignorant teachers from repeating these things. Its a very big problem that impacts everyone to some degree. yes, even you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Complete waste of time... by houghi · · Score: 1

      People believed the moon landing, so why not this?
      And if they are right, it will be a lot of fun. If they are wrong, there will be nobody to care about it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    16. Re:Complete waste of time... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Since you have no idea what you're talking about, we'll just agree to disagree."

      That is a rather bold assumption. You got that after hearing nothing more than that I tend to lean toward the nurture camp?

    17. Re:Complete waste of time... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The rest of us have near roughly the same amount of gray matter to work with and can't instantly dismiss either the nature or nurture side of the debate. fyngyrz is obviously packing substantially more and has no time for the discussion.

      He keeps dropping vague references implying something in the world of genetics is going to magically cure all ignorance but hasn't provided so much as a premise. It's too bad. I was looking forward to hearing what it was.

    18. Re:Complete waste of time... by icebike · · Score: 1

      You can't keep a secret in this country. Not for months. Certainly not for years. Not from other countries..

      If there was any truth to the Mayan End of the World, other governments, or Wikileaks would be all over it.
      The same would be true of faked moon landings.
      There are lots of countries which would love to catch the US in a big lie.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  19. Re:But....On the internets... by Fluffeh · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm surprised the Fox news isn't reporting 'The End'

    Fox only wants to frighten it's viewers if it aligns with their agenda. There is nothing to be gained by Fox if all their viewers think the end is nigh.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  20. While evidence is lacking... by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

    ...I'm going to laugh my ass off if the apocalypse DOES happen on Friday. I mean, I'll laugh as long as I'm able to...probably with quite a few swearwords and an "about damn time"

    1. Re:While evidence is lacking... by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      You're going to laugh at all those rational folk who correctly based their plans on available evidence?
      That makes sense.

  21. or an Evolutionary Adaptation by m.shenhav · · Score: 2

    While I have make plans for the weekend, I do believe that a small measure of such paranoia might be an evolutionary adaptation. While any particular doomsday scenario seems unlikely - our species and life at large has faced many in its history. Perhaps this paranoia has dispersed and thus saved some humans or their ancestors from localized natural disasters.

    1. Re:or an Evolutionary Adaptation by icebike · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how there is any particular adaptive advantage in preparing for "the end of the world".
      Seems like a gene not likely to be passed on to one's offspring.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:or an Evolutionary Adaptation by geekoid · · Score: 1

      it's tribal. end of the world would have meant the end of a tribe or community*. SO it would be advantages to prevent it. That advantage can be leveraged into making people do thing to prevent the perception of the end of the world.

      *pre ag..

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Works for me - fewer people taking my wave by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    The more of you believe there is no Mayan Apocolypse, the fewer people crowding me from pole position when I catch the wave after the Mayan Apocolypse and surf safely to land.

    Oh, and if you could keep it down when you're dying, I'd appreciate it, cause screams really harsh my mellow.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Works for me - fewer people taking my wave by drkim · · Score: 1

      The more of you believe there is no Mayan Apocolypse, the fewer people crowding me from pole position when I catch the wave after the Mayan Apocolypse and surf safely to land.

      ...uh, what land?

  23. Re:21..? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    This and our complete inability to embrace the metric system are one of the few things I'll accept that Europeans are right about.

    Metric system?

    Heck, we don't even have high speed trains.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. Re:But....On the internets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    durrr posted: "The amount of stupidity will exceed the swarzchild limit, luckily nothing will escape from here after that."

    And here in two posts we have examples of that unthinking reactionary bloviation right here on Slashdot.

  25. one of these days...... by m.shenhav · · Score: 2

    ...... some Black Swan will hit. We can't know when or how big it will be, the only certainty is uncertainty.

  26. Office Space: The Mayan Edition by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2

    So crazy. This whole Mayan doomsday prophecy stuff all amounts to nothing more than an ancient form of the y2k bug.

    I've often imagined getting together a crew to do a remake of Office Space , only where everyone would be wearing Mayan outfits, carrying chisels, and complaining about having to rework all these bloody great stone calendar wheels.

    If I only had the time, and the budget... :)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  27. All in fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys understand that the vast, overwhelming majority of people are having fun with this Mayan thing, right? That there are only a teeny tiny number of conspiracy nuts and other wackos that actually think the world is going to end? And you know what's the MOST fun for these people? Reading about Slashdot and NASA news postings "debunking" their fun.

    Hee hee. Haven't had this much fun since Hale-Bopp

  28. Why is NASA spending even one second doing this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can think of better things for them to be doing with my money. Let the wackjobs hide in their basements and bunkers. Who gives a flying fsck?

  29. I'm convinced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm convinced that the threat is real, and as a result I have signed up for the maximum amount of debt I could and, frankly, I'm in the process of blowing through every last penny I have. I can't point to any particular proof, but I'm certain this entire planet will be "reset" in a matter of days.

    1. Re:I'm convinced by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      sell me your stuff for cheap, have more money!

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  30. Mayans were stupid. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

    No offense intended to Mayans. I am sure they were very smart relative to other primitive people, and are probably not more stupid than a lot of people living today (i.e. the people that defer to Mayans for modern doomsday predictions). The fact remains that science is by far the best tool available for explaining the universe and making predictions about future events. The Mayans and a lot of other ancient civilizations did a lot of things that could be considered scientific (like noticing patterns in motion of celestial bodies), but this is more of a proto-science that was mixed in with religion and other superstition. Looking back on Mayan civilization the only things we actually learn are about what the Mayans knew. This is interesting for anthropological reasons, but they didn't have any scientific knowledge that we don't already have. They didn't know anything about Newtons laws, relativity, Maxwell's equations, Quantum Mechanics, etc. They don't have any of the tools necessary TO predict any kind of astronomical doomsday. We (i.e. modern society + our current scientific knowledge) might not be able to either, but we are orders of magnitude more likely to be correct. Even if by some strange coincidence the world ends in 2012, it will be just that, a coincidence. There are 7 billion people in the world. Every day has no doubt been singled out as a doomsday by one nutjob or another. Picking an entire year increases your odds of being right by 365 times, and it will still be wrong in 13 days. It is not even accepted that the Mayans even predicted the end of the world, much less that they predicted it to happen in 2012. All I am saying is that whatever predictions the Mayans (or anyone else with their level of scientific understanding) may have possibly made about the end of the world, are almost certainly wrong.

    1. Re:Mayans were stupid. by Georules · · Score: 1

      The Mayans did not predict a doomsday. This is simply the reset of their calendar. Of course: intelligence is relative. I'm not really sure what the point of asserting that an ancient civilization knew less then a modern one would be.

    2. Re:Mayans were stupid. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      It is not even accepted that the Mayans even predicted the end of the world

      Or that they predicted the collapse of their own civilization, for that matter...

    3. Re:Mayans were stupid. by cusco · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice if, before writing a big, long post, you had actually done the slightest bit of reading about what the Mayans predicted would happen the 21st. (Hint: nothing special besides the rollover of one calendar cycle to the next.)

      And before you declare that an entire civilization was "stupid" you might keep in mind that the Maya were one of the highest civilizations of their time, while in Europe the idea that one could do something with horses besides hunt them with a flint-tipped spear was regarded with suspicion.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    4. Re:Mayans were stupid. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice before posting your reply that you had actually read my post. From my post: " It is not even accepted that the Mayans even predicted the end of the world, much less that they predicted it to happen in 2012. All I am saying is that whatever predictions the Mayans (or anyone else with their level of scientific understanding) may have possibly made about the end of the world, are almost certainly wrong." " I am sure they were very smart relative to other primitive people, and are probably not more stupid than a lot of people living today."

    5. Re:Mayans were stupid. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I am not saying the Mayans predicted a doomsday either. I was saying that they were incapable of accurately predicting a doomsday so far into the future. I will be the first person to say intelligence is relative and in fact I even said they were smart relative to other primitive people. The point of asserting that an ancient civilization knew less than a modern one, is because a bunch of people in a a modern civilization think that this is not true. It is obvious to some, and less obvious to others. If you don't think the Mayans knew something about doomsday that we don't, this post was not designed to convince you of anything new.

    6. Re:Mayans were stupid. by cusco · · Score: 1

      Yeesh, I missed the entire sentence. Sorry.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  31. Oh Dear... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I hope the weather's nice so I can get in a skydive before or better yet during the apocalypse. I bet it'd be quite a sight to see from 12,000 feet. I guess I'll just have to keep skydiving all that day in the hopes that I can catch it at exactly the right time!

    Anyone want to freak out some poor grocery store clerk by buying like 40 pounds of kool aid and rat poison? A couple of those simpletons have already mentioned the impending doomsday to me, so I'm sure they'd know what they thought you were up to! Take a video and post it to youtube!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  32. Report from December 23rd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I jumped into the trusty time machine and went to December 23rd, 2012. Everything is still here.

    1. Re:Report from December 23rd by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      You dumbass, you should have gone to the 25th to see what you're getting for Christmas!

    2. Re:Report from December 23rd by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

      Except now you caused a time paradox that will manifest itself as the Earth exploding on the 21st.

  33. Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if there's a giant planet coming down to hit the Earth, we all know that Korben Dallas and Leeloo are going to save us all!

    1. Re:Nothing to worry about by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Even if there's a giant planet coming down to hit the Earth, we all know that Korben Dallas and Leeloo Dallas Multipass are going to save us all!

      FTFY

  34. You think that's stupid and pointless by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    The university I went to put something on this nonsense in one of their mailings to shill for donations. (Something about how one of their archeology professors looked into this and proved it wasn't going to happen.) My reaction? If you've got enough money to blow on this horseshit you obviously don't need a donation from me and would probably blow it on something just as rediculous if I did give it to you. (Yes, this is at a legit university that is normally well respected.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:You think that's stupid and pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like teaching students how to spell "ridiculous"? (Sorry, pet peeve of mine)

  35. Epoch Fail by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny

    Eschatology is simply a matter of your particular brand of religion.

    Every Unix user knows the world doesn't end until January 18th or 19th, 2038.
    Mac users know the world doesn't end until February 6, 2040, at 6:25:15 a.m.
    Windows users know that the world ended at the dawn of the Ballmerzoic Epoch in January 2000.

    (I couldn't remember when the Ballmer Epoch began, so I asked Google and somehow got "Did you mean: when did batman take over Microsoft?")

    1. Re:Epoch Fail by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Actually, Mac users know that the world will end sometime in the year 29,940.

    2. Re:Epoch Fail by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Windows users know that the world ended at the dawn of the Ballmerzoic Epoch in January 2000.

      Microsoft End of the World Counter.
      Microsoft(R)
      End of the world predicted for: 2012, 2014, 2218, 1997,

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  36. Vogons by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course NASA doesn't know that the Vogons will destroy the Earth on 22 December 2012 to make way for an intergalactic bypass. They missed the notification. The Vogons will miss their originally scheduled date of the 21st because, as usual, the construction project is behind schedule. Sorry for the inconvenience.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Vogons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case 2 pints and a packet of peanuts please!

    2. Re:Vogons by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Don't for get your towel!

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    3. Re:Vogons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course NASA doesn't know that the Vogons will destroy the Earth on 22 December 2012 to make way for an intergalactic bypass. They missed the notification. The Vogons will miss their originally scheduled date of the 21st because, as usual, the construction project is behind schedule. Sorry for the inconvenience.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      Unless of course this version of reality that has coalesced around me is the one where I ate Taco Bell at 2:17AM and had violent diarrhea at 9:09PM...

      Phew! Earth is safe for now!

    4. Re:Vogons by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      The Vogons did give us notice, 5,000 years of notice. That should have been enough time for any civilisation to develop space travel if they really wanted to. We all saw how the Jatravartids invented the aerosol before the wheel, because of their great need.

      The fact that given this stupendous length of time, we still failed to work together to get off this rock, just shows that we have nothing to offer the rest of the galaxy.

  37. An Accurate Statement by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    "The world isn't going to end because the Mayan Calendar says so."

    Science cannot predict world ending/mass extinction asteroid strikes much in advance.

    Science cannot predict catastrophic earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.

    The world is going to end when the world is going to end. We simply don't have technology to predict when really bad things are going to happen.

    "As of the end of 2004, astronomers had discovered more than two thirds of the larger Near Earth Asteroids (diameter greater than 1 km). None of the known asteroids is a threat, but we have no way of predicting the next impact from an unknown object. "

    http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/intro_faq.cfm

    NASA isn't debunking anything. The world is as likely to end on the 21st as any other day.

    1. Re:An Accurate Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, from astronomical sources at least, we can be very confident in our predictions. A mass extinction level asteroid would be something we'd see many, many years in advance. Worst case, we'd see it just before it hits us - that is, a few years. More likely, we'd see it tens or hundreds of years early, and be constantly refining its trajectory until we could tell you which satellites it'd knock down on its way to impact.

      Similarly with supernovae, stars don't just explode all of a sudden. The only nearby one that's remotely close is Eta Carinae, and even when that one goes it'll be nothing more than a bright light in the night sky.

      So you're mostly right - but I'd say there's even less of a chance of the world ending on the 21st than any day in the future.

  38. Proof the end in nigh... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    The W3C announced a finalized HTML5 Spec. Yep it's the end of the world.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:Proof the end in nigh... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      And I know that DNF was released, but have they announced the release of Daikatana 2?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  39. NASA makes it obvious we are doomed by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Judging from NASA, you would have to think we are quite doomed.

    The fact is NASA is trying WAY too hard for what should be a non-event. If they really believed what they say, they would not produce a long video then release it early, nor would they go through so much effort to keep everyone calm when no-one was really panicking.

    At this point they look to be calming the masses while the elite are shipped to secret off-planet doomsday shelters on the moon. Nuts of course but they are making it look that way.

    P.S. I apologize for any delays in responding to replies, moncrete is awfully tough on WiFi signals.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:NASA makes it obvious we are doomed by GiganticLyingMouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On NPR a while back there was an interview with a NASA scientist about the doomsday predictions. He runs the Q/A column "Ask an Astrobiologist" responsible for answering questions posed to NASA, which as of late have mostly centered around Dec 21st. He was incredulous that anyone would believe these stories, but as the same time took it very seriously; he mentioned that many of the people writing to him were of the younger generations (i.e. schoolkids) genuinely concerned about whether the world was going to end. This was the demographic that concerned him. One such excerpt -- "Though some of the questions may seem frivolous and outlandish, Morrison receives queries from people who are legitimately concerned and contemplating suicide. "Another extreme one ... I got was quite touching. It was: My only friend is my little dog. When should I put her to sleep so she won't suffer in the cataclysm?" It's easy to dismiss the doomsday people as loons (and most are), but some of them are just kids so we should focus more on taking them seriously and helping educate them to understand that it's a myth rather than dismissing the entire thing offhand. This can be a very good opportunity to show the community that science > superstition. Interview is at http://www.npr.org/2012/11/26/165928588/as-dec-21-draws-nigh-the-facts-about-doomsday

  40. NASA scam for more budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfectly Logical for them to fake non-extinct of the world - If the world ends in december 12th, why give taxpayer money to NASA?

    In scientific and engineering terms, Mayans, despite their pre-existence which predates NASA by far, were more accurate and precise in space observation and exploration, and their publishings beat NASA by at least 1000 years. The only advantages NASA have over Mayans are a few space probes and rockets which are resulted from literally pouring astronomic amount of taxpayer money for more than 50 years, which is already a shame even without mentioning that about half of them had gone self-destruct by design flows/human errors/misplaced colons/etc. If you are a reasonable man who have records of Mayans and NASA both, there is no ground in falsely believing that NASA have enough evidence to disprove what Mayans have claimed.

  41. Voyager.... by gatfirls · · Score: 2

    Is going to break some intergalactic 'no fly' zone. The council will be held and they will be shown grainy black and white pictures of our Weapons of Galactic Destruction manufacturing facilities. We're screwed.

  42. they'll sure look stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when the world does end. too bad no one will be around to laugh at them.

  43. understandable, these are scientists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be their last chance to get some, so a panic would ruin their chances for any hope with members of the opposite sex.

  44. NASA Mission Directorates expand... by AlienSexist · · Score: 1

    According to their list of Mission Directorates

    1. Enable a safer, more secure, efficient, and environmentally friendly air transportation system.
    2. Operate the International Space Station and prepare for human exploration beyond low Earth orbit.
    3. Exploring the Earth-Sun system, our own solar system, and the universe beyond.

    They should now add:
    4. Protection of Humanity from hysteria due to mythical threats said to originate from space.

    1. Re:NASA Mission Directorates expand... by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      #4 sure does open can of worms!

    2. Re:NASA Mission Directorates expand... by AlienSexist · · Score: 1

      Yes but just think of all the new taxes we could have the privilege of paying to fund it!

  45. That's OK, even if the world doesn't end by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    NASA will fake it just like they did the moon landings. That's the real secret behind Area 51 - it's a giant sound stage.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  46. The fine print: by spcebar · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone who firmly believes in the Mayan doomsday is going to be swayed by a little organization like NASA. You'll always have people saying "there's things they can't predict!"

    --
    Which one is the 'anykey'?
    1. Re:The fine print: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a detail like a lack-of-results will sway the government from borrowing money from our great-grandkids so they can produce nanny-state videos for folks with IQs below room temperature.

  47. Re:Why is NASA spending even one second doing this by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    Because it gets them headlines.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  48. To play devil's advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50165912/ns/technology_and_science-space/

    "A newfound asteroid gave Earth a close shave early today, zipping between our planet and the moon just two days after astronomers first spotted it...
    Astronomers estimate that 2012 XE54 is about 120 feet (36 meters) wide — big enough to cause substantial damage if it slams into Earth someday."

    How good is NASA's ability to detect asteroids or space colonies full of space zombies and facehuggers?

  49. Re:But....On the internets... by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised the Fox news isn't reporting 'The End'

    Fox only wants to frighten it's viewers if it aligns with their agenda. There is nothing to be gained by Fox if all their viewers think the end is nigh.

    Really? Where were you during the Presidential election?

    --
    My studio - www.graylands.ca
  50. For the conspiracy theorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, for all the conspiracy theories thinking "We're not being informed" I just have to ask where are NASA and the select Politicians and "key people" going to go? Lunar Hilton Plaza? Or is it some secret super-space station hidden in the depths of the Earth stockpiled with enough food and fuel to last, what, another 10 years? Are they waiting till Friday to cowboy up for a dramatic exit risking it all on weather, false starts, or maybe the fire and brimstone showing up early?

    NASA couldn't hide something falling from the sky that catastrophic this close to doomsday unless it was under the cloak of stupidity. And, if I'm not mistaken, Mayan's were never aware of Julius Caesar's Leap Year implementation in 45 BC which puts us about 15 days ahead of schedule. Even in the likelihood of facilitating the theory of aliens returning to Earth as suggested by several world civilizations, what benefit would anyone have from hiding these events, especially when we're already informed of them. And even the most likely scenario of solar flare catastrophe, you are more likely to sizzle like bacon on the sidewalk than worry about electric devices malfunctioning from a solar flare damaging enough to have an effect longer than a few seconds to a few days, as scientifically predicted for this solar cycle.

    So if you're running out this week to get your titanium umbrella, rocket fuel, ice packs, 10-15,000 cans of beans to accurately fulfill your life expectancy, or at the very least, a pair of "men in black" sunglasses.. I suggest instead looking up resources on how not to be an idiot.

  51. Greedy Shysters by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

    The sad thing is that there are so many people out there who do not have the intelligence to resist the shyster doomsayers. They will get all worried and send in all kinds of money to these lowlifes, but on 12/22 where will they be? Off spending these peoples hard earned cash! The question that needs to be asked of these shysters is; If the world is going to end on 12/21, why do you need my money? You won't be here to use it if the world ends!

    --
    My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
  52. The Mayans never said it was an Asteroid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand what NASA has to do with it.

  53. Re:But....On the internets... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Unless it is a plot from the LiBeRaLs.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  54. NASA is not psychic... like this guy... by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 1

    Have y'all seen the French Psychic from 1980 with 85% prediction accuracy confirmed for us we'd have an Alien Invasion before 2013!? He predicted 9/11, war on terror, chernobyl, Obama, and end of the Soviet Union. With over 1 million views (when you add up all the copy cat videos), it must be true! Nobody has been able to credibly debunk this guy... yet, although there's been several debunking theories, all of which have thus far been debunked.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAIQJmE75vg

    PS. Try not to lose too much sleep over this, you can sleep as much as you want after the aliens get you.

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:NASA is not psychic... like this guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Past performance is not an indication of future results.

      In any case, debunking this guy is easy. He made his "pre"dictions after the events occurred, and just back-dated them.

  55. Don't Panic by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

    You're going to die anyways, eventually. Towel?

  56. Lunatics remain unconvinced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't change the mind of crazy.

  57. Felis Catus Erectus by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    It is going to be a rebellion by bipedal cats with opposable thumbs. I give you...Felis Catus Erectus

  58. waste of time by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    But I'm taking bets.

  59. Rover has found a shiny object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My betting it is a button that might get pressed one day very soon

  60. Re:12/21/2012 by camperdave · · Score: 0

    It's primarily US - which, of course, means that half of Canada does it that way as well. It's annoying and confusing. That's why I spell out my months: 21-Dec-2012.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  61. Hunkered Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I plan on staying home on Friday. Not out of fear of the Mayan crud, but the crazy people in the world that just might decide a rampage would be fun that day.

    1. Re:Hunkered Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea either way.

  62. Where I come from there are only 12 months by linatux · · Score: 1

    you insensative clod! (21/12/2012)

  63. Re: kickstarter it man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously you have to get a kickstarter going. For 100 dollars you can be one of the chosen few to survive!

  64. This is a waste of money by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    I don't want my money wasted on this. People will figure this out for themselves. Or they won't. I won't care either way. I would think all the intelligent scientists at NASA would realize that curing superstition in four short days is an extremely unlikely proposition.

  65. I'm gonna start calling Dec 31st.... by vell0cet · · Score: 5, Funny

    If people are going to call Dec 21 the "Mayan Apocalypse," I'm going to start calling Dec 31 the "Gregorian Apocalypse" ... every year.

    1. Re:I'm gonna start calling Dec 31st.... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      If people are going to call Dec 21 the "Mayan Apocalypse," I'm going to start calling Dec 31 the "Gregorian Apocalypse" ... every year.

      I like that one.

    2. Re:I'm gonna start calling Dec 31st.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know just what you mean. In my younger days, Jan 1 always felt like the aftermath of an Apocalypse ;-)

    3. Re:I'm gonna start calling Dec 31st.... by mick129 · · Score: 1

      That is so good. I'm stealing it.

      --
      Move along, no sig to see here.
  66. Not me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, Nibiru is fun.In a mundane world of stagnation where nothing truly changes, part of me wants Nibiru to shake things up.
    Plus all the rants from that guy didn't address the reality that Nibiru (or the Nibiru system) would be coming from the sun itself. It wouldn't really effect the orbits of the planets as it's trajectory is incoming from the south pole. If it's on course for 21 Dec, it's already swung around the sun, and is on a direct course for Earth. In fact it's probably getting to the point where it's own output (relative to the Earth) is exceeding that of the sun. So you wouldn't easily see it by looking at the sun, you'd need spacial lenses to filter it. It's like a zero fighter coming at you from the sun. You can't see it because the suns gaze is too bright. She has already unmistakenly effected the orbit of Mercury, and she's on her way. Here she comes now! wooot!

    I'm not taking off my lead helmet until new year!

  67. No jfengel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kudos to me and my brothers for getting people to forget the New World order and concentrate on whats real - the sky! by indulging in my beliefs that Nibiru is indeed en route as she is, and even if she doesn't show, I will have handed NASA their glory day!

  68. It's the End of the World... Again [Re:Thank God] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep. But yah know, if you listen to the wind you hear the same nonsense every year, often multiple times a year....

    Yep!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  69. Re:Why is NASA spending even one second doing this by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Because it gets them headlines.

    Yes, in a splendidly good way. On 12/22, NASA will be the people who said in public "You pitiful morons are pitiful morons", and some percentage of the pitiful morons will realize they've been acting like pitiful morons.

  70. Incoming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brace yourself people. It's sling-shotted around the sun and now the main plane of the solar system has been tilted. Here she comes, and fast!

    Nibru system

  71. Re:12/21/2012 by godrik · · Score: 0

    I've been living in the US for 4 years now. And I still get mixed up from time to time. This convention makes little sense to me. Note that in English "July 4th, 2012" is a valid date, so is "the 4th of july, 2012". In French, there is no equivalent to the first form, only the second one.

  72. Re:21..? by godrik · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? They are going at least 50 miles an hour!

  73. Lexdysic by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It was supposed to be on 12/12/12, but the Mayans are dyslexic.

  74. Don't worry - if you wake up on 21 DEC 12 by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    Then the world will not have ended, as it will already be 22 DEC 12 in Australia.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  75. I Predict for Certain that on 12/21/12 . . . by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2

    . . . the world will end . . . for someone.

    1. Re:I Predict for Certain that on 12/21/12 . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...somehow... more or less..

  76. Re:It's the End of the World... Again [Re:Thank Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but that's just end time predictions. What about transformative predictions. I predict the earth will low down and stop spinning for a few days, and flip about it's axis, and the resume spinning on a new axis and orbit the sun in a different orbit with a short habitable period of the eccentric orbit and a long uninhabitable unsurvivable period.

    I call it the prediction of the random coin flip.

  77. History of Apocalyptic days by nomad-9 · · Score: 1

    Here's a partial list:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

    Of course, nobody could let the following years slip by without a doomsday label attached to them:: 1000, Jan 1 (Pope Sylvester II), 1666 (surprise!), 2000, Jan 1.

    And of course, the year 2020 is among those future doomsdays. I'm surprised 2222 is not in the list, but not to worry, some "psychic" or religious nut is bound to take that opportunity and get some followers...

    NASA is wasting time with this nonsense. If the history of failed apocalypses teaches us anything, is that a large chunk of the world population will always be irrational.

    1. Re:History of Apocalyptic days by Coisiche · · Score: 2

      Given that significantly more than half that list is 20th century or later dates and the lead time to impending apocalypse seems to be getting shorter it is certain that it will rapidly grow. 2222 will eventually be on it. As will 2221 and 2223 and every year.

  78. Re:It's the End of the World... Again [Re:Thank Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    LOL Heat death of the universe. That shizz is cray-cray.

  79. Re: kickstarter it man! by drkim · · Score: 1

    Seriously you have to get a kickstarter going. For 100 dollars you can be one of the chosen few to survive!

    Or, for $955,000 dollars you can survive in your own Atlas-F missile silo:
    http://www.missilebases.com/adirondack

  80. The world will end by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    It's just not due to asteroids, planetary alignment or similar... it'll be a couple of redneck gun-nuts trying out nuclear ICBMs for hunting... because fully automatic handguns, rifles and machine guns just isn't doing the job efficiently enough...

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  81. The post event excuses sweepstakes by DrXym · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's guess what excuses the nuts will use on 22 Dec when the event conspicuously fails to happen:
    1. "We all suffered a spiritual death, not a physical one"
    2. "The space aliens decided to give us one more chance"
    3. "The calculations were wrong, it's going to happen in 2020 / 2021 / some other date I pulled out of my numerlogical ass."
    4. "The prophecy was actually referring to (insert-some-news-of-the-day-here)"
    5. "The end of the world has started but it doesn't happen overnight, it might take years, decades, centuries, enough time to write a series of books about it."
    6. "I never meant the prediction to be taken literally"
    7. "My positive mind beams averted the disaster"

    What you won't hear:

    1. "What a fucking ass I was to have believed this nonsense and promoted fear and possibly a few deaths through my ignorance."
    1. Re:The post event excuses sweepstakes by martyros · · Score: 1

      What you won't hear: "What a fucking ass I was to have believed this nonsense and promoted fear and possibly a few deaths through my ignorance."

      Well Harold Camping did say this in the aftermath:

      We were even so bold as to insist that the Bible guaranteed that Christ would return on May 21 and that the true believers would be raptured. ...However, even so, that does not excuse us. We tremble before God as we humbly ask Him for forgiveness for making that sinful statement. We are so thankful that God is so loving that He will forgive even this sin.

      but yeah, not sure how many other people who believed him have come out and said the same thing...

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    2. Re:The post event excuses sweepstakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that would probably qualify as a variant of "the space aliens decided to give us one more chance".

  82. Re:It's the End of the World... Again [Re:Thank Go by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    It's good to see scientists at least putting down a predicted end well beyond not only their lifetime, but also beyond the likelihood that anyone will remember them predicting it.

  83. NASA -vs- AU's PM's "end of is world coming" video by ivi · · Score: 1

    Julia Gillard was looking either solemn or broken, as she read her [spoof] doomsday message - at JJJ's request - recently.

    We happened to find it a day or 2 after viewing 2 more helpful video shorts from NASAtelevision channel @ YouTube.com

    Julia, what were you thinking, when you agreed to make your silly spoof?!?

    I say: If you can't take your job seriously, please find another job.

  84. It was a typo by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    On December 21st Nyan Cat(aclysm) will stop.

  85. Re:21..? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but how much is that in kilograms?

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  86. Car rental India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carrentalindia is formerly independent car rental company which operated all over india.It provides buisness and wide range of vechile rental services with reasonable rates and best quality.for more information visit http://www.carrentalindia.co.in

  87. Re:NASA -vs- AU's PM's "end of is world coming" vi by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    As an Australian, I approve Julia's message. Australia likes to view itself as being approving of larrikin behaviour.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  88. The aliens are returning by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    The alien overloards, who kickstarted human intelligence and helped to build the pyramids, are returning on December 21st, as promised, to become our masters once again. As we will refuse to bow down and try to launch nukes at them, they will simply destroy us rather than let these pesky Earthlings talk back to them. As they are currently traveling here faster than the speed of light, NASA can't see them.

  89. And here I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA's primary mission was to make muslims feel good about their history...

  90. nasa shouldn't bother by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    I think nasa shouldn't bother to comment on ideas pertaining to religion.

    1. Re:nasa shouldn't bother by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Even when it's impacting them? even when people from around the country continually contact them asking about planets that don't actually exist? Even when school kids are afraid?

      It's not simple commenting on a religious issue, its a response to a very real problem.

      As someone who deals with these dumb asses every freaking day, I find it good that NASA is debunking the actual science informative aspects of these issues.

      When someone is telling kids a planet is going to crash into the Earth, who do you want the kids to turn to?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:nasa shouldn't bother by someones · · Score: 1

      givr them all guns. that will sort out the problem...

  91. NASA should have said 'wait it out' 'day after'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA should have made a conference for the 'day after' in their schedules.

    Just the fact of putting a government function on a Saturday is enough to convince anyone.

    bash-this-host$ --> cal
          December 2012
    Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
                                          1
      2 3 4 5 6 7 8
      9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 31

    Does that convince you?

  92. Well if it happens by redwraith94 · · Score: 1

    At least I took my vacation this week. I guess it's time to break out the end-of-the-world booze. Then I just have to travel to a place where you can actually see the stars at night...

    --
    I art more snarky, and terse than thou. I art Slashdot!
  93. Re:12/21/2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the "Euro" and the "US" date formats are wrong. The correct format is ISO 8601: YYYY-MM-DD.

  94. Re:It's the End of the World... Again [Re:Thank Go by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

    I know they're a long way off, but the scientific predictions are way more terrifying.

    From Wikipedia, "The heat death of the universe is a suggested ultimate fate of the universe, in which the universe has diminished to a state of no thermodynamic free energy and therefore can no longer sustain motion or life.'

    WTF? I don't even.

  95. I don't care what NASA says by badlogic · · Score: 1

    I am still taking Friday off of work, just in case! =)

  96. Waste of money and valuable resources. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This problem solves itself in 5 days. Jesus.

  97. Not to worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the world will end. But don't worry, we always get it going again.

  98. even crazier by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    I have decided instead to take it as a completely solipsistic message. This whole doomsday prophecy business is somehow me telling myself that I have reached the end of the line, that my world is coming to an end.

  99. NASA.. Glad we got everything else fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad that we've got everything else fixed and have such a budget surplus that we can throw away taxpayer dollars on this bullshit. Everyone must be wealthy now, so I'm sure my check's in the mail.

  100. SHHH! Keep it SECRET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear NASA:

    Don't tell the gullible fools the world's NOT coming to an end. Keep your mouth shut and bet against them!! Let them do stupid (#)%@ and let them hand over their cash to you! Sell'em doomsday kits, dehydrated food, survival books, etc. You can't do it AS NASA, of course, but go home and start your own business catering to the doomsday idiots! You can't LOSE! Either you'll be depositing a bunch of checks, or if they're right and the world DOES end--nobody will be around to bitch at you. Of course, you won't be around to be bitched AT, but the effect is the same.

  101. Yea bring it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I look at it, when a system is so corrupt with adware and malware that it requires/demands more money, of which I gradually have less and less of, the only sane option is to re-format and re-boot. :)

  102. the bible says only the Father knows the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only." Mat 24:36

    1. Re:the bible says only the Father knows the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain Kirk asks: what does God need with a star ship?