The news I got was from Taiwan, so we might not have the same sources. However, all the English articles I've seen either imply or directly state that it's a full on crackdown on everyone - no puns for any reason.
China isn't banning puns. They're disallowing news anchors from using them during broadcasts, specifically public media. But that's not fear mongering enough, so of course that's not how it got picked up.
"Already"? HTML5 has been around for a really long time. Web devs who try to desperately hold onto flash have been losing clients for years.
Unless, of course, this article was meant to draw attention to Tom Dale (because obviously he needs more attention), and two shitty articles about idiots thinking that web is dead. If that's the case, carry on.
So someone submits a false DMCA, and Youtube accepted this without requiring any proof. They then forced the youtuber to provide proof that it wasn't a copyright violation. They then provided said youtuber's personal information to the person submitting a false DMCA.
The summary reads like it was written by Buzzfeed. It's also a top 100 list. Hovering over the link, it appears to be nature.com, but I'm going to err on the side of caution and not click on it.
As I explain in this article, the game is filled with special cases that rarely occur in normal play, and these can only be easily found with the help of a coverage tool.
This doesn't seem like news to me! I'm shocked and appalled!
I'm just here to read the comments about what an utter piece of shit Bennet Hasselhoff is. Seriously, Ben 10 is the least qualified person to write about anything. I'd rather ask a hobo for advice, because at least then I'd be asking and not assaulted with random horseshit from Chris Benoit.
Slashdot Mirror
The news I got was from Taiwan, so we might not have the same sources. However, all the English articles I've seen either imply or directly state that it's a full on crackdown on everyone - no puns for any reason.
China isn't banning puns. They're disallowing news anchors from using them during broadcasts, specifically public media. But that's not fear mongering enough, so of course that's not how it got picked up.
The clickbait joke reply wasn't funny the first time it was posted. It didn't suddenly become funny after the third time, or any time thereafter.
Seriously, it's fucking source code. I don't care if the dev identifies as a man, woman, or plant. That doesn't make it any better or worse.
"But measuring the size of the commons has always been a challenge. Until now..."
And why is that? What changed? Reading the article, it seems like the answer is, "We finally bothered to check."
What the fuck are these things? Am I supposed to know software/brand/product/service names off the top of my head?
Never heard of it.
And this is supposed to be from a design company? I think I'll just walk.
"Already"? HTML5 has been around for a really long time. Web devs who try to desperately hold onto flash have been losing clients for years.
Unless, of course, this article was meant to draw attention to Tom Dale (because obviously he needs more attention), and two shitty articles about idiots thinking that web is dead. If that's the case, carry on.
What's frightening about your comment is that it's hard to tell if you're joking or not.
Alleged Satellite Photo Says Ukraine Shootdown of MH17
What?
You're connecting directly to people's IP addresses! For fuck's sake, guys! Are you even trying to make it anonymous anymore?
So someone submits a false DMCA, and Youtube accepted this without requiring any proof. They then forced the youtuber to provide proof that it wasn't a copyright violation. They then provided said youtuber's personal information to the person submitting a false DMCA.
What in the actual fuck?
I run everything as root because YOLO. I'm not gonna be guessing perms and retyping commands, son. I got shit to do.
The summary reads like it was written by Buzzfeed. It's also a top 100 list. Hovering over the link, it appears to be nature.com, but I'm going to err on the side of caution and not click on it.
Try $4k+
this triangular-shaped machine grabs your attention right away.
Looks ugly and boring to me.
As I explain in this article, the game is filled with special cases that rarely occur in normal play, and these can only be easily found with the help of a coverage tool.
This doesn't seem like news to me! I'm shocked and appalled!
Those are Cheerios.
Yeah, I know Jenny McCarthy's name too. That doesn't mean she isn't a pile of shit.
I actually tried to read the article, but their images which are supposedly irrefutable proof are all broken. Good job, geniuses.
I'm just here to read the comments about what an utter piece of shit Bennet Hasselhoff is. Seriously, Ben 10 is the least qualified person to write about anything. I'd rather ask a hobo for advice, because at least then I'd be asking and not assaulted with random horseshit from Chris Benoit.
"it's not impossible, meaning it is possible."
You don't say.
I'm going to need a lot more than he said she said to believe a word of this.
I'm going to need to hear a lot more than he said she said to believe a word of this.