This may seem a plus because our society doesn't require so much running through the woods after game for survival. Unfortunately, left on the forsaken island of albonia with no ready resources, most doom knockers probably wouldn't survive by knocking down trees and throwing rocks at each other...
How can something die if it doesn't rely on anything to stay alive? The authors/port maintainers of FreeBSD don't necessarily rush to meet the demands of any market. What does that tell you? I'm developing some relatively sophisticated multimedia software _on my own_. The other day I was thinking that I should publish it somehow, but started thinking about others copying my innovative idea. That's when I realized I didn't care, because I did it for fun.
** Have it, play with it, mess with it. I might hack your systems if you say YOU wrote it, but that's your problem. Get it?
I've always beleived that a proper system, from an oo perspective, has a top-down hierarchy with no links going upwards. That is never possible, but if you have tools T that are used by users U, and U are used by Senior users S, then T will never use U, and U will never use S. Heck, it works in companies... Now I know that sounds elementary and naive, but I still beleive that if you are making [too many] links up, it might be possible to re-work your design.
heh. Or J#. already used it. Like all of the MS languages/implementations, its fast as balls. I used it for a project last week simply because compiling a 7 class app took amazing how Microsoft just decides to implement a language, and it outperforms the original by logorithmic factors.
I love kde, I live innovation, I feel like freebsd is a close friend or familty member, but microsoft makes the widest range of _solid_ products. They get their fingers into every last bit of marketplace, and they aim to do it well.
Windows is slightly boring, but that's why my freebsd box sits next to it. When I have problems with zope, I read the source. when I want zope up quick and running fast, I put it on windows. WHen I want to get my design document for my senior project done, I do it on windows. When I want an industry-superior real-time audio application running on a state of the art driver sbstraction layer, I comply with ASIO on WINDOWS. fact.
mate, have you ever _tried_ FreeBSD? I'd say it's got more of a *fine-lined niche* than any other free os out there. Isn't Linux still expanding its horizons looking for one.
Be careful about generalizing.
Come on tyskland...build ARTILLERY
on
Potato Bazookas
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Ahh please. people in rural america have been doing this for as long as there hav been potatoes lying around an not being stewed. When I was working on a pipeline job this summer in Alaska, the welders and I had a plot to weld a chamber 12 inch 40 wall steel pipe and use compressed oxygen and sedeline (EXTREMELY explosive) to shoot rubber-sealed foam pipeline pigs _miles_ accross the wilderness. I can't beleive ze germans are actually injuring people.
Good point. I too used linux because it _was_ more stable than 95 and 98, but even then it wasn't more stable than NT. 95 and 98 aren't Ms's biggest operating systems anymore.
This article has almost no validity. When you use windows, you get a feeling of reliability and an *speed*. I'm writing an audio application that has very tight time-performance constraints, and I'm finding MFC's threads and gui widgets to be by far the quickest over qt. Why? its native. Don't flame me about qt not being linux. if you do you've missed the point. The point IS that MFC is native. N-A-T-I-V-E. In the windows sense that means its going to deal with the K-E-R-N-E-L better, and anything else that has to do with the windows platform. Windows XP is not just a windowing system. It is more complete than linux. I don't like XP for various reasons, but that doesn't change how a business makes decisions. point is, if this all this was true windows WOULD be, how was that? "kissing the ring of linux?"
I'm an avid FreeBSD lover. In the past few years I've fallen in love with FreeBSD for it's rigid organization and ultimate simplicity. I use windows because it offers speed and elegance at a level not yet attained by any open-source or free operating evironment. I don't play games; I develop in C++ and python. I don't use any of the.NET or msn what-have-you that MS offers, but the choice is still simple. I own one primary laptop running windows, and a tower (266Mhz, 8000 miles away) running FreeBSD for anything unix. What's the quibble?
To be forward, when are they going to get it? This isn't a question about how to stop music piracy, it's a question about how long they can fend it off. We're learning more, using more, and son enough we'll _all_ be writing our own streaming capability. As long as we have a line-in and tcp, we can do anything. Figure it out.
At Queen Mary and Westfield College in London we use TogetherJ by Together soft. With together you can make use cases, sequence charts, state charts, all the edu text-book stuff, but most of all are class diagrams. make us happy. works for c++, too.
It's a hog, though, so get a fat machine.
Forte isn't bad, though for a nice IDE.
Slashdot Mirror
I know it's cliche, but isn't it amazing how kids that young write things that intelligent and don't put themselves to good use?
This may seem a plus because our society doesn't require so much running through the woods after game for survival.
Unfortunately, left on the forsaken island of albonia with no ready resources, most doom knockers probably wouldn't survive by knocking down trees and throwing rocks at each other...
Yes, I agree. Although I've never used Macs, it's nice to admire the things that they produce.
If software has always been about as reliable as it has always been, doesn't that mean that software is just not that reliable?
Take a risk analysis course.
How can something die if it doesn't rely on anything to stay alive? The authors/port maintainers of FreeBSD don't necessarily rush to meet the demands of any market. What does that tell you?
I'm developing some relatively sophisticated multimedia software _on my own_. The other day I was thinking that I should publish it somehow, but started thinking about others copying my innovative idea. That's when I realized I didn't care, because I did it for fun.
** Have it, play with it, mess with it. I might hack your systems if you say YOU wrote it, but that's your problem.
Get it?
Multimedia Multimedia Multimedia. show me ASIO and all the blinking apps for Linux/UNIX.
Example: Soundforge/Propellerhead Reason with synchronized hardware outputs; basic music production/sound engineering tools.
plain and simple.
I've always beleived that a proper system, from an oo perspective, has a top-down hierarchy with no links going upwards. That is never possible, but if you have tools T that are used by users U, and U are used by Senior users S, then T will never use U, and U will never use S. Heck, it works in companies...
Now I know that sounds elementary and naive, but I still beleive that if you are making [too many] links up, it might be possible to re-work your design.
heh. Or J#. already used it. Like all of the MS languages/implementations, its fast as balls. I used it for a project last week simply because compiling a 7 class app took
amazing how Microsoft just decides to implement a language, and it outperforms the original by logorithmic factors.
This damned langauge will go one of two ways:
they'll fix it,
or it'll die (phase out, dehype, become far too slow and filled with awkward design mechanisms that it cannot survive any longer).
I love kde, I live innovation, I feel like freebsd is a close friend or familty member, but microsoft makes the widest range of _solid_ products. They get their fingers into every last bit of marketplace, and they aim to do it well.
Windows is slightly boring, but that's why my freebsd box sits next to it. When I have problems with zope, I read the source. when I want zope up quick and running fast, I put it on windows. WHen I want to get my design document for my senior project done, I do it on windows. When I want an industry-superior real-time audio application running on a state of the art driver sbstraction layer, I comply with ASIO on WINDOWS. fact.
I love facts.
mate, have you ever _tried_ FreeBSD? I'd say it's got more of a *fine-lined niche* than any other free os out there. Isn't Linux still expanding its horizons looking for one.
Be careful about generalizing.
Ahh please. people in rural america have been doing this for as long as there hav been potatoes lying around an not being stewed. When I was working on a pipeline job this summer in Alaska, the welders and I had a plot to weld a chamber 12 inch 40 wall steel pipe and use compressed oxygen and sedeline (EXTREMELY explosive) to shoot rubber-sealed foam pipeline pigs _miles_ accross the wilderness.
I can't beleive ze germans are actually injuring people.
Good point. I too used linux because it _was_ more stable than 95 and 98, but even then it wasn't more stable than NT. 95 and 98 aren't Ms's biggest operating systems anymore.
This article has almost no validity. When you use windows, you get a feeling of reliability and an *speed*. I'm writing an audio application that has very tight time-performance constraints, and I'm finding MFC's threads and gui widgets to be by far the quickest over qt. Why? its native. Don't flame me about qt not being linux. if you do you've missed the point.
The point IS that MFC is native. N-A-T-I-V-E. In the windows sense that means its going to deal with the K-E-R-N-E-L better, and anything else that has to do with the windows platform.
Windows XP is not just a windowing system. It is more complete than linux. I don't like XP for various reasons, but that doesn't change how a business makes decisions. point is, if this all this was true windows WOULD be, how was that? "kissing the ring of linux?"
nerd
I'm an avid FreeBSD lover. In the past few years I've fallen in love with FreeBSD for it's rigid organization and ultimate simplicity. .NET or msn what-have-you that MS offers, but the choice is still simple. I own one primary laptop running windows, and a tower (266Mhz, 8000 miles away) running FreeBSD for anything unix. What's the quibble?
I use windows because it offers speed and elegance at a level not yet attained by any open-source or free operating evironment. I don't play games; I develop in C++ and python. I don't use any of the
To be forward, when are they going to get it? This isn't a question about how to stop music piracy, it's a question about how long they can fend it off. We're learning more, using more, and son enough we'll _all_ be writing our own streaming capability. As long as we have a line-in and tcp, we can do anything.
Figure it out.
FreeBSD? ports? 2.2? 1.5? take your pick.
where do you get 75% from two posts. intelligent? ha! have some respect.
-P
With together you can make use cases, sequence charts, state charts, all the edu text-book stuff, but most of all are class diagrams. make us happy. works for c++, too.
It's a hog, though, so get a fat machine. Forte isn't bad, though for a nice IDE.
I gotta agree though, emacs is the shtuff.
Patrick Kidd
This is absolutely rediculous
Well, all of these rediculous lawsuits will eventually come to a head