Slashdot Mirror


CES, Reporter Breaks "Unbreakable" Mobile Phone

ChiefMonkeyGrinder writes "Reporter Dan Simmons from the BBC's technology show Click managed to break a mobile phone marketed as 'unbreakable' (video), during a demonstration at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas." The phone can survive a 10 story fall, being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins, and you can use it to hammer a nail; but it's no match for a British journalist.

316 comments

  1. What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Troll

    What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it?

    1. Re:What's with the nationalism by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

      Only British hacks come with that special "wrecking mode"??

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    2. Re:What's with the nationalism by Idiot+with+a+gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like "manhole" and "mankind." It's part of the presentation style, relax.

    3. Re:What's with the nationalism by XPeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It adds another word to the bland summary.

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    4. Re:What's with the nationalism by CaseyB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not as if we wouldn't have known anyway: his first reaction is to apologize profusely.

    5. Re:What's with the nationalism by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An American journalist would've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone, not tried it out, and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords, only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.

    6. Re:What's with the nationalism by turtleAJ · · Score: 0

      What does the reporters nationality have anything to do with it?

      Yeah... and they said "being submerged 20 feet for 30 mins"
      How much is that in meters?!
      VW Bugs laid end-to-end?

      British Reporter breaks phone... in retaliation, American site breaks British site...

      Somebody tell me what nationality the phone is!

    7. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Don't even get me started on "huMANs!"

    8. Re:What's with the nationalism by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My dad told me the story of when he was 16 (around 1966) and the local hardware store had got in unbreakable dishes (Corningware I think), and being a young imp, he decided to give it a shot. He dropped the plate on its edge, which, apparently is the weak spot on such dishes, and it literally exploded. He did this, naturally, during a product demonstration, and was promptly banned from the store.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 1, Funny

      The yellow sun rays from his teeth did it?

    10. Re:What's with the nationalism by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An American journalist would've rephrased the marketing blurb on the phone, not tried it out, and welcomed our new invincible mobile overlords, only to be made fun of by Jon Stewart later that night.

      It's a bit offtopic but I just heard something about this on NPR recently:

      For decades, young reporters would ask themselves, "What would Walter think?" Nowadays, it's not the memory of Walter Cronkite or even Edward R. Murrow that motivates some reporters — it's more often the fear that the stories they put out today might get picked apart by Jon Stewart tomorrow.

      Prominent among the wary: NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams, who recently explained in a magazine essay that The Daily Show host "has gone from optional to indispensable" in just a few short years.

      I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester. Indeed, my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious. It's like an MST3K recap of the day's news ... except with a bizarre twist: the truth.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    11. Re:What's with the nationalism by denzacar · · Score: 1, Informative

      Somebody tell me what nationality the phone is!

      Apparently, USA-ian.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    12. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huwoman?

    13. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Hubeings!

    14. Re:What's with the nationalism by n2art2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't even get me started on "huwoMANs!"

      --
      Self proclaimed wannabe geek. You know how it is. Most of us who read this stuff probably fit in that category.
    15. Re:What's with the nationalism by n2art2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      but was he British?

      --
      Self proclaimed wannabe geek. You know how it is. Most of us who read this stuff probably fit in that category.
    16. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure he wasn't French?

    17. Re:What's with the nationalism by MSG · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only do those explode quite spectacularly, but the shards are amazingly sharp. I don't envy the person who had to clean up that mess.

    18. Re:What's with the nationalism by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure he wasn't French?

      He said the guy apologized, not surrendered.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    19. Re:What's with the nationalism by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

      My dad told me the story of when he was 16 (around 1966) and the local hardware store had got in unbreakable dishes (Corningware I think), and being a young imp, he decided to give it a shot. He dropped the plate on its edge, which, apparently is the weak spot on such dishes, and it literally exploded. He did this, naturally, during a product demonstration, and was promptly banned from the store.

      That sounds like Corningware alright... When that stuff breaks, it's very serious about it.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    20. Re:What's with the nationalism by Tetsujin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The yellow sun rays from his teeth did it?

      No, no, that would never work - the rays would need to converge to get enough power - but the teeth are so crooked the rays get scattered all over the place

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    21. Re:What's with the nationalism by kaini · · Score: 0

      Don't even get me started on "huwoMANs!"

      did you come up with the acronym PHP, by any chance?

      --
      please restate bitrate in libraries of congress per hour.
    22. Re:What's with the nationalism by The+Orange+Mage · · Score: 5, Funny

      You all have it wrong, technically he apologised.

    23. Re:What's with the nationalism by LSD-OBS · · Score: 1

      huwoWOMANs?

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    24. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huwowoman?

    25. Re:What's with the nationalism by LSD-OBS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hah, I just GNU that would come up

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    26. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An excellent court jester is the best of role models; they allow themselves to be the butt of many jokes while exposing the truth often at a potentially signifigant cost to themselves.

      Jon Stewart is an excellent court jester

    27. Re:What's with the nationalism by LordofEntropy · · Score: 1

      You all have it wrong, technically he apologised.

      Absolutely hysterical. Well played. I can't believe this hasn't been modded up given the usual numbers of regional spelling and grammar threads.

      --
      Entropy just isn't what it used to be.
    28. Re:What's with the nationalism by theantipop · · Score: 1

      He often doesn't need to really point out anything. Simply display a video of what someone said yesterday next to a video of what they said two years ago.

    29. Re:What's with the nationalism by johny42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hereby suggest "but it's no match for a British journalist" as a new catchphrase.

    30. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cause its funny, you ass. your the kind of person that really cant take a joke, and causes wars over a fucking joke.

    31. Re:What's with the nationalism by topham · · Score: 1

      We had a set of such dishes; the bowls will break after being dropped from a cupboard, bounced off the counter and dropped to the floor several times.

      And yes, when they do finally break you can pickup the pieces, all 50 bajillion of them, with their razor sharp edges.

      I have a small scar on one toe from when a bowl exploded and a small piece skimmed across my foot.

    32. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugly bags of mostly water.

    33. Re:What's with the nationalism by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Had a book of Politically Correct Nursery Rymes..

      It should be Persun, and Womyn, and Humyn.. Then, there is no sexism. Damn those nursery ryhmes were funny.

      Don't forget Femail..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    34. Re:What's with the nationalism by GigaHurtsMyRobot · · Score: 1

      It's called Corelle. Man, that stuff is dangerous!

    35. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hereby suggest "but it's no match for a British journalist" as a new catchphrase.

      It's a pretty good catchphrase but it's no match for a British journalist.

    36. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Meatbags is what the droids refer to us as.

    37. Re:What's with the nationalism by Garridan · · Score: 5, Funny

      But... Iron Man was a Fe male...

    38. Re:What's with the nationalism by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1, Funny

      British mouths are like diamonds; the funky teeth bend light around them causing them to sparkle and glow unnaturally, and they absorb all colors except yellow.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    39. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Because its funny, you ass. You're the kind of person that really can't take a joke and causes wars over a fucking joke.

      The Internet, it's serious business.

    40. Re:What's with the nationalism by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I still say "HK47 error" to refer to "meatbag incompetence".

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    41. Re:What's with the nationalism by nyctopterus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why is this stupid joke always modded up? Enough already.

    42. Re:What's with the nationalism by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Court jesters have often played the role of pointing out the poignant truths around them with just enough humour to avoid being hung for noticing.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    43. Re:What's with the nationalism by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      huwogrrlz?

    44. Re:What's with the nationalism by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      Be glad that that phone was not 'shagged by a rare parrot' ;)

    45. Re:What's with the nationalism by Shotgun · · Score: 0, Troll

      I guess he doesn't do MSNBC, because they're just to damn easy, being a complete parody of themselves.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    46. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found it odd yet telling that keeping anchors in check is not regulated by role models today but rather the court jester. Indeed, my opinions of both Fox News and CNN have dropped significantly from watching a few shows of Stewarts where he systematically picks apart their idiocy with a montage or just pointing out the obvious. It's like an MST3K recap of the day's news ... except with a bizarre twist: the truth.

      I wonder what it says about our society when it so closely resembles a Shakespearean comedy.

    47. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ironically thats the same thing Glenn Beck gets ripped for doing too.

    48. Re:What's with the nationalism by quanticle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In addition to providing entertainment, wasn't the court jester supposed to keep the monarch humble by pointing out things that others would not dare? I'd say Jon Stewart makes an excellent jester in that regard, and all the more power to him for it.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    49. Re:What's with the nationalism by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

      Glenn Beck gets ripped for a hell of a lot more than that...

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    50. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      John Stewart is good, but he's no match for a British journalist.

    51. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough already.

      I think that's what they usually say, yes.

    52. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too lazy to log in.... *yawn*

      ANYWAYS, I recall watching B.Williams mention on-air that the news staff looks at what they've written through a "stewart filter" or similar. Basically, is what they broadcast mockable by the Daily Show? If so, they are not doing justice to journalism.

    53. Re:What's with the nationalism by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I don't remember one of nursery rhymes...I think you may be referring to the works of James Finn Garner. I had "Politically correct bedtime stories" and "once upon a more enlightened time", and they were excellent. If there was a nursery rhymes one that I just missed, that'd be great.

    54. Re:What's with the nationalism by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not so bad. I'd rather be hung than hanged...

    55. Re:What's with the nationalism by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      So true. I accidentally shattered one once by pressing it with a rocking chair. The plate split into shards, but since it wasn't from a drop, they stayed in place. It was so impressive to look at, I got the SLR and spent an hour photographing it.

    56. Re:What's with the nationalism by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I didn't expect some kind of British journalist!"

      *danger chord* "Nobody expects the British journalists! Our chief weapon is surprise!!"

      and so forth.

    57. Re:What's with the nationalism by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      He used to be.

    58. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They guy used the phone, said the word "schedule" and the phone leapt from his hand and landed at the "Will It Blend" booth...

    59. Re:What's with the nationalism by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Enough already.

      So you're ready to surrender then?

    60. Re:What's with the nationalism by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Need to remove the point of contention with a hu-bris.

    61. Re:What's with the nationalism by Chysn · · Score: 1

      Hmm...

      • "In Soviet Russia, the British journalists are no match for YOU..." or
      • "All your base are no match for a British journalist" or
      • "Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of British journalists?" or
      • "It's like a 1989 Buick LeSabre in that it's no match for a British journalist" or
      • "Duke Nukem Forever is no match for a British journalist" or
      • "A British journalist beat my brother at Wimbledon, you insensitive clod!"

      I like it. It fits.

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    62. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      About 25 years ago, I worked in a home/garden store that sold glass fireplace doors. We always told customers that they were "unbreakable", so they didn't have to worry about their children falling into them and getting hurt, or sudden changes of temperature causing the glass to shatter, etc. To demonstrate, we always took a fireplace poker and offered to let the customer hit the door as hard as they wanted. If they declined, we did it for them. We had done this hundreds of times, and never had a problem. One day, I was working with a customer and telling them about how they wanted to make sure they got one that was shatterproof so they wouldn't have any problems; I was facing them and swung the poker backwards into the door and heard this most horrific *CRASH*, *tinkle*, *tinkle*. I think I only stumbled slightly as I finished "like this cheap style here" and pointed them at the next higher model. Then I broke down laughing (and so did they), as I told them we must have weakened that one with repeated abuse (if you looked at the other panels and the doors themselves, you could see how often we had hit it). They ended up buying one anyway, so it was a good story and a good sale.

    63. Re:What's with the nationalism by Chas · · Score: 1

      Not Corning. Corelle (slightly different product, same company).

      CorningWare is marketed for it's resistance to thermal stresses (going freezer to over).
      Corelle is marketed for it's durability (though it has problems with thermal stressing).

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    64. Re:What's with the nationalism by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Back to the original NPR piece... The point was that Brian Williams said they'd stop and do a double take on some stories if it felt like it could turn out to be comedy fodder. As in rewording some lines. It isn't that Jon Stewart is right but that his presence makes people stop and wonder if they're going to look like a fool before speaking.

      Sure there have always been political comedians. But the Jon Stewart Show is now big enough that you can't just ignore it. This is also an era where you can't just have some one-off news reports that people will forget about in a day. Someone (Jon, Glenn, etc) will dredge it up later.

    65. Re:What's with the nationalism by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Negative, I am a meat popsicle.

    66. Re:What's with the nationalism by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's not so bad. I'd rather be hung than hanged...

      Take it from me. Being hung isn't all its made out to be.

    67. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like those crazy sociology professors who get pissed at words like "manhole" and "mankind." It's part of the presentation style, relax.

      Some of those professors are brilliant satirists: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/purity.html

    68. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's a nice catchphrase, but it's no match for a British journalist.

    69. Re:What's with the nationalism by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      Coffee spurt moment. well done.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    70. Re:What's with the nationalism by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Actually he has mocked MSNBC, you dont watch the show do you?

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    71. Re:What's with the nationalism by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The word "man" originally meant the entire human race. Later on people decided to call the sexy ones "Woohoo man!" or "woman" for short.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    72. Re:What's with the nationalism by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Femail..

      Mail order brides?

    73. Re:What's with the nationalism by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      "And the circle is complete..." Nicely done.

    74. Re:What's with the nationalism by rs79 · · Score: 1

      When I was in Uni in the late 70s I went out one day to buy a cereal bowl. One of my housemates was along for the ride and was rather shocked I'd paid $3.50 for a bowl. "But it's Corelle, it's unbreakable" was my reply and I threw it up in the air to let it land in the parking lot.

      It broke. I could have bought 4 china bowls for the same place.

      Corelle is "unbreakable" like the 60's watch I'm wearing is "waterproof". It's really water resistant and Corelle is actually shatter resistant.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    75. Re:What's with the nationalism by ukemike · · Score: 1

      I can actually here Jeremy Clarkson saying this in my mind. Not that he's really a journalist...

      --
      -- QED
    76. Re:What's with the nationalism by F34nor · · Score: 1

      I found it odd that the NPR reporter didn't ask Brain if he thought that being owned by the larges military contractor in the world doesn't effect how they report on politics or military spending.

    77. Re:What's with the nationalism by dangitman · · Score: 1

      EVERYONE IS FREAKING BIASED TO THEIR OWN BELIEFS

      What an amazing revelation. You must be one proud 13 year-old.

      try to understand the point of view of the other side, which, even when you don't think you agree, 9 times out of 10 what the other side is saying has merit

      Where did you get that statistic from?

      if you're too stupid to realize 'your political party' or 'your news channel' isn't just as fucked up as the other side,

      Except that isn't true. Some sides are more correct and truthful than others. Thinking that everything is equally biased is as stupid a fallacy as thinking there is no bias.

      The fact is that when it comes to many issues, often one side is just lying and spreading propaganda that has no basis in truth. Sometimes both sides are, but that's much rarer.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    78. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those fell on my head when I was about sixteen and just shattered.

      It took years for me to live that down.

    79. Re:What's with the nationalism by longacre · · Score: 1

      Wasn't expecting to read a 1970s Bill Cosby joke on /. today.

    80. Re:What's with the nationalism by Narcogen · · Score: 1

      My dad told me the story of when he was 16 (around 1966) and the local hardware store had got in unbreakable dishes (Corningware I think)

      Probably was Corelle.

    81. Re:What's with the nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the pudding.

    82. Re:What's with the nationalism by stupid_is · · Score: 1

      I think they're both supposed to be the same stuff - Pyrex (another brand). However, in the US, I think they changed the manufacturing process of it and that introduced the shattering/exploding tendencies which has led to some investigation - although no conclusions were reached, according to the wiki. I seem to remember reading somewhere that the Pyrex used in the US is different to that used on the other side of the pond, though, and that it is particularly vulnerable from being removed from a freezer to be put straight in the oven (tendency to violently explode). Certainly the (UK) Pyrex dishes I have have never shattered - I managed to get one to chip, though. Have not tried sticking a frozen one into a hot oven, and it's not something I'd care to experiment with.....

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
    83. Re:What's with the nationalism by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      If the guy was a redneck from the south, I think the article would have mentioned shotgun pellets...

    84. Re:What's with the nationalism by jedrek · · Score: 1

      perSUN?

      that's starist!

    85. Re:What's with the nationalism by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      No. He's a little to one-sided for my tastes.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  2. Oops by powelly · · Score: 1

    All publicity is good publicity?

    --
    --- I'm sure using a computer was fun back in the 80's. *sigh*
    1. Re:Oops by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Make something idiot-proof, and the world just makes a better idiot...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Oops by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was at school this kid was showing off his unbreakable watch. I said I bet I could break it. He said 'go on then' and gave me the watch. It's amazing how much pressure you can apply to something with a point. In this case the point of an iron (we were in an art room) was more than a match. I still feel bad about killing his watch though :(

    3. Re:Oops by charleste · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Wish I had mod points left. "Insightful", "Informative" ... or "Redundant"?

    4. Re:Oops by hierophanta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All publicity is good publicity?

      well, we now have the idea of an unbreakable phone in our head.
      & we probably think of it as something that is difficult to achieve and mostly likely attribute value to the product.

    5. Re:Oops by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Or... we could be remembering another so-called "un" object, and remembering how that one ended up fairing.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    6. Re:Oops by Vitani · · Score: 1

      While that is true, and a good thing to remember, the phone was not claimed to be idiot-proof, nor would I call Dan Simmons an idiot (actually it was quite a smart move to whack the screen on the corner of the tank). So in this instance, that particular saying is not relevant.

      It's strange, the human race have conquered the highest mountains on Earth, travelled through space, and explored the deepest oceans, yet making an unbreakable/unsinkable creation of our own? Seemingly impossible!

    7. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A colleague of me me has this on his door: "Programming is a competition between the programmer and god, the programmer tries to make the code idiot proof and god keeps on producing bigger idiots" Or something like that

  3. Nothing is unbreakable. by ATestR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can destroy anything if you apply the right force. Making a bald statement that a phone (or anything else) is unbreakable will just prompt some folks to find the right force, even if it isn't something the phone would normally experience.

    --
    âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    1. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Nightwraith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree with you generally, don't you think that bashing the screen with something sharp/pointy is a fairly common occurrence with non-flip phones?

      Keys, countertops, railings and curbs all come to mind...

    2. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It is nice though to have something sturdy. Something you don't have to care about at all. If only most rugged phones weren't hideously ugly or with very poor UI & functionality...

      Though luckily there are compromises like Nokia 3720 classic; both quite rugged and rather stylish
      http://conversations.nokia.com/2009/07/09/nokia-3720-classic-rugged-phone-video-montage-and-hands-on/

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      .. don't you think that bashing the screen with something sharp/pointy is a fairly common occurrence with non-flip phones?

      Not if you stay on your meds.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can destroy anything if you apply the right force.

      Of course. Even the forces binding the proton together are not so strong that one can't be blasted apart in a particle accelerator. Even the mythical and ludicrously strong material the Ringworld was made from had to succumb to this rule. It is in some ways trivial to take "unbreakable" in a way that it equals "non-existant".

      I think it's more useful to define "unbreakable" to mean "within reason", and go from there. For a phone, being able to use it as an impromptu hammer is pretty good. Or being dropped off your balcony. Or submerged in water. That covers most of the abuse that a phone takes, so "unbreakable" as in "you aren't going to accidentally break it in normal circumstances" is pretty good. Though if a journalist can break it while standing at your booth at a trade show, then it seems it doesn't live up to even this lesser standard.

      Of course the gold standard for unbreakability in mobile electronics is over twenty years old. Ah, now that is some damn sturdy hardware!

      On the other hand, dip that thing in some water and see what happens...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Exactly. Nothing is unbreakable!

      That’s why my walls and my clothes are made out of nothing.

      But I plan to sell nothing, so others have nothing too, and so have to pay taxes for nothing.
      I only hope nobody steals nothing for me, because how will I sue him then?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      I wager a 100 ton hydraulic press would make short work of it.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    7. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC as I'm modding this discussion:

      Nope. Those of us with Non flip phones do not tend to put them in position where they get stabbed by Sharp Pointy Objects like Keys and such. In my case, most of my pants/shorts all have a dedicated pocket where I place it, screen towards my body. Yes it's been stabbed, slammed into corners, rails and walls yet it still works quite well. If it's not in the cell pocket, it's in my shirt pocket so it's never near keys or other pointed objects except when out or someone tries to use me for target practice. Then I hope to hell the phone takes the slug instead of my precious skin because it aint "My Precious" as Gollum would say.

    8. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      It is in some ways trivial to take "unbreakable" in a way that it equals "non-existant".

      The speed of light is unbreakable! :P

    9. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Nerdposeur · · Score: 3, Funny

      I only hope nobody steals nothing for me, because how will I sue him then?

      You won't have to. He'll gladly settle out of court and give you nothing for your trouble.

    10. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      "No PR is bad PR." Look at all the free PR they got now, because smart-asses (got karma to burn) want to point out the blindingly obvious. I'd say it's a genius statement, if it wasn't so sad that we've fallen for this trick over and over again.

      Also, consider the blank stares if they'd said "This phone can take up to X Nm before breaking!".

    11. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by tg123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can destroy anything if you apply the right force. Making a bald statement that a phone (or anything else) is unbreakable will just prompt some folks to find the right force, even if it isn't something the phone would normally experience.

      How true.

      Did you notice that he hit the screen against the corner of the tank?

      Now if I remember correctly from high school a force applied to a small surface area means high pressure.

      http://www.school-for-champions.com/SCIENCE/pressure.htm

      Great to see this in practice. ;-)

    12. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by toriver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A tachyon wants a word with you. Keep in mind it talks backwards though.

    13. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      "You can destroy anything if you apply the right force. Making a bald statement that a phone (or anything else) is unbreakable will just prompt some folks to find the right force, even if it isn't something the phone would normally experience."

      Too bad for the phone maker it was a simple act of smacking the thing like a child would or an angry person. I'd expect more from an unbreakable phone.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    15. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a bald statement that a phone (or anything else) is unbreakable will just prompt some folks to find the right force, even if it isn't something the phone would normally experience.

      My hero is Sir. Patrick Stewart, you insensitive clod!

    16. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by samwichse · · Score: 1

      I also hear they work pretty well on the T-800 Terminators. Though this was fixed with the 1000 series.

      Sam

    17. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by freedumb2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree, that's one hairy mess.

    18. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Aeros · · Score: 1

      but if its nothing then it wont break and you lose your repeat business

    19. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      In comes often into contact with them, yes. But bashing it with them - not really...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    20. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by hedronist · · Score: 1

      And for completeness sake let's not forget these classics:

      • "If you push something hard enough, it will fall over."
        – Fudd's First Law of Opposition
      • "What goes in must come out."
        – Testicle's Deviant to Fudd's First Law

      All Hail TFST!

    21. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by schnell · · Score: 1

      "No PR is bad PR."

      Ask an actual PR person about this commonly repeated phrase and they will roll their eyes. That phrase is only true for celebrities. For companies, there is A LOT of bad PR. Do you really think that the companies involved welcomed any of these:

      • PR AT&T has received over iPhone network problems?
      • PR Amazon received over wiping "1984" off people's Kindles?
      • PR T-Mobile and Microsoft received over vanished Sidekick data?
      • PR Microsoft received over Xbox Red Rings of Death? Or Vista's woefulness? Or ... you get the idea.

      For businesses with a brand to protect, there is absolutely such a thing as PR which taints their image and will stop customers from buying things from them/using them. I really wish the phrase "there's no such thing as bad press" would vanish from people's minds because (at least in some contexts) it's just not true.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    22. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by jimthehorsegod · · Score: 1

      Didn't the build-up state that you could hammer in a nail with the phone? Nail heads have pretty small surface areas too...

    23. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you break a photon in half.

    24. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC destroy everything they touch...

      Don't the British people know it.

    25. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Chuck Norris! And I think he heard you, too. Run!

    26. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by nuOpus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but did you see how many times he smacked the screen up against the tank with a lot of force? I have owned lots of phones in my day, but ALL of them would have had a smashed screen with just one hit lighter than the force he was using. The iPhone has a more rugged screen than lots of others, but I will bet anything that one smack against the tank like that, and the screen would be done for. Even though he cracked the screen, that thing held up like a tank! After seeing that, I would have confidence that if that phone fell out of my pocket and fell in the rocks, it would survive in tact. I can't see how a fall out of a pocket could exert that much pressure repeatedly.

      So in normal circumstances, yes I would still consider this phone unbreakable.

    27. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Steve+Max · · Score: 1

      If you have nothing, you can afford nothing, and you buy nothing.

    28. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Well all the free PR Dasani (Coca Cola's bottled tap water) got in Europe is doing them a lot of good.

    29. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that the monster from The Never Ending Story?

    30. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the whole "can hammer a nail in with it" aspect they were advertising about the phone would seem to indicate that it CAN take that kind of force.

      Or was supposed to, anyway.

    31. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      This demonstrator didn't just say it was practically unbreakable he then went on to offer the reporter a free phone if he could break the demo model!

      The phone was broken by hitting it three times on the corner of the demonstrators fish tank.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    32. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by iammani · · Score: 1

      The speed of tachyon is unbreakable! How about that :)

    33. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      ?talking it hear could you if say tachyon a would whaT ?"above out looK"

    34. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If more people buy nothing, then more will sell nothing. That leads to a glut and drives down prices. Eventually, sellers will sell nothing for nothing.

    35. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tachyon wants a word with you. Keep in mind it talks backwards though.

      If you get a word, or any other sign of existence, from a tachyon then you'll probably receive a Nobel prize. So far they have no scientific basis beyond "if we ever find anything that travels faster than light we'll call it a tachyon".

    36. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      I only hope nobody steals nothing for me, because how will I sue him then?

      You won't have to. He'll gladly settle out of court and give you nothing for your trouble.

      And hopefully without using lawyers, because they will not settle for nothing.

    37. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by M8e · · Score: 0

      That was 'The Nothingness'.
      Only nothing is nothing and nothingness is not nothing.

      Not noting is something.
      Ergo
      Nothingness is something.

      QED

    38. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but my inspiration comes from an old comic where Scrooge McDuck flies out to the end of the universe, to scoop up some “nothing”. Then he kept it in a safe, and sold it no everyone, so they could evade taxes.
      But the Beagle Boys cracked the safe and stole all of the nothing. The cops told Scrooge that he could not put them into jail, because they stole nothing. So he had to end his business.
      I loved that story. :D

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    39. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Even the mythical and ludicrously strong material the Ringworld was made from had to succumb to this rule.

      Since you Niven to the discussion, I should point out that the General Products hull could survive anything except collision with antimatter, but the I wonder about a black hole? Surely a black hole would at least put a hole in one of those hulls. I doubt a British journalist could damage a black hole beyond making it 50-100 kilos heavier.

    40. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      my walls and my clothes are made out of nothing.

      My clothes are made out of nothing too, but my wife keeps complaining.

    41. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      absolutely. My 3yr old son has this innate ability to discover such forces.

    42. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Since you Niven to the discussion, I should point out that the General Products hull could survive anything except collision with antimatter, but the I wonder about a black hole?

      And I have to wonder if that wasn't just the Puppeteer marketing department. :P

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    43. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Since you Niven to the discussion, I should point out that the General Products hull could survive anything except collision with antimatter, but the I wonder about a black hole?

      And I have to wonder if that wasn't just the Puppeteer marketing department. :P

      Yes well in the books we never see sane Puppeteers actually travelling in the things.

    44. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I still get the feeling that nothing's wrong with your business model.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    45. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They probably can hammer a nail with the side of the phone, not the screen.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    46. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Dude, he whacked the "unbreakable" phone against a glass aquarium.

      Now granted he hit it on the plastic trim. But it's still glass under there leading me to conclude in a collision with glass and the unbreakable phone, the phone was more fragile.

      Of course from an f=ma standpoint whacking it hard like this may be more force than the 20 foot drop it was spec'd for.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    47. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      True. For a slightly more mundane example, hitting a diamond in exactly the right place with a chisel will split it. Ask any diamond worker.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    48. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      I think it's more useful to define "unbreakable" to mean "within reason",

      You mean sort of like those unlimited* internet connections?

      *connection will be shaped to 28 kbps after 1 GB usage

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    49. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by th3rmite · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? What about Bruce Willis?

    50. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Since you Niven to the discussion, I should point out that the General Products hull could survive anything except collision with antimatter, but the I wonder about a black hole?

      [Niven Pedant]You're significantly wrong in the canon, and the latter question has never been raised as far as I know.
      Within the canon, one of the more recent books ('Fleet of Worlds' IIRC, but my copy is on a different continent so I can't check) has as a central plot theme being able to "turn off" a GP hull remotely. That's a bug, not a feature.
      Or was it a feature that the Puppeteer's DARPA insisted on putting into the GP hulls before selling them to potentially unfriendly customers? To quote (approximately) 'Neutron Star', "Puppeteers are not in the habit of building invulnerable warships". So, against the possible prospect of the Kzin buying up a fleet of used GP hulls a thousand years after the Puppeteers have left Known Space, then setting off in pursuit of the dishonourably meddling leafeaters ... well, now you see why they put that remote "off" switch into the GP hull. That's as "rationally cautious" as the UK and US governments keeping the fact that the Poles had broken the enigma machine secret for many years after the end of WWII - and reaping a reward in people still using the system. So, it was a feature to the designers, but a bug once non-Puppeteers knew of it.

      'Neutron Star' itself clearly indicates the consequences of a black hole meeting a GP hull, for the crew - either entire consumption, GP hull and all (there's nothing about a GP hull that allows light elsewhere to exceed 'c', so the hole remains black outside the hull, once the hull is inside) ; or if the hole is small enough to fit into the GP hull, death by tidal forces for the occupants. In the latter case, 'Flatlander' provides the answer : contact between a black hole (or probably a neutron star) and a GP hull would result in occasional atoms being pulled from the GP hull into the black hole (or onto the neutronium) ; eventually enough atoms would leave the GP hull to destabilise it, at which point, 'poof'. The forces between atoms in a GP hull are clearly described as being molecular (though strengthened by the inbuilt power supply of the hull), so anything that provides nuclear-type forces will eventually be able to dislodge some atoms from the hull and so eventually the hull would go 'poof'. The claims that the Puppeteers make for their hulls sound like marketing speak.

      I think that if you hit a GP hull for long enough with a hard gamma-ray laser then you'd eventually be able to ablate through it. But I'm a spoilsport!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    51. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      A kill switch for the GP hull, controlled by Puppeteers is consistent with the earlier books (consider the superior performance of Nessus's flycycle WRT the other vehicles in the original Ringworld) though I haven't read the later books.

      'Neutron Star' itself clearly indicates the consequences of a black hole meeting a GP hull, for the crew - either entire consumption, GP hull and all (there's nothing about a GP hull that allows light elsewhere to exceed 'c', so the hole remains black outside the hull, once the hull is inside) ; or if the hole is small enough to fit into the GP hull, death by tidal forces for the occupants.

      But hang on a black hole is not a neutron star so that story doesn't apply. The GP hull is just an atom. Maybe the hull would go into the hole as a solid object or not at all (in which case you may be right). I suspect the GP hull would be toast because the gravitational field in a small black hole brakes things up by requiring them to move faster than light to stay together, but I am not aware of Niven addressing the subject.

      Now to address the issue of Stasis field vs Black Hole...

    52. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      A kill switch for the GP hull, controlled by Puppeteers is consistent with the earlier books (consider the superior performance of Nessus's flycycle WRT the other vehicles in the original Ringworld) though I haven't read the later books.

      Entirely consistent. But imagine if Speaker had taken Nessus' flycycle back to the Patriarchy, where they figured out enough of the notations so that on another mission, the Kzin could have flown Nessus' (or whichever other Puppeteer) flycycle in pursuit of the Puppeteer. So there'd be another system in there too. Or maybe that's why they took the more programmable stepping discs on the next mission.

      But hang on a black hole is not a neutron star so that story doesn't apply. The GP hull is just an atom.

      Now, I can't remember if this is in Flatlander or in the more recent books, but no, a GP hull is not "just an atom" it is (approximately) "a molecule with it's bonds strengthened by a [special process || internal power supply]". If it were made of nuclear matter, then it'd have a density comparable with neutronium ... with very non-canon consequences.

      I suspect the GP hull would be toast because the gravitational field in a small black hole brakes things up by requiring them to move faster than light to stay together, but I am not aware of Niven addressing the subject.

      I think that we're in general agreement about the consequences, but you need to double-check your physics. Or the way you express your physics.

      Now to address the issue of Stasis field vs Black Hole...

      Hmmm, interesting question. There's nothing to stop a stasis field from going around a black hole. See the [non-canon] story about the Slaver/ Tnuctipun weapon that went through the Wunderland system during the occupation. If a black hole approached a stasis field from the outside ... well, stasis is a non-physical effect (it's a temporal distortion - see 'World of Ptavvs'), so ... I can't see why a black hole couldn't envelope a stasis field, and then who knows what would happen ; but if the stasis field enclosed a larger volume than the black hole's event horizon ... interesting indeed.

      You may want to follow this up on www.larryniven.org , the semi-official fan site ; I think they have forums there.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    53. Re:Nothing is unbreakable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. Whoops! by Nightwraith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh...

    Is this live? We can edit that out right?

    Ok, reset. Ready? Take TWO!

  5. Learn from history... by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's the "titanic" tag?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Learn from history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where's the "titanic" tag?

      Somewhere in the North Atlantic?

  6. So before I by Themer · · Score: 1

    RTFA to WTFV can anyone tell us how he breaks it?

    1. Re:So before I by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      He gives it a few good whacks on the side of an aquarium (after dunking the phone in the water, and managing to still receive a phone call on the device). It's kind of funny, but not terribly exciting.

    2. Re:So before I by SirKveldulv · · Score: 1

      He smashes the screen against the edge of a water tank.

    3. Re:So before I by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      Would've been funnier if the tank broke.

    4. Re:So before I by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      It's just wrong that people make a summary about someone breaking an unbreakable and doesn't include how it was broken. I'm all for people being encouraged to RTFA, but leaving out such a vital piece of the story? Epic fail...

  7. Seriously? by jlp2097 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously? A story about breaking a phone which surprisingly is not unbreakable? If it's a slow news day at least put it in idle!

    Meh.

  8. Video by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a link to the actual video? The provided link just keeps playing a PBS commercial at me.

    -Peter

    1. Re:Video by Captain+Spam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone have a link to the actual video? The provided link just keeps playing a PBS commercial at me.

      -Peter

      That's how they broke it. One too many pledge drives and the poor phone just couldn't take any more...

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    2. Re:Video by dkh2 · · Score: 1

      That's entirely the wrong response to too many pledge drives. You're supposed to make a drinking game out of it. Every time [on-air-personality] says [key phrase] you drink.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
  9. Use it as a hammer? by jgreco · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I wouldn't consider it indestructible at least until you can try to nail it to the wall WITH a hammer and nail - and it still works.

    1. Re:Use it as a hammer? by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I wouldn't consider it indestructible at least until you can try to nail it to the wall WITH a hammer and nail - and it still works.
      Sounds like you need a Jesus Phone.

  10. Happens to the best of us! by pasm · · Score: 1

    Demo dyndrome is alive and well!
    I am sure nearly all of us knows how he feels.
    I remember when Oracle was unbreakable. Surely it is computing taboo to use this description :)

  11. Spoiler: by bcmm · · Score: 4, Informative

    He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in. Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone, it breaks like any normal screen. You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Spoiler: by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that was Gorilla Glass.

    2. Re:Spoiler: by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Spoiler: by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      It's a bit funny just how fast he breaks it. The CEO seems a bit surprised how the guy whacks at it for a few seconds and breaks it that easily.

    4. Re:Spoiler: by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.

      That's because the "rep" in the video is the CEO of the company. What I'd like to see is the rant that was edited out (you can tell pretty easily that there's an edit at 1:09). I'm betting you saw the CEO's face turn a few shades of red and that a few employees were packing up their desks.

    5. Re:Spoiler: by radtea · · Score: 1

      It's a bit funny just how fast he breaks it.

      Sounds like a case of developers testing their own code, or in this case engineers testing their own product. There is a strong tendency to create impressive tests for the product's strengths while carefully avoiding the weaknesses.

      You need independent testers who don't feel they've done their job until the product is good and truly borken.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    6. Re:Spoiler: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did take 3 to 4 good hits before breaking. I have to say that he was hitting it quite hard.

    7. Re:Spoiler: by maxume · · Score: 1

      He looks embarrassed, but I don't think he looks all that pissed.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Spoiler: by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.

      To be fair, they have a good laugh about it after it breaks, too. The company rep doesn't act embarrassed, and has good humor about it.

      I think if I needed a rugged phone I'd probably consider one from this company anyway, it's certainly a more durable phone than a regular phone. Obviously not "indestructible" but it'd handle being in my pocket.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    9. Re:Spoiler: by fast+turtle · · Score: 0

      Damn You: I don't know whether to mark you as Funny or Insightful becuase you've succeeded in reaching both.

      It's very true that you can't idiot proof something as I gleefully instructed a salesperson on regarding flip phones. I'm a trekie (grew up on it) and the first thing I did was flip it open. Funny thing is, he got hit in the knee with one screen while the other flew across the room and just missed hitting his boss in the face. Yep totally destroyed a $300 dollar phone in less then 2 seconds only to ask the guy "Now do you understand why I don't like flip phones?"

      I'll take a brick phone over a flip any day of the week simply because I wont destroy telling the ship to "Beam Me Up. There's no Inteligent Life here."

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    10. Re:Spoiler: by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      He just smashes the screen against the corner of the fish tank that he just failed to drown it in. Not being covered in rubber like the rest of the phone, it breaks like any normal screen. You could probably apply the same pressure by accidentally dropping it on a jagged rock.

      A fairly big oversight when testing for destruction - after all, you want to concentrate on the unarmored areas because they'd be an obvious weak spot. And a huge planar surface like an LCD seems especially prone to breaking from accidental overpressure on a point.

      Still, there are many ways to protect such things - the common ones I've seen is to space the LCD away from the touchscreen and use the extra gap to stick in some protection. Smashing the screen may destroy the touchpanel, but the screen stays protected. It was common joked we could use the things as hammers.

    11. Re:Spoiler: by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      I can't believe it took this long for someone to post just exactly what he did. I went to RTFA until i realized it was a video and it started playing a commercial at me. How much effort is it to write "he whacked the screen on a hard object"?

    12. Re:Spoiler: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The CEO gave the reporter a new phone because the reporter was able to break the demo phone.

      Some bosses are very nice people and understand that things can fail --- if you listen to the CEO he does say "almost unbreakable" at the start of the video.

    13. Re:Spoiler: by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      And what you didn't see was the CEO signaling the techs something that translates to
      " WHY IN THE NINE RINGS OF HELL did you not test this particular failure mode??? you ring up 10,000 engineers and you get them working on this"

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    14. Re:Spoiler: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like marketing making claims that no engineer would want their name associated with. They are very specific about the resistance to water damage, for example. 20 feet deep under water for up to 30 minutes. Not "you can take this thing deep sea diving". "Unbreakable" is equally ludicrous. The materials have a known strength and every engineering student can tell you how to exceed these dynamically.

      And then marketing fails to stage the presentation right (or the overconfident CEO ignored the warnings). You do not allow live tests by strangers, unless you know exactly what they're going to do and that the product can stand it.

    15. Re:Spoiler: by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Space above the actual screen is a good idea - if I were to hit my old-fashioned Nokia 3410 (once, not four times) like that, I'd be out a fascia that I could replace at a market for less that £5 (the fascia on those phones is just a replaceable bit of coloured or patterned plastic, included for the sake of fashion rather than ruggedisation, containing a transparent plastic screen cover which is about 5mm above the screen).

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    16. Re:Spoiler: by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Look. I don't care if the LCD screen breaks.. I mean, I do, but if you can build a screen robust enough so that the device is still SOMEWHAT usable in a pinch, then we're golden. And engineer your interface so that if the touch-screen is malfunctioning, you can still use the device (Treo!), great.

      I pity all the iPhone users with broken screens and I'm terrified of the day I break the screen on my iPod Touch.

      I've broken the screen on my treo, and it was usable, except for a few apps that didn't function well without a touchscreen, or when the touchscreen was stuck (and I had to break it extra good to get it to stop trying to SMS some dude in Somalia).

    17. Re:Spoiler: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Did you actually watch it? The CEO clearly pissed himself with laughter when it happened.

    18. Re:Spoiler: by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      IIRC the screen of that phone is actually made of Gorilla Glass, which is pretty impressively tough stuff. Obviously not tough enough for British journalists mixed with a sharp metal corner...

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    19. Re:Spoiler: by Angostura · · Score: 1

      And kudos to the CEO for actually having an outbreak of genuine mirth when it broke.

    20. Re:Spoiler: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it takes him a few solid whallops before it does break, and the rep doesn't look the least bit concerned until it actually snaps.

      Four pretty good whacks of a hard angled point againt the same spot on the screen surface before it breaks. I'd say it'd be pretty safe in most environments if you're not doing something stupid.

  12. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but is it unblendable?

    1. Re:yeah by 222 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've always wondered if Blendtec blender could actually blend another Blendtec blender...

    2. Re:yeah by PGOER · · Score: 0

      I am Bender. Please insert cell phone.

      --
      I am not a nerd, I just play one in real life. My avatar thinks I'm a total loser.
    3. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo dawg we heard you like blenders so we put a blender in yo blender so you can blend while you blend.

    4. Re:yeah by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      You, sir, just won the internets!

  13. Awkward by electricbern · · Score: 1

    The "unbreakable" phone being actually breakable is nothing extraordinary, but the awkward position the reporter puts the guy on is priceless. And I have to tell you the reporter was pretty gentle with the phone.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    1. Re:Awkward by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      Poor stupid reporter :) But the video is really funny!

      Idiots call cell phone unbreakable. Idiots try and test it. Make your cell phone from a solid chunk of steel, and it still will be breakable.

  14. Screens are weak by keithpreston · · Score: 1

    Screens are always the weak point of a phone. I would surprised if any lcd screen can withstand a direct contact with only the screen (generally by corners or pointy objects). Thet have the drop issue solved because they assume the casing will absorb the shock on a flat surface.

    Working for a phone manufacturer it took us month of back and forth with the LCD manufacturer and reinforcing plastic to make our phone's LCD not break from a 1.5 meter drop. So 10 stories is impressive!

    1. Re:Screens are weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Screens are weak by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why does it need a screen?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Screens are weak by daten · · Score: 1

      There's an article from 2007 about an LCD computer monitor that could take a direct shot from a crossbow without damage.

  15. Always the screen by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The key to breakage here being that when they said "You can hammer a nail with it!" they didn't mean, "You can hammer a nail with the screen"

    Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out there to shield it while keeping it visible. And even then, you know, that little display would still be susceptible to heat. I have a hunch a lighter would have had similar success in destroying the screen.

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    1. Re:Always the screen by swillden · · Score: 1

      Screens will always be the weak point until we get that transparent aluminum out there

      You mean like this transparent aluminum (oxide)?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Always the screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean synthetic sapphire (aluminum oxide?) Yeah they already have that for cellphones in Nokia's Vertu Brand:

      # Signature’s face utilizes 69.25 carats of sapphire crystal.
      # Signature’s face includes the “largest piece of complex cosmetic sapphire in the world”.

      http://cellphones.about.com/od/vertuphonereviews/fr/vertusignature.htm

      *Bra-Boosh* That's the sound of your mind being blown ;D

    3. Re:Always the screen by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Synthetic corundum (which a ruby is) is already used in high end watches and it's scratch proof but even more brittle than glass.
      If you want durable you need plastic. It scratches easily but a thick layer of it really is pretty unbreakable. The scratches can be polished out of an acrylic but you can't polish a crack out of corundum.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:Always the screen by vlm · · Score: 1

      You mean like this transparent aluminum (oxide)?

      Ah that's the cheap aluminum oxide stuff stuff. You want this "AlON" oxynitride stuff:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_oxynitride

      A mere $15 per sq inch. Probably affordable for typical 1 sq inch cell phone screens.

      "It is currently the crucial outer layer of experimental transparent armor being considered by the US Air Force for the windows of armored vehicles."

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Always the screen by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      I think polycrystalline diamond is insanely strong as well as being insanely hard.
      There's always sapphire, too, which can be made into very hard windows, but I don't know about their shatter resistance.

      --PM

    6. Re:Always the screen by fermion · · Score: 1

      Screens have become much more durable. My Palm V screen broke even though it was in a good leather case. My keys happened to be in the exact wrong position and, with the body mass, shattered the screen. This was one of the reasons why I went to flip phone. Still broke the little outer screen, though. OTOH, my old iPhone, in my pocket with no protection for a couple years, had no issue. I have seen similar strength on other phones. If I were worried about anything on the new phones, it would the thin plastic shell.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Always the screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key to breakage here being that when they said "You can hammer a nail with it!" they didn't mean, "You can hammer a nail with the screen"

      Yeah, the key to demonstration here being if they don't mean the screen of a cel, then don't say you can hammer a nail with it.

      Sure the statement is technically true if there is any portion of the phone that can hammer a nail, but it is deliberately deceptive if that's the only portion and the product is specifically a ruggedized phone.

      Hell, I can hammer nails with my old Mitsubishi. Being careful and using the butt, I can even /drive/ the nail I'm hammering on, given small nails and a fairly soft wood like spruce. Language is great that way. But given the context, these people deserve ridicule for their statement.

  16. Something like that would normally happen by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    Something very similar is how I broke my phone. it hit really hard on the edge of a desk or something when it was in my pocket. The screen was even protected by a SD to CF converter, just happened to be between the screen and what ever it hit. The SD to CF converter was trashed and so was the screen on my phone. My phone was not unbreakable.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    1. Re:Something like that would normally happen by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If the phone is cheap enough, as long as I can recover (and quickly+easily backup) data in the phone (SIM, messages, contacts, etc), I don't care so much if it breaks after a truck rolls over it, or a BBC reporter is unleashed on it.

      You could then buy two phones, and have one as a spare. I think it'll work out cheaper that way than buying a special ruggedized phone.

      --
    2. Re:Something like that would normally happen by weazzle · · Score: 1

      I always face the screen toward my body even when it is in a protective case. This has saved my phone's screen from many a counter/table corner.

    3. Re:Something like that would normally happen by rew · · Score: 1

      I always put the screen towards my body, since I broke a screen the other way around.... :-)

    4. Re:Something like that would normally happen by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      This has saved my phone's screen from many a counter/table corner.

      I always keep my phone in the front pocket of my pants. Since I'm pretty careful with that area of my body it benefits my phone as well :)
      Conversely, if the area should take any real damage I probably wouldn't care much about the phone.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  17. More like patriotism... which is the same thing,,, by denzacar · · Score: 1

    TFA is from BBC, journalist is British and it is a form of national pride.
    "Brits can do the undoable, break the unbreakable."

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  18. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye; don't let the door hit you in the arse on the way out.

  19. Actually... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Informative

    From TFV... the screen still worked - it is just that he apparently cracked it.
    Not that you could actually tell from the video.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Actually... by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, well, when the CEO-chap said "You've broken the screen" I assumed that meant he'd broken the screen. ;)

      And lots of things still work after being broken. Screens like that are one of them. It's just that as the breakage increases, the usability decreases. I'm sure that if he managed to crack it by hitting it on the corner of a fish tank, he could continue to break it further by continuing his previous actions. In the long run, the screen would break to the point of non-usability.

      I have a friend with an old iphone. I think it was run over several times by a car. There is not a single piece of glass on the display that is larger than 3mm in diameter. They're all still attached due to the glue used to adhere it, however. It's just a horribly fractured display. It still works somehow, display and touch functionality, but I don't think anyone would go so far as to claim it's "not broken." ;)

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    2. Re:Actually... by horza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can still access your information on the phone, and it can still make and receive calls, then it's not broken. Just damaged.

      Phillip.

    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks Phillip, but put your sig in the fucking sig area.

    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Semantics. When I'm using a pencil and the tip snaps off, I say that I broke my pencil lead, not that I damaged my pencil.

    5. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well, when the CEO-chap said "You've broken the screen" I assumed that meant he'd broken the screen. ;)

      Yes, but not the phone. And technically, the screen wasn't really broken since it still worked, it was just damaged.

      There is a difference between unbreakable and indestructible. As long as they define how much and what type of damage constitutes each, they can say pretty much whatever they want and no matter how badly you mangle the device it won't count as "broken".

      Or to sum it up in a word, in these parts we like to call it marketing

  20. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I have your Karma?

  21. Re:What the hell? by mattOzan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've changed, man. It used to be about the music!

    Or, wait...what was Slashdot about waaay back in the 900,000 range of UIDs?

  22. Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones. by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased, bulky "ruggedized" phones last year, bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on. We tried out a few, and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the "push to talk" button on his the first day he had it. A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.

    The fact is, the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of "accidents", such as the phone's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth, or surviving a drop from X number of feet. In the real world, people find MANY other ways to break these devices that weren't even investigated. (The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel, for example. Eventually, the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone's speaker, where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out. When disassembling "dead" phones, we've found that a number of times. But I haven't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.

  23. Wrong summary by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    The Shrike broke it. Reporter Dan Simmons included that scene in the next Hyperion book.

    1. Re:Wrong summary by natehoy · · Score: 1

      He'll call it "Prayers to Broken Phones"

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  24. Re:Video = patience Grasshopper (pete-classic) by SargentDU · · Score: 1

    If you are patient enough the story does follow your PBS commercial.

  25. Re: how he broke it by Svartormr · · Score: 3, Informative

    More specifically, he beats the phone on the corner of the metal frame of the aquarium, where the metal comes to a point. Which cracked the display.

  26. Marketing lies exposed!!!!!!!! by qoncept · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Extra, extra! HUGE NEWS!! Child opens child proof bottle!

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:Marketing lies exposed!!!!!!!! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Extra, extra! HUGE NEWS!! Child opens child proof bottle!

      Now if you said that an adult opened a child proof bottle, I might get impressed. But a kid, no.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  27. Unbreakable??? by ewenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie, The Neverending Story.

    1. Re:Unbreakable??? by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      To be fair, originally The Neverending Story was neverending, but they still haven't heard back from the focus groups and the investors got impatient.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    2. Re:Unbreakable??? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      That is the most blatant false advertising since my lawsuit against the movie, The Neverending Story.

      Or the never ending video game Final Fantasy.

    3. Re:Unbreakable??? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      They had to make some cuts for the film adaptation. The original cast went in for a read-through of the initial script, and nobody ever heard back from them. That's why we have the abridged version with their understudies.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    4. Re:Unbreakable??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or Stoner's Pot Palace

    5. Re:Unbreakable??? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      That lawsuit was so bogus. It's a "story" not reality. It just makes you feel like the movie is never going to end. On that, they succeeded.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    6. Re:Unbreakable??? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      My brother was in one of those focus groups. 2 days later I got a letter from him that just said "Kill me."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Unbreakable??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe no one recognized the Lionel Hutz quote.

    8. Re:Unbreakable??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the movie Unbreakable?

  28. Really now? by Xelios · · Score: 1

    This was worthy of a front page post? I saw that video earlier, thought "heh" and moved on with my day. Is there really anything more to discuss here?

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
    1. Re:Really now? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      This was posted by sampenzus. You expected something better?

    2. Re:Really now? by aicrules · · Score: 1

      You're telling me there is a page 2 to slashdot? And all this time I've only been reading page 1!?!? I quit!

  29. Will it blend? by Pointy_Hair · · Score: 1
  30. So, it's not unbreakable ... by jonhainer · · Score: 1

    ... but will it blend?

    Will it blend? - iPhone

  31. Re:Video = patience Grasshopper (pete-classic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not mine. The PBS commercial stops, and I just get a black video window. Ubuntu 9.10 / Firefox

  32. Re:Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones by fredjh · · Score: 1

    Like you said... the guy broke the "push to talk button." The rubberized casing would prevent the keys from getting pushed on a fall to a flat surface, but I'm sure pretty much ANY of these phones will break simply by pushing buttons too hard.

    And if that fails, smash the screen against the corner of a fish tank.

    --
    Stupid, sexy Flanders.
  33. Re:What the hell? by Karganeth · · Score: 1

    Eh? Whats wrong with videos?

  34. Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by wsanders · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because Brits have a Stiff Upper Lip. Great for breaking phones, summers where it never gets above 50, and attempting to conquer places like Afghanistan and India.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "Because Brits have a Stiff Upper Lip. Great for breaking phones, summers where it never gets above 50"

      Im pretty sure most places on earth don't get above 50*c even in the summer. Maybe you meant 5*c?

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    2. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I think he meant 50F but I have to point out it was 44C in Melbourne yesterday, which is incidently between the two setpoints on my hot water service 40-50). Right now in the Simpson desert it could easily be 70C.

    3. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by Barny · · Score: 1

      Little north of you here in Bendigo, but have had up to 52C days here before, bit further inland in Kerang and have seen 56C days.

      "most places on earth" indeed.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    4. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The BOM's primary weather radar seems to be broken but the backup from gellibrand hill is showing a front of sorts at about cape otway. We emptied our tank on the garden over the last two days, anticipating rain. This morning we got a southerly flow of air and I thought the temperature would stay down around 30 before the front, but now the sun is burning the cloud away and we may hit the forecast 40.

      52 sounds nasty, particularly in the sun.

    5. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you are thinking of surface temprature rather than air temprature. All official air temprature recordings (the ones you hear on the news) are taken in the shade, surface temp can be 10-15deg warmer than air temp. I've lived in Oz for half a century and have never heard* of it going above 50degC in the shade, 47.3degC is the record for Melbourne. But yeah, it's hot and humid at the moment, last night was Melbourne's (equal) hottest night on record, can't wait for the cold front to get here.

      * - A quick google turned up the following => "The highest temperature ever recorded anywhere in Australia was 53.1C (127.6F) in Cloncurry, Queensland on 16th January 1889. In recent years, the validity of this record has been challenged, since it was a while ago and the equipment used would not satisfy today’s standards. However, most people still regard this as the record. The Meteorological Office, however, is prepared to vouch only for the 50.7C (123.3F) recorded in Oodnadatta, South Australia on 2nd January 1960."

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 1

      I cry bullshit. I have personally experienced 52C in the shade at a station called Cogla Downs near Cue in Western Australia. It may not have been a BOM reading but I have never in my life been as hot as the few weeks I stayed there.

    7. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, anywhere that gets a good breeze off a desert will do that, Kerang gets some nasty north-westers that blow in and make it feel about 3x hotter than it should.

      As to the parent and their validity claim, my measurements are very scientific, you see I had an old mercury thermometer in the bottle-shop I was working in, when it said it was over 50C, it meant it was fucking hot and that I could have any free chilled drink I could grab (and still be able to serve while drinking).

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    8. Re:Stiff Upper Lip, You Insensitive Clod by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we get shitty rainfall at this time of year though, last January was the worst on record with, uh, 0mm of rain for the month.

      As someone else rather pedantically pointed out, thats the surface temp, the temp "in the shade", is usually lower, recorded officially at 45.4C (114F). The reason for my temp measurements being a bit skewed is we have a huge sign on top of a Bendigo Bank branch that has the time and temp on it, it HAS been over 50 a few times, and I said 52 as its the highest I have seen it reach.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  35. Re:What the hell? by Taedirk · · Score: 1

    About half as many stories per day.

  36. The British Empire by el3mentary · · Score: 1

    Breaking other peoples stuff since 1583!

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  37. Wooaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BBC just got famous... in limelight... NASDAQ skyrocketing... amazing work!!!

    --ssk

  38. I love the rep's reaction though by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    Instead of being shocked or dismayed, he actually laughs at it. That is, to me, the best possible way he could react. The only thing that could have made it better, would have been if he had said something like "well, you've just earned yourself a new phone".

    1. Re:I love the rep's reaction though by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Or "We're always looking for good testers; if you will want a new job - you know where to find us"

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:I love the rep's reaction though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best would be if he took an extra screen out of his pocket, and just popped the old one with a "Cheaper than replacing the phone.", replaced the broken one with the new and showed it working.

  39. Cracking by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Obviously rather than dipping the phone in water, it was put into a solution of sodium pentothal, and the phone barked "Enough of this torture, I'll give you the contacts list". And thus the phone was "broken."

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  40. Is the a challenge? by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    Just say that it is tough not unbreakable

  41. Re:Video = patience Grasshopper (pete-classic) by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    What's what I got as well. On the third reload I got a different commercial (Toyota) and then the video played. Chrome on Snow Leopard.

    -Peter

  42. Surefire way to break the unbreakable by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Give it to a 6 year old boy.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  43. Wow the "sales rep" was not seeing that comming by McNihil · · Score: 1

    Epic fail... though I have to say the rep did do a good job showing humility. Good PR in the end.

  44. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... does it run Linux?

    And can you break it merely by installing Linux?

  45. Re:Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones by Xtravar · · Score: 1

    Here at work, we've gotten free devices with kevlar-coated screens on occasion for software development. One of our developers accidentally split the device's case in half from a 3 foot drop when they're supposed to have a 6 foot drop spec. :)

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  46. what did the rep do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so... did the reporter get a free one?

  47. This has got to be illegal by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 1

    This reporter (an alien no less) is interfering with a cell phone company's ability to profit from its invention.

    Call Homeland Security!

  48. Did the same thing at Comdex once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was covering Comdex around 2001 for sysopt.com and earthweb.com, and we came across a handheld rugged MID running Win CE. The sales guy talked about how you could do anything you wanted to it, and I pointed at the 5" LCD, and said something like, "There's no way that would stand up to a rock, though."

    He claimed it would and proceeded to punch the screen hard... and it completely shattered. We later inferred that his wedding ring made direct contact, adding to the force.

    Lesson learned: It's not truly rugged until the front of the LCD can take the brunt of whatever force you want.

  49. Re:More like patriotism... which is the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...row row, fight the power"?

  50. Will it blend? by flyingfsck · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That is the question...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  51. The Bal Conies test by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Funny

    An acquaintance of mine who suspected that he was being BSed by a sales person asked if his project had passed the Bal Conies test.

    "Yes, it certainly has," he replied.

    "Really!" he said. "Let's see." He then took the device in question and dropped it off the Bal Cony.

    Sadly, the device in question did *not* pass the Bal Conies test.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  52. Note to self: by Daley_G · · Score: 1

    Don't wait until the product is on display at an international convention to validate claims of ultimate reliability.

  53. And "mailman" by BetterSense · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which is why I'm always careful to say "mailman or femailman"

  54. Re:What the hell? by DaTrueDave · · Score: 0

    See you later!

  55. It's not nationalism, it's credit. by meerling · · Score: 1

    It's standard practice to list the affiliation of reporter/media personality when they aren't being shown/published on their own network/paper/whatever.

    So to break it down for you, "Reporter Dan Simmons from the BBC's technology show Click..." means:
        Dan Simmons - that's his name, duh
        Click - what he's from
        technology show - describes the focus of click, so nobody mistakes it for a photography show or other things.
        BBC's - indicating Click is on BBC, so you again don't mistake it for Southern Swaziland's Castanet music show, Click (among others)

  56. Why bother breaking it? by dvoecks · · Score: 1

    Are there really that many people who go actually take the term "unbreakable" literally and need to be protected from "blatant false advertising"? Personally, I just mentally translate it to "really tough to break accidentally".

    1. Re:Why bother breaking it? by HenryKoren · · Score: 1

      "Break-resistant" Just isn't sexy marketing now, is it?

  57. Off-topic but noteworthy by 3.1415926535898 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Volume on the BBC Video player still "goes to eleven."

    1. Re:Off-topic but noteworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just noticed that this morning and lol'd.

    2. Re:Off-topic but noteworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      for 2000$, I'll make you a web player that goes to 12

    3. Re:Off-topic but noteworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course... otherwise, when an ad says to watch something "Tonight at 11," the people would get confused....

    4. Re:Off-topic but noteworthy by 3.1415926535898 · · Score: 1

      xkcd ftw!

  58. Two Words.. by sc0p3 · · Score: 1

    Free Advertising. They only use "indestructible" to attract people to try and destroy it.

  59. Heh not too tough by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    Hehe, my friend has one of these phones and broke it in the first week by using a compressed air line to blow dust and crap off it. The external speaker thing broke, so now it has no ring tone and he has to use vibrate. The earphone and the mic survived so it is ok to make calls. Don't knowif it is no longer waterproof.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  60. They just need to give it to the right person by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they think it's unbreakable, all we have to do is find a four year old boy who will be happy to prove them wrong.

    1. Re:They just need to give it to the right person by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Or a BBC reporter

      --
      It is what it is.
  61. Re:I love the rep's reaction though - New Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch the first 15(+) seconds again you will notice that the CEO does offer the reporter a new phone if the reporter can break the test phone :D

  62. This was interesting? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Slashdot. News for nerds. For people, most of which have some basic understanding of the concepts of Newtonian physics.

    Then you come and say "Interesting to see that force applied on small area is more efficient than same force applied on a larger area" (as if that wasn't blindingly obvious. That is why he intentionally hit the corner, after all...) and get modded +3, interesting?

    Nothing personal, but WTF? Have people here never heard of a knife? Or a spear? Or a nail? You DO realize that those simple things - invented by cavemen - use this very same technology?

    Please tell me that I'm just missing something here. If that is the case, I apologize for being so blunt (pun intended), but your comment and the moderation really puzzle me.

    1. Re:This was interesting? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. News for nerds. For people, most of which have some basic understanding of the concepts of Newtonian physics.

      Then you come and say "Interesting to see that force applied on small area is more efficient than same force applied on a larger area" (as if that wasn't blindingly obvious. That is why he intentionally hit the corner, after all...) and get modded +3, interesting?

      Nothing personal, but WTF? ............

      Just lucky I guess..........

      My humble apologies if I have in anyway offended you in anyway on such a trivial subject as Newtonian physics.

      I will try to sound more educated in the future.

      But you see I'm a myth busters fan and this was one cool demo.
      Wait maybe Jamie and Adam should test this further....

      Did you see the stunned look on the other guy's face?

  63. Re:More like patriotism... which is the same thing by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    maybe he was an ex Squaddie they can break anything

  64. Then the CEO said "... by PGOER · · Score: 0

    We can rebuild it, we have the technology". Of course, they probably junk them instead of repairing, but it's a valid comment.

    --
    I am not a nerd, I just play one in real life. My avatar thinks I'm a total loser.
  65. Re:More like patriotism... which is the same thing by azmodean+1 · · Score: 1
    aaaagh! I'll have that song stuck in my head all day now!

    ~Beowulf cluster of nested robots?

  66. Free phone by Acecoolco · · Score: 1

    Im surprised no one posted this... But the phone guy promised the guy a free phone if he could break it... pay up?

    --
    Just because it works, Doesn't make it right. - JTM
    1. Re:Free phone by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      You broke it, it's yours!

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  67. But Will it Blend... with a Blendtek Blender? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Will it Blend... with a Blendtek Blender?

  68. MOD PARENT UP by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad for the phone maker it was a simple act of smacking the thing like a child would or an angry person.
    Spot on

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  69. Build an idiot proof device... by Arimus · · Score: 1

    and they'll just build a better class of idiot.

    Not that the journalist is an idiot but its the same principle. Make something indestructible and they'll just come up with a new way of destroying it.

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  70. Re:What the hell? by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    About twice as many relevant stories per day.

    There, FTFY

  71. Re: how he broke it by tsa · · Score: 1

    That is not metal; it's a pair of plastic strips glued to the aquarium to make it look better and to support the lamphouse. If you look closely you can see the glass of the aquarium crack in the corner where he hits it. It would have been cool if he broke the aquarium too :)

    --

    -- Cheers!

  72. Re:Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our Nextel rep tried to sell us on some of their rubber-encased, bulky "ruggedized" phones last year, bragging about how they met U.S. military specifications and so on. We tried out a few, and one of the maintenance guys out in the shop managed to break the "push to talk" button on his the first day he had it. A couple others developed keypad failures in a matter of months.

    The fact is, the cellphone makers come up with these claims based on very specific types of "accidents", such as the phone's ability to survive submerging in water to a certain depth, or surviving a drop from X number of feet. In the real world, people find MANY other ways to break these devices that weren't even investigated. (The guys in our shop do a lot of grinding and cutting of steel, for example. Eventually, the little metal filings find their way into the cellphone's speaker, where the magnet in the speaker causes them to collect up - until they make a big enough pile to short things out. When disassembling "dead" phones, we've found that a number of times. But I haven't seen a single cellphone maker take any steps in their design to prevent THAT mode of failure.

    Casio's Gz'One is supposedly dust proof. I work in a metal fabrication shop myself, and aside from a few scratches and dings on the casing, it still works great after 2 years.

  73. god dammed limy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god dommed limy used his shiyttey teath

  74. everything is breakable by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    There's no such thing as unbreakable.

    1. Re:everything is breakable by dumbunny · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as unbreakable.

      When something is marketed as 'unbreakable', it really means nigh-unbreakable. This phone should have been marketed as 'nigh-unbreakable', since clearly it was nigh-nigh-unbreakable at best.

  75. Bright.nl took a bit longer by Incadenza · · Score: 1

    He wasn't the first to break the phone, but this Dutch reviewer did need more time (and more tools).

  76. Re:Reminds me of the Nextel "military spec" phones by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    The absorbent rubber will also reduce the tactile sensation of pushing the button, so a person will use more pressure to push the button though it will feel the same to them.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  77. A better use for unbreakable phones by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    If this phone was truely unbreakable, we should use it as armour plating on tanks.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  78. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations - criticize slashdot and get modded down. This can also be accomplished by questioning the moderation system, metamoderation or left leaning politics.

    Welcome to the new slashdot. Enjoy your stay.

  79. par for the course for CES news this year by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I found it interesting that groups of conventioneers had to head over to the Las Vegas Apple store to see something interesting this year. The company that wasn't there was a bigger story than just about any of the companies that were. So I'm not at all surprised that a cell phone breaking is big news from the weekend. The smart ones skipped the convention center altogether and spent their time in the Venetian listening to high end audio systems and pretending to care what the cables were made of....

  80. More marketing than engineering by Naznarreb · · Score: 1

    The phone was designed to be unbreakable provided you're doing anything with the phone besides using it as a phone. I mean, seriously, how often are people near 10th story balconies? And supposing you did drop it in 20 meters (65ish feet) of water, unless you were just getting ready to go SCUBA diving you're not getting back at all, let alone within the 1/2 hour time limit that's certainly specified in the warranty. And I can't tell you the number of times I was doing a little carpentry, and they only tool that was available to me was my cell phone. For me, from personal experience, an "unbreakable" phone would be able to survive all of the following:

    -Repeated trips through the washer and dryer
    -Left outside, in all weather, for 2 days
    -Abruptly sat on, on a hard bench or concrete ledge
    -Stepped on, screen side up or down, on various surfaces from carpet to gravel
    -Thrown across the room in anger/frustration
    -Left on the dash of my car when when it's 110 outside and 195 in the car
    -For flip phones: landing open, hinge side up, then being stepped on

    That's the environment it needs to be designed for.

  81. That's what the Darwin Awards are for by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    We just need to start removing safety barriers, seat belts, warning labels etc.

    Safety should be optional.

    Then you can up the publish rate for Darwins. Publish it in newspapers; "With great thanks from the human race, Darwin of the week goes to ..."

     

    --
    Deleted
  82. Unbreakable? by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

    I take unbreakable as a personal challenge

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,