Don't make your text fucking white on almost-white. It is completely unreadable.
Design rule number 2, make it fucking work. This is a cross-browser language you used. Why use HTML5 if you're not going to make it work on HTML5 compatible browsers?
Re:This site works best with...
on
OK Go Goes HTML5
·
· Score: 1
All current browser should be able to handle HTML5 video just fine, so there is no excuse that this doesn't work on Firefox. That's exactly the opposite of what HTML5 is supposed to achieve.
Name your packages and shortcut links GNOME System Settings and KDE System Settings. Problem solved. Having a consistent experience when it comes to finding certain software isn't a bad thing.
It implies that the reason offered makes no sense on this particular story... Had he worded it differently and shown the reason holds by showing older posts with more content, his reason given would have gotten so much less disputable.
To be 100% fair, though. Java is at least close to native compiled languages at this point. Much more so than a language like, say, JS, which also has to camp with the rather CPU-heavy DOM.
Plus het, DOSBox was written in C++, and this is faster than DOSBox if it can run Windows XP.
Yes, for obviously they are like THE MAN! They wish to do nothing but OPPRESS and HARM us!
Please. Realize how many different people and departments there are on a big company like MS. Hardly everyone is an untrustworthy dick. (Sure Ballmer may not always know what he's doing, but once again, that's an individual.)
Slashdot Mirror
Is the Slashdot interface open-source, then?
But can you play Commander Keen on it?
Yeah, because individuals are totally like the government.
Yeah, but why did it cost money? Games like this are found by the dozen for free, really...
SRWare Iron is not Chromium. Chromium is Chromium. And even a half year old version of this at the least should work on this.
The whole thing just consists of shitty coding. That's easily proven by the fact that a ton of windows pop up when you try this thing out.
Oh, damn. And it opens up 800,000 windows containing nothing but pure black. This is such shitty coding.
Don't make your text fucking white on almost-white. It is completely unreadable.
Design rule number 2, make it fucking work. This is a cross-browser language you used. Why use HTML5 if you're not going to make it work on HTML5 compatible browsers?
All current browser should be able to handle HTML5 video just fine, so there is no excuse that this doesn't work on Firefox. That's exactly the opposite of what HTML5 is supposed to achieve.
Sorry for the late reply, but you could just use the inferior browsers for *just* those banking websites.
Gee, you sure understand the meaning of new.
This is really a non-issue.
Name your packages and shortcut links GNOME System Settings and KDE System Settings. Problem solved. Having a consistent experience when it comes to finding certain software isn't a bad thing.
Less resource-intensive. There's no doubt about what it's supposed to mean at all.
To make the joke everyone's been making so far: catgirl.
It sounds like they're making installing MacOS Lion more difficult than it needs to be...
It implies that the reason offered makes no sense on this particular story... Had he worded it differently and shown the reason holds by showing older posts with more content, his reason given would have gotten so much less disputable.
Making an interface more accessible does not mean it's being "dumbed down". I'd hate to see you create a website with the Dwarf Fortress design ideas.
Or hell, maybe even Wolfenstein 3-D! With a dash in the middle!
To be 100% fair, though. Java is at least close to native compiled languages at this point. Much more so than a language like, say, JS, which also has to camp with the rather CPU-heavy DOM.
Plus het, DOSBox was written in C++, and this is faster than DOSBox if it can run Windows XP.
The web page is hosting some Java applets. Your company might have dediced that *all* Java applets are some sort of risk to security.
Besides, none of the browsers I use give me a bright red warning page, which means it's very likely just safe.
Since it's on YouTube, it's probably WebM (if you use the HTML5 player).
Well, which is it? GLaDOS or Win7? Or are you running GLaDOS inside a VM in Win7 or something?
Yes, for obviously they are like THE MAN! They wish to do nothing but OPPRESS and HARM us!
Please. Realize how many different people and departments there are on a big company like MS. Hardly everyone is an untrustworthy dick. (Sure Ballmer may not always know what he's doing, but once again, that's an individual.)
They did that, but that part's only available on the private version of their video.
99% of the comments on that Google+ post seem to be people giving a shit. (The other 1% is fanboys saying "I luv u Linus".)
...and the social networking software on said Linux servers is proprietary.