Don't ANY of us know how to read a news story and think for ourselves, anymore?
There's a methodology used to substantiate this kind of BULLSHIT claim. It can be described as shooting an arrow towards a wall, then drawing a bulls-eye around it, after the fact.
For another metaphor? Here's the word you get to drive your Mack truck through:
Call it "Psyop Ju-Jitsu". This is an all-star set up, to make a positive scare-tactic out of the negative public relations resulting from Snowden's revelations.
By-the-fucking-way, what else do you expect, when you let this kind of shit go down? Objective and agenda-less reporting of fact?
USA. It's like a police-state with Tesla Model S and overnight shipping, instead of Bread and Circuses.
TRUTH: You advocate indiscriminate elimination of women and children as a legitimate consequence of legal military action. TRUTH: You refer to other societies as "uncivilized".
I leave unto God Almighty, the judgement of the aforesaid.
You address my specifics about sourcing with more assertion from selective and unexamined sources.
Even former Bush officials are warning that the alleged Syrian chemical use is possibly an Israeli operation.
Somehow, you assert that "uncivilized" regions, can be brought to enlightenment through the enforcement of state-sponsored violence. Yes. This is what you say. Period. You are a complete stooge for big government. A complete lackey.
I ask you again: Before you bitch at me, why aren't you on the front-line with a rifle, making the world safe for "democracy"?
You talk VERY BIG about understanding the reality of war, you hypocrite. So I again say, you know so much about it? I'll give you a Glasgow whipping.
It is racist to say that the various peoples of the Middle East live in an essentially non-civilized state. That is a view you have formulated based on liberal-media lies, justifying interventionism and a lopsided commitment to Israeli interests.
Syrian President Asad who gassed his people.
Did not. Assertion of "facts" not in evidence. People who spout this sound like those who parroted Colin Powell on Iraq. The word is "brainwashed".
I'd look closer at how these three letters are related:
Rich people make you peasants fight, having first convinced you that you have a dog in the race.
They get richer, while you get deader - and the longer it drags, the more they make.
So? Climb down off that "society" nonsense. DO you actually believe that you are a part of the same society as David Rockefeller or Mikhail Khordokovsky?
Rockefeller is closer to the same society as Bashar Al-Assad, than any of us. It takes billions of dollars of media coverage and public education, to convince us otherwise.
Despite your serious dog-eat-dog bluster, I am pretty sure that on a street, with even footing, that I'd scare your little suburban arse so badly, that the shit, leaking down your leg, would trail all the way back to your mother's house.
So quit it with the armchair machismo, and put your money where your fucking mouth is, child. Grab a rifle, a parachute, and sign up to shoot foreign women in the face. Or close your rancid face, justifying murder.
Don't play this off. I seriously WILL fucking call you out on the street, and we will see who knows about "play pens".
Mr. Sulu? You want him to race away from catty "ass-teroid" humor? I think George might be motivated to penetrate this mystery himself... Especially if he's wearing that Trojan.
It has been revealed today, thanks to Edward Snowden, that Google and other US tech companies received millions of dollars from the NSA for their compliance with the PRISM mass surveillance system.
So just how close is Google to the US securitocracy? Back in 2011 I had a meeting with Eric Schmidt, the then Chairman of Google, who came out to see me with three other people while I was under house arrest. You might suppose that coming to see me was gesture that he and the other big boys at Google were secretly on our side: that they support what we at WikiLeaks are struggling for: justice, government transparency, and privacy for individuals. But that would be a false supposition. Their agenda was much more complex, and as we found out, was inextricable from that of the US State Department. The full transcript of our meeting is available online through the WikiLeaks website.
The pretext for their visit was that Schmidt was then researching a new book, a banal tome which has since come out as The New Digital Age. My less than enthusiastic review of this book was published in the New York Times in late May of this year. On the back of that book are a series of pre-publication endorsements: Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright, Michael Hayden (former head of the CIA and NSA) and Tony Blair. Inside the book Henry Kissinger appears once again, this time given pride of place in the acknowledgements.
Schmidt's book is not about communicating with the public. He is worth $6.1 billion and does not need to sell books. Rather, this book is a mechanism by which Google seeks to project itself into Washington. It shows Washington that Google can be its partner, its geopolitical visionary, who will help Washington see further about America's interests. And by tying itself to the US state, Google thereby cements its own security, at the expense of all competitors.
Two months after my meeting with Eric Schmidt, WikiLeaks had a legal reason to call Hilary Clinton and to document that we were calling her. It's interesting that if you call the front desk of the State Department and ask for Hillary Clinton, you can actually get pretty close, and we've become quite good at this. Anyone who has seen Doctor Strangelove may remember the fantastic scene when Peter Sellers calls the White House from a payphone on the army base and is put on hold as his call gradually moves through the levels. Well WikiLeaks journalist Sarah Harrison, pretending to be my PA, put through our call to the State Department, and like Peter Sellers we started moving through the levels, and eventually we got up to Hillary Clinton's senior legal advisor, who said that we would be called back.
Shortly afterwards another one of our people, WikiLeaks' ambassador Joseph Farrell, received a call back, not from the State Department, but from Lisa Shields, the then girlfriend of Eric Schmidt, who does not formally work for the US State Department. So let's reprise this situation: The Chairman of Google's girlfriend was being used as a back channel for Hillary Clinton. This is illustrative. It shows that at this level of US society, as in other corporate states, it is all musical chairs.
That visit from Google while I was under house arrest was, as it turns out, an unofficial visit from the State Department. Just consider the people who accompanied Schmidt on that visit: his girlfriend Lisa Shields, Vice President for Communications at the CFR; Scott Malcolmson, former senior State Department advisor; and Jared Cohen, advisor to both Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice, a kind of Generation Y Kissinger figure -- a noisy Quiet American as the author Graham Greene might have put it.
Google started out as part of Californian graduate student culture around San Francisco's Bay Area. But as Goo
Don't ANY of us know how to read a news story and think for ourselves, anymore?
There's a methodology used to substantiate this kind of BULLSHIT claim. It can be described as shooting an arrow towards a wall, then drawing a bulls-eye around it, after the fact.
For another metaphor? Here's the word you get to drive your Mack truck through:
"Affiliated"
When you have the NYPD secretly assign all Mosques the "Terrorist Organization" label, and you have the CIA recruiting for record numbers of native Arabic speakers, for translation?
Call it "Psyop Ju-Jitsu". This is an all-star set up, to make a positive scare-tactic out of the negative public relations resulting from Snowden's revelations.
By-the-fucking-way, what else do you expect, when you let this kind of shit go down? Objective and agenda-less reporting of fact?
USA. It's like a police-state with Tesla Model S and overnight shipping, instead of Bread and Circuses.
I have, for years, been WRONG!
My Slashdot replies have been unwittingly posted in a masturbation forum called "Point Stroke".
It seems to have been taken over by armchair satirists and political screed-writers.
Oh, What? That is Slashdot? You don't say!
THere is no hell.
I dunno. Spend a few hours with the advocates for war, to whom I am responding, and you may claim to be witnessing Hell, in the first person.
TRUTH: You advocate indiscriminate elimination of women and children as a legitimate consequence of legal military action.
TRUTH: You refer to other societies as "uncivilized".
I leave unto God Almighty, the judgement of the aforesaid.
You address my specifics about sourcing with more assertion from selective and unexamined sources.
Even former Bush officials are warning that the alleged Syrian chemical use is possibly an Israeli operation.
Somehow, you assert that "uncivilized" regions, can be brought to enlightenment through the enforcement of state-sponsored violence. Yes. This is what you say. Period. You are a complete stooge for big government. A complete lackey.
I ask you again: Before you bitch at me, why aren't you on the front-line with a rifle, making the world safe for "democracy"?
You talk VERY BIG about understanding the reality of war, you hypocrite. So I again say, you know so much about it? I'll give you a Glasgow whipping.
OK. You are on a roll, and you rock.
Rock and roll, John Hurt. Don't let the face-huggers get you down... :-)
It is racist to say that the various peoples of the Middle East live in an essentially non-civilized state. That is a view you have formulated based on liberal-media lies, justifying interventionism and a lopsided commitment to Israeli interests.
Syrian President Asad who gassed his people.
Did not. Assertion of "facts" not in evidence. People who spout this sound like those who parroted Colin Powell on Iraq. The word is "brainwashed".
I'd look closer at how these three letters are related:
January 26, 1998 letter to Clinton.
September 20, 2001 letter to Bush.
"Neocons Push Obama to Go Beyond a Punitive Strike in Syria"
You wanna get a downmod on Slashdot?
Tell people there's no way that they will live forever.
Then I can plan to see both of you together, wearing gas-masks, in Syria?
Right. "More Doritos, please, Mom..."
It makes 'em live 20% longer, and increases by 40% the likelihood that they are exclusively homosexual.
"Well, maybe the neighbors can try it on their kids..."
Roll the dice, takes your chance... There's something unintended - that's for sure.
Rich people make you peasants fight, having first convinced you that you have a dog in the race.
They get richer, while you get deader - and the longer it drags, the more they make.
So? Climb down off that "society" nonsense. DO you actually believe that you are a part of the same society as David Rockefeller or Mikhail Khordokovsky?
Rockefeller is closer to the same society as Bashar Al-Assad, than any of us. It takes billions of dollars of media coverage and public education, to convince us otherwise.
You are an a-historical, racist little shite.
Despite your serious dog-eat-dog bluster, I am pretty sure that on a street, with even footing, that I'd scare your little suburban arse so badly, that the shit, leaking down your leg, would trail all the way back to your mother's house.
So quit it with the armchair machismo, and put your money where your fucking mouth is, child. Grab a rifle, a parachute, and sign up to shoot foreign women in the face. Or close your rancid face, justifying murder.
Don't play this off. I seriously WILL fucking call you out on the street, and we will see who knows about "play pens".
"Warp speed, Mr Sulu."
Mr. Sulu? You want him to race away from catty "ass-teroid" humor? I think George might be motivated to penetrate this mystery himself... Especially if he's wearing that Trojan.
So mammas and babies are "enemies".
You and Genghis Khan and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Enjoy your time in hell!
That Colin Powell discovered that Saddam stored in Iraq.
The kind that exist in "intelligence assessments" that are long on pronouncement and void of evidence.
OK. NeXT?
Cars don't destroy Jobs.
Cook destroys Jobs.
Ahh. Then it's not Facebook that faces disaster - it's my commute.
I just bought a Tesla Model S!
I'm sure the powerful are grateful for your apologetic.
Google are in a unique, panopticon position.
I'm arming my Jag with an RPG pod.
And financial market manipulation. And drug trafficking.
The mind reels.
"Don't be EVIL..."
Never, NEVER use anything by these crooks.
Google and the NSA: Who's holding the 'shit-bag' now?
by Julian Assange
It has been revealed today, thanks to Edward Snowden, that Google and other US tech companies received millions of dollars from the NSA for their compliance with the PRISM mass surveillance system.
So just how close is Google to the US securitocracy? Back in 2011 I had a meeting with Eric Schmidt, the then Chairman of Google, who came out to see me with three other people while I was under house arrest. You might suppose that coming to see me was gesture that he and the other big boys at Google were secretly on our side: that they support what we at WikiLeaks are struggling for: justice, government transparency, and privacy for individuals. But that would be a false supposition. Their agenda was much more complex, and as we found out, was inextricable from that of the US State Department. The full transcript of our meeting is available online through the WikiLeaks website.
The pretext for their visit was that Schmidt was then researching a new book, a banal tome which has since come out as The New Digital Age. My less than enthusiastic review of this book was published in the New York Times in late May of this year. On the back of that book are a series of pre-publication endorsements: Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright, Michael Hayden (former head of the CIA and NSA) and Tony Blair. Inside the book Henry Kissinger appears once again, this time given pride of place in the acknowledgements.
Schmidt's book is not about communicating with the public. He is worth $6.1 billion and does not need to sell books. Rather, this book is a mechanism by which Google seeks to project itself into Washington. It shows Washington that Google can be its partner, its geopolitical visionary, who will help Washington see further about America's interests. And by tying itself to the US state, Google thereby cements its own security, at the expense of all competitors.
Two months after my meeting with Eric Schmidt, WikiLeaks had a legal reason to call Hilary Clinton and to document that we were calling her. It's interesting that if you call the front desk of the State Department and ask for Hillary Clinton, you can actually get pretty close, and we've become quite good at this. Anyone who has seen Doctor Strangelove may remember the fantastic scene when Peter Sellers calls the White House from a payphone on the army base and is put on hold as his call gradually moves through the levels. Well WikiLeaks journalist Sarah Harrison, pretending to be my PA, put through our call to the State Department, and like Peter Sellers we started moving through the levels, and eventually we got up to Hillary Clinton's senior legal advisor, who said that we would be called back.
Shortly afterwards another one of our people, WikiLeaks' ambassador Joseph Farrell, received a call back, not from the State Department, but from Lisa Shields, the then girlfriend of Eric Schmidt, who does not formally work for the US State Department. So let's reprise this situation: The Chairman of Google's girlfriend was being used as a back channel for Hillary Clinton. This is illustrative. It shows that at this level of US society, as in other corporate states, it is all musical chairs.
That visit from Google while I was under house arrest was, as it turns out, an unofficial visit from the State Department. Just consider the people who accompanied Schmidt on that visit: his girlfriend Lisa Shields, Vice President for Communications at the CFR; Scott Malcolmson, former senior State Department advisor; and Jared Cohen, advisor to both Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice, a kind of Generation Y Kissinger figure -- a noisy Quiet American as the author Graham Greene might have put it.
Google started out as part of Californian graduate student culture around San Francisco's Bay Area. But as Goo
purely my own opinion; other people can and will always see very different things in it to me, which is kind of how it should be
My god! On Slashdot? You are a generous and admirable conversation to have had!
It didn't start very far uphill to begin with.
Game? Hide the salami in her best friend.