But yes, people can change, and that's a fact. Provided they want to and they have the ability to change, they very much can. Not everyone does have the abilities, but I'd bet my money on this one.
Only a fraction of them would benefit from being put in to asylum. Most would benefit simply from medical treatment that has been denied from them. Even more would benefit from combining medical treatment with psychiatric treatment.
It would help many (not everyone) to get their life together, get a place to stay in and maybe even a job.
Yes, I figured out my dumb mistake there almost right after posting my comment, then wondered if there was any way to re-edit or delete that post, but didn't find one, so now I'm embarrassed.
That was a good reply. At this moment I'm not sure where exactly I'm standing on nuclear power... If it wasn't for the urgent need to address the issue of climate change, I'd be against it. But as things are currently I'm not so sure... If nuclear power was used to drive down burning coal, that would leave us a cleaner environment right now and time to think about WTF we're going to do with the waste, but obviously there's still the matter of uranium mining...
What do you think robots are? Hate to break it to you they are capital. Now once you can use robots to make robots capitalism will do what it has been trying to do since the beginning...drive costs to zero.
Has it really? Capitalism doesn't do or try anything. Capitalists do - and they most certainly aren't trying to drive costs to zero. They would call it socialism, although really it wouldn't be - it would be a new kind of system, free of capitalism OR socialism as economic systems.
Yes, behaviorally they are very different, and different kind of computers are a good thing to exist. Among the differences is that some type of computers are better for development, for others it may be easier or more practical to do the development (or certain parts of it) on another type of machine.
Still, combine a tablet with bluetooth mouse and keyboard, or a phone with docking station with monitor, keyboard and mouse, and you could indeed run development software just like with a laptop PC, but that's besides the point I tried to make: these are all generic computers, but very different behaviorally - you can do same kind of stuff with them, but some will be better for certain tasks and others for different tasks. And this is good, because there is no one kind of computer that can do all this.
I'm NOT arguing, unlike some, that a smartphone (not without a bunch of additional hardware peripherals) will, or even could, ever replace a desktop or laptop computers (although with laptops and tablets the differences are growing smaller).
If I may ask, what country is that? I'll go first: I'm from Finland, and men can cry here without anyone but the lowest brows thinking that he is not a man because cry.
So, you wan't your nlggers to behave nice and stop complaining about cops targeting and killing unarmed blac... I mean nlggers. Like the good nlggers they should be, right?
By what definition of the word are smartphones and tablets not computers? Yes, they are different from desktop and laptop computers, as laptops are different from desktop and tablets/smartphones, but they still very much are mobile handheld computers.
I guess you didn't think of PDA's as computers either.
Slashdot Mirror
His 48, not even close to 60.
But yes, people can change, and that's a fact. Provided they want to and they have the ability to change, they very much can. Not everyone does have the abilities, but I'd bet my money on this one.
...also, Microsoft has publicly admitted they are in fact real. What's that all about then? Wise ass.
files=documents
WTF, are you for real? Construct? WHAT!? Maybe try googling "Halloween files" and actually read them?
That's the stupidest thing ever. And the reason you're posting as AC, you trollboi.
Only a fraction of them would benefit from being put in to asylum. Most would benefit simply from medical treatment that has been denied from them. Even more would benefit from combining medical treatment with psychiatric treatment.
It would help many (not everyone) to get their life together, get a place to stay in and maybe even a job.
They even browse the web with javascript disabled.
Yes, I made a stupid mistake posting that comment.
Yes, I figured out my dumb mistake there almost right after posting my comment, then wondered if there was any way to re-edit or delete that post, but didn't find one, so now I'm embarrassed.
That was a good reply. At this moment I'm not sure where exactly I'm standing on nuclear power... If it wasn't for the urgent need to address the issue of climate change, I'd be against it. But as things are currently I'm not so sure... If nuclear power was used to drive down burning coal, that would leave us a cleaner environment right now and time to think about WTF we're going to do with the waste, but obviously there's still the matter of uranium mining...
The free market exists only on EUrope or America ? O'really ?
Wait... what?
I'm certain I said nothing even remotely like that. Anywhere. Ever.
You are perhaps taking capitalism as some utopian academic idea, and not for the exchange of goods and price-finding system that it is.
I'm not sure... no, correct that, I'm definitely sure I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
What do you think robots are? Hate to break it to you they are capital. Now once you can use robots to make robots capitalism will do what it has been trying to do since the beginning...drive costs to zero.
Has it really? Capitalism doesn't do or try anything. Capitalists do - and they most certainly aren't trying to drive costs to zero. They would call it socialism, although really it wouldn't be - it would be a new kind of system, free of capitalism OR socialism as economic systems.
Yes, behaviorally they are very different, and different kind of computers are a good thing to exist. Among the differences is that some type of computers are better for development, for others it may be easier or more practical to do the development (or certain parts of it) on another type of machine.
Still, combine a tablet with bluetooth mouse and keyboard, or a phone with docking station with monitor, keyboard and mouse, and you could indeed run development software just like with a laptop PC, but that's besides the point I tried to make: these are all generic computers, but very different behaviorally - you can do same kind of stuff with them, but some will be better for certain tasks and others for different tasks. And this is good, because there is no one kind of computer that can do all this.
I'm NOT arguing, unlike some, that a smartphone (not without a bunch of additional hardware peripherals) will, or even could, ever replace a desktop or laptop computers (although with laptops and tablets the differences are growing smaller).
I would like everyone to be rational, but that's not going to happen - the comment I replied to was a great example of that.
If I may ask, what country is that? I'll go first: I'm from Finland, and men can cry here without anyone but the lowest brows thinking that he is not a man because cry.
Yeah, grrls don't play games, right?
So, you wan't your nlggers to behave nice and stop complaining about cops targeting and killing unarmed blac... I mean nlggers. Like the good nlggers they should be, right?
In '97 I bought a new Pentium MMX 200Mhz (with 32MB or RAM, 3.6GB HD and a Voodoo Rush video card) with my summer job money.
It was so sweet after our family Pentium 75Mhz/16MB/750MB/Matrox Millenium.
By what definition of the word are smartphones and tablets not computers? Yes, they are different from desktop and laptop computers, as laptops are different from desktop and tablets/smartphones, but they still very much are mobile handheld computers.
I guess you didn't think of PDA's as computers either.
Governments are free to print money, and the value of currency is artificial.
And that's exactly how Zimbabwe saved itself from poverty.
It's interesting how nuclear advocates almost never talk about uranium mining...
I like visiting certain parts of California, but there's no way I'd ever live there, because the government is WAY too irrational.
And yet you live in the USA.
I don't see how he thinks water vapor is a gas of any kind :)
That's the most stupid two non-arguments ever on that subject.
And that will eventually lead to death of capitalism - good riddance, although I doubt I'll be alive to see that.