The price goes up due to supply side costs, reducing demand. It decreases the profit motive of fishing.
If it costs me $10 to fish and I sell it for $20 I make $10 profit. If it costs me $20 to fish and I sell it for $25 I only make $5 profit. It doesn't make the fish more profitable, just more expensive.
No, RMS and DRM are opposites. RMS wants to make sure the code is always available. DRM wants to make sure the code is never available. How the developers use those two idioms has nothing to do with what they are, and neither care one bit for the developers they are purely for the work in question.
If you are a developer and you want your code to always be available you follow RMS. If you are a developer and you want your code to only be in your hands you use DRM.
The nice thing about free market is that it balances these things out. As fish supplies drop and catches come back smaller then the price goes up and fewer people buy fish.
After being in the met life blimp, I have to say, the size required to lift a cabin 2 people and a bit of camera equipment is crazy. I'd hate to see the size of one made to lift a load of 10s of tons.
Exactly, If asked "have you ever cheated on your wife?" most people would think full intercourse, others may think that a slightly more than friendly relationship was cheating some may even believe to them selves that an imaginary fantasy was cheating. So when asked the question and you justify in your mind that they were meaning full intercourse, but you believe that the fantasy you had was cheating then when you say 'No' you will be detected as lying.
you know if they can get the statistics exactly right, then they could just charge people for how much they are going to cost. You WILL have 3 accidents costing $15k, $8k, and a $345 fender bender. Add all that up +profit and charge that. It would be the only way to be fair.
I'm confused by your post, are you saying that 2000+ miles on I40 cross country trip is more likely to produce an accident that 2000+ miles in traffic lights, parking lots and cross streets?
But insurance is suppose to be an assumption of shared risk. Why should one person have to pay more just because he has to driver father? Everyone should have to pay the same exact amount for car insurance. It could be handled by the government just like the soon to be healthcare. In fact with the healthcare infrastructure already going into place it could be rolled into this as well. Why stop there we could have one tax bill that covers every possible insurance that we could all want to have. This way we can make the greedy rich people pay for our stuff if it is lost, stolen, broken or worn out.
21M barrels a day? That's ~14 Barrels for each man/woman/child in the country. At $33 a barrel that's $168,000 a year per person, or about 4 times the national average household income.
The price goes up due to supply side costs, reducing demand. It decreases the profit motive of fishing.
If it costs me $10 to fish and I sell it for $20 I make $10 profit.
If it costs me $20 to fish and I sell it for $25 I only make $5 profit.
It doesn't make the fish more profitable, just more expensive.
I'd love to see it proved that Santa Clause doesn't exist.
I'd love to see it proved that the cake is a lie.
No, RMS and DRM are opposites. RMS wants to make sure the code is always available. DRM wants to make sure the code is never available. How the developers use those two idioms has nothing to do with what they are, and neither care one bit for the developers they are purely for the work in question.
If you are a developer and you want your code to always be available you follow RMS.
If you are a developer and you want your code to only be in your hands you use DRM.
dumbass, that's not in the Constitution. It's in the Deceleration of Independence.
The nice thing about free market is that it balances these things out. As fish supplies drop and catches come back smaller then the price goes up and fewer people buy fish.
I have been working on this my self. How did you overcome the 50% false negative problem?
After being in the met life blimp, I have to say, the size required to lift a cabin 2 people and a bit of camera equipment is crazy. I'd hate to see the size of one made to lift a load of 10s of tons.
...Green energy does create jobs.
Some people are able to grasp new concepts and others cant???
I'll get off your lawn now.
That's just standard in many buildings due to superstitions. They don't count the 13th floor.
They've narrowed it down to two possibilities.
But they're all pretty sure its Number two.
I've always had a dream to drop a deuce on the ISS and clog the toilet.
It's good to have goals.
Error $DEITY undefined.
I'm atheist you insensitive clod.
Exactly, If asked "have you ever cheated on your wife?" most people would think full intercourse, others may think that a slightly more than friendly relationship was cheating some may even believe to them selves that an imaginary fantasy was cheating. So when asked the question and you justify in your mind that they were meaning full intercourse, but you believe that the fantasy you had was cheating then when you say 'No' you will be detected as lying.
you know if they can get the statistics exactly right, then they could just charge people for how much they are going to cost. You WILL have 3 accidents costing $15k, $8k, and a $345 fender bender. Add all that up +profit and charge that. It would be the only way to be fair.
I'm confused by your post, are you saying that 2000+ miles on I40 cross country trip is more likely to produce an accident that 2000+ miles in traffic lights, parking lots and cross streets?
Insurance companies study these things...
Then the government regulates what they can do with those studies.
But insurance is suppose to be an assumption of shared risk. Why should one person have to pay more just because he has to driver father? Everyone should have to pay the same exact amount for car insurance. It could be handled by the government just like the soon to be healthcare. In fact with the healthcare infrastructure already going into place it could be rolled into this as well. Why stop there we could have one tax bill that covers every possible insurance that we could all want to have. This way we can make the greedy rich people pay for our stuff if it is lost, stolen, broken or worn out.
We have several variations of it. We normally call it solar power though.
whoops, forget all that, calculated it wrong. .05 Barrels a day per person and ~$600 a year. More reasonable.
21M barrels a day? That's ~14 Barrels for each man/woman/child in the country. At $33 a barrel that's $168,000 a year per person, or about 4 times the national average household income.
The current war on capitalism isn't going to let that happen any time soon.
This is how Obama is paying for health care.
We discovered it wasn't actually made of cheese. That's why we haven't been back since.
liberals are always screwing things up.