Slashdot Mirror


Software Glitch Leads To $23,148,855,308,184,500 Visa Charges

Hmmm2000 writes "Recently several Visa card holders were, um, overcharged for certain purchases, to the tune of $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 on a single charge. The company says it was due to a programming error, and that the problem has been corrected. What is interesting is that the amount charged actually reveals the type of programming error that caused the problem. 23,148,855,308,184,500.00 * 100 (I'm guessing this is how the number is actually stored) is 2314885530818450000. Convert 2314885530818450000 to hexadecimal, and you end up with 20 20 20 20 20 20 12 50. Most C/C++ programmers see the error now ... hex 20 is a space. So spaces were stuffed into a field where binary zero should have been."

544 comments

  1. Hey by sonicmerlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting? You're assuming we're all computer geeks. Wait a minute...

    1. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're using a computer right now.

    2. Re:Hey by Itninja · · Score: 3, Funny

      Joke's on you! I post via US Mail.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    3. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Welcome, visitor from the past! In this futuristic year of 2009, people who are not nerds are actually USING COMPUTERS! Also, WOMEN are allowed to VOTE and WEAR PANTS.

    4. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Greetings kind future man. Could you perchance be able to give me a ride in one of those horseless buggies I've heard so much about?

    5. Re:Hey by cthulu_mt · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must have to get up awful early in the morning to score a first post.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    6. Re:Hey by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      Welcome, visitor from the past! In this futuristic year of 2009, people who are not nerds are actually USING COMPUTERS! Also, WOMEN are allowed to VOTE and WEAR PANTS.

      Oh sure, but let them vote to wear no pants and the wheels come right off the whole system... Pity... I for one would have welcomed our bottomless female overlords...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    7. Re:Hey by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Anywhere that Wednesday July 15, @05:06PM is early in the morning.

    8. Re:Hey by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Then you're still using Linux!

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    9. Re:Hey by iowannaski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      people who are not nerds are actually USING COMPUTERS!

      Correct.

      What they are not doing, however, is reading Slashdot.

      --
      i forget
    10. Re:Hey by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Morning is all relative. I woke up at 2pm local time, realized how early it was, and went back to bed until 4:30pm local. So now that 3am local has come by, I'm still working (and reading a little Slashdot).

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:Hey by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Haven't you outlawed clothing by 2009? That, and mandatory genetic screening to disallow ugly people? That would not only keep the population at a manageable level, but would keep people from getting nauseous seeing the ugly people naked. You're going to have a huge problem by 2012, where the population will be unsustainable, and stupid people will be in charge of everything. Be careful.

          - Voice from the past

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    12. Re:Hey by PatLam · · Score: 0

      That's exactly why 2012 is supposed to be the end of the human race. It all makes sense.

    13. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you RICH?
       
      Your name seems to imply that you are rich. And your method of "speech". So... idle rich? Noveau riche?
       
      Answer me.

    14. Re:Hey by kamochan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but let them vote with no pants and watch the system achieve unheard of performance!

  2. meh by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meh. What's 23 quadrillion dollars really worth these days?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:meh by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not much to us, but think of the children. They'll be paying it off for decades!

    2. Re:meh by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just hyper-inflate the dollar enough and you could spend 23 quadrillion on a bag of chips. Just look at Zimbabwe ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe ) from the article "On January 16, 2009, Zimbabwe announced plans for imminent issue of banknotes of $10 trillion, $20 trillion, $50 trillion, and $100 trillion". So actually, its possible that the dollar could somehow inflate that high so 23 quadrillion isn't that much.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:meh by davester666 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sign in window: "Sorry, we only have change for $1 trillion bills"

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US or Zimbabwe?

    5. Re:meh by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      About one triganic pu. But most markets refuse to deal with fiddling small change.

    6. Re:meh by jameskojiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, of course what happened after that was people started having to resort to bartering for goods using small amounts of Gold, Kinda like what they did TWO-Thousand years ago. So you take an economy and you screw it up so badly that you have to reset it back to the pre-roman levels of commerce.
      .
      And people laugh at other people for collecting and buying gold.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    7. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't buy gold. They invest in gold. Until you have shiny yellow metal in your possession, you only have a piece of paper certifying a value, just like money.

    8. Re:meh by nizo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing is if the economy tanks that badly, gold probably won't be worth much either. Which is why buying large boxes of ammo, cigarettes, and toilet paper is the way to go!

    9. Re:meh by SkyDude · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do I just pay the minimum?

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    10. Re:meh by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Meh. What's 23 quadrillion dollars really worth these days?"

      Well, after seeing what the US Senate has put out of committee for a so called Health Care Bill, that still doesn't cover everyone, and costs in the Trillions of dollars. I'd say not much, considering how much more money the Fed is going to have to print to cover all this...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:meh by owlstead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, I've already got a stack of thousands rolls of toilet paper stacked up here, just in case.

    12. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you're wrong.

      Gold will just get ridiculously expensive - think $2000/oz or as much as $10000/oz - double its current price.

      Just give it 5-10 years, you'll see.

    13. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place
      or something. Shit. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane
      detail.

    14. Re:meh by mike260 · · Score: 1

      Even if it hit $10,000/oz, you'd still need several megatons of it to buy a pack of smokes.

    15. Re:meh by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      So actually, its possible that the dollar could somehow inflate that high so 23 quadrillion isn't that much.

      Possible? Yes, but I don't think Zimbabwe's troubles are indicative of how the dollar could be hyperinflated. After all, that wiki page suggests one of two events that started it was the confiscation of white owned farmland. I kind of doubt that's going to happen over here.

      (A few particularly crazy farmers might disagree, and probably have elaborate conspiracy theories that start with Obama getting elected, involve a world government, stem cells somehow, climax with gun control, and end in the apocalypse, but I'd like to ignore those people as usual.)

    16. Re:meh by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Informative

      On January 16, 2009, Zimbabwe announced plans for imminent issue of banknotes of $10 trillion, $20 trillion, $50 trillion, and $100 trillion

      Believe it or not, that was after Zimbabwe had lopped off a bunch of zeros from their currency the previous year.... twice. And then they did it a third time a month after they printed their first $100 trillion notes.

    17. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So that's only 232 of the $100 trillion bills. Too bad you can't pay with Zimbabwe dollars.

    18. Re:meh by techno-vampire · · Score: 0

      I don't think you understand how such things work. Currently, one ounce of gold is worth several hundred packs of cigarettes. If the price per pack goes up ba a factor of 1,000,000, so will the price of gold. One ounce will always be worth the same amount of other goods, even though the price (in dollars, euros, pounds or whatever) fluctuates. That's why people buy gold to hedge against inflation.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    19. Re:meh by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      So we are all going to be having to switch over to "Prison-system economics"?
      .
      At McDonald's we will have to buy Big Macs using cigarettes and shivs for currency.
      .
      One plasma TV will Equal 10 cartons of cigarettes.
      .

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    20. Re:meh by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've a-heard of silver dollars, an someone I knew had a gold double-eagle oncet. So there's all kinds a dollars. But what kind a dollar is a "trillian" ?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    21. Re:meh by Darkness404 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...Except for the fact that if we ever get plunged into a state of war and chaos, a shiny piece of metal that is gold won't be worth anything. Lets see, if I'm barely surviving in the radioactive wasteland, which is going to be worth more, a huge can of food that would allow me to store it for later and not have to spend hours looking for my next meal, or a shiny piece of metal that looks cool, but doesn't help me survive, nor has the pleasures of drugs, etc.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    22. Re:meh by MMC+Monster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gold is only worth that much (in relation to other things) because of it's relative scarcity *and* because of the demand due to perceived value.

      If there is no perceived value for gold (think: a post-apocalyptic world where people are just fighting to stay alive, not save up for later), cigarettes or clean food and water may be worth more.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    23. Re:meh by onionlee · · Score: 1

      america

    24. Re:meh by DotNM · · Score: 1

      Meh. What's 23 quadrillion dollars really worth these days?

      About the price of an extra-value meal.

      --
      There's no place like localhost
    25. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My father's a paranoid NRA type, and I couldn't agree more. I tell him all the time "you can always trade brass for gold, but you can't always trade gold for brass".

    26. Re:meh by trav242 · · Score: 1

      Look out, folks! That man is a Charmin Mogul!

    27. Re:meh by techno-vampire · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gold would probably retain value (maybe even the same value; who knows) in that situation, because its main value is as a treasure metal and/or medium of exchange.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    28. Re:meh by rho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't use gold for it's intrinsic value as a metal. It's used because sometimes you can't buy a herd of goats with a thousand cans of Dinty Moore stew. Gold is small, convenient, historical, and rare, so it makes a pretty good medium of exchange.

      Historically paper money only had value because it was backed by gold, or some other known commodity. Now it's backed by faith. How's that working out for everybody?

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    29. Re:meh by Lunzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sensible move that. You've gotta be ready for when the shit hits the fan!

    30. Re:meh by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Believe it or not, that was after Zimbabwe had lopped off a bunch of zeros from their currency the previous year.... twice. And then they did it a third time a month after they printed their first $100 trillion notes.

      I was going to say something similar:-

      On July 30, 2008, the Governor of the RBZ, Gideon Gono announced that the Zimbabwe dollar would be redenominated by removing 10 zeroes, with effect from August 1, 2008. ZWD10billion will become 1 dollar after the redenomination.

      Then

      [*After* the above revaluing] On 12 January 2009, Zimbabwe introduced the $50,000,000,000 note.

      So you can multiply $50 billion by $10 billion (per new dollar) to get what it would have been if they hadn't done that sleight of hand; $500 billion billion.

      Or let's put that another way (50 * 10^9) * (10 * 10^9) = 500 * 10^18 =

      500 exadollars, or 5,000,000,000,000,000,000 dollars.

      If 1,000,000 US dollars in 100 dollar bills weighs 10kg, then assuming Zimbabwean 100 dollars had similar weight, the unrevalued currency would weigh:-

      $5*(10^18) / ($100,000 per kilogram) = 5*(10^13) kilograms = 5*(10^10) metric tonnes....

      i.e. 50 billion tonnes!!!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    31. Re:meh by syousef · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Meh. What's 23 quadrillion dollars really worth these days?

      A government bailout and a golden paracute for the execs.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    32. Re:meh by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Investing in gold is the same as buying gold, that little piece of paper says that you own X oz of gold. Good luck actually getting your hands on the gold but why would you want to anyways? It'll be much more safe and secure in the vault with all the other bars of gold.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    33. Re:meh by antek9 · · Score: 1

      The point is to buy both, doing one thing doesn't mean you should neglect the other. You stock up on food and toilet paper for the chaotic times ahead, and you hide some gold in the ground to be dug out in better times, when everyone else starts from scratch with 100 New Dollars (or whatever the name). Just don't forget to leave a note for your kids where you buried it...

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    34. Re:meh by Thansal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually that doesn't really work. In fact it is completely wrong.

      There is nothing that actually pegs gold to a specific value. We (that is society) think that gold is worth something, and are thus willing to pay it.

      If, in the future, we no longer value gold as much, it will no longer have the purchasing power it once had.

      Gold, like all commodities, is priced loosely on supply and demand (yes, lots of other factors go into it, but I am being simple here). Even if there is a small supply, if there is no demand (because people are more worried about food then anything else), it isn't worth anything.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    35. Re:meh by geekboy642 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Meanwhile, you're transferring the gold certificates around, complete with fees for every transaction (straight to the vault owner, naturally) and he still has an impervious vault full of gold. If society breaks down--which gold buyers seem to expect--you really think he'll honor those scraps of paper? No, he'll be riding it out inside the vault.

      I'm too paranoid to buy gold, I invested in seed corn. Too large to steal, too real to lose value.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    36. Re:meh by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now it's backed by faith. How's that working out for everybody?

      Gold also only has value because people believe it does - as the GP post said, you can't eat it, you can't really build a shelter out of it, etc.

      In any event, why should the money supply be tied to a rare, precious metal? Matching the growth (or shrinkage!) of the money supply based solely on the discovery, loss, or recovery of a particular natural resource hardly seems like a good plan for managing the economy.

      --
      Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    37. Re:meh by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      I paid my bill in full ... always do. Should I ask for a refund or just carry a credit balance for a while?

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    38. Re:meh by mike260 · · Score: 0

      I was pretending to believe that cigarettes actually cost 23 quadrillion USD per packet, based on the story at the top of this page. I combined this premise with the opinion of the parent post regarding future fluctuations in the price of gold in order to derive a prima facie absurd conclusion. I then stated this conclusion in a sincere manner, without making any reference to the incongruity of my position. The intent was that the this would inspire mild amusement in the reader.

    39. Re:meh by dakameleon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a post-apocalyptic world where people are just fighting to stay alive... cigarettes or clean food and water may be worth more.

      If you're just fighting to stay alive... I'm thinking cigarettes aren't at the top of your shopping list.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    40. Re:meh by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Historically paper money only had value because it was backed by gold, or some other known commodity. Now it's backed by faith. How's that working out for everybody?

      Better, actually, except in isolated cases like Zimbabwe where the central bank has totally failed.

      Gold only has trading value because people expect that others will take gold in exchange for goods and services -- just like the dollar only has trading value because people expect that others will take dollars in exchange. In other words, gold as a currency is also "backed by faith".

      The difference is that the supply of gold fluctuates unpredictably based on natural deposits, industrial use, and the activity of mining companies, while the supply of dollars fluctuates deliberately according to the monetary policy imposed by the central bank. Generally we're better off when the supply is controlled by people who know what they're doing rather than random fluctuations -- if you think business cycles are bad now, take a look at how they worked before the Federal Reserve -- although the outcome can be catastrophic when it's controlled by people who have no clue (i.e. Zimbabwe).

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    41. Re:meh by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      I think you're discounting cultural training and history there. By your reasoning, gold should have never gotten to its place of prominence in the first place. It never played a role as a necessity, and it's only recently that it's had a functional purpose, as a effective conductor in electronics which doesn't corrode.

      People will hold on to gold and other shiny things through hard times in the hope that things will return to "normal" and the shiny stuff is restored to its place of value. Short of nuclear-induced war, gold will retain a nominal value that is disproportionate to its functional abilities.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    42. Re:meh by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we really do suffer a complete and total failure of society to the point where the caretakers of the large stockpiles of gold can get away with claiming ownership of it then the gold will be worthless anyways and of no value anyways. Gold buying is there to help insure against recessions or the collapse of one or more economies/currencies.

      BTW If society does collapse I'm coming to live with you and your pile of corn :)

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    43. Re:meh by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      $10000/oz means alot when the dollar is worth less than the paper...

    44. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. What's 23 quadrillion dollars really worth these days?

      It just might be enough to bail out California?

    45. Re:meh by BryanL · · Score: 5, Funny

      If inflation gets that bad, your currency *is* your toilet paper.

    46. Re:meh by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      ...Except for the fact that if we ever get plunged into a state of war and chaos, a shiny piece of metal that is gold won't be worth anything. Lets see, if I'm barely surviving in the radioactive wasteland, which is going to be worth more, a huge can of food that would allow me to store it for later and not have to spend hours looking for my next meal, or a shiny piece of metal that looks cool, but doesn't help me survive, nor has the pleasures of drugs, etc.

      What a pleasant "fact". I'd say it's fairly obvious that gold is useless in a real doomsday scenario, but so is everything else. Having some food & guns might bring some comfort when you're one of the 0.1% survivors, but I suspect most would use the last bullet on themselves.

      Now for any survivable "end of the world" like the world wars, hyperinflation, pandemics etc, gold is one good way of storing wealth through turbulent times.

    47. Re:meh by feepness · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gold is small, convenient, historical, and rare, so it makes a pretty good medium of exchange.

      This is what people don't get. When you are transferring large amounts of wealth around there are very few other options. I've heard of using oil as a medium... but transferring the equivalent amount of wealth in oil would require fleets of tankers. There is nothing special about gold except that it is common enough to be common but rare enough to be rare. We could use platinum but that is too rare, or copper, which isn't quite rare enough. Silver is actually a decent alternative and what many economies used prior to settling on gold.

      No, when you're starving, gold isn't worth much. But when you're just past the starving point and trying to create a base economy, crating around a wheelbarrow full of canned goods is inconvenient and makes you a target.

    48. Re:meh by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 0

      Until the jail guards do cell search and then they take all of the toilet paper away, put you on disciplinary restriction for hoarding toilet paper, and you're lucky if they give you a new roll next week.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    49. Re:meh by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Today, gold hit about $938 an ounce. A pack of Camels around here is about $6.30. You can get about 150 packs per ounce. That's liable to stay about the same ratio unless they tack on even more cigarette taxes, or seriously devalue gold.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    50. Re:meh by feepness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that the supply of gold fluctuates unpredictably based on natural deposits, industrial use, and the activity of mining companies, while the supply of dollars fluctuates deliberately according to the monetary policy imposed by the central bank. Generally we're better off when the supply is controlled by people who know what they're doing rather than random fluctuations -- if you think business cycles are bad now, take a look at how they worked before the Federal Reserve -- although the outcome can be catastrophic when it's controlled by people who have no clue (i.e. Zimbabwe).

      So you're saying the people who didn't see the current crisis coming, assured us it was contained, and then told us we barely avoided catastrophe know what they're doing and are the perfect stewards for our monetary system?

      Ben Bernanke: There is no housing bubble to go bust.

      Ben Bernanke: Subprime Mortgage Problems Contained

      Ben Bernanke: We barely avoided catastrophe

      The Federal Reserve was founded in 1913. The Great Depression started 16 years later.

      The intrinsic value of gold is that it is rare enough to hold large quantities of wealth and cannot be manufactured arbitrarily. The second reason is why every fiat currency has historically failed, despite the fact that people were told by the bankers that they knew what they were doing this time.

      "...of all the contrivances for cheating the laboring classes of mankind, none has been more effective than that which deludes them with paper-money." -- Daniel Webster

    51. Re:meh by feepness · · Score: 0, Troll

      Matching the growth (or shrinkage!) of the money supply based solely on the discovery, loss, or recovery of a particular natural resource hardly seems like a good plan for managing the economy.

      Matching the growth or shrinkage of the money supply based on the whims of banks and legislators seems like a much worse plan. They've done such a wonderful job recently, haven't they?

    52. Re:meh by dougmc · · Score: 1

      Gold does have considerable value to industry. If society crashed, it would lose a lot of it's value -- but certainly not all.

      What you've described more accurately describes diamonds. Sure, they have value to industry, but industry has learned how to make them. And natural diamonds aren't all that rare either -- it's just that they're kept artificially scarce.

      What would really kill the value of gold would be if people found a way to economically transmute lead or some other element into gold, removing the scarcity. Fortunately, this seems to be a ways off.

    53. Re:meh by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      Note that he didn't buy corn, he "invested in" corn. Hence, by his own reasoning, he doesn't have a pile of corn, he has scraps of paper indicating that he is owed a pile of corn. If society breaks down, what makes you think the corn-vault owner is going to honor his scraps of paper?

    54. Re:meh by bogidu · · Score: 1

      "Most people" that confirms it, most people ARE stupid!

      Anybody want to invest in gold? Send me money, I'll send you a piece of paper, trust me, it's safe with me.

    55. Re:meh by WCguru42 · · Score: 1

      People don't use gold for it's intrinsic value as a metal.

      I have a $40,000 pair of speaker cables that beg to differ. Seriously!

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    56. Re:meh by hawk · · Score: 1

      >But what kind a dollar is a "trillian" ?

      quite obviously, the kind that Zaphod uses to leave a tip!

      hawk, looking for his towel

    57. Re:meh by wazza · · Score: 1

      Historically cigarettes have always been a good bartering item. They're a (mild) drug of dependence, and when everything is going wrong around you, smokers will give almost anything for another hit. And if a smoker has something you want, then...

      The second world war was a good example of this (soap was valuable, too).

    58. Re:meh by Capsaicin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there is no perceived value for gold (think: a post-apocalyptic world where people are just fighting to stay alive, not save up for later), cigarettes or clean food and water may be worth more.

      Cigarettes and clean food and water are too easily consumed to make a good exchange technology (in any case, food and clean water are the commodities one would most likely want to exchange). Assuming central authority breaks down in this post-apocalyptic society there will be a radical need for a universally recognised exchange technology. It is true, people could agree to use shells, but given the relative scarcity, the material integrity and most importantly of all, the cultural history of gold, my bet would be that the perceived value of gold would increase.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    59. Re:meh by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Historically paper money only had value because it was backed by gold, or some other known commodity. Now it's backed by faith. How's that working out for everybody?

      So far, much better than the last global financial meltdown that happened when (and because) we were still on the gold standard.

    60. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's worth way more than the entire world's wealth combined...

      The U.S. National Debt is only $60 some Trillion dollars, the entire world GDP is only $54 Trillion dollars...

      You could buy the entire world with that kind of money........ lolol.

    61. Re:meh by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Unless, that is, people realize that gold isn't actually good for much of anything and stop accepting it in trade. Gold is valuable solely because people believe it to be valuable, but when you get down to it there's no pile of gold big enough to replace food, water and shelter. You can't really say that a pack of cigarettes won't ever gain value compared to an ounce of gold, because they are completely dissimilar... cigarettes are a consumable good in fluctuating demand, where gold is just another currency.

      You might also want to look into some of the different ways that cultures outside of Europe view(ed) gold, I think you'd be surprised at just how universal a currency it actually wasn't before European explorers and conquerors imposing it around the world. Turns out that very heavy, shiny yellow metal too malleable to be used for anything other than decoration just isn't worth much to a lot of people.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    62. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confused.

      The easiest way to explain it is with an example, where adding in a third item, like bread. When there's hyper-inflation, the price, in dollars, of bread and gold will both sky rocket, but they'd stay the same relative to each other. Right now I can sell an ounce of gold for $1000 (or whatever), and use that money to buy a ton of bread (or however much). If there were hyper-inflation, then I'd be able to sell an ounce of gold for $100 trillion, and then use that $100 trillion to buy the same amount of bread as before. Or, in both cases, I could just trade an ounce of gold for a ton of bread directly.

      The point the OP was making is that gold has the same problem as money - it's only valuable because everybody else believes it is. On the other hand, something like bread has actual value, because you can always just eat it. Since most of the easily found gold has already been mined, and since most of the already found gold is locked up in safes, and since gold doesn't have much utility, if hyper-inflation were to ever destroy the entire global economy, it's likely we'd use something besides gold for trading.

    63. Re:meh by GunFodder · · Score: 1

      Apparently some folks in Zimbabwe had to start posting signs on restroom doors to ask people not to wipe their asses with money, since it's cheaper than toilet paper but clogs up the plumbing.

    64. Re:meh by Mr2001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      So you're saying the people who didn't see the current crisis coming, assured us it was contained, and then told us we barely avoided catastrophe know what they're doing and are the perfect stewards for our monetary system?

      Not perfect stewards, no. But they're still better stewards than mining companies and gold-consuming industries. The alternative is for the value of our currency be affected by what sort of rocks were uncovered recently or how many edge connectors and necklaces are being manufactured; do you really think that would be an improvement?

      The Federal Reserve was founded in 1913. The Great Depression started 16 years later.

      Surely you aren't trying to imply causality there, are you? Because recessions have gotten shorter and less frequent since 1900.

      The intrinsic value of gold is that it is rare enough to hold large quantities of wealth and cannot be manufactured arbitrarily. The second reason is why every fiat currency has historically failed

      Except the ones that haven't, you mean?

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    65. Re:meh by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Hrm... I think it'll buy you one pink spaceship from the greatest musician of all time, all the foie gras in London, the London Zoo, and allow you to tip the concierge at the hotel you are staying in by buying the hotel itself and giving it to him. Or it buys you a demolition crew with horrible poetry and a nasty desire to obliterate earth in all of the infinite probability lines so that you can build a hyperspace highway through sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha. Just sayin...

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    66. Re:meh by jra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *My* question, though, is this:

      Why do Visa's systems have the bandwitdh to *allow* 23 quadrillion dollars to make it to a credit card bill.

      Is there anyone, at all, anywhere, who's gonna carry a balance of even a megabuck?

      6.2, really. That's all they needed.

    67. Re:meh by feepness · · Score: 1

      Not perfect stewards, no. But they're still better stewards than mining companies and gold-consuming industries. The alternative is for the value of our currency be affected by what sort of rocks were uncovered recently or how many edge connectors and necklaces are being manufactured; do you really think that would be an improvement?

      Barring monopolistic practices, the mining companies would no more be in charge of our economy than the banks are now. That we have handed control to a private monopoly (The Federal Reserve) notwithstanding.

      Surely you aren't trying to imply causality there, are you? Because recessions have gotten shorter and less frequent since 1900.

      Exactly, the duration may have gotten shorter, but the effect when reality finally hits is worse. For example, if I have a hangover, I can drink more, having the good times last longer with infrequent downturns. When I finally hit bottom the effect is much worse. This is why we had the Great Depression, and why we are heading into another major downturn now. We can put things off for decades and then we lose ten to twenty years.

      Except the ones that haven't, you mean?

      Right. 2000 years of history vs 30. It's gotta be the 30 that mean something.

    68. Re:meh by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, this seems to be a ways off.

      Especially considering that it would require quite a bit of significant fusion to create gold in any quantity. If we get to that point in our technology, gold will be a byproduct. The main product will be the energy, and the stuff you can do with it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    69. Re:meh by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      hehe, I bought the deluxe model.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    70. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget all that, bottle caps are what's really worth hoarding.

    71. Re:meh by tibman · · Score: 1

      Wasn't paper money introduced as checks for travelers between two distant locations? That way when they were robbed five times during the trip they didn't lose all the gold. Or was it an IOU type deal?

      I think that in the end, you'll trade all your gold for usable materials. I have always felt that gold was a virtually useless material. The only reason it holds value is that enough people have been convinced it's important and rare. It can't keep you warm, it can't feed or protect you. It can (currently) however be traded for another currency with someone who also values it. Atleast local currency can be directly used to purchase something.. but in the end it'll be just toilet paper (or possibly to keep you warm). But paper money in the form of an IOU/Debt is useful because it's like a contract. It can be backed by cows, gold, wood, whatever.. it doesn't matter. Gold is backed by nothing but the belief that it's valuable.

      All my opinion of course! Please don't be offended by my comments. I think anyone who can capitalize on gold right now should jump on it! It will definitely survive one (or more?) currency crashes.. anything short of apocalypse and gold owners should be just fine.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    72. Re:meh by iowannaski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well said.

      If you think that the economy will fall back to gold after a collapse of the fiat currency, take a look at Zimbabwe: is gold the major currency of the informal economy there? No. They use American dollars and South African rand.

      And just to mix a little irony into the situation, many of those rand are earned by digging up gold and selling it for dollars.

      --
      i forget
    73. Re:meh by drosboro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Exactly. Then we'll use bottle caps for currency.

    74. Re:meh by anagama · · Score: 1

      And who wants Meeses anymore either?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    75. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you, of course, are "most people", just like most people.

    76. Re:meh by denobug · · Score: 1

      The intrinsic value of gold is that it is rare enough to hold large quantities of wealth and cannot be manufactured arbitrarily.

      This is why Federal Reserve has deposited large amount of gold. Fort Knox is most famous by its huge deposit and tight security, hence the phrase "security is tight like Fort Knox" (I'm sure you heard phrases like that).

      In another word, us dollars are still backed up partially by gold. So there, we are "somewhat" covered.

    77. Re:meh by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      People will hold on to gold and other shiny things through hard times in the hope that things will return to "normal" and the shiny stuff is restored to its place of value. Short of nuclear-induced war, gold will retain a nominal value that is disproportionate to its functional abilities.

      Don't be so quick to discount the functional ability of gold to serve as a currency. That function has historically been far more important than as a conductor that won't corrode, though its physical stability certainly plays a part in its utility as a currency too.

      You've heard the talking points before I'm sure. Wikipedia succinctly states that "gold has intrinsic value as representative money due to its physical properties. That is, it is fungible, liquid, divisible, easily recognizable, and rare." Personally I'm not too particular about what kind of metal or resource is used, as long as it has those properties and therefore is a return to a relatively stable hard currency. IMO we wouldn't be in These Hard Economic Times right now had we not been using a fiat currency for 40 years (though sorta 100). But it's a lot harder to fight expensive wars and use your power to pay off your buddies if money is truly a finite resource.

    78. Re:meh by Dlugar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, of course what happened after that was people started having to resort to bartering for goods using small amounts of Gold, Kinda like what they did TWO-Thousand years ago. So you take an economy and you screw it up so badly that you have to reset it back to the pre-roman levels of commerce.

      I've heard lots of news reports of Zimbabweans bartering goods or using foreign currencies, but I've never heard any reports of them using gold. Do you happen to have a citation handy?

      Dlugar

      --
      Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
    79. Re:meh by enoz · · Score: 1

      At McDonald's we will have to buy Big Macs using mackerel for currency.

      One plasma TV will Equal 10 cases of mackerel.

      FTFY

    80. Re:meh by blueturffan · · Score: 1

      I've heard that if you have enough chocolate and feminine hygiene products you can trade for anything else you could possibly need.

    81. Re:meh by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Gold is valuable solely because people believe it to be valuable,

      So is every other currency.

      but when you get down to it there's no pile of gold big enough to replace food, water and shelter.

      The same goes for paper money unless you can survive on a paper diet. At least with a giant pile of gold you know I'm not just running a printing press in the basement--it takes a lot more work to mine more gold.

      I think you'd be surprised at just how universal a currency it actually wasn't before European explorers and conquerors imposing it around the world.

      Well, you're right, but European explorers and conquerors did impose it around the world. It's at least as close to universal now as the dollar, and it's a hell of a lot more stable.

    82. Re:meh by izomiac · · Score: 1

      The thing about gold that's different from other goods is that its value is more or less constant over long time periods. If it wasn't intrinsically valuable (electronics, medicine, jewelry), and the supply of gold was constant then it wouldn't really ever change in buying power. The price of gold is more an indication of the value of currency. If it's high, then your currency isn't worth much. If it's low then it's the opposite. Or at least that's a simple version of it...

      OTOH, goods can change a lot more in value. In a tanked economy they might be scarce so they'd have a high value. Or maybe everyone will buy up tons of them in anticipation and they'll be nearly worthless. The reason I wouldn't attempt to stock up on them is because they can be destroyed or obsoleted and lose all of their value. Not to mention that they aren't terribly portable.

      So, what would I stock up on? Cheap pyrite! Because even the apocalypse can't get rid of idiots. Plus, it'd probably make fairly good slingshot ammo.

    83. Re:meh by Eivind · · Score: 1

      It seems to be working very well. Listen, this ain't the apocalypse, it's a recession. Neither the first, nor the last. It's not as if the recession in the 30ies prevented society from being wealthier in 1950 than it was in 1920. In the larger scheme of things, recessions are speedbumps.

      Now that you mention it, gold is also valuable mainly because people *believe* it to be valuable, so you could fairly claim that that's "backed by faith" too.

    84. Re:meh by samcan · · Score: 1

      My scheme...

      1. Buy truckloads of ammo and toilet paper.
      2. ???
      3. Profit!
    85. Re:meh by 56 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they said that this happened "fewer than 13,000 prepaid transactions," so, according to google, the most it could be is $3.00935119 × 10 to the power of 20. Chump change, really.

    86. Re:meh by robosycho · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Wizard of Oz was a direct result of the silver vs. gold standard in the US. "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" was a children's novel published in 1900 that had several gold/silver references. The famous "Ruby Slippers" were originally silver, while the "yellow brick road" is related to the gold standard at the time.

    87. Re:meh by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 1

      So is every other currency.

      The same goes for paper money unless you can survive on a paper diet. At least with a giant pile of gold you know I'm not just running a printing press in the basement--it takes a lot more work to mine more gold.

      I think that's kind of the point everyone's trying to make though. Basically, gold is the same as every other currency, just as you say. So if a paper currency can collapse, it's entirely possible for gold as a currency to collapse as well. If people are desperate enough for necessities, they won't be willing to trade them for something that they know may not acquire them anything they need any more, be it gold or paper money.

      Now on the opposite end of the scale, the one difference between paper currency and gold is that gold is something that has a finite amount, which guards it against some of the economic tactics that have damaged our existing economy. (Not all of them, mind, but some. Loans as an example are still totally possible with a finite currency.) All that said, if our existing economy suffered a total collapse, other economies tied in with it (both international currencies as well as gold) are going to be affected.

      Just how they may be affected, I'll leave to people better than I at economics to discuss.

    88. Re:meh by camperdave · · Score: 1

      In fact there are three freely convertible currencies in the Galaxy, but none of them count. The Altarian Dollar has recently collapsed, the Flainian Pobble Bead is only exchangeable for other Flainian Pobble Beads, and the Triganic Pu has its own very special problems. It exchange rate of eight Ningis to one Pu is simple enough, but since Ningi is a triangular rubber coin six thousand eight hundred miles along each side, no one has ever collected enough to own one Pu. Nigis are not negotiable currency, because Galactibanks refuse to deal in fiddling small change. From this basic premise it is very simple to prove that the Galactibanks are also the product of a deranged imagination.

      From the deranged imagination of Douglas Adams.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    89. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(gold) makes a pretty good medium of exchange"

      Only as long as there's no other medium of exchange that's hard to fake.

      The downside of gold-backed currency is that there's limited amount of it; why would anyone want to limit the maximum value of the global economy to the amount of some rare resource?

    90. Re:meh by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Barring monopolistic practices, the mining companies would no more be in charge of our economy than the banks are now.

      You're missing the point. A central bank controls the money supply deliberately with an eye toward the effect of that money supply on the overall economy. Mining companies produce gold, and industrial users consume gold, for their own purposes, with no regard for the effect of the gold supply on the economy.

      Exactly, the duration may have gotten shorter, but the effect when reality finally hits is worse.

      Any evidence for this claim?

      This is why we had the Great Depression, and why we are heading into another major downturn now.

      Good luck finding anyone who isn't a crank who believes that the Great Depression was caused by insufficient goldbuggery. If anything, gold standard contributed to the Depression.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    91. Re:meh by CyberRider · · Score: 1

      Backed by faith?? Is that why Seppo currency has the motto "In God We Trust"? Perhaps "Faith No More" should write the anthem for the current economic situation!

    92. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Mining companies produce gold, and industrial users consume gold, for their own purposes, with no regard for the effect of the gold supply on the economy.

      Mining _cartels_. And you can bet that once you put the power to fiddle with the money supply into their hands, they _will_ use that power for their benefit.

    93. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      So if a paper currency can collapse, it's entirely possible for gold as a currency to collapse as well.

      Anyone who played Civ4 should know at least one example:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mansa_Musa

      And this wasn't even about people being desperate, it happened because the local market was flooded with so much gold that hyperinflation set in.

    94. Re:meh by mi · · Score: 1

      think: a post-apocalyptic world where people are just fighting to stay alive

      I don't think, "post-apocalyptic world", as filmed in various distopias, is really looming. But the hyperinflation caused by the government's mishandling the economy (which it really is not supposed to even handle), is possible. A few postings above yours someone has offered the example of the current day (rather than distopian) Zimbabwe, where gold is used today, because the official currency changes value significantly from morning to evening.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    95. Re:meh by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Gold is a questionable unit. Have you ever tried to go to a store and buy something with gold rather than the local currency? In most places, it simply isn't going to happen.

          An effective bartering system not only has a currency that you can carry around (like gold), but more happens with the implied or agreed upon value of items you are wishing to barter. For example, if civilization should collapse tomorrow, in a year weapons and ammunition will be worth a whole lot more than say a cell phone. You may be able to trade a case full of spam for a good weapon. Several years after that, the weapons would only be good for their metal value to be reformed into other tools. Sure, I'll trade you 10 M-16's for a pick-axe and shovel. How about a wagon for that M1 Abrams tank. Either of the given items wouldn't be much good without fuel and/or ammunition, but the resulting product would mean the difference between life and death.

          A wagon full of gold is only worth anything as long as the person you're willing to trade with believes it's worth something. Consider Gilligan's Island. Mr. Howell, the millionaire, had a trunk full of cash, which would still have been legitimate currency back in civilization, but it was worthless on the island because it was not a necessity to have. Two coconuts and a machete would be worth more to most of the folks there. The exception would be the professor who could use the gold, a vine, a couple bird feathers, some chewing gum, and a bit of sea water to build a satellite uplink. Too bad Gilligan swallowed the last piece of gum already. :)

          I'm sure after they made it back, the Professor had a kid named Angus MacGyver. But, now I'm wandering too far off topic.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    96. Re:meh by plilov · · Score: 1

      You all don't get it, women like jewelry, so gold = sex, even in post apocalypse world.

    97. Re:meh by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      Meh. What's 23 quadrillion dollars really worth these days?

      Nothing if you invest it with Madoff.

    98. Re:meh by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      In any event, why should the money supply be tied to a rare, precious metal? Matching the growth (or shrinkage!) of the money supply based solely on the discovery, loss, or recovery of a particular natural resource hardly seems like a good plan for managing the economy.

      Indeed, the goal is to make it much more difficult to manage the economy. When we let select groups manage the economy, they seem to do it primarily for the benefit of themselves and their friends.

      Gold (or other commodity backed) currency is a currency based on tangible reality. Fiat currency or fractional reserve lending "chequebook money" are based on the promises of politicians or bankers. Given the choice between tangible reality and a politicians promise, I choose reality. YMMV.

    99. Re:meh by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *My* question, though, is this:

      Why do Visa's systems have the bandwitdh to *allow* 23 quadrillion dollars to make it to a credit card bill.

      Is there anyone, at all, anywhere, who's gonna carry a balance of even a megabuck?

      6.2, really. That's all they needed.

      Full ack, 6.2 digits will be enough for all purposes eternally.

      Just like no computer will ever need more than 64k RAM, and 32 bits will always be enough for time_t.

      --
      Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
    100. Re:meh by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, you're transferring the gold certificates around, complete with fees for every transaction (straight to the vault owner, naturally) and he still has an impervious vault full of gold. If society breaks down--which gold buyers seem to expect--you really think he'll honor those scraps of paper? No, he'll be riding it out inside the vault.

      I'm too paranoid to buy gold, I invested in seed corn. Too large to steal, too real to lose value.

      And if all hell breaks loose, you could always malt the corn and brew enough beer to be drunk to old age. Perfect!

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    101. Re:meh by the+ReviveR · · Score: 1

      Is there anyone, at all, anywhere, who's gonna carry a balance of even a megabuck?

      6.2, really. That's all they needed.

      Yes, because Visa doesn't do business in other currencies...

      Besides, maybe this bug was introduced while Visa was preparing their system to match the estimate for coming inflation =)

    102. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there anyone, at all, anywhere, who's gonna carry a balance of even a megabuck?

      So what your're saying is, 640k should be enough for anyone? YA Bill Gates AICMFP!

    103. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *coughsnarfle* Rubles anyone?

    104. Re:meh by jacobsm · · Score: 1

      During the hyperinflation period in Germany in the 1930's people would burn money for heating and cooking since any alternate fuel was more expensive.

    105. Re:meh by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well he could, if he can find a way to make corn into barley.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    106. Re:meh by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Ignore them? I'd hire them to write a movie script.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    107. Re:meh by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      You've made your annual Costco trip recently as well, I see. Is there any way to buy fewer than a thousand rolls at a time?

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    108. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah... who needs toilet paper at that point... I'll just use cash... besides, maybe if I use enough ones I will get a nice high from trace amount of coke on the bills...

    109. Re:meh by Migity · · Score: 1

      Walmart's having a sale?

    110. Re:meh by johnw · · Score: 1

      Why do Visa's systems have the bandwitdh to *allow* 23 quadrillion dollars to make it to a credit card bill.

      I've done work in the past on stock exchange price systems and it seems to be fairly standard there to allow numbers up to 18 digits - presumably because that's as big as you can fit in a 64 bit value.

      My guess would be that they're just using stock financial calculation code and no-one ever thought to put a sanity check on it. "It's far bigger than we'll ever need so nothing to worry about there".

    111. Re:meh by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      In Zimbabwean dollars, it wouldn't buy you a pre-chewed piece of Bazooka Joe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation

    112. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're not a Jewish business man doesn't mean that nobody else is...With my gold I'll buy thousands of cans of nasty slop and sell it for double what I paid for...then I'll go buy more to sell to you sorry bastards! You stupid fuckers will be happy with your nasty can o'shit and I'll get my can o'shit for free...and the funny thing is is that you'll be coming back to me for more cans o'shit. All it takes is a little money and the ability to see what people want/need, JACKASS!

    113. Re:meh by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Even at just 2% inflation, you just have to wait about 1,900 years for something costing $1 today to be worth that amount.

      Although when I first saw this story, I thought it was on about another RIAA fine for sharing mp3s.

    114. Re:meh by pfleming · · Score: 1

      (A few particularly crazy farmers might disagree, and probably have elaborate conspiracy theories that start with Obama getting elected, involve a world government, stem cells somehow, climax with gun control, and end in the apocalypse, but I'd like to ignore those people as usual.)

      You say that like it's not true...

    115. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is small, convenient, historical, and rare, so it makes a pretty good medium of exchange.

      This is what people don't get. When you are transferring large amounts of wealth around there are very few other options. I've heard of using oil as a medium... but transferring the equivalent amount of wealth in oil would require fleets of tankers. There is nothing special about gold except that it is common enough to be common but rare enough to be rare. We could use platinum but that is too rare, or copper, which isn't quite rare enough. Silver is actually a decent alternative and what many economies used prior to settling on gold. /- - -/

      Sweden used copper between 1664 and 1776, our largest coin weighted 19.7 kg (43.4 US pounds). Previous to that we used silver, but there was not enough silver within Sweden to use, so we became dependent on imported silver.

      Copper was, and still is, abundant in Sweden. At that time Sweden was the only country within the western civilisation that could produce serious amounts of copper. Despite several serious efforts within other countries we had an unchallanged monpoly (we had a near monopoly on iron as well, and was the only European country capable of producing high quality steel, and yes we have had iron coins as well). Copper production was under total control of the Swedish government, that made copper perfect as a Swedish currency.

      Those heavy and bulky coins never became popular though. In 1664 the bank Stockholms Banco issued the first European bank note. A few years later the bank become fully owned by the government (before that it was a similar semi private organisation as the Federal Reserve is today). And that is how the worlds first central bank came to exist. The need had propably never arised unless the copper coins had been in use.

      Here is a picture of how it could have looked when you went on some small shopping in Sweden during the use of copper currency.

    116. Re:meh by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      I would argue that part of the appeal of gold through the ages is its intrinsic value as a metal. When we think of gold here at /. we tend to think of it as a circuit component or in some other esoteric function. Gold is nearly impervious to corrosion; it is easy to manufacture (due to its ductility, malleability, and ease of combination with other metals), it seems to hold some value as a jewelry to many cultures. Think about it? What other currency can be worn as a necklace, passed down through many generations, traded for a herd of goats, and then transformed into coins with Caesar's image all without losing any of its intrinsic value?

    117. Re:meh by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      I'm more curious as to why Visa is storing what could easily be a 6.2 (heck- make it a 10.2) digit field as binary...

    118. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6.2, really. That's all they needed.

      I thought you were going to say 640K...

    119. Re:meh by It's+its · · Score: 1

      What does it mean to "use gold for it is intrinsic value"?

      Please re-learn 2nd grade grammar.

      Thanks

    120. Re:meh by jsalbre · · Score: 1

      Historically paper money only had value because it was backed by gold, or some other known commodity. Now it's backed by faith. How's that working out for everybody?

      .

      You gotta have faith ah faith ah faith ah.

      (On a side note, what's up with /.s blockquoting lately?)

    121. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      I'm more curious as to why Visa is storing what could easily be a 6.2 (heck- make it a 10.2) digit field as binary...

      Try adding up a bunch of 10.2 (actually, it's 10.4 I think - sub-cent precision is necessary for interest calculations and such) digit field, or calculate the interest on that.

      Finished?

      Ok, no try doing the same with an integer. Notice the difference?

    122. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when you're just past the starving point and trying to create a base economy, crating around a wheelbarrow full of canned goods is inconvenient and makes you a target.

      I'll have to remember that when I crate around the alternative of a wheelbarrow full of gold.

    123. Re:meh by Godkar · · Score: 1

      I guess Dr. Evil must be happy now...

      --
      Is "no" the answer to this question?
    124. Re:meh by pcraven · · Score: 1

      Plus, you could always eat the seed corn.

    125. Re:meh by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      But gold or silver don't grow, at least not appreciably. When you have growing wealth (an expanding economy) but only a fixed pool of assets to tie it too (gold), you still make yourself a target because now even a small amount of gold has an enormous value.

      It makes far more sense to have money grow and shrink with the wealth than attempt to tie it arbitrarily to some limited commodity.

      I know the gold standard guys like to spin a good yarn, but even when countries where on the gold standard there were painful economic crashes. Often in crashes, you got hoarding. There was still inflation. The gold standard has it's negatives (some of them quite bad), and fiat has it's negatives (not quite as bad).

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    126. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the difference between this and a bank note which promises to pay the bearer the amount written, is...?

    127. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its sad when the paper you're printing the money on is worth more than the money itself.
      for a comparison to coinage, check out www.coininflation.com

    128. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      But gold or silver don't grow, at least not appreciably. When you have growing wealth (an expanding economy) but only a fixed pool of assets to tie it too (gold), you still make yourself a target because now even a small amount of gold has an enormous value.

      Deflation is the term you're looking for. And it's bad in even smaller amounts than inflation.

    129. Re:meh by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      Who's storing currency as an integer?

    130. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Who's storing currency as an integer?

      Anyone who's doing serious calculations with it?

      If you know that you'll need to be accurate to 1/100th of a cent, there's no point whatsoever in using a floating point format. Fixed point is all you need, and you're not going to run into any of the ugliness that floating point brings with it.

    131. Re:meh by feepness · · Score: 1

      It's useful past the basic system. Once you get to a modern economy you can still use cash or credit cards backed with the promise of a fixed exchange rate, rather than on the promise of more promises.

    132. Re:meh by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah- the "*100" in the original post. Brain fart :)

    133. Re:meh by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      The thing is if the economy tanks that badly, gold probably won't be worth much either. Which is why buying large boxes of ammo, cigarettes, and toilet paper is the way to go!

      Just have to find the downed airship for the Firelance and pick up some Alien Power Cells.

    134. Re:meh by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Matching the growth (or shrinkage!) of the money supply based solely on the discovery, loss, or recovery of a particular natural resource hardly seems like a good plan for managing the economy.

      Matching the growth or shrinkage of the money supply based on the whims of banks and legislators seems like a much worse plan.

      Certainly, fiat currency its had more visible problems recently, but that's only because gold as currency is so much worse that its not used on a wide scale anymore, and when no one is using it, it can't have any visible problems.

      Note that gold as currency is, as well as being inconvenient for small transactions, subject to most of the many of the same potential problems as fiat currency, while gold-backed representational currency, which deals with the convenience problems, is subject to all of the same potential problems, while both are subject to additional problems like being subject to the market conditions relating to a single commodity that is otherwise not that critical to the economy, increasing the ability of market fluctuations for that commodity to disrupt the entire economy.

    135. Re:meh by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Dude, these things add up! Aquadrillion here, a quadrillion there, and before you know it you're talking about a lot of money!

    136. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      protip: most of its gone.

    137. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now it's backed by faith. How's that working out for everybody?

      Gold also only has value because people believe it does - as the GP post said, you can't eat it, you can't really build a shelter out of it, etc.

      Well also, Gold doesn't really rust or spoil.

      Desirable traits when you're trying to protect yourself from rampant inflation (even if just for the principle of the thing).

    138. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold also only has value because people believe it does - as the GP post said, you can't eat it, you can't really build a shelter out of it, etc.

      Actually, you can eat it. http://www.fancyflours.com/site/edible-gold-leaves.html

    139. Re:meh by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Um, what? Why are you saying gold would not be worth much? Are you talking real or nominal dollars? Sure there would probably be some price deflation in real terms, but for the most part it would hold its real value.

    140. Re:meh by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Well, there are corn-based alcohols, though you're right, I don't believe they're malted.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    141. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your name is appropriate.

    142. Re:meh by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      It seemed to me that Miseph (and others) are arguing that gold is no better for use as a currency than unbacked paper. There are good reasons (that I outlined in another post) for why this is not true, one of the big ones as you mentioned being gold's finiteness. That alone makes a dramatic collapse in gold's value much less likely than any fiat currency. Arguments stating that "it only has worth because we believe it does," in addition to being tautologies, are really arguments against all currencies. It is unclear thinking that leads to such arguments being applied against gold as currency.

      All I'm saying is that to have any kind of stable economy at any kind of scale worth mentioning, a currency is needed, and that gold's physical properties as well as its history make it more well-suited for use than unbacked paper.

    143. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      There are good reasons (that I outlined in another post) for why this is not true, one of the big ones as you mentioned being gold's finiteness. That alone makes a dramatic collapse in gold's value much less likely than any fiat currency.

      This also means that it is next to impossible to combat inflation if the economy grows faster than amount of gold mined. And deflation is seriously bad.

    144. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      Replace inflation by deflation.

    145. Re:meh by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Wanna spend a week in futility, but have some fun irritating people? Buy some crude oil on an exchange, and start calling to try and get a few barrels delivered to your house.

    146. Re:meh by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      Very well thank you!

      *Message Brought to you by the First Church of Golden Faith*

    147. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to kill a joke

    148. Re:meh by jnnnnn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but no-one can just make more gold when they feel like it.

      Unlike government-backed currency.

      Do you really think the USA is going to be able to pay off its national debt? I think a lot of inflation is coming for the USD, and everyone will switch to the Euro or the Chinese dollar (which will be unhitched from the USD, obviously). Someone has to pay (not with "money", but with work) for all the corporate greed we've been seeing recently, and historically it's always (eventually) been the poor or the working class. After all, who else is there?

    149. Re:meh by jra · · Score: 1

      I expected the "640k" replies... but different currencies is an excellent point. I *still* think that's a bit too many digits, but what *is* the convertible currency with the *smallest* value relative to the US dollar; anyone know offhand?

    150. Re:meh by feepness · · Score: 1

      The convenience problem is not subject to the same arbitrary inflation that fiat is. There is a reason Nixon had to "close the gold window". Sure you can get away with it for a little bit... but not decades like we've been doing now. Now the inflation problem is much worse and will cause many more repercussions.

      This also isn't 300 BC. We aren't finding massive new strikes of gold and invading neighbors and carting away slaves and jewelry. The amount of gold is relatively fixed and new deposits are rare. Given that we've just faced a crisis which almost destroyed the economy, I don't know how anyone can claim gold could be any worse. It would have prevented the runup.

    151. Re:meh by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Unless they're on an old COBOL system or a derivative of such. In which case, they're probably storing as compact BCD (2 decimal digits per byte). Which could be how the spaces passed validation.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    152. Re:meh by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      In any event, why should the money supply be tied to a rare, precious metal? Matching the growth (or shrinkage!) of the money supply based solely on the discovery, loss, or recovery of a particular natural resource hardly seems like a good plan for managing the economy.

      I can't name a resource that is non-perishable, reasonably durable, slightly scarce (but not tooscarce), readily divisible, and useful to someone with Iron Age or lower technology. But gold fulfills all those qualities except usefulness.

    153. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      I can't name a resource that is non-perishable, reasonably durable, slightly scarce (but not tooscarce), readily divisible, and useful to someone with Iron Age or lower technology. But gold fulfills all those qualities except usefulness.

      Coal. Salt. Bronze.

      Of course, you didn't mention "compact" in your list, but the first two are way more useful than gold. Bronze makes superior tools and weapons and is quite resistant to corrosion. The bronze age didn't end because iron was "better", but because it was more abundant and easily-accessible deposits of copper and tin were exhausted.

    154. Re:meh by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      This also isn't 300 BC. We aren't finding massive new strikes of gold and invading neighbors and carting away slaves and jewelry. The amount of gold is relatively fixed and new deposits are rare.

      But the economy is usually growing. See the problem?

    155. Re:meh by hotdog.sk · · Score: 1

      Why do Visa's systems have the bandwitdh to *allow* 23 quadrillion dollars to make it to a credit card bill.

      Is there anyone, at all, anywhere, who's gonna carry a balance of even a megabuck?

      6.2, really. That's all they needed.

      Probably because there are other currencies in the world and you can get Visa with other base currency than USD. And some reports do sum over account balances and need enough precision for that.

    156. Re:meh by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Visa deal with more or less every currency in the world. My guess would be they store the value of the transaction in the lowest common denominator of that currency and a separate field tells them what the currency is.

      Not all countries have a currency where 5 of the major unit would buy you a burger.

    157. Re:meh by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure I'd call salt scarce, and I don't think coal orsalt is as water resistant as bronze or gold. And you yourself point out how scarce bronze is. It might make a good currency for that reason, but the "price" of fashioning it into something useful will be prohibitive.

      Of course, you didn't mention "compact" in your list,

      Compact is relative. Salt and coal are not called compact simply because they are not valuable enough that any easily portable amounts are worth much.

    158. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so long ago there were places in Africa where a known counterfeit US Dollar (a bad photocopy) was more valuable than the local currency. Angola was one, the DRC another. I imagine Zimbabwe is like this as well now.

    159. Re:meh by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      We aren't finding massive new strikes of gold and invading neighbors and carting away slaves and jewelry.

      We're not invading other countries over gold because its not fundamental to the economy (even late in the period where there was a notional gold standard, there were all kinds of mechanisms in place that weakened the influence of actual gold on the economy.

      (OTOH, we do fight wars -- fairly frequently -- over control of resources that are important to the economy; reducing those to the ones that are fundamentally important rather than one's that we make important as an easily avoidable choice is probably a good idea; that's one major argument over tying currency closely to any particular resource.)

      Given that we've just faced a crisis which almost destroyed the economy, I don't know how anyone can claim gold could be any worse. It would have prevented the runup.

      No, it wouldn't. Speculative bubbles and other types of financial meltdowns with very similar (and, in many cases, more severe) effects than the current major recession are not prevented by having commodity-backed currency. The Great Depression happened while the US was on the gold standard (and not in as loose and notional a way as it was after the Depression up until the 1970s.) The same is true of the late 19th Century railroad bubble (in which the resulting crisis was exacerbated by factors related to the fact that the US had redeemable gold-backed currency), the wave of bank of failures in 1907, and a number of other major economic crises of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

      The argument that the present economic crisis is somehow proves that nothing could be any worse is amazingly historically ignorant.

    160. Re:meh by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Going from a currency who's value was backed by rocks who's value was backed by faith, we moved to a currency who skips the middle man and goes right to faith.

      It's worked pretty well since the 70's, even a gold standard would've tanked after GWB's reign.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    161. Re:meh by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Correlation is not causation.

      Federal Reserve was founded in 1913, and the GD started 16 years later.

      Consequently, Pancho Villa died in 1926, and WW2 started 16 years later.

      Notice how silly your statement now sounds?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  3. At least it wasn't EBCDIC by sheepweevil · · Score: 4, Funny

    In EBCDIC, hex 40 is a space. Making this error if EBCDIC was used would make the charge a whopping $4,629,771,061,636,895,312 - 4 quintillion dollars!

    1. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, well -- if they were still using COBOL this wouldn't have happened.

      Now get off my lawns!

    2. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Electrawn · · Score: 1

      Good god, if Visa is still using a Unisys V Series and Burroughs terminals.... I'm switching to Mastercard!

    3. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Funny

      One big ASCII charge!

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    4. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good god, if Visa is still using a Unisys V Series and Burroughs terminals.... I'm switching to Mastercard!

      Excellent. Now please wait while we calculate your interest with an abacus.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would be a really large abacus run by a team of shackled slaves being whipped by a leather clad master.
      So pretty much like any IT shop.

    6. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd hate to be overcharged by -2^63 dollars! That would be tragic!

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    7. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      ahhhh.....Visa OWNS Mastercard

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    8. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by MarkTina · · Score: 1

      Sounds kinky! Where can I sign up ? ;-)

    9. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What IT shop is like that? And where can I find it?

    10. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they probably have stopped using them, but most of VISA/MC (read: interchange) and the third party processors run on mainframes. EBCDIC ftw.

    11. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Minwee · · Score: 1

      I think that was a whole different set of charges on your credit card. You probably won't be able to explain them away as a billing error, either.

    12. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if you had a Dvorak keyboard?

    13. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must have been using the binary abacus instead of the chinese one which supports base 16.

    14. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Mastercard .... PRICELESS! Oh, wait I think Visa has that covered now!

    15. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're using EBCDIC, they're also probably using BCD math, in which case 40 40 40 40 40 40 12 50 works out to: $40,404,040,404,012.50

    16. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh too hard.

      I use an abacus (really) to do binary arithmetic. I find it very simple to do calculations and visualize the results with my abacus.

      In fact, I have two of them. I keep my "big" one on the bookshelf beside my computer desk, and a smaller one beside my office desk.

      If you haven't learned to use an abacus for binary, you're missing something. I hate doing that stuff on paper (and I usually manage to get it wrong) and it takes too long to set it up on the computer.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    17. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Hold on, I think I work there.

    18. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by ewertz · · Score: 0

      No, COBOL was probably the culprit, PICTURE that.

    19. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by yanyan · · Score: 1

      That sounds absolutely kinky.

    20. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they'd have the same hardware. You know, given that Visa & Mastercard are two different brands owned by the same company...

      (That's why they always bash Discover in the ads.)

    21. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Picture a REDEFINES clause or something non 77 and a MOVE LOW-VALUES indeed.

    22. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a hot femaie leather clad master?

    23. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace "binary zero" with "ascii zero" in the summary and you get hex 48, taking you over 5 quintillion. Who can I call at Visa that will punch in some "error-correcting" zeroes for me?

  4. of course they didn't reverse interest charges... by random+coward · · Score: 1

    So now the interest charges for the month based on average daily balance will be quit a lot.

  5. Extremely speculative. by Marillion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While all this is plausible, of course, the 12 is octal for a UNIX newline and the 50 is the '@' symbol; let us not forget that there are a lot of assumptions being made here and a lot of speculation.

    --
    This is a boring sig
    1. Re:Extremely speculative. by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but the data definition conundrum "space fill or zero fill" is pretty persuasive in this case. Or at least a damn interesting coincidence.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Extremely speculative. by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then why didn't it happen uniformly, on all charges? Unless the posting function for 12 50 ($46.88) is different from the posting function for every other amount?

    3. Re:Extremely speculative. by fbjon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Might be because the code (like a lot of code) is braindead in other, unimaginable ways?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the number was pasted as decoded in hex, how could it possibly be an octal 12 in it? WTF mate?

    5. Re:Extremely speculative. by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, to make the jump from hexidecimal representation for a number to ascii is rather a long-shot.

      Here's another:

      Represented as 2-nibble-per-byte packed BCD (Binary Coded Decimal), this is the exact correct number of digits for a Visa card number. What you could well be looking at is a pre-initialized dummy card number overlayed with a price (stored in the last two bytes). If so, the expected value of the original default would be:

      20 20 20 20 20 20 20 24

      That is, a card number that stores 2 in every odd position and zero in every even position followed by a trailing 4 to make the checksum work.

      Just as plausible.

    6. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is unlikely that some piece of code was written to intentionally put 0x20 into that location. There are lots of possible causes: a flipped bit in memory corrupting a pointer, a buffer overflow, a memory management bug, filesystem corruption, ...
      What is clear though is that the system uses 64bit fixed point arithmetic and that somehow spaces got into a place where they don't belong.

    7. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let us not forget that there are a lot of assumptions being made here and a lot of speculation.

      Like the speculation that somewhere within Visa's accounting system, they store currency transactions as 8 byte integers, completely disregarding any fractional money.

    8. Re:Extremely speculative. by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't it be a simple web interface error? 20 or %20 is a space. It could be a bug cause by input cleansing that managed to cause a bug . %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%12 Isn't 12 or %12 a line feed or something?

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    9. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...
      elseif (amt == 12.00)
            Post_12_00()
      elseif (amt == 12.01)
            Post_12_01() ....

    10. Re:Extremely speculative. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Like the speculation that somewhere within Visa's accounting system, they store currency transactions as 8 byte integers, completely disregarding any fractional money.

      Well, integer math is faster that floating point math, you wouldn't want to have only mantissa accuracy for storing a large number as a float or double, and he did multiply it by 100 cents to a dollar first so it would be stored as integer cents.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm

    12. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, this is ./
      You are telling me no single poster has seen a buffer overflow here?
      It seems pretty obvious really. The overflow may be accidental or not, however it explains why there are spaces instead of zeros which would make for a more believable amount. Strcpy is likely involved.
      Fill with "spaces" is not something you do unless you are trying.
      Probably there is some string input somewhere else in the program and somebody bombed it.

    13. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might be right. I've dealt with numbers, conversions, input validation, storage retrieval and calculations of for many many years and I've never ran into this. I've had my share of overwrites and bad code too but when i'm dealing with money numbers I leave the fancy stuff at home, simple stupid.

      At least it makes a good case for using a strongly typed managed language for this type of thing. I'd rather them loose a few cpu cycles than my money!

    14. Re:Extremely speculative. by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      But Visa card numbers start with 4

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    15. Re:Extremely speculative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Though I think it is unlikely that they are storing numeric values in strings. If they are, I'm taking all of my money out of the banks now! If I were a betting man, I would put my money on a memory leak. Most likely some character buffer was overrun. Assuming you believe the whole 20 20 20 20 20 20 story. Which is plausible. But if it is true, I seriously doubt it's because someone padded an int[] with ''. As I said, my bet is a on memory leak.

    16. Re:Extremely speculative. by Pallidrone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually it looks even simpler then that. It looks like $2.31 was his amount and the rest was his CC number, since the 4885 is a typical Visa Check Card sequence issued by BofA. I wonder if this guy was smart enough to look at his card number and verify that was not the case here, especially before putting it out to the press.

    17. Re:Extremely speculative. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Like the speculation that somewhere within Visa's accounting system, they store currency transactions as 8 byte integers, completely disregarding any fractional money.

      Fixed point arithmetics. Ever heard of it?

    18. Re:Extremely speculative. by ajs · · Score: 1

      No, PUBLIC card numbers start with 4. 2020202020202024 might well be an internal testing number.

      I'm not saying this is terribly likely, I'm just saying that the original speculation from the article is not the only, or even most likely reason, as it seems to imply.

    19. Re:Extremely speculative. by urlmaker · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that anywhere in the US a pack of Camels is $2.31. Even in a tobacco state they are $4.50.

    20. Re:Extremely speculative. by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Actually it looks even simpler then that.

      It looks like $2.31 was his amount and the rest was his CC number, since the 4885 is a typical Visa Check Card sequence issued by BofA.

      I wonder if this guy was smart enough to look at his card number and verify that was not the case here, especially before putting it out to the press.

      Good suggestion, but there are only 14 digits:

      4885 5308 1845 00

      If you count the "cents" there are 16, but then the card ends with 0000, and doesn't pass the checksum.

  6. Minimum by Selfbain · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what was the minimum payment on that?

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:Minimum by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Funny

      $5. But if they've got any sense they'll pay the whole thing off straight away to avoid the interest.

    2. Re:Minimum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Tell that to the US Gov...

    3. Re:Minimum by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Just leave it for the next guy to pay off...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  7. Not an error by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is how Obama is paying for health care.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    1. Re:Not an error by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      This is how Obama is paying for health care.

      By adding a 0.003% tax on all visa transactions?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Not an error by Saliegh · · Score: 1

      Why does this make me think of Superman 3?

      --
      1368127 is prime!
    3. Re:Not an error by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Actually it makes me think of Office Space.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:Not an error by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      For real. Who bothered to remember Superman 3?

    5. Re:Not an error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's going to come up short.

    6. Re:Not an error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly... apparently, we're all going to get our share of the ObamaDebt put directly on our credit cards; these visa card holders just got the preview by accident!

    7. Re:Not an error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how Bush was paying for all the wars, torture, assassination hit sqauds etc?

    8. Re:Not an error by Saliegh · · Score: 1

      That's what I said.

      Wait, someone's actually seen Superman 3?

      --
      1368127 is prime!
    9. Re:Not an error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily this was so small in comparison that nobody noticed.

  8. So what's the big deal? by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that about the cost of a couple of packs of smokes and a bag of chips at one of those gas station stores? If he filled up the truck, too...well, that would just about account for it.

    Dude should shut up and pay what he owes.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:So what's the big deal? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "sin" tax on those smokes must have been part of the new anti-smoking bill.

      That, or the president thinks the best way to prevent him from ever smoking again is to never be able to afford one.

    2. Re:So what's the big deal? by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      Remove the 0x20 padding, convert back to decimal and divide by 100 and you get $46.88

    3. Re:So what's the big deal? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      If he filled up the truck, too...

      Only if it was a dually diesel 3/4 ton with a rope in the back window.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    4. Re:So what's the big deal? by Ant+P. · · Score: 5, Funny

      The "sin" tax on those smokes must have been part of the new anti-smoking bill.

      Wait... does that mean this is a sin tax error?

    5. Re:So what's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. cosine

    6. Re:So what's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "sin" tax on those smokes must have been part of the new anti-smoking bill.

      Wait... does that mean this is a sin tax error?

      Uggg! I will kill you if I don't die of laughter!

    7. Re:So what's the big deal? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir, I tip my hat to you. That was very possibly the best, and almost certainly the worst, joke in this thread. (I'd mod you up, as I have points, but you're at +5 already).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:So what's the big deal? by matt20102 · · Score: 1

      wait for it... wait for it... lol- that's great!

    9. Re:So what's the big deal? by clam666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Although I award you first prize for the simple brilliance of that joke, I still feel you should be shot for having made it.

      Kudos.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    10. Re:So what's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "sin" tax on those smokes must have been part of the new anti-smoking bill.

      Wait... does that mean this is a sin tax error?

      That quite nearly made me spit soda all over my computer.

      +1 Internets for you

    11. Re:So what's the big deal? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      It's all part of Obama's Socialist Agenda. Tax all the quadrillionaires until they're poor starving billionaires!

    12. Re:So what's the big deal? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

  9. stack garbage by cockpitcomp · · Score: 1

    variable used before set

    But type to get them to admit their software made a mistake when it happens to your account and it will be like talking to a brick.

    1. Re:stack garbage by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh please... if the person on the phone knew anything about programming, they wouldn't be working the phones, they would be coding their apps like the guys who got promoted from answering the phones last week.

  10. Not pr0n then? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    So they weren't getting multiply charged by a site that claimed to only charge once, and only if you cancelled after the trial period, even though you can cancelled before the end of the trial period. Just spaces huh, who would have though?

    Yes I am ashamed I signed up innocently, now realising torrents are far safer.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  11. The Aftereffect? by greatica · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, my credit card bounces into "crap customer mode" when certain activity like overcharges (or nonpayment) occur. This ups my interest rate permanently from 6% to something silly like 20%.

    If this happens, I wonder how many people will be relieved to have the charges reversed, only to be upset next month when their rate is hiked.

    1. Re:The Aftereffect? by greatica · · Score: 0

      err, scratch that...prepaid.

  12. Re:What about Unicode? by Co0Ps · · Score: 1

    Wrong. It could also be UTF8 which is a Unicode encoding.

  13. Sensationalist article by Xoltri · · Score: 5, Funny

    He also felt a stab of fear that he had saddled all his unborn grandchildren -- and their grandchildren -- with a lifetime of debt. "Down the generational line, nobody would have any money."

    Give me a break.

    --
    -Xoltri
    1. Re:Sensationalist article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      anyone who sees a 23 quadrillion dollar charge on their visa bill and thinks that should not be allowed to have children.

      Stupidity is evil!

    2. Re:Sensationalist article by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Funny how he's not thinking about how this error could (and should) make him rich. No court would side with the company over the victim, and he could claim any damages he'd like -- he'd win, simply on the fact that the company gave him a $BIGNUM bill and didn't *immediately* acknowledge and correct the error.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Sensationalist article by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Everyone should know that credit card debt is unsecured! Your heirs don't have any obligation to pay off your credit card bills!

      --
      This space available.
    4. Re:Sensationalist article by jd · · Score: 1

      Just as importantly, if there's one obviously corrupt item in the database, couldn't any transaction record have been corrupted by the error? If Visa isn't willing to supply the code to a third-party for inspection, then clearly the entire bill for that month has to be voided.

      (Given the economy these days, that could be just as much as any direct damages awarded.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Sensationalist article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOSH!

    6. Re:Sensationalist article by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1

      I don't quite get it - what damages?

    7. Re:Sensationalist article by omnichad · · Score: 1

      So why don't old people on their death bed get a dozen credit cards and max them out to buy an inheritance for their kids? That would be...awesome!

  14. Visa just testing their systems for hyperinflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets hope they didn't underestimate.

  15. Wrong Currency? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The number seems about right for Zimbabwe dollars.

    1. Re:Wrong Currency? by horatio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe not the wrong currency soon, the way we're printing money here...

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
  16. What is truly appalling... by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...is that this was not caught by validity checks. Was this perhaps an error that affected only the printing of the statement?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:What is truly appalling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it wasn't just the output. People were charged overlimit fees in addition to the erroneous amount.

    2. Re:What is truly appalling... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      At a minimum, a charge that far outside the cardholder's normal pattern should have been flagged for manual review at the fraud control department.

    3. Re:What is truly appalling... by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...is that this was not caught by validity checks

      My thoughts exactly. Why is it that when I try and legitimately spend a largish amount (anything into 4 figures basically), the credit card company immediately phones me to check on it, and if I try to spend above my credit limit, they can block the purchase, but things like this are not caught?

      Something similar happened to my brother once - a $10 fee for a replacement card somehow became $12 million, automatically debited from his bank account. It took 3 days to find someone at the bank with enough authority to reverse a transaction of that magnitude, and that was only after he'd gone to the local newspaper about it.

    4. Re:What is truly appalling... by ciantic · · Score: 1

      ...is that this was not caught by validity checks. Was this perhaps an error that affected only the printing of the statement?

      From the article "... and the $15 overdraft fee ...", this means the system knew that it went to negative. So I suspect not.

    5. Re:What is truly appalling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only were there apparently no validity checks or even bounds checking, but the initial reports
      in one of the incidents (in Manchester, New Hampshire) indicated a finger-pointing battle between
      Bank Of America and Visa, two institutions who should've known better to begin with, and who
      should've been smart enough to say something like "Well, there's apparently a problem here that
      we need to investigate" instead of looking to offload the blame.

      This is the sort of crap that should force us to let B of A fail - indeed, crumble under its own weight -
      it's not too big to fail, as far as I'm concerned!

    6. Re:What is truly appalling... by cephus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      TFA mentions that the over-limit charges were waived but did they reverse the charge in a way that won't affect his average daily balance? Or will he be facing a 15 trillion dollar finance charge on his next statement?

    7. Re:What is truly appalling... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, you want the same programmers who couldn't keep track of their pointers to add validity checks? Yeah, that'll work.

      This kind of error is actually nothing new. The business with all those 0x20s (do they really store dollar values in 64-bit integers?) Is reminiscent of a snafu I read about back when punched cards where the main data input medium.

      To understand what happened you need to know how 80-column IBM punched cards worked. (Here's a picture of such a card. It's printed to show how the columns are allocated for FORTRAN source code, but that doesn't affect how the card actually works.) Each column represents an alphanumeric value. A single punch in the numbered rows meant a numeric digit. Other characters were encoded by combinations I won't go into (more details here); suffice to say that the letters A through R were represented by a punch in the zone rows (the top two rows above the numeric rows) combined with a numeric punch. In particular, the later A is represented by a punch in the top row combined with a punch in the 1 row.

      Now then, one fine day a keypunch operator is inputting data for a town that taxes personal property. (I don't remember the specific figures, so I'll make some up to illustrate what happened.) A guy owns a car valued at $200. In the card used for inputting the tax data for the car, ten columns are set aside for the assessed value. The operator should have punched "_____20000" (using _ to represent blank columns with no punch). But his finger slipped, and he input "A____20000".

      Any properly designed language runtime would have choked on this input (alphabetic data in a numeric field). The language runtime (FORTRAN I think, or maybe COBOL) was not properly designed. In a numeric field, any blank column in a numeric field was assumed to represent 0 — and the zone punches were simply ignored! End result: the value of the car was recorded as $10,000,200.00. With a 0.5% tax on personal property, the guy was sent a bill taxing his $200 car at $50,001. (Like I said, these figures are imaginary, but they're in the ballpark.) He didn't have to pay, of course, but by the time he protested his bill, the city budget had already been drawn up, and had to be hastily revised based on $50K (about $300K in today's money) suddenly evaporating.

  17. Re:of course they didn't reverse interest charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah at 19% annually it would be 12050089064534.39, like a trillion a day.

  18. Illuminating answer on Stack Overflow by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Illuminating answer on Stack Overflow by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      It was probably partly overwritten by spaces

      wait.. you actually got modded interesting for pointing out what the summery said?

      So spaces were stuffed into a field where binary zero should have been.

    2. Re:Illuminating answer on Stack Overflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why thank you, Captain Obvious!

  19. The Sad Thing... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is not so much the error(stupid; but, if corrected, not ultimately a giant deal); but the response of the cardholder to the error:

    "The bank kept him on hold for two hours, during which time he contemplated the impossibly bleak financial future that might await him. He also felt a stab of fear that he had saddled all his unborn grandchildren -- and their grandchildren -- with a lifetime of debt. "Down the generational line, nobody would have any money."

    For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet, and this guy thinks that it is already on the books?

    Muszynski compared the giant debt reprieve to receiving "an amazing Monopoly card that says, 'Bank error in your favor.' "

    Pathetic. This guy is grateful that Visa condescended to fix their obvious mistake(this isn't some he said/she said billing dispute, this is someone who allegedly spent more than the world GDP at a gas station)? What is this cringing bullshit? Either this guy is just a sad sack or, rather worse, the "customer service" we get, along with the kangaroo courts that are "mandatory binding arbitration" actually make thankfulness for not being screwed a reasonable response.

    1. Re:The Sad Thing... by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anything more then "Huh, what an odd error" and you really need to check your reality.

      On the plus side you might be able to leverage:
      Hey, if Visa lends me 23 quintillion dollar, surely I'm good for another 100 billion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The Sad Thing... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The huge number even has the advantage of being highly noticeable.

      Much worse to get screwed for $150 and not realize it than have to call your bank and tell them that their computer puked.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:The Sad Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic. This guy is grateful that Visa condescended to fix their obvious mistake(this isn't some he said/she said billing dispute, this is someone who allegedly spent more than the world GDP at a gas station)? What is this cringing bullshit? Either this guy is just a sad sack or, rather worse, the "customer service" we get, along with the kangaroo courts that are "mandatory binding arbitration" actually make thankfulness for not being screwed a reasonable response.

      This is such an obvious error it's actually comical. If this happened to me I would start making the dumbest requests including, but not limited to, spending my credit card points right on the spot.

    4. Re:The Sad Thing... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you contemplated the possibility that maybe, just maybe, this guy was just cracking wise to the reporter?

      "Can I buy Europe on pump 4?" That doesn't really sound like a guy who was taking the bill seriously.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:The Sad Thing... by nizo · · Score: 1

      Exactly; I figure the response should be equal to the error. Not only could I get quite a bit of scream therapy with the operator working off that kinda money, but my great great grandkids could too.

    6. Re:The Sad Thing... by Beerdood · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet, and this guy thinks that it is already on the books?

      Maybe he read this article the other day. Basically the son gets sued for a medical bill because mom didn't pay it. Who would think such an arcane law still existed?

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    7. Re:The Sad Thing... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have stayed on hold. I doubt I would even have called. I would be hoping these people are stupid enough to sue me.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:The Sad Thing... by jachim69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever think that it's just some artistic license.... a littler hyperbole maybe?

    9. Re:The Sad Thing... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet, and this guy thinks that it is already on the books?

      Yet, I agree.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    10. Re:The Sad Thing... by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      > Anything more then "Huh, what an odd error" and you really need to check your reality.

      If you really checked your reality, you would most likely think "Huh, what an odd error. Holy shit, this could be the end of my life".

      Errors are not always resolved in the "Obvious" way you might be assuming.

      If you don't have the money and time to make a fuss, they may not be resolved at all.

    11. Re:The Sad Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only sue if you have suffered emotional damage. Mental scarring is a x3 multiplier.

    12. Re:The Sad Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if Visa lends me 23 quintillion dollar, surely I'm good for another 100 billion.

      Bah...you're not thinking creatively. Just figure out how much more you'd have to add to your balance before it overflows the number of storage bits and flips back to negative. Not only will you get a whopper of a cash advance, but you'll also have a huge credit on your next statement.

      When Visa finds the massive credit on your bill and calls you about it, you can even play nice and offer to call it even.

    13. Re:The Sad Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ... Is that these days, we EXPECT sloppy programming.

    14. Re:The Sad Thing... by forgoodmeasure · · Score: 1

      The Sad Thing... is that nobody appreciates comedy anymore.

      Er - I think the guy was joking. He also asked with regards to the gas station, "Can I buy Europe on pump 4?" Somehow I doubt whether this was a serious question.

    15. Re:The Sad Thing... by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      Anything more then "Huh, what an odd error" and you really need to check your reality.

      In reality, you have to clear this stuff up super pronto, even if its ridiculous. It's an organization with no sense of reality itself, just autonomous and poorly written subroutines. The more fees you stack up on something like this, the more tape you have to disentwine later. Two hours on hold becomes four then sixteen. Let it go a couple of months without paying your bureaucratic dues and your children just might have to suffer a lifetime of dealing with idiots on the phone.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    16. Re:The Sad Thing... by Stiletto · · Score: 1
      For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet, and this guy thinks that it is already on the books?

      Maybe not the credit cards, but the health care industry has:

      In Pennsylvania you are responsible for paying off your parents' debts. The 'boomers are going to have a field day farming their debt off on us...

    17. Re:The Sad Thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I agree with you, his attitude is skewed but follow this line of reasoning, it's logical:

                Companies have been giving people large lines of credit and large loans for years.
                People go into heavy debts that they cannot possibly repay, and companies will still give them MORE credit.
                Companies, are in it to make money.
                Conclusion: It would be reasonable based on this information to assume any debts that cannot be paid by someone's estate would be passed on generationally somehow. It's more reasonable than the reality of these financial institutions almost bankrupting themselves via bad loans.

    18. Re:The Sad Thing... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Nah. I'd go with the amount it takes to buy Visa, the US government including the millitary, and half the world. :D
      Then I'll nuke the other half from orbit. Just for fun. *muhahahahaaa*

      Yes. Actually I have a white cat and a iron glove. Why do you ask?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    19. Re:The Sad Thing... by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet, and this guy thinks that it is already on the books?

      It's already on the books, and has been since Elizabethan England. It's starting to be enforced again, at least it is in Pennsylvania.

      The law can force adult children to pay their parents' health-care costs. If Mom and Pop can't pay, you pay. If they have the money but refuse to pay, you pay. If you don't, watch your credit rating sink under the weight of a legal judgment that will haunt you for life.

      Don't think debt collectors won't try every possible method to squeeze your money out of you and your family for as long as it takes.

    20. Re:The Sad Thing... by db32 · · Score: 1

      Uhm...you are obviously missing what it said. The bank fucked up, they erased the charge, and negated the over limit charge. Yes...that is indeed "bank error in your favor" because you just got everything on that purchase for free due to the bank's error, it is not because they decided to not charge you a $15 fee on a $23 quadrillion dollar gas station purchase. Also, I would like to congratulate you on your fantastic understanding of sarcasm and humor in the article.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    21. Re:The Sad Thing... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Anything more then "Huh, what an odd error" and you really need to check your reality.

      Difficult to turn that into a news story though...

    22. Re:The Sad Thing... by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet

      Nope, the US government already has that one all sewn up ;)

    23. Re:The Sad Thing... by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. If your bank erroneously claims you owe $783, and you have no resources to fight the claim, you may very well end up losing that money.

      If your bank erroneously claims that you owe $23.781.221.057.355.142.880,12 it doesn't pass the laugh-test, and there's absolutely no way whatsoever you could be left with that bill. The amount is such that it's obvious bullshit to the first PERSON that actually looks at it, be that a bank-manager, a judge, or whomever.

      Having someone make a false-but-plausible claim against you might be harmful.

      Having someone make a false-and-obviously-batshit-insane claim against you, only exposes the one making the claim as batshit insane.

    24. Re:The Sad Thing... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe if the credit companies pulled a credit report at that exact time he might have a perfect credit score for life as part of your credit score is calculated on how much combined debt you have compared to your credit limits. Your revolving credit limit is: 24e15, debt: $2000, very good ratio.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    25. Re:The Sad Thing... by pfleming · · Score: 1

      TFA stated that this was on prepaid cards. BOA issues what some consider to be credit rebuilding cards. He had to send in maybe $500.00 and got a $500.00 "credit line". This is someone with no credit history or a really trashed credit history. His reaction is not totally out of line when you realize what kind of people have to have prepaid cards.

    26. Re:The Sad Thing... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You've got that backwards. Credit limit: $2000, debt: 24e15

    27. Re:The Sad Thing... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      He's lucky that it wasn't Verizon who made the error. Their customer service reps aren't exactly the brightest bulbs in the broken box of bulbs.

      Customer: "I think I was overcharged. My bill says I owe $23 quadrillion dollars."
      Verizon: "Yes, that's what our records show."
      Customer: "But I only used my iPhone once to check my e-mail in Canada. I used only 100kb of data and the rate is .002 dollars per kb."
      Verizon: "Yes, that amounts to $23 quadrillion dollars."
      Customer: "But that's many times the GDP of the entire world!"
      Verizon: "GD what? Look sir, pay up or we'll send the collectors."

    28. Re:The Sad Thing... by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, people, the credit card guys haven't actually bought a law concerning hereditary debt slavery yet, and this guy thinks that it is already on the books?

      He must have thought it was a student loan for a moment.

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    29. Re:The Sad Thing... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      He must have thought it was a student loan for a moment.

      ... or a medical bill. (like, two band-aids and some ibuprofen).

  20. Yeeeaaaaahh... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    Still, isn't it funny how these kinds of "computer glitches" always seem to benefit the company, never the customer? Pretty interesting odds at play here.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Not true. I have personally gotten the better end of the deal at least twice. But no one wants to stand up and say 'I bought a new stereo and was charged -$250 dollars!'. There have also been numerous published accounts of gas stations mistakenly charging hundreds of people $0.25/gal for gas (instead of $2.50).

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your biased.
      Look it up, there ahve been many glitches on both sides of the fence. People getting account credited with too much money, checks getting sent for 100million times the amount that should actually be made.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Do you really think a customer would report a monetary account error in their favor?

    4. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by ral8158 · · Score: 1

      That's because no customers who would benefit from something like this would want to publicize the error, and lose their ill-gotten gains.

    5. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by asolidvoid · · Score: 1

      But just think of all the frequent flier miles that the customers just accrued!

    6. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, you hear about people getting large checks and returning them.

      I wouldn't return it right away, I would stuff it into a short term account, and draw interest until they asked for it...in writing, .and within 60 days.

      Hey, they don't like it we can battle it out in court.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of this benefits VISA? It makes them look like morons and costs them a a whole bunch extra in customer support calls - both from people directly effected and others who want to play the 'I've lost confidence in your ability to report my bill correctly' card. If you mean billing errors tend to favour companies, consider that most billing errors in a customers favour (whether they're discovered or not) won't be publicised - unless they're huge and rare like this one.

    8. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      The only time I've heard of the glitch that favoured the consumer is when they are on a man hunt to find the family that ran away with the $100 million that suddenly popped up in their bank account.

    9. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      Heck he earned enough Frequent Flier miles he could have spent the rest of his life hiding from his creditors on Pluto.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    10. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      No, you hear about people getting large checks and returning them. I wouldn't return it right away, I would stuff it into a short term account,

      The very good chance is that the check you tried to deposit would not clear and you would be faced with a bank charge for handling an invalid check.

      I tried cashing a 178-day old check. The issuing bank refused to honor it, and I got it back in the mail with a $5 fee attached.

      Hey, they don't like it we can battle it out in court.

      "Your honor, the defendant tried to cash a check that he knew was invalid, thus demonstrating intent to defraud both his own bank and the company issuing the invalid check." Yeah, you're going to win THAT one.

    11. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I think I've heard of people being arrested and charged with fraud for cashing checks that were obviously in error.

      --
      This space available.
    12. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Simple explanation:

      When the error favours the company, it's an error and it gets fixed, apologies are issued and everything goes back to normal.

      When the error favours the customer, accusations of fraud are floated and the small guy is threatened into returning the money, plus a lifetime NDA with stiff penalties.

      It's all about PR.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    13. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had a roommate who had a calling card that had rolled over to maxint minutes remaining. He checked the balance on a speakerphone to prove it to me.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    14. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geral rule of banking programming: In case of doubt, is a debt to customer

    15. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by jmerlin · · Score: 0

      This gives a WHOLE new meaning to the phrase "rollover minutes". I like it.

    16. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder what would have happened if it had been in his favour... Imagine checking your balance and seeing a 17-digit figure. I'm pretty sure I'd lose my balance if that happened.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    17. Re:Yeeeaaaaahh... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Your biased. Look it up, there ahve been many glitches on both sides of the fence. People getting account credited with too much money, checks getting sent for 100million times the amount that should actually be made.

      If you mean, I'm "biased" due to personal experience, guilty as charged. Verizon, Comcast, banks, everytime there's been some kind of "computer glitch" with any of them, it resulted in an overcharge, or a charge for some service I don't even have.
      I have never, ever, been undercharged or sent a check for monies that weren't mine. Just because 3 guys out of 200 million experienced otherwise doesnt' invalidate the lopsided reality of it.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  21. C/C++ programmers by anonymousNR · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am ruby programmer so i didn't understand what caused those numbers. somebody please explain.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    1. Re:C/C++ programmers by Arakageeta · · Score: 2, Funny

      0x20 is "space" in ASCII. The ASCII table maps numerical values to (mostly) readable characters. Unicode is a buffed out table supporting international (and other) characters. The programmers forgot to strip the whitespace from their input.

    2. Re:C/C++ programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!

    3. Re:C/C++ programmers by kamatsu · · Score: 1

      Well done, except you can quite easily manipulate the numerical values of characters in ruby.

  22. I can hear the radio ads now by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Do you owe $23 quadrillion or more on your credit cards? Well I'm about to tell you a secret that the credit card companies don't want you to know. You can settle your debt for pennies on the dollar and get out of debt fast!"

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually calling up one of these companies and having them pull up your balance would be awesome.

    2. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Even if you could settle for pennies on the dollar, you'll still be more indebted than Uncle Sam.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    3. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by calmofthestorm · · Score: 0

      Pennies on the dollar is still far, far more than anyone can afford here.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    4. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 1

      You can settle your debt for pennies on the dollar and get out of debt fast!

      I had no idea I could be debt-free for as little as $70 trillion! I'm glad I made that phone call!

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    5. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I think with that kind of debt you would have to call the World Bank and even they would shit their pants.

    6. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      You can settle your debt for pennies on the dollar and get out of debt fast

      What a relief, now you can settle your $23 quadrillion debt for mere trillions. By Grapthar's hammer, what a savings!

    7. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you owe $23 quadrillion or more on your credit cards? Well I'm about to tell you a secret that the credit card companies don't want you to know. You can settle your debt for pennies on the dollar and get out of debt fast!"

      Pennies on the dollar?! You mean I can settle my debt for only $230 trillion? Wow!

    8. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Hell, if this guy can get out of a $23,148,855, uh etc. charge, surely I can get out of a measly $10,000 charge.

    9. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pennies on the dollar huh? well, only $0.23 quadrillion sure would make it all better.

    10. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John, is that you?

    11. Re:I can hear the radio ads now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you owe $23 quadrillion or more on your credit cards? Well I'm about to tell you a secret that the credit card companies don't want you to know. You can settle your debt for pennies on the dollar and get out of debt fast!"

      Still screwed. 2 percent (minimum of units described 'pennies') of 23 quadrillion is still over 400 trillion.

  23. I agree, Video has proof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I must've put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail.

    1. Re:Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wanna go to the federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison!

    2. Re:Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sweet Office Space reference :)

    3. Re:Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing a good fire can't solve...just steel the right guy's stapler and you're all set!

    4. Re:Been there by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      .....Well this is NOT a mundane detail, Michael!

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    5. Re:Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. Zimbabwe by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Maybe they ran it through the Zimbabwe exchange conversion by mistake.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  26. It's a Trap! by Leafheart · · Score: 1

    Leave, now!

    --
    --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    1. Re:It's a Trap! by oatworm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Our credit score cannot repel debt of that magnitude!

  27. Okay. The spaces make sense... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    But that 12 50 seems a little odd. That would be either "[DLE] P", or $46.88 which seems a lot for a packet of cigs.

  28. That's a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For that money you could download dozens of MP3s via your US mobile phone while in Canada, and still have money left to pay the RIAA.

    1. Re:That's a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply awesome. Post of the Day.

  29. Re:of course they didn't reverse interest charges. by avandesande · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously though the Visa transaction charge of 2% = 462,977,106,163,690
    How could this transaction go through?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  30. Will the IRS tax any party for this in any way tip by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Will the IRS tax any party for this in any way tipped workers look out you may end up owning 15% of $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 of the bill even if this is a error yes the IRS is evil like that some times like that.

    Will people get back billed / end up on a baned list as visa seems to be whipping out the full charge is the real charge lost now?

    Will people get all there overdrafts taken off or just one even if they are not at error for all of them.

  31. oblig... by nih · · Score: 1, Funny

    I always mess up some mundane detail :(

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    1. Re:oblig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got there first! I did something today!

  32. Debt--American Dream by tmosley · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I were him, I would have applied for a bailout, then gave myself a nice hefty bonus before going bankrupt.

    It's the American Dream!

  33. or the OTC fee if.. by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    just imagine what the Over-the-Credit Limit fee would be if it were based on a percentage instead of the typical $39.

    man....wonder if that counts as an automatic default...and thus 29.99% of that would be....holyshit

  34. m$vb by amnezick · · Score: 0

    This has to be a VB code

    Dim sum as String * 8

    ' Any VB programmer knows that VB will auto fill the String*n variable with n-Len(sum) spaces. Notice the pun on "dim sum".

    ' Let's see how many VB programmers are there around here ...

    --
    mov ax,4c00h
    int 21h
  35. Re:of course they didn't reverse interest charges. by jbezorg · · Score: 1

    Probably the transaction charge was handled in another sub-routine and was correctly handled.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  36. Re:Will the IRS tax any party for this in any way by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Or bette, will there credit reflent that they paid back 23 quintillion dollars? The should max your rating, forever~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. triggered an overlimit fee, as I recall by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

    I saw this earlier on another site which included a screen-cap, wherein there was a $20 Negative Balance Fee shown after the huge erroneous charge, so it would seem that it did trigger issues on the business logic level.

    1. Re:triggered an overlimit fee, as I recall by HawkinsD · · Score: 1

      Correct, Mr. Deviant. Perhaps that was my screencap that you saw. They removed the $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 within a few hours, but I had to speak to a supervisor to get them to remove the $20 "Negative Balance Fee."

      --
      Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    2. Re:triggered an overlimit fee, as I recall by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      They removed the $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 within a few hours, but I had to speak to a supervisor to get them to remove the $20 "Negative Balance Fee."

      I wonder how many people forgot about that small detail. Free money for the CC company, yay.

  38. Does binding arbitration suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For credit card customers? Yes, it normally sucks. However, if the credit card company went after you FOR 23-QUADRILLION DOLLARS, even a pro-business Arbitrator would camel-rape them with a johnson the size of Saturn.

    1. Re:Does binding arbitration suck? by adam613 · · Score: 1

      Um, no. The whole point of the binding arbitration clauses is that the arbitrator rules in favor of the business 100% of the time.

    2. Re:Does binding arbitration suck? by jefu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I think it is more like 95% of the time So it's not so bad after all.

  39. The Money that was created by this error.... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1, Funny

    The money that was created out of thin air by this error is no more invalid than the trillions of dollars of Fiat currency that the Government forces down everyone's throat.
    .
    Nixon was an absolute bastard for getting us off of the Gold Standard.
    .
    Now money should not be backed by just one precious metal, but should be backed may various different precious metals and maybe some other precious resources. Full faith and credit is a joke.
    .
    Hey maybe they should give this guy a gold metal, because he could have single handedly used his debit card to pay off all out debts like Stan did in "Margaritaville".
    .

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by jd · · Score: 1

      Gold is a problem as there's much more of it now than there was when it was an international standard. However, there ARE precious metals (and non-metallic elements elements) where there is a relatively fixed amount available, and huge additional reserves are next to impossible.

      If a currency were to be pegged to something like that, where price is in a dynamic equilibrium and is unlikely to shift from equilibrium overall, then that would work.

      Gold is not good for this. Too much of it, too many reserves being discovered, pushing the price down. It's not stable. But gold is not the only metal on Earth. It's not even the rarest.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Not calling you out or anything, but what would be a good place to learn about it? I am currently considering moving some of my assets into my mattress and I need pointers for what to buy. Even though gold, as you say, may be more abundant than before, it is still a lot rarer than the fiat dollar.

    3. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Also, having a fixed amount is not an issue. It is enough if the production is stable and low in relation to the total supply. What are the chances that gold production will double next year? Very low. That the gold supply will double? Astronomically low. US dollar supply? We've seen what happened in 2009 :)

    4. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Gold only has value because we say it has value (which is the same reason the dollar has value). Now if you had a potato...

    5. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Gold is computers' potato.

    6. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      "...Now money should not be backed by just one precious metal, but should be backed may various different precious metals..."

      Awesome! I knew my collection of AC/DC and Metallica vinyl would be the new currency some day!

    7. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      The dollar is US taxpayers' potato. Seriously. Just like the inherent value of gold comes from its use in electronics and jewelry, the inherent value of the dollar comes from the fact that Americans must pay taxes in dollars.

      Beyond that, gold and dollars only have value because people expect that others will take them in exchange for goods and services. And despite goldbug claims, we're better off with a currency whose supply is deliberately controlled according to monetary policy than with one whose supply fluctuates randomly according to natural deposits, industrial use, and the whims of mining companies.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    8. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      What are the chances that gold production will double next year? Very low. That the gold supply will double? Astronomically low. US dollar supply? We've seen what happened in 2009 :)

      Yes, and...? The supply of dollars didn't double. Production of dollars is "stable and low in relation to the total supply", and the chance that the dollar supply will double next year is astronomically low.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    9. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      from http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/Current/


      M2 June 2007 - $7225.0 bn
      M2 May 2009 - $8344.8 bn

      (8 344 - 7 225) / 7 225 = 0.154878893

      I don't think I'd call 15% growth in 9 months "stable and low." I can't say for sure what M3 is because M3, which tracks M1, M2, and really-freaking-big transactions, hasn't been published since 2006. I wonder why?

    10. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      May be you can explain this chart to me?

    11. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'd call 15% growth in 9 months "stable and low."

      June 2007 to May 2009 is 23 months, not 9 months. In the same period, the gold supply grew around 5%. Typical growth in M2 since the mid-90s has been around 5% per year, or twice the rate of gold.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    12. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      I'll let others explain it.

      The short answer seems to be: monetary base is not money supply. This spike is related to the Fed's decision to pay interest on excess reserves, and it has not translated into a similar rise in the supply of currency.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    13. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, that was bad, good catch.

      I'm still concerned about M3, and I found a site that recreates M3 from other Fed data still available. You'll see that that hasn't dipped below 5% annual growth since 2005, and was over 14% for most of 2008. It's currently trending downwards, which is good, but 5% growth of M3 is still a hell of a lot of new money.

      And then there's the Fed's $9 Trillion in off-balance sheet transactions that they can't even account for. If you count those as part of the money supply (and I do) then the supply of dollars has in fact doubled.

    14. Re:The Money that was created by this error.... by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Wow, the second link in particular is very informative, thank you. While you are right about the difference between monetary base and supply, I would like to point out that money was indeed created. We just cannot feel it yet because banks are exercising restraint:

      That idleness, as I read the situation, was something the Fed initially actually wanted, and deliberately cultivated by choosing to pay an interest rate on excess reserves that is equal to what banks could expect to obtain by lending them overnight. As long as banks do just sit on these excess reserves, the Fed has found close to a trillion dollars it can use for the various targeted programs.

      But what would happen if those electronic credits start to be redeemed for actual cash? Then we would have a concern, and the Fed would need to call the reserves back in by selling assets or failing to renew loans. But that presents a potential problem ...

      There are concerns that reversing the process may be very difficult for political reasons. The ending is very telling:

      Which brings me back to the original question. Does the explosive growth of the monetary base in Figure 1 imply uncontrollable inflationary pressures? My answer: not yet, but stay tuned.

      I do not predict hyper-inflation, like some people already do, nor do I advise anyone to panic, but I am close to doing it for myself :) This whole thing seems to be holding on the fact that the newly created money will not be liquidated.

  40. Re:What about Unicode? by O'Nazareth · · Score: 1

    Unicode needs at least 18 bits, which does not fit into 16. UTF-16 is pretty useless. Maybe UTF-32 is more logical so you never have escape sequences. But to save space, in general UTF-8 is a lot better.

  41. reassuring... by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's good to know their system is able to handle $23 quadrillion charges, now I just need to get them to raise my limit a bit.

    1. Re:reassuring... by dunawayc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how was the customer charged this amount? Surely that must go over his credit limit!!

    2. Re:reassuring... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      They should do it. Charging crap is good for the economy. Before you know it; a quintillion here, a quintillion there, pretty soon you're talkin' real money...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:reassuring... by stoffel · · Score: 1

      hmmm.. I would worry if my bank approves a $23 quadrillion money transfer, without checking my limit!

    4. Re:reassuring... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that the code that authorized the transaction (checking it against the credit limit) worked, but the code that actually applied the transaction to the account didn't.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:reassuring... by noname444 · · Score: 1

      When I'm signing my next VISA receipt It'll look something like this:

      1 Guinness .... $5

      Total .............. $5

      Tip:
      $ 2^63

      Sign here

      _________

    6. Re:reassuring... by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Scary thought. I'm going to have to look for exponential signs on my bills.

    7. Re:reassuring... by selven · · Score: 1

      What, you thought you could get rich by getting your debt past $2147483648?

    8. Re:reassuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samir, where's that disc? I'm telling you this plan is fool proof, its only pennies on the quadrillion!

  42. Signed or Unsigned? by jbezorg · · Score: 1

    Is anybody else wondering what you would get to spend and turn the charge into a negative?

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    1. Re:Signed or Unsigned? by jd · · Score: 1

      Let's see. The first hex digit is a 2. Let's see... 4... 8... Ok, you'd need to spend four times as much again, and the sign bit will flip, provided they use two's compliment notation.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Signed or Unsigned? by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      Okay... now factor in the cost of a secret underground lair, and my evil plan to rule the world is almost complete. There's only one tiny little problem.

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    3. Re:Signed or Unsigned? by defireman · · Score: 1

      So, the solution to the current US economic troubles is for them the run up the credit cards until the sign bit on the bills flip over? Suddenly China will owe the US to the tune of $999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999...

      Of course, that might be why Obama/The governator are spending so much money that they don't have.

  43. Re:What about Unicode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yep. UCS-2 is the tool of the devil. It's consistent, sure, but it's a heckuva waste if you've got a lot of strings that are mostly ASCII. Microsoft uses it for their APIs since forever, and Python uses it internally, but these are low-level situations where consistent and fast encoding/decoding are valuable. Most of the rest of the world (the parts that use a Latin-based character set, anyway) have standardized on UTF-8. You'd be pretty crazy to lard up a database that's 99% English text with UCS-2.

  44. Re:Okay. The spaces make sense... by El+Gigante+de+Justic · · Score: 1

    If he also purchased gasoline, or purchased an entire carton of cigarette's that price could be accurate.

    The article states that the gas station was his normal stop for cigarette's but doesn't state that the transaction in question only included cigarettes, so really, he could have bought anything.

  45. Only Notice Large Glitches by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably more offensive is that a glitch happened at all, large or small. It could have just as easily been $2.31 in which case he may have not noticed the overcharge and paid it. Charge several thousand people $2.31 too much and you can make an alright profit.

    --
    "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
    1. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by dave562 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Things like this happen where I work with our AT&T bills all the time. We're on the smaller end of businesses and have a little over 200 lines. At least a couple of times a year we find a number on our bill that isn't one of our numbers. We contact AT&T, they act baffled, and then they credit us for the error. It's so common that they barely even ask any questions when we dispute the charge. I have to imagine that there are numerous other businesses out there in the same situation, but they aren't going through their bills and are subsiquently paying for services they aren't even using. AT&T even has some BS verbage on their statements that says charges not disputed within 60 days can't be disputed. So they can ream someone for years, and then if the company finds out, they can only recoup the last 60 days worth of over charges.

    2. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Charge several thousand people $2.31 too much and you can make an alright profit.

      Let's see... 2000 x $2.31 is, er, around $4620. Yes indeed, big mamou, yes indeed.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I'd want $5000 for doing absolute crap too.

      Fuck you bourgeoisie bastard.

    4. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by louiswins · · Score: 1

      Ah, but technically that was only "a couple" thousand, not "several" thousand, so you could easily get your $5000!

    5. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      AT&T even has some BS verbage on their statements that says charges not disputed within 60 days can't be disputed. So they can ream someone for years, and then if the company finds out, they can only recoup the last 60 days worth of over charges.

      Just because it's in the fine print doesn't make it so. Overcharged party can sue, and with evidence, probably win.

    6. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by radtea · · Score: 1

      Charge several thousand people $2.31 too much and you can make an alright profit.

      What exactly was being "made" in this case?

      Taken, yes. Made... not so much.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    7. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're probably being crammed
      It sucks because the phone companies legally make money off of other people's fraud this way, so they have negative incentive to check the identity of the crammers.

    8. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Years ago our phone company began mis-charging us. We called and had it fixed a couple of times. Once it became apparent that they didn't care to fix the underlying problem we told them we wouldn't pay until they sent a correct bill, incorrect bills wouldn't be paid.

      Apparently paying someone to manually correct all our bills was too expensive, so they told us to "strike anything we didn't want to pay". We sent them back bills struck through entirely, and they happily accepted zero payment for months until they got their act together and fixed the billing system.

    9. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      AT&T even has some BS verbage on their statements that says charges not disputed within 60 days can't be disputed. So they can ream someone for years, and then if the company finds out, they can only recoup the last 60 days worth of over charges.

      They can say whatever they want, doesn't mean it'll hold up in court.

    10. Re:Only Notice Large Glitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not being crammed, but a legitimate billing error because telecoms are so large they have no idea what they are billing. There is so much legacy equipment out there, telco's have a hard time understanding all of it. (Both in inventory/maintenance & billing)

      Also since much of it is automated, the billing CSR probably truly does not know how it happened. And probably the network engineers too.

      -mapgirl

  46. probably was an offshore mistake..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so much for that contract.

  47. Octal? Piffle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That was not an "insightful" comment. WTF does it matter what a couple of hex digits mean in octal? What would you have said if it was 12 80? A field that should have held a binary large integer getting filled with ascii characters makes sense; a field that gets filled not with the binary representation of the ascii characters, but to suggest that some process would take the octal representation of those characters, discard the most significant digit and then pack them into hex nibbles (a kind of BCO - binary coded octal representation) is ludicrous.

    The 12 50 is just an artifact of the number being rounded to the nearest $100 by the journalists reporting the story. Check it out; if you assume they were actually 20 20, you get an amount somewhere around $35-$36+some small change over the $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 figure mentioned.

  48. This could explain a lot. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    Back in my college days in the early nineties, I had a debit account to which my parents deposited a modest monthly stipend, you know, student budget for weekday ramen and weekend beers. BTW, this was in Mexico.
    One day, while using the ATM, I was startled to see a HUGE balance in my account, to the tune of billions or more, I can't remember how much. Of course I went back to the ATM the following day just to check the balance, and it was back to normal.
    When it happened again the following week, just for the hell of it I withdrew a bit more than I had. Of course, next day my account reflected the negative balance. The huge balance repeated itself a couple more times during the span of a month, then it was gone and never occurred again.

    Years later, while casually commenting on this to a couple of friends, one of them said the same thing had happened to her, but her account was in a different bank.
    For a long time, I've thought that people within the system used the ATM grid to embezzle money, moving it through accounts to cover their tracks. But now I'm starting to suspect it may have just been buggy programming.

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  49. Nothing to see here, keep moving along please... by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work in this industry. The only novelty here is that the error got into production, and was not caught and corrected before it went that far.

    Submitters send files to processors which are supposed to be formatted according to specifications.

    Note I wrote 'supposed to be'.

    Some submitters do, from time to time, change their code, and sometimes they get it wrong. For instance padding a field with spaces instead of zeros. Woopsie...!

    Seems that's what happened here. Sounds like a hex or dec field got padded with hex 20, and boom.

    This is annoying, especially when the processor gets to help correct the overwhelming number of errors, and then tries to explain that it wasn't their fault. Plenty of blame to go around with this one.

    And then explains why they don't both validate/sanitize input, and test for at least some reasonable maximum value in the transaction amount. A max amount of $10,000,000 would have fixed this. That and an obvious lapse in testing. This is what keeps my bosses awake sometimes, fearing they will end up on the front page of the fishwrap looking stupid 'cause their overworked minions screwed something up, or didn't check, or didn't test very well. I love one of the guys we have testing. He's insufferable, and he catches genuine show-stoppers on a regular basis. They can't pay him what he's been worth, literally $millions, just in avoiding downtime and re-working code that went too far down the wrong path.

    Believe me, this is in some ways preferable to getting files with one byte wrong that doesn't show up for a month, or sending the wrong data format (hex instead of packed binary or EBCDIC, for instance) and crashing the process completely. Please, I know data should never IPL a system. Tell it to the architects, please. As if they don't know now, after the one crash...

    If you knew what I know, you'd chuckle and share this story with some of your buddies in development and certification.

    And pray a little.

    At least it didn't overbill the cardholders by $.08/transaction. That would suck. This is easy by comparison. Just fix the report data. Piece of cake. Evening's worth of coding and slam it out in off-peak time. Hahahahaha!

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  50. My question... by T-Bucket · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does he still get the airline miles for that one? I mean, even at 1 mile per dollar spent.... He can now book a first class ticket to mars...

  51. Visa Rewards? by WTSane · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope it was on one of the cards that gives him 1% cash back.

  52. Sorry but........ by S7urm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lemme debunk a myth real quick for you folks.

    If you EVER see a bank error "in your favor" or if your payroll check is off and you are over paid.......DO NOT SPEND THE MONEY

    You will be charged for what you owe, and in some circumstances you can be prosecuted for using money that "was reasonably evident that you did not earn"

    --
    "This is the value of a summer spent and a winter earned"
    1. Re:Sorry but........ by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if it's a semi-reasonable amount: Report it to the bank. Some banks will actually say 'oops, our error, your gain' and let you keep the money.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:Sorry but........ by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      I wonder what would have happened if he sat on it for another billing period.

  53. What's his credit limit? by Joce640k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If he can be charged that much, what's his credit limit?

    --
    No sig today...
  54. no wonder by wimg · · Score: 1

    "he had spent the profound sum in one pop at a nearby Mobil gas station -- his regular stop for Camel cigarettes"
    Smoking is bad for your health... and wallet ;-)

  55. Bank of America Credit-Card Charge-Offs Reach 14% by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I bet this didn't include ~12-13,000 x $2.3 x 10^16 in charge-offs. What's that in percentage terms I wonder?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  56. COBOL error possibly.... by AEC216 · · Score: 1

    01 CURRENT_BALANCE PIC X(20) COMP.
    01 BILLED_BALANCE PIC 9(18) V9(2) COMP.

    MOVE CURRENT_BALANCE TO BILLED_BALANCE.

    My rough guess is that CURRENT_BALANCE was full of spaces/needed to be initialized from an error before hand.

    --
    May I please have my frontal lobotomy if I bring back the ashtrays?
    1. Re:COBOL error possibly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay then.

      MOVE SELF TO SOMEWHERE_OTHER_THAN_YOUR_LAWN.

      Jeez, lameness filter, relax. I'm not yelling, it's COBOL.

    2. Re:COBOL error possibly.... by TivoAussie · · Score: 1

      Underscores arent valid COBOL.

    3. Re:COBOL error possibly.... by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1
      Agreed, though not with your code (underscores aren't valid, dude). More likely you had something like

      01 WS-Temp-Variables-Rec.
      03 WS-Data-1 Pic X(100).
      ...
      03 WS-Working-Balance Pic s9(18)v99 Comp-3.
      ....

      Followed by somewhere in the code:

      *> Initialise working rec
      MOVE SPACES TO WS-TEMP-VARIABLES-REC
      ...
      *> Update the balance
      ADD WS-CURRENT-AMOUNT TO WS-WORKING-BALANCE

      Seen it done and seen the results far too many times...

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    4. Re:COBOL error possibly.... by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      I'm 20 and I have to touch COBOL every day. :(

  57. Re:Will the IRS tax any party for this in any way by jd · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, there'd be a hell of a tax break for someone shown as paying 23 quadrillion dollars to the Visa CEO's favourite charity. Lifetime immunity?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  58. Re:Okay. The spaces make sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that 12 50 seems a little odd. That would be either "[DLE] P", or $46.88 which seems a lot for a packet of cigs.

    This story says the $46.88 charge came from eating out at Wolfgang Puck's restaurant, in which case the $23 quadrillion dollars seems legit.

  59. Re:meh ... Nevermindt THAT... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many died from:

    -- disbelief-induced-shock
    -- from laughter-induced heart attacks

    OTOH, that is going to be the DOD charge to taxpayers in a few years, when they are authorized to build a gateway to escape the Hell on Earth

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  60. â75,- by stoffel · · Score: 1

    23 quadrillion is like 75 euro's these days..

    I can handle that!

  61. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if it ends up being not the case here, there's not much I hate more than developers who pad their character data with spaces.

  62. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC... I can see Starbuck by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    in her apartment, shivering, with no water, heat, or act contemplating that the rent is a crime, that the AC doesn't work in summer, and the heat doesn't work in winter... and then see says, "LORDS OF KOBOL... HEAR MY PRAYERS...HELP ME BEAT BALTAR SO I HAVE ENOUGH CUBITS TO PAY MY BILLS..."

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  63. Sounds like Red Dwarf by Ainu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holly: Busy, Dave?
    Lister: Well, yeah. I am, actually.
    Holly: Oh, then you won't want to know about the two super-lightspeed
                    fighters that are tracking us.
    Lister: What?!
    Holly: I'll leave you to your bubble blowing, mate.
    Lister: No, Hol, come on, come on.
    Holly: They're from Earth.
    Lister: Three million years away?
    Holly: They're from the NorWEB federation.
    Lister: What's that?
    Holly: The North Western Electricity Board. They want you, Dave.
    Lister: Me? Why? What for?
    Holly: For your crimes against humanity.
    Lister: You what!
    Holly: It seems when you left Earth three million years ago, you
                    left two half-eaten German sausages on a plate in your
                    kitchen.
    Lister: Did I?
    Holly: You know what happens to sausages left unattended for
                    three million years?
    Lister: Yeah. They go all mouldy.
    Holly: Your sausages, Dave, now cover seven-eighths of the Earth's
                    surface. Also you left seventeen pounds, fifty pence in a
                    bank account. Thanks to compound interest you now own
                    ninety-eight percent of all the world's wealth, but since
                    you've hoarded it for three million years nobody's got any
                    money except for you and NorWEB.
    Lister: Why NorWEB?
    Holly: You left a light on in the bathroom. I've got a final demand
                    here for one hundred and eighty billion pounds.
    Lister: A hundred and eighty billion pounds! You're kidding!
    Holly: (wearing Groucho Marx disguise) April fool.
    Lister: But it's not April.
    Holly: Yeah, I know, but I could hardly wait six months with a red-hot
                    jape like that under my belt.

    1. Re:Sounds like Red Dwarf by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "It has a six in it, but it's not six thousand."

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  64. Mike is at it again ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Manuel Garcia O'Kelly Davis when you need him?

  65. Re:Paying off for decades by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    "Jammie Thomas-Rasset's case was reviewed, and the review court decided the earlier sentence was too leinent."

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  66. The Programmer's Guild Did It by Baldrson · · Score: 0

    This obviously wouldn't have happened if the Programmer's Guild had supporting lifting the H-1b cap so there wasn't such a shortage of good programmers.

  67. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "In a statement, Visa said the rogue charges affected "fewer than 13,000 prepaid transactions" and resulted from a "temporary programming error at Visa Debit Processing Services ... [which] caused some transactions to be inaccurately posted to a small number of Visa prepaid accounts.""

    I call bullshit, Visa. Don't you people have some basic QA? If, say, a monthly statement (especially on a PREPAID CARD, for frack's sake...) exceeds the spending potential of a given client, flag the statement and alert a regional or local processing center manager.

    FRACK! At the very LEAST your programmers should have been told (or, if they asked, been allowed) to put QA bounding-box fields on the statements. If a monthly charge font size to be printed is longer than the width of the statement imaginary box, eject the statement from the enveloping system, then punt it to a manager.

    Having even FIFTY of these things get out is unprofessional, and plain stupid. Unfortunately, some dumbos pay without checking, then may have to wait several days or weeks, only to be told they won't get a reversal, but only a credit to offset future purchases...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  68. 32767 by sureshc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of the time I transferred 100,000 miles from my Amex rewards account to one of my airline mileage accounts. I initiated the transfer on the Amex website. When I logged into the airline web site to confirm the transfer, I saw that it had been transferred in increments:
    32767,
    32767,
    32767,
    and finally 1699 ;)

  69. Re:Okay. The spaces make sense... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Different person. This apparently happened to a bunch of people. This story is about somebody in New Hampshire; the one you linked to is about somebody in Texas.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  70. Best Summary I've Seen on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to commend this summary (and more importantly, the summarizer) for writing such a clear, cogent, and simple summation to this article. You explained the problem, the solution, and your thought process clearly in 5 lines. I don't know how you did it, but I can only hope to aspire to such greatness (no sarcasm). You've earned the Anonymous Coward's badge for Summation Excellence. Wear it with pride.

  71. Re:At least it wasn't EBCDIC... I can see Starbuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Her? Whatever. Starbuck will always be a man in my mind

  72. Accounting question by JobyOne · · Score: 1

    Until this debt is reversed can Visa leverage it?

    Even at a paltry 5:1 they could buy THE WORLD.

    --
    Porquoi?
  73. Explanation makes sense by BlindSpot · · Score: 1

    Kudos to whoever figured that out. I am working on a project that sends dollar amounts for invoicing to PeopleSoft in flat files, and the format for all currency fields is exactly the one described: 16.4 digits, zero padded. So it seems perfectly plausible to me, not to mention very relevant. Hey maybe Visa uses PeopleSoft too... *shudder*

  74. auto pay by bashamer · · Score: 1

    I wonder what would have happened if this was left on auto pay.

    and why didn't the FDIC catch this ? it would make the financial institution pretty defunct if they authorized the transaction.

  75. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, and it wasn't as simple as padding with spaces. Space is hex 20. Zero is hex 30. They should have been been billed 30 quadrillion-something. More likely it was a bad conversion. Still reason to waterboard the testers.

    You should try converting packed binary to some flavor of EBCDIC, not knowing in advance which particular version EBCDIC they meant.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  76. 64 bit charge amounts? by saccade.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's really strange is they're using 64 bits to express a charge amount. How many people are charging manned missions to Mars or the military invasion of a superpower to their Visa? A 64 bit credit limit must be quite the status symbol.

    1. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I gave him an unlimited expense account and he exceeded it." Edward Bennett Williams, who used to own the Redskins--once said about George Allen, Sr., whom he had hired to be his coach.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    2. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by pafrusurewa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not really as absurd as it sounds. You couldn't really go shopping with Zimbabwe dollars in 32 bits.

    3. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 64-bit signed integer would limit you to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 cents, or $92,233,720,368,547,758.07. I think $92.2 quadrillion is enough wiggle room.

      A 32-bit signed integer, would limit you to 2,147,483,647 cents, which is "only" $21,474,836.47. Financial institutions deal with numbers higher than this on a regular basis for corporate or very wealthy customers.

    4. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that strange to choose 32 bits.

      I'm presuming that the currency of billing is in a different field, in which case you've got to be able to handle the smallest unit currency in the world. If you exclude At this time I believe that's the Colombian Peso, approximatly 1/2000th the value of the US Dollar. That means that 32 Bits is obviously too small, and the next size up is 64 bits.

    5. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all places in this world use USD.

    6. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      What's really strange is they're using 64 bits to express a charge amount. How many people are charging manned missions to Mars or the military invasion of a superpower to their Visa? A 64 bit credit limit must be quite the status symbol.

      They are simply preparing for Obama to sign up the U.S. for a line of credit. 64 bits still may not be enough to hold the balance though. The only way to make money by spending money is when you use the credit cards that offer cash back. Of course you don't actually net anything with those award programs but Obama doesn't seem to realize that. I thought we already got the idiot out of office?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    7. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      They're planning for the near future when gas prices (practically the only necessity we import on large scale in this country) will be in scientific notation.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:64 bit charge amounts? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Why not? 24 bits mantissa, 8 bits for exponent of 10.

  77. Verizon accounting math sold to Visa? by Mathness · · Score: 1

    Is that in normal or Verizon dollars? :p

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  78. Miles by ec_hack · · Score: 1

    Think of the frequent flyer miles. First class to the moon and back on PanAm!

  79. Don't Complain...Return the Item for Credit !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid Customer -- Don't Complain...Return the Item for Credit !!!

    1. Re:Don't Complain...Return the Item for Credit !!! by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      What would that solve? That would result in a credit of $12.50, or a credit in the amount charged, returning the balance to $0, $0 plus ~2% interest on $23e15, or $23e15 less $12.50. There's no normal outcome of returning the item that isn't a zero or substantially very negative balance.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  80. Re:Okay. The spaces make sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could be a carton (12-pack), or perhaps he filled up with gas at the same time

  81. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by imtheguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FRACK! At the very LEAST your programmers should have been told (or, if they asked, been allowed) to put QA bounding-box fields on the statements. If a monthly charge font size to be printed is longer than the width of the statement imaginary box, eject the statement from the enveloping system, then punt it to a manager.

    That isn't even close to how the financial organizations function. There is simply zero drive to pre-empt problems as there is no major authority breathing down their necks and auditing every single iteration of their customer-facing software processes in great detail.

    Moreover, the customers are individuals or small businesses, meaning there is practically nothing to fear in the form of loss of business due to dissatisfied customerbase or defamation. It's not like they have too many other choices.

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
  82. Is real bill lost for ever. will people get back b by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Is real bill lost for ever. will people get back billed? Is the store out the cash? Will some people end up on the bounced check list / have to pay store fee for not having the funds?

  83. Did you think this only happened to this one goob? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but look around. This bug hit hundreds of people, and at least one of them manned up. Er, only she wasn't a man, totally fscking up my childish metaphor. Stoopid reality, damnit.

    It's been on digg, boingboing, yaddayaddayadda... slashdot's a little late to the party here. Christ, the Beeb even covered this bug already.

  84. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

    I really doubt it was maliciously done to try and trick any of those 13000 customers into really paying it.

  85. Henceforth known as "telling a Fibonacci" by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

    For a long time zero was represented as a space, so the coders aren't incorrect, just 800 years behind the times.

    Compound interest is a bitch, though.

  86. huh... by DeusExMach · · Score: 1

    Add all those numbers up together, divide by 8, and flip the calculator upside down and it spells out "BOOBIES"... weird.

  87. Why stock toilet paper but not ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    ... food? I mean, don't you need to eat for you to create a need to use the other product?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  88. Prepaid Visa Card by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

    A humorous nugget from the article not mentioned in the summary. This was a prepaid Visa. Just makes it that much more ridiculous. Perhaps it was his choice of storing this amount of money on a secured credit card that had him sweating. He must of built a time machine and drained his grandchild's bank account. Of course in the future that was their monthly salary.

    --
    "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
  89. TP Is a Bad Investment by severoon · · Score: 1

    Toilet paper is a terrible investment if this hyperinflationary future ever actually comes to pass—everyone's wallets will be packed with it already!

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:TP Is a Bad Investment by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Its also a relatively recent invention. We lived for thousands of years without it. We'll adjust. I'd rather take something less bulky and more vital to my survival.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  90. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by SkyDude · · Score: 1

    Moreover, the customers are individuals or small businesses, meaning there is practically nothing to fear in the form of loss of business due to dissatisfied customer base or defamation. It's not like they have too many other choices.

    You'd get my mod points for this statement alone, if I had any....

    You can exist without a credit card, but having one does make things easier, especially when you travel. But if you slip up on the rules, cc issuers will nail you. Few businesses would ever stand for that kind of thing but without significant legal protection, the cc issuers can do anything they please.

    Stupidity is raised to a new level at cc banks. Several years ago, I thought I had paid off a card, only to receive a statement with a .33 balance on it. It cost at that time, about .35 to mail the damn statement, and who knows how much the processing costs were, and they paid for the call on the toll free number I made to ask if they really thought I was going to write a check for that absurd amount. The CSR removed the charge, but wouldn't it have made more sense for their systems to NOT produce a statement and automatically delete the charge?

    I don't like a lot of government regulation, but when an industry is as stupid as the cc industry, clearly they need a lot of oversight.

    --
    == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  91. Way To Go C & C++ ! by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is another reason why the C and C++ languages should be reserved for a few, high profile uses such as making compilers. These languages should not be used for any general purpose language other than ones like C and C++ that allow you to royally shoot yourself in the foot with bad pointer arithmetic. What a doozy of an error all thanks to the "freedom" given the developer in the language. Surely, C and C++ are among the most powerful options available--but only for select applications. Do you drive a Formula One race car through Midtown Manhattan? I don't think so. You restrict them to racetracks. Thus too with C & C++.

    1. Re:Way To Go C & C++ ! by kwikrick · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. C and C++ are statically typed languages, and therefore very good at catching errors at compile time. Only an idiot would use pointers and unsafe casts. Anyway, who said that this bug is in C or C++ code? Most likely, some fool is simply interpreting a file format wrongly. If I were trolling, I'd say XML is the culprit. Fuck XML.

      --
      assignment != equality != identity
    2. Re:Way To Go C & C++ ! by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      I don't think the suggestion is that the error had to be internal to a single set of code, but probably in communication between two. One sent a string while the other was expecting to receive an integer. Neither C nor C++ encodes type information with serialized data (like Java does, for example) so they would not necessarily catch it. If they were using a decent ASN.1 module, it should have been able to notice a different encoding definition, but I don't suppose they were doing anything like that.

    3. Re:Way To Go C & C++ ! by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

      "I don't suppose they were doing anything like that--" because we've already established that the coders were idiots incapable of coding in C/C++.
      Remember that old saying? "Java is 'C' without the Guns and Knives".

  92. taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the purchase qualify for sales tax? The Govt would like to pay off the national debt.

  93. C# Error? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the kind of error you could make in C#.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  94. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by ILikeRed · · Score: 1

    It is rather funny (and sad) that so much of the IT industry is still awash in problems that were observed, and solutions published for, with UNIX years ago. I've read at least three UNIX books that address this issue, among others. And yet the majority of IT industry (and even many "CS" programs) act like there just is not any solution to these problems, when I learned of them in undergraduate level courses.

    "This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface." - Doug McIlroy

    "Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly." - Henry Spencer

    --
    I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress -J Adams
  95. Only a few by mqduck · · Score: 1

    In a statement, Visa said the rogue charges affected "fewer than 13,000 prepaid transactions"

    Wow. Does that statement even need comment?

    --
    Property is theft.
  96. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    It makes sense until people find out they'll forgive small amounts.

    Then you wouldn't believe the number of people who would pay off all but $0.50 just because they can.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  97. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was once told by the head of operations of a large credit card company that when a (different) credit card screwed him, he got revenge by overpaying by $0.50. They have to keep track of that, send you statements, and eventually cut you a check. It'd probably cost them about $50.00, as long as you quit making pruchases with that card.

    The biggest screwing I got was from Citibank Visa. We paid, but they claimed we didn't and charged us late fees and interest. Visa said we had to deal with Citibank, and Citibank said we had to deal with Visa. After back and forth several times, We got advice from someone in the business to get a copy of our processed check and what to look for. It turns out, Citbank had routed the check back to itself, rather than to our bank. We didn't have a Citibank checking account, so it was returned as insufficient funds. Citibank still tried to say it was our fault and wanted us to pay the late fees. I'll never use them again.

  98. Isn't that his iPhone bill.. by grepya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shouldn't have checked his email from Mexico.

  99. Well there you go... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... we now have a solution to the growing national debt.

  100. Inverse?? by Dunge · · Score: 0

    What about the inverse? You deposit 20 20 15 50 ($538,972,752), it add a space and gives you much more? Quick before your local city datacenter get updated!

  101. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there were space padding in the field, would not every transaction suffer? Why only a couple of transactions?

  102. The United States is right behind him.. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since our national debit has just hit 1 trillion dollars, we in the United States of American will be second to him in debit.
    I'm very surprised that credit card company, bank or anybody else didn't have any alarm bells (more air raid sirens in this case) when this went through. Also I thought there will be limit on anyone could charge, not only the credit card, bank or even this case, the nation could get.
    This shows there is something wrong with the financial system and that is the understatement of the century.

    1. Re:The United States is right behind him.. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Not sure that the word "debit" is appropriate here for the U.S., since the U.S. had only just hit a trillion dollars for the DEFICIT during THIS FISCAL YEAR. The actual _debt_ (equivalent to the total charged) has exceeded a trillion dollars for a couple decades and should be up to 12-13 trillion dollars this year. To me, the word "debit" implies a single charge, which isn't exactly the same as an annual deficit. (I say this not to be pedantic, but mainly because most Americans don't seem to even realize that there is an ongoing debt in addition to the "deficit" that is discussed every year on the news.)

  103. The really bad thing here is: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    All the transaction errors that weren't so obvious, and where the card owner ended up paying it, because he could not afford defending himself.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  104. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    A honest question: What's the point of this padding again? Especially more than 128 bit padding or similar things.

    It is because C is unable to do simple things like be flexible in its data structures? ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  105. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by radtea · · Score: 1

    Still reason to waterboard the testers.

    Yeah, because that works so well too.. uh... remind me what it was that was supposed to accomplish again?

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  106. Re:of course they didn't reverse interest charges. by afabbro · · Score: 3, Funny

    But just think of the airline miles!

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  107. Hey... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    Most C/C++ programmers see the error now ...

    .
    Hey, what about us assembler programmers?

    1. Re:Hey... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I had a similar question. Why not any programmer, since any programmer should know hexadecimal? It is a complete mystery to me why C/C++ was singled out. Perhaps (only guessing here), the person who made the claim was a C or C++ programmer, and is not familiar with other programming paradigms.

  108. Screenshot by hanzoach · · Score: 1

    Anyone have the screenshot ? *checking dailywtf*

  109. Time to quit smoking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am going to quit when a pack of smokes costs 24 quadrillion.

  110. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work in the industry, the parent post takes me back. The rambling sentences, the mild hysteria, the whiff of over-caffeination... that is credit transaction processing, never a good nights sleep.

  111. Is charges stored in a 64 bit int? Is it signed? by Alascom · · Score: 1

    I wonder what a charge of $18,446,744,073,709,551,617.00 would do... $1 charge? (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF + 2)
    Or maybe $9,223,372,036,854,775,809.00? Would that result in a $1 credit? (signed int?)

  112. Wife found the statement ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... and asked for an explaination.

    "What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  113. No one will get this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from here [act 1, part way through].

    You made a bad purchase. Now, do the right thing, and pay what you owe.

  114. Re:meh FUNNY, but serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You screwed yourself if you actually paid them. The first step you should have taken is to file a fraud report with your states' attorney general consumer protection agency (it's free, you can do it over the internet). The credit card companies may feel like they can give you, the consumer, a load of shit but that changes quickly once you get the state involved.

    Alternatively, if you're an asshole like me, you can max out your unsecured credit limits and then immediately file for bankruptcy. It's essentially free since you are using their money to pay for it. And you don't need to worry about your credit score taking a hit since creditors aren't extending credit to anyone anyway. I actually ended up with a better credit score after doing this.

  115. Similar charge happened to me by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    I had something similar ring up when paying with credit card. However the guy canceled the transaction right away. It seemed the machine took my credit card number and used that as a charge, explains 16 digits. Hope that was not his credit card number... ooops?

  116. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with the parent. I too do a good deal of database stuff where I work and I've come up with a little mantra.

    If %99 of the query results make no sense, its the query language that's the problem. If 1% of the query results make no sense, its the input.

    It doesn't matter if the input was done directly by a person or if the input was from a digital file. At some point, the information was ultimately entered by a person... garbage in, garbage out so they say. This goes for code and for data.

    We have a staff member that simply ignores data requirments. Colen? Semi Colen? Same thing and it takes to long to hit the shift key...

    No wonder we have to scrub only her input. The devil is in the details and when dealing with a database, the smallest things can cause interesting problems.

    I loath the day when she (a smart and curious person) decides to start learning sql. She is the kind of person that would learn about sql just enough to learn how to do an sql injection that executes drop table * just so she doesn't have to do the data entry.

    A major part of her job is data entry by the way.

    What does she care? She gets to go home early and someone else has to stay late right?

    I'm glad I'm not dealing with data this as important as the parent. I probably would have killed her by now.... just so customers affected by the work she does at her next job don't have to suffer.

    Yes, I know it shouldn't be possible... the data should be validated before its uploaded into the database. However, when you run the backend database and the front end the users see is not under your control, you have a much harder time of it when the html coders are more interested in look and feel than function. "Oh that will never happen and it will be alot of work."

    Nope, it IS happening and rather than address the problem, you merely pasted the work down the line. These developers that know nothing of sql other than how to right an ODBC connection string and call a pre-written query should also be shot. Why the hell are you writing code that touches a database without understanding what your code can do to the database? Sure, you don't have to be able to do my job, but you should understand enough about it to intermingle without problems AND should listen to the person who fixes the problems you can't fix when they say something. Your right to code your website the way you want ends THE MOMENT you query my database.

    People just don't get that 1 is NOT 'close enough' to 0 when it comes to computers.... there simply is no 'close enough' - there is only correct and everything else.

    I don't blame people for making mistakes - were human beings and to error is human. Then again, when its repeated or malicious or just plain incompetent, well, if I have to break a date with a girl I like (who knew anyone would to get away with that on slashdot?), I'm certainly NOT divine in my reaction. Next target is management that keeps people like this on staff to avoid paying un-employment or is not qualified to understand the nuance of their decision to not enforce standards in data entry or downline sanitation because 'Its not important - my web guys told me so.'

    It doesn't matter if you understand why or why not a certain action could be a problem. If you pay an expert to tell you these things, you listen to them... otherwise, why did you hire the expert with knowledge you don't have in the first place?

    Do you second guess your doctor when they tell you that the new must have medicine you saw on TV would kill you? Of course not, you never asked your doctor did you? The doctor is just supposed to give you a different pill to make it all better right?

    See how little sense that makes? Of course not - the first pill killed you and now you see nothing.

  117. Re:of course they didn't reverse interest charges. by denobug · · Score: 1

    You brought on a good point. Since this is a debit card how does his bank account not getting freezed because he has TWO transactions exceeding $5000.00 and not getting freezed for 7-30 days by procedure to prevent money laundering...

    A bank did that to me while I was still in school when the financial aid finally came in. Took them over a week after I went to the branch to have them unfreezed. This is why I hold my main checking account with a credit union to this day, even though I have accounts with other major banks.

  118. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work in this industry. The only novelty here is that the error got into production, and was not caught and corrected before it went that far.

    That explains why there are so many software testers currently looking for work. The CC industry doesn't use as many of them, anymore.

    Some submitters do, from time to time, change their code, and sometimes they get it wrong. For instance padding a field with spaces instead of zeros. Woopsie...!

    You're still using legacy zero padding? You should be doing things in XML.

    Seems that's what happened here. Sounds like a hex or dec field got padded with hex 20, and boom.

    Not quite. If it were padded with space characters, you get 0x20 in each byte (and that's just what this number had in the first 6 of 8 bytes). If it were padded with zero characters, you would get 34,723,282,962,276,803.04 or so.

    The REAL problem here is that the code was interpreting 64 bits as internal binary integer, when the data that arrived was at least 6 ASCII space characters. In other words, the data was in an old legacy format with space padding (which is easily handled by decimal conversion code along with zero padding), but the code expected a raw 64 bit integer, perhaps in the big-endian byte order.

    This is annoying, especially when the processor gets to help correct the overwhelming number of errors, and then tries to explain that it wasn't their fault. Plenty of blame to go around with this one.

    It was clearly someone's fault. Possibly a programmer not applying the proper field conversion? Perhaps the code was intended field conversion in place (replace the memory that has ASCII digit characters with the binary representation) and the conversion bailed out for some reason and the calling code didn't properly detect that (hint: in today's dollar amounts, the highest order byte of 64 bit integers should be zero).

    Even if a programmer is to blame, management is not blameless. And maybe it's not even a programmer to blame. Ultimately, the real blame does lie with management who should have seen to it that errors never happen. Of course, errors do happen and while the blame may be correct, it's really cheaper apply 99.999% perfection instead of 100% perfection. It's not that serious a blame ... at least as long as problems get corrected.

    And then explains why they don't both validate/sanitize input, and test for at least some reasonable maximum value in the transaction amount. A max amount of $10,000,000 would have fixed this. That and an obvious lapse in testing. This is what keeps my bosses awake sometimes, fearing they will end up on the front page of the fishwrap looking stupid 'cause their overworked minions screwed something up, or didn't check, or didn't test very well. I love one of the guys we have testing. He's insufferable, and he catches genuine show-stoppers on a regular basis. They can't pay him what he's been worth, literally $millions, just in avoiding downtime and re-working code that went too far down the wrong path.

    I don't know that $10,000,000 would be high enough. The kind of error this one is could be detected with a test against 2 to the 56th power. A lower test might catch other errors. And whatever tests are done, they should be in their own class, module, function, macro, or whatever, and separate from the mainline code. Two tests should be applied, one being conservatively high but fixed by the coders (e.g. the 2 to the 56th power test) and the other being configurable for code used by multiple processors (they can choose their own closer to the edge sanity check).

    Believe me, this is in some ways preferable to getting files with one byte wrong that doesn't show up for a month, or sending the wrong data format (hex instead of packed binary or EBCDIC, for instance) and crashing the process completely. Plea

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  119. Re:Octal? Piffle. by Tacvek · · Score: 1

    I would not be so sure of that. They post a screen shot in the story.
    The 12 50 comes out to 46.88, which while a bit steep could easily be the bill on filling up a fairly large gas tank, or buying 2 cartons of cigarettes. Or buying a carton of cigarettes and filling up a small tank.

    Interestingly, at least one other story on this issue also happened to use the same value. Perhaps this bug was specific to the dollar amount 46.88 in some way.

    --
    Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  120. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For instance padding a field with spaces instead of zeros. Woopsie...!

    You go girl

  121. Totally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hilarious; there's actually more Emoney than there is real money. Think about that - stored electric impulses which amount to something of transactionable value. The system is now so flawed that it's off it's freakin' rocker!

  122. Almost $100k in interest per millisecond. by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yikes.

  123. Hex calculator... by bagsta · · Score: 1

    I think from now on we have to carry with us a hex calculator and make all the calculations in hexadecimal... :)
    (Would like a 0xCAFEBABE?)

    --
    Until the skies turn blue...
    Until the air of freedom strikes us...
  124. Cobol error? by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

    This seems a common COBOL error I've seen numerous times: Define an alphanumeric field, redefine it as a numeric field, and don't bother checking your input for "performance reasons" (or just plain stupid/lazy programming). Read the alphanumeric fields from a DB or a flat file, where everything is nicely padded with spaces, and use the redefined numeric field for your accounting. Errors like this can occur easily by novice COBOL programmers, or by too lax compilers (the compiler at the developer's firm is configured to quietly convert these spaces to zeros in such cases, while the mainframe compiler at the client is not).

    --
    int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
  125. Air miles by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    Atleast he'll never have to pay for a flight again. I wonder how many airmiles he has now. Trip to the moon anyone?

  126. Most C/C++ programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should a C programmer know what ASCII is in hex? Am I missing something or are you doing web pages instead of system programming in C?

    1. Re:Most C/C++ programmers by Skapare · · Score: 1

      The good C programmers do know what ASCII is in hex. That's one of many things that separate them from not-so-good C programmers, as well as from the bad C programmers.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  127. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by dkf · · Score: 1

    Please, I know data should never IPL a system.

    Could you expand that abbreviation? I don't recognize it and none of the definitions that Google offers up make that much sense. (How do you "Indian Premier League" a system anyway?)

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  128. It's no bug.... by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

    Doctor Evil is extorting people again.

  129. ISO-8583 error by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    It looks like someone filled in data element 4 of an ISO-8583 request as type an12 type instead of n12.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  130. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Padding is used in fixed-length fields.

    There. Was that so hard?

    Oh yeah, it is. Let me finish this.

    'Our' submission files use combinations of fixed-length and variable-length fields. Fixed-length is easy, but variable-length is usually designated by a check byte that tells you what sort of data follows. Our submission file can overall be submitted as either fixed-length or variable length. Yes, the terms are mixed in the specification.

    Why?

    Well, among other things, many submission files include data intended for disparate systems. Some of these systems are new and purpose-built, and the data format is fairly efficient, but some systems are ancient and were never intended to do what they do today. It happens.

    Some systems talk EBCDIC, some can't tolerate decimal, others are sensitive to input data. One can't pass anything above dec 0x127. One has to accept a binary blob. Yep, we have to parse that stuff out and mske sure it goes to the right system. Input validation is a bear.

    I'm amused at this problem, as allowing that much field width for transaction amounts is pretty bad design. It is supremely unlikely to see a $10,000,000 charge for your typical cardholder. Even for your commercial cardholder. Just an unfortunate example of bad execution. Here, fixed-width is your friend.

    And yes, an XML file would be magnificent. How would we improve things when most of our systems cannot parse XML? No, doing that much parsing in a separate system system is not worth the cycles, and interpreting data is left to the actual receiving system. And while XML is extensible, you don't want that in a submission file. It is supposed to conform to the specification.

    As an analogy, you don't answer your teen-age daughter's phone calls and then scream the conversation to her and scream her responses back to the caller. When you realize the call (data field) is for her (other system) you just hand the phone (data) to her. Let her deal with it. If she has a question for you, like how much money can she have to buy something, you deal with that.

    XML is not the solution. Neither is putting everything on one system. Those of you in the card business know why fraud stays off to the side. Like integrating anti-virus into Windows for instance. Once some processes are integrated into others, it becomes *one* process. Checks and balances disappear. Chaos reigns.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  131. New meaning of $Hex notation by shervinemami · · Score: 1

    It gives a new meaning to the common $Hex notation, like $FF :-)

  132. Moore's Law by shervinemami · · Score: 1

    Trust me, in another 10 years you'll be wondering how people lived without 128 bit credit limits.

  133. How did that old saying go? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    "If you owe $100,000 to the bank, the bank owns you, but if you own 23 quadrillion to the bank, you own the bank"?

  134. Sin Tax Error [was: So what's the big deal?] by kosty · · Score: 1

    The "sin" tax on those smokes must have been part of the new anti-smoking bill.

    Quite correct. So smoke if ya' got em'. It's for the children...

    --
    "Democracy." It's just a slogan.
  135. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Nevyn · · Score: 1

    This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it well

    Like? "cat -n" or "nl"? make? Awk? Perl? bash/zsh? Which mythical version of unix is this which has programs which only do one thing, but do it well?

    --
    ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
  136. I'm afraid you're wrong, sir by HawkinsD · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm afraid you're wrong, sir or madam.

    I am one of the victims of this programming error, and I can tell you that several thousand VISA debit transactions were miscoded with the same amount: $23,148,855,308,184,500.00.

    I was not smart enough to look at my card number before I sent it off to Consumerist so that VISA could be made fun of. Happily, the string does not contain my (or apparently anybody's) credit (or debit) card number.

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    1. Re:I'm afraid you're wrong, sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, the number 2314885530818450 has the proper Luhn checksum to be a valid CC number, so it certainly could be somebody's credit card number

  137. Fortunately... by byrdfl3w · · Score: 0

    Fortunately for Visa none of the affected customers will be suing, as they all died of heart attacks upon opening their credit card statements.

  138. Hex? Not likely... by rocca · · Score: 1

    Visa doesn't do hex, and they certainly wouldn't convert spaces to binary. Most of the credit card import systems use formatted flat files. The problem is more likely an alignment issue and the credit card number itself was 4231 4885 5308 1845.

  139. looks like someone forgot to trim by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    It looks to me like someone forgot to ltrim the value they had stored. I get why they used a varchar to store the data. I think most programmers here do. What I don't get is why they would assume a number coming from a varchar would not have leading spaced or trailing spaces for that matter.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  140. > Recently several Visa card holders were, um, overcharged for certain
    > purchases, to the tune of $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 on a single charge

    $23 quadrillion and change, eh?

    "When the customers called the 800 help number, they were directed to "just pay it for now" and eventually they'd be credited with the amount. When one pointed out this was roughly a thousand times the cost of everything on Earth, they were transferred to the installments department."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  141. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well i don't really care how it happened, I'm just pissed that it did and I had no money for 2 days. I was unable to pick up medication that I needed, I couldn't drive over a couple miles because I couldn't put gas in my car. I'm glad this screw up had little effect on their life, other than a little extra work, because I was left to suffer in pain until this got figured out.

  142. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by jaydeekay · · Score: 1
  143. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have a submitter who simply ignores grammatical requirements. "to" "too"? Same thing, and it takes too long to hit "o" twice.

  144. Re:Nothing to see here, keep moving along please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO ONE in major financial institutions uses XML for anything important. It's slow. It's redundant. And very importantly: It's not at all suited for stream-based processing.

    Try setting up a "standard" XML parser to read "standard" XML which is of unknown length and routinely reaches 5mBps for three years. That is not something XML is designed for. Not only is it impossible to process sanely; but, even if it were: there's absolutely no way the features of XML would be remotely useful to anyone for that kind of data.

    Using XML for simple data (like updates to airport descriptions) is fine. XML for anything serious and long-running tends to be a horrible idea.

    Now, you could run a non-standard subset of XML and process it through a not-at-all-standard home-grown parser, but that is NOT XML.

    As a special bonus: XML is also more than a little flaky about whitespace, and has zero (nada, none, nothing, NO) support for the one thing which would help in this situation: format constraints on a particular field. XML does not specify, and has no way of specifying, the difference or equality between "000008", " 8", "8", " 8 ", etc. XML is useless in this situation.

  145. about gold by SMFC · · Score: 1

    ok i figured i would comment a little about gold since it was brought up. Yes paper currency used to actually equate to an amount of gold in a vault somewhere until we went ape shit with printing money. Gold is still one of the best invest, it is pretty safe and the increase in value over the next 10 years will just be simply retarded, silver is really good too cause it is an easier investment for rookies that are just getting started in metals. my brother in law has about 10k in silver in his possesion at home, i must say holding a bar of silver feels fucking awesome lol. gold even better but its so much more expensive. Historically gold prices have went up aand down. most fluctuations have really only happened sincec the late 70's. in 1998 an ounce of chronic was worth its weight in gold about 300 bucks. 10 years later it was about 880 bucks if you had purchased enough in 98 that would have been some good profit. the lowest it dropped after 1998 was 2001@ 271 but it jumped to 309 in 2002. Also keep in mind that although gold is a precious metal used for large currency transfer and trading, it also has a use, it rocks in electronics, it coducts pretty fucking fantastic, I think we all no electronics are not going anywhere until atleast 12/21/12. the rocketing in price was not random, the computer industry really got going when?? its only going to go up in value... Please keep this in mind.yearly averages of gold prices have been kept since 1793. http://goldinfo.net/yearly.html the value between 1890 and 1932 did not change from 20.67 an ounce, talk about a long term investment