Slashdot Mirror


Six Men Endure 105-Day Mars Flight Simulator

drunken_boxer777 writes with this excerpt from an AP report: "Six men emerged from a metal hatch after 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft, still smiling after testing the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars. They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers — who also monitored them via TV cameras — and an internal e-mail system. Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight."

274 comments

  1. Wow. by XPeter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah yeah Mars...anyone can do that. 105 days with no TV or internet?

    I, for one, welcome our godlike astronaut overlords.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Wow. by Technoodle · · Score: 4, Funny

      I find it useful to "unplug" from technology every once and a while, but 105 days? I would go crazy---Wait, I'm already there.

    2. Re:Wow. by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Luckily they bring the ladies along; that eliminates the need for the Internet and TV.

    3. Re:Wow. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm missing something, but why exactly do they have to go without TV and internet? Is there a significant technical problem beaming a lot of bandwidth that far? What about text-only internet?

      Yes, I realize there'd be a large time lag, but having web pages come up 20-30 minutes after loading them is better than not seeing them at all. If I'm bored, I can read Wikipedia pages, opening new ones in separate tabs and reading already-loaded ones while waiting for the new ones to load.

      If they can receive high-resolution photos from Mars landers, what's the problem with sending lots of data towards astronauts who are bored out of their skulls on a trip towards Mars?

    4. Re:Wow. by Bigby · · Score: 1

      The issue isn't data. It is power. Should excess power be used for TV or for something that has more value. By value, I don't necessarily mean scientific value, but even entertainment value.

    5. Re:Wow. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      But what would they do the remaining 23 hours and 58 minutes a day?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:Wow. by fataugie · · Score: 1

      If it's at all like my house, it's filled with bitching and nagging.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    7. Re:Wow. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would go crazy--

      Astronaut 1: Are we there yet? Are we there yet?
      Astronaut 2: I shouldn't have eaten all of those beans... (gurgle)
      Astronaut 3: I hope you like country music as much as I do.

    8. Re:Wow. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why not just send them off with 3 or 4 terabyte hard drives filled with movies. Sure it would use a little bit of power to power screen and stuff to show the movie, but I'd opt for having an extra solar panel over having absolutely nothing for these guys to do for 105 days.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if there was a sick psychopath who kills all but one other crewmember who he incapacitates. Then he slowly violates/tortures that crewmate while posting continuous updates to a horrified and helpless control center who is forced to watch the events unfold. Sounds like a movie plot.

    10. Re:Wow. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As I said to someone else, a generator could be easily fitted to an exercise cycle to power low-power stuff like this.

      Besides, this ship would probably need nuclear propulsion. Power should be plentiful.

    11. Re:Wow. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep. At the very least, bring a Kindle packed with books to read (can't really bring real books because they weigh too much). You can use one of those hand-powered generators to run a Kindle.

    12. Re:Wow. by akincisor · · Score: 1

      Remember that this is a closed system. The astronauts will need more food to power them powering the exercycles. There would be additional heat to dissipate. Things are not so simple. It *is* rocket science after all.

    13. Re:Wow. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the astronauts MUST exercise a LOT just to maintain their muscle mass and bone density in zero-g, right? It's not like this exercise is going to be extra, they have to do it anyway. Why not get some power back from it, rather than just dissipating it as heat?

      Sometimes, yes, things really are that simple.

    14. Re:Wow. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      They'll be almost as unable to communicate in our modern language as that poor iceman they thawed out in Colorado back in 1999. He'd been frozen in the ice for over two years. Poor bastard didn't even realize that flannel was no longer cool.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Wow. by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      We could supply them with all sorts of great movies to help keep their mental state in peak form...Lost in Space, Apollo 13, Armageddon, Deep Impact, Red Planet, ...

    16. Re:Wow. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "Please somebody help me, help me... help me somebody, please help me....Somebody's looking at me, somebody's watching me, help me... help me."
      -- Astronaut Mike Ferris, The Twilight Zone "Where Is Everybody?"

      "A man was confined alone in a box for something in the neighborhood of four hundred and eighty-four hours. That's roughly equivalent to a trip to the moon, several orbits and return."
      -- Air Force General, The Twilight Zone "Where Is Everybody?"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    17. Re:Wow. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      astronaut #4, waking from date-rape sedative: "ow, my rectum hurts"

    18. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is such a thing as female astronauts, you know

      --
      Parent poster is like a children's horror story: big trolls

    19. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No one implied that Astronaut #4 was male...

    20. Re:Wow. by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Why not get some power back from it, rather than just dissipating it as heat?

      Because humans are good for about a quarter of a horsepower. Maybe 175 watts, peak. Not really worth the effort of converting to power.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    21. Re:Wow. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You don't think that's enough to run a netbook or small notebook? No one's suggesting running an Alienware gaming rig here. It certainly beats carrying a pile of pre-charged laptop batteries, as one other poster suggested.

    22. Re:Wow. by NotOverHere · · Score: 1

      So, cut off from family, no outside entertainment, and living in a tin can breathing each other's farts for 100+ days at a time?

      Add a sadistic, drill-happy Command Master Chief (no, not the cool one)and you'd have exactly what thousands of US submariners do every year.... For the last few decades.

      Raise your hand if you have ever experienced "boat funk".

    23. Re:Wow. by arndawg · · Score: 1

      What's your point? Now's your chance for some backdoor action.

    24. Re:Wow. by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Sure. And, for that matter, why not pedal an ergometer to run the radio in your car? I mean, maybe the radio does sit one meter away from an engine producing tens of kilowatts, but you're in the car anyway, so why not add your 170 watts and run the radio on it? Heck, you could run the radio, MP3 player, GPS-- the works.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    25. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the article summary, of course, but who reads that here anyway?

    26. Re:Wow. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, and female astronauts #1, #2 and #3 strapped their steel dildos on and sodomized astronaut #4 the male twink.

      feel better?

  2. 105 days? No problem. by jack2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Give em the newest rpg(or jrpg grinder if you like). Make the story and game so it updates their world with earth's servers on par with the delays and there you go. Next thing you know they wouldn't want to leave the ship. Or if rts is their fancy ... well you got the idea...

    1. Re:105 days? No problem. by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless of course the astronauts don't like video games...

    2. Re:105 days? No problem. by mdm-adph · · Score: 4, Funny

      The astronauts are made up of our parents?

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:105 days? No problem. by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the latest ones don't have LAN support...

    4. Re:105 days? No problem. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      That's not really a bad idea. While I hate to sound like the nerd that I am (and I'm not as bad in real life at all), I really think I could make it through the time required if they gave me a few 1TB hard drives full of Divx movies and a few dozen console or computer games to play with. Particularly if they setup data transfer to and from Earth for certain things. Give them email access (email works FINE with 20 minute latency), and have them choose a handful of websites which could be cached and updated on a nightly job to a server on the capsule.

      The main thing that would be a problem for me would be environmental comfort. IE, apparently most stations and spacecraft stink to high heaven - for obvious reasons (several people stuck in a relatively closed system that's so small for months or years at a time). Temperature controls would also be an issue for me - if they could keep the craft at around 72F then I'd be happy, but more than 4-5 degrees on either side of that comfort zone and I start to get annoyed after a few hours. With energy being at a premium maintaining the temperature high enough might be an issue.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:105 days? No problem. by Graff · · Score: 1

      Give em the newest rpg(or jrpg grinder if you like). Make the story and game so it updates their world with earth's servers on par with the delays and there you go.

      Pfft, have you SEEN the drama that some guilds go through in RPGs? They'll get stuck on some boss and then one of the guys will mysteriously get a stomach bug or his cat will spontaneously combust and he'll have to bail. Next thing you know they'll split into small groups who will shout insults at each other and try to recruit more people to finish the raid from the Chinese space ship a few million kilometers away. It will just disintegrate into chaos!

    6. Re:105 days? No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With energy being at a premium maintaining the temperature high enough might be an issue.

      As seen in Apollo 13.

    7. Re:105 days? No problem. by Sethus · · Score: 1

      You'd think that would waste a lot of energy over a 100+ day trip. Surely there are better things to do? All I can think of is read a book; since you can't even play cards.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    8. Re:105 days? No problem. by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, "you can't even play cards." Why? You have no light? Your statement is invalid!

    9. Re:105 days? No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you have realized the GRAVITY of the situation...

    10. Re:105 days? No problem. by johannesg · · Score: 1

      Give em the newest rpg(or jrpg grinder if you like). Make the story and game so it updates their world with earth's servers on par with the delays and there you go.
      Next thing you know they wouldn't want to leave the ship.
      Or if rts is their fancy ... well you got the idea...

      RTS?

      Look, I need to explain something to you. Colonies have this way of becoming independent, in the end, and we should _not_ be training to think of conquest as their most important hobby for when that time comes.

      They can have a copy of Animal Crossing if they want.

    11. Re:105 days? No problem. by pentalive · · Score: 1

      So, put slots in the card table to hold the cards.

      make the cards magnetic.

      Simulate the cards on a computer.

      Play a game where you can hold all your cards in your hand.

      hmm make up a new game where some cards are dealt facing you and you get to see them
      and other cards are dealt facing away, and the other players get to see them....

    12. Re:105 days? No problem. by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, who wouldn't enjoy a 3 month long Diablo 2 Marathon? Just make sure to bring some Red Bull and extra mice!

    13. Re:105 days? No problem. by martas · · Score: 1

      so, the best astronauts for a trip to mars are awkward 13 year old boys suffering from severe social anxiety? how bizarre...

    14. Re:105 days? No problem. by nizo · · Score: 1

      ...a few dozen console or computer games...

      This should work fine as long as they don't go apeshit from:

      getting frustrated on a game level
      a controller breaking
      fighting over whose turn it is to play

    15. Re:105 days? No problem. by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      even better then that, have artificial gravity ffs. Using rotation isn't that hard...

    16. Re:105 days? No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spaceship will not be big enough to have mom's basement attached to it's underbelly.

    17. Re:105 days? No problem. by melf-san · · Score: 1

      They can have a copy of Animal Crossing if they want.

      Well, I dont think its a good idea.

    18. Re:105 days? No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a Linux box and Gentoo to compile.

    19. Re:105 days? No problem. by Samgilljoy · · Score: 1

      They could farm gold in WOW to offset the cost of the trip.

  3. Why no TV/Internet? by lobiusmoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would have thought that would be an easy thing to provide them for mental stimulation on a long boring journey. Couple of laptops with few thousand hours of video, games, website snapshots, virtual environments to explore.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably power. Still, I would think access to email would be a reasonable affordance.

    2. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by lobiusmoop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These days we'd only be talking a few watts per person for a modern laptop. Surely they could spare that... a little bit of diverted solar, or reuse some of the power from the 1 hour daily exercise they're probably expected to take.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    3. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 1

      Where exactly are you going to get your TV/Internet signal from in space?

    4. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by lobiusmoop · · Score: 0

      You're joking right? A lot of people already get their TV from space and some even get their Internet access that way too.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    5. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What kind of dumb question is this? Perhaps the same way they already receive other communications signals from Earth? How do you think the Mars landers communicate with Earth?

    6. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Earth?

    7. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Yeah, from satellites that point TOWARD the Earth, not away from it.

    8. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by tsalmark · · Score: 1

      Those satellites point at earth, not Mars.

    9. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      one would think that solar power should be readily available in space, and with current technology commercially available the power demands are low enough where a full "PC experience" shouldn't be an issue, i'm thinking of the current generation of netbooks for example. their power consumption is pretty negligible, relative to the power used in modern avionics.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    10. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 1

      You're joking right? A lot of people already get their TV from space and some even get their Internet access that way too.

      I think you're neglecting a few small problems. For example, the fact that communications satellites are typically 35,000km above the earth, while Mars is 274,500,000km from the earth. The signal would need to travel 7,843 times farther, and we already have bad lag times waiting for satellite internet. Imagine waiting for your HTTP requests to come back -- especially the ones that get lost every time a planet/comet/other gets between the satellite and your ship.

      TV might be reasonable as long as you're ok with your TV being two weeks old and it cutting out every time those aforementioned objects block the transmission. Oh, and building a new satellite purely for the purpose of transmitting that signal to the ship.

    11. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the budget for a Mars mission would include a dedicated massive satellite transceiver on Earth for their own comms. I'm just saying they can probably include some TV signals and high-latency internet in there too.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    12. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      Mmm. The 20 minute lag between clicking a link and viewing a web page would be annoying. ;) The solution, albeit imperfect, would be to create a shipboard intranet that's regularly updated from Earth when bandwidth permits. Ten years ago, the Mars Global Surveyor had a minimum downlink speed of 21.33 kbps, with 2 kbps engineering data downlink. NASA's new LRO will be mapping the moon with telemetry downlink speeds of up to 3000 kbps in direct modulated mode (albeit at much shorter range).

    13. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do you think the Mars landers communicate with Earth?

      I think they waited approximately fifteen minutes for the signal to travel each direction. Would you want your HTTP requests to take fifteen minutes? You'd lose your stiff every time you clicked to the next porn image.

    14. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that would be an easy thing to provide them for mental stimulation on a long boring journey. Couple of laptops with few thousand hours of video, games, website snapshots, virtual environments to explore.

      The question you ask in your subject ("Why no TV/Internet?") and the answer you provide are, to some extent, apples and oranges.
       
      They had no [live] TV/internet because a real space craft headed even to the Moon, let alone Mars, would have such access. A laptop loaded as your propose is no substitute because it isn't 'live' or 'real' in the same manner they would experience TV or internet the same way they would sitting at home. It's canned, not spontaneous, and it doesn't change over time.
       
      Which, of course, isn't to say that such things aren't valuable, only that they are to real thing like a Real Doll is to actual human contact and communication. (Even non sexual contact.) Over time, such things only serve to increase the pressure of being far from home. Canned and simulated entertainment is ultimately no substitute for actual communication.
       
      Disclaimer - I am not an astronaut, nor do I play one on TV. But I did make multiple SSBN patrols while serving in the USN Submarine Service. (However, I served back in the 1980's, long before laptops became available or common.)

    15. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern computers can't be used in space, because the process technology is too small for the transistors to be unaffected by radiation.

      I had an AI professor in college who was hugely interested in the Mars Rovers, and he said one of the things involved with radiation-hardening the on-board computers was using an old, Pentium 1 era process technology.

      Posting as anon because I modded.

    16. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where exactly are you going to get your TV/Internet signal from in space?

      The same exact way you get your TV/Internet "signal" anywhere else. I'll let you do your own learning, but suffice it to say all you really need is an antenna.

      Latency and power are the only two issues. Latency is already being worked on, I won't post a link but there've been a couple threads on slashdot about it already.

      I see the real issue being the power- but as long as there is enough to run the entertainment and life support, navigation, etc. then it's not a problem.

      To answer some of the smartass comments, it's not that tough to cache locally. They could even setup a temporary solution with existing technology (as opposed to deep space TCP/IP). The crew sends the requests to NASA, who actually gather all the data & cache it, then compress it and send it up. All data would be cached locally on the craft for quick access.

    17. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where exactly are you going to get your TV/Internet signal from in space?

      DVDs anyone?

    18. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're neglecting a few small problems.

      No, the solutions are obvious, and in many cases already solved or compensated for.

      For example, the fact that communications satellites are typically 35,000km [wikipedia.org] above the earth, while Mars is 274,500,000km from the earth. The signal would need to travel 7,843 times farther,
      [...] TV might be reasonable as long as you're ok with your TV being two weeks old

      At the speed of light, which is how fast radio signals travel through vacuum, it is not anywhere close to 2 weeks. Figure a few hours in a worst case scenario, maybe a day if there's a lot of solar activity.

      Imagine waiting for your HTTP requests to come back -- especially the ones that get lost every time a planet/comet/other gets between the satellite and your ship.

      Ummm. This is already solved. For example, at work if I want to go to slashdot, I send the request to a proxy server, which then retrieves the data and caches it, and then serves me off the cache. Same idea would work just fine with spacecraft... the server on the groundstation retrieves the data, and relays it to the spacecraft in big chunks where it's then cached locally. The only real difference would be to jack up the TTL and session timeouts from the ground station to the craft to compensate for the latency.

      Oh, and building a new satellite purely for the purpose of transmitting that signal to the ship.

      And exactly how do you think they would do any other communication with the craft? That's right, the same way.... so there will already be a communication link.

      To sum it up, the transport issues are easily solved, and in such a manner to make it nearly transparent to the applications that would be in use on the craft. No, you won't be able to play WoW, but email and some light web browsing would be easy to implement.

    19. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be fine with being on a 15 minute delay on tv, with DVR's I regularly wait much longer to start watching stuff. You'd never get anything in real time, but I dont think you'd really care. A good story is still a good story 30 minutes later. Not that i'd expect that to be what would happen.

      Realistically, you would just launch with all the entertainment you would need. A few hundred games, a few thousand tv shows, as many movies as you wish. Mirrors of any kind of reference site, full copies of books.. The only thing you would want 'the internet' for is communication, and you don't need HTTP for that. You would use SMTP and UUCP-- Both were used very widely when 15-30minute latencies were a good connection.

    20. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How do they rad harden that computer between your ears?

      Or perhaps they just shield the whole crew compartment?

    21. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just not creative enough. I solve this problem by creating a Adult Entertainment Coordinator position (heh) at NASA. This person will be tasked with selecting adult entertainment selections for each member of the crew and uploading them to the capsule's computers for on-demand viewing.

    22. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      If it took long enough for your signal to reach earth, your post could be first in the inevitable dupe on slashdot!

    23. Re:Why no TV/Internet? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      TCP/IP from a Mars lander to Earth would be fun.. SYN .. [an hour].. ACK.. [an hour]

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  4. If only... by theuhstuf · · Score: 1

    I could sail away, never to see another same day. I'd leave it all behind and nothing could change my mind.

    1. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could sail away, never to see another same day. I'd leave it all behind and nothing could change my mind.

      Or you could set an open course for the virgin seas. You've got to be free... free to face the life that's ahead of thee!

    2. Re:If only... by theuhstuf · · Score: 1

      No one knows what sacrifice is today. You are all petty waists of flesh.

    3. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sacrifice requires belief in something greater than one's self. Good luck, trying to promote that among a loose community of people who like to think of themselves as hyperindividualistic non-conformists.

      Oh, and I think the word you wanted to use was "wastes" instead of "waists", unless you are implying all slashdotters are fat in addition to being petty. In that case "waists of flesh" would be appropriate.

    4. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled pretty waists and flesh.

  5. how many times were they pod-killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in all that time?

  6. Obligatory Robot Chicken reference by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny
    Mission to Mars: Day 336

    "STOP. FARTING."

    1. Re:Obligatory Robot Chicken reference by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Future generations of historians will be studying the journals of whoever does go on the first Mars mission for decades.

      Day: 428

      I tossed off Dave again today for what must've been the 50th time. Jesus he produces an ungodly amount o..... oh shit, the computer's just picked up a fault in the AE35 unit. It's going to go 100% failure in 72 hours. Damnit!

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    2. Re:Obligatory Robot Chicken reference by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should stop eating sugar. Eat no sugar and short carbohydrates for a month, and you can eat nearly everything (especially beans & co) without any farting.
      (So it's actually the long-term effect of sugar making you fart, not the beans.)

      Should be easy to enforce on that Mars trip. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  7. The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, I get to see this in my lifetime. The building blocks of a conspiracy theory.

    If they ever do manage to land on Mars the conspiracy theorists will now point to this and say "see they SAY they built it as a simulator but REALLY that's where they faked the entire Mars landing! Why else would they need to build such a simulator!" Very much like the lunar surface simulator they built out in the desert, or the landing simulator MIT built for the moon landings. Oh well...

    1. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      You think you're on top of this. What will shake you to the core is when those people start wailing about how the simulator is actually real, and they faked their not going to mars.
      Say, maybe we already travel to mars, ALOT!.
      Scary!

    2. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by Bigby · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So you are telling me we landed on the moon and didn't bring back any cheese?

    3. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they ever do manage to land on Mars the conspiracy theorists will now point to this and say "see they SAY they built it as a simulator but REALLY that's where they faked the entire Mars landing!

      Pffft! This conspiracy was already exposed in the documentary "Capricorn 1"! And now we have proof of the simulator, so we conspiracy theorists were right all along! /smug

    4. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, as a matter of fact, we STARTED out on Mars. WWII was just a cover up to hide the fact that we were all secretly moved to Earth, which back then was like Mars to us, because of the fact that we overutilized the planet and... no, I can't go on with it.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    5. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 4, Funny

      > If they ever do manage to land on Mars...

      Hah, you *fool*, you've already fallen for it! You think this is a simulator? The government has been secretly colonizing Mars for years now, they just spin these "simulator" stories to "explain" why certain individual astronauts are out of touch for long periods of time. You think mere robots could do what the recent Mars probes and rovers have done? Oh, no. They can go to Mars whenever they want.

      But they are POWERLESS against my ALL CAPS and "inappropriate" quoting! I "shall" EXPOSE them!

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    6. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by igny · · Score: 1

      That is why they should not use the tin-foil enthusiasts in these experiments. They may later claim that they were tricked into doing this simulation but instead they were taken to Mars and brought back.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    7. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      We discovered it wasn't actually made of cheese. That's why we haven't been back since.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      What? How are you going populate Mars when the Decepticons are already there? Haven't you seen Transformers!?

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    9. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just guessing, but if/when man gets to Mars, I somehow doubt that ship will be equipped with faux wood paneling.

    10. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      This whole stunt is bogus. They were never locked up in a simulator in Russia at all.

      It is all an elaborate cover-up of an actual mission to Mars.

      I have proof - did you see the flag not flutter?

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    11. Re:The building blocks of a conspiracy theory... by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      No, you've got it wrong. They've been to mars, they just hushed it up and pretended it was a simulation.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  8. Uh, DVR? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows. Ironically, while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them, it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars. There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.

    1. Re:Uh, DVR? by Niris · · Score: 0

      You'd have to have thousands of hours of battery power. That'd be damn heavy. Solar power isn't that strong once you get out a bit closer to Mars.

    2. Re:Uh, DVR? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      First, any realistic Mars spacecraft is probably going to have megawatts of power from nuclear generators. The power would be used to run CASIMIR plasma engines. While this will make the spacecraft more complex, it would greatly shorten the length of the mission and increase the amount of supplies and spare parts the spacecraft could carry. Second, no matter how they build the spacecraft, they'll need enough juice to run radios, heaters, fans, air conditioners, lighting, and tons of other equipment. A few watts from a video decoding device and a few OLED displays is not going to break the energy budget.

    3. Re:Uh, DVR? by Bigby · · Score: 1

      They can generate the extra electricity with exercise;
      Add more solar panels;
      Or just have a nice little PBNR on board

    4. Re:Uh, DVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manned missions to Mars would be forced to use a nuclear power source.

    5. Re:Uh, DVR? by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows.

      Except, as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation, the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necks, complaining to their congresspeople about how much more important their anti-piracy efforts are over scientific discovery, cosmic exploration, and our astronauts not going insane during a nearly one-third year flight. And then they'd add a few extra trillion in to the "potential lost sales" figures they flaunt due to the Martians the astronauts would potentially be sharing the movies with who would then not buy the movies.

      Then they'd bitch about making sure there's DRM on the spacecraft (jacking up the price and complexity) and make excuses that a 40-minute round-trip communication back to the central servers on earth every X minutes of playback is a perfectly reasonable compromise to make "sure" it doesn't fall into the wrong hands, and would try their damndest to delay the launch until they could convince the entire judicial branch of the United States government to quite cheerfully treat the astronauts like potential criminals.

      I mean, other than THAT, it'd be a perfectly reasonable idea.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    6. Re:Uh, DVR? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Huh? They'd bring a few pounds of Plutonium 238, or they'd be is a spaceship with solar panels, or their exercise equipment would have generators. Note the inclusive "or" - most likely, all of the above would be true.

    7. Re:Uh, DVR? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a generator? Hook one up to an exercise bike, like they do in some third-world countries, and you can easily power a laptop computer. The astronauts already have to exercise a lot to stay in shape to counteract the effects of zero-g, so instead of wasting that energy it can be used for powering electronics.

      And, as others have said, such a craft is likely to be nuclear-powered, which means tons of leftover energy for electronics.

    8. Re:Uh, DVR? by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      They could use thorium fission generators too...

    9. Re:Uh, DVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the movie/radio companies MIGHT see it as a marketing opportunity and actually help them do it. After all, it would cost them next to nothing to actually set it up and make copies of movies...

    10. Re:Uh, DVR? by Maximus633 · · Score: 1

      Hi, Yes NetFlix I had a change of address... Yeah I am on mars right now. Can you send me Apollo 13? What? No? Why not?! I want to watch Apollo 13!

    11. Re:Uh, DVR? by Welshalian · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be too difficult to pack a few hard drives or SSDs with a few thousand movies and episodes of TV shows. Ironically, while it would cost tens of thousands of dollars to buy all those DVDs and rip them, it would cost a lot more money to send the media holding the video files to mars. There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.

      Do not underestimate the bandwidth of a spaceship full of tapes!

    12. Re:Uh, DVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There would be a lengthy time-lag for emails, but that's little different than email is already.

      True. Especially when avoiding our IT project managers.
      Unfortunately, in this case, it would be much more difficult to say "I was away from my desk"

    13. Re:Uh, DVR? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Except, as soon as word got out of them flipping the first bit on the drive during the copy operation, the MPAA/RIAA/ABC/CBS/NBC/etc would be down their necks

      That would suck. Think about leaving the spacecraft, all exicted about being the first human to set foot on Mars, only to find a media company lawyer there tapping his foot waiting for you with a subpeona.

      You'd still be the first human to set foot on Mars, but what a letdown.

  9. Homer Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No tv and no internet, make Homer.... Something Something =-p

    1. Re:Homer Says by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Go Crazy?

    2. Re:Homer Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go crazy?

    3. Re:Homer Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mind if I do! Blablbublbublbbulbulbulbulbulbu!

      hop to the 40 second mark for the uninformed.

  10. Isn't the mars mission a 1-Way mission? by stickrnan · · Score: 1

    They'll need to last without these things a lot longer than 105 days.

    1. Re:Isn't the mars mission a 1-Way mission? by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not one way - round trip is approx. 3 months or approx. 2 years, depending upon how it's timed.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:Isn't the mars mission a 1-Way mission? by MinistryOfTruthiness · · Score: 1

      I think point of this experiment was just to see if they would murder each other on the way. 105 days stuck in a little space with 5 other people and few diversions leaves a lot up to the social dynamics between the people involved. They need to know what sorts of things to prepare for along the way.

      For example, they might expect that boredom would be the major problem, but it winds up being B.O. If they know that, they can stock up on deodorants. Point being, by doing experiments like this, they can test their assumptions about the social interactions and try to mitigate any unexpected points of contention.

      --
      "I know that every word that man just said is true, because it's EXACTLY what I wanted to hear." -- Space Ghost
  11. Physchology by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Living in cramped quarters with a few other people for 105 days is not so big a deal. Reality would likely be far different. See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out. They are a day-flight away from home, wherever it be. Something go wrong? Darn, too bad. Simulation over, everybody have a beer and go home!

    But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing. Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight. Something go wrong? Everybody's dead!

    Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure. Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure. And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure of living here on Earth, with lots of air, beer, and pretty babes!

    The simulation is more of a publicity stunt, and it's appropriate. People want to try the trip, and that's A-OK. But do not think, even for a moment, that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Physchology by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      EDIT: /"those 105 people"/"those people in there for 105 days"/

      Sheesh. Maybe I'll try preview next time?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars. At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!

    3. Re:Physchology by MobileMrX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the solution:

      "Hey guys, we are going to do one more simulation, just step over here. We've made some improvements that make this ULTRA realistic."

      Let them think it is a simulation until they get to Mars, then send them the "tricked you!" email when they get there.

    4. Re:Physchology by Myrimos · · Score: 1

      And even our best and brightest... [foxnews.com]

      To be fair, I did click the link, but it sure is portrayed in a hilarious way.

      --
      Internet scofflaw
    5. Re:Physchology by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see it differently, and I think the test subject do too: If you're the first crew to Mars, you know every second that what you're doing is fucking important, and that you have a special privilege and responsibility, and that the whole world is watching you. I think it's pretty likely that under such circumstances the dude wouldn't have tried to fondle the hot Canadian chick. You'd keep a lid on it.

      Contrast that to an experiment where you basically have five people in railroad car undergoing isolation torture with dubious scientific value. Then you realize "you know, if I have nice bloody fistfight with Sergey, they'll cancel this stupid experiment, let me go home, and the jerk might even lose a tooth like he deserves to. All signs point to yes."

      So in summary, I'm saying that a real crew on its way to the actual planet Mars has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.

    6. Re:Physchology by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try for the fake moon colony first. I think NASA has some film sets they could lend you.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    7. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How about using a second hand soviet nuclear submarine?

      Crushing pressures outside the vessel, old reactor core 50 metres from where you sleep, noisy cramped environment, etc.

      Also, they would *have* to perform certain maintenance tasks or risk any number of horrible deaths.

    8. Re:Physchology by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Enders game idea on /. inconceivable!

    9. Re:Physchology by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing.

      So you're saying that if they screw this up, they get kicked up to management?

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    10. Re:Physchology by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out.

      Believe it not, that makes it harder rather then easier. When I was making SSBN patrols for the USN, 'fast cruises' (simulating underway while tied up to the pier) were much harder knowing those things were so close. Actual patrols were easier because you knew they weren't close and thus weren't nearly so much a distraction.
       
       

      Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure. Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure.

      Which is why they don't let just anyone go, just like the Submarine Service they pick preferentially from the right hand side of the bell curve. Sure, the occasional loon makes it through screening, but that doesn't disprove the whole concept.

    11. Re:Physchology by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure i'd be more of a quitter part way on some stupid experiment on earth than I would in space. Even if it was just that there is no oxygen outside so you CAN'T quit.

    12. Re:Physchology by Tiger4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is actually a great idea. A reasonable submersible, or some kind of isolation in the Arctic or Antarctic in the winter would focus their minds nicely on Staying Alive. You don't want to kill them, but you do want to keep aware of the consequences of screwing up.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    13. Re:Physchology by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they use people who've got the right... uhm, what do they call that stuff?

    14. Re:Physchology by McGregorMortis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Isaac Asimov wrote a short story along those lines. I can't remember the title. Massive spoilers here, though you can probably guess what they are just from the context of this reply...

      It's set in a space capsule on the way to the moon (it was written before the Apollo landings.) One of the men starts going kinda loopy during the long isolation, gets crazy ideas about Man's place in the universe, maybe it's all a big trick. When they finally reach the moon and start coming around to the dark side, which had never before been seen by human eyes, they see that the entire moon is just a gigantic stage prop with wooden struts and fabric stretched over it. The guy goes insane and tries to kill the others to keep the secret.

      Turns out the entire trip was actually a simulation, conducted in a research facility on Earth, though the crew didn't know it. The image of the moon they saw from their viewport was actually generated using a scale model of the moon and a tracking camera. The simulation was supposed to end before the camera came around to the far side of the moon, but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something.

      It's a cool story. Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...

    15. Re:Physchology by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      Didn't a British reality TV show do something like that?

    16. Re:Physchology by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      We could name it "Project Magic Christian."

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    17. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the sheer fact that you linked to foxnews in your comments made anything you say completely unreliable. Better luck next time.

    18. Re:Physchology by Shinobi · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Believe it not, that makes it harder rather then easier. When I was making SSBN patrols for the USN, 'fast cruises' (simulating underway while tied up to the pier) were much harder knowing those things were so close. Actual patrols were easier because you knew they weren't close and thus weren't nearly so much a distraction."

      I'll second that. While not having done duty on a sub or similar, as preparation for a deployment with Swedish forces for UN ops in africa, we went through hothouse training. Basically, we had 2 weeks in a huge house with temperature and humidity ramped up to the levels we would encounter there. Knowing that just outside the walls were people drinking cool drinks, eating ice cream etc made it infinitely harder to endure than the real mission actually, on a psychological level.

    19. Re:Physchology by Karganeth · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Cadets Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience). The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength. They didn't go insane.

    20. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true. the closest you can come to the real thing while staying on earth is to do it deep, deep under water, because down there there's no beer, no babes, and instead of the endless void, there's endless pressure.

    21. Re:Physchology by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Yes, those 105 days might have been hell... is that 105 days one way or round trip ??

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    22. Re:Physchology by fooslacker · · Score: 1

      Is it a one for one comparison that gives you a perfect sim? No. But does it provide useful data? sure. To call it useless because it isn't a perfect sim is a bit silly.

      That's why they call them simulations. It can't expose all stress factors and no it isn't allowed to kill people to simulate death but that doesn't make it useless. Some stresses can be discovered and tested and dealt with. They psychologically tested the early Astronauts too. Again, was it a perfect sim? No but it wasn't useless and it at least begins to harden and prepare the mind for some portion of what it will face.

      Additionally it helps weed out those that will face issues because if they can't hack this they can't hack the real deal.

    23. Re:Physchology by mistahkurtz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But do not think, even for a moment, that this gives particularly meaningful data on what a real Mars trip would be like!

      i see what you're saying, but i have to disagree some. remember the stanford prison experiment? everyone there knew they were part of a study or an experiment, and yet they went well beyond what their described roles were, into some very dark places.

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    24. Re:Physchology by nizo · · Score: 1

      So the key is to send people who aren't very bright and don't even have a basic scientific education.

      "Oh I don't worry about holes in the ship; if the air starts to leak out we'll patch it with duct tape and open the box labeled 'emergency air' that is stashed under my bunk"

    25. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the set of people qualified to go to Mars, and the set of people who could be fooled by a hoax like Space Cadets, are about as far apart as the Earth and Mars.

    26. Re:Physchology by nizo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "You know, if there was an 'airlock accident' I could flush Segey out into space, and then I could have my way with one of my crewmates because, seriously, who can stop me?"

      Yeah I'm thinking the screening process will be pretty thorough for a Mars mission.

    27. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing.

      Perhaps we should be sending /. posters to Mars, then. They'll feel right at home.

    28. Re:Physchology by dasunt · · Score: 1

      So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars. At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!

      There was an old SF short story about a similarly fake moon mission.

      The "ship" went off course and managed to give the "astronauts" a glimps of the dark side of the moon -- which ended up being obviously a wooden prop.

      One of the men went insane.

    29. Re:Physchology by broggyr · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to dump the emergency 'Liquid Schwartz' in the fuel tank so you can get home quickly for repairs...

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    30. Re:Physchology by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out

      Every geek knows that too, but they stay anyway much longer than 105 days in their mother's basement.

    31. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom.

      See, *I've* always thought of space as the most unfathomably complete void mankind can comprehend.

    32. Re:Physchology by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read your response and I liked it....mostly.

      Lest anyone disagree, he's pretty damn accurate. I'm a former submariner. I've lived through fires, suicides (not me, silly!) and other casualties that really scared the personnel and myself on board my submarine. Let's focus on what scared the shit out of me. Floating in the middle of the ocean with no hydraulic pressure to steer the ship, no hydraulics to open and close critical valve's to safety-of-ship systems, limited fuel and using reactor power is now out of the question, bobbing on the ocean for three full days in heavy sea state. Since the reactor was placed in a 'safe' state, we used our diesel engine (yes, just 1!) to power critical systems. Limited lighting and ventilation only.

      None of us were too sure if we'd make it back alive and/or in one piece. The only thing we had going for us is that we could still pull fresh oxygen into the boat. Oh, and the captain secured drills for the remainder of the cruise. He always made us run drills. Always except this time.

      We had it made.

      Now for the 'mostly' part. And this is the fun stuff.

      You got 6 guys here who basically 'behaved' during the simulation. Wait till 60 days begins to set in. They'll start screwing with each other's minds. Trust me.

      We used to lock people in their bunks by raising the hinged bunk and placing the support bar in its lock to keep it raised at 45 deg with the victim in it. For our astro buddies, Straps to keep you in your bunk will strangely become stuck with another victim in them.

      Personal items will be held for ransom by some unknown assailant. Pictures will be posted of said personal item every few weeks. Sometimes with pieces of it missing, often being torn off of it...violently. Sometimes there are doubles of the items so as not to really destroy the object. Other times it's the real thing and your personal device is being destroyed!

      Food will be contaminated. That's all I'm saying.

      Why beat and a man down when you can slowly enjoy watch him tear himself apart because of the things that are subversively committed against him.

      I'm no prophet here; but, I'm sure that as space travel becomes routine there are people that are going to enjoy tormenting others endlessly. Just like here on Earth. Ah, smell that fresh air.

    33. Re:Physchology by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1

      > No air, no beer, no babes

      I like your sense of priority.

    34. Re:Physchology by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Sure, just about anybody could live with this kind of stress for a while, but we're not talking about a while, we're talking about MONTHS of this kind of pressure. Many perfectly healthy, strong, capable people would crack under this kind of pressure. And even our best and brightest crack under the pressure [foxnews.com] of living here on Earth, with lots of air, beer, and pretty babes!

      Put on a bigger engine, make the trip shorter. How is left as an exercise to the reader. :)

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    35. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have already been submerged submarine patrols lasting over a hundred days.

      You'd think that military psychologists would have plenty of studies of people in these situations. Perhaps they are not sharing them.

    36. Re:Physchology by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...

      Awwww.... :(

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    37. Re:Physchology by legirons · · Score: 1

      So, what we should do is put people in a "mock spacecraft" for a "test" and launch them towards Mars. At the end of the 105 days they open the hatch and... surprise!

      Uhh, we already did that:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_cadets

    38. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, maybe it doesn't give "meaningful data" on a real Mars trip, but it does represent a lower bound on the stress of a Mars trip. If this had failed, we would have learned something. If it had not failed, then we need to up the ante.

    39. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also different in that "no tv and no internet" will not apply. I really don't see how they put that restriction on them.

      1TB of storage hardly takes any physical space at all and will hold roughly 40 hours of video. I don't see why they wouldnt launch with the most massive dvd/tvrip collection known to man. And a local copy of wikipedia, plenty of ebooks, etc.

      I'm not saying it would be easy, but there certainly would be more entertainment than is found on this test.

      For that matter, I'd be surprised if they kept everyone conscious the entire way. It's a pretty clear shot, why wouldn't we just have everyone in an induced sleep? Work out the medicine involved to keep people asleep for weeks or months at a time and the trip will be nothing.

    40. Re:Physchology by whopub · · Score: 0

      Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience). The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength. They didn't go insane.

      Well, if they fell for that they didn't have to go insane, they'd have a huge headstart to begin with.

      It's a shame I wasn't involved in the production of that one! I'd apoint one as commander and give him a Napoleon suit!

    41. Re:Physchology by Deputy+Doodah · · Score: 1

      I disagree. It's my own experience that simulations drive people crazy.

      I served aboard a submarine.
      Sometimes before we left on a deployment we would go through a drill called a "fast cruise'. We'd be tied up at the dock, surfaced, but the whole crew would be down below with the hatches shut pretending we were at sea and submerged. It was absolutely maddening because we knew that air, beer, and babes were separated from us by 2 to 3 inches of steel and that everything we were suffering through was just made-up. With no real danger and no real mission to concentrate on, we were left to wallow in our misery.

      When we were actually on deployment we were submerged for months at a time, which was no picnic, but it was much more bearable than spending 24 hours at the pier. Part of it was knowing that death lay on the other side of those 2 to 3 inches of steel and that we were in the most comfortable spot out in the middle of nowhere. There was stress, but that stress was due to real conditions, which is much more tolerable than stress that's contrived. With real stress you barely notice conditions like the AC being off while you're sitting next to a reactor.

      When the same thing was being done as a drill, we just sat there sweaty and pissed off.

    42. Re:Physchology by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a cool story. Probably would have been cooler if you hadn't read this...

      I dunno. I like Asimov, and I may read this story at some point, and I have to admit I'll be a little disappointed if the denouement doesn't include the phrase "but the mission controllers forgot or were asleep or something."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    43. Re:Physchology by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Screw trying a simulation first! We all know simulations are *perfect* - so why bother at all? I appreciate what you are saying, but I think you miss the point. Simulations are just that - simulations, and not the real thing. But they at least let you collect a subset of data *before* you try the real thing. You know, so they don't get hot for each other flesh around the van allen belt.

    44. Re:Physchology by cenc · · Score: 1

      It is likly most similar to what people went through on ships crossing the Atlantic in the 17th century or earlier. Perhaps more like the Vikings. Perhaps we can put them all in a sub, and force them to go around the World or something several times. There is an element missing in the experiment. Essentially being on your own, with no hope of rescue or assistance in a place where even little things can be fatal. Even when everything is going well, there must always be that concern way in the back of the mind to get a real feel for the long-term impact.

    45. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, and we all know people always act rationally...

      In fact, that's just what this experiment was designed to find out, wasn't it? How people would react? People here on Slashdot seem to have this automatic assumption that the experiment would be successful only if those folks actually managed the full 105 days, but that's not true.

      Let me stress that: this sort of study isn't a computer game. No outcome is, a priori, "good" or "bad"; they all lead to further insights. Nobody's trying to get a specific result.

    46. Re:Physchology by kklein · · Score: 1

      I'm just going to suggest that there are a lot of social differences between middle-aged scientists and 20somethings trained to kill. Basically, young soldiers are assholes. They're trained to be. It's a mean boys' club. I don't think we'd see that type of hazing on an exploratory mission unless we put a bunch of 20something submariners on it.

      I don't have a military background, but my dad was an officer in Korea and one of my best friends was a submarine captain. I don't have the personal experience you have, of course, and I believe every word of what you've said. I just think that it would not be as you say. I'm sure some teasing would go on, but I just don't think that older people do that kind of thing. That's young, testosterone-fueled, monkey alpha behavior that people grow out of when testosterone levels go down.

    47. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true geek!

      See, those 105 people *knew* that just outside the cramped wall was a big, beautiful, receptive planet, with air to breathe, beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out.

      OR, Those astronauts did the 105 days knowing they only had a shower etc. to look forward to- not one of the most life changing, history making experiences of their lives. These are people that live for adventure- not "beer to drink, and babes walking around to scope out".

      IMO 105 days in a boring danger free bubble with nothing at the end of it would seem to last a lot longer than living at the edge of safety and MARS!! to scope out.

    48. Re:Physchology by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing. Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight. Something go wrong? Everybody's dead!

      On the flip side, it's not unusual for the crew of a submarine to be underwater for at least 80 days straight, with a similar sense of "if anything goes wrong everybody's dead." Unlike a submarine crew, a Mars crew would also have regular contact with the world back home.

    49. Re:Physchology by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      I see it differently, and I think the test subject do too: If you're the first crew to Mars, you know every second that what you're doing is fucking important, and that you have a special privilege and responsibility,

      It might be helpful if you were to demonstrate *why* it would be important. This reasoning seems entirely subjective, and like all subjective reasoning, subject to change. If the astronaut/cosmonaut were to get halfway there and suddenly realise they didn't , after all, really think it was important to go, that would be pretty disruptive.

    50. Re:Physchology by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      has many more reasons to be on their best behavior.

      Many people have a lot of reasons to be on their best behavior, and many people have a lot of reasons to be on their worst behavior. That rarely stops many people from doing what they want to do or feel like doing...

    51. Re:Physchology by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right?

      The engineering solution to the psychology problem is to put some mutually agreeable and compatible people in the capsule and launch it. People are mission critical component and a good engineer doesn't fight the properties of his materials.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    52. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really mean no offense by this to you personally. But I would like to point out that in your situation on the sub, everyone was military. I'm thinking of the people I know who joined various branches of the military. They tended to be the ones who would do things like put another human beings head in a toilet for their own amusement if you know what I mean. In addition to this self-selection, military organizations seem to have an overall bully mentality. People selected for a Mars mission might very well have quite different personality profiles.

    53. Re:Physchology by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't yo just get used to the void, after some time?

      Oh, and I won't click on a foxnews.com link for the life of me. There is nothing to learn from that site except for sensationalist and extremist lies and irrelevancies.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    54. Re:Physchology by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you assume that there would be reasonable behavior going on. ^^

      Reason and making sense has nothing to do with what usually makes such things go wrong.

      It's deepest psychology.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    55. Re:Physchology by countach · · Score: 1

      Easy, take beer and babes with you in the space ship.

    56. Re:Physchology by bronney · · Score: 1

      welcome to Fox River, fish.

    57. Re:Physchology by KeensMustard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The engineering solution to the psychology problem is to put some mutually agreeable and compatible people in the capsule and launch it. People are mission critical component and a good engineer doesn't fight the properties of his materials.

      The ironic thing is that people aren't a mission critical component after all. There really isn't any reason for them to be aboard.

    58. Re:Physchology by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

      But an actual, honest-to-god Mars trip is different, and everybody will know it. Just outside the cramped wall is the darkest, blackest, most incomprehensibly complete void mankind can fathom. No air, no beer, no babes. Nothing. And not just some nothing, MILLIONS of miles of nothing. Months of travel at speeds inconceivable to airlines flight. Something go wrong? Everybody's dead!

      Ok, ok, so just put them in a bathysphere, send it to the bottom of Challenger Deep, and pull up the tow line. Should take care of the stress issue...

    59. Re:Physchology by Falconhell · · Score: 2, Funny

      So the key is to send people who aren't very bright and don't even have a basic scientific education.

      You want to send managers etc to mars? Hmmm not a bad idea,we could call it a "B" Ark. (-:

    60. Re:Physchology by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      More likely they'll just put a ship in orbit or perhaps moon orbit for 105 days.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    61. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be "quite easy" to test real flight to Mars - they just must repeat test on ISS.

    62. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think GP is talking about the other way around... tell them that it is fake so that they believe that it's just a simulation and withstand it the same way that these men endured their 105-day flight simulation, but actually send them to mars. Of course, the bad part of this idea is that the poor people would be freaking out when they realized they were actually on mars :).

    63. Re:Physchology by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      They didn't go insane.

      From the article: "Space Cadets was a British television program made by Zeppotron..."

      Hmmm... Unbiased, accurate, significant scientific research there. Perhaps you're not a good candidate for this mission to Mars; You might confuse the landing system for an old MS Flight Sim game.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    64. Re:Physchology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add air, add beer, add babes inside the ship and it will be even better than the simulation !

    65. Re:Physchology by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some teasing would go on, but I just don't think that older people do that kind of thing. That's young, testosterone-fueled, monkey alpha behavior that people grow out of when testosterone levels go down.

      And that's where you'd be wrong. I'd be in agreement with you for heinous personal offenses (Tying someone up with duct-tape, holding personal items for ransom); however, our 50-something XO didn't have a problem supporting some of the lessor offenses committed against others. Our XO stole the navigator's pillow one day, wet it with water, placed it in the freezer until very solid and then placed it back just in time for the NAV to attempt to go to his bunk for some rack time. And, it isn't like the Captain wasn't cognizant of the goings-on. Generally, the Captain didn't partake in behavior like that. He was, by station, above such petty things. And rightly so.

      These kinds of behavior have been handed down since sailors started sailing the seas. Boredom generates all kinds of oddities of entertainment one wouldn't normally find even mildly interesting onshore.

      Beard growing contests: Fastest-growing beard, worst beard (naturally kept), longest beard, best beard, fullest beard, sparsest beard, ....

      Contests to see who can come up with the most number of dishes cooked with animal 'X' (No Internet available so no cheating!).

      Silly name games: Movie names beginning with one letter and ending in another. The end letter for the latter begins the name of the next title.
      If I said, "Rainman".
      You'd have to "Neverending Story".
      I've have to say, "Yanks".
      Until someone runs out of names.

      It's traditional. Now, maybe you're correct and the Utopian-existence-in-space will supersede the odd behavior of man confined to small spaces for prolonged periods of time without much stimulation other than stress induced by that of their own small microcosm. Maybe space travel really will only ever be the realm of the people that act like Jon Luke Pickard and his bridge dwelling officers. Maybe I'm completely out of touch with what the future holds.

      I'll agree with one point, though. Having lived through some of those same childish pranks I can only really say, "I hope you are correct." I somehow doubt it, though.

      (ps: Then again, some of my fondest memories of the sonar shack consist of the movie game above. My favorite memory is when I got the Sonar Supervisor so pissed off he damn near attacked me. Paybacks are mothers.)

    66. Re:Physchology by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      No offense taken. Some people were more prone to be victims than others. Some were more likely to commit the offenses than others. The thing is, there is just enough assholes on board to make everyone's lives miserable from time to time.

      As it is currently - in this day and age - the space jockeys are hand selected for their mission to be placed on such as highly technical ship as a spacecraft.

      But, wait. Hyman G. Rickover used to hand-select the personnel he envisioned on Submarines, too. Every submariner, even to this day (loons and all) have psychological tests to see if they can handle the rigors of Space^H^H^H^H^HSubmarine Service. (Shut those hatches and you don't know where you are.) The point is, psychological tests were used to ensure perfect harmony on board subs.

      I wonder what happened? ;-)

  12. Better bring a game or two by Uther2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like they should add an Xbox360 or a PS3 to the supply list. They can practice their hand-to-eye coordination just in case of hostile little-green-men

    --
    "You were expecting something witty here ?"
    1. Re:Better bring a game or two by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? Why not use the computers the ships is already sprawling with?

    2. Re:Better bring a game or two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mars Journal Day 4:
      Turned on XB360 and got the RROD... f***k

    3. Re:Better bring a game or two by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of hand-to-eye coordination they'll practice after they get the inevitable RROD, but it could involve their fisted-up hands hands in someone else's eye.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  13. Perfect enviroment... by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a perfect marketing opportunity for an E-Book reader. A device like a Kindle that gets VERY long battery life + can hold MANY books would be the perfect design for the weight conscious space launch, limited electrical supply, and low-bandwidth data link (email).

    If I were to spend 200+ days in transit I would want a lot of reading material. All duties become dull and repetitive, it's the down-time that will drive a man insane from boredom.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  14. Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nice test, but of course a Hohmann trajectory to Mars takes nine months-- 275 days, not 105. They exited the spacecraft when they were only halfway there!

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nice test, but of course a Hohmann trajectory to Mars takes nine months-- 275 days, not 105.

      True enough. However, the most likely trajectory will be an Earth-return trajectory, so that they'll come back here if something goes wrong along the way. Which is only 180 days long.

      So they made it MORE than halfway before they exited the spacecraft, not less than halfway...

      Note, by the way, that some of the crews of Mir spent six months on Mir, which is smaller than a Mars craft is likely to be.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      They don't have to take a Hohmann trajectory. That is the least energy path, but not the only path. If we spent the money on better propulsion and more fuel, they'd get their sooner.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    3. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by robinesque · · Score: 1

      Once again, if something went wrong (providing it wasn't catastrophic), everyone could jump in the soyuz lifeboat and have air, beer and babes.

    4. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by martas · · Score: 1

      so what? maybe they were simulating stopping at a burger king on the way to mars? i don't see anything wrong with that...

    5. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if *I* went to Mars, I'd sure as hell want to come back to Earth afterwards. So let's say 180 days there + 180 days return = basically one entire year spent in transit.

      Sure, *after* there is a base constructed on Mars, things will be easier - but it will take many working trips until such a base could be completed. Before that, you're not only travelling to and fro in cramped quarters, you're living in cramped quarters while you're there.

    6. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by nizo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe they have a working antimatter drive?

      Another significant advantage is speed. The Reference Mission spacecraft would take astronauts to Mars in about 180 days. "Our advanced designs, like the gas core and the ablative engine concepts, could take astronauts to Mars in half that time, and perhaps even in as little as 45 days," said Kirby Meyer, an engineer with Positronics Research on the study.

      http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/home/antimatter_spaceship.html

    7. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1

      At the glacial pace we're going now, by the time we're ready to actually launch folks to Mars, we should have a workable ion drive or plasma drive or Russian Reversal drive. Heck, we've known ion drives work for over a decade.

      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
    8. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      If working antimatter containment were perfected by the US government, you can bet that it would end up in bombs before it ended up in spacecraft.

      However, there isn't anything magical about this. You can get to Mars in as little time as you like (short of the speed of light), provided you are willing to expend the fuel accellerating and decellerating, and that the crew can endure the G forces. Of course, the more fuel you expend the harder it will be to launch all that fuel into space in the first place. On the other hand, there is a tradeoff since a faster transit time may require less in the way of supplies and shielding.

      The nine month figure is what is needed for the most efficient possible trip in terms of fuel only.

      The other consideration is that the faster the transit time the more you need to decellerate when you get there. If you are on the most efficient route then you can probably just use aerobraking to do most of the work to put you in martian orbit. If you are on a hyperbolic orbit out of the solar system then chances are you're going to have to bleed off a lot of speed with thrusters first or you WILL end up leaving the solar system. As others have posted here, an Earth-return trajectory makes sense since it shortens the time modestly and if anything goes wrong you'll at least end up near the Earth (and if you can maneuver enough you might even be able to aerobrake and descend - although your speed will be quite high).

    9. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by T.E.D. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note, by the way, that some of the crews of Mir spent six months on Mir, which is smaller than a Mars craft is likely to be.

      Yeah, but those were Russians. The Mir was probably a lot nicer and roomier than their apartments back home.

    10. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this one guy Valeri Polyakov stayed up over a year. 105 days? Humbug.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valeri_Polyakov

    11. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if *I* went to Mars, I'd sure as hell want to come back to Earth afterwards. So let's say 180 days there + 180 days return = basically one entire year spent in transit.

      About that. With about 1.5 years on Mars between the going and the returning.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    12. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note, by the way, that some of the crews of Mir spent six months on Mir, which is smaller than a Mars craft is likely to be.

      Yeah, but those were Russians.

      Not all of them-- Shannon Lucid spent six months on Mir.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    13. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're planning on building a space 7 Eleven there.

    14. Re:Trip to Mars takes 9 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. Real isolation by dargaud · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you want to know what 365 days in real isolation in a tin can feels like... At least we had: (1) plenty of things to do, (2) the pressure that if we failed bad we'd most likely die. They had: (1) nothing to do, (2) the possibility to open the can if things got bad...

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Real isolation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had toys. If you check out the pics in that link for Miss September, you can see that they had frickin' lasers mounted on their heads.

    2. Re:Real isolation by shird · · Score: 1

      Just ask Elizabeth Fritzl. At least she had TV though, and kids. Getting raped by your father was probably a downside though.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
  16. Submarine Patrol 105 Days by kurtb149 · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was on a US Navy, FBM submarine, we typically spent 105 days submerged, with no contact from the outside world. It was not fun, but it was not that hard either.

    --
    http://www.x2ii.info/
    1. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by tjstork · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was just going to post that, if NASA needs people that can spend months in space, they can go Navy... like, when they got Alan Shepard.

      --
      This is my sig.
    2. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been saying that for years (and not just because I'm USN/Submarine service). The fighter jock mentality that worked so well for Mercury works less well as missions become longer and more demanding - but the submariner mentality is perfectly suited for such missions.
       
      On the subject of Alan Shepard - I once saw a study that showed that NASA (probably unconsciously) tended to select Naval and Marine aviators over USAF pilots for mission command and pilot slots. Not overwhelming so, but the ratio was decidedly lopsided. (IIRC there were at least two all Navy Apollo crews to only one all USAF crew.)

    3. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by VoxMagis · · Score: 1

      I've always felt that perhaps we really do look for Astronauts in the wrong place. It seems to me the modern space traveler should come from submariners rather than pilots.

      Able to spend huge amounts of time in a metal tube with no release, no room and little if any privacy? Check
      Able to solve problems from inside said tube? Check

      --
      -- I really need to bleed off some of this /. karma.
    4. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like when Shepard had sex with that blue alien. That was cool.

    5. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      True, but deep down, you still knew that if needs *really really* must, you were a few minutes from surfacing, and at most, a day or two from home.

      50 days into that trip to Mars, on the other hand....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    6. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you go navy you never go back.

    7. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But even your cramped submarine was much bigger than a mars vehicle will be, and had a lot more room for entertainment related equipment.

    8. Re:Submarine Patrol 105 Days by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ah, someone knowledgeable about this - I was just asking the other day, "why isn't a Mars mission the same thing as a submarine mission plus some heat management?"

      Do submerged subs exchange with the seawater for oxygen?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. The hardest part... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    They had no television

    Easy. I hardly watch TV any more, with all the bullshit that's usually on...

    or Internet and

    That's already lots harder... but I might muster enough willpower...

    their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers

    ...

    â" who also monitored them via TV cameras â"

    O gosh! That's cruel. No privacy for a quick handjob... 105 days without wanking, o the inhumanity!

  18. Capricorn One by querist · · Score: 1

    There was a movie about a faked manned Mars landing titled "Capricorn One".

    I know that supposedly art imitates life, but life imitating movies?

    1. Re:Capricorn One by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Cosmodrome, you kill O.J.!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Capricorn One by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Science imitades Sci-fi allllll the time, I see no reason why not to.

    3. Re:Capricorn One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you don't think it's coincidence that the movie starred OJ Simpson?

  19. Skip to the end... by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    The experiment was the second for the institute, whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls.

    Russian officials at the time downplayed the incidents, attributing it to cultural gaps and stress.

    Soviet engineers also tried a similar yearlong experiment, but that was interrupted because of unending conflicts between crew members.

    It sounds like this is there only successful attempt in three tries.

    1. Re:Skip to the end... by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      For a trip as critical as this one it might be a good idea to simulate a year long confinement with the actual crew being sent just to make sure they're compatible.

  20. Re:Psychology by CorporateSuit · · Score: 3, Informative

    You have to understand, though, the psyche of astronauts. There are two archetypes: Fighter pilots and scientists. These two types fit into a single archetype: Obsessive. The first astronauts were fighter pilots and test pilots. They were cocky, confident, and absolutely attention-whorish (It has to be ME up on that moon). Then, scientists trickled in. What type of scientist makes for a good astronaut? The kind that shrugs off a 10% chance of death from getting to the lab this morning. You put these guys in a simulator and they're looking for everything to go wrong. They want to get to Mars. They're probably stir-crazy in a simulator, but they have that obsessive eye on the prize. "This simulator is preparing me to go to Mars."

    If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel, outside of the simulator, all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying "Guys, we're on our way to MARS!" and poof! Problems solved.

    For the typical you and me, we aren't QUITE so obsessive. Our trip to Mars would probably include some measure of space madness, but for the first groups, it's the non-psychological biology that needs to be tested rather than their mental fortitude. The people on those trips know they've got a 3% survival rate, and tends to be a very calming experience when volunteered for.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  21. Wasn't MIR a much better simulator than this? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, the Mir space station was probably much roomier than any likely Mars spaceship, but it's worth noting that people stayed up there for a year at a time, and there were no fistfights, gropings, or any other such silliness. I'm sure the Russian space agency has reams of psychological data from Mir.

    The value I see in this is that if you repeat such experiments many times, you can start testing theories about the interaction of certain personality types, and also test theories about choosing optimal group sizes, gender mix, degree of contact with Earth (less might actually be better). Also, I know that Mir cosmonauts frequently got pissed off because they were given too much work. Experiments like this could establish an appropriate threshold for "minimum necessary slack time".

    OK, I take it back - maybe there is a lot to be learned from experiments like this. As a bonus they're absurdly cheap (as a fraction of the total Mars mission cost) and if repeated often enough, they really might help (in unexpected ways) with planning a mission which is least likely to fail.

    (Though it's worth adding that if the actual Mars astronauts got into bloody fistfights and sexually harassed the hot Canadian crewmate, Americans might actually tune in and learn more astronomy sort of by accident. Hmm, maybe Rupert Murdoch should fund the mission and give FOX/Sky broadcast rights to what would surely be the most watched reality show in all of history!)

    1. Re:Wasn't MIR a much better simulator than this? by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      (Though it's worth adding that if the actual Mars astronauts got into bloody fistfights and sexually harassed the hot Canadian crewmate, Americans might actually tune in and learn more astronomy sort of by accident. Hmm, maybe Rupert Murdoch should fund the mission and give FOX/Sky broadcast rights to what would surely be the most watched reality show in all of history!)

      http://www.hulu.com/watch/80030/virtuality

  22. internal email system? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    to: Commander Bob
    fr: Commander Tom
    subj: Your leg

    Hi Bob, could you move your leg? It's blocking my mouth.

    Thanks, Tom

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:internal email system? by SomeWhiteGuy · · Score: 1

      to: Commander Tom
      fr: Commander Bob
      subj: Re: Your leg

      Sorry

      Bob

    2. Re:internal email system? by KylePflug · · Score: 2, Funny

      to: Ground Control
      fr: Major Tom
      subj: Status update

      I'm stepping through the door...

      Tom

    3. Re:internal email system? by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...so basically this e-mail system will be about as useful as Twitter?

    4. Re:internal email system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naval Message?

      That would require a:

      "V/r"

    5. Re:internal email system? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      to: Commander Tom
      fr: Commander Bob
      subj: Re: Your leg

      That's not my leg! =D

      Bob

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:internal email system? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Here I'm sitting in a tin can
      far above the world,
      my computer's screen is blue,
      and there's nothing I can do.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  23. Why so cut off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curious why the crew was so cut off from TV, Internet, pictures of the natural world, etc?

    Maybe in the trillion dollar Mars exploration plan we should include a couple thousand dollars to equip the vehicle with a DirecTV Dish and keep a relay here on Earth pointed at it, and a couple of screens which can display movies, trees, oceans, water and other nature.

    Internet might be a little harder with the delay, but I see no reason why the crew couldn't be beamed a daily 'cache' of favorite web pages, Earthly news, etc.

    1. Re:Why so cut off? by theuhstuf · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. Earth = Gone Mars = New Home

  24. Re:Psychology by Stele · · Score: 1

    Our trip to Mars would probably include some measure of space madness...

    Then I hope they pack enough ice-cream bars!

  25. Why No Internet? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    They had no television or Internet and their only link to the outside world was communications with the experiment's controllers -- who also monitored them via TV cameras -- and an internal e-mail system. Communications with the outside world had 20-minute delays to imitate a real space flight.

    Why would we subject astronauts to "no Internet"? OK, they couldn't use our "World" -wide apps that depend on low latency. But an "internet" (small "i", not the unified public one) would be a perfect tech to keep their mission LANs communicating with NASA networks on Earth. And making such an internet would be a very valuable product of such a mission. Extending the Internet into space while it's still basically "American style" would be a huge dividend for getting both the Internet and the space colonization global industries (and human endeavors) started and fully under way. America's national interest coinciding with furthering the global interest of everyone already riding the momentum of America's earlier pioneering.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Why No Internet? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      they were worried about pirates?

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  26. so its set then, by nimbius · · Score: 1

    if my insight into the delay is correct, we're set to use microsoft Exchange for interstellar email.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  27. Missing Link? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Better than their first attempt:

    "The experiment was the second for the institute, whose previous effort in 1999 ended in scandal when a Canadian woman complained of being forcibly kissed by a Russian captain and said that two Russian crew members had a fist fight that left blood splattered on the walls."

    Moral of the story don't put hot Canadian women on board unless you want all the men to fight over her.

    Hey isn't there a launch today with a Canadian woman on board?

    Nooooooooooooo!

    Also note that this successful attempt was all men, no women at all. Have to wonder if that was on purpose.

  28. Twilight Zone by Crock23A · · Score: 1

    There was an episode of the Twilight Zone where they did this. It was a year-long test, if I recall correctly and the guy either flipped out or died at the end.

    1. Re:Twilight Zone by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      I believe you're thinking of the original pilot episode "Where is Everybody?" written by Rod Serling that helped sell the series concpet to CBS. Astronaut (played by Earl Holliman) flips out after 484 days of an isolation experiment.

      "Up there, up there in the vastness of space, in the void that is the sky, up there is an enemy known as isolation. It sits there in the stars, waiting, waiting with the patience of eons, forever waiting... in The Twilight Zone."
      -- Serling's final narration at the end of the episode.

  29. Celebrities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had no television or Internet...

    One of the first questions asked by the test subjects:
    "So, did any famous celebrities die while we were on our mission of isolation?"

  30. US is doing it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.fmars2009.org/

    They are focusing on what to do when on mars, rather than what to do when going to mars though.

  31. Re:Psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, they are all right inside by that panel with the handle there Mr Stele. In fact, why don't you go over and grab one right now. *close door behind and over speaker* Mr Stele, might want to buckle up.

    Mij

  32. Mission to Mars Needs Women. by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    It's lonely in space.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  33. Holy shit! by shaze · · Score: 0

    Dudes, They should totally send David Blaine up in that shit.

  34. Re:Physchology ... Ah, you're alluding to by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Capricorn One", or to "It's a windy day in Arizona", hehehe...

    Well, these three took their chicken coop VERY SPHERIOUSLY. But, yeh, as mentioned before, if they ate beans (or, even opened a box of natto), they would suffer from a new sphere of end-fluence...

    What would make it more interesting is if the sphere were WELDED SHUT, and then put in a dunking tank. Transparent Aluminum-like ports could be in the design, but the tank would have flow-makers, and then all sorts of flotsam, veggies, effluent, or tentacular things could from time to time be introduced, of course with a life-like starfield.

    To make things MORE interesting, fire it across the desert SLAC-like (Stanford Linear Accelerator) tube at about 800mph to simulate g forces, then have the "launch" terminate in the tank. 0-g might be tough, unless the tank incorporated a rotating arm undulating, and nutating as necessary, with uulating noises on the outside. Basically, TRICK these guys into thinking "simulation" was a lie, and that they are trapped in a sphere. To make things even MOOOOORE interesting, have the uulations coincide with periodic dishing in of the sphere, like crushing. Have the computer report gravimetric pressures having reduced structural integrity by 28% in the x-year duration travel. Make the comms delays longer and longer, and then break the toilet.

    These 3 won't be friendly with each other for too much longer. They'll either be lovers, enemies, or frenemies. Or, LoNeMies.... Especially if they are allowed to "smell" space and think they are unmonitored and running out of time to profess their (un)dying admiration for each other while they still have fresh water (or NASA urine) to bathe with.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  35. Space dogged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All i could think of when i read the headline was "Ren and Stimpy - Space Dogged" http://www.joost.com/079000m/t/Ren-and-Stimpy-Space-Dogged-Feud-for-Sale#id=079000m

    167 days of isolation without food or water :-)

  36. Intimate human contact by Theovon · · Score: 1

    I wonder how well the space agencies are taking into consideration human need for intimate contact. NASA crews at least get some scheduled parts of the day when they get privacy and are disconnected from health monitors. But this is for relatively short missions. Unsatisfied sexual needs can create tension, especially in situations of extreme isolation with no way out. Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips?

    1. Re:Intimate human contact by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

      It's that or aces (asexuals). Straight single men do not do well when cooped up for long periods of time.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    2. Re:Intimate human contact by vlm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps only sexually active couples should be sent on these trips?

      Well, that rules out the married folks.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  37. laptop + bittorrent? by thinsoldier · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they could find somebody with 105 days worth of tv & movies on their laptop to lend to the astronauts so they have some entertainment. Surely somebody on slashdot has 365 days worth of porn on an external hard drive they could donate to NASA? If you add in a Kindle for when they're tired of video they can keep completely entertained for the whole trip!

  38. Easy! by msormune · · Score: 1

    I could do that, as long as there were Internet and beer. Wait what?

  39. Excessive? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    I think their test was excessive. The real travelers will have access to "television" and "internet". The latency will just suck nuts and the bandwidth won't be too awesome either.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Excessive? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I'd go crazy a lot more quickly if they gave me Internet access in that scenario. Imagine having to wait 20 minutes after each click for results to show up in your web browser. Even worse, images embedded in a page would take an additional 20 minutes to show up because your browser won't know what image files to ask for until it receives the page with the embedded links. It would be like Chinese water torture, always wondering when the next page was going to hit. If I didn't lose my mind sooner, I'd lose it the first time I got a 404 message. It would definitely be better to not have Internet access at all.

      It may not be too bad if NASA creates a customized browser and proxy server so that when you visit a new page, the proxy server crawls every link on that page and starts streaming them to the ship before you ask for them, and then crawls the links on those pages recursively using a breadth-first search pattern until the browser tells it which link you picked (at which point it picks a new root for the tree). The customized browser would continually listen for new files to be sent and cache them on the local drive. Even with relatively low bandwidth, the browsing experience should be fairly responsive as long as you keep following a chain of links, don't click too fast, and don't hit a page with like a million links. If you do something silly like try to fill out a web form (i.e. type a search term into Google), type a web site name into the address bar, or visit a dynamic web 2.0 site with a bunch of Ajax calls, it's back to the Chinese water torture.

  40. One hell of a reality TV show by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    "This is the true story... of six strangers... picked to live in a space shuttle...work together and have their lives taped... to find out what happens... when people stop being polite... and start getting real...The Real Mars." Coming to MTV, Fall of 2031.

  41. Disable gravity, then walk out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disable gravity for 105 days, then walk out of the experiment.
    THAT will impress me.

    Humans lose muscle very quickly without gravity even if they exercise 2+ hours a day. Walking after 2 weeks is difficult. http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2006/09/22/astronaut-collapse.html To be clear, these people are fitter than most. The other astronauts were FEELING gravity just as much. Studies show over 30% muscle loss after a few months in micro-gravity.

  42. Laaaaag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 minute lag? Man, they would need to find a really high-ping server to play UT2004.

  43. More power to you! by bonedog73 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad there are people willing to do this type of thing, I'm just not one of them. I have no desire to goto Mars with today's technology. When we can hop on a plane and get to Mars in a few hours...not that will be something!

    1. Re:More power to you! by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Without massive breakthroughs in physics a 2 hour perceived travel time is impossible.

      If we had a warp drive we could potentially do it.

      Alternatively, if we figure out how to negate the mass of spacecraft, it would allow mind-numbing acceleration, so that we could travel close to the speed of light for most of the trip.

      A third option, if we could master the physics of quantum tunneling, would be to simply instantly pop from Earth to Mars, without actually traveling the intervening space.

      But I wouldn't bet on any of those becoming reality.

  44. simulation by confused+one · · Score: 1

    did they simulate the lack of gravity and radiation as well? I didn't think so. The ISS is a better simulation of the voyage. As has been pointed out, submariners routinely endure 100 day missions without outside contact; so, they didn't really prove much.

    1. Re:simulation by cmseagle · · Score: 1

      But most submarine crews are much larger than 6.

      I think this was more a test of: "Can we pick 6 people, lock them in a tin can for 3 months, and not have them kill each other?"

  45. Re:Psychology by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    And a shiny, candy-like button!

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  46. Power isn't a problem by becker · · Score: 1

    How much energy does it take to get out of earth orbit? How much power capacity needs to be held in reserve for unexpected events?

    I don't expect that power usage for entertainment communications is an issue. The ship will no doubt have antennas and transmitters large enough to transmit video and telemetry both for control and for the benefit of the citizens that paid for the mission. The bits needed to request something is trivial in comparison.

    On the other side, there is plenty of power on earth to transmit por... entertainment during the slow periods.

    I also don't see any problem with the latency. You obviously wouldn't be able to play online games, but most of what you view in a day could be pre-cached or just waited for without a problem.

  47. Hutu Uprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The isolation is tough, but the hardest part of a mission to Mars is surviving the Hutu uprising.

    And always make sure the monkey doesn't steal your suspended animation chamber.

  48. mod GP up Re:Physchology by Shipwack · · Score: 2, Informative

    There have already been submerged submarine patrols lasting over a hundred days.

    You'd think that military psychologists would have plenty of studies of people in these situations. Perhaps they are not sharing them.

    Veteran of the SSBN sub force here, and I'm kind of surprised that this is considered that big a deal. We've been doing trips in isolation this long since the 60s.

    Then again, I suppose the group dynamics for 6 people are slightly different than for 110 people.

  49. Redo the test by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    A better test would be locking the astronauts for 105 days in a small box, letting them out in the middle of the desert of Arizona for 2 weeks and then relocking them for another 105 days. Unless we only care for them to get sane to Mars but we don't really care if they are not sane when they get back to Earth. Unless (2) we're not planning of getting them back.

  50. Russian time compression technology by 4181 · · Score: 1
    The real news was hidden deep in the article:

    officials ... promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year

    1. Re:Russian time compression technology by Zalminen · · Score: 1

      Maybe they intend to make sure the next one won't even last this long?

      "Damn, they're still inside... Ok, release the skunks!"

  51. Re:Psychology by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

    If there ARE any problems or clashes onboard a Mars vessel, outside of the simulator, all they have to do is have one guy dedicated to saying "Guys, we're on our way to MARS!" and poof! Problems solved.

    That works for road trips to Mardi Gras also.

    Peter

  52. The Hollywood Version by Agripa · · Score: 1

    [making video diary entry] I do not like the men on this spaceship. They are uncouth and fail to appreciate my better qualities. I have something of value to contribute to this mission if they would only recognize it. Today over lunch I tried to improve morale and build a sense of camaraderie among the men by holding a humorous, round-robin discussion of the early days of the mission. My overtures were brutally rejected. These men do not want a happy ship. They are deeply sick and try to compensate by making me feel miserable. Last week was my birthday. Nobody even said "happy birthday" to me. Someday this tape will be played and then they'll feel sorry.

  53. Red Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kim Stanley Robinson wrote a trilogy about mars colonization starting with Red Mars.

    How did they deal with the trip out? They brought 50 men and 50 women so they would have something to do.

  54. Send Anne Hathaway and Malin Ackerman instead. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > 105 days of isolation in a mock spacecraft, still smiling after testing
    > the stresses that space travelers may face on the journey to Mars. They
    > had no television or Internet...

    "One of the 'astronauts' exclaimed he was glad to be out because, "Boy, did that place smell like butt!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  55. Institute for Temporal and Scheduling Problems... by dhempy · · Score: 1

    ...officials at the Institute for Medical and Biological Problems praised the experiment as a success and promised to conduct a 500-day simulation experiment later this year...

    Nice trick. Maybe they rented 100 capsules for a week...