They sort of did give money, indirectly. They forced us/you to show up for a job. Some shitty job where everybody slacked off as much as possible and you got a paycheck. Thing is there was not much to buy with the money. This was here in europe.
Oh far from me to advocate any revolution, the Frech revolution and Russian revolution were catastrophic, which is why i was suggesting not trying to claim you are helping someone who doesn't want help.
But how about those people who were forced out of this world through Siberia&Co because they, being morons, could not see the betterment some people did just for bettering of mankind. JUST FOR THE BETTERING OF MANKIND and for sure no possible other reason. Or are we, and i go back to my original question, simply not counting them ?
Are you sure? Super duper sure? Because the morons might one night burn down your castle and strip you of your nobiliary title, just to help you of course you see...
Let me get this straight, you are comparing 1930s german honesty levels with N.K and Congo ?? Hell the nazis even wrote a book about their intentions, it's super obscure nobody read it....
Because communists claim to govern in the name of the people, that's why. Just like Hilter. Also like him they love them an all powerful state. Funny how you don't see any individual rights touted in either N.K. nor nazi Germany. Just a coincidence i guess that they all just love them this socialism stuff. You know, think of the people !!!!!!!!
If it says apply liberally it can mean apply as much OR AS LITTLE as *YOU* WANT. Emphasys on YOUr dominion over the qty required. Also, i speak a neolatin language where to liberate means to free someone/something. (not to widen them).
They both pushed right wing societal values such as attacking and even killing homosexuals...
Wtf are you making stuff up? Attacking homosexuals is right there in Stuart Mill or Friedrich Hayek, I must have missed it. It's like saying leftist values are killing jews because the nazis were left wing.
He even believed in capitalism
Just like the KKK believes in freedom for all. What glue are you sniffing?
You explain it to me then why instead of the S there isn't a L (for liberal, the real kind) or some other individual liberties minded doctrine ? Why did they chose socialism+*arbeiters* partei ? Let me guess they just had to pick a name and rolled a dice or something, since the nazis were known to not plan propaganda or anything.
"The community needs to provide some regulation on production, distribution and exchange"
And of course you know this because you are the one true community-whisperer/high-priest ? And by some you mean complete, don't you ? And by community you mean you, don't you now ? I'm probably not in the "community" because i don't need more regulation on "everything". OMG i must be an evil exploiter or some such imaginary creature.
It's amazing how one DOESN'T think they were socialists, in spite of all obviousness. n*S*dap. Go on, tell us how these are not the S we are looking for.
You may of course be making fun of Jesus, but seems you have noticed that there might be some corelation (achtung obligatory corelation/causation) between jesus followers and success in life. Just sayin.
also:), "system needs competition, but the players within it desire to have as little competition as possible," -- the majority of players DO want competition, just not in their narrow field:), which is ofc understandable to anyone who gets human nature, luckaly the market doesn't care.
Also while true that perhaps switching to a new product becomes too expensive, you must also consider that new clients don't have this problem, so if a better product comes along it might win the marked when enough old peoples die off.
To be honest I would be more worried about oligopoly markets/cartels, and would ask the state to closely eyeball THAT and perhaps take some indirect action as to foster competition in those markets (which would be to me a valid use of state power).
I said so because you said "are a real thing..", as if trying to convince the public of an unknown/obscure phenomenon, but I understand what you meant. Btw I also try to stick to FF.
"despite a monopoly is more damaging to a market than any government regulation short of a full planned economy could be." -- i firmly disagree, monopolies tend to go away after a few years whereas govt reg. just adds to the power trip.
and btw i was born in a planned economy and i know a fing o two.
Slashdot Mirror
They sort of did give money, indirectly. They forced us/you to show up for a job. Some shitty job where everybody slacked off as much as possible and you got a paycheck. Thing is there was not much to buy with the money. This was here in europe.
Known fact that a 1%er eats with two spoons at a time !!! Damn parasites....
i won't understand how much unless you tell me in Libraries of Congress !
Oh far from me to advocate any revolution, the Frech revolution and Russian revolution were catastrophic, which is why i was suggesting not trying to claim you are helping someone who doesn't want help.
But how about those people who were forced out of this world through Siberia&Co because they, being morons, could not see the betterment some people did just for bettering of mankind. JUST FOR THE BETTERING OF MANKIND and for sure no possible other reason. Or are we, and i go back to my original question, simply not counting them ?
Are you sure? Super duper sure? Because the morons might one night burn down your castle and strip you of your nobiliary title, just to help you of course you see...
I'm sure you mean "us all" to exclude the "lamers" that aren't helped :).
Let me get this straight, you are comparing 1930s german honesty levels with N.K and Congo ?? Hell the nazis even wrote a book about their intentions, it's super obscure nobody read it....
Because communists claim to govern in the name of the people, that's why. Just like Hilter. Also like him they love them an all powerful state. Funny how you don't see any individual rights touted in either N.K. nor nazi Germany. Just a coincidence i guess that they all just love them this socialism stuff. You know, think of the people !!!!!!!!
If it says apply liberally it can mean apply as much OR AS LITTLE as *YOU* WANT. Emphasys on YOUr dominion over the qty required. Also, i speak a neolatin language where to liberate means to free someone/something. (not to widen them).
They both pushed right wing societal values such as attacking and even killing homosexuals...
Wtf are you making stuff up? Attacking homosexuals is right there in Stuart Mill or Friedrich Hayek, I must have missed it. It's like saying leftist values are killing jews because the nazis were left wing.
He even believed in capitalism
Just like the KKK believes in freedom for all. What glue are you sniffing?
You explain it to me then why instead of the S there isn't a L (for liberal, the real kind) or some other individual liberties minded doctrine ? Why did they chose socialism+*arbeiters* partei ? Let me guess they just had to pick a name and rolled a dice or something, since the nazis were known to not plan propaganda or anything.
You must open a book or two. Liberal means for Liberty, specially individual liberties, like how the state/King can't impede on some Liberties.
"The community needs to provide some regulation on production, distribution and exchange"
And of course you know this because you are the one true community-whisperer/high-priest ? And by some you mean complete, don't you ? And by community you mean you, don't you now ? I'm probably not in the "community" because i don't need more regulation on "everything". OMG i must be an evil exploiter or some such imaginary creature.
It's amazing how one DOESN'T think they were socialists, in spite of all obviousness. n*S*dap. Go on, tell us how these are not the S we are looking for.
You may of course be making fun of Jesus, but seems you have noticed that there might be some corelation (achtung obligatory corelation/causation) between jesus followers and success in life. Just sayin.
read this: PARTY. The country may be capitalistic, but the communist PARTY is STILL COMMUNIST son.
+1
citation needed or else.
A) Adults don't do revenge. -- bwhahahahhaha.
And do you also believe in Santa Klaus ?
Can someone calculate/guesstimate ?
could it be that of all people the right takes security more seriously than the pie-in-the-sky people ? Just an idea....
perhaps woosh but i don't understand the joke.
also :), "system needs competition, but the players within it desire to have as little competition as possible," -- the majority of players DO want competition, just not in their narrow field :), which is ofc understandable to anyone who gets human nature, luckaly the market doesn't care.
Also while true that perhaps switching to a new product becomes too expensive, you must also consider that new clients don't have this problem, so if a better product comes along it might win the marked when enough old peoples die off.
To be honest I would be more worried about oligopoly markets/cartels, and would ask the state to closely eyeball THAT and perhaps take some indirect action as to foster competition in those markets (which would be to me a valid use of state power).
I said so because you said "are a real thing..", as if trying to convince the public of an unknown/obscure phenomenon, but I understand what you meant. Btw I also try to stick to FF.
"despite a monopoly is more damaging to a market than any government regulation short of a full planned economy could be." -- i firmly disagree, monopolies tend to go away after a few years whereas govt reg. just adds to the power trip.
and btw i was born in a planned economy and i know a fing o two.