so the lights are in your favour, cant help myself i STILL check both ways before proceeding, not just because the highway code says so. its simple self preservation
"You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you may later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence." they only imply that they will infer your guilt due to silence, doesnt mean its true though or proper or right, but LOL you belived a police man LOL (not you strictly but OP)
Exactly, assume everyone is trying to kill you. you maybe in the right but you may also in the hospital if you dont. just reading these posts is a good demonstration of other trying to blame any/every one else for something that you have a fair amount of control over. it is after all your life and NOBODY really cares about it even 1/2 as much as you , please look after yourself
clearly the public perception of the danger is lesser than the systems perception of the offence. that is to say that those that talk and drive mostly havent killed anyone (yet). thus its hard toi get it into there head that it might be dangerous. more people have died the year due to swine (mexican) flu this year than have died due to mobile phone use . and nobody thinks swine flu is a danger on the roads
its all about impression of speed. most modern cars dont 'feel' fast at a ton (100mph) where as 1970's level tech is shaking itself to bits at that speed.
and certainly not comfortable to maintain that speed for any distance
so the lights are in your favour, cant help myself i STILL check both ways before proceeding, not just because the highway code says so. its simple self preservation
so when they say 'real name' they mean , string that matches our interpretation of a real name, 'nae intention' normally passes that weak test
"You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you may later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence." they only imply that they will infer your guilt due to silence, doesnt mean its true though or proper or right, but LOL you belived a police man LOL (not you strictly but OP)
Exactly, assume everyone is trying to kill you. you maybe in the right but you may also in the hospital if you dont. just reading these posts is a good demonstration of other trying to blame any /every one else for something that you have a fair amount of control over. it is after all your life and NOBODY really cares about it even 1/2 as much as you , please look after yourself
My car tyres are flat and I have go to the garage to blow them up. what should i do ?
Fuck Myspace. Fuck Facebook. Fuck Twitter. And a special "fuck you" to attention-starved fucks who use any of the above.
this the most reasoned argument I have EVER heard.
if you are rich and mad you are classed as an excentric, and if your poor and mad well you just plain mad
for free stuff i use p2p, best marketing tool ever, apart from the sales graph
clearly the public perception of the danger is lesser than the systems perception of the offence. that is to say that those that talk and drive mostly havent killed anyone (yet). thus its hard toi get it into there head that it might be dangerous. more people have died the year due to swine (mexican) flu this year than have died due to mobile phone use . and nobody thinks swine flu is a danger on the roads
ear plugs are your friend (well mine at least), takes the edge of the noise enviroment and I just love the sound of tinnitus
so p2p is now like the post office ???
are all down hill from here
come now China is merely being green, reduce the criminals, reuse the organs, recycle the bodies (as fuel)
+1
thats a nice sign loOKOUT FOR THAT TRUCK , road side advertising never distracted anyone !
so when we now hear of a car being blown up in an incident it doesn't mean its terror related
stalin?, pol pot? damn I am all out of tyrants.
shock horror, doing the infeasible will save the planet
BBC
more study required and then to re run those disaster scenarios the day after the week tomorrow
hard to imagine it hasnt happened already, the stronger the denial the more likely it is
think of all of the lost sales
its all about impression of speed. most modern cars dont 'feel' fast at a ton (100mph) where as 1970's level tech is shaking itself to bits at that speed. and certainly not comfortable to maintain that speed for any distance
microhoo or googlesoft should take this and make it a floating data centre and close all its ports to keep it stealthy
which deters all murders