I don't mind these journals making a profit. But after an article is ~10 years old the content should go to the public domain, especially since this is where the money for the research usually comes from.
Peter Wright is a software consultant and the author of numerous books on Visual Basic programming. He is currently working on two.Net titles for Apress slated for release later this year.
I'm not a great hairdresser, but I love hair and especially hairdressing. Those professional hairdressers that I know often complain of their managers not understanding the hairdressing process and having unrealistic expectations of hairdressers. As such, I am considering a new career path: management. Since middle management is all about balancing, I'm looking for pointers before I start looking for positions. What do you, as hairdressers and hairdressers, want from your immediate manager? If there are any beauticians out there in upper management, what do you want from your lower-level managers who keep the hairdressers in line? I'm not asking for the basic 'stand-up-for-your-subordinates' advice, but rather requests from a hairdresser's standpoint. Hairdressers have special needs, and accommodating those needs (and 'odd' behaviors) is a good idea all around, for both employee morale and department output." I think many of us would rather like one who listened or who would at least take advice from the shampoo girls to heart. Many times managers will not consult their hairdressers when they make plans, they'll make the plans first and tell their hairdressing staff later, and this causes all kinds of problems. Generally, a superior with less "pointy hair" is something we'd all appreciate, but I'm sure the rest of you can expand what I'm trying to say here, or even say it better than I can.
I think you are correct. For a small outlay, you can add 100 times the value to residents that desire broadband. I think this would contribute greatly to a citys growth.
This seems to be a good application for a replacement of the CCD used in digital cameras. CCD manufacturers have been making their features smaller and smaller, but they are running out of room.(features can't be smaller than a wavelength of light) Another problem with the small ccd is that it is hard to open the aperature enough to limit the depth of field(to purposely blur the background). Ideally I would like to see an insert that you could put into your regular old film camera so you could 'go digital' without giving up all your nice lenses and bodies. One ill fated company that tried this was http://www.imagek.com, but it was vaporware (and their site just went down)
Performance is nice, but so is fast time to market and maintainability. Unless a site is going to have high traffic and hardware constraints, the latter two come first.
I have coworkers that throw around issues like performance, which can be a red herring if you are doing a web site with only a few users. (one guy insisted on doing all is string stuff as string buffer instead of as strings because it would increase performance)
You may want to look at your code in a similar fashion. There may be just a few modules that are causing problems with redundancy(or whatever is making you want to rewrite them). Why rewrite the ones that have worked faithfully without any problems?
This is actually purposeful. They would rather that you spend your money on 'new' things than on old things that will do just as well.
And what about all the scientific journals mouldering away in university libraries? Woulden't they be much more useful if they were available on the web?
Slashdot Mirror
Please add to the troll library.
Yeah, but where is he going to put his toolbox and whataver else he needs to lug to the job?
And at +3. Now where is the turd report?
Itaniums will become commodities when people figure out how to write compilers for them. That will be in about 10 years.
The Roman empire fell because of lead poisoning. They used lead acetate to sweeten food, and pewter for plates and bowls.
get your kicks here...
http://www.tubcat.com/
I wonder if John Sperling cloned his wife's pussy?
I don't mind these journals making a profit. But after an article is ~10 years old the content should go to the public domain, especially since this is where the money for the research usually comes from.
About the writer
.Net titles for Apress slated for release later this year.
Peter Wright is a software consultant and the author of numerous books on Visual Basic programming. He is currently working on two
He will also be graduating 8th grade this June.
maybe they couldn't find a buyer for the data, so they just gave up storing it.
Hell, i would of killed for a decent html guy.
Our company let go of 'Dreamweaver People' when the boom ended.
I'm not a great hairdresser, but I love hair and especially hairdressing. Those professional hairdressers that I know often complain of their managers not understanding the hairdressing process and having unrealistic expectations of hairdressers. As such, I am considering a new career path: management. Since middle management is all about balancing, I'm looking for pointers before I start looking for positions. What do you, as hairdressers and hairdressers, want from your immediate manager? If there are any beauticians out there in upper management, what do you want from your lower-level managers who keep the hairdressers in line? I'm not asking for the basic 'stand-up-for-your-subordinates' advice, but rather requests from a hairdresser's standpoint. Hairdressers have special needs, and accommodating those needs (and 'odd' behaviors) is a good idea all around, for both employee morale and department output." I think many of us would rather like one who listened or who would at least take advice from the shampoo girls to heart. Many times managers will not consult their hairdressers when they make plans, they'll make the plans first and tell their hairdressing staff later, and this causes all kinds of problems. Generally, a superior with less "pointy hair" is something we'd all appreciate, but I'm sure the rest of you can expand what I'm trying to say here, or even say it better than I can.
Jeez, on a per page basis Kernighan & Ritchie's
'The C Programming Language' is one of the most expensive computer books around....
This is why your brain is turning into sawdust...
t ml
http://www.sciam.com/2002/0202issue/0202kubey.h
if you watch tv, you get what you deserve.
I think you are correct. For a small outlay, you can add 100 times the value to residents that desire broadband. I think this would contribute greatly to a citys growth.
Everyone knows just to use the Oracle database and throw away the other apps. Does anyone out there even use their application server?
This seems to be a good application for a replacement of the CCD used in digital cameras. CCD manufacturers have been making their features smaller and smaller, but they are running out of room.(features can't be smaller than a wavelength of light) Another problem with the small ccd is that it is hard to open the aperature enough to limit the depth of field(to purposely blur the background). Ideally I would like to see an insert that you could put into your regular old film camera so you could 'go digital' without giving up all your nice lenses and bodies. One ill fated company that tried this was http://www.imagek.com, but it was vaporware (and their site just went down)
'Fuel' seems pretty general to me. Where did you get this information?
The problem with hdtv is that although the resolution is increased, the same crappy programming and lousy movies are being broadcasted.
Performance is nice, but so is fast time to market and maintainability. Unless a site is going to have high traffic and hardware constraints, the latter two come first.
I have coworkers that throw around issues like performance, which can be a red herring if you are doing a web site with only a few users. (one guy insisted on doing all is string stuff as string buffer instead of as strings because it would increase performance)
You may want to look at your code in a similar fashion. There may be just a few modules that are causing problems with redundancy(or whatever is making you want to rewrite them). Why rewrite the ones that have worked faithfully without any problems?
This is actually purposeful. They would rather that you spend your money on 'new' things than on old things that will do just as well.
And what about all the scientific journals mouldering away in university libraries? Woulden't they be much more useful if they were available on the web?
Please, let's eliminate this awful practice of "sleeping." Those 6 hours a day should be spent working!
Obviously nobody in this company has small children.
Ok then, just warn the people with aol email not to read the review.