Slashdot Mirror


All Work And No Play ...

Clifton Forlines writes: "Jupiter Media Metrix released a report on Monday about PC gaming - here's one of the more interesting tidbits: 'Similar to past years, Microsoft Windows-bundled games dominated the top rankings in October 2001: Solitaire was number one, with 21.3 million users.' A little math tells us that americans spent about 24 million man-hours in October on Solitarie (estimating that each user spent a little more than an hour over the whole month) That corresponds to about 1 million man-days, or around 2740 man-years! For comparison, I looked up these numbers... Empire State Building: 7 million man-hours (a mere 9 days of Solitaire), Panama Canal: 20 million man-hours (a mere 26 days of Solitaire), Apollo project: 15.5 billion man-hours (or a mere 52 years of Solitaire) Think about it!"

251 comments

  1. Pot, Kettle, Black by PD · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmmm. That's amazing. I wonder how many billions of Solitaires go into a single Slashdot?

    1. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      Different scale... The average Solitaire player is not of the mental capacity to affect slashdot, so one hour of their time only counts for about 20 seconds of slashdot time...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    2. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm. That's amazing. I wonder how many billions of Solitaires go into a single Slashdot?

      if you are referring to Slashcode development, perhaps you are thinking of the "monkeys with typewriters" analogy...

    3. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by Skirwan · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's amazing. I wonder how many billions of Solitaires go into a single Slashdot?
      The difference, of course, is that one is generally used as a mindless diversion while one should be doing real work, and the other is a card game.

      --
      Humour through misdirection: I could write for Angel!
    4. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by karb · · Score: 2, Funny
      My favorite article was when slashdot went crazy because the DoJ was spending a few hundred thousand on an anti-hacking education program for kids.

      It seemed like the amount of money (measured by person-hours) spent reading the article and posting nasty rants about the DoJ involved far more money than the measly few hundred k allocated by the DoJ :)

      --

      Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

    5. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      So I suppose that makes it wrong then, right? Are you suggesting that we shouldn't have gone into Afghanistan? Because that would be a very bold suggestion.

    6. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FSCK YES, IT MAKES IT WRONG!

      Isn't the whole reason we're upset because a great number of noncombatants were massacred? But through the eyes of unilateralism only American lives count; after all, all those Afghans are far away and don't even speak English.

    7. Re:Pot, Kettle, Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he's not killing anyone. The idea of revenge is extremely juvenile and will only result in more death. Just look at gang violence (which is exactly what this U.S. military VS Afghani Taliban is; one gang against another).

      I have no respect for someone who willingly becomes a trained killer (ie. soldiers). I do have respect for people who are simply living their lives (ie. civilians).

  2. no freecell? by sugardaddyano · · Score: 1

    no mention of freecell? that takes as much playing time, so double those stats

    1. Re:no freecell? by Tasty+Beef+Jerky · · Score: 1, Informative

      According to the article... "Freecell was number two, with 14.8 million users". I guess you must have read something different than I did.

      --

      I'm the tasty treat nobody can resist!
      IM Me! AOL IM:Tasty Beef Jerky

    2. Re:no freecell? by Lancer · · Score: 2
      I guess you must have read something different than I did.
      Silly guy - you don't get s3c0nd p057 by reading articles... :)
      --
      Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
  3. Gaming Improves Us! by Sierpinski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been a lot of research done that shows that playing games not only improves critical thinking skills (like with games like Myst, etc), but also can improve hand-eye coordination with the fast paced shooter type games. (Quake3, etc).

    1. Re:Gaming Improves Us! by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      That was part of the justification for having solitare installed on machines at work. Solitare supposedly helps develop the player's mousing skills which is then assumed to increase productivity for all other tasks in the point-and-click windows interface.

      Don't know if that's really true?

    2. Re:Gaming Improves Us! by sketerpot · · Score: 2
      That was part of the justification for having solitare installed on machines at work. Solitare supposedly helps develop the player's mousing skills which is then assumed to increase productivity for all other tasks in the point-and-click windows interface.

      Nice joke!
      ...Oh. It wasn't a joke?

      You can improve mouse skills by simply doing work with pointing and clicking on little buttons and stuff. There's realy no need for solitaire.

      Good thing the boss doesn't think this way...

    3. Re:Gaming Improves Us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which begs the question what is Hand-Eye coordination good for besides more games?

    4. Re:Gaming Improves Us! by Denial+of+Cervix · · Score: 0

      You can improve mouse skills by simply doing work with pointing and clicking on little buttons and stuff.


      For the average user, yes. I spend half my day teaching computer skills to inmates, some of whom have never touched a computer. To dive right in and start trying to teach them Word is very difficult when you have to explain the entire concept while showing them one and sometimes two input devices they've never used before.

      Solitaire works well to teach clicking and dragging and double-clicking before diving into keyboarding skills and applications.


      Back on topic, I am guilty of countless hours of Freecell myself. I quit after I hit a thousand games, and I'd already reset the stats several times.

      One step ahead of a 12-step program. It should be recognized that Solitaire is merely the "gateway" game - the heavy use- ah, players are into Freecell.

      DoC

  4. Sorry, I'm busy. by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't think about the implications of this right now, I'm supposed to be re-engineering software systems but I'm just about to win my Solitaire game.
    --Charlie

  5. Minesweeper #4?!? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on, we need to make a concerted effort to get Minesweeper up to number 1! I mean, it's available on many different platforms (Minus the Microsoft copyright, at least) so there's got to be more than 21 million users of Minesweeper!


    Minesweeper forever!!!

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
    1. Re:Minesweeper #4?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as many play minesweeper's, that a game that you actually have to think at, it takes decent deductive reasoning, and my goodness we couldn't possibly have that.

    2. Re:Minesweeper #4?!? by geekster · · Score: 1

      So that's why I never liked it!

  6. Solitaire? No by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    Solitaire? No I've spent many a man hour on minesweeper, I swear if that site that lets you play minesweeper for money online would allow florida based credit cards, I'd be rackig in the dough :)

    1. Re:Solitaire? No by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      What site is it that lets you play "minesweeper online for money"?

    2. Re:Solitaire? No by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Umm www.worldwinner.com it lets you enter tournment of many different types of online games. everyone pays like 2 bucks and the top winner(s) get the money paid minus like 1%. And they set up the games so there is absolutly no luck involved (the mindsweeper game never has any thing that you HAVE to guess at) so in most states its not considered gambling, simply a skill game. But Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Tennessee and Vermont, stil consider it illigal. Their faq states that United States, Anguilla, Antigua, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Belize, Brazil, Canada, China, Costa Rica, Curacao, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Hong Kong, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom.
      citizens are allowed (except for ones in those US states :( )
      I played a few free practice games on their site, and I kicked butt. But oh well

    3. Re:Solitaire? No by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the mindsweeper game never has any thing that you HAVE to guess at

      Given that Minesweeper is NP-complete, are you so sure of that assertion? In a sufficiently-crowded field, you almost always get to some point where you can't deduce from the surrounding squares whether or not there's a mine in a space. You end up guessing and hoping for the best when this happens. I suspect that the Minesweeper where you never have to guess isn't the true Minesweeper.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Solitaire? No by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Sorry, what I meant to say, was that the program that layed out the mines sets it up so that you never get stuck in a situation where you have to guess. I believe the top left corner is always a free area, and any guess are removed. I've gotten good enough at minesweeper personally that in expert mode, excluding the attept to get an open area at the beginning, I only have to guess maby 3 or 4 times in a game when there is simply no way around it.

    5. Re:Solitaire? No by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Actually the first spot u select is always free.

  7. What about TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ever stop to think how much *MORE* time Americans spend watching TV than playing solitaire (etc).?

    1. Re:What about TV by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Everyone needs time to be unwind to turn themselves off (you know what I mean). I always hear quotes about how much time people waste watching television, but it's not like they would be learning french, or helping the poor if it weren't for television. People spent plenty of their time being idle even before television. By the way, novels used to be looked at in the exact same way as television is today. Sure it's entertaining, and sometimes interesting and even informative, but it's still a waste of time. That said I will give no one the argument that sitcoms are not for the most part a big waste of time 8^)

  8. Solitaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beats working!

  9. So let's waste more time.. by IAmBlakeM · · Score: 1

    The solution to people wasting time on games is to spend more valuable time figuring out how the wasted time scales to modern achievements.

    On that note, why am I replying..

  10. Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by typical+geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we could just convince all the women that they really don't need orgasms, we could cut down the hours needed for sex to about 5 minutes each time.

    1. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by simetra · · Score: 1, Troll

      Uh, most slashdot readers probably aren't concerned with partners.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by big_cat79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      5 minutes? Damn, you must be a marathon man.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    3. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we could just convince all the women that they really don't need orgasms, we could cut down the hours needed for sex to about 5 minutes each time

      Except that all the time saved would be plowed (no pun intended, but what the heck) right back into trying to convince them to submit to 5 minutes of sex 10 times a day.

    4. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by aoty · · Score: 0, Troll
      If we could just convince all the women that they really don't need orgasms, we could cut down the hours needed for sex to about 5 minutes each time.

      Women can have orgasms? That's news to me :-)
    5. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can. Seriously.
      Not that this means anything to us.

    6. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by elefantstn · · Score: 1, Troll

      Q: Why do women fake orgasms?

      A: Because they think we care.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    7. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a man, I would like to be on record as considering the WOMAN-hours wasted...

    8. Re:Think of the man-hours wasted on sex by lurwas · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you could convince yourself that you don't need sex, you'll save another 5 minutes!

  11. Windows-Bundled Games by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Of course they'll lead the pack. Since most businesses still use Windows, there are more copies in every office.

    I have no admin rights, so I can't install everything else.

    Just because more play it does not necessarily mean it's the best game!

  12. The difference here by oooga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The difference here is that most skyscrapers and canals require _actual physical labor_, not just moving a mouse. Plus, most people play Solitaire as a break, so their potential productivity during Solitaire-playing hours is low.

    --
    -- Nerds on toast in the new millenium
  13. Bubblet by spaanoft · · Score: 1

    I've spent many an hour on bubblet for my palm III. It's the most addictive game I've ever played. Good way to look like you're doing work while you're not, as with all palm games.

    1. Re:Bubblet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dopewars for Palm has taken more hours than any other palm game. I wish more classic (aka addictive old school) games were around. Maybe Castle of the Winds for Palm.

  14. inspiring by bigpat · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    It is truly inspiring that one of the tallest buildings in the world, the Empire State Building, was built in under a year. I was just there last weekend and visited the tower for the first time.

    It was both a humbling experience and encouraging. People can do both great and horrible things when working in concert. We just need good ideas to rally around, rather than sitting idly by or doing repetitive tasks.

    Anyone want to help me with my spaceship?

    1. Re:inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Empire State Building is not the tallest building in the world. It isn't even in the top 5.

      The Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur (sp?) are officially the worlds tallest buildings (they're identical) at 452 m. Despite this, they only have 88 floors, since they cheated by putting decorative stuff on the top.

      Number two is the Sears Tower in Chicago. It has 110
      floors, more than any other building in the world, at least since the 11/9 (WTC A & B had 110 floors, too).

      In case you're wondering where I found that (useless) trivia out, you might want check out http://www.skyscrapers.com/ , which lists pretty much every structure with a height exceeding ~ 30 m in the *entire world*.

  15. Play Games and Sleep is important by frankie_guasch · · Score: 1

    To keep the mind safe. Just think about all the
    work you could do while you sleep. But if you
    don't sleep the next day you can't work.

    1. Re:Play Games and Sleep is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit...all good programmers now that you can give up sleep for a couple days at least and get TONS done...=o)

  16. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doctor-what-about-my-gamboling-addiction

    And your lack of grammar skills. I thought techies were supposed to have a mind like a steel cage.

    Apparently the cages of the Slashdot crew weren't galvanized.

    1. Re:What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps he's addicted to frolicking about playfully. You never know.


      And substituting "gamboling" for "gambling" isn't a gramattical error, it's a spelling error. Idiot.

  17. WinFlower by MoceanWorker · · Score: 1

    heh.. seeing Minesweeper on the list reminded me of WinFlower and the ICBW (International Campaign to Ban Winmine)... anybody try out that game? you can find it here. btw, it's java-based

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
  18. This is exactly what keeps Linux down. by gayrod · · Score: 1, Funny

    Linux will continue to be an afterthought in the OS world without a solid bundle of games that come pre-installed. Hearts, Solitaire, Minesweeper, etc. have all become classics and are many users' introduction to computers. Can you think of one Linux game as imaginative or innovative as Minesweeper or Freecell? I sure can't.

    Until Linux distros wake up and realize that packaging high quality games with their installations will guarantee their success, Linux will remain a minor thorn in Microsoft's side.

    Microsoft knows what's important when bundling their OS: games and entertainment. Redhat, Debian, etc. just need to wake up and follow their lead.

    --

    http://www.davebrenninslaw.org
    dave@davebrenninslaw.org
    1. Re:This is exactly what keeps Linux down. by jwbozzy · · Score: 1

      please tell me you're not serious...

      --
      perl -e 'printf("mmm %x\n", 3735928559)'
    2. Re:This is exactly what keeps Linux down. by UCRowerG · · Score: 1

      I'm still rather new to the Linux world, but my Mandrake distro came with more games than I can count, including Tux Racer, Tetris (clones), Boulderdash, PySol (Freecell, Solitaire, Tuts Tomb, and many other card games), etc.

    3. Re:This is exactly what keeps Linux down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, keep your silly card games. Give me nethack any day! :)

      Not that you can't install it on *nix...

    4. Re:This is exactly what keeps Linux down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can you think of one Linux game as imaginative or innovative as Minesweeper or Freecell? I sure can't.

      XBill anyone? :-)

    5. Re:This is exactly what keeps Linux down. by DarkProphet · · Score: 1

      Even though the parent post was made in jest, there is kind of a point there. Strangely enough, most people learn how to use windows by playing games. My Ex-girlfriend loved Linux, if for no other reasons other than not getting a BSOD everyday, and of course, ksishen. She bought me a new RH distro. All's well that ends well, eh?

      --
      What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
  19. There is a big market for card games by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Informative
    and the like. Most of us just don't interact with these people, unless they are our grandparents.


    Consider the man hours needed to produce Hoyle's Poker vs. Quake3. Its glamorous to do the latter, but I bet the former makes a lot more profit.


    I've always avoided game programming simply because I know it would require me to give up virtually everything else I enjoy doing with computers(databases, web programming, sysadminning). You have to be pretty dedicated to be any good at it. However, if I was to start a game company, it would definitely start out producing simpler games for older customers, then perhaps move to making bigger 3D action games once I made enough to hire more people.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:There is a big market for card games by hirebrand · · Score: 1

      Actually, card games don't sell -that- well. Solitare is ranked so highly because its free and included with Windows...

  20. What were solitaire makers playing during breaks? by ghislain_leblanc · · Score: 1

    Pong or Pac Man, maybe.

  21. Yeah, but I can afford to play solitaire! by CitznFish · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just how much does it cost to 'play' Empire State Building or Panama Canal? It costs me more to just visit those places then to sit and let my mind waste away watching cards flip over on my monitor... ;^]

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
    1. Re:Yeah, but I can afford to play solitaire! by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Just how much does it cost to 'play' Empire State Building or Panama Canal?

      Last time I checked, the "players" of those two "games" were paid to play--not the other way around. Of course, the same could probably be said for most of the Solitaire players out there as well...

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  22. Why Solitaire? by fizzboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those people should be playing Freecell.

    --
    -- "Never call your girlfriend 'Butterball'. Not even once."
    1. Re:Why Solitaire? by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      Freecell is too much for most people, which is too bad, it's my favorite game as well.

  23. Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by dstone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ask yourself this: do you really want the type of person who finds fulfillment playing Solitaire and Minesweeper to divert his/her attention to building the next skyscraper or hydroelectric project? Please, no!

    1. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by renehollan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      A socialist friend of mine used that argument to justify a 90-90% unemployment rate: if we could just feed, clothe, and house people who messed up the work we did, we'd be more than 20 times more efficient with the same effort, and could easily afford the astronomical taxes to support the welfare state that would result.

      Being a libertarian, I said a few disparaging words upon hearing this suggestion, but I have to admit, he had a point.

      Of course the proper counter is, having increased my efficiency 2000% or more, why shouldn't I reap the benefits? Because you didn't stop me? Is that a threat? There are other ways of getting threatening freeloaders out of the way...

      --
      You could've hired me.
    2. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by naasking · · Score: 1

      A socialist friend of mine used that argument to justify a 90-90% unemployment rate: if we could just feed, clothe, and house people who messed up the work we did, we'd be more than 20 times more efficient with the same effort, and could easily afford the astronomical taxes to support the welfare state that would result.

      I'm sorry, I can't seem to parse that. Could you reword it please? Who feeds what people? Who's "we" in "messed up the work we did"? Messed up what work? If you mean employ more people, it seems you are expending more effort, not less.

    3. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by renehollan · · Score: 2
      O.K. Sorry about the run on sentence. My bad.

      "We" is the invarying productive component of society, in this case (beholden to all of society, according to socialists).

      The general idea is if you pay people to not work and mess up or slow down what productive people do, those productive people would be so much more efficient that they could earn enough to pay the non-workers.

      IOW: Factory employs 1000 people to make widgets. Do the investors care if they can make the same widgets by paying the same total wages to 10 really efficient people who automate most everything? Probably not: those 10 people are worth 100 times the average. So pay each of those people 100 times as much, and tax them at a 99% rate to "pay off" the other 990 to not have to work.

      Of course, why should some work while others get a free ride just because it is possible? So those others don't make our working lives miserable? To some extent this may actually be worthwhile, but not as a general principle.

      I can cite a personal example here: I produce pretty good code with below average defect rates at above average coding rates. (After 25 years, you'd think that I'd better!) In many shops, we had formal review processes. I was asked to reduce my output because it was taking too much of others' time to keep up reviewing it. This, despite taking on the coding efforts of many of those other reviewers in the process. The right thing to do, IMHO, would be to relax review requirements where there was a history of low defect rates. But, PHBs being what they are...

      --
      You could've hired me.
    4. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by pwagland · · Score: 2
      Hmm. Sadly, being a socialist myself, I have to say that anyone who used that argument aginst you is a fool.

      Socialism is about the most good for the community, not how to make one person more productive. The most good for a community actually involves having most people feeling productive. When people do not feel productive, they get bored. When they get bored, they start mucking around. When people start mucking around, the bell shaped curve idicates that a certain percentage will turn to crime. The more the people who are bored, the longer the tail on the curve...

      Socialism is not about raping the productive individual, but rather, the individual not raping the society.

      To counter your argument, just because someone is born a cripple, is that reason to make them lve on the street?

      Using your text, I suspect that the answer would be euthanasia, but, as I recall, that is illegal in America....

      Anyway, to make this vaguely on topic, if you brush your teeth, as dentists recommend, twice a day, three minutes a time, that is roughly 3 hours a month just wasted. Better kill all those people with clean teeth too.

      If you drink one coffee a day, assuming 1 minute to walk to the machine, get the coffe etc, then you are wasting a 1/2 hour per month. Better kill those people who like coffee as well. They are just robbing you of your riches!

      If you get stuck in a traffic jam, then you, along with the thousand or so others, could easily build a new freeway to alleviate the congestion. Hmm, maybe I have the answer to road rage here....

      Relaxation has nothing to do with Socialism vs. Capitalism. In a true capitalist society, you make money so that you can enjoy it. And guess what, that is what we "socialists" call relaxation.

    5. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Sorry, I find your points somewhat rambling, but I will try to respond.

      First, my friend was not using the 99% forced unemployment as an example of socialism -- he was arguing that in a socialist society, where the unemployable are supported, it is not morally wrong to deny them work because of incompetence, and might be more efficient, overall.

      Socialism is about the most good for the community, not how to make one person more productive. The most good for a community actually involves having most people feeling productive. When people do not feel productive, they get bored. When they get bored, they start mucking around. When people start mucking around, the bell shaped curve idicates that a certain percentage will turn to crime. The more the people who are bored, the longer the tail on the curve...

      How can you define what is "good for the community", if not in terms of what is good for individual members? Further, "feeling productive" does not put food on the table -- being productive does. And when people do not see the fruits of their labour as benifiting them directly, they tend to be less productive. The horse requires the carrot, in other words.

      Socialism is not about raping the productive individual, but rather, the individual not raping the society.

      Ah, but "raping society" is invariably defined as "not sharing the fruits of your labour" often to a degree decided by others. I'd define "raping society" as living off the fruits of others' labour, without their consent. Let me provide an example: my father died because he could not save up enough money to travel to the U.S. for a lifesaving operation -- his taxes having gone to pay for a social healthcare system that had collapsed to the point of not being technically capable of providing the required surgery (which, admittedly has only a 70% recovery rate). He certainly earned enough money over his life to pay for that operation, but, alas, it was taken and given to others. Should we debate whether society is better off because, perhaps, someone else's life was saved?, or even more lives were saved? Socialism, as practiced, in Canada, reached the point where the state decided who lived and who died (there being a celebrated case of someone dying of a broken leg because they had to wait in line too long for care). Note: I am not bitter because of my father's death -- I was a libertarian for many years before that event, but I do note that Canada's brand of socialism certainly accelerated it, and surely the deaths of others.

      To counter your argument, just because someone is born a cripple, is that reason to make them lve on the street?

      They can live wherever they can afford, or from what charity is available to them. Certainly I am not responsible for their state of affairs? Should others have to feed me because I am disadvantaged in that I am not a stellar athlete? I have also met many so called "cripples" that were quite capable of supporting themselves at least as well as I support myself.

      Using your text, I suspect that the answer would be euthanasia, but, as I recall, that is illegal in America....

      Why kill someone if they do not want to die? I do not understand.

      Anyway, to make this vaguely on topic, if you brush your teeth, as dentists recommend, twice a day, three minutes a time, that is roughly 3 hours a month just wasted. Better kill all those people with clean teeth too.

      Now, I really don't understand the relevance of this.

      If you drink one coffee a day, assuming 1 minute to walk to the machine, get the coffe etc, then you are wasting a 1/2 hour per month. Better kill those people who like coffee as well. They are just robbing you of your riches!

      Oh, I see, you're equating inefficiency in others with a lack of productivity in the productive. That wasn't my friend's point. Such people have a neutral effect (unless the coffe machine crowd is so noisy as to be a distraction). His point was that many workers actively impede productivity. A better example would be a policy (and yes, this is an exagerated example) where one had to change all 1's in a file to 2's, by hand, and being forbidden to use sed to automate the process because (a) not everyone knows sed, and (b) it makes other's "look bad".

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by naasking · · Score: 1

      You make an interesting point, but I would simply say: "Don't work for people who have a track record of hiring slip-shod workers". If they have such a lack of foresight that they keep these people, this company is doomed. You're better off on your own. No free rides, since that company is doomed, those lazy people will get their dues and quickly be out of a job. No problem.

      As to your situation: your boss has just given you license to take extra paid breaks. If your boss doesn't like the thought of that, tell him he should come up with a better solution.

    7. Re:Regarding the man-hour comparisons... by renehollan · · Score: 2
      As to your situation: your boss has just given you license to take extra paid breaks. If your boss doesn't like the thought of that, tell him he should come up with a better solution.

      Well, I no longer work there for the very reason you mentioned.

      Regarding the quoted suggestion: this wouldn't work: I was constrained to get a certain amount of work done in a particular interval of time which translated to a particular coding rate (and my code is quite dense, it it wasn't simply a matter of racking up useless LOCs). I could not simultaneously get the work done in the time required and produce code for review at a slower rate. Yes, it was very much a "do the impossible and if you can't we will fire you without cause" place. Like I said, I stopped working there (3-1/2 years without any time off or compensation was too much). I would have left sooner, but being on an H1-B visa made that difficult.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  24. I thought about it by Nf1nk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought about, and it it hurts, but it points to an interesting thought, is solitare a good game on the PC.
    It just isn't but for some stupid reason I keep playing it.
    The interesting thing about the article is that it shows more than ever that graphics and speed are unimportant to the quality of the game. Right after the bundled games were and I quote
    October 2001were (Electronic Arts) Maxis' The Sims, with 1.6 million users; Microsoft's Age of Empires, with 805,000 users; (Vivendi Universal) Blizzard's Diablo II with 624,000 users; and (Electronic Arts) Westwood's Command & Conquer: Tiberian Sun with 563,000 users.
    none of these are visualy very impressive, but they all share one common theme anyone can play them with ease.
    conclusion gameplay over style every time

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  25. What a waste... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a disgrace, the way people waste their time at work. It's cheating their employer, too.

    I'd write more, but i don't want my boss to see me on Slashdot.

  26. Slashdot Man Hours? by Bubblesculpter · · Score: 1



    Here's what I really want to know:

    - How many man-hours are spent by people reading/posting to SlashDot?

    You gotta figure there's millions of hours spent by young smart programmer's minds reading this stuff instead of writing code. Think of all the great improvements that could have been made to the world's software if we hadn't been wasting time on this website!?

    Maybe Slashdot can add some rough time-calculating scripts to slashcode for tracking user hours spent.

    --
    www.Beyond7.com Insane modern art water sculpture.
    1. Re:Slashdot Man Hours? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2

      You gotta figure there's millions of hours spent by young smart programmer's minds reading this stuff instead of writing code. Think of all the great improvements that could have been made to the world's software if we hadn't been wasting time on this website!?

      I guess you don't program... Cause from where I'm sitting, if I didn't take a few minutes every hour to do something other than programming, there would be a ten fold increase in the amount of crap code I write... Programmers aren't machines, we need a mental break too...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    2. Re:Slashdot Man Hours? by Bubblesculpter · · Score: 1

      I do plenty of programming... And I read Slashdot. It's pretty typical to keep a browser window open with a story or dozen from slashdot while I'm coding. I agree it keeps your mind fresh with ideas. I also know that sometimes I end up reading more than I should when there's code to write...

      My main preferences of ways to keep fresh mind involve stuff away from the computer: playing guitar, building acrylic bubble fountains working with powertools and acetylene torches, and with my girlfriend.. All that *should* keep me with a fresh mind to code all day, yet I keep returning to Slashdot.

      But lots of time my mind is coding while I read. Some of the tougher algorithms seem like my mind needs to grind over it for a while when I'm doing something else, and then it comes together nicely...

      --
      www.Beyond7.com Insane modern art water sculpture.
    3. Re:Slashdot Man Hours? by trongey · · Score: 1

      ...there would be a ten fold increase in the amount of crap code I write...

      Then you would get rewarded for being such a productive and hard-working programmer.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:Slashdot Man Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps /. needs to be classified as an illegal drug?

    5. Re:Slashdot Man Hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How many man-hours are spent by people reading/posting to SlashDot?


      Many, in fact. But personally I don't consider them to be "wasted time". I've learned a great deal, especially regarding linux, availability of software and hardware, and also got some fresh ideas from readind slasdot posts. Of course 90% or more is crap, but if you're good at filtering, reading slashdot may be very productive.

  27. Funny numbers by snake_dad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But not that amazing. It just means that if 23 million people each spend one hour digging, the Panama canal could have been finished in less then a month. There would be some elbowing ofcourse, and maybe Panama would have sunk by itself with al those people standing in spot...

    The point is, if you choose the statistics that you compare to carefully, you can make anything seem amazing. Compare hours spent playing solitaire to hours spent while brushing teeth, and suddenly he numbers don't seem so amazing anymore.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    1. Re:Funny numbers by 23_Elders · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. If I had mod points I'd mod this up. Humans need down time. You can only work so long before you need to stare at the wall for a few hours. Comparing these numbers to big projects of human engineering really doesn't mean a whole heap of alot. Now if by playing a game as simple as solitaire we could accomplish feats of grandeur, that would be something.

    2. Re:Funny numbers by gorilla · · Score: 3, Informative
      It just means that if 23 million people each spend one hour digging, the Panama canal could have been finished in less then a month.

      No, it couldn't. This is the mythical man month, which was truely debunked in the book of the same name. Each project has it's optimal size. If you don't have enough people, then the project will fail or take longer than neccessary. However, if you have too many people, then the project will also fail or take longer than necessary.

      This is especially true when you think of overall design, or other tasks which cannot be sub-divided. If you split the design work into 10 units, then you could well have either a canal where the two ends don't meet in the middle, or your designers spend longer in meetings deciding on the route instead of just doing it.

    3. Re:Funny numbers by drewness · · Score: 1

      I think he said it tongue in cheek.

    4. Re:Funny numbers by snake_dad · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you are right ofcourse. I just tried to show the absurdity of comparing those numbers. Just try to think how you would feed those 23 million, how many more you would need to dispose of the digged up mud, how to avoid "traffic jams" of people walking with shovels and inadvertantly hitting each other with them. Oh, and sanitary conditions? Scary... :-)

      Anyway, the Panama canal killed enough workers originally. When contemplating the magnitude and grandeur of such a giant project we should remember that a lot of lives were lost in the creation of it. Come to think of it, this may even support your point.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    5. Re:Funny numbers by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree totally... if we could similarly stack people like this, imagine what could get done...

      6,480 women could have a baby in an hour!
      388,800 women could have a baby in a miunte!
      23,328,000 women could have a baby in a second!

      Now, while I doubt I could handle all of those women, I would certainly be willing to try...

    6. Re:Funny numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then there are the tasks that take little planning, managing, or cooperation to complete. Focusing manpower here could result in dramatic decrease in total time.

      For example, think about how many of those 7 million man-hours for the Empire State building were spent on the task "waiting for the foundation to harden", and over how much time those man-hours were spread. Now, put the majority of your work force on this task and you've saved, what, days? Weeks? Months?

      In other words, I completely agree with you.

  28. Solitaire programmer 'killed' 36 people by Tattva · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you assume a lifespan of 76 years than that programmer has robbed the world of the equivalent of 36 lives. Worse than Jeffery Dahmer.

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
    1. Re:Solitaire programmer 'killed' 36 people by jwbozzy · · Score: 1

      he may have, we just dont know, after all, think about who he worked for...

      --
      perl -e 'printf("mmm %x\n", 3735928559)'
  29. Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think when you measure man-hours, you have to measure the quality of the person. The Empire State building was built by 7 million man-hours put in by some of American's finest citizens and workers. Men died building that building. And don't even get me started on the Apollo project. To compare the work that these men did quantitatively with the the work of millions of unproductive Windows-bound office drones wasting their employers money goofing off at work is a disrespect to the qualitative difference between these groups of people.

    My grandfather worked on the Apollo project; granted his role was small, he helped to turn down the radio stations operating in Apollo 13's band when it was operating under power due to difficulty. But without even his minor contribution men could have died. To compare the work of brave men in the same tally as lazy overpriveleged goof-offs is a damned insult.

    Sorry if I come of as irate; it's because I am.

    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    1. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by gaudior · · Score: 1

      Lighten Up! Geez, who pissed on your wheaties?

    2. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 1

      Lighten Up! Geez, who pissed on your wheaties?

      Look, I'm sorry if I seem upset, it's just that this whole "comparison" between people who are considered America's heros and people who are doing their best to destroy the economy by cheating American business really pisses me off!.

      Who pissed on my Wheaties? Probably someone who dragged a company into the ground playing Minesweeper at work. It takes the same destructive attitude.

      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    3. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point, the comparison was intended just for that purpose, to show how much time we waste spending on useless pointless things when we could be achieving greatness. To get fired up over a little comment is pretty stupid (it's called irony, look it up sometime).

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    4. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by trongey · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, we're posting comments on /.

      Oops.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    5. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by gus+goose · · Score: 2

      No disrespect to your Grandfather ...

      ... but men have died playing solataire as well.

      gus

      --
      .. if only.
    6. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because comparing unrelated indicators like qualitative and quantitative is a Good Thing! I say we stick to quantitative, since that's what we have here... and in that respect all they were doing is saying, "Gee. Think what these people could have accomplished if they had done something else".

      And frankly, I don't think your grandfather asking radio stations to turn down their broadcasts indicates much risk on his part, so I don't see why you're taking this so personally. *My* grandfather helped keep the Japanese from owning the whole Pacific Ocean-- but you don't see me ranting that the freedom to waste your life playing Solitaire is not what he had in mind when he served in the Army. *You* need to lighten up.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    7. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by mosch · · Score: 1

      You don't come off as irate; you come off as a fucking retard.

    8. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This guy should not be allowed to breed... oh wait... he's probably a faggot. In any event he needs to be promptly destroyed. Retards are a drain on the intelligent and should not be allowed to live.

    9. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by gentlewizard · · Score: 2
      To compare the work of brave men in the same tally as lazy overpriveleged goof-offs is a damned insult.


      I agree that people should take responsibility for using their own time productively. However, let's not ignore the toxic organizational environment in some companies that actually discourages personal contribution or penalizes it (no good deed goes unpunished).

      Maybe the "lazy overprivileged goof-offs" are the managers of these people, who can't seem to find them anything to do that's more interesting than Solitaire. Yes, in an ideal world each person would manage themselves. But since we live in THIS world, it falls upon the manager to motivate and develop the people who report to them, instead of frustrating them so much they escape into games instead of doing their work.
    10. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 0, Troll

      *My* grandfather helped keep the Japanese from owning the whole Pacific Ocean-- but you don't see me ranting

      Hello, Mr. Illogical Argument, but no one posted a story on Slashdot that attempts to equate what your Grandfather did with people attempting to drag down our economy by playing games at work.

      The point is that you can't compare 1:1 the time spent by people working to their very limits on some of our greatest accomplishments with Gen-X slackers pissing away investor's money in the .com disaster. It's an insult.

      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    11. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 0, Troll

      Meanwhile, we're posting comments on /.

      Are you trying to insinuate something? I am self-employed, when I spend time posting comments to Slashdot I'm robbing no one - unlike the Solitaire-playing Gen-X leeches the article is talking about. I was (and am) trying to make an important point about the absurdity of comparing honest hard-working Americans and dead weight.

      Please keep your Flamebait to yourself.

      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    12. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *My* grandfather was a drunken bum. If only someone had invented Windows (running solitaire) earlier it would have given him something to do and kept him off the booze.

      And you don' shee mee ranshing do you! Bunken drumsh the lotta yas.

    13. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 1

      You don't come off as irate; you come off as a fucking retard.

      As much as I hate to dignify this garbage with a response, I feel it is my duty to point out that you have obviously spent too much time playing Solitaire at work.

      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    14. Re:Quantitative vs. Qualitative. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Take your stereotypes about Gen-X slackers and shove them up your ass, okay? And frankly I don't care what project your grandfather was involved in. That, by chance, they chose that project is *immaterial* to your assertion that comparing the amount of time spent playing a game to the time spent on projects that promoted major social progress is somehow insulting to the people involved in the latter.

      For all you know, John Glenn loves a good game of Windows Solitaire every damn night of the week. As to the people who died building the Empire State Building... if they were anything like the people who do construction now, I bet they spent a lot of their spare time playing card games, watching baseball, and playing whatever games were popular at the time (Monopoly maybe?). It's just an amusing comparison not meant to be taken as indicative of anything. Like when they tell you how many swimming pools full you sweat in a lifetime. So take a deep breath and get a life (cripes, I'm responding to your drivel, what does that say about me?)

      --
      I do not have a signature
  30. On the other hand by mir · · Score: 1

    If Solitaire was not bundled any more with Windows:
    Hours lost due to nervous breakdown by people not being able to relax and let off some steam using solitaire at work: 21.3 * 1 day * 3% ~ 5 million man-hours (60 floors of the Empire State Building?). Hours lost frantically searching the internet and trying to bypass the company firewall to get the darn game back: 21.2 * 2 = 42.4 million man-hours (2 Panama Canals). Damage provoqued by irrate postal workers deprived of their favorite game: 852285 * 0.001 * 20 years ~ 27 million man-hours (one more Panama Canal and an Empire State Building, we're starting to run out of Panama to dig new canals...).

    As they say, 87.3% of all statistics are made up.

    --
    Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before you break 'em. (Terry Pratchett)
  31. +1 Class Action Lawsuit Against Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For contributing to the health problems of
    millions of people in the United States of
    America.

  32. Deer Hunter? by kryzx · · Score: 2

    Here's the one I can't believe:
    #30 Deer Hunter 364,000 unique users.

    I'm going to give away the secret to winning right here:

    1) Be sure to get at least three six-packs on the way to the stand. You can't win without them.
    2) Make sure Bubba drinks more of them than you.
    3) Piss into Bubba's box of ammo to prevent him from getting a deer.
    4) Tell Bubba you're headed into town for more beer.
    5) Drive on Rt. 17
    6) Hit the deer that jumps out near mile marker 248.
    7) Put the deer in the back of the truck.
    8) Return home, leaving Bubba on the stand.
    9) Victory!! You bagged more deer than Bubba!

    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
  33. Solitare is a trainer... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've found Solitare a great way to introduce the idea of double click, single click, and drag for those who really don't know beans about this computer thing. That app was the moment of zen for my Mom, and I hear others with similar stories.

    1. Re:Solitare is a trainer... by matt_morgan · · Score: 1

      I used to often tell people that that was the intended point of solitaire and minesweeper, to get people used to the mouse. I'm sure other people told me as much, and I took it on faith. Maybe that's an urban myth, or maybe that's what MS said was part of the point, while understanding the entertainment value. I don't know.

    2. Re:Solitare is a trainer... by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      Actually, I heard a trainer say the same thing. The trainer said this was the reasoning behind including it in windows 3... I dunno about that..

    3. Re:Solitare is a trainer... by pavon · · Score: 1

      I always thought xbill was good for that myself :)

  34. Come on. by Krapangor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Solitaire has a much better plot than minesweeper, is less violent and enhances you illectual capacity.
    It runs on more platforms than minesweeper, there are even forms of solitaire which run without an computer or any electric power !

    Why should we even consider playing minesweeper ?
    It's obviously much worse.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:Come on. by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hey, minesweeper is played without computers or electricity by millions of kids around the world too! Now there's a fun game for all to enjoy.

      Particularly the version where the mines are actually disguised as really neat wristwatches and stuff like that.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  35. Amusing how Linux has hundreds of bundled games. by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    Hahah. This is certainly an amusing post. Send me an e-mail (n1tr0g3n=at=gmx.net) some time and I'll send you a screen shot of all the games I've got that came with my Linux distribution. You know what? I even have Solitaire, Freecell, and Minesweeper (probably two different versions of each, one for Gnome and one for KDE).

    Gaming is certainly an addiction. I recommend Uplink (posted here on /. a little while back). My brother won't touch it because it doesn't have blood, and the interface isn't in 3D, but I'd take Uplink over Quake 2 any day.

    If anything, Linux comes with too much bundled software, causing it to load more slowly as the icons are drawn in the K menu (which is why I predominantly use Blackbox).

  36. Mythical Man Month by michaeldouma · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you have read The Mythical Man-Month, Anniversary Edition : Essays on Software Engineering by Frederick P. Brooks... The peculiarly nonlinear economies of scale in collaborative work and the nature of individuals and groups means that such comparisons are amusing, at most. If it takes 1 boy 60 minutes to mow a lawn, does it take 60 boys 1 minute?

    1. Re:Mythical Man Month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It could take 60 boys 1 minute since a lawn can be partitioned into 60 pieces and each boy works independently, therefore, not affecting the work of the other 59 boys. What you probably meant was something more like: it takes 3 doctors 6 hours to do an operation, does it take 18 doctors 1 hour?

    2. Re:Mythical Man Month by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      I think both cases are completely valid, when you factor in all the time involved planning and organizing those 60 boys, getting them all to their assigned plots of land, and checking the quality of their work, it WOULD take more than one minute, just as it would take more than 1 hour for those 18 doctors to perform that operation (although the doctor's time management would probably be more based on the human body's limitiations, but you get the idea)

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    3. Re:Mythical Man Month by mwalker · · Score: 1

      What you're reaching for here, boys, is this:

      "9 women and 1 month do not a baby make".

      Have fun.

    4. Re:Mythical Man Month by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      "9 women and 1 month do not a baby make".

      Ok, its English, not German. In English, we use the verb BEFORE the direct object.
      So "9 women and 1 month do not a baby make" should be "9 women and 1 month do not make a baby".

    5. Re:Mythical Man Month by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      just a throwback to our language's germanic roots, ever heard the expression "iron bars do not a prison make"? there's alot of english expressions like that with rather poetic sentence structure

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  37. Nothing compared to TV by joshv · · Score: 2

    Now do the math for television. I imagine the average in the US is at least an hour a day of television viewing. Truly a waste.

    -josh

    1. Re:Nothing compared to TV by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

      I imagine the average in the US is at least an hour a day of television viewing. Truly a waste.

      You can't really compare watching TV with playing computer games when you're talking about wasting time. The major difference is that video games require interaction. Many people watch TV casually while doing other things. For example, my TV is rarely turned off when I'm awake at home, although the vast majority of the time it is in the background while I'm doing other things.

    2. Re:Nothing compared to TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ONE HOUR? Which country are you living? Somalia? Afghanistan?

      More like 3+ hours, depending on the amount of free time. (sometimes a lot more than 3 hours)

  38. to heck w/ solitare by ch-chuck · · Score: 3

    Give me an NT server w/ 3D pinball in the backoffice anyday. That's the reason they put video drivers in kernel space you know.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:to heck w/ solitare by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 1

      screw that, gimme a BSD server with a pinball table (Attack from Mars or Medieval Madness, please) in the break room!

    2. Re:to heck w/ solitare by tlhIngan · · Score: 2
  39. But if you have MAME... by Bonker · · Score: 2

    You don't need the Apollo project. Why, you can get five or six kick-ass spaceships from Galaga alone!

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  40. What were they doing? by 3seas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps there is a question to ask: What was it people were doing that they had that kind of time to play solitary?

    Cumulative hours waited for internet to download this year

    I was just using mapquest and it seems that IE wants to download everything, even what you have already downloaded once.

    Geee, I suppose I do have time to play solitary.

    1. Re:What were they doing? by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1


      ...Cumulative hours waited for internet to download this year: 29,423,030,092...


      of course they are still waiting if they hope to download the whole internet

      --


      Kilroy was here!
    2. Re:What were they doing? by T3kno · · Score: 1

      I didn't have to wait...the nice man at CompUSA installed the internet in my computer when I bought it.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  41. Well Hell! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If mind-numbing games like Solitaire, FreeCell, and Minesweeper are all that's keeping Linux off the desktop of millions of users, why doesn't KDE and Gnome just start including a quick link to Entertainment -> FreeCell, Minesweeper, Solitaire, and Pinball on thier desktop systems too?! Forget about office productivity suites, set us up the minesweeper! ;)

  42. I am shocked!! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    No mention of Q3A???

    Actually, quite lacking in FPS's...

  43. Forgetting the real problem... by Evro · · Score: 1

    The real scourge of productivity has once again been left out. Billions of man-hours are lost each month in the US alone. A company with ten employees is losing, on average, over 1000 man-hours per month. That is over 40 Man-days!

    Please, let's eliminate this awful practice of "sleeping." Those 6 hours a day should be spent working!

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Forgetting the real problem... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Please, let's eliminate this awful practice of "sleeping." Those 6 hours a day should be spent working!


      Obviously nobody in this company has small children.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  44. Spam Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    junk@brc2.com

  45. I thought this was legit untill.... by bucky0 · · Score: 1

    I saw this:
    37 HALF-LIFE
    BLASPHEMY!! How is Half-Life after games like:

    11 ROLLERCOASTER TYCOON
    12 STARCRAFT
    13 GOLF
    14 ULTIMATE YAHTZEE
    15 AGE OF EMPIRES
    16 DIABLO II
    17 COMMAND & CONQUER: TIBERIAN SUN
    18 MAH JONGG FOR WINDOWS

    I can see starcraft, but Tiberian Sun?? That game is aweful. Where do they get their data from? Online play? I though CS by itself had everyone else beat. Oh well :(

    --

    -Bucky
  46. man hours doesn't work by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    I mean, seriously. A Beowulf cluster of solitaire players is not going to build the next Big Blue.

    OTOH, maybe they'll give us the Ultimate Question...

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  47. Looks right to me, was Re:What about by bourne · · Score: 1

    >>doctor-what-about-my-gamboling-addiction

    >And your lack of grammar skills.

    The grammar is correct:
    gambol (g m b l)
    intr.v. gamboled, or gambolled gamboling, or gambolling gambols or gambols
    To leap about playfully; frolic.

    In short, "doctor-what-about-my-game-playing-addiction." It said exactly what it was meant to say. Don't blame them because you missed the clever play on the traditional phrase.

  48. Kinda Ironic by dytin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's kinda ironic that the subject of the post is "All work and no play...". If anyone remembers the end of that saying, its "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy". In other words, people need some time to play, or else they become dull. The funny thing is, the poster rambles on about how much more could have been done for the world if people didn't play. But would the world be worth living in if everyone was dull?

    1. Re:Kinda Ironic by Overdrive_SS · · Score: 1

      I thought it was Homer: All work and no play make Homer something something
      Marge: go crazy?
      Homer: don't mind if I do

  49. People spent too much time playing games by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    IF people could be just ALITTLE more serious, perhaps we wouldnt be having economy trouble, terrorist attacks, problems with virii, hackers, worms.

    Instead of using your computer to play stupid games, use your computer to do stuff thats important and play a game no more than a half hour to an hour per week.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:People spent too much time playing games by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      IF people could be just ALITTLE more serious, perhaps we wouldnt be having economy trouble, terrorist attacks, problems with virii, hackers, worms.
      Instead of using your computer to play stupid games, use your computer to do stuff thats important and play a game no more than a half hour to an hour per week.


      You know, most economists and terrorists (meatspace and cyber) I know of are severely serious people. If they had a fscking modicum of playfulness in their bodies, much less a sense of humor, we would probably have a lot fewer recessions and suicide bombers.

      Now that we've put economists and terrorists in the same boat, let's throw you in -- a /. flamebait-poster who really needs to get out more and have some fun. ;-)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:People spent too much time playing games by yardbird · · Score: 1
      Terrorist:Suicide Bombing :: Economist:Recession?

      (Couldn't resist -- the former Princeton Review teacher in me coming out. :-)
      --

      --
      Free, legal music for iTunes users.
  50. and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by Infonaut · · Score: 5, Interesting
    people wasted the same amount of time by:

    * watching TV
    * masturbating
    * sitting around thinking of ways to avoid doing something
    * bowling
    * watching bowling on TV
    * reading Danielle Steel novels
    ad nauseum...

    People will "waste time" because humans can't work 24/7. We're primates, for Chrissakes.. have you ever seen primates in a zoo? "Wasting time" is all they do!

    Video games are just a way of wasting the same amount of time in a different way.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "before?"

      uhhh... i think geeks still masturbate, watch tv, etc.

      sometimes, at the same time (Playboy is doing that new series about the chicks in the house thing...)

    2. Re:and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by swankypimp · · Score: 1
      We're primates, for Chrissakes.. have you ever seen primates in a zoo? "Wasting time" is all they do!

      Yup, if they were just a bit more motivated, they'd be able to build a great civilization and put Chuck Heston in a cage. As it is, they sleep all day and have shotput contests with their own poo. Damn slackers.

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    3. Re:and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      have you ever seen primates in a zoo? "Wasting time" is all they do!

      Er, perhaps it has something to do with the bars on the cage?

      Have you ever seen people in prison? wasting time is all they do!

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by bughunter · · Score: 1
      have you ever seen primates in a zoo? "Wasting time" is all they do!

      Yes, especially item number two on your list.

      Not to mention throwing number two... the kind not on your list.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by Slurm-V · · Score: 1

      Dammit - you can't compare on a 1:1 ratio what those idle chimps in the zoo do with their doodoo while waiting for ratepayer funded free food to what my ancestors did dragging themselves up off their knuckles and getting busy with some real evolution. It's a flaming insult.

      --
      Of course it's going off the rails. How else is it ever going to fly?
    6. Re:and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and before Solitare and Mindsweeper... people wasted the same amount of time by... masturbating...

      What do you mean, before? I submit to you that if in a given week you spend more time playing Solitaire than pursuing sexual gratification, your priorities are fucked.

  51. Too bad we can't combine work and play... by bourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now what we need is some game that provides a playable veneer over an actual problem that benefits from human judgement. Kind of like Seti@Home benefits from all the idle computer power out there. Humans are capable of inuition and pattern discrimination that computers are not, and a game would be an excellent way to apply massive amounts of distributed human analysis to an appropriate problem.

    Has anyone got an appropriate problem? I'm thinking that somewhere in the vast field of genetics there's got to be some problem that humans can work on better than computers, next step is to turn it into a game and getting it bundled with your favorite (or least favorite ;>) operating system...

    1. Re:Too bad we can't combine work and play... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2

      Now what we need is some game that provides a playable veneer over an actual problem that benefits from human judgement
      Consider Everquest. I've never played it (would get way too addicted) but hear that people have jobs in it, such as making shirts or swords or whatever. Now, no real-world good comes from this time, because you're pretending to be putting physical work into a physical product.
      Most slashdot users however spend most of their days doing various forms of information-processing. Replace "making shirts" with "writing a perl/python script to do x", perhaps you could find some way of doing that without even breaking the Middle Earth setting, and WHAMO, people's productivity skyrockets.

    2. Re:Too bad we can't combine work and play... by mattbelcher · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about this a lot since I took those CS theory classes. Since so many problems can be "reduced" to each other (that is a solution for one can be converted to a solution to the other) you would think that some of those problems would be fun to solve, while others would be boring. Just think if we could find a "fun" variant of Travelling Salesperson...

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    3. Re:Too bad we can't combine work and play... by DrCode · · Score: 2

      Actually... when I worked for a semiconductor firm a couple years ago, someone seriously suggested writing a place-and-route game for FPGA's. This is an area that's difficult for software to do optimally, and is highly puzzle-like.

  52. No more wonders by famazza · · Score: 2

    That's why humanity won't build no more major wonders anymore. We'll spend our lives playing games.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
    1. Re:No more wonders by JatTDB · · Score: 2

      "won't build no more major wonders anymore."

      Damn. Just...damn.

      Damn.

      Damn.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  53. Pointing Out the Obvious by nikoftime · · Score: 1

    Though those statistics may seem somewhat intriguing, one must remember that in actuality it is highly unlikely that the people playing solitaire would rather spend their time building a large building or monumental structure.
    This is not off-topic. Just listen and understand.

    In general, computer gaming in the adult realm is the result of hours of boredom (Unlike teenagers/kids/some young adults who simply play the games as a hobby or a past time). And this boredom is usually a result of not having something to do at a job, or perhaps at home. People who spend hours playing solitaire generally wouldn't take it upon themselves to work on an Empire State Building or a Panama Canal.

    Let's see this article for what it really is: "Lot's of people who have a lot of time on their hands spend hours achieving nothing." Or less cynically: "People, unaided by their jobs, find other routes to circumvent boredom."

  54. I'm surprised by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that Microsoft hasn't taken advantage of the popularity of Solitaire to inflate the number of Passport users by requiring players to get a Passport account :)

    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
  55. The Mythical Man-Month by thelenm · · Score: 1

    First off, those stats are pretty amazing.

    But comparing man-hours wasted playing Solitaire to the man-hours required to complete large construction projects is not really a valid comparison. In the realm of software engineering, anyway, Brooks tells us in The Mythical Man-Month that men and months (or men and hours) are not interchangeable. So although it's easy for 23.1 million people to waste their time independently, in parallel, it would require tremendous overhead to get them to work together on anything constructive. Of course you can't build an Empire State Building in 9 days if you just get 23.1 million people to work on it.

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    1. Re:The Mythical Man-Month by elblanco · · Score: 1

      Why not? I can see it now, we could hire an entire country, say....Belgium to start erecting skyscrapers all over the place (often without regard as to where it is) so for example Kansas could end up with a 9 day skyscraper in the middle of a corn field. Just imagine in a year or so we could have around 40 new Empire State Building class buildings around my house.

  56. Solitare on Mac by mattkime · · Score: 3, Informative

    While its not pre-installed, for years it was the first shareware Mac users would come in contact with - Klondike! The mac equivilant of solitare for windows. I believe MS may have even copied Klondike, as it was originally created on a Mac Lisa in 1984.

    Anyways, this past week I discovered that not only has Klondike been ported to Mac OS X, but that it still runs on a Mac Plus with System 6! Thats right, the same binary can be run on a Motorola 68000 processor running an operating system without multitasking (unless you count MultiFinder) AND run on a machine with a total of 1.6 gigaherts with a fuly modern operating system, including protected memory.

    Perhaps some day my mom will be ready to switch to Mac OS X.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    1. Re:Solitare on Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Great. Macs still suck and pc users can still run shitty DOS programs from 1981.

  57. Games by Hatter · · Score: 1

    My downloaded version of Mandrake 8.1 came with 30+ games installed by default. They include minesweeper, about 15 arcade games, KPatience (solitaire), XPat2 (which has 16 card games in it, including Freecell), and a handful of puzzle games. And to clarify, Freecell was not invented by Microsoft, it's been around 20 years.

    Games are not the deciding factor in Linux's sucess in the Desktop market. The thing that keeps Linux off most people's desktop is that it's not ready for many of them, and they're scared of it. Regardless of the leaps in terms of usability in the past couple years, Windows is still much easier to use. I love to use Linux and avoid a Windows machine whenever possible, but I don't expect a large % of my friends or my parents to be able to use it at this point.

  58. Microsoft's monopoly power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hoyle should be suing Microsoft for a virtual monopoly on the card game Solitare! How can other card game software publishers compete with Microsoft when Microsoft bundles their Solitare game with every copy of the operating system!

    Someone should report Microsoft to the Department of Justice immediately!

  59. Numbers deceive by oosajack · · Score: 0

    Often numbers and stats deceive as they don't tell the whole story. You are comparing building empire state bldg and panama canal which is like comparing oranges to apples. People play solitaire for fun as a relaxation not to earn some money or satisfy intellectual thirst. So it might actually would have increased the productivity (we don't know). If you comapre this, then you have compare hours wasted in sleeping, eating and in rest rooms.

    If only people find some way to eliminate rest room time, we can build hundereds of empire state bldgs but the world would be stinking.....

    pc

    Though I'm anything but clever, I can write like that for ever. --Tom holt

  60. The reason for sol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Becuase it is the only damn application thaat is stable and does not crash the system

  61. Thank you wine by joeflies · · Score: 2, Funny

    for supporting one of the top Windows applications, and especially allowing me to minimize without the evidence showing up on the task window.

  62. Methodology? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1
    We have a list and numbers, but how on god did we get them? Open spyware detecting what people run? Questionairre? Packet sniffing? Taking the publiser's word for it? Any of these methods has innate problems.


    If I was a publisher, theres no way in hell I'd take this "data" without the methodology to give it a proper window.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  63. Killjoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was enjoying the stupid, makey-no-sense numbers. 99% of the people reading slashdot are quite aware the numbers are meaningless, and the other 5% are just stupid.

    1. Re:Killjoy! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      What about the other 12%?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  64. Distributed Processing... by Greyfox · · Score: 3
    A while back some clever folks worked out how to "steal" distributed processing by getting systems on the internet to compute checksums for them.

    If we could apply something similar to the game of Solitaire, there could be millions to be made! After all, Solitaire is just a sorting problem.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Distributed Processing... by davidhan · · Score: 1

      Maybe MS already has done this ... check the EULA.

    2. Re:Distributed Processing... by Nautilus · · Score: 1

      Yes, but now you're depending on people to play solitaire well.

      Not the sort of thing I'd rely on in a business plan.

  65. Cool! by sterno · · Score: 3, Funny

    So if everybody gave up the time that they spent showering, that could easily be like... well let's see:

    Let's assume roughly 170 million people in the US who aren't too old or too young to be useful. Then let's assume they each shower for roughly 15 minutes a day on average. That is 42.5 million man hours per day spent showering. At that rate:

    Emprie State Building: Under 4 hours
    Panama Canal: Half a day
    Apollo project: 36 days

    So the empire state building and panama canal are easy. The apollo project is doable, but I doubt anybody would want to fly on it. Man would that thing smell bad.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Cool! by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      The apollo project is doable, but I doubt anybody would want to fly on it. Man would that thing smell bad.

      That has not kept them from flying it before, the smell aboard the Apollo capsules was reportedly quite bad. Three guys locked up in a very, very small room with no real useful way to clean either themselves or their clothes... But I'm sure that in your example the guys would have gladly jumped in the capsule just to get away from 170 million smelly Americans, if only for a few days :-)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  66. Unions by davidhan · · Score: 1

    Buildings also generally require a union. Imagine how powerful a union of Solitaire players would be? It would rule the world!

    1. Re:Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a union of television viewers!

      The right to watch bad comedy without annoying ads!

    2. Re:Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, union workers have too much of a strong work ethic.

  67. Boggle and Yahtzee by Cacophony · · Score: 1

    They make a big deal about all the many new users users of Ultimate Yahtzee and Boggle pretty high on the list of most popular games...Maybe it has something to do with that they were free with General Mills cereals for a while.

    -Al-

  68. top-sekret distributed computing project by phloda · · Score: 1

    You just think that yur playing Solitare. It is actually a giant distrbuted computing project. With that many hours complete, my estimate is that they are about 1/8 of the way to finding the question to 42.

  69. TROLL ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators, do your thing!

    1. Re:TROLL ALERT! by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 1

      "TROLL ALERT!"

      What is this? You're sitting behind your keyboard anonymously mocking me by comparing me to some large mythical creature? Do you think moderation is governed by mysticism? The moderators of this site are here to promote intelligent discussion, not offtopic anonymous mystical rambling.

      I am trying to make people understand that you can't compare decent hard-working Americans to slacking .com disaster workers pissing away investment money playing Solitaire. What that has to do with Trolls, Orcs or Demons is your own business, but please don't bother me with it.

      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    2. Re:TROLL ALERT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. He's a troll alright. Not a very funny one though.
      Was that supposed to be some kind of lame attempt at humor?
      Go back to Geekizoid, turd burgler.

  70. Harnessing the power of millions by Scouras · · Score: 1
    The practical application of this being that, if you could write a game that both solved a problem and was fun (and was bundled) you would could have your own Human Distributed.Net.

    Which of course sounds completely unrealistic, but hey, IBM just made a Quantum Computer, right?

  71. Maybe we need math games instead... by sljck · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice the bad math here-

    24e6 man hours ~ 2740 man years for solitaire, but for the Appolo project
    15.5e9 man hours ~ 52 man years.
    hmmm..

    "Assurons-nous bien du fait, avant de nous inquiter de la cause."- Fontenelle

    --
    "Assurons-nous bien du fait, avant de nous inquiter de la cause."- Fontenelle
  72. How many hours? by tenor · · Score: 1

    15.5 billion man-hours for the Apollo project?

    Let's see, if one man-year is 2000 hours, then we need 7,750,000 man-years of work. Assuming that 50,000 people worked on the project, it would take them 155 years to complete. Wait a minute, it couldn't possibly have taken more than 20 years to do the Apollo project, since NASA had only been around for a little while. So how many people would that be...387,500 people. Which was most of Houston back then. Can these numbers be for real? Or perhaps this is like AT&T saying that a publicly available 911 document is worth a couple million...

    --
    Opinions change daily as new information arrives. Stay tuned.
    1. Re:How many hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.sciencenet.org.uk/publications/moonland ing.html

      You have to remember that a lot of folks outside of NASA were involved in the Appolo project, even if only indirectly. For instance, NASA doesn't manufacture its own steel.

      15.5 billion probably holds up.

  73. Bad Math! by frank2 · · Score: 1

    > A little math tells us that americans spent about 24 million man-hours .. That corresponds to about 1 million man-days, or around 2740 man-years!

    > Panama Canal: 20 million man-hours (a mere 26 days of Solitaire), Apollo project: 15.5 billion man-hours (or a mere 52 years of Solitaire) Think about it!"

    Yes, please think about it. The comparisons are way off.

  74. I just wasted a man-day on Freecell #11982 alone! by jlowery · · Score: 1

    http://www.austega.com/diversions/FreeCell/freecel l.htm

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  75. The curse of violent video games by karb · · Score: 2, Funny

    As noted time and time again by those opposed to game violence, just a casual glance reveals that the Most Popular games are also the Most Violent.

    For example, just take a look at number 21 : HOYLE SOLITAIRE. HOYT SOLITAIRE has been comdemned by numerous game anti-violence activism groups, including The Lion and Lamb Project.

    How many more children need to die before HOYT and other violent-game makers stand up and becomes accountable? How many more people will buy (and I'm getting ill at the thought of it) ... _Guns_, for 'self-protection' and 'hunting', before congress will take action against these code-writing purveyors of death?

    As a bible-thumping christian, I am reviled by the thought of these violent games and guns, especially remembering the death of our savior, Jesus Christ, at the hands of Doom-playing gun-wielding members of the pharisees. Evil is no older than videogames and guns. Write to your congressman now! Stop the corruption of our children!

    (and since I typically get mod'd down at least once before someone realizes my sarcasm, yes, this is sarcastic.)

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

    1. Re:The curse of violent video games by karb · · Score: 1
      I just have to say that
      1. About 90% of the comments I have that _ever_ get modded up now get modded back down. Which is just hell on the karma.
      2. All of you, everywhere, who use the 'overrated' moderation on me nearly everyday, your days are numbered. I know who you are.
      --

      Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  76. Question the data and their methods by Cosmicbandito · · Score: 1
    Jupiter Media Metrix is known for skewing their data to keep clients happy. Could it be that M$ is trying to cast themselves as the "ultimate games company"? Maybe a branding push to help the XBox?

    Take these figures with an extremely large grain of salt. One of my English Profs maintains a webpagepage about Jupiter and their "research." Lots of links to other stuff on Jupiter too. They have a long and sordid history. At long last, Cosmic Banditos has been reprinted! Signed copies available Cheap.

    1. Re:Question the data and their methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The ultimate games company" with Solitaire as showcase? Are you on fucking drugs?

    2. Re:Question the data and their methods by Cosmicbandito · · Score: 1

      In this case "ultimate" doesn't necessecarily mean they make the coolest games, but that they're the biggest player.

      Having their name at the top of a list of videogames is meaningless to geeks, but when grandma wants to buy Johnny something for Xmas, she'll go with the brand name she's at least heard of.

  77. pregnant by geekoid · · Score: 2

    and IF I get nine women pregnant, I'll have a baby in a month!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:pregnant by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      IF I get nine women pregnant, I'll have a baby in a month!

      If you're posting to slashdot, that's a pretty big IF....

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:pregnant by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      You will have a baby?

      Comparing arbitrary statistics is stupid, but not that stupid. I mean, you didn't really believe that Schwarzenegger movie, right? :-P

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    3. Re:pregnant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no joking around, man! my gf's test just came back negative! i am SO FUCKING RELIEVED!

  78. Solitaire sucks... Minesweeper rocks. by Domini · · Score: 2

    Minesweeper as a game is great. The mathematical properties of it are intriguing.

    I have a lot of fun with it on Linux as well...

    Solitaire is a waste of time.

  79. Person-hours by Bastian227 · · Score: 1

    Hey, women can play Solitaire just as well as a man:

    s/man-(\w*)/person-$1/gi;

    [Personhole] is not an acceptable de-sexed word.
    * Shirley Dean, explaining why the wording in a sewer equipment request was changed back to manhole cover

  80. Windows Minesweeper Bug by Domini · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    A friend of mine (A girl who can do expert on windows in under 80s consistently!!!) found the following bug... can you spot the error?

    minesweeper-error.gif

    Trust Micrsoft to fuck up something as simple as Minesweeper.

    1. Re:Windows Minesweeper Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems legit to me, what's the problem?

    2. Re:Windows Minesweeper Bug by Domini · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Look on the left-hand side... there is a blank sqare with a mine below it... the blank square should have a '1' in it.

    3. Re:Windows Minesweeper Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee that wasn't hard to fake at all was it? Will this picture of Linus fucking a donkey convince you that Linux sucks (fucks) ass?

    4. Re:Windows Minesweeper Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This bug is easily reproduced. Hold down the middle button (left+right doesn't work, if you have a 2-button mouse) to depress an area of squares and click the left button. The squares stay depressed.

      Who feels stooopid now?

  81. Your radical ideas about the mythical man month... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...have occurred to others.

    I swear to God, if I hear another person mention the "mythical man month," I'm going to pull my hair out... one strand at a time.

    If I had mod points right now, it'd be -1 Redudant, across the board, reverse-chronologically ;P

  82. Utilize the time wasted... by Coventry · · Score: 2

    If someone is playing solitaire, they obviously aren't doing work or using the cpu heavily - so why not build-in a distributed computing client to perform work on a cure for cancer or some such in the background of these games?

    http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/curecancer.html

    --
    man is machine
  83. ...Make Homer Something Something by Polsar · · Score: 1

    Go Crazy
    ....Don't mind if i do!

    --
    "Gravity cannot be held accountable for people falling in love." -Einstein
  84. lies by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Solitaire was number one, with 21.3 million users.
    how do they know that?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  85. The Simms #1.....knida by darrad · · Score: 1

    I found it interesting that the #1 non-bundled game(Not installed with an OS of any kind) is The Simms....

    wouldn't this equate to more time spent on sex...?

  86. Ad Revenue by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 1

    Now if only there were banner ads at the top of every solitare game, you'd make at least a good $10/year in click-throughs!

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
  87. Panama Canal by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

    Interesting Note on the Panama Canal

    Started in 1880

    Finished in 1914

    34 years!

    Estimated that 80,000 persons took part and that 30,000 lives where lost in the construction.

    If only 12 hours of work was done per day (it was much much higher but...) then in that 34 years there was 11913600000 hours of work.

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  88. Didn't they do just that... by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    ...when they put Internet enabled games on the Start menu? IIRC, those games connect you to the Zone, and IIRC the Zone now requires Passport.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  89. So then... by Night0wl · · Score: 1

    What one needs to do, to motivate people into education, is write a virus using the standard Virus protocal distrobution methods (Outlook) which does the whole self spreading thing. You know, the same ole' shit, different package.

    Except with this one you have it delete solitare....hell you could have it delete the SHORTCUT to the exe and it would cause people to stop and realize what the hell is going on.

    "Oh no, I can't play solitare any more because of the virus!"

    --
    Computational Madness in a round package.
  90. evidence of Solitaire's popularity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I pass through the Bali airport in Dempasar on a semi-regular basis and all the little over priced duty free shops run the same POS cash registars, which use windows as the underlying operating system. Anyway, the clerks have figured out how to play Solitare from their cash register keyboard and it's not at all uncommon to walk through the Bali airport and see every last clerk playing solitare... Since there are about 50 shops with store fronts spaced every 5 meters, it's very sureal and a good general commentary on the Human Race(tm) in general.

  91. Other high-ranking activities on Windows by merlyn · · Score: 2

    Didn't say whether they spent more time at Solitaire or at rebooting after a BSOD, or reinstalling their software.

    Maybe if the BSOD was made to resemble Solitaire, it'd be less threatening?

  92. MYST!!!! Get some more improvement! by MemeRot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Myst does not improve critical thinking skills.

    The only critical thought one needs when playing Myst is 'where is the off button?'

  93. hehe.... by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    all good tweakers maybe ;)
    though i have coded for 30 hours straight before, i would not recommend it.

  94. "We" feed "You", of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of "us" with the skills and abilities to (right now) do those things correctly and efficiently [and not have "you" get in our way and mess up our work] could create, build, harvest, plant, whatever in a fraction of the time it currently takes to do those tasks.

    But then when talking of the rate of efficiency the poster was probably talking in the "everyone" sense as "we". Though I know my personal efficiency can get F'd pretty badly by a couple bad interjects from a crappy supervisor.

    Of course the Best People To Do The Work fluxuates over time. However if "doing a good job" qualification means you'll be attached semi-permanently to a task, few people would probably stand up and say "Yup, I'll devote the next X years of my life to doing the same thing because I do it a thousand times better than anyone near me."

    Which brings up another point from the original reply said "Why shouldn't *we* reap some of those benefits? Because *you* would have prevented us from doing so?"

    Too many cooks spoil the pot. Er, dinner? Production?

  95. Not if you play Civ by xX_sticky_Xx · · Score: 1

    I routinely build many major wonders (and now minor wonders with Civ3). Not a week goes by where I don't build the Pyramids, the Hanging Gardens, the Sistine Chapel, the Manhattan Project etc.

    You just have to know which games to play.

    --

    ---

    I didn't want to leave this space blank.
  96. eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Claiming that Minesweeper is NP-complete would only help to support the claim that you would never have to guess, seeing as all NP problems are Turing decidable.

    1. Re:eh? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Claiming that Minesweeper is NP-complete would only help to support the claim that you would never have to guess

      Bzzt...NP means that it's nondeterministically solvable in polynomial time. This assumes that the nondeterminism is solved ideally, or that the correct guess is made every time it pops up. Each nondeterminism requires a guess to resolve. (At least that's more or less how I remember it was explained in automata.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  97. well neither did Dahmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First of all, Dahmer didn't get with any "young boys", unless you're some sort of perverse American who thinks "young child" is anyone under 18. He was attracted to young men, though, I'll give you that.

    Secondly, didn't really molest or rape anyone (at least not that I can remember). AFAIK, the only non-consensual sex he had was with people he'd already killed (he had a bit of a death fetish). Generally, the routine was: pick up a guy, maybe have sex with him (or not), kill him, maybe have sex with him (or not), put in freezer, maybe eat parts of him (or not). Calling him a molestor or rapist is a bit unfair, really; he was really just more of a serial murderer.

    Finally, what on earth is wrong with sodomy?!

  98. Re: Your .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use REAL poo for what you others use your substandard Sham-poo. I eat is as well. My supply is unfortunately always very low, thanks to my ever-increasing appreciation for my wonderful turds.

    And that's where YOU come in! If you have any spare turds for me to eat, bathe in or have intercourse with, please, please contact me.

  99. oh yeah?.. by CleanTroath · · Score: 1

    And just think about how much time an average american spends in front of a television.

    Humans don't care about productivity, but humanity does.

  100. the truth about computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're all just something to keep us feverishly busy until we die. And the whole time we don't notice that we're not doing anything worthwhile. If it doesn't involve eating, breathing, and breeding, it's a waste of time. One could argue that computer use that benefits medicine, farmers, and education are about the only real uses there are. (No, learning codes for games or downloading the latest wait-we-really-have-USB-working-this-time Linux kernel doesn't count as education.) Otherwise we're twiddling our fingers until... hey, they caught me, too!

  101. Ann Landers Column 12/20 by joeflies · · Score: 1

    I wonder what game (cough cough) that this woman is refering to? Computer Games Are Addictive

  102. Did Malda Mean "What About My Gambling"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Malda ever learn to write English?

  103. What about the guy in Georgia? by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

    and that whole distributed.net fiasco down there? I bet the defense could use this solitaire thing to better their case - how many man-hours (or more importantly, computer-hours) are spent playing solitaire (+etc.) on university-owned computers?

    Something to think about, anyway...

  104. Bug is easily reproduced by pterry · · Score: 1

    This bug is easily reproduced. Hold down the middle button (left+right doesn't work, if you have a 2-button mouse) to depress an area of squares and click the left button. The squares stay depressed.
    Mind you, I'm using the Win2k version, and haven't tested this with other versions. The Win2k version also has a "feature" which I would call a bug: pressing Esc stops the clock but lets you play on, allowing you to fake any time you want! The help file describes a more complicated series of actions to do this, but pressing Esc is in fact sufficient. What drugs were M$ on when they implemented this??

  105. Re:Gaming Improves Us! NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Playing games stuns the frontal lobe...which leads to aggression.

  106. Any way to limit usage under windows 2000? by fractaltiger · · Score: 1

    Is there any service or program that will let me set the maximum activation of solitaire and freecell to 5 times per day? My dad spends way too much time using these useless programs when I could be coding.

    I do not currently know if Win2k allows what I'm talking about, but limiting usage would be a plus and should be a feature of Windows

    --
    "Wireless : LAN :: Laptop : Desktop"
    1. Re:Any way to limit usage under windows 2000? by MemberFDIC · · Score: 1

      Try this:
      delete C:\Windows\System32\sol.exe
      delete C:\Windows\System32\freecell.exe

      That should do the trick

  107. Re: Your .sig by the_bikeman · · Score: 1

    I hope that at least you thought this meant something useful.

  108. Yeah.. by ericvids · · Score: 1

    And people in prison waste their time by playing solitaire. ;-)

    (And they're doing it without the aid of the computer. Imagine if all those users playing Solitaire actually used real cards and played the same number of games in a session... Gosh, we'd be way past a million man-hours!)

    --
    Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
  109. holy shit, ignoramus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A problem being NP-complete does not mean you have to guess. It means that ****IF**** (should I add more asterisks for you?) you guess correctly each time, ****THEN**** you will solve the problem in polynomial time.

    As we all know, though (or those of us with even a few years of compatibility theory), all problems decidable by a non-deterministic Turing machine can be solved by a deterministic Turing machine, albeit very inefficiently (usually in exponential time). Thus, the Minesweeper problem is decidable by a deterministic Turing machine (it's trivial to come with an O(e^n) solution, in fact). The fact that it *is* decidable by a deterministic Turing machine proves undoubtedly that you will never *have* to guess (though if you happen to be a good guesser, you would want to guess in order to speed things up a bit).

    BTW, usually I wouldn't use such an offensive tone. IMHO, however, anyone who uses the non-word "bzzt" deserves death (seriously). Consider yourself fortunate.

  110. Re:Gaming Improves Us! NOT by Sierpinski · · Score: 1
    I considered not even dignifying this with a response, but I feel that your comment should be answered.


    First of all, "playing games" can't be categorized as doing anything, since there are too many types of games out there to consider. Does scrabble lead to aggression? I'd say probably not. What about Risk? There you're getting into a war-oriented game, however there is no direct violence.


    That leads me to Doom/Quake/etc. Those games are full of violence, blood, killing, etc., however the problem that might occur with children playing these games is when/if they have no ability to distinguish between what is "fake" (the games), and reality.


    There's another factor, and that's called predisposition. The "trenchcoat mafia" incident in Colombine brought up the issue of the music that they were listening to. People made the connection that the music had an effect on them, when in fact it is just the reverse. People who are predisposed to commit violent acts like that probably listen to the music because it contains violence.

    Aggression is a trait that has many, many causes. Much research has been done, but it just boils down to an individuals ability to deal with life and certain situations. I know people who were beaten by parents as children. Some of them are agressive, and some of them are not. The ones that aren't, have successful lives, loving families, etc., because they were able to deal with their childhood tradegies.

    Next time, do a little research before making such a vague, incorrect comment.