Slashdot Mirror


User: SealBeater

SealBeater's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
364
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 364

  1. Re:Use it at home on Best Training in Linux Administration? · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slackware is be the distro to begin with.

    Amen.

    SealBeater

  2. Re:What about banning booting Knoppix CD? on Longhorn Will Have Ability to Ban External Storage Devices · · Score: 1

    All you people who are parroting off "Bios Password" have no idea what you are
    talking about. Many bioses have default passwords and often time, a little
    social engineering can get it out of the BIOS manufacturer. In addition to
    that, there are tools availble that will allow you to edit your BIOS from
    within the OS

    You guys are a joke. Try learning something instead of chiming in with the
    same wrong two cents.

    SealBeater

  3. Re:What about banning booting Knoppix CD? on Longhorn Will Have Ability to Ban External Storage Devices · · Score: 1

    If you're going to open the computer's case, it is easier to remove the HD and
    use a jury-rigged "external usb enclosure" canabalized guts to connect it to
    your laptop


    Having once found myself in the aforementioned postition, with the added
    difficulty of a locked box, in addition to live monitoring of "chassis
    intrusions", with people around, I can tell you it's much faster to feel for
    the battery by touch and rip it out, then to mess with cables

    SealBeater
  4. Re:It is indeed about security, not control... on Longhorn Will Have Ability to Ban External Storage Devices · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet I could get past this guys set up. Give me a knoppix cd.

  5. Re:I think it's an inside job on Walmart Stored Value Cards Compromised · · Score: 1

    Are you sure that the WAPs are for the registers?


    I didn't mean to say that the WAPs for for the registers, merely that there are
    WAPs present, and sooner or later, I'm sure, once you get on their network, you
    can get in their network

    SealBeater
  6. Re:Why steal when you can make? on Walmart Stored Value Cards Compromised · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If someone has access to Walmart's database and/or registration
    data, why can't this someone just get a pre-paid card, and change its value
    with all matching/tracking records in the database?


    There might be a system of checks and balances, like the card not being
    activated unless/until the til is checked at the end of the day, to prevent the
    employees simply issuing themselves cards. It might even check against a different
    database..other than the above pure speculation, I agree.

    SealBeater
  7. Re:I think it's an inside job on Walmart Stored Value Cards Compromised · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Replying to the post about how Wal-Mart gift cards work, I've noticed this
    cards before. (This is all speculation, I read the article) One possiblity
    is that, the person doing this, for instance, has a bar code printer (if
    their smart). If they are stupid, they have an in on the database, and are
    transferring the credit to their card, then using it. Easy to track even if
    Wal-Mart isn't logging transactions, and even tho I agree that their probably
    stupid, big companies are usually smart to pay lots of money for security
    (expensive != good, of course). So, they print out a card, (or a sticker for a
    card) go to a store, buy it up. Looks like they are sticking to a store in
    Cali, so unless they are reading slashdot, they are screwed if they go there
    too often, unless they have a crew (have a girl, makes guys stupid) and even
    then, they are screwed, it'll just take longer.

    As for the sniffing idea, well shit, every Wal-Mart I've seen has at least 4
    WAPs with antenees. Good ones too, Cisco 1500s which pump out a lot more power
    than linksys (at least the default ones). I can't imagine that the registers
    (which have to send info over the wire somewhere) send them encrypted or
    anything like that. Personally, I'm surprised that we are just now hearing
    about it.

    Oh, and don't be surprised if this going at any number of stores. I see WAPs
    everywhere. Brave New World.

    SealBeater

  8. Why I use ext3 (Was Re:ext3 to reiser4) on Reiser4 Filesystem Released · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No, you will have to reformat. However, I recommend the upgrade; I've seen a number of studies showing that the performance of ext3 is awful compared to reiserfs. The only arguable advantage of ext3 is its compatibility with the baseline ext2.


    I have to take exception to this, as according to everything I know, this is a bit deceptive. As you would normally want to use a journaling
    filesystem on very large discs (whether this be regular hard drives, which is bad enough, but can get very large when dealing with raid arrays, for
    instance). This is the single most important factor when it came to deciding what filesystem to run, namely, can reiserfs 4 be upgraded to new
    versions easily? In the past, the only way to upgrade rieiserfs was to reformat the device. This is a point that I don't think people pay enough
    attention to, especially in production enviroments. Say I have a 500 Gig raid array. I use reiserfs, (which is an excellent filesystem) and it is
    later discovered to have a security flaw or a bug that causes data corruption. In order to upgrade to a new version of reiserfs, you have to
    reformat the entire array. With ext3, you unmount the device, mount it as ext2, unmount it and remount it as ext3. Done. This is hugely important.
    I am completely uninterested in having to maintain a 1Tb of drive space, in order to upgrade a 500G array.
    Well, that wouldn't happen, you say? It did. Google
    Also, I do seem to remember some problems running LVM and NFS on reiserfs as well, but I am willing to be corrected.

    SealBeater

    P.S. I am only really interested in knowing if I can upgrade a reiserfs filesystem without having to reformat.
  9. Re:quote: on Stirring The GNOME Fires · · Score: 1

    Hear hear.

    SealBeater

  10. Re:Why? on The Latest And Greatest Console Applications? · · Score: 1

    Why not use that same ssh session to create a tunnel to that box on the outside
    of the firewall? Then you can run any number of graphical client
    securely.

    Because text uses up less bandwidth than graphics?
    Because I might not want to suffer through the lag of multiple gui clients over
    ssh over a network?
    Because I can have all the apps I want running on a single VT without having to
    startx?

    SealBeater

  11. Re:VTs with gpm on The Latest And Greatest Console Applications? · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, nohup works, but you have to know that you are planning to detach before
    you run anything, screen will allow you to handle disconnects (intentional and
    otherwise) gracefully.

    SealBeater

  12. Re:Southpark... on 'Brain Pacemakers' Being Tested · · Score: 1

    I call it speaking to your audience. 8*)

    SealBeater

  13. Southpark... on 'Brain Pacemakers' Being Tested · · Score: 1

    Ever see the movie Southpark? Remember the device that zapped Cartman
    everytime he cursed? I wonder how long, given human nature, something like
    this is used for evil purposes. I don't mean to cast a shadow over what could
    be a very worthy achivement, but it behooves us to properly consider the
    possible...adverse reprocussions.

    SealBeater

  14. OE... on FreeS/WAN Project Bows Out · · Score: 1

    OE, or oppertunistic encryption, which is a good thing, in the sense of
    providing seamless ipsec without configuration, depends on having control of
    your reverse dns. A lot of ISPs won't allow you to change or won't change for
    you the reverse, as this is often encoded with useful info for the ISP, such as
    node id, and geographic location. This has had as big an effect at slowing
    down the spread of it as anything else. Some are cool, and I am actually very
    disappointed cause I recommended it to a friend of mine, and even tho I know
    it'll be useful for more time to come, I am planning on installing it on all my
    boxes, (I have control of the reverse for my lan, if not for my dsl ip, which I
    will inquire about).

    SealBeater

  15. Re:Where's the VOICE RECOG.?! on William Gibson on his Tech Life and Latest Novel · · Score: 1

    So I got one wrong.

    SealBeater

  16. Re:Where's the VOICE RECOG.?! on William Gibson on his Tech Life and Latest Novel · · Score: 1


    since I doubt he runs Linux or any OS that doesn't support speech-to-text software.)


    One should always be careful of making bold statements in public forums that
    are glaringly wrong.

    See for yourself.
    Festival

    ViaVoice

    SealBeater

  17. Re:How about someone of the opposite sex on What's Next for Your High-Tech Home? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    sadly single or just single? The state of being the one doesn't necessitate
    the following of the other.

    SealBeater

  18. Re:My response... on Microsoft Sends Linux Survey · · Score: 1

    You're right, gconf does use an xml based text format, I stand corrected.

    SealBeater

  19. My response... on Microsoft Sends Linux Survey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    15. List the top one or two possible improvements that you would like to see made to Windows.

    Nothing. You don't understand, your whole design philosiphy is flawed. You are presenting to the user little boxes that say "this far and no further" Such boxes do not exist with Linux. For instance, I can network every computer in my home, multiple firewire, multiple ethernet, SCSI if I want to, bond them all into one virtual interface, install openmosix, have a cluster, have it serve a webpage or my mp3s and I can do it from the internet cafe. From the command line. For free.
    I don't have to worry about viruses. I don't have to worry about a document I write containing identifying information about me. I don't have to worry about what's the next thing that is going to attack my box, due to your screw ups. I don't have to worry about my computer doing things that you want it to do rather that what I want it to do. Free upgrades, for life. Don't like something? Change it. Would you like to have no bloat? Rip out X Would you like your apps to be optimized to your CPU? OK, change your $CFLAGS. Got old hardware? No problem, what do you want to do? Mail? Web? Game server? GUI overhead? What's that? You don't understand. Windows is a fisher price toy.

    16. List the top one or two improvements that you would like to see made to Linux.

    Gnome, stop trying to be another microsoft. Don't walk down the same road. Some of us don't want binary format registry file configuration files that can't be edited by hand.

    GTK, some of us like to run ./configure --disable-nls and not have the script ignore us. We don't want all the translations and some of us do notice and don't like it when we tell software to do something basic like this and it ignores us.

    Glibc, modualize the security options. Let the user choose the level of encryption. There is a project that replaced the stock md5 with blowfish. This is a good idea.

    SealBeater

  20. Re:Childish behavior on Giant International Fusion Reactor Draws Nearer · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget however, that concern for the possibility of earthquakes in
    Japan, and Japan's financial ability to implement and maintain it are both
    valid points against thier suitability as a site.

    SealBeater

  21. Re:Childish behavior on Giant International Fusion Reactor Draws Nearer · · Score: 1

    If you think that France and Germany were operating on a purely moral plain,
    your'e missing the fact that they had the largest financial stakes in Saddams
    Iraq.


    I think Russia has the largest finanacial stake, at $8 billion U.S.

    SealBeater

  22. Re:Why fish? on Glowing Fish are First Genetically Engineered Pets · · Score: 1

    Yea, but there is a difference between a house cat and a predator cat. For
    instance, I've seen cats that were as big as botcats. That doesn't mean I want
    a bobcat for a pet.

    SealBeater

  23. Simular concept in comicbook on Tangible Interfaces for Computers · · Score: 0

    Ok, there was something simular in a recent Batman comic book I read.
    Basically, he wore these little lcd projecter things over his eyes, and had a
    pair of Minority Report gautlet things, and the information he needed was
    superimposed in front of him, monitors, virtual keyboard, everything you need
    floating right in front of you. He was able to type in the air, as if it were
    actually there. Imagine being to intensity or decrease the
    transparency of the controls, and you got something I would give a lot to play with.

    SealBeater

  24. Re:wow, not only did you not RTFA... on U.S. Continues Biological Warfare Research · · Score: 1

    When will humanity come to the conclusion that we have not evolved
    enough socially and morally to handle this type of knowlege in a safe
    manner?

    Yes, I could have adhered to the tenets of political correctness and/or
    eloquence, but skill in word smithing also includes the ability to speak in
    terms your audience can understand. Not that the intelligence of most of /. is
    in doubt, but I am very disappointed in humanity right now. Everywhere I look,
    all I seem to see is willful ignorance and stupidity. Consider it blowing off steam. I
    am well and truly sick and tired of it.

    On top of that, sometimes you just have to say "fuck". Try it, it truly does
    relieve tension.

    As for the mice being used for research comment, my point was that since the
    test animals are chosen for their simular responses, it seems silly to me to
    assume that this thing is confined soley to mice, esp, without further testing.
    Of course, this begs the question, who is going to be first. My stating of the
    obvious was to illustrate the point that picking an animal subject that bears
    close simularity to humans and then assuming that it couldn't effect humans is
    blatent scientific arrogance.

    SealBeater

  25. Re:We need this on U.S. Continues Biological Warfare Research · · Score: 1

    Yea, and we bombed Iraq cause they had WMD. Sure. Believe whatever the govt.
    tells you. Good sheep.

    SealBeater