Slashdot Mirror


'Brain Pacemakers' Being Tested

meshmar writes "Shades of 'The Terminal Man'? Rob Stein of The Washington Post has reported, via MSNBC, that: 'A handful of scientists around the world have begun cautiously experimenting with devices implanted in patients' bodies to deliver precisely targeted electrical stimulation to the brain in hopes of treating otherwise hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders.' A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too."

352 comments

  1. nah, probably not. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shades of 'The Terminal Man'?

    According to the novel a man with "psychomotor epilepsy" was severely hurting/killing people w/no memories of the events. He was implanted with some sort of device that shocked areas of his brain and stopped the seizures before they happened. The doctors chose an area of the brain that was the pleasure center. The brain began CAUSING seizures to get the shocks.

    So, as long as they don't put the shocks into the pleasure centers this should work out! Sci-fi for the masses!

    Note: I am only basing this on the book. IANANS (neurosurgeon).

    1. Re:nah, probably not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The possiblities are astounding! Buy a Microsoft product, get an orgasm!

    2. Re:nah, probably not. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      That's not what the CIA, err, aliens told me it was for!!!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:nah, probably not. by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
      So, as long as they don't put the shocks into the pleasure centers this should work out!

      I think the concern is that people would do precisely that. After all, it happened on both Futurama *and* the Simpsons, so naturally it's of grave concern to the Slashdot editors.

    4. Re:nah, probably not. by woohoodonuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Moreover, researchers say, the treatment has the advantage of being able to be simply turned off or removed if it does not work or if problems occur.
      Nevertheless, the research arouses fears of reviving the reckless use of brain surgery, about the wisdom of poking around in what some consider the font of a person's humanity, about oversimplifying mental illness as a purely biological problem, and the temptation to move too quickly to try out new technologies.

      and then I read this
      A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too.

      My question is this: what technology has been created in the past that COULD NOT have potentially been misused? Sure, you invented a pencil... a whole lot of good could come from this--but some dejected office worker could jam it in someone's ear too...

      This technology has the potential to be fantastic. Sure, a crazy mad scientist somewhere could definitely mess someone up pretty bad with this stuff--but how many medical procedures are already performed now where the doctor Doesn't have to power to seriously mess the patient up?

      I support this technology... Yeah, sure... Doctor's may be able to kill someone with it... but they also may just run someone over on the sidewalk driving home. And before anyone starts ranting about thousands of armies full of pacemaker brain-people... cut me a break. (although it would probably make a pretty cool book) There's too many things that are not directly related to science for that to happen... so the argument isnt' exactly with the science but with the implementation of it... There are more holes... also, but they're not on-topic to this discussion....

      Give science a break... this stuff could save lives and help out a lot of people.

    5. Re:nah, probably not. by imr · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would probably be:
      Buy a Microsoft product, get a BSOD (Blue Schock Of Death)!

    6. Re:nah, probably not. by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      Where do you want to "go" today?

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    7. Re:nah, probably not. by Hitch · · Score: 1

      it's not the "mess people up" standpoint as much as it is the behavioral control standpoint. as one po ster above posited "buy a microsoft product, get an orgasm". I'm more scared of the "disagree with [insert current political leader here], get a nasty shock" aspect (or, "agree with [same] get an orgasm.". perhaps the FCC would try to mandate shock jocks get them implanted so any use of "vulgar" language or "bad ideas" will get shocks. THAT scares the hell out of me.

      I mean, just the other day I was saying "Alwa-AAAAAAHHHHHOOOWWWWWW!!!!!!"

      --
      You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
      http://propheteer.org
    8. Re:nah, probably not. by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buy a Microsoft product, get an orgasm!

      You're under the mistaken assumption that people have an orgasm every time they're screwed :-)

    9. Re:nah, probably not. by mog007 · · Score: 1

      At least one person has an orgasm during any standard screw session, that's why the orgasm was invented, to let us know we can stop and get on with our lives.

    10. Re:nah, probably not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, especially in the case of any woman who's ever thought you were worth sleeping with.

      Fail-fast semantics in action!

    11. Re:nah, probably not. by etLux · · Score: 1, Funny



      I can barely begin to imagine the error messages.

    12. Re:nah, probably not. by bugnuts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great Googlymoogly! I can start using a two-handed keyboard again!

    13. Re:nah, probably not. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The possiblities are astounding! Buy a Microsoft product, get an orgasm!

      Correlate the above with reasoning behind developed nations policy on illegal drugs.

      Consider.

    14. Re:nah, probably not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That already happens to me.

    15. Re:nah, probably not. by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      Ya know, considering the kinds of political candidates we get lately I'd be thrilled to have someone I can feel good about, even if it's not because I like or agree with them, but because an electrical stimulator gave me a pleasant feeling.

      Freedom of thought is overrated anyway, it's not like we can do much about the things we disagree with.

    16. Re:nah, probably not. by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Great, just when I thought we had eradicated shock therapy forever!

    17. Re:nah, probably not. by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 1

      Sort of like a Bill Gates cream pie!

      --
      Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    18. Re:nah, probably not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all this is not exactly new and is used to treat movement disorders that are refractory to medical (i.e. pills) treatment. This started with ablation procedures in the 1970s, where the electrode was used to essentially fry a few cells and thus imbalance the basal ganglia network that regulates motor control. As a refinement we started to leave the electrode in. It works by overwhelming the neurons own activity and can be adjusted over time. This is a totally different concept from vagal pacemakers that are used to treat certain epilepsy subgroups.
      All of this only works in a very delicate balance, in conjunction with drugs and hence the potential for misuse at this point is nearly nil.
      We may reconvene in 20 years though...

      Clemens

    19. Re:nah, probably not. by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to see a beowolf of these. (Sorry, I just had to do it.)

    20. Re:nah, probably not. by flewp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you didn't. And the world would have been a better place had you not.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    21. Re:nah, probably not. by tswann01 · · Score: 1
      And before anyone starts ranting about thousands of armies full of pacemaker brain-people... cut me a break. (although it would probably make a pretty cool book) There's too many things that are not directly related to science for that to happen.
      I don't know. Hackers and spammers could team up again, unleashing wave after wave of door-to-door herbal viagra salesmen.
    22. Re:nah, probably not. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Actually shock therapy is still used as a last ditch defense against terminal depression. If talking therapies don't work ~60% and drugs don't work ~30% and you are suicidal then shock therapy is your only hope. It is not harmful or painful and is administered with anesthesia and muscle relaxants. Of course like most psychology they have no idea why it works, just that it does.

      The days of using it to punish schizophrenics are long gone. Don't confuse One Flew over the Cookoo's Nest by Ken Kesey for modern science.

      Transcranial Magnetic Induction may also be able to get the same results in a far more focused fashion. Wired even ran an article about how you can use Transcranial Magnetic Induction to activate the "god module" and give you extremely powerful religious experiences. Makes me want to found a church with some fancy pews and a BIG collection plate.

  2. Clockwork Orange comes to life by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    in a kinder, more gentle way. Instead of causing huge pain in reformed criminals when they hear music, you can now just give them "corrective shocks" for the misbehaving brain segment! Next, we'll all be stepping in lock-step....

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:Clockwork Orange comes to life by geekee · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you misunderstood the book, or have oversimplified it. He was conditioned to feel ill when thinking about pychotic behavior using drugs. However, one of the movies used to condition him used Beethoven's 9th, which he then became ill when hearing. The govt. removed the conditioning because it was determined that the rights of this pychopath were violated since he could no longer enjoy Beethoven.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    2. Re:Clockwork Orange comes to life by The-Dalai-LLama · · Score: 1

      Next, we'll all be stepping in lock-step....

      I imagine that there will be many Parkinson's sufferers who will be very grateful for the opportunity to march in lock-step.

      The Dalai Llama

    3. Re:Clockwork Orange comes to life by yet+another+coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think it would be so bad? Unless it were targeted to an area of the brain involved in pain processing, it would not be painful. If we were able to isolate the roots of antisocial behavior precisely enough to know certain brain areas and pathways, it might be cruel not to treat. Autonomy is a central idea of modern medicine and modern governments, and I would not advocate performing such procedures on a competent person against her or his wishes. Such treatments for people who could benefit, however, should be a goal.

    4. Re:Clockwork Orange comes to life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making the assumption that "autonomy is a central idea of modern medicine and governments". It most certainly is not. Most of them see it as counterproductive. The slippery slope here begins with using this treatment on violent criminals.

      Then less violent criminals: on your (probably bogus) drug conviction, you can undergo this harmless procedure or spent eternity in prison.

      Then it becomes a way to control unruly teenagers. They're parents know what's best for them, right? And they're still kids, not autonomous adults.

      Ultimately more people will have been conditioned with this technology than haven't, and we'll all be happy productive generic consumeroids.

  3. So the question is by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    Would you use your brain pacemaker for good or for awesome?

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:So the question is by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

      I think the question is whether this device works in reverse too... Matrix anyone?

    2. Re:So the question is by ferkelparade · · Score: 1

      Would you like to join forces?

      (I just noticed we have a STRONG tag for posts, but not a BAD tag. Now there's something /. could use...)

      --
      frotz grue
    3. Re:So the question is by flewp · · Score: 1

      Nah, there's already enough bad posts here, no sense in making them worse.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  4. I know just who to test this on by ageoffri · · Score: 3, Funny
    Daryl McBride. There has to be something wrong with his brain and some nice little shocks couldn't hurt him.

    --
    -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    1. Re:I know just who to test this on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Christ sake, if you are going to insult someone, at least spell his name correctly.

  5. online reservation NOW. I mean *NOW*. by tasinet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reserve one, under the name George W. Bush. He'll need a lot of boosting in that section. Thank you.

    1. Re:online reservation NOW. I mean *NOW*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, but wouldn't he actually need to have a brain to implant this thing in for it to be of any use to him?

    2. Re:online reservation NOW. I mean *NOW*. by kommakazi · · Score: 1

      Well, he has genitals I'm sure we could attach them to

  6. Battle Field Earth by spribyl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't the bad dudes in Battle Field Earth have implants that caused them to be extra agressive and bad actors.

    1. Re:Battle Field Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a better question would be, who actually watched Battlefield Earth?

    2. Re:Battle Field Earth by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

      I though they left that bit out of the Movie? The book was good. Please don't mix them up.

    3. Re:Battle Field Earth by trmj · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean Starship Troopers.

      And the writers for both had the same implants, but for the writing instead of the acting.

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    4. Re:Battle Field Earth by gregfortune · · Score: 1

      That's what they wanted you to think. In truth, it was just the coffee.

    5. Re:Battle Field Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be onto something. John Travolta was in that, and he's a very bad actor.

    6. Re:Battle Field Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Psychlo's had implants that made them agressive as hell, additionally they were sterilized before going off planet. So, even though, in the book, they were able to reform them by removing the implants; the species was doomed to extinction.

    7. Re:Battle Field Earth by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      In BE there were implantes the Phychlos (or whatever) had in their heads that are implanted at birth in the baby farms.

      The mechanic didnt have one (being a runt, he was thrown in the dustbin or something) and thus did not act like a psychopath... leading up to be the pal of the main character.

      Dunno about troopers, haven't read that in a while.

    8. Re:Battle Field Earth by trmj · · Score: 1

      no, troopers just sucked.

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  7. no good. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Trust me, I speak from experience... I've electricuted myself enough times to know that only bad things come of passing electricity through the brain via outside stimulus... (notice my horrible spelling, contrary to popular belief, I used to be good at spelling until I decided to staple a live electrical wire...)

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:no good. by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually for SEVERE depression electric shocks can be a treatment. It is considered a last resort though. For some patients its the only thing that does any good. I recall seeing a 20/20 about it. They shock you in a controlled environment, and the treatments effects last anywhere from a few weeks to a few months. The guy they interviewed was unresponsive to meds but got some relief from the shock treatments.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:no good. by manWorkSucks · · Score: 1

      i doubt you've electrocuted yourself before. perhaps you gave yourself an electric shock?

      --
      NERDS!!!!
    3. Re:no good. by October_30th · · Score: 1
      That is correct.

      Modern electroshock treatment is carried out under sedation and it tends to to provide very quick and effective relief in some forms of depression. I would not have hesitated trying out electroshocks if the meds had not worked out in my case.

      I suppose no-one knows how the electroshocks actually work, but the last theory I heard about said that some forms of depression are caused by "loops" (as in the obsessive-compulsion disorder) in thought and that the shock breaks them down.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    4. Re:no good. by OwlWhacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      My experience with electrocution taught me never to trust old vacuum tube radios again.

      It did help me uncover an unknown vocal talent though...

    5. Re:no good. by baryon351 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a candidate for ECT. I'd like to get it done sooner rather than later, as years of all kinds of therapy & drugs have done absolutely nil. It gets tiring going over some similar variation on the drugs/therapy routing, working up a little hope for just a slight improvement, to still go no further.

      I wouldn't like to see ECT or probes in the brain used as a first resort for someone who'd been depressed for a couple of weeks, as a little help can go a LONG way in many people.

      The shocks used in ECT are quite controlled, with muscle relaxants to minimise any muscular contraction that goes along with the shock. It works for some reason, and that reason isn't exactly known. Personally I don't give a shit why it works or how, or even if it wipes 20 years from my life. Chronic treatment resistant depression has laid waste to the last 20 years of my life, doing nothing isn't going to make the next 20 any better.

    6. Re:no good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depression is just a distraction. and the shocks are a distraction from the distraction. and OCD is yet another distraction.

      find out what the real problem is, and the distractions [from the real problem] will go away. not always easy, though.

    7. Re:no good. by elohim · · Score: 1

      Not just "can" be a treatment, it is the gold standard for treating refractory major depressive disorder.

    8. Re:no good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      dude didnt you SEE Requiem for a Dream ??? i mean DUDE do you honsetly want that kind of "therapy". don't buy the hype. the things that make you different are what makes you -- you. you really want to be a zoned out sheep like the rest of these fuxkers? a little anxiety makes you stronger than them!

    9. Re:no good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Resistant depression" is life threatening. Peoplr commit suicide cause of it. My ex-wife's mother had it and Electro shock therapy 10 times to get over it in the sixties (and yes all the modern muscle relaxation stuff was in full use back then). In the seventies she started getting depresed again and would call us up and have long talks. I suggested she try sleep as a therapy. Stay in bed until she felt motivated to get up and do something. No alcohol, no pills, no inhibiting thoughts, just watch the thoughts like it was a movie reel. And do nothing she wasn't motivated to do. Let her brain heal.

      She latter told me the advice worked and "Saved her life".

    10. Re:no good. by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It certainly is a frightening proposition, but I want to counter some of the stupid /. jokes. You seem to understand the procedure well, almost certainly more than I do. I will add a little more, though.

      Typically, a person has a few treatments within a few days. The mechanism of its action is mysterious. It works very well for some people, though. The most likely adverse effect is amnesia, especially for events surrounding the therapy. The recovery from depression can be very fast compared to medications. I have heard of people who preferred ECT to drugs upon having a recurrence of depression years later because it had worked very quickly for them the first time, and they did not want to wait so long to get better. People who receive therapy usually come out with much improved mood and seem perfectly normal.

      Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an investigational tool that may replace ECT someday. The idea is the same, to cause a burst of activity within the brain. It might offer the advantage of better targeting. The magnetic pulses are focused somehow to affect structures such as the amygdala and cingulate gyrus more than the rest of the brain and the body. I have heard that early studies have shown promise, but I have not read about it first hand.

      Whether or not you decide to pursue ECT, I wish you the best.

    11. Re:no good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Trust me, I speak from experience... I've electricuted myself enough times to know that only bad things come of passing electricity through the brain via outside stimulus... (notice my horrible spelling, contrary to popular belief, I used to be good at spelling until I decided to staple a live electrical wire...)

      Wow, you were not kidding about your horrible spelling!

  8. Tin Foil by halo8 · · Score: 0

    All Tin Foil posts can under this Thread

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    1. Re:Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      i'd hate to see what happens when you use this device WITH a tinfoil hate, i mean the foil conducts electricity right? if the device is malfunctioning it could create a huge spark that fries all of your hair, which as we know helps to stop the government from reading your head where you have the tattoo's of secret numbers

    2. Re:Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I forget, is this the proper hiearchy:

      psychiatrists - CIA - NAZIs - illuminati - aliens - fallen angels

    3. Re:Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have a kind of sixth sense: A radio antenna in your head picks up rfid tag signals from consumer items, and relays a signal to the pleasure center of your brain. Not only could your navigate Wal*Mart blindfolded, but you could let yourself be carried away by a materialistic Zen.

    4. Re:Tin Foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hat wont help you when the transmitter is in the skull.

      The hat might stop them sending you updates but perhaps it will be rigged to explode and kill you if it's cut off from the government happiness transmitters for more than two hours. Of course, if you block it even for ten-minutes (enough to plot rebellion at occasional intervals) then you'll probably be visited at 3am by the Service Engineers in Black.

    5. Re:Tin Foil by StefanJ · · Score: 1

      I like it! A Shopping Sense!

      Of course, you'd be rewarded by being near items the retailer wants to push.

      Dedicated consumers might be punished severely if they try to enter a bookstore, or even worse, a library.

      It is better to end than to mend.

      Stefan

  9. Someone has to say it... by orion024 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Time to invest in tin foil!

  10. Harrison Bergeron Anyone by nordic2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yikes.

    http://penguinppc.org/~hollis/personal/bergeron. sh tml

    1. Re:Harrison Bergeron Anyone by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      mmmmm, I like what comes up when you leave slashdot's patented URL mangling in place!!!

      Pictures of the original prototype trials.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. A good thing by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would be a good thing. If I had an implant I could program my computer at work to monitor my brainwaves. When they showed I was asleep my system could give me a little wake up jolt.

    "3M We don't make your brain. We make it better."

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:A good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant 'At BASF we dont make blah blah..."

      Though I stll have no idea what BASF is, but I've seen their commercials.

  12. uh-oh by slim+hades · · Score: 0

    great.. now when I go to use the microwave, i can forget my name, shit my pants, and curb my homicidal tendancies at the same time...

    1. Re:uh-oh by loserbert · · Score: 0

      So, life as usual right??

  13. V-Chip? by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dr. Vosknocker: Now, I want you to say "doggy".
    Cartman: Doggy.
    Dr. Vosknocker: [to audience] Notice, that nothing happens. [to Cartman] Now, say "montana".
    Cartman: Montana.
    Dr. Vosknocker: Good. Now, "pillow".
    Cartman: Pillow.
    Dr. Vosknocker: Alright. Now I want you to say "horse f*cker".
    Mrs. Cartman: Go on, honey. It's alright.
    Cartman: Horse fu-- [gets shocked by the V-chip] That hurts, god damn it!
    [gets shocked again]
    Dr. Vosknocker: Now I want you to say "big floppy donkey dick".
    Cartman: No!
    Dr. Vosknocker: [to audience] Success! The child doesn't want to swear!
    Cartman: This isn't fair, you sons of bi--
    [gets shocked repeatedly]

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    1. Re:V-Chip? by Dinath33 · · Score: 0

      Haha, I am assuming the length of the post is why it took 3 minutes to post this. If this wasn't the first thing to pop into your head, you should go rent the South Park Movie and educate yourself.

    2. Re:V-Chip? by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Damn you Mal. I saw the headline and the first thing I thought of was Cartman and the V-chip.

    3. Re:V-Chip? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should have recognised the chip was defective right at the start. As someone who's lived here a couple years, I can verify that the strongest profanity he says there is, in fact, the word Montana.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  14. you will be assimilated by Jotaigna · · Score: 1

    Prosthetics will evolve from simple mimmicks for limbs to fully functional devices that will help improving life quality for may persons. You just have to plug this in your shoulder, wear this on your ear and....psst pssst....pssst....you are assimilated.

    --
    "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
  15. Put Down That Twinkie! by druske · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...researchers have begun testing on monkeys to see whether the devices might suppress appetite, and perhaps boost metabolism, in obese people..."
    "Eat less or we'll CUT YOUR SKULL OPEN AND STICK A CHIP IN YOUR HEAD!"

    Yeah, I think that would suppress my appetite...
    1. Re:Put Down That Twinkie! by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      Well on a slightly more serious note it might not be such a bad threat. Given the propensity of obese people(and pretty much everyone else) to shift the blame for all of their problems onto someone else(see fast food law suits) it might work wonders for personal responsiblity.

      Scientist:"You say you can't help eating too much, well ok, we'll cut open your head and stick this little chip in which can help you with that." Fat Person: "On second thought maybe I can just cut back on the snack foods and exercise more."

      And if they can't actually control it, well then this will help.

    2. Re:Put Down That Twinkie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's times like this that you see the real damage nerd harrasing in high school causes to society. Those columbine kids are the tip of the ice berg, most of the psychos end up like this guy.

    3. Re:Put Down That Twinkie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, so I think that either fat people can't help themselves, in which case a chip would be helpful, or else they're lazy overeating wastes of space and resources and that a little motivation might help them out. What's so wrong with that?

  16. Are we losing something in all of this by Ckwop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if the progress of science in treating "mental illness" is potentially reducing the creativity of our race.

    It's long been know that genius is "in bed" with madness.

    Some of these "mad" people probably aren't mad at all.. they're just rather odd but that oddity gives can give them brilliant insight!

    Simon.

    1. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was discussed by Dr. James Watson (of Double Helix fame) in a PBS show I watched recently called DNA. He was talking about modern eugenics where parents have the option of removing undesirable characteristics from their children (e.g. schizophrenia, manic depression, physical deformities, etc.). He pointed out what you did about being people thinking this could be bad for civilization, but his rebuttal was that if the technology is available it seems irresponsible for the parent to not have the _option_ to augment their children. As long as it is not society (the government) requiring this. Likewise, no one is forcing these people to get treated, but it is nice to have the option.

    2. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who is dating a woman with a mental illness, if they can find a way to treat this stuff better, good. It might seem like a good idea on the outside to just let things run their course, but the truth is that mental illness is no less a medical problem that needs ot be treated then allegies and diabetes. Few things in this world are more painful then seeing someone physically unable to be happy simply because some chemical in their brain has gone askew. The world could be perfect and they could still be miserable to depths I will never ever feel.

      Mental illness is as much of a world health problem as AIDs or cancer. The sooner these problems can be stamped out, the better.

    3. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Some of these "mad" people probably aren't mad at all.. they're just rather odd but that oddity gives can give them brilliant insight!

      That, is brilliantly insightful.

      Look at musicians. The most brilliant of them have always had a few screws loose - many if not most of the classical composers, the whole dead 60's rocker collection (Janis, Jimi, Jim, etc etc etc), lots of these folks were just plain strange. I don't know, though, that one causes the other (odd vs. talent), or if it just happens that these particular wierdos became successful and known, rather than the equally strange guy on the streetcorner who doesn't have the talent, and is never noticed or known.

      There does seem, however, to be a higher than normal percentage of whack-jobs amongst talented artists. But, we're veering way off the topic of electrostimulation of the brain, so I'll ramble about this some other time or place, or - oh look, shiny thing.

    4. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by FroMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's long been know that genius is "in bed" with madness.

      Yes, and we know why my wife and I have such a good time...

      Oh, nevermind...

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    5. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      There are vastly more people whose creativity is greatly impaired (and cannot live a normal life) due to their mental disorders. And, disregarding the tinfoil hat brigade, these devices wouldn't be any more "required" than a pacemaker or a parolee's tracking bracelet. They're merely a more advanced treatment than therapy or drugs.

    6. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by pacc · · Score: 1

      I've heard of these kinds of treatments
      (in modern times not the 50's) and it
      didn't have anything to do with mental illnesses,
      as the story said there are neurological disorders where electrical pacemakers can be helpful. In other words a man in Greece with severe epilepsy that could stop an attack without biting his own tongue off.

      Any medication or treatment that affects your mood or whole self could be discussed back and forth.
      However, on this day, why not ponder why women are more often medicated for depressions and men on the other hand are expected to cope.

    7. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by rark · · Score: 1

      And therein lies the problem.

      I have aspergers syndrome. I've noticed that doctors are much more willing to medicate obvious but 'odd' behaviors than to medicate the things that cause problems to me. Medicating me so that I don't rock is far more important to them than pushing down the adreneline kick (hyper startle reflex) or helping my attention span, even though the two latter issues bug me far more than rocking.

      "Mental health" would be much more useful if the professionals would stop using 'normality' as a baseline for treatment, and used functionality instead.

      The effect on kids esspecially scares me -- because kids are still developing, and because with kids, even more than with adults, the treatments goals tend to be some paraphrased equivelant of "be less annoying to parents and teachers". I know too many young adults with tourettes and anti-psychotic induced tardive dyskinesia, because their parents, teachers and doctors decided that it was more important to keep them shut up in class than to keep them out of a wheel chair as an adult.

  17. Southpark... by SealBeater · · Score: 1

    Ever see the movie Southpark? Remember the device that zapped Cartman
    everytime he cursed? I wonder how long, given human nature, something like
    this is used for evil purposes. I don't mean to cast a shadow over what could
    be a very worthy achivement, but it behooves us to properly consider the
    possible...adverse reprocussions.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    1. Re:Southpark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only on slashdot would someone try to make a serious point and use South Park as an example.

    2. Re:Southpark... by SealBeater · · Score: 1

      I call it speaking to your audience. 8*)

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    3. Re:Southpark... by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Um... have you ever seen Southpark? Most episodes are satire of some unbelievably stupid current event. IIRC the episode in question is poking fun at the whole vchip concept.

      Look around - this is America. If we had this kind of technology it would take about 2 weeks for some bible-thumping nutbar to propose we all get them installed in our heads to make us more Christian or something similarly lame.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  18. No No No, they can't put one in MEEEE!!! by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh God no, I'll never let them put one of their mind control thingies in me. I swear, if I ever found out that they tried to put something like that in my head, I would take their stupid implant and#FA3T32FEAFf3#r325[NO CARRIER]

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    1. Re:No No No, they can't put one in MEEEE!!! by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I would take their stupid implant and#FA3T32FEAFf3#r325[NO CARRIER] ...and, what -- pick your handset off of your acoustically-coupled modem?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  19. I've got one of those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately they gave me the one, by Microsoft. Keeps rebooting me and those blue deaths are terrible... other than that, the world is pretty XP for me...

  20. strangely related... by segment · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is your brain on DARPA. any questions?

    DARPA researchers are also at work on the "Brain Machine Interface" ("neuromics") project, designed as a mind/machine interface, allowing mechanical devices to be controlled via thought-power. Thus far, researchers have taught a monkey to move a computer mouse and a telerobotic arm simply by thinking about it. With arrays of up to 96 electrodes implanted in their brains, the animals are able to reach for food with a robotic arm. Researchers even transmitted the signals over the internet, allowing remote control of an robotic arm 600 miles away. In the future they hope to develop a "non-invasive interface" for human use. Says DARPA, "The long-term Defense implications of finding ways to turn thoughts into acts, if it can be developed, are enormous: imagine U.S. warfighters that only need use the power of their thoughts to do things at great distances." For years, the U.S. military has been improving its ability to reach out and kill someone. What's the mantra of the future? Maybe, if you think it, they will die. Wild weapons of DARPA

    1. Re:strangely related... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      *cough* telepathy *cough*

      Screw machines, if I can selectively connect my brain with someone's over great distances, that could bring about an entirely new era in communication. But again, I would stress that the individual would have to have COMPLETE control over who they connected to. I don't want the government or anyone else I don't know in my head.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:strangely related... by sparkywonderchicken · · Score: 1

      We already do.......

  21. ha! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    they can have control over my brain when they pry it out of my cold, dead skull!

    1. Re:ha! by WhodoVoodoo · · Score: 1

      Oh, we've been planning to do just that for quite a while now.

      Can you say 'Zombie Warriors'? Go, my childeren of the night! Take his brain!

    2. Re:ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they can have control over my brain when they pry it out of my cold, dead skull!

      That can be arranged.

    3. Re:ha! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You say that like they don't already have control.

      Damn, what the hell is that black helicopter doing hovering above my hou*(&H#R~(*#Q

      NO CARRIER

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:ha! by aled · · Score: 1

      Everything... fine... there... is... no... mind... control... I... like... chips... in... head...

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
  22. Interesting by SteveXE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi im ::ZAP!:: Steve, dont mind ::ZAP!:: me i use to ::ZAP!:: suffer from anxiety atta ::ZAP!:: cks. Now i just ::ZAP!:: stutter.

  23. Zzzzzt! by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    devices implanted in patients' bodies to deliver precisely targeted electrical stimulation to the brain

    Yeah, they should watch the resistor values in that thing very very carefully.

    1. Re:Zzzzzt! by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      When I worked in the medical device field awhile back, we were putting 1% tolerance reisistors on the logic pullups to the Microprocessor.

      (this might seem to make little or no sense at all, there are a few reasons it's not that idiotic, mainly having to do with knowing to a very close tolerance how much current a device will consume. Plus the cost of including both 5% and 1% resistors of a similar value in inventory is more expensive than just using 1% parts everywhere.)

      --
      ---
  24. South Park V-Chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon.. you know you have seen that episode.... Imagine children runing around getting shocked every time they utter a curse... o-yea....

    1. Re:South Park V-Chip? by SynKKnyS · · Score: 1

      That was actually from the movie.

  25. Dance Mailman! by hoggoth · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dance mailman, dance!
    zzzzzap!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  26. good and misuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too.

    Nearly anything can be misused to harm. It seems that things with the most potential for good can have them most potential for misuse as well.

  27. "brain attack" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Slightly off-topic, but some doctors use the term "brain attack" to refer to a cerebral stroke. This term better reflects are quick and serious strokes are.

  28. Why do I... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...get this urge to build a large electromagnet and aim at the head of someone with this implant? Just for the 'scientific value' off course *evil smile*

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Why do I... by exspecto · · Score: 0

      And here I always thought fear was the mindkiller...

    2. Re:Why do I... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No no no, you want to use a HERF gun. Magnetism won't do much if it's all integrated, but high energy RF will. In fact it could flip open gates and cause the thing to shock, though it could also cause it to do nothing. "In the future", devices like this will have to be designed such that HERF won't activate them, they will have to have some device (perhaps MEMS-constructed) which will disable its power source entirely while substantial interference is received, or they won't be licensed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Why do I... by bakawally · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that you would starting singing Jimmy Crack Corn.

  29. noozflash! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But I can see a the potential for misuse too."

    Gee. Ya think?

    Can we once and for all just declare that ANYTHING can be misued and be done with it? It's not exactly secret Jedi lore.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:noozflash! by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, some things just happen to be more easily misused. For example:

      A fork can kill a person.
      A bomb can kill a person.

      Don't you think that such concerns are more warranted when someone builds a new kind of bomb than when they build a new kind of fork?

      This is a great little device that obviously has abuse written all over it. Even the good guys look at this and cringe. Such devices might look good on paper (or in a controlled lab) but I sure as hell don't want them anywhere else.

    2. Re:noozflash! by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      On Slashdot, potential misuses of new technology are always brought up. It's not a bad thing either, because if there is a way to abuse a new tech, someone will try to do it.

    3. Re:noozflash! by ajs · · Score: 1

      Can we once and for all just declare that ANYTHING can be misued

      There are degrees of misuse. Yes, a hammer can be used to build a nuclear weapon (well, not really, but you get the idea).

      But this technique on the other hand practically invites misuse. Psycotherapy has moved from being a field that was primarily oriented around counseling to a field first-and-foremost about medication. To that particular fox, the hen-house we now present is a tool for electrically modifying mood or stimulus response.

      This technology SHOULD be a good thing, but cautious application of the Hipocratic Oath isn't exactly something that this field is known for.

      I don't think it's out of line to point out the potential for abuse.

    4. Re:noozflash! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      How much you want to bet that Al Quaeda monitors Slashdot for ideas on great new technologies to abuse? It would save a lot of time and effort recruiting and training suicide bombers if you could just shanghai anyone off the street, put a chip in their heads, and make them believe they're on a holy mission to kill infidels, or whatever. The CIA wouldn't need to look for training camps, but operating rooms.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:noozflash! by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      A fork can kill a person.
      A bomb can kill a person.

      Don't you think that such concerns are more warranted when someone builds a new kind of bomb than when they build a new kind of fork?


      No. Not at all. It just means that software licenses should be rigorously reviewed and rewritten to prevent code forks. It's the software equivalent of a bomb, after all.
      --
      ---
    6. Re:noozflash! by bryanp · · Score: 1

      Why bother? People stupid enough to believe that when they die killing the infidels they get a free ticket to Heaven with their own private Virgin Brigade are apparently not in short supply.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    7. Re:noozflash! by br0ck · · Score: 1

      And now..

      A fork bomb can kill a person?

    8. Re:noozflash! by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 1

      Before heart pacemakers become common (at least in the developed world), slashdotters probably worried about the effect of EMPs on such devices, or people using powerful magnets to kill people who've had them implanted. However, there are a lot of people who aren't permenantly in hospital hooked up to machines because of these little devices. There is potential for missuse but there is also great potential for vast improvements in quality of life for some people.

    9. Re:noozflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we once and for all just declare that ANYTHING can be misued and be done with it? It's not exactly secret Jedi lore.

      Exactly. I get tired of hearing all of these so called intellectual types that believe in withholding technology because they fear misuse. Mind them all, that many everyday things (for example, computers) were pioneered by warfare. Should we withhold the development of the polyglot anyone?

    10. Re:noozflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you think that such concerns are more warranted when someone builds a new kind of bomb than when they build a new kind of fork?

      No, not at all. If the air force makes a new bomb that harnesses the power of 2200 tons of TNT instead of just 2000 tons like the previous bomb, It's not going to kill anyone that wasn't going to die with the 2000 ton one, it might just take a few more bombs dropped. On the other hand, if a company releases a new kind of fork and we find out that the shiny coating on it reacts with asparagus to create poision gas, then that's a concern that should be addressed, even though the potential for harm from a fork is much smaller than the potential from a bomb.

    11. Re:noozflash! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      err, and here I was going to say that if I used forks in the building of a bomb, it would be all the more devestating!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    12. Re:noozflash! by SandSpider · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that such concerns are more warranted when someone builds a new kind of bomb than when they build a new kind of fork? This is a great little device that obviously has abuse written all over it. Even the good guys look at this and cringe.

      I think the difference is because you use the fork every day, so you have a lot stronger connections in your mind with the okay uses of a fork. Whereas the idea for the chip comes out, and you can see the good and the bad, but the bad seems a bit easier to come up with exciting and abusive possibilities.

      If you were locked up in a room with a crazy person who slowly killed and tortured everyone you love in various and increasingly creative methods with a fork, you might not feel so great about forks. Then, if you saw a commercial for a fork with, say, a serrated edge, you would probably consider that to be a worse thing than any hypothetical chip.

      It's an extreme example, to be sure, but you've probably been using a fork for most of your life, so it would take something extreme to offset all of the years of mundane usage.

      Frankly, it would be a lot more difficult to abuse the chip than the fork, because any fool could use the fork, whereas it would take a very skilled and knowledgeable person to successfully wield the chip. And it would be a lot more expensive.

      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    13. Re:noozflash! by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes forks and bombs can kill people but that was clearly not the point. Take any NON-WEAPON technology: it can be misused. Any research into disease can be morphed into weapons research. Many forms of power research turns into bomb research. etc. etc.

      The point is that almost any technology can be adopted by the Dark Side and turned into something "evil".

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    14. Re:noozflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fork can kill a person.
      A bomb can kill a person.

      If i want to kill a person, I would use a fork. Where the hell do I get a bomb?

  30. Heroin, crack, ain't got nuthin' by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Heroin, crack, ain't got nuthin' on a street hack of this, buddy.

    1. Re:Heroin, crack, ain't got nuthin' by conan776 · · Score: 1

      BTL = Better than Life

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
  31. Indeed! by AIX-Hood · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been a victiZZZZZT ... beneficiary of this technology and I would like to say it has brought me nothing but extreme paiZZZZZZT ... joy as I see that other people may now implanted with this horrifiZZZZZZZZZTTTT ... hopeful device.

  32. Who needs implants? by DR+SoB · · Score: 0

    They can control your mind from satellites so who needs the implants?

    I wonder if this could somehow help me out at the casino? :)

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
    1. Re:Who needs implants? by tommck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chicks with small tits?

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  33. Technology by DrugCheese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any technology can be used for good or evil. A board with a nail through it can be the beginning of a house for the homeless, or an instrument to bloody someone to death.

    I'm a huge fan of new technology and was wondering when someone would start to broach this area. I've read several pages of different universities that were playing with this including my favorite Caltech. This is great as it's a step away from just having the patient hardwired into a computer system.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:Technology by S3D · · Score: 1

      This is great as it's a step away from just having the patient hardwired into a computer system. You mean upload patient brain into computer, debug, and download back ? Brain debugging to replace psychiatry !

    2. Re:Technology by OldMrToad · · Score: 1

      I'm frum the Guvmint, An' I'm here to hep yew!

    3. Re:Technology by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      If the brain up/download software is as stable as many software these days, I think I prefer to remain insane.
      Now pass me the happy pills please.

    4. Re:Technology by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "Yes, but they will build bigger boards with bigger nails in them until one day...
      they build a board with a nail in it so large it destorys themselves!!!
      bwaahahahahaha!"
      -- alien words of wisdome from Kang (or was it Kodos? Dang, which one's the female again?!!!)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:Technology by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Stay Puft!

    6. Re:Technology by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      This is great as it's a step away from just having the patient hardwired into a computer system.

      You mean upload patient brain into computer, debug, and download back ? Brain debugging to replace psychiatry !

      cool finally we can fix M$ bugs at the source, that bundle of defects we call billy boys "brain".

      As if Billy has anything resembling a brain.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
  34. Stimulate the pleasure centers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This will get out of hand when you can get
    an implant for $599 that stimulates the pleasure
    centers on demand, possibly tied to your latest
    VR-based game console. Now, just add some
    viagra and....

    1. Re:Stimulate the pleasure centers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes! Now all we will need to do is starting writing a "driver" that will emulate the effects of THC. :) ::starts coding like mad::

    2. Re:Stimulate the pleasure centers! by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      Or GHB maybe? (For use on somebody else, I would assume...)

      I'd personally like one that works with the image processing center of the brain. I'd love to see THAT winamp vis plugin... No more need for LSD.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  35. There are FOUR LIGHTS!!!! by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK so my first reaction brings back memories of a naked Patrick Stewart but I digress....

  36. Didn't Crichton write a book about this? by irritating+environme · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Some psychopath being treated with a pleasure center stimulator.

    Unfortunately, he built up resistance and eventually the thing did nothing, and exacerbated his condition, and he went on a killing spree.

    Granted its fiction, but it seems at least passably grounded in science.

    --


    Hey, I'm just your average shit and piss factory.
    1. Re:Didn't Crichton write a book about this? by gregfortune · · Score: 1

      Dude... Don't bother reading the article, but at least skim the /. blurb. The book is called The Terminal Man.

  37. Star trek has these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cortical stimulator, STAT!

  38. Hope by schnits0r · · Score: 1

    So there *IS* hope for my exgirlfriend to get a working funcitonal brain?

    1. Re:Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but she hopes this technology will give you a fully functional penis...

  39. Quick diagnosis... by Faust7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You've got the crazies. I prescribe 5 milliamps every 3 hours."

    1. Re:Quick diagnosis... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      It would definitely be microamperes, not 'milliamps.' mA currents would likely cause tissue damage.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Quick diagnosis... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Like he said... milliamps .. hehehehehehhehehehe

      --
  40. Tres cool ! by whovian · · Score: 1

    Acupuncture for the brain, the heart, ....

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  41. but... by Savatte · · Score: 1

    hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders

    But this is the exact reason why we love some of our favorite celebrities! And they are the people who can afford it.

  42. Report to the nearest tripod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...for your capping.

  43. Terminal man? How about Harrison Bergeron? by david_reese · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Great short story by Kurt Vonnegut. From the first few paragraphs:

    Some things about living still weren't quite right, though. April for instance, still drove people crazy by not being springtime. And it was in that clammy month that the H-G men took George and Hazel Bergeron's fourteen-year-old son, Harrison, away.

    It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn't think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains.

    1. Re:Terminal man? How about Harrison Bergeron? by dslpwr · · Score: 1

      I rememeber that story from 7th Grade English, but couldn't rememeber who wrote it. Thanks!

      --
      www.robot-invasion.com smart-assed political news, humor, and commentary
    2. Re:Terminal man? How about Harrison Bergeron? by jcorgan · · Score: 1

      Boy, that was a doozy!

      --
      Babies are cute because they have to be.
    3. Re:Terminal man? How about Harrison Bergeron? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree, Kurt is pretty fucked up. So what are you saying, that we should put a chip in him?

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:Terminal man? How about Harrison Bergeron? by rark · · Score: 1

      What always struck me about this story is that I, at least, can 'think around' such things -- even random loud noises at 20 second intervals. If absolutely necessary, I can shut my ears off. In fact, I do this on a regular basis. Maybe I'm even more abnormal than I thought?

      Though I have to say I have no idea of I could route around a chip in my head :)

  44. Potential for misuse? by mal0rd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really doubt this has much potential for misuse. Whatever misuse I can think of there is an easier method already invented. I mean if you let somebody stick an electronic gismo into your body you probably are desperate or out of your mind enough to submit to most anything. That comment by the poster really needs to be backed up. Until this it's just typical slashdot ramblings.

    1. Re:Potential for misuse? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      To not submit to prison terms? Yea I think there is some potential for misues.

      I mean it sounds like a conspiracy theory but there are some pretty nasty surprises that society will have to deal with once we master the mind.

  45. Moderating-Metamoderating by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    in hopes of treating otherwise hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders.'

    Moderating-Metamoderating for the average person on the street!

    "Buggerit!"
    BZZT!
    "Millenium hand and shrimp!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  46. Epileptic Stimulator by Br0therShin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, They have these for people with epilepsy. they stimulate the Vagus Nerve by sending periodic shocks.. I guess the idea is to set some regularity for the brain to base by.. but does anyone else think its dangerous to send shocks into nerves? Wouldent the heart be impacted etc?

    1. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by trtmrt · · Score: 1

      The hart has it's own, automonous circuitry that runs hart contractions. You need very high currents (as compared to currents in the brain) to mess up the hart.

    2. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      but does anyone else think its dangerous to send shocks into nerves? Wouldent the heart be impacted etc?

      You mean, the way that shocks are sent into nerves by pacemakers? Or the way shocks are sent into nerves by TENS devices (FDA regulated) and 'muscle development devices? (same thing unregulated sold in snake oil muscle magazine ads)

      --
      ---
    3. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by Br0therShin · · Score: 1

      no no, Not TENS units, This thing wraps around the Vagus nerve in your neck, and it does alot of the involuntary work for you, Like heart and breathing etc. That sounds dangerous to me

    4. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heart beats independently of the brain's nerve signals. They merely "throttle" the heart rate -- basically from 40-250% of baseline speed. Given a neural decapitation (full loss of innervation to the torso) your heart defaults to 100bpm or so, and will stay there for the rest of your life.

      Unless, you know, you dump potassium or sodium into it. That tends to make it angry.

    5. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by neurophys · · Score: 1

      When they started, they where afraid of effects on the heart. They tested other brain nerves, but got the best effect on the vagal nerve. The implant is done of the left side which has fibres mainly for the stomach. There are examples of rightsided implants without cardiac side effects. VNS seems to be a safe procedure.

    6. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by lockholm · · Score: 2, Informative
      The vagus nerve is the a major carrier of parasympathetic nerve fibers. The parasympathetic nerves, when stimulated, mediate the "resting" states of the body - increasing digestion, slowing heart rate, constricting the airways, and so on. In vagal nerve stimulation, the side effects you see don't affect the heart, they are more likely to affect the airways (you can experience hoarseness and difficulty breathing) this is probably because the parasympathetic nerve activation is very specific - you activate one fiber, which has a very specific effect, rather than activating the whole parasympathetic nervous system.

      The point is, this is approved because it is safe - it doesn't damage the heart, though I'm sure it's possible that some side effects could include those on heart rate. And "sending shocks into nerves" - this is how the body sends signals on nerves! Sending excess current in would be a bad idea, yes, but electricity itself is not evil. Similarly, it seems that limited electrical signals in the brain could have benefits that outweigh the negatives.

      ps: I have no idea WHY vagal stimulation works, though.

  47. Misuse? by friendofafriend · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But I can see a the potential for misuse too

    Come on, do you really think that? How many deaths from intentional frying of heart pacemakers have there been?

    1. Re:Misuse? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well the first thing I thought of was... (recreational) drugs. think (rec)drugs mess up your mind now, wait till we get electronic computerized drugs...

    2. Re:Misuse? by Skater · · Score: 1

      We've all read Tekwar, even if we don't like to admit it. :)

      --RJ

  48. *Zap* by whitelabrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a brain pacemaker and it sucks...*ZAP*

    I mean they're fantastic.

  49. weirder news comes to mind... by segment · · Score: 3, Funny

    Things look far more frightening, in fact. Genetic weapons could do more than destroy an ethnic group. They could kill according to a person's 'usefulness' or 'talents'. American journalist and bestselling author Thom Hartmann has argued that it would even be possible to kill those with the gene for attention deficit disorder. This means that if you are easily distracted and have a hard time concentrating (there could be other selection criteria as well), you could end up marked for destruction. The Mark of Doom Finally! A solution for those trolls

  50. Some hopeless disorders they are trying to fix... by stienman · · Score: 1

    "treating otherwise hopeless behavioral,
    Desire to check email "one last time" before bed

    neurological
    Thinking of the internet as a living entity with rights of its own, or less drastically as existing in a different legal space than 'the big blue box'

    and psychiatric disorders"
    Software is imbued with a desire to be free.

    -Adam

  51. How ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too."

    It's pretty ironic that the editor is paranoid about a procedure to cure paranoia.

  52. What they are testing this on... by JavaLord · · Score: 0, Troll

    This kitten sure doesn't look happy

    but hey, if it can get all these people off prozac and bring my heath insurance price down I'm all for hooking the kittens up to serial ports or whatever to experement.

    (yeah, I know that doesn't have the right pins to be a serial port..geek!)

    1. Re:What they are testing this on... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      I'm all for hooking the kittens up to serial ports or whatever to experement.
      That's cruel! Can't they use humans for that purpose? I mean kittens are cute, while most humans are quite annoying.
      I guess we all have our list of prefered "volunteers" for medical experiments.
  53. All we have to lose is our urban myths by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's long been know that genius is "in bed" with madness.

    No, it has NOT "long been known" that genius is in bed with madness. IQ has never significantly correleated with any mental disorders.

    However, mental illness DOES correleate well with poverty.

    And any correleation between mental illness and creativity is clearly and demostratably false. These illnesses are most often a serious disability to people with otherwise normal intelligence and creativity. To suggest to these people that it's some sort of boon would be cruel.

    Some of these "mad" people probably aren't mad at all.. they're just rather odd but that oddity gives can give them brilliant insight!

    No rational person would ever suggest that mere eccentricity is a mental illness.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what you tell yourself to bring yourself back down when you think a train of thought that scares you?

    2. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by frankie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      any correleation between mental illness and creativity is clearly and demostratably false

      I think you need to have a word with the authors of published studies linking creativity and mental illness, because psych researchers at multiple universities disagree with your declaration.

      A substantial and disproportionate number of world-famous writers and artists suffered from cyclothymia, if not full-blown manic-depression.
    3. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by Kaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it has NOT "long been known" that genius is in bed with madness. IQ has never significantly correleated with any mental disorders. ... And any correleation between mental illness and creativity is clearly and demostratably false.

      Whoa, slow down. You are not making sense. First, IQ *does* correlate with certain mental illnesses -- negatively. For example people with a Down's syndrome have very low IQ.

      However that's neither here, nor there. We are talking about *geniuses* -- the far right tail of the IQ curve, nothing to do with averages. We are talking about people whose brains are *abnormal* by most definitions of normality. And some of them do walk a fine line between being a genius and being a crazy psycho.

      Note that doesn't imply that all geniuses are crazy. And it most definitely doesn't imply that all crazy people are geniuses. But to state in such strong terms that there is (and can not be) any connection between genius and madness is umm.. misleading, to put it mildly.

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    4. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by CFTM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Common Myth: High IQ == Genius. Just because someone has a high IQ doesn't mean jack shit, not to mention the fact that IQ tests one of many facets of the brain. In fact, many modern psychologist believe that your EIQ (Emotional Intelligence Quotient) places a much larger role in success than IQ. Granted this isn't about success it's about genius.

      Not that mental illness is a good thing by any stretch of the imagination, it falls into the category of the law of unintended consequences. There is no way that we can tell what sort of things would occur with the total elimination of mental illness in many different fields. Sometimes solutions to complex problems come from a perspective that is wholey different. All I'm trying say is your blanket statement falls victim to the idea that you can know how one thing effects another when in reality one can never know such things.

    5. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1
      IQ has never significantly correleated with any mental disorders.

      Aside from the fact that genius does not implicitly imply high IQ, there seems to be much anecdotal evidence to suggest that many famous creative geniuses were at least "troubled". I'm guessing this is what the original poster meant, but I wouldn't want to put words in their mouth.

    6. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      "Just because someone has a high IQ doesn't mean jack shit"

      You may have a point but high IQ is not a bad thing. It's not a neutral thing either. High IQ is goodness. Perhaps it doesn't automatically mean you will be an uber nerd but it means a lot more than "jack shit".

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    7. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by tumbaumba · · Score: 1

      ...that many famous creative geniuses were at least "troubled"

      Case in point: Edgar Alan Poe. He was indeed crazy, but would he write all those stories if not for his mental illness. And what if he wouldn't want to be "cured", should we take him by force. There is already enough abuse in psychiatric hospitals. Or psychic and mental diversity is our greatest strength.

    8. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      IQ has never significantly correleated with any mental disorders.

      Psychopaths almost always have an IQ over 175.

      Omg poverty! People better um stick electrodes in their brain?

      For your inane comment I think you need a cure too, quick find a fork this map needs neuro surgery.

      Technology will only be a cure for the human condition when we have proper perspective, there are a few other arguements we need to get out of the way first.

    9. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Many of the studies done show that your IQ can be off the charts but if your EQ isn't up to par you'll epitomize the uber-nerd stereotype (Ie someone who is very good at techincal stuff/writing/etc but has absolutely no social skills). That was what I meant, without the ability to effectively deal with situations and the ability to communicate thoughts and feels, you're severly disadvantaged. I fell victim to over simplification of my statement ... mea culpa

    10. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Down's syndrome is not mental illness. It is mental retardation.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    11. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by tumbaumba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, I read you link to Cyclothymic Personality Disorder. This is the most ridicules "disorder" ever invented. Just read it: has periods of sharpened and creative thinking alternating with periods of mental confusion and apathy; has depressive periods: depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities etc. etc. What this "disorder" do is really stigmatizes normal life with our ups and downs. This is what modern clinical psychology is all about to turn all of us into some kind of gray mass. If only they could they would sedate most if not all of slashdot readers.

    12. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      OK, I need a reference for this. Something other than "silence of the Lambs", please.

    13. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      psychopath, sociopath + intelligence

      Google.

    14. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      You could say that of any mental disorder, if you wer so naive as just to read the DSM definitions. Actual educated professionals haev a very high threshold for assigning these symptoms--yes, many people have creative periods and depressive periods. It's only a problem (and would only be diagnosed) if the swings are so extreme as to impair your ability to function in the world, or pose a severe threat to yourself or others.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  54. Where can I get one? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    For my wife...

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  55. upgrades? by rjelks · · Score: 1

    Maybe this technology will pave the way for other brain modifications. Maybe they could improve memory and thought in people. Could it be a future without computer monitors? /still afraid of OnStar

    -

  56. The brain in my head? by scottennis · · Score: 1

    T. F. Gumby: Are you the brain specialist?

    Specialist: No, no, I am not the brain specialist. No, no, I am not... Yes. Yes I am.

  57. Practical Applications by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    This may deliver precisely coordinated jolts of electricity upon detecting reduced brain activity...

    Finally a device which will stop me falling asleep during those boring meetings ;)

  58. That's my point by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry, it's just a peeve of mine. It should be a given, especially around here, that ANYTHING can be abused.

    Now if someone wants to suggest a particular and likely abuse for discussion, fine.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  59. BASF... by GAVollink · · Score: 2, Informative
    Way back (late 70s) BASF was well known for manufacturing really cheap - marginal quality cassette tapes. They are a "chemicals" conglomerate, like Dow Corning, or S.C.Johnson.

    Just now, I realise that nobody is likely to care, but I answered the question already, so I'm posting the answer anyway.

    1. Re:BASF... by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      (insert sexy female voice):

      At BASF, we don't put the electric shocks in your brain, we put them in your brain deeper.

      teehee?

      In Soviet Russia, your Brain shocks YOU!!

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
  60. Article Repost? by Spunk · · Score: 1

    I can't read the article. For some reason this usually happens with MSN sites. I doubt I'm the only one, so could someone post it here?

    1. Re:Article Repost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not using Opera by any chance? The MSN site often displays incorrectly for this browser. The amusing thing is that if Opera pretends to be IE then everything is fine - they have screwy CSSs for Opera.

      Unbelievable but I've seen it with my own eyes.

    2. Re:Article Repost? by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Mozilla. I've tried telling the site that I'm using IE, but it didn't work.

  61. Your Wife! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or is that your 13 year old boyfriend???

  62. Boom by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Yes, a hammer can be used to build a nuclear weapon (well, not really, but you get the idea).

    Actually, used carefully, a hammer could possibly set off a nuclear weapon. :-)

    I don't think it's out of line to point out the potential for abuse.

    Eh... it just seems so -5 Redundant right off the bat unless the person goes on to suggest a particular type of abuse.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Boom by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      Actually, used carefully, a hammer could possibly set off a nuclear weapon. :-)
      Don't use a hammer to detonate a A-bomb. It tends to dent the bomb's case. Please handle your WMD's with care and respect.
    2. Re:Boom by jandrese · · Score: 1
      We are at war with the System, and it's no longer a war of words.
      Yes, the war has escalated to long words and double words, fortunatly nobody has unleashed the horror of the quadword yet.
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Boom by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... too late, Itanic did that about 3 years ago, and AMD did it not just 4 or 6 months ago... Sorry dude, quadwords are the future!

  63. Anyone know how far we may be from... by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..Treating the brain like a ROM, and being able to get a complete "brain state"? I imagine it would be difficult, a bit like reading a quantum computer, in that using any signal to read the state may reinforce some linkages, thus changing the system.

    Being able to "back up" a mind would definetly be one of those day-the-universe-changed moments. If death could mean more a loss of short-term memory since last backup, rather than loss of known existence, almost every aspect of our culture would be shaken to its core. Any number of results could be imagined.

    Even if not in ROM-style form, some form of human-as-information seems innevitable. From emulation, to virtual-life recreation, to any number of things, the human experience may not be limited to DNA & brains forever. What that means for the presumed entities behind our eyes, we do not know. But perhaps that expansion of information is part of whatever human nature is.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ryan,

      You MUST read Cory Doctorow's
      Down & Out in the Magic Kingdom

      It talks about backing up brains and the effect it has on a human society.

      http://craphound.com/down/download.php

      It's free, too!
      Great story!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    2. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Icculus · · Score: 1

      You need to read this book. This is just one of the subjects they discuss.

    3. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We don't even really understand the mechanism used to store memories. We're a long, long way off. Of course someone could figure it out tomorrow by accident, but assuming a relatively linear rate of advancement it's a long way off. Assumptions are seldom safe (never? h0 h0) but they're used every day.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      Being able to "back up" a mind would definetly be one of those day-the-universe-changed moments. If death could mean more a loss of short-term memory since last backup, rather than loss of known existence, almost every aspect of our culture would be shaken to its core. Any number of results could be imagined.
      Intresting, but wouldn't you just be death? I mean you make a copy and when you die, the copy lives on. But that still leaves you quite death and burried.
      It would be a way to keep exceptional people around, but I doubt it would be real immortality.

      But that would probably result in B. Gates (or any other generic rich person) being around forever.
    5. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

      Will do - checked out the prologue. A little bit "fakey", but worth reading for the concepts.

      I always thought the topic was a great one for pure comedy, in a futurama-kind of way. I believe Phillip K Dick wrote a few stories along these lines too.

      Ryan Fenton

    6. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Andorion · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link man, reading through it now... sounds interesting =)

      ~Berj

    7. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by sbma44 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      as others have said: the answer is a long, long way away.

      simplest case scenario -- you need to trace every axon, find every dendrite it interfaces with, and measure the strength of the synapse, and take down the type of neurotransmitter(s) and receptor(s) used -- there are generally several configurations of receptor for each neurotransmitter, and there are at least a dozen identified neurotransmitters.

      As you mentioned, measuring synaptic strength will modify the synapse. And of course there's currently no way to do this in vivo with much precision for even one synapse -- you certainly can't do it for very many synapses. Passive sensing technologies can detect relative activity down to a precision of several hundred (thousand? I'm not up to date) neurons, but that's about it.

      Given that there are 100 billion neurons in the brain, it might take a while for this to become feasible. Maybe someday we'll be able to strip off the skull and use ultra-precise PET to start recording whole brains, but I doubt it'll be in your or my lifetime.

    8. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by t_pet422 · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is called a sincording, as seen in The 6th Day :) The philosophy touched on by that movie (and your post) is actually quite interesting.

    9. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The backup is only halfway there. We'd also need to be able to "restore" the mind. Into a different body, since the original would be dead.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      North America destroyed by Nano-bot accident rendering it into grey goo. The surviving backups on overseas mirror sites are being restored...

      Restoring user763518821.brain...

      DRM ERROR: user763518821.brain has been region encoded to region 1 (North America). Restoration in other regions is prohibited.

    11. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also recommend reading The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect for the "day-the-universe-changed moment".

    12. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by lxs · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, a human brain is a lot like an EPROM in that you can erase it's contents by applying UV radiation.

      If you don't believe me, try having a conversation with someone who visits a tanning booth on a regular basis.

  64. Hardware Mods. by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Y'know; I *HAVE* been thinking about overclocking my brain. Of course, the heat-sink would be a bit awkward.

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
  65. Maybe I could get one by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Funny
    that would be able to keep me from reading /. compulsively.

    btw, what is up with the mini-flag at the top of the page?

  66. The book you want is: by Azeroth · · Score: 1
    Interface by Stephen Bury aka Neal Stephenson.


    Its like a John Grisham thriller done well.

  67. It works. by forand · · Score: 4, Informative

    A family friend has a daughter which such a disorder and has had something similar to this implanted in her for over a year. It has reduced the frequency and intensity of the seizures since she has had it. It does cause some discomfort at a regular interval to prevent seizures but it is a small price to pay, viewed by the parents and the child, to have less seizure. This is a great technology that needs more development.

    1. Re:It works. by Keighvin · · Score: 1

      My mother also has such a device, used to prevent similar seizures. Makes a world of difference in the operating capacity of the severly afflicted.

      --
      Any spoon would be too big.
  68. wow by bmac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When can I get my nervous system jacked so my reflexes will go with the gear?

    Seriously, though, I can't imagine there *not* being some sort of long-term damage from piping too much non-biogenerated electricity through some sub-section of the brains neural net.

    Of course, our medical establishment is giving extremely powerful central nervous system stimulants to our youth, so we know *they* don't care.

    Bonus points if you get both Gibson quotes.

    Peace & Blessings,
    bmac

  69. Bring on... by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    The Cartman jokes...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  70. Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My iPod is my brain pacemaker, without the discomfort of an implantion surgery.

  71. Almost out of foil, but here goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about time somebody came up with a better way to controll kids than ritalin.

    That's not what it's for you say? Well, I say just wait and see.

  72. Shiny side out or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even a tin foil hat can save you now!

  73. Can you? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I can OUCH! see a the OUCH! potential for OUCH! misuse too.

    OUCH! Dammit! Stop that!

    Sort of Clockwork Orangesque, eh?

    1. Re:Can you? by oshy · · Score: 1

      Or Southpark's V-chip.

      Dirty mu..... oww.

  74. Re:Perverted story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone will have to post a perverted mind control story on asstr.org about this

  75. Potential of misuse by redNuht · · Score: 1

    Why is there always a "I see the risk of misuse" on every new technology that comes out? Are we all mad evil scientists? One can misuse a kitchen knife and inflict far worse damage than with a brain pacemaker.

    I may be wrong, but kitchen knives are considerably easiear to get a hold of.

    1. Re:Potential of misuse by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      Are we all mad evil scientists?
      hey, we're not all scientists!
  76. Microwave Ovens In Use by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    ... i know that microwave ovens and serious radio signals can cause havoc for pacemakers...

    But with a brain pacemaker, does this mean that someone can blow away everyone in say, a Best Buy store or convenience store and say "THEM WIRES IN ME HAID MADE ME DO IT!!"

    ??

    i know this sounds kinda off the deep end, but fwiw, i can attest that subwoofers (or any deep bass source such as thumpin' car stereos) *do* resonate in my skull and make be both nauseous and VERY irritable, such as instantly furious about minor stuff.

    Which really sux because i'd otherwise enjoy movie theatres etc.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  77. Reality follows fiction!? by GAVollink · · Score: 1
    Robotech (or enter any one of a dozen later Anime storylines here) style mental control over machinery interfaces. I wonder if they'll give a nod to the "Tatsunoko Studios" once they have war machines that run on this mental interface.

    What's really sad, is that I've fully bought that they will probably get it to work effectively, and that this type of weaponry will actually come to fruition. Boy did they have an effect on my childhood. Hmph.

  78. hypnoToad by my_name_is_steve · · Score: 0

    Who needs these crazy Brain-chips The Hypno-Toad can fix all brain malfunctions! All Hail The Hypno-Toad! BZzzzZZZzzzZZZ.

  79. Actually. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't exactly new.

    I friend of mine here in the office has a similar device for controlling his epileptic seizures. The wires run up along the Vagus nerve, while the actual implant that controls the electronic pulses resides in his chest.

    Every three minutes an automated pules is sent out for a period of a few seconds, thus regulating his "brain electricity" and controlling his epilepsy. He also has a device which resembles a watch, but with the "face" on the inside of the band, and whenever he feels a seizure coming on he places the face onto his chest, over the implant, and in turns it on manually

    He can actually feel the pulses along his vocal cords, and says that it took quite a while for him to adjust to the feeling of it. He's had it for almost two years.

  80. FDA already approved "Activa" therapy by chipace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Medtronic makes an implantable neurostimulator that treats the symptoms of Parkinsons and Natural Tremor.

    http://www.medtronic.com/activa/physician/implan ta ble.html

    The unit is implanted close to the shoulder, and the leads are fed through the neck, up to the brain.

    If symptoms are isolated to one side of the body, only one set of leads are required... otherwise two sets of leads are needed to treat both sides of the body.

    This is the only FDA approved implantable device for brain stimulation that I know of.

    1. Re:FDA already approved "Activa" therapy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that they are working on a cranial implant that is rechargable (no wires through the neck). A similar unit to treat epilepsy is supposedly in the works too.

      These therapies work well for the symptoms, but don't cure the patient. They're better than drugs that have side effects and dull the patients senses.

  81. Why would we need this? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    FP! (ZAP!) Damn. Well maybe we would.

  82. Overclock! by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, let's overclock one of these puppies! ;-)

    -psy

  83. I'll let them put one in me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...but only if they wire it up to the orgasm center of my brain and give me a remote control button to activate it.

    1. Re:I'll let them put one in me... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      ...but only if they wire it up to the orgasm center of my brain and give me a remote control button to activate it.

      That has already been done.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  84. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aluminum foil has already sold out at my local grocery store. COINCIDENCE? I dont think so...people are scared

  85. sounds like a ST: TNG episode by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    there are four lights....

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  86. Battlefield: Earth by Malvegil · · Score: 1

    I think that about says it all. Anyone who's read the book can draw the parallels to this story.

  87. Delgado by Kaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone interested in the subject should google for the name Delgado. The guy worked back in the 60s and implanted electrodes in animals' brains to see what stimulating certain regions does.

    One of his most well-known umm... party tricks involved him getting into a bull-fighting arena with a bull. The bull had an electrode implanted in its brain, and Delgado had a wireless transmitter in his hands. The bull charged, Delgado pressed a button, and the bull came to a screeching halt.

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  88. Future - implants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eventually these things will become most sophisticated. We'll see implants that will no only restore a variety of abilities, helping stroke patients,the brain damaged, etc., but I think we'll see implants that will give folks extreme ability in areas like memory and mathematical ability.

    The big things that worry me here:
    1) will these devices become virtually obligatory? Will folks be able to function in society without them?

    2) what will be the real controls on what goes into these devices? Would you really want an implant with a Microsoft OS?

  89. Misuse by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But I can see a the potential for misuse too.

    I have no idea what you're talking about. Now step over here so I can jab this pencil in your eye, give you a paper cut across the neck and stick your fingers in this space heater.

    I predict this will be the next great urban legend, following in the vein of kidney theives and zombies created by criminals. "I woke up in my room and there were wires coming out of my head. I could only scream silently in my head as my body walked out the door and proceeded to rob a bank." Hmmm...reminds me of Spock's Brain...

  90. You're bad-mouthing BattleField Earth? by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    Xemu will get you for that, Walter. Xemu will get you for that.

  91. Already saw a special on this.... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    it was called something like "Star Trek: TNG" and they called the implants "borg" technology....whatever that means to anyone. The special reruns quite often so you can probably still catch it on certain stations.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  92. Now we're talking science fiction by cgenman · · Score: 1

    We don't even know the mechanism by which the brain stores memories, let alone how to read out the entire thing. Sure, we theorize that the closeness of synaptic pathways allowing for neurotransmitters to bridge more easily has something to do with it. There are also lovely brain models in computing that have all of the power of the human eye but none of the subtlety. But nobody knows how, for example, memories are stored in a non-localized fashion, or how higher processing functions take place. Furthermore, it is getting more and more apparent that storage and processing cannot be separated out as they are in computer systems... but as there isn't a coherent, accurate model of what constitutes thought it is difficult to see how such a thing would be relevant.

    In short, you might as well take an article on extra powerful pogo sticks and muse on how far off human powered space flight could be. The musing here is virtually identical, except that human powered space flight would be an original concept.

  93. And that really challenges the ultimate questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is I, anything? How does I persist over time?

    But most important of all:

    Suppose that the state of my mind is backed up to a computer and my biological existence is annihilated. Suppose that my computer mind is given function.

    Is the computer mind, me?

    If at time t1 my biological mind were destroyed with my body, and at time t2 the computer mind were given function, am I now at time t2 and in the computer?

    I believe that the Ship of Theseus question raised over 2000 years ago is the oldest, the most enduring, and the most challenging puzzle still facing the modern mind.

  94. Evil Applications by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Teaching white people rhythm?

    1. Re:Evil Applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist motherfucker.

  95. MOD PARENT UP! by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have seen severe mental illness close up, and I think that if it could be banished from our society forever we would be very much the richer for it.

  96. I worry about this stuff. by Millennium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way I can see these things as ethically allowable is if it is mandatory that they be developed in such a way that the user can remove them at will, or failing that, that they can be deactivated at will in such a manner that only the user can reactivate them.

    Abuse of these things must be impossible, not just legally but technically, before I could ever bring myself to accept them as anything but a dehumanizing abomination.

  97. Tasp, anyone? by coachvince · · Score: 1

    treating otherwise hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders. All we need is some doc to say that depression should be treated with current to the pleasure centers.

    --
  98. The brain is NOT a ROM, by crovira · · Score: 1

    it WetRAM (TM :-) and the attempt to back it up would probably result in it being different at the end of the process than at the beginning (and you know what does to your back up, don't your?)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  99. MODS ON CRACK ROCK..MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is that a troll? More like informative.

  100. BWAH-Hah-hah! Re:Tin Foil by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've replaced all of your tin foil with aluminum foil, which is totally permeable to our MK-ULTRA mind control beams!

    While this channel is open:

    Attention!

    Attention all implantees!

    You will now believe that smearing cottage cheese into your hair will prevent the CIA from putting voices in your heads! Report to the nearest dumpster and root around for cartons of expired cottage cheese.

    Implantees with last names beginning with a letter from A to Z should STOP taking their medication.

    Implantees with last names beginning with secret alphabet letters should continue not taking their medication.

    That is all.


    Stefan "Mental illness is a serious thing and nothing to make fun of except by insenstive jerks" Jones

  101. History of Lobotomy by cartman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article briefly mentioned the dark history of psychosurgery. A few interesting details were omitted however.

    The most popular kind of psychosurgery ever done was the prefontal lobotomy. This technique had something of a heyday in the 1940s.

    The gentleman who invented the lobotomy (Freeman) lacked any surgical training. He would perform the procedure on an outpatient basis; he drove around the countryside in his "loboto-mobile" (quite seriously) and performed thousands of the operations himself.

    His method of lobotomizing involved jamming an icepick through the eye socket with a hammer, until the icepick was deeply recessed within the brain. Then he would wiggle the icepick around vigorously. (I'm not making this up). The entire procedure took less than 5 minutes. A hospital visit was unnecessary.

    Freeman went around the country demonstrating the procedure in mental hospitals etc. The technique fell out of favor in the 1950s, when it was learned that lobotomies had no therapeutic value whatsoever, and often had severe and permanent side-effects.

    1. Re:History of Lobotomy by spacemky · · Score: 4, Informative

      wow, that's crazy.

      I didn't belive you until I read this.

      The procedure even had experienced neurosergeons fainting...

      --
      640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
  102. 666 The Number of The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chips inside the head! It's coming.. It's coming! Satan laughs!

    "The mark is on you now
    The furnace sealed inside your head
    Melting from the inside now
    Waxy tears run down your face

    The whore that never told her tale
    Relives it every night with you
    Far off stands the lamb and waits
    For the wolf to come and end its life"
    - from 'The Book of Thel' song by Bruce Dickinson

    1. Re:666 The Number of The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The whore that never told her tale
      Relives it every night with you
      "


      sounds good! bring on my devil wh0res!

  103. Oh good God! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    You slashbots are so totally backwards it's laughable!
    It's been well known since Sumerian times that all you need to capture the brain's standing wave pattern is an appropriately tuned (*) brass tuning fork and a clay amphora of honey! Now procuring a suitable host for implantaion is a more difficult endeavor.

    (*) yeah, like I'd tell you!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  104. Anyone else think "The Sixth Day" sucked? by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

    I sure did. Even ignoring the errors about brains and cloning and what not.

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  105. I met a lady by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

    in an airport bar with one of these for her epilepsy. There was a thingy implanted in her chest w/ a wire running to her head. you could see the wire just under her skin. Her voice went out and she had to explain that the wires ran near her voicebox so that when it turned on, her voice went out. She said before the device she couldn't do anything...couldn't go out w/o help, couldn't drink, couldn't do drugs, now she can do anything. Very exciting stuff!!

    --
    perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    1. Re:I met a lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you score with her?!!!

  106. Salute by fizban · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new pacemaker overlords.

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  107. Radical procedures on poorly understood organs by Featureless · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, we have a "computer" here in the lab that's crashing a lot, and losing people's data, and we have this new theory for how to fix it. I don't exactly know how these "computers" work, of course, so we can't be sure... but we have some ideas gleaned we from when we used to just get rid of them when they broke. A lot of times, we'd take a computer out of the garbage pile and see what was inside. They're mostly green plastic in there. Lots of very small, small parts - too small for the eye to see. No one knows how they all work together, yet, but we put one in an X-Ray and gave it an MRI and we notice that certain parts are hotter than others when the computer is doing different tasks. Also, we put a computer in the blender and then studied the little chunks under a microscope. So we're definitely making progress.

    Based on all this we figure Jim in maintenance can insert some electrical probes into the "chips" and send in little shocks with just the right voltage to stop Microsoft Word from crashing so much. Plus we think it might really help our Quake 3 framerates.

    We think this could be better than the best idea we've had so far, having computer therapists sit with them and press different keys to try to recreate past successes we've had by trial and error. It couldn't be worse than our previous attempts, which involved just putting unruly computers in the closet until they got better on their own, or administering electric shocks to the outside of the case, or (my favorite) just taking the sucker down to the shop and really giving it a good whack on the drill press.

    Somebody call Discover Magazine.

  108. Cheers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever see that episode of Cheers where Cliff gets a shock therapy decice put on him to stifle his "anti-social" behavior? Imagine doing something like that to Slashdot geeks...or juvenile delinquents (is that different from Slashdot geeks?)...or sex offenders...or YOU!

  109. Parkinson's too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a guy with Parkinson's who has something like this, now, and it helped him quite a bit.

  110. These really work by bozojoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    My mother suffered from Parkinson's. She got sick of all the drugs she had to take to remain functional. Her Doctor refered her to a specialist who implanted a brain pacemaker. Within a month she was off the drugs and feeling much much better.

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
    1. Re:These really work by LowellPorter · · Score: 1

      Hey Bozojoe, my mom has parkinson's too. She's considering this implant. Can you email me, so I can ask you some questions about it? It would be greatly appreciated.

      lowellporter@yahoo.com

  111. Isn't this a duplicate from this morning? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    Seem like I already use a brain pacemaker: just like the one described here

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  112. Biofeedback by soren100 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your brain already HAS a natural pacemaker, it's called the alpha rhythm, which cycles at about 8-10 seconds per second. All of the other brainwaves seem run to in sync with this rhythm, being in one way or another multiples of it.

    You can use biofeedback (or more specifically neurofeedback) to "train up" this natural pacemaker activity, teaching the brain to relieve it's own Parkinson's symptoms. This would have the advantage of having a lot fewer side effects than opening up the skill and jamming electrified wires in your brain.

    A good resource for people interested in non-surgical ways of changing their brain is Dr. Jeffrey Schwartz's book "The Mind and the Brain: neuroplasticity and the power of mental force" -- he demonstrates how people can cause profound changes in their brain wiring merely through thought.

    Insight meditation, for example has been proven helpful in teaching OCD patients how to gain control over their own obsessive thoughts.

    It certainly sounds sexy to have something like electric implants but there are other ways to get the benefits without the side effects of brain surgery. It's kind of like a back patient has the choice of having their vertebrae fused or going to a chiropractor or physical therapist.

    1. Re:Biofeedback by daddymac · · Score: 1
      Your brain already HAS a natural pacemaker, it's called the alpha rhythm, which cycles at about 8-10 seconds per second.
      8-10 seconds per second? That's blazing fast!
      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  113. Deep brain stimulation by Pedals · · Score: 1

    Deep brain stimulation is a treatment used for various movement disorders. At a cost of about $50,000, it is not the first treatment used. It is used in patients who have failed all other treatments available, medications usually, or cannot use these treatments. It is also used in those whose disease significantly impairs their ability to function due to their abnormal movements. See www.wemove.org for more information about movement disorders and their treatment.

    In epilepsy, vagus nerve (one of the cranial nerves from the head, not the brain itself) stimulation can significantly decrease seizure frequency in those patients not controlled by medictions. About 25% of all epileptics are not controlled by medications. See http://www.epilepsy.com/epilepsy/vns.html for more information.

    These treatments are carefully studied by the medical community and regulated by the Federal Drug Administration. If studies showed a treatment made people run amok or had unacceptable side effects, it would not be approved, or vould be removed from use once this was documented.

    It is not realistic to worry you or society may be harmed by a neighbor with a deep brain stimulator or a vagus nerve stimulator.

    Now automobiles and motorcycles-that's real danger.

    ASO, MD
    Neurology

  114. whats the use? by sh2kwave · · Score: 0

    why carry a gun if you cant shoot it, proably got to much kick for him anyways and will up up back in his face if he ever did use it.

    Darl mcbride shoots doughnut store attendent says they were plotting on him by running linux on POS systems. more at 10!

  115. Bottom of the page.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the bottom of the page it currently says:

    "Memory fault -- brain fried"

    How appropriate

  116. The Original Clockwork Orange by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anthony Burgess, author of the book "A Clockwork Orange" was the artist in residence while I was in the undergraduate program at the Iowa City Writer's Workshop back in 1974. I think he based his book on the work of Jose M.R. Delgado, M.D. published under the book with the damn spooky title: "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society".

    I managed to get a copy of the book finally, and discovered wonderful passages such as the following on page 115:

    ESB [electrical stimulation of the brain -- JAB] may evoke more elaborate responses. For example, in one of our patients, electrical stimulation of the rostral part of the internal capsule produced head turning and slow displacement of the body to either side with a well-oriented and apparently normal sequence, as if the patient were looking for something. This stimulation was repeated six times on two different days with comparable results. The interesting fact was that the patient considered the evoked activity spontaneous and always offered a reasonable explanation for it. When asked, "What are you doing?" the answers were, "I am looking for my slippers," "I heard a noise," "I am restless," and "I was looking under the bed." In this case it was difficult to ascertain whether the stimulation had evoked a movement which the patient tried to justify, or if an hallucination had been elicited which subsequently induced the patient to move and to explore the surroundings.

    This passage is eerily reminiscent of a passage from Richard Dawkins' "The Extended Phenotype" chapter titled "Host Phenotypes of Parasite Genes":

    "Many fascinating examples of parasites manipulating the behavior of their hosts can be given. For nematomorph larvae, who need to break out of their insect hosts and get into water where they live as adults, '...a major difficulty in the parasite's life is the return to water. It is, therefore, of particular interest that the parasite appears to affect the behavior of its host, and "encourages" it to return to water. The mechanism by which this is achieved is obscure, but there are sufficient isolated reports to certify that the parasite does influence its host, and often suicidally for the host... One of the more dramatic reports describes an infected bee flying over a pool and, when about six feet over it, diving straight into the water. Immediately on impact the gordian worm burst out and swam into the water, the maimed bee being left to die' (Croll 1966)."
  117. just ... by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    use mobile

    to set your brain to a slower pace :)

  118. Just like Buffy the Vampire Slayer! by forevermore · · Score: 1
    treating otherwise hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders

    Does anyone think this sounds remotely like the chip the "military" was using on vampires and demons to change their behavior in the second-to-last season of Buffy?

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    1. Re:Just like Buffy the Vampire Slayer! by JurgenThor · · Score: 0

      "Chip, Soul, What's the difference?" -- Spike

      --
      GENERAL PUBLIC SIGNATURE (GPS) Any replies (derivatives) of this post must also use the GPS
  119. HELP MOD ABUSE!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See you in meta mod you fucker!

  120. Life.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Don't talk to me about life...

    1. Re:Life.... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Here I am, brain the size of a planet...

  121. Why does it even need mentioning...? by spinspin · · Score: 1

    A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too.

    Every single technological application or scientifiic advancement has a possible misuse. Period.

    Pens! They could be used to stab people! Or worse! They could be used to write dirty words or nasty letters!

    Stop jerking your knee and think of the people this can help.

  122. Re:FP scripts are for homos and homos ONLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3y3 5+1ll 0wn0rz y3w b1z1+ch.

  123. what is normal ? are you gay ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    the potential for misuse is massive, last century they put homosexuals in mental institutions to try and "cure" them, kids who where hyperactive last year have some ACRONYM assigned to them this year, send them off with chemicals in their brain at 14 and they are "normal" again

    the trouble with defining mental "illness" is its based on someone elses judgement, their idea of normality which will always be biased to a degree, what was ab-normal last century (homosexuals) are completely normal today (they are even getting married)

    and you want to do stick things in peoples brains so you can help them ? seems like we have been here before

  124. Yeah, but... by sczimme · · Score: 2, Funny


    A fork can kill a person.
    A bomb can kill a person.


    eating with a bomb is such a pain. Except with the Claymore mines: they have a nice curved spoon-like shape.

    PS Don't take that 'potato-masher' grenade thing literally.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  125. Already in use for Parkinson's Syndrome by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    I have a relative with Parkinson's, and she recently received an implant of an electrode in each hemisphere of her brain to control the diskinesias (movements) and distonias (contractions) caused by Parkinson's. This is called "Deep Brain Stimulation" and is documented on the Parkinson's Foundation website.

    The device has greatly lowered her dose of medications, and made it possible for her to sleep through the night and get up in the morning. The devices are connected by wire to pacemaker-like battery and control packs implanted beneath the skin of the shoulder. They can be toggled on and off with a remote control provided to the patient, and wirelessly adjusted as to frequency and strength of pulses by the doctor.

    This is quite different from the surgery received by Michael J Fox, which actually involved removing a small section of brain -- the same one being stimulated by DBS -- so he is ineligible for that treatment.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  126. For the by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    ...scientists around the world have begun cautiously experimenting with devices implanted in patients' bodies to deliver precisely targeted electrical stimulation to the brain in hopes of treating otherwise hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders.

    Considering that decisions from the top can result in fatalities, I wonder if our President's numbskull antics the past four years have accelerated the research to cure stupidity.

    = 9J =

  127. consider LSD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm a candidate for ECT."

    Ask your doctor "if I had some LSD and was going to try it no matter what you said, what advice would you give me to maximize the chances of the experience benefitting my condition."

    Then think about using LSD.

    Then try it or something like it (ask doctor) or not.

  128. Seizures by AlanOfDale · · Score: 1

    At the end of December I was diagnosed with having seizures. Since Jan1 04 I have had 39 seizures, some of which come in clusters of 4 and 5 within an hours time.

    This could be a god send for people like me. Currently the tech is not there to understand how the brain works let alone control the mind of the person who has it implanted.

    So before everyone gets on their parnoid high horse about this being the begining of 1984, Think about what good can come about because of tech like this.

    Quote form War Games " I'd piss on a sparkplug if I thought it would help "

    --
    Can Smeg!!! Will Smeg!!!
  129. like clockwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    an obvious parody of clockwork orange. tho, bravo to southpark for updating it.

  130. You made me look... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the mini-flag, and then I had to re-read a whole bunch of comments to find my place again!

  131. Oh dear God, by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    don't you people learn from the works of great literature?!!!

    "The babelfish lead to longer and bloodier wars than ever before..."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  132. It's about time! by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1


    I'm ready for my droud

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  133. Farside by MorePower · · Score: 1

    Oh you just reminded me of that old Farside cartoon where one scientist is carefully hammering a panel onto the side of a nuclear bomb, and another scientist is carefully sneaking up behind him holding an inflated paper bag in one hand...

  134. I wouldn't worry, I make these....... by DucatiBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work as a software engineer for the second biggest medical electronics company in that field (Medtronic being the biggest). I can't speak for them, but nothing goes into an implant that is not supposed to be there for functionality of what it's designed for. With the FDA constantly looking at us, we verify and validate the heck out of these things. My boss actually developed the Epileptic Stimulator pretty much all by himself back in the late 80's and early 90's. It's gone though through testing since then. It takes forever for this stuff to get put into a human. And these things are real simple. If you saw the code in these, there is no way they could do anything "evil". There is just enough code to keep time and shock the nerve ever so often, and some user settings. In order to make these last longer than a few months, the processor is clocked down into the khz and just enough code to get the job done and that's it. In this business it's all about how long the device will last till it has to get explanted. There is no way we would give up longevity for having some government mind control v-chip or something. And I'm not a Dr. but I think the electrical shock doesn't trevel that far, it starts getting "absorbed" as it traveles, so danger to the heart from a nerve stim is pretty much nil. In fact they even see that people who use the Epileptic Stimulator also seem to have a better mood. They think that no only will it help against tremmors, and parkenson's but depression as well. I suppose that if you let your mind run away with you, you could see the potential misuse in just about anything. But with how simple these are and how we want to sell these to help people (and profit) we don't want any bad press, we want people to want these. And there is no way something "bad" could be put in these with no one noticing. And if it got out, it could ruin a company. And I know that we woudln't want that to happen. I feel bad, cause I see how these help people in Europe and the FDA takes such a long time to convence that people suffer while we are jumping though hoops for them. I know people who could be helped now. I guess it's good for lots of testing though. :)

    1. Re:I wouldn't worry, I make these....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that the topic was brain stimulation? Do you know what the "brain" is? Obviously the moderators don't, that's why you got mod-ed so high.

      --the first largest

    2. Re:I wouldn't worry, I make these....... by DucatiBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the risk of feeding a troll, I see that you don't seem to use your brain. A.C.

      What I was posting info about was the quote at the end with the possibility of misuse. That possibility is so close to 0 it's not even worth mentioning. I have only worked in this industry since 1991.

      And there is a huge difference between "brain stimulation" and "deep brain stimulation". Brain stimulation is though a nerve going into the brain like with the Epileptic Stimulator to the Vegus nerve. Deep brain is putting an electrode deep inside the brain.

      Either way it, to me (not a Dr. but an engineer) I'm just asked to creat a constat current source or a voltage differental for a time every so often. And that is all these devices to. They are programmable to deliver differnt pulses, but there is nothing that could be considered misuse. These are VERY simple devices.

      Heck, the top physicians in the world don't even understand exactly why this stuff works, but it does.

      And I'll bet the people that get implanted with the devices that I work on are very glad I use my brain and test the heck out of these things. To make sure it's supposed to do exactly what I mean it to do and only that.

      And I prey every day that I never need one of these devices. What these things cure (Epilisy, Parkinsons, Chronic Pain, etc....) are really rough illnesses. My heart goes out to those who have them.

  135. Military been 'souping' up soldiers for ages. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Troll
    From a recent post in this very forum. . .

    "My boss actually developed the Epileptic Stimulator pretty much all by himself back in the late 80's[. . .]"

    Think about it. This is not Star Trek way-off technology. I know, but I won't say how.

    Believe me. Nothing the media tells you is new is actually new. We have ray-guns and teleporters, people. We have had them for some 'time'. Lift the curtain once in a while if you are interested in knowing what's really going on in the world. Be prepared though. If you have no spine, then that Rabbit hole ride will shatter your life but good. Most sleepers sleep for a reason. Only problem is that sleepers are worthless in the bigger scheme of things; they get left behind. . .

    You have all watched those Holodeck-Logan's Run-THX1138-George Orwell-Matrix adventure stories, and thought to yourselves, "I'd have figured it out. I wouldn't have been one of those wieners in the background!"

    Talk is cheap and 'time' is short.


    -FL

  136. Infinitely far. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The brain consists of a number of neurons that communicate with each other at high speed

    However, inside every neuron and every guard cell is a protein based structure. The number of connections indicates that if it were a computer (it is too small to determine its function easily), than its computer power is approximately that of an IBM supercomputer.

    Unfortunately, there is more than that. Much of memory cannot be localized in any part of the brain at all. Note that patients reciving hemospherictomies[sp?] do not loose half their memory of before that time.

    Therefore, the state of the mind is larger than the state of the brain.

  137. Did I mention Natalie Portman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf clu-BZZZT ungh...

    OK I'm all better now.

  138. Here is the flag by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    http://ads.osdn.com/images/flags/us.gif"

    That is the flag image. It appeared a few times at the very top of the page, centered above the banner ad. I have no idea what it is about.

  139. Both Good, and Misuse by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too.

    Both good, and misuse -- as with recreational drugs.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  140. access point by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've just got this to say about that:
    They just better not enable wireless access to this thing.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  141. Seems like there's a lot of potential... by schreibn · · Score: 1

    ...for beneficent use as well. Here's an example concerning concepts that they're teaching us right now in med school where they have able to treat a Parkinsons like disease...

    http://neuroanatomy.wisc.edu/selflearn/deepbrain st imuPD.htm

  142. Meaningless quote by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 0

    "A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too." EVERYTHING has the potential for misuse.

  143. Re:It's all good, hang in there! by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    I've tried more than a half-dozen antidepressants, but I really liked the MAOI-inhibitor Parnate. Within minutes of taking it in the morning I would be wide awake and alert beyond what coffee or any other stimulant ever did for me. I had to be prescribed something to sleep at night, but other than that, it was great. I could not stick to the diet restrictions, however and now I'm back on a ssri. I too have seen ECT and talked with ECT patients. It seems healthier to me than taking heavy duty chemicals daily, but who would keep the big Pharmaceutical companies so profitable if we don't take their pills?

  144. Try heroin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, it'd probably do alot less damage to you, and it'd certainly make you happy(while on it).Although I suspect that with all the brain rotting "medicines" you've already been given you seriously can no longer understand why ECT is bad.

  145. I have epilepsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brain surgery is a major invasive surgery, too bad or I'd consider getting it.

    I have epilepsy caused by sleep deprivation - its pretty rare. Under medication I don't have too many problems. Except for the medication itself. The cure is worse than the condition sometimes. I wish that there was some other way to control this other than medication - sleep is a cure, yes technically, but its not that simple. ;)

    Just a rant but I wish people would stop making jokes about seizures. They're not funny. I've had a major one once and was out cold for about 20 minutes. Other than risking brain damage, and death (depending on where you are at the time) your body hurts like hell for weeks after since the muscles were contracting so hard. I hurt for over 4 weeks and I'm a pretty fit person.

    1. Re:I have epilepsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the folks on this message have absolutely no idea what epilepsy is and how it can affect someone's life, the treatment options and their side effects. I hear you and wish to thank you for encouraging people to learn first, think, and then maybe state an opinion.

  146. Perhaps another use by localhost00 · · Score: 1

    Rather than stimulate the brain, they should use this sort of technology for Spinal Cord injury patients. The brain would be wired with sensors and the stimulators will be placed at key locations below the injury.

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

  147. Freejack! by mojogojo · · Score: 1

    Hollywood has already done a movie about this called "Freejack".

  148. While you're at it... by ocie · · Score: 0

    Tap into the auditory nerves so I can use it as a radio.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  149. Of course! by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    Because everything that's on TV/in books, is TRUE.

    Certainly, it is a possibility to keep in mind, but let's not toss the idea aside because a work of ficition argues against it.

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  150. hey, he's right!! by conan776 · · Score: 1

    A fork *can* kill a person. How 'bout that? Um... oh,oh. Like Socrates said: Oh the tines, oh the morals!

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
  151. Deep Brain Stimulation... by Peterus7 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My mom is actually involved with the surguries where they implant this type of thing. Pretty much she has this to say about them:

    -They're effective as all hell
    -They work best for movement disorders, such as Parkinsons, as well as Chronic pain
    -The surgury itself is pretty drastic; you have to literally drill holes in people's heads... And the patient has to be consious. Numbed up, but consious.
    -There are some side effects if it isn't done properly.

    Some of her cases include one guy who had the electrode too deep, which caused a deep depression as it was stimulating too much area. They moved it a notch up, and the depression faded instantly. Another case included a cop that would have to leave his job if he kept on having this chronic pain that kept him from working, but he is not back on the job and loving it.

    One thing she we have talked about is that it would be interesting to use them for psychiatric disorders, but with doctors perscribing ritalin and prozak at the drop of a hat, it's not a good thing to suddenly have holes drilled into kids heads.

    Also, I asked about replacing ECT with Deep brain stimulation for depression, but apparently ECT is much cheaper. Pity.

    Still, this is a LONG way away from stuff like the Matrix and Ghost in a Shell. Currently it just controls overactive areas of the brain that cause neurological diseases, nothing more, nothing less. Don't get your hopes up quite yet.

    1. Re:Deep Brain Stimulation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post... on topic, informative. I only look at Score:2 posts... they're the only ones that are on-topic.

      Random moderation would be more accurate than what these jokers do.

  152. ...I taste ice cream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crap. where the hell do I remember this line from? I crack up every time I think of it. Something to do with a dart in a guy's head. commercial?

  153. Rant On by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, this is not new. Grenoble is behind the curve. I've seen patients with implanted stimulators from years ago. These were for treatment of Parkinson's. It's hardly the optimal solution, but it's the best so far, even better than most of the drugs we use. Some day this will be "stone knives and bear claws". Right now it's cutting edge.

    Second, it is trivial at best to foresee abuses. The trick is in recognizing the over-reaching fact that the abuses never have anything to do with the technology involved. Those who will abuse will do so whether they have an electrical stimulator or just the rubber hammer used to test your reflexes (corrective phrenology, anyone?). These people don't even need technology to do this; they will do it gladly with no technology at all. Focusing on the abuses the technology may be put to takes the focus away from the people who will do such things, allowing them to get on with their business.

    Third, there are a lot of people out there who need something, and society in general dictates that there be someone to take care of them. Hopefully, trained specialists who can help them, but also the sad fact is because most people don't want to have to deal with it. They insist on, and are glad to have, someone fulfill the role required so they don't have to, including having to have the people with problems around them. Unfortunately these people also tend to feel guilty when they see others suffering, and rather than appreciate the fact that someone else is doing the best they can, they get upset because that person is not doing a better job. Sooner or later the people doing the helping get blamed for not being better than they are, ie. they're not perfect.

    Believe it or not, lobotomy was a god send. It still can help many people. People decry electroshock therapy, but the fact is for a lot of people, it's their only hope of a normal life. People got upset that many mental patients were stuck in hospitals with no hope of improvement and so insisted that we let them out; now those same people are no better or worse than they were, but the are far better off, since many of them are the chronic homeless (you won't give them housing, but you won't let us keep them warm and fed).

    If you want to help, aren't of the bent to help develop the tools and techniques to help people like I do, then at least keep your eye out for the kinds of people that will abuse, and get rid of them. They cause us who have to try to help people far more problems than they do others. They give us a bad name and make people suspect us. Root those people out and do something about them. Or else shut the hell up and stop repeating the painfully obvious paternalistic mantra "they might do bad things!". It's helping nothing and it's annoying.

    Rant not off. I'm not done. Not until I stop trying to develop new ways to help people, and that'll probably happen when I die or need that kind of help myself. And it won't end then because I'll train every student of mine along the way to fight this same fight. You want us to do this. You NEED us to this this. Help us do this by focusing on finding abusers and getting rid of them, so we can get on with the role that society demands exist, and we have chosen to fulfill.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  154. Re:no good. DON'T DO IT. by joemontoya · · Score: 1

    ECT should be your absolute last option. I have seen several people subjected to it and the result is the temporary erasure of their personalities. With repeated shocks the results become permanent. The place where I used to work, it was used more for punishment of bad behavior than for treatment.

  155. rTMS vs. ECT by Amaranthyne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FYI, there's another option besides ECT. There's a new technology called Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). brief intro here

    rTMS seems to have cured the depression that I had going on for the last 10 years (I'm 22). I'd tried nearly every kind of antidepressant, with no good/lasting results, and was ready to off myself, as I didn't consider ECT an option due to the risk of memory loss and/or brain damage. I was the one to mention rTMS to my last shrink (learned about it online, Wired might have had the first mention I saw), and somehow got a referral. I had an initial appointment, a brain scan the next day, and the day after that I was told & shown that parts of my brain were abnormal hyperactive and drawing resources away from the other parts. I had my first rTMS treatment that day and started a low dose anti-epilepsy drug and, tho I barely believe it myself, haven't been depressed since. The only side effects I've had are excedrin-treatable headaches here and there, and increased mileage on my car due to driving to chicago for maintenance treatments.

    When I say I haven't been depressed, I mean the following:
    Sad thoughts will happen, but my brain doesn't grab them and run off into despair anymore. Sometimes I'll come across thoughts that just a month and a half ago would have sent me into hours of crying or inertia, but now I'm able to be mindful, to go "oh, that's sad. hmm. that's sad because xyxyxy. I might as well think about something else." And then I do so and the parts of my brain that were white (overactive) in the scans don't dominate and I can just be myself and go about my day. I feel like my full brain capability is back. I'm more attentive, more creative. I actually feel like getting out of bed and doing things.

    AND I can use my laptop, read, or even play gameboy during the treatments! in a comfy chair!
    Plus now I have cool pictures of my brain!!!! I'm psyched to get scanned again and see what my normal brain activity looks like.

    Seriously, go see a neurologist and definitely get a brain scan before getting ECT. IMHO, ECT is too broad a disruption to the brain when it's quite possible that it's more of a localized problem. rTMS is precise, requires no anesthesia or muscle relaxants (all you have to do is keep your head still), and far, far less neurological side effects like memory loss. (I haven't forgotten a single thing).

    aie, what a first post. had to say something, tho.

    as to the initial article, the implants would be a fantabulous idea for people who respond to stuff like rTMS but need it very frequently to keep sane. where I am now, I'd rather go to the doctor's periodically than have something stuck in my head, unless it gave me superpowers or something.

  156. Ah, slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The refuge of people who cannot argue anything better.

    We should not try something that makes perfect sense and is good because if we did it something else that is similar, but significantly different, all society would collapse.

    First, we taught morons how to talk. Now they're posting on /. It's only a matter of time before they replace sensible discussion in the public world. Oh... wait...

    Seriously, slippery slope statements seem such sensational senseless simpleton shit.

    1. Re:Ah, slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seriously, slippery slope statements seem such sensational senseless simpleton shit

      great alliteration there!

  157. Come back when educated by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    It appears I trod on some mentally ill toes in this thread.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  158. LOL! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    And other researchers at other universities disagree with your researchers. Universities have become quite the bullshit factories these days.

    And you completely missed the point of my response to the original post, as did most of those who replied to me, which is a pretty common thing around here, sadly.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  159. Re:no good. But No Choice by TackyF · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had ECT. Eight times over two weeks in 2002. I have some memory loss surrounding that time, but I was in the middle of a two month psych stay and I know I didn't miss much. My personality wasn't erased. It is a last resort - when I got to that point I hoped it would erase the prior 4 years. But it didn't, and the procedures eliminated the psychotic symptoms I had and helped reduce the depression for several months.
    Given the history of ECT it was a very scary thing for me to consent to, but if it wasn't available then I wouldn't be writing this now.

    --
    ..close your eyes and this post will disappear..
  160. Where have i heard this before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm.

    Implants in people to modify their behavour.

  161. OT observation by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Must every Slashdot submission end with "But I can see a downside to this technology." ? Do submitters think that this makes them look insightful? Oooh, the big picture. Thanks for pointing that out!

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  162. Touched with Fire by frankie · · Score: 1
    you completely missed the point of my response to the original post

    No, you are the one who missed the point of your parent's post. Upon further research, I say that creative genius strongly correlates with mental illness in general and manic-depression in particular.

    You replied that most of the mentally ill are not geniuses and that many of them are poverty-stricken. While this is true, it is completely irrelevant to the question at hand: if we electrochemically block the pathways of mania, will some of humanity's genius be blocked with it?

    1. Re:Touched with Fire by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      if we electrochemically block the pathways of mania, will some of humanity's genius be blocked with it?

      No.

      Simple enough for you?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  163. Oh, that's just scratching the surface! by Featureless · · Score: 1

    Don't forget my favorite, Electroconvulsive Therapy. Still in use today!

    Psychotherapy, cognitivie science... today we are about in the leeches and cauterization phase.