Pay to receive SMS? What carrier does that? Both of the carriers I use (Verizon and AT&T) provide unlimited free incoming messages. They do charge something like 10c for each sent message though.
Yes, but the existance of collisions isn't the suprising part to anyone involved in this. Hashes, by their definition will have collisions. (See Pigeon Hole Principle). Any 1:1 encoding algorithm, is better called an encryption algorithm. (Possibly a very weak algorithm, but one none the less)
The part that is suprising (and the point of the article), is the speed at which these collisions can be found. Yes, it requires ~56 hours, and works best with certain types of messages. So they are encouraging people to start changing now, so that as computational power increases over the next few years (reducing the time to find the collisions), people will be safe.
Yes, but if it is truely cheaper for consumers to switch on a small scale, the large power companies will be making the same switch. Infact, I bet the truely cheap technology will be due to the power companies making the switch.
To expand on your point. Is loading a plugin really that different from loading a document, be it a word processing document, or a music file you are editing? Heck, even running a perl script is no different.
Well, I would imagine that the farmer could consent to selling the seeds, without breaking his contract, if he were to sell the fruit containing said seeds. That actually sounds like an interesting idea. People should try and find plants that were grown using these seeds, and buy them, simply for the purpose of harvesting the seeds.
I suppose automakers should stop giving away radios with their cars, since it prevents people from selling aftermarket radios. Oh wait, there are pleanty of companys that sell them.
So, wait.... Are you saying that the NFL should be forced to liscense thier copy righted material (logos and what have you) to people, even if they don't want to? Since that is the only way to make exclusive contracts such as this illegal.... What if instead of saying noone else can liscense it they simply say that it will cost $10billion dollars? Would that be better? (even though the outcome is the same...)
I've never heard anyone speak the way you say Americans supposedly pronounce things. The pronunciations you list for the British, sound just like the ones I hear on this side of the pond. Though, I will say that this is a big country and I haven't seen all of it yet, so some of us might use the other version you have.
"The parent or guardian who signed the driver license application for an applicant under the age of 18 may withdraw consent for the child to have a
permit or license at any time until the child turns 18"
Again, YMMV in other states/countries, but I would imagine at least some other areas would have a similar law. Also, this does not apply to emancipated/married minors.
Frankly, I think the USS Cole is different from the WTC. The Cole, is a ship of war, where as the WTC is a civilian building. Attacking war ships sitting off of your coast seems quite valid to me. Civilian targets, are another matter entirely.
Umm.. no. The $95000 specified is in USD. The value of 10 million Yen is actually the true value given, while the $95000 is a conversion applied by Yahoo. (along with the conversions for metric to non metric.)
So, let me get this straight. You like one of their games. You feel sorry for your fellow developers, who are working for EA. And yet, you are "evaluating" (read: pirating) said game. Does that make sense to anyone?
The whole second admendment (and several of the others) was due to actions of the Britsh, prior to the U.S Revolutionary War. The citizens of Boston, (and possibly others) were ordered to turn over their arms, to prevent them from joining to growing milita.
Pay to receive SMS? What carrier does that? Both of the carriers I use (Verizon and AT&T) provide unlimited free incoming messages. They do charge something like 10c for each sent message though.
Actually, Yahoo interface is done nicely with CSS layout. Google still uses tables.
Yes, but the existance of collisions isn't the suprising part to anyone involved in this. Hashes, by their definition will have collisions. (See Pigeon Hole Principle). Any 1:1 encoding algorithm, is better called an encryption algorithm. (Possibly a very weak algorithm, but one none the less)
The part that is suprising (and the point of the article), is the speed at which these collisions can be found. Yes, it requires ~56 hours, and works best with certain types of messages. So they are encouraging people to start changing now, so that as computational power increases over the next few years (reducing the time to find the collisions), people will be safe.
Yes, but if it is truely cheaper for consumers to switch on a small scale, the large power companies will be making the same switch. Infact, I bet the truely cheap technology will be due to the power companies making the switch.
To expand on your point. Is loading a plugin really that different from loading a document, be it a word processing document, or a music file you are editing? Heck, even running a perl script is no different.
Just to clarify here, you are saying that the radio prevents the car from being jump-started, as an anti theft mechinism?
They didn't say it would do so over USB, just over it;s own bus. When connected (via adapter) to USB, it would be limited by that bus speed.
Well, I would imagine that the farmer could consent to selling the seeds, without breaking his contract, if he were to sell the fruit containing said seeds. That actually sounds like an interesting idea. People should try and find plants that were grown using these seeds, and buy them, simply for the purpose of harvesting the seeds.
I suppose automakers should stop giving away radios with their cars, since it prevents people from selling aftermarket radios. Oh wait, there are pleanty of companys that sell them.
So, wait.... Are you saying that the NFL should be forced to liscense thier copy righted material (logos and what have you) to people, even if they don't want to? Since that is the only way to make exclusive contracts such as this illegal.... What if instead of saying noone else can liscense it they simply say that it will cost $10billion dollars? Would that be better? (even though the outcome is the same...)
I've never heard anyone speak the way you say Americans supposedly pronounce things. The pronunciations you list for the British, sound just like the ones I hear on this side of the pond. Though, I will say that this is a big country and I haven't seen all of it yet, so some of us might use the other version you have.
Well, it may depend on your local laws then. Where I currently live parental consent can be revoke anytime before your 18th birthday
e rmits.htm
http://www.oregondmv.com/TeenDriving/Provl_Inst_P
Google seems to indicate that the similar laws exist in other states. YMMV in other countries/planets.
Though on the same note, these same kids only get to drive with the consent of their parents. I see not the issue here.
Frankly, I think the USS Cole is different from the WTC. The Cole, is a ship of war, where as the WTC is a civilian building. Attacking war ships sitting off of your coast seems quite valid to me. Civilian targets, are another matter entirely.
RFID tags by themselves are too small yes. But the topic at hand is Tin foil wrapped passports!!!!
Umm.. no. The $95000 specified is in USD. The value of 10 million Yen is actually the true value given, while the $95000 is a conversion applied by Yahoo. (along with the conversions for metric to non metric.)
Yes, and most people simply use the stock parts that came on their car. What is your point?
So, let me get this straight. You like one of their games. You feel sorry for your fellow developers, who are working for EA. And yet, you are "evaluating" (read: pirating) said game. Does that make sense to anyone?
Really? It was there Friday night....
The whole second admendment (and several of the others) was due to actions of the Britsh, prior to the U.S Revolutionary War. The citizens of Boston, (and possibly others) were ordered to turn over their arms, to prevent them from joining to growing milita.
What country allows you to be tried again after you win an appeal? That seems rather odd to me.