Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo, Apache, Ebay, Amazon, Netscape Celebrate 10 Year Anniversaries

tagish writes "Roy Fielding writes on the Apache dev mailing list: 10 years ago today, the Apache Group decloaked with the creation of the new-httpd archive and initial accounts on hyperreal.org. I had the lucky timing of having the first message archived on the list, though we had actually been talking about what to do for at least a week before that (sadly, without any archives)." At the same time, Mike Porter simply writes "Yahoo celebrates its tenth anniversary on March 2nd." News about some other anniversaries available via an MSNBC article.

222 comments

  1. Linux celebrates by grennis · · Score: 4, Funny

    10th year of "Year of Linux"

    1. Re:Linux celebrates by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Except since Linux was founded in 1991, it's more like the 14th year..

    2. Re:Linux celebrates by dauthur · · Score: 0

      No, he was made in 1950 by Mr. Schulz.

      Oops.

    3. Re:Linux celebrates by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      No, that was Linus.. and isn't it about time he left that security blanket behind?

    4. Re:Linux celebrates by dauthur · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and that teacher should learn something besides Geniac-speak.

      NOT:AND:ANDNOT:OR:OR:OR:NOT:NOTNOTNOTNOTNOTNOT:AND

    5. Re:Linux celebrates by stor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      10th year of "Year of Linux"
      - 9th year of "Linux in the server room"
      - 8th year of "Linux in the enterprise"
      - 7th year of "Linux in a cluster"
      - 6th year of "Linux on the Desktop"
      - 5th year of "Random WTF Linux (e.g. pen, Dreamcast)"
      - 4th year of "We need some standards in Linux"
      - 3rd year of "Company X Aligning with Linux"
      - 2nd year of "Linux means Communism(tm)"
      - 1st year of "Linux means Litigation(tm)"

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    6. Re:Linux celebrates by mboverload · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apache is what brought Linux into the mainstream. Linux owes everything to the Apache project.

    7. Re:Linux celebrates by segmond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      rubbish.

      I found Linux in 94/95 because I wanted a free Unix system. I was in high school then and had access to a shared BSD system. The idea of running my own Unix system, having telnet, telenet, gopher, ftp, archie, irc servers and my own root account that wouldn't get me in trouble got me into Linux. If Apache wasn't there, we would have used another web server, if Linux wasn't there, there was BSD/386, BSDI, FreeBSD. Linux owes nothing to everything, and if we really want to get down to what it owes it to, it owes a lot to Linus's attitude towards sharing + the GNU suite.

      --
      ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    8. Re:Linux celebrates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they owe their success to their own years upon years of hard work. Anyone knows that.

  2. Now please clean up your act by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 4, Funny

    After the celebrations are you considering giving us a clean home page? Please YAHOO... its been long due

    1. Re:Now please clean up your act by everdred · · Score: 5, Informative
      It's not in their business model.

      From the thus far print-only Wired article (available on wired.com on March 1), the average Yahoo! user spends 4.8 hours per month on their site. And Google users spend an average of 6/10ths of an hour on Google. And that's the way they both want it.

      Their approaches and goals are different. Google keeps their users coming back by getting them what they need as quickly as possible. Yahoo! seems to keep users coming back for Games! and Music! and Shopping! Oh my!

    2. Re:Now please clean up your act by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      I got an email from Yahoo that said that there would be something "special" on the homepage on March 2nd. Given the sucsess of Google, maybe they are going to do just that, give a simple homepage, with a new navigation system to all their differnet areas. The page is WAY too complicated to be useful to anyone as it is.

    3. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      between the big three (AOL,MSN & yahoo) it seems Yahoo is the cleanest, free email and instant messenger for anyone, plus news & multimedia, between the three yahoo is the best...

      Google is nice but lacks an instant messenger client, Google does have good email and a good news section,

    4. Re:Now please clean up your act by AmoHongos · · Score: 1

      The article says the "something special" is a coupon for a free scoop of ice cream from Baskin-Robbins.

      Yahoo. And I mean that in a sarcastic, literal sense.

    5. Re:Now please clean up your act by everdred · · Score: 5, Informative

      By the way, if it's a clean, Google-like (search-centric) interface you'd like to see on Yahoo!, try search.yahoo.com.

    6. Re:Now please clean up your act by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "Google-like (search-centric) interface you'd like to see on Yahoo!, try search.yahoo.com."

      Still Yahoo-like in the amount of ads. At least google keeps their ads on the left side of the page. Joe 6 pack doesn't know the difference, but it's still sleazy...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re:Now please clean up your act by blixel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yahoo is the cleanest, free email and instant messenger for anyone, plus news & multimedia, between the three yahoo is the best...

      Google is nice but lacks an instant messenger client...


      Why would you want Yet Another Instant Messenger? At least if you have a gmail account, you can still send e-mail to whomever you like. If Google creates an Instant Messenger, all your friend(s) will have to install yet another IM client.

      No - we don't need another Instant Messenger. What we need is an IM standard based on an open protocol like Jabber.

      Though if Google created an IM client which was in fact based on Jabber, it might give Jabber the boost it needs to slow down the spread of crappy, proprietary IM protocols like ICQ and Yahoo.

    8. Re:Now please clean up your act by novakyu · · Score: 1
      Still Yahoo-like in the amount of ads. At least google keeps their ads on the left side of the page. Joe 6 pack doesn't know the difference, but it's still sleazy...

      IDK, but, to me it seems, it's exactly like Google interface. In fact, they probably copied it over from Google, exactly. If it weren't for the logo (o.k. I'm exaggerating), I wouldn't be able to tell that it wasn't Google. (BTW, google also displays some ads on top of the search page, but they are marked clearly (by different background) as ads---and it's exactly the same way in search.yahoo.com.)

    9. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no!!! its just like google.... infact it must be google.hmm akamai...... and god damn i hate places like ebay msn.com yahoo. amazon etc etc etc. i hope they die!

    10. Re:Now please clean up your act by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Yahoo interface is done nicely with CSS layout. Google still uses tables.

    11. Re:Now please clean up your act by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh come on. Yahoo didn't copy anything. Advanced users of yahoo were using search.yahoo.com all the time and it was simply like that.

      Also http://web.archive.org/web/19961017235908/http://w ww2.yahoo.com/ . So, Google copied Yahoo's clean interface?

      You guys may hate all the information on front page but there are people already using it. Thats why Yahoo is still nr1 destination on web.

      Have fun with ex NSA founded Google which harvests your private mail text to show you relevant ads. Wonder what would you geeks do if any other company did it.

      Have fun censoring me too, mods.

    12. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, i use yahoo mail services (paid account) which is very convinient as i'm consultant. Clustered service or what they have, gives most good uptime, never had outage with yahoo!mail. Rather good spam filtering etc. Only good things to say about yahoo! service from me.

    13. Re:Now please clean up your act by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      hello (hello.com) is google's IM client.

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    14. Re:Now please clean up your act by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      clickable link

      Hello

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    15. Re:Now please clean up your act by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      ex NSA founded Google which harvests your private mail text to show you relevant ads.

      Even though the price in dollars is "free," you pay by viewing ads on the web-page. If you don't trust Google, you shouldn't be doing business with them.

      What is the difference between this and any other mail server? The message has to be parsed as part of moving it through the mail server, from the incoming SMTP into your mailbox. What is the difference if, with non-identifiable information, Google shows you ads based on what you're talking about using an automated process?

      My only objection would be if they were logging the email they parsed if it contained information they found "questionable." I don't work at Google (and even if I did, I'm young, I'd be a peon and probably wouldn't know anything) but I don't believe they are going to compromise everyone's personal messages to the government, or anybody else, because they're an advertising channel. This would not be in their best financial interest.

      Advertising channels that lose credibility in the eyes of consumers will become less effective and cost their owners' money.

      Bottom line: Google is an advertising business. Unless you can document your NSA claims (not that somebody working at Google was in the NSA, but of some nefarious link where the NSA is spying on Gmail users,) I'm inclined to contine my present use of Gmail.

      Show me, don't tell me.
      --
      Who did what now?
    16. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about MSN messenger, pal. the worst proprietary IM program since it comes with the os. At least when people go with a proprietary IM like ICQ and Yahoo, it's because they voluntarily and conciously did it.

    17. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jabber stuff is nice, but it's like most of linux IM stuff - limited to text only. Talking with audio/video (with webcams) for example, yahoo is hard to beat still for many.

    18. Re:Now please clean up your act by Ansonmont · · Score: 1

      Choicepoint harvested data on people and they got hacked. If Google harvests information on individual users, even if they have no "bad" plans for it, that information may then be used in a manner that people don't like. However, no one is forcing anyone to use Gmail or Google, whereas Choicepoint was/is collecting data on people who do not "sign up" for their service.

    19. Re:Now please clean up your act by Phiu-x · · Score: 1

      That's not proprietary, that's a monopoly. The parent was talking about an open source IM protocol. MSN IM protocol might be proprietary and closed source, but the fact that MS uses its monopoly (thus wide installed base) and include it in the OS at install time is a different matter.

      --
      This is a stolen sig.
    20. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about MSN messenger, pal.

      Unless MSN messenger started using an Open protocol, I didn't forget about it. Just because I didn't mention MSN or AIM by name doesn't mean I forgot about them. Last I checked, they were proprietary - like ICQ and Yahoo, pal.

    21. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.google-watch.org/jobad.html

    22. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have:
      search.yahoo.com

      Or, if you prefer the directory:
      dir.yahoo.com

    23. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no joke. that's why I wrote:
      You forgot about MSN messenger, pal. the worst proprietary IM program since it comes with the os.

      Learn how to read, pal.

    24. Re:Now please clean up your act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about MSN messenger, pal. the worst proprietary IM program since it comes with the os.

      Again - I didn't "forget" it. I didn't deem it necessary to mention them all.

  3. Celebration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well this is fairly special, how exactly are they going to be celebrating? :)

    -- Methynutnut

  4. One of these things is not like the other by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yahoo, Apache, Ebay, Amazon, Netscape

    One of these things is not the same kind.

  5. Twirl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well hooray for a bunch of people who got to ride the .com bubble and get far richer than I'll ever be.

    1. Re:Twirl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to call your bluff and write you a fat check, but unfortunately, you're anonymous.

    2. Re:Twirl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He most likely was too young to ride it, I am currently pretty much pissed off about it myself. Thanks to all the people who are in IT and don't give a damn about it now (they got in for the cash) I can't even find a decent job.

    3. Re:Twirl by sampowers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oops, I forgot to log in when I posted that! No, really, it was me! You can send the check to the address in my profile!

    4. Re:Twirl by stor · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oops, I forgot to log in when I posted that! No, really, it was me! You can send the check to the address in my profile!

      I'm the original "Twirl" poster!!

      No, I'm the original "Twirl" poster!!

      I'm the original "Twirl" poster and so is my wife!!

      Cheers
      Stor

      p.s. Monty Python, Life of Brian

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  6. Why not wonderbra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yahoo, Apache, Ebay, Amazon, Netscape Celebrate 10 Year Anniversaries

    um, did we not mention www.wonderbra.com?

    1. Re:Why not wonderbra? by game+kid · · Score: 1

      God bless Flash introductions that celebrate said birthday--especially ones with Maja Latinovic in front. My brother might rightly say holla to that.

      How far we have come in 10 years, but how dangerous Internet browsing has become. With the popup-blocking vulnerabilities found a few days ago no browser is too safe yet IMO.

      (Side note: Sara Lee makes Wonderbras? No wonder those mammaries look finger-lickin' good.)

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Why not wonderbra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn corporate proxy

  7. in other words.... by Venexiano · · Score: 0

    google said it would celebrate its 10th annyversary too.

  8. Wow. by GregoryD · · Score: 4, Funny

    This also means I have been online 10 years. Wow. Where does the time go?

    Oh yeah, multiplayer internet games!

    1. Re:Wow. by LordNokia · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow... That's right... Scary thought- I've spent most of my life online... even while sleeping!

      --
      Tim says: "please mod me up so my karma won't be terrible. Please?"
    2. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen. mmorpgs are the greatest thing since the small refrigerators that sit by your computer. i no longer have to get up for food while playing mmorpgs.

    3. Re:Wow. by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Same here.

      I feel old.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    4. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only 10 years? Ha noob.

  9. Happy BD by ATAMAH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Happy BD, to the lot of them. Interesting to see how some of them have grown into being huge companies (amazon), and continue to develop, others being manhandled by opposition (Netscape)illegaly, and yet others outdone by fair competition and still being in business (yahoo).

    1. Re:Happy BD by Anubis350 · · Score: 1, Troll

      interestingly, in reference to yahoo, while they have been outdone in the search market by google and email by hotmail (and prolly gmail), I still use them for weather and driving directions all the time and I know many who do.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    2. Re:Happy BD by Rassleholic · · Score: 0

      I share the same birthday with Yahoo. Hooray!!!

      --
      Not noteable, IMO a rubbish article.
    3. Re:Happy BD by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Happy Bondage/Discipline??

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re:Happy BD by sahala · · Score: 1
      Happy Bondage/Discipline??

      I'm an Amazon employee. You just hit the nail on the head. Trust me on this one.

    5. Re:Happy BD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an Amazon employee... ...Trust me on this one.

      Oh nos! You just created a parallel universe collision.

    6. Re:Happy BD by sllim · · Score: 1

      If weather and driving directions are all they have in there bag of goodies then they do NOT have much longer to live.

      I point you to Google Maps. http://maps.google.com/

    7. Re:Happy BD by coder.keitaro · · Score: 0

      You're 10?!!

      Congratulations! ;-)

      --
      watashi wa bengoshi dewa arimasen!
    8. Re:Happy BD by xtracto · · Score: 1

      If weather and driving directions are all they have in there bag of goodies then they do NOT have much longer to live.
      I point you to Google Maps. http://maps.google.com/

      And I point you to : Map24 Its far better than Gmap AND it has more than US maps... for us [un]fortunately living outside US.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  10. It's like Jeopardy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is "relevant", Alex?

    1. Re:It's like Jeopardy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Jeopardy doesn't have Lifelines. Netscape could have called Ken Jennings.

    2. Re:It's like Jeopardy! by dnixon112 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not a fan of the browsers, are you Trebek?

    3. Re:It's like Jeopardy! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trebek: And the categories are: Potents Potable, Sharp Things, Navigators that end with "etscape navigator", A Petit Dejeuner, Animal Sounds, Condiments and finally Your Ass or a Hole in The Ground.
      Reynolds: Yeah I'll take the alien thing for 8000.
      Trebek: That's etscape... for 400.

  11. I say this in all seriousness... by Faust7 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does Netscape even really count anymore? They're no longer independent, nor are they even influential, for crying out loud.

    1. Re:I say this in all seriousness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But they're going head to head with Netzero!

    2. Re:I say this in all seriousness... by raehl · · Score: 1

      Does Netscape even really count anymore?

      Even the dead have birthdays.

  12. Filo said it, not me by Haxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's immensely more challenging to get to $10 billion in revenue than it was to get to $10 million in revenue," Filo said. "That's why we are still here today.

    Sounds like tough work. How will they ever make enough to see ends meet.

    1. Re:Filo said it, not me by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mean, really, a factor of a thousand here, a factor of a thousand there...what's three orders of magnitude among friends.

  13. Sadly, there can be only none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where have you gone, HomeGrocer.com and WebVan?

    1. Re:Sadly, there can be only none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safeway.com! (in my area and a few others anyway... there's probably other grocery stores that do online shopping in your area?)

      I miss Kozmo.com most of all.

    2. Re:Sadly, there can be only none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than MyLackey.com?

      Those groceries aren't putting getting put away by themselves!

  14. Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by nolife · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From id@yahoo.com Thu Nov 23 21:03:25 1995
    Return-Path: <id@yahoo.com>
    Received: from marburg.yahoo.com (marburg.yahoo.com [205.216.162.14]) by mail.hula.net (8.6.12/SMI-4.1) with ESMTP id VAA00599 for <XXXXXX@hula.net>; Thu, 23 Nov 1995 21:03:24 -1000
    From: id@yahoo.com
    Received: (from http@localhost) by marburg.yahoo.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA21476; Thu, 23 Nov 1995 23:03:25 -0800
    Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 23:03:25 -0800
    Message-Id: <199511240703.XAA21476@marburg.yahoo.com>
    To: XXXXXX@hula.net
    Subject: Your Yahoo ID
    Mime-Version: 1.0

    Thank you for registering. Your Yahoo ID is

    XXXXXXX

    Please make a note of it for future Yahoo promotions. By using
    this ID you can avoid filling out the personal information that
    you just submitted to us. We know that filling out these forms
    is a pain, so we'd like to make it as easy as possible. Address
    questions about this to id@yahoo.com.

    Thanks again for registering..

    Bunch of Yahoos
    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by 0racle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You must have a huge datastore if you keep this level of information.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      you did realize that his username is "nolife", right?

    3. Re:Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by DeathByDuke · · Score: 0

      'Received: from marburg.yahoo.com'

      Wow, they can see into the future virus wise can't they!

    4. Re:Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by nolife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      60MB uncompressed. I delete most of my stuff (mailing lists/slashdot/crap friends forward around) but I have a specific mail folder for account related things and I normally do not delete things in there. I have a mail older then the Yahoo one referenced from Real Networks as well ;). I have not lost anything yet only because I backup /home (which contains my maildir) on a frequent basis to another physical drive. The IMAP/Procmail/Fetchmail combination is the best thing since sliced bread.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Emails don't take up much space. I have every email I received going back quite a number of years (at least 5) and it hasn't even reached 1 GB yet. IRC, logs, though... I stay out of #gentoo and #linux else they would fill my disk :/

      --
      Luke-Jr
    6. Re:Confirmation email from Yahoo in 1995.. by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Obviously, and damn its a good thing they don't. I was more thinking of the pack-rat tendencies that keeping a welcome email from 1995 revealed.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  15. Not Quite. by cacepi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, but Yahoo has been around since January 1994.

    1. Re:Not Quite. by DarkMantle · · Score: 4, Informative

      They seem to be celebrating the incorperation date, which according to the link you posted was March 1995.

      I hope you don't get marked insightful for not reading your own link and being able to think by yourself.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    2. Re:Not Quite. by everdred · · Score: 1

      They're referring to the date it was incorporated, March 2.

    3. Re:Not Quite. by Scaz7 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Always leave it to a slashdoter to find and poke a stick at something wrong with some post, sometime, somewhere...

    4. Re:Not Quite. by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember the spring semester of my final year at college (1994) when they added the www and mosaic browsers to the existing internet services.

      I'm pretty sure the first time I saw yahoo it was a single page -- http://www.yahoo.com/yahoo.html. Originally it was a list of a hundred or so links on a single page. :-)

      In the first few months there the "list of links" was a common feature on a lot of sites. It was related to the best feature of gopher -- here's all the places to go from here.

    5. Re:Not Quite. by identity0 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I hope you don't get marked insightful for not reading your own link and being able to think by yourself.

      But it would be hypocracy if he was modded down for that : )

    6. Re:Not Quite. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      But it would be hypocracy if he was modded down for that
      So that's what Slashdot's form of government is called! I'd been wondering...
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Not Quite. by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Another trip to the Wayback.. Anybody remember when yahoo was at 'akibono.stanford.edu' (or something close to this?)....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  16. Re:4 character password by geofforius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not anymore you don't

  17. its ten years as a "public" company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hell, jerry's akabono.stanford.edu sumo wrestling site probably goes back even further.

    1. Re:its ten years as a "public" company by BJH · · Score: 1

      akebono.stanford.edu

      And yes, I did use it back in the day.

  18. Re:4 character password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, we know

  19. Worth Noting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yahoo was building and running a site with free software (perl,bsd,etc...apache came later) when people were saying "you can't do that!!".

    I personally credit Filo with making open source accepted...when the market cap topped $150 billion (for a short time) it was hard to argue you could not make money with open source.

  20. 6/10ths of an hour ? by grennis · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you are going to use a fraction why not 3/5? But why use a fraction, why not just say 36 minutes? Something is not right here.

    1. Re:6/10ths of an hour ? by everdred · · Score: 2, Funny

      Artistic license.

  21. Re:4 character password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nono.

    I've made it more secure for you.

  22. life before apache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    does anybody know what the most popular web-server was before apache?

    1. Re:life before apache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ever heard of Google?

      Before Apache

    2. Re:life before apache by Meetch · · Score: 1

      The library?

    3. Re:life before apache by Marc+Slemko · · Score: 4, Informative

      NCSA.

      http://www.apache.org/history/timeline.html

      The Apache HTTP server was an evolution, not a revolution.

    4. Re:life before apache by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      NCSA httpd webserver. Remember compiling and running it on an Indigo R3K. That probably makes me old :-D.

    5. Re:life before apache by jamesjw · · Score: 1


      Indeed, I remember using NCSA httpd back in the days of slackware 2.0, As i recall Apache was a welcome sight as NCSA httpd had been neglected with regard to updates (if memory serves anyhow, it was a long time ago on a 486sx25 far far away)

      --Jim

      --
      -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
    6. Re:life before apache by hugesmile · · Score: 3, Funny
      does anybody know what the most popular web-server was before apache?
      Ever heard of Google?

      No way! Google was not around before Apache. And I don't think they were ever a web server either!
      Geez, n00b!

      I'm sure I can prove it... let me see, how could I research this...

      Oh wait...

    7. Re:life before apache by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      NCSA - Go Illini!

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    8. Re:life before apache by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

      I was happy to discover that they still have the original hostname hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu available! I remember getting this to compile on an old NeXT box, which hosted our math department's web page before most colleges at our uni had a web page.

    9. Re:life before apache by JakeThompson1 · · Score: 1

      It's still there but hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu is now running Apache. So it's labeled "Powered by NCSA HTTPd" but it's not.

  23. Re:4 character password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mines at 5, it was on my mousepad and one of my favorite games at the time. when my dog destroyed the original mousepad i found one on ebay in australia and ordered it, $4.50USD including shipping...

  24. How DOES Yahoo! make money? by Skadet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really want to know how exactly a site like Yahoo! makes money. Are click-thru ads really that profitable?

    Someone explain this, I'm in the dark.

    1. Re:How DOES Yahoo! make money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > Are click-thru ads really that profitable?

      It's, uh, very complicated. It's, uh, it's, it's aggregate so I'm talking about fractions of a cent that, uh, over time, they add up to a lot. I'm just talking about fractions of a penny here, but Yahoo! does it from a much bigger tray. A couple of million times. So what's wrong with that?

    2. Re:How DOES Yahoo! make money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read their filings.

      Looks like a mix of banner ads, paid services (personals and so on), and sponsored search. Maybe a few other things, but I'm not a lawyer.

      Remember, they bought Overture, they company that Google borrowed sponsored search from. (I think Yahoo used Google when this happen, which is probably why it was okay with them.)

    3. Re:How DOES Yahoo! make money? by Mishura · · Score: 1

      Yahoo! has a partnership with SBC (One of them "baby bells"; and the one that bought out 'or merged' with Ma Bell AT&T). They do that SBC-Yahoo! DSL internet service, which I, unfortunately, use. Half of my $25-30-something a month internet fees must be going to them so yeah, they make money.

      Also considering where I live you really only have two choices of Broadband--Cox and SBC; since I already had a phone account with SBC, getting the DSL was much cheaper then getting cable TV & cable internet (You can't just get cable internet w/o TV.) Therefore, they own half of the broadband services here.

    4. Re:How DOES Yahoo! make money? by segmond · · Score: 1

      how does TV station make money? do you pick up the phone and order something or run out to buy something everytime you see an ad? So why must you "click-through" an online ad? Ad is suppose to be about image branding.

      --
      ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  25. Billion Dollar Babies by Sundroid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the MSNBC article: "Relative youngster Google has been lauded for reaching $1 billion in sales in just six years. Well, Amazon did it in four, Yahoo in five and eBay achieved it in seven. Compare those companies with Wal-Mart, which aged to 18 before it could slap the phrase, 'the billion dollar company' on its annual report; and McDonald's took 24 years to hit the benchmark."

    Page and Brin of Google, Filo and Yang of Yahoo were in Stanford Ph. D. program; Jeff Bezos of Amazon graduated from Princeton (EE and CS); Pierre Omidyar, Ebay founder, went to Tufts (CS); Meg Whitman, CEO of Ebay, went to Princeton and Harvard. What's the lesson here? Hitting the books pays. I guess.

    1. Re:Billion Dollar Babies by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All thouse people had good access to inital capital because of the schools they went to and the connections they made there.

    2. Re:Billion Dollar Babies by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful
      From the MSNBC article: "Relative youngster Google has been lauded for reaching $1 billion in sales in just six years. Well, Amazon did it in four, Yahoo in five and eBay achieved it in seven. Compare those companies with Wal-Mart, which aged to 18 before it could slap the phrase, 'the billion dollar company' on its annual report; and McDonald's took 24 years to hit the benchmark."

      Yeah and IBM probably took something like eighty years since it began in 1885 and revenues probably didn't reach the billion mark till the mid 60s. The measurements are not in constant dollars. A much better measure would be looking at how long it took the companies to reach a certain fraction of GDP. AT&T probably looks similar. Its a meaningless comparison except in constant dollars.

      McDonalds operated as a single diner for many years before Ray Krok drove up to sell them a mixer and ended up inventing franchising and it was another ten years before they went public. If Krok had had access to the amount of capital Amazon and EBay did they could have become a billion dollar company much faster.

      A better measure would be the point at which a company had earned a billion dollars in profits (inflation adjusted).

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Billion Dollar Babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it shows that people who are smart gravitate to big-name universities. People with degrees from those universities are not always "smarter", but often they are smart enough to realise the value of the big name for networking and venture capital. That is a form of intelligence also, to navigate social structures to your best advantage.

      I wouldn't say that someone is good just because they have gone to a certain institution. The reason Trinity college in Cambridge has more Nobel prizes than the whole of France is not just the quality of the teaching... It's about who are the people who seek to go to these places, and what are the entrance requirements.

      So it really does become more about who sets up shop first, as they will always have the smarter people *come* to them rather than actually *producing* them.

      So yes, for all the anti-university sentiment from some quarters of the slashdot crowd you can say something about someone from a prestige university. But that's not to say you should discount someone from another university, or a person who did not go to a uni.

      The recent article on John Gilmore is awesome, he's twice the man any google-do-no-evil-but-fire-the-bloggers-hand-over- details-to-feds-without-a-fight-and-censor-in-chin a-france-and-germany founder can claim to be.

      Same with Stallman or any of the BSD guys. All of them are massively more important in my eyes (university or no). But that doesn't say that a degree is meaningless either.

      Anyway, to return to your phrase "hitting the books", I don't think universities have a monopoly on "hitting the books".

    4. Re:Billion Dollar Babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, they were smart enough to get such an education and were simply smart men. There degrees act only as testimony to this fact.

  26. Ahhh the good old days! by Meetch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I remember, about 10 years ago (give or take - 12 maybe?), evaluating FOSS proxy caches for a company as part of a short-term contract. One was Squid, another - bit of an upstart - was Apache in proxy mode. I was not very impressed with Apache at the time. I thought its storage methods were silly, and it had a lot of optimisation to do before it could even think of going anywhere.

    I guess we're here now, and we probably have been for some time - but that appears to have quietly slipped in while I wasn't looking.

    Then I moved into a position with a company selling a solution with PAID FOR LICENSES of Netscape included. We were happy to pay the fee though, because it did things for us that simply didn't work otherwise on Windows 3.1(/1) - the choice of clients of my old employers...

    Now, although I thought those large warrior women were around a bit longer ago than 10 years, at least I know what they are... but what's an "ebay"??

    1. Re:Ahhh the good old days! by Pan+Sola · · Score: 1

      I remember, about 10 years ago (give or take - 12 maybe?) ten years ago tive or take 12 years could be two years into the future! d-:

      --
      Warning: Sig Fault. Dumping warp core.
  27. my apache experience 10 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's my experience with Apache about (almost) ten years ago. I was working at a place where we were running NCSA httpd 1.3 on SunOS 4.1. Our web site had become more popular due to a news article or something. Performance was bad because NCSA httpd waited to receive a new TCP connection, and then forked a child to service that connection. The child served the request, then immediately exited. Not a horrible model when the web was some guy's fun little research project, but not optimal either.

    So, we needed something better. I had heard about this new httpd called Apache, which had started off life as a series of patches to NCSA httpd. Hence the name: it was a-patchy-server. I thought the pun was mildly lame, but when I read the info on how it worked, I was impressed: here was an httpd that forked off N different httpd server children in advance and then communicated with them to assign tasks as TCP connections came in. It would start out with N of them, and if all N were busy at the time a new connection came in, it would create child N+1, and so on. Performance was supposed to be something like an order of magnitude better, and since it was a branch of NCSA httpd, it could read all our config files (although we'd want to tweak them a little to get good performance).

    NCSA httpd 1.3 had been released, but no new changes had come from NCSA in a while, and these Apache people seemed to have gotten a lot accomplished in a short time, so I had a good feeling about them. So, I talked to my boss and suggested that this new Apache thingamabob might be the solution to all our problems.

    He thought about it and decided he wasn't sure some obscure bunch of hotshot developers creating their own rogue branch from the well-respected NCSA code were the type of people we should expect to be around for long. He thought it'd be much safer to just wait for NCSA httpd 1.4, which was supposed to have its own pre-forking implementation. So we did.

    A few years later, I had to look back and laugh that my boss was skeptical that this weird new Apache thing could ever catch on. But all in all, there was nothing wrong with his decision. He may've been a little too conservative, but a good system administrator makes decisions that will make the system work, and doesn't let the coolness factor of this or that technology sway him.

    On the other hand, I get some satisfaction from looking back and knowing that my gut instinct was right on target.

    On the other other hand, I get even more satisfaction from looking back and realizing I'm not a systems administrator anymore, and I've actually manage to escape to a different part of the technical universe (knock on wood). :-)

    1. Re:my apache experience 10 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddammit.

      Apache, which had started off life as a series of patches to NCSA httpd. Hence the name: it was a-patchy-server.

      Why does everyone seem to want to perpetuate this myth? It's not true.

      See here.

      I'll quote it for the lazy:
      The name 'Apache' was chosen from respect for the Native American Indian tribe of Apache (Indé), well-known for their superior skills in warfare strategy and their inexhaustible endurance. For more information on the Apache Nation, we suggest searching Google, Northernlight, or AllTheWeb.

      Secondarily, and more popularly (though incorrectly) accepted, it's a considered cute name which stuck. Apache is "A PAtCHy server". It was based on some existing code and a series of "patch files".

      You of all people...one who worked with the GrandPaPa of web servers, NCSA httpd 1.3, should know this.

    2. Re:my apache experience 10 years ago by fyoder · · Score: 1

      I had a similar experience to your boss, but as a user of the Mosaic web browser. I was certain that with its next version it would eclipse that upstart Netscape browser. Go Mosaic! Then it went.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    3. Re:my apache experience 10 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the name: it was a-patchy-server. I thought the pun was mildly lame

      Except Apache was named after the native American tribe and wasn't a pun at all.

  28. If only I'd stuck with the Amazon Affiliate... by bc90021 · · Score: 1

    ...program. I remember making my page with that A-River logo, and putting up books for sale. If I'd have stuck with it, who knows how much I'd have in terms of money and experience!

    Ah, to go back in time and tell myself then what I know now. ;)

  29. I ALSO say this in all seriousness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What shallow person modded you insightful? The WWW would not be anything near what we have today, had it not been for Netscape in the 90s. One can argue that Mosaic had brought graphics to the WWW, but Netscape added Java, Javascript, plugins, and many other rich multimedia extensions just a click away.

    And don't forget, we would NOT have Firefox today, had it not been for Netscape.

    1. Re:I ALSO say this in all seriousness... by natrius · · Score: 1

      No one discounts Netscape's contributions, but when was the last time you celebrated the birthday of a dead person? Or more accurately, when was the last time you celebrated the birthday of a person who was purchased and assimilated into someone else? I'm guessing never, but I could be wrong...

    2. Re:I ALSO say this in all seriousness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about the PAST. The person you responded to was clearly talking about the PRESENT.

    3. Re:I ALSO say this in all seriousness... by Mold · · Score: 1, Funny

      Martin Luther King Jr. day.

      He was purchased and assimilated by Gandhi during the great French Borg wars, and later Gandhi Luther King Jr. was bought out by Microsoft in 1812 for their revolutionary new version of Windows due out sometime in 2015.

      Sheesh. Don't they teach history in schools anymore?

    4. Re:I ALSO say this in all seriousness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Mosaic had improved by 1995 and people would've adopted it en masse in the place of Netscape.
      2) Java came from Sun, not Netscape, and would've been around anyway
      3) We would not have Firefox today, but we would've had something like it years ago. The release of the Netscape Communicator 5 codebase stalled free-browser efforts for years and years - on the one hand nobody much quite felt like starting their own codebase from scratch because Mozilla was open sourced, but on the other hand nobody quite felt like working on Mozilla because it was one gigantic tangle of code nobody except the Netscape employees could handle.

      If Netscape hadn't done what they did, somebody else would've.

  30. Hookers and blow. Except for Netscape... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...whose remaining four employees will get trashed on listerine in the broom closet.

  31. OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    And let's not forget OpenBSD!

    Like their website says: "Free, Functional & Secure - since 1995".

  32. woot ! by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Funny

    14 years of gopher !
    no pop ups/downs/arounds/unders
    no ads
    no pictures
    but it did have a clickable interface, and it might have been the beginning of the "everything I can see is the filesystem" revolution leading to the web browser/filesystem browser integration.

  33. Characteristics of a Ten Year Old by NicksMyName · · Score: 5, Funny
    Just looked for the charactertics of a ten year old and found a good list here Ones that seem to apply to Apache as a ten year old:

    "Care of clothes/room at dismal low"

    "Responsive to anger often violent and immediate"

    "Will accept bathing schedule if it doesn't interfere with activities"

    "Fears at a low ebb"

    "Not yet aware of when they are tired and need to go to bed"

    "Humor is corny, sometimes smutty"

    "Interest span still somewhat short"

    "Needs certain amount of liberty to move around"

    "Concerned about fairness"

    "Greatest difficulties in relation to siblings "

    "Responsive to anger often violent and immediate"

    Ones that may not apply:

    "Still exhibits admiration for adults, teachers"

    "Still needs considerable amount of supervision to get things done, needs clues to organization"

    "Enjoys outdoor play activities, sports, collections, Cub Scouts, T.V., and video games" (well, except for the TV and Video Games)

    "Enjoys listening to stories"

    "Not necessarily a worker"

    "Have sudden bursts of affection"

    "Last age (for a while) when child goes happily on family outings"

  34. "A PAtCHy server" -- myth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why does everyone seem to want to perpetuate this myth? [ meaning the myth that 'Apache is "A PAtCHy server"'. ] It's not true.

    Ah, but it IS true. Or at least it was true at the time. If you don't believe me, take a look at the archive.org archives of the www.apache.org FAQ as of October 28, 1996, where it clearly says:

    4. Why the name "Apache" ?

    A cute name which stuck. Apache is "A PAtCHy server". It was based on some existing code and a series of "patch files".

    This is kind of an interesting development. I can see four possible explanations:

    1. It could mean that the apache.org people are misinformed. They may just not know their history. I don't know how many of the original people are still involved; maybe it's a whole different set of people.
    2. It could mean that the apache.org people were wrong in the past, i.e. this page as posted on October 28, 1996 was, though it was the FAQ on their own web page, not the correct description of how the name came about.
    3. It could mean that the official meaning behind the name has simply been changed. This has actually happened before. For instance, "gcc" used to stand for "GNU C Compiler", but now because the compiler suite supports so many languages, the name has been changed so that "gcc" now officially stands for "GNU Compiler Collection".
    4. Finally, it could mean that the apache.org people are being historical revisionists for whatever reason. I don't know for sure that this is the case, but I can't rule it out either, so I thought I'd include it.

    I have to say, at the very least, the current FAQ entry is so misleading that it's bordering on deceptive. If people who believe it stands for "A PAtCHy server" believe so incorrectly, the current FAQ ought to point out that the reason they believe that is that a previous version of the very same FAQ told them so!

    1. Re:"A PAtCHy server" -- myth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Found some more information and thought I'd post it. archive.org has a page where you can see all the spidered revisions of the Apache FAQ (for as long as it was at the URL www.apache.org/docs/FAQ.html, at least).

      The October 28, 1996 archive entry (the earliest that archive.org has) has this explanation of the name:

      Why the name "Apache" ?

      A cute name which stuck. Apache is "A PAtCHy server". It was based on some existing code and a series of "patch files".

      Then, the May 6, 1999 snapshot captured this version:

      Why the name "Apache"?

      A cute name which stuck. Apache is "A PAtCHy server". It was based on some existing code and a series of "patch files".

      For many developers it is also a reverent connotation to the Native American Indian tribe of Apache, well-known for their superior skills in warfare strategy and inexhaustible endurance. Online information about the Apache Nation is tough to locate; we suggest searching Google, Northernlight, Infoseek, or AllTheWeb.

      In addition, http://www.indian.org/ and http://www.nativeweb.com/ are two excellent resources for Native American information.

      Then, in the October 4, 2004 snapshot, we see that the last paragraph (with the "excellent resources") has been removed.

      Then finally, in the December 15, 2002 snapshot, we see that it's been changed to make "A PAtCHy server" into an "incorrect" name.

      Why the name "Apache"? The name 'Apache' was chosen from respect for the Native American Indian tribe of Apache (Indé), well-known for their superior skills in warfare strategy and their inexhaustible endurance. For more information on the Apache Nation, we suggest searching Google, Northernlight, or AllTheWeb.

      Secondarily, and more popularly (though incorrectly) accepted, it's a considered cute name which stuck. Apache is "A PAtCHy server". It was based on some existing code and a series of "patch files".

      So basically, it wasn't until just over 2 years ago that "A PAtCHy server" was called incorrect by the FAQ. And Apache is, of course, nearing 10 years old, so for over 75% of its lifetime, "A PAtCHy server" has been the official explanation of the name given in the FAQ.

      So, I'm confused how the current FAQ can even endeavor to call it "incorrect". At the least they should say "no longer correct" or something.

    2. Re:"A PAtCHy server" -- myth? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, I'm confused how the current FAQ can even endeavor to call it "incorrect". At the least they should say "no longer correct" or something.

      It's called "rewriting history". It used to be that only dicatorial governments who strictly censored newspapers and other media and dictated what was taught in school could rewrite history to make past events cease to exist. Now, with modern internet technology, that capability is available to anyone!

      Seriously though, the idea that Apache started out as a patch to another program is a seen as a bad thing by the current group. I agree with them. It is bad to have people think that your code is somehow smaller than or less important than some other thing.

      Not that their situation is unique. The very high quality LAME mp3 encoder used to stand for (Lame Ain't an MP3 Encoder) because it was a patch against the Fraunhaufer dist10 MP3 encoder source code. That changed though when they purged the dist10 code and rewrote necessary routines.

      Also, WinAmp was originally a port of a command line mp3 player called amp. As they gained popularity they replaced all of the amp code with thier own MP3 decoding routines.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  35. Re:4 character password by Tuffsnake · · Score: 0

    haha my *mail password is still 3 characters, no caps and no numbers, it is only a matter of time now before some spammer finds it, exploits it and sends out thousands of emails under my name ... somewhere a cs teacher is cringing ... 1997, how i do miss thee :D

  36. kind of bums me in a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm about the same age as the founders of some of these companies, and what do I have to show after a decade on the internet? One massive pr0n collection.

  37. PNG by Glenn+R-P · · Score: 5, Interesting

    March 7, 1995, birth of the Portable Network Graphics (PNG) format.

    1. Re:PNG by Mishura · · Score: 1

      Wow. Really that old? I've only heard of it recently (coincidently when I switched to Linux). Maybe it was more popular with Unix systems back then, and only very recently in the MS world.

      BTW: .PNG kicks ass. Too bad IE doesn't like them (Transparent ones definately).

    2. Re:PNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      March 7, 1995, 5 minutes later, PNG declared stillborn.

  38. Your popups will never touch... by jrushton · · Score: 1

    links! :D

  39. LOL WHAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude it was a joke. Whoosh! Whoosh!

  40. 10 years for me too by trash+eighty · · Score: 0, Troll

    10 years of working in web design this year. always thought it would be a passing fad and i would have to get a real job writing C or something too.

  41. *cry* by MikeFM · · Score: 1, Funny

    If it helps, I've been on the Internet more than ten years and I didn't get rich from the dot com bubble. Damn, I made the mistake of buying into the geeky net culture of making information and software available for free. Damn me for falling in with the wrong crowd. Why didn't I try some yuppie greed?!

    Actually, from the first point I started recording my Internet experience (I was online maybe a year before that.), I've spent 10 years, 11 months, and 17 days on the Internet so far. Give or take a few hours a day to sleep and stuff.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  42. fp? by hugesmile · · Score: 3, Funny
    10 years ago today, the Apache Group decloaked with the creation of the new-httpd archive and initial accounts on hyperreal.org. I had the lucky timing of having the first message archived on the list,

    ok, so now the first post guy is celebrating his tenth anniversary, and bragging about it? ("hey, I got first post ten years ago! nah-nah-nah-nah boo-boo")

    First five messages on the "new-httpd" archive:

    1) fp??
    2) First p0st!!!!
    3) pirst fost
    4) In Soviet Russia, Daemon posts you
    5) ... profit...

  43. anniversary = years by 1u3hr · · Score: 1, Informative
    "10 Year Anniversaries"?? what semi-literate made that phrase up? As TFA says, it's "10th anniversaries".

    anniversary: The yearly return of a noteworthy date. (Oxford English Dictionary)

    (Please don't regale me with "one month anniversaries of your first date" you celebrated in high school.) This is worse than "very unique".

  44. Hookers and blow... by raehl · · Score: 0

    Brings back memories of my 10th birthday party.

    1. Re:Hookers and blow... by raehl · · Score: 1

      Brings back memories of my 10th birthday party.

      Your parents hired Daryl Strawberry to come to your birthday party too?

    2. Re:Hookers and blow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      No, they couldn't figure out how to use the Post Anonymously box.

    3. Re:Hookers and blow... by raehl · · Score: 1

      How would I burn my karma if I did that?

  45. last time I celebrated the birthday of a dead guy. by rdunnell · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last Monday, February 21 (Presidents Day). My dad used to actually get both Washington and Lincoln's birthdays off but eventually that was changed to President's Day too.

    Before that was Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebrated through much of the USA.

    Of course, there's always Christmas (for some), and I'm sure other countries have kings or queens or saints or other people they like to have a good cheer about.

    all in all I'd say a lot of people celebrate the birthdays of dead people worldwide. Unless they work in retail in the US, because then they probably have to go sell stuff to everyone else who isn't working.

  46. Auxillary fees. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! is a portal, and search is a loss-leader.

    They make money on premium services - email accounts, personal ads, auctions, fees on Yahoo merchants, etc. Having the search makes it easier for you to direct traffic to your premium services.

  47. Hyperreal by lisaparratt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    /me looks at www.hyperreal.org Hmm, so Apache was created by drugged up ravers? Well, that explains a lot... ;)

    1. Re:Hyperreal by Jour_Hadique · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Hyperreal, one of the highest-quality websites of the time. I used their MDMA ball-and-stick model as my background for years. :)

  48. Suddenly, by mshiltonj · · Score: 0

    Suddenly, I feel old.

  49. Step back in time.. by Dynamoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Funny that nobody mentioned the Wayback Machine where you can see somewhat broken examples of these sites from early in their histories.. for example - Yahoo in October 1996. It's still quite usable, but alas not all the early archives are.

    And Google Groups is always a lot of fun.. you can see Jeff Bezos asking some questions about marketing Amazon here, and even searching for developers here

    I know somewhere the very first attempt at a bookstore by Jeff Bezos is still archived, but I can't remember where..

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Step back in time.. by dema · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haha, gotta love this reply to Bezos' post about developers.

      Jeff,

      My name is Jonathan. I think that commerce on the Internet will never
      work, because people prefer to buy things in stores. Just my two
      cents, I don't want to see you wasting effort on a company that is
      going to bankrupt you very quickly. If you want to hear a much better
      outlet for capital funding, my start-up company is involved in
      something called the XFL, which is sure to be the most successful
      enterprise of the decade. Just my two cents.

      -Jonathan

    2. Re:Step back in time.. by jac1962 · · Score: 1

      Man, is that a classic or what? I wonder which homeless shelter Johnathan lives in these days?

      --
      "I worked hard for it. I deserve it. And I have it," Campbell said. "It's all mine."
    3. Re:Step back in time.. by Felipe+Hoffa · · Score: 1

      That might be funny, until you realize that answer was posted 9 years later, well after the XFL first (and last) season. And guess what, the "XFL guy" used Google Groups to answer to such an old post.

      full post
      XFL

      Fh

    4. Re:Step back in time.. by dema · · Score: 1

      Haha, shit i didn't even notice that (:

  50. Re:I bought a red sportscar. by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

    I know exactly how you feel. Within a week of owning my black sports car some stupid woman opened her door into mine and made a huge dent in it. Later a branch fell on it, a golf ball bounced off the roof leaving a nice dent, someone keyed one side. Several other things have happened to this car that never happened to the others I owned for far longer. Do they attract disaster?

  51. I don't think so. They have the same goal. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Both Yahoo and Google are in the business of selling people to advertisers (who may be people, but are possibly also rats or other vermin). The more clicks to advertisers sites, and the more that advertiser's pages are seen, the more money the search engines make.

    This translates into "the more time spent looking at and clicking on links from a search engine, the more money the search engine makes."

    The goals are the same, the approach is different.

    Use the same units for comparison, won't you? Otherwise, it's difficult to see that your argument makes sense. 36 minutes of an hour on google versus 4.8 hours per month.... Is that every hour for google? Or are you picking certain ones? How many hours a month?

    My guess is that people are spending more time at Google per month than at Yahoo per month, and that because of this (among other reasons, i.e. this would be a reason if all other factors were equal), Google is generating more revenue.

    Now if simplifying their interface led to more revenue...it might be worth looking into even if it shoots their current business model to pieces.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  52. Someone should mention Windows 95 by bookemdano63 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not a coincidence that it is also the year of Windows 95. While Win95 has been dwarfed by today's stability and functionality it is the way the vast majority of users first accessed the internet and I don't think Yahoo or Apache or the eventual Google would be around without it.

    1. Re:Someone should mention Windows 95 by smchris · · Score: 1

      Nah. Between the CompuServer/GEnie years (with GEnie's text "internet portal") and, in my case, OS/2 (which handled the internet just fine for several years), I actually ran the IBM Internet Connection Kit for Windows 3.1. It didn't lock up _very_ often.

      I guess I wasn't paying attention to internet tech at the time, but if Netscape is only 10, that explains why the Connection Kit came with its own profoundly minimalist browser by today's standards.

    2. Re:Someone should mention Windows 95 by adzoox · · Score: 1

      In 95, I was accessing the internet with a Mac. If Apple had won it's lawsuit in 96 we probably would have had streaming media and iTunes Music Store, possibly even faster broadband adoption YEARS before.

      There's a possibility we may not even be discussing a security hole every day in the prevalent OS on Slashdot.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    3. Re:Someone should mention Windows 95 by eboot · · Score: 1

      Don't forget what Apple was like in '95. No Steve Jobs and an altogether different company. Also no nextstep OS so no OSX. But one thing is for sure, their OS was pretty secure.

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  53. Almost starting a /. tradition ... by Lucky+Kevin · · Score: 0

    He means he got "First Post"

    --
    Kevin
    "It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in" O. Nash
  54. Re:I don't think so. They have the same goal. by qbwiz · · Score: 1

    My guess is that is that it's 6/10ths of an hour per month on google, i.e. .6 hours per month.

    --
    Ewige Blumenkraft.
  55. First Amazon Order? by Deinhard · · Score: 1

    Reading this made me think back to my first order from Amazon. It was April 4, 1997 and was a used copy of The Spear of Mars edited by Reginald Bretnor.

    Interestingly enough, it wasn't until Sep. 6, 1998 that the book shipped.

    Anyone else care to share what/when you ordered first?

    --
    Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
  56. And also a really *important* 10-year anniversary. by dtobias · · Score: 0

    My personal home page reaches its ten-year anniversary on March 7th!

    --
    --Dan
    Web Tips
  57. Yahoo was around longer than 10 years by dananderson · · Score: 1
    Yahoo was around longer than 10 years. Yahoo.com may have started in 1995, but it was going strong in 1994 as a non-dommercial directory at Stanford University. The URL, IIRC, was http://yahoo.stanford.com/

    Google started similarly a few years later. It also was initially hosted at Stanford. It's address stared out as http://google.stanford.com/ (neither link is still live).

  58. you remember incorrectly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    akebono.stanford.edu was the first url.