Slashdot Mirror


M-Flash, Yet Another Flash Memory Format

Verteiron writes "Despite all the (mostly incompatible) flash memory/card formats out there already, a consortium made up of several Taiwan-based manufacturers are preparing to unveil a new one at the upcoming CeBIT. The memory itself, called M-Flash, will form the backbone of the new M-Card format. According to C-One, a member of the M-Card group and the maker of Pretec brand flash devices, the M-Flash memory architecture is cheap to manufacture and allows for devices 2/3 the size of existing MMC products. The M-Card format uses the USB 2.0 I/O specification, but C-One claims it will transfer data at twice the speed of USB 2.0 while using about a third the power required by current devices. To encourage adoption of the new card format, it has been designed to be compatible with the existing SD/MMC format at reduced speeds. C-One also plans to make the currently proprietary format an open standard. Palm Blvd. and the EE Times (free reg. required) have articles with a few more details."

113 comments

  1. Convergence by winkydink · · Score: 1
    It's so nice to see the plethora of existing formats converging into a single standard.

    Not

    Sigh

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Convergence by realdpk · · Score: 2, Informative

      "To encourage adoption of the new card format, it has been designed to be compatible with the existing SD/MMC format at reduced speeds."

      Seems pretty good to me. Not exactly one single standard (there's still Sony's MemoryStick and I think CF might still be in use somewhere), but nice to see it would still work with at least two existing memory standards.

    2. Re:Convergence by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Well, you know, the great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. :-)

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    3. Re:Convergence by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Informative

      CompactFlash is still very much around and unlikely to go anywhere soon because of its dominance in the high end digital camera sector. As far as I am aware it's still the smallest removable media format that you can get a Microdrive in. Secondly, it has consistently offered the highest available storage capacity in a single card - up to 12GB (so far) if you have the cash. Even if you could afford it, whether you would actually want to trust 12GB of data to a single card is another matter of course.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Convergence by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      12GB is about enough for an hour of DV footage - roughly the same capacity as a MiniDV tape. Once these are £5 I imagine they will be incredibly popular. At the moment they're just a little too pricey (but hey, I remember paying £30 for a 128K flash card not so long ago).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Convergence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, this stuff is totally unnecessary. There is one existing format -- USB 2.0. The market has even produced a USB flash memory device small enough for any handheld device: PQI 1GB Intelligent Stick. Say goodbye to adapters and let's have the manufacturers use this as the new standard. USB is the answer. We don't need YAS.

    6. Re:Convergence by kapella · · Score: 1
      I think CF might still be in use somewhere


      Digital cameras. Particularly high-end prosumer and professional digital cameras. Canon EOS 20D, EOS 1Ds Mk II, Nikon D70, D2X, etc.
    7. Re:Convergence by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, this is basically a modified USB protocol implemented on flash memory, with support for SD/MMC protocols as alternatives for devices that don't support USB in the flash slot.

      So, there'd be an adaptor, but it'd be a wiring change, no logic involved.

  2. Aaaargh by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not ANOTHER format.. now i'll need to buy a 7-way-card reader instead of the currenet 6-way beasts of devices companies put out.

    Cant we all play nice ???

    1. Re:Aaaargh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it's backward compatible

    2. Re:Aaaargh by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Not ANOTHER format.. now i'll need to buy a 7-way-card reader instead of the currenet 6-way beasts of devices companies put out.

      No you wont. It'll plug right into your SD card slot.

      TW

    3. Re:Aaaargh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god. You're right. It's also annoying how it's compatible with other standards.

      I also hate how there's 20 different operating systems who all have to compile differently, even if they all are compatibile with the same hardware. I mean really, do we *need* 12 different distros?

      Oh wait...

    4. Re:Aaaargh by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      New, pointless kinds of cards are bad, M-kay?

    5. Re:Aaaargh by dextroz · · Score: 0

      The card will work just fine in your existing SD/MMC reader.

      The only company everyone needs to bitch at is Sony (for a never-ending string of abuses, one of which it recently apologised for) and FujiFilm (XD).

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  3. 19-in-1 by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 1
    1. Re:19-in-1 by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly like that.

      I cant stand the damn things, they drive me NUTS.

    2. Re:19-in-1 by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with the people at Sony ? They have * 8 * different Memory Stick formats now ? Are some of them at least compatible with one another ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. Incompatible with fscking what? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 0, Redundant

    >Despite all the (mostly incompatible) flash memory/card formats out there already

    Yet another of in a long series of illiterate articles. Not everyone was born to be a writer, but illiterate individuals should observe utmost care when submitting articles.

    http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/illite ra te

    1. Re:Incompatible with fscking what? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Incompatible with each other. Maybe you can call this not knowing your audience (though I'd assume most people know the formats aren't compatible with each other), but it's not illiteracy.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Incompatible with fscking what? by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      >>Despite all the (mostly incompatible) flash memory/card formats out there already

      >Yet another of in a long series of illiterate articles. Not everyone was born to be a writer, but illiterate individuals should observe utmost care when submitting articles.

      My word, you are absolutely correct. In my rash haste to compose a brief summary of a press release, I allowed an unclear parenthetical clause to escape my extensive proofreading. How could I have been such a fool?

      Allow me to offer my sincere apology for this heinous transgression. That I have sullied, nay, tarnished the otherwise pristine linguistic landscape that is Slashdot through simple carelessness is all but unthinkable. My irresponsible actions surely herald the imminent transformation of this last shining bastion of syntactic excellence into a darkened cesspit of uncontrolled grammatical chaos.

      Your accusation of illiteracy is well-founded, but falls far short of revealing the full nature of the crime I have committed. While I cannot hope for redemption, I shall seek to atone for my grievous sin. I write this in the hope that others may be warned and so avoid my fate. Hark, ye rash article submitters! Seek not to compose your summaries quickly, that they may be posted for the enlightenment of your fellow Slashdotters. The wrath of Donny Smith and others who cherish grammar above all else awaits those who follow my path. Avoid unclear parenthetical statements at all costs!

      (unless you really feel like it)

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:Incompatible with fscking what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incompatible with each other, you ill-begotten twit. That parenthetical could be made more clear by the addition of quite a few words, but people who read English on a regular basis shouldn't really have trouble figuring out that the incompatibility between memory card formats probably refers to, say, the formats' inabilities to interface with one another.

  5. So how many storage formats do we have now ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    because the 5 1/4" slot on the front of my PC wants to know

    media format wars are becoming a joke, historians are going to look back and laugh at us

    1. Re:So how many storage formats do we have now ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What historians? The world's coming to an end in 2011, haven't you heard of the Mayan prophecy? Ask your 5 1/4" slot, it knows.

  6. Open Format, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me to be the best way to get widespread approval for a format is to open it up. As always because something in software is closed it means that there will always be somebody for some reason that can't use it.

    Hopefully this new one will be the one to succeed were others have failed.

  7. Open Standards and Compatibility are A GOOD THING. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was pretty sceptical 'till I got to that part. This seems like a well thought out product all the way around.

    TW

  8. The incredible shrinking flashcard by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Interesting
    the M-Flash memory architecture is cheap to manufacture and allows for devices 2/3 the size of existing MMC products

    I don't know how other people feel about this, but for me, the Secure Digital format is pretty close to being as small as I want to get. I don't want to have to use tweezers to get my memory into and out of devices.

    1. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      I don't know how other people feel about this, but for me, the Secure Digital format is pretty close to being as small as I want to get. I don't want to have to use tweezers to get my memory into and out of devices.

      It's not as bad as all that. I use mini-SD in my cell phone and it's actually pretty nice to have the smaller size. I know it sounds bizzare, but SD cards look so big to me now. It's kind of like looking back at one of those Motorola flip phones we all thought were so small at the time.

      TW

    2. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine when you're young, but when you get too far past 40 small isn't quite so cool anymore.

    3. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

      Think "Same Size" more on the chip, instead of smaller. Now does it sound better?

    4. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      I don't know how other people feel about this, but for me, the Secure Digital format is pretty close to being as small as I want to get. I don't want to have to use tweezers to get my memory into and out of devices.

      For me, it's CompactFlash. Maybe that's just the one I imprinted with, but to me the SD cards look so skinny I'm afraid of them getting bent too easily.

      CF cards have a nice, solid feel to them. I don't feel afraid to toss one onto my desk lest it get broken or lost, yet you can still fit plenty of them in your pocket at once.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    5. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by hashwolf · · Score: 1, Funny

      "I don't know how other people feel about this, but for me, the Secure Digital format is pretty close to being as small as I want to get. I don't want to have to use tweezers to get my memory into and out of devices."

      Yes, but the average taiwanese guy is about 2/3 the size of your average american, so there you are.

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
    6. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      If you mean the Startac I think that was the perfectly sized phone, and still do.

      If you mean something else then I am noise.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      I dunno, CF cards feel cheap and plasticky to me.

      All a matter of taste I suppose.

      SD cards are my favorite, especially that one SanDisk (I think) is supposed to be coming out with next month that's a combo SD/USB drive. Really slick.

    8. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by arekq · · Score: 1

      He's talking about the old Motorola analog phone.
      The whole thing (phone and battery) is about 2.5"(W)x6.5"(H)x1.5"(D).

    9. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think SD cards are a bit too small also, except maybe in the use of cellphones. What is so wrong with compact flash? If they are going to keep decreasing the size of the memory cards, we won't have any increases in capacity. I for one would rather have a 8GB CF memory card in my camera, than a 512MB fingertip sized memory card.

      And Sony, please stop already trying to produce your proprietary memory cards. No one cares about your cards and you are frustrating consumers.

    10. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by cameldrv · · Score: 1

      He probably means the microtac -- which was before the startac.

    11. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Plus most CompactFlash cards have metal in the casing to make it more rigid, and the edges are plastic welded together instead of glued. If you put an SD card in the sun the two sides seperate and you have to glue them back together. No such problems with CF.

    12. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      not only that, there is already the miniSD format for phones etc.

    13. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1
      For me, it's CompactFlash. Maybe that's just the one I imprinted with, but to me the SD cards look so skinny I'm afraid of them getting bent too easily.

      CF cards have a nice, solid feel to them. I don't feel afraid to toss one onto my desk lest it get broken or lost, yet you can still fit plenty of them in your pocket at once.

      Same here. I like CF, and feel like I'd probably drop anything smaller. Especially if I want to take pictures outside when it's cold.

      Tim

    14. Re:The incredible shrinking flashcard by putaro · · Score: 1

      That's what comes from not going to McDonald's so much.

  9. Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    - Smart Media Card
    - XD Card
    - Compact Flash I
    - Compact Flash II
    - Micro Drive
    - Secure Digital
    - MMC card
    - MMC II card
    - RS-MMC card
    - Memory Stick card
    - MS Pro
    - MS MG Card
    - MS MG Pro Card
    - MS Duo
    - MS MG Duo
    - MS Pro Duo
    - MS MG Pro Duo
    - UTMA Fish Card

    aren't standards great
    just as long as it's MY standard of course

    1. Re:Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from.
      -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

    2. Re:Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current list of formats that work with all modern personal computers (without requiring a special adapter):

      - USB Flash Drives

      We don't need another standard. We need to get camera manufacturers, et al., to accept USB devices for flash memory purposes.

    3. Re:Current list of formats by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Yes, and all the Memory Stick formats are only used by Sony, XD is only used by Olympus and Fuji, Smart Media isn't used by anyone (except me, I have an old Olympus camera), CompactFlash and Micro Drive are compatible, Secure Digital and MMC are compatible. UTMA I've never heard of. That narrows it down quite a bit:

      Memory Stick
      CF/MD
      SD/MMC
      XD

      Two of which, CF/MD and SD/MMC, were used by the vast majority of cameras and other devices last time I checked.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dont forget TransFlash

      128mb the in less than 1cm squared in my phone :) ...but id rather see 10Gb solid state memory and a real operating system on a usable device than another nock off memory format. People really need to stop buying this sort of thing and then they wouldnt make it

    5. Re:Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should check your "facts" again before you wite nonsense! MemoryStick has about 600 supporting companies, and is the second larges flash memory system in the world.

      MemoryStick actually passed Compact Flash back in 2003, only the Matshushita SD format is bigger.

      For a list of supporting companies and electronics gear using MS, you can check the official http://www.memorystick.com/en/index.html or the http://www.memorystick.org/ sites.

    6. Re:Current list of formats by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The problem with that listing is that you are listing all sub-variants even if they are compatible. Memory Stick is Memory Stick to me. I don't see the point in listing the "Pro" as that is mostly a speed rating than anything else, it doesn't change the interface or physical spec that I know about.

      Compact Flash II and Microdrive are basically the same form factor and interface, only the storage means is different, and IIRC, isn't relevant from the device point of view.

      I would call Smart Media a dead-end, it just didn't scale in capacity. The only reason to keep it around in readers is for legacy devices.

    7. Re:Current list of formats by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I have the Fuji S7000, it allows tho use of xD cards up to 512meg and at the same time allows me to use CF cards Type 1 and 2. 3 Formats for my camera! I still need a card reader however, my dad's camera uses SD, doh!

    8. Re:Current list of formats by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Too big too bulky - CF is great for cameras.

    9. Re:Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PQI makes ones that are smaller than you'd believe. I just got a 512MB USB 2.0 one for under $50 and it works better than any previous USB flash drive I've tried (on both Mac and PC). All my family's cameras are CF (various elphs). But if I could I would choose this over CF. (Here's a review.)

    10. Re:Current list of formats by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Secure Digital and MMC are compatible

      Actually, no. SD and MMC are completely incompatible. Their physical formfactors are different, even (SD is thicker). SD has more pins than MMC also (SD has 11, MMC 9). And they're from two different groups, too (MMC and SD Association, I believe). And yes, the command sets are different - the controller sends an invalid MMC command (but valid SD) to check if there's an SD card present.

      The only reason they call it an SD/MMC slot is because the SD association made it a requirement that SD slots accept MMC cards. But MMC has no such requirement. So SD cards may get jammed into an MMC slot (and not work), but it works the other way around. Luckily, there aren't many MMC-only slots around.

    11. Re:Current list of formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The normal MemoryStick has a serial interface while the PRO has a parallel. PRO gear can use both types, but regular MS equipment can NOT use PRO media.

      Both types can be had with or without encryption/drm (aka MagicGate) and is available in both physical form factors (regualar or mini (aka "duo")).

      The old MemoryStick format has an upper limit of 128 MiB, and the new PRO format can
      be found with more expensive ultra high-speed flash-memory (just like most other types of flash-card-types).

    12. Re:Current list of formats by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Current list of formats that work with all modern personal computers (without requiring a special adapter):

      - USB Flash Drives


      You obviously haven't used many of them. I have a friend whose line of work involves moving data between many machines in many locations, and as a result he owns a frighteningly huge pile of removable media devices. I'd say his USB drives manage about a 75% success rate without installing drivers under both XP and MacOS. On the other hand, CF and CF2 are running 100% (because they're basically just IDE, as far as I know -- could be wrong, but there only appears to be a single resistor on my CF-to-IDE adaptor card).

      I also tend to think USB must be processing-intensive for the "host" device, since there aren't any non-PC electronics out there with USB ports (such as cameras).

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  10. Stop complaining! by lemonylimey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With digicams heading towards 14 megapixels, I can see the need for faster data storage (ever waited for a 60mb RAW file to save to a CF card?), and introducing something that combines backwards compatibilty with SD/MMC cards and native USB2.0 support (No more card readers, just an adaptor cable, or possibly even a set of built-in contacts like the new SD/USB cards.) seems like a suspiciously common-sense approach.

    1. Re:Stop complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14 megapixel camera will produce 21MB RAW image (12 bits per pixel).

    2. Re:Stop complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 bits per pixel is only 4096 colours! I think 24 or even 32 bits is more what you need in a digital camera, especially a high end 14 megapixel one.

    3. Re:Stop complaining! by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      The Canon EOS 1Ds MkII is a 17 megapixel camera. But there are also cameras out there which are way past that, they are 22 megapixels (they are digital backs however). www.phaseone.com

    4. Re:Stop complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each pixel is Red, Green, or Blue. So you have 12x3 = 36 bits per color pixel output.

    5. Re:Stop complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CCD raw != normal image file

      camera CCDs only capture one channel (out of RGB) per pixel. interpolation is used to fill in the rest by saving the CCD raw this step can be moved to after download.

    6. Re:Stop complaining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 60 milli-bit file shouldn't take that long to save.

  11. Comparison to MMC... by sH4RD · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that C-One compares the size of this card to the MM card. It almsot seems like the death knell is sounding already. MMC died, this has no backing from popular, trusted media manufactures (Pretec....did you ever buy anything made by them? I've never even seen them around here before). I mean, who cares if it's great, if it doesn't have the backing to bring it to the mainstream market? It's going to take one big format endorsed by all media manufactures, all camera makers, and all digital device makers to create a single standard. And for one innovation needs to stop for awhile. How can we possibly agree on a standard if something better comes out in 6 months?

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
  12. converged memories by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm generally happy with the convergence of these flash devices with one another. It looks like we'll eventually have two: USB and MMC - this MFlash does both. CompactFlash sockets can be filled with CF/MMC adapters. With the exception of the Sony (proprietary) Memory Stick - though Sony has started including both CF and MS sockets in top of the line gear, like their F-818 camera. Sony should release a CF MemoryStick socket. If eventually the Flash formats settle down the way floppy media formats did in the 1980s, we'll all benefit from the defragmented markets, economies of unified scale, and interop.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:converged memories by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      That might be hard, as Memory Sticks and Memory Stick Pro cards are longer than CF cards any way you look at it, so the memory stick would stick 1/2" (about 1 cm) out of the card slot. Not to mention that everyone uses a different transfer protocol, so they would have to design, build, and power through CF a MS to PIO converter.

    2. Re:converged memories by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

      Ahh, would that be a benefit in the same way consumers benefit from having a converged operating systems market?

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    3. Re:converged memories by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Manufacturers don't seem to have a problem with the cards sticking out of the adapters. None of these formats require force on the outer end to mount the cards, so they don't need to be enclosed (though it keeps them cleaner - a generous capacity at the end with a spring or foam would work). A MS/PIO ASIC, powered by the CF port, sounds like a $25 one-shot adapter purchase. And profitable, too, as everyone holding incompatible memory types converges with that tool.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:converged memories by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      So long as the technology is converged on universal interop standards, without monopolies ownership of the products, yes. Like in Linux: many vendors, one tech standard (more or less). When the LSB is more common, with filesystem structure interop (maybe through symlink overlays), Linux will be a perfect example. Even more perfect is web services, where the network is the computer, and the web services constitute the OS, with the underlying OS the drivers for the HW on which a given instance runs. A converged market is not the same as a monopoly marketer - it happens to benefit everyone, including the marketers, though not as much as a monopoly marketer can benefit from unfair competition, in their fragment of a market.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:converged memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The propietary MemoryStick? Do you really think Matshushita's SD-cards are less proprietary?

      MemoryStick has around 600 supporting companies and is the second largest flash-card standard (it passed CompactFlash sales in Japan and USA back in 2003). There are loads of devices using MemoryStick : http://www.memorystick.com/en/index.html

      In fact, with the new Portable Playstation (PSP) using MemoryStick for game saves, movies, mp3 etc - demand for large MemorySticks will get an enormous boost. All PSP owners will need to own at least one MS card, and projected sales of the PSP is 10 million units just this year.

      The CF slot on the prosumer F-828 camera is an exception, and is NOT a general Sony trend.

      In fact CF is a dying format, just as SmartMedia, and MemoryStick and SD-card variants are the two winners.

    6. Re:converged memories by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Does anyone but Sony make a Memory Stick? That's what proprietary means. Lots of PC makers run Windows, but only Microsoft makes it: proprietary. If Matsushita's SD card is compatible with SanDisk's, it's not proprietary *technology*, though of course their implementation might be patented and proprietary. Who cares, if it works?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:converged memories by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      The propietary MemoryStick? Do you really think Matshushita's SD-cards are less proprietary?

      Yes, I do.
      Do you know why? Because last I checked, MS in any of its 8 yummy flavors, costs at least 150% of SD. Because it's only used in a precious few Sony and Konica cameras, and every one of Sony's devices (TV's, etc). Just because they were able to bribe others into using it in the last couple years, don't pretend it's some sort of open standard. SD is used by the rest of the industry. Canon, Nikon--they're the ones to watch in that market. What do they use? SD. Look at PocketPC and Palm: (Except Sony) Those manufacturers use SD too. How about portable audio? Once again, Except Sony, pretty much all removable storage there is SD too. Remind me now, why would I want to buy anything with MS in it? So I can be locked in to Sony's high prices, DRM, and a new, incompatible MS "standard" every six months?? As far as I'm concerned, MS, XD, and all their variants are no more of a "standard" for data storage than a Playstation memory card.

    8. Re:converged memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you actually bother to check the provided link? As the post said, there are around 600 supporting companies, and serveal that actually make MemoryStick compatible flash cards.

      I have both a 256 MiB Lexar MemoryStick PRO and a 128 MiB SanDisk MemoryStick for my digital camera.

      In fact the MemoryStick PRO specification was a joint developement between SanDisk and Sony :)

    9. Re:converged memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree MS are more expensive, but price don't make it proprietary!

      And what about new "incompatible" standard every six months?

      There are only two types of MemoryStick, the old serial MemoryStick type maxing out at 128 MiB and the new paralell interfaced MemoryStick PRO.

      You can get either type with or without encryption/DRM (aka MagicGate) if you choose.

      They are also available in two physical sizes, regular or tiny (aka "duo"), just as SD-card also come in a small "Mini SD" variant.

      And while Sony media is quite expensive, you could just buy cheaper Lexar or SanDisk.

      A 512 MiB MS-PRO-DUO from SanDisc cost 537 NOK in Norway while a similar sized mini SD fro SanDisk cost 455 NOK.

    10. Re:converged memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The higher prices of MS and XD could just be the result of a lower total sale. Last year SD sold around 30 mio cards in Japan, while MS sold 22.4 mio and XD sold 11 mio (XD is the most expensive of the three).

      I don't see why Canon and Nikon are the ones to watch either, as Sony and Canon are the digital camera market leaders with equal shares each.

      Btw - Samsung also use MemoryStick in some of their cameras, mobiles and dv cams - and they also produce media.

    11. Re:converged memories by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, I checked. I couldn't tell from their list which companies make MS, and which of those aren't making it under a licensed patent (merely outsourced manufacturing for Sony), vs any independent developers according to an unencumbered spec. In fact the SanDisk/Song JV you seem to like is exactly the kind of noncompetition among MS vendors I'm talking about. If there were real competition, at least one vendor would probably yield to the economic attraction of a MS/CD or /SD adapter product. So until I learn about some actual competition with Sony within the Memory Stick world, I'll remain unconvinced.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  13. sd card compatibility by sometwo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The palm boulevard article says special drivers maybe needed for existing sd card readers. I guess this won't be working in my digital camera anytime soon.

    Also I think it's pronounced Micro-card.

  14. Yet Another Single-Letter Prefix by ChipMonk · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news, Motorola sued several Taiwan-based manufacturers for using the prefix "M-". Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple, was heard to say, "What do we care? We use 'i', not 'M-'."

  15. Pretec by Zocalo · · Score: 1

    The Pretec brandname has been around for a while and their products are often found at the leading edge of memory technology rather than the mainstream. I guess there is money to be made in targetting the niche sector that *really* needs high capacities in single cards like the 12GB CompactFlash card that they make. As the linked article says, you could get the same amount of storage in three cards for a tenth of the price, but if you have no choice...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  16. M-Flash by demon_2k · · Score: 1

    Competition is good...
    All the current flash memory is pretty much the some. If M-flash will be everything it promises to be it should cause a drop in costs of flash storage.

    1. Re:M-Flash by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I just bought a Toshiba 512M SD card for $35 out the door (ok I had a $15 coupon, it was $50 to start) and I still haven't decided if I will send in the $20 Mail In Rebate ... bringing the net cost for a 512M SD card down to about $15. How much cheaper can it get?

      Oh yea, no fair quoting me on that last line a decade from now ala '640k ought to be enough for anybody'.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:M-Flash by demon_2k · · Score: 1

      Ok, you got yours for cheap. Great, good on you.
      I however live in Australia. these things aren't that cheap here.

  17. Nice, more compact memory... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...now run Linux from it and I'll be happy.

    Seriously, it does suck that so many formats exist. <pun>At least hard drive formats aren't so fragmented yet.</pun>

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  18. Dude... the NOT jokes died with the 90's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...NOT!!! NOT!!!

  19. eh ? by selderrr · · Score: 3, Informative

    it will transfer data at twice the speed of USB 2.0

    Is that even possible ? Would any properly certified USB host-controller not be limited to USB2 speeds, unless they also force you to buy a PCI card that is M-whatever compatible ?

    1. Re:eh ? by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      They didn't say it would do so over USB, just over it;s own bus. When connected (via adapter) to USB, it would be limited by that bus speed.

    2. Re:eh ? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that, while the USB controllers in PC's won't be able to read and write at 960Mb/s, hopefully the card writers built into cameras don't need to be so standards-based. Who needs a buffer if the camera can write to the card as fast as you can take pictures?

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  20. Smaller AGAIN? by zerocircle · · Score: 4, Funny

    2/3 the size of existing formats? Do we need this? We're already in danger of accidentally inhaling these things or losing them between the ridges of our fingerprints. Jeez, I must have a terabyte lodged in various spots, slowly sloughing off with the dust.

  21. Re:Open Standards and Compatibility are A GOOD THI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, using USB is smart. If they keep up the good work and use a standard USB Mass Storage function, we get *nix compatibility for free, right from the start. (The card reader would simply look like a 1-port hub to the computer.)

  22. The best thing about standards ... by Vollernurd · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is that there's so many of them. Ack.

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    1. Re:The best thing about standards ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Copycat proprietary technology pfffft. Id rather have reliability and dependability.

      Id like to be able to buy compatible portable memory that was designed properly for 10 years without having to think, not all this come and go rubbish that means next year you have to buy mem stick, and the year after transflash...

  23. Awesome! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

    I was just saying to a friend of mine that what I REALLy wanted to see in 2005 was a new flash memory card format introduced that was smaller than SD.

    Do you know I can only carry two or three thousand SD cards with me at any one time? I'm glad to see someone's working on alleviating this huge problem.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  24. Uh...how? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

    and allows for devices 2/3 the size of existing MMC products...it has been designed to be compatible with the existing SD/MMC format at reduced speeds.

    I presume we won't see the improvements in device size until they drop the MMC backwards-compatibility.

    --
    ± 29 dB
  25. In Other news by Anm · · Score: 1

    Marketing firm A-Name announces the trendiest product or company naming sceme of 2005 is going to be a letter prepended to a single syllable.

  26. aka by UnRDJ · · Score: 1

    YAFMF

  27. F-Mat by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    I-Think this new T-Mark F-Mat is F-King Stoo-Pid.

  28. Lessons in standard you pay for by augustz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some interesting lessons here in standards one pays for.

    You'll all remember the cell phone wars. While the rest of world used GSM, american carriers, looking for a competitive advantage and patent royalities, and certainly unwilling to pay royalties to their competitors, got going with CDMA and TDMA to name a few of the schemes. While technically superior perhaps, one ends up with a fragemented market. What's interesting to see is the recent moves to GSM even in the US.

    Memory cards, the same thing. If there was a true, open standard without payments (but with optional certification) a la USB, I don't think you'd see the number of flash memory formats poping up that we have been. Instead, sony pulled another ATRAC stunt with their memory stick, and other manufacturers and devices developers played in their own camps.

    Short term gain for long term pain, my computer must have 5 or six slots for flash memory!

    Here's the Ahha moment for USB (after the HCI/OHCI stuff). "On the second version of USB, we looked at how we could learn from the first round, and we decided that it was better for the industry for there to be one spec that was available to everybody," said Jason Ziller, an Intel technology initiatives manager.

    1. Re:Lessons in standard you pay for by paulkoan · · Score: 1


      CDMA is a superior tech to GSM, and yet GSM networks seem to work so much better than CDMA.

      Can anyone explain why that is?

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Lessons in standard you pay for by augustz · · Score: 1

      Assume you have a superior tech, but only a few providers can use it. So you have better tech, but it's only in 40% of possible cell sites.

      Then you have the inferior tech, but it is in 80% of possible cell sites. The perceived performance of the inferior tech starts to look pretty good.

      CDMA is technically superior, but GSM has got something like a million users. Worldwide, if you traveled, you would likely be able to use your same GSM phone in Europe, but your CDMA phone wouldn't get much coverage.

  29. next generation flash by chipace · · Score: 1

    I'm not expecting to see m-flash in cameras or pdas anythime soon, but they may appear in DOKs (Disk On Key) very soon. For greatest compatibility, the USB interface would have to be compatible with the generic driver that windows/linux/macs use. Additionally, I'm not sure if they will have on-chip ESD and pad drivers necessary for driving cables (significant external components may still be neccessary).

    If they were twice as fast as the present DOKs (12MByte/s reads? 10MByte/s writes), that would allow them to approach 2.5inch disk performance (and have smaller access time).

  30. Trademark Infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University of Michigan calls student ID cards Mcard. They both store information. . . how long until a lawsuit?

  31. M-cards by thedillybar · · Score: 1

    Old news, I got my M-Card from the University of Michigan years ago...

  32. xD Format Royalties and 1GB xD Card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other day I was wondering why n-in-1 USB card readers that supported the xD format were so bloody expensive when compared to their non-xD brothers and sisters. It didn't take long to come to the conclusion that it must cost more to license xD than other formats, otherwise, the price disparity wouldn't make much sense to anyone.

    Sure enough, after looking into it, there is a royalty that one has to pay to use the xD connector. On this site there's a blurb that reads under the "Media Cards" sub-heading:

    Of these cards, only the last one has a royalty charged for the use of the connector. As our contact stated - the IP holders have finally gotten it right not to charge those seeking to be able to accept their media on products the OEM designs. In the case of the XD Picture Card, the royalties were characterized as "high."

    Here's some information you can get here on the new 1GB xD card:

    The ultra-compact xD-Picture Card will have a 1GB version early in 2005, according to Fuji Photo Film and Olympus, which have jointly developed the new addition.

    Dubbed the M1GB, the 'M' stands for 'Multi Level Cell', a new high-density flash memory technology. MLC purportedly offers a capacity potential of up to 8GB. The mini cards measure just 20mm x 25mm x 1.7mm.

    While such storage in such a small dimension would once have been considered fantastic, the need for greater capacity is being driven by the higher resolution offered by multi-mega pixel digital cameras.

    The xD-Picture Card was launched in September 2002.

  33. Ignore it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore it and it will go away. CF is the only portable that we need. All high end camera's use it and that is all that matters.

  34. Now you see the secret of Bayer cameras by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    12 bits per pixel is only 4096 colours! I think 24 or even 32 bits is more what you need in a digital camera, especially a high end 14 megapixel one.

    If you were talking about a normal image, you'd be correct.

    But because Bayer sensors are all whatever the MP rating is with a giant color filter array in front of them, you are really capturing a greyscale image - with each pixel being greyscae of a certain spectrum (like Red, Green, Blue, or in Sony's case also Cyan).

    You would be correct if you were talking about an image from a Foveon sensor, that has RGB layers per pixel to capture full image data. So a foveon pixel is really 12x3 or 36 bytes (which it what you were expecting).

    Thus the controversy between current Foveon camers being 3.$MP. or 10MP (since they have as many photosensors as other 10MP bayer cameras would have).

    But it does go to show how much an illusion the MP rating is when you are really subdivinging and then interpolating to get the final result. It's nothing like how you think of images in Photoshop.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. Pfft, 21-in-1 by yem · · Score: 1

    And you thought the DVD+/-R debacle was silly..

    http://www.usbgeek.com/prod_detail.php?prod_id=020 6

    • CF-Type I, CF-Type II, CF-Ultra II
    • Micro Drive
    • SD, SD-Ultra, SDC, Mini SD
    • MMC, HS-MMC, RS-MMC
    • MS, MS(MG), MS-Pro, HS-MS-Pro, MS-Duo, MS-Pro Duo, HS-MS-Pro Duo
    • SM
    • X Card
    • T-Flash


    --
    No, I did not read the f***ing article!
  36. press release link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the press release about the read and write speeds...

    Jan 2005 demo at CES: 25MByte/s read

    End of year expectations: 40MByte/s read 20MByte/s write (products having upto 8GBytes of storage).

    http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/050107/66061_1.html

  37. 22-in-1 by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    Mine has more!

    http://www.photoscala.com/node/view/619

    CF (type I & II), Microdrive, SD, SM, MM, Memory Stick, Memory Stick MagicGate, Memory Stick Select, Memory Stick Duo, Memory Stick Duo MagicGate, Memory Stick Pro, Memory Stick Pro MagicGate, Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro Duo MagicGate, xD, MagicStore, MMC 4.0, RS-MMC, RS-MMC 4.0, Mini-SD.

  38. GEE I DUNNO! EMAIL ME WHEN YOU FIND OUT. by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    asshole.

  39. jesus, read the damned article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you didnt even make it to the bottom of the fucking description before you hit the reply button... come on.

  40. tasty CF dog chews by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

    Had a dog chew on a CF card. Found it dirty on the floor with obvious teeth marks in the corner. And it still worked. At least it was only a 16MB freebie.

    Id like to see any of those exposed terminal plate cards taking even remotely the same beating.

  41. What's wrong with CF ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    CF is a parrallell interface that's effectively a miniaturized ISA slot. While the CF cards themselves aren't very big ... the connectors are HUGE!!!!

    Memory transfer rates on CF cards are limited. So as media sizes increase, the devices themselves will become an impedement to video and floppy replacement applications.

    I expect that we'll eventually see a CF replacement (still capable of housing a micro-drive) based on PCI Express.

    Sony seems to be doing just fine with it's card. It's a proprietary format. But so is SD/MMC, and Memcard and xD.

    Until PCIExpress/Express Card permeates the laptop market, we probably won't see a proper open standard successor to Compact Flash.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  42. ExpressCard ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    For professional cameras, you may see the smaller Expresscard interface. Those big hulks are big enough to support the "stick".

    Either this, or you will see a local wireless network where storage is worn in a bag or on a belt, the camera has enough fast memory to cache the images while they're being transferred.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  43. Don't blame Sony ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    The ONLY memory format that is open is Compact Flash. Sony is JUST LIKE everybody else.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  44. Compact Flash ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    CompactFlash is a miniaturized ISA slot.

    There are TWO types of CF. Type 1 and Type 2. Type 2 is slightly thicker to accomodate a Micordrive.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!