Slashdot Mirror


Dolphin Jumps Again with Artificial Fin

Ant writes "This Yahoo! News story mentions Fuji, a mother dolphin that lost 75 percent of her tail due to a mysterious disease, being able to jump again with the help of what is believed to be the world's first artificial fin. The 34-year-old dolphin held at Japan's largest aquarium in the southern island of Okinawa wears the rubber fin for about 20 minutes a day allowing her to jump and to swim at the same speed of other dolphins."

256 comments

  1. First post by murraythegreat · · Score: 1, Funny

    If we don't stop the dolphins now we'll be overrun with evil cyborg dolphins

    --
    See your sig here
    1. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware of the evil cyborg dophins with lasers !

  2. I'm curious by pymerej · · Score: 0

    I'm curious how many more animals need prosthetics?

    1. Re:I'm curious by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm curious how many more animals need prosthetics?"

      I saw a titmouse once. It didn't have any, well uhm... you know.

    2. Re:I'm curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you extend 'animal' cover corporate executives lots, every exec I ever met need an EMPU (Emotion Processing Unit). Of course comparing executives to animals is an insult... to animals.

    3. Re:I'm curious by soulee · · Score: 1

      I work in the human prosthetic business, but have seen and heard of quite a few prosthetics used on animals, including mostly horses and dogs. They tend to be more on the functional side rather than cosmetic. But they do exist. There doesn't seem to be a certain profession for animal prosthetics. Most often it is either prosthetist or engineers creating them for pet owners. But it's nice to see the development of such devices and the publicity is always good for the industry.

  3. First Porpoise! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny

    First Porpoise!

  4. Oh great ... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not looking forward to artificial fin chunks in my Tuna sandwich

    1. Re:Oh great ... by Nahor · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking forward to any kind of fin chunks in my Tuna. Only the meat part interest me.

    2. Re:Oh great ... by rcbaxter · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking forward to artificial fin chunks in my Chicken casserole.

  5. Hmmm... by MonoSynth · · Score: 5, Funny

    I expected that dolphin to be red with 'Marlboro', 'Shell' and 'Vodafone' painted on its other fins...

    1. Re:Hmmm... by DigitumDei · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why do I see bridgestone using this in ads promoting their traction in the wet...

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Marlboro or Shell advertise so much? I think we are more likely to see Yonsama's face on the fin.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      That's the best idea I've ever heard.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Now seaworld and all these aquariums will be filled with EA-turtles and M$ Squid. But they'll all be OEMed under Dell animals.

  6. I for one, welcome... by felonius+maximus · · Score: 5, Funny

    our bionic dolphin masters.

    1. Re:I for one, welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who thinks this joked stopped being funny at least three months ago? I mean, the joke itself has got to be 10 years old, and that's an incredible shelf life, but it's dead now, and it's time we stopped fucking its corpse. Thank you.

      Posting AC because I hate it when people complain about moderation too.

    2. Re:I for one, welcome... by databyss · · Score: 1

      IN SOVIET RUSSIA bad jokes get sick of YOU!

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  7. Re:Really now. by BuzzLY · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear they taste just like tuna...

  8. Dolphins eat rubber? by xmas2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was confused by this statement in the article - " The breeders decided not to keep Fuji's fin on all day fearing that it may fall off and be eaten or destroyed by other dolphins." - I've read that sharks will eat just about anything, but do dolphins eat rubber?

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    1. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny
      "I've read that sharks will eat just about anything, but do dolphins eat rubber?"
      • I'm only going to say this once ...


      • Rock beats scissors
        Paper covers rock
        Scissors cuts paper
        Dolphin eats plastic

        Got it?
    2. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      So you're guy who released this horror into the world!

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    3. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      Got it - so never play RoShamBo with a dolphin!

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    4. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by MrPrefect · · Score: 1

      well that link didn't work too well, and apparently the page it sent me to called you a cheap bastard for hotlinking to them.. haha

    5. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by magarity · · Score: 1

      The breeders decided not to keep Fuji's fin on all day

      I feel sorry for this unfortunate animal who certainly has no concept of artifical limbs or amputation to prevent the spread of disease. All it knows is that it can't normally swim and these landlubber mammals come along and fiddle with its back end, it can swim again for all of 20 minutes, then the sadistic bastards do something to take swimming away again. This is like the double or triple amputee dogs who drag themselves around in little carts. IMO it's a selfish act of self indulgence on the part of the humans. Mod me down if you will, but I think it's cruel to the animals.

    6. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      Funny; the site berates us for wasting their bandwidth by hotlinking, yet it uses a 49 KB image to do so.

    7. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that it's because dolphins, as social animals, aren't nice to freaks, and would probably harass her and her new toy, even to the point of destroying it.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    8. Re:Dolphins eat rubber? by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      That could explain why their skin feels kinda rubbery.

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  9. Artifical foot? by Poltras · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder where we are in bio research, getting humans able to walk, run, jump at the speed of other humans.

    1. Re:Artifical foot? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      every year there are a few people with artificial legs at the boston marathon.

      and these people can run faster than the typical human. but not fast enough to win, some really thin guy from kenya always does that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Artifical foot? by Poltras · · Score: 1
      Thanks. At the very least, it recomforts me to know that there is some good developments regarding this.

      Sometimes I wonder what's more important: doing something that is easy, or doing something that's useful... we have to admit that giving an artificial fin to a dolphin brings nothing important to humankind, except maybe entertainment.

    3. Re:Artifical foot? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dont think we have to admit that at all. The same science is being used to improve the quality of the very thing you're moaning about: prosthetics for humans. Its extremely complicated to design flexible materials that respond like types of flesh, and this is all part of the progress. Its disapointing, especially on Slashdot, to see people who don't realize that research isn't a straight line. Research is a branching tree, with some branches rejoining the main trunk, where distal improvements often reintegrate to improve the main research.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    4. Re:Artifical foot? by danila · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Andrew Lourake is an American jet pilot, who had his leg amputeed in 1998. Now he has a C-Leg and in October 2004 he returned to his job. He works for the federal government carrying government officials, congressmen and the like in the C-20 Gulfstream. During the training his performance during some exercises (saving passengers from a burning plane after a crash, for example) was better than that of two healthy novice pilots training together with him.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    5. Re:Artifical foot? by vul7ure · · Score: 0

      nothing important to humankind but something very important to a dolphin - the ability to move like any other dolphin

      --
      waiting, just waiting...
    6. Re:Artifical foot? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Not that I ever fook forward to loosing my lower legs, but if I do I can think of a few possible alternatives to traditional prostetics... Why try to restore natural function when you can have something better?

      =Smidge=

    7. Re:Artifical foot? by WhatsAProGingrass · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen the guy that skateboards with an artificial leg? I believe his name is Jon Comer. I can't find any links, but i've seen video of it and he is really good at it. Better than most humans.

      --
      Mark
    8. Re:Artifical foot? by CreatureComfort · · Score: 4, Interesting


      In the current Survivor:Vanuatu one of the contestants has an artificial lower leg. He is one of the best competitors in the physical challenges. The only test that he seems to have a bit more trouble than the others in is walking a narrow balance beam. He was voted off last night after 29(?) days and making it to the final 8.

      Depending on whether you believe they actually live in that shelter on the beach for 39 days when the cameras aren't turned on or not, his leg doesn't seem to be having any trouble with the salt water, sand, dirt, etc. I'm actually very interested in seeing some interviews with him after the show ends on some of the particular problems he faced with it.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    9. Re:Artifical foot? by CreatureComfort · · Score: 2, Funny


      Maybe I should have posted AC, and not admitted to watching the show...

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    10. Re:Artifical foot? by TigerNut · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's quite a bit going on both in the academic world and by prosthetics manufacturers. One of the bigger struggles is getting an amputee a prosthetic that's suitable for what they're going to be doing - a foot optimized for running looks a lot different from a foot that's designed to look like a foot and that you'd wear with ordinary footwear.
      Without turning this into a shill for our products, the company I work for makes an inertial-sensor based activity monitor that helps doctors choose an appropriate prosthetic depending on the patient's activity profile. This is one of our customers

      --

      Less is more.

    11. Re:Artifical foot? by Poltras · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I realize this. I understand a certain extent of this: what you describe is not a branching tree, it's a graph of cooperation between researchers and centers.

      Problem is, to me, that most of the time people base their research subject on how much it can brings in terms of money/entertainment, instead of what improvement it can brings to our lives/evolution.

      I understand your frustation, but what I wanted to point out is that, mysteriouly, a slashdot post about a dolphin was on first page, but there is rarely an update about human research topic. Not that I don't care about the dolphin, but we should give more importance to what concerns us, somehow.

      not sure if my point is clear :P Gotta sleep. Or more coffee.
    12. Re:Artifical foot? by blahlemon · · Score: 1
      You don't think this is useful? What if that dolphin dies early because it's not able to get to it's food? The article mentions that without the fin it could still swim but very slowly.

      I think it's an incredible gesture that they cared enough about the dolphins well being to have this fin made.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    13. Re:Artifical foot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current issue of Runner's World Magazine has a picture of a lady with one artificial leg on the cover. She does triathlons, and has to change legs 4 times for a race (a swim leg, a run leg to get to her bike, a bike leg, and the run leg again.)

    14. Re:Artifical foot? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      I don't want to walk, run and jump at the speeds of other humans. I want SUPERHUMAN abilities. Someone slap some doctor octopus arms on me, yeah baby! No more fumbling for keys and groceries when I get home from work! No more having to take my hands off the keyboard to get a drink... or use the mouse... No more trying to contain million-degree balls of plasma with my bare hands! I'd do it in a heartbeat!

      Also, want to be able to see into infra-red.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    15. Re:Artifical foot? by Kerstyun · · Score: 1, Funny
      a branching tree, with some branches rejoining the main trunk
      Hey, leave mah famly out of it, y'hear!
      --
      Keep the whitehouse white, vote Trump & Palin 2020.
    16. Re:Artifical foot? by Kerstyun · · Score: 0
      She does triathlons, and has to change legs 4 times for a race (a swim leg, a run leg to get to her bike, a bike leg, and the run leg again.)
      How far frem the water to the bike? Couldn't she just hop?
      --
      Keep the whitehouse white, vote Trump & Palin 2020.
    17. Re:Artifical foot? by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      When you have a physical disability, you don't spend much of your time imagining superhuman compensations. You spend your time trying to cope with the nasty limitations real life gives you. Instead of imagining super-vision, you imagine being able to see normally so you can drive. It might not be the inspiration for comic book heroes, but it fits those loved ones I know who are impaired.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    18. Re:Artifical foot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It varies by course. Some small triathlons it's less than 50 yards, at large IronMan length ones (she recently completed IronMan Hawaii, and was the first leg amputee to do so) it can be upwards of 1/4 mile. Quite a ways to hop, especially after swimming for 2.4 miles.

    19. Re:Artifical foot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Problem is, to me, that most of the time people base their research subject on how much it can brings in terms of money/entertainment, instead of what improvement it can brings to our lives/evolution."

      Um, entertainment is an improvement to our lives. We would not spend so much money on it were this not so.

    20. Re:Artifical foot? by jd · · Score: 1

      In World War II, there was an RAF Spitfire pilot who continued to fly (and dogfight) after losing both legs. Either they guy was extremely brave or totally nuts. My guess is both.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    21. Re:Artifical foot? by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should have posted AC, and not admitted to watching the show

      Your followup is just as interesting as your parent post. I'm curious.. why should you be ashamed of watching a this TV show or just this show in particular?

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    22. Re:Artifical foot? by danila · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is that then it was considered an extraordinary accomplishment, a heroic act, but nowadays it's just the matter of persuading your insurance company to foot the bill. Wonders of progress.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    23. Re:Artifical foot? by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Curious, you find money and improvements in life to be mutually exclusive?

      I always thought they went hand in hand. People find a "need", and fill it. Some do it for free, most do it for profit.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    24. Re:Artifical foot? by Mignon · · Score: 1
      ... after losing both legs. Either they guy was extremely brave or totally nuts.

      Below the waist, I'd guess he was totally nuts.

    25. Re:Artifical foot? by felonius+maximus · · Score: 1
      When our shop moved house about 3 years ago, we had a bloke helping us called Andrew (I think). Only one of his legs was grown by him.

      He was fucking amazing - he ran up the stairs, faster than anyone else, whilst carrying boxes full of stock.

      I'm quite surprised the company didn't give him the job he was trying to get, as he was one of the hardest workers I've ever seen.

  10. Ob Austin Powers... by mhayenga · · Score: 3, Funny

    I ASKED for FREAKING LAZERS damnit... Whats a guy supposed to do around here?

    1. Re:Ob Austin Powers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe I had to scroll down so far to find this! I would've thought it would have been in the first pos... err, first porpoise.

    2. Re:Ob Austin Powers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's SHARKS with Frickin' Lasers

  11. really?? by joper90 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When she saw the artificial fin for the first time, she ran away - did they graft legs onto her first?

    1. Re:really?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was wearing Prof. Ogden Wernstrom's reverse scuba suit at the time.

  12. Mystery "disease"? by rdc_uk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. Re:Mystery "disease"? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 2, Informative
      While I agree with your point regarding wild dolphins, from the article:

      Fuji was stricken by a mysterious disease causing necrosis - the death of cells - in 2002. To save her life, veterinarians had to amputate three-quarters of her tail with an electronic surgical knife.

      So it sounds like it was done intentionally while in captivity.

    2. Re:Mystery "disease"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pull the doomed thing behind the shed out back and give it a lead pill.

    3. Re:Mystery "disease"? by AS400+Hacker · · Score: 1

      A dolphin that special, you don't eat all at once.

    4. Re:Mystery "disease"? by CurveBall · · Score: 1

      Read the article? Oh, you're new here. Welcome to Slashdot!

    5. Re:Mystery "disease"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point, which seems to have eluded some of the others who have replied, being that this instance was a matter of preserving an economic investment in the form of a trained amusement attraction.

      Japanese culture does not, as a whole, value dolphins as much other than a commodity, whether entertainment or food, though an article like this might lend a different impression at first glance.

    6. Re:Mystery "disease"? by Comrade_X · · Score: 0

      I am King Phallus XXXVIIII yay

      --
      Hello world :)
  13. Um... by felonius+maximus · · Score: 1
    "We make tires; we specialize in foots of sort. If we see offers, we will consider them,"

    ...I really would like a new pair of shoes, can you help me?

    1. Re:Um... by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      No, but if you need new arms I know a good second hand store....

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
    2. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "We make tires; we specialize in foots of sort."

      He continued: "Let's fighting love!"

  14. Feel goodism by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is less applicable being in a hman controlled environement. But I have to wonder if our attempts to "help" animals actually results in long-term harm. Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out. Perhaps we should do less to help animals.

    I will also temper my argument by saying that people need to stop intruding so much on animals' natural habitats so that they can have a healthy population that can rebound from the occasional disease or natural disaster.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Feel goodism by KrancHammer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, its not as if they went out and found a physically challenged wild dolphin, and laughing at Darwin, gave it an artificial fin. This was a captive dolphin that contracted a disease and lost some finnage. That's hardly a natural situation, and I don't think the long-term genetic health of the species will be affected.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    2. Re:Feel goodism by KrancHammer · · Score: 1

      Just read your first sentence, and saw you made
      the point about this being less applicable in a human controlled environment. My bad. Although I think your point is not just less applicable in that situation, but not applicable at all.

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    3. Re:Feel goodism by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out."

      Uhh... says who? I think you're taking that "survival of the fittest" a little too literally. There is no direction to evolution. In the long run it might be the case that the fittest survive most often, but this isn't necessarily the case on a per-individual scale.

      In any case, intelligent life has changed all this. Does this mean it's bad for evolution? No. It just means the "survival of the fittest" phrase needs some changing.

    4. Re:Feel goodism by DarkHand · · Score: 1

      But people are much more apt to help the dolphin... "Dolphins are so much cuter than hobos! Here, have some money."

    5. Re:Feel goodism by Random_Goblin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      from bridgestone's point of view though, they just got some excellent worldwide feel good PR and advertising for $95,000, cheap at twice the price...I can't find data on the price of F1 tires (mostly because Bridgestone refuses to discuss figures, usually a good sign you can't afford them!),but i wouldn't be at all suprised if it made 95k look like spare change

      not to mention they will have got some valuable research data from the experiment

      and while i might agree that saving one dolphin, is (pardon the pun) a drop in the ocean... it's a start. Dolphins are truely facinating creatures, very bright and with a primary sense (ultra sound) we are just begining to understand. It would be a great shame if they were all gone before we actually got to know them a bit more.

      and yes there is an element of "feel goodism" involved, but if that translates into more empathy for dolphins, ie NOT " euthanize the dolphin and go out and catch another one" then i for one am all for it.

    6. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you think of any other company (not charity) who would devote this kind of money to those things. I think this is a nice story, and a charitable thing from the tire company.

    7. Re:Feel goodism by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Yea, but right now it is "survival of the cutest animals that can gain a lot of public sympathy". When is the last time you heard of a public fundraiser for a warthog with a missing leg? Never. Why? They are ugly.

      Interjecting human selection into the mix is only going to be harmful to the ecosystem long term.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    8. Re:Feel goodism by vul7ure · · Score: 1

      same is appliable to humans...

      --
      waiting, just waiting...
    9. Re:Feel goodism by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but right now it is "survival of the cutest animals that can gain a lot of public sympathy".

      If that's how it is, that's how it is.

      "Interjecting human selection into the mix is only going to be harmful to the ecosystem long term."

      We are a product of evolution. Our actions are just a part of this aimless process. Your choice to set us apart because you believe disrupting the ecosystem is bad (as do I) doesn't change the meaning of evolution and doesn't give it purpose.

    10. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank god *someone* understands Darwinism. "Survival of the Fittest" is a damn phrase to mean a macro-genetic concept, not a catchphrase to justify letting things just die. Like the parent said, "intelligent life has changed all this." We use our brains and tools *instead* of evolving new biological constructs. Does that mean we're not evolving? No. We're just evolving along a different mode now, and just happen to be carrying other species along, for better or worse. Weak and strong are abstract concepts, each definition changing depending on the specifics involved. And to those of you who'll scream that Darwinian evolution depends on inheritance - what the hell do you think archiving data is about?! Just saving data for the sake of saving it? No.
      Evolution is a dynamic concept, people. Get with it, and stop using terms you don't fully understand.

    11. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Archive data, you will never in your life time be able to understand all that has take place. The man who has the most information in his brain may be the man who is killed in a car accident. The man who doesn't ride in cars will be the man who experiences less but lives longer. Survival is ultimately for the man who survives. You can be hit in head with a meteor. You can also die when your computer catches on fire while you're sleeping after being up for two days learning. You will never know all, but the strong will survive. Third degree burns could cause a man to die or a man to start a fight. The educated man will choose to die, while the strong man will choose to fight. When dolphins develop medecine to cure their diseases the will not need prostetics!

    12. Re:Feel goodism by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      It's a decent enough question, but I seriously doubt one artificial dolphin flipper has any effect at all on evolution. "Help" is a relative term of course and depends on your value system.

      For example, the US Park Service policy of putting out all forrest fires over the last many decades has resulted in a buildup of fuel for much more massive and devastating forrest fires. In "helping" forrests we've really hurt them.

      --
      AccountKiller
    13. Re:Feel goodism by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      That's hardly a natural situation, and I don't think the long-term genetic health of the species will be affected.


      Right, because humans exist outside of nature. While the fate of one dolphin is negligible in terms of evolution, humanity is part of nature. I've always found the "not natural" argument to be a fallacy that leads to wrong conclusions.

      --
      AccountKiller
    14. Re:Feel goodism by proggoddess · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't feel this way with respect to humans....

      --
      --The Programming goddess from Gorflaz
    15. Re:Feel goodism by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      If it is all aimless.... then why do you care enough to post about it? :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    16. Re:Feel goodism by forkazoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just remember that "the fittest" is defined as whoever survives in their environment. So, this particular dolphin may have a cuteness adaptation that makes humans want to help her. While that wouldn't be a benefit in a humanless ocean, she doesn't live in a humanless ocean. It doesn't make any sense trying to decide who is the fittest beforehand. That is trying to put a human value judgement on a natural process. You do what you do. They do what they do. No need to worry about evolution. It'll keep on going without us. It's like that.

    17. Re:Feel goodism by cavac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out.

      Well known but untrue. Although it's commonly refered as the "survival of the fittest" - which many people misunderstand as "survival of the strongest" - what modern science means is the "survival of the most adaptive". That is, species that can adapt fastest with the least amount of hazzle to changing environments and new illnesses have the biggest chances of survival.

      If that means getting some two-legged ape-decendants - who still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea - to make you a rubber fin thats perfectly fine for us dolphins...

      --
      Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
    18. Re:Feel goodism by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thank you - well said! The same misinterpretation of the meaning of natural selection always seems to come up in these kinds of discussions. The perfect example I can think of are dogs. Many of their original behavoirs and appearences would have been detrimental to them while living with humans, and in their new environment these have been selected against. Being smaller, less aggresive on average, or more able to communicate with humans might not help, or even activly hurt them in the wild - but the breeds in question don't live in the wild anymore. I think humans get a bit overly arogent about exactly how much global effect we have over natural proceesses.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    19. Re:Feel goodism by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Informative

      the weak are supposed to die out

      So I take it that you've never used antibiotics to fight an infection. You can't use "survival of the fittest" as a law of nature. The quote was actually made by an economist describing the buisness climate of the early 1900's, not by Darwin describing his theory of evolution. The two just have superficial similarities which is why people equate the two together. Remember, "fit" is a relative term compared to the environment at the time.

    20. Re:Feel goodism by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would argue that susceptability to a disease IS an element, if those susceptible to disease are kept alive and are mating, their offspring may have the same susceptability, requiring further aid, etc, while animals with stronger immune systems and their offspring live on without need of care.

      I just feel slightly uncomfortable talking about living things like that, I guess, because when people talk about humans in those terms they begin to sound like evil eugenics fans. In terms of our overall evolutionary success as a species, compassion may turn out to be a big mistake.

      But then people like Steven Hawking prove that wrong. How about we just let things continue as they are, only give prosthetics to the most rare and expensive of animals, let the rest die as they would anyway, and save all humans from everything.

      --
      Yup...
    21. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if that were entirely true (and I'm not arguing that it isn't) then it would be the same for people. However, I couldn't imagine many folks saying "Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out. Perhaps we should do less to help [people]".

    22. Re:Feel goodism by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out.

      I'm feel guilty for wearing glasses now, but I'm not sure what to do next. Should I proactively slit my wrists, or just stop wearing lenses while driving and let nature take its course?

    23. Re:Feel goodism by amatheum · · Score: 1

      your right, the weak are Supposed to die out. so how come we work on treatments for all sorts of human ailments and conditions ? I'm all for survival of the fittest, just want to see it applied across the full spectrum of animals on this backwater. apart from dolphins, they deserve everything we can do for them.

    24. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    25. Re:Feel goodism by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      When is the last time you heard of a public fundraiser for a warthog with a missing leg? Why? They are ugly.
      No they aren't, you insensitive clod!!!!!!

      They taste nice though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:Feel goodism by gekko513 · · Score: 1

      This is leading us to the theory about memes and that coevolution between genes and memes has controlled the human development ever since our brains were able to carry and copy ideas and thoughts.

      Since the ecology on earth is now to a high degree controlled by humans, the memes are now also a big factor in the evolution of other species, too.

    27. Re:Feel goodism by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      This is less applicable being in a hman controlled environement

      Bzzzt. Thank you for playing. Nature operates just the same regardless if the clever monkeys think they are running things or not.

      I have to wonder if our attempts to "help" animals actually results in long-term harm. Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out.

      As others have commented, the survival of the fittest is a long term propasition. It should probably be reworded as the survival of the fittest genetic information. Short term survival in the wild is as much random luck as physical strength.

      But on to my real point. Just because monkeys who think they are clever are at the top of the food chain (for now), doesn't mean that the principle doesn't apply. The animals that will survive and live with us are the most fit to do so. If we happen to like 'cute' animals, then they are gifted with a useful trait that will cause them to dominate the environment we create. We cannot tamper with the system from the outside, since we are part of the system, too.

      People are funny to think they can control nature. We can alter it's direction a bit, but never cotrol it.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    28. Re:Feel goodism by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      Considering that bottlenose dolphins have a life expectancy of 25 years and max longevity of 45, this one's not looking too shagadelic.

      Darwin 1
      Diseased Unattractive Plastic-Fin Dolphin 0

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
    29. Re:Feel goodism by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      Like it or not, the weak are supposed to die out. Perhaps we should do less to help animals.

      Everything dies out so I don't get your argument.

      I will also temper my argument by saying that people need to stop intruding so much on animals' natural habitats so that they can have a healthy population that can rebound from the occasional disease or natural disaster.

      Interesting thought. Does this mean the next time you get an infection you shouldn't be provided with antibiotics? Or is it just the animals we shouldn't help? If that's the case, why would one treat humans and animals differently? Are animals "lesser than" humans?

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    30. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See above for "survival of the most adaptive"

    31. Re:Feel goodism by Jahz · · Score: 1

      people need to stop intruding so much on animals' natural habitats so that they can have a healthy population that can rebound from the occasional disease or natural disaster.

      ummm... first off strict Darwinism has to do with genetic adaption. If this Dolphin was in open waters it would most likely have found a mate and spawned offspring before it got sick (illness struck at age 32). If this rare disease takes affect late in life, and can be passed to children, then over many generations, the population of inflicted Dolphins would grow. Only then will the Dolphin population begin to adapt to it.
      And if you are mistakenly interpreting Darwinism to apply to physical strength or short term changes, consider this:
      Humans feed it every day. Humans monitor its vitals. Humans maintain a clean tank/living space for it. It even has human "friends." This is not how Dolphins survive in their natural environment. So you see, in some sense, this "Dolphin" is not really even a Dolphin anymore. It has already physically adapted to suit Humanities purposes, so why not change a little more?
      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    32. Re:Feel goodism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do anything so drastic - your /. number is 4015 and yet you still read and post here (despite trolls and dupe posts).

      This surely means you are one of the strongest people around, and will be sorely needed to repopulate the geek stocks after the tragic Comet Surprise of 2013.

  15. Re:Really now. by L0C0loco · · Score: 3, Funny

    No they can't do that! This is their attempt to rebalance the karma loss from continued hunting (I mean research) of whales. It would be plain wrong to kill a defective animal for food when there are bigger healthier ones to eat (I mean research).

    --
    -- Instant Karma's gonna get you! [320848 = 2*2*2*2*11*1823]
  16. Humans are a natural disaster by felonius+maximus · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  17. The real reason is... by MonoSynth · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that wearing this fin for too long makes the dolphin tyred.

    1. Re:The real reason is... by daeley · · Score: 1

      That joke was treadfully unfunny.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  18. Uplift by amstrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is just the first step in uplifting the dolphins.

    Next step: decyphering trinary.

    1. Re:Uplift by Tassach · · Score: 1

      ObPedanticSciFiFact: In the Uplift books, Trinary was an invented language so that uplifted Fins and humans could talk to each other without mechanical translators. Un-uplifted dolphins used Primal Delphin.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  19. Bridgestone rep quote by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1


    "We make tires; we specialize in foots of sort. If we see offers, we will consider them," he said.

    I guess a fin qualifies under "foots of sort". You have to hand it to capitalism. What other manufacturing culture would even consider "foots of sort" for a lady porpoise.

    Based on the following, "Visitors have told us she looks happy," he said. Inside Bridgestone a line of female prosthetics is undder consideration. An anonymous source reports, "There has been a sudden shift in our research departments interest in hootage. What was once considered locker decoration may soon beccome a significant contributor to our bottom line. Yes, pun on purpose, we are looking into booty enhancments as well."

  20. learning by Outsider_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know how the dolphin gets used to using the new fin? If people go through training to use a fake leg, how do dolphins do it?

    1. Re:learning by iamthemoog · · Score: 1

      Push 'em in at the deep end. They'll either sink or swim.

      --
      No Norm, those are your safety glasses; I'll wear my own thanks...
    2. Re:learning by felonius+maximus · · Score: 1
      Same way humans do I suppose - practice. Obviously it takes some time.

      It took us five months to make her get used to the artificial fin.

      My late grandfather took several months to get accustomed to his "new" leg after the organic one was removed (a blood clot I believe his doc told him - now where did I leave that Brie with pepperoni and lard rolled into a tasty bread roll?).
    3. Re:learning by Merkuri22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember that an artificial fin is a lot simpler than an artifical leg. When an amputee had a leg, he had an ankle and a knee. Dolphins cannot move their tailfins the way we move our legs. Think of it more like an ear, it's functional but it doesn't move. The part that moves is in her tail, and that part wasn't amputated. The fin only provided extra push (thus why she can still swim with the amputated fin, just slower and with more exertion). I imagine that once she got used to having it on it was very easy to "remember" how to swim.

    4. Re:learning by TigerNut · · Score: 1

      This picture would suggest that the dolphin didn't actually lose any skeletal structure.

      --

      Less is more.

  21. More Photos from the Aquarium Pages by Tuqui · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are more photos in the page of the Aquarium (in Japanese) Chura Umi Aquarium

  22. Re:In other news by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Vietnam vet is still sitting by the side of the road singing about how he has no legs.

    Not to rag on a veteran, but what obligation do the Japanese have to make prosthetics for Americans? If you want to rail against our misplaced priorities, this is probably not the place.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  23. First artificial tail fin, not dolphin appendage by dbretton · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Dolphins have been given artificial flippers on several occasions before this.

  24. Obligatory HHGTTU quote mangling by hashwolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    So long, and thanks for all the fins.

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
    1. Re:Obligatory HHGTTU quote mangling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HHGTTU?

      Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe? So, you have the whole 200 billion volume set, huh? How much did that set you back?

  25. First Porpoise inaccurate by Laebshade · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Considering that dolphins are not porpoises, yeah I'd say so.
    There are only six porpoise species, sometimes called "true porpoises," four of which live in the northern hemisphere. Porpoises are smaller in size than whales and dolphins and have a low dorsal fin (one species has no dorsal fin at all) and, most distinctively, no beak. Most are shy, live close to shore and are less likely to ride alongside the bows of ships than are dolphins.
    1. Re:First Porpoise inaccurate by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      or what... I'm not going to bite the flamebait though.

    2. Re:First Porpoise inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict you are a flaming homosexual with a tiny dick.

    3. Re:First Porpoise inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a miserable life?
      ...or just a life without a porpoise?
    4. Re:First Porpoise inaccurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not going to bite the flamebait though.
      Oh yeah?
  26. Re:Really now. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Actually whales and porpoises taste nothing like tuna. The meat is very tender and tastes a bit like premium beef. I doubt dolphins taste much different. Last time Rainbow Warrior was in port we had a Barbecue on the wharf right next to it. No prizes for guessing what we were barbecuing ...

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  27. You got it wrong by MarkEst1973 · · Score: 1
    It's supposed to be...

    I, for one, welcome our new artificial fin wearing, dolphin jumping overlords.

    1. Re:You got it wrong by CriX · · Score: 1

      The moderators think otherwise. While definately not applicable to positive Informative/Insightful moderation, the validity of positive Funny moderation has to be trusted. Kinda like "the customer is always right," ... "the moderator is always right" when it comes to humor. In addition, I assert that this post will be modded +500 Genius Insight and will land me the Nobel Prize of Slashdottery. Er, yeah. hehe

      --
      Moderation: +1 pwnage
    2. Re:You got it wrong by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but where does the I for one welcome our new blah blah blah overlords come from?

      Also who was the dude who made the In Soviet Russia Jokes?

      Thanks

      Yeah yeah, im the most uninformed slashdot nerd around.

    3. Re:You got it wrong by mjtaylor24601 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I first heard it on the Simpsons. It's the episode where Homer goes into space and accidently breaks open the ant farm. Kent Brockman sees a close up of one of the ants and thinks that the space ship has been overrun by a super race of giant ants....

      "It's unclear whether they will consume the captive crew or merly enslave them But one thing is certain, there is no stopping them...the ants will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new insect overloards. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted media personality I can be useful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves..."

      Wow, how sad is it that I can do that from memory. Anyway, that's where I first heard that line. Although it's entirly possible that the simpsons stole it from somewhere else that I don't know about.

      --
      I wish I were as sure of anything as some people are of everything
    4. Re:You got it wrong by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 0, Redundant

      check out this link wikipedia It will answer all your questions about In Soviet Russia, Overlords, and other questions you have about slashdot but were too affraid to ask.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  28. so long and... by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...thanks for the fin.

    [ducks, runs for cover]

  29. let's see by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    spending a few tens of thousands on a fun project, overstating the cost to your company to the press, and enjoying WORLDWIDE FEELGOOD PUBLICITY FOR NOTHING? doesn't sound that bad a deal to me. Look how much bridgestone spend on F1 tyres, for example...

    1. Re:let's see by Cat_Byte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of the treehugger party to turn the 2 seals loose back into the wild and they got ate by the killer whale right in front of them.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:let's see by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      not to mention the fact that 95000 dollars in japan != 95000 dollars in the usa...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    3. Re:let's see by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Umm.. no. The $95000 specified is in USD. The value of 10 million Yen is actually the true value given, while the $95000 is a conversion applied by Yahoo. (along with the conversions for metric to non metric.)

  30. OMG TROLL by josmum · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    omg mod parent down

    dolphins r your friends, you shoudl not shit them

  31. Re:In other news by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    as the other poster put it "not to rag on vietnam vets" but that was 30 years ago. Hell before I was even born. Not that I think they don't deserve help just that at this point in the game they probably didn't want the help.

    Though I have yet to see a dude in a wheelchair who was actually from a war and not just handicapped either from birth or another accident.

    In Canada at least I don't share many thoughts with the homeless street bums. Shelters exist where you can get a shower, shave and food. There is no reason to be a disgusting totally unemployable slob on the streets other than you're too lazy to actually clean yourself...

    Of course you have to be sober to stay at most shelters.... but no wait society forced those drugs into the guys arm. Yah....

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  32. From the Seattle Times sports section by baegucb_18706 · · Score: 1

    "In a related story, the 1-8 Miami Dolphins announced that all player surgery will henceforth be performed in Japan."

  33. Yeah. that's great but... by rqqrtnb · · Score: 5, Funny

    now she has to be balanced and rotated every 10,000 miles.

    1. Re:Yeah. that's great but... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      This dolphin won't even take a balancing!

  34. 95000 $ by sshtome · · Score: 1

    I guess that everyone thinks that's the normal price for a chunk of rubber?

    Bridgestone have an odd idea of marketing!

    Or has no one else RTFA?

    1. Re:95000 $ by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the price includes more then "just a hunk of rubber".

      You know, things like research and development of an artificial fin for a dolphin... testing prototypes and rubber compounds.

      Heck, they even tried a few before they found one Fuji (the dolphin in question) was able to successfully use.

      I mean, it's not like they could just pop down to the local Bridgestone dealer, cut a hunk out of a tire and make a dolphin fin. ;)

  35. Enalrge Your F1n! by PeteDotNu · · Score: 0, Funny

    Thanks to breakthroughs in m e d i c a l technology, you can enalrge your f1n by up to 75%

    Click on the link below for more details.

    I am a dancing tally wodge furtlecherry
    Sitting on the banks of a ragadacious portlecabin
    Smear me with terrifying woesomeness

    --
    My other processor is big-endian.
    1. Re:Enalrge Your F1n! by Comrade_X · · Score: 0

      LoL, if you a big pimp go brush your sholders off

      --
      Hello world :)
  36. Re:In other news by FinalCut · · Score: 0

    wow, how does it feel to be so completely clueless. 30 years ago isn't that long ago - definatly not long enough for some scars to heal; particularly the mental ones.

    Be glad you have no idea what war is like.

  37. Kinda funny when Japs eat them by rqqrtnb · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...for "scientific" purposes... maybe they are feeling guilty and want to save the species now. Yea!!!

    1. Re:Kinda funny when Japs eat them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm posting this anonymously 'cos some people might take this the wrong way...

      The term "jap" is offensive to many, as it has WW2-style-implications, as it was the term of choice for Japanese people. Just like if you called a German person a nazi now. I know it's short for Japanese, but that doesn't change the accidental implications. Just saying :)

  38. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA charges an arm and a leg for AIDS medicine. Japan wants to do the same, but nobody agrees to trade an arm for an artificial leg...

  39. So Long .... by Gopal.V · · Score: 1

    So Long and Thanks for all the fish

    Man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much... the wheel, New York, wars, and so on, whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely the dolphins believed themselves to be more intelligent than man for precisely the same reasons.

  40. Re:I got it wrong by felonius+maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah, I know, I picked it up only about thirty minutes after I wrote it.

    However, I'm drunk. So fuck youse all.

  41. Re:Kill the Damn Thing! by bwy · · Score: 1

    Time for Flipper and chips.

    Just make sure some pub in Britain does the cooking. As bad as their food is supposed to be, it is the only place I've ever had good Flipper and chips.

  42. Re:Really now. by metricmusic · · Score: 1

    Fool! Do you really think what what youve eaten to be tuna is really tuna? It's tuna that tastes like dolphin! bahaha ;)

    --
    http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
  43. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was your point? You are on a mission to bad mouth sea-mammals? Uh right! Tuna are fish, they might absorb heavy metals but as carnivores so will dolphins. If you were trying to argue that fish are as intelligent as dolphins - then I call BS. Dilphins and tuna pack hunt together sometimes but it is quite possible that this is actually instictive cooperation. There is no evidence of cognition in fish that I know of. your post isn't even related to the artical appart from a slight reference to dolphins.

  44. Re:Feel goodism (But Still Good) by bstarrfield · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, I generally agree with you, but this is still a worthwhile act. Corporations are, in a legal sense, people, and should act as responsible members of the community. Charitable corporate donations have plunged over the last twenty years. Any positive action, even helping a dolphin, is a good thing.

    Considering that Bridgestone's primary product (tires) is environmentally quite destructive, helping an animal is the least that they can do. We can be critical about what other causes they could have chosen to support, we can even make fun of dolphins, but fundamentally it was a decent act to help the creature.

    How much is a dolphin worth? It's market value, or it's value as a living, caring, creature? People spend fortunes taking care of their pets, though it would be much cheaper to purchase a new dog or cat. They do it because they recognize the moral value and ethical requirement to be a good caretaker for the creature that they own. This is a 34 year old dolphin, dependant on human beings for it's life. There is nothing wrong with being decent towards it.

    All of the alternate uses are good, even better. But to get a corporation to do something good is in itself remarkable.

    --
    /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
  45. Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by HighOrbit · · Score: 0, Troll
    Bridgestone said the artificial fin was given to the aquarium for free, but that it cost the company about 10 million yen (95,000 dollars).
    Great for the dolphin. But do you know how many lives in the developing world could have been saved with $95,000? Every day thousands of children under 5 year old die from diarrhea caused by un-clean water. $95K could have bought a water purification unit (possibley several depending on capacity) in Africa or India or where-ever.

    Great for the dolphin but I think there are better things to spend your philanthropy on.

    This is similar to what we see on the news every day. If the news has a story about some dog getting burnt in a house fire, people will spontaneously send in thousands of donations for the dog. If a family with children gets burned out of their house, they get jack in donations (except for help from the established relief agencies like the Red Cross and Salvation Army).
    1. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by dave420 · · Score: 0

      Like when those people read how Chinese people eat St. Bernards, they got all in a state and DEMANDED China stop eating dogs. Even though Chinese people have to eat during food shortages, and we eat cows (which other people might not appreciate). Somehow if it's cute to US, we protect it beyond measure. If it's cute to someone else, fuck it - it's dinner time.

    2. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm curious. How much do you give to charity each year?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by Ignignot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is this getting rated insightful? This is either a troll or a moron.

      First off, it isn't philanthropy because you can only be philanthropic towards humans.

      Second, Bridgestone is doing this as a cool way to market themselves and maybe do something nice at the same time.

      Third, by your argument you should sell your property, if any, stop eating nice food, stop using medical insurance, stop going on trips, stop buying new clothes, and stop using electricity. The amount of lives you could save with all of that money by far dwarfs your own - even if you die because you are homeless and malnourished, you're going to make it so that hundreds of children will live. So please, go follow your own advice and stop not saving children's lives by posting on slashdot. I figure every 10 posts is another dead baby at your feet.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    4. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Oh stop with your bleeding heart bullshit. $100,000 is peanuts, and I bet most of the expense is manhours from people at the tire company.

      The "money could have been spent elsewhere" argument can go on forever. You've mistaken "philanthropy" for a very cheap PR. Bridgestone just got a LOT of cheap very positive advertising out of this story.

      That's even really beside the point. Are people not allowed to spend money anymore because there's some other "better" place that their efforts could have gone? How many lives could have been saved with the money that went to that computer in front of you?

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is, most environmental organizations are about as cash-strapped and close to ruin as they can get (discounting the obvious Greenpeace and PETA, which are practically corporations nowadays). Personally, I have trouble thinking of one thing the human race has done to improve the environment, other than fixing its own mistakes. We've got a lot of them to fix, too. I feel my hard-earned money does more work improving the world as a whole when I donate to organizations that follow similar philosophies.

      To remain on-topic,
      http://www.seashepherd.org/,
      http://www.mote.org/, and
      http://www.dolphinproject.org/
      http://www.tursiops.org/
      are good places to start.

    6. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every time there's a story about some interesting research somebody posts this.

      You're wrong.

      It is not correct - in the general case - to not do research because the money could have been spent feeding starving children.

      There exist numerous organisations that exist solely to collect money to help starving / sick / poor children in third world countries. They could always use more money, but this is no different than it's been in the past fifty years, and it's way better than it was before that.

      Research needs to happen. Pure research, with no immediate obvious payback ends up consistantly producing more valuable results per dollar in the long term than pretty much anything else that can be done with money - assuming that civilization is n't horribly broken somehow.

      Those water purifiers you mentioned? We wouldn't even have them without pure research having been done in the past.

      Now, giving a dolphin an artificial fin may not seem like such a big deal - or even like it would ever matter at all, but it answers some interesting research questions: Can a dolphin adapt to a prosthesis? How long does it take? How do we make one?

      Another point: You reference $95,000 as being a lot of money. It's not, especially in the context keeping captive dolphins.

      It's not like if the money hadn't been spent on an artificial fin it would have gone to a charity anyway. It probably would have gone to some other dolphin-related expense.

      In conclusion: Charity is not, in the general case, a better use of money than research.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day thousands of tedious people like you keep reminding us about the plight of this or that. Guess what? I don't care. Thousands don't. Millions. That a dolphin (which are interesting creatures) is happy and able to swim properly is a story that brightens up my week, in a sea of otherwise miserable or depressing news.

      Shut up about the starving humans. We will inevitably continue to over-breed anyway. The correct solution is to simply reduce the number of births in the 3rd world so that greater resource can be given to the ones who are born. Since nobody appears to have the common sense to just ship them a billion condoms or offer sterilisation for those who want it, it looks like nature is going to do it for us.

      Darwin at work.

      And amusingly, Darwin was also the name of a dolphin in Seaquest DSV.

    8. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by HighOrbit · · Score: 1
      No, by my agrument I need do nothing so self destructive as you suggest. As way of answer, I shall cut and paste from another one of my posts.

      In a way, this is a strange argument for me to make because I am a libertarian influenced strongly by Rand. In Objectivist thought, altruism is mostly considered to be bunk and self-interest is considered the superior morality. Generally, I agree with that analysis. However, when charity is given (for whatever reason it suits you to give it), I would hope that rationality and reason would prevail instead of irrational "the dolphins make me cry" misguided altruism. If you consider yourself part of humanity, then the advancement of humanity is rationally also in your own self interest (although in a roundabout matter). Since I wish to live in a world free of disease, war, and poverty, I think it is rational to work toward those goals and that is where my "charity" is directed.

      And yes, there are always better uses of money. Without getting on a logical slippery slope that many people seem to falsely imply, spending money on your fellow human beings is both more rational (and in IMHO therefore more moral) than wasting it on an animal.

      Perhaps Bridgestone *has* bought themselves some free publicity. But they do it by apealling to the irrational instead of the rational. That makes me less willing to buy their product.
    9. Re:Dolphin Swims... but Children Keep Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jumping dolphins give Bridgestone more exposure & bang for the buck than a water filtration plant buried in some forgotten corner of Africa

  46. Re:Ob: Douglas Adams by jcostantino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, not a problem! Being able to give people such as yourself an outlet for their blinding sarcasm is what it's all about, right? You truly deserve a clap on the back for your zing in my direction! I believe that you deserve the "good work" more than I.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  47. Now ricky williams has a place to hide by SensitiveMale · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    his dope when he travels.

  48. Re:Really now. by Mikail · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Soylent Tuna is made of dolphins!! DOLPHINS I tell you!!

    --
    If life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life, let's all get wasted and have the time of our lives.
  49. Thanx anyway... by felonius+maximus · · Score: 1
    I already work in one.

    Though I've never had body parts come through (at least, not as part of the Second-Hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 1996), although many of my customers may have desired the transaction of the body parts of their rivals.

  50. OT but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as Mike Myers gets under my skin sometimes I did have to laugh my ass of when playing Evil Genius and found the mission to go get the Freaking Lazer.

  51. Re:Really now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not tender at all. It is stringy like horse.

    Please stop lying.

    It does not taste liek beef either, it is very gamey and potent. Not mild in the least like corn fed beef.

  52. Re:It must be cool to watch flowers shrivel and... by denjin · · Score: 1

    Wow, who modded him down to a 0? Your post really is a bit cynical as he notes.

  53. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > > > Dolphins don't make me cry. They make me vomit!
    > > > Dolphins aren't "always smiling". That's just an optical illusion[...]
    > > > Dolphins don't use radar. It's sonar.
    > > > If dolphins are that smart, why haven't they built cities?
    > > > Finally, why does every can of tuna say on it "Dolphin friendly" ?
    > > > They aren't beautiful, they're overrated. Dolphin-worship culture is merely an excuse for whiney new-age types {who probably believe in aliens as well} to make their own miserable existences seem a little less pointless. {And for people to make a quick buck selling tat decorated with dolphins to gullible people.}

    I work at an aquarium, and I've the liberty of preserving the rest of the reply to this thread.

    clik-k-reeeeeek-klik-rDELPHINE TRANSLATOR ACTIVE

    > > "Tee-hee! You're an orca, aren't you? Got the cute little eye patch thing goin' on, but we warned you about the primates and their looking-boxes. The primates, especially the ones on Slashdot, are really protective of their mascot. Silly Orcas, always thinkin' with your stomach, not your brain.
    > >
    > >VOTE LEVIATHAN-2008! THE ILLUMINATED CHOICE!!!k!ik!"

    vrooooop-wooooaSPECIES TRANSITION DETECTED

    > "Yeah, yeah, yeah... So Shamfoo ate one fuckin' penguin in front of a National Geographic expedition, and we never hear the end of it. Fuck you, fin-boy, and your blowhole end up lookin' like that guy on tunase-cx. Oh, and Leviathan's a pussy.
    >
    >CTHULHU-2008, YOU COMMIE FINBERAL WUSS!!!wo!o!!oo!!oo!o!"

  54. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Anne+Honime · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If dolphins are that smart, why haven't they built cities? Or vehicles? Where is their historical record, their literature?

    Dolphins are vastly superior to human beings : they don't need to have cities nor vehicules ; they're fit to their environement far better than we are to ours. They're actually among the fastest creatures in the water. Our best boats are just close to their top speed, after 15.000 years of so-called "scientific evolution". They don't need to work to buy food : they can grab a snack whenever they want, wherever they want. Try to catch a rabbit on your own ! They're smarter than humans : no dolphin would attack one of its sibblings. So they can spend an entire laid-back life, probably telling themselves fun stories about us, forever enslaved and fighting hostile conditions.

    But there is more : being a dolphin, you would have a lifelong erection, and not having to go to the old trick of "- Here is your aspirin darling ! - What for, I've got no headeache ? - Fine, let's shag!" to have sexual relationships.

    If I were on metempsychosis, I would DIE to reincarnate into a dolphin.

  55. OK by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    The real question is: if thet fit *ME* with one of those fins, will *I* be able to leap 20 feet out of the water?

    Now that would be cool.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:OK by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      I want a jet pack.

  56. Dolphin Fin Soup!! by Torontoman · · Score: 1

    And in Other News.... Restaurant owners accross the Far East have noticed a sharp increase in the supply of dolphin fins for their soups. "Mysterious ilness" indeed... It's called a knife.

  57. Hint on how to fix the "developing" world. by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    But do you know how many lives in the developing world could have been saved with $95,000?

    Do you know how many condoms that would buy?

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  58. overlords! by DrCash · · Score: 0
    I for one welcome our new bionic dolphin overlords!

  59. Even cooler by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    at first I was gonna start with the age old Shark-laser thing, but think about it Dolphins with prosthetic lasers! They are more intelligent than sharks, and could be trained to fire lasers on cue!

  60. Frikkin' Bionic Fins by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    First came sharks with frikkin' lasers attached to their heads and now bionic finned dolphins... when did we decide to go Inspector Gadget on our sea creatures?

  61. How ironic by fredrated · · Score: 0

    Isn't it in Japan where they have a sport of clubbing dolphins to death?

    Stupidity: it's a renewable resource

  62. Dolphins that can Run by vivin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "When she saw the artificial fin for the first time, she ran away. She was so scared of the object. It took us five months to make her get used to the artificial fin. Now she is perfectly fine with it," he said.

    Wow! They got her artificial feet too?

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  63. Fluke, no? by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the fluke rather than the fin
    they're talking about?

    1. Re:Fluke, no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fluke makes copper and fiber testers...

      I know, was shopping for one today..

  64. But we've had articial finns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for a long time, they're called Swedes.

  65. in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...still no cure for cancer

    1. Re:in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are cures for MANY forms of cancer -- so many, in fact, that cancer has lost the stigma as a "death sentence" it once held; these days if a doctor tells a patient he/she has cancer, the patient is likely to say "Huh, ok. So, how're we gonna treat it?" than (as in the "old days") "OMFG, NOOOOooooo!" (this has had the added benefit of making doctors' jobs of informing patients of the news -- still bad news, but not the worst news -- easier and therefore more likely; there was a time when some doctors considered not telling a patient if they had cancer and some even refused to do so, and that's still the case in certain parts of the world such as Asia...)

  66. Typical female by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    "Does this fin make me look fat?"

  67. dolphins are not porpoises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dolphins are not porpoises, will the real anal retentive shade please stand up?

    it's the first "first post" joke with some actual humor in it. not like any of us think dolphins are actually porpoises.

  68. Research Good but waste bad by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    Well. I agree that pure basic research is a very good use of money, and in the long run, research is a better investment in the betterment of mankind's situation than one-shot charity. For example, pure research in atomic reactors and fusion, while perhaps not immediately leading to a commercial product, ultimately brings us closer to cheap clean engery and a better life for everyone. I however fail to discern how 'questions' like "Can a dolphin adapt to a prosthesis" will lead to bettering humanity's condition in life.

    Its a matter of priorities. In this case, IMHO, building a water purification unit (which will last for years) for a village in Africa serves the long term interest of humanity better than putting a prosthesis on a dolphin.

  69. Re:Research Good but waste bad by jmays · · Score: 1

    I am curious HighOrbit ... what do you do for a living? Do you better humanity's condition daily? What do you spend your money on? Anything for yourself? Any luxuries? Lecturing on Slashdot is all well and good ... but I doubt you hold up to your own standards ... most people don't hold up to their own. Can you? I would welcome a reply.

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
  70. Unbelievable!! by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    One of those few times that /. get's beat out by the US press.

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  71. Re:Research Good but waste bad by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    To get personal, I am a civil servant and I have worked in public service my entire adult life. And yes, I do give to charity (mainly the March of Dimes).

    We live in a world of scare resources and waste is irrational. Luxury is not necessarily evil because it is an element of human happiness. But waste is evil because it squanders resources while maximizing no moral good. There are only so many resources to go around and yes, sick children do rate higher on my list of priorites than animals. If I had $95K extra to give to charity, I would be interested in prosthesis for human beings and not animals.

    In a way, this is a strange argument for me to make because I am a libertarian influenced strongly by Rand. In Objectivist though, altruism is mostly considered to be bunk and self-interest is considered the superior morality. Generally, I agree with that analysis. However, when charity is given (for whatever reason it suits you to give it), I would hope that rationality and reason would prevail instead of irrational "the dolphins make me cry" misguided altruism. If you consider youself part of humanity, then the advancement of humanity is rationally also in your own self interest (although in a roundabout matter). Since I wish to live in a world free of disease, war, and poverty, I think it is rational to work toward those goals and that is where my "charity" is directed.

    And yes, there are always better uses of money. Without getting on a logical slippery slop that many people seem to falsely imply, spending money on your fellow human beings is both more rational (and in IMHO therefore more moral) than wasting it on an animal.

  72. Re:In other news by Kerstyun · · Score: 0
    Not to rag on a veteran, but what obligation do the Japanese have to make prosthetics for Americans?
    Ma uncle and my pappy died on betaan and we don't even know where he's buried, that's why, yer danged yellerbelly!
    --
    Keep the whitehouse white, vote Trump & Palin 2020.
  73. veterans by phyruxus · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This is insightful, not flamebait.

    The point isn't that Japan should be giving our veterans prosthetics. The point is that in Japan, a dolphin has a prosthetic, while in America, vietnam veterans still lack prosthetics.

    I dare you to spent 2 hours with a vietnam veteran. Ask him to tell you what it was like over there, and what it was like when he got back.

    I for one am glad that we now make a distinction between supporting the soldier and supporting the war, and that the former does not require the latter, in fact if may preclude it (in the case of an unjust war).

    Most of the time I hear conservatives liberal bashing, it's just a load of crap. But people really screwed up by hating vietnam vets; most of them didn't want to be there, they had to serve. And we, the country screwed them double - in what we put them through, and in how we have treated them since.

    Those who came back with their psyches relatively intact at least had a chance to try to live the rest of their life - however haunted it may be. But MOST people who are in an extended war - I think it's 6 months - fall into one of two categories: 1) mentally scarred by the experience (this is around 90%) and 2) not affected heavily, but these people are predisposed to anger, violence, killing, etc anyway.

    Oh, but it got moderated flamebait, so I'll just forget about all that... yeah, screw that guy on the side of the road who's short an arm or leg or both, who can't see or hear, who spends every night of his life in nightmares running from through dark paddies with a legion of hidden pursuers on his heels; yeah, screw that guy who can't speak full sentences because he's so screwed up from booby trapped bodies and following orders to machine gun 8 year olds. Yeah, he's lived through more than you and I will probably ever suffer in ten of our lifetimes, but it's his fault right? He was drafted, but so what? He was under duress and direct orders in a war zone, but he had a choice right? He's PTSD and schizo now, but hey, he should just "snap out of it" right? It doesn't work that way.

    >:[

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:veterans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it looks like its Offtopic.

  74. Get rich selling arms to both sides! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    Time to buy stock in Garvey Unlimited!



    Stupid gimpy fish! Oh yeah?!! Whatta ya goin' ta do aboot it?!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  75. Re:Really now. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    mmmmm.... tastes just like chicken of the sea!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  76. They were after a rubber that is easy on female sk by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They were after a rubber that is easy on female skin, it too has to endure physical stress and is often wet. Wink wink, nudge nudge you know what I mean.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  77. More like a steal bone. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    She still has all the bits that make up a dolphins tale. Just less surface area. A human with a no leg can't walk. She could swim just that she tired quickly (because less surface area means less power per ehm wiggle?)

    So she would have to get used to having something attached to her but she is a trained animal with reasonably intelligence. Even dogs manage to get used to being attached to wheels instead of legs and you can't get much dumber then dogs. (oh and dog lovers bite me. Only a braindead creature can keep up a bark for hours on end before getting bored)

    So how do dolphins do it? Simple same as we do when we hurt our foot and use a crutch for a while. No training needed.

    When the entire leg is gone and people have to train to use a completly different set of damaged and weakened muscles to walk, that is when the months of retraining start kicking in. You don't need to retrain seeing when you finally get the glasses you have been avoiding to get do you?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  78. Kenshin fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he's just trying to illustrate the ideas of Shishi-o Makoto.

    "Tsuyokereba iki, yowakereba shinu."

    The strong live and the weak die. muahahaha *ignites sword on fire*

  79. Re:First artificial tail fin, not dolphin appendag by shreak · · Score: 1

    No they haven't.

    =Shreak
    Dept of Assertions

  80. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our best boats are just close to their top speed.

    I didn't know that dolphins swim faster than 100 km/h!

  81. Extreme Makeover: Aquatic Mammal Edition by gelfling · · Score: 1

    fin enlargement - check
    smile tuck - check
    exfoliation - check
    lose 20 lbs - check
    blowhole piercing - check
    dump husband - check

  82. Bridgestone? look out by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Those suckaz flip over for no good reason.

  83. Well! by maimbeth · · Score: 1

    If that don't just beat all. But, if they can fix a Bobbitt...

  84. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1
    I didn't know that dolphins swim faster than 100 km/h!

    Available figures are ranging from 20 km/h to 40 km/h for "normal speed" (depending on the species), with a record of 56 km/h. I agree it's nowhere near 100 km/h, but 100 km/h is for a racing motor boat with over 250 hp ; how much HP are packed in a dolphin ? Not much more than a couple, I bet (optimisticaly). Add to that that race boats are far from being all weather - if the waves get in, they'll flip over pretty easly. So compared to normal, usable boats, the dolphin still does pretty well.

  85. Ekekekek... by digital.prion · · Score: 1

    That's dolphine for "Look ma no hands!". The fin.

    --
    Smile.
  86. H2G2 by cybersavior · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, they are the second most intelligent animal on our planet....

  87. Re:Research Good but waste bad ---ARRRGH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 - RTFA

    There was no money spent (as in exchanged), Bridgestone (Japan) donated their employees time to the project R&D, the $$$ comes from the man hours for the R&D.

    #2 - Happy captive dolphin in aquarium (public) = happy people (esp. children).

    Nuff said.

    #3 - Get off it!

    This type of research *can* be used to better mankind, esp. if you consider for a moment, a tyre company can build a prosthesis for an animal, they can probably build one for a human also (read -- cheaper). Think of what this could do for the third world everyone is bleeding over.

    Cheers!

  88. Re:They were after a rubber that is easy on female by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

    What's emacs?
    Winks as good as a nod to a blind man

  89. Great story. Good job japan. Humanity +1 by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Its nice to see humans doing something kind for another creature.

    I personally think its our best and most uniquely human attribute. Bravo Japan. The Japanese continue to enrich our world with their kindness, and technological "know how"

    Nice fuzzy warm story... Maybe we as a human race should do more kind things like this and a little less bombing.

    We might just learn to like living in peace with our planet and ourselves.

    Back to doom3 ;)

  90. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? If I were on metempsychosis, I would DIE to reincarnate into a unicorn.

  91. "Mysterious"? by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 0

    Why do they always say "mysterious" disease? If they don't know anything else about it, why isn't it just referred to as an "unknown" disease? "Mysterious disease" just sounds like a cover up for some guy who ran into the dolphin with a boat, or something.

  92. Re:Over-rated Cetaceans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our best boats are just close to their top speed" Yeah, I've seen lots of dolphins that swim at 120 mph. http://www.powerboatmag.com/2001tests/may3.php

  93. I for one welcome our new evil cyborg dolphin over by Agret · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new evil cyborg dolphin overlords.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  94. how the fuck is this redundant? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    ....when nobody else had made the joke when I wrote it? And almost 12 hours later, they still haven't?

    Watch me meta-bitch-slap your asses from "moderators" down to "readers".

    (Burning karma, and proud to do so.)

  95. Re:Research Good but waste bad by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    The first, and most important thing (that you missed from my earlier post) is that the money that went to the dolphin's new fin could not have gone to charity. It was eithor dolphin research money or rubbers research money.

    The fact that there's no way to randomly reach into an aquarium or corporate R&D lab's budget and use it to build water purifiers for villiages in Afria is a good thing. Pure research would grind to a halt if there was a comittee of nonscientific citizens who approved each research project beforehand. ("100 square mile array of satilite dishes for radio astronomy or buy food for ten thousand starving kids in Uganda for a year...")

    Second, how can you possibly know that the question "Can a dolphin adapt to a prosthesis" isn't important? Are you an expert in marine mamals? Mamilian nervous systems?

    The thing about pure research is that you don't know where it will lead or what you might learn.

    You mention "Long term interests of humanity". Perhaps if you could show a specific case where a single water treatment facility would allow a town or city to get in a position where they wouldn't need aid like that again it would be arguable, but the simple fact of having answered a scientific has long term value all by itself.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  96. Re:Great story. Good job japan. Humanity +1 by Lifthrasir · · Score: 1
    The Japanese continue to enrich our world with their kindness
    Yet they are still into whaling, but not for food, for 'scientific research'. Yet they still kill 100's of minke whales each year.
    --
    No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something