Obviously this is just a means for google to attack other companies -- the ones that actually need an identifier to be passed around with you to track a link rather than just having a huge database on you already (like google does).
Wait, they showed the firefighter dog saving a burning airplane? What's next, are they going to do the big reveal on where exactly the paw patrol's favourite bones comes from? Hint: They aren't picked from The Bone Tree in The Great Bone Orchard!
I wrote you the source code for a Linux port weeks ago and you still didn't do it? Also.. how would this even block a script running from the same domain, a la this paticular exploit?
I've never heard anyone who wasn't filthy-stinkin rich say this. Often to show off how much richer they are than the just very-wealthy person to whom they are speaking.
When I was a kid, my mind was my favourite toy. I would just run back and forth, sometimes I'd be an astronaut. Sometimes a knight. Sometimes a construction worker. Now I see 3 year olds glued to ipads... expect a hoard of drones to make up the next generation.
Also obligatory walked uphill both ways get off my lawn etc etc
Lots of projects use "generic build tools" and unfortunately, this may be the easiest and safest way to integrate AND get the project that's under-budgeted by months out the door.
You don't need to pause. You can press "Right" and go right back to hitting the 4 button but on a new character. Some older phones you had to press "Left", then "Right", but always quicker than the pause delay.
If you're asking WHY do folks fork and NOT modify, it's to "lock" a version, and to be able to build in an automated way. Granted, git supports this via checking out a specific commit, but for some reason a LOT of folks find it better to fork it, and then clone off that fork. The only advantage I can think of is it protects you from the original deleting the project altogether.
So imagine if you're developing a commercial software that uses LibraryA. You write it to how LibraryA looked when you pulled it and developed it. You want to automate your build so that you pull the dependencies from a URL. So you fork it, and then you just always pull from that fork. If at any point in time you're allocated resources to do updates, then can merge into that branch.
So that's why someone would fork and not change it. Another part to which maybe you're referring is to why "so much cold would remain unchanged." Well, a pull request could be a single line, it could touch 20 files out of a project of 5000. Most code is likely going to remain a copy in any fork scenario.
That's not true at all. Just because there is AN adjective "democratic" does NOT mean you can just take a proper noun and use an adjective for an improper noun to describe it. If I work for a company called "Rainbow", you would say "Rainbow employees does X", not "Prismatic employees do x". A proper noun is a proper noun period.
Federal sovereign immunity
In the United States, the federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. The United States has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent, mainly through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which waives the immunity if a tortious act of a federal employee causes damage, and the Tucker Act, which waives the immunity over claims arising out of contracts to which the federal government is a party.[45] The United States as a sovereign is immune from suit unless it unequivocally consents to being sued.[46] The United States Supreme Court in Price v. United States observed: "It is an axiom of our jurisprudence. The government is not liable to suit unless it consents thereto, and its liability in suit cannot be extended beyond the plain language of the statute authorizing it." Price v. United States, 174 U.S. 373, 375-76 (1899).
Nothing. The government is immune to its own laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity
Sovereign immunity, or crown immunity, is a legal doctrine by which the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution.
"and of the fact that notification of the security breach is required"
Good thing they worked "If you didn't know this was a law, it doesn't apply to you" into the law itself. Nobody would EVER lie about that to get off of a 5 year prison stint...
If this goes into law... what if they don't discover the breach until someone tries to sell the database they lifted? This is perfect for criminals. Now, wait 31 days before selling the database. Then, in order to avoid jailtime, the companies are FORCED to spend funds to cover up the fact that they were breached and NOT notify customers. Bravo.
It was intentional, so that the dog did not run away, and could not take over (being obviously superior to flesh-and-blood). Why the Dar leks have a similar flaw in that they cannot climb stairs is a mystery though...
Slashdot Mirror
Obviously this is just a means for google to attack other companies -- the ones that actually need an identifier to be passed around with you to track a link rather than just having a huge database on you already (like google does).
Wait, they showed the firefighter dog saving a burning airplane? What's next, are they going to do the big reveal on where exactly the paw patrol's favourite bones comes from? Hint: They aren't picked from The Bone Tree in The Great Bone Orchard!
Also, when can I get airbags in my Information Stuperhighway Steering Wheel? I hear it will protect me from loss after inevitable crashes.
People still search with google? I guess people also still use Facebook, so why not. Us cool robots use duckduckgo
www.notavirus.com/really_this_is_safe.jpg.exe
I'm guessing you missed the ending "is a myth."
I wrote you the source code for a Linux port weeks ago and you still didn't do it? Also.. how would this even block a script running from the same domain, a la this paticular exploit?
I feel like I have more different species of microbes in my gut than on that whole space station!
Whys everyone hate you, bud? I musta missed the big break...
Were these "Hey, I'm replying to some guy in Russia! LOLZ" posts EVER funny?
I've never heard anyone who wasn't filthy-stinkin rich say this. Often to show off how much richer they are than the just very-wealthy person to whom they are speaking.
When I was a kid, my mind was my favourite toy. I would just run back and forth, sometimes I'd be an astronaut. Sometimes a knight. Sometimes a construction worker. Now I see 3 year olds glued to ipads... expect a hoard of drones to make up the next generation.
Also obligatory walked uphill both ways get off my lawn etc etc
Lots of projects use "generic build tools" and unfortunately, this may be the easiest and safest way to integrate AND get the project that's under-budgeted by months out the door.
You don't need to pause. You can press "Right" and go right back to hitting the 4 button but on a new character. Some older phones you had to press "Left", then "Right", but always quicker than the pause delay.
Is it better than the original "computer composed" piece? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Did they divert this battery from Puerto Rico to a richer area?
If you're asking WHY do folks fork and NOT modify, it's to "lock" a version, and to be able to build in an automated way. Granted, git supports this via checking out a specific commit, but for some reason a LOT of folks find it better to fork it, and then clone off that fork. The only advantage I can think of is it protects you from the original deleting the project altogether.
So imagine if you're developing a commercial software that uses LibraryA. You write it to how LibraryA looked when you pulled it and developed it. You want to automate your build so that you pull the dependencies from a URL. So you fork it, and then you just always pull from that fork. If at any point in time you're allocated resources to do updates, then can merge into that branch.
So that's why someone would fork and not change it. Another part to which maybe you're referring is to why "so much cold would remain unchanged." Well, a pull request could be a single line, it could touch 20 files out of a project of 5000. Most code is likely going to remain a copy in any fork scenario.
That's not true at all. Just because there is AN adjective "democratic" does NOT mean you can just take a proper noun and use an adjective for an improper noun to describe it. If I work for a company called "Rainbow", you would say "Rainbow employees does X", not "Prismatic employees do x". A proper noun is a proper noun period.
Specifically to the US Federal Govt:
Federal sovereign immunity In the United States, the federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. The United States has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent, mainly through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which waives the immunity if a tortious act of a federal employee causes damage, and the Tucker Act, which waives the immunity over claims arising out of contracts to which the federal government is a party.[45] The United States as a sovereign is immune from suit unless it unequivocally consents to being sued.[46] The United States Supreme Court in Price v. United States observed: "It is an axiom of our jurisprudence. The government is not liable to suit unless it consents thereto, and its liability in suit cannot be extended beyond the plain language of the statute authorizing it." Price v. United States, 174 U.S. 373, 375-76 (1899).
Nothing. The government is immune to its own laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity
Sovereign immunity, or crown immunity, is a legal doctrine by which the sovereign or state cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution.
"and of the fact that notification of the security breach is required"
Good thing they worked "If you didn't know this was a law, it doesn't apply to you" into the law itself. Nobody would EVER lie about that to get off of a 5 year prison stint...
If this goes into law... what if they don't discover the breach until someone tries to sell the database they lifted? This is perfect for criminals. Now, wait 31 days before selling the database. Then, in order to avoid jailtime, the companies are FORCED to spend funds to cover up the fact that they were breached and NOT notify customers. Bravo.
Wow, then whitepages.com owes a lot of money for having millions of entries for those first 3...
It was intentional, so that the dog did not run away, and could not take over (being obviously superior to flesh-and-blood). Why the Dar leks have a similar flaw in that they cannot climb stairs is a mystery though...
6. Remove FreeBSD
7. Install archlinux www.archlinux.org