I definitely do not want to start a war here, but give me a V6 Mustang and I can have just as much fun on the streets or the track as someone with a $100k Porsche, or any other "super car" for that matter. Plus it looks much more bad ass.
Gawd, the amount of Obama boot licking going in that post is unbelievable.
You guy lied. He lied deliberately. Democrats believed it and supported the law. Now, you say only idiots believed it. Well, that just happens to be the Democrats in Congress.
If you want to cite something from wikipedia, read the actual cite yourself. Then, use that cite to support your argument. Where wikipedia fails is that I can make a statement and throw any cite I want after it. No one will check it. No one will correct it unless they have a vested interest in it.
The best that can be said of wikipedia is that it is a place to go and find references to authoritative sources for the most part. You are an idiot if you trust any of the text of the article.
Every organization has its toolbox of utilities, systems, etc that make things actually work. New development almost always integrates with these systems. Odds are, much of the legacy code is not documented very well. So a person assigned a task usually has to reverse engineer existing code in order to integrate the new code.
Add to that learning the business processes, getting to know colleagues and the needs of the business, and it can take up to a year before someone can become an effective and competent member of an IT organization.
But then again, you probably want to keep them in a dark room and just slide incomplete and shoddy specifications under the door.
Slashdot Mirror
Conspiracy. You participate, you own the whole thing.
You should see about a part time job as a getaway driver for bank robbers.
When your buddies get caught, just try saying that you were "only the getaway driver".
Not one mention of Republicans in that link.
So, you are just guessing? Hoping? Accusing?
We know you are lying, that's plain to see by visiting the link.
Or, you are just being a dick.
We calls it likes we sees it.
I definitely do not want to start a war here, but give me a V6 Mustang and I can have just as much fun on the streets or the track as someone with a $100k Porsche, or any other "super car" for that matter. Plus it looks much more bad ass.
OK...I do want to start a war. :-)
Irony is a better way to put it.
Otherwise you condemn all actors in all movies that portray anything dangerous and/or illegal.
Ahh, The Face Painting Homer shows himself. Team Obama, Now and Forever eh?
So you justify the abortion that is Obamacare by pointing the the fucked up program created in a fucked up little state on the east coast?
You realize, don't you, that MA has more in common with Cuba than it does other states in the U.S?
Take you Pom Poms and you face paint and GTFO.
I am participating just fine. Paying my taxes and following the law and making sure my children are provided for.
Can't say the same for all these people who want free shit, including health insurance.
And, BTW, if you really feel so strongly about this, stop being a fucking pussy and login. That way we will all know who the stooge is.
Gawd, the amount of Obama boot licking going in that post is unbelievable.
You guy lied. He lied deliberately. Democrats believed it and supported the law. Now, you say only idiots believed it. Well, that just happens to be the Democrats in Congress.
1. You know nothing about my current plan.
2. You know nothing about me.
Yet you and the Dems feel you know enough to tell me what plan to buy and what needs to be covered.
Fuck you.
Provide actual cites and not some mouth breathing, mother's basement dwelling loser's biased slant.
If you want to cite something from wikipedia, read the actual cite yourself. Then, use that cite to support your argument. Where wikipedia fails is that I can make a statement and throw any cite I want after it. No one will check it. No one will correct it unless they have a vested interest in it.
The best that can be said of wikipedia is that it is a place to go and find references to authoritative sources for the most part. You are an idiot if you trust any of the text of the article.
It's ok. You can still edit the articles to say whatever you and then cite them on Slashdot. No one can defy you!
Obamacare, anyone?
And with a simple cite of wikipedia, you absolve yourself of the need to provide actual evidence of anything.
When you can go online and edit a paper in Nature to say pretty much anything you want, then Wikipedia is "research".
The more you hear about how he supposedly didn't know this or that, the more you have to wonder if he isn't a simple community organizer.
I bet if Islam allowed alcohol they'd all be a lot less cranky.
Every organization has its toolbox of utilities, systems, etc that make things actually work. New development almost always integrates with these systems. Odds are, much of the legacy code is not documented very well. So a person assigned a task usually has to reverse engineer existing code in order to integrate the new code.
Add to that learning the business processes, getting to know colleagues and the needs of the business, and it can take up to a year before someone can become an effective and competent member of an IT organization.
But then again, you probably want to keep them in a dark room and just slide incomplete and shoddy specifications under the door.
You must work for HHS.
Experience, fuckhead.
And WTF with all these angry atheists?
They overwhelmingly rejected it.
XML soo sucks for db applications.
Do you even understand what a shareholder is?
I don't think you do. Hint: They are the ones that stand to lose when "a public company is failing".
Hey MD...fuck you and you troll mods.
The GOP allowed solar -production- to be kicked over to China.
Perhaps you could enlighten us all on how they "allowed" that.