1. She and her aids were careless in handling classified information. 2. There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes. 3.110 emails in 52 separate chains had been determined to contain classified information “at the time they were sent or received.” Of those, he continued, eight included “Top Secret” information, while 36 chains had “Secret” information at the time it was received, while eight contained “Confidential” information, the lowest level of classification. 4. Participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it. 5. You or I would be in big trouble -"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"
So Questions:
1. Will she face ANY sanctions of any kind? 2. If WE would lose security clearance, will she? 3. Can someone be President if they are not cleared to see 90% of what crosses their desk?
There is a balance point in any support function. If you are too helpful and too quick, the user will never learn and will call you each and every time they get in a bind, even if they've been in that bind multiple times.
We are very helpful the first time around and as part of resolving the issue, provide copious links to online training materials specific to the issue they experienced. The next time, we simple provide citations to where they can read the solution to the problems. Eventually, they don't have to call anymore.
Yes, there are some idiots who just don't take the hint or just can't fathom the materials (often times, inept executives), but the solution there is to refer them to a peer who has been designated as an "expert".
1. Armed citizens are less likely to be injured by an attacker:
2. Defensive uses of guns are common:
3. Mass shootings and accidental firearm deaths account for a small fraction of gun-related deaths, and both are declining:
4. “Interventions” (i.e, gun control) such as background checks, so-called assault rifle bans and gun-free zones produce “mixed” results:
5. Gun buyback/turn-in programs are “ineffective” in reducing crime:
6. Stolen guns and retail/gun show purchases account for very little crime:
7. The vast majority of gun-related deaths are not homicides, but suicides:
Again, as ArylAkamov mentions, this was a CDC study.
The Obama Admin disappeared it for all practical purposes. It wasn't on any morning news shows, the View, any of the late night Snark shows, none of the Sunday Morning shows, nothing.
Newspapers, ink, pens, don't occur naturally either. Someone I don't think you believe the right to Free Speech and of the Press is not a natural right.
He's right. It's not a "civil right" according to the definition in the link provided, as pedantic as that is.
What it is is more important... it is a Fundamental Right, or a Civil Liberty. It is a Right that predates Governments and is not subject to Government infringement.
They will always have my business because it will be a cold day in hell before I'll let a computer drive me around.
And it will also it will be a cold day in hell before I'll enjoy sitting in the back like some some mushroom more than driving my 500+ horsepower, six speed Mustang 302R.
The worst assumption is that anyone would actually be intersted in speaking with us. One look at the TV signals and they'd immediatly place a quarantine around our solar system.
How many news stories by the supposedly professional news gatherers are festooned with copies of tweets by some random joe? Many stories are 80-90% Twitter comments.
Useless.
Social Media hasn't taken over the News Media, the News Medaia is freely giving itself over to Social Media.
Even if there were advanced civilizations on only 1% of all the planets, that would still be millions or more.
To believe there are no other advanced civilizations out there, that they are somehow obligated to come pay us a visit, or that they blew themselves up, is pretty fucking arrogant of us.
When you move into a new neighborhood and the neighbors don't come to visit you, that doesn't mean they don't exist
Slashdot Mirror
So what did they find?
1. She and her aids were careless in handling classified information.
2. There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes.
3.110 emails in 52 separate chains had been determined to contain classified information “at the time they were sent or received.” Of those, he continued, eight included “Top Secret” information, while 36 chains had “Secret” information at the time it was received, while eight contained “Confidential” information, the lowest level of classification.
4. Participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
5. You or I would be in big trouble -"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"
So Questions:
1. Will she face ANY sanctions of any kind?
2. If WE would lose security clearance, will she?
3. Can someone be President if they are not cleared to see 90% of what crosses their desk?
There is a balance point in any support function. If you are too helpful and too quick, the user will never learn and will call you each and every time they get in a bind, even if they've been in that bind multiple times.
We are very helpful the first time around and as part of resolving the issue, provide copious links to online training materials specific to the issue they experienced.
The next time, we simple provide citations to where they can read the solution to the problems. Eventually, they don't have to call anymore.
Yes, there are some idiots who just don't take the hint or just can't fathom the materials (often times, inept executives), but the solution there is to refer them to a peer who has been designated as an "expert".
I hope it can figure out where the Ads are going and how big they are. Then, stop the page from jumping around as they load.
1. Armed citizens are less likely to be injured by an attacker:
2. Defensive uses of guns are common:
3. Mass shootings and accidental firearm deaths account for a small fraction of gun-related deaths, and both are declining:
4. “Interventions” (i.e, gun control) such as background checks, so-called assault rifle bans and gun-free zones produce “mixed” results:
5. Gun buyback/turn-in programs are “ineffective” in reducing crime:
6. Stolen guns and retail/gun show purchases account for very little crime:
7. The vast majority of gun-related deaths are not homicides, but suicides:
Again, as ArylAkamov mentions, this was a CDC study.
The Obama Admin disappeared it for all practical purposes. It wasn't on any morning news shows, the View, any of the late night Snark shows, none of the Sunday Morning shows, nothing.
Any true "moral dilemma" would have to include information about all the parties involved.
Neither the Government nor the Tech has the right to make a moral decision for someone nor do they have enough information to do so.
Should a Nobel Winning Physicist be sacrificed in order to save a car load of Gang Bangers on their way to a Drive By Shooting?
What if that Hypothetical Crowd was a bunch on NeoNazis?
Morality is a Human thing and can't be programmed.
All these words wasted on a pedantic argument.
Newspapers, ink, pens, don't occur naturally either. Someone I don't think you believe the right to Free Speech and of the Press is not a natural right.
He's right. It's not a "civil right" according to the definition in the link provided, as pedantic as that is.
What it is is more important... it is a Fundamental Right, or a Civil Liberty. It is a Right that predates Governments and is not subject to Government infringement.
They will always have my business because it will be a cold day in hell before I'll let a computer drive me around.
And it will also it will be a cold day in hell before I'll enjoy sitting in the back like some some mushroom more than driving my 500+ horsepower, six speed Mustang 302R.
The worst assumption is that anyone would actually be intersted in speaking with us. One look at the TV signals and they'd immediatly place a quarantine around our solar system.
How many news stories by the supposedly professional news gatherers are festooned with copies of tweets by some random joe? Many stories are 80-90% Twitter comments.
Useless.
Social Media hasn't taken over the News Media, the News Medaia is freely giving itself over to Social Media.
This guy has been working on a flying car for like 50 years.
Funny thing is, his car is the coolest looking of them all.
Don't forget the profs telling them that the system rigged against them and that some mystery "they" are racist out to oppress them.
When the message you are getting every day is that your efforts are in vain, anyone would become discouraged.
No, we are going to write, "Stick to it. Never give up" 100 times...or tell them that 100 times.
Really, that's called encouragement and leadership. The Armed Forces do it all the time. Coaches do it for their teams.
It just occurred to me that I'm pretty fucking arrogant to suggest that we are an "advanced civilization"
Bombing the crap out of North Korea's infrastructure should take about 6 planes with two bombs each.
Everything else is just barren wasteland.
Even if there were advanced civilizations on only 1% of all the planets, that would still be millions or more.
To believe there are no other advanced civilizations out there, that they are somehow obligated to come pay us a visit, or that they blew themselves up, is pretty fucking arrogant of us.
When you move into a new neighborhood and the neighbors don't come to visit you, that doesn't mean they don't exist
Maybe that includes a Camo finish.
EVERY HTML app I've ever used sucked royally.
Delays, dropped letters, crashes.
Barely one step above two tin cans and some string.
The Swiss just rejected the idea big time.
Now that is a nit-pic.
But I wouldn't put it past the FAA
Pull the plug.
Take out the battery.
So...no profit allowed
General aviation airports bring in jobs, taxes, tourists (if they are big enough) and commerce.
LOL!
Well, we can dream, can't we?