In some cases (for example 14.01 - Microeconomics) the lecturer uses copyrighted material in the lecture notes, and therefore must restrict access to these notes. In order to make the notes available on OCW the notes will have to be restructured.
Except that what survived were things like mice and roaches, not pigs, cows and monkeys. In any event while the species might survive, the majority of the individuals would not.
1. Hardly a valid comparison. Information was not as easily disseminated. so he published a book. So did Newton.
2. Who claims that? It's news to me.
3. Search google for anti-bitoic reistant bacteria.
4. See #3
5. Again, news to me. I would say "I prefer to accpet evolution because it makes sense and fits the evidence."
6. Actually much of Darwin's work is based upon his own and other's research of South Pacific bird species.
7. Evolutionary force? Nope. It's simply life, death, and sex. As opposed to say inventing some giant invisible hand in the sky that invented everything and that got pissed off because, while omniscient and omnipotent, things aren't going his way.
Similar if not the exact same thing exists for linux. Awhile back I had kernel panics write to floppy (IIRC because the problem I was debugging was with a bad disk, and swap was on said disk).
Re:Near Ground Ozone _IS_ an environmental problem
on
Ozone As Pesticide
·
· Score: 1
Off hand I can't say, it wasn't covered in my readings. However I do know signficant quantities of livestock are raised in the area. A quick search on google for San Joaquin air quality turns up all sorts of information, much of it making specific reference to problems with ground level ozone.
Re:Near Ground Ozone _IS_ an environmental problem
on
Ozone As Pesticide
·
· Score: 1
Actually it is. The San Joaquin Valley (a primary agricultural area in CA, and the US) just passed LA for worst air quality. Increasing ground level ozone would not improve things.
sar.casm \'sa:r-.kaz-*m\ \sa:r-'kas-tik\ \-ti-k(*-)le-\ n [F sarcasme, fr. LL sarcasmos, fr. Gk sarkasmos, fr. sarka]zein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, fr. sark-, sarx flesh; akin to Av thwar*s to cut 1: a cutting, hostile, or contemptuous remark : GIBE 2: the use of caustic or ironic language - sar.cas.tic aj - sar.cas.ti.cal.ly av
Geez, you'd think nobody'd ever taken a science class. When you freeze water the impurities are forced out of the crystal structure. You can make freshwater from seawater by "creating snow" with it.
AM is for talk and sports. You don't need stereo to listen to that shit. (Of course some would argue that much of the stuff passing for music isn't deserving of the bandwidth wasted on FM stereo either)
This is not an environmentally friendly fuel, it's just less egregious.
Diesel is not the answer
on
239 MPG Car
·
· Score: 1
Ignoring the fact that diesel is a fossil fuel,
and therefore nasty outright. Diesel
(including biodisel) is not the answer.
While they do produce 6% less CO2
and can produce 80% less NOX,
they produce 25 to 400x more soot (See
recent issue of New Scientist). Soot
also causes global warming (although it has a shorter lifespan than CO2). It also has
severe direct impacts upon human health.
Indeed. We used to have an agency that was half-way there. No taxation, but evaluated and made recommendations on new and alternative technologies. But guess who axed it?
In some cases (for example 14.01 - Microeconomics)
the lecturer uses copyrighted material in the
lecture notes, and therefore must restrict access
to these notes. In order to make the notes
available on OCW the notes will have to be
restructured.
Except that what survived were things like
mice and roaches, not pigs, cows and monkeys.
In any event while the species might survive,
the majority of the individuals would not.
A native of Los Angeles
1.
Hardly a valid comparison. Information was not
as easily disseminated. so he published a book.
So did Newton.
2.
Who claims that? It's news to me.
3.
Search google for anti-bitoic reistant bacteria.
4.
See #3
5.
Again, news to me. I would say "I prefer to accpet
evolution because it makes sense and fits the
evidence."
6.
Actually much of Darwin's work is based upon his
own and other's research of South Pacific bird
species.
7.
Evolutionary force? Nope. It's simply life, death,
and sex. As opposed to say inventing some giant
invisible hand in the sky that invented everything
and that got pissed off because, while omniscient and omnipotent, things aren't going his way.
"base legislation on it."
Come again? Just how many scientists
do you think are in congress? and how
many of them actually made the proposals
you accuse them of?
So keep your hardware... Sparc/Linux
http://www.ultralinux.org/
What about arla?
http://www.stacken.kth.se/projekt/arla/
Similar if not the exact same thing exists
for linux. Awhile back I had kernel panics
write to floppy (IIRC because the problem I
was debugging was with a bad disk, and swap
was on said disk).
Off hand I can't say, it wasn't covered in my
readings. However I do know signficant quantities
of livestock are raised in the area. A quick
search on google for San Joaquin air quality
turns up all sorts of information, much of it
making specific reference to problems with
ground level ozone.
Actually it is. The San Joaquin Valley
(a primary agricultural area in CA, and
the US) just passed LA for worst air quality.
Increasing ground level ozone would not
improve things.
The dumpster is *not* cheaper.
Because somebody is going to
have to monitor the groundwater,
cleanup the site...
Who the hell authenticates when serving up files?
Geez, anonymous read access for all. However,
one could always use sftp.
sar.casm \'sa:r-.kaz-*m\ \sa:r-'kas-tik\ \-ti-k(*-)le-\ n [F sarcasme, fr.
LL sarcasmos, fr. Gk sarkasmos, fr. sarka]zein to tear flesh, bite the lips
in rage, sneer, fr. sark-, sarx flesh; akin to Av thwar*s to cut 1: a
cutting, hostile, or contemptuous remark : GIBE 2: the use of caustic or
ironic language - sar.cas.tic aj - sar.cas.ti.cal.ly av
One word: stack
Right, because HTTP *isn't* plain text
Geez, you'd think nobody'd ever taken a
science class. When you freeze water the
impurities are forced out of the crystal
structure. You can make freshwater from
seawater by "creating snow" with it.
Socially acceptable?
Not where I'm from...
Are they really? Do you know that for sure?
Well in fact, now some of them are. But not all.
There's a reason San Jose has the highest
concentration of Superfund sites (oh wait, Bush
cancelled that) in the country.
FM is for music.
AM is for talk and sports.
You don't need stereo to listen to
that shit. (Of course some would
argue that much of the stuff passing
for music isn't deserving of the
bandwidth wasted on FM stereo either)
This is not an environmentally friendly fuel,
it's just less egregious.
Ignoring the fact that diesel is a fossil fuel, and therefore nasty outright. Diesel (including biodisel) is not the answer. While they do produce 6% less CO2 and can produce 80% less NOX, they produce 25 to 400x more soot (See recent issue of New Scientist). Soot also causes global warming (although it has a shorter lifespan than CO2). It also has severe direct impacts upon human health.
Many unions have benefited their constituents,.
Try checking out turn of the century textile working conditions.
Indeed. We used to have an agency that was half-way there. No taxation, but evaluated
and made recommendations on new and alternative
technologies. But guess who axed it?
Just great.
As if we don't have a hard enough time getting
Joe Sixpack to recycle lead-acid and NiCad
batteries let's give him some *really* heavy
metal.
I've seen this error on some boxen when
attempting to give the three finger salute
without being logged in.