Slashdot Mirror


Don't Eat The White Snow Either

loteck writes "An interesting article about an Australian ski resort that is converting human waste into freshly driven snow. The waste is converted "through a three-step purifying process of UV light filtration, ozonation and ultra-filtration", and they say it's "even cleaner than that made from nearby creek water." I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste."

233 comments

  1. Creek? by Op7imus_Prim3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll think you'll find that's due to the fact there IS NO WATER in the nearby creek. You can thank the Snowy Mountains Hydro project for that one.

    1. Re:Creek? by Op7imus_Prim3 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the recent bushfires.

    2. Re:Creek? by chamenos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      water purified from human waste can actually be cleaner than water purified through normal means. its just the idea that irks most people. singapore has started introducing water that is "reclaimed" from sewage for consumption. the purity of the water exceeded the standard set by the world health organization by quite a far margin. if i'm not wrong some places in america already use water reclaimed from sewage for consumption, so its not as if this is a completely new concept.

    3. Re:Creek? by cdrudge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many cities sewer systems have overflow mechanisms that allow raw sewage to wind up ultimately in a nearby river. Those same rivers feed water treatment facilities downstream for other cities' drinking water. I realize that this isn't a direct reclaimation, but it is more "direct" then the evaporation/precipitation route.

    4. Re:Creek? by MoThugz · · Score: 1

      And the Singaporeans dub it NEWater.

    5. Re:Creek? by silence535 · · Score: 1

      Get used to the thought that ALL water on earth has been consumed at some time in history and that ALL water on earth has simply been purified by the normal ways of nature. (Hmm, I guess there is some really old water deep down under the north and south pole...)

      And even all the carbon inside of us has been thru some other living organism sometime before. Yes, your neighbour actually has been shit before (scuse me french) and you too.

      Oh my god, we are all made of recycled material and *gasp* even our soul has been reincarnated...

      nevermind...

      -silence

      --
      Dyslectics of the world, untie!
    6. Re:Creek? by wicked_little_critta · · Score: 3, Informative

      PAWS, Inc. (the office of Jim Davis, the Garfield guy) has a 'solar aquatic system' in Indiana that processes all the waste water from their complex in a greenhouse, using plants and small critters in series of tanks and pools. Without using any chemicals or electricity (beyond pumping and some supplementary heat for the greenhouse in extreme cold), the system outputs water cleaner than what you used to make your morning coffee.

    7. Re:Creek? by Sethb · · Score: 4, Informative

      My dad works at the waste treatment plant in Las Vegas, and he's told me many times that the water that comes out of the plant is acutally clean enough that it could be used for consumption, but they dump it back into Lake Mead, dirty it up with the lake's normal filth, then pull it back out, process it, and send it to your faucet.

      He told me the only reason they don't just pipe it directly from the plant back into the drinking water system is that people would cringe at the thought of drinking it, even though it's much cleaner than what they're pulling out of the lake now.

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    8. Re:Creek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      water purified from human waste can actually be cleaner than water purified through normal means.

      I'm sure that's not quite what you meant to say, but water from a creek or river can be purified just as cleanly as water from sewage. That's what purification does. Uh, pure water is pure water, no matter where it comes from.

    9. Re:Creek? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      Is our water getting THAT dirty, such that water "reclaimed" from sewage is cleaner than regular used water?

      LOL, times have changed. Water comes from top and falls to ground, and we drain it out. But now we get water from shit, and tell people, "well our regular source of water is contaminated, and your body acts like a water filter thats mixed with shit. Don't worry it's 100% the government and organization WHO, FDDA, CPPSDA and TDI, IANAL, etc."

      "So when do I get to stick a funnel filter up my ass?"

    10. Re:Creek? by antic · · Score: 1

      "So when do I get to stick a funnel filter up my ass?"

      Don't let us stop you...

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  2. Interesting, but... by Latrommi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not use the recycled water to fill up the toliets again instead of putting it on the mountainside. Not sure if I'd want to be skiing on a wastewater snow slope.

    1. Re:Interesting, but... by garcia · · Score: 1, Funny

      you may not want to, but they want to use this water to make the snow. I am sure that they are FAR less concerned w/the amount of water that they use to flush the toilets than the amount that the use to make snow.

      If they are going to go through this (no doubt) expensive cleansing process to put this water on the mountain, it must cost them a SHITLOAD to use fresh water to make the snow.

      You can at least HOPE that your lift tickets, etc go down in price ;)

    2. Re:Interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There would definitely be more of water being flushed out, than the amount being used overall. I guess they would convert to snow only the water which would be over and above their daily requirements.

      Think of it buddy, there are 7500 rooms in the resort, and each occupant would bring in a lot of orange juice, coke and bottled water with him. All this has to be recycled :-)

    3. Re:Interesting, but... by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1, Funny
      You can at least HOPE that your lift tickets, etc go down in price ;)

      Actually, it'd probably work on a sliding scale, depending on how many burritos you ate the night before.

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    4. Re:Interesting, but... by suman28 · · Score: 1

      Seeing that nothing is really pure anymore, I can't really blame anyone for trying. With people growth getting out of control, landfills are filling up too fast. Many things are recycled now-a-days. I guess someone's been wathching Planteers? cartoon too much :-)

    5. Re:Interesting, but... by captnkurt · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they are going to go through this (no doubt) expensive cleansing process to put this water on the mountain, it must cost them a SHITLOAD to use fresh water to make the snow.

      Actually the term is now "SNOWLOAD".

    6. Re:Interesting, but... by mjpaci · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw a show on TLC or Discovery about 6 months ago about a project in Southern California that was taking treated water that would normally go into the Pacific and re-distributing it to homes on a second water main. Water coming off of this "second main" would be used for toilets and outdoor spigots. While this water was just as clean (if not cleaner) than the water coming in on the primary main, people couldn't get over the idea that the water was once (recently) in someone's toilet.

      --Mike

    7. Re:Interesting, but... by MikeDX · · Score: 1

      Actually the term is now "SNOWLOAD".

      Actually I think you'll find the term is "SNOWSHIT"

    8. Re:Interesting, but... by wrax · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how much it costs to pump water from the creeks to make snow, but it has to be more expensive and energy wasteful to do this process. I mean if running their recycling process takes a million dollars in oil every year, and it only takes 100,000 dollars in oil to pump from the rivers then its not really saving anything at all.

    9. Re:Interesting, but... by wind · · Score: 1

      That'd be San Diego, where I used to live. The problem was, when you looked at the reclamation maps to see where the waste water was coming from and where the cleaned water was going to - it was pretty clear that poor people were going to end up using rich people's (albeit clean) waste water. That just struck me as pretty screwed up.

      I'd never thought about the matter until this came up for a vote, and I guess I'd always naively assumed (after growing up watching Star Trek constantly) that we already used reclaimed water, so I was surprised that people reacted so negatively to the idea of it. That said, I do think the planners could have been a bit less obvious about the class distinctions in SD.

    10. Re:Interesting, but... by Forgotten · · Score: 2, Funny

      it was pretty clear that poor people were going to end up using rich people's (albeit clean) waste water. That just struck me as pretty screwed up.

      I see you're not familiar with the theory of "trickle-down economics".

    11. Re:Interesting, but... by captnkurt · · Score: 1

      This gives a whole new meaning to "taking a powder".

  3. sorry but it has to be said. by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

    they got some REAL shitty skiing at that resort.

  4. crash by dirk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think this completely validates the time I yell "oh shit!" when I fell skiing.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    1. Re:crash by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

      Snow happens, I guess :/

      --

      Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
    2. Re:crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of it as more motivation not to fall.

  5. so now its... by b96miata · · Score: 5, Funny

    SHITBALL FIGHT!!!!!!! heh heh......doesn't have the same ring.....

    1. Re:so now its... by m4ik · · Score: 1

      As Ellen Feiss would say: this is like, eew eew ewwww

      --
      Quod in aeternum cubet mortuum non est,
      Et saeculis miris actis etiam Mors perierit
    2. Re:so now its... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell poop.

  6. Right now, as useless as..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    As we would say in Australia right now, given the fires in the Snowy Mountains region...

    "This is about as useless as pissing on a bushfire."

  7. What would you consider "clean" ? by NKJensen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder what the writer of the write-up think happen with all other human waste?

    You and I both live in the middle of mother natures great recycler.

    There is no such thing as to remove human waste, you may MOVE it at best.

    --
    -- From Denmark
    1. Re:What would you consider "clean" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once you remove the waste it become fertilizer.

    2. Re:What would you consider "clean" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are wrong. I worked with a man about 4 years ago on this. This is a proved and patented method of dealing with human excrement. The thing is that nobody has actually implemented a solution involving all three steps on a large scale. We were working on converting wastewater treatment plants in NYC and other large cities to this method. Unfortunately we never got the funding we needed and only got to build a 100 gallon prototype. This method does in fact remove NOT move human waste. It does this through a conversion process of breaking down the excrement into its base parts. At the end you are left with sludge (which can be dried and used as a burnable fuel), water, and a small amount of actual waste. You are correct in a sense that if there was mercury or other toxins in the waste we could not "get rid" of them but only isolate them. Through this isolation we were able to get the dried sludge for fuel, water clean enough to drink (although it did have a little funky color/odor) and a small amount of actual toxins which we could remove and dispose of properly. The other great thing about this process and the reason I was involved is that unlike other wastewater treatment plants this one can be almost totally automated and controlled via computer. (An old 386 in the prototype case). Either way it is a great idea and will actually change the world if it gets implements an a mass scale. How many things can you say that about? Posting as an AC because I hate cookies and forget to log in every time I post.

    3. Re:What would you consider "clean" ? by tada_mac · · Score: 3, Informative

      No you are wrong. any town with decent treatment, (known as primary treatment) removes all solid waste before dumping the water. What they are doing is in addition to secondary and tertiary treatment. The Lake Tahoe area has had to do teriary treatment for more than thirty years to protect the lake as it is such a closed system. the treated water goes in to the Truckee river. The new lodge at the Columbia Icefields Center in the Canadian Rockies reuses grey water (from showers in the hotel and kitchen waste) after it is filtered for toilet flushing. This vastly reduces the total amount of water used, and the total amount of water to be released into the river. Amsterdam gets its water from the Rhine. The process for snowmaking actually works to make the water "cleaner", blowing it up into the air and mixing it with compressed air to make snow kills bacteria, as does exposure to ultraviolet light as it falls othe slopes. So makes for cleaner water in the river in the spring, and it also stores the water for the spring when it is needed more.

    4. Re:What would you consider "clean" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The process I describe was a total treatment process. I think I know how traditional treatment plants work as I needed to research it before prototyping the unit. The interesting thing with the process I describe is that it is a constant flow process. Human excrement is, in the US anyway, a tiny portion of the total flow that goes through any given treatment plant. Most water that passes through the treatment process is as you say gray water. The place that this was going to have the largest impact is in my opinion third world countries and islands, closed water shed systems or low water shed locations basically. The other great thing is that it is a step process that uses constant flow while performing the treatment steps. There are no huge holding tanks to "store" the water. The only holding tank that is needed is one to accept the max flow for any given time. This has in my limited experience been max flow from the population + the largest max runoff from storm conditions in the past 100 years. Or as far back as you can go if records from 100 years ago are not available. Anyway, thanks. It's never a good day unless I learn something new and I just did.

    5. Re:What would you consider "clean" ? by NKJensen · · Score: 1

      "removes all solid waste before dumping the water"

      Well, where do the solid waste go then?

      Sooner or later, it will turn up near someone - possibly you. The issue is if it still is dangerous to you after the processes, it went through on the way.

      That was my point.

      We both know that a lot of processes can be applied to waste water in order to reduce these risks. Sometimes it makes sense to reuse waste water thereby preserving natural reserves of clean water.

      --
      -- From Denmark
    6. Re:What would you consider "clean" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In traditional plants solids are filtered and processed as sludge. With the process I described the solids are scraped and treated before the water ever gets treated. It is an Electro-magnetic process that breaks the sludge down. In the end the sludge is a dark, odorless, harmless fiber. When dried it makes a good burning fuel. It burns cleaner the petroleum products and there is a never-ending supply of it basically, unless the population somehow stops taking a dump.

  8. Marks out of ten.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this resort would make for one of the mankiest on ratemypoo.com

  9. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh oh, did anyone check to see if MS has a patent on the stuff?

  10. Yes! by salemnic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I can legitimately roll in my own filth!

    All the way down the mountain! :p

  11. Mr. Hankey and a white christmas..... by Phigrin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh dear...

  12. Now... by Dibblah · · Score: 2

    That's just taking the piss. However, seriously - The 7 million people who live in london don't seem to mind drinking 'recycled' water. Why should it be different here?

    1. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water in the Thames Basin is said to be recycled on average 7 times. No wonder Europeans stick to wine and bottled water.

    2. Re:Now... by ces · · Score: 1

      New Orleans has the same thing, they're drinking everyone upstream's sewage and were doing so even before treatment was required.

      Actually the tap water in New Orleans isn't bad. Got some BIG filters at that intake station.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  13. Before anyone else gets in with this one by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now to find the decent snow you REALLY have to go off-piste.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Before anyone else gets in with this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now to find the decent snow you REALLY have to go off-piste.

      You mean off-poo

    2. Re:Before anyone else gets in with this one by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

      I can't believe it's not piste!

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
  14. another snow-from-sewage story by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've heard of another project that uses semi-processed waste water to make snow. The process of making snow, in which the water is mixed with some other stuff ("chemicals", they are called, I think ?), then sprayed under very high pressure. As the water emerges from the spray nozzel, the sudden depressurization causes the cells of any living organizims (say , germs, or bacteria) to burst, effectively disinfecting the water on a microscopic level.
    And they swore you couldn't tell it was sewage...

    --


    -------------------------
    A person of moderate zeal
    1. Re:another snow-from-sewage story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a video demonstrating how this works. On a macroscopic level.

    2. Re:another snow-from-sewage story by petitclv · · Score: 1

      I saw recently a documentary that explained how they make artificial snow. (the complete video documentary -in french, sorry, no babelfish! - is here) And what they said is that the more filthy is the water, the better will be the artificial snow. Usually ski centers use non-treated river water for their snow cannons.

      --
      __________ petitclv
    3. Re:another snow-from-sewage story by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 1

      that has GOT to hurt!!

      --


      -------------------------
      A person of moderate zeal
    4. Re:another snow-from-sewage story by Ioldanach · · Score: 1
      I've heard of another project that uses semi-processed waste water to make snow. The process of making snow, in which the water is mixed with some other stuff ("chemicals", they are called, I think ?), then sprayed under very high pressure. As the water emerges from the spray nozzel, the sudden depressurization causes the cells of any living organizims (say , germs, or bacteria) to burst, effectively disinfecting the water on a microscopic level.

      The process of snowmaking itself has been used lately in many areas of the US that make supplementary snow for skiing. Basically, the process of snowmaking is to pressurize the water and shoot it out of a nozzle with a cavity that causes the water to go from high pressure to small particles very quickly (like, milliseconds). The process, as a side effect, causes any cellular structures to be rapidly crushed and expanded, destroying the cell walls. So, it won't remove toxic minerals but it will eliminate the problems posed by human waste.

      It sounds like the extra work they're going through is either overstated, overkill, or to remove those extra chemicals that the depressurization doesn't handle.

  15. You drink waste water anyway.. by MikeFM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where do you think waste water goes? Back into the drinking water! Sure they run it though a filtering process when they make it drinking water again but the process probably isn't a lot different except these guys probably don't add as many nasty chemicals. If it were me I wouldn't even bother telling my customers. I'd run a monthly (weekly?) test to make sure my filters were doing their job and just go on about my business.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Avogadro, urine and eternal recycling

      A calculation of what would happen if we'd dilute all the urine from one days urination of the world population into all the 1.4 billion trillions litres water on earth. Yes, thank god for the internet putting questions like these into rest. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by apdt · · Score: 1, Informative

      I remember reading that all the water you drink has been through at least 6 people before you get it.

      --
      I lay awake last night wondering where the sun had gone, then it dawned on me.
    3. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by will_die · · Score: 1

      I would think that is really low, could that of been in the last year of the waters life?

      Hey just think of all the fish waste you suck in everthing you out in the oceans.

      Got Urine?

    4. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all dinosaurs... :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by kqc7011 · · Score: 1

      If you live downstream of a city where they treat and release the sewage? Guess what your drinking. A simple rule of thumb is that human usage for a resort is 100 gallons per person per day.

      --
      Passionately Indifferent
    6. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by br0ck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about all of the drugs and pharmaceuticals that make it into the water supply? Antibiotics passed from humans and feed animals have been found in the water supply. Hormones are present in greater concentrations than you'd think and are thought to be disrupting fish reproduction with males having eggs in their testes. Although being able to produce caviar at will could make you quite the party favorite.

    7. Re:You drink waste water anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No biggie, but fish actually don't excrete nitrogen waste as urine (urea). They produce ammonia instead (it's cheaper to do this, and safe for them because, well, they're surrounded by water). At the other end of the scale birds produce uric acid instead of urea, because urea is too toxic for the amount of water they can spare to dilute it. See, I do remember something from first-year biology.
      Ammonia is pretty toxic of course, but it's not intact in the water by the time you drink it (or even swim in it, in the sea).
      Interesting that water is the limiting factor for one of the most basic necessary steps of metabolism (nitrogen waste removal). Water really is life.

  16. Nothing new really by caveat · · Score: 1

    ski areas have been usiing variations on this for years - a while back (mid, late 90s) there was a fuss about using mildly engineered enterococcal bacteria in the water to not only provide nuclei for the 'snowflakes' to form (that's why wastewater's so useful, full of dead bacteria and bits of protein and crap), but also to secrete some enzyme that would increase the temperature they could blow snow to 35 or 38F or something. this is probably safer than most snowblowing systems; they just use water atraight from the nearest pond/lake.river/stream/whatever - friend of mine got giardia from eating made snow once...

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  17. How much water is saved? by jhawkins · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm a little unclear on this. How much water does it take to clean the wastewater to use as snow? I've never run a 7500-bed ski resort, so I don't know exactly how much sewage we're talking about, but I thought it generally takes several gallons of water to treat a gallon of sewage. It sounds like they're taking the discharge from their "recycling plant for initial treatment" and then treating it some more. Are they using more water to treat the sewage to be able to have their marketing dept say they are "friends to the environment" than they would have used if they pumped out of the creek to make snow?

    My other thought is, I'd imaging there must be some sort of minimum standard for the cleanliness of the water to make snow (no, there probably isn't a national standard like there is for drinking water), but there's probably some maximum amount of crud allowed in the water to not clog up the snowmaker machines. I've never been skiing, but don't you generally have several layers of clothing on, and nearly every part of your body covered? I don't think too many people are getting sick from the quality of the water used in snowmaking. Plus, are you eating it? Maybe the guy in the footage from ABC's Wide World of Sports (" .. and the agony of defeat... ") ate some snow, but most skiers probably don't ingest the snow.

    I'm glad to see that they're purifying their sewage that much, but wouldn't it have been treated properly before this system was put in palce, and then discharged into a creek for other users (human, plant, and animal alike) downstream to use?

    just thoughts from a non-skier, non sewage plant operater..

  18. Hope its reliable by kinnell · · Score: 1

    What happens when the filtration unit breaks down and starts spraying raw sewage onto the unhappy punters?

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Hope its reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > What happens when the filtration unit breaks down and starts spraying raw sewage onto the unhappy punters?

      The shit hits the fan?

  19. Future predictions by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for this technology to become sufficiently miniaturized that you can have it fitted internally, and just excrete pure white snow directly. It would certainly make snowball fights more interesting.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Future predictions by gorjusborg · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for this technology to become sufficiently miniaturized that you can have it fitted internally...

      Me too!

      But forget the snow. I am tired of stopping my car to buy bottled water on the way home from work.
      Just open the Nalgene, kill two birds with one stone :)

      --
      If it's not one thing, it's Steve's Mother
    2. Re:Future predictions by Dman33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice thought but I am afraid that would just defeat the purpose of pissing your name in the snow...

      Now what am I to do on Saturday nights???

    3. Re:Future predictions by calethix · · Score: 1

      But forget the snow. I am tired of stopping my car to buy bottled water on the way home from work. Just open the Nalgene, kill two birds with one stone :)
      You would of course still need to keep a bottle in your car unless your are either exceptionally endowed or quite flexible... perhaps we should just stop this thread on that note.

    4. Re:Future predictions by anotherone · · Score: 1
      You could just piss your name onto the sidewalk before it snows.


      Or, there's the same joke that everyone on this page has already made twice: Snowball fight!

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    5. Re:Future predictions by TheDormouse · · Score: 0

      It has, on several occasions, occured to me that it is ridiculous that humans still excrete stinking sticky waste out of an orifice that is lodged in a deep crevice of skin.

      Seems like, being the 21st century, we'd have a more civilized way to do it nowadays....

    6. Re:Future predictions by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now you could snow your name in the piss.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    7. Re:Future predictions by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and some people's crevices are MUCH deeper than others.

      Ugh. Happy thoughts, happy thoughts!

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    8. Re:Future predictions by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      just excrete pure white snow directly. It would certainly make snowball fights more interesting.

      Buddy #1: "I can't shit right now, and its almost recess"
      Buddy #2: "Here, eat some Taco Bell, you'll get bowel movement instantly!"
      Buddy #1: "Do you have vasaline?"

  20. I just don't know what to say . . . by Wire+Tap · · Score: 4, Funny

    The resort has an amazing 7500 beds, which all adds up to a lot of visitors making a lot of human waste. Converting this into snow seemed a logical step.

    Maybe I'm not as logical as I once thought.

    --

    Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

    1. Re:I just don't know what to say . . . by dackroyd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The resort has an amazing 7500 beds, which all adds up to a lot of visitors making a lot of human waste. Converting this into snow seemed a logical step.

      Maybe I'm not as logical as I once thought.

      I can't find exact figures, but I guess that each guest could easily produce 100 litres of waste 'liquid' each day, once you've taken into account all the water that is used in washing your teeth, showering, washing the plates you used for brekfast etc, etc.

      If you could reclaim 95% of that water at a reasonable cost/efficiency then you're looking at 700,000 litres over water a day. Which would make quite a bit of snow.

      Even if the resort saved just 1 cent per litre by not having to have more piped in that'd be a saving of $7000 dollars a day, definitely not to be sniffed at (or tasted :o).
      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    2. Re:I just don't know what to say . . . by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      definitely not to be sniffed at

      I'd definitely not sniff at it...

    3. Re:I just don't know what to say . . . by rolfpal · · Score: 1

      "but I guess that each guest could easily produce 100 litres of waste 'liquid' each day"

      Resorts create about 500 litres of wastewater per day per guest.

      Reclaimed water is used all over the world. My company makes residential sized biological water reclamation systems for the Canadian Arctic. The link is here. Our systems are used for flushing toilets and washing clothes, the system I have in my house is used for toilet flushing, washing clothes, bathing and showering and for garden irrigation.

      Cheers,

      --
      nothing is real
    4. Re:I just don't know what to say . . . by AndFluff · · Score: 1
      In New Jersey where i work the design flow of a hotel is 130 gallons/per room/per day, which would work out to about 975,000 gallons per day (and this is not including if there are restrants and shops which i am sure that there are.) Even if they were to use a Greywater distribustion system for the toilets, and other greywayer devises, it would only use a small fraction of this was, which would mean that they would have to dispose of it on site some how.

      Currently i am actualy designing a similar (but much smaller) system using a 6,000 gallon per day Zenon system, to recycle wastewater, and storm water runoff to be used to make ice at an ice rink.

      Ben
      AKA: AndFluff

    5. Re:I just don't know what to say . . . by dackroyd · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a lot of water. I thought I might be overestimating at 100 litres.

      So that changes the numbers above to 3.5 mega-litres of water a day and savings probably in the range of tens of thousands of dollars a day.

      Definitely a case where the enivironmentally friendly choice is also the wallet friendly choice.

      --
      "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
  21. Competitive Advantage by perfects · · Score: 1

    Mark my words, as a result of this development the Australian downhill team will be unbeatable at the next Winter Olympics. I mean, the motivation to avoid an "agony of defeat" moment with a fece-bank and to get off the hill as soon as possible would be incredible.

    Of course the gas masks will make their skiers less aerodynamic, so it might even things out.

  22. Nice try, geography's a bit out... by Goonie · · Score: 2, Informative
    Seeing it's several hundred kilometres from Buller to the Snowy Mountains Hydro project, and the Buller area is in completely different catchments, I'm not sure how you can blame the Snowy scheme.

    Try again later!

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  23. If you drink out of the river... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nothing new about that at all, been going on for centuries, unless you were the settlement furthest upstream. Even then, you were probably drinking run-off sheep and goat...

    1. Re:If you drink out of the river... by chamenos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i agree...the concept i'm referring to though, is the concept of water purified through man-made means, as opposed to nature which most people are more used to. in singapore's case, they're currently pumping the purified water into reservoirs, just to let it sit in the open so the birds and fish can crap into it and let nature do a bit of its thing, before purifying it again to pump into the water supply. all this, just to satisfy the odd inhibitions that a lot of people have to consuming purified sewage. weak-minded people really do bother me sometimes.

    2. Re:If you drink out of the river... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
      and they say it's "even cleaner than that made from nearby creek water." I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste."

      the concept of water purified through man-made means, as opposed to nature which most people are more used to. in singapore's case, they're currently pumping the purified water into reservoirs, just to let it sit in the open so the birds and fish can crap into it and let nature do a bit of its thing, before purifying it again to pump into the water supply. all this, just to satisfy the odd inhibitions that a lot of people have to consuming purified sewage. weak-minded people really do bother me sometimes.

      Don't be so hasty to cast stones. Clearly there is a double standard, born of ignorance on the part of many. A small ski resort I visited used to pump icky water from a swamp and make snow from it. You could tell because the air smelled terrible when they were doing it and the snow had a yellowish tinge from algae. However, look at what advertising has told the consumer:

      Beer from the land of sky blue waters (can you name it? :-)

      Mountain spring water (yeah, right... all 50 zillion gallons of it every day, that's no spring it's a river, in Cal. it's probably pumped from Colorado or Owens River, read Cadillac Desert)

      Then there's the simple test of putting two glasses of water in front of someone, filtered from the town well and recovered water. Don't tell them before they taste test, then see if they make a face and call a lawyer once you've explained one came from recovered water.

      People have been trained, since before the Bible to avoid water touched by human waste, because bacteria and fungi which cause some pretty bad aflictions grow in it. That was wisdom, it may seem misguided, until you run a marketing campaign to change people's opinion, then catch the local water filtration manager cutting corners. It's probably happening in your town and you don't even know it.

      Me, I put a filter on my drinking water, for whatever good it does. Which it does to some small noticable degree.

      Water is getting poorer in quality and reuse isn't a new concept, but reuse is growing and people will need to accept it, because alternatives (desalination, for example) can be very expensive.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:If you drink out of the river... by Sabalon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good time to mention the book "The Great Stink of London" (Amazon) which is about the development of the London sewer system.

      The above was one of the problems - the futher down the Thames you got, the more crap (litterally) there was in the water. Though, since the Thames is a tidal river it went both ways.

      An interesting read.

    4. Re:If you drink out of the river... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but when you say, "Water is getting poorer in quality..." what do you mean?

    5. Re:If you drink out of the river... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      San Diego, CA has a big project doing just this, but currently they use the water only for irrigation (i.e., city facility lawns and golf courses).

      People have hangups about this, yet many, if not all, of the complainers will regularly buy water in clear plastic bottles because they think it's "cleaner" and "healthier" than the water from the tap, from the regular water supply, or they buy their own water treatment facilities (aka water softeners, Reverse Osmosis filtration, etc., which are even more wasteful of water).

      When I lived there, we had a softener, and a RO system for the kitchen sink. San Diego water is pretty hard... It wasn't because of any fear of chemicals, it was so it would taste like...water.

      SoCal water though, generally does suck in general.

    6. Re:If you drink out of the river... by chamenos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      actually i live in singapore...sorry if i gave you the wrong impression. currently, the water purified through some method called "reverse-osmosis" or something similar, has been tested in a laboratory to be cleaner than the water we currently consume, and as it is the water here is already clean enough to be consumed straight from the tap. i drink water straight from the tap all the time without any ill effects so much so that i've gotten used to it to the point, that when i went to china a few years ago my local host looked appalled when i proceeded to do the same there. apparently the water has to be boiled at least once before it is safe for consumption.

      anyway i didn't mean to imply that the ski resort would purify water to the same standards that singapore does. i agree that they probably wouldn't, since it wouldn't be cost-effective. i was just attempting to dismiss the eek factor a lot of people have with reclaimed water, despite the fact that it can be cleaner than most forms of potable water today.

      by the way, singapore's utilities services are strictly government monitored, and even small screw-ups are widely publicised. a few years ago a sewage pipe in an apartment buildling leaked raw sewage into the water pipes due to lack of maintenance, resulting in some people being hospitalized. the case was plastered all over the newspapers and i'm sure some heads were rolling after that, as they rightfully should ;)

    7. Re:If you drink out of the river... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Just curious, but when you say, "Water is getting poorer in quality..." what do you mean?

      Snowmelt/rainfall fills the stream or aquifer your water comes from (exceptions, like L.A., where it's pumped hundreds of miles _into_ an aquifer)

      You live in city D, downstream from Cities A, B, C.

      City A uses the water, some of it is treated then fed to streams or back into wells.

      City B does the same thing.

      City C does the same thing.

      All this use increases mineral content of the water, since minerals are disolved into water, not chunks you can filter out. Most can only be removed by energy intensive evaporation.

      In City D you turn on the tap and out comes a glass of water with the accumulated minerals, trace elements, pollutants it has acquired on its journey.

      Most cities grow, thus increasing their need for water.

      The mineral and other chemical content compounds.

      There is a treaty between the US and Mexico governing use of the Colorado River, as concentration of salts in water have, in the past, reached levels which were harmful to mexican agriculture. Recently L.A. lost access to Mono Lake water (because they were draining it almost completely), more recently Southern California has lost access to extra shares of Colorado River water, unused by upstream states, until now.

      In short, the more water is used after it falls from the clouds, the more things accumulate in it. Biologicals can be treated out, but salts and chemicals are much more difficult. Pumping water into wells, to "purify" water has resulted in their decreasing effectiveness.

      Granted, in the eastern US and other regions which receive greater rain and snowfall, it's less of an issue (so far.)

      When I was much younger I heard of some Army Corps of Engineers plan to run a pipeline from Lake Michigan to the California. I thought it was just another goofy rumor. After reading Cadillac Desert, I found it wasn't just proposed, but the Great Lake States fought it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:If you drink out of the river... by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1
      Beer from the land of sky blue waters (can you name it? :-)

      Are the kids around here really so young they don't remember Hamms?

    9. Re:If you drink out of the river... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not an emotional issue, dude. There is no such thing as pure H2O for drinking; the water tastes different depending on what goes into it, plain and simple. It doesn't matter if water cotnains fish and crafish shit, or human shit, cleaned water is cleaned water.

      Personally and honestly, I detest bottled water. I prefer city-clorinated water, it "tastes" better. But I'll drink any water so long as enough animal shit and dangerous chemicals are removed that it's deemed "safe".

      I can't help commenting on your Bible comment, but you do understand that humans have been drinling water for 10's of thousands of years before the first religions which came thousands of years before the Bible, right? Let's not get into non-nodern or pre-human apes, or Neanderthals, etc.

      The post to which you replied was right - it's weak minded-ness, like, "I eat snails, fungus and shrimp, but would never eat ants!".

      Ignorant fools.

    10. Re:If you drink out of the river... by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      People have hangups about this, yet many, if not all, of the complainers will regularly buy water in clear plastic bottles because they think it's "cleaner" and "healthier" than the water from the tap,

      This is one of those things that regularly amuses me - the notion that water (or anything) is better for you if it comes from a nice sealed plastic container. Personally I try to limit my intake of foodstuffs that have been in prolonged contact with soft plastics - the pthalates and other organics that seep or offgas into your food and drink are generally worse than what's in the tap water. Many of them are hormone analogues like some of the nasty petrochemical-based pollutants flowing into streams and rivers these days. Lately I've phased out plastic in my kitchen in favour of glass and steel cookware and storage containers. I find since I've done this that I can taste when something's been contained in plastic, depending on the kind (hard thermoset plastics are usually ok, and notably don't imbue a flavour).

      I saw a TV commercial the other day that claimed some sort of home water filter (probably Brita, which I have one of but have no real faith in for the things that matter) produces output that "tastes as fresh as bottled water". WTF? Since when did something bottled, canned, or wrapped in plastic become our yardstick of "fresh"? Shrinkwrap culture, I guess.

    11. Re:If you drink out of the river... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      It's not an emotional issue, dude.

      Dude, yourself. In the U.S. emotion overrules logic. As the original poster stated, people have inhibitions. In the absence of reason, emotion prevails. Respect, or fear of Cholera and Dysentery?

      There is no such thing as pure H2O for drinking; the water tastes different depending on what goes into it, plain and simple. It doesn't matter if water cotnains fish and crafish shit, or human shit, cleaned water is cleaned water.

      There is pure water, it is called Deionized or Distilled water, but you shouldn't drink it without adding minerals since it would leech them out of the body to acheive equillibrium. This is why people get stomach cramps from eating snow.

      Cleaned water is subjective. What has been removed? Ideally it is free of harmful bacteria, parasites, fungi, etc., which boiling or chlorination would achieve. Other pollutants are another matter. A friend who worked a hazardous waste site shared this nugget of wisdom with me: Hazardous doesn't mean toxic, it simply means of an excessive concentration which would harm the environment. A fine and important point too few are aware of. They increased the demand on our town wells until the displaced water is replaced with unacceptable water, that from nearby aquifers or the sea, which have high (and getting higher) concentrations of various minerals. Fecal matter is the least of anyone's concerns.

      Personally and honestly, I detest bottled water. I prefer city-clorinated water, it "tastes" better. But I'll drink any water so long as enough animal shit and dangerous chemicals are removed that it's deemed "safe". You're fortunate to have a good source of water. When I lived in Michigan the water came from deep in Lake Huron. Even wells up near Gladwin had exceptionally good water. Try the water in Ann Arbor, though, or try it in Phoenix, AZ or Los Angeles, CA. Much of the wests water drains through relatively young geology, such that dozens of salts exist and are building up. A visit to Salt Lake, Death Valley or Owens Valley can shead some light on the magnatude of the problem.

      I can't help commenting on your Bible comment, but you do understand that humans have been drinling water for 10's of thousands of years before the first religions which came thousands of years before the Bible, right? Let's not get into non-nodern or pre-human apes, or Neanderthals, etc.

      Not a matter of religion, though much of religion is peppered with sage advice brought from experience. Though early people lacked the details (what the organism or compound was), they could see the cause and effect clearly. Drink water from a pool with a carcass or drained from a loo and get sick. Science has made us aware of what is in the water and what it does to a body, it takes education to dispell fears and build trust.

      The post to which you replied was right - it's weak minded-ness, like, "I eat snails, fungus and shrimp, but would never eat ants!".

      Weakminded, or caution for self preservation? Epidemics and plagues are hard to erase from civilizations memory, labeling people stupid or cowardly for their caution is undoubtably what a great many dead or maimed people have done. If it's safe, work toward educating people, rather than name calling.

      Ignorant fools.

      Bravely stated, o anonymous one.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    12. Re:If you drink out of the river... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Beer from the land of sky blue waters (can you name it? :-)

      Are the kids around here really so young they don't remember Hamms?

      Did you know that beer and wine were originally ways to keep water potable? :-)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    13. Re:If you drink out of the river... by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Ohio's govener at the time wanted some ridiculous ammount of cash for it, like 10 dollars a barrel of water ro something for everything they pumped out fo lake erie. Wish they would have done it, Ohio's economy is shot right now. Seem worse off than any other place I have been recently.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  24. Australian skiers on drugs, by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 3, Funny

    They already have "snow" and "powder", now they get the "good clean shit" too....

    No wonder australians are so relaxed :)

    1. Re:Australian skiers on drugs, by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you can get ahold of "snow" and "powder", and now "good clean shit" too,

      relaxed is one thing you WON'T be.

      Now "green"......

  25. Waterworld by dduardo · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is a way to convert piss into water, just like Kevin Costner did on his boat :)

    1. Re:Waterworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er - where do you think your town gets its drinking water?

    2. Re:Waterworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get you Paul Muad'dib's phone number; he's been doing the piss-to-water schtick years before Costner made it big.

  26. Yeah right... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Trust me, it would take more than skiing on crap to make the Australian downhill team competitive... we had one good female slalom skiier, but that's only because she spent her teenage years in the Alps somewhere. In snow terms, you might say we already ski on crap... it's usually complete slush about 30cm deep for most of the season.

    The only sensible season to spend *any* time in the Australian high country is summer, when the weather is damn pleasant, the flowers are out, and the views are fscking spectacular. Particularly at the moment, when half of it is on fire ... :/

    We are, however, much better skiiers than the Austrians are surfers :)

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  27. Needs electricity, so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they still make snow during a brown-out?

  28. Wait a minute... by Noryungi · · Score: 1

    Australian ski resort

    Emphasis on Australian .

    Does anyone else also think this is a contradiction in terms??

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Showing your ignorance again, Try to find a channel with world news instead of watching the navel gazing halfwits in your neck of the woods.

      Australia does not have a lot of snow, but it is there in winter, and yes, there are resorts, and skiers even.

    2. Re:Wait a minute... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Not really, they won gold in the men's speed skating in the last Olympics. Speed skating!

      Granted, you won't see them winning one for skiing anytime soon, unless you have several skiers racing at the same time (now THAT would be a sight to see!) and all except the Aussie skier run into each other just before the end...

  29. Pisste by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 1

    do you call that a piss-te?

    --
    IAAL
  30. Coming to grips with new tech. by mt-biker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "even cleaner than that made from nearby creek water." I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste.

    A typical knee-jerk reaction that nearly all of us have, myself included. But perhaps quite an unfair one.

    This is going to seem a little off-topic. Bear with me!

    We seem to be quite often short of water these days, and since we don't have a lot of new water catchment possibilities, it would seem that it can only get worse as the population increases.

    Saving water seems to be the key here. Not only through more efficient appliances, but also through multiple uses of our water. How much sense does it make to be flushing our toilets with drinking water?

    Some houses already capture "grey water" and use it for tasks where drinking water is not required. Obviously there's some filtering required. I've heard of other projects which are completely water self-sufficient. Yes, you end up boiling your potatoes in recycled piss!

    Pretty revulsive to us today, but who knows? Maybe our grandkids will find it completely normal.

    1. Re:Coming to grips with new tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that the Buccanear on St. Croix, USVI captures "grey water" for agriculture needs. Fresh water is at a premium down there and the Bucc has a really nice golf course...

    2. Re:Coming to grips with new tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "revolting"? "repulsive"? please choose one.

    3. Re:Coming to grips with new tech. by IncarnationTwo · · Score: 1

      Some houses already capture "grey water" and use it for tasks where drinking water is not required. Obviously there's some filtering required. I've heard of other projects which are completely water self-sufficient. Yes, you end up boiling your potatoes in recycled piss!

      Pretty revulsive to us today, but who knows? Maybe our grandkids will find it completely normal.


      To be honest we are allready doing it. Earth is mostly a closed system. And might I say, I find it less repulsive to drink water where only I have pissed compared to the water where whole world pisses.

      --
      In dream society, people could be given the ability to mod replies. In real life, it would be disaster.
    4. Re:Coming to grips with new tech. by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      "revolting"? "repulsive"? please choose one.

      Come now. Don't you think you're being a bit vulterant?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    5. Re:Coming to grips with new tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking of giving up showering? Taking a shower every day with a low-flow showerhead uses about as much water as it takes to raise one pound of beef.

      Raising animals for food consumes more than half of all water used in the U.S. A totally vegetarian diet requires 300 gallons of water per day, while a meat-eating diet requires more than 4,200 gallons of water per day.

      Producing just one hamburger uses enough fossil fuel to drive a small car 20 miles. Of all raw materials and fossil fuels used in the U.S., more than one-third is used to raise animals for food.

      Fifty-five square feet of rain forest may be razed to produce just one quarter-pound burger.

  31. hmm... by horcy · · Score: 0

    Nothing like snowboarding from your own pile of shit...

    --
    Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
  32. Don't eat the mints in the Bathroom either by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Before you know it we will be told not to eat the mints many resturaunts have in the bathroom :(

  33. New word by bushwahd · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Swiss have a word for this: Schussenfallenschitzensnarfen. I think there's an umlaut in there somewhere.

    1. Re:New word by chefbimbo · · Score: 1

      Actually, we don't. We are only of the happy countries to have abundant water supply thanks to all the rain the alps catch.

      Still the water we dump back into rivers and lakes is basically drinking water (you can safely drink water from the lake of Zurich. It doesn't taste too yummy, but sick you won't be after it).

  34. Maturity by coloth · · Score: 1


    I like where the resort manager assures us that the Australian people are "mature" enough to see what a great idea this is.

    I'm not sure it would be the "mature" individual who would be enthused about skiing on their own excrement.

    And if the Australian people are "mature" enough, what people isn't? The Chinese? The Jamaicans? Perhaps he feels he'll only alienate the 'childish,' 'spoiled' populace of Switzerland with his revolutionary shit-shooters.

    John

    --

    Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

    1. Re:Maturity by damiam · · Score: 1

      It's pure fucking H2O, no matter where it came from. It's the exact same thing, and a sufficiently mature individual would see that.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Maturity by coloth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good point! Really good point!

      And hey! A "sufficiently" mature individual might also recognize sarcasm and humor as well!

      Now pardon me while I sip on some apple juice.

      --

      Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

  35. Plz read, IT'S CLEAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they are lying idiots.

  36. It makes sense I guess... by vistic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    when you consider that the creek is basically going to be filled with solid and liquid animal waste and decomposed fish and other animals.

    It's enough to give you OCD, isn't it?

    I wonder if they didn't try to experiment with untreated waste first. I would think it might have a lower coefficient of friction. Pretty slick slopes. Just give the customers bodysuits and gas masks, and they'll be happier than a pig in... oh.

  37. hm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why exactly do they purify it? Shit skiing is really catching on.

  38. What do you think they do on the space station? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's how the water recycling systems on the space station work. Believe it or not, the water is actually more clean and pure than most tap and bottled water. Such systems are also planned for use on flights to Mars.

  39. Ankh Morpork by xixax · · Score: 4, Funny

    Citizens figured the water's been through so many kidneys, it *has* to be pure....

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:Ankh Morpork by chamenos · · Score: 1

      i think most people are bothered more by the water that's been through the bowels rather than the kidneys though :

    2. Re:Ankh Morpork by LimeColoredSloth · · Score: 1

      mmm... pure blood...

  40. Well this explains why... by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    ..that slope I skied on last week was yellow.

  41. Everyone knows that isn't real human waste... by SB5 · · Score: 1

    Real human waste is made from... PEOPLE... Ok enough Soylent Green references. Seriously the real human waste is in the cubicle next to you playing Solitaire(actually due to the economy that guy was fired, sorry for the misinformation) and running the country, at least that's my opinion. When it is made out of real humans tell me about otherwise I will make comedy about skiing on shitty snow.

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  42. Gross!!! by joelwest · · Score: 1

    Hey kids! Anyone want a snow cone?

  43. Hey, this is bumper sticker material... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mount Buller: Where the affluent meet the effluent.

  44. Ah, now we know. by Raymond+Luxury+Yacht · · Score: 1

    " I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste."

    I think this says more about Australians...

    /me ducks...

    --

    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  45. Offtopic by extra88 · · Score: 1

    I think this deserves a nomination for Best Slashdot Article Title.

  46. London water by m00nun1t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a widely known "fact" in London (not sure if it's an urban myth or not - I suspect not) that water goes through the system seven times. So, there's a good chance your tap water is someone elses piss. Their extensive filtration means the water is actually pretty good.

    Anyway, waste liquid has to go somewhere - a ski slope seems pretty mild compared to many alternatives.

    1. Re:London water by drunkahol · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not entirely accurate, but it has a factual basis.

      It should be remembered that the percentage of household waste water that is urine is actually very small. e.g. more water is used to flush away a piss than is actually piss. Then there are people showering, having baths, washing clothes, washing dished, cooking etc etc etc.

      It's not all that bad when you look at it closely.

      What actually bothered me when I lived in London was that the base amount of oestrogen (spelling?) was climbing due to the huge number of women on the pill. This was then linked to rising male infertility in the London area.

      To be safe - I drank only bottled water. Now my nuts have produced offspring - I don't mind so much.

    2. Re:London water by bmh5c · · Score: 2, Funny
      So, there's a good chance your tap water is someone elses piss

      There's also a good chance that your tap water is a dinoasur's piss, a neaderthal's piss...hell, it might even be my piss. Your tap water has probably been more places than you want to think about.

    3. Re:London water by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Pretty good?!?! You have obviously never been to London. I moved here recently and have taken to asking people if they would like a slice of water or a chunk of coffee. It really is that bad (At least compared to my home in Wales).

      Even my water filter seems to be having trouble with it (I wont touch it straight from the tap). Nasty, nasty stuff.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    4. Re:London water by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

      Try Washington DC. It smells like a swimming pool it has so much clorine and shit in it to keep it clean. IMHO London drinking water is some of the best 'Big City' water around.

      But I agree compared to Wales it is shit...

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
    5. Re:London water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (don't want to mess with Karma).
      I have been to London - I lived there for 6 years, left 2 years ago. The water was fine in my 4 different places, SW9, NW6, W9, NW10. Maybe you have a bad area.

    6. Re:London water by ces · · Score: 1

      Haven't tried the London tap water. From my experience the tap water in most big cities in the US is pretty drinkable. The only place I wouldn't drink out of the tap was LA.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  47. Isn't that how it works in nature? by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Myself, along with all the other organisms on this earth, piss and shit all over. It evaporates (the liquid parts, at least) and then it condenses in clouds, precipitates back down....

  48. The Creek by keesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    This wouldn't be Shit Creek, would it?

    1. Re:The Creek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the moment.. without a puddle!!

    2. Re:The Creek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just Dawson's.

  49. This is a good idea. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I personally would not be the least bit squeamish about this. First off, they make filters capable of filter guiarda(sp) and other microbes out. Even if they don't filter it out you can get rid of it by irradiating the water, or heck BOILING the water will kill most creepy crawlys. They can also filter other things that ain't so nice out of the water. If they make a filter that can filter chlorine out of the water at your house, then this filter or a similar one could work in this machine. They also recycle water on the shuttle because the weight of water costs so much for them to carry it up. They'd rather use as much weight for carrying satellites and other things that can help generate revenue then water for the astronauts.

    Second, and I know some may dispute this, if we are running out of water where does it go? Water that evaporates down here usually turns up as a cloud and then rain somewhere on the planet. I know the planet isn't a closed system, but this water has to go somewhere. It doesn't just zoom off into space. I think that those who claim know have no idea what they are talking about when there's a water shortage. There's oceans full of it just wating to be desalinized. If they can find a economical process for desalinization, then most water problems could be solved.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:This is a good idea. by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's oceans full of it just wating to be desalinized. If they can find a economical process for desalinization, then most water problems could be solved.

      I think that's the crux of the problem. IANAWaterExpert but I think I've read the freshwater problem is basically that we're converting to saltwater the existing supply of non-saline water faster than the natural processes (evaporation, precipitation, ground filtration) can re-create it.

      I think from an energy perspective its far cheaper to convert dirty freshwater into potable water than it is to convert saline water into freshwater, and even non-human drinkable freshwater is used for much more than drinking and bathing.

    2. Re:This is a good idea. by mcpheat · · Score: 1

      They don't recycle water on the shuttle, they get so much out of the hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells which provide the electrical power that they dump waste water. They have occasionally had problems with water freezing in the outlet and causing a blockage.

    3. Re:This is a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The keyword was "economical". The energy and equipment cost of desalinization is silly, although this changes if the cost of water goes up (entirely possible in the near future--I'm from California), of course.

      They do seem to be making progress on it. The energy cost of reverse osmosis isn't all that much, but the equipment (the membranes) breaks down like crazy right now.

      Note that what's used for fresh water is only the like 0.1% that's in rivers, lakes, streams, and underground. Most of the fresh water on the planet is frozen. It's probably cheaper to steal icebergs from Greenland or something.

    4. Re:This is a good idea. by adrenalinerush · · Score: 1
      I know the planet isn't a closed system, but this water has to go somewhere. It doesn't just zoom off into space. I think that those who claim know have no idea what they are talking about when there's a water shortage.

      Ever heard the phrase, "Water, water everywhere, and not a drop to drink?" It's not simply finding water that is such a problem. Finding *clean* water is the problem. The water that you use daily may not disappear, but the water you flush down your toilet is now dirty, and not suitable for drinking, irrigation, making snow, etc. Hence the focus on reclaiming water from waste processes.

      I once worked in a manufacturing plant for Proctor & Gamble, where they made paper towels and toilet paper. The paper-making process uses enormous amounts of water, and can be envorinmentally nasty (think bleaching process). The environmental team at this plant was very proud of their water-cleaning systems: the water that went back into the river was cleaner than the water they took out of it.

  50. Photos Generia by djshiawase · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is it just me, or do the photos in the article seem like the 'journalists' did some 'reclaiming' of their own?

    Snowflake
    ->
    Bathroom
    ->
    Wintery Creek

    Cycle of nature I guess. Or maybe cycle of clip art? And no Australian mountain creeks look like that - there's a distinct lack of mountains!

    --
    they made me do it
  51. why? by Godzookie2k · · Score: 0

    Who researches this crap?!?!?!?!?!? (clever pun, I know. :) )

  52. American's are so damn immature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea is old and has been rehashed how many times in literature? And american's still get all stupid about it. There was an episode of Farscape recently where two of the characters had to drink each other's piss unfiltered.

    1. Re:American's are so damn immature by carlos_benj · · Score: 0

      "Howdy! What're y'all drinkin'?"

      "Urine."

      "Well, if'n it's mine, why are y'all drinkin' it? If'n you want somethin' to drink, y'all ought to drink your'n."

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  53. Filtration Processes by Etrigan_696 · · Score: 2, Informative

    First of all, the filtration process they just described in the most effective, most "high tech" filtration process used to process water. See, it works this way - OZONE is the MOST poisonous substance known to man. It's also one of the easiest to deal with. When that 03 hits the fecal coliform bacteria in the sewage (which has already had all solid matter removed from it in settling basins) they basically get oxidized to nothingness.
    Most cities do less treating worse water which you drink, every day. Drink soda? You're drinking city water mixed with syrup and bottled. Drink Sparklets/bottled water? They have even more lax rules when it comes to water quality. Most cities use a sand filter/chlorination deal to treat your water. While this does a good job on fecal bacteria, it won't even irritate cryptosporidia, which can cause all sorts of nice diseases.

    So don't just start saying "EW EW! Nasty!" Next to using electrolysis (which is a really sub-optimal solution on the cost angle) this is the cleanest water you'd be able to find.

  54. Why not treat the creek water instead? by phobos72 · · Score: 1
    At the moment, extra snow that the resort creates to extend the ski season is pumped from surrounding creeks. While this water is perfectly good, it often contains suspended matter from wildlife in the area. The treated wastewater would have all solids removed..

    Why not use their wastewater treatment system to purify the creek water instead? Then they won't have any PR problems.

    Unless they have plans to commercialize the purified wastewater.

    1. Re:Why not treat the creek water instead? by twocoasttb · · Score: 1

      Why drag water out of the creek unnecessarily just to solve a PR problem? The approach these people are taking is the correct one; the ever growing human population on this planet is going to necessitate many more solutions like this. I hope they stick with it...

    2. Re:Why not treat the creek water instead? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      Because it takes ASSLOADS (pun intended) of water to cover the ski trails in artificial snow, which has a major impact on the environment. When ski resorts were getting water from snowmaking straight from local natural sources, they were lowering the watershed, draining small lakes, and in a nutshell totally f'ing the local wildlife. Many mountains now has artificial streams and lakes built in now to collect the manmade snow as it melts so it can be reused, but even this isn't a perfect solution. If filtering wastewater can give them another cheap water supply then i'm all for it.

  55. Spoiled youth by anno1a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste.

    This is what I'd typically expect from the spoiled youth of today, who think that what the water they drink is either synthetically created from pure Hydrogen and Oxygen, or at least have never been anywhere near anything even resembling filth. So when they hear that people are purifying waste and putting it on the hill side (which probably isn't too sterile as it is), or... say... Watch Dune, where people use a suit to purify their own bodilly waste products for drinking, they go "eeeeew! Gross!". Well, FYI, your water has been on this planet for millions of years! Just about every species that have lived on this planet has crapped in your water, and then it's been through natural followed by artificial purification... What the ski resort is doing is just the same, and they only put it onto the hills... Wake up and smell the water!

    --
    ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    1. Re:Spoiled youth by ces · · Score: 1

      Funny thing, in many parts of the world the standards for wastewater treatment plant discharge are stricter than the standards for what comes out of your tap.

      Yes, that's right, treated sewage can be required to be cleaner than tap water.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  56. Wow by phlack · · Score: 1

    They've got some really shitty snow on that slope.

  57. Ya gotta love the Aussies by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
    Pissing in the wind and selling as snow!

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  58. Bacteria can help to form snowflakes... by silvaran · · Score: 1

    I'm just taking a shot in the dark here, but I heard awhile back that some ski resorts were using bacteria to create snow. Essentially you mix near-freezing water with bacteria particles and fire it out. When the water freezes, it clings to the bacteria and forms snowflakes. These snowflakes are more natural than those created using other man-made methods, so the end result is more natural snow to ski/snowboard on. I'd be willing to bet that the method in the article is similar, though they don't really go into the specifics of flake formation.

  59. Where the affluent ski with the effluent by dpilot · · Score: 1

    This idea was proposed in Vermont years ago, and my subject line made the headlines in our papers. The idea faded, or at least the publicity about it did, and we went back to worrying about overstressing local creeks.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  60. I thought the same thing of NASA by AssFace · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the early 90's my dad was on some summer program where professors would go and do work for NASA and then during the year be the regular profs that they were.

    He was an analytical chemistry professor and then for NASA worked on the water filtration system for the Space Station.
    The basic concept being that water is heavy at 8lbs/gal and so if they can limit how much they take up, they can use that saved weight towards carrying something else.
    So they wanted to bring up a small fixed amount and then recycle out the waste - so when you took a leak, it would recover that and clean it out (with very similar methods to this article interestingly enough), and then... according to my dad - was usually cleaner than the water they brought on.

    I was always puzzled at why they didn't just bring on cleaner water - but I suppose he was also hinting at the astronauts bringing some inside themselves as well... don't know.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:I thought the same thing of NASA by sunking2 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:I thought the same thing of NASA by AssFace · · Score: 1

      I think the stuff he and his group were working on was supposed to be really small.
      They had existing stuff that was large-ish (like what those links show), but then they wanted something as small as possible...

      he doesn't do any of that any more, so I have no clue where they are at now - perhaps they gave up entirely.
      now he is in the biotech world designing automation robots and stuff - although he just took over a year off to travel the us and canada living out of his car and write a book.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    3. Re:I thought the same thing of NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes this is true NASA does recycle their waste through the same process that the skiing resort does. One more thing to add though. How is it we get drinking water ("the right way")? First we pee in the bowl, then we flush and it eventually goes out to see after treatment. The see water with our piss in it eventually all evaporates into the air. When enuf moisture collects in the air it rains or snows over some moutain which feeds some river. Which means chance are you could be drinking peoples piss from all over the world every day of your life. It's good for you ;) My name is Scott just to lazy to sign up at the moment.

  61. Not as bad as it sounds... by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Freezing actually is not such a bad way to kill microorganisms in water.

    Cells tend to rupture when frozen, either because the ice inside expands and bursts them (fast freezing) or because long, sharp, pointy ice crystals inside form and pierce the cell membrane (slow freezing). The temperatures typically found on ski slopes (within a few degrees of zero Celsius) are ideal for the formation of large ice crystals. There are also dehydration processes at work. Finally, cells left outside in slightly warmer weather still don't do well, because they'll starve to death. (Researchers who want to preserve cells long-term store them at liquid nitrogen temperatures to stop all metabolism.)

    Recent research has suggested that freezing and thawing will also disable many viruses--apparently it damages the surface proteins they use to bind to our cells. Experiments conducted on freezing whole blood for storage revealed that freezing also inactivated much of the HIV in test samples. Some jurisdictions are now considering freezing all donated blood as an additional safety precaution before transfusion.

    Not so say that freezing is a panacea--there are a number of nasties that will survive the process (encysted bad guys are often reisistant) but the frozen stuff is significantly cleaner than what came in, and it may well be cleaner than what's in most rivers.

    Yes, I read the article, and yes, I realize that they filter and treat the water extensively before turning it to snow...but all that work might be overkill.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
    1. Re:Not as bad as it sounds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do they freeze the whole blood to prevent the cell damage you described?

    2. Re:Not as bad as it sounds... by mikewas · · Score: 1

      ... but who wants to ski on yellow or brown snow, no matter how germ-free it is?

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  62. Piss Poor by GenusP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, now it seems they have piss poor skiing all season long.

    --
    "Make me some if you're making some"
  63. "Dirty"-snow in America Too by Levendis47 · · Score: 2

    Heyall, Killington Mountain in Vermont has been doing this for over a decade if memory serves.

    Even "natural" snow is filthy...

    It would be interesting to do a broad chem comparison of melted natural snow versus "waste-product" snow ("This mountain is PURE SNOW!!! Do you know the street value of this slope?!")

    Now where'd I put those "lemon" snow cones... 8^)

    -Levendis47

    --
    --==[ AOL YIM ICQ : Levendis47 : levendis47@yahoo.com ]==--
    1. Re:"Dirty"-snow in America Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am left wondering how many people got that reference to possibly the best movie of the 80's

      "Gee Ricky, I'm real sorry your mom blew up"

  64. This is nothing new :-) by Goody · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot has been converting crap into articles and postings for some time now. In fact, this post is recycled crap that I've posted before.

    --
    Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  65. not the only place by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    Sugarloaf Resort in Maine has been doing this for several years with their effluent. However, they don't put that snow on the slopes.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:not the only place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      without the recycling it would be a loaf of another color (flavor)?

    2. Re:not the only place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sugarloaf Resort in Maine has been doing this for several years with their effluent. However, they don't put that snow on the slopes.


      Sugarloaf/USA doesn't put any snow on its slopes, and when they get natural snow, they make sure to till too deep and hit gravel, ensuring that even when they have larger base depths, the snow has plenty of floaters in it. (and, for clarity, "floaters" in this case refers to gravel and other solid objects that damage skis, not to human waste that resists efforts to be flushed).
  66. Great! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    Now, when someone tells you the snow on the mountain is "Shitty" you won't know if it's a positive or negative remark...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  67. Don't eat the meatloaf... by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    The final ultra-filtration step removes all suspended solids from the liquid including all biological matter, alive or dead.

    What do they do with the "suspended solids"?

    -ted

  68. Blast from the Past by KFury · · Score: 1

    "Welcome to Bandini Montain!"

    "Bandini is the word for... fertilizer."

  69. Nanook rubs it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -"Watchout where the humans go, dont you eat that yellow snow"

  70. dont EAT the white snow by greenalbatros · · Score: 0

    i think you'll find this is the stuff one normally intakes through the nose accompanied by brief spasmodic head jerking and a realisation that caffeine doesnt quite cut it. warning: excessive use may result in nose falling off in shower

    --
    this sig steers like a cow. and i can prove it
  71. Beyond 2000?? by Julius+X · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that this is being posted as news, given that theres a big notice saying the site hasn't been updated since April 12, 2002, which is just shy of 10 months ago.... so it would seem to be that this is not new news.

    Now, I used to be a fan of Beyond 2000 back in the '80s and early '90s when Discovery aired the TV show in the US here, but why on earth is it still around? It's 2003 folks! Same goes for 20th Century Fox? We really need to get our heads out of our respective 20th century butts.

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
  72. Flagstaff trying to do the same thing by dsoltesz · · Score: 1

    Our local ski hill has gotten approval for using reclaimed water for making snow (the city's been using reclaimed water for watering lawns and such for a long time). The whole question has caused a very big fuss because the mountain is considered a holy site by local Native Americans. The arguments have been less about the health concerns and more about the desecration of a holy site. Because this is Arizona and water is at a serious premium, plus we haven't had a whole lotta snow the last few years, most folks are for using reclaimed water for snowmaking. A lot of people would rather ski on reclaimed water snow than not be able to ski at all. See the Tea Party website for one set of viepoints on the issue.

  73. It is normal by kypper · · Score: 1

    Recycled urine is, chemically, water! When I look at it from that perspective, I don't care whether it comes from a mountain spring or the dog down the street; as long as it's purified (i.e. just H2O, and preferably no Fluoride) than it's good for what ails you.

  74. No shit ? by MSenhanced · · Score: 1

    An Australian ski resort that is converting human waste into freshly driven snow. No shit.. really?

    --
    I write sig's like I know what I'm talking about.
  75. Am I missing something here? by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    The waste is converted "through a three-step purifying process of UV light filtration, ozonation and ultra-filtration", and they say it's "even cleaner than that made from nearby creek water."

    Uhhh... why not just use the water from the nearby creek?

    Did someone actually stand up at a board meeting and say, "No, let's not use the creek water, let's use human waste water instead!"

    Now when you tell someone there's an "ice sheet" on the mountain, you may have to clarify what you mean...

  76. It's purified for God's sake! by jordandeamattson · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Let me get this right: it has been purified three different ways, is pristine and clean, and people are still worried about it?!? One can only imagine what Freud could make of these "potty fetishes"!



    We really have to think about what these "potty fetishes" are costing us. Here in the SF Bay Area, we are dumping literally millions of gallons of fresh, pure, clean water (cleaner than the the input sources)a day into the SF Bay. We are spending millions to try and protect the brakish marsh and watelands of the SF Bay from this invaison of fresh water. The open loop water economies that we practice through out the world are costing us a untold price economically and ecologically. Southern California, due to its cut off of Colorado River water by the Federal Government, will be setting up desilenation plants. If they wanted to do it cheaper, and with less ecologoical impact, they would start water recycling.



    My call for economic and ecological reason is "Close the Loop! Drink Recycled Water!"

  77. Re:Dont you mean SEWatER? by gorjusborg · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone name it NEWater?

    sounds too much like SEW(at)ER
    (pronounced soo-otter)

    Also, wouldn't OLDwater be more appropriate?

    Just wonderin' ; )

    --
    If it's not one thing, it's Steve's Mother
  78. water crystallizes - snow more easily than waste by avi33 · · Score: 1

    Actually it makes perfect sense...just a different form of distilling.

    If you could determine them, you could create conditions that make it ideal for water molecules to disengage from the organic material, and to crystallize with one another. You're left with snow in the air and a pile of crap on the ground.

    Probably useful if you have a place and use for the snow, but my guess is it would be too expensive for long-term disposal.

    jm2c, iana scientist.

  79. so what.. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    The waste is converted "through a three-step purifying process of UV light filtration, ozonation and ultra-filtration", and they say it's "even cleaner than that made from nearby creek water." I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste."

    So what.. what do you think happens to your waste water in general? It doesn't disappear, it gets purified and pumped back into whatever river or lake you get your drinking water from. People in bfe just pump it into the ground where it filters through the dirt and seeps back into their wells.

    1. Re:so what.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "So what.. what do you think happens to your waste water in general? "

      I can answer that. It goes into this porcalin bowl, which magicaly makes it go away forever. Meanwhile, there is another magic place that gives me water...
      It is starting to seem to me that is what people really think.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. Been going on for years and years already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been a standard method for creating water for snowmaking at east coast U.S. ski resorts for more than 10 years. It's become a standard thing to do, because it's such a great conservation method - potable, clean water does not need to be wasted in the hundreds of thousands of gallons in order to give people something to slide on.

    I remember hearing a warning to not eat the man-made snow because of more than just the dead bacteria they use as the 'dust mote' that needs to exist for moisture to cling to and freeze to to form snow flakes. The fact that the snowmaking water is handled with, and travels thru some relatively low-tech and rough and ready hydraulic equipment means it's contaminated with metal particles and greases on top of being non-potable recycled waste water to begin with!

    The moral is, don't eat any snow from a resort that makes snow. There's never been any reason to think man-made snow might be as clean as natural.

  81. snow guns.. by mcdade · · Score: 1

    For anyone who has been to a resort while they are making snow (which) involve large snowguns (the newer ones look like jet engines, old ones look like a big firehose) know it's not fun to have to ski by one of these things.

    You better hope they filter everything out of there or you could be covered in some sort of virii or feces by product.

    Isn't there something about not shitting where you eat? How bout not shitting where you make snow either.

  82. No reason not to use it by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All water at some point has to go through a water purification process. If you can drink water from the Amazon jungle after boiling it for 1/2 hour and/or using a few iodine tablets,

    Skiing on this snow shouldn't be a problem. Its not like you have to drink/eat the stuff. Urine is not hard to purify, there are much worse and much harder things to purify. I suppose there is a small psychological barrier to skiing on it at first.

    If you're so paranoid about skiing on sanitized snow then I should mention you shouldn't taste your own sweat - it's 1 to 2 % urine. Another liitle known fact you probably didn't want to know ;)

  83. Typical by geekoid · · Score: 1

    " I think that says more about the creek than it does the waste."

    What, exactly?

    Do you think there going to run it straight from the toilet to the snow maker?
    In many cities, this is the norm. You can filter all the inpurities and end up with oure water. This is magic, it is a tried and true method of opperation.
    But people are stupid. In LA, the city had a problem, It was paying a lot of money to ship recycled water it didn't have room to store. Somebody with a clue says "I know, instead of paying to ship water, why don't we just dump it into the ground water?" IMHO that was a good idea.

    However, when the press found out about it, they said something like "City to put sewage into ground water" Naturally, people went nuts. So the water company had a press conference and said, "no, this is recycled waste. The same stuff we putinto the pipes". People still freaked out and where saying stuff like "I don't want that stuff polluting my ground water". The fact it came from the exact same place there tap water came from didn't seem to matter. sheesh.

    FYI Los Angels water is very pure when it leaves the recycling plant, however the miles of rotten pipes it has to go through to get to your tap is getting pretty nasty, so use a filter.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. Where Effluence meets Affluence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Credit to the Rutland Herald, I believe, some 15 years ago and regarding the same bright idea.

  85. Speaking of dirty snow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just had a little fun last night http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~fredh/piss.html

    For the curious... I did the deed, but that it's my gf's handwriting :)

  86. Nifty technology, but... by Cranx · · Score: 1

    ...wouldn't it be more practical to use a lesser technology to simply filter the creekwater and let mother nature process the poo water elsewhere?

  87. avalanches... by jmorse · · Score: 1

    So if you get caught in an avalanche of this snow, you're truly in a world of shit...

    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
  88. What about the color? by DaHat · · Score: 1

    Ok so you kill all the bugs with some UV and stuff... wont it still be brown or yellow? I dunno about you but I avoid yellow snow like the plauge!

  89. Implementation by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

    to accomplish this scientists modeled the system after Keith Richard's organs since they've somehow filtered out any and all existing drugs known to man.

  90. now this makes me mad!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a huge money saver for the ski resort, so now everytime I secrete bodily fluids, the ski resort will make money off of me! I think that they should pay me to pass of my waste.

  91. Not unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do this in a resort in VT too. The snow has a greyish color to it. I can't remember which place off the top of my hed...

  92. Potable and Non Poteble. by Brigadier · · Score: 1



    What your talking about is filtering waste line water and redistributing it for irrigation. Using it for toilet water isn't so common. But as you know in southern cali all that greenry is do to irrigation which uses this water. Typically in a purple pvc line. So dont drink the water from the purple pvc pipe.

  93. Story's kinda stale, ain't it? by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    (moreso than the water used to make snow on certain ski slopes)

    Hmm...seems some featured articles on Slashdot are like the human foetus--they must gestate for around 40 weeks before making an appearance. (Take a look at the article--last updated 12 APRIL 2002!? I watched a TV program on this EXACT CASE on the Discovery channel AGES ago.

    Even before that--some YEARS ago--on (if I recall) the CBC about a site somewhere in the Northern US states or Canada about using snowmaking technology as a final stage in sewage disposal--spraying droplets of wastewater through snowmaker nozzels infused it with oxygen and caused flash-freezing which destroyed a great deal of the remaining bacterial contaminants. It wasn't donr on a ski slope, however, the additional nutrients and moisture made for a really good vegetable crop in the summer.

    Mildly interesting as the subject is, recycling wastewater is not the latest, greatest groundbreaking in technology--and it's been happening implictly for ages. My city gets almost all it's drinking water from a river--which is downstream from a nomber of small towns. Our fair city drinks from the piss and crap of not only countless birds, fish, beavers and livestock--it drinks from that of tens of thousands of people as well. I pity those who live downstream of the city--they get to pull water from a river that is essentially the effluent from the waste of 1 MILLION people.

    Novel and environmentally consious way of making snow? Sure. Hardly shocking or cutting edge though.

    NEXT...

  94. regular wastewater treatment plants already do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    regular wastewater treatment plants in the US already do this through slightly different means. look up wastewater treatment on google. i took a course in college on it. we even got to visit a plant. it smelled bad.

  95. Where the Affluent ski the Effulent by tbuskey · · Score: 1

    Killington VT was going to do this....

  96. Are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

    By the way, mods, this is NOT off topic. Well, maybe a little...

  97. And? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    Geez, you'd think nobody'd ever taken a
    science class. When you freeze water the
    impurities are forced out of the crystal
    structure. You can make freshwater from
    seawater by "creating snow" with it.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  98. Don't Eat the Yellow Snow... by Pflipp · · Score: 1

    ...who invented that phrase anyway?

    I know Zappa has used it once, and that there is some eeyuh-wee reference to it in some Dexter cartoon or something, but I just wonder where the phrase came from originally.

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  99. i can see the slogan now.... by slobberjaws · · Score: 1

    one mans shit is another mans lemonade!

  100. My wife plays with poop ;-) by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    I second that. My wife is a chemist at a waste water treatment plant, and knows the operation forwards and backwards (We kid around that she plays with poop for a living). Working at the plant and seeing how it works first hand has made her a strong advocate for using purified waste as drinking water.

    She had some friends in a lab test the water at our house when we first moved in. The water coming out of the plant is cleaner than the water coming out of our tap, and our tap water is pretty darned good (at least for Florida). Meanwhile, our fair city is scraping for money to build a desalination plant. Go figure.

    The technology is mature, proven, and robust. The only problem is public acceptance, but it's a huge problem. To even propose the idea would be political suicide for a mayor, which is ironic given that we have legislation passed (face-scanning cameras on city streets and puritanical blue laws) that makes the idea of drinking piss seem positively benign. If only we lived in a world where reason and freedom were valued over ignorance and politics!

    -Cybrex

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  101. This is from April 2002 - how is this "news"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all - how is this considered news when it's almost a year old???

    Must be time for a story about the Sydney Olympics or maybe the lunar landing...

  102. Snow Machines and Bush Fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Victorian Ski Resorts even use snow machines in mid-summer.

    This year they have been using the machines to hold back the flames.

  103. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This puts a whole new spin on the phrase "pure as the driven snow"! ;-)

  104. A reservior, or a lagoon? by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    This may be a semantic point to most people, but a reservior is usually for storing (relatively) clean water. Lagoons are used for anaerobic digestion of sludge.

    Basically, once you get rid of the big stuff (flitering, letting it settle out, or grinding it in), the oil and scum (skimmed off the top), and the stuff that clumps together (floculation and letting it settle), you have two things -- relatively clear water, which is decanted off, and sludge.

    If you take the sludge, and let it sit in an oxygen less environment, it'll break down further, but it produces methane as a byproduct. Sometimes, a lagoon is used, other times, they just warn it up in a controled environment.

    Oh -- and for drinking water, there might be some de-hardening/de-ionizing done (depends on the source), some biological filtering, and some form of sanitizing (ozone or chlorine).

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  105. Don't eat the White Snow either by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    Snowshit?

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  106. This is quite common by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    Many (most?) ski resorts world wide do this. I know of several in Vermont at least. The problem is that making snow uses a LOT of water! The only limit to the amount of snow they can make IS the amount of water they can get. And the more snow they make the deeper their base is and longer they can stay open into the spring before it all melts off. SO naturally they want to get as much water as possible.

    The ski areas already create huge artificial ponds simple for collecting water during the off season, and also tend to take as much as they can get from any local natural water supplies, such as lakes, rivers and streams. Of course a lot of big ski states like Vermont and Colorado also have a lot of environmentalists that bitterly oppose the ski areas sucking streams dry (which they will do, given the opportunity). So the ski areas tap their HUGE supply of otherwise wasted wastewater.

    Environmentally this is great. They super-treat their wastewater and the spread it over a large area. I'm sure it's better for the environment than dumping halfass treated wastewater into natural bodies of water like most localities do.

    As for the skiing, well, the snow IS of a somewhat ODD color and odour. YMMV, but I try not to fall down on it.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  107. there is more to it than just by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    perception...distilled water tastes FLAT. There is a NEED for a certain mineral balance to provide that 'Water' taste. I am sure there is need for a certain amount of biological micro-organisms in the water/food which would manifest itself in long term problems..ie digestive issues due to lack of something basic in your digestive track, but I have no real proof of it :)
    As far as re-use goes read Dune,now there was a society that got over the recycle/reuse fear, mmm nothing like a big swing of recycled urine and sweat to take the edge off your thirst, gimme one of those stillsuits please :)

    BTW Seth, My uncle was an engineer at a Sanitation plant as well. He lead tours that capped off with him pulling a glass of water from a tap in the final treatment tank and taking a big swallow....amazingly VERY FEW people would take the offered drink :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  108. Re:Interesting, but... sunday river... by TI-83 · · Score: 1

    sunday river reuses its waste water in the snow. I'm assuming they purify it, of bacteria at least. they are a huge mountain, almost all covered by snowmaking, and they draw their water from a smallish river. one of the things that helps them meet their water needs is recycling it.

    also -- dirty water makes better snow. not dirty as in bacteria-y, but with some (very small) particle stuff in it. it gives the water something to crystallize around when it freezes.

    --
    &&stuff;
  109. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    BOFH excuse #145:

    Flat tire on station wagon with tapes. ("Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurling down the highway" Andrew S. Tanenbaum)

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...