Slashdot Mirror


New NASA Maps Show A Bad Day On Earth

Stephen Lau writes "ScienceDaily has an article talking about the new NASA maps that reveal the geography of the North American continent in amazing detail. One of the maps provides strong evidence of a 112 mile wide, 3000 foot deep impact crater which they believe was the comet/asteroid impact that killed the dinosaurs and more than 70% of Earth's living species 65 million years ago."

392 comments

  1. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is awesome! We should stop wasting money on war and increase NASA's budget immediately!

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government will only spend money on science when it is for war. *points to nuclear weapons*

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      artemis67 makes a good point... while it's important to fund science; we also have to do what we can to stop Bush, Ashcroft, and the other terrorists who have established a dictatorship over America.

      I guess it's all about finding a balance.

    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, great idea. We can spend all the money we have on science and technology, then wait for the Osama Bin Laden's, Saddam Hussein's, Adolf Hitler's, Mao Tse Tung's, and Joseph Stalin's to take it all away again. Fantastic fuckin idea, brainiac. Dipshit.

    4. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      america's only war is with itself, it's plain to see. take a step outside for a minute... oh wait a sec xenophobes don't like going out. ok, sit at home and believe everything your government wants you to believe.... many of you are good at that. pity for the rest.

    5. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? so they can use that funding to build more stable, more load capable web servers?

      good thing the international space station doesn't have any webservers.

      it's /.ed hehehe...

    6. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that you've told us what Noam Chomsky want's you to think, what do YOU really think, or do you?

    7. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell is Noam Chomsky?

    8. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even know who that is, but apparently I agree with him (or her?).
      Also, you would benefit greatly from this: http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif, my illiterate friend.

  2. sounds like a dupe by databoing · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wasn't this in Slashdot about 2 days ago?

    1. Re:sounds like a dupe by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, but it was on every other news site this weekend. Way to stay ahead of the curve /.

    2. Re:sounds like a dupe by happyDave · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, on March 7, 2003. New NASA releases new topopgraphic map.

    3. Re:sounds like a dupe by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they're running it again in hopes that NASA has installed a new web server...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:sounds like a dupe by _anomaly_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't posting a story on slashdot that links to a government website (which results in bringing down said website) considered an act of terror?

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:sounds like a dupe by aled · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I saw this 65 million years ago. More or less.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    6. Re:sounds like a dupe by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Well if you had a Slashdot subscription you would've heard about it earlier! ;)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  3. A Meteor Did *NOT* Kill the Dinosaurs by egg+troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone knows that cigarette smoking did. At least that's what Gary Larson has hypothesized.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:A Meteor Did *NOT* Kill the Dinosaurs by whovian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Acutally it was Homer Simpson's sneeze.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    2. Re:A Meteor Did *NOT* Kill the Dinosaurs by MrLint · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that when the mammals passed the Dinosaur Managed Copulation Agenda (DMCA) it was really a plot to make them extince.. and look how well it worked..

      *GO MAMMALS!*

    3. Re:A Meteor Did *NOT* Kill the Dinosaurs by elutfall · · Score: 1

      Actually if you look at that particular illustration from the prehistoric era closely, you will see that it was not the cigarettes that killed the dinosaurs.

      Everyone knows that 3 on a match is bad luck. So obviously once that third dinosaur lit off of the same match, their kind was doomed.

      This also sheds new light on the origins of the "3 on a match" saying. Originally attributed to WWI trench wars, it was said that the first was to see them, the second was to aim, and the third on a match was the one to get shot.

      The emminent historian Professor Larson shows us otherwise.

      Apparently the meteor was aimed at the third dinosaur.

      I have to stop now. If I go any further off-topic I'll have to...

      --
      It's not easy being green. -K.T.F.
    4. Re:A Meteor Did *NOT* Kill the Dinosaurs by IXI · · Score: 1

      Your subject is true but your message isn't. The fact is the dinosaurs weren't killed, they can still be found alive, eg in the White House.

      --
      He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
    5. Re:A Meteor Did *NOT* Kill the Dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was a very labored joke...

  4. Interesting.... by XianDeath · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My favorite part of the article was the part about "ÁÏ.ãqÌ|fs~á×|bovVÁ3pè5B úèÍ2E¼}Â÷Pg|\ÎÝ®ÝXD(TM)ÓËûÀêâæÐóØq3 ì8Îx-×> M'r " I have no idea how to even begin to respond.

    1. Re:Interesting.... by XianDeath · · Score: 1

      Which was only to say that when I initially attempted to acccess the primary link, the above text was exactly what I got. Unfortunate that in my haste to spread the frustration of what appeared to be a dead site, I've been mod'ed down to offtopic... oh well. Must... explicate... more...

  5. That wasn't a crater. by Trespass · · Score: 1, Funny

    It was Bryan Adams' acne scars. Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week.

    1. Re:That wasn't a crater. by wwest4 · · Score: 1


      Yeah, let's hope it hits Canada next time instead of Mexico.


      Just kidding, I love all of my northern neighbors.

    2. Re:That wasn't a crater. by ncc74656 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Yeah, let's hope it hits Canada next time instead of Mexico.

      Better yet, let it hit France. Their white flags would be useless against it.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:That wasn't a crater. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Better yet, let it hit France. Their white flags would be useless against it."

      Knowing Chirac, he'd veto any plans to evacuate.

    4. Re:That wasn't a crater. by bluephone · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Knowing Chirac, he'd veto any plans to evacuate."

      Why? Running away is what they're best at.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    5. Re:That wasn't a crater. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      They don't run away. They just give up.

      Hence the white flag in every home, right next to the umbrella. :-)

  6. Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by ArmorFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems whenever anyone finds a reasonably large crater, they declare "this is it, this is the one that killed the dinos". It grabs headlines. I'd hate to be a dinosaur, because it seems like I'd've been extinctified about 12 times over by genocidal asteroid de jour.

    1. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Malc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They've been talking about an asteroid landing in the Gulf of Mexico since before I studied Geology in 1990. I remember being taught about the ejector blanket evidence they'd discovered in amongst the rock layers. The actual crater is rather harder to find due to it being submerged and eroded - it's not like it's obvious like the one in the desert in Arizona.

    2. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by rabiteman · · Score: 5, Funny
      It seems whenever anyone finds a reasonably large crater, they declare "this is it, this is the one that killed the dinos". It grabs headlines. I'd hate to be a dinosaur, because it seems like I'd've been extinctified about 12 times over by genocidal asteroid de jour.

      Well, the first asteroid was just a warning. Then the next ten were warnings, too. This current one, on the other hand... was the final chance for the dinosaurs to get their act in gear. In a few months, satellites will discover evidence of a 13th apocalyptic asteroid in Siberia. That's the one that took out the dinosaurs.

      --
      Oh cruel fate, to be thusly boned! Ask not for whom the bone bones; it bones for thee. -Bender

    3. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 5, Informative
      Quote from the article:

      ... the flat limestone plateau of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula

      In this particular case, though, this research is verifying a long held belief that a giant asteroid/comet hit the Yucatan Peninsula. This is not news of a new asteroid.

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    4. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And they all fail to take the bible into account: Clearly it was GOD who smote the dinasaurs as he tired of their annoyingly repetitive and formulaic gameplay, instead installing a copy a Humans v1.0. Unfortunately he's getting a little tired of this game, too, and rumor has it that he's ready to unleash some fun WMDs to clean the slate for the next game.

    5. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      The Chicxulub site has been referenced and studied for quite a while now in the context of "the" meteor hit. Most of the meteor impact theory surrounds this one site, not many different sites.
      It just gets a newsworthy face lift every time someone finds yet more evidence supporting it.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    6. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Surak · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, but how do they know that this *particular* asteroid wiped out most of the species on the planet 65 million years ago? As the parent poster pointed out, there have been many such asteroid impacts discovered, and there's no proof one way or the other that one or any of them caused the extinction of the dinos. It's not like anyone was around 65 million years ago to see it.

    7. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by superdan2k · · Score: 1

      You'd swear Apple was a dinosaur, too -- they've been declared "extinct" on a monthly basis since the early 1990's. Something weird about Asteroid Gates or something like that... I'd still love to be Apple, though.

      --
      blog |
    8. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by TequilaMonster · · Score: 1

      It's a smoking gun situation. No-one saw the shot, but the gun is there next to the body.

      Carbon dating the ring shows that it occurred 65 million years ago, and checking the fossil record all over the world shows a massive extinction occurring at the same time.

      The glove fits.

      Book 'em, Dano.

      --
      Tequila - drink of the gods.
    9. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Xformer · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Considering that dinos had space travel nailed by that time, they should have been able to save themselves. They just couldn't figure out that the end was near.

      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    10. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > how do they know that this *particular* asteroid
      > wiped out most of the species on the planet 65
      > million years ago?

      obviously they can't, with irrefutable "ah-ha this is it!" evidence. However they can narrow down the range of options for a specific candidate with things like core samples.

      when an asteroid hits, it reorders the earth around it in some fairly identifiable ways. I don't know all the specifics, but it is rather common for geologists to date asteroid impacts by analyzing not just the dirt above the old crater, but the dirt below it too.

      For example, if you take a core sample from a known undisturbed part of the planet, and identify at what age any specific depth was the surface of the earth, you can compare this sample to a sample taken from a suspected asteroid impact crater and date it that way.

      Under the impact crater, there will be undisturbed material (fossils, stones, etc). Above it will be a messy jumble of everything, from bits of glass formed in the heat of the impact, to shattered rocks, a complete reordering of dirt layers.. stuff like that.

      if you can link an event in earth's history (eg, dinosaurs going extinct) to the timeline a core sample reveals, you can get a pretty good guess for what the cause of the event was.

    11. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 4, Informative

      They had evidence of soil from the Yucatan peninsula in the K/T layer from outcroppings around to world, indicating that the impact took place there and scattered material specific to the peninsula, around the globe. Dinosaurs are found up to the K/T layer, but not above. This has been known for quite some time. The exact location of the crater was located around 1991 I believe, but was only corroborating evidence. The evidence comes from the composition of the K/T layer. This link might help.

      --
      0xfeedface
    12. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Drachemorder · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "Carbon dating the ring shows that it occurred 65 million years ago"

      Um, you can't carbon date an asteroid. You can only carbon date organic material, and that only up to maybe 10,000 years old or so.

      If you want to date rocks, you have to use other forms of radiometric dating, which is what I assume you were referring to.

    13. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because of all the dino skeletons in this crater, twisted to look over their shoulder with forelegs raised in a defensive "oh no" posture.

    14. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Malc · · Score: 1

      There's a clear point of delineation in the rock record. After that point there are no more dinosaur fossil remains.

      The ejector blanket (material thrown out from the impact) from an asteroid hit is also apparent in the rock record as a thin layer. It often contains things that aren't normally present in the type of surrounding rock strata, such a higher level of nickel.

      I think you will find that the ejector blanket coincides with the extinction of the dinosaurs. No, it's 100% certain, but it is one of the most highly likely causes discovered. It's a case of probabilities and no discoveries of anything more believable.

    15. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Spudley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember being taught about the ejector blanket...

      No! It's called an ejector SEAT - it only looks like a blanket when it lands, and gets completely covered up in an amusing fashion by the parachute.

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    16. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Graff · · Score: 4, Informative
      how do they know that this *particular* asteroid wiped out most of the species on the planet 65 million years ago?

      They can't be 100% absolutely positively certain, but they can get pretty close to certain. There are several ways to find out if a particular asteroid was the cause of a certain effect.

      We can get fairly accurate dating of both the asteroid event and the extinction event. You can find out when the impact occurred by noting how deep the the impact site and the material ejected from it is buried and comparing it to the sedimentation rates in the area. You can also perform carbon dating or other isotopic analysis on material that was killed in the region of the event at the impact layer.

      If the impact was large enough then the material that made up the asteroid should have been deposited around the world. Each asteroid has a "fingerprint" of different isotopes that is fairly unique, so the deposited layer can be identified as to which asteroid caused it. This means that there will be an identifiable layer of material in the arctic ice. Since each yearly layer has seasonal dark and light bands, just count the rings to find out how old the deposited layer is.

      Dating the dinosaurs is also done pretty easily. Carbon dating and isotopic analysis can narrow down the date pretty well, as well as buried depth, sedimentation rates, and other geological identifiers. Finally, the layer that the dinosaur fossils are found in will have some of that isotopic "fingerprint" from the asteroid that impacted the Earth.

      With this information you can narrow down both the impact date and the extinction dates to a narrow range. If those ranges overlap and the impact was large enough, you probably have the impact that caused the extinction. It turns out that there is probably the major impact in the Yucatan Peninsula and a few much more minor impacts that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. We've known about this for years, but more evidence never hurts.
    17. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't remember when the asteroid theory of dinosaur extinction was recognized as a good possibility, but it must have late 80s. At that time we didn't know if was one or many. I know that in the early 90s the the Yucatan crater was identified as the most likely culprit, as it was big enough and contemporaneous with the extinction which put the single asteroid extinction at the forefront.

      So, through most of the 90's we accepted that a single impact event wiped out the dinosaurs. Now, however, more impact craters are being found to have been formed within the crucial 65 million time frame (a search on multiple impact and dinosaur extinction). This is good news because perhaps a single big asteroid might not be fatal, and we may be more able to detect a swarm of meteors.

      Anyway, science is a self correcting system, and at this point is may be best just to say it is likely that at least one asteroid hit the earth and was a major contributor to the extinction of the dinosaur. But I know that is too long for a soundbyte.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by dsz · · Score: 4, Informative
      There's a well-written book called T. rex and the Crater of Doom by the man who was part of the team that figured out how, when and where the asteroid hit, Walter Alvarez.

      It's a very accessible read, and explains their thought processes quite clearly.

      As I recall, the discovery of iridium, an element only found extraterrestrially (i.e. on asteroids), in the strata of rock that corresponds to the date of the extinction of the dinosaurs tipped them off.

      -DZ

    19. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by hmccabe · · Score: 1

      What do you expect, the UN gave the dinosaurs 1 last chance to clean up their act too many times.

    20. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $$$$$exyGal, world's biggest karma whore!!!

    21. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by razberry636 · · Score: 1
      If you want to date rocks, you have to use other forms...

      There's other ways to date rocks, too, though not as successful:
      "Okay, how about a week from Saturday?"

      --paraphrased from Larry Gonick, Cartoon History of the Universe

    22. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...Carbon dating and isotopic analysis can narrow down the date pretty well, ..."


      Let's see.... the half-life of radio-active Carbon is approximately 5,700 YEARS. After about 10 half-lives the aggragate properties of radioactive decay no long hold. So, the oldest date that can be reliably checked with Carbon dating is around 60,000 years, which is 1/1000th the necessary time span.


      Even dates that young are based on lots of assumptions: that cosmic rays influx at a constant rate over that period of time, that Nitrogen is converted to radioactive Carbon at a constant rate, etc....

    23. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      It seems whenever anyone finds a reasonably large crater, they declare "this is it, this is the one that killed the dinos"

      Yeah, but it missed Barney. Tho there's always hope.

      "I have this theory, and I'd like a grant of $1 billion to study it, I say the Dinosaurs were killed off by restrictive intellectual property laws run amok."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    24. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Even dates that young are based on lots of assumptions: that cosmic rays influx at a constant rate over that period of time, that Nitrogen is converted to radioactive Carbon at a constant rate, etc....

      That's true. But what's your point? That because a technique relies on assumptions it is inherently flawed? All of those assumptions are tested and their validity quantified. 14C is well understood, particularly the assumptions behind it. In addition, no 14C (or any other radiometric date from any method) has any meaning at all without knowing its precise geologic context. There is far more to geochronology than just measuring a number (contrary to what most slashbots think).

    25. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's other ways to date rocks...

      Like dinner and a movie????

    26. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm. Iridium, eh? So that's where all those Motorola satellites landed.

    27. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dating the dinosaurs is also done pretty easily.

      If you can get past the rotting meat breath...

    28. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to go, you just recycled his joke!

      Given some time and a little practice, you might be able to attempt a joke of your own one day!

    29. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you count 65 million rings.

    30. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You can find out when the impact occurred by noting how deep the the impact site and the material ejected from it is buried and comparing it to the sedimentation rates in the area

      Dating things by assuming sedimentation rates, etc. is a very imprecise business. Sedimentation rates change over time. Compaction will change the thickness of strata. Unconformities may be present which represent unknown amounts of missing stratigraphy.

      >You can also perform carbon dating or other isotopic analysis on material that was killed in the region of the event at the impact layer.

      Isotopic dating is what would be done first. But not 14C for something that is Cretaceous in age. 14C is only useful back to ca. 50,000 years.

      >means that there will be an identifiable layer of material in the arctic ice. Since each yearly layer has seasonal dark and light bands, just count the rings to find out how old the deposited layer is.

      A reasonable idea. The only problem with using this to date the K-T event is the fact that there is no ice of that age anywhere on earth.

    31. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by saskboy · · Score: 1

      From what I've learned in Astronomy recently, it sounds like there is a good possibility that some solar bound object disturbs the Earth's Oort cloud every few million years. Many astroids may have impacted in the final years of the dinosaurs, not just one killer as the experts at Hollywood would have us understand things.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    32. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that carbon dating is useless after about 60,000 years. So little isotope remains, that there's no way to tell 60,000 years from 65 million.

      Geochronology uses other methods, as 14C doesn't stick around long enough.

    33. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

      Oh they knew it was near... it's just that the new season of "Survivor" was starting and they were busy with that whole "mammal" civil war and all.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    34. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Graff · · Score: 1
      the half-life of radio-active Carbon is approximately 5,700 YEARS. After about 10 half-lives the aggragate properties of radioactive decay no long hold

      Yes, I am a chemist and yes, I do know this. This is why I specfically said "Carbon dating and isotopic analysis ". Isotopic analysis includes using other isotopes such as potassium-40, rubidium-87, uranium-235, and uranium 238. Using these isotopes you can get dating as far back as about 5 billion years, more than enough to date dinosaur fossils and asteroid fragments that caused the extinction level event.

      Take a look at this site to understand more about isotopic analysis methods.
    35. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Graff · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see you count 65 million rings.

      Sure, just count the rings in a few selected feet or so and then extrapolate. You may not get an exact number but then again you don't need to be exactly right, just within a acceptable level or uncertainty.
    36. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by Tycho · · Score: 1

      One of my geology professors made the case that the a meteor impact did not kill off the dinosaurs. What is claimed which is backed up by evidence was that the impact in Mexico was only large enough to have only had regional effects. In other words no global firestorms and no clouds of dust obscuring the sun and cooling the earth. The iridium layer may have been deposited by the meteor, but it also could have been deposited by massive volcanism that was occuring in India at the end of the Cretaceous. The evidence also shows that the number of dinosaur species were declining at the end of the Cretaceous and the number of mammal species were increasing. For that matter insects did not appear to undergo any sort of mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous. What is even more interesting is that dinosaurs could have survived after the end of the Cretaceous in rain forests. However, it is difficult to prove either way because fossils do not generally form in rain forests. Additionally at the end of the Cretaceous global temperatures were cooling even before the impact which would have resulted in less good habitat for the dinosuars..

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    37. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by DarkMinds69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And yet very few are aware of the fact that according to the fossil record, the Dino's were pretty much finished long before that blanket was laid..

    38. Re:Man, every asteroid kills the poor dinosaurs by PsykhoKiwi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this reply is worth more mention and a better mod. From my studies in Geology, I can't remember the exact figures but the fossil records of dinosaurs finish largely before the evidence of this comet in the rock strata.
      This would indicate that the dinos were already well on their way out and that this comet just made sure of it.
      I also remember being shown evidence of a massive but slow and progressive climate change happening beforehand which could be attributed to the dinos pegging it.

      Of course this is all circumstantial because the fossil record is massively incomplete. Just because the fossils start to disappear doesn't mean the species did, it just means that for some reason none of the species were fossilised.

      Dates are very general aswell. The further back you go with radio-isoptope dating, the more inaccurate it becomes so you can only generalise and hope you are in the right area.

      --
      Just remember that if the world didn't suck we'd all fall off.
  7. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Dupe by geoswan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed this too. The strange thing is that this iteration has already had fifteen times as many comments posted, in just four hours, as the earliear iteration has in four days.

    2. Re:Dupe by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      That's because the last was posted to the Science section only. Unless you have Collapse sections (show stories from all sections, unless specifically excluded) selected on your homepage options you will not see this story on the main page, only if you go to the science section.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  8. Fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know that the dinosaurs were wiped out by a global flood, not an asteroid! Stop spreading these Satanic lies!

    1. Re:Fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Heresy! There has never been such a thing as a 'dinosaur'. Those rock formations that appear in the shapes of plant and animal remains were put there by God to test the faithful. Also, the Earth is flat and the celestial orbs revolve around it.

    2. Re:Fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heretic! There aren't ANY stars in the sky. It's just an illusion.

      In reality, life is a stage. There aren't 5 billion people on earth, just the 100 we started with, and a giant illusion. This board is mostly robots(which also don't exist -- that would be against the Lords divine law. It's just two guys using a lot of userids.

  9. Dino Deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Dinos died coz they ran out of beer. Stop lying to us !

    1. Re:Dino Deaths by hoagieslapper · · Score: 1

      I acutally support Gary Larson's theory that smoking killed the dinosours.

    2. Re:Dino Deaths by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Er.. I don't think barley or wheat had evolved yet, at the time of the dinosaurs. They never had beer!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Dino Deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This gets moderated as funny? You dumb fucking mods mod down every hilarious troll on the site, but you mod this piece of shit up? Dinos died because they ran out of beer... haha? Fuck you, you're so god damned pathetic.

    4. Re:Dino Deaths by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "The Dinos died coz they ran out of beer. Stop lying to us !"

      Actually they died because they were overly reliant on fossil fuels.

    5. Re:Dino Deaths by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      This is true. There were to be no grasses at all for several million years.

      --
      Jeremy
  10. Something concrete by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally something people can "grab ahold of" out of NASA. If they made a bigger deal out of a lot of their other advances and discoveries they would be held in better public esteem. But the public usually only pays attention when something bad happens.

    1. Re:Something concrete by two_socks · · Score: 1

      Or when there's dinosaurs!

      --
      I can't help it - I'm a 19D.
    2. Re:Something concrete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War sells better and it doesn't require its spectators to think. Now science and discovery.... the public isn't so keen because it might compel them to think and heaven forbid that.

    3. Re:Something concrete by quintessent · · Score: 1

      The ignorant public doesn't realize that this is just another attempt by NASA to distract us from the truth about the moon landings. They never happened! And this data is certain to all be faked as well.

      Conspiracy theorists unite and take over the airwaves!

      Oh wait, we've already done that. Unite anyway! Buy an Art Bell t-shirt and show pride in what you believe! Keep this great American country safe for truth, coverups, and UFO sightings!

  11. deja vu all over again... by kryzx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    this looks familiar.

    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    1. Re:deja vu all over again... by supergiovane · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In other news:
      recently published satellite maps show the 3000 feet deep, 112 miles wide crater subsequent to the explosion of a NASA webserver during the second slashdotting in two days.

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
  12. It's dead Jim! by LazloTheDog · · Score: 1
    Looks like we killed NASA.

    --
    Oink, Oink!!
  13. Re:Slashdotted... by bluecalix · · Score: 1

    Seriously, are they getting their bandwidth thru a garden hose?

    --
    e x p e c t d e l a y . c o m
  14. Dead Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No comments as I type and the site is dead. Oh well, I need to code a slashdot scheduler service that stays behind /. by two or so days and lets me mark the articles I want to see later.

    1. Re:Dead Site by rusty+spoon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Will you post a link to it on slashdot?

  15. Re:If you support Slashdot, you support terrorism by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 5, Funny
    Personally I hope the whole lot of you are arrested and subjected to sleep-deprivation interrogation techniques.
    Sure. Then they can try the Chinese water torture on Aquaman. These are Linux geeks, for God's sake.
    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
  16. Re:Slashdotted... by exley · · Score: 1

    Yup, it's gone from being a picture of a bad day on earth to a bad day for JPL's webmasters.

  17. New NASA Maps Show A Bad Dupe on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA Releases New Topographic Map of North America. It was found buried in the Science region of Slashdot, which has is thus far mostly unphotographed.

  18. Dinosaurs not killed by comet by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    C'mon! If the dinosaurs were killed by a comet, why weren't people killed, too? Didn't you ever watch the Flintstones? Given the interspecies symbiosis, it is highly unlikely that a sudden and catastrophic loss of the dinosaurs would not have resulted in a destruction of mankind as well. How would humans have quarried rock?

    No, I think a much more plausible explanation is that the dinosaurs were actually the victims of second-hand smoke, overpopulation, and perhaps disease. I mean, really.

    GF.

    1. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No doubt the dinosaurs got their heads stuck in the plastic ring can holders too. Damn us, damn us!

    2. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by potaz · · Score: 1
      The way the dinosaurs were killed is clearly explained here, in comic-strip form..

      What's more, it's in Choose-Your-Own-Adventure comic-strip form.

      Perhaps.. the perfect educational tool?

    3. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by bizitch · · Score: 1

      What? - weren't they killed by the BIGGEST killer of all?

      Global Warming! ..... AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

      --
      ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
    4. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

      Global Warning?? No...

      It's SLASHDOTTING!!!

      --
      Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
    5. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Makes my day. A "keeper" for sure.

    6. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by HamNRye · · Score: 1

      Good point... Also, how come noone has discovered the missing link that shows how we came by all those extra chromosomes so quickly. Read "THe Evolutionists", because there is alot more to evolution than you thought.

    7. Re:Dinosaurs not killed by comet by geoswan · · Score: 1
      Also, how come noone has discovered the missing link that shows how we came by all those extra chromosomes so quickly.

      Extra chromosomes?

      Speak for yourself! I am making use of all of mine, thank you very much.

  19. no nuclear winter by wwest4 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The most important finding as a result of new imaging is that the mass extiction may have been caused by sulfur fumes, and fires started by hot falling debris. Before they thought photosynthesis was halted by solar obstruction from the dust cloud.


    Which means that a similarly-sized asteroid may be slightly less apocalyptic than thought. Sort of comforting, though I wonder how we'd deal with global forest fires when we can't even handle a relatively small number now.

    1. Re:no nuclear winter by antis0c · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've often wondered what I'd do if there were some kind of mass catastrophy headed our way. And I don't mean Osama setting off a Nuke on the east coast, or something, I'm talking about real apocolyptic stuff, the stuff that would destroy our entire society. Of course the first thought is to stock up on Guns, Food, Water and Toilet Paper. Build a shelter of some kind, that sort of stuff.

      Then I'm reminded that in those situations, the people that die are often the lucky ones. So I'm torn, try to survive or just give up. I'm not sure I'd want to live a life in a post apocolyptic world anyway. So I say when the big one hits, I only need 3 supplies. A Ladder, A Lawn Chair and A bottle of Southern Comfort. This way at least I have a decent view.

      --

      ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    2. Re:no nuclear winter by scatter_gather · · Score: 1

      As we have just had our Larry Niven interview, might I suggest you read Lucifer's Hammer for a speculative look at post "Big Rock Hits Earth" survival scenario.

    3. Re:no nuclear winter by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, don't wuss out completely. I have learned from playing Fallout 1 & 2, Wasteland and watching all the Road Warrior movies that I can finally have a pink mohawk, wear football pads and drive as fast as I want with a sawed-off shotgun in a Post-Apocolyptic world.

    4. Re:no nuclear winter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, you would get them all, brother.

    5. Re:no nuclear winter by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why a gun? I don't see why a post-apocolyptic world would be particularly violent, though I guess it depends on what kind of apocolypse.

      If the mass of humanity was killed, and you survived, wouldn't you seek the company and assistance of others? In the wake of tremendous destruction, what purpose would violence have? Cooperation would seem infinitely more important.

      Sure, in a riot people are violent. But a riot involves people doing things they can't normally do in their lives amidst their society. It's a temporary state, almost by definition.

      In a war people are violent, often long after the war. But that's more than just the collapse of society, that's an extension of society's self-destruction. Few apocolyptic scenarios involve mass societal collapse as a cause, unless the apocolypse is somehow based on everyone being turned crazy by Radio Waves From Space or something (very Steven King-like). In that case you wouldn't want a gun, because you'd kill someone you love or some other horror.

      It'd look real silly if the survivors of an apocolypse were toting around guns in an empty landscape.

    6. Re:no nuclear winter by Machine9 · · Score: 1
      Big rocks, Schmocks...

      Everybody knows to watch for the stars...when they are right, THEN cthuloid shit hits the fan, and we'll WISH we'd been hit by a rock!

    7. Re:no nuclear winter by maraist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a war people are violent, often long after the war. But that's more than just the collapse of society, that's an extension of society's self-destruction. Few apocolyptic scenarios involve mass societal collapse as a cause..

      Step 1) Shock/Fear: Mass fear (will might die, my family might die, where will I live?, what will I eat?).

      Step 2) Hysteria: People vauling their families or in worst cases, themselves over anything, including common human decency (trampling over people, driving over people, etc). At this stage, we become primally instinctive; we're in self-defense mode.. We're not able to think rationally.

      Step 3) Anarchy: Hysteria slowly calms down.. We're no longer screaming (though many are still crying). Depression will start kicking in for some.. Many will lose hope. Many will start to think about the future. They'll quickly rationalize lawless activities. Rape, looting, general acts of violence.. People will chant the "end of the world", and try and live out their fantacies.

      Step 4) Pragmatism: As the remaining loyalist military/police kills off the most violent offenders, the more remaining people are in three camps.

      a) The "victims" that will not be able to recover on their own; they will need to be followers.
      b) The "leaders", these will be people that will try and help out; working through the wake of disaster. These will be the optimisits. Being somewhat altruistic, they will fight for what they consider right, even in the face of dispair.
      c) The selfish. These are people who will quickly surmise that it will take decades (if ever) to recover, and in the mean time, we will be living in the stone age. There will not be enough resources to sustain the remaining levels of population. Fresh water will be virtually non-existant due to polluting drainage, and lack of pump-work. Rain-water is likely to be hazardous, and possibly droubting. Thus the selfish will realize that if they forcibly coerse other's, the "leaders" (including the military) will have them killed. Thus they will subtly backstab, usurping power (at least within their community).

      The problem is that only those smart enough to survive will become leaders. But as a follower, you can't be sure that your local leaders aren't secretly maliscious.

      The fact of the matter is that people will die due to shortages, and in the face of this, the majority of people will act accordingly, even in the long run.

      This will continue until either the population has dwindled to a sufficiently small group (which is unlikely given the then-newly-encouraged birthrate), or complex and corrupt power-systems will develop, which can contain the selfish class. Tyranical Dictatorships are the only systems that can contain anarchy. It is only given enough time and prosperity that benevolant systems can prevail.

      In short, we're talking hundreds if not thousands of years to rebuild society.

      If you're into apacolyptic tales, Revelation and Various profits (Nostradamus, etc) tend to talk about an apocalyptic aftermath which takes hundreds or thousands of years. So in short, I disagree that a cataclysmic event would have to be radio-enduced.

      --
      -Michael
    8. Re:no nuclear winter by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Not just people, some wild animals may survive too. What do you do when a mountain lion wants your lunch? Also hunting.

      --
      Q.
    9. Re:no nuclear winter by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Which book of Revelation have you been reading?

      Revelation states (among other things) that after a 7 year period of intense turmoil (called the tribulation), Christ comes back to earth and institutes perfect environment. This continues for 1000 years. Then at the end of 1000 years there is a huge war lasting a short time and then Christ causes the Earth to destroy itself completely through nuclear fission (Take a look at the Greek on this one, the details are AWESOME! Describes fission quite well.)

      Then cretion of a new Heavens and a new Earth.

      Nowhere does it describe a period of time where there is an "apocalyptic aftermath."

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    10. Re:no nuclear winter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, all of those steps describe black people perfectly!!!

    11. Re:no nuclear winter by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      Please buy guns, food and water with your excess cash before you decide to go camp out on the roof. That way those of us who choose to carry on the species will be able to pilfer through your things and live to fight another day.

      Thanks.

      Seriously.

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    12. Re:no nuclear winter by maraist · · Score: 1

      Generally the entire period is considered to be more than a few days, and contain more than a few tragedies. Exact timing, however, is somewhat of a farse. There are references to thousands of days and thousands of years being interchanged. You'd be hard press to interpret the timing literally (7 days of creation anyone? Or how about the Jehovah's Witnesses?)

      That being said, I was actually more focusing on interpretations I'd read on Nostradamus.. It's been a while since I'd studied revelations.

      I'm almost sorry I brought it up though, because this is a matter of faith (or lack thereof) and there's no end to such interpretation.

      --
      -Michael
    13. Re:no nuclear winter by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "and there's no end to such interpretation."

      These words make me cringe like you cannot believe. Surely there is no end to the interpretation of the writings of Nostradamus...they happen to be confusing and oblique from almost any perspective.

      However, if you again are referring to the book of Revelation, there is very little that is up for "interpretation." If one is to look at the original Greek language of the book, the meaning becomes clear to the point where "interpretation" is completely unnecessary.

      As to the comment about timing, your reference to the Genesis account is a straw man. The issue of the timing of the Revelation account is undisputed and easily confirmed through many intra-biblical references starting in the old testament and continuing throughout the new as well.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    14. Re:no nuclear winter by ScottBob · · Score: 1

      You got 'em right, but named 'em wrong and even left out a step. Every good Discordian knows there are 5 stages to a civilization's rise and fall.

      What you wrote = Discordian equivalent

      Step 1) Shock/Fear = Chaos
      Step 2) Hysteria = Confusion
      Step 3) Anarchy = Discord
      Step 4) Pragmatism = Bureaucracy

      Step 5) It's there, you just didn't name it:
      This will continue until either the population has dwindled to a sufficiently small group (which is unlikely given the then-newly-encouraged birthrate), or complex and corrupt power-systems will develop, which can contain the selfish class. Tyranical Dictatorships are the only systems that can contain anarchy. It is only given enough time and prosperity that benevolant systems can prevail. This is what Discordians call Aftermath.

      Then a cataclysm happens, whether natural or man-made, which starts the cycle all over again.

    15. Re:no nuclear winter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well its a damn good thing our government are such staunch supporters of increased logging in national forests. Thank God they have the foresight to elimiate these deathtraps! Besides, we need more room for parking shopping malls and parking lots.

    16. Re:no nuclear winter by maraist · · Score: 1

      These words make me cringe like you cannot believe.

      I know and I appologize for bringing it up.. But since I've already gotten you to this level of interaction. I'll press my luck.

      Surely there is no end to the interpretation of the writings of Nostradamus...they happen to be confusing and oblique from almost any perspective.

      Agreed, I was referring to both "prophetic" works.

      However, if you again are referring to the book of Revelation, there is very little that is up for "interpretation."

      Wow, this was the kicker that made me want to reply. I've never actually met someone that felt this way.

      In fact, I recall going through a very interesting "interpretation" which suggested that the entirety of Revelation was meant for the times and life of John and Christianity's great tribulation: Nero Caesar.

      Not speaking greek, I can't attest to the "clearity" of which you speak, however I have gone through books that had greek on left, english on right, and was not as convinced as you.

      As for the rest, I'll merely say that I have a problem with the phrase "undisputed" in relation to anything biblical. To attest to the correctness of a work is one thing, but to suggest that no-one has presented serious and succesful logical opposition is straining credibility. A work that makes an untestible claim is not free of scrutiny. It is no more "correct" than fiction.

      --
      -Michael
    17. Re:no nuclear winter by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Let me make an analogy that will help explain my position on the writings of the Bible and their "interpretation."

      When you read a newspaper article and discuss it with someone your discussion is, usually, not about your "interpretation" of the article. Generally you discuss the facts of the article and correlate them to things that you know or feel and convey them to the other person. You can do this because you have a common background: the language you speak, your understanding of idiom and vernacular language, social conventions, the historical framework of the time in which you were raised, and the immersion in and awareness of current events. The reason that your attempts to use a Greek new testament and an Greek to English dictionary result in lack of clarity stems from the fact that many of the tools you need for proper translation are not all in the words when considered individually.

      Idiomatic language, for one, can be a huge stumbling block. This is one of the things that make the English language so hard to learn if you are not born into it. Now look at Koine Greek, not only is it filled with idioms, but it also is sprinkled with other forms of Greek (Attic Greek and Ionic Greek) and their peculiar idioms as well, not to mention their verb tenses and grammatical differences.

      Verb tenses are another problem in Greek. Consider the word "Tetelestai." Many translations say it means "It is finished." However, the verb tense conveys a different meaning. The true translation into English would look like this "It is finished now, with results that will continue forever." Not totally different, but much more precise, and furthermore, that is how it would be seen by someone who was Greek living in that day who read it or heard it.

      Both verb tenses and idioms and all other things grammatical and definitional fall under the heading of exegesis. However, exegesis falls short of the mark in translation because it does not fully encompass the social customs, current events, and historical framework of the time in which the words were written. The study of those things is called isagogics. Without the proper understanding of isagogics, translation will fail miserably. Just imagine someone translating the front page of the newspaper of today a couple thousand years from now. Without knowledge of current events, much less knowledge of our political forms and climate, or about basic things like movies and television, they would not get far at all.

      Fortunately, we have inherited and discovered innumerable documents that fill in our understanding of all the things we need to properly translate, exegetically and isagogically, the New Testament. However, the vast majority of people who go to Christian churches today do not have instruction by people who understand Greek or Hebrew, much less the intricacies and mechanics involved with the translation of the Bible. This does not negate the fact that the knowledge is extant and available. Lack of knowledge of the existence of something does not negate its existence. Unfortunately, I see many people argue from this viewpoint. Just because you have not seen/experienced/been exposed to/understood something does not make it untrue. If this were the case, no one would ever learn anything new.

      The next part of understanding the Bible comes from the intra-Biblical references. The Bible is its own authority on many matters. By this I mean that it describes history, phenomena, mechanics, and knowledge that are not discussed in other works. Therefore, many of the authors of the individual books will continue where another author left off in another book or will speak with the assumption of knowledge in a certain category that is discussed elsewhere in the Bible. Without the proper understanding of the category or categories of knowledge that the author is currently speaking about, the passage will be meaningless or perplexing. However, in the right categorical context, it becomes illuminating.

      With regard for the book of Revelation this pr

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  20. Not a good day for NASA, either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been slashdotted in less than 20 posts.

  21. Alternate image by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the site is slashdotted, you can just download the full-resolution image [617.7 megabyte TIFF]

    1. Re:Alternate image by trmj · · Score: 4, Funny


      my dialup is angry at you right now.

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    2. Re:Alternate image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INFORMATIVE?! He's suggesting downloading a 600-meg file!!!

      WORST SLASHDOTTING EVER!

    3. Re:Alternate image by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      Umm....how about a reasonably sized JPG, or anything that won't choke a horse. 617 MBs? Sweet Christ...

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    4. Re:Alternate image by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1, Funny

      And now this link is /.ed. What server shall we destory next, Brain?

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    5. Re:Alternate image by Edball · · Score: 1
      If the site is slashdotted, you can just download the full-resolution image [617.7 megabyte TIFF] [nasa.gov]

      Apparently their server wasn't quite liquidy enough? ;)

    6. Re:Alternate image by dattaway · · Score: 1

      I would have reduced that picture down to a reasonable level for hosting, but my best computer doesn't have even half that much memory. And I don't think xv is able to parse a picture with that large of a footprint.

      They have some nice computing equipment at NASA to generate an image that large.

    7. Re:Alternate image by micromoog · · Score: 5, Funny
      [617.7 megabyte TIFF]

      I take it that the "112 mile wide, 3000 foot deep impact crater" is actual size?

    8. Re:Alternate image by TequilaMonster · · Score: 1

      How the heck do you view an image like that? What kind of machine do you need?

      Hmm. Imagine a Beowulf

      *click*

      *boom*

      NO CARRIER

      --
      Tequila - drink of the gods.
    9. Re:Alternate image by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Since this is a dupe from last week, I had already downloaded the TIFF of the North America image, and converted it to a 1600x1200 JPEG.

      You can grab it here.

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    10. Re:Alternate image by catch23 · · Score: 1

      how does downloading an image half a gig in size help keep the server from being slashdotted?

    11. Re: Alternate Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      618 MB pic? Is that life-sized?

    12. Re:Alternate image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheers

    13. Re:Alternate image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke, cocksucker.

    14. Re:Alternate image by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, dumbasses wanting to freely share information with the American public and the rest of the world! We showed them alright, suckers!

      Really, what's the fun in intentionally Slashdotting a server? Would it be as humorous if we all had a couple bots and did a real DDOS? Really, tell me, cause I don't get it. Does it make you guys feel powerful or special?

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    15. Re:Alternate image by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiousity... What resolution was the original image?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    16. Re:Alternate image by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      My coworker downloaded it this morning... something like 24000 x 14000. Well into the absurd category for any non-commercial use.

    17. Re:Alternate image by rabandy · · Score: 0

      I'm going to print off this comment and all the replys it gets. Then in a couple years I'm going to read them and laugh my ass off.

    18. Re:Alternate image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the srtm data just released for north america has 90 m resolution.

    19. Re:Alternate image by Amorpheus_MMS · · Score: 1

      Isn't that just a *little* counterproductive? :D

  22. /. as a verb. by psychalgia · · Score: 1

    bah, shes shut down already. anyone got the pics?

    --

    ________________________________________________

  23. Re:Slashdotted... by SlipJig · · Score: 1

    No, it's still slashdotted from when this story was posted two days ago ;)

    --
    Read my keyboard review.
  24. Seems... by Mourgos · · Score: 0, Redundant

    that slashdot killed NASA....

  25. New meaning to NASA by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now Another Slashdotting Attempt.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:New meaning to NASA by Malc · · Score: 0

      A bit better than "Need Another Seven Astronauts".

    2. Re:New meaning to NASA by Drakonian · · Score: 0

      Yikes!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:New meaning to NASA by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Not Another Stupid Acronym?

      Never Abandon Space Adventures?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:New meaning to NASA by Rysith · · Score: 1

      or maybe: No! Another Slashdotting! Aargh!

    5. Re:New meaning to NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now accepting seven applications

    6. Re:New meaning to NASA by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Hehehehe.

      Amazingly how quickly the Challenger jokes were dusted off and re-inserted into popular parlance?

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    7. Re:New meaning to NASA by Malc · · Score: 1

      *chuckle* Yes. I'm guilty of being unoriginal. I must have hit the PC Nerve of some moderator too, and they reacted by modding me down below 1. Good job I didn't mention that they've switched Sprite at NASA as 7-Up was probing rather unpopular. Oh the crap jokes ;)

    8. Re:New meaning to NASA by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      I'm sure this will get modded into the nether regions, but my favorite (God awful as it is) was always,

      Q: How many astronauts can you fit in a VW bug?

      A: 11. 2 in the front, 2 in the back, and 7 in the ashtray.

      Of course this time around, instead of being the kid in the room, I was the parental figure. SO I couldn't recite any of the half dozen jokes that instantly came to mind;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  26. Re:Slashdotted... by 241comp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, it was "slashdotted" before it was posted here. I read it this morning and already then it was at a crawl. Could be because about 390 news articles already link to it?

  27. Re:Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who needs an asteroid.
    we have slashdot.

    take that dinosaurs.

  28. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Troll
    I know you're trolling, but I have one and only one word for you:

    Bruce Willis

    (OK, maybe two)

  29. Not Shown... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 5, Funny

    The crater that used to be their server before it was slashdotted.

  30. the benefits to earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Potentially the benefits to earth of such an event could be huge. Humanity is a plague, a scourge on the earth, and a large asteroid impact could be just the catalyst that would be needed for human extinction, without a disasterous war involving biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.

    A large impact could alter the climate and make all crops and agriculture nonviable for decades. All the larger life forms would go extinct, but many smaller plants and animals would survive, as their needs are much smaller. This would be much better than environmental or war with weapons of mass destruction that would render the whole earth bare of all life. Eliminating the scourge of humanity into extinction would be the best thing that could happen to the planet.

  31. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 0

    Naw, we'll just blame it on Al-Queida and Sadaam.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  32. Re:Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chances are at the bottom of the 3000ft deep crater is the NASA web server.

  33. Not a bad day... by stereo_Barryo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually it was a GOOD day for the earth as it got a major influx of material and upped its accretion rate, helping out in the race to be the biggest object orbiting the sun, though it still trails several other bodies, as of this writing. It WAS a BAD day for the life forms that inhabited the skin of the earth, but they didn't contribute a lot to the total mass. It WAS a GOOD day, though, for the minor life forms called mammals, as many of their predators and competitors were disposed of. Tough call on Good vs. Bad.

    1. Re:Not a bad day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well considering what mammals are doing to the earth now, I'd say it was a VERY bad day for the Earth.

    2. Re:Not a bad day... by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      In that case, I hope the next asteroid lands on your house!
      (And that you don't live near me. ;)

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:Not a bad day... by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Actually it was a GOOD day for the earth as it got a major influx of material and upped its accretion rate, helping out in the race to be the biggest object orbiting the sun, though it still trails several other bodies, as of this writing.

      By the time of the Chicxulub impact, that race had already been decided for a few billion years.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    4. Re:Not a bad day... by jagilbertvt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Want more karma? Consider responding to any post of mine! Never fails.

      Well, lets give it a try shall we?

      Thanks for the karma everyone!

    5. Re:Not a bad day... by Graff · · Score: 1
      a GOOD day for the earth as it got a major influx of material and upped its accretion rate, helping out in the race to be the biggest object orbiting the sun, though it still trails several other bodies

      Well, considering that the Earth tips the scales at 5.97x10^24 kg and that the next highest planet is Uranus at 86.8x10^24 kg, I'd say that the Earth doesn't have much of a chance. Oh well, at least we are ahead of Pluto, Mercury, Mars, and Venus.

      (Information is found at The Planetary Fact Sheet - Metric, you can check out the US measures at The Planetary Fact Sheet - U.S..)
    6. Re:Not a bad day... by NixterAg · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the postmodern version of the story.

    7. Re:Not a bad day... by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it was a good day because it killed off all those nasty lizard beasts!

    8. Re:Not a bad day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just amazed that it took this long to find where Lavos landed. Now if only we could unravel the mystery of where he was in 1999 when the world was supposed to end.

      Don't eat scrambled time eggs for breakfast, kids.

    9. Re:Not a bad day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget.. you have to look at the chest, but not open it.
      Then go in the future and open it for real.

      I hate those space-time continuity loops.

      NU!

    10. Re:Not a bad day... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding.

      There's a tons of stuff wrong with this.

      First of all, the asteroid probably didn't contriubute a substantial amount of material to the Earth. While I'm no physicist, a crater that size could be made by an object roughly the size of the Empire State Building or the Pentagon (or /.'s favorite metric measure: the LOC). In the large scale of things, this adds up to nothing. Correct me if i'm wrong.

      It is largely agreed upon that most of the life on earth at the time of the collision was destroyed. But you're forgetting the biggest law of thermodynamics: CONSERVATION OF MASS. Just because the dinosaurs died, doesn't mean that the carbon atoms which composed their bodies disappeared... they were disintergrated into smaller carbon atoms collectively weighing the same as the original dinosaur.

      Finally, I don't believe this helped the mammals very much. It's arguable that mammals didn't emerge until after the impact (think of it, a 50 foot reptile is more likely to survive ANYTHING than a badger.) In addition, the smaller reptiles and fish are argued to be some of the only remaining life left.

      The earth was formed LONG before life emerged. I'm not sure where the 'race to be the biggest object orbiting the sun' thing came from....

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    11. Re:Not a bad day... by non-poster · · Score: 0

      Did you (or they) purposely make the exponent the same in the mass values? I was expecting to just compare the exponents, but alas! They are the same. However, Uranus's non-exponent (is that mantissa?) is 86.8, which should be 8.68, and the exponent be 25. But, who wants to be that technical.

    12. Re:Not a bad day... by TheKey · · Score: 1

      I seek to disprove your theory.

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
    13. Re:Not a bad day... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      First of all, the asteroid probably didn't contriubute a substantial amount of material to the Earth. While I'm no physicist, a crater that size could be made by an object roughly the size of the Empire State Building or the Pentagon (or /.'s favorite metric measure: the LOC). In the large scale of things, this adds up to nothing. Correct me if i'm wrong.

      It may have contributed some important elements, as well as providing climactic changes so that different organic material (like ferns, for instance, which took over after the impact) takes over. The estimate for the size of the meteor is ~6miles.

      Finally, I don't believe this helped the mammals very much. It's arguable that mammals didn't emerge until after the impact (think of it, a 50 foot reptile is more likely to survive ANYTHING than a badger.) In addition, the smaller reptiles and fish are argued to be some of the only remaining life left.

      This is intuitively incorrect. Most of the dinosaurs did not die out at the same time, as a cause of the asteroid. It happened when food supplies diminished and climates changed. A 50 foot reptile, that just had it's food supply (whether it be carnivore or omnivore) take a huge dip is going to be hard pressed to survive. In the mean time, a badger eats much less and can also scavange for all the dead meat laying around. Omnivores will thrive, because of the increase of vegetation after the initial shroud. There are many studies that show in the million years after the impact, vegetation thrived globally (especially ferns, which is just weird to me.)

      As a little bit of trivia, the "scientist" (or greedy tax accountant killed in the French Revolution) who came up with the conservation of mass principle asked a simple question: Does slow burning a piece of metal, to cause rust and oxidization of the metal increase weight, keep the weight the same, or decrease weight? He found it increased in weight, after building a cool little mass conservation box, but the air weighed less.

      It really is a shame he got his head chopped off, because he was a dedicated scientist and very meticulous in his work.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    14. Re:Not a bad day... by Graff · · Score: 1
      Uranus's non-exponent (is that mantissa?) is 86.8, which should be 8.68, and the exponent be 25

      Yeah, of course the mantissa (you were right about that) should be less than 10. The web site had the exponents of the measurements as the same magnitude because that makes comparison of each mantissa easier. That's better for a lay-person to compare the values here on Slashdot, but in a more technical forum I would keep to the rule of a mantissa being less than 10.
    15. Re:Not a bad day... by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

      It works! Wow, to think I didn't believe him.

    16. Re:Not a bad day... by stereo_Barryo · · Score: 1

      > You've got to be kidding. I am. The post was tongue-in-cheek >There's a tons of stuff wrong with this. See above > But you're forgetting the biggest law of thermodynamics: CONSERVATION OF MASS. Just because the dinosaurs died, doesn't mean that the carbon atoms which composed their bodies disappeared... There was no such reference in my post. >The earth was formed LONG before life emerged. I'm not sure where the 'race to be the biggest object orbiting the sun' thing came from.... I invented that "race", that's where. How is your life better now that you know where it came from?

  34. YellowStone Volcano as kill the dinosaurs by denisbergeron · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It what I always believe.
    No other disater was bigger than the YellowStone Volcano.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:YellowStone Volcano as kill the dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any concept of the size of a 120 mile across, 3000 foot crater? 120 miles.

  35. MRTG shows a bad day at NASA by numbski · · Score: 0, Redundant

    After being posted at slashdot, a huge impact crater where the photojournal server once stood could be seen via a huge red splotch on the mrtg graph for the nasa.gov domain.

    What a horrid sight to behold. The smell of smoke and melted silicon could be inhaled for miles around. :P

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  36. Re:Slashdotted... by L0stb0Y · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it was a slashdoting that killed the...er nevermind.

    Yeah, server is dead. Throw it in the crater...

    (Hell, increase their budget so they can afford non-slashdottable servers)

    LosT

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  37. ABOVE ARTICLE CONTAINS A GOATSEX LINK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Please mod down the AC's goatsex-tainted posting, plz, thx!

    1. Re:ABOVE ARTICLE CONTAINS A GOATSEX LINK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? It doesn't even have a link!

    2. Re:ABOVE ARTICLE CONTAINS A GOATSEX LINK! by stormraven · · Score: 1

      If you think that's cool you'll LOVE this: Coolest site around

  38. Deja Vu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
  39. Nope - Re:Alternate image by Malc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those images have been timing out since before the first comments appeared.

  40. So it killed the dinosaurs? by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

    But I thought that was the asteroid in India.

    Or maybe it was the asteroid in the ocean.

    Everytime they find evidence of a crater its always the one that killed the dinosaurs.

    1. Re:So it killed the dinosaurs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this ones different - it's in North America. Therefore it is bigger and badder than all the others and MUST have been resposible for the death of an entire species...

      Oh, wait. Maybe there IS something in that theory.

    2. Re:So it killed the dinosaurs? by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      Nono. IANAG, but IIRC, there were three things that happened at the same time. One thing was that a big asteroid hit the Yucatan peninsula (and thats the crater they have been talking about the last few decades), the second thing was that India began to bump into the rest of Asia and created the Himalayas and stuff. That was pretty messy too. And the last thing I don't remember right now... I haven't read a lot about it lately, but I think I have an idea where I should go looking if I wanted to read up... :-)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  41. The difference is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visible results. Let's say we set up some sort of asteroid detection and desctruction unit. And then... no major asteroids end up destined to hit Earth for another 230 years. You think taxpayers will want to sit around paying billions of dollars for 230 years with little in way of results? Not likely.

    However, Iraq, a problem that's existed for well over a decade, is something easy to point at say "Look! Problem!" and then fix. We can spend billions, and that's okay, because we get our results quickly. We don't have to wait 200 years for something to happen. We only have to wait months.

    1. Re:The difference is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the US has been a problem since 1776, but we don't invade it!

    2. Re:The difference is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is we? The rest of Earth? *yawn* Jealousy is so sad. And, you know what, Portugal is a smart country. They decided they'd rather have the US as an ally in the world than France or Germany, because they know if they were attacked, we'd defend them. You can't say the same thing about France or Germany.

  42. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scientists have been unable to found any traces of intelligent life anywhere on that side of the planet.

    1. Re:In related news... by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      Scientists have been unable to found any traces of intelligent life anywhere on that side of the planet.

      Apparently they have been unable to find any intelligent life on your side of the planet too.

  43. Re:lucky to live in Europe by geeber · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last I checked, Mexico isn't part of the U.S. Yet. Perhaps we'll get to them next after we are done annexing Iraq, though.

  44. GAAHHH!! by Soko · · Score: 4, Funny

    TIFF? 617 Megabyte? You moderators are cruel.

    BTW, that's not a picture of a 112 mile wide, 3000 foot deep impact crater - that's an aerial view of what happened to the server when morcheeba's linkage comment was modded up so the whole of /. could see it. :-P

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  45. Crash? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Scientists believe the impact, which was centered just off the coast in the Caribbean, altered the subsurface rocks such that the overlying limestone sediments, which formed later and erode very easily, would preferentially erode on the vicinity of the crater rim.

    Wait. So nothing's really changed. So they are basically still saying that the Gulf of Mexico is the "real" meteor crash site and not this dimple... Hmmm... let's see, let's keep reading:

    This formed the trough as well as numerous sinkholes (called cenotes) which are visible as small circular depressions.

    Ummm... yup. This is a sink-hole, a dimple in the earth caused by the sudden crash/explosion NEAR BY. This is not the crash site. I wish people would read the damn articles before even submitting them to the editors (and that opens another can of worms there, but I digress...).

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:Crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out how they found a impact in the Gulf of Mexico in the geography of the North American continent. But the site slashdotted, so I can't figure out what parts wrong.

    2. Re:Crash? by immybaby · · Score: 1

      The Chicxulub data show a subtle, yet unmistakable, topographic indication of the impact crater's outer boundary: a semicircular trough 3 to 5 meters (10 to 15 feet) deep and 5 kilometers (3 miles) wide. Scientists believe the impact, centered off Yucatan's coast in the Caribbean, disturbed the subsurface rocks, making them unstable. The rocks were subsequently buried by limestone sediments, which erode easily. The crater rim's instability caused the limestone to fracture along the rim, forming the trough. In addition, the collapse of numerous limestone caverns above the crater rim resulted in an arcing chain of sinkholes, called cenotes, that are visible as small, circular depressions. The image linked at the top of the page _is_ of the Yucatan Peninsula (i.e. the Chicxulub crater and surroundings). The image is of this crater (yes the same one that was proposed before), and the article states the boundary of the crater rim consists of these sinkholes.

    3. Re:Crash? by immybaby · · Score: 1
      The Chicxulub data show a subtle, yet unmistakable, topographic indication of the impact crater's outer boundary: a semicircular trough 3 to 5 meters (10 to 15 feet) deep and 5 kilometers (3 miles) wide. Scientists believe the impact, centered off Yucatan's coast in the Caribbean, disturbed the subsurface rocks, making them unstable. The rocks were subsequently buried by limestone sediments, which erode easily. The crater rim's instability caused the limestone to fracture along the rim, forming the trough. In addition, the collapse of numerous limestone caverns above the crater rim resulted in an arcing chain of sinkholes, called cenotes, that are visible as small, circular depressions.

      The image linked at the top of the page _is_ of the Yucatan Peninsula (i.e. the Chicxulub crater and surroundings). The image is of this crater (yes the same one that was proposed before), and the article states the boundary of the crater rim consists of these sinkholes.

    4. Re:Crash? by UOZaphod · · Score: 1

      So much for reading the article... If you go to the original new s release, you will notice a picture clearly captioned "Chicxulub impact crater region, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico".

      The picture also clearly shows the center of the impact being just off the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, and not in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico.

      --
      "The unicode stuff in the latest version is working fabulously well. My russian mafia friends are ecstatic."
    5. Re:Crash? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      impact being just off the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula

      And what is just off the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula?
      Hmmm...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    6. Re:Crash? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      oh god I wish I could take that back...

      sorry...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    7. Re:Crash? by reallocate · · Score: 1

      This is an image of the Chicxulub impact site. The sinkholes outline the perimeter. How'f you get from This formed the trough as well as numerous sinkholes... to calling the crater "a sinkhole"?

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  46. Re:Slashdotted... by trmj · · Score: 1

    that's not that bad of a thing. really.

    look at the size of garden hose, and then look at the size of a phone wire. if properly threaded, the number of wire that could fit into a garden hose would make for a great amount of bandwidth, even though it would only be like an isdn line.

    perhaps filling the hose with optics would be better. either way, a garden hose is big enough to produce quite a bit of bandwidth.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  47. number 8 by initnull · · Score: 0

    Earth is a big pool ball.

    They should know that we are not the white one.

  48. yea but what about california/nevada/arizona ?? by romerom · · Score: 1

    Have you ever looked at one of them maps that shows elevation of the united states.. more specifically look closer at california, nevada and arizona.. the rocky mountains like a half circle where southern california is kinda in the center.. kinda looks like it could have been a huge volcano or something or maybe a giant crater from a meteor

    --
    http://www.awwsheezy.com
    1. Re:yea but what about california/nevada/arizona ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A meteor that big would've split the earth in half.
      And the rocky mountains are formed by plate tectonics - well understood.

  49. Cap'n! The shields are down to 2% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is that really a CD-sized TIFF?!!

    Way to take down their bandwith, morcheeba!

    (I gueess they brought it upon themselves by being idiotic enough to post such a monster pig image.)

  50. For those in Syracuse,NY or Rochester, NY by Garion911 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Now I'm dying for some Dinosaur BBQ...

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
    1. Re:For those in Syracuse,NY or Rochester, NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators, how is this flamebait?

      Is it going to offend dinosaur-hugging PETA activists or something?

      I mean it's not +funny, but there are appropriate moderations (offtopic, overrated, redundant). /. mod system is bullshit.

    2. Re:For those in Syracuse,NY or Rochester, NY by llamalicious · · Score: 1

      You betcha man!

      In fact, next time I'm @ Dino I'll have to suggest they add another option to the rib menu:
      1/4, 1/2, 3/4, Full, or Crater Sized rack of ribs.

      Hell, it's only Karma!

    3. Re:For those in Syracuse,NY or Rochester, NY by autojive · · Score: 1


      Modded as Flamebait? I guess some mod out there didn't get the reference.

      *sigh*

      --
      I wish my lawn was emo, so it would cut itself.
  51. Hush hush by E_elven · · Score: 1

    Ha! Craters in North America.. finally it was proven! I've suspected for long that it indeed was the honorable G.W. Bush who released us from the horrible death regime of the dinosaurs!

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    1. Re:Hush hush by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      yep, those dinosaurs certainly had posession of "wepons of mass destruction" and were unwilling to prove they were disarming said "wepons of mass destruction". they were suspected to harbor unidentified terrorists and when they could not produce a single terrorist they were harboring or a "wepon of mass destruction" (that phrase has long past the austin powers phase) they indeed needed to be eliminated!

  52. Re:Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF are you talking about? Have you been eating retard sandwiches again?

  53. Liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just want to file claims and earn $$$ by making false and baseless allegations. Marlboro hates you .

  54. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by dammy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just take it to the UN, that should solve all our problems, right?

    Dammy

  55. Does anyone else see the irony... by allism · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...of a post about an article being a dupe being modded redundant?

    Oh, yeah, I'm killin my karma now...

  56. Re:Slashdotted... by bluecalix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i was referring to turning the water on and off to simulate binary data transfer

    --
    e x p e c t d e l a y . c o m
  57. Not another one... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Just how many asteroid impacts does it take to wipe out the dinosaurs, anyway? They find a new one every other month, it seems.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Not another one... by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's the media that adds the "this killed the dinosaurs" hype to it. They merely find evidence of collisions, but it's near impossible to accurately date them.

      If they could date a crater with reasonable accuracy, then they could say more concretely that "This crater was formed by a meteor at about the same time dinosaurs went extinct, and the impact could have been sufficient to cause their extinction"

      Many of the craters probably predate all life on earth. Maybe one of em is the one that split off the big chunk of rock that we call the Moon now.

      But anyone who's saying matter-of-factly what happened, isn't acting like a scientist.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Not another one... by TequilaMonster · · Score: 1

      17 meteor strikes and counting, or one /.'ing.

      Take yer pick ;P

      --
      Tequila - drink of the gods.
    3. Re:Not another one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *owl's voice from the old Tootsie Pop commercials*

      One, tah-whoooooooo, threee. Three

      The world may never know.

    4. Re:Not another one... by Anthony · · Score: 1

      It's the media that adds the "this killed the dinosaurs" hype to it. They merely find evidence of collisions, but it's near impossible to accurately date them.

      I am not sure about the impossibility story. Reworking of the surrounding and subsequently formed rock structures certainly makes it difficult. For example, if one can put date on rocks that were obviously disturbed by the impact, this puts a "floor" on the oldest time of the impact. Difficult, but not impossible.

      Many of the craters probably predate all life on earth. Maybe one of em is the one that split off the big chunk of rock that we call the Moon now.

      Here is some ideas on how we got the moon. An impact of that size would have obliterated most of the outer surface of the [much larger than today's earth] proto-earth. Of course this is just a hypothesis, but it does seem to correlate with observed data. It also can be used to explain the tilt in the earth's axis.
      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  58. Harkens back to the Niven discussion...us against by TerraFORM · · Score: 1

    the universe. Someone had commented that there is really no compelling reason for human space exploration at this time. Sure, statistically such occurrences are exceedingly rare, but does that argue for or against human spaceflight? If one of these rogues happens along, the whole species is in danger. We sure as heck need to be established somewhere off-planet or go the way of the dinosaurs mentioned in the story. I say, that is your goddam reason for human spaceflight, at the very least.

  59. Tch Tch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was root beer Johnny ! They had loooots of roots at that time. I even have a foto of my grand^1000 uncle Barney the Dino grinning silly in a root beer induced haze standing muzzle deep in crushed roots while my aunty Diney the Dino stood behind him with a disapproving snout held high in the air. So there !

  60. I didn't get the pics, but I did get the text. by SirLantos · · Score: 1, Informative

    Original Caption Released with Image: This shaded relief image of Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula show a subtle, but unmistakable, indication of the Chicxulub impact crater. Most scientists now agree that this impact was the cause of the Cretatious-Tertiary Extinction, the event 65 million years ago that marked the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs as well as the majority of life then on Earth.

    Most of the peninsula is visible here, along with the island of Cozumel off the east coast. The Yucatan is a plateau composed mostly of limestone and is an area of very low relief with elevations varying by less than a few hundred meters (about 500 feet.) In this computer-enhanced image the topography has been greatly exaggerated to highlight a semicircular trough, the darker green arcing line at the upper left corner of the peninsula. This trough is only about 3 to 5 meters (10 to 15 feet) deep and is about 5 km. wide (3 miles), so subtle that if you walked across it you probably would not notice it, and is a surface expression of the crater's outer boundary. Scientists believe the impact, which was centered just off the coast in the Caribbean, altered the subsurface rocks such that the overlying limestone sediments, which formed later and erode very easily, would preferentially erode on the vicinity of the crater rim. This formed the trough as well as numerous sinkholes (called cenotes) which are visible as small circular depressions.

    Two visualization methods were combined to produce the image: shading and color coding of topographic height. The shade image was derived by computing topographic slope in the northwest-southeast direction, so that northwestern slopes appear bright and southeastern slopes appear dark. Color coding is directly related to topographic height, with green at the lower elevations, rising through yellow and tan, to white at the highest elevations.

    Elevation data used in this image were acquired by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) aboard the Space Shuttle Endeavour, launched on Feb. 11, 2000. SRTM used the same radar instrument that comprised the Spaceborne Imaging Radar-C/X-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SIR-C/X-SAR) that flew twice on the Space Shuttle Endeavour in 1994. SRTM was designed to collect 3-D measurements of the Earth's surface. To collect the 3-D data, engineers added a 60-meter (approximately 200-foot) mast, installed additional C-band and X-band antennas, and improved tracking and navigation devices. The mission is a cooperative project between NASA, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) of the U.S. Department of Defense and the German and Italian space agencies. It is managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., for NASA's Earth Science Enterprise, Washington, D.C.

    --
    The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
  61. Hey wait a minute... by Bvardi · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the sake of tradition, shouldn't we be blaming microsoft for the death of the dinosaur? :) (And for that matter pointing out that linux helps prevent system crashes of this magnitude ;)

  62. Next impact will be in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's odd that they're playing down the fact that this happens only once every 65 million years.

  63. Re:Slashdotted... by trmj · · Score: 1

    oh. well where's the fun in that? :-

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  64. Ignorant question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm no scientist but it seems to me that a comet that big would throw the earth out of it's orbit. Why haven't we crashed into the sun yet?

    1. Re:Ignorant question by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I'm no scientist but it seems to me that a comet that big would throw the earth out of it's orbit. Why haven't we crashed into the sun yet?

      I'm no scientist either, but who's to say it didn't move Earth from it's orbit? I'm sure an impact of that magnitude would affect the speed, attitude, spin, and position of the planet to some extent.

      However, let's not assume that it would push the planet closer to the sun. It would be just as likely to push it away, or into an eccentric orbit. It probably took millions of years but Earth's orbit seems to have stabilized, perhaps due to gyroscopic effects?

    2. Re:Ignorant question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I was being facetious with the "crashing into the sun " remark. I wonder if a comet that big could throw the earth far enough out of orbit to affect the climate--perhaps bring about an ice age or something...

    3. Re:Ignorant question by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      Here is an excersise you may perform in order to determine just how much a meteor would affect the earth. First, get a cueball, now get a small round marble. Now, fire the marble at the cueball at varying velocities. Observe the motion of the cueball.
      Draw your own conclusions about how far the earth might have been adjusted by an approximately scaled object impacting it at an approximately scaled velocity.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    4. Re:Ignorant question by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Except that the scales involved are more like "grain of sand" and "bowling ball." It is very, very hard to get the grain of sand to a velocity that will affect the bowling ball much.

      I think people tend to forget just how much of the Earth is solid (or molten) rock. The entire ecosphere -- from the depths of the ocean to the top of Everest -- is a very thin skin. An asteroid impact that can have a biological effect will still do very little to the planet in a geological or astronomical sense.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  65. You just posted a link to a 617M image... by verch · · Score: 3, Funny


    Worst slashdot effect... ever.

  66. MOD up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod the parent up

  67. Re:IF YOU MOD THE PARENT POST DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, that troll is a little better than the parent troll, which itself really missed a perfect opportunity. I shall try and correct the situation:

    GOD ALMIGHTY created this prefect planit in HIS OWN IMAGE and GOD does not have craters on HIS perfect face. This NASA stuff is all lies of satan, the greatest liar. The Earth is just 5,000 years old. And that crater was created when?!? Like 65 million years ago? Well those are Satan years and they are just a fraction of the years you nonbeliefers will suffer the ravaging torments of unbridled HELL FIRE for even reading this satanic lie about the earth. Jesus walked this earth and he did not fall into any sink holes. The bible would record them if he had! We all know the bible is the word and work of GOD ALMIGHTY and sink holes are the shortcut to HELL, so that proves my point. They are SATAN HOLES.

    ANyone who disagrees with me is a deluded minion of the fallen satan. Burn if you mod me down. Jesus saves! I was saved by Jesus and you can be saved or just burn, and I will laugh.

  68. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UN approach to stopping asteroids: "Stop! Or we'll say 'Stop!' again."

  69. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how the US has to protect the world. Why not make some piss-ant European or Middle East country pay for it?

  70. While it does not have these particular pictures by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    here is yet another government server for us to destroy. It has many similar pretty thing for you to look at.

    http://photojournal.wr.usgs.gov

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  71. ob. meteor joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here.

  72. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it will.

    France, Russia and Germany have no oil interests, AFAIK, in regards to incoming asteroids of death.

  73. Re:Fight Meteor Impacts, Not Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you already took all their money and natural resources?

  74. partial mirrors by cetan · · Score: 4, Informative

    I managed to save some of the two catalog pages here:

    http://www.phule.net/mirrors/PIA03379.html
    and
    http://www.phule.net/mirrors/PIA03377.html

    PIA03379.html has the 1.5MB image.

    No, I'm not going to try and mirror the 600+MB TIFF file :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    1. Re:partial mirrors by cetan · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  75. Interesting article...but what's with Nasa.gov? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know this is off topic, but if you go to Nasa.gov... check out that flash animation- what is up with that???
    Are they trying to make people think George Bush is some kind of hero?
    I expect to see something from star-trek fly by at the end, or maybe "To bodly go where no man has gone before"-- perhaps they are trying to make it more mainstream... but I'm sorry that is just lame, the quote from Bush seems out of place- At least they made the audio from the Bush speech extremely poor.
    If you're going to spend tax payers money- put some class into it.

  76. In other related news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because airplanes, nuclear weapons (bliss), peanut butter, the internet, and cars were all made by morons. I guess that doesn't say much for the Europeans, considering they didn't make them first.

    Fuck you, eurotrash.

    1. Re:In other related news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aeroplanes: New Zealand.
      the web: Great Britain.
      peanut butter?: ok, I'll give you that.

    2. Re:In other related news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said, the Internet, not the Web (Internet >>>>> the Web). That would be the US.

    3. Re:In other related news.... by Anthony · · Score: 1

      Cars: Certainly not the US. Try Daimler-Benz in Germany for the oldest manufacturer. Somewhere in Europe I'm told.

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  77. Re:Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you jest! Do you really want to force the idiots on slashdot to realize they are not all powerful? That they do not actually control the internet?

    It's funny. Slashdot thinks they're so fucking cool when they bring down Joe Schmoe's website that's running on a cable modem, but if they ever linked to a normal website that wasn't already under enormous load, everyone would realize slashdot is a joke.

    Fuck you.

  78. rock record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a clear point of delineation in the rock record

    Would that be next to the Grand Funk Railroad label?

  79. Was I asleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I thought the dinosaurs died so that steven spielberg could make three movies and lots of money.

  80. Re:Slashdotted... by MrNemesis · · Score: 0

    "But what about the USS's?"

    "Un-Slashdottable servers? I don't believe they exist."

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  81. Re:What business model? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Let's see... Your compelling reason for Space exploration is to discover and provide warning of biblical size impact events. To whom do you suppose the bill should be sent?

    This isn't a flame. If a workable business model exists it could actually happen. Without this, however, it's hand waving. Perhaps the "global conscience" should be above such matters but it's not.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  82. WARNING: GOATSE LINK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy Troll Tuesday, everybody!

  83. Why we shouldn't worry about another impact by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

    Logically thinking, since we evolved directly from the remaining 30% of life on the planet after the comet impact, wouldn't we be a likely survivor of subsequent 'extinction level' impacts?

    It's all about evolution baby:)

    1. Re:Why we shouldn't worry about another impact by belg4mit · · Score: 2

      Except that what survived were things like
      mice and roaches, not pigs, cows and monkeys.
      In any event while the species might survive,
      the majority of the individuals would not.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  84. Mod Parent Up! Its Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he he :P

  85. Re:If you support Slashdot, you support terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batman was subjected to this evil tourture once.. luckily he recited his multiplication tables backwards and kept his sanity...

    (Cant belive i rememeberd that... Old Sk00l batman was the best..)

  86. Main site-links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:Main site-links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPAN is my friend - wget is CPAN's friend therefore wget is my freind's friend...oh never mind.

    2. Re:Main site-links. by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      I think it's no coincidence that these enormous images are all prefixed with 'PIA'.

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
  87. Basic Geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The north american continent ends at Mexico's southern tip. Central america begins at Guatemala (Mexico's southern neighbor).

    See, it makes sense!

  88. Mirror by immybaby · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is an annotated mirror which should help: Image

  89. muah ha ha ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FAIL IT!

  90. [JOKE] Re:Dino Deaths by ardiri · · Score: 1

    it could also be because of the introduction of the new bread of gay/homosexual dinosaurs - the megasoraus and the likalotofpus.

  91. New NASA Maps Show A New Slasdotting of .GOV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, the .tif map is around 200 megs!!

  92. Re:Something concrete-War declared on NASA server. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But the public usually only pays attention when something bad happens."

    Well then I guess their server will be on the six o' clock news then.

  93. Great resolution by siphoncolder · · Score: 2, Funny
    *zooms in on the 600MB+ TIFF*

    Wow... I think I can see my house from here...

    --
    i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
  94. I agree AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. That was a fucking stupid joke. But, it is funny here because computer geeks think stupid shit is funny. That's why they are unpopular in school, and are virgins until they are about 46 years old. Most geeks think the beer stuff is still funny as they sit at work as a grown up. For us, mostly ACs who love to mock you retarded geeks, those beer jokes went out in 10th grade after we had already been drunk too often and laid equally the same.

    Mod that root post (what is it this one's grandparent) as follows:

    Score: -5, FUCKING RETARDED

  95. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to see the creater created by the MOAB? Take that you undecided Floridians

  96. muah ha ha ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FAIL IT

  97. Re:What business model? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    That's not how I read his comment...

    He was trying to point out that every human in existance resides on Earth, and that makes humans, as a species, vulnerable.

    We should put humans in places other than Earth.

    As far as the bill goes, I think it should go to the largest purveyour of the population that wants to send up the seeds.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  98. AMEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AMEN!

  99. Why this asteroid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are pretty sure this is the 'one' that killed off the dino-beasts. How do they know? Well, at the geolocial dividing line of approximately 65 million years ago, all over the Earth, there is a layer of space material (iridium, I believe). This substance only comes from asteroids. Below this dividing line of iridium dust, there are abundant dino fossils. Above this line, none. This was the major clue to the asteroid theory long before the impact crater was found. This crater is the right age (65 mil years), the right size to have caused world-wide calamities, and the location is correct. The asteroid 'signs' are much stronger in North America than in say, Asia. All in all, they are pretty sure this is the right one. The next one will have our name on it.

  100. FUCK NY BBQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are from NY and think you have BBQ?

    What the fuck ever!

    -Texas

  101. /.ed jpl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't beleave you guys /.ed jpl. Homeland security should hire all as to take on Iraq when the fighting starts.

    DOS attacts are not on the rise it been us here doing it all over the web for years is the real problem.

    Good news service you going here cause you can never read any of the news anyway.

  102. Not to be a party pooper by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    But if I wanted I really wanted I could play with the color schemes enough to make the virgin mary's face appear in the yukatan. They could have just as easily made this photo appear that Mount Doom exhisted off the coast of Mexico.

    Tell people to look for the man in the moon and they will. Or a rabbit.

    Not that I don't believe this, I'm just pointing out that all of these digitally enhanced photos, be it from this or the hubbell, or whatever are just that. Enhanced.

    Just food for thought.

  103. Quick trip to off-topic land... by FamedLamer · · Score: 1

    No thank you. If The End comes, I'm killing as many as I can. Food will be in short supply, so I might as well rid us of as many mouths a possible.

    Rape is high on my todo list also: need to get busy recreating man-kind.

    Once its safe to crawl back out into the open, I'll need to spread as many lies as possible too. I'll need to start laying down the foundation for mankinds' new religion too. Lots of fun work to do.

    In the begining, FamedLamer created the heavens and the Earth^H^H^H^H^H LamerOrb....

  104. muah ha ha ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FAIL IT.

  105. /. of NASA by uchi · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or have we slashdotted everything under the nasa domain name. I can't even get the main nasa.gov page to load :(

  106. muah ha ha ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FAIL IT!!

  107. So it's confirmed. by Trogre · · Score: 1

    The US really is a hole.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  108. Dinosaurs?? Yellowstone volcano will kill US by saudadelinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It pretty much could happen anytime.

    http://www.solcomhouse.com/yellowstone.htm

    for maps and other graphics and

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/1999/superv ol canoes_script.shtml

    for the transcript of the BBC's program. The truly scary part is the correlation of the Toba supervolcano 74K ago, and a human genetic bottleneck which happened around the same time -
    a bottleneck caused by not enough of a gene pool. That one nearly took us out, and the next one, who knows?

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  109. Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and FR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And still after you say all that, you're little nation is still envious of the USA.

    Why then do 90% of you live with in 100 miles of the US border?
    Why do you drive our cars?
    Eat our food?
    And invest in our markets?

    Because you secretly want to be Americans.. or some of you think your French.

    Your a weak, helpless country. You should be God Damn happy that you live in our shaddow. No one would attack you or put sanctions on you. You owe your big brother a little respect instead of *trying* to back stab US in a resultless attempt to become a player in the big leagues. When that private shipping company releases 18% of your military for shipping payments you didn't pay, then maybe you can get in line to open your mouth.

    Shit, three of our states have bigger GDPs than your whole fucking nation!

    Sit down you monkey with a small mustache.

  110. Actually, C-14 dating works to 40000 years ago... by horse_pheathers · · Score: 3, Informative

    Carbon 14 is good for dating organic matter up to around 40000 years old... But there are other means of dating on a geological time scale. Forinstance, when certain minerals are melted and then cooled, they form with a crystalline structure aligned to the earth's magnetic field. By taking into account shifts in the alignment, the known rate of continental drift, comparisons to other nearby rock layers, etc, you can get a pretty good idea when those rocks initially cooled. Also, you can use radioactive elements with longer half lives than carbon-14 to date rocks, by comparing the ratio of that element to its decay products within the rock. This is what most often gets confused with radio-carbon dating, due to both techniques' reliance on radioactive isotopes. And don't forget just looking at the rock strata.... -- Horse_Pheathers

  111. Pity for the dinosaurs.... by horse_pheathers · · Score: 1

    Pity for the dinosaurs they didn't have Bruce Willis and his deep core drilling team around to save 'em from the killer asteroid.....

    -- Horse_Pheathers

  112. At least.... by Alomex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ....for once an extinction that wasn't really Microsoft's fault.

  113. its a caldera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Yellowstone 'super-volcano' is actually a caldera. This is kind of a reverse volcano, where it occurs as a depression in the land instead of a rise, as a mountain. The Yellowstone Caldera is probably the potentially most dangerous geological feature in North America, maybe in the world. When, not if, it goes, it takes out pretty much all of North America with it. And then you know what that means...No more Ben & Jerrys Ice Cream.

    1. Re:its a caldera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yellowstone isn't the only "supervolcano" in the continental US. The Long Valley Caldera in the northern Owens Valley in California is also due to erupt any time now...

  114. Indeed by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    I'm going to unleash them babies tomo...

    Oops, you aren't supposed to know that I'm Your God yet.

    Uhm...

    This is obviously another case of exploding gas mains that only sounded like me admitting to being God. Now, good netizens, if you would only look into the laser of your optical mice, we'll have the matter cleared up in a jiffy.:)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  115. Viewable Pics here by Hecubas · · Score: 1

    Just to the project's main page: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/

    Better than trying to download TIFFs that your system will choke on anyways.

    --
    hecubas

    --
    Hecubas
  116. What's the ladder for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get the booze and comfortable place to sit, but how would you use a ladder?

    1. Re:What's the ladder for? by antis0c · · Score: 1

      Get on my roof of course, I need a good view. :)

      --

      ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  117. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Ironix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A major reason for your GDP is because your country was founded on slave labour; helping it become the richest country in the world in no time at all.

    90% of us live within the US border for the simple fact that the climate is friendlier further south.

    We don't manufacture our own brand of cars. And we also drive european cars.

    I presume you mean fast food? Well, for the people that do eat that stuff, it is because those franchises entrenched themselves into the fast food business...

    When you are NOT talking about fast food, the MAJORITY of the ENTIRE WORLD eats Canadian food (i.e. Grains).

    We did until your markets burst... As you will notice, Canada's economy is not faltering, it remains strong. Our markets are not collapsing as yours did, and our people are not being put into poorhouses.

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  118. If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this is where the meteor hit the earth, where's the meteor? We see all these impact crators, but nobody seems to have found - or at least mention having found - the meteor. It must've been one huge SOB, so why haven't they found it?

    Could this (looking for a crater hole) be akin to something like seeing shapes and animals in the clouds? Or along the lines of finding the face of a man on mars? Topography is very diverse and complex, and there are millions of weird variations on the earth. There's a large crater in the Sea of Japan, too - has this one been discredited as causing the great evolutionary distinction of the dinosaurs?

    What if - maybe - these "caters" weren't caused by meteorites or comets, or anything like that at all? What if they're something like 'sink holes' (not the right term - what I'm thinking of are the holes that are made by fresh-water springs) that once spewed up large amounts of water to flood the earth? (another extinction theory that's equally plauseable, it's just that people disvow it because it 'supports' creationism) These 'craters' could be the result of water flowing back into the sinkhole after this flood (caused by high-presure volcanic action?), bringing large amounts of soil with them - the water had to go somewhere, right?

    If anyone has links or other information on where these craters went, I'd be glad to see them. It's pretty obvious to me that something that big doesn't just disappear.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by cranos · · Score: 1

      Oookkay, so what you're saying is that all the craters in the world were made by giant geysers, set there by god to flood the world. To paraphrase a dodgy movie - "Show me the water." Where in the crust of the planet has their been discovered a body of water large enough to flood the planet a la Noahs Ark(if that is what you are referring to).

      Most meteor craters are thousands if not millions of years old, and in that time they have been weathered down, especially if they are under water. As to the actual meteorite itself, when it impacts with the surface it doesn't stay in one piece, it explodes, scattering pieces of itself over a radius of hundreds to thousands of miles if it is big enough. The core does manage to bury itself into the ground but what is left is nowhere the size of the original object.

      The Meteorite theory of the destruction of the Dinosaurs is just that, a theory, however at the moment it is the theory which more closely fits the facts as we know them. Who knows, another theory may come along which gains main stream acceptance, but for now I'm going to stick with the big rock falling on dinosaurs head theory, it makes more sense than the giant flood theory.

    2. Re:If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the vast majority of the impactor would have been either vaporized or shattered into tiny pieces (dust sized) by the deceleration and the conversion of kinetic energy to heat.

      the yucatan (and other) impact craters that have been identified on earth are identified as impacts not just by their morphology! in fact the yucatan crater was not "seen" until after they inferred that it was there.

      the other evidence includes geochemistry (such as the famous irridium "anomalies people like to bring up), tektites (tiny globs of glass caused by the impact), "shocked" quartz (in which the crystal structure has been severely modified by the stresses caused by the impact), coesite at the surface (coesite is a high-pressure polymorph of quartz usually only found in rocks deep in the crust), tsunami deposits (caused by the giant "tidal" wave resulting from an impact into shallow ocean), etc.

    3. Re:If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by norite · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason we don't usually get to see the original meteor is simply because it has been vapourised in the intense heat caused by impact ;) If you think about it, these things may be travelling at about 150 000km/h, and all that kinetic energy needs to go somewhere, so it gets transferred to heat energy - here's an experiment you can perform in your garage - strike a metal plate with a sledgehammer several times (wear ear protection!) not only might you see sparks fly, but feel the plate and hammer afterwards - it will be hot. Meteorites usually contain high concentrations of Platinum Group Elements (PGE's) e.g. rhodium, palladium, and platinum. They also contain relatively high concentrations of irridium relative to earth because these bodies haven't had the chance to chemically differentiate them through the forces of gravity. Moreover, they have different isotope ratio's when compared with terrestial PGE's - this is how you know if it's terrestrial or not! Now, when the impact event occurs, the atoms don't get destroyed, they get transferred to the target material. (you can vapourise the impactor, sure, but you can't destroy the atoms) So you can look for these signatures geochemically, and in some cases you can even tell what type of meteorite hit the earth (stoney, iron or carbonaceous chondrite) Reference: McDonald, I (2002): Clearwater East impact structure: A re-interpretation of the projectile type using new platinum-group element data from meteorites, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, vol.37 459-464

      --
      -- Fuck Beta
    4. Re:If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by gilleyj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, by your logic, where are all the meteors and other things that have hit the moon. There are bunches of craters there. And not one big meteor sitting in the middle. Actually, quite a bit of research into this crater has been done, there is a layer of a material (compacted dust, the actual material I cannot remember. Nickel and ferrite maybe.) all over the globe which roughly coincides with the estimated impact date. This "layer" seems to be thicker around the geographical regions near the impact site. Oh right, what about that crater in Arizona? Where's the rock that made that? My point is, albeit a bad one, there are some basic laws regarding transfer of energy (some physics major or 8th grader could tell you what they are) which basically dictate that the earth is this really big huge heavy rock. And you hit that rock with basically a little rock, something's gotta give. Typically the little rock. So either it gets liquified or what not. Where's the proof? Fire a lead pellet into a brick of lead at a very very high rate of speed. What do you get? A crater in the lead block, a fine coating around and in that crater of the lead that made up your pellet. How do we know it's not a sink hole? Because of the make up of the material's around an impact site that do not coincide with the native materials of the geological area?

      --
      feh
    5. Re:If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ay these guys are dreaming. The meteror is there but it's miles undergound or at least a mile and it's under the ocean. You got to look at the magnetic map to see it. Don't exist? Sure they do look at Sudbury Ontario. Been mining it for over 100 years. It's way underground. The one in arizona broke up and spread all over the place. Collecting it is now against the law. I bought a piece of that one legally.

      If you got a nickel and the nickel is from Sudbury it's part of a meteror. I got a piece of this one too from underground.

      Some do completely vaporize though but I'd say most metal ones don't.

    6. Re:If this is where the meteor hit the earth... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      This makes much more sense than the foolhardy "it vaporized" replies, thanks.

      Something big enough to make a crater isn't going to vaporize. Break up or tunnel, sure. But not 'vaporize'.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  119. Re:What business model? by cranos · · Score: 1

    Why did you mention a business model? Frankly space exploration is and should be above the almighty dollar. As I have said before if we could set up a truly International Space Agency with contributions from every nation on the planet then we would be getting a hell of a lot further along than we are at the moment.

    But thats just me I suppose, silly me for believing that the continuation of the species is a good thing.

  120. Houston, we have a problem... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Our NASA servers have been /.ed

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  121. Slashdot... almost as good as Fark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, the story was almost as good as when I read it two weeks ago on Fark!

  122. More Interesting... by suchire · · Score: 1

    I personally want to know more about the Cambrian extinction. Almost all life on earth was wiped out by that, but we really have almost no idea what caused it. All those cute little trilobites...gone!

    --
    Such irE
  123. ..which has yet to be proved... by Thorstein · · Score: 1

    Deep impact, though an okay hollywood version, is not necessarily the ONLY theory about what happened to the dinosaurs. THorstein

  124. YOU FUCKING CANADIAN THEIF!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you stole that shit from another website.. typical canadian bullshit.

    in america, at the VERY LEAST we would have cited where we "borrowed" that paper from.

    you fucking loser, you stole it from here.

    1. Re:YOU FUCKING CANADIAN THEIF!!! by Ironix · · Score: 1

      Actually NO, I didn't steal it from there...

      Rick Mercer on "This Hour has 22-Minutes" did that rant on CBC television some months back.

      Rick Mercer was inproperly attributed as the author, but apparantly Rick Mercer states he did not write the piece, nor does he know the source.

      --
      Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  125. Carbonic acid? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    I know that when the himalays first poped up, that much raw limestone being eroded took some co2 out of the air when the acid in rainwater ate it away. OCuld that much limestone added tot eh water do the same thing over a large area? SO not just nuclear winter, but the climate gasses permanetly changed?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  126. Come on mods it is funny NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on mods it is funny NT

  127. Asteroids? Since When? by Mars+Ultor · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that EXTINCTION was what wiped out the dinosaurs.

    --
    "Nokia is not a country, it's the capital of Finland!" -Moderated "Informative". Yeesh.
  128. Re:Asteroids? Since When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's as useless as saying "death is what made that guy die".

  129. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A major reason for your GDP is because your country was founded on slave labour; helping it become the richest country in the world in no time at all.

    Right slave labor has what to with computers?
    Wrong the states that embraced slavery are stull the poorest in the nation. So your stupid as well.

    We did until your markets burst... As you will notice, Canada's economy is not faltering, it remains strong. Our markets are not collapsing as yours did, and our people are not being put into poorhouses.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAH O that is good not faultering? What kind of crack are you smoking??? Care to quote the exchange rate bewteen your money and ours? Na didn't think you would care to look at a long term graph of the exchange rate?
    But the only nugget of truth to your spew is that your economy has been holding steady.

    Going down......
    BBBwwwwaaaaahhhhahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!
    Prehaps more tech would help out Mining sure isn't

  130. Re:Harkens back to the Niven discussion...us again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but who cares? Sure, I don't want to die, and I don't want to see Earth destroyed, but if a large object in the cosmos comes flying in & wipes out life as we know on Earth, whats the big deal? Are we really, as a species, adding a whole lot to the universe? Is the loss of our particular form of life really all that relevant?

  131. Re:Harkens back to the Niven discussion...us again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fine. just go curl up and die somewhere and let the rest of us worry about it then.

  132. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 1800s everyone had slaves. Even Canadia. Well, that was then, and this is now. No one has slaves, and that's the right thing to do. And the USA built the largest economy the world has ever seen in its post-slavery century.

    You envy our weather. So.. you still want to be down here. You said it yourself.

    What's your point about cars? We have foreign ones too, thats what a democracy is all about. But largely, very largely, you drive ours.

    Umm, you're wrong on the food thing. You lie. Besides that we are better at marketing, and taking advantage of your desire for fast food, we have MUCH more land that produces the world's food. Canadia's irrigated land: 7,200 km^2. US' irrigated land: 214,00 km^2. When a desert nation grows more than twice as much food that you do, you know you suck at agriculture. Saudi Arabia = 16,200 km^2.

    And you want to compare markets? Ours has recently corrected (any economist would know why, and since you don't, go study the correcting graph of normal US inflation and GDP growth rates over the last 100 years). Lets see, how powerful is the Canadiaian currency? Wait, you even named it after OUR dollar! Similar to what the other AC said, one of our states (California) has enough purchasing power to just outright buy Canadia. We're being put in the poor houses? Whatever, we don't pay 15% of our money to a failing socialist health care system.

    So basically, you Canadiaians still want to be Americans, but you won't say so because saying so, would mean we were right all along. You are too envious to let us know for sure that we won. But that's OK, because we already know.

  133. Clear-cutting by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Look closely at the vegetation in that area.

    The different shaded green blocks are too large to be JPG artifacts.

    I'm guessing they are clear-cutting.

    1. Re:Clear-cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what image are you referring to? keep in mind that the radar images are just showing topography. the green in those images is just a color map showing elevations, not vegetation.

    2. Re:Clear-cutting by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Get one of the hi-res images (GIF or PICT or TIFF) of the Yucatan from the NASA site mentioned in the article.

      Zoom into the East rim of the crater where it
      meets the ocean. You'll see what looks like JPG artifacts as polygons in the green expanse, but they're gigantic and show up on the uncompressed images.

      The fact that they're regular and it's an elevation map makes it all the more certain it's man-made clear-cut activity.

  134. Re:If you support Slashdot, you support terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real Anti-American is the one who sits idle and swallows everything the adminstration (conservative, liberal, or otherwise) says without any perspective or thought. America was not built with blind obedience, and blind obedience is definitely not what America needs.

    Remember the best thing to do in case of an A-bomb attack: Duck and cover!

  135. Echelon confirms my day has been worse by Sir+Network · · Score: 1

    Screw NASA's findings.
    Today I lost my job and my girlfriend.
    Astronauts have **nothing** on my government.

    --
    Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. --John Wayne
  136. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Ironix · · Score: 1

    When I was referring to the 'markets' I was not specifically quoting the currency markets, but if you want to be that way...

    Check out the 2-year chart for Canadian Dollars vs. US Dollars.

    Looks to me like our Canadian dollar is moving up quite quickly, it is almost as though it were becomming an upward trend!... Don't mind me, I am a market analyst.

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  137. Re:dupe!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your as bad as Mr Taco.

    Are you pussy whipped too?

  138. Isn't incredible mother nature? by rrobles · · Score: 1

    The same place where the "mother of all asteroids" hit the earth and created such hard to imagine destruction is today one of the most beautiful places on earth: Cancun, Cozumel and the Caribbean. Do we know the truth?

  139. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Ironix · · Score: 1

    "So basically, you Canadiaians still want to be Americans, but you won't say so because saying so, would mean we were right all along. You are too envious to let us know for sure that we won. But that's OK, because we already know."

    Actually, it is our greatest fear, that of becoming American or Americanised. We prefer not to live in a perpetual state of fear.

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  140. Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That little dent in Yucatan is supposed to be *it*? What about the big wopper that created the Gulf itself then? Must have done more good then just kill a bushnblairaurus..

  141. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "A major reason for your GDP is because your country was founded on slave labour; helping it become the richest country in the world in no time at all."

    When slavery was at it's peak, the US wasn't so 'rich'. That didn't happen until well after slavery was completely abolished.

  142. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by norite · · Score: 1

    Well, at least the Canadians can get it together to give universal healthcare to ALL of their citizens nad not waste so much of it on bombs and the military. (America's military budget is $400 thousand million per year - that's a disgrace) During my visits to america, I was struck by the number of poor, homeless people I saw. For such a rich powerful country, this was a surprise. I lived in canada for a while, and let me say that this is the BEST place ever. I've been both sides of the border, and I know where I'd rather live :) Mod me down, call me a troll, whatever, I don't care, but those 28 million who live on your northern border will know what I mean when I say that Canada is a BRILLIANT place :) GO CANADA!!!

    --
    -- Fuck Beta
  143. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's your point about cars? We have foreign ones too, thats what a democracy is all about. But largely, very largely, you drive ours.

    No, this is incorrect. I've been there. They predominantly drive Japanese cars, just like us.

    You can argue back and forth all you want about envy, but for the record, I put a Canadian flag on my backpack when I go abroad just because it's a fuckload safer than having my own (or none at all).

  144. Re:Alternate image - moderations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, moderators!!

    At first you rated my comment as 80% Insightful + 20% funny, and now it's overrated + flamebait.

    All I have to say is wow! I thought it was pretty funny when I posted it; uh, sorry some moderators didn't get it and thought it was insightful / flamebait... It was just a little slashdot absurdity. I suspect some 'insightfuls' were in on the joke...

  145. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also contains a goatsex link. Are the trolls in control here?!

  146. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by TheKey · · Score: 1

    I live in America. I've only been to Canada once (Niagra Falls). Let me just say that the grass IS greener on the other side (speaking of Canada as the other side) :D

    --
    My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  147. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by sethr · · Score: 1

    Ironix should acknowledge that his post is taken from Rick Mercer's CBC show This Hour Has 22 Minutes.

    As for Anonymous Coward, well as a United States citizen, I can only apologize.

    Seth

  148. Please be nice to my poor little Photojournal box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm the Webmaster (well, one of them) of the NASA PhotoJournal machine currently being Slashdotted.
    (Too lazy to try and remember my /. account at the moment, sorry for the AC bit ...)

    It's a poor little dual-Athlon 1.2 GHz box with only 512 Mbytes of RAM. The load average is up over 100 and holding steady:

    [root@photojournal root]# uptime
    5:53pm up 8:30, 2 users, load average: 118.52, 111.40, 108.14

    We're looking to scrounge some more memory to get it up to a Gbyte of RAM, but that's about the best we can do at the moment.

    Please be nice to our little box, it wasn't meant to be Slashdotted :)
  149. Re:IF YOU MOD THE PARENT POST DOWN by stormraven · · Score: 0, Troll

    Way to be tolerant. I'm impressed.

    Perhaps if you were less a student of religion and more a student of history you would realize that Christianity has arguably caused more evil overall than any other organization in history, with the possible exception of Nazi Germany.

    Allow me to clarify. The longevity of the Roman empire was brought about by its openness and acceptance of the gods of others. They might not have always believed in them, but they respected them. Naturally they expected their own gods to be respected, and when the Christians told them to go to hell instead. This was, in fact, largely ignored until Nero blamed the burning of Rome on them, and they used it to turn public opinion their way, breed dissent, and bring down the Roman empire.

    Or perhaps I should bring mention to the Inquisition. Contrary to what many think, it lasted from around the time Christians got real political power to around the time of the American colonies (remember the Salem witch trials?). They wanted to stamp out any and all other religions, and used whatever means necessary to do so. If you disobeyed, you would be murdered.

    Now, add in the Crusades. The men who went didn't go for religious purposes. They went to loot, pillage, and rape, a task they fulfilled with grim efficiency. Well, ok, maybe some went for religious reasons, but not all that many of them were so deluded.

    You can question the credibility of some of these claims, but they can each be backed up by historical fact. I will admit Christians weren't the only reason for the decline of rome, but they WERE one of the major factors in Rome's fall, and I challenge you all to provide to provide broad-based, credible proof that states otherwise.

    And likewise, I challenge any of you to provide any real credible verifiable undeniable proof of the existance of the Christian god. I doubt it can be done.

  150. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

    Why then do 90% of you live with in 100 miles of the US border?

    It's called climate. You'd know that if you'd been awake in social studies.

    Why do you drive our cars?

    Actually, GM and Ford make a lot of cars in Canada. Which you'd know if you'd been awake during economics.

    Eat our food?

    Actually, we mainly eat whale blubber and Tim Horton's donuts. Neither of which you'd know anything about.

    And invest in our markets?

    Actually, we own your markets so technically, you're investing in our markets.

    Because you secretly want to be Americans.. or some of you think your French.

    See the above post about George Bush.

    Your a weak, helpless country. You should be God Damn happy that you live in our shaddow. No one would attack you or put sanctions on you. You owe your big brother a little respect instead of *trying* to back stab US in a resultless attempt to become a player in the big leagues. When that private shipping company releases 18% of your military for shipping payments you didn't pay, then maybe you can get in line to open your mouth.

    Serge, shut off the water and turn off the lights. Winter is almost over and the natives down south are getting uppity again.

    Shit, three of our states have bigger GDPs than your whole fucking nation!

    And three times the poverty, gangs, teenage pregnancy, property crime, prison populations, sick people because they can't afford healthcare, grade nine dropouts (per capita, look it up), shall I continue? $$$ mean fuck all to quality of life or humanity of civilization.

    Sit down you monkey with a small mustache.

    Ouch, you got me, that hurt. I'm gonna cry now.

    Homo sapiens neanderthalensis.

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
  151. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

    Where's Canadia? I can't find it on the map. Oh... you meant Canada...

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
  152. Re:Slashdotted... by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

    If we ever get out of this fireswamp...

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
  153. Un-doing the Slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK folks ... I think we may have a Band-Aid® "fix" for the dreaded Slashdot Effect on the NASA PhotoJournal.

    What you have to understand is that the NASA PhotoJournal is not really intended for "casual users" as a rule. It's really more oriented towards researchers. Thus, you'll find, it was easy to download full-resolution TIFFs, and the stuff like JPEGs and GIFs was really somewhat of an afterthought. Meaning, basically, that methods (cgi-bin) were provided to create those JPEG images on the fly, from pull-down menus.

    Basically, part of the "Slashdotting" of the machine was the CPU being eaten alive by all that cgi-bin on-the-fly conversion stuff.

    What we've done (Band-Aid® fix) is to change the interface to be more "user friendly" until a final decision is made on how to orient the site - namely, what this means is that each page will now have a thumb, and clicking on the thumb will get you a modest-sized (pre-cached, not on-the-fly) JPEG image. The original full-sized TIFF image will be available from the menu on the lower-right of the page. In addition, full-scale JPEGs are currently being generated on a back-end machine, so when those are done, they'll be transferred over and then a link/menu entry for getting the full-sized JPEGs will be provided as well as the TIFF link.

    While the load average is still high, I think responsiveness should be doing better now.

    (Just for fun, in case you've never been /.'ed, there's about 9,000-12,000 HTTP packets going back and forth every second at the moment, according to tcpdump.)

  154. You're missing two steps by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

    Step 5) ???
    Step 6) Profit!

  155. Its ok, we're canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehehehe, we used to do a similar thing. We would go nuts and act all crazy, mostly to see people's reactions, and when people were about to lose it, we said "its ok, we're canadian".

  156. About the iridium anomaly and mass extinctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For the record:

    Iridium is found on the Earth, but only in small quantities. The iridium anomaly is a band of clay greatly enriched in iridium over background levels.

    Earthly processes can concentrate iridium, even on fairly large scales, but not even approaching the degree needed to explain the very high levels observed, let alone the world wide extent of the enrichment.

    It's also worth pointing out that not all non-earthly bodies are enriched in iridium, so it's possible to suffer an impact event without iridium enrichment.

    On the subject of mass extinctions and impacts: most of the notable mass extinctions in the Earth's history have apparently not been caused by impacts. Really large extinctions are fairly rare (depending on how you count, there are about five really big ones), and comet/asteroid impacts are much, much, more common.

    It's possible that this paricular impact was especially disasterous because it hit close to North America where most of the dinosaurs lived, it was a very large impact, it hit in the ocean which generated exceptionally large tsunamis as well as water vapor, it hit limestone which was vaporized to produce CO2, and there was gypsum or anhydrite interbedded with the limestone which would have produced unpleasant sulfur compounds including sulfuric acid rain...but that's hardly the whole story. Still, it is a rather unpleasant start.

    - Anonymous Coward

  157. Re:IF YOU MOD THE PARENT POST DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Christianity has arguably caused more evil overall than any other organization in history

    PEOLPLE acting in the "name" of Christiany commited those evil acts. Christianity in and of itself is anything but evil.

    >I challenge any of you to provide any real credible verifiable undeniable proof of the existance of the Christian god. I doubt it can be done.

    No it can't be done. That's not the point. Religion is based on faith. Period. It is pointless to demand proof, etc. The spiritual cannot be approached from a scientific point of view. That, however, is not to say that science and religion are mutually exlusive. For instance I am both a practicing Catholic and a professional geologist.

  158. Lavos by TheCubic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that was where I had to fight Lavos a couple of years ago. Tough bastard -- too bad killing it created an alternate dimension...

  159. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello,

    I am french, and I would really appreciate some feedback about that...
    many thanks

  160. Slashdot effect kills dinosaurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or so one person stated the last time this was on /.

    I personally think they all evolved in racist darwin fashion into small lemmings, and were trapped by a mad, yes mad I tell you, computer games programmer, and transported back to the future, and NUKED by hundreds of perverse children, to shreiks of 'Oh oh!' and manic, manic I tell you, laughter.

    You ever set a blocker, then another right next to it, wait til all the lemmings fall into the trap, then NUKE THE LITTLE BITCHES DIE!!

    yey.

  161. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "Actually, it is our greatest fear, that of becoming American or Americanised. We prefer not to live in a perpetual state of fear."

    Liar.

  162. Vulcanism by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Mod this guy's parent up please.

  163. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by byron150 · · Score: 1

    We have to spend all that money on our Military you goddamn idiots!!!!!! Who the fuck do you think would save your ass if the shit happened to hit the fan right over your goddamned heads. Stupid Canadian Fucks ;) !!!!

    --
    -Never believe in the end of something great, send it to sub-committee for further study!!! - ME
  164. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Well, if you don't allow people to be very poor, they can have no desire to be very rich. When I reached age 21, I was expected to provide my own food, clothing and health care, or go without. MY CHOICE. In Canada, there is no choice. therefore no opportunity.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  165. Re:Lets break asteroid into 2 pieces, for CA and F by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, you can choose to go without clothing and food in Canada if you want. (??)

    Well, if you don't allow people to be very poor, they can have no desire to be very rich.

    You're a libertarian, so you probably believe that. Sure. But anyway, what does that have to do with Canada? We have lots of homeless people, and lots of really really rich people too. Does that clear things up?

  166. Re:What business model? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Frankly space exploration is and should be above the almighty dollar.

    Sigh. The operative word there is should. What should be and what is are two quite distinct matters.

    If you wish to see phenomenal progress in Space, find a way to make it turn a profit. You'll live to witness contract negotiations between businesses and astronaut unions.

    As I have said before if we could set up a truly International Space Agency with contributions from every nation on the planet then we would be getting a hell of a lot further along than we are at the moment.

    A "truly international" Space Agency would spend most of it's time squabbling over which country gets the rocket contracts and how much launch facility compensation must be paid.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  167. Re:What business model? by cranos · · Score: 1

    A "truly international" Space Agency would spend most of it's time squabbling over which country gets the rocket contracts and how much launch facility compensation must be paid.

    Funny that sounds exactly like the way it happens now, only replacing nation states with US States. I never said it would be easy, it will need strong leadership and a hands off approach from the pollies (I know I know) but it could happen.

  168. elle pee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lhaste phoaste

    no more post for you!

    \/\/[][]7!

  169. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Two hundred years ago today, Irma Chine of White Plains, New York, was
    performing her normal housekeeping routines. She was interrupted by
    British soldiers who, rallying to the call of their supervisor, General
    Hughes, sought to gain control of the voter registration lists kept in
    her home. Masking her fear and thinking fast, Mrs. Chine quickly divided
    a nearby apple in two and deftly stored the list in its center. Upon
    entering, the British blatantly violated every conceivable convention,
    and, though they went through the house virtually bit by bit, their
    search was fruitless. They had to return empty handed. Word of the
    incident propagated rapidly through the region. This historic event
    became the first documented use of core storage for the saving of registers.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...