Slashdot Mirror


Hilary Rosen Will Step Down As RIAA Head

Phoenix666 writes "NYT Business reports Hilary Rosen is leaving. Question is, what head will spring from the Hydra next? Could this signal a shift in the RIAA's tactics? The article reports 'Rosen's departure comes as the organization sought to soften its image among Internet consumers, many of whom viewed the RIAA -- and Rosen personally -- with antipathy over incessant pressure for crackdowns on sharing digital music over the Internet.'" A press release on the RIAA site says that Rosen will leave at the end of this year.

552 comments

  1. Ding Dong by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Funny

    The witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead!

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:Ding Dong by Professor+North · · Score: 1

      I see I wasn't the only one who was greeting by this song in my head upon reading the headline.

      "Which old witch? The wicked witch!"

      --
      - - Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand. - -
    2. Re:Ding Dong by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 5, Funny

      isn't that song copyrighted? I'm going to have to sue you under the DMCA... blah blah blah

    3. Re:Ding Dong by cioxx · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You know what I compare her resignation to?

      End of LOTR: The Two Towers.

      The scene where Saruman watches his factory get flooded. Hillary Rosen is Saruman.

      (and CmdrTaco is Frodo)

    4. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Ding Dong by drdink · · Score: 0, Troll

      If that is the case, she will now move on to corrupt the Shire with industrialism. So what do you expect "the Shire" to equate to in real life? What will she move on to destroy next?

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
    6. Re:Ding Dong by t0qer · · Score: 0, Troll

      isn't that song copyrighted? I'm going to have to sue you under the DMCA... blah blah blah


      Actually, copyrights run out after 50 or so years, it's why you can download elvis without worry now.

    7. Re:Ding Dong by bnenning · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, copyrights run out after 50 or so years


      Welcome back, how was your coma?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    8. Re:Ding Dong by sam_handelman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Er... which old witch?

      It's time we let Jack Valenti know: You have no power here! Be gone, before someone drops a house on you!

      Courtney Love, by the way, is Glenda.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    9. Re:Ding Dong by brain159 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ok, you win 6 months at the Lawrence Lessig Re-Education Camp for completely failing to grasp that this is not true (although in a fair world, maybe it should be), thanks to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.

      Your specific example is also wrong in Europe where terms are also at artist death + 70 years, but were not extended retroactively.

    10. Re:Ding Dong by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While her successor may be no better than Hilary Rosen, I imagine even they are glad to see her go. They don't all believe that piracy is why sales are down. They won't say it, but many in the recording industry blame Hilary for their woes. Everyone needs to continue to boycott the recording industry. We are winning this fight! Hilary Rosen has surrendered.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    11. Re:Ding Dong by swschrad · · Score: 5, Funny

      "She said the RIAA board will conduct a search for her replacement." -AP

      Hey, how about Kevin Mitnick? he's availiable now.

      --
      if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    12. Re:Ding Dong by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The witch is dead, the wicked witch is dead!

      (big explosion of smoke and fire, munchkin geeks scatter at the sight of Valenti in witches' drag)

      I thought you said the wicked witch was dead!

      Ah, but we killed the wicked witch of the east; this is her sister, the wicked witch of the west. She's much worse.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    13. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought Courtney Love was Glen... there you go.

    14. Re:Ding Dong by sconeu · · Score: 1

      "She said the RIAA board will conduct a search for her replacement."

      And the ISP anyone found to have downloaded an MP3 of her replacement will be handed a subpoena!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    15. Re:Ding Dong by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Actually, copyrights run out after 50 or so years, it's why you can download elvis without worry now.

      Have you even been paying attention?

      Lessig just lost a claim in the Supreme Court that retroactively extended every extant copyright in the past seventy years for 95 years if a corporation or 90 years after the artist dies.

      You _cannot_ download elvis without infriging on the copyright of whomever owns the rights to the King--either a music industry tycoon or his daughter.

      Same goes for J.R.R. Tolkien, the warner bros. wartime propaganda (from WWII), and big band music.

      Let's assume that Elvis, rich as he was, never sold his copyrights on both his lyrics and his performance. He died in 1977. Assuming that there's no more extensions to copyright again (which is entirely possible, given the recent outcry), Elvis won't enter the Public Domain until 2067--so you've got sixty four _more_ years to wait.

      Oh, and it's not the friggin' DMCA, the Sony Bono act, the PATRIOT act, or anything else that keeps Elivs off the PD slate. It's basic copyright law.

    16. Re:Ding Dong by lilricky · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as its not Disney the copyright runs out after 50 years...

    17. Re:Ding Dong by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      I imagine even they are glad to see her go

      She's "resigning to spend more time with her family", i.e. was fired.

    18. Re:Ding Dong by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      She said the RIAA board will conduct a search for her replacement." -AP

      Hey, how about Kevin Mitnick? he's availiable now.

      Unless he's currently living under a rock, I doubt the RIAA headhunters will come into contact with him during their "interviews".

    19. Re:Ding Dong by einTier · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't be so sure. I just read the latest issue of Wired, which has a relatively good article on Hillary Rosen.

      Now, I'm not going to say she isn't the monster we imagine her to be, but we have to understand that she is only the head of a massive organization that is funded by several massive corporations. The words that came out of Hillary's mouth were not nessessarily hers, and if the record companies can get you to think that the opinions of the RIAA are somehow different from the opinions of the major record labels, then they have won an important battle.

      The record labels do not understand the internet, file trading, MP3s, or anything other than the carefully crafted way they've done business since the 1940's. There were many people paying the RIAA's bills who thought that Hillary Rosen was way too soft on piracy, and thought that the genie should (and could) be put back in the bottle.

      We absolutely have to understand that the person to follow Hillary could just as likely be worse than she ever was.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    20. Re:Ding Dong by cduffy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's assume that Elvis, rich as he was, never sold his copyrights on both his lyrics and his performance. He died in 1977. Assuming that there's no more extensions to copyright again (which is entirely possible, given the recent outcry), Elvis won't enter the Public Domain until 2067--so you've got sixty four _more_ years to wait.

      Even if he /did/ sell his copyrights, it would still be the same expiration date. Transferral doesn't change how long they last -- it's only if a corporation is the *original* holder of a copyright that the 95-year hardlimit applies.

      And in some measure it *is* the CTEA (aka the Sony Bono act) and its predecessors that keep Elvis off the PD slate, since they revized how long "basic copyright law" keeps works away from the public.

    21. Re:Ding Dong by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but i think toilken released some e-books. (or his son)http://www.geocities.com/palmtolkien/

    22. Re:Ding Dong by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Unless of course it is a poorly animated mouse with a one-dimentional charactor and a stupid highpitched voice singing.... then we wouldn't be able to listen to his singing until humanity has fully wiped itself off the planet or come to its sences.... which is not as bad as it seems given the nausia factor of most Disney stuff.

      P.s. I am pretty sure elvis' music is still copyright... how else do you think Lisa Marie is making more than Elvis ever did? Do you think record companies just give her money out of the goodness of their heart so she can seduce celebrety husbands and blow on the church of scientology training courses?

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    23. Re:Ding Dong by Associate · · Score: 1

      Quick, somebody throw a bucket of water on Jack. Maybe he will melt. I bet he really does have flying monkeys. He just can't legally say what he does with them.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    24. Re:Ding Dong by ruiner13 · · Score: 1
      "She said the RIAA board will conduct a search for her replacement." -AP

      Sure, they've made a good few years doing nothing but searching... on Kazaa, Morpeus, Napster... oh wait. I hope this turns out like the presidential races and when they discover the new pres. has downloaded MP3s all hell will break loose! ;)

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    25. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I'd known more about him a few years back when he walked into Coppi's in DC with his entourage (no flying monkeys), where I was having a drink at the bar -- I could have complied with the pouring of water on him.

    26. Re:Ding Dong by Yagotta+B.+Kidding · · Score: 2, Funny

      Family? I thought she drank from the furry cup...

    27. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake up, dude! Copyrights now last life of the author plus 70 years, and for corporate holdings, 95 years. In 20 years, they will extend it agian. Elvis will never be in the public domain.

    28. Re:Ding Dong by betamaxV2.1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually the copyright laws have been extended to nearly a century because of a recent lawsuit involving disney and a couple of other corporations that had the problem of their copyrights running out. the story can be found here http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/01/15/scotus.copyright s.ap/

    29. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, but your analogy only works if later Glenda "convinces" Dorothy to go get another pair of Ruby Slippers for her, and then Dorothy shoots herself in the head.

      --AC

    30. Re:Ding Dong by scottfi · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Hating the RIAA's Hilary Rosen" - Wired Article

    31. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The record labels do not understand the internet, file trading, MP3s, or anything other than the carefully crafted way they've done business since the 1940's"

      WRONG! They understand the technology all too well, including the threat it represents: obselescence. They're just trying to hold out as long as possible, in hopes of bilking us out of a few billion more (and leaving a crapload of shitty legislation in their wake ... what a legacy).

    32. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      As soon as I read that she thinks that the music market should expand beyond cd's, I was with her.

      I'd love to be able to download a song, legally paid for, and then do what I want with it. I don't want to purchase cd's anymore. My place is small, I don't have the space to store commercial jewelcases and compact disks. If I want music on a cd, I'm more than capable of burning it to a cd. Why don't the record companies realize this?

      Sell me the content, dammit, and let me be responsible for the media!

    33. Re:Ding Dong by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's only in some European Countries, and only for certain things. If you live in the US or any countries under the Berne convention, it's signficantly longer than the life of the artist.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    34. Re:Ding Dong by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      >>Ding dong, the witch is dead...
      >isn't that song copyrighted?


      Yes it is. MGM made "The Wizard Of Oz" in 1939 with a budget of $128,000. (Movies today cost more like $128 million.) We need to not only sue anyone who would even consider singing (or thinking about) this song without permission, but we also need to extend copyrights in order to give MGM an opportunity to recoup their original investment. Please help support both of these efforts.

      While I'm at it, I should also suggest that both the RIAA and MPAA could get a second benefit by legislating that everyone have brain implants. Besides the primary benefit of decoding the DRM directly as it hits your brain and automatically charging your credit card for seeing or hearing anything copyrighted; there is a second benefit. We could also find wrongthinking people who are guilty of thinking about violating copyright.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    35. Re:Ding Dong by CmdrPinkTaco · · Score: 1
      From the Wired article "Hating Hilary"(re-printed without permission):

      Some of Rosen's toughness can be traced to her twenties, when she came out as a lesbian and fought on the frontier of gay politics, becoming an early and ardent advocate for AIDS research. I ask Rosen if she thinks the stereotype of a militant lesbian plays into her image as being too aggressive. She considers this. "I never thought of myself as one of those separatist dykes," she says finally. "But I suppose if people see me that way, that's fine."
      --
      Please give your mod points to others, Im at the cap. They will appreciate it more
    36. Re:Ding Dong by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "isn't that song copyrighted?"

      By a member of the MPAA. We're busy talking about Natasha right now, not Boris.

    37. Re:Ding Dong by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Ah, but we killed the wicked witch of the east; this is her sister, the wicked witch of the west. She's much worse.

      Actually, they're both based in LA.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    38. Re:Ding Dong by Xanlexian · · Score: 1

      "The words that came out of Hillary's mouth were not nessessarily hers"

      She said them, they're HER words. If I say something, I'd expect people to believe they are MY words -- regardless if I am right or wrong.

      --Xan

      --
      "Congratulations, Boots. Your robot has become self-aware. You're a daddy now." -- Dr. Rho Bowman
    39. Re:Ding Dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RPG Gamer? That's like saying NIC Card.

    40. Re:Ding Dong by einTier · · Score: 1

      OK, so they are her words, but what I'm trying to say is that we have to recognise that that she's not just saying them because that's how she feels. She's saying those words because someone with lots of money that directly controls her job is telling her that this is the position she needs to take. They may not be handing her a script, but I can promise you that she's like every other lobbist, politician, or CEO. She says the words and holds the opinions that her bosses need to hear her say.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    41. Re:Ding Dong by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      And in some measure it *is* the CTEA (aka the Sony Bono act) and its predecessors that keep Elvis off the PD slate, since they revized how long "basic copyright law" keeps works away from the public.

      2003 - 1977 = 26 years ago.

      I'm not up on the history of law, but I think it's been more than a century since copyrights were _that_ short.

    42. Re:Ding Dong by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Granted, but it would have been coming up Real Soon Now (28 years) barring (a one-time) renewal, as opposed to not being available in the forseeable future.

    43. Re:Ding Dong by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1
      Actually, they're both based in LA

      According to an interview, Hilary Rosen grew up in New Jersey.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  2. Interview? by Muerte23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that she's stepped down, maybe she's available for a Slashdot Interview?

    But then again, maybe not. I can see the questions now...

    1. Re:Interview? by nevershower · · Score: 1

      She reads slashdot?

      --
      Look, ma! I'm a karma whore
    2. Re:Interview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First question:
      "So, do your kids have horns or hooves or both maybe?"

      Second question:
      "What was it like being the mouthpiece for the greediest pack of idiots ever, who comparatively make Enron look like Habitat for Humanity?"

      Third question:
      "Are you that stupid in person too?"

    3. Re:Interview? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Now that she's stepped down, maybe she's available for a Slashdot Interview?

      But then again, maybe not. I can see the questions now... "


      Look guys, she's not the enemy anymore. Let's pool our money together and send her a T-shirt or something to prove there's no hard feelings. She seems to like this one.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Interview? by geek · · Score: 1

      Question #1-100:

      "Hillary, do you like hot grits?"

    5. Re:Interview? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She stepped down to spend time with her children. Yeah, right! She has harmed her industry beyond repair by trying to kill the free promotion of file trading, and calling paying customers thieves, all to slay a paper tiger called "piracy." They suggested that she should leave quietly. Expect more executives to be be forced out as more and more people get tired of their crap, and stop buying CDs.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    6. Re:Interview? by qortra · · Score: 1

      Maybe she can answer this. When she says "physical piracy" (in the press release), is she saying that viking vermin boarded her ship, raped the crew, and plundered their jewlry? Perhaps people make it clear that they won't tolerate the RIAA portraying file sharers as evil dangerous people. Choose your words more carefully Hilary, whether you're working for greedy bastards or not. If you verbally abuse your children like you verbally abuse the consumers of the music lables you represent, they will grow to hate you.

    7. Re:Interview? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Expect more executives to be be forced out as more and more people get tired of their crap, and stop buying CDs. [dontbuycds.org] "

      Any revenue lost by a boycott of the RIAA will be accounted to 'piracy'. They already blamed Kazaa for the loss of revenue following 9-11.

      Find a better solution.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Interview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and does she prefer them in her usual attire, or naked and petrified?

    9. Re:Interview? by pahpabut · · Score: 1

      She stepped down to spend time with her children. Yeah, right!
      It's the best of reasons. Politics and lobbying is a job like any other for most. Hardly different than say working in the tobacco, firearm, car industry.
      It's not like you wanna stop parenting cause you got snotty kids and klan folk in your neighbourhood, right?
      Personal responsibility for ones decisions at work is ok and heavedly underused for public work, but agreeing to more responsibility also should grant a greater freedom from it when the work is done.

    10. Re:Interview? by Rip!ey · · Score: 2, Funny

      She stepped down to spend time with her children.

      Damn, you Americans *are* brave. You actually let her breed ...

    11. Re:Interview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any revenue lost by a boycott of the RIAA will be accounted to 'piracy'. They already blamed Kazaa for the loss of revenue following 9-11.

      Actually quite refreshing, everybody else in the western hemisphere blamed everything that year, regardless of how stupid on 9/11.
      That's the only good thing about the RIAA that springs to mind.
      At least they try to invent their own scapegoats...

    12. Re:Interview? by Zonekeeper · · Score: 1

      I love that shirt! Anyone know where it can be bought?

    13. Re:Interview? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "She has harmed her industry beyond repair by"

      You assume she mastermined the whole thing. Rosen isn't the evil mastermind here, she's just a patsy/puppet/lackey/middleman/figurehead/etc. to the big RIAA members (Sony, EMI, AOL/TW, etc.). Replacing her isn't going to change any of the policies of the RIAA, just the name and face of the person espousing the ideas.

      Earlier this week I decided that I'm going to sell off most of my CD collection (I refuse to own anything publised by a member of the RIAA). This news doesn't change my intentions because it doesn't change theirs.

      "Expect more executives to be be forced out as more and more people get tired of their crap, and stop buying CDs."

      Yeah, right. What dreamworld do you live in? You can't even organize a Slashdot-wide boycott of the media conglomerates (Stupid evil Jack Valenti. OOOH! LotR!), what makes you think the general public give's a rat's ass?

      Boycotting CDs is little more than a personal political statement that ultimately will have little weight beyond your own circle of friends. If you're doing it to "stick it to The Man," not only are you deluding yourself but you're doing it for the wrong reasons.

    14. Re:Interview? by PCBman! · · Score: 1

      ^_^ Due to Godwin's law, we're unable to even discuss the possibility of committing small scale genocide against her bloodline.

      --
      So, when's lunch?
    15. Re:Interview? by CaseyB · · Score: 1
      Damn, you Americans *are* brave. You actually let her breed ...

      Nope. She and her "life partner" adopted twins.

    16. Re:Interview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy it here for £10: http://www.geekstyle.co.uk/ntkmart.cgi#Corrupt

  3. Good - or bad? by jhouserizer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My papy always said:

    "Don't wish for a new enemy, you won't know what tricks are up its sleeves!"

    1. Re:Good - or bad? by unicron · · Score: 4, Funny

      What your daddy meant to say, between belches of scotch, is "The devil you know is better than the devil you dont."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Good - or bad? by trotski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I vote irrelevent, you insensitive clod!

      Seriously though, I don't see how this makes a big difference as to how the RIAA is run. The decisions are made directly by the members of the RIAA, Hillary Rosen is little more than a spokesperson/figurehead. Honestly, I concider this somewhat of a non issue.

      Of course who knows, maybe they'll elect someone cool, like Axel Rose for example instead of an MBA monkey who wouldn't know music if it bit him/her in the bottom.

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    3. Re:Good - or bad? by schmink182 · · Score: 1
      "Don't wish for a new enemy, you won't know what tricks are up its sleeves!"

      What good does it do for us to know this new guy's tricks? We're already effectively powerless. However, I do agree with the skepticism of this being a good thing.

      "Prepare for the worst but hope for the best."

    4. Re:Good - or bad? by datadictator · · Score: 1

      " Hillary Rosen is little more than a spokesperson/figurehead"
      Eh, don't you mean snurf gun target ? Hey somebody call the international legion of pie throwers...the mpeg will go beautifully next to the one of Bill getting splotched...

    5. Re:Good - or bad? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      like Axel Rose for example instead of an MBA monkey who wouldn't know music if it bit him/her in the bottom.

      What does Axle (Asshole?) Rose know about music? He screams his lyrics instead of singing them.

      And yes, I own some of their CDs and have seen them in concert (with Metallica, ironically) so I know of what I speak.

      Not to mention that the fuckwit tried to start a riot by insulting his audience halfway through his show...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  4. the next head will be.... by nebenfun · · Score: 1

    lars ulrich.....

    pirates BAD!
    metallica GOOD!

    man I hate that fairy princess....
    nbfn

  5. mercy by jaxle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rosen said. ``But I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them.''

    May god have mercy on their souls.

    1. Re:mercy by exspecto · · Score: 0

      she probably has them chained up in the basement so they don't become evil pirates.

    2. Re:mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine they must get regular school beatings from adolescent napster fans.

    3. Re:mercy by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Rosen said. ``But I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them.''
      >
      > May god have mercy on their souls.

      Rosenkids, if you're reading this, start wiping the hard drives NOW, before Mom gets home!

      (P.S. Your Mom's still a big fat bitch!)

      In fact, I think I'm gonna sing a song about it...

      (Don't do it, Cartman! Don't do it!)

    4. Re:mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rosen is a lesbian, how the hell did she manage to come up with a kid?

    5. Re:mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanna know... Is she going to singing nursery rhymes to them??

    6. Re:mercy by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Rosen said. ``But I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them.''"

      She's taking her kids to court. Evidentally, some bits of their DNA were copied from her own. She considers this theft so she's suing them for 1.4 billion dollars in damages. She was quoted as saying

      "All the blood they're generating is based on my own. Trillions of cells using pirated DNA are created every single month! They can't be allowed to do this. I mean, who's going to pay parents to be concieved if all it takes is a couple ordinary body parts?"

    7. Re:mercy by droopus · · Score: 1

      Rosen is a lesbian, how the hell did she manage to come up with a kid?

      Been living under a rock?

      Easy!

      The very thought makes me shudder and think of Gregory Peck.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    8. Re:mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An amusing point. If I patent my genes (or the process of reproducing them) before I have my first child, and my wife does the same, can we sue our own child later for damages?

    9. Re:mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she found kazaa loaded on the kids computers.

    10. Re:mercy by HohlerMann · · Score: 1

      Confiscate her husband.

    11. Re:mercy by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      Rosen said. ``But I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them.''

      When I first read this I thought it said:
      But I have young children and I want to devour more of them.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    12. Re:mercy by linzeal · · Score: 1

      She is a lesbian last I heard, want to change her ways geek boy ?

    13. Re:mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I have young children and I want to devour more of them.

      She'll only eat the girls...

    14. Re:mercy by adapt · · Score: 1

      I wonder how the life of little Adolf and little Benito is...

      We definitely need a /. interview with Frau Rosen, and a reality show with lots of khaki, leather, chains, suffering, and IP rights protection...

    15. Re:mercy by bigfleet · · Score: 1

      "All the blood they're generating is based on my own. Trillions of cells using pirated DNA are created every single month! They can't be allowed to do this. I mean, who's going to pay parents to be concieved if all it takes is a couple ordinary body parts?"

      This, of course, following her proposal of a fee for all parents to pay the RIAA since their children are pirating music.

    16. Re:mercy by hugh+bris · · Score: 1

      Ummm, her "life partner" is named Elizabeth Birch (who runs the Human Rights Campaign, the influential gay rights group) see http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.02/hating.ht ml?pg=2&topic=&topic_set= Could it be she got someone to anonymously share their DNA? Who said freely sharing is a bad thing?

  6. Where next for Rosen? by joebp · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking perhaps as an oarswoman on the river Styx? Rumours are that Charon is hiring!

  7. who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares

  8. As I see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...this should be a signal for all of us to be on our guard for more 'subtle' actions against music sharers. Who's to say those behind the organization's agenda aren't who chose her in the first place?

  9. Combine this with the last article by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve Jobs for RIAA Head!

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Combine this with the last article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that doesn't work. We'll need someone weak willed and not too bright... how about George W. Bu... what do you mean he's busy?

    2. Re:Combine this with the last article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefuly, Steve Jobs would live up to his history of quality decisions when heading the RIAA!

    3. Re:Combine this with the last article by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      How about Dan Quayle, he doesn't seem too busy and he's not too bright, but a lot brighter than Hilary; just perfect

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    4. Re:Combine this with the last article by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      Or Hilary Rosen for president

  10. Real reason for leaving... by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... there is a job opening in Hell.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Real reason for leaving... by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Perhpas the real reason for her leaving is that the business model of the riaa members of using the umbrella organization to spread lies and FUD, and aggressively harass people that arelooking for an alternatative to the current marketing schemes of the group, while allat the same time screwing the artists?

    2. Re:Real reason for leaving... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... there is a job opening in Hell.

      What? You mean they still haven't filled that position left vacant when Satan accepted the promotion to VP at Microsoft?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Real reason for leaving... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that`s right coal shovelers are in big demand. but she plans to bring hell to the U.S. when she becomes president..

  11. jhouserizer is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now im more than a little worried...dont rejoice just yet.

  12. Hot off the presses by cscx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jack Valenti to replace her at the end of her term.

    1. Re:Hot off the presses by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Funny
      Actually, Lars Ulrich will be the next head.

      Metallica's musical career and integrity have been in the toilet forever, so hes got nothing better to do.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    2. Re:Hot off the presses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Valenti bears the mark of Cain. He and all who follow him shall live, like Judas Iscariot, in eternal damnation. Beware, there is a tide!

    3. Re:Hot off the presses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, Lars Ulrich will be the next head.

      You misspelled "give"!

    4. Re:Hot off the presses by JenovaSynthesis · · Score: 1

      Nah. He's dumber than a box of hair.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards generally receive no replies because you're a coward and I'm a bitch :)
    5. Re:Hot off the presses by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lay off, man. Of all the people who have been bitching, Metallica and the other artists are the only people who deserve to be listened to. Just because you don't like what they have to say doesn't put them on the same scale as Rosen and Valenti. At least they have some right to the music, their creation. Personally, a few people I know stopped downloading Metallica MP3s when they asked. It's just respect for the band and their music. If you don't respect the band enough to follow a simple request of "hey, don't steal our music"(granted, with a couple things for napster to do, but that's another thing altogether), why are you still listening to their music?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:Hot off the presses by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but is he dumber than Cotton?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    7. Re:Hot off the presses by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      Personally, a few people I know stopped downloading Metallica MP3s when they asked.

      I did.

      why are you still listening to their music?

      I'm not.

      The funny thing is, lots of other people stopped listening to it at about the same time. From what I've seen, they did a world of harm to themselves and their fanbase when they went past just _asking_ people not to download.

      I used to buy their CDs and even saw them in concert. Never again will they see another dime of my money. Hell, I even change channels when they come on the radio. And it's not _just_me_.

      So the parent poster was right, in a way. Their career went into the toilet when they pissed off their fans.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    8. Re:Hot off the presses by rtscts · · Score: 1
      Actually, Lars Ulrich will be the next head
      I always knew he was a cock...
  13. Ever notice that all bitches are named Hillary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously:

    Hillary-->Rosen
    Hillary-->Clinton
    etc.

    1. Re:Ever notice that all bitches are named Hillary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND they're Jewish.

      I bet that Clinton cow is a carpet muncher as well. Would explain her husband's behaviour.

  14. Of her own accord? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Rosen's departure comes as the organization sought to soften its image among Internet consumers ...

    To me this sounds like she was asked to leave, rather then because she wanted to, or wanted to move on to something else. Could she have been forced out by the other members?

  15. My only consolation... by siskbc · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is that, when these children become teenagers, that she will be bombarded with a steady stream of the shitty music she lobbied for. What's that Hillary? You hate Brittany Spears? Too F*cking bad! You could have had diversity, but YOU didn't want it. HA!

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:My only consolation... by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shit, by the time her kids are teenagers I'm hoping Britney Spears will have moved on to porn. *fingers crossed*

    2. Re:My only consolation... by Song+for+the+Deaf · · Score: 1

      The statement that the RIAA is responsible for the quality of music today really shows how ignorant many people are of how the music industry actually works. Know your enemy, kids.

      The RIAA itself does not sign the artists. The RIAA does not develop or market these artists. The RIAA as an organization merely represents the major labels and would have the same position regardless of diversity in music or lack thereof.

      Your problem, in reality, lies with the A&R (artist and reportoire) departments of these artists' respective labels. They are the ones responsible, who actually sign and 'develop' the artists. The people in the A&R departments at major labels are concerned primarily with keeping their job. How do they do this? By signing artists that make money for the label. What's the most surefire, knee jerk way to do this? By signing an artist thats already part of a sucessful style (i.e. teen pop, boy bands).

      how do we protest against this? How do we get quality and diversity back into popular music?

      i'll tell you, not buying CDs definitley won't help.

      You see, every now and then, just like at any company, there is an idealist who manages to infiltrate the A&R system. Against all logic he manages to convince his company to sign an artist that is different and good and will possibly take a long term commitment to develop (i.e. Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Beatles, you know, all the GOOD ones).

      Those artists are out there, right now, you just have to find them. On majors and indies. Artists you will enjoy for a lifetime. I won't go into the subjective matter of tastes or which ones I like because that's not the point. They need you to BUY their discs. The artist and the people who represent them need to be REWARDED for taking risks and trying to bring good music to popular culture, despite the current situation.

      As it stands right now, Joe Sixpack's daugter is spending cash at the Wal Mart buying the new teen pop of the moment, reinforcing the current situation, while many new artists get their "one good song" (god i hate that fucking phrase!!! when did A.D.D. become cool?) downloaded and the album isn't bought, also, REINFORCING THE CURRENT SITUATION.

      The paradox is- A lot of good music doesn't sell when it is downloaded, so why should labels sign or keep artists that don't sell?

      You just have to take the time to look elsewhere and find these artists and QUIT GOING THROUGH THE NORMAL CHANNELS, because if you feel overwhelmed and annoyed by Brittany Spears that is obviously what you are doing.

      Hard to be annoyed at her when you don't listen to top 40 and watch MTV. You want the music industry to change? Sure, we all do, but so should you, buddy.

    3. Re:My only consolation... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      by the time her kids are teenagers I'm hoping Britney Spears will have moved on to MUSIC

      --
      ^_^
    4. Re:My only consolation... by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      >Shit, by the time her kids are teenagers I'm hoping Britney Spears will have moved on to porn. *fingers crossed*

      She already has. Haven't you seen any of her music videos?

    5. Re:My only consolation... by Grayswan · · Score: 1
      She will have to learn how to scream better than she sings.


      I object to the next comment.

      --
      If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  16. Her next job by eyeball · · Score: 0, Funny

    Yeah, she's stepping down to run against Steve Jobs for President of the US

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  17. Only eleven more months to go. by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why are you all celebrating already? It doesn't take effect until the end of the year. Until then nothing important will change in the RIAA.

    After she leaves? Nothing will change then either.

    --
    Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    1. Re:Only eleven more months to go. by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Dude! Don't rain on my parade! :-) This is may be our only chance to laugh at her and maybe even make her cry!!!

      That would be NIce.

    2. Re:Only eleven more months to go. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and consider that the RIAA is 1) a business, and 2) part of the entertainment industry. So everything is this week; long term is next month. Anything they say about a year in the future is pure fantasy, and has no relation to any actual plans.

      The only question here is: What are their motives for making such an announcement now? How can they profit from it?

      --

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Only eleven more months to go. by Dexx · · Score: 1

      Everybody assumes the threat is over and buys more CD's?

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
  18. Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news Microsoft were pleased to announce the new position of Chief Digital Rights Management Officer to Hilary Rosen, who had previously worked for the RIAA.
    A Microsoft spokesperson didn't give the following quote: "We're sure that through this appointment we will better serve our customers and shareholders and help foster further innovation"
    News at 10.

  19. The end of this year... by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    That's almost a year away.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  20. Only to find out tomorrow by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 1

    That the RIAA and MPAA will merge into the Entertainment Industry Association of America. God help us if they do.

    --
    Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
    1. Re:Only to find out tomorrow by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      hmm. EIAA close to E I E I E I O but wait... that is copyrighted. I will need to have that portion of my brain formatted.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  21. Know your Mythology: Lesson 1: The Hydra. by Syncdata · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hilary Rosen Will Step Down As RIAA Head
    Someone be sure to cauterize the wound! Quickly, Or seven more execs will take her place!

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Know your Mythology: Lesson 1: The Hydra. by ottffssent · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? Fabulous! As any IT professional knows, adding more management makes an organization more efficient and focused, which is just what we want for the RIAA right now. I'm all in favor of Rosen being replaced by 7 highly-paid execs.

  22. uh oh by hhknighter · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe Bill Gates will take over

    uh oh, all future CDs require an online activation code, and crashes your CD player, which must be 90x speed in order to hear the songs at "normal tone"

  23. Actually by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    I expect the RIAA to create a seven person panel to replace her. Makes sense.

    Joking aside - if you read her WIRED interview she didn't seem happy and complained loudly about her bosses not getting it. I didn't think she'd last.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  24. WTF! by goatasaur · · Score: 1

    I thought the phrase 'first post' automatically gave you a -4!

    Rosen resigns and a 'first post' post gets modded up... what is the world coming to!

    --
    ~D:
    1. Re:WTF! by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I thought the phrase 'first post' automatically gave you a -4!

      It got him a -9! But also +11:

      Moderation Totals: Offtopic=1, Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Funny=10, Overrated=5, Underrated=1, Total=20.

      I guess he started at 2. Congrats! And well said.

    2. Re:WTF! by MrEd · · Score: 1
      Offtopic=2, Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Funny=14, Overrated=8, Underrated=2, Total=29.


      Still truckin'...

      --

      Wah!

    3. Re:WTF! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First post modded up and Hillary Rosen stepping down... In other news, the devil was seen buying ice skates.

  25. Quality of music by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, I really couldn't care who's at the head of the RIAA train.
    Good. She's leaving. Whatever. She's leaving to change the image - not the politics. But even the politics don't bother me so much.

    Here's a clue: You will alienate less people if you put out better music. Woot Woot, the clue train is arriving, and this incarnation of the Pop train is finally leaving.

    Here's another clue: We all have CD burners. Besides the obvious ability to copy music CD's, what you don't realize it has taught us is how cheap CD's truely are. I know there's the cost of the production of the album, the marketing, etc., but over 8 million copies, those costs are negligable. People hate you because the last CD they bought cost them $18.99 and the last CD they burned cost $1.76, including the label, the insert, and the case.

    ~Will

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:Quality of music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      FYI: The cost of a legally licensed music CD here in SE Asia is around 9 dollars--Yes, nine.

      Mod me up for being redundant if you will, but if the recording industry can sell music CDs here in Asia for $9 and still make a profit, why can't they do the same in the US?

    2. Re:Quality of music by geekee · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Here's a clue: You will alienate less people if you put out better music. Woot Woot, the clue train is arriving, and this incarnation of the Pop train is finally leaving."

      Every generation claims that music was better when they were young. Things are no different today. You just got old, that's all. It has nothing to do with the RIAA

      "Here's another clue: We all have CD burners. Besides the obvious ability to copy music CD's, what you don't realize it has taught us is how cheap CD's truely are. I know there's the cost of the production of the album, the marketing, etc., but over 8 million copies, those costs are negligable. People hate you because the last CD they bought cost them $18.99 and the last CD they burned cost $1.76, including the label, the insert, and the case."

      Copy a hundred cds and throw out 99. Then you'll start to get the picture of the economics of marketing music. Oh, and don't forget studio time, promotion, actually paying the artists, salaries of employees, printing costs, etc. Maybe it's not $18, but it's a lot more than $0.50, or whatever you pay for blank cd-r's put the cd burner divided by the number of cds you burn.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    3. Re:Quality of music by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nope.

      I'm 17 and I still think the popular music of today is shit.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    4. Re:Quality of music by OldMansHands · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fine, stop making CDs and allow people to download them cheaply and burn them themselves. Word of mouth is better than marketing, and there aren't any printing costs or sales employees. The point is we don't need this system any more, the internet has the potential to do everything much more efficiently and the RIAA just want to maintain the status quo for their own benefit

    5. Re:Quality of music by Bisifiniti · · Score: 1

      Then, of all the profits you have left, give 99.98% of it to Bill Gates, and spend the rest you have on stale crackers for lunch. Then you'll start to get the picture of the economics of non-cookie cutter artists.

    6. Re:Quality of music by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Remember that there was a *lot* of crappy music around in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s... and probably earlier, but I can't speak from experience for that.

      But you're right. The popular music of today is shit.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    7. Re:Quality of music by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Every generation claims that music was better when they were young. Things are no different today. You just got old, that's all. It has nothing to do with the RIAA

      Perhaps the RIAA's music has maintained a steady level of awfulness over the years. But when the RIAA decides to put out music that I enjoy now, I'll consider giving them money for it now.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    8. Re:Quality of music by MyHair · · Score: 1, Funny
      Shut up Hilary. Shouldn't you be cleaning out your office or something?

      :-)

    9. Re:Quality of music by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, at least we now know the secret acct Hilary uses here at /...

      Every generation claims that music was better when they were young. Things are no different today. You just got old, that's all. It has nothing to do with the RIAA

      No, nimrod - music today is driven by marketing departments, databases full of sales stats and any other business source that combined create the "products" that will appeal to the most lucrative source of income. The same small teams of song writers turning out the same tired old lyrics for wave upon wave of dancing puppets to mime to hormone bombs. If you look closely at %%_boy_or_girl_band_of_the_moment%%, you can see the big holes in their backs where the winder key is inserted...

      The only places you can hear anything not based upon a proven formula would be independent radio, clubs and live gigs. If the only thing you ever listen to is comercial radio, your getting the audio equivelent of some cheesy cable shopping channel. Soul-less, company product.

    10. Re:Quality of music by VAXman · · Score: 1

      Since when is the recording industry making a profit? Last time I checked, none of the biggest 5 recording companies are profitable.

    11. Re:Quality of music by mgblst-portege · · Score: 1

      Here's a clue: You will alienate less people if you put out better music. Woot Woot, the clue train is arriving, and this incarnation of the Pop train is finally leaving.

      Who decides what music is better. It seems that most people seem to like what they are given, it doesn't really matter whether you and I think it is mindless pap.

      Music these days(and for a long time), is no longer about music, but about an image, whether you are pro or anti the mass produced stuff.

    12. Re:Quality of music by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

      I know there's the cost of the production of the album, the marketing, etc., but over 8 million copies, those costs are negligable.

      The vast majority of albums do not sell eight million copies! In fact, in the last ten years only 2356 albums have gone "Multi-Platinum" - the designation for albums with more than two million sales.

      I challenge someone to come up with the total number of album releases in the last ten years. A hint: it's a big number. Think orders of magnatude.

    13. Re:Quality of music by fobbman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Competition with the pirated stuff down the street for $4 does tend to keep the price low.

    14. Re:Quality of music by dink33 · · Score: 0

      Mod me up for being redundant if you will, but if the recording industry can sell music CDs here in Asia for $9 and still make a profit, why can't they do the same in the US?

      I'm no marketing monkey but I'm sure cost of living in SE Asia is significantly cheaper than in the US or Canada. There's the demand curve in economics in which at any price for a product, there is a certain number of people who are willing to pay that price. Obviously, if the price is ~ 19$ in SE Asia, then nobody would buy it. But that price would probably maximize profits in North America.

      --

      -- Frank Hsueh, frank.hsueh@gmail.com

    15. Re:Quality of music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woot Woot, the clue train is arriving, and this incarnation of the Pop train is finally leaving.

      Riiiiight - yet American Idol gears up for an even bigger season than last...

    16. Re:Quality of music by einTier · · Score: 1
      Copy a hundred cds and throw out 99. Then you'll start to get the picture of the economics of marketing music. Oh, and don't forget studio time, promotion, actually paying the artists, salaries of employees, printing costs, etc. Maybe it's not $18, but it's a lot more than $0.50, or whatever you pay for blank cd-r's put the cd burner divided by the number of cds you burn.

      First off, if I can make a CD for $2.76 (including sending a dollar to the artist to cover the paltry royalty they get), it should be considerably less for the record company to do so. Why? Economy of scale. When you produce something in bulk, it costs a lot less. If you'll look at RV's on the road, you'll notice the headlamp and taillamp assemblies are taken from things like Mustangs and Crown Victorias and F-150 pickups. Why? Because it's too expensive to design and make when you're only going to make a few hundred copies. Look at the Panoz Esperante, which uses mostly Mustang GT running gear and trim pieces, or the Quvale Mangusta which also uses Mustang GT interior trim pieces -- and costs $90,000.

      Since the record company is running off millions of copies of the same product, even with the R&D costs, they should be able crank out each copy for less than I can do it at home.

      Also, why should I have to subsidize 99 crappy acts to get my one good one? No other business in the world operates on such a principle. If they did, they'd be out of business tomorrow. Can you imagine Toyota making 99 cars that didn't sell and then saying you have to pay a 1000% premium on your Camry because no one wanted to buy the other 99 models? If your failure rate is 99%, perhaps you don't deserve to be in business.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    17. Re:Quality of music by antirename · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that's true. I have a radio in my office, tuned to one of the "modern rock" stations. I left it off for a year, just left it sitting on the shelf after I changed departments, turned it on today and it still sounds like the SAME OLD SHIT! A year later, and I can't really find a difference or anything new to like. Maybe I'm getting old... it's possible, but I doubt it. Give me some new REM that makes me think, maybe I'll reconsider. The music on the radio is bullshit. I don't listen to it when it's on the radio (and sort of free) and I sure as hell wouldn't waste my time downloading it. The record industry is targeting pre-teens and early-teens that spend their parent's money. Not smart? No, very dumb, but that's what they're doing in the short term. Geeks and techies aren't their market, guys, they want people that "tune in" to whatever the BS station is in your town. We are not their market. At least not now. And it's not because we're nostalgic, at least in my case... I have a few Judy Collins records that I taped... but I enjoy listening to that and what's on the radio sucks. Period. Although most of my MP3s are goth metal. Here's the point: fuck hillary. fuck the riaa. Support your local bands; if you like the music buy the CD (and tip your bartender). Some people just like to make music/software because they want other people to enjoy it... and if you do, give them the $5.00! And then go up and say Hi, and tell them why you did so... you'll feel better :)

    18. Re:Quality of music by sheldon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Besides the obvious ability to copy music CD's, what you don't realize it has taught us is how cheap CD's truely are.

      I'm sure the same thing was said about books when the printing press arrived.

      Hmm, come to think of it, isn't that why we have copyright law? Because of the realization that the true cost of creating something is far more than the cost of reproducing it in a media form.

      BTW, I buy my CDs at Best Buy for about $12-13 on average. Now if the RIAA prevented Best Buy from discounting prices, then I'd be pissed. For now I'll just point out your an idiot for paying $18.99.

    19. Re:Quality of music by doubtless · · Score: 1

      9 US Dollars is a very steep price for people who earns, on average, less than $6000 a year.

      Imagine having a salary of $24,000 a year and the price of a CD is $36!

      The prices of CDs in many Asian countries are already way too high. When audio cassettes were still around, they were around $2-3 each while the CDs are $6-7, now the CDs shot up to $9 and the cassettes are all but history.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    20. Re:Quality of music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. The amount they spend on litigation and lobbying is higher in the U.S. (ducking)

    21. Re:Quality of music by kyz · · Score: 1

      And you think mainstream music in the 1950 and 60s was different to now? It wasn't.

      BBC radio was the same old bland rubbish back then. Kids had to listen to live music or tune in to foreign radio stations to hear the "new music", the BBC would only play what the government wanted to do. This lead to the invention of pirate radio, radio stations on ships anchored in international waters off the British coast.

      Independent radio isn't a god-given right, it's a business just like the music business. It can only survive if it can sell its listeners to its advertisers. You can't run a radio station out of your own pocket like you can with a website, unless you're very rich. Imagine a student radio station: the radio authority fees for FM would be £1500 non-refundable application fee + £214 per year. The Performing Rights fees would be £400 per year, and then there's the transmitter and studio electricity bill, assuming your DJs are doing it for free and playing only their own records to save the station buying any! You can't get away without sponsorship, and sponsors are only looking for one thing - your audience.

      The same thing goes for any pubs and clubs you've been to - there's a world of fees and licensing ready to swallow you up unless you turn a steady profit.

      Please stop pretending that "independent" radio, clubs and musicians are anything less than money-grubbing whores, because that's what they are.

      --
      Does my bum look big in this?
    22. Re:Quality of music by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      So you've sent $1 to the artist. Well done. Given that average album sells only 33,600 copies, and that most artists produce at most one album a year, then that gives a living wage to one artist... who has written, performed, recorded, edited and distributed her own music.

      Still think $1 an album pays for all that?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    23. Re:Quality of music by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod me up for being redundant if you will, but if the recording industry can sell music CDs here in Asia for $9 and still make a profit, why can't they do the same in the US?

      OK, you can't compare dollar for dollar in different markets. What is the average rent in a mall, in USD, in Malaysia compared to Manhattan? What are the average wages in those two locations? Electricity, taxes, price of a cup of coffee, it all factors in. Because you aren't paying US$9 for a CD, you're paying whatever your local currency is.

      I fully agree that CDs are way overpriced (esp. in the UK) but the argument that products and services are cheaper in hard currencies if you buy them in soft currencies is irrelevant.

    24. Re:Quality of music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, none of the biggest 5 recording companies are profitable.

      Check more thoroughly. The recording companies are very much profitable. It's the companies that own them that make a loss. The big multinationals which own the various record companies use the profit made selling music to subsidize the losses they make in industries where there isn't any price fixing.

    25. Re:Quality of music by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      Not sure of your age, but consider this:

      Remember music 10 years ago? 1993: Pearl Jam, Pumpkins, STP, etc were played on the radio. THEY'RE STILL being played on the "alternative/modern rock stations" That music is still considered contemporary and almost all music on the current rock stations are playing music replicated from these "huge" bands from the early nineties.
      Now..think back to 10 years before that. Nothing that was produced in 1983 was being played on the radio in 1993, that music was being played on "classic" rock stations.

      My point is that music's evolution has come to a halt in terms of popular music and radio. And a mechanism like P2P (napster!) would allow myself to find music I would not normally find on the radio or by browsing CD labels at the local music store.

      I just think it's amazing that music sucks ass so bad today. I don't think the RIAA should have the right to bitch about file sharing until they put out something that doesn't suck.

      my $0.02

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    26. Re:Quality of music by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      Copy a hundred cds and throw out 99. Then you'll start to get the picture of the economics of marketing music.

      This isn't economics! The reason people hate the music companies is because they create artificial scarcity.

      Before the advent of audio compression, music had to be sent around on CDs, 80 minutes at a time, which made it unwieldy. But now, that's changed. My 80 gb HD can hold some 1,000 CDs worth of compressed music. The music companies have the capability to supply you and I with every song they've ever produced, at almost no cost to them(bandwidth).

      You and I would be willing to pay a premium to access to more music, but who's going to pay for 1000 CDs at $18/each? The point is, I'd be willing to spend much more money on music if I got to listen to 100x as much music. How much more does it cost the music companies to supply me with 100x as much music? Not much more. And they'd get more money.

      But they plod along complaining about how 99 CDs out of 100 fail, when they could follow some simple supply/demand curves to find a happy medium. Do 99 CDs out of 100 fail because the music on them is no good, or do they fail because people don't want to pay $18 for 99 CDs?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    27. Re:Quality of music by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      You are so deprived. The one Clear Channel station with a soul is in my market (100.5 WTFX-Louisvile, KY WARNING--Not work safe, they have a Thong of the day). Yes the Early 90's derivatives make up a portion of their playlist, but they cover everything from Sabbath and Zeplin to hair bands to grunge and on to todays bands, plus they have a kick ass lineup on Sunday nights, 2 hours of local acts and 1 hour of material that will never get rotation (Industrial, grindcore, ska, new death, etc). Between them and the college station at WKU, I actually get some kick-ass radio.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    28. Re:Quality of music by PCBman! · · Score: 1

      So how much do you think an artist REALLY gets per CD--after the label recoups 'expenses'?

      --
      So, when's lunch?
    29. Re:Quality of music by einTier · · Score: 1
      Well, according to ASCAP,, you're looking at ~$2.04 per CD for royalties. That's before "recoupment" and all the other ways the record companies use to screw the artist out of their money. This is also an offical site, so you have to understand that they are going to inflate the figures as much as they can. So, $2.04 should be considered high, especially when directly below they state, "there are a bunch of additional issues" that affect the royalty rate, and all of the additional issues seem to negatively affect the money recieved by the artist.

      So, even with ASCAP's figure, we're up on $3.80 a CD. That's a long, long way from the MSRP on a CD. If they could sell me a CD for an even $5.00, there should be plenty of money to go around to everyone, and I would honestly stop pirating completely. In fact, they'd see a lot more of money than they ever have in the past.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    30. Re:Quality of music by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      OK, you can't compare dollar for dollar in different markets. What is the average rent in a mall, in USD, in Malaysia compared to Manhattan? What are the average wages in those two locations? Electricity, taxes, price of a cup of coffee, it all factors in. Because you aren't paying US$9 for a CD, you're paying whatever your local currency is.


      Not as much as you'd think.
      When I worked at best buy, we used to sell a CRAPLOAD of CD's. The thing is, we made about $1 per CD.
      That's right, our markup was $1, pretty much no matter what the price was. Moreover, if someone stole a CD, to break even, it now means we had to sell 15 CD's.

      So, while I do agree that locale can factor into it, it's not as much as you think. The distributors were selling us the CD's for $15.73 and we were selling them for $16.99. Obviously in asia, the distributors weren't selling the CD's to the stores for $15.73 and the stores turning around and selling them for $9.

      I think it may be a result of piracy in asia. I was under the impression that there is such nonchalance with regards to illegally copied music sales in S.E. Asia that mabey the RIAA lowered prices to be competative.... what an idea!

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    31. Re:Quality of music by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of albums do not sell eight million copies! In fact, in the last ten years only 2356 albums have gone "Multi-Platinum" - the designation for albums with more than two million sales.


      @$16 ea. -

      I'm sorry, but any industry that can't survive on $75,392,000,000 over ten years needs to buy new accountants.
      That's $7.5 billion per year on album sales not to mention merchandising and ticket sales. Also, not taking into account artists that "only" sold 500,000 copies of an album.

      GWAR (who?) on the smaller-known Metal Blade Records released an album late 2001. It's sold ~80,000 copies. Now, there are 5 people directly in the band, and a huge support team of artists and craftsman, which is evidant for anyone who has been to a GWAR show (they dress up in rubber suits like monsters and spew fake blood-colored-water on the audience). Tickets to GWAR shows are $17-$22. I've talked to people in the band, and they're definately not p.diddy rich, but they make enough that they don't have other jobs, and they tour 4 or so months a year. Mabey 5. They make money.

      So it's not that people that "only" sell 100,000 copies don't make money, they just don't make enough money for the record industry to be happy.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    32. Re:Quality of music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your = possession
      you're = contraction of you are.

      Your an idiot or you're an idiot.

  26. Way to get with it! by DMaster0 · · Score: 1

    Wow, what a concept, the internet should be marketed TO and not AGAINST.

    Revolutionary concept, yeah?

    2 years too late Hillary. Shutting down napster was supposed to save the recording industry and stop music sharing right? Oops. We can only hope that the next person in charge happens to realize how to do more than load up a webpage and can understand that there are actually consumers using the internet, not "thieves".

  27. Ding Dong the witch is dead.. by Kasmiur · · Score: 1

    Which old witch the wicked witch..

    wait.. she not dead yet. Perhaps they will get someone with a bit more intelligence. Perhaps we can get someone who reads slashdot.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
    1. Re:Ding Dong the witch is dead.. by mkro · · Score: 1
      Perhaps they will get someone with a bit more intelligence. Perhaps we can get someone who reads slashdot.
      The CEO's intelligence has very little to do with anything. Yes, she is a front for the company, but every CEO has to follow the will of the corporation - and yes, corporations do have a will - which can be summed up to:

      1. Make money
      2. Defend the company from whatever can make it lose money.

      Even though corporations have a human-like will, the only human-like moral they have comes from the two mentioned points: E.g. "If we break the law, will it cost us more than we gained by breaking the law?", "If we enforce unpopular restrictions, will a consumer boycott cost us more than we gain by enforcing the restrictions?", etc.

      If individuals inside the RIAA thinks they are doing something unfair, it doesn't mean shit (and they know better than to say anything), because the mechanisms that are the "will" of the corporation (Responsability to stock holders, etc.) always are stronger.

      The same mechanism makes them fight against copyright expiration too: Other than the money spent on lawyers and politicans for changing the law, it doesn't cost them anything to keep copyrights forever. "Sure, that obscure jazz tape from 1943 doesn't sell, no-one is interested in it, but why release it into the public domain? If it is unrestricted, some Fatboy Slim-wannabe might use it to make music that can be distributed outside our system, taking away paying listener time from us."

      Some people call it capitalism, others call it evil. What ever you call it, don't do the mistake of thinking RIAA's use of the expressions "fair" and "unfair" has any meaning.

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    2. Re:Ding Dong the witch is dead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait for the kind of laws she`ll pass if she becomes president. hell hath no fury...

  28. People's Choice Awards: My vote ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...many of whom viewed the RIAA -- and Rosen personally -- with antipathy over incessant pressure for crackdowns on sharing digital music over the Internet.

    for the "Stating the Most Obvious" award

  29. To soften iron you have to turn up the heat by GoatEnigma · · Score: 2, Insightful
    many of whom viewed the RIAA -- and Rosen personally -- with antipathy over incessant pressure for crackdowns on sharing digital music over the Internet.

    If by "antipathy" you mean "violent hatred", you win! It missed a reason why I view them this way though - the fact that they have turned the popular music scene into a mechanical whore for the guys upstairs.

    Can they soften their image? Aren't they surpassing Microsoft and Kim Jong II on the list of evil things we hate?

  30. successful tenure perhaps?? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    She also is a founding board member of Rock the Vote, an organization aimed to get younger people more politically involved. [emphasis mine]

    I'd say she was successful. Lord knows where our young people would be when it comes to the issues of the entertainment business in government!

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  31. Who will be the replacement? by plone · · Score: 0, Funny

    I heard that they wanted Hitler's ghost as the replacement, but it objected on moral grounds.

  32. this is the danger zone by Audent · · Score: 1

    apologies for the appalling subject line - for some reason the RIAA and bad 80s music pap are linked irrevokably in my mind.

    But it's true - this is the time when we don't stop the pressure tactics (such as we have). Just because the public face of the RIAA isn't there any more doesn't mean it's gone away. Now's the time to start in on the new head (presumably an internal promotion rather than an external head hunt?) before he/she/it gets his/her/its feet under the table. All too often a simple name change/personel change/whatever change is enough to make people forget what's gone before... beware. Beware!

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
  33. Awww nutbunnies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.riaa.com is slashdotted ?

  34. This changes nothing. by ScottForbes · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's not as though Hilary Rosen's departure will suddenly cause the RIAA to change heart: Remember that the RIAA is just a facade, and the cartel behind it is just as pro-DMCA, anti-You as ever.

    I'm sure the RIAA will find another shill in no time: All they need is an entertainment lawyer who will set aside ethics and the common good in exchage for a large bundle of money. Goodness knows how long it will take them to find one of those.

  35. New leader, new tactics, new threat, old war by ciphertext · · Score: 1

    In another article posted on Wired about ISPs being the new target of the RIAA, Rosen mentions two tactics with serious issues.

    --
    To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  36. Text of NYT article by dietlein · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Music Industry Lobbyist Rosen to Leave
    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Filed at 7:47 p.m. ET

    NEW YORK (AP) -- Hilary Rosen, the U.S. recording industry's head lobbyist who waged a high-profile battle against Napster and music piracy, is resigning at the end of the year.

    Rosen cited personal reasons for leaving the Recording Industry Association of America, where she has served as chief executive since 1998.

    ``During my tenure here, the recording industry has undergone dramatic challenges and it is well positioned for future success. I have been extremely proud to be a part of this industry transition,'' Rosen said. ``But I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them.''

    She said the RIAA board will conduct a formal search for a replacement.

    David Munns, chairman and chief executive of EMI Recorded Music North America, called Rosen ``a tremendous advocate'' who has been ``extremely influential in both transforming the music industry in the digital age and in fighting piracy.''

    The recording industry has been struggling with declining sales, which Rosen has blamed on illegal downloading over Napster and successors like Kazaa. Album sales declined for the second straight year in 2002, down 10.7 percent from the previous year.

    Within the past few weeks, top executives at Sony Music and Vivendi Universal's MCA Records also said they were leaving.

    Rosen's departure comes as the organization sought to soften its image among Internet consumers, many of whom viewed the RIAA -- and Rosen personally -- with antipathy over incessant pressure for crackdowns on sharing digital music over the Internet.

    On Tuesday, Rosen's group won a closely watched lawsuit seeking Internet providers' cooperation in tracking down individual computer users who illegally download music. Verizon Communications Inc. had resisted, citing privacy concerns.

    The RIAA recently set aside a simmering dispute with leading technology companies by agreeing to oppose any government efforts to build locking controls into future generations of entertainment devices.

    Technology companies have complained that such controls, which would hamper consumers' efforts to share movies and music, are too expensive and complex.

    The recording industry also has been promoting its own, for-fee online music services, but consumers have largely rejected them because of usage restrictions and limited selections.

    Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., a leading advocate of consumer rights to copyright works, said it was too early to tell whether Rosen's departure would fundamentally change the industry's stance toward the Internet.

    ``I do not think that she has been a spiritual champion of the industry embracing the Internet as a distribution medium,'' Boucher said. ``I think the industry clearly needs to do that. It's the only way that the industry has to compete with peer-to-peer'' file-sharing services like Kazaa.

    Others praised her tenure and said she would be missed.

    ``Hilary has been a valiant, brave leader for the U.S. music industry,'' said Jack Valenti, president and chief executive of the Motion Picture Association of America. ``I confess that I am an ardent admirer of her skills, her tenacity and her integrity. She'll be a hard act to follow.''

    Even her adversaries had praise.

    ``While we don't always see eye to eye, I think that she's extremely good at her job,'' said Joe Kraus of Digitalconsumer.org, which promotes greater ``fair use'' rights to songs and movies. ``Hilary's had a big influence in the way that members of Congress view the issue.''

    But ultimately, he said, the recording industry is broader than any one person, so her resignation may not profoundly change attitudes.

    Rosen was an independent consultant before joining the RIAA in 1987. She also is a founding board member of Rock the Vote, an organization aimed to get younger people more politically involved.

  37. Re:first post by baba · · Score: 1

    So what exactly is funny enough about this to get score 5? Some moderators are very easily amused, I guess.

  38. From Hilary's POV by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

    Hilary (to rest of RIAA): "What!?!? I did all your dirty work - I did exactly what you told me to do, what you desperately needed to have someone do. I suffered the hate mail and made the sacrifices for the job - to do what you demanded, and because I did it all, you want me to step down, because doing your dirty work has made me unpopular and your PR bunnies don't like that?!?!"

    Ha, wouldn't that be cool; poetic justice - a great example of evil eating it's own.

    Moral of the story - jobs and careers that have you abandon ethics and screw over others, make you just another rat in the race. ie, fair game for all the other vermin.
    The only problem is that this country is owned, run, and ruled by vermin. So this brief little triumph for good is a lonely, isolated case.

    1. Re:From Hilary's POV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So this brief little triumph for good is a lonely, isolated case" ...and it feels sooooo fucking good.

  39. Oh crap, Mitnick's going to take over by writertype · · Score: 1
    This is the guy who wrote a book on "social engineering", after all. And he's reformed. And he's media-friendly (he uses a Mac).

    "So you want me to hack the Internet." -- from the upcoming movie The Core

    Huh? Huh? You know I'm right...

  40. (+5 INSIGHTFUL!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most excellent troll!

  41. Only Hilary Rosen has stepped down.. by sgtsanity · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... but it's the equivalent of 10 Music Industry CEOs in RIAA math.

    1. Re:Only Hilary Rosen has stepped down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh heh heh. thanks.

  42. w00t by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

    In light of the recent Wired article, I got to see the human side of Rosen. I'm kind of disappointed. I mean, she DOES own an iPod.

    --
    I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    1. Re:w00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link plz.

  43. Can't get to the press release by lingqi · · Score: 1

    questions:

    1) when is "end of year"? as in fiscal year (coming up SOON) or end of 2003 (oh-so-long)?
    2) where is she GOING? I know everybody is scared about who's coming in, but hell, what if she gets elected senator or something? or wose-yet appointed head some government agency about this-or-that?

    comments:

    In business world resigning is sometimes used as an "I quit" or "I give up," but often is "I am moving onto greener pastures." If a CEO sees that there is no way he can bring the company out of deep shits, resignation is frequent - as he can shift the blame onto the successor. (I am hoping this is the case and the next guy / gal is a little more mellow) On the other hand, I am very in fear if it's because there is an opening in the Federal Anti-Piracy Beurau or somesuch (yes i know "piracy" is a misnomer - it's "copyright infringement" - but you bet your ass that's what they will name it).

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:Can't get to the press release by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'm more afraid of as well. Who's her next employee? She's not of retirement age yet. She has a lot of contacts in the music and political ( unfortunately ) circles. I don't see her joining a gov't agency but perhaps some lobbying is her next modus operandi.

      As for an answer to #1 question, fiscal quarter or end of year doesn't matter to me. Sonner she's gone, the more there is hope. Perhpas they will find someone w/ more high-tec/Internet savy
      to take over her position

      Side notes:

      Maybe she could work for Eminem. Any cut down on piracy on his albums == less listeners would be great!

    2. Re:Can't get to the press release by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Maybe she could work for Eminem. Any cut down on piracy on his albums == less listeners would be great!

      "...I just found out Hilary Rosen pirates more music than I do."

      "...the only problem was, the leader of RIAA was a guy..."

      - Rosenem: The Real Hilary Rosen.

    3. Re:Can't get to the press release by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      She made a million bucks last year, and (if it was invested in anything other than music industry stock) doesn't have to work again.

    4. Re:Can't get to the press release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she could work for Eminem. Any cut down on piracy on his albums == less listeners would be great!

      +5 lol

  44. important thing to note by blueworm · · Score: 1

    Hilary Rosen was probably only echoing the general feeling of the RIAA's members when she spoke out against internet piracy and whatnot. Perhaps this means that the RIAA is shifting its policy to not be so public about denouncing filesharing while cracking down on it behind the scenes. Generates a lot less public scrutiny. :)

  45. Unencrypted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, look! The message is in secret RIAA cipher! Luckily, I was able to translate:
    --
    "But, young children continue to face unprecedented levels of on-line piracy and I want to devote more of my time to them. This has been an extremely difficult decision but this is a critical time and I have much to do in the coming months."
    --

  46. Thank F***ing god by geekd · · Score: 1
    I work for a company that has felt the wrath of the RIAA. Everyone over here (at least in my office) is doing the hapy dance upon hearing the news.

    One of my co-workers commented:


    She's probably leaving to "spend more time with [her] children" so she can police her kids' out-of-control file-sharing tendancies. Probably found a blank CD-R under her kid's mattress.


    I thought that was pretty funny. "If I catch you file swapping again, I'll get Lars Ulrich over here to kick your ass!"

    She would do it, too.

    1. Re:Thank F***ing god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well i hate to be a party pooper BUT, she still wants to be a dictater err i mean president. so just imagine what insane laws she will want to pass. we are ALL gonna get it up the ass with that industrial stength strap-on dildo of hers!

  47. At the end of this year? by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    Her resignation takes effect at the end of this year? That's about the slowest acting resignation I've ever heard of. Couldn't she have gone by fiscal quarter?

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  48. Blame the industry by CakerX · · Score: 1

    Blame the industry for the lack of sales. rack it up to kazaa all you want. Record sales drop due to a simple lack of intrest. No one really wants to here the crap they spew out. All the shitting cheap rock replacement stuff they throw out there is not holding its weight, especially if it costs an arm and a leg.

  49. let's keep her around by f00zbll · · Score: 1
    seems like HR is not a popular person and is seen as a joke. Therefore, it would be better for the consumers if she stays in that job. Think about. Having a new CEO of RIAA gives them a chance to build up their influence, whereas now there's so much negative press, she can't do her job.

    So let's be smart about this and keep her in the spot, where she do absolutely nothing.

  50. I PRESENT TO YOU SIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The song IN MP3 FORMAT!

    1. Re:I PRESENT TO YOU SIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh this is perfect theme music for reading the rest of the comments.

  51. Wired magazine issue 11.02 by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    or wait until tomorrow for the online article. This is an interview on her which was an interesting read. Here's what the Web site said:

    Hating Hilary [Coming Jan. 23]
    Napster slayer. Corporate thug. Industry shill. Hilary Rosen has heard it all as the reviled frontwoman for the music biz. Sure, she knows file-sharing is the future. She's just fighting to give the dinosaurs one last gasp.
    By Matt Bai

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. Ho Humm by Stumbles · · Score: 0

    What's the big deal? Nothing to get excited about, they will just replace one knucklehead with another.

    It is amazing the HR would be so willing to lay down our rights for money, good ridence baby!

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  53. for-fee online music services unpopular by geekee · · Score: 1

    "The recording industry also has been promoting its own, for-fee online music services, but consumers have largely rejected them because of usage restrictions and limited selections."

    They forgot to mention that for-fee means costs money. Consumers don't enjoying paying money if they don't have to.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  54. With Eddie Murphy (Mr. Rogers)'s voice: by Petronius · · Score: 1

    ...aren't you glad the bitch is gone?

    --
    there's no place like ~
  55. Question prediction by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    Are you blood related to other known and hated demonspawns that plague this earth, such as Jack Valenti?

    How does it feel to be despised more than Martha Stewart and that crazy president of CloneAid?

    Do you have any plans for the future as far as furthering the movement to restrict American freedoms go? Should we expect you to be running for the Republican party in 2004?

    1. Re:Question prediction by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      Should we expect you to be running for the Republican party in 2004?
      Shrub asked her to be the Secretary of the next department he will create after the war: Volkssicherheitsministerium.

      Once Congress bows to Shrub's will (how can they resist after his decisive victory in Iraq when he sends wave after wave of his own men at Saddam?), all you whiny /. pukes will be the first in line to get CHIPPED!

      --
      Yeah, right.
    2. Re:Question prediction by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Bzzt, wrong, Ms. Rosen is more in line with them democrats^WHollywood Liberals than the GOP. Check out this data from opensecrets.org to see who the real enemy is. Its the liberals who really want to strip you of your money and freedom, the Constitution could give a rats ass about your DVD collection or your religon, we just need lawmakers that follow it.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    3. Re:Question prediction by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure GWB is going to create a department he has no hope of ever pronouncing correctly. Can you imagine the speech where he announces the creation of this department? It would take him an hour just to get the name out.

      Besides, according to the law of inverse names, it would have to be called something like "Department of Personal Rights" or something.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Question prediction by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      You're not far off! Volkssicherheitsministerium translates to "People Safety Ministry."

      --
      Yeah, right.
  56. Dear Sir, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You misspelled "Jason" in both your user name and at the bottom of your post. Remember to use the preview button so you can catch similar spelling mistakes in the future. Thanks, Michael Simms

  57. Trying to replace her is a mistake by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Replacing Hiliary Rosen with someone nicer won't cut it.

    The RIAA's actions are the very thing that define the attitudes of consumers towards it. Their propaganda is irrelevant to the people they are trying to address. This is not due to the vehicle they are using to deliver their message, but the very simple and plain fact that their message is not one that people agree with, nor is it one people will agree with given time.

    Nobody likes Hiliary Rosen because of what she represents. It was never a personal issue. Though many people have directed their anger towards her, it was never at her as an individual, but rather as the figurehead of an organization who's goals are in opposition to a large percentage of the public.

    The RIAA is trying the same tactic the U.S is going to try with the Middle East. Ratchet up the propaganda to people who know its propganada and despise it, attempt to paint a picture of things that is directly at odds with what people see and experience every day, all the while continuing with the same actions the people hate.

    This is a move that is a desperate gamble by the RIAA to win a struggle they are losing. An act that has more to do with not knowing what else to do, than a concrete plan based in logic and well-thought out strategy.

    1. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by geek · · Score: 1

      I was with you up until this point:

      "The RIAA is trying the same tactic the U.S is going to try with the Middle East. Ratchet up the propaganda to people who know its propganada and despise it, attempt to paint a picture of things that is directly at odds with what people see and experience every day, all the while continuing with the same actions the people hate."

      Once you said that I realized you had no clue what you are talking about.

    2. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by argoff · · Score: 1

      This is a move that is a desperate gamble by the RIAA to win a struggle they are losing. An act that has more to do with not knowing what else to do, than a concrete plan based in logic and well-thought out strategy.

      On the contrary, I think they know exactly what they are doing. Like the rapeist who cunningly and quitely slips his victim some poison rather than chase her down and beat her senseless - they have changed their tactics but not their stripes. Infinite extensions, the DCMA, and now an attempt to which-hunt ISP's, are still going full blast. It is not over till the fat lady sings, not resignes ;) Don't believe them for a second, nothing has changed.

    3. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by roderickm · · Score: 1

      She's not mean enough for the RIAA.

      In a recent Wired article profiling Ms. Rosen, she specifically said that the RIAA isn't interested in the internet users that are DOWNLOADING, rather those UPLOADING music. The recent ruling against Verizon that forces the ISP to release the identity of a Kazaa-happy music-downloading customer is evidence to the contrary.

      Maybe Ms. Rosen is tired of being the target for vitriol that should truly be directed at the art-crushing record labels themselves.

    4. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by NickFortune · · Score: 0
      'Rosen's departure comes as the organization sought to soften its image among Internet consumers
      You'll notice nothing was said about chainging their actual policy. They just want a new face in there in the hope that they can buy some short-term credibility.

      I don't see anyone falling for it around here...
      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    5. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by ebyrob · · Score: 3, Insightful
      People are angry because the RIAA doesn't want people ripping cds and sharing the content online. Because they are taking steps to prevent this, it upsets the music pirates.

      Ya, who other than a pirate would be upset by this:
      No black flags with skull and crossbones, no cutlasses, cannons, or daggers identify today's pirates. You can't see them coming; there's no warning shot across your bow. Yet rest assured the pirates are out there because today there is plenty of gold (and platinum and diamonds) to be had. Today's pirates operate not on the high seas but on the Internet, in illegal CD factories, distribution centers, and on the street. The pirate's credo is still the same--why pay for it when it's so easy to steal? The credo is as wrong as it ever was. Stealing is still illegal, unethical, and all too frequent in today's digital age. That is why RIAA continues to fight music piracy.
      Wait, I'm a programmer working for a small company. I make my living off of the compromise of copyright. It pisses the hell out of me!

      Copyright infringement is not the same thing as killing people at sea and taking everything they have. Copyright infringement is also not the same thing as breaking into someone's house and stealing what they own. It's not even the same as depriving someone else of their property. Copyright is more akin to jaywalking, trespassing or jumping a subway toll gate. Copyright is valid exactly as long as society decides to make it valid.

      Groups like the RIAA would be wise to remember this fact if they value their "intellectual property".
    6. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by mgblst-portege · · Score: 1

      Nobody likes Hiliary Rosen because of what she represents. It was never a personal issue. Though many people have directed their anger towards her, it was never at her as an individual, but rather as the figurehead of an organization who's goals are in opposition to a large percentage of the public.

      Yes, but she was the CEO. Surely she had some input into the direction her company was heading? At the very least, she is the most responsible for it. That is why people hate her so much. She could have done something good, but choose to go the easy root, and protect the old forms of doing business. It is analagous to people being upset at the G.Bush for what the US does.

    7. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by mgblst-portege · · Score: 1

      Also it may be an attempt by the RIAA to soften it's stance on the Internet as a delivery system, the first move is to get rid of Hilary, then get in someone more tech focused.

    8. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by freestyle-fiend · · Score: 0

      > The RIAA is trying the same tactic the U.S is
      > going to try with the Middle East.

      Yeah, but there is no pretence that RIAA is acting in our interests, and the situation seems a little more hopeful regarding the music industry than the Middle East.

      On the other hand, Bush is waging war regardless of what Saddam does or his people want (while claiming popular support). The anti-war movement isn't going to succeed (without the realistic threat of force).

      Bush might actually achieve something with his tactic, but RIAA won't. The recording industry is widely viewed with suspicion and will decline even if they keep buying draconian measures.

    9. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Um, there are various versions of that story flying around, but the most clued ones (written by actual tech correspondants) seem to say that they're after someone who was sharing 600 files, or from whom they downloaded 600 files in a day, not from someone who downloaded 600 files in a day.

      Think about it; how would they know that Joe Defendant had downloaded 600 files in a day? Unless he downloaded them all from their honeypot, which seems unlikely.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1
      "Yes, but she was the CEO. Surely she had some input into the direction her company was heading?"

      She was head of an industry organization, not a company. If Hillary Rosen had declared that the RIAA was no longer interested in pursuing copyright infringement, such a statement would not magically change the opinions of the people in charge of Sony, Vivendi, and the other large companies that actually make up the music industry and own the actual copyrights to the music being shared.

    11. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by roderickm · · Score: 1

      True enough -- and the default configuration of most P2P clients automatically share any files you download, so the line between downloading and providing uploads for others is blurred, if not eliminated.

      Joe Defendant aside, Ms. Rosen has been a well-paid shield for an industry that deserves the criticism that she has shouldered in their place. I'm not surprised she stepped down.

      The labels will have a weaker, less unified front without a strong RIAA spokesperson. Opponents of the RIAA would do well to remember to divide and conquer: attacking the RIAA at its strongest, most publicly unified point lends them legitimacy and will continue to be a painful, head-against-the-wall experience.

    12. Re:Trying to replace her is a mistake by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
      • the line between downloading and providing uploads for others is blurred, if not eliminated

      I suspect that they'd have a hard time proving that merely listing files as available breaches copyright, which is why I suspect that the "600 files in a day" is probably the number (complete or partial) that they downloaded from Joe.

      And here they do have a clear breach of copyright. All they did was say "Hey, Joe, make a copy of that song", and it was Joe's machine that chose to actually duplicate the data and send it down the wire. If that is the case, it kills two birds with one stone. It removes the ambiguity about whether Joe actually made a copy (he did), and it also avoids the "friends and family" fair use argument because it's demonstrable that Joe had no idea who he was making copies for.

      Hmm, I'm beginning to wonder if I should prefix "Contact me to request - " to all of my shared files, and allow listing but not sharing for all users by default.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  58. Hilary Rosen for President 2004! (joke) by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    Rosen was an independent consultant before joining the RIAA in 1987. She also is a founding board member of Rock the Vote, an organization aimed to get younger people more politically involved.

    Even She knows that the way to change our country is to vote. With all the bad laws being passed, people should wake the fuck up and vote.
    -
    americans will go to war to protect democracy, but wont walk across the street to vote

    1. Re:Hilary Rosen for President 2004! (joke) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the entertainment biz is tired of bribing the demo's and wants to send in one of its own at the top.

  59. she's the most hated person in recent history! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Poor dyke can't get anyone...yanno?

  60. Fiscal Year? by jbridleman · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the RIAA is on a fiscal year that ends in February!

  61. ...but I thought by The+Prophet+Jesse · · Score: 1

    "...the recording industry has undergone dramatic challenges and it is well positioned for future success. "

    But I thought that the record industry was loosing money and was on the decline?
    /sarcasm

  62. Napster not to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The recording industry has been struggling with declining sales, which Rosen has blamed on illegal downloading over Napster and successors like Kazaa. Album sales declined for the second straight year in 2002, down 10.7 percent from the previous year.

    A little research would have shown that sales were up during the Napster era, and only went into decline in the two years after the service died out. It wouldn't be suprising to find that these folks were being asked to leave because someone actually looked at the numbers and figured out it's not cost effective to declare war on your customers.

  63. Re:Hehe, also, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This actually had the potential to be funny, had you inscribed the words "HILARY ROSEN" inside the stretched anus.

  64. She will be missed by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hillary Rosen will be missed for all she's done for Slashdot, geeks, and Humanity. As all people who resign are. Btw, who is Hilary Rosen?? ;-)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:She will be missed by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      I just heard some sad news on talk radio - RIAA CEO Hillary Rosen was fired in her Washington D.C. office this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss her - even if you didn't enjoy her work, there's no denying her contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  65. It's still a year... by VirexEye · · Score: 2, Informative
    Chairman and CEO Hilary Rosen, announced today that she will leave the organization at the end of 2003

    I hate to remind everyone but it is still January of 2003... which means she will be around for awhile still.

    1. Re:It's still a year... by hhknighter · · Score: 1

      hmmm, and they had plans with going after individual consumers on the Internet and stuff. Are they planning to go so far that they are going to need her to step down?

      Is this a heads up that something extremely controversal is about to happen?

    2. Re:It's still a year... by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hate to remind everyone but it is still January of 2003

      It's just my sense of humor, but the fact that this got modded as "informative" is awesome.

    3. Re:It's still a year... by mgblst-portege · · Score: 0

      Quit complaining, for once slashdot is early with the news.

      Nah, I love you guys, really.

    4. Re:It's still a year... by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like almost 11 months d00d

    5. Re:It's still a year... by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 1

      Well it's hard to work out what month it is when you stay in your parent's basement all the time.

      Boom boom!

    6. Re:It's still a year... by Hays · · Score: 1

      heheh... very nice. All of these comments are bringing tears to my eyes.. :)

  66. First, your mp3's. Next...Mexico! by hansroy · · Score: 1

    I fear this means 2003 will be her most agressive year yet.

    I wonder where she's going next. Perhaps somewhere she'll be even less unencumbered by notions of personal morality & common sense. Maybe to be the right-hand of an aging dictator?

    After being a stone cold bitch all day, does Hilary Rosen go home, cuddle with her puppies, and then make sweet sweet love all night? Maybe being aggressive isn't so bad after all....

  67. standard tactic by cats-paw · · Score: 1

    Their campaign attracted a lot of negative PR because of the fairly undiplomatic messages coming from Hilary. Now that she's been personally identified with the negative image her value to the RIAA is diminished.

    The next talking head for the RIAA will use much more diplomatic words to avoid the same mistake.

    As we all know, the RIAA will continue to be every bit the bulldog.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
  68. Next head will be Celine Deon... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Funny

    That way, /. posters will be able to flame RIAA, hammer home the blandness of mainstream music offerings and blame Canada in a single post!

    Think about it, in future you'll be able to get three on-topic posts for the price of one! Woot!

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Next head will be Celine Deon... by JonnyElvis42 · · Score: 1

      Think about it, in future you'll be able to get three on-topic posts for the price of one! Woot!

      What is this "on-topic post" you speak about?

      So many new ideas for me to understand at once...

  69. hold on a minute by mcrypt · · Score: 1

    Who's going to take over? No point in celebrating until we know!

    And where's she going anyway? It would be silly to think this is the last we've seen of her.

  70. in all seriousness... by havaloc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a profound action by Ms. Rosen. The music industry is in serious trouble. The movie industry can bring us value and epics, such as 'Lord of the Rings', and DVD videos priced at 14.99. Most people I know would rather buy a DVD, and most are a good value.

    On the other hand, what can the music industry bring us? What value do they have anymore? CD prices are way too high, and the value they have in most people's eyes are low. You cannot really produce an epic in terms of music anymore. All the good stuff has already been written and produced (think the 80s and 70s).

    Her stepping down is waving the white flag, which states, I'm tired of fighting a losing battle, and I know our days are numbered. I think that after she came up with/annouced the zany levy the ISP, she realized that she could no longer carry on.

    1. Re:in all seriousness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more good music left in the world. You might not like any of it, but that's a different story. People will still buy cd's. People who pirate cd's would pirate movies if affordable.

  71. nothing changes by DeadPrez · · Score: 1

    And in a related story, Recording Industry executives promised to use a more "consumer friendly" lubrication the next time they try to screw you all over.

    1. Re:nothing changes by hhknighter · · Score: 1

      yes, instead of feeling a large polo stick roughly charging in, the DRM will be implemented silently and all your information will be obtained without notice.

      bend over, but it will only be a slight prick

  72. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well Said.

  73. (/rubs eyes) by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    I need to go to bed earlier as I read the title as "Hilary Rosen was going to be beheaded".

    And I thought "Karma's a bitch, ain't it"?
    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:(/rubs eyes) by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      Still wouldn't work...you have to burn the body and stuff the head full of garlic

  74. DING DONG by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Troll

    The bitch be dead.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  75. Trauma by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it has anything to do with millions of artist supporting citizens going to RIAA.org to read about the latest lawsuits only to find the forsaken Goatse.cx image on the news page?

    Dr Nick "That's trauma!"

    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
  76. Great!! Let's celebrate... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    ...by buying a CD!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  77. Slashdot? Intelligence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait.. she not dead yet. Perhaps they will get someone with a bit more intelligence. Perhaps we can get someone who reads slashdot.

    Oh, that's just too easy. I salute you sir!

  78. in other news... by Patrick13 · · Score: 1

    The RIAA has announced that Lars Ulrich will take up the reigns...

    --
    ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
  79. Whatever we do, by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Let's NOT consider Hilary Rosen for President.

    1. Re:Whatever we do, by long_john_stewart_mi · · Score: 1

      Let's NOT consider Hilary Rosen for President.

      In RIAA math, she would be the equivalent to Congress. Is she a big woman?

      --
      ...oOOo..'(_)'..oOOo...
    2. Re:Whatever we do, by $rtbl_this · · Score: 1

      Please, do not use the words "congress" and "Hilary Rosen" in the same sentence -- my poor, smutty mind can't help but rearrange them. You may just have inadvertantly created a form of communicable erectile disfunction.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
  80. Hail to the King, baby by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely sure about the 50 years thing. Could be.

    Even if that's the case, Elvis didn't start recording until 1954, so his earlist works are still copyrighted.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:Hail to the King, baby by cblood · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this example is that elvis didn't write anything. so he only got performance royalties. And they riped off most of the original authors of the songs.

  81. WARNING: Dont Believe it!!! by argoff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if she resigns, things will get worse - not better. Nothing has changed, they have held themselves accountable to ramming copyrights down our throat, even if it means tossing out the 1st and 4th amendment and more. Just as the plantation masters of the 1850's believed that the entire purpose of the industrial revolution was to use inventions like the cotton-gyn to expand their plantations for unlimited controll and profit, modern day copyright lords believe the internet is the leverage tool that they will use to ram copyrights down everyones throat, and controll every last bit of content in existence.

    Information is simply too easy to manipulate and copy, either they will half to controll all of it, or none of it. And you had better bet that their goal is to controll all of it - they have not changed one bit. Sorry, it's not over till the fat lady sings. Copyrights, the DMCA, infinite extensions, warrentless searches and seizures, and more are still here and still kicking everybody's but. Dont buy it for a second - the fundamental facts have not changed one bit.

    1. Re:WARNING: Dont Believe it!!! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's not over till the fat lady sings

      In light of Rita McNeal, and the fact that this IS the RIAA, I move that we choose another figure of speech when talking about this.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:WARNING: Dont Believe it!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am interested in hearing more about this "cotton-gyn", as the real gyns around here have been declared off-limits to me.

  82. Dear Mrs. Rosen by jDinK · · Score: 1

    How many babies can you eat in just ONE minute?

  83. Don't Rejoice Yet.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Her replacement may be 1000x worse, or more evil..

    At least we currently know the agenda and tactics..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  84. Damn, now we can't drop a house on her! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I wanted to pour a bucket of water on her, too!

  85. I think she is leaving because by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

    Congress threatened to say....No

  86. Continued.... by ciphertext · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whoops! I'm sorry. I pressed the Submit instead of Preview.

    The story can be found here.

    • The two tactics are:
    • Persue ISPs in court to recoup losses for piracy over the internet.
    • Rosen also "advised" the music industry to "develop technological protections instead of relying on enforcement to quash pirating".

    Rosen essentially wants ISP's to pay a fee to the RIAA to compensate for the loss of revenues due to piracy across the net. She would also like to see the ISP's begin scanning P2P type files being swapped on the net for pirated works.

    The successor for Rosen will undoubtedly try to take a more subtle approach. Essentially, we'll be seeing the equivalent of the "Softer Side of RIAA" advertisements. I would implore the Slashdot community to see through the new image to the cold, black, evil that is the essence of the RIAA (and MPAA). Hopefully, Rosen doesn't live in Salem lest she run the risk of being burned at the stake!

    --
    To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
    1. Re:Continued.... by PixelCat · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, Rosen doesn't live in Salem lest she run the risk of being burned at the stake!

      The witches of Salem would be organizing a campaign to preserve the dignity of burning at the stake if someone tried to do that to an RIAA exec.

  87. Don't let the door hit you on the way out by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

    bitch

    --
    Fuck it
  88. After her departure, I wish by jsse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    music industry will regain their focus on improving quality of music production rather than setting prices for maximizing profit and accusing youngsters not paying enough.

    I compare the sound quality of CD now and ten years ago...nothing improved. And then they blame us for listening to sub-quality electronic music. Shame on them. Give us something that worth buying.

    Think I should stop ranting, this is the day of celebrating. :)

  89. Re:Hehe, also, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feeling nostalgic are we?

  90. Leaving? Well... by fleener · · Score: 1

    Leaving at the end of 2003? Why announce the departure 11 months in advance? 11 months in Internet time might as well mean she'll be around another decade.

  91. won't save em by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    haha. this still won't stop them from being hacked. :)

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  92. Don't shoot the messenger by geekee · · Score: 1

    From a wired article:
    "In the first six months of 2002, CD sales fell 11 percent - on top of a 3 percent decline the year before. Sales of blank CDs jumped 40 percent last year, while the users of Kazaa, the biggest online file-trading service, tripled in number. Meanwhile, the labels' new legitimate online music services attracted fewer paying customers than the McDonald's in Times Square."

    Hard to argue that cds sales are down for the 1st time ever solely due to the economy given these statistics. You may not like what Rosen is saying, but she's probably right. Despite all the self-righteousness of slashdot readers, they're the real thieves and liars, making up bullshit excuses and lame cases that actually occur 0.0001% of the time to justify keeping technology around whose primary purpose is to steal property from copyright holders.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:Don't shoot the messenger by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Troll food....

      From a weird article:

      "In the first six months of 2002, my frequency of leaving the house fell 11 percent. Sales of handguns jumped 40% last year while the number of people incarcerated for Marijuana charges tripled. Meanwhile, legitimate whore houses in this country attracted fewer paying customer than Jack Valenti and Hillary Rosen combined."

      Hard to argue that I leave the house less now solely because Jack Valenti and Hilary Rosen are money-whoring marijuana users with guns. Despite the self-righteousness of people who don't know what they're talking about, they're the real idiots that come up with lame, half-assed arguments to defend their completely illogical viewpoints.

      Nice strawman... who's buying it besides you?

      I don't download illegal music. Interestingly enough, I also don't buy "music" because it doesn't seem to exist anymore (or, exists so sporadically that I miss it).

      Of course, one other thing: you forgot to mention the fact that if the industry were to embrace this technology instead of trying so desperately hard to thwart it, it would be a non-issue.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:Don't shoot the messenger by Violet+Null · · Score: 1

      In the first six months of 2002, CD sales fell 11 percent

      Yeah, that might be explained by piracy. Or it might be explained by the fact that the RIAA lowered production by 25% over the same time period. That doesn't just translate into less copies of CDs, it translates into less different CDs. Less different types of CDs, less for people to buy.

  93. Re:Quality of food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I go to a fine restaurant they have the nerve to price their hamburgers in the $8 range!

    However the last burger I got at McDonalds was $.99 including the bun, meat, cheese, and I got fries with that!

  94. Wages are higher in USA by yerricde · · Score: 1

    if the recording industry can sell music CDs here in Asia for $9 and still make a profit, why can't they do the same in the US?

    The sound engineers and others involved with production of the album demand a higher salary in the USA than in Asia.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Wages are higher in USA by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Also, record store employees are probably paid lower wages there, retail space costs less the lease, businesses probably don't have to take out insurance policies in case some idiot trips on a dropped CD, etc.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:Wages are higher in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno... I worked retail music sales... I got paid barely above minimum wage... and let me tell you this... it sucks working at a record store run by a souless corperation. no joking around with customers... always on your feet... its a real drag...

    3. Re:Wages are higher in USA by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Right subject, wrong explaination.

      Simply put, $9 is worth more to someone in Asia than it is in the US. It buys more food, pays more rent and buys more entertainment.

      Comparing prices across regions is stupid and pointless unless you take account of the relative wages vs. the relative cost of living.

      So, in essence, there is a good chance that $9 in Asia is actually still a rip-off price. You could use The Big Mac Index, which is a silly but much more accurate way of looking at the costs in other countries. A Big Mac in China is half the US price, so it follows (loosely) that the same ratio will apply for other goods.

  95. [OT[Re:Where next for Rosen? by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

    OMFG!

    I clicked your sig and lo and behold! OMFG OMFG!! *dies*

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  96. Nice quote tipped from Wired today... by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    "And the electronics industry's attitude toward the labels is summed up by an Apple slogan: Rip. Mix. Burn. Which, a music executive once told me, translates into "Fuck you, record labels."

  97. Copyrights Aside..... by PingXao · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What's really scary is not that fair use is being destroyed, or that copyright extension after copyright extension gets passed due to the bribing of elected officials. What really scares me is that the gubmint is going to look at the music and film industries as thriving industries and do whatever needs to be done to protect them. Sure, the thinly disguised bribery will continue, but thses "industries" will sell the pols on the overall economic impact of their decisions. Since people vote with their wallets for the most part, not even the Constitution will ultimately stand up to $$$ forces at work.

    Even if the natural order of things is for the old money music publishers to go out of business, do you really think the Congresscritters are going to just stand by while a multi-billion dollar industry goes down the drain? Certainly not! There are way too many jobs and livlihoods dependent on Hollywood to just have them disappear because of some newfangled technology that punks think they can abuse. (note sarcasm, please). Back in the late 1970s a guy named Frank Zappa summed it up nicely on the album "Joe's Garage":
    ... it is my responsibility to enforce all the laws that haven't been passed yet. It is also my responsibility to alert each and every one of you to the potential consequences of various ordinary everyday activities you might be performing which could eventually lead to *The Death Penalty* (or affect your parents' credit rating). Our criminal institutions are full of little creeps like you who do wrong things...and many of them were driven to these crimes by a horrible force called MUSIC!

    Our studies have shown that this horrible force is so dangerous to society at large that laws are being drawn up at this very moment to stop it forever! Cruel and inhuman punishments are being carefully described in tiny paragraphs so they won't conflict with the Constitution (which, itself, is being modified in order to accommodate THE FUTURE).

    Man oh man, Zappa was WAY ahead of his time. Well, at least by 20 years or so.
  98. That volume is unusual by yerricde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know there's the cost of the production of the album, the marketing, etc., but over 8 million copies, those costs are negligable.

    What percent of albums even sell one million copies? What's a record company supposed to do with an artist whose album has a slim chance of even going gold?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:That volume is unusual by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      Is that a rhetorical question?

      What's a record company supposed to do with an artist whose album has a slim chance of even going gold?

      1) Make copies
      2) Sell copies
      3) Profit!

      If it takes RIAA members 1,000,000 copies to make a profit, something is way off... that's $15,000,000 gross profit at today's CD prices... Maybe half is lost to retail markup, but still! There is no way in the 21st century that it should cost even 1/100th that much to set up a production run of CD's. Perhaps the record industry needs to take a lesson from cheapbytes.

    2. Re:That volume is unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it takes RIAA members 1,000,000 copies to make a profit, something is way off... that's $15,000,000 gross profit at today's CD prices... Maybe half is lost to retail markup, but still! There is no way in the 21st century that it should cost even 1/100th that much to set up a production run of CD's. Perhaps the record industry needs to take a lesson from cheapbytes.

      What about the production (studio time, equipment, engineers...) or marketing? This is what makes up the bolk of the costs.

    3. Re:That volume is unusual by snol · · Score: 1

      If production cost so much, you certainly wouldn't see smalltime artists selling their (pressed, studio-recorded) cds while playing bars. There's something seriously inefficient about the majors' way of doing business if not-particularly-loaded individuals can afford to publish their music while major labels take a loss if an album only brings in, say, $300,000 gross.

    4. Re:That volume is unusual by tetsuo13 · · Score: 1

      What's a record company supposed to do with an artist whose album has a slim chance of even going gold?

      You're implying that we, the customers, make up for their lousy artists who don't sell by paying upwards of 5x what it actually costs to make a CD so they come out at least even?!? That's ridiculous! If such a low percentage or their roster have a tough time selling one million copies, this should be a clue to put more effort into finding better talent. Or realize that the days of artists selling ~25 million copies and making ~50 million dollars are coming to an end.

      Diversify (there's that word again)! Instead of 10 different bands/groups sell 8 million copies, get 50 different [good] artists to sell even 500,000 copies.

    5. Re:That volume is unusual by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Who cares?

      Fuck the record company who takes an artist's copyright, forces them to muzzle their originality and put out radio-friendly crap, to sell themselves into debt and take all the financial risks while skimming the rewards from them so they can shove it up their septum-deficient, coke-raddled noses.

      Let artists go to independent labels, and let the days of the Mega-Starosaurus come to an end. Musicians will still become famous and very rich, but it'll happen more slowly, and organically.
      And who cares if they don't? They can still live a comforable, middle-class lifestyle, so I've heard, without being the next Michael Jackson/Britney/Maradonna/Elton John.

      An album that sells less than a million copies, can make a profit if it has lower production costs.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    6. Re:That volume is unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bands that press their own cds to sell at shows aren't making money on the cds. They do that so that these peoples friends will hear their music so that the next time they are performing, they'll come to the show as well. It's a grassroots thing... eventually if they get popular enough they get notice from a label and maybe a contract.

    7. Re:That volume is unusual by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      What about the production (studio time, equipment, engineers...)

      Not something the record industry really pays for anyways. Some artists might get help, but most end up doing this pretty much on their own ticket.

      or marketing?

      Well, a lot of money gets thrown at that one... Unfortuneately it's always hard to determine just what is a waste and what is useful. I would think a marketing budget should be determined based on the size/cost of a product, not the cost of the product based on the marketing budget. This seems to be where I part company with most RIAA members.

      In fact, "letting the market decide" the cost, by trying to sell a product for as much as can be gotten, before even determing what it costs to manufacture has been a popular business practice (particularly in telcos) in the last few years. Of course, the nice thing about music is that when it costs almost nothing to produce, there's a lot of leeway between "percieved value" and "production cost". Call it a "cushy middle".

      This is what makes up the bolk of the costs

      Yes, and for some people fat makes up a lot of this bolk. This doesn't mean a person *must* way 300 pounds to survive.

    8. Re:That volume is unusual by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      How many of those people do you know?

      I have a fiddle teacher for a step-mom and a few of her students have pressed a disc or two in their time. Believe you me, those students aren't *losing* money by pressing CD's and selling them for $10 at shows. Some actually make a pretty good income. Enough that they don't have to worry about summer jobs at least.

  99. Finally! by jwdeff · · Score: 1

    My threatening phone calls paid off!

  100. END OF THE YEAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else realize it's only JANUARY. Thus, we have 11 months of that bitches bs to deal with.

    1. Re:END OF THE YEAR! by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As you say, we have 11 months to go. It's unusual to keep a lame duck CEO kicking around for that length of time. Then again, maybe they have an especially vile agenda and want her to act as the lightning rod for a while longer.

      The search for a replacement ought to be interesting. RIAA leader is one of the toughest jobs in the world today; right up there with Saddam's travel agent.

  101. goodbye BITCH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, we should all hold big and well-publicized GOODBYE HILARY parties at the end of the year! Let the RIAA bloodsuckers know how much we love them (note: by "love" I mean "despise").

    But, I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them. This has been an extremely difficult decision but I know it is the right one for my family.

    You and your "domestic partner" have kids? Freaky! Adopted, of course, unless Hil's been up to something naughty!

    I believe that the RIAA staff is simply the best in the business and I am proud of the team we have built.

    Bwah ha ha ha! Yes, the RIAA's team is much better than the teams at all those other American music industry government lobbying groups. Oh wait..

    Goodbye, Hil! Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out!

    Can't wait for the replacement..

    PS: Yo, Jack Valenti, isn't about time for your retirement too? Let's get fresh blood (question: does Valenti even HAVE a circulatory system?) in the MPAA too!

  102. Very true by Sanity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You are right. From what I have heard on the grapevine, Rosen is privately very unhappy with the recording industry's response to file-sharing, even though she could never say this publicly. If she was not constrained in what she can say by her position, you might find that she agrees with much of what the RIAA's critics have to say.

    1. Re:Very true by NormalVisual · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In her interview in Wired (the print version), she seemed pretty frustrated with the whole recording industry. I too came away thinking that while she was professionally obligated to further the RIAA member companies' agendas, privately she felt they were a bunch of greedy fricking idiots. I wouldn't be surprised if she left simply because she was tired of dealing with them and their lack of vision. I'd love to see what she *really* thinks.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:Very true by gsfprez · · Score: 1

      > you might find that she agrees with much of what the RIAA's critics have to say.

      well, she does own an iPod.. this may be more true than you may think.

      i'd give you a link to the picture of her in the latest release of Wired Magazine, listening to an iPod and smiling.

      if she had gotten her way - according to what she was being paid to say - then the iPod would be outlaw hardware.

      Maybe that iPod pict was her first public finger in the face of the RIAA? If she didn't mean it to be - it was all the same.

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    3. Re:Very true by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Link to picture of Hillary listening to an iPod.

    4. Re:Very true by tornater · · Score: 1

      It's "friggin'" not "fricking." God! When will slashdotters learn to spell?

    5. Re:Very true by mselmeci · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, if she really felt this way, why did she give the reason that she wanted to spend time with her family? Since she's not going to be associated with them anymore, couldn't she have told the press what you wrote?

    6. Re:Very true by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      That's a good question. It could quite possibly be that she really is the shill she appears to be, or maybe not. That was the gist of my suggestion - there seem to be some conflicting views that she holds, and it would be interesting to see how she rationalizes all of that together.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    7. Re:Very true by jafac · · Score: 1

      or maybe, their standard offer of "A blowjob from your choice of Christina Aguillera or Brittney Spears, in exchange for seeing things our way" didn't appeal to her as it appealed to the other male execs. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Very true by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Given that she's a lesbian, I would think it might be equally appealing. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  103. Meet the New Boss.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ....same as the Old Boss.

  104. You ain't seen nothin' by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1

    Behold the awesome sight of an AC +5 first post

    [Previews] wtf? it's been deleted! I didn't think they did that round here?

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    1. Re:You ain't seen nothin' by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      Try this link.

  105. Interview: The Salem Bitch Trial by deft · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long have you been a bitch?
    Why are you a bitch?
    What evil made you a Bitch? ...

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Interview: The Salem Bitch Trial by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      And of course the combo: Do you consider yourself a bitch, or an evil bitch?

    2. Re:Interview: The Salem Bitch Trial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the only good bitch is a dead bitch.

    3. Re:Interview: The Salem Bitch Trial by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      What was it like giving birth to kyle?

      --

  106. Dubya's your man! by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 0, Troll

    They're not just looking for an entertainment lawyer...it sounds like they're looking for Bush.

  107. my thoughts by smead · · Score: 1

    all i can say is:
    don't let the door hit you on the way out
    -smead

  108. good ol' turkey baster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Rosen is a lesbian, how the hell did she manage to come up with a kid?
  109. Hell may yawn, by Erris · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but you don't think this has anything to do with double didgit declines in music sales do you? Money talks, insulting your customers, market research number crunchers, lawers and persuing pipe dreams of "pay per play" has walked. Let the good times roll, baby, make some music or die!

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  110. Damn!! by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just when the nerd-wing conspiracy to assasinate Hillary Rosen was about to come to fruition, she has to step down and spoil our fun! :(

    1. Re:Damn!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      careful, or you'll trigger another terror alert (funny how we haven't had one of those in a while)

    2. Re:Damn!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last one was probably the same old butt covering and blame throwing "terrorists are planing an attack, and this anouncement is good untill the end of humanity. We warned you the public, so it is your fault if anything happens between then."

  111. Step down as Head? by RelliK · · Score: 1

    So will she become RIAA's ass now? (About time too...)

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:Step down as Head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's big enough........

  112. Yes!!! by mjtiernan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that most of us can agree that this is a good thing. However, it is January. She can still do a lot of damage in a year. AND, I would hate to see what she did as a last minute effort to leave her mark on the industry.

  113. Dang! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I have to make a whole new Voodoo Doll!

  114. Let the endless stream of /. jokes commence! by bonch · · Score: 1

    A beautiful chorus line of wannabe-comedians and wisecrackers fit for a king await us all!

  115. From: Secret meeting - RIAA board of directors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ladies and gentlemen, I am pleased to anounce our new CEO Adolph Hi...um...er...SKIPPY, the magical tap-dancing elf. Yes...yes that will do nicely. Excellent..."

  116. hydra lesson by pummer · · Score: 1

    As I learned in biology, the hydra has no brain. What an interesting metaphor for the RIAA.

  117. The rats are jumping ship... by k-0s · · Score: 1

    Rosen stepping down with top executives at Sony and Vivendi Universal's MCA also leaving do you get the feeling that the rats are jumping a sinking ship?

  118. In Summary by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly, most /.ers would like to see Hillary stripped naked (well that could blind a person), tarred and feathered, and ridden out of town on a syphillitic jackass. No love lost here. Of course, this cannot be done, because next thing you know, we'd want to have it done to the rest of the RIAA.

    What do you call 6 members of the RIAA buried up to their necks in sand? A good start.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  119. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think she deserves most of this, she's a hired gun nothing more.

    Most of these comments should be directed to a policy of public deception and misinformation. But, I guess that would lead to a most unpopular outcome.

  120. Lars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Metallica stopped being good when they stopped doing drugs..

  121. I bet she'd do it by geophile · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well that was a predictable set of witless responses.


    I seriously think that is a great suggestion, and
    I bet that she would agree to it. If she cares
    what the /. crowd thinks about her at all, then
    such a move could do nothing but improve her image.
    What could she possibly have to lose by agreeing
    to such an interview?

    1. Re:I bet she'd do it by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      If she cares what the /. crowd thinks about her at all, then such a move could do nothing but improve her image. What could she possibly have to lose by agreeing to such an interview?

      Maybe she doesn't care what the /. crowd thinks about her. I know I don't.

      -a

    2. Re:I bet she'd do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could she possibly have to lose by agreeing
      to such an interview?


      Time.

      I can't imagine how utterly unconcerned she is with what a bunch of pubescent, copyright-infringers think of her.

    3. Re:I bet she'd do it by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      such a move could do nothing but improve her image.

      I wouldn't say that.

      "Slashdot Interviews Rosen"

      CmdrTaco: It's nice to meet you, Miss Rosen. I'd like to start out with one question: 'Why are you against file sharing?'
      Rosen: Because, it's impossible to control your lives unless we lock down the minor things first and slowly build up to bigger things.
      CmdrTaco: I see. What bigger things?
      Rosen: Well, the big plan is to implant RFID chips in your tires and skull. The tires one is obvious, but the skull one is there so that when you start thinking of a song, it'll be reported to the RIAA, and we'll debit the cost of the song play to your bank account. If you don't have a bank account, we'll send repo men to your house to take your CD's and computer to cover the costs.
      CmdrTaco: Ooooookayy..and one more thing. What is your stance on freedom of speech?
      Rosen: Two words for you, Taco-boy. "Penis Enlargement".

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  122. Time out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's everybody going on about? She isn't leaving for 11 months ... if then. A lot can happen in 11 months ... including a decisison to stay on for a while. Since when is a (real) resignation tendered 11 months in advance?

  123. and what will this change???? by rmdyer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I for one am so tired of the price structure of audio CD's that I've quit purchasing them outright.

    I just purchased the movie "Signs" for $17.99 which I might consider to be "reasonable". For one, "Signs" must have cost millions to make. I don't have the amount at hand, but I must imagine that it cost over 10 million dollars. Now, how much does it cost to produce a single album for a group? Less than a million?

    In my view audio CD's should be priced at the point at which it becomes pointless for me to even try to pirate them. The price I think audio CD's should sell for is $4.99 plus applicable tax. At that price it is just not convenient to put together all the effort to copy them or pirate mp3's of them. After all, what I would really like is the original high quality PCM samples not mp3's.

    If CD's actually cost around a dollar to produce, then the producers can double that when they sell them. That will be two dollars when they sell them to companies like Best Buy. Then, Best Buy can turn around and sell them for double that price, which is four dollars. Of course there will be some variation from state to state so we add a dollar to cover extra's. At most, a $5.99 cost of a CD would be plenty.

    If CD's were priced at one third of what they are now then I'd actually purchase more than I am currently purchasing at the current price, way more than to cover the amount they think they would be losing. A secondary problem is the sheer number of artists that I want to purchase grows by leaps and bounds every year, but my purchasing power does not. Everytime I go into a store like Media Play the number of CD's grows, but I still can't take advantage of that.

    I've got to imagine that the only reason CD's still sell at the $17 and $18 dollar mall prices is because of stupid teenage girls with large parental pocketbooks. And, yes, that was a slam, so yea, I'm blaming the music industry and stupid teenagers for the current prices of CD's.

    The cost structure of CD's is now and has always been ridiculous. We are only now beginning to realize that. The music industry is currently living way beyond it's means and it's time to wake them up and serve them some hot coffee. Until that time I'm done with them. My boycott has started and will not abate until the music industry sees reason.

    1. Re:and what will this change???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, now this will fail because of one glaring problem with it...

      It makes sense....

      I can apply that reasoning to everything that is a create-it and all the copies are free... (software)

      Ut2003 for example... is one of the BIGGEST pirated games of all time... it's awesome, it's great, and it's way too fricking expensive. I want the game, I am tired of playing the demo.. but I will not shell out the $50.00 for it. so I spent the $25.95 I had on hand at my local eb games for ghost recon..

      video games are also horribly overpriced. sorry, but as great as many games are, they are not worth $50.00 in any way shape or form.. the software companies make wild claims that it cost billions to develop the games, and they need to make up some of the money spent... bla bla bla... Obviousally they are ran by the same idiots that run the record companies... Gouge the consumer and you get more money.. This is not the case... you can sell more than twice the units by simply halving your profit margin per item..

      Many people are shopping for software like me.. Not buying it until it hit's the bargian bin. From operating systems to games to the PS2.. the windows users I know are still staying at Windows 98 and windows 2000 and simply buying computers with no OS and re-installing there while wiping the old computer.

      not only is music insanely priced (I only buy used) but software is horribly overpriced also.

    2. Re:and what will this change???? by Casualposter · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way: 14 songs (usually 10) at 4 minutes a song is 40 to 76 minutes of entertainment. Less if most of the songs stink. Signs, which I bought for 15 USD at Walmart was over 120 minutes of entertainment. A game, Diablo for example, I bought for 50 bucks and spend WEEKS playing it.

      Dollars per hour of entertainment: Games win.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    3. Re:and what will this change???? by mr+breakfast · · Score: 0

      And you only ever listen to an album once? No wonder you think they're overpriced.

    4. Re:and what will this change???? by domodude · · Score: 1

      I haven't purchased an audio CD for 5 years. My local music store (FYE) charges over 20$ for a new CD. Not only is that too high, but I would only buy the CD for one maybe two songs. Why not just download them? Rather than listen to the MTV and the media for good music, talk to your friends about what music they like. I have all together given up on mainstream music and I am now listening to smaller, less know artists. Frankly, the music is just better. How to end the RIAA: don't buy OR download songs from the record companies that fund the RIAA.

    5. Re:and what will this change???? by n3uxf · · Score: 1

      You're missing a few things as to why the cost of CD's are so high. All the stores wrap the cost of doing business in the goods they sell. The companies have employees to pay, the cost of running and maintaining the physical structure (such as the electric bill), and employee benefits just to name a few. Where do the stores get the money to pay for these things? From the sales of goods at a profit. The income has to at least meet the expenditures. The price of CD's are high because everyone who was involved in producing the CD wants a cut of the pie.

    6. Re:and what will this change???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That comparison is garbage. Signs got released and people paid $7 to $10/ticket to go see it. The DVD sales are suplementary. Bands tour for exposure, there's not a ton of profit from concerts.

      The pricing models for film and music are very different, even if their governing bodies behave in the same "we hate our customers" way.

    7. Re:and what will this change???? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Not only do they charge 20 bucks, but if you use a computer as your CD player, fewer of them even will play. The recording industry doesn't deserve our business.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    8. Re:and what will this change???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I gave up buying CDs a long time ago, so the profit RIAA makes on me is 0.
      But if CDs will be prices at a couple of bucks a piece, I would be bringing home a couple every day, regardless of the content.
      That will make 365*2*2 = 1460 bucks a year just from me. And I can see millions of people who will do the same.
      Yes, it might take a lot of money to make an album, but considering the potential market, it wil not even show up on the total cost of manufacturing.
      I guess greed makes people blind.

    9. Re:and what will this change???? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "For one, "Signs" must have cost millions to make. I don't have the amount at hand, but I must imagine that it cost over 10 million dollars. Now, how much does it cost to produce a single album for a group? Less than a million?"

      You're forgetting about ticket sales. For the cost of making "Signs", the studio got something they could show in the movie theatre, and something they could slap on DVD. By the time you go out to buy it, they've most likely already made back their initial investment (and then some).

      With an album, on the other hand, people wouldn't pay to go to a concert hall nad have the studio recordings played for them. Instead, they (quite reasonably) demand a separate, live performance from the artists who made the album. That places constraints on both how many performances can be done (no musician can match the 3264 different venues all showing Signs on opening weekend) and it places constraints on how much money the investor can recoup (as concert sales are generally regarded as the area where the artist, a key part of every single live performance, can attempt to make back some of the money that crappy recording contracts cheat them out of).

      Overall, it boils down to two different economic models. You could've just as easily compared an album to a computer game with a modest budget, and you would've come out favoring the album. Sure, at the base level, it's all intellectual property, but the details are a key part of the pricing. (And I haven't even really touched on supply and demand issues, which further differentiate the products.)

    10. Re:and what will this change???? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Unfortunately, it's not up to a single person to determine what a producer charges for its goods, it's up to the entire market. But a boycott is a good way to start, and it's about all one person can do.

      So if you don't think that the music you're getting for $15 or $20, don't buy it. No one's forcing anyone to listen to big RIAA bands. Buying a $20 CD is just admitting that the artist's music and his producer's marketing have been good enough that you decided you'd rather have the CD than a $20 bill.

      Don't try to give any monopoly arguments, or arguments that "the entire music industry" is causing this, because there's plenty of free and low cost, high quality music out there.

      The cost structure of CD's is now and has always been ridiculous.

      How is it any different than any other industry? If a large group of dairy farmers could sell milk for $100 a bottle, then they would. And they could, if they could somehow market their milk as being so far superior to other producers' milk; make their milk sexier, more glamorous, and full of fame and celebrity; just as the Recording Industry has done for those they decide to make into Superstar artists.

      And the public is willing to pay to own an album made by a Corporate Superstar. Maybe you're not (and I'm not either:-)), so if you still want music than buy albums from cheaper, lesser known artists. If you like Rock music (or blues or jazz or anything popular in your part of the country), you can go to a bar or club and hear great live rock music for under $10. And you can buy their CD for about $10 as well. So for the cost of a $20 corporate CD + $50 corporate concert ticket = $70 corporate experience, you could go to a different bar/club and buy a new CD for three straight weekends, meet a lot more people, and, in your own way, stick it to the recording industry.

      Or, you could make friends with that guy you know who plays guitar, and get to see his band's concerts and get his CD's for free!

    11. Re:and what will this change???? by UncleGizmo · · Score: 1
      Bands tour for exposure, there's not a ton of profit from concerts

      Actually, it's the other way around in most cases...bands release albums [and get on the radio] for exposure, and make their money touring, selling t-shirts, etc. Any 'profits' they make from record sales are minimal, because they are last in line after the record company takes their cut and subtracts out recording advances, studio time, production, artwork, etc. etc. etc.

      --
      Who put this thing together? Me, that's who.
    12. Re:and what will this change???? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      And you only ever listen to an album once? No wonder you think they're overpriced.

      How many times do you exclusively listen to an album, without doing anything else? I rarely do this, music is something I put on while I'm working, or reading, etc...

    13. Re:and what will this change???? by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Where do the stores get the money to pay for these things?

      Good point... except that stores generally make a dollar or so off of a CD. It might be more at chain stores, but the CD store my friend works at marks up their products by about a buck (and their prices are pretty high).

    14. Re:and what will this change???? by geronimo87 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone noticed how the price of movies on VHS has dropped like a stone in the last couple of years? Demand has gone down (due to DVD's, not piracy). IANAA ( I am not an accountant) but it seems tome, the proper response to lower sales is to reduce prices, not to accuse your customers of theft.

    15. Re:and what will this change???? by Unwise+One · · Score: 1

      There are certainly large costs involved in making a CD according to the current way that the music industry works.

      However, most tech-savvy consumers (and there a growing number of them out there) look at the CD-RW drive in their computer that they bought for $100, and then at the pile of 50 blank CDs that they bought for ten bucks and put the cost of burning a music CD at about a dime over the long term.

      Sure, the intelligent consumer will realize that there are production costs, jewel cases, cover art, shrink wrap, salaries of some number employees, marketing, shipping, paying the artist, paying the middle-man, paying the retail chain, etc., etc.

      But as a consumer, I have a hard time with the industry's claim that their overhead costs require them to increase the basic materials costs by several orders of magnitude when they (read: a handful of large companies) sell somewhere on the order of 900 million CDs over the course of a year... you'd think that economies of scale would work in their favor.

    16. Re:and what will this change???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see. I saw Metallica play to a sold out arena crowd. Tickets were $30. There were approx. 17,000 tickets sold. You're saying the show was so expensive to put on that they burned half a million dollars and were just doing it to sell records?

      I've been to about 90 small shows where what you say may have been true, but many of the bigger shows draw thousands of people all paying $20-$30 at a minimum to get in... plus they're buying shirts and other stuff. I'm pretty sure CDs from popular bands don't need to cost more than $10 (which I should point out is just less than the average price for them at Best Buy and cdnow.com).

    17. Re:and what will this change???? by calvinthorne · · Score: 1

      To add to the pricing meme...
      I don't really think I mind a new release being $18. What burns me is seeing older, not-very-popular music sitting there for $16. Give us a better trade-off...instead of the store being filled with $16 cds and a small little bargain bin of true crap (usually) being $10, why not the whole store at less than $10 and a small "promotion" bin at the front with the latest and greatest at a premium price?
      That should satisfy the "stupid teenage girls with large parental pocketbooks" who want to feel like they belong, as well as those of us with patience...or just a different agenda...personally, I like to own cds and would love to play "catch up" in the jazz world, but it isn't economically feasible for me, or for the stores to shelve every single record ever produced.
      Enter the internet distribution model. But, come on, there are people out there (me!) who don't "do" mp3! Gimmie my FLAC or SHN and I'll even pay a little more.
      Like this! Add a couple bucks for cds, case(s), paper and ink, and it's $18 for 3 discs (each around 70min). I consider that reasonable. I wish they'd taken the next step and released their latest studio album that way!
      The! Yahoo! account! must! be! affecting! my! use! of! exclamation! points!!

    18. Re:and what will this change???? by rmdyer · · Score: 1

      Thanks for keeping me straight on how things work. Due to my knee-jerk reaction to music prices I don't always consider all the variables.

      Problem is, you've only made things seem worse to me. Are you for or against the current prices on CD's?

      It still begs the question, how much profit should be made on a piece of plastic that only cost a dollar to fully produce, bits and all?

    19. Re:and what will this change???? by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      I'm not old enough to remember. But how much were Albums (LP's) in their heyday? I remember my sisters buying 45's for what came up to about a buck each, so I can't imagine a full album was that much back then (taking inflation into consideration).

      If what I'm thinking is true, then with the advent of CDs (which eventually became cheap to manufacture) album prices skyrocketed to the perceived value of music on an optical disk.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    20. Re:and what will this change???? by Mysticeti · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting about ticket sales.

      I'm not sure I buy this argument. There are plenty of direct to video titles out there selling for roughly the same price as titles that were shown in theaters.

    21. Re:and what will this change???? by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

      Ah, but many direct-to-video/DVD titles still sell for about $20 each, as well. They're made cheaper, but still, they do come out at that price and have larger budgets, including marketing, than any album could.

      What's more, rereleases of albums, like The Beatles "White Album" and "Greatest Hits" albums, still rank high in price, sometimes much higher than two DVD movie sets.

      Even with ticket sales for movies, the pricing of DVDs and VHS still show that the RIAA members are taking in too much and not paying out enough to artists, or lying about how much they're losing. I can't fathom any other reason why a CD costing $18+ can still lose money when it can sell more than a copy of Shanghai Noon on DVD that costs only $15. Just for examples. Something to think about.

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    22. Re:and what will this change???? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1
      "Are you for or against the current prices on CD's?"

      As a consumer, I'd prefer prices to be as low as possible. However, I generally find the current price-per-entertainment ratio of CDs to be acceptable.

      Putting on a more objective hat though, I'd say that CD prices would be more fair if the major factors artificially limiting competition were removed. The two biggest problems I see are collusion on the part of record labels to keep the price higher than normal and the entire payola/airplay problem that prevents viable independent competition. Tackle those, and the free market should theoretically do the rest.

      "It still begs the question, how much profit should be made on a piece of plastic that only cost a dollar to fully produce, bits and all?"

      First, it's kind of hard to put a per-unit price on the production of the bits. It's a fixed, upfront cost that will eventually be spread across each CD sold. Second, if you assume that the anti-competitive issues are resolved, then I just don't see any reason to limit the profit. In a free market, a competitor can come along and undercut the prices.

    23. Re:and what will this change???? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1
      "Ah, but many direct-to-video/DVD titles still sell for about $20 each, as well."

      I had forgotten about those. I honestly have no clue where they'd fit in.

      "I can't fathom any other reason why a CD costing $18+ can still lose money when it can sell more than a copy of Shanghai Noon on DVD that costs only $15."

      Huh?

      Checking Amazon, Shanghai Noon on DVD is $25.49. The average CD price on there seems to be between $14 and $15 (random sampling: Britney Spears' "Oops I did it again" is $14.99; the Beatles' "White Album" is $14.00 per disc (2 disc set, $27.99); The Pixies' "Surfer Rosa" is $11.98; Faith Hill's "Cry" is $13.49).

    24. Re:and what will this change???? by DragonMagic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To visualize... At Best Buy, Shanghai Noon DVD is $22.99, while the CD Soundtrack is $15.99

      That's right, for $7 more you get the images WITH the music.

      Now, Fight Club single DVD movie is $11.99 at Best Buy, while the Fight Club CD soundtrack is $14.99.

      The trends are still there. Music is as much, if not more, than DVDs, which generally give you much more. Two different, but parallel, industries, one complaining it's losing money, the other with record years. The one losing money is making more off sales than the one not losing money.

      So, go figure.

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    25. Re:and what will this change???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me: 32 years old, large consumer of albums and later, CDs.

      mid to late 80s: Average retail price of most albums: $8.99, on sale for $6.99

      Early to mid 90s: Average retail price on most popular music CDs: $13.99 to $14.99, on sale for $11.99.

      Biggest jump up: when longbox was eliminated!

      My demographic is around New Orleans, LA; perhaps prices varied in other cities?

    26. Re:and what will this change???? by xjerky · · Score: 1


      They also claim that games are as high as they are due to piracy. But the Nintendo Gamecube has not seen any piracy yet, and yet the prices of their games are exactly the same as the PS2 and X-Box.

      What a crock......

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  124. Soften is image?! by drix · · Score: 1

    The only thing they're trying to soften is Kazaa. Rosen said "resigned" to spend more time with her family. Meaning she was fired. And why not? She's the figurehead of an huge, costly, and utterly failing war effort (e.g. Napster/Kazaa/whatever users doubling every year) against Internet audio sharing. After 4+ years in this position someone at the top finally woke up and smolt the Folger's; voila, no more Rosen. The bitch should feel lucky, she got about 3.5 more years at the helm than if she put in this type of performance at a major corporation and maybe a year longer than if she was in the United States armed services :) You can bet the next capo RIAA foists up to lead the charge will be every bit as arrogant, clueless and dishonest. If anyone deserves our sympathy today it's the those poor Rosen kids, who face the prospect of hours more daily "quality time" with their whore of a mother. Haha!

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  125. Rosen to be replaced by.... by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...John Ashcroft.

    Have a nice day.

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  126. Her kids huh? by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them.

    TRANSLATION: I know those brats are on Kazaa right now.

    -ted

    1. Re:Her kids huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At (my company), "spending more time with my family" ALWAYS equates to "forced to step down.

      ALWAYS

      ALWAYS

    2. Re:Her kids huh? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      Maybe Dr Laura got to her and she wants to be her kids' Mom.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    3. Re:Her kids huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has kids? I thought she was lesbian!

  127. Hillary Rosen's children by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    I wish Hillary Rosen well in her new job as stay at home mom..

    May her children in ten years time teach her about:

    1. Music is human nature, it cannot be held and imprisioned by the RIAA!
    2. That even kids can download music and then go out and buy it.
    3. That even kids can record their own orginal music without a record label and make money,
    4. That music put out by only ten record labels will sound like shit for lack of choice.
    5. That Heavy Metal only has one sound level, LOUD!

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  128. Ummm, yeah by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    except for the 9$ cds that are created in the us and still sold for 9$. Look at it this way, casette tapes were selling for 8-9 dollars long before cds came out, and still are. Wanna explin to me how its cheaper to make a casette tape?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  129. Frankly, i dont care anymore. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    I stopped bying their cds 5 years ago, and my downloading has slowed to a trickle, and is mostly replacing older stuff, and live variations on stuff i own. There has been maybe 1-2 songs in the past year i have felt like downloading. I am still buying local bands stuff, however, usually with a 5 buck tip on top of it. I dont mind paying 15 bucks to someone selling me a cd for 10. I figure i bought some poor band memeber a cheeseburger for a 5 buck tip.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Frankly, i dont care anymore. by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      That's very cool- I love that there are people like you. I'm currently gearing up to sell CDs directly to people for yeah, 10 bucks (which includes postage- I'll just mail 'em). You gotta be a fiend for cost controlling to make that work- I know some places where to get a CD made, it'd run you six bucks a CD just to make it. To beat that you have to be creative.

  130. Look what you have done! by ExCEPTION · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Rosen's departure comes as the organization sought to soften its image among Internet consumers, many of whom viewed the RIAA -- and Rosen personally -- with antipathy over incessant pressure for crackdowns on sharing digital music over the Internet.'

    Look what you have done to this poor lady who is just trying hard to make a living.

  131. Sing with me by rosewood · · Score: 1

    Ding Dong! The Witch is dead.
    Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!
    Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.

    Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed. Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead. She's gone where the goblins go, Below - below - below. Yo-ho, let's open up and sing and ring the bells out.

    Ding Dong' the merry-oh, sing it high, sing it low.
    Let them know The Wicked Witch is dead!

  132. Stepping down? by Droz1313 · · Score: 1

    Na Na Na Na....Na Na Na Na...hey hey hey, goodbye Bill me......

  133. Big Ups to Michael Jordan #23 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He just scored to pass Wilt Chamberlain NBA all-time scoring list.

  134. Internet = Good by be-fan · · Score: 1

    The internet is a great place to make money. Companies that understand this, like Dell, Apple, IBM, the various online retailers, etc, are in a powerful position. I have personally spent thousands of dollars online, and now do almost all my major purchases on the internet. If music was conveniently available online, a chunk of that money would go the RIAAs way. But since it isn't, well, too bad for them.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  135. I think Pete Townshend said it best by Savatte · · Score: 5, Funny

    meet the new boss
    same as the old boss

    Then again, he also said the kids are alright, and we only now figured out what he meant. zing!

    1. Re:I think Pete Townshend said it best by AntiNorm · · Score: 1

      Or "Second verse, same as the first!"

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    2. Re:I think Pete Townshend said it best by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Then again, he also said the kids are alright, and we only now figured out what he meant. zing!

      I was about to chime in with a comment about his current legal trouble, but then saw the last line of your post and realized you did it far better than I could have.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  136. Lee Iacocca and Dave Thomas by Stalcair · · Score: 1
    Just an opinion (as if these all aren't here) but it seemed to me for a while that Hilary Rosen was less the "head" in the sense of any real leadership but more just the spokesman. In her case she may be one of these that "sorta" believes in what she spews but is really just a puppet. Regardless, my feeling from this is that they will soon present someone who is either more of a shark or more of a snake. In other words, someone who is overt in attacks or a politician with smooth words and an ability to charm the common sense right out of the masses.

    Or she just wants to take up basket weaving, who knows?

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  137. I think she has made mistakes by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    Most record companies are now taking the stance that as long as they stay close to the artists they will be able to make money. Even in these technological times it is still difficult to make a professional sounding recording without the use of a proper (read expensive) recording studio.

    Also, while the sales overall may have dipped in the last couple of years, manafactured bands (pop idol, american idol, etc.) have been quite succesfull. Even if they are only around for a short time they do make money for the record companies.

    1. Re:I think she has made mistakes by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1
      Um, outright buggery certainly qualifies as CLOSE, in fact closer than a lot of people would want, but I'm not sure where the money enters into it- they already have all the artists' money. How could they get more unless they ask the artists to get jobs at Wal-Mart and give the proceeds to the RIAA? :)

      As for professional sounding, they're screwing that up badly due to wars over CD output level. There's a batch of mastering engineers doing most of the big label work these days because they are known to distort stuff dreadfully in order to make it louder. This combined with Gibb phenomenon (in which high slew rates on a CD overdrive the DACs post reconstruction filter) means that it's very unlikely for major label output to be as good as the output of a reasonably clueful geek musician: you CANNOT have sound be both good and that loud, and only independents these days have the percieved freedom to choose good over loud- the majors cannot possibly risk losing rack-jobber business to the other majors, so they're basically trapped.

      These are very, very interesting times- especially if you're an indie. We're probably looking at some years of severe customer alienation, but those who can avoid going out of business during this period could be the big guns of the next phase.

      Main rules for indies: don't overextend yourself financially, and be able to give away large amounts of free goods to remain visible. These things seem contradictory: nobody said it was going to be easy.

  138. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see someone came out and said it.
    This just screams HaHA Bitch!

  139. This can't fool me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The RIAA has a patent on Hilary Rosen's DNA and they've created an army of ugly clones.

    By making the public think she's gone, the rest of the Rosen Army will be at work brainwashing the public by installing bio-chemical virii onto every disc purchased. These virii will rot the fingers off anyone that downloads music but has a twisted side effect where retinal based controls are perfected in the next couple of years.

  140. Here I come, Hilary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_ g_______________________________________________g_ _ o_/_____\_____________\____________/____\_______o_ _ a|_______|_____________\__________|______|______a_ _ t|_______`._____________|_________|_______:_____t_ _ s`________|_____________|________\|_______|_____s_ _ e_\_______|_/_______/__\\\___--___\\_______:____e_ _ x__\______\/____--~~__________~--__|_\_____|____x_ _ *___\______\_-~____________________~-_\____|____*_ _ g____\______\_________.--------.______\|___|____g_ _ o______\_____\______//_________(_(__>__\___|____o_ _ a_______\___.__C____)_________(_(____>__|__/____a_ _ t_______/\_|___C_____)/______\_(_____>__|_/_____t_ _ s______/_/\|___C_____)_Rosen_|__(___>___/__\____s_ _ e_____|___(____C_____)\______/__//__/_/_____\___e_ _ x_____|____\__|_____\\_________//_(__/_______|__x_ _ *____|_\____\____)___`----___--'_____________|__*_ _ g____|__\______________\_______/____________/_|_g_ _ o___|______________/____|_____|__\____________|_o_ _ a___|_____________|____/_______\__\___________|_a_ _ t___|__________/_/____|_________|__\___________|t_ _ s___|_________/_/______\__/\___/____|__________|s_ _ e__|_________/_/________|____|_______|_________|e_ _ x__|__________|_________|____|_______|_________|x_ _ *_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_s_e_x_*_g_o_a_t_e_x_*_ Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

  141. people 1. riaa 0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    course... i guess its more like terrorizing a person until she fell on her weak knees like a true blowjob slut...

    but hey! one for the people!

    now on to jack v.

  142. New Replacement Just Announced!!! by The+Ancients · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs - Rip. Mix. Burn. to your heart's content... ..k

  143. For replacement, I nominate-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    --that champion of decency and fair-mindedness, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger!

    After all, he couldn't possibly be worse then Mrs. Rosen. Could he?

  144. (c) me by Ty · · Score: 1

    Ding dong the Witch is dead! WHICH OLD WITCH? The Wicked Witch! or should it be bitch?

  145. Fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 + 1 = 2
    2 + 2 = 5

    If 2 + 2 isn't 5, 1 + 1 can't be 2.

  146. Can we really trust an RIAA press release? by derF024 · · Score: 1

    Seeing how easy it is to post a press release on riaa.org, is it really reasonable to trust anything that gets posted there?

  147. Unsubstantiated Rumors by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    I head somewhere that Bill Clinton was in line for head of the MPAA after Valenti. I cant decide if thats a good thing or a bad thing.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  148. Ignoramus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > Can they soften their image? Aren't they
    > surpassing Microsoft and Kim Jong II on the
    > list of evil things we hate?

    The leader of North Korea is named Kim Jong Il. And while he has done shockingly indefensible things to the citizens of his own nation and others, keep in mind that the sunshine policy was working. Prior to Bush riding into the dusty plains of international diplomacy with a plastic stetson in one hand and a non-alchoholic beer in the other, North Korea's leadership was starting to soften its policies and open up about their past shit-headery. South Korea and Japan went out of their way to build up trust with their paranoid neighbor, after a long and bizarre history of North Korea's wrongs. Bush dumped a steaming, red-white-and-brown shit onto those efforts. Want to be reunited with your family in the north? Fuck you, they're part of The Axis.

    But, hey, don't listen to me. Keep hating whatever slashdot and/or Ari Fleischer tell you to hate.

  149. My obvious thoughts... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    A kinder, gentler RIAA? My ass. However, I do believe that they've had a chance to look at things. "Hillary, we've gone your way for the past few years. You aren't winning the war. Revenues are declining. The legal system hasn't beem allowing us to make enough progress fast enough the way we were going."

    Of course, this could be good. Maybe they'll try something completely different. That could be embracing their new future that they should have embraced in the first place. Yeah, right.

    Or it could be them becoming an even greater pain in the ass... and Hillary not wanting THAT big of a target painted on her forehead.

    The latest spat with getting information on a net user could just be opening the door into a new front... direct prosecution of file sharers. You know, if I was her, I know I wouldn't want to be the shining face that people have associated with that kind of behavior.

  150. Actually its by Suchetha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    better the known devil than the unknown angel

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
    1. Re:Actually its by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      "better the known devil than the unknown angel"

      Modded as Interesting? Interesting?

      There's never a modearation option of bullshit when you need one, is there?

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:Actually its by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      Arg! It's "Better the devil you know."
      I hope

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    3. Re:Actually its by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Hey! Do you have permission to use those lyrics?

    4. Re:Actually its by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Short form of "Better the devil you know than the angel you don't."

  151. keep calling her the outgoing president of RIAA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    until she leaves everytime we refer to her lets refer to her in the form "outgoing RIAA president Hilary Rosen said blah blah blah". That will deny credibility to RIAA and also to her until 2004.

    mod this up pls.

  152. Where you selected from within the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or were you personally appointed by the Fuhrer?

  153. Re:I PRESENT TO YOU SIR funny! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 0

    I have to say that your response is so ironically funny, that even though ironically isn't a word, I'm still going to type it. May many moderation points flow in your general direction.

  154. Change is good but . . . by Beatnick · · Score: 1

    . . . changes in policy are better. She wasn't
    standing up there spewing out for her health,
    she was spewing RIAA's policy.

    Their attempt is shallow and transparent or there
    are deeper issues why she is stepping down.

    The industry is at a cross-roads of change.
    As much as they would like to hang on to the old
    draconian style of making policies they
    realize that the winds of change are upon them.
    Until the policies reveal any direction and innovation,
    it's nothing to really dwell on or for me to bring any
    new concern about RIAA.

  155. Re:Interview? Only one question: by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    Are you intrinsically evil, or were you simply misled?

    (Shamelessly stolen from an episode of Paranoia! by West End Games. At least it isn't music.)

  156. 90x speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like the equivalent of 10 CD players. You'll have to buy a license for each of them.

  157. Nothing to do with RIAA strategy by coinreturn · · Score: 0, Troll

    She's just stepping down to be with her "life partner" (aka lesbian lover) and their twin kids. She's probably already rich enough to not have to work anymore. CEO's suck cash out of all businesses.

    1. Re:Nothing to do with RIAA strategy by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      "life partner" (aka lesbian lover)

      Man... thanks for pointing out that "life partner" means lesbian lover. I did not know that. By the way... what is my favorite color? I don't know the answer to that one either.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
  158. WHOA, wait!!! by hhknighter · · Score: 1

    She is leaving at the end of the year. At the danger of being hated for repeating myself: THere is a danger here knowing that they planned on attacking home end users this year, wouldn't it be possible that something is planned that a step down would result from the action anyways?

    Besides.......
    Would you be surprised when you find out your computer was hacked and a list of files were anonymously sent to *ahem*

  159. What I wonder... by teslatug · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will we have a Thorne after Rosen?

  160. At the end of this year, eh? by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    I wonder if that means 2003 will be the year of the dragon... the fire-breathing version of Rosen that attacks every copyright infringement in sight in order to leave her impression on an already troubled industry.

    I suppose the best we can hope for is that her replacement understands economics.

    1. Re:At the end of this year, eh? by Ric0chet · · Score: 1

      This could actually be more accurate than we think. Interesting that this announcement comes so soon after having won the case against Verizon. (Even though that is still under appeal as far as I know.)

      --


      How you see the world is how the world sees you.
  161. now is our chance!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we could insert a loyalist covertly from the ranks of slashdot and overthrow the riaa once and for all...

  162. Ooops, I misread this as... by vudufixit · · Score: 0, Troll


    "Hilary Rodham steps down"

    Too bad...

    1. Re:Ooops, I misread this as... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's a troll alright. And so is our former First Lady. She and hubby Bill have no clue what humility, decency or modesty are.

  163. Talk about neglecting your core competencies... by bgeer · · Score: 1
    It took RIAA this long to get around to doing a focus group and finding out that 90+% of their customers who know who Hilary Rosen is have "antipathy" toward her?

    The entire business model of the RIAA's members is to focus group lyrics, tunes, logos, and the physical characteristics of their so-called "artists" isn't it? So what took them so long, and why do they care anyway? The average angst-ridden teenage sucker they milk has no idea that anyone other than the purportedly rebellious "artist" whose image..oops album they're buying is getting the money.

    More likely the labels are kicking her out because of her lack of progress, and are taking the opportunity to play the part of good cop in their leaks to the NYT. If you're hoping for a letup in DRM crap because of this, you're dreaming.

  164. hah hah by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Oh yeah, that's funny...the person who killed ten million jews is not as bad as the person who wants to charge you $18.99 for a CD.


    That's slashdot priorities for ya.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:hah hah by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between Jews and people? Hrmmm?? Before you blame him.... take a look at yourself

    2. Re:hah hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll.

      The number bandied about for the total number of casualties in Nazi-German penal/correctional facilities is 6 million. All kinds of people. Not only Jews.

      Of course, that's a horribly inflated figure, fabricated from all deaths and missing persons in German-controlled/occupied areas between 1939 and 1945.

      I agreee that Hitler was a much worse person than Rosen. After all, Rosen never signed any non-aggression treaty with a Communist dictator. Neither did Rosen abuse the Me-262 as a bomber instead of further developing it as a fighter and mass producing it. Also, we haven't seen Rosen delaying attacks against Moscow and hesitating in securing Ukrainian oil fields.

    3. Re:hah hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the difference between Jews and people?

      People don't run the RIAA/MPAA?

  165. Too bad!!! by telstar · · Score: 1

    Too bad it's only January. 343 days and counting.

  166. Anti-karma Post -- Hillary Rosen is NOT the Enemy by bigfatlamer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I should probably post this AC but what the hell.

    I'm no fan of Hillary Rosen's tactics as head of the RIAA. But it should be pointed out that she's the head of a lobbying/representative group. She does the bidding of the CEOs whose companies pony up fat wads of cash for the services of the organization that she heads. In a recent Wired article (which will be online tomorrow according to the website) she said that her job is basically to do all the unpopular shit that the record execs want her to do, while shielding them from the criticism. In other words, she's a paper tiger. Her successor will be one as well. She and the RIAA are doing the bidding of the likes of Sony, Vivendi Universal, AOL-TW and all the others. I don't see anyone giving Sean (Pissy) Coombs a hard time about the RIAA's tactics but he's as culpable (as the head of a label that is an RIAA member) as Hillary Rosen is.

    If you don't like the shit the RIAA is pulling (and you shouldn't), stop buying music from companies that support the RIAA. Of course, after seeing the list here you'll have quite a hard time finding any music to buy.

    BFL

    --
    There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
    --Doug Copland
  167. Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, I know it was meant as a joke, but get a fucking life, will you? Did it ever occur to your /.-addled brain that while you don't like what Rosen did professionally that she might be a terrific parent?

    I can't speak for anyone else here, but I personally have known a lot of people who were first-rate jerks in a professional setting yet were still great parents. So get off your damn high horse.

  168. Dear Hilary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FISTED!!

  169. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had a /. account (/. itself isn't very feasable on a 14.4 modem), I'd mod you up as much as I could.

  170. Don't mistake public pronouncements-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --for private policy. They may say their current revenue slide is due to piracy but you can bet that behind closed doors they know the actual truth--they aren't that dumb after all. It never pays to harass your customers!

  171. OT: Your Sig by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    It's the tram at DisneyWorld.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:OT: Your Sig by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      It's from the monorails actually. :-) For the life of me, I can't ever remember the tram spiels, even though I've been working there for years.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:OT: Your Sig by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's what I meant, I forgot there were trollies (trams) there too, I've never ridden on those.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:OT: Your Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's from the monorails actually. :-) For the life of me, I can't ever remember the tram spiels, even though I've been working there for years.

      For their protection, small children should be seated on the inside of the car. Please keep your arms and legs inside the tram while it is in motion. You are parked in Minnie 46. Driver: All clear.

      sigh. I need to move.

  172. Haha! by rabtech · · Score: 1

    If she stepped down only because she wanted to spend more time with her kids, then I've never traded songs on Kazaa.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  173. The REAL reason why Rosen resigned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is simply a cover up to disguise the real reason why she is leaving - MP3's were found on her laptop. She's claiming she was framed, but ISP records show otherwise. Apparently, Hillary Rosen has a penchant for gangsta rap and militant German speed metal.

  174. Slashdot interview please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wouldn't be surprised if she left simply because she was tired of dealing with them and their lack of vision. I'd love to see what she *really* thinks.

    All the more reason to have a Slashdot interview! Get on it, Taco--imagine what a coup for this site it would be!

  175. TIME TO BRING OUT THE MUNCHKINS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ding Dong
    The wicked BITCH
    The wicked BITCH
    The wicked BITCH
    DING DONG THE WICKED BITCH IS DEAD

    YOU GOTO HELL AND YOU DIE!
    auto262814@hushmail.com

  176. preparre for nothing good.... by TygerFish · · Score: 1

    First off, the piece says that Rosen is leaving, not that she has been or will be:

    a) Immediately and ignomineously fired,

    and...

    b) I also believe she is expected to be leaving at the end of this year. Great news on December 2nd but, indifferent at best in late January.

    I personally don't mind the thought of dancing in the streets over it but as far as we know, the whole reason for her leaving is that she got a really irressistable offer from a headhunter.

    The other shoe that should keep everyone's eyes pointed skyward is the possibility that the cause behind her leaving is that they've found someone who is like her but a smoother liar...;

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    1. Re:preparre for nothing good.... by Guido69 · · Score: 1

      "...but as far as we know, the whole reason for her leaving is that she got a really irressistable offer from a headhunter."

      Yeah, I overheard that call. Something about the Napster name being available and "can't beat 'em, join 'em".

      --
      - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  177. I'm disappointed... by TheShadow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    /. is definately going down hill... 328 comments so far an still no "In Soviet Russia..."

    At least we got the ASCII goatse.cx picture to give us a sense of normalcy.

    --

    --
    "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    1. Re:I'm disappointed... by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      Damn... apparently someone posted it while I was typing.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    2. Re:I'm disappointed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on committing that URL to memory. I bet you pull it out every so often and disguise it under a tiny URL.

  178. Re:first post by archnerd · · Score: 1

    Alright, I'm duly impressed. What's the secret?

  179. Re:I PRESENT TO YOU SIR funny! by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

    "I have to say that your response is so ironically funny, that even though ironically isn't a word"

    Er... "ironically" is a word.

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  180. I am stepping down as head of the RIAA.... by shoemakc · · Score: 1, Funny


    ...in order to fully devote myself to my other passion: Eating starving babies in the Congo.

    Thank You.

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  181. about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good riddance you fucken old piece of snail shit...

    may you rot in hell with all the CD's you claim have been pirated...

  182. Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long live the new RIAA Witch/Warlock/Asswipe!

  183. Re:I PRESENT TO YOU SIR funny! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    "Er... "ironically" is a word."

    Then you have embiggened me.
    Thank you.

  184. Sturgeon's Law by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If such a low percentage or their roster have a tough time selling one million copies, this should be a clue to put more effort into finding better talent.

    The RIAA's bottleneck with respect to talent is called "Sturgeon's Law", which states that "ninety percent of everything is crud." I'd go further and apply Sturgeon's Law twice to performing musicians seeking a recording contract: fewer than 10 percent of artists are not-crud enough to land a record deal, and fewer than 10 percent of those are not-crud enough to move enough units to recoup costs.

    Not every record published will sell a million copies. Labels published about 27,000 new recordings in 2001. Compare with 906.6 million CDs shipped, and the mean album in 2001 sold only about 33,600 units.

    Though not all americans have musical talent, there are still 250 million americans and only 100 slots on the Billboard pop chart. What are your odds of making it big?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  185. Payola by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If production cost so much

    The cost of a record isn't production as much as promotion. The most effective way to promote your record is to buy a four-minute ad spot on radio stations in most major metro markets. Last time I checked, only the major labels had the infrastructure and the cash reserves to afford that.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  186. Quality of food Mk II by Kragg · · Score: 1

    an excellent analogy for making the exact opposite point you're trying to make.

    McDonald's sell burgers for $99 because they're mass produced turgid crap, much like the RIAA's marketing-driven sewage.

    Buying a burger, bun and cheese from a supermarket and making that burger yourself costs.... oh, about the same.

    But McDonalds can still turn a profit by exploiting economies of scale, something that the recording labels should perhaps look into.

    --
    If you can't see this, click here to enable sigs.
    1. Re:Quality of food Mk II by Yagotta+B.+Kidding · · Score: 1

      Now if McDonald's really did sell burgers for $99 ... that'd be like the RIAA ;)

  187. Correction: Ding Dong The Bitch Is Dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HaHa HaHa HaHa HaHa HaHa HaHa!!!!!

  188. I think you shot the messenger. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to think we've just hit a cultural sinkhole or somthing. We've got this conservative, suburban, anal-retentive 50s-esque decade going here, only this time the black people aren't opressed enough to write any good music. Punk has the potential to come back, but they've gotten so caught up in the look that they're too mainstream to keep their anger going.

    Osama could have produced some great music. After 9-11 all the music guys were all so fucking excited that pop would die and we'd have the 60s all over again, but our attention span was so fucked that Laden sat in a cave for 3 months and we forgot all about him.

    There's no conflict or anything. I'm thinking maybe by 2010 anti-corporatism will kick up a little, some insurance company reception areas will get firebombed, and we'll maybe get some decent art out of the whole deal.

    It's not just music. Movies are losing it, books are coasting but slacking off, even games are just upgrades on older releases. I think I'll be able to tolerate whatever social unrest's gonna end up knocking us out of this comfortable slump if I'll be able to see movies without feeling embarassed for the filmmakers.

  189. Re:first post by S_Jamessmith · · Score: 1

    YAYAYAY!!!! and you know all of us are happy she is stepping down but we should be even more worried about what they might have next to represent the beast. she was evil, but qwho might be satans replacement?

  190. You know... by Peterus7 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They're trying to soften their image, trying to let people see the softer side of the RIAA, eh?

    Well, I feel that the replacement may look like a friendly santa claus, but under that nice smile and family friendly approach hides a demon.

    Think about it, if they soften their image, people will listen to them and let them get away with more wheeling and dealing away from the limelight. Netizens, do not lose your vigil! The face may change, but the mind is still the same!

    That, or they could just spawn someone just as bad as her.

  191. yeah but... by GePS · · Score: 1

    ...posters will be able to flame RIAA, hammer home the blandness of mainstream music offerings and blame Canada in a single post!

    That's nice, but how am I going to say that in soviet Russia, posting flaming canadians hammer home the lameness of YOU!



    Oi, moderators, this is not meant to insult the parent. Go easy with those flamebait mods.

  192. And now our new theme song...... by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    Hit the road Jack, and don't ya come back no more no more no more...

  193. Family? by x136 · · Score: 1
    "But, I have young children and I want to devote more of my time to them. This has been an extremely difficult decision but I know it is the right one for my family."

    So... Did she adopt, or eat her husband?
    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:Family? by krinsh · · Score: 1

      I believe she and her 'partner' adopted or one of them was artificially inseminated. Wired did a puff piece on her in their most recent magazine.

      My take on the matter is that if you chose to lead an organization that is reviled by the general public; then you are tainted by its policies and vision (or lack thereof). I will hold to that until I see her new venture. I'm also very surprised that other activist groups - her fellow lesbians for example - haven't risen up in her defense as they tend to do for purportedly persecuted individuals. I'm still surprised that someone with such obvious liberal leanings would work for such apparently conservative executives.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  194. time? by wolf- · · Score: 1

    At the "end of this year". Um, its only January. Dont get excited about it, she still has 11 months left to put the world through hell.

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  195. lost weight...feel great by LegendOfLink · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like the RIAA just lost 200 pounds of ugly fat...too bad they still need to lose about a thousand more.

    Hey Hilary, I'll save you a spot in the unemployment line, bitch.

    1. Re:lost weight...feel great by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I doubt she needs to collect unemployment for awhile. She got paid around $1mil US per year for being the spokeslesbian for the RIAA.

      You'll be lucky if she stops her Mercedes long enough for you to ask her for a dollar. ;)

  196. joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old man comes up to RIAA headquaters lobby.

    Security: Sir, can I help you?

    Old man: I want to talk with Hilary Rosen!

    Security: Sir, Hilary Rosen doesn't work here anymore.

    The old man turns and leaves. The next day the old man comes back to RIAA headquarters lobby.

    Security: Sir, can I help you?

    Old man: I want to talk with Hillary Rosen!

    Security: Sir, I told you yesterday that Hillary Rosen doesn't work here anymore.

    The old man turns and leaves. The next day the old man comes back to RIAA headquarters lobby.

    Old man: I want to talk with Hilary Rosen!

    Security: Sir, I already told you before that Hilary Rosen doesn't work here anymore!! Do you understand that?

    Old man: I sure do, but I just like to hear you say it.

  197. Better the enemy you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then the enemy you do not.

  198. RIAA SITE HACKED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we know that this wasn't just put up by some 1337 Script Kiddie.

  199. Re:keep calling her the outgoing president of RIAA by datadictator · · Score: 1

    Well what can we say ?
    Ding dong the witch is dead
    Which old witch ?
    the wicked old witch !!!
    Ding dong the witch is dead the witch is dead....

  200. once again...so what! by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This doesnt matter for many, many reasons. Yes this woman has been irritating, but she is just a representative of a larger industry. The RIAA is just a lobbying body, the real problem is the member labels that support this crap, not the RIAA. You can block the RIAA IP's all you want, but what about the hundreds and hundreds of member labels...did you remember to block them too? And dont forget the sister org of the RIAA which has gotten some press here on slashdot recently, the IFPI. Ha! And you thought the RIAA was the problem all this time. Just remember the concept of 'lightning rod' here.

    If you doubt any of what Im saying, and your halfway competent, dig into it a little deeper instead of going with the quick and visible enemy. Sooner or later, you will realize that the RIAA website is just a 'honeypot'. I mean come on, nobody is as stupid to do what they have done, and leave it that way after its been hacked for months...you say I am making this up...oh no...look at this security hole wide enough to fly the whole planet through. This problem has been exploited at least twice now to deface the page in recent months and nothing has been done to make it even the slightest bit better. All though as I test these links, the whole site seems to be down yet again. I cant imagine how that happened.

  201. Re:keep calling her the outgoing president of RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the RIAA's credibility in the eyes of the world surely will be denied by posts on Slashdot.

  202. Not Soon Enough by shadowxtc · · Score: 1

    At the end of the year? Come on, it's a trick.

  203. Shocking attachment to a First Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Album sales declined for the second straight year in 2002, down 10.7 percent from the previous year." Quoted from the NYT article. Duh, when was the last time you bought an album??? Jeeze, get the terms correct. Music, generic, sales would have been better. Too bad the music out there that is pushed by the labels sucks so hard. I might be tempted to buy a few CD's...(records? Vinyl is dissappearing everywhere) DB

  204. Elvis Costello said it best by Cally · · Score: 1
    I am irresistably reminded by a happy song by that master of melody, Elvis Costello. Originally this was about Margaret Thatcher, but somehow I think it applies to Hilary too.


    "Well I hope you live long now, I pray the Lord your soul to keep
    I think I'll be going before we fold our arms and start to weep
    I never thought for a moment that human life could be so cheap
    'Cos when they finally put you in the ground
    They'll stand there laughing and tramp the dirt down"

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  205. And Somewhere, Off In The Distance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...The Hallilujia Chorus is heard....

  206. DMCA by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Yeah. And don't forget that your so called "genitals" are circumvention devices illegal under the DMCA

  207. Satan missing the devil by drkich · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this statement: ``Hilary has been a valiant, brave leader for the U.S. music industry,'' said Jack Valenti, president and chief executive of the Motion Picture Association of America. strike you as the Satan saying he will miss the devil when she is gone?

  208. Huh? by Craig3010 · · Score: 1

    "many of whom viewed the RIAA -- and Rosen personally -- with antipathy over incessant pressure for crackdowns on sharing digital music over the Internet" The term BITCH always came to my mind, does this mean the same thing?

  209. Re:Profit by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

    I have absolutely no problem with people/companies I deal with making a profit. However, charging $15+ for an audio CD is not "making a profit", it's "gouging the customer". This is like every auto company teaming up to buy laws to make changing your own oil illegal and then charging $100 for them to do it.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  210. New head of RIAA? My bet's on Cary Sherman by egoff · · Score: 1

    Clearly, Cary Sherman will be the new chief. The press release is all there. Rosen said: "The Board will be conducting a formal search for my replacement over the next several months and we are confident of a smooth transition. I believe that the RIAA staff is simply the best in the business and I am proud of the team we have built. "Cary Sherman will remain in his current position as RIAA President and the Board and I have asked him to serve on the search committee," concluded Rosen. Why even bother to point out he's on the search committee unless he'll head it up? After all, Dick Cheney headed up Bush II vice presidential committee during the 2000 election. Here's the appropriate links: Picture of Smiling Sherman Interview with Mr. Sherman and the /. comments on said interview Looks like Mr. Sherman will as head of the RIAA will not lead to anything different at the RIAA, except, perhaps many more tesosterone induced lawsuits.

  211. End of the year? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Let's see, by saying she's leaving now they gain the publicity they want and put a "softer" face on the organization. By making it effective at the end of the year, they get to continue the very behavior that got them the bad publicity in the first place. If anyone throws up signals they can say, "Hey, we're getting rid of her this year!" >

  212. Personal reasons... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    "Rosen cited personal reasons for leaving the Recording Industry Association of America, where she has served as chief executive since 1998."

    Yeah, She had to find a proctologist to have a boot removed.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  213. Still has 11 months by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    Not to pop anyone's bubble but she still has 11 months to continue to mess with society. Queue's up the "munchkins" "Ding dong..." (You know the rest)

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  214. They Just Don't Get It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The recording industry also has been promoting its own, for-fee online music services, but consumers have largely rejected them because of usage restrictions and limited selections.

    See where it says "usage restrictions?" Put every artist, album, and song that each distributor has the rights to on their service. Charge me $1.00 per song, or give me a discount for an entire album (say, $10.00 for a CD), and let me download it quickly, in both high-quality .MP3 and .WAV format, and as part of my purchase, I receive the right to copy those songs into any media I wish, without limit, for my own personal use. Oddly, I already have this right with normal CDs, but I'm willing to pay the industry for my music rather than steal it off the Internet. My problem is that I don't want to pay the same price for CDs that I can't burn into MP3 to listen to on my Powerbook, copy to another CD to keep in my car, and rip/mix/burn CDs of my favorite songs. I am accustomed to not only having this right, but exercising it frequently. Why on earth they're SPENDING MONEY that we gave them to lower the value of their products, I can't imagine.

    Imagine if Honda decided to install speed governers and GPS receivers in their vehicles that refused to let you go over the speed limit depending on where you were. It's to prevent you from breaking the law! Garbage. No (normal) business would actively lobby for legislation that reduces the value of their product and waste R&D dollars towards the same end. This is why the content distributors need to get with the time. The more they push, the people hear about it and get angry.

    I don't think most of us have any delusions of entitlement to free movies and music. But we do know that $15 is too much for a CD, especially considering the complete lack of innovation or talent in music over the last few years. We got away from New Kids On the Block and the industry invested heavily in fresh new sounds, which was probably incorporated and dried out, and now Pearl Jam is easy listening for thirtysomethings. Now the industry is investing in boy bands, slutty skinny blonde chicks that can't sing, and we're just encouraging more of it with shlock like American Idol.

    Is it any wonder that sensible consumers aren't cooperating?

  215. By-By Hilary... by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

    ... Don't let the door pinch you on your FAT ASS on the way out!!! :-)

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
  216. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Hilary Rosen is leaving the RIAA, she will have more time to work in porno. By the way, did anyone else see her S&M bondage pictorial on the net? I think that was Jack Valenti in the gimp mask.

  217. A few figures by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    The box office data for Signs shows that it cost USD $64 million to make and to date has made USD $390 million (or more, depending on how you interpret the figures) at the box office alone. Now, you'll be aware that movie theatres make minimal profit on the tickets; all their money comes from concessions. Signs probably made about USD $300 million gross profit for the distributors. I'm not making a point here, just clarifying.

    The average album sells 33,600 copies. At about $15 retail cost, that's USD $0.5 million, give or take, per album. Wow, that's a lot, eh?

    Well, it is until you think how many people it takes to write, score, perform, record, edit, manufacture, distribute and market that album. Now, theoretically, one artist could do all of that themselves, but how much would Joe Unknown have to spend on marketing to rake in half a million bucks of sales?

    Think of it this way. Every time some mall rat pays $15 for "Shake My Titties One More Time", it pays for the loss the record company takes on the special interest $15 Cajun folk album sitting next to it, or a Bach album, or a spoken word reading.

    Frankly I'm delighted that mall rats keep paying enough so that special interest recordings can be made. More power to the pimply faced ones and their herd instinct, says I.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:A few figures by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Uh, except that the companies that put out the special interest records (Rhino, Folkways) ARE NOT the same companies that put out the crappy pop music...

      The major labels have their heads so far up there ass that they drop musicians like Paul Westerberg because his records "only" sell 200,000 copies.

      To me, that's crazy. Why drop an artist who consistantly sells hundreds of thousands of copies of their releases? The answer is that the big companies are so bloated that they actually can't make money on a release that "small".

      However, this doesn't mean that no one can. A smaller, indie label (doghouse? vagrant? I can't recall) snapped Mr. Westerberg up and made a nice sum of money releasing his latest record, proving that you can release records by smaller artists and do very well if, and this is key, you run your business correctly.

      I read an interview with Westerberg where he said he was very happy he got dropped because he manages to sell about the same amount of records with a lower marketing budget and way more royalties for him.

    2. Re:A few figures by rmdyer · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the cost info in this thread, it really emphasizes the point I am trying to make, even though you've basically stated that the average artists makes nothing.

      Look, I'm a full blooded american, I certainly believe companies should be able to make a profit on their products. In the spirit of taking, companies should be able to make "a lot of money". But, I have a real problem with companies going way too far beyond what I feel is "realistic pricing" for products. When you've gone beyond double the cost of producing the product, you've really got to think that something is just plain wrong. I'm not advocating some socialist point of view. I'm only saying that at some point it is benificial, or even philanthropic to price your products at a level at which many people can afford them, and provide your company with a nice cozy return on investment. Pricing things high just so you can live your life with a certain lifestyle is plain greedy and is probably what is wrong with most capitalist countries.

      Also, remmember one thing, the number of people on the planet that can potentially purchase CDs goes up every day. Due to that, a single point of sales doesn't need high prices to justify a great profit, it is going to happen anyway as a result of the low cost of the plastic disk.

      Due to the prices on CDs, the record companies are alienating me from many potentially new varieties of enjoyable music, or music that I like but can't see the value in buying. That means that the companies are "pricing me out" of sales of music that I might try if prices were lower. As it is, I really can't afford to buy any "if'y" music, I have to purchase only the music that I really really go "jones'ing" for.

      I'm not exactly poor. I make a reasonable salary at my job. I just want to get value for the little plastic disks that I am purchasing.

      If the music industry was seen as a company as a whole then maybe losses on poorly selling specialty albums could be spread throughout the company. The act of selling those specialty albums at the same cost as great selling albums would be seen as a positive aspect of the company.

      As things are the music industry is about ready to really "rake in the dough". Due to the internet, if you can purchase and download entire albums of mp3'd music, then they are just shooting you bits. They don't even have to buy materials to make the product. I'm sure in that respect they "love the internet".

      If the music industry falls, because they can't reduce prices, because they would lost profit, then you might say we are all doomed. We've stretched the american dollar as far as it will stretch without tearing. If the dollar tears it is over.

      Can I say anymore? Gosh, I LOVE MUSIC! The fact that I just can't afford it really really bites. I would love to go into any Media Play and purchase 2 or 3 albums a week for $4.99. BUT I CAN'T! I JUST CAN'T SEEM TO GET PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT PRICES ARE TOO HIGH!

      Please, please, please lower the cost of CD's so that people can really start buying them again. You won't lose money, you will actually make more money, I promise!

      My 2 cents.

    3. Re:A few figures by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      OK, good retort, I rather lost my way at the end there. However, there will be a limited amount of cross-pollination in the production chain, with some of the mad money from "Shake My Titties" filtering through to indie labels, even if it's only in the form of keeping a recording studio open for them to use, or driving down the cost of their own recording gear through economies-of-scale manufacturing.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  218. You're a dumbass` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >And you only ever listen to an album once? No wonder you think they're overpriced.

    The usage the BUYER does with the goods/medias has nothing to do with the price it should sell for. This is like saying The Matrix DVD was underpriced because we all watched it at least 10 times or more. By your opinion that DVD should've cost 200$US, not 20$US.

    Also In your opinion, people buying cars to be used as TAXIS should pay about 10 times more for their cars because they'll use them all day long?

  219. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no dancing in the aisles.

  220. I like this... by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

    Companies who know they have control of their consumers have no need or desire to "soften" their image for fear of losing a market segment. They're afraid. They're beginning to see that their bullying scare tactics and slimy business practices aren't as effective as Microsoft's. They're pissing off ALOT of people, and they simply aren't as important as they think they are.....and I think they're finally starting to get frightened. The good ol days of juicing the public are gone.

  221. Proposed song list for the goodbye party. by sik+puppy · · Score: 1


    Elton John - The bitch is back
    Anthrax - Starting up a posse

    anyone else have some apropriate music to say goodbye to that #$%^ ?

    the songs should of course be downloaded off kazaa etc, just for that extra little bite

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  222. Discount Beast by vizualizr · · Score: 3, Funny

    This weekend at walmart, we're rolling back prices. Look at this example;

    The Beast - was $665.95

    Now $665.93

    Always the lowest prices on the brands you trust. Always.

    --
    anything i tell you will cloud your opinion.
  223. Hilary Rosen = Lesbian.....with chidren? by copperhead035 · · Score: 1

    Turns out she and her "partner", Elizabeth Birch, adopted twins back in '99. http://www.datalounge.com/datalounge/news/record.h tml?record=3818

  224. Re:Profit by n3uxf · · Score: 1

    THe stores are only making a couple of dollars on the cd. You have to factor in the cost of the goods/raw materials to make the cd and the equipment, the cost of packaging the cd, the cost of shipping the cd, the cost of advertising. I know there is much more to look at factoring in the cost, but I am not an economic type person. They would be able to tell you more details about. The cost is always passed back to the consumer.

  225. Re:Interview? T-shirts? IPOD! by VivianC · · Score: 1

    Forget a cheap T-shirt. Let's all chip in and get her an IPOD filled with MP3s of bands who have released their music in MP3 form. We can include major label talent like Wilco and unsigned acts like Phantom Stranger and HEX. Fill it up with your favorites from MP3.com or any other site that you like. Just make sure that they are all legal MP3s.

    In fact, let's get two: One for Hillary and one for whoever replaces her. Then they can no longer claim ignorance of all the music out there that is legal to share.

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
  226. Soften their image? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Why would they need to soften their image? I mean, all they did was try repeatedly to get bills enacted that would let them legally preform acts of cyber-terrorism, and on a couple occasions, take responsibility for acts of cyber-terrorism against thousands(if not millions) of p2p users(or threaten it), and give the middle finger to owners of modern CD players and those who actually listen to music on their PCs.

    I mean, any softer, and they might not want to take the law into their own hands! :P

    --
    It's been a long time.
  227. Buy the products of the artists you believe in by MSenhanced · · Score: 1

    Basically, when it comes right down to it. The big bucks that people shell out is for an image..that's what media live and breathes under..that's why they have over-priced CDs and when when people download "their" music, they see it as profit-loss of the image they hyped up. They don't see it as a fair reaction.. they see it as more of user taking advantage of (violating) them.. I dono't think prices will go down for "image" CDs since teenage preppy girls go for that shit.. but I think most "non-image" bands welcome the exposure of users downloading theirs music, as long as they can get reasonable profit from other areas of business.. so it all depends on who you want to support and give your money to.. within that.. that will make things change.. because the RIAA will always support the artists that bring in the money.. but I think some artists are more fair to their listeners than others.. For Me, the choice is clear.. support the artists you believe in.. buy their shit.. and to the rest of the "Hip gangsta wannabe's", download their shit. I think that's a balanced solution to the problem.

    --
    I write sig's like I know what I'm talking about.
  228. Re:Profit by joshsisk · · Score: 1

    I run a small record label. I mostly do vinyl, but have two CD releases in the works. Both will be runs of 1000, with full color packaging, jewel cases, etc. These are professionaly duplicated CDs, not CD-Rs. The cost to me? About $2.50 per CD, with shipping included.

    I'm not factoring recording costs in here, but if you are a major label and making 500,000 cds of a release, you can factor in a $1 million recording budget and still get a cost of less than $5. per piece.

    Then you have to take into account that if they make 500,000 copies, the physical costs will be much less than the $2.50 I'm paying for only 1000 copies.

    Any way you look at it, CDs are overpriced.

  229. what kinda music? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Might be interested.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  230. Looks like she already has one by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    See here. But then again, it's probably Wired's.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
    1. Re:Looks like she already has one by jred · · Score: 1

      It's hers:

      Hilary Rosen would prefer it if the world's youth didn't think she was hopelessly uncool. She has an iPod. She counts both Al and Tipper Gore, as well as the rapper Chuck D, among her close friends. She helped found Rock the Vote, for God's sake.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  231. We don't know diddly about Hillary. by yAm · · Score: 1

    She's the head of a cartel, sorta like the Bud Selig is the head of pro baseball. Yeah, she's one of 'em, but think of it this way, she's riding herd on some of the greediest bastard companies on the planet. Would you want the job of dealing with greedy, ignorant, technophobe lawyer-accountant creatures? A whole room full of them?

    I sure as hell don't.

    The music industry used to be lead by quirky, single-minded folk, people that acutally had a clue about music. That's all but changed now. Now you've got lawyers and accountants deciding what is good for the music company. These are a collection of people that are so used to "the way we do things" that they are virtually incapable of doing anything different.

    So, since these people don't know any different, they have hired a spokesperson to be a front for them. We don't really know what Hillary thinks, but with constant exposure to the toxic atmosphere at the level she's working at, perhaps some of it has changed her. I'm not saying that she's innocent, not at all, but remember this, she's the head of a consortium. There are many different opinions and we don't know what the discussions are about, just what is finally decided.

    She could have been a voice that reasoned for change in the industry and is stepping down because of disgust (good for you, write up a tell-all!), or she was forced out because her ideas were unpopular -- either not strict enough (God help the music-buying public), or too strict (there be the winds of change a-blowin', good for us).

    I want to see who they pick as a replacement to see what is going on in the heads behind the mouth. Then we'll learn something. Until then, don't be too quick to cheer her departure.

    --

    Chris

    So Buddha walks into a pizza parlor and says: "Hey, make me one with everything."

  232. News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news, the RIAA has announced that Jack Valenti will assume the position of president as of January 2004...

  233. Quote from interview by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

    When asked to confirm the rumors that she was stepping down as CEO of the RIAA, the Dark Lord gave this statement:

    "Yes, it is true. I am afraid things have been slipping during my five year hiatus from hell. The angels of darkness I left in charge are becoming soft. Plus, I have a lot of work to do to prepare the place...with all of these spammers popping up, we have been experiencing an overpopulation crisis. On a personal level, I believe I need to spend more time with my fiancee. She has needed my support during this whole IMClone scandal, and frankly, I haven't been there for her as I should have. I ask my loyal worshippers to not lose heart. Once I have placed my dominion back in order, I will continue my mission of the destruction of popular music and the harvesting of your mortal souls. Thank you."

    --
    Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
  234. Re:Profit by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    THe stores are only making a couple of dollars on the cd. You have to factor in the cost... The cost is always passed back to the consumer.

    So?

    Look, if the only way to break even (or make a decent profit) is to raise the prices above what the customer thinks is reasonable, then the proper thing to do is go out of business. The proper thing is not to whine about how much it costs to sell your product, in the hopes that the consumer will give you bonus sympathy dollars, instead of saving their money and getting better goods and services for lower prices elsewhere.

    Not to mention the fact that DVDs cost just as much to manufacture and distribute, and the content costs several orders of magnitude more to produce... by your reasoning, Black Hawk Down should cost five or six times more than the its own soundtrack, instead of almost exactly the same price.

    But my first point is so important that I'm going to repeat it: if you can't sell a product at a price that people will pay, get out of the business.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  235. Usage IS a factor in a buying decision... by PCBman! · · Score: 1

    As far as a consumer is concerned, usage is a factor in the value of an item. I get many more hours of entertainment out of a DVD then I EVER have out of a CD, after all, how long can you listen to the best 3 to 5 songs on a CD 'fore you're done.

    At least with a DVD, I get ~2 hours of enjoyment everytime I open it up and watch it, or flip through the specials, or read a translator's notes and see if I catch any new meaning behind the movie from the notes.

    Even when buying a game, I consider hours of gameplay and replayability. There are some games where you just want to beat them once and that's that, there are others that you can replay over and over and the enjoyment doesn't quite go away. Sure it diminishes over time, but I've always gone back to my favorites in 6 months to a year to feed the addiction, as light as it is.

    --
    So, when's lunch?
  236. Re:Profit by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    You want it done fast, or you want it done right? :P

    --
    It's been a long time.
  237. MOD PARENT UP [INFORMATIVE] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wished I'd known this a long time ago. I would have had much more fun!

  238. funnier if you... by PCBman! · · Score: 1

    It'd be funnier if you tried to get them patented and the USPTO actually gave you a patent for 'discovering' your own genes. Even I have to think patent examiners aren't THAT idiotic--although I'm afraid they might not be that far off.

    --
    So, when's lunch?
  239. Re:Anti-karma Post -- Hillary Rosen is NOT the Ene by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Of course, after seeing the list here you'll have quite a hard time finding any music to buy.

    Bullshit.

    There's thousands and thousands of non-RIAA CDs released each and every year. You just have to look a little harder to find them.

    I recommend CD Baby as a starting point.

  240. Further Off Track by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    "driving down the cost of their own recording gear through economies-of-scale manufacturing."

    Obviously you're not in the business. Pro audio is a small-market to begin with and I'm not talking about DAW's exclusively. There is no economy of scale because the scale is so minute that the companies only reason for existence is the prices they charge for basically custom equipment.

    That said, as technology marches onward, the cost of professional recording has fallen substantially with the development of cost-effective and powerful DAW's. But they are just one piece of the puzzle.

    1. Re:Further Off Track by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Point taken again. I'd be interested to see a decent study into how much crossover there is between big and small labels, that includes both hardware and wetware, e.g. recording and editing studios, the techies to run them, session performers, CD pressing plants, the whole works. Know of anything like that?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  241. AH HA! An RIAA austroturffer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a hillary supporter at that!

    Just kidding.

    Seriously, they may have been a pupet, but it doesn't do much to change the fact that they are responsible for a lot of what they said and the actions they took.

    If this was the case where they really didn't belive these thing, they probably would have quit a lot sooner. But they didn't, they continued this war on piracy and spewing their madness. Even though a lot of us knew that they where just a figure pice pushing the coperations agenda, they are still responsible for what they said and have done.

  242. OT: YOUR Sig by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
    Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.

    You know, I'm glad someone else was thinking this. I busted out laughing in LOTR when he was onscreen.

    There was a part in LOTR where he even _sounded_ like he did in the Matrix. It kinda ruined the movie mood for me...

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  243. You missed a few points. by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    First off, duplicating a movie and distributing it to the theaters is actually quite expensive. (This is one of the big points behind going digital.) Also, the movie companies are shelling out big bucks to get all of those TV commercials. Not to mention those press junkets that they host. It would be interesting to see how well they actually do on recouping their money. (Look at those movies where they have to pay $10 Million + to get the big star PLUS residuals.)

    Additionally, most DVD's come with a lot of extra content on them. This content has to be created for the DVD so there's a cost related there. Also, we all know that a bad transfer can ruin a good movie so it's not a mere "slap" it down.

    Finally, I don't see people like Julia Roberts or Mel Gibson having their residuals charged to cover all the expenses of making the movie.

    It's probably really difficult to compare the cost of movie making to the cost of music making. Especially when it comes down to the price you pay for the CD or DVD.

    The big thing is the perceived value you're getting for the money that you plunk down. That $20 gets you an entire movie and bunches of extras. That $16 gets you a CD with maybe two good tracks and a lot of filler.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  244. Good For Her by artsygeek · · Score: 1

    Maybe now she can do work in issues that are personally salient. Perhaps she can, once she distances herself from RIAA, become a voice for sexual minorities issues, or work in the campaign for a Democrat candidate for president, or begin work in things like Rock The Vote (which she co-founded). This will allow her to not be considered the embodiment of evil amongst younger folks and keep her from being the William Jennings "Cross of Gold" Bryan of the music industry in the history books.

  245. Re:Anti-karma Post -- Hillary Rosen is NOT the Ene by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

    Sweet! Barsuk isn't on there. We can still support Death Cab for Cutie. And DeSoto's not there either - the Dismemberment Plan is fine, too.

    Unfortunately, Built to Spill is out.. Jimmy Eat World is out.. R.E.M. and Radiohead are, obviously, no good. No Flaming Lips, either.

    Oh well, for now I'll stick with Death and Dismemberment - and you know, there are some really awesome amateur, totally free cuts floating around the 'net if you have the patience to look.

    --
    "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
  246. Re:Profit by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    ...but I am not an economic type person...

    Which is good because otherwise you would have remembered that the RIAA just got busted for price gauging.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  247. Adopt, she is a dyke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  248. WTF2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now /. is using %ages!
    10% Offtopic, 10% Flamebait, 40% Funny.
    Shit, this doesn't look good.

    1. Re:WTF2! by CmdrTaco+(1) · · Score: 0

      Heh! Looks like Taco's maths is as good as his spelling.

  249. You're Fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I finally convince the idiot record companies that they have to offer a product to compete with pirates, and now the publishers won't make a deal," she said, throwing up her hands. "They'd rather we shoot at each other until we're both dead. It's always one step forward and two steps back."

    Bet it was this quote that got her shown the door -- from her million dollar per year job.

    Hahahahaha bitch.

  250. Re:I PRESENT TO YOU SIR funny! by svferris · · Score: 1

    Er... "ironically" is a word.

    How ironic.

  251. Me Too. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    I WAS going to post something along those lines; You got there first.

    They havent had an original thought in a while; I bought the last couple of albums (before they came out against Napster) just on their name. They were a rehash, and BS.

    Haven't bought any of their shit since then, and wont.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  252. Re:Profit by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
    Not to mention the fact that DVDs cost just as much to manufacture and distribute, and the content costs several orders of magnitude more to produce... by your reasoning,

    I think that, yes, this is EXACTLY what he's saying...

    If $5 is a fair price for a CD, $25 ($5 x 5) is a fair price for a movie.

    DVDs already cost about this much at the store anyway, so I don't see the problem. Of course, if the MPAA decided to follow this strategy they'd probably raise their prices to be five times current CD prices rather than five times the fair price for a CD.
    --
    Who did what now?
  253. Re:Profit by susano_otter · · Score: 1
    See, I thought he was saying that $17 is a fair price for a CD. Which raises the question: If $17 covers the cost of the content, the cost of the media, the cost of distribution, and a reasonable profit margin for a CD, then why don't DVDs go for about $100 each, since the media, distribution, and profit margin costs all stay roughly the same, but the content cost is much higher?

    It seems much more reasonable to assume that the MPAA has inadvertently stumbled upon a sane price-to-performance ratio, while the RIAA is apparently afflicted by some sort of bizarre space madness.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  254. Hillary Rosen moves on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe she is retiring so she can get laid.
    She seems like she hasn't gotten some in a long time. (or is it just chronic PMS?)

  255. Just announced: by erik_fredricks · · Score: 1
    Rosen's replacement will be none other than Janet Reno!

    ...hey, at least she dances better than Steve Ballmer.

    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

  256. Independent radio stations by TMB · · Score: 1

    I dj at a local independent radio station, and I can attest that they're not money-grubbing whores. And yes, the djs do it for free. I only play my own records, but in fact the station spends very little on new music because they get promo copies of everything plus people donate collections to them when they die (the fans are very devoted to the station). The funding comes in roughly equal parts from (a) public grants, (b) sponsors, and (c) listener donations.

    [TMB]

  257. Re:Anti-karma Post -- Hillary Rosen is NOT the Ene by bigfatlamer · · Score: 1

    There's thousands and thousands of non-RIAA CDs released each and every year. You just have to look a little harder to find them.

    Actually I totally agree with you. I've even made a couple of purchases at cdbaby (horrible service and mollasses slow shipping but great selection). I was actually just amazed at how many members they did have and who some of them were. I mean, Nettwerk is the home of a number of anti-corporate indie bands. And Grateful Dead Records (and Rhino which is distributing a fair amount of Dead stuff)? That band (though I despise them) practically invented music swapping.

    FWIW, of the last dozen or so CDs I've bought, of the labels that put out those albums Yep Roc Records (Mayflies USA, The Sadies and The Bigger Lovers), Secretly Canadian (Songs:Ohia), New West (2 Slobberbone records), KimChee Records (Cordelia's Dad and PeeWee Fist), Undertow Music (Jay Bennett/Ed Burch and Centro-matic/Will Johnson/South San Gabrie) and as another poster mentioned, Barsuk records, non are RIAA members. But the vast majority of people (including Slashdotters) will likely not go any further than the top 25 rack at the local Tower Records and won't be interested in any bands that they haven't heard 2000 times on their local Clear Channel owned "alternative rock" station. That said, at least they can buy the White Stripes... Sympathy For The Record Industry isn't a member either.

    BFL

    --
    There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
    --Doug Copland
  258. YOU FAIL IT!!! by dagg · · Score: 1

    last post (mine)

    --
    Sex - Find It