Government is obviously still the bedroom if it is going to mail out checks to reward sustained homosexual activity like it rewarded regular heterosexuality
Since when are "liberals" against rich people being taxed more? Yeah, let's look at the actual case: a woman who already got alimony and social security from her ex-husband, and then hooked up with an heiress complaining about how unfair she is being treated...
The state was trying to incentive breeding pairs to grow the population, but fine, let's tax all widows equally: single "undocumented" mothers are after all the foundation American was built on.
You're seriously claiming that intelligence has nothing to do with genetics? I guess believing that you are retarded because your mom dropped you on your head as a baby is better than accepting that you are a retard from a long line of retards who was also dropped as a baby.
If a drone is monitoring a private residence or business or following someone to one I think a warrant ought to be required (subject to the normal hot pursuit exceptions). But if you're monitoring some public area, no big deal.
Public areas are bounded by businesses and private residences, so I don't really see the distinction. Drone sees all. Might come into play if you own a lot of acres, but a court ruled that cops can even install cameras on larger land holdings without a warrant. Strange how privacy was supposed to be a restriction on the government, but it ended being a restriction on us.
Anyway, this is a relief, I've been following you around for the past 6 months, and was starting to feel guilty, but now I know it's OK... as long as I stop sleeping under your bed (though it obviously doesn't bother you so what's the problem?!).
Judging by women's magazines, women like looking at pretty women too. There also an element of schadenfreude, criticizing celebrities' "plastic surgery" and "anorexia", playing to women's envy. Which is what is really going on here. The women aren't demanding the addition of "booth studs" or appearances by Justin Bieber, they want the women who look better than them to lose their jobs.
You only have to take a look at which elements of the political spectrum the Nazis preferred to murder: Communists, anarchists, social democrats, liberals, Christians
Socialists are famous for liquidating rival factions. Who would Obama rather have seen dead in 2008, Hilary or McCain?
If they drink adult beverages does that also make them adults? In fact I think babies are entitled to vote since they are already sucking on titties. Probably get more titty than Obama, so they should also be eligible to run for President.
Maybe they don't use telephones or computers? Most of these government officials who assure us it's no big deal for them to read our emails or listen to our calls have staffers or other intermediaries handle all communications to set up face-to-face meetings.
The good news is that in another ten years or so the politicians will start to be replaced by people that grew up with the Internet, that understand it better and that will at least have a grasp of the pragmatic realities involved.
I wouldn't rely on internet dwellers to have a sense of perspective. Soon we'll probably be able to call 911 to have police dispatched when we read a mean facebook comment.
Let's all think that we are fated to be losers, and beg for some table scraps from our betters, while imagining that we are sticking them up. And we'll vote for open borders, bigger government, and gay marriage, because that's the only way scum like us can get ahead in this world!
The government also seizes property, and will presumably also take your Bitcoins, so I don't see the difference, except that unlike dollars, Bitcoins would be worth stealing.
You can't have a civilized government without the potential for armed mass resistance. You think you are an "adult" negotiating with a government that has all the power? No, you do what it says, because it says so. All you Europeans can do is riot like children throwing a tantrum, and riots are quickly pacified by Daddy Government's firm hand.
And government has a simple tool as well: a life sentence (or execution) for anyone who defends their life. Imprisonment for anyone engaging in free action.
If it was just about killing, they could have killed more than one guy. The Western powers are indeed waging a war against Islamism on a global scale, so anyone subscribing to that ideology has to be a militant.
Don't give Obama any ideas. He'd could wipe the weapons to render them inoperable so a small handpicked force supplemented by regulars from Latin America could liquidate units loyal to the USA.
The most common thread in criminals, particularly murderers, is poor impulse control and emotional volatility. People kill because they get angry, or desperate. 3/4 of people who attempt suicide will be deterred by a simple obstacle or obstruction in their way.Most murders and suicides are actually rational.
Is this even true? Criminals and depressed people may have poor impulse control, but it's a persistent problem. So the only practical implementation of your line of thought is lock all us in cells and take away our shoelaces, forever.
Gun control is about limiting any action. Rolling Stone even recently had a feature that listed the victims of gun violence who were "senselessly" shot dead when they tried to mug, burgle, or rob.
What percentage of taxes goes towards essential infrastructure? Paying too much tax instead of investing in research, production, and employment is going to be worse for both the company and for society in general.
I look down on them because of their widespread bad business practices: the majority of the time you can expect price gouging and poor workmanship. They'd be better off working for Microsoft with that attitude.
The more knowledgeable they are about the product the more they are going to lie to you. I suggest hula hoops instead.
Government is obviously still the bedroom if it is going to mail out checks to reward sustained homosexual activity like it rewarded regular heterosexuality
Since when are "liberals" against rich people being taxed more? Yeah, let's look at the actual case: a woman who already got alimony and social security from her ex-husband, and then hooked up with an heiress complaining about how unfair she is being treated...
The state was trying to incentive breeding pairs to grow the population, but fine, let's tax all widows equally: single "undocumented" mothers are after all the foundation American was built on.
the property of whatever foreign intelligence agency is protecting him and they don't have to respect his human rights.
So...the same as us, but with some perks thrown in.
You're seriously claiming that intelligence has nothing to do with genetics? I guess believing that you are retarded because your mom dropped you on your head as a baby is better than accepting that you are a retard from a long line of retards who was also dropped as a baby.
If a drone is monitoring a private residence or business or following someone to one I think a warrant ought to be required (subject to the normal hot pursuit exceptions). But if you're monitoring some public area, no big deal.
Public areas are bounded by businesses and private residences, so I don't really see the distinction. Drone sees all. Might come into play if you own a lot of acres, but a court ruled that cops can even install cameras on larger land holdings without a warrant. Strange how privacy was supposed to be a restriction on the government, but it ended being a restriction on us.
Anyway, this is a relief, I've been following you around for the past 6 months, and was starting to feel guilty, but now I know it's OK... as long as I stop sleeping under your bed (though it obviously doesn't bother you so what's the problem?!).
Judging by women's magazines, women like looking at pretty women too. There also an element of schadenfreude, criticizing celebrities' "plastic surgery" and "anorexia", playing to women's envy. Which is what is really going on here. The women aren't demanding the addition of "booth studs" or appearances by Justin Bieber, they want the women who look better than them to lose their jobs.
Doubt much will change when they say, "I'll work for Starbucks money"
You only have to take a look at which elements of the political spectrum the Nazis preferred to murder: Communists, anarchists, social democrats, liberals, Christians
Socialists are famous for liquidating rival factions. Who would Obama rather have seen dead in 2008, Hilary or McCain?
"A few bucks" is like their hourly wage. Also depending on the store the penalty for not using the card can double your cost...
If they drink adult beverages does that also make them adults? In fact I think babies are entitled to vote since they are already sucking on titties. Probably get more titty than Obama, so they should also be eligible to run for President.
Maybe they don't use telephones or computers? Most of these government officials who assure us it's no big deal for them to read our emails or listen to our calls have staffers or other intermediaries handle all communications to set up face-to-face meetings.
The good news is that in another ten years or so the politicians will start to be replaced by people that grew up with the Internet, that understand it better and that will at least have a grasp of the pragmatic realities involved.
I wouldn't rely on internet dwellers to have a sense of perspective. Soon we'll probably be able to call 911 to have police dispatched when we read a mean facebook comment.
Let's all think that we are fated to be losers, and beg for some table scraps from our betters, while imagining that we are sticking them up. And we'll vote for open borders, bigger government, and gay marriage, because that's the only way scum like us can get ahead in this world!
The government also seizes property, and will presumably also take your Bitcoins, so I don't see the difference, except that unlike dollars, Bitcoins would be worth stealing.
You mean like sunglasses? But I'm sure Google will eventually offer you a surgical option for thousands of GBPs!
You can't have a civilized government without the potential for armed mass resistance. You think you are an "adult" negotiating with a government that has all the power? No, you do what it says, because it says so. All you Europeans can do is riot like children throwing a tantrum, and riots are quickly pacified by Daddy Government's firm hand.
And government has a simple tool as well: a life sentence (or execution) for anyone who defends their life. Imprisonment for anyone engaging in free action.
And Germany is known for its lack of scientific innovation...
Breivik is white.
If it was just about killing, they could have killed more than one guy. The Western powers are indeed waging a war against Islamism on a global scale, so anyone subscribing to that ideology has to be a militant.
Don't give Obama any ideas. He'd could wipe the weapons to render them inoperable so a small handpicked force supplemented by regulars from Latin America could liquidate units loyal to the USA.
The most common thread in criminals, particularly murderers, is poor impulse control and emotional volatility. People kill because they get angry, or desperate. 3/4 of people who attempt suicide will be deterred by a simple obstacle or obstruction in their way.Most murders and suicides are actually rational.
Is this even true? Criminals and depressed people may have poor impulse control, but it's a persistent problem. So the only practical implementation of your line of thought is lock all us in cells and take away our shoelaces, forever. Gun control is about limiting any action. Rolling Stone even recently had a feature that listed the victims of gun violence who were "senselessly" shot dead when they tried to mug, burgle, or rob.
What percentage of taxes goes towards essential infrastructure? Paying too much tax instead of investing in research, production, and employment is going to be worse for both the company and for society in general.
I look down on them because of their widespread bad business practices: the majority of the time you can expect price gouging and poor workmanship. They'd be better off working for Microsoft with that attitude.